20221280 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220916

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/1/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221280 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone] Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Camden Place
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Deborah Shirley
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
9/16/2022
Nearest Body of Water
UT to Black River
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C;Sw
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.52905 -78.73715
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Taylor Morrison of Carolinas, Inc
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 4090 DP: 0481
2c. Contact Person:
Mark Altman
2d. Address
Street Address
15501 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Postal /Zip Code
27513
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c. Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Angier
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0674-87-1972, 0674-87-0285, 0674-76-8919 &
0674-76-8650
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Junny Road
Address Line 2
City
Angier
Postal / Zip Code
27501
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
UT to Black River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C;Sw
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040501
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
+/- 35.61
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of forested land and field areas. Specifically, there are eight (8) wetland features, two (2) pond features and one (1) pond in high ground
located on the property. General land use in the vicinity of the property consists of rural single-family homes. Kennebec Church Road bounds the property to the North and Junny Road
bounds the property to the east.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 3.6 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 1,693 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of this project is to construct a mixed use single-family and multi -family residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project consists of the construction of a mixed use single-family and multi -family residential development including but not limited to; roadway infrastructure, residential lots,
utilities, SCMs, greenway, clubhouse and amenities. Specifically, there are two (2) road crossings that impact wetlands/streams, one (1) greenway crossing that impacts a stream, and two
(2) area of roadway improvements that impacts wetland/streams. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc.
will be utilized for this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-01101
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Jeff Harbor
Terracon
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE: Site visit and determination issued by Liz Hair on October 13, 2021.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project will be constructed internally in 2 phases.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Impact 1
Road Widening
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 9
Yes
Both
0.006
(acres)
Impact 2
Road Crossing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 6 & 7
Yes
Both
0.027
(acres)
Impact 3
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.214
(acres)
Impact 5
Road Widening
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 9
Yes
Both
0.023
(acres)

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.270
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.270
2i. Comments:
Total permanent loss wetland = 0.270 acres;
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Impact 1 - Road Widening
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 5
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
18
(linear feet)
S2
Impact 2 - Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 3b & 3c
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
50
(linear feet)
S3
Impact 2 - Road Crossing -
RipRap (Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
Permanent
Other
Stream 3b & 3c
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
32
(linear feet)
S4
Impact 3 - Road Crossing
Permanent
Other
Stream 2
Perennial
Both
7
Average (feet)
249
(linear feet)
S5
Impact 3 - Road Crossing -
RipRap (Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
Permanent
Other
Stream 2
Perennial
Both
9
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S6
Impact 4 - Greenway
Crossing
Permanent
Other
Stream 3b
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
11
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
365
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
365
3j. Comments:
Total permanent loss stream = 328 LF; Total permanent -no permanent loss stream = 37 LF.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impact Area 1 is a proposed culvert extension and grading necessary to provide roadway improvements (i.e. curb and gutter) and a sidewalk along
Junny Road. Proposed impacts include permanent wetland impacts for the culvert extension. The sidewalk is required by the Town of Angier along all
existing streets that front the proposed project. Impact Area 2 is a proposed road crossing necessary to access the southwest portion of the project.
Proposed impacts include permanent stream and wetland impacts, in addition to "permanent -no permanent loss" stream impacts which will consist of
riprap keyed into the stream bed (i.e. the top elevation of the riprap post construction will not exceed the pre -construction elevation of the stream bed) for
a riprap dissipator. Stream impacts have been minimized by utilizing an existing culvert crossing. Impact Area 3 is for a proposed road crossing to
access the project from Kennebec Road. Proposed impacts include permanent stream and wetland impacts, in addition to "permanent -no permanent
loss" stream impacts which will consist of riprap keyed into the stream bed (i.e. the top elevation of the riprap post construction will not exceed the pre -
construction elevation of the stream bed) for a riprap dissipator. This impact is necessary because the State Fire Code requires two points of
ingress/egress from a development whenever there is more than 100 lots. Those access points must be on two different roads or significantly spaced
apart if on the same road. Additionally, NCDOT and Town of Angier roadway design standards require that the road come off Kennebec at a near
perpendicular intersection. The road must run straight for a minimum distance before it can curve. For this proposed road, it would need to curve in a
reversing fashion in order to avoid stream T2 and wetland W1 and then curve back to stay on our property. Those two curves have minimal radius
values due to Town design standards tied to transportation safety rules. Impact Area 4 is a proposed culvert for a walking trail adjacent to lots and an
existing pond. Proposed impacts include permanent stream impacts. This impact could not be avoided because it is adjacent to proposed residential lots
that require grading above the adjacent wetland elevation. Impact Area 5 is a proposed grading necessary to provide roadway improvements (i.e. curb
and gutter) and a sidewalk along Junny Road. Proposed impacts include permanent wetland impacts for the grading. The sidewalk is required by the
Town of Angier along all existing streets that front the proposed project. Compensatory mitigation in the form of payment is proposed at a 2:1 ratio for all
permanent wetland and permanent stream impacts to offset permanent losses.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Diversion berms, silt fence and ec matting will be used to minimize impacts. There is an existing culvert where the road crossing is proposed.
Cofferdams may be used to install the culvert for the stream crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No

2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Stream
3c. Comments
Quantity:
637
Please note that the 637 LF of stream mitigation identified within the Wildlings Holdings SOA letter has been invoiced for another project. It is possible
that this stream mitigation will not be available at a later date. Therefore, DMS has written an Acceptance letter stating that the will accept "up to 656",
the total stream mitigation needed for this project.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
up to 656
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.55
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h. Comments
DMS has written an Acceptance letter stating that the will accept "up to 656", the total stream mitigation needed for this project because Wildlands has
invoiced another project for the 637 LF stated in their SOA letter.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State

Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Angier
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Camden Place project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Angier ETJ,
therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Water
Supply, Watershed Protection Program which limits development densities as well as requires protective riparian buffers; 2) the Phase II NPDES
Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -
construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Non -discharge wastewater will be generated.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
WithersRavenel completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service
(USFWS), a query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. WithersRavenel received response
from USFWS on November 16, 2021 that they concurred with the determinations made by WithersRavenel that the proposed actions is not likely to
adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Please see attached WithersRavenel Threatened & Endangered Species report and correspondence from
USFWS.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on July 6, 2022, no historic listings or study list entries
or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Attachments_Camden Place.pdf 14.47MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Deborah Shirley
Signature
4044. ,4/ ¢ 'r'idej
Date
9/16/2022

DocuSign Envelope ID: 68B71349-3CA1-4F06-AD69-EBBOF448A5C5
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
s ndec.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Camden Place
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
S&EC Project #
Attn: Liz Hair Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0674-76-8919, 0674-76-8650 & 0674-87-0285
Site Address: Junny Road
City, County, State: Angier, Harnett/Wake County, NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: L isk..t p r f 3rT [" 01Alfkjf �-
Mailing Address: l 5 S I V•� 5 T1 Tag �C I Cast s r ri� y ,' s� 7 1 3
Telephone Numb r: �1L ~ .1150 " 7
Email: ia,\ m\or mQCC; Son , �'am
Mark Altman
Applicant (please print) Date
(-DocuSigned by:
&WA,
Apl41 Signature
6/1/2022
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Deborah Shirley
From: Camden Brunick
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 3:10 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -Filing Meeting Request for Camden Place
Attachments: Overall site map.pdf
Good afternoon Chad,
This pre -filing meeting request is for the Camden Place project located just west of Junny Road and South of Kennebec
Road in Angier, Harnett/Wake County, NC. The project is approximately 35 acres. The project purpose is to construct a
multi -family residential development and its necessary infrastructure including but not limited to; residential lots,
roadway infrastructure, SCM's, and utilities. Specifically, there are four proposed road crossing that impacts wetlands
and/or streams. Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of field areas and underdeveloped forested land. General
land use in the vicinity of the project consists of farmland, forested land and residential areas. Junny Road bounds the
property to the East and Kennebec Road bounds the property to the North. Please see the attached site plan above.
Please note this may change as we work with the engineers on minimizing impacts.
Project Name: Camden Place
County: Harnett/Wake
Applicant Name: Taylor Morrison of Carolinas, Inc (attn: Mark Altman)
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Thank you,
CAMDEN BRUNICK
Environmental Consultant
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone](cell)
1

