20060274 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20141007

Soil & En' vironmoontal Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neusc Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
sandec com
To:
We Transmit to you Herewith:
❑ Drawings
❑ Specifications
❑ Brochures or photos
❑ Correspondence
❑ As per your request
Transmittal
Project #: �. t I Date: lb - -) -I
Project Name: t ' 0 V\
File:
❑ For your'information and files
For comment or approval
❑ Returned for correction, resubmit
❑ Approved as noted
Under Separate Cover:
❑ By mail
❑ By courser
❑ By express
No. Co ies
Document No.
Date
Description
11 II
Remarks,
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once
6)�f ka.cV\e
cc:

Newell Farm
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Year Five Monitoring Report
Warren County, North Carolina
September 2014
AID# 200221365
DWQ# 20060274
Prepared For:
Wake Stone
Corporation
L OCT 0 7 2014
U
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
841' falls of \euse Rand, Suite 101, Raleigh, \ (:'7611. Thane. (919) 846-59(g)- Fax; [phone]
1andec.uan

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Swle 104, Raleigh, 1\'C 27615 • Phone ()19)�W -5900 • Fax
sander ami
S &EC Project No. 102LE1
US.Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attn: Ms. Jean Gibby
September 30, 2014
NCDENR — DWQ
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Year Five, Monitoring Report
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland' Restoration Site
Warren County, NC
USACE Action ID No. 200221365
DWQ Project No. 20060274
Please find enclosed the Year Five Monitoring Report for the above referenced site. As you
will find in the report, it is our opinion that the stream, wetland, and vegetative components of
the restoration efforts have,not only met, but have exceeded the success criteria as described in
the Monitoring Plan. Due to the success of the site at the end of the required five year monitoring
period, we request,release of the site from further monitoring, and recommend transfer of
stewardship of the site to the Tar River Land Conservancy under the terms of their Conservation
Easement agreement with the Newell family.
Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments at your earliest
opportunity,. We thank you for youuassistance to date and look „ - forward to the continued success
of this project.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
�-' M1 U
David Gaine Pro ct Manager
Y� J g
Attachments: Year Five Monitoring Report dated September 2014
Cc: Mr. David Lee, Wake Stone Corporation

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ...........:.............................................................................................................. ..............................1
1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. ..............................1
1.2 Project History .......................................................................................................... ..............................1
1.3 Mitigation Components ............................................................................:................ ..............................2
2.0 Monitoring ....:..................................................:.................................................................... .....................:........3
2.1 Methodoloy ...............................................................:............................................... ..............................3
2.1.1 Hydrologic Monitoring ............................................................................... ...................:..........3
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring .......................................... : ....... -. ............................. .. ............................ 3
'2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring ................................................................. ..............................4
2.2 Results ................................................. -.: .......................................................................................... : ....... 4
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria .....................:.................................................. ..............................4
2.2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria ......................................................................... .............................5'
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success Criteria ......................................................... ..............................7
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success ....................................................................................... ..............................7
Figure 1— USGS Vicinity Map
Appendix A — Monitoring Layout
Appendix B — Stream Cross - section and Overbank Event,Photos
Appendix C — Groundwater and Rainfall Data
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Appendix E — Pebble Count Data
Appendix F — Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix G — Vegetation Count Data
Appendix H — Herbaceous Area Map and Photos

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This monitoring report has been prepared by Soil & Environmental Consultants,.PA (S&EC) to present and
evaluate site monitoring data for the period January 2013 through December 2013 (Year 5) for the Newell Farm
Stream and Wetland Restoration Site located in Warren County, North Carolina.
1.2 Project History
The, Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site was restored by 4he Wake Stone Corporation-in order to
offset an estimated 2,058 linear feet of stream channel impacts and an estimated 6.28 acres of'wetland impacts
associated with the expansion of its Nash County Quarry. The project site consists of approximately 28 acres
and is located roughly 2.25 miles southeast of the Town of Warrenton on the west side of Dr. King Road (SR
1001) in Warren County, NC. A vicinity map is included as Figure 1.
Waters on -site drain to Fishing Creek (C; NSW) in the Tar River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloguing Unit
03020102). Stream mitigation includes the restoration of approximately 2,551 linear feetof stream,and the
enhancement of approximately 737 linear feet of stream. Wetland acreage generated on the Newell Farm
Mitigation Site is based on a wetland delineation performed by S&EC in 2013 in conjunction with Year 5 site
monitoring,data collection. Based on the 2013, wetland delineation, the wetland mitigation effort includes a total,
of 19.93 acres of wetlands, including the restoration of prior converted wetlands, the creation of new wetlands,
and the enhancement and preservation of select existing wetlands.
Construction of the restoration, enhancement, and creation areas on -site was performed during the period
January 2008 through June 2008. All construction and planting was performed by Wake Stone Corporation:
Periodic construction observation was performed by S&EC in order to ensure that construction was performed
in general accordance with our design intent.
On January 15, 2014, a letter addressed to Wake Stone Corporation was,received by,S&EC from Karen Higgins
of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) addressing Vegetation Plot # 4 (VP -4). This letter requested
determination of the acreage of the herbaceous wetland area within the Floodplain of Fishing Creek that has
'been discussed in the previous year's monitoring reports. 'The current acreage based upon GPS location is
approximately 5.15 Acres.
We believe that this area meets the components set out in the original restoration plan for herbaceous planting
zones, backwater pockets and emergent marsh zones along Fishing Creek. Some woody species, mainly Button
Bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), and a wide variety of herbaceous species have created a marsh area that
correlates directly with the already established Foodplain of Fishing Creek It is our opinion that survival of
supplemental plantings in this, marsh area would be unlikely based upon the current inundation within this area,
and would also be uncharacteristic of the connected marsh areas that continue along Fishing Creek downstream
from the Newell Farm Restoration site.
The marsh that has been created within the Newell Farm Restoration site not only replicates the off -site
conditions of Fishing Creek but has also created an added, level of diverse.habitat that enhances and
compliments the already diverse conditions existing throughout the extent of the Newell Farm Restoration Site.

