20141056 Ver 1_401 Application_20141002

STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
17BP.7.R.63
ALAMANCE COUNTY
OVER REEDY BRANCH
V
=
=MPH
ADT

INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
FUNC CLASS =
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
DESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
0
00
3
/
12
/
2
0
14
R
:
\
N
C
D
O
T

D
IV
IS
IO
N

7
B

B
R
ID
G
E
S
\
0
0
0
2
4
8
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
\
2
4
8
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
t
s
h
_
1.
d
g
n
U
S
R
S
0
14
16
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
I
O
N
T
A TEOFN RT
C AR
O
LI
N
A
www.summit-engineer.com
Fax: [phone]
Voice: [phone]
Hillsborough, NC 27278-8551
504 Meadowland Drive
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT = 0.061 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.005 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 0.066 MILES
50 25 50 100
50 25 50 100
10 5 10 20
SUB-REGIONAL TIER
Prepared in the Office of:
TRACY N. PARROTT, PE
BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE
2013 240
55
T =% *6
* TTST =3%DUAL 3%
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1-C For Survey Control Sheet
DETOUR ROUTE
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
4
RE
E
D
Y B
RAN
C
H
-L-SR 2354
BRIDGE NO. 000248 ON SR 2354 (QUAKENBUSH RD.)
QUAKENBUSH RD.
LOCAL RURAL
FIRM NO. P-0339
17BP.7.R.63
17BP.7.R.63
17BP.7.R.63
NA
NA
NA
R/W
CONST
PE
SUBMITTAL S-011
RESPONSE S-011
25% PLANS
25% PLANS
NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY
NCDOT TPMU
1
7
B
P
.
7
.
R
.
6
3
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
C
2
0
3
2
7
4
H
o
a
g
i
eCreek
L
n
Cane
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
C
lu
b
D
r
Tr
Braxton
Curve
Tr
DavisMt
R
d
Rd
2334
2348
2345
2357
2405
2327
2358
2435
Chapel
Burnetts
Chapel
Victory
C reek
2354
2354
2347
Church
Spring
PineSouth
M
a
ry
s
Bethlehem
Ch.
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
08/14/13
08/23/13
VICINITY MAP
2352
2351
2352
2356
2351
2356
1005
1004
2359
2345
2346
1004
1003
1003
1003
1005
1004
2335
2338
87
87
kralC
d
R
hsubnekauQ
dR
l
liH
roj
aM 2348
ellesoRdRnamkroW
dR
B ranch
R eedy
dR lliH neerG dR
d
r
a
o
b
h
c
tiw
S
d
lO
lliM y
el
d
niL
dR
nil
w
eN
dR
nL notxar
B
tnasaelP
dR hcruhC
dR lleweJ
ebmaL
dR
etihW
rD
r
e
h
c
a
e
r
P
d
R

n
o
s
t
r
e
b
o
RlehteB
htuoS
kroF
d
R
2351
C
a
ne
Cr
eek
F o r k Branch
yentihW
d
R
d
r
a
k
c
o
t
S
d
R
Marys Creek
niffirG
dR
Church
Bethel
Church
Chatam
Church
Grove
West
Whitney
Eli
Mill
Lindley
n
a
ml
oH
dR lliM
-L- STA. 11+00.00
BEGIN PROJECT
(HOLMAN MILL RD.)
TO SR 2356
(WORKMAN RD.)
TO SR 2358
-L- STA. 12+55.00
END CULVERT
-L- STA. 12+25.00
BEGIN CULVERT
-L- STA. 14+50.00
END PROJECT
Office of:
Prepared in the
[phone] (FAX)
[phone]
Cary, NC 27513
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891
WSP
SHEET 1 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
5
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND CULVERT
SITE
PROJECT
10 11 12 13 14
(-)1.8054%
(+)4.6121%
PI = 12+85.00
EL = 575.92’
VC = 320’
K = 50
DS = 35 mph
EL=579.26
-L- STA 11+00.00
BEGIN GRADE
EL=583.53
-L- STA 14+50.00
END GRADE E
L
=

5
7
7
.7
4
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
6
.0
1
11+
2
5
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
7
.9
2
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
3
.0
2
S
T
A
. 12
+
2
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=
5
7
5
.6
0
P
I
=
11+
2
5
.0
0

L
T
E
L
=
5
7
4
.7
1
P
I
=
11+
5
0
.0
0

L
T
(-
)
8.
5
600
%
(
-
)
3
.5600%
(-) 2.4143%
(-
)
7.
6400%
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
G
A
T
E
BW
BW
B
W
BW
B
W
BW
15" CMP
SR 2354 - QUAKENBUSH RD
18.5’ BST
1
2
ELEV=602.41’
LOW POINT
AERIAL LINE
AERIAL
AERIAL
AERIAL
13
’ GR
TO WORKMAN RD
TO HOLMAN RD
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.
0
0
’
6
0
.
0
0
’
R
E
E
DY
B
R
A
N
C
H
T
OB
TOB
C
L
IV
18
" R
C
P
T
O
B
WOODS
SR 2354 - QUAKENBUSH RD
18.5’ BST
ELEV=602.41’
LOW POINT
AERIAL LINE
AERIAL
B
R
A
N
C
H
R
E
V
IS
IO
N
S

DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
Office of:
Prepared in the
NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
[phone] - [phone] (FAX)
Hillsborough, NC 27278
504 Meadowlands Drive
Office of:
Prepared in the
[phone] (FAX)
[phone]
Cary, NC 27513
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891
WSP
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
217BP.7.R.63
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
9
/
4
/
2
0
14
R
:
\
N
C
D
O
T

D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

7
B

B
R
I
D
G
E
S
\
0
0
0
2
4
8
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
\
2
4
8
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
p
s
h
_
2
.
d
g
n
u
s
r
s
0
1
4
1
6
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
= 800
= 25
= 576.0
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
SHEET 2 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SCALE 1"=50’
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
-L- SR 2354 (QUAKENBUSH ROAD)
600
590
580
570
560
550
540
ELEV. = 578.06
PROP. 100 YR.
BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
0 EXISTING RD
OR EQUIVALENT
1 @ 30’ X 3.5’ CROWNSPAN
ELEV. = 571.38
AT CENTERLINE
TOP OF FOOTING
ELEV. = 576.0
PROP. 25 YR.
DATE: 7-01-13
NWS ELEV. = 570.48
(JUNE 2012)
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
ROCK LINE PER
PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY
SEE DETAIL A
STA. 12+20 -L- LT
STA. 11+60 TO
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL D
STA. 11+60 -L- LT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
STA. 11+25 -L- RT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
( Not to Scale)
LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1 D
B
b
d
2:1 1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+60 LT
DETAIL D
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0’
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
( Not to Scale)
2:12:
1 D
B
b
LATERAL BASE DITCH
1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+60 TO STA. 12+20 LT
DETAIL A
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
D
d
2:
1
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+25 -L- RT
DETAIL C
Max. d= 1.25 Ft.
Min. D= 0.75 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL B Rip-Rap
Slope
Fill
Flatter4:1 or
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
EEP MITIGATION SITE
= 4.43 fps
10
V
= 4.34 FPS5V
= 4.17 FPS
2
V
= 3.28/4.83 FPS10V
= 3.22/4.74 FPS5V
= 3.11/4.57 FPS2V
= 3.92/5.39 FPS
10
V
= 3.85/5.29 FPS5V
= 3.70/5.08 FPS
2
V
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
401
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
FF F
F
10 11 12 13 14
(-)1.8054%
(+)4.6121%
PI = 12+85.00
EL = 575.92’
VC = 320’
K = 50
DS = 35 mph
EL=579.26
-L- STA 11+00.00
BEGIN GRADE
EL=583.53
-L- STA 14+50.00
END GRADE E
L
=

5
7
7
.7
4
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
6
.0
1
11+
2
5
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
7
.9
2
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
3
.0
2
S
T
A
. 12
+
2
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=
5
7
5
.6
0
P
I
=
11+
2
5
.0
0

L
T
E
L
=
5
7
4
.7
1
P
I
=
11+
5
0
.0
0

L
T
(-
)
8.
5
600
%
(
-
)
3
.5600%
(-) 2.4143%
(-
)
7.
6400%
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
G
A
T
E
BW
BW
B
W
BW
B
W
BW
15" CMP
SR 2354 - QUAKENBUSH RD
18.5’ BST
1
2
ELEV=602.41’
LOW POINT
AERIAL LINE
AERIAL
AERIAL
AERIAL
13
’ GR
TO WORKMAN RD
TO HOLMAN RD
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.
0
0
’
6
0
.
0
0
’
R
E
E
DY
B
R
A
N
C
H
T
OB
TOB
C
L
IV
18
" R
C
P
5
6
8
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
7
0
570
570
5
7
0
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
5735
7
3
573
5
7
4 574
5
7
5
575
575
575
5
7
6
576
5
7
7
T
O
B
WOODS
SR 2354 - QUAKENBUSH RD
18.5’ BST
ELEV=602.41’
LOW POINT
AERIAL LINE
AERIAL
B
R
A
N
C
H
5
6
8
5
6
8
569
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
7
0
570
570
570
5
70
570
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
572
573
5
7
3
5
7
3
573
573
5
7
4
574
574
574
5
7
5
575
5
7
5
5
7
5
5
7
5
575
575
575
5
7
6
5
7
6
576
5
7
6
5
7
7
5
7
7
5
7
7
577
5
7
7
578
5
7
8
578
578
579
579
579
579
580
580
580
5
8
0
5
8
0
580
5
8
0
5
8
0
581
581
581
582
582
5
8
3
5
8
3
583
584
584
584
585
5
8
5
585
586 5
8
6
5
8
6
5
8
7
5
8
7
5
8
7
5
8
8 5
8
8
5
8
9
R
E
V
IS
IO
N
S

DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
Office of:
Prepared in the
NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
[phone] - [phone] (FAX)
Hillsborough, NC 27278
504 Meadowlands Drive
Office of:
Prepared in the
[phone] (FAX)
[phone]
Cary, NC 27513
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891
WSP
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
317BP.7.R.63
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
9
/
4
/
2
0
14
R
:
\
N
C
D
O
T