C11ilCUee
C
COK
Afeci,
, .4.,40
o,
,_.,,., A., -
. i 'Nip
R
4 et
R,gtyzs I,
c-,s,
Project Number:
15326.W1
Project Manager:
SB
Scale: 1" 1000'
Date:
07/06/2022
J
-�t
c
"PQ
so 411..Stea.
•Yr‘%vnri-evr
Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS
Camden Place
Angier, NC
ource:
2019 USGS Angier Quad
O
NC Centter for Geographic Informa'tio &'Analysis"
0 1,000 2,000
1 1 1 I 1 1 1
Feet
S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Nense Road. Suite 104, Raleigh. NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fay: [phone]
sand, corn

:20 PIA — RICCI, ALVSSA
on\Wellmds—Streans\CAD\Wetlants Bme.d g— Monday, October 4, 2021
K:\21\21-115
CAITLIN MEADOWS -
TAYLOR MORRISON
ANGIER HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
HARNETT CO. SOIL SURVEY (1994) - SHEET 7
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
iWithersRavenel
1/% Engineers Planners Surveyors

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01101 County: Wake and Harnett Counties U.S.G.S. Quad: Angier
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant:
Address:
Phillip R. Stephenson
1187 N. Raleigh Street
An2ier, NC, 27501
[e-mail]
Telephone Number: 919-427-8654
Size (acres) -35 acres Nearest Town Angier
Nearest Waterway Black River River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030004 Coordinates Latitude: 35.52905
Longitude: -78.73715
Location description: The site is located on approximately 35 acres on four parcels (Wake Co. PIN: 0674871973;
Harnett Co. PINs: 0674-76-8919; 0674-76-8650; 0674-87-0285), located along the Wake/Harnett County line, to the
south of Kennebec Road, west of Junny Road, north of An2ier, in North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, includin2 wetlands, on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC 403).
The waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be
sufficiently accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit
evaluation process, includin2 determining compensatory miti2ation. For purposes of computation of impacts,
compensatory miti2ation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the
basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted
activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for
further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2021-01101
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject
to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from
the date of this notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Sarah Hair at (910)
251-4049 or Sarah.E.Hair(a,usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See attached Approved JD forms.
D. Remarks: AJD review area is limited to the Upland Pond area identified on the attached
Terracon wetland delineation sketch labeled: Exhibit No. 3: Potential Wetlands and Waters. PJD
review area is the remainder of the site as identified on the aforementioned map and attached PJD
form.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this
request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,
prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803

SAW-2021-01101
AND
PHIL IP.A. SHANNIN@USAGE ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by December 13, 2021.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: October 13, 2021 Expiration Date: October 13, 2026 (AJD Upland Pond area); N/A: (Aquatic resources subject
to PJD)
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p= 1 3 6:4:0.
Copy Furnished:
Jeff Harbor/Rhiannon Graham; Terrracon

SAW-2021-01101
NOTIFICATION OF ADNIINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Phillip R. Stephenson
File Number: SAW-2021-01101
Date: October 13, 2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
ix
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
ix
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION
Additional
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative
information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
appeal of the above decision.
or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2021-01101
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Sarah Hair
If you only have questions regarding
also contact:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
the appeal process you may
Officer
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Administrative Appeal Review
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
PHILIP.A. [e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Sarah Hair, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone], PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(a,USACE.ARMY.MIL

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 13-OCT-2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Stephenson, Phillip R.
1187 N Raleigh Street
Angier, NC 27501
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
SAW, Stephenson Property Kennebec Road / Angier / Harnett , SAW-2021-01101
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC
RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake/Harnett Counties City: Angier
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.52905° Long.: -78.73715°
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Black River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: October 13, 2021
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic
resource in review
area (acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic
authority to which
the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or
Section 10/404)
SW1
35.5287
-78.73795
0.33 acres
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
SW3
35.5276
-78.73887
0.29 acres
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
T1
35.529793
-78.737496
463 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
T2
35.530039
-78.737102
283 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
T3
35.527085
-78.738883
906 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
T5
35.527375
-78.736356
145 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
T6
35.526179
-78.736731
166 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
W1
35.53016
-78.73725
0.47 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W2
35.52935
-78.73798
0.01 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W3
35.52808
-78.7389
0.55 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W5
35.52774
-78.73942
0.05 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W6
35.52726
-78.73922
0.51 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W7
35.52633
-78.73924
0.57 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W8
35.52605
-78.73725
0.05 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W9
35.526713
-78.736568
1.21 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Page 1 of 3

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain
an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed
the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be
appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification"
(PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit
applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware
that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which
does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has
the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the
right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP
or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever
mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity
in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a
proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either
an AJD or a PJD, the.JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can
be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal,
it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists
over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional
aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as
soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there
"may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic
features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated
for all checked items:
X Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Terracon Wetland Delineation Sketch; Exhibit 3: Potential wetlands and waters.
X_ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
X_ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
' Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Page 2 of 3

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
X_ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Angier NC.
X_ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey Harnett County/
Wake County.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: . (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date):
or Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
X Other information (please specify): USACE National Regulatory Viewer; SAD; NC.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by
the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Liz Hair V October 13, 2021 *refer to JD request 5/20/21
Signature and date of Regulatory staff
member completing PJD
Signature and date of person requesting
PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Page 3 of 3

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): October 13, 2021
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Stephenson Property, SAW-2021-01101
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Wake/Harnett City: Angier
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.528056° I, Long. -78.740662° M.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Black River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC):
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: October 13, 2021
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are nil "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: linnhi
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: Area identified as 'upland pond' on attached delineation sketch is completely surrounded by upland soils and
has no connection to downstream RPW's. Suspect it was excavated in uplands as an irrigation source for adjacent
agricultural fields. Mapped soils are Dothan; well drained, non-hydric soils. .
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section flLF.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III D 1 only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: .
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus fmding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are
Project waters are
Project waters are
Project waters are
Pick List
Pick List
Pick List
Pick List
river miles from TNW.
river miles from RPW.
aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b)
General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts
❑ Cobbles
❑ Bedrock
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Sands
❑ Gravel
❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Picln
k L
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
fl High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain fmdings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain fmdings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain fmdings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b)
General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: 1111111. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain fmdings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain fmdings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick Lis4
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus fmdings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
fmdings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus fmdings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain fmdings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus fmdings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain fmdings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Q Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
C3 Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
71 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section DI.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
io Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
p Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
® Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: Open waters
likely excavated in uplands, with no downstream connection to RPWs.
❑ Other. (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
® Lakes/ponds: 0.58 acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date):SW2; SW2(2); Non-hydric; Non-hydric (2): April 12, 2021; September 28, 2021 photos.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
® Other information (please specify):Additional information received August 2, 2021 and October 4, 2021: specific to the upland
pond area, formerly identified as SW2 and W4; Web soil survey; Google Earth image shows pond since at least 1993.
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