The planted buffers discussed in the restoration plan for the Newell Farm site were designed to extend,from the
restored channel to the floodplain of Fishing Creek and called for a width of at least 50 feet. It.is our opinion
that this criterion has also been met and these species are flourishing within the buffer of the restored channel.
Furthermore, it is our opinion that this area would not benefit from any supplemental planting which would
cause extensive disturbance within a well - established marsh zone within the floodplain of Fishing Creek. A map
depicting the area and photographs of the marsh areas both on and off -site have been included in Appendix
for further documentation.
1.3 Mitigation Components
After the completion of project construction, total accrued mitigation credits were tabulated. Field data were
gathered and evaluated to quantify the length of the stream channel and wetland acreage on -site. Sheet 1 in
Appendix A depicts the overall monitoring layout, with the A - - - -A section line (at Station 7 +37) shown to
separate stream enhancement from stream restoration areas. The table below describes the resultant project
stream and wetland mitigation:
Mitigation Ty
Total
Stream Restoration
2,551 linear feet
Stream Enhancement
737 linear feet
Total Stream Length
3,288 linear feet
Wetland Restoratiov(2013 Delineation)
5.20 acres
Wetland Creation (2013 Delineation)
5.15 acres
Wetland Enhancement (2013 Delineation)
3.55 acres
Wetland Preservation (2013 Delineation)
6.03 acres
Total Wetland Acreage (2013 Delineation)
19.93 acres
In November 2006, a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit was issued to the Wake Stone
Corporation for impacts at the Nash County Quarry. Required mitigation for stream impacts has been
exceeded by 493 feet of stream - restoration and 737 feet of stream enhancement on -site. These surplus
stream mitigation credits are detailed below in the, column labeled "Mitigation Credit Balance ". The permit
Action ID Numbers are also identified in the following table:
Impacts on the Nash
Compensatory Mitigation
Mitigation Provided by the
Mitigation
County Quarry (USACE
Required as per Condition 6 of
Newell Farm Stream and
Credit Balance
Action ID Number
the 401 Water Quality
Wetland Restoration Site
200221365, DWQ
Certification
(2013 Wetland Delineation and
Project Number
Survey)
20060274)
2,058 linear feet of stream
2,058 linear feet.of stream
2,551 linear1eetrestoration and
+4931mear feetrestoration
restoration
737 linear feet enhancement
and +737 linear feet
(total 3,288,finear feet)
enhancement
618 acres of
19.6 acres of combined wetland
5.20 acres restoration,
+0.1 acre restoration, +0.45
jurisdictional wetland
restoration, creation,
5.15 acres creation, (10 35 acres
acre creation,
enhancement and preservation,
of restoration and creation), 3.55
-0.05 acre enhancement, -
including 6 28 acres from
acres enhancement, and 6 03
0.17 preservation
restoranonand/or creation
acres preservation,(total
wetlands _19 -93 acres)
2

2.0 MONITORING
As described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan dated February 16, 2006, site
monitoring has been performed fora, period of 5 years., This report serves as the Year Five Monitoring
report for the Newell Farm'Stream,and Wetland Restoration Site. Since project inception in 2008,
stream and wetlannd- monitoring has occurred annually, hicludingquatterly site visits to assess general
site conditions. Morphological, vegetative; and hydrologic data, collection been performed as required
during these site visits. Monitoring reports have also been submitted, annually to the Agencies. Site
monitoring, through Year 5 documents complete success of the project °with Conceptual Stream &
Wetland Restoration goals having been exceeded.
2.1 Methodology
This sectionincludes information concerning; 1) hydrologic monitoring, 2) vegetation monitoring, 3)
stream, morphology monitoring, and 4) evaluation of site monitor,mi &succes& These data have been
-used for year -to -year comparisons to document project success.
2.1.1 Hydrologic, Monitoring
A total of eight (8) Infinities U:S.A., groundwater monitoring gauges (labeled Gauges A through,
H) were installed on the site, with four (4) in wetland restoration areas, three (3) in wetland
creation areas, and,one (1) in a wetland enhancement areas An Infinities U.S.A., rain gauge was
also installed on -site. The locations of all monitoring gauges are shown in Appendix,A on the
Monitoring Layout (Sheets 1 through 6).
Gauge data for 2013 was recorded for the period January 1 through,December 31. At the time of
the last download, ,gauges, C through H had been, operational for the entire growing season.
Gauge A malfunctioned during 2012, and Gauge B malfunctioned during'2613. Both of these
gauges were replaced on August'20, 2013. Gauges,A and B were operational for 71 days of the
recorded,period of the 2013 growing season. All,hydrology gauges confirmed that each-wetland
type met the success criteria, during the Year 5 monitoring - period. Rainfall was also recorded
on -site by the Infinities rain, gauge. Rainfall-during the 2012 monitoring year (for the period
January ,1, 2013 through December 341, 2013),was measured.at 38.23 inches.
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring
Eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots labeled VP 1 through VP8 are located across
the site. Each tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plovis a square, 10 metersf(32.8 feet) on each,
side (100 square meters, or approximately 1,075 square feet). Two (2) bank,vegetation
monitoring-plots are located adjacent tothe,'restored stream channel. Each bank vegetation
monitoring plot includes the planted live stakes along approximately, 65 linear feet of stream
channel. Three (3) herbaceous monitorin&plots are,located across the site. Each herbaceous
monitor`ing,plot 'is a square, 3 meters (10 feet) on each side.
The locations,of all monitoring plots are shown in Appendix A on the Monitoring Layout (Sheets
1 through 6): One corner,of each vegetation monitoring plot serves as a permanent photo point

during annual monitoring. Photos of each vegetation plot are presented in Appendix F.
Vegetation counts for Monitoring Year Five were performed on August 2, 2013 by S&EC.
To aid, in comparison of'data collected during annual surveys; the Carolina Vegetation Survey
(CVS) Level 1 Protocol was used (during, Year 1 and subsequent monitoring year) to prepare a
maps of the plants within each of the eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots. Each
planted stem counted during Monitoring Year Five was flagged with pink or orange flagging. A
table indicating the species diversity and total number of live, planted woody stems in each
sample plot is represented in Appendix G. Planted live stakes were counted within the two (2)
bank vegetation monitoring plots. Live stake survival was calculated based on data collected
during the Year One Monitoring in 2009. Live stake counts by species and by plot are presented
in, Appendix G.
NOTE: During the 2009 stem count, several specimens of Black Willow (Salix nigra)
were mistakenly flagged lagged and counted as Silky Willow (Salix sericea). These previously
counted Black Willows were also counted during the 2010 Year Two vegetation count.
Now that the plants are large enough for proper identification, specimens of Black
Willow have been counted separately from specimens of Silky Willow, and the original
number of planted stems of each species has been amended.
2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring
Fourteen (14) stream cross - sections consisting of seven (7) nested riffle -pool pairs were established on-
site and are illustrated in Appendix A on Sheet 1. The Year Five stream survey, including cross - section
data, and representative longitudinal profile data, was performed by the Wake Stone Corporation in
November. Representative Longitudinal Profile No. l data was collected from Cross - section Pool 4 to
Cross - section Pool 5. Representative Longitudinal Profile No. 2 data was collected from Cross - section
Pool 6 to Cross - section Pool 7.
To assess continued channel stability, comparisons of cross - section and representative longitudinal
profile data from the Years One through Five, and As -Built data are presented graphically in Appendix
D. Photos of each surveyed stream cross - section (all taken while facing downstream) are presented in
Appendix B. Surveyed cross - sections and longitudinal profiles during Year 5 monitoring confirm the
morphological (plan & profile) stability within all channel reaches.
2.2 Results
This section includes a summary of site monitoring as compared to established success criteria for hydrologic,
vegetation, and stream morphology. For additional information, the interested reader is referred to the
appendices.
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria
Success criteria for wetland hydrology, as described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream and Wetland
Restoration Plan, include the saturation of the upper 12 inches of soil for at least 18 consecutive days
during the growing season. There is no specific data regarding the average growing season for Warren
4