D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

7
B

B
R
I
D
G
E
S
\
0
0
0
2
4
8
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
\
2
4
8
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
p
s
h
_
3
.
d
g
n
u
s
r
s
0
1
4
1
6
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
= 800
= 25
= 576.0
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
SHEET 3 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SCALE 1"=50’
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
-L- SR 2354 (QUAKENBUSH ROAD)
600
590
580
570
560
550
540
ELEV. = 578.06
PROP. 100 YR.
BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
0 EXISTING RD
OR EQUIVALENT
1 @ 30’ X 3.5’ CROWNSPAN
ELEV. = 571.38
AT CENTERLINE
TOP OF FOOTING
ELEV. = 576.0
PROP. 25 YR.
DATE: 7-01-13
NWS ELEV. = 570.48
(JUNE 2012)
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
ROCK LINE PER
PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY
SEE DETAIL A
STA. 12+20 -L- LT
STA. 11+60 TO
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL D
STA. 11+60 -L- LT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
STA. 11+25 -L- RT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
( Not to Scale)
2:12:
1 D
B
b
LATERAL BASE DITCH
1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+60 TO STA. 12+20 LT
DETAIL A
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
( Not to Scale)
LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1 D
B
b
d
2:1 1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+60 LT
DETAIL D
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0’
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
D
d
2:
1
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+25 -L- RT
DETAIL C
Max. d= 0.75 Ft.
Min. D= 0.75 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL B Rip-Rap
Slope
Fill
Flatter4:1 or
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
EEP MITIGATION SITE
= 4.43 fps
10
V
= 4.34 FPS5V
= 4.17 FPS
2
V
= 3.28/4.83 FPS10V
= 3.22/4.74 FPS5V
= 3.11/4.57 FPS2V
= 3.92/5.39 FPS10
V
= 3.85/5.29 FPS5V
= 3.70/5.08 FPS2
V
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
401
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
FF F
F
5
6
8
5
6
8
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
7
0
570
570
5
7
0
570
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
572
573
5
7
3
5
7
3
573
573
5
7
4
574
574
5
7
4
5
7
5
575
5
7
5
575
575
575
5
7
6
5
7
6
576
5
7
6
5
7
7
5
7
7
577
5
7
7
578
578
579
579
579
580
580
580
5
8
0
580
5
8
0
5
8
0
581
581
581
582
582
5
8
3
5
8
3
583
584
584
585
5
8
5
585
586 5
8
6
5
8
6
5
8
7
5
8
7
5
8
7
5
8
8
5
8
9
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
G
A
T
E
BW
BW
B
W
BW
B
W
BW
15" CMP
SR 2354 - QUAKENBUSH RD
18.5’ BST
1
2
ELEV=602.41’
LOW POINT
AERIAL LINE
AERIAL
AERIAL
AERIAL
13
’ G
R
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.
0
0
’
6
0
.
0
0
’
B
R
A
N
C
H
T
O
B
TOB
C
L
IV
18
" R
C
P
DRAINAGE OUTLETS.
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECKS TYPE - A AT
FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES MANUAL
REQUIREMENTS IN THE NCDOT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
BRIDGE REMOVAL AND CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PER
NOTE:
DRAINAGE OUTLETS.
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECKS TYPE - A AT
FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES MANUAL
REQUIREMENTS IN THE NCDOT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
BRIDGE REMOVAL AND CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PER
NOTE:
DIKE
IMPERVIOUS
PIPE
TEMPORARY
24 INCH
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
DIKE
IMPERVIOUS
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
CONSTRUCTION SHEET 4
EROSION CONTROL FOR
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
EC-4/CONST.4
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
17BP.7.R.63
-L- STA. 11+00.00
BEGIN PROJECT
DIKE
IMPERVIOUS
DIKE
IMPERVIOUS
COMPLETE ROADWAY.7.
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S).
REMOVE TEMP. IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PIPE, AND 6.
PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES.
RESULTED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM STREAM THAT 5.
INSTALL CLASS I RIPRAP ALONG WINGWALLS.4.
CULVERT AND CONSTRUCT WINGWALLS.
PLACE PRECAST SECTIONS OF BOTTOMLESS3.
CONSTRUCT CHANNEL AND ARMOR CHANNEL EMBANKMENTS.2.
CONSTRUCT FOOTINGS.1.
STAGE II
-L- STA. 14+50.00
END PROJECT
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
30’X3.5’ RC BOTTOMLESS CULVERT 30’X3.5’ RC BOTTOMLESS CULVERT
SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA
INTO SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S).
DEWATER AREA BEHIND IMPERVIOUS DIKES
NO DEBRIS TO ENTER STREAM.
REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE ALLOWING6.
BASIN(S).
DEWATER CONSTRUCTION AREA INTO SPECIAL STILLING5.
CONSTRUCT IMPERVIOUS DIKE DOWNSTREAM.4.
AS SHOWN.
PLACE TEMP. FLEXIBLE PIPE ALONG EXISTING CHANNEL 3.
CONSTRUCT TEMP. IMPERVIOUS DIKE UPSTREAM.2.
UTILIZE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AS NECESSARY.1.
STAGE I
SHEET 4 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
EEP MITIGATION SITE
FCW
FCW
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
GRAU 350 TL-3
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
401
F F
F
F
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. ExcavationMechanized ClearingPermanent Temp. ChannelChannelNatural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts ImpactsStream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlandsin Wetlands Wetlands impacts impactsPermanentTemp.Design
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft)
12+29 to 12+51 CL
12+24 to 12+49 -LT
12+22 to 12+50 -RT-
excavation/channel
realignmentfor bottomless
culvert, floodpain bench,
stabilization and temporary pipe
and impervious dikes 0.03 0.01 64 20
TOTALS:0.03 0.01 64 20
ATN Revised 3/31/05 SHEET 5 OF 5 7/1/2014
ALAMANCE COUNTY
WBS - 17BP.7.R.63 (000248)
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS
Bridge No. 248 Over Reedy Branch on SR 2354
Quakenbush Rd
SR 2354 - QUAKENBUSH RD
18.5’ BST
TO WORKMAN RD
TO HOLMAN RD

STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
17BP.7.R.63
ALAMANCE COUNTY
OVER REEDY BRANCH
V
=
=MPH
ADT

INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
FUNC CLASS =
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
DESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
0
00
3
/
12
/
2
0
14
R
:
\
N
C
D
O
T

D
IV
IS
IO
N

7
B

B
R
ID
G
E
S
\
0
0
0
2
4
8
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
u
f
f
e
r
s
\
2
4
8
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
b
u
f
_
t
s
h
_
1.
d
g
n
U
S
R
S
0
14
16
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
I
O
N
T
A TEOFN RT
C AR
O
LI
N
A
www.summit-engineer.com
Fax: [phone]
Voice: [phone]
Hillsborough, NC 27278-8551
504 Meadowland Drive
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT = 0.061 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.005 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 0.066 MILES
50 25 50 100
50 25 50 100
10 5 10 20
SUB-REGIONAL TIER
Prepared in the Office of:
TRACY N. PARROTT, PE
BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE
2013 240
55
T =% *6
* TTST =3%DUAL 3%
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1-C For Survey Control Sheet
DETOUR ROUTE
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
4
RE
E
D
Y B
RAN
C
H
-L-SR 2354
BRIDGE NO. 000248 ON SR 2354 (QUAKENBUSH RD.)
QUAKENBUSH RD.
LOCAL RURAL
FIRM NO. P-0339
17BP.7.R.63
17BP.7.R.63
17BP.7.R.63
NA
NA
NA
R/W
CONST
PE
SUBMITTAL S-011
RESPONSE S-011
25% PLANS
25% PLANS
NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY
NCDOT TPMU
1
7
B
P
.
7
.
R
.
6
3
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
C
2
0
3
2
7
4
H
o
a
g
i
eCreek
L
n
Cane
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
C
lu
b
D
r
Tr
Braxton
Curve
Tr
DavisMt
R
d
Rd
2334
2348
2345
2357
2405
2327
2358
2435
Chapel
Burnetts
Chapel
Victory
C reek
2354
2354
2347
Church
Spring
PineSouth
M
a
ry
s
Bethlehem
Ch.
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
08/14/13
08/23/13
VICINITY MAP
SITE
PROJECT
2352
2351
2352
2356
2351
2356
1005
1004
2359
2345
2346
1004
1003
1003
1003
1005
1004
2335
2338
87
87
kralC
d
R
hsubnekauQ
dR
l
liH
roj
aM 2348
ellesoRdRnamkroW
dR
B ranch
R eedy
dR lliH neerG dR
d
r
a
o
b
h
c
tiw
S
d
lO
lliM y
el
d
niL
dR
nil
w
eN
dR
nL notxar
B
tnasaelP
dR hcruhC
dR lleweJ
ebmaL
dR
etihW
rD
r
e
h
c
a
e
r
P
d
R

n
o
s
t
r
e
b
o
RlehteB
htuoS
kroF
d
R
2351
C
a
ne
Cr
eek
F o r k Branch
yentihW
d
R
d
r
a
k
c
o
t
S
d
R
Marys Creek
niffirG
dR
Church
Bethel
Church
Chatam
Church
Grove
West
Whitney
Eli
Mill
Lindley
n
a
ml
oH
dR lliM
-L- STA. 11+00.00
BEGIN PROJECT
(HOLMAN MILL RD.)
TO SR 2356
(WORKMAN RD.)
TO SR 2358
-L- STA. 12+55.00
END CULVERT
-L- STA. 12+25.00
BEGIN CULVERT
-L- STA. 14+50.00
END PROJECT
Office of:
Prepared in the
[phone] (FAX)
[phone]
Cary, NC 27513
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891
WSP
SHEET 1 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
4
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND CULVERT
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.
0
0
’
6
0
.
0
0
’
R
E
E
DY
B
R
A
N
C
H
T
O
B
TOB
C
L
IV
18
" R
C
P
T
O
B
TOB
C
L
IV
18
" R
C
P
B
R
A
N
C
H
10 11 12 13 14
(-)1.8054%
(+)4.6121%
PI = 12+85.00
EL = 575.92’
VC = 320’
K = 50
DS = 35 mph
EL=579.26
-L- STA 11+00.00
BEGIN GRADE
EL=583.53
-L- STA 14+50.00
END GRADE E
L
=

5
7
7
.7
4
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
6
.0
1
11+
2
5
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
7
.9
2
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
3
.0
2
S
T
A
. 12
+
2
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=
5
7
5
.6
0
P
I
=
11+
2
5
.0
0