These preliminary delineation results are subject to regulatory
review and concurrence.
This is not a replacement for a traditional survey and is suitable for
preliminary planning purposes only and for use by surveyor to aid in
locating flags.
a 'Aca
I I
Cape Fear River Basin
Neuse River Basin
0
Project Study Area 0 AJ D area
I/Gd Potential Wetland Waters
Potential Non -Wetland Waters Surface Water)
River Basin Boundary
Potential Non -Wetland Water (Tributary)
0 300 600
Feet
PM: RT
Project No.
70217242
lierracon
Potential Wetlands and Waters
EXHIBIT
NO.
Drawn By:
KT
Scale:
1 in = 300 ft
Stephenson Property
Wake and Harnett Counties,
North Carolina
3
Checked By: RT
Filename:
aerial.mxd
Approved By:
JH
Date:
April 2021
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC 5
OneMap Server; 2017; Site Boundary based on Harnett V
and Wake County Parcel Data.
0
Note: Vegetation removal or alteration of soils or hydrologya
after initial site evaluation can affect jurisdictional status $
and may require re-evaluation of wetland boundaries.
5I
N
N
N
O
0
Li;

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Stream & Riparian Wetland Credit Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 04 Watershed
August 29, 2022
Taylor Morrison of the Carolinas, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Mark Altman
15501 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
RE: Availability of Stream and Riparian Wetland Credits for the "Camden Place" project
Bank Name: Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Bank Site: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Permittee: Taylor Morrison of the Carolinas, Inc.
Stream Credits Needed: 656.00 LF
Stream Credits Available: 637.00 LF
Cape Fear 03030004 River Basin
Dear Mr. Altman,
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC currently has sufficient stream credits from the Middle Cape Fear Umbrella
Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site to partially satisfy the mitigation requirements related
to the above -mentioned project. The project is located within the Cape Fear HUC 03030004 watershed.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. Although current
inventory is high, the letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first
serve basis. An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will formally reserve
both the credits and price quoted for a period of 30 days from the invoice at no cost.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon completion of the Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
within the 404 permit approving the mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your
payment to Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
[phone] x124 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
Ashley N. Yarsinske
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Marketing & Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 124
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Liz Hair, Regulatory Specialist I USACE
Ms. Deborah Shirley, Project Manager -Regulatory Specialist I Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

ROY COOPER.
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretory
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Mark Altman
Taylor Morrison of the Carolinas, Inc
15501 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 12, 2022
Expiration of Acceptance: 3/12/2023
Project: Camden Place County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and bank credit
availability and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Warm Stream
Up to 656
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.55
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Debbie E. Shirley, agent
DeJa't Ie:l: n1 (11,-101,11..131 QUA iv
Sincerely,
Atiirktlactv)loa
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

40 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
III
October 6, 2021
Mark Altman
Taylor Morrison of Carolinas, Inc.
15501 Weston Parkway
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Re: Caitlin Meadows
Angier, Harnett & Wake Counties, NC
Threatened & Endangered Species Assessment Report
WR Project #0221150.00
Mr. Altman:
On September 29, 2021, WithersRavenel (WR) conducted a site review of the Caitlin Meadows
project area (Review Area) for the purpose of evaluating the presence of federally listed threatened
and endangered species and/or potential habitat within the review area. The review area is ±35.16
acres located on four parcels (Wake County PIN: 0674871973 and Harnett County PINs: 0674-87-
0285.000, 0674-76-8919.000, and 0674-76-8650.000) in Angier (Lat: 35.527784°N; Long: -
78.737854°W) as depicted in the attached exhibits.
The review area is in the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004) and onsite waters drain to Neills
Creek. The water Quality Classification for Neills Creek is WS-IV, and the Stream Index Number is 18-
16-(0.7).
WR surveyed the review area for the presence of federally listed threatened and endangered species,
or their potential habitat, protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This report summarizes
the findings of the survey.
Proposed Activities
The project proposes to construct a residential subdivision and associated infrastructure within the
review area.
Site Conditions
The review area consists of undeveloped adjacent to Kennebec Road and Junny Road in Harnett and
Wake Counties and contains woodlands, active farm fields, and three ponds. The vegetative
communities within the review area consisted of mixed hardwood/pine forest, agricultural fields and
ponds as depicted in the Vegetative Communities Exhibit.
The mixed hardwood/pine forest comprised most of the review area. The vegetative composition
consisted of a dense canopy of red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), oaks
(Querus spp.), hickories (Carya spp.), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). At the boundary of the wooded
areas, the trees consisted of loblolly pine, sweetgum, eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), dogwood
(Corpus florida), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and red bud (Cercis canadensis). Due to the density
of the canopy, there was no significant herbaceous vegetation within the interior of the mixed
hardwood/pine forest. Herbaceous vegetation along the boundary of the mixed hardwood/pine
forest and agricultural fields consisted of pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), goldenrod (Solidago spp.),
Bermuda grass ( Cynodon dactylon), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), and Asiatic dayflower
(Commelina communis).
115 MacKenan Drive, Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 I f: 919.467.6008 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

■■ WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
Caitlin Meadows - Harnett & Wake Counties
The agricultural fields were in active row crop production and had been planted in either tobacco or
soybeans. At the time of the survey, the tobacco had been harvested while the soybeans had not
been harvested.
There were three ponds located in the review area. These ponds were small, less than 0.5 acres in
size. There were no streams coming into or out of these ponds.
Threatened & Endangered Species Review
Methodology
WR reviewed the US Fish and Wildlife Service's online threatened and endangered species database,
located at: http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nccounties.html and the NC Wildlife
Resource Commission's "State and Federally Listed Endangered Wildlife Species of North Carolina"
publication, located at www.ncwildlife.org, to identify federally listed threatened and endangered
species known to occur in Harnett and Wake Counties, North Carolina.
WR submitted a project review request to the NCNHP through theft Data Explorer webpage, located
at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/, to identify known occurrences of federally listed threatened or
endangered species within 1.0 mile of the review area. The NCNHP project review did not identify
any known occurrences of federally listed species within the review area or within 1.0 mile of the
review area, as documented in the attached letter from NCNHP dated 09/27/2021.
Based on the review of the US Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) online database located at
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc counties.html, on 09/27/21, there are ten federally
listed endangered or threatened species (American alligator, Carolina madtom, Cape Fear shiner, dwarf
wedgemussel, Neuse River waterdog, Michaux's sumac, red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW), rough -
leaved loosestrife, Tar River spinymussel, and yellow lance) and one federally listed proposed
threatened species (Atlantic pigtoe) known to occur within Harnett and Wake Counties. The USFWS
list of threatened and endangered species known to occur in Harnett and Wake Counties has been
provided as an attachment. An official species list was generated using USFWS' Information for
Planning and Consultation (IPaC), located at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/, on 09/27/21. This species list
identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and
designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of the project and may be affected by
the project. The IPaC list specified that there are six species (American alligator, Atlantic pigtoe, Cape
Fear Shiner, Michaux's sumac, RCW, and rough -leaved loosestrife) that may be within the vicinity of
the project area. The IPaC list has been provided as an attachment.
On 09/29/2021, WR conducted a pedestrian survey to assess vegetative communities and identify
potential habitat for, or occurrences of federally listed species within or immediately adjacent to the
review area. Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still
protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and was included in the survey. The review
area contains three vegetative communities as described in the Site Conditions section of this report.
Species Synopsis and Pedestrian Survey Results
Plants and animals classified as Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) by the USFWS are protected under
the provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Plants
and animals classified as Proposed (P) are currently proposed for official designation of a protected
species under the Endangered Species Act. The following table presents federally listed species on the
IPaC list dated 09/29/2021.
Page 2 of 7