County,, NC,; 'however, the growinI season for Vance County, located immediately-west of Warren
County; is 210' days (from April 6` - through November 1s)
Hydrologic ,monitoring data for the 2013 (Year, Five) monitoring year indicates that the site is
experiencing conditions consistentwith local jurisdictional wetlands. All of the eight (8) gauges on -site
documented the site having met hydrology requirements for the 20,13 monitoring year. Consecutive days
of saturation for the 2013 growing season range from 38 days to 161, days of the 21,0 recorded days of
the 2013 growing season., Data collected for the monitoring period, are presented in graphical format,in
Appendix C.
Based on our sitewobservations and recorded groundwater gauge data, the site has ,performed
successfully during, the 2013 (Year Five), monitoring season with respect to hydrology.
2:2.2 Vegetation Success - Criteria
The success criteria of planted woody ,stems within the riparian wetlands are based on'the combined
survival, of tree, and.shrub spec'es ,for, the 5 -.year monitoring period. Survival of woody species planted
within the restored' buffers and' wetlands must be at least 320 stems per acre ,through Monitoring Year
Three, 288 stems per acre through Monitoring Year Four, and,260 stems per acre through Monitoring
Year Five.
The, stem count °is based on.an average of'the stem counts of-the eight (8) evaluated 10x10 -meter tree
and shrub buffer vegetation plots. The success criteria of 'the two (2) bank vegetation plots alongthe.
restored channels are, based ,on the survival of approximately SO percent of live -stake bank plantings, for
the, 5 =year, monitoring period. Vegetative success criteria of'50% coverage will be required at the.,end of
the 5 -year period for the herbaceous planting zones. This coverage,will be qualitatively evaluated based
on observation of the three (3) herbaceous monitoringp lots and herbaceous vegetation within other
planted areas.
Based on the eight (8) vegetation, survival monitoring plots, the overall site planted woody stem
density, is 394 ,stems r
peacre for the 2013,(Year Five) monitoring period. There are thirteen (13)
different planted woody species; represented within the eight (8) tree and shrub monitoring plots. The
,current overall siteilive stake, survival percentage for the two (2) bank vegetation pl`ots,is 85 %.
Vegetation data collected for the monitoring;period are presented in tables in Appendix G.
** NOTE: Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is located'within an area of weiland enhancement. The area
surrounding Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is heavily vegetated `with natural volunteer herbaceous
species and is regu/ar,`ly inundated`with shallow water approximately & to 24 inches in depth. 'Soil ,in
this area has�a high organic content. Enhancement of this area consisted of modifications to the
surrounding grade in order to improve the liydroloo of the Brea. This area was not planted due, to
the level of 'inundation at the time of planting. Based on a visual inspection of the inundated portions
of the wetland enhancement area including and'surrouhding 'Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4, the area
is a well vegetated functional freshwater wetland marsh complex, and contributes to overall site
diversity by providing the open' wetland type necessary for many native plant and animal species.
Because the Restoration Plan species a total of eight tree and'shrub vegetation monitoring plots,
we, have included Vegetation Plot 4 in the calculations of site average stem density; however, it is
5

our opinion that the inundated wetland enhancement area including and surrounding Vegetation
Plot 4 will continue to thrive according to its ecological' niche within the overall diverse site.
Volunteer woody species such,as-Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) were noted during_ Year
One and subsequent monitoring years. These previously observed stems continue to,thrive through
Year- Five monitoring.
Herbaceous species composition varies throughout the. restoration site, with all areas densely covered
with herbaceous vegetation. The three herbaceous monitoring,plots are alt; currently 100 percent
covered with herbaceous vegetation, and thereby meet the requirement of being over 50, percent
covered with, herbaceous vegetation.
-Native herbaceous species have become densely established, and,are dominant throughout the site.
Herbaceous species observed along stream banks and in the buffer, and wetlands on -site include:
• Jewelweed — Impatiens capensis
• Soft Rush — Juncus effusus
• Lizard',s Tail — Saururus cernuus
• Sedges — Carex spp.
• Switchgrass — PgWcum virgatum,
• Arrow Arum — Peltandra virginica
• Joe -Pye Weed — Eupatoriadelphus fistulo. us
® Duck=Potato — Sagittaria latifolia
• Goldenrod — Solidago sp.
• Dog - fennel — Eupatorium capill folium
• Boneset — Eupatorium perfoliatum
Many volunteer woody and herbaceous species,have appeared due, to seed contribution provided by
surrounding ,forests and mature trees preserved on -site. Volunteer tree and shrub species noted within
the tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots include Swamp Rose (Rosa palustris); ,Buttonbush
(Cepha'lanthus occidentalis),,Red,Maple (Ater rubrum), American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
Green Ash (Fraxirius pennsylvanica), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendr6h tulipifera), Mockernut Hickory
(Carya ,tomentosa),, Black Willow (Salix digrd), Persimmon (Diospyr "os virginiana), Ta`g Alder (A'lnus
serrulata), and Sweet Gum (Liquidambar styraeiflua). Volunteerwoody steins within the tree.and'
shrub vegetation monitoring;plots °were noted, but,not -taken into account in calculating planted
woody stem densities within the plots.
Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora), Privet (Ligustrum sinense) and Cattails (Typha latifolia) are three
invasive species that have been observed on- site., Prior to site construction, the population ,of Multiflora
Rose on -site was treated with an herbicide to prevent it from,dominating the restored wetland and buffer
areas. No areas of Multiflora 'Rose were observed on -site during Year Five. The site `is being monitored
for any reoccurrence of the species. Privet, although It is a highly invasive species, is not common on the
Newell Farm site. Very" few specimens of Privet were noted in the northern portion of 'the stream
enhancement area.
Based on Year Five stem density, the vegetative component of the mitigation effort has exceeded
(394,stems /ac.) the established' success criteria of 260 live stems per acre by the end of the
2

monitoring period (Year 5). Live stake counts within bank vegetation monitoring plots has
exceeded (85% average survival) the required survivability criteria of at least 50% by the end,of
the monitoring period (Year 5). Herbaceous vegetation cover in all herbaceous monitoring plots
currently exceeds (100% coverage) the required survivability criteria of at least 50% by the end of
the monitoring period (Year 5). The site in its entirety demonstrates dense and vigorous vegetation
growth.
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success�Criteria
Based on visual observation of the restored stream channel, the restored channel is stable. Multiple
overbank.events have been documented by the presence of wrack lines, flotsam, and flattened vegetation
observed in the floodplain duringvarious site visits. No areas of channel erosion or failing, structures
were observed during this year's monitoring.
A representative pebble count was performed at cross - sections Riffle 5 and Pool 5. The pebble count
shows that both Riffle 5 and Pool 5 are currently composed mainly of medium,to coarse gravel. During
the past year, substrate in Riffle,and Pool 5 has remained stable. Data collected are presented in tabular
and graphical form in Appendix E.
Per the Mitigation. Plan, success criteria have been met in that the stream bedform features and
cross - sections have °remained stable (i.e. the restored portion of the stream has retained its
proposed Rosgen stream -type classification of C) through the current monitoring year.
Accordingly, it'is our opinion that Year Five monitoring of the stream channel confirms
morphological success.
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success — Year Five (2013)
As evidenced by site monitoring through Year Five the restoration site is densely- vegetated, the relocated
and enhanced stream reaches are stable, and the total surface area of wetland types have exceeded the
approved acreage totals. Based on vegetation data collected within the sample plots, existing groundwater
gauge data, and stream morphological data, it is our opinion that the site exceeds the success criteria as
set forth in the approved Restoration Plan.
7

•' xC
,. , �( /• � \ � i..: fie.- .
_ 4 4
_ lot.
C Q q`y
LI
1110
her�
Project No.
figure I - USGS
1021.E I
Vicinity Map
Project Mgr.:
Wake Stone Corp,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
DG
Newell Farm Restoration
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh,
g', NC 27614
1919) 846 -5900 - (919) 846 -9467
Scale:
Warren County, NC
Web Page. www SandEC.com
I" = 2,000'
Warrenton and
5/21/2009
Afton Quadrangles