L
T
E
L
=
5
7
4
.7
1
P
I
=
11+
5
0
.0
0

L
T
(-)
8.
5
60
0%
(
-
)
3
.5600%
(-) 2.4143%
(-
)
7.
6400%

SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
217BP.7.R.63
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
9
/
4
/
2
0
14
R
:
\
N
C
D
O
T

D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

7
B

B
R
I
D
G
E
S
\
0
0
0
2
4
8
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
u
f
f
e
r
s
\
2
4
8
_
H
Y
D
_
p
r
m
_
b
u
f
_
p
s
h
_
2
.
d
g
n
u
s
r
s
0
1
4
1
6
-L- SR 2354 (QUAKENBUSH ROAD)
600
590
580
570
560
550
540
ELEV. = 578.06
PROP. 100 YR.
BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
0 EXISTING RD
OR EQUIVALENT
1 @ 30’ X 3.5’ CROWNSPAN
ELEV. = 571.38
AT CENTERLINE
TOP OF FOOTING
ELEV. = 576.0
PROP. 25 YR.
DATE: 7-01-13
NWS ELEV. = 570.48
(JUNE 2012)
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
ROCK LINE PER
PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY
SHEET 2 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
Office of:
Prepared in the
[phone] (FAX)
[phone]
Cary, NC 27513
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891
WSP
Office of:
Prepared in the
NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
[phone] - [phone] (FAX)
Hillsborough, NC 27278
504 Meadowlands Drive
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
SCALE 1"=50’
SEE DETAIL C
STA. 11+25 -L- RT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
= 800
= 25
= 576.0
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
SEE DETAIL D
STA. 11+60 -L- LT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
STA. 12+20 -L- LT
STA. 11+60 TO
LATERAL BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1 D
B
b
d
2:1 1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+60 LT
DETAIL D
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0’
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
( Not to Scale)
2:12:
1 D
B
b
LATERAL BASE DITCH
1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+60 TO STA. 12+20 LT
DETAIL A
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
D
d
2:
1
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+25 -L- RT
DETAIL C
Max. d= 0.75 Ft.
Min. D= 0.75 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL B Rip-Rap
Slope
Fill
Flatter4:1 or
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
EEP MITIGATION SITE
EEP MITIGATION SITE
= 4.43 fps10V
= 4.34 FPS5V
= 4.17 FPS2V
= 3.28/4.83 FPS10V
= 3.22/4.74 FPS5V
= 3.11/4.57 FPS2V
= 3.92/5.39 FPS
10
V
= 3.85/5.29 FPS5V
= 3.70/5.08 FPS2
V
401
401
F
FF
5
6
8
5
6
8
569
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
7
0
570
570
570
5
7
0
570
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
572
573
5
7
3
5
7
3
573
573
5
7
4
574
574
574
5
7
5
575
5
7
5
5
7
5
5
7
5
575
575
575
5
7
6
5
7
6
576
5
7
6
5
7
7
5
7
7
5
7
7
577
5
7
7
578
5
7
8
578
578
579
579
579
579
580
580
580
5
8
0
5
8
0
580
5
8
0
5
8
0
581
581
581
582
582
5
8
3
5
8
3
583
584
584
584
585
5
8
5
585
586 5
8
6
5
8
6
5
8
7
5
8
7
5
8
7
5
8
8 5
8
8
5
8
9
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.
0
0
’
6
0
.
0
0
’
R
E
E
DY
B
R
A
N
C
H
T
OB
TOB
C
L
IV
18
" R
C
P
5
6
8
5
6
8
569
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
7
0
570
570
5
7
0
570
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
1
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
572
5735
7
3
573
5
7
4 574
5
7
5
575
575
575
5
7
6
576
5
7
7
578
5795
8
0
581
T
O
B
TOB
C
L
IV
18
" R
C
P
30.08’
B
R
A
N
C
H
10 11 12 13 14
(-)1.8054%
(+)4.6121%
PI = 12+85.00
EL = 575.92’
VC = 320’
K = 50
DS = 35 mph
EL=579.26
-L- STA 11+00.00
BEGIN GRADE
EL=583.53
-L- STA 14+50.00
END GRADE E
L
=

5
7
7
.7
4
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
6
.0
1
11+
2
5
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
7
.9
2
11+
0
0
.0
0

-
L
-

R
T
B
E
G
I
N

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=

5
7
3
.0
2
S
T
A
. 12
+
2
0
.0
0

-
L
-

L
T
E
N
D

D
I
T
C
H

G
R
A
D
E
E
L
=
5
7
5
.6
0
P
I
=
11+
2
5
.0
0

L
T
E
L
=
5
7
4
.7
1
P
I
=
11+
5
0
.0
0

L
T
(-
)
8.
5
600
%
(
-
)
3
.5600%
(-) 2.4143%
(-
)
7.
6400%

SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
317BP.7.R.63
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
9
/
4
/
2
0
14
R
:
\
N
C
D
O
T