■■ WithersRavenel
. 0 Our People. Your Success.
Caitlin Meadows - Harnett & Wake Counties
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological Determination
American alligator
Alligator mississippiensis
T/SA*
Marginal
May Affect Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
Atlantic Pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
PT**
No
No Effect
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA***
No
No Effect
Cape Fear Shiner
Notropis mekistocholas
E
No
No Effect
Michaux's Sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
No
No Effect
Red cockaded
woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
No
No Effect
Rough leaved
loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
E
No
No Effect
T/SA* - Threatened due to similarity in appearance
PT** - Proposed Threatened
BGPA*** - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
American Alligator (T/SA)
The American alligator is a large, semi -aquatic, armored reptile that ranges in size from 6 to 14 feet
long. Alligators live in swampy areas, rivers, streams, lakes and ponds. There is no critical habitat
designated for the American alligator. The American alligator is listed as Threatened due to the
similarity in appearance to the American crocodile but are not protected themselves. There are no
known populations of American crocodile within North Carolina. Species listed as T(S/A) are not
biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to consultation under Section 7 of the ESA.
Based on the review of the NCNHP GIS data, there are no known occurrences of American alligator
within 1.0 mile of the review area.
The three ponds that are in the review area were considered marginally suitable habitat due to the
small size of ponds (<0 .5 acre).
Due to the marginally suitable habitat, lack of nearby records and the project not being within the
known range of the American crocodile, WR concludes that the proposed project may affect, not likely
to adversely affect the American alligator. However, formal consultation with the USFWS is not
required for American alligator.
Biological Conclusion - May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Bald Eagle (BGPA)
Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open water
for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water.
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program GIS data to determine the location of the known bald
eagle nest sites and their distance from the review area. Based on the NC Natural Heritage Program
GIS data, there are no known occurrences of bald eagle nesting/roosting sites within 1.0 mile of the
review area. Fish and Wildlife Services' "National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines" (May 2007)
specifies that activities taking place more than 660' from a bald eagle nest will have no effect on the
nesting activities. Based on the NCNHP GIS data, there are no known occurrences of bald eagle within
1.0 mile of the review area.
Page 3 of 7

■■ WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
Caitlin Meadows - Harnett & Wake Counties
During the pedestrian surveys, no bald eagles or their nests were observed in or the review area.
There was no foraging habitat within 1 mile of the review area, therefore survey of areas within 660'
was not required. Additionally, no bald eagles were observed in flight. The project area did not contain
large dominant trees with unobstructed access that could be used for nesting sites.
Based on a lack of suitable nesting habitat, and lack of nearby records, WR concludes that the project
will have No Effect on bald eagles.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Cape Fear Shiner (E)
The Cape Fear shiner is a small (approximately 2" long), yellowish minnow with a black band along the
sides of its body. The Cape Fear shiner is generally associated with gravel, cobble and boulder
substrates and is endemic to the upper Cape Fear River Basin in the Central Piedmont of North
Carolina. The species is known to occur in tributaries and mainstreams of the Deep River, Haw River,
Rocky River and Cape Fear River in Chatham, Harnett, Lee, Moore and Randolph Counties.
The USFWS identifies the Critical Habitat Designation for the Cape Fear Shiner as being ±4.1 miles of
the Rocky River from NC Hwy 902 bridge downstream to Chatham County Road 1010 Bridge, and
±0.5 river miles of Bear Creek, from Chatham County Road 2156 Bridge downstream to the Rocky
River, then downstream in the Rocky River (±4.2 river miles) to the Deep River, the downstream in the
Deep River (±2.6 river miles) to a point 0.3 river miles below the Moncure, NC, USGS Geological
Survey Gauging Station. The USFWS designated critical area is located upstream from the project.
Constituent elements include clean streams with gravel, cobble and boulder substrates with pools,
riffles, shallow runs and slack water areas with large outcrops and side channels and pools with water
of good quality with relatively low silt loads (USFWS, Federal Register reference 9/25/87, Federal
Register, 2: 36034-36039). Based on the NC Natural Heritage Program GIS data, there are no known
occurrences of Cape Fear Shiner within 1.0 mile of the review area.
There are no streams in the review area.
The three small ponds were not considered suitable habitat.
Based on a lack of suitable habitat, lack of nearby records, and being downstream of the critical area,
WR concludes that the project will have No Effect on Cape Fear shiner.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Michaux's Sumac (E)
Michaux's sumac a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from 1 - 3 feet (ft) (30.5 - 91
centimeters, cm) in height. The compound leaves contain evenly serrated, oblong to lanceolate,
acuminate leaflets. The flowers are small, borne in a terminal, erect, dense cluster, and colored
greenish yellow to white. Flowering usually occurs from June to July; while the fruit, a red drupe, is
produced through the months of August to October. Michaux's sumac is typically found in the inner
Coastal Plain and lower Piedmont and grows in sandy or rocky, open, upland woodlands on acidic or
circumneutral, well drained sands or sandy loam soils. This species is also found around maintained
railroad, roadside, power line and utility rights -of -way, areas where forest canopies have been opened
by blow downs and/or storm damage; small wildlife food plots, abandoned building sites, under
moderately dense pine or pine/hardwood canopies; and in and along edges of other artificially
maintained clearings undergoing natural succession. In the central Piedmont, it occurs on clayey soils
derived from mafic rocks. Michaux's sumac is shade intolerant and, therefore, grows best where
disturbance (i.e., mowing, clearing, grazing, periodic fire) maintains its open habitat. Based on the
review of the NCNHP GIS data, there are no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the review area.
Page 4 of 7

■■ WithersRavenel
Caitlin Meadows - Harnett & Wake Counties
III.Our People. Your Success.
The mixed hardwood/pine forest has a dense tree canopy. These areas create shade that Michaux's
sumac is intolerant and cannot survive. These areas were not considered suitable habitat for Michaux's
sumac (see Photo Documentation). The agricultural fields are not suitable habitat as tobacco and
soybeans were planted this season.
The pedestrian survey was focused on the edges of the mixed hardwood/pine forest and the
agricultural fields where the artificial edges were considered potential habitat. No occurrences of
Michaux's sumac were observed during the pedestrian survey (see Photo Documentation).
Based on the lack of nearby records, limited potential habitat in the review area and no occurrences
noted in these areas during the optimal survey window, WR concludes that the proposed project will
have No Effect on Michaux's sumac.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Red -Cockaded Woodpecker (E)
The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) occurs in extensive tracts of open stands of mature pines,
particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), for foraging and nesting/roosting habitat, typically 70 to 100
acres or more. The red -cockaded woodpecker is rarely found in deciduous or mixed pine -hardwoods.
The RCW excavates cavities for nesting and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, which
are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. Optimal habitat
is characterized as a broad savanna with a scattered overstory of large pines and a dense groundcover
containing a diversity of grass, forbs, and shrub species. Midstory vegetation is sparse or absent.
Frequent fires maintain the quality of the RCW's habitat. The foraging range of the RCW is normally
no more than 0.5 miles. Based on the NCNHP GIS data, there are no known occurrences of RCW
within 1.0 mile of the review area.
The review area does not contain longleaf pine trees, or large contiguous pine stands that are suitable
for either nesting or foraging habitats. Therefore, WR concludes that the project will have No Effect
on RCW.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Rough -leaved Loosestrife (E)
This plant is an erect, rhizomatous, late spring- to early summer -flowering perennial herb which grows
to 2 feet tall. Its leaves are mostly 3-whorled, lanceolate to ovate -lanceolate, sessile, and 2-4 cm long.
There are usually three conspicuous veins on each leaf. The flowers are 5-petales, showy, yellow
flowers with yellow -orange anthers. The fruit is an ovoid or subglobose capsule, 3-4.5 mm in diameter,
with several somewhat winged seeds. Rough -leaf loosestrife occurs most often in ecotones between
longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins in moist, sandy or peaty soils with low vegetation that
allows for abundant sunlight to the herb layer. Fire is primarily responsible for maintaining low
vegetation in these ecotones, as well as regular maintenance/mowing that mimics fire and maintains
vegetation so that the herbaceous species are open to sunlight. Based on the NCNHP GIS data, there
are no known occurrences of rough -leaved loosestrife within 1.0 mile of the review area.
The mixed hardwood/pine forest has a tree canopy that creates shade that rough -leaved loosestrife
is intolerant and cannot survive. There are no periodic disturbances that maintains vegetation open to
sunlight. There was no ecotone between upland longleaf pine and pond pine pocosins in the review
area. The agricultural fields are not suitable habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife. Therefore, there was
no suitable habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife.
Page 5 of 7