APPENDIX A - MONITORING LAYOUT

N
O
°
LEGEND
0
Q4
rn
o
© WETLAND CREATION AREAS
3
R
NORTH
® WETLAND RESTORATION AREAS
SCALE 1 " = 300'
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS
�
`
9_'G'N 9rrG,v
`" ° 00))
o +oo
® WETLAND PRESERVATION AREAS
300 150 O 300
ABOVE SECTION "A" - STREAM
� gea:
ENHANCEMENT
n
l
® BELOW SECTION "A" - STREAM
RESTORATION
FISHING CREEK
W2
MG 9rr_wV IoroaanN
O
.7+3-,)
A
C
rn
L
L
L
L
L
r
L
L
O
W4
z
L
LL
LL
O
LLLL
L >�
�/j
E L LL
/ "
L
z
L
L
L
LL
L
_ LLLL LLL
LL
LLLLL
—�
L
LL LLL
O
L
LLrr�oaoirtr
LLLL
LLLLL
C
LLLL
L
L
LL L
t LL L
L C
..
rn
M.. 3T +aa
z
0
rn
1! 11 N C
NOTES:
I . LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS. AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL 51TE
FEATURE5 ARE APPROXIMATE.
2. LIMITED ENGINEERING
5URVEY ON OCTOBER 2, 2008 BY
WAKE STONE.
3. LIMITED ENGINEERING
5URVEY ON JULY 28 - 30, 2009 BY
5 *EC.
Project:
Project No.:
NEWELL FARM
f021.El
o. gr.:
raven:
°
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
MITIGATION 51TE
Location!
hen :
e:
11010 Rawn Ridgc Road • Ralcigh. North Caroline 27614 • Phonic: [phone] • Fax: (919) 846-W7
WARREN CO.. NC
WAKE STONE
CORPORATION
5heet hle:
OVERALL MONITORING LAYOUT
I OF G
wwwS.dtC.cam

6
N
O
0
0
.+
rn
s'
0
3
;v
ID
0
z
0
z
O
C
N1
Z
rn
rn
E
LEGEND
VEGETATION PHOTO POINTS
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOTS
> -, STREAM CR055- 5ECTIONS
• HYDROLOGY MONITORING GAUGES
® WETLAND CREATION AREAS
® WETLAND RESTORATION AREAS
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS
®
WETLAND PRESERVATION AREAS
ABOVE SECTION "N'- STREAM
ENHANCEMENT
®
BELOW SECTION "A" - STREAM
RESTORATION
FISHING CREEK
LOG J -HOOK
�$
ROCK CRO55-VANE
ROCK J -HOOK
BEGIN STREAM
ENHANCEMENT
(5ta . 0 + 00)
CULVERTED
ROAD
CRO55ING
VEGETATION
MONITORING
PLOT I
W
Ili,
N
f
04
0
NORTH
SCALE I " = GO'
60 30 O 60
BEG STREAM RESTORATION
D OTED BY A - - - -A LINE
ta. 7 +37)
VEGETATION
MONITORING
f,
PLOT 2
3
Project: Project No.:
NEWELL FARM I I.eI
MITIGATION SITE rol. gr.: raven: DG PCIC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: lien : WAKE STONE pie:
11010 Raven Ridgc Rmd • Ralcigk Nwtb Caotma 27614 • Phaic: (919) 6465900 • Fax: (919) 846.W7 WARREN CO., NC CORPORATION I' - 60
—IN wwN.Saodt:C.cam 5heet Freet o.:
MONON ITORING LAYOUT SHEET A 2 OF 6

N
O
O
N
0
rn
Q. 3
C
Q.
v
HYDROLOGY
GAUGE H
N (RESTORATION)
D L
HERBACEOU5 L J
MONITORING _
PLOT 1
O
z
O L
r -
D
-C
O
c
rn 4 NP4
rn
co AL� R
Ll
L L 11
L L
L Li
P3 mR3
BANK VEGETATION
MONITORING
PLOT I
L-
NORTH
SCALE I " = GO'
GO 30 0 GO
P5
Project: Project No.:
NEWELL FARM 1
MITIGATION SITE rod. jr.: raven:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Location: ien : WAKE 5TONE U e:
11010 Ravcn Ridgc Road • Ralcigh, Nortb Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 84(.5900 • Fm: (919) 846-W7 WARREN CO., NC CORPORATION 1' — 60
www.SimdEC.c m 5heet Title: ee o.:
MONITORING LAYOUT SHEET B 3 OF G
LEGEND
VEGETATION PHOTO POINTS
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOTS
Pay
" -1112
STREAM CROSS- SECTIONS
HYDROLOGY MONITORING GAUGES
®
WETLAND CREATION AREAS
®
WETLAND RESTORATION AREAS
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS
®
WETLAND PRESERVATION AREAS
\ /
I\ I
ABOVE SECTION "Ai'- STREAM
ENHANCEMENT
®
BELOW SECTION "A" - STREAM
RESTORATION
FISHING CREEK
LOG J -HOOK
ROCK CROSS -VANE
ROCK J -HOOK
®
ROCK TOE PROTECTION
BANK VEGETATION
MONITORING
PLOT I
L-
NORTH
SCALE I " = GO'
GO 30 0 GO
P5
Project: Project No.:
NEWELL FARM 1
MITIGATION SITE rod. jr.: raven:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Location: ien : WAKE 5TONE U e:
11010 Ravcn Ridgc Road • Ralcigh, Nortb Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 84(.5900 • Fm: (919) 846-W7 WARREN CO., NC CORPORATION 1' — 60
www.SimdEC.c m 5heet Title: ee o.:
MONITORING LAYOUT SHEET B 3 OF G

N
0
0
0
4.
0
3
(D
0
N
c
3
D
O
z
O
z
-c
O
C
CP
Z
rn
r-n
In
- k
1 ROCK J -HOOK
® ROCK TOE PROTECTION
r5
HYDROLOGY
GAUGE G
NORTH
(CREATION) L 5CALE 1 = 60'
L 30 0 60
HERBACEOU5 L
MON ITORI N
PLOT 2
EGETA
i
PLOT-A-- L L D
I, L
L L L4p-e L
L L L
,�-
j vra
oe
L L L L L
LLL
LLLL
LLI-L
LL
Lj
RAI N
GAUGE
VEGETATION
MONITORING
PLOT 3
VEGETATION
MONITORING
PLOT 4
HYDROLOGY
GAUGE F
(CREATION)
�1YDROLOGY GAUGE A
L C
ENHANCEMENT)
NEWELL FARM
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA MITIGATION SITE
Location: lien t: WAKE STONE
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] WARREN CO.. NC CORPORATION
—SandEcsorn 5heCt Title:
MONITORING LAYOUT SHEET C
: Ivraw :
1' =GC
7
4OFG
LEGEND
12
VEGETATION PHOTO POINTS
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT5
Pj
r�NP' STREAM CRO55- 5ECTION5
az
HYDROLOGY MONITORING GAUGE5
WETLAND CREATION AREAS
WETLAND RE5TORATION AREAS
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS
®
WETLAND PRE5ERVATION AREAS
ABOVE 5ECTION "A" - 5TREAM
ENHANCEMENT
BELOW SECTION "A"- STREAM
RE5TORATION
1`15HING CREEK
LOG J -HOOK
ROCK CR055 -VANE
- k
1 ROCK J -HOOK
® ROCK TOE PROTECTION
r5
HYDROLOGY
GAUGE G
NORTH
(CREATION) L 5CALE 1 = 60'
L 30 0 60
HERBACEOU5 L
MON ITORI N
PLOT 2
EGETA
i
PLOT-A-- L L D
I, L
L L L4p-e L
L L L
,�-
j vra
oe
L L L L L
LLL
LLLL
LLI-L
LL
Lj
RAI N
GAUGE
VEGETATION
MONITORING
PLOT 3
VEGETATION
MONITORING
PLOT 4
HYDROLOGY
GAUGE F
(CREATION)
�1YDROLOGY GAUGE A
L C
ENHANCEMENT)
NEWELL FARM
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA MITIGATION SITE
Location: lien t: WAKE STONE
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] WARREN CO.. NC CORPORATION
—SandEcsorn 5heCt Title:
MONITORING LAYOUT SHEET C
: Ivraw :
1' =GC
7
4OFG