D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

7
B

B
R
I
D
G
E
S
\
0
0
0
2
4
8
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
u
f
f
e
r
s
\
2
4
8
_
H
Y
D
_
p
r
m
_
b
u
f
_
p
s
h
_
3
.
d
g
n
u
s
r
s
0
1
4
1
6
-L- SR 2354 (QUAKENBUSH ROAD)
600
590
580
570
560
550
540
ELEV. = 578.06
PROP. 100 YR.
BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
0 EXISTING RD
OR EQUIVALENT
1 @ 30’ X 3.5’ CROWNSPAN
ELEV. = 571.38
AT CENTERLINE
TOP OF FOOTING
ELEV. = 576.0
PROP. 25 YR.
DATE: 7-01-13
NWS ELEV. = 570.48
(JUNE 2012)
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
ROCK LINE PER
PROFILE VIEW ALONG ROADWAY
SHEET 3 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
Office of:
Prepared in the
[phone] (FAX)
[phone]
Cary, NC 27513
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0891
WSP
Office of:
Prepared in the
NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
[phone] - [phone] (FAX)
Hillsborough, NC 27278
504 Meadowlands Drive
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
SCALE 1"=50’
SEE DETAIL A
STA. 12+20 -L- LT
STA. 11+60 TO
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
STA. 11+25 -L- RT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
SEE DETAIL D
STA. 11+60 -L- LT
STA. 11+00 TO
W/RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
= 800
= 25
= 576.0
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
= 1200
= 100
= 578.08
( Not to Scale)
LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1 D
B
b
d
2:1 1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+60 LT
DETAIL D
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0’
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
( Not to Scale)
2:12:
1 D
B
b
LATERAL BASE DITCH
1"/Ft.
FROM STA. 11+60 TO STA. 12+20 LT
DETAIL A
b= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
D
d
2:
1
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+25 -L- RT
DETAIL C
Max. d= 0.75 Ft.
Min. D= 0.75 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL B Rip-Rap
Slope
Fill
Flatter4:1 or
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
EEP MITIGATION SITE
EEP MITIGATION SITE
= 3.28/4.83 FPS10V
= 3.22/4.74 FPS5V
= 3.11/4.57 FPS2V
= 3.92/5.39 FPS10V
= 3.85/5.29 FPS5V
= 3.70/5.08 FPS2V
= 4.43 fps10V
= 4.34 FPS5V
= 4.17 FPS2V
401
401
F
ROAD
CROSSINGBRIDGE
PARALLEL
IMPACT
ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
Road Fill and Clearing
11+20 to 12+25 -LT-
12+55 to 13+03 -LT-
11+65 to 12+25 -RT-
12+55 to 13+04 -RT-X 1638.0 1299.0 2937.0
Bridge Fill and
Clearing
12+25 to 12+28 -LT-
12+49 to 12+55 -LT-
12+25 to 12+29 -RT-
12+46 to 12+55 -RT- X 246.0 246.0
TOTAL:1884.0 1299.0 3183.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SHEET 4 OF 4
PROJECT: 17BP.7.R.63 (000248)
7/1/2014
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

ALAMANCE COUNTY
Bridge No. 248 Over Reedy Branch on SR 2354
Quakenbush Rd
IMPACT
BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
TYPE
SITE NO.
STRUCTURE SIZE /
TYPE
STATION
(FROM/TO)
ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE
BUFFER
REPLACEMENT
Rev. May 2006
NO PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC PROPERTIES

PRESENT/AFFECTED FORM

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project No: Str#000248 County: Alamance
WBSNo: 17BP.7.R.57 Document: PCE orCE
F.A. No: nla Funding: I:8J State D Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? I:8J Yes D No Permit Type: NWP 3 or NWP14
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 248 over Reedy Branch on SR2354 (Quakenbush Rd) in Alamance
County,North Carolina. The archaeological APE(Area of Potential Effects) for the project measures 600ft in length
(300ft from each bridge end-point) by 150ft in width (75ft laterally from each side of the SR2354 center-line). As
currently proposed, the project will constitute an in-place replacement with minor ditch-line impacts. An off-site
detour will be utilized during construction activities.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
TheNorth Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)reviewed the subject project anddetermined:
Historic Architecture/Landscapes
D There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential effects.
D There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the
project's area of potential effects.
D There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
D There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not meet the criteria for
listing on the National Register.
D All properties greater than 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered and all compliance for historic
architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for
this project.
D There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed)
Archaeology
~ There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential effects.
~ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
D Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
D Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the
National Register.
D All identified Archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for
archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been
completed for this project.
~ There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed)
"No Historic Properues Present" form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology on Thursday, June 21, 2012.
One previously recorded archaeological site (31AM384) is located relatively proximal to the project study area. The
Joseph Vincent (1856-1922) house and kiln site is located in a wooded area surrounded by an earthen mound in an
area just south of Quakenbush Road. As some of the chamber walls were still intact, the feature was interpreted to
be a rectangular groundhog kiln which was probably loaded from the side. Two heavily glazed brick fragments and
an Albany-slipped basal sherd were collected from the site during the survey. Joseph Vincent worked at this
pottery shop with his brother-in-law Timothy Boggs and later, Joseph's sons Cesco and Turner also became potters
and built their own shop which operated there until the 1930's (Zugg 1986; 30). Further work was recommended
for the resource (Carnes 1986).
A review of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study List (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined
Eligible (DE) and Surveyed Site (SS) properties was next accomplished utilizing resources available on the NCSHPO
website. This search located numerous surveyed site locations nearby but determined that no significant historic
resources containing potential archaeological deposits, features, or artifatcs were subsumed within the APE or
immediately adjacent. Topographic, L1DAR, USDA soil survey (HdD, HdC2, Mc), and historic maps of the project
area were inspected, as were aerial photographs, and historical/archaeological reference materials. Additionally,
the Google Street View map application was utilized to gain a first-hand, in-field perpective of the ground surfaces
and disturbances present within and abutting the project APE. Together, this data was employed to determine the
likelihood of past prehistoric or historic occupation within the APE. Overall, the topographical, pedeological, and
hydrological attributes of the defined APE boundaries are considered very low for cultural habitation, particularly
to the prehistoric end. The poorly drained and eroded project soil types hold little potential of containing intact
and meaningful deposits eligible for inclusion to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). However, because
of the proximity of an important historic pottery kiln and workshop to the west, the cultural resource specialist
recommends a reconnaissance of the project area to determine if any related deposits or artifacts lie within the
defined APE.
Investigation of the project area was completed on Thursday, June 19, 2012. First, a reconnaissance or walk-over of
the entire APE was conducted to identify any above-ground archaeological or historical remains, note &
photograph the conditions within the project study area, and determine the level of subsurface investigation, if
any, necessary for project compliance. This preemptive audit evidenced poorly drained, eroded, or sloping ground
surfaces, all coupled with elements of disturbance. No above-ground remains nor artifacts potentially related to
pottery manufacture were observed within, or even in areas adjacent to the bridge replacement locale. Since
those areas within the defined APE held little to no potential for containing significant archaeological resources, no
subsurface shovel testing was conducted in exertion of the Bridge 248 archaeological assessment.
Following in-field investigation and inspection of the Bridge 248 replacement location in Alamance County, North
Carolina, the cultural resource specialist recommends that no further archaeological work is necessary for the
project as proposed. The disturbed character of the existing right-of-way corridor and those areas adjacent to it,
and the diminutive and restricted nature of the construction effort make it highly unlikely that any significant,
NRHP eligible cultural resources or archaeological sites would be present within the APE.
OONo Historic Properties Presenttform for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in (he 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