■■ WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
Caitlin Meadows - Harnett & Wake Counties
Based on a lack nearby records and no potential suitable habitat within the review area, WR concludes
that the project will have No Effect on rough -leaved loosestrife.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Atlantic Pigtoe (PT)
The Atlantic pigtoe is a freshwater mussel with a chunky, rhombus shape, like that of a pig's hoof/toe.
The outer shell is yellow to dark brown and parchment -like, while the inner layer is iridescent blue to
salmon, white or orange. The Atlantic pigtoe rarely exceeds 2-inches in length. The preferred habitat
for the Atlantic pigtoe is coarse sand and gravel in small creeks and large rivers with excellent water
quality, where flows are sufficient to maintain clean, silt free substrates. In NC, Atlantic pigtoe is found
in the James, Chowan, Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, Cape Fear, and Pee Dee River basins. Based on the review
of the NCNHP GIS data, there are no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the review area.
There are no streams in the review area,
therefore there is no suitable habitat for Atlantic pigtoe.
Based on a lack nearby records and no potential suitable habitat within the review area, WR concludes
that the project will have No Effect on Atlantic pigtoe.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Summary
The review area does not contain occurrences of, or potential habitat for the bald eagle, Cape Fear
shiner, Michaux's sumac, red -cockaded woodpecker, rough -leaved loosestrife, and Atlantic pigtoe and
will have no effect on these species. There is marginal suitable habitat for American alligator but is
listed as T(S/A) and not biologically endangered or threatened and is not subject to consultation under
Section 7 of the ESA. Therefore, based our findings and best professional judgment Section 7
consultation with the USFWS under the ESA is not required as the proposed project will have No
Effect on federally listed threatened or endangered species known to occur in Harnett and Wake
Counties.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the contents of this
report.
Sincerely,
*4,43.,
---7-7---- S
Gary Kreiser Troy Beasley
NEPA Specialist Senior Environmental Scientist
WithersRavenel WithersRavenel
Attachments:
1) USGS Quadrangle Exhibits
2) Aerial Exhibit
3) Parcel Exhibit
4) Vegetative Communities Exhibit
5) Harnett & Wake County Soil Survey Exhibit
6) USFWS T&E List for Wake County
7) USFWS Official Species List
8) NCNHP Project Review Letter
9) Photo Documentation
Page 6 of 7

■■ WithersRavenel
Caitlin Meadows - Harnett & Wake Counties
REFERENCES
.. Our People. Your Success.
1. 2018 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. Edited by Laura Gadd
Robinson. N. C. Natural Heritage Program; NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
2. 2018 Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina. Compiled by
Judith A. Ratcliffe. N. C. Natural Heritage Program; NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
3. Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States - May 2015 version by Alan S. Weakly, University
of North Carolina Herbarium.
4. US Fish & Wildlife Service Threatened and Endangered Species in North Carolina webpage search
at: http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc counties.html accessed 09/27/2021.
5. Natural Heritage Program Database Search at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/ accessed
09/01/2021.
6. NC Natural Heritage Program Project Review Letter dated 09/27/2021.
7. USFWS IPaC Official Species List dated 09/27/2021.
Page 7 of 7

14:43 PIA — RICCI, ALVSSA
on\Wellmds—Streans\CAD\Wetlands Bme.d g— Monday, October 4, 2021
K:\21\21-115
W DORA ST
,1 DEPOT ST
• W CHURCH 57"
MQRGAN MCLEOQ LN
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
1 inch = 2000 ft.
ClfCi_E_DR
WILLIAMS s
E DEPOT_ST
CAITLIN MEADOWS -
TAYLOR MORRISON
ANGIER HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD (2019) - ANGIER
iWithersRavenel
1/% Engineers Planners Surveyors

1-!
•
•
•
1
ti
■ kJ
r
ANGIER
l
r • s,
•
•
•
r
CAITLIN MEADOWS -
TAYLOR MORRISON
HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
REVIEW AREA
i
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
r
l
• I
; 5
y�fr IT.
O
•
•
Jeir
USGS QUAD (2019) - ANGIER
r
•
-�..-
•
•
�l WithersRavenel
1 / Engineers Planners Surveyors

CAITLIN MEADOWS -
TAYLOR MORRISON
ANGIER HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
AERIAL (2017)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 125 250
1 inch = 250 ft.
1/�lWithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

211 I50 CoiUn
CAITLIN MEADOWS -
TAYLOR MORRISON
ANGIER HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
PARCEL EXHIBIT
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 125 250
1 inch = 250 ft.
�l WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

LEGEND:
IZI MIXED HARDWOOD/PINE
AGRICULTURAL FIELD
I REVIEW AREA
MIXED HARDWOOD/PINE
CAITLIN MEADOWS -
TAYLOR MORRISON
ANGIER HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES EXHIBIT
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 125 250
1 inch = 250 ft.
AGRICULTURAL
FIELD
DEER HAVEN DRIVE
MIXED HARDWOOD/PINE
i0 WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

:20 PIA — RICCI, ALVSSA
on\Wellmds—Streans\CAD\Wetlants Bme.d g— Monday, October 4, 2021
K:\21\21-115
CAITLIN MEADOWS -
TAYLOR MORRISON
ANGIER HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
HARNETT CO. SOIL SURVEY (1994) - SHEET 7
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
iWithersRavenel
1/% Engineers Planners Surveyors

9/27/21, 9:38 AM Listed species believed to or known to occur in Harnett, North Carolina
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
ECOS
ECOS / Species Reports / Species County Report
Listed species believed to or known to occur in Harnett, North
Carolina
The following report contains species that are known to or are believed to occur in this county, based on
the species current range, as defined by the USFWS. The definition of current range that the FWS uses is
the general geographic area where we know or suspect that a species currently occurs.
This list of species by countycannot be used for consultation purposes. To obtain an official list of species
that should be considered during consultation, please visitPaC.
Show
All
Dcsv
entries Search: I
9 Species Listings
Group Name
Population Status
Lead
Office
Recovery Plan
Saint Francis'
satyr butterfly
Insects (Neonyinpha Wherever found Endangered 4
mitchellii
francisci)
Saint Francis' Implementation
Satyr Butterfly Progress
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listings-by-current-range-county?fips=37085 1/3

9/27/21, 9:38 AM Listed species believed to or known to occur in Harnett, North Carolina
Insects
Reptiles
Birds
Fishes
Clams
monarch
butterfly
(Danaus
plexippus)
American
alligator
(Alligator
mississippiensis)
Red -cockaded
woodpecker
(Picoides
borealis)
Carolina
madtom
(Noturus
furiosus)
Wherever found Candidate 3
Similarity of
Wherever found Appearance 4
(Threatened)
Wherever found Endangered 4
Wherever found Endangered 4
Atlantic pigtoe
(Fusconaia Wherever found Proposed
Threatened
masoni)
Cape Fear shiner
Fishes (Notropis
mekistocholas)
4
Wherever found Endangered 4
Neuse River
Amphibians waterdog Wherever found Threatened 4
(Necturus lewisi)
Red -cockaded
Woodpecker
Recovery Plan,
Second
Revision
Implementation
Progress
Cape Fear Implementation
Shiner Progress
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listings-by-current-range-county?fips=37085 2/3