N
O
O
N
o_
L L
R
VEGETATION
6
Ob
NORTH MONITORING
v
SCALE I = GO' PLOT 7
N
c
N
60 30 O 60
I—I YD RO LO GY
D
GAUGE C
(RESTORATION)
s
VEGETATION
MON ITORI N
PLOT G
HERDACEOU5
MONITORIN
PLOT 3
O
z
VEGETATION
—�
MON ITORI N
L
O
PLOT 5
z
HYDROLOGY
�L
C)
GAUGE B
(RESTORATION)
0
LEGEND
VEGETATION PHOTO POINT5
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOTS
P� NP STREAM CR055- 5ECTION5
s HYDROLOGY MONITORING GAUGES
rn
© WETLAND CREATION ARE A5
rn®
�1
WETLAND RESTORATION AREAS
Q
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS
® WETLAND PRESERVATION AREAS
ABOVE SECTION "A" - 5TREAM
ENHANCEMENT
® BELOW SECTION "A" - STREAM
RESTORATION
FISHING CREEK
L
yp'!a LOG J -HOOK
ROCK CRO55 -VANE
ROCK J -HOOK
® ROCK TOE PROTECTION
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-13
Project:
NEWELL FARM
MITIGATION 5(TE
Project No.:
I I. I
ol. gr.:
°
DGC
Location:
�e WAKE STONE
le:
11010 Raven Ridge Rnad • Raleigh. North Carolma 27614 • Phnnc: [phone]
— .SandEC.cam
• Fu: (919) 816 -916'
WARREN CO., NC
CORPORATION
I"- 60
heel tle:
MONITORING LAYOUT St1EET D
5 OF 6

N
0
LEGEND
W2 VEGETATION PHOTO POINTS
0 VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT5
3 P , 5TREAM CRO55- 5ECTION5
Cb
W. 0 HYDROLOGY MONITORING GAUGES
® WETLAND CREATION AREAS
® WETLAND RESTORATION AREAS NORTH
D WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREA5 SCALE I " = GO'
® WETLAND PRESERVATION AREAS
G. 30 O 60
® ABOVE SECTION 'W- 5TREAM
ENHANCEMENT
® BELOW SECTION "A" - STREAM
RESTORATION
F15HING CREEK
apJ LOG J -HOOK
aq ROCK CR055 -VANE
ROCK J -HOOK
® ROCK TOE PROTECTION
O
z
O
/-0 i
z
C
CP
Z
Fn
rn
Fn
H YD RO LO G
GAUGE E
CREATION
VEGETATION I
MON ITORI N
PLOTS LLL
LLLL
11 YD RO LO GY L
GAUGE D
(RESTORATION)
L �
Project: Project No.:
NEWELL FARM 1 z 1 .e'
MITIGATION 51TE ol. gr.: Dawn:
Pr
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Location: he : WAKE STONE le:
11010 Ravcn Ridge Read • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: (919) 846 -W7 WARREN CO., NC CORPORATION 1' - GO
www- .SandEC.cum 5heet Title: eet o.:
MONITORING LAYOUT 5HEET E G OF G

APPENDIX B - STREAM CROSS - SECTION PHOTOS

Appendix B
Stream Cross- Section Photos
Riffle 1 — Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 1 —Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E1

R
elf If
-tit I

Appendix B
Riffle 1 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Muigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Soil & Environmental Cmultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

. 1
1{
I 'yy
F
•� � NJ K ri' ,��. � ,e '•� IF
is
n r
r,
I
y
1. 11
Y•

�� c��7, :. _ 9
�'+ �
x
i.
.. !4j.!
,_ ., � Y
�q
� `,` 1!'
,,S � !��
�� l � ,'�,
_ i � � �
.. � V��•
Y F \III /rrte i � .. !� ��
r
4 • *.Y �_.
";~�� ,
` 4
♦•� �� ,
•i
�l�I ..
�i \ M y
`. :,,) ` r
A �

Appendix B
Pool 1 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 2 — Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 2 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2012 Project No. 1021.E1

v F4
YW
�-fj i
Or
•
or.
v F4
YW
�-fj i

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 2 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2012 Project No. 102 LEI

W,
,..r
.JA
F .a
f
s

vA
to j
I! im

MA
r
t
.•
a:

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 3 — Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 3 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Fans Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 3 — Year 3 (2011)
Riffle 3 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

u
r
5 I �
2 F--4 '
r
yL► T
t
YYY tl

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Pool 3 — Year 1 (2009)
Pool 3 — Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Pool 3 — Year 3 (2011)
Pool 3 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2012 Project No. 102 LEI

OW

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 4— Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 4 —Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Fame Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LEI

` Rsa
.ter �•'7''Y: - ns �` ' � • �• L' \ c • • ,_ 1 ;� �. ,
� it . 1. • , •�V
Lw
ION
or
�.� �f ;, ;'r ti }• _ �'' fir,' ��
10

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Pool 4— Year 1 (2009)
Pool 4 —Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2012 Project No. 1021.E1

s.
I.
r .7
� � •
4.* 70
%k Vj"'
loop
_. Z

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 5 — Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 5 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2012 Project No. 1021.El

Appendix B
Stream Cross- Section Photos
Riffle 5 — Year 3 (2011)
Riffle 5 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.El

• •' ' ,��' Jr - � • •fir _ .il u 5� ?�S.y�� }_ • .. ' 'r t.�/ ;� �8 /y'yi
' �r: f*r , y •� ' • � �s� '✓ — - --- / �� � •' ' ``SSA_''
-,, • ", � ••cam Ede.. _.�V. ..- 1L.