See attached : Map(s),Previous Survey Info ,Photos,Correspondence,Photocopy of notes from survey.

Signed:
Cultural Resources Specialist, NCDOT Date
"No Historic PropertiesPresent "f orm for Min or Transportation Projects as Qualified inthe 2 007Programmati c Ag reement.
NCDOTArchaeology & Historic Architecture Group s
.' .

«NUM»

---
---_ _' 1 8 80000 FEE T I 64·4 79°22'
-:..:..: ~ \3
39 j
77
FE
5 0 '
o)1
3966
c:J
-/--,y o '/ I
/I
Bridge 248/ Alamance

AN~13 CaM Cntek D.m
"'110071 Cine C'en Collen Uil
AlenHcute tIJ1. Clire Ctftt Celton"',. Hcu1C
AY 1£.&.4 HcmllnHrK&e
EJld{_1_ • ~-L ...,1
JiIICD27Natfl. "Alcn H:-...e
l!'Sl St ... Ho....
~ S Cc<dT....pI"'l.odS'OHII o
AIl CC2" J ~n ,. ttc m _ H twe
AIID:.\1SDr NHu: Houu
",..
•10loi01 '. Hil Chloltll ~'Gc ••) AlJ C1 ~9 Grl\~ HII Sdlool
All0tll8 C""!Ieo SIulrt L.g H.... I Sj4_p.~ L.A MA N C E
AIa'01 '''Rev.[ ncd'l Cnt.d'lkfdH""(Gene}
AM tt-azSimonH,'" 1ib. 1Ie HDli.I .
<',>
AIIl1ll:6lA1ylol Hc. . A1J Q 7H_ IJsP~H"".

0 0

-e ..,l
~.,,,,
..''" .. 01 J \Y H"eyH aMe
E

o

All J..... ltg H
\ '"
c
•c ....'. ..'t
• 1'00 lJlq T_
AU ~. 'i T eM Farm
III79 AIocH0lgey Ho...
" p.tAlHAM
I '",....t",i 1... .:f"
Copyright 2011 Esri . All rights reserved . Fri Jul20 2012 01 :13 :27 PM .
JNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
J VI~ -
.ale 1 : 20 000
"0
'< §.

~ o
vi
:i '
~
.~ I
'" C ' .g f
~~ o '
" '0 .
'"
~.
D
•
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL I!z.. 0",-b 047 1
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
MEMORANDUM TO:

ATTENTION:

FROM :

SUBJECT:

DATE:

Drew Joyner, Human Environment Unit
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
Mary Pope Furr, Historic Architecture Supervisor ENTERED JUN 1 Z01L
Pamela R . Williams
Priority Projects Engineer
Reque st for Cultural Resources Review
May 9, 2012
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No : Str. # 000248 County: ALAMANCE
LIDR data Sheet (PCE) or
WBSNo: 17BP.7.R.57 Document: Minimum Criteria checklist
F.A. No: N/A Funding: [8J State o Federal
USGS Quad: CRUTCHFIELD CROSSROADS
Project Description: BRIDGE #248 OVER REEDY BRANCH ON SR 2354 Q (,loa. t~r? j,CAj l-: f2 J .
Replace structure in kind. There will be minor ditch-line impacts. Area of potential effects is 75' either
side from the centerline of the roadway/bridge and 300' from either end of the bridge.
Purpose & Need: Bridge is in poor condition and selected to be replaced under the State Funded Bridge
Replacement Program-Design-Build Year 2.
SCHEDULING AND CONTACT INFORMATION
Date Needed: 07/11/2012
Engineer: Pam Williams Tel [phone] Email [e-mail]
DESIGN INFORMATION
Proje ct L ength: Approximately 500 feet
Exist. R/W 60 feet or from ditch line to
ditch line maintained Proposed R/W: Varies
Exist. Speed Limit: N/A Proposed Speed Limit: N/A
Exist. X-Section : One lane in each direction
Detour Route : Off-Site
Structure Type : Bridge Year Built: 1958
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Str. 000248
WBS No: 17BP.7.R.57
County:
Document
Project Tracking No. (Internal UseJ
12-06-0047
Alamance
PCE or Minimum Criteria Checklist
F.A. No: N/A Funding: � State ❑ Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? � Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP3 or NWP14
Project Description: Bridge No. 248 over Reedy Branch on SR 2354 (Quakenbush Rd.).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on June 19, 2012. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 75' either side of the centerline and 300' from each
end of the bridge. Alamance County GIS/Tax information indicates that there are no properties over fifty
years of age within the APE, and Google Maps Street view confirms that there are modern mobile homes
and prefabricated homes in the area. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties within
the APE, and no survey is required. In addition, Bridge No. 248 is not NR eligible based on the NCDOT
Historic Bridge Inventory. If design plans change, additional review will be reyuired.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Alamance
County survey, Alamance County GIS/Tax information, and Google Maps Street View are considered
valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no
National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Maps.
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED
ARCHAEOLOGY ISTORIC AR HC ITEC UT�RE � (CIRCLE ONE)
Cultural Resources Specialist
"No Survey Requn•ed"form forMinar Transportalron Projecls as Qualifted rn 1he 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Hrstoric Archilecla�re Groups
�l
Date

12-06-0047
.�.�
� 1
\ "'" 1
HPO GIS Website
�
���.� � ,: ,R„
� ��
�I 1 I�I i l{� Y f^t,
y �d'.:�:. ( � f. ' '� _ �
� ��.� '� .��+ .�- � �.��... _ , -
� �� ,.�
� ._ u, , -
.t �:._ � �-;, ; ..
.
- ,. . �., , . ..
,� _
��. :
_ �, .
;rb� � �� � .
� � �� � _ .� � �q � . ��
;�, � . � ',,�„��`�� � -' � x � _
�; � � � � " ,,;.; ��
$ ,
.
.: � � � ��� . ., K - -° �.�
.�c � �. � � � ,, z , 5 � `��
� � : •. � y� � 3 � � ;,�
°:.. _.
� �.;� " � .�.�.�: . ° u� '�.:.�.��� -� r x ��, .. -�� .
:� � *`: � �S i�,.F�s �
„ ;,e�;; � . � � x "� = x � �;sw k 'i� ��'' _ .
- � a - � + ' ` , -�,.. °�
��� � � � �: � . ; y��. •�: ,
� �. '���.
-�,.aa �' u.. ,g =Me'x�v f�.::��- -�'>• .. � � . __
�
�.,i�; ,. ,i-;.'ii:, .�,...'.an i � � ::`" _n�;l. .�._ . � . .: ._, ..:
. ,. ..,�.. u. . . ...._ ., . ,... ...._:. .�,_ .r.
Mobile Homes and Manufactures Homes, northeast quadrant of bride crossing.
Looking north.
„No S:uvey Reguired" fornr fm• Mina• 7ransportation Projects as Q:ralrfied ii� d�e 2007 Yrogramnalrc Agreen:en(.
NCDOT Archaeology & Hislorrc A�•chi�ecrure Grm�ps

12-06-0047
;1y �1k��t, ' ti��l) �
. \ �1 � � '�,�� _.
. _ "' ",\ _ ,�. :
n � � ' ` �� 1
�, ..- � ,` � .` ` , -�,;;�/' ��,
� � ` , .
�, '��
�� t i � { ,� ! ��;1
a
. ,
. �. _L `�•.,._ iti�
, � � .
_ . .. �..� �_ ,.,
_ � _ �. __-. -- __ . �_ , .
a
, . . - --� � -_=� �..::�;w,� 99
; i
°y� \ \ � i .. 7 Y.f . . , ': _"
ry,` ' �� � ��� � � . '
� �":.�. .,t `i} \ ��'i,�.
� < f
�`�. . . .... � � �1
}+�p��' ' ` ''�-A/`A ''
, � �l. �'�'y � -�. `� f� ;,
✓ ±� �',
`.�\. '`•„✓, `� E��' ,�.1
.,
t �� ' � � '
�....�
. .- � �A
�� '\ -�.,"' _ � . -�., �
', :� _ f � k . �.
_ _ ��� ;: a r� � �—
. �� ,
;
Bridge No. 248, 1974 Quad Map.
"No S:uvey Required"fav� fa�Minor Transporlalion Projects as Qualified in 1he 2007 Progranmiatic Agreemenl.
NCD07' Archaeology & Historic Archilechu•e Groups

«NUM»