9/27/21, 9:38 AM Listed species believed to or known to occur in Harnett, North Carolina
Rough -leaved
Flowering loosestrife
Plants (Lysimachia
asperulaefolia)
Wherever found Endangered 4
Rough -leaved Implementation
Loosestrife Progress
Showing 1 to 9 of 9 entries Previous 11 Next
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listings-by-current-range-county?fips=37085 3/3

9/27/21, 9:37 AM Listed species believed to or known to occur in Wake, North Carolina
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
ECOS
ECOS / Species Reports / Species County Report
Listed species believed to or known to occur in Wake, North Carolina
The following report contains species that are known to or are believed to occur in this county, based on
the species current range, as defined by the USFWS. The definition of current range that the FWS uses is
the general geographic area where we know or suspect that a species currently occurs.
This list of species by countycannot be used for consultation purposes. To obtain an oftiial list of species
that should be considered during consultation, please visitPaC.
Show
All
Dcsv
entries Search: I
13 Species Listings
Group Name Population Status
Lead
Office
Recovery Plan
Insects
monarch
butterfly Wherever
(Danaus found
plexippus)
Candidate 3
(:roori fln�tor
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listi ngs-by-curre nt-range-county?fips=37183
1/3

9/27/21, 9:37 AM Listed species believed to or known to occur in Wake, North Carolina
V I CCI I I IVQICI
Clams
Clams
Clams
Birds
Clams
Fishes
Clams
(Lasmigona Wherever
subviridis)
found
Tar River
spinymussel Wherever
(Elliptio found
steinstansana)
Tar River
spinymussel Wherever
(Elliptio found
steinstansana)
Red -cockaded
woodpecker Wherever
(Picoides found
borealis)
Dwarf
wedgemussel Wherever
(Alasmidonta found
heterodon)
Carolina
madtom Wherever
(Noturus found
furiosus)
Yellow lance
(Elliptio
lanceolata)
Little brown
Wherever
found
Under
Review
5
Endangered 4
Endangered 4
Endangered 4
Endangered 5
Endangered 4
Threatened 4
Tar River Spinymussel
Implement
Progress
TarRiverSpinymussel Recovery Implement
Plan Amendment Progress
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Recovery Plan, Second
Revision
Dwarf Wedge Mussel
Implement
Progress
Implement
Progress
Recovery Outline for Yellow Implement
Lance (Elliptio lanceolata) Progress
IA/h.,r.,...,r
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listi ngs-by-curre nt-range-county?fips=37183
I Ir..l�v
2/3

9/27/21, 9:37 AM Listed species believed to or known to occur in Wake, North Carolina
Mammals Udl_ VVIleleVel uriuei 5
(Myotis found Review
lucifugus)
Cape Fear
shiner Wherever Implement
Fishes Endangered 4 Cape Fear Shiner
(Notropis found Progress
mekistocholas)
Atlantic pigtoe Wherever Proposed
Clams (Fusconaia 4
found Threatened
masoni)
Michaux's
Flowering sumac Wherever Implement
Plants (Rhus found Endangered 4 Michaux's Sumac Progress
michauxii)
Neuse River
Amphibians waterdog Wherever Threatened 4
(Necturus found
lewisi)
Showing 1 to 13 of 13 entries Previous
1
Next
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listings-by-current-range-county?fips=37183 3/3

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-2295
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04736
Project Name: Caitlin Meadows
September 27, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

09/27/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04736 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

09/27/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04736 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

09/27/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04736 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/27/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04736 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-2295
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2021-E-04736)
Project Name: Caitlin Meadows
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: residential subdivision
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.52875335,-78.73743661869698,14z
Counties: Harnett and Wake counties, North Carolina

09/27/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04736 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Fishes
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Endangered

09/27/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04736 4
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Endangered
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

■■■
■■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■. ■a NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• •D•
September 27, 2021
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Caitlin Meadows: 02211150.00
Dear Troy Beasley:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-15842
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4) 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGh 1_ NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. EIOH, NC 27699
OFC V19 707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Caitlin Meadows
Project No. 02211150.00
September 27, 2021
NCNHDE-15842
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID cientific Name Common Name
Group Observation
Date dm
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33751 Somatochlora
Damselfly georgiana
Coppery Emerald
2004-Pre
2004-Pre
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Element Accuracy
Occurrence
Rank
1
Federal State
Status Status
i
Global State
Rank Rank
H?
H?
5-Very
Low
5-Very
Low
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
G5 S2?
G3G4 S1?
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on September 27, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q2 July 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-15842: Caitlin Meadows
L KO
W+E
3 ',laiaium. Or
kr:rryllOOC l r{
Frryx ;;ar: Y:syc
Lan] m.rrk rir
Wrmerre
September 27, 2021
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
1:24,093
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
j 1 1 1 f 1 1 5
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources: Esn, HERE, Garmin. Inlarmap, in men[ P Corp., GERCO, USGS,
FAO, NP5. NRCAN, 5reo5ase. IGN. Kadaster NL, Ordnance 5urvey, 5sri .Japan.
METI_ Esri China {Hang Karla), (c) Oper.5lreeWlap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

■ WithersRavenel
.4Our People. Your Success.
Caitlin Meadows -Angier, Harnett & Wake Counties
Photographic Documentation (09/29/2021)
Photo 1: View of tobacco field, facing north.
Photo 2: View of soybean field, facing south.
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

■■ WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
Photo 3: Typical view of edge of mixed hardwood/pine forest and agricultural fields, facing south.
Photo 4: Another typical view of edge of mixed hardwood/pine forest and agricultural fields, facing north.
Page 2 of 4

■■ WithersRavenel
. Our People. Your Success.
Photo 5: Typical view of mixed hardwood/pine forest, facing south.
Photo 6: View of pond, facing east.
Page 3 of 4

■■ WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
Photo 7: View of another pond, facing west.
Page 4 of 4

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
November 16, 2021
Gary Kreiser
WithersRavenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Re: Caitlin Meadows — Harnett and Wake Counties
Dear Mr. Kreiser:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by aproposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office's project planning web site at
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concerns that are
known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, ensure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
1 The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation
does not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or
threatened species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse
impacts to federal species of concern.

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.

We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
Pete Benjam
Field Supe or

VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
I
22
—J
—JUNNY ROAD
32o
`
W8
— 320
I
320
32-1
325
wg
W8
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
II UHT Ur AUC,UJI , H.U., LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PR(1FFCCIMIAI I AM") CIIPVFVf1R — I _L'i71
NC GRID NAD 83 (2011)
\\
//
\ t/
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 200
400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 200 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
wwwADSltesoBNons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN PLACE
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS, INC.
15501 Weston Parkway - Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY: CAL
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=200'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 25, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
w-1
EB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1895
OF

4 IMPACT
C.* 1 AREA#4
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS II UHT V� AIJG LIJI H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
IMPACT AREA #1
STREAM IMPACT:
18 LF (50 SF) PERMANENT IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT:
295 SF PERMANENT IMPACT
IMPACT AREA #2
STREAM IMPACT:
50 LF (150 SF) PERMANENT IMPACT
32 LF (96 SF) EMBEDDED RIP RAP; NO LOSS OF STREAM BED
WETLAND IMPACT:
1,204 SF PERMANENT IMPACT
IMPACT AREA #3
STREAM IMPACT:
249 LF (1,837 SF) PERMANENT IMPACT
5 LF (45 SF) EMBEDDED RIP RAP; NO LOSS OF STREAM BED
WETLAND IMPACT:
9,333 SF PERMANENT IMPACT
IMPACT AREA #4
STREAM IMPACT:
11 LF (33 SF) PERMANENT IMPACT
IMPACT AREA #5
WETLAND IMPACT:
1,036 SF PERMANENT IMPACT
TOTAL IMPACT
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 2,070 SF
WETLAND IMPACT: 11,868 SF
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
wwwADslbsoBNons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN PLACE
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS, INC.
15501 Weston Parkway - Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1895
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=200'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 25, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-2
OF 7

LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
TOP OF BANK
�_.'.'. WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS II UHT V� AIJG UJI H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 18 LF (50 SF)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 295 SF
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING STREAM AND WETLANDS WILL BE
IMPACTED BY EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING
CULVERT AND GRADING RESULTING FROM
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG JUNNY ROAD AS
SHOWN.
/ EXISTING
GROUND
1
\
F\N P
R�U� GO
I
1
I
iI
Aj
EXISTING 47.55
1.07% 24"
LF ©
RCP
16.00 LF © 1.07% 24" RCP
N
r7
co
o
N
r7
o
N
r7
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
wwwADsltasoBNons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN PLACE
IMPACT AREA #1
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS, INC.
15501 Weston Parkway - Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1895
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 25, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-3
OF 7

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
TOP OF BANK
�_.'.'. WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS II UHT V� AIJG UJI H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 50 LF (150 SF)
EMBEDDED RIP RAP; NO LOSS OF STREAM BED: 32 LF (96 SF)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 1,204 SF
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING STREAM AND WETLANDS WILL BE IMPACTED BY
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAY, CULVERT PIPE,
AND RIP RAP APRON AS SHOWN.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
wwwADsltasoBNons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN PLACE
IMPACT AREA #2
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS, INC.
15501 Weston Parkway - Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1895
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 25, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-4
OF 7

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
— TOP OF BANK
�_.'.'. WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE c)
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS II UHT V� AIJG UJI H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 249 LF (1,837 SF)
EMBEDDED RIP RAP; NO LOSS OF STREAM BED 5 LF (45 SF)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 9,333 SF
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING STREAM AND WETLANDS WILL BE IMPACTED BY
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAY, RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS, AND ASSOCIATED STORM INFRASTRUCTURE AS
SHOWN.
•
•
■•air LIp i l-.$9N-71AP
1 •
Cl
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
wwwADsltasoBNons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN PLACE
IMPACT AREA #3
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS, INC.
Weston Parkway Suite 100
� Cary, NC 27513
I� Cary, Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1895
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 25, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-5
OF 7

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
TOP OF BANK
�_.'.'. WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS II UHT V� AIJG UJI H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 11 LF (33 SF)
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING STREAM WILL BE IMPACTED BY
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED WALKING PATH
AS SHOWN.
--,*NO IMPACT TO STREAM
RESULTING FROM
ELEVATED WALK
00�
roe\ O'
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
wwwADsltasoBNons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN PLACE
IMPACT AREA #4
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS, INC.
15501 Weston Parkway - Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1895
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 25, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-6
OF 7

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
— TOP OF BANK
�_.'.'. WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS II UHT V� AIJG UJI H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
APPROXIMATE EXISTING
WATERLINE LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING WETLANDS WILL BE IMPACTED BY
CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
ALONG JUNNY ROAD AS SHOWN.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
wwwADsltasoBNons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN PLACE
IMPACT AREA #5
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS, INC.
15501 Weston Parkway - Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1895
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 25, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-7
OF 7