Appendix B
Stream Cross- Section Photos
Pool 5 — Year 1 (2009)
Pool 5 — Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

fir
Iwo
t�
`'-
t• � :,
�
,'•, ,.� ��
r �„� a -T
Ok
fir
Iwo

y
AP

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 6 — Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 6 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Faun Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021. E 1

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Riffle 6 — Year 3 (2011)
Riffle 6 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111

•F , ..� •.
. - 'r '' - �r -' -i. �-
� i � �� Fi
.`'� �� -
M � � � �
ti
�. � .�! �.. ;, .t
:.�,�. y 4 , i -
+i�. -.� : b� +zti ire �V,�.. yr '�
y -. � ;
.�
aT, , .��. y. _ �, ��,_ � � -
,^
;. ,rr,';� �- iii � �� ,� .
� r-, t x'gi*'t' t�
. -` „f j
. �,l,:f'
�.
� : - _ �”'
_ - r , - ,

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Pool 6 — Year 1 (2009)
Pool 6 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

all,
d-I

� 1
1
Jl�
f i
' fir. %' 1 �� -►
\I l y

Appendix B
Stream Cross- Section Photos
Riffle 7 — Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 7 — Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2012 Project No. 1021.El

r
Aw
r

iikkff__'
TN0%
yvA�,��
�� f J.I. � `•
', .� ``I• •
�;
'
�
•
y
., is � , '
r /
.
i

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Pool 7 — Year 1 (2009)
Pool 7 — Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.El

;1
AT 11411F
4
r�
1%
' t
i
AT 11411F
4
r�
1%
' t

-!. r1` . � �'�� �t,. .. `f+r••" gal..:

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Wrack Piles from Overbank Event — Stream Enhancement Section — March 2010
Wrack Piles from Overbank Event — Stream Restoration Section — March 2010
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 4 Monitoring 2012 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix B
Stream Cross - Section Photos
Wrack Piles from Overbank Event
Stream Enhancement Section — March 2010
Wrack Piles from Overbank Event — Stream Restoration Section — March 2010
Newell Fame Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 4 Monitoring 2012
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

APPENDIX C - GROUNDWATER AND RAINFALL DATA

E�- aaa -�E
E � -aaa-L �
E _aaa -E
E 1. -noN-6
E � -AOWS
E l.-Iao-ZZ
,^
E � -}ao-9
M
a�
M
E L-daS -p
L
E
E �- Bny-LZ j
d o
4
E � -find -E I
Q N
C U
U)
E L-Inf -0E
N o
E l-Inf -9 _
N
•i
E �-Inf -Z
,O
cu
E -unr-g m
�ir
ca �.
n a)
E �- unr-ti O
L
CL �
E
O �
0 —
Q
E � -AV -EZ a)
M C
p _0
E � -add -6 C�
CD cu
C� N
E �_JeW-Z
•— ca
o (D
E �-gaj-9Z
O o
E �-gaj-Z
Z
E � -uef -6Z
CO
0
0
N
0
0
0
0
N
0
M
se4ou
i `aajeM
o} yjdaQ

1L- Oaa-LE
t, L -noN-6 L
t, L -AOWS
K-100-ZZ
V L -100-8
t,[- daS -t,Z o
.-ft%
CD
o
t, L -daS -p L
N
ch
V L-6nd-LZ
t, L -6nd -E L
�
C U
-
t7L-Inf -0E �
CL
tq -Inf -9 L
C
L
ld -Z
L
t,L- unp -gL 0 m
L ca V)
u. v
ao
co
O
cYi
K-unf -t, cc
3 .N CN
tvlL- eW -LZ 0
a� o
Z 0
K- �(eW -L
O o
V
Q
V L- add -EZ
co
ca m
O -0
cv
t7L- aeW-9Z
� U
C�
•— cu
o C�
VL- qej -9Z
a)
0
2 Z
K-uef -6Z
K-uef -5 L
0
M N
0 0
0
0
0
N
0
M
say3
u i `aajeM
o4 t4ldaa

E � -aaa- LE
EL-aaQ-LL
E � -aaa -E
E L -noN -6 L
E L-AOWS
E I -100-ZZ
.-.
E L-100-9
M
VII
N
E L-daS-VZ
M
CD
E L-daS -p co
L
�
m
E L- find -LZ
E L -6nd -E L
O
�
C7
E �-Inf -0E •0
CL
N
- -
E �-Inf -Z •O
E co
=
E -un� -g d
_
v
CD
O a
G)
E L -u n r-v
Z 2
EL- AeW -LZ
ca
CL
E
.s
I'
w
O
m
E - jdd -e Z
to
o
E -ady -6
E L- aeW -9Z
ca
E L-JeW -Z L
_
•L
,0
E L-gaj-9Z
O
0
E L -gaj-Z L
EL -Uef -6Z
E L -uef -5 L
E L -uer- L
0
co
N
0 0
0 0
0
N co
0
S0143ui
`aaleM
o} y}dea

��- aaa-LE
t7 L -noN -6 L
t L -noN -S
t7 L- 100 -ZZ
K-100 - -100-8
i� L- daS-�Z
m
o
N
�
CD
M
t L- finy-LZ
ca
L-finb'-E L
2
'
�L-Inf'-pE •0 �
as �
N
tL-Inf -9L t�
!"
L
tq Inf Z O
m
c
E
� m
L M
v
O m
Li
K -unr-V
3 24
L
L- dew - L Z 0
�
Z Q
,s
E
O
t, L- add -EZ
ca
O
VL -add -6
K- aevq-9Z
K -aen-Z L
•L
t7 L-gaj-9Z
O
t L-ga=j-Z L
K -uef -6Z
K -uef -S L
co
0
0
N
0
0
0
N
0
co
0
Sayoul
`ialeM
of yldea

M
r
N
M
�
�
E M
Li N
A� w
Z
�
ca
O
a�
3
ca
=
C L -noN-6 L
E L -noN -9
£ L-100-ZZ
£ L-1aO-8
E L- daS-j7Z
E L-daS-0 L
E L- 6nd-LZ
E L -6nd-E L
�
E L-Inf -0E ,O
a
EL-Inf-Z O
E L -un� -g L O ■
-
EL W LZ
E L- JdV-CZ
E L -Jdy -6
E L- JeW-9Z
E L-JeW-Z L
E L-ga=l-9Z
E L -uef -6Z
E L-uef -5 L
E L -uer- L
O
m
°°
,I-
N N
N N
seLloui
00
1-
CO
1-
�T
1,-
`llejuieN
r-
N
CO
Allea
CO
O
d'
O
O
N
O

��- aaa-LE
tr L-aaa-L L
K -000-E
t7 L -noN -6 L
V L -noN -9
K-laO-ZZ
� L-ta0-8
tq-daS-t7Z
t, L-daS-O L
t, L- 6n`d-LZ
o
N
N
0
N
Z co
t, L -6nV-E L
10
VL-Inr-OC •o �
a
VL-Inr-9L
17 L -I n r -Z O •� AW
•E
t, L -unr -8 L 0 ■
t L- add-EZ
co
C�
t L -add -6
=
K- ae"-9Z
V L-aeW-Z L
t L-gaj-9Z
t7 L-gaj-Z L
V L- uer -6Z
� L -uer -5 L
t,L -uer -L
N N
O
O
O
O
sayoui
`nejuiem
Area

APPENDIX D - STREAM SURVEY DATA

W
_J
O
OC
J
Q
_Z
LL ~
� Z
U-i O
LU LLJ
Z >
Q
Z
LLJ
()
U-i
OC
LLJ
W/
O
v
0
N
+
O
O
m
O
co
co
O
O
v
O
N
+
O
O
co
O
co
O
�D
O
v
O
N
+
O
O
r
O
co
+
O
O
t9
O
N
+
C9
O
0
�o
0
Ln
0
0
8
0
0
0
8`�
0
0
0
Ln
J
O
D_
x
0
ch
N
—
O
Ln
w
J
'L
L
oC
x
a0
I-�
CD
u
u
u
to
to
In
Ln
to
In
to
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U-1
J
U-
L
CLI
J x
O
O
x
O
v
0
N
+
O
O
m
O
co
co
O
O
v
O
N
+
O
O
co
O
co
O
�D
O
v
O
N
+
O
O
r
O
co
+
O
O
t9
O
N
+
C9
O
0
�o
0
Ln
0
(4001) N O UVA9-19
.-1
N
N
Z
O
Q
H
X
o�
o�C
■
m
O
O
Nl
I
0
0
N
O
N
m
0
C\
T
0
8
0
0
0
8`�
0
0
0
0
0
ch
N
—
O
m
a0
I-�
CD
u
u
u
to
to
In
Ln
to
In
to
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
(4001) N O UVA9-19
.-1
N
N
Z
O
Q
H
X
o�
o�C
■
m
O
O
Nl
I
0
0
N
O
N
m
0
C\
T

