20181034 Ver 1_Notice of As-Built Review_20220902

Hamilton, Ryan
From:Davis, Erin B
Sent:Wednesday, September 7, 2022 1:18 PM
To:Hamilton, Ryan
Subject:FW: \[External\] Notice of As-Built Review/ NCDMS UT to Rush Fork Mitigation Project/
SAW-2018-01171/ Haywood County
Attachments:UT to Rush Fork_100068_MY0_2022.pdf; UT to Rush Fork_100068_AB_2022.pdf
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
Laserfiche Upload: Email & Attachment
DWR#: 20181034 v.1
Doc Date: 9/2/22
Doc Type: Mitigation Information
Doc Name: Same as email subject

From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 11:09 AM
To: Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>;
Wilson, Travis W. <[e-mail]>; Bowers, Todd <[e-mail]>; Leslie, Andrea J
<[e-mail]>; McHenry, David G <[e-mail]>; Youngman, Holland J
<[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Crumbley, Tyler A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Fennel, Tommy E CIV USARMY
CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Clemmons, Micky <[e-mail]>; Wiesner, Paul
<[e-mail]>; Stanfill, Jim <[e-mail]>; katie mckeithan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] Notice of As-Built Review/ NCDMS UT to Rush Fork Mitigation Project/ SAW-2018-01171/ Haywood
County

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.

Hello IRT,

The below referenced FINAL As-Built Report review has been requested by NCDMS. Per Section 332.8(o)(9) of the 2008
Mitigation Rule, this review follows the streamlined review process, which requires an IRT review period of 15 calendar
days from this email notification. Please provide any comments by 5 PM on the 15-day comment deadline shown
below. When providing comments please indicate if your concerns are great enough that you recommend not issuing
the credit release. Comments provided after the 15-day comment deadline (shown below) may not be considered.
Please note, if a site visit is requested by the IRT, comments will be due 15-days following the visit. At the conclusion of
this comment period, a copy of all comments will be provided to NCDMS and the NCIRT along with District Engineer's
intent to approve or disapprove this Final Record Drawing and initial credit release.

15-Day Comment Start Date: September 6, 2022
15-Day Comment Deadline: September 21, 2022
45-Day Credit Release Approval Deadline: October 21, 2022

1

Project information and location of the FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report (MY0):
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project
DMS Project # 100068
RFP# 16-007335 – Issued 9/8/2017
Institution Date: 4/23/2018 – Full Delivery
SAW-2018-01171
DWR# 2018-01171 v1
French Broad River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06010106
Haywood County, North Carolina

Mitigation Plan Project Credits:
3,533.610 SMUs (cold)

As-Built-MY0 Project Credits:
3,533.610 SMUs (cold)

Mitigation Plan Lengths/ Acreages:
4,023.12 ft

As-Built-MY0 Lengths/ Acreages:
4,004.23 ft

FD Provider: Michael Baker International – Contact: Micky Clemmons, [e-mail], [phone]
NCDEQ - DMS PM: Paul Wiesner, [e-mail], [phone]

IRT-DMS SharePoint Page:
https://ncconnect.sharepoint.