I:\Taylor Morrison\1895-Camden Place\CIVIL 3D\DWG \1895-DESIGN-SUR.dwg • C3.0 G&EC • 8.10.2022 5:32:05 PM
ALL INLET/OUTLET PROTECTION WILL BE CHECKED FOR
MAINTENANCE AND FAILURE EACH ACTIVE DAY ON SITE.
SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT TRAP AND
INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WHEN THE STORAGE CAPACITY HAS
BEEN APPROXIMATELY 50% FILLED. GRAVEL WILL BE CLEANED
OR REPLACED WHEN THE SEDIMENT POOL NO LONGER DRAINS
PROPERLY. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE
SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES ABOUT 0.5' DEEP AT THE
FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO
MAINTAIN A PROPER BARRIER.
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AND/OR PERMANENT
FACILITIES INTENDED TO CONTROL EROSION OF AND EARTH
DISTURBANCE OPERATION SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY
EARTH DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS TAKE PLACE OR AT THE
EARLIEST POSSIBLE POINT DURING CONSTRUCTION.
TEMPORARY & PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL
BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE DETAILS HEREIN, OR SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL.
THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE NCDEQ
OFFICE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 910-433-3300
REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE
DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS.
REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING
OCCURS.
LOCATE SOIL STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN FIFTY (50) FEET FROM
ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF
REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZE THE
STOCKPILES BY VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS.
CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT
BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES
LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN FIVE
FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE
COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24 HOURS.
MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA
HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE
DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES IMMEDIATELY.
TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DENUDED AREAS
WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED, AND ALL DENUDED AREAS IN
WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN,
WIND AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 14 DAYS. USE SEEDING AND
MULCHING, EROSION CONTROL MATTING, AND/OR SODDING AND
STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS AND OTHERWISE APPROPRIATE
MEASURES. USE EARLY APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON
AREAS TO BE PAVED.
DO NOT REMOVE ANY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES AFTER THE PROTECTED AREA HAS UNDERGONE FINAL
STABILIZATION AND PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN
ESTABLISHED, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT NCDEQ APPROVE THE
ACTION PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED
CONCURRENTLY WITH THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY.
THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL
TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS
AND PERFORMANCE OF ANY OTHER PARTIES PERFORMING WORK
ON THIS PROJECT.
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE
CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN
ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE
IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(2), THE ANGLE FOR GRADED
SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN THE ANGLE
THAT CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER
ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES. IN ANY
EVENT, SLOPES LEFT EXPOSED WILL, WITHIN 7 OR 14 CALENDAR
DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING, BE PLANTED
OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT
GROUND COVER, DEVICES OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO
RESTRAIN EROSION. PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(3), PROVISIONS
FOR PERMANENT GROUND COVER SUFFICIENT TO RETAIN
EROSION MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS
WITHIN 90 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN AND ANY ADDITIONAL MEASURES
REQUIRED TO CONTROL THE SEDIMENT DURING THE COURSE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS
NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS HEREIN.
THE CONTACT PERSON FOR EROSION CONTROL ISSUES THAT
ARISE ON SITE IS MARK ALTMAN. CONTACT 919-407-1232.
APPROXIMATE EXISTING
WATERLINE LOCATION
TBM 4D NAIL #3
N 648,414.527
/ E 2, 078, 276.615
ELEV 351.30
NC GRID NAD 83
LEGEND:
A COUNTY LINE CAP
ECSO ECS-EXISTING COTTON SPINDLE
EIP EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE
EIS 0 EIS -EXISTING IRON STAKE
ERBO ERB-EXISTING REBAR
ERSO ERS-EXISTING RAILROAD SPIKE
SRBO SRB-SET REBAR
COMPUTED POINT
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
OVERHEAD UTILITY
PPS UTILITY POLE
C GUY WIRE
N WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
307 MINOR CONTOUR
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
SILT FENCE LINE
-- JUTE NETTING
- olv - olv - DIVERSION BERM
OINLET PROTECTION
5/8"
ERB,---
I N/F
JACOB BENJAMIN McGUIRE &
JILL ELIZABETH McGUIRE
DB 4003, PG 316
PC# C, SLIDE 176-A
-1 4(1
� J
9$.
/ \
i
N /F
JOHN WILKINS JR & DEBRA WILKINS
DB 2029, PG 565
PB 98, PG 581
SSM, , n I
RIM 308.8 .00
B F 301.4o
INV
INV IN 301.00
INV OUT 300.92
N/F
TONY SLOAN
DB 1946, PG 817
PB 2004, PG 307
N /F
TONY SLOAN
DB 1946, PG 817
PB 2004, PG 307
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN
2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH
PHASE OF THE PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING
FOLLOWED. RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE
INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010.
TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS
AND NPDES SELF -MONITORING REPORTS, DWQ AND DEMLR
DEVELOPED A COMBINED FORM. THE SELF -INSPECTION
PROGRAM IS SEPARATE FROM THE WEEKLY SELF -MONITORING
PROGRAM OF THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE FOCUS OF THE
SELF -INSPECTION REPORT IS THE INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF
THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND
COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE FORM CAN BE ACCESSED AT:
HTTP: //PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE AT (910)
433-3300.
EXISTING
"I" BEAM
OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS AND
HOLD PRE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
INSTALL STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, TEMPORARY
SILT FENCE, TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLETS, AND
DIVERSION BERMS WHERE SPECIFIED.
CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS.
CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE AS NEEDED.
ROUGH GRADE THE SITE AND APPLY TEMPORARY SEEDING
TO AREAS TO REMAIN GRASSED.
INSTALL TEMPORARY CHECK DAMS IN SWALES AS SHOWN.
INSTALL UTILITIES.
INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON ALL NEW STORM WATER
INLETS.
PERFORM FINE GRADING.
INSTALL AND PREPARE BASE COURSE.
PAVE ROADWAYS AND PARKING LOTS.
FERTILIZE, SEED AND MULCH ALL REMAINING DISTURBED
AREAS.
UPON SITE STABILIZATION, SEEK NCDEQ APPROVAL TO
REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES.
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED
AS OUTLINED IN THE DETAILS WITHIN THE PLANS AND
ACCORDING TO THE NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL MANUAL.
TERMINATION OF COVERAGE UNDER THE NPDES GENERAL
STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST
BE REQUESTED BY THE PERMITTEE VIA A NOTICE OF
TERMINATION (NOT). THE NOT IS AVAILABLE AT:
HTTPS: //EDOCS.DEQ.NC.GOV/FORMS/NCG01-TERMINATION.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CLOSE OUT INSPECTION REPORT
MUST BE UPLOADED AS PART OF COMPLETING THE NOTICE
OF TERMINATION PROCESS.
5/8°
ERB
N /F
TERRY SLOAN HOLT
DB 1947, PG 868
PB 2004, PG 307
N /F
TERRY SLOAN
DB 1947, PG
PB 2004, PG
APPROXIMATE EXISTING
WATERLINE LOCATION
SSMH #8128
RIM 316.86
SHELF 306.59
INV OUT 3�.04
oC0
N/F
C. WILKINS, JR. & WIFE,
DEBRA D. WILKINS
DB 2029, PG 565
PB 2000, PG 10
PB 98, PG 581
N/F
LOGAN COURT DEVELOPMENT,
DB 1320, PG 601
PB 98, PG 581
W W /W
W W W W W
ell
W W W W W W W W W , .'
4, W W"\ W W W W , W • W W 4' 4' 4.*"....‘...".4, 4, '',4(.../4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, �4, 4, 4, 4, W W W W W
W W W W W W W W 4,'W W W W I W lj W W W
WWWWW 4W. WWW4, 4, W�WWWWWETLANDS
,W W W W W W W W W 4, W 4
.
�iW W -=��W._.4.WWIWWtWW*4,4,WW.
`4... W W W W W Y
_ii
WARIGWHTOF-'_� YJW W �
WW+ )
-'------
".1,
Know
what's below.
CaII before you dig.
1/2"
ERB
N 647,085.107
E 2,078,321.427
NC GRID NAD 83
(2011)
N /F
GRACE W. WILKINS
DB 2662, PG 598
PC F, SLIDE 640-B
N 647,250.286
E 2,077,856.522
NC GRID NAD 83
(2011)
■
■
�C MMON' 151 UNDARY BE EEN
1-1-AR CTY EFFECTI\ JAN
DB 3667, PG 859 (HA NETT
PB 2018, PG 376 (HA NETT
DB 17332, PG 2561 QNAKE
PB 2018, PG 2448 AKE
_SR 2778 (JUNNY ROAD)
60' PUBLIC R/W
WR
COUNTY LINE
FENO WITH CAP
/ "MON. 14"
N/F
MELBA ARNOLD
DB 12055, PG 1225 11.
PB 1999, PG 472
ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE
BENCHMARK AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE FINISHED
GRADE OF THE CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ALL SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN WALKING SURFACES
SHALL HAVE A CROSS SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2% AND
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 5%.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT AND
MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND CLEAR ANY
DEBRIS LEAVING THE SITE ON NEIGHBORING ROADS.
EXISTING GROUND UPON WHICH FILL OR BASE IS TO BE
PLACED SHALL BE CLEARED OF WEEDS, DEBRIS, TOPSOIL,
AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS; NO FILL SHALL
BE PLACED UNTIL PREPARATION OF THE EXISTING GROUND
HAS BEEN COMPLETED
PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE
CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER TO PROTECT ADJACENT
PROPERTY, THE PUBLIC AND UTILITIES DURING GRADING
OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY FOR
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS, OR
STRUCTURES, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT ON THE PLAN
IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY
THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES ABOVE
AND BELOW GROUND, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE
PLANS. THEY WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE
TO ANY UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES CAUSED BY HIS
OPERATION.
ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BOTH
DURING AND AFTER GRADING BY THE CONTRACTOR TO
DETERMINE IF ANY SLOPE STABILITY PROBLEMS EXIST. IF IT
IS DETERMINED THAT THERE IS A SLOPE STABILITY
PROBLEM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD BE NOTIFIED.
STOCKPILE AREAS THAT WILL EXCEED 10' IN HEIGHT
SHOULD BE GRADED WITH 3:1 SLOPES AND SURROUNDED
BY SILT FENCE.
APPROVED COPIES OF THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL
PLANS SHALL BE ON THE PERMITTED SITE WHILE WORK IS
IN PROGRESS.
ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE COURSES THROUGH THIS SITE
SHALL REMAIN IN A CONDITION SUCH THAT THEY CAN
TRANSPORT THE NATURAL DRAINAGE UNTIL FACILITIES TO
HANDLE THE STORM WATER ARE CONSTRUCTED. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE
DUE TO OBSTRUCTING NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN
SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR
TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHANGE.
ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER THAT EXTEND TEN FEET OR
MORE SHALL BE LINED WITH NORTH AMERICAN GREEN S75
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR EQUAL
SUBSTITUTE.
STORM PIPE DISTANCES SHOWN ARE TO THE CENTER OF
THE BOX FOR ALL STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS
USING THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
N /F
RACHEL BARBOUR DAUGHTRY
DB 7344, PG 242
PB 1997, PG 181
WAKE AND
UARY 1, 2019
COUNTY)
COUNTY)
COUNTY)
COUNTY)
N /F
PEGGY H. JACKSON
DB 15085, PG 1206
SITE AREA
DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
TIME FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITHCES
AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY
WATER (HQW)
ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER
THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR
LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1,
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR
FLATTER
14 DAYS
7-DAYS FOR SLOPES
GREATER THAN 50 FEET
IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS
WITH SLOPES FLATTER
THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE
(EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND
HQW ZONES)
THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL CENTER AT 1-800-632-4949 A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING IN ORDER TO HAVE THE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwAD site solutions.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CAMDEN
PLACE
OVERALL
GRADING AND
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
CLIENT
TAYLOR MORRISON
OF CAROLINAS,
INC.
15501 Weston Parkway - Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1795
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=100'
DATE RELEASED
MAY 19, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
0-3.0