MI
W
_J
O
J
Q
z
OL �
LLL �—
� z
WO
LLJ U-1
Z _>
Q
Z
LU
LLl
IL
LL J
cz
O
m
0
o_
0
m
0
m
m
N
O
N
O
Ln
+
n
N
O
m
m
N
O
+
61
N
+
N
O
n
+
N
O
Ln
N
O
+
N
O
N
O
m
N
O
r
N
O
Ln
r
N
O
m
r
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
Ln
N
0
m
�n
N
O
N
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
000
O
N
�16
Ln
N
—
O
m
J
O
CL
N
x �
W
J
LL
LL
oz
(S)
x
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
►n
It
v
v
d
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
CD
Lu
LL-
CL/
�D Ln
x
O
O
x
O
m
0
o_
0
m
0
m
m
N
O
N
O
Ln
+
n
N
O
m
m
N
O
+
61
N
+
N
O
n
+
N
O
Ln
N
O
+
N
O
N
O
m
N
O
r
N
O
Ln
r
N
O
m
r
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
Ln
N
0
m
�n
N
O
N
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
000
O
N
�16
Ln
N
—
O
m
cp
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
►n
It
v
v
d
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
(4001) N O UVA 91 :1
N
O
Q
co—o
000
N N N

C)
N
+
N
J
O cn
Q Z Z
O Q
w
w U oL
uj
w
z � �
O w
U
U z
Q
Z
W
O
0
CD
o Q
Ln
0
L
0
It
+ N
O L
m
4�i }
� 1
z r
O O m
O �
O
N
+
O
O
+
O
H
(1004) NOIIVA9 :1
n
L
O O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
in m
—
m
U
�n
N N
N
N
N
N
(1004) NOIIVA9 :1
n
L

O
N
W
J
LL-
D
LL- z0 U
J f- W
w U
> w
w w
Z Lu
0
0 w U
U z
Q
L
z
w
0
0
O
+
O
m
O
O
0
O O
O O
Q
T
O
O
L
O
}I
O
Ln
N
i
O Z
+ p
O
Q
i
O �
O
O
+
O
a
Le,
(1094) NOIIVA91�
O O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
Ln m
Ln
N N
N
N
N
N
(1094) NOIIVA91�

F
N
N �
J
O -u
O ct�
Q Z =
LL O Q
J
W LLJ
LLJ
H
Zcl�W
Ow
U
U z
Q
L
Z
w
O
�n
O
m
O Q
Ln
0
i
O T
O N
L
Z
O O m
m Q i
+
O }
O
N
+
O
O
O
(1094) NOUVA9�:]
Ln
a
i
+
0 0
m =
L m
N N N N N N
(1094) NOUVA9�:]
Ln
a
i

F
N +
w
J �
U
CZ
LL O_ v
J W
W U w/
WZ
Z W
O `L'
U
Uz
Q
Z
W
0
0
m
Q
o T
O L
N
m
M
+
Z
O m
Q �
O �
+ L
O
+
(1024) NOUVA91:1
ii
O
0 0 0 o O 00
0 o 0 o O o
m —
m ►n m
r r u U
N N N N N N
(1024) NOUVA91:1

m +
m
J
0�
0
a0U
Q
w (-) W/
�: (S) z
z�n0
O
°L
U 0
�
w
oz
0
0
rn
O Q
T
O
O
o
O z
O
Q
cn
O
m
0
O
N
+
O
O
O
(4001) NOUVA91�
INT
m
r
Ln
o
O O O O O O
O
O O O O O O
c6 6 N O (0
l9 u u U C9 In
N N N N N N
(4001) NOUVA91�
INT
m
r
Ln

m
V'
m +
w
LL M
LL
CLI
LL p U
H W
WU�
wLLJ
z
z � O
O
U O0
O O O 0 O
�p C9 C9 l9 �
N N N N N
(4904) NOIUdn919
O
O
CD
+ 1
o i
L
v
o T
v
O N
L
}
o�
z
O O m
+
O }
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
co
tf1
N
M,

l.0
T
Ln
O
S �
O
Y U J
IL z
LL O v
J ~ Q
U-i W
WZ
z (t) O
O~
U O
LU
F--
0
�n
0
CD
o Q
0
o
Ir
+ N
L
Q�
Z
O
m
0
o (S)
O
N
+
O
+
N
(4004) NOUVA91:1
O
O
O
O
O
O�
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
m
—
m
u)
N
N
N
N
N
N
(4004) NOUVA91:1

1
w —
_J
LL
IL
�0
LL Ov
J Q
W W
WLn z
Z L6 O
O�
UO
m
R
O O O O O
Ln Ln
N N N N N
(1904) NOUVA; M
0
0
O
u
+ „
O
m
Q
0
T
Ln _
+ L
O t0
�1T
I
O N
d' a
+ � }
O
z
O m
+
O
O
N
+
O
O_
O
O
O
O O
O
L1i
Ln
N
Ln
L
}

l `
m
Ln
O
S�
L O V J
°LZ`"
LL O U
J Q
Lu
�
�(n
W I Z
z (n O
O~
C
uO
LLJ
^V1
oz
0
Ln
0
0
0
m
+
0
N
+
0
O
+
6
R
+
0 0
O
O
0
o
0 0
0
0
0
V 1 O
N 0
C0
C9
0
o a'
=
N
u u
lf)
L
N N
� O
O �
J �
N
N
N
O �
1.� O
0
Ln
0
0
0
m
+
0
N
+
0
O
+
6
R
(1024) NOUVAIII
m
Q
T
i
N
L
Q�
Q�
Z
O m
if )
+
0 0
O
O
0
o
0 0
0
0
0
0
N 0
C0
C9
N
u u
lf)
N N
N
N
N
N
(1024) NOUVAIII
m
Q
T
i
N
L
Q�
Q�
Z
O m
if )

+
w —
LL
R
Q/ T)
"- oU
J Q
LL
LU Z
z O
(J)
0
U O
o�
0
0
O
0
O
m
+
O
O
N
+
O
o_
0
H
(1004) NOIIVA91:�
CD
Q
T
L
R
N
L
R
Z
O m
m
}
0
0
o
O
O
o0
O
o
O
o
O
O
N
O
CO
<D
d
N
<D
C9
Lf)
Lf)
Lf)
1f)
N
N
N
N
N
N
(1004) NOIIVA91:�
CD
Q
T
L
R
N
L
R
Z
O m
m
}

0)
lD to
ON
� O 4-1
z
LL O v
J
W
W
WZ
ZU�Q
0 Q
U Q
I
(4004) NOIIVA91:1
O
+
CD
O ,
Q
L
}
+
N
L
Ql
O z
+ O m
o Q
}
O �
N
O
O
O
O
O
+
O
O
O
O
O
O O
u
q
N
O
c0 lD
Ln
Ln
lf7
lfi
N
N
N
N
N N
(4004) NOIIVA91:1
O
+
CD
O ,
Q
L
}
+
N
L
Ql
O z
+ O m
o Q
}
O �
N
O
O
O
O
O
+
O

N
W N
J
IL-
IL
C/ L)
CZ
'LOU
J�a
J
W W
WZ
z
0/
t
0
0
CD
Q
o T
O L
�a
N
o
i
m � }
+
0
z
O
m
(S) }
0
N
Lo
O
0
0
H
P994) NOIIVA ;1 ;1
0
0
°
S
0
0
0
6
It
N
O
co
u
I!i
U)
In
U)
It
It
N
(\j
N
N
N
N
P994) NOIIVA ;1 ;1

W
t� O
O�
SM
O V J
IY z
LL O U
CLI
� (n
11J i Z
z (s) p
O~
CLI
U O
LLJ
F-
(1004) NOIU` A91:1
0
O
OD
o Q
Ln
0
i
Q�
o T
v
+ N
O
L
Q�
Q%
z
O
m
O
o �
O
N
O
O
O
6
M,,
N
O
O
O O
O
O
Ln
iri
u)
un
q
N
N
N
N
N
N
(1004) NOIU` A91:1
0
O
OD
o Q
Ln
0
i
Q�
o T
v
+ N
O
L
Q�
Q%
z
O
m
O
o �
O
N
O
O
O
6
M,,
N

J N
LL
IL O U
J L Q
J SV.
W
W Z
z 0
O�
UO
4i
A
0 0 0 0 0
Ln
m =
N N N N N
(4004) NOUVA21:1
0
0
CD
o Q
0
L
}
+ N
O
L
Z
0 O CO
m
O
N
+
O
•
O
O
00
0
It
N
N,
L

APPENDIX E - PEBBLE COUNT DATA

W
I-1-�
v 1
0
L
L
N
z
Ln
_u
C2
4-
U
u�
Si
IL
•
•
•
•
1
Iwo
Ime
f l I ICI I I Imo
°o °m o� o 0 0 0 ° ° ° °
uegl Joule IUODJa j
E
E
N_
U
L
L
L
}
m
}
N
L
}
L
c�
�l
I

W
r(�
V
O
V
L
�a
Z
u 1
O
nnO
l.�
O
U
•
•
•
•
1
m
m
uegj Joug quoojo,�
E
E
U
_N
U
L
C.
u�
i
L
m
L
m
}
N
L
L
�l-
I
°°
O
0
°
O
°
°
°
°
°
°
uegj Joug quoojo,�
E
E
U
_N
U
L
C.
u�
i
L
m
L
m
}
N
L
L
�l-
I

APPENDIX F - VEGETATION MONITORING PLOYPHOTOS

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

z � i
dm
!�f • i
1-10
T '
It ipL.
N •, �' "
. - �1 •' +� - �. � F ' �•t y +yam, •1 � 1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
I
Vegetation Monitorute Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

r,
,. qF ,9
.L • V

Appendix F
VeL,erition Monitorine Plot P1lolos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Fartn Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 102 LEI

Appendix F
Vegetation Monaoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 3 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4— Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4— Year 3 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4— Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4— Year 5 (2013)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.El

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 — Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 — Year 3 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Fami Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E l.

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 — Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 — Year 2 (2010) (Photo taken in December)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 102 LE 1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 — Year 3 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7— Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 —Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7— Year 3 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7— Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7— Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LEI

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8— Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 —Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Enviromnental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8— Year 3 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8— Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8— Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 1 (2009)
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Fame Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitorin g Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 3 (2011)
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 3 (2011)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix }
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.El

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 1 (2009)
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 2 (20 10)
Newell Fami Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix F
Veeetation NlonitoruIe Plot Photo."
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 3 (2011)
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year ( 201 1 )
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 102 LEI

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

P.- - �' * N l.,:; ,. -_.Z:
I
{

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 Year 3 (2011)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LEI

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 102 LEI

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 1 (2009)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.El

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 3 (2011)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — Year 5 (2013)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 1 (2009)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.E1

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 3 (2011)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 4 (2012)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 5 Monitoring 2013 Project No. 1021.El

Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — Year 5 (2013)
(Taken from different plot corner)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021. E 1

APPENDIX G - VEGETATION COUNT DATA

Year
Planted Woody,Stems,
Five
Year Five (2013)
Plots
Totals
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
River, Birch
etula ni a
11
--
1
0
--
--
--
3
5
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
--
--
0
6
1
0
1
8
Persimmon
(Diospyros w imana
--
2
--
0
--
--
--
1
3
Virginia Sweetspire
Itea yr imca
--
1
--
0
--
--
--
-_
1
Spicebush
Lmdera benzoin
--
1
--
0
--
--
--
1
American Sycamore
Platanus occidentalrs
9
=-
3
0
=-
--
--
1
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak
uercus michauxii
2
4
1
0
--
--
--
1
8
Water Oak
(Quercus ni ra
--
2
--
0
--
--
--
--
2
Cherrybark Oak
(Quercus pagoda)
3
8
2
0
--
--
--
--
13
Willow Oak
(Quercus hellos
--
14
--
0
--
--
--
--
14
Silky Willow
Salix sericea
0
0
--
0
1
4
4
0
9
Arrowwood
Viburnum dentatum
--
--
--
0
--
--
--
0
0
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
--
1
--
0
--
--
--
--
1
Year Five Totals
15
33
7
0
7
5
4
7
78
As -built Totals
16
35
7
0
12
19
16
11
116
Plot Survival Rate
94%
94%
100%
N/A
58%
26%
25%
63%
66%
Plot Live Stem Density
stems /acre
607
1,336
283
0
283
202
162
283
451
Site Average Live Stem
451 stems per acre is avg. of all plots except Plot 4 **
Density
394 stems per acre is avg. of all eight plots including Plot 4 **

Year 5 2013 - Bank Plot 1
Common Name
Species
Year
Four
Count
Total
Number,
Planted
% of Total
`Species
'Composition
Species
Survival
Rate,
'Silky Do Mood
Cornus amomum
9
23
14%
390/0
,Silky Willow
Sahx sericea
30,
34
45%
88%
Arrowwood
Viburnum deniatum
5
9
8%
56 %_
-Black Willow
Salix ni ra_
22
23
33%
96%
Black Willow
TOTAL
66
89
1'00%
189%
Live,Stake Survival=
1-74.2%
1 100.0 %
100%
Year 5 (2013),- Bank Plot 2
Common Name
Species
Year
Four
Count
Total
Number
Planted
% of Total
Species
Composition
Species,
Survival
Rate
Silky Dogwood-
Cornus amomum
11
23
33%
70%
Silky Willow
Salix sericea
16
8
34%
200%
Arrowwood'
Viburnum dentatum
0
6
NO
06%
Elderbe rry
Sambueus canadensis
0
6
2%
0%,
Black Willow
Saliz rii ra
1 "7
9
33%
189%
TOTAL
50
522
100%
Live StakeSurvival =
100%
96.1%

APPENDIX G - HERBACEOUS AREA MAP AND PHOTOS

le
• •
Herbaceous Boundary 5.15 Ac.
. � t
jr
IRS -•�z• %�1J~.

VA
') I

Appendix H
Herbaceous Area Photos
Newell Farm Herbaceous Marsh Area
Newell Farm Herbaceous Marsh Area (Gauge 4)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E l

Appendix H
Herbaceous Area Photos
Newell Farm Herbaceous Transitional Marsh to Buffer Area
Newell Farm Herbaceous Transitional Marsh to Buffer Area
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 5 Monitoring 2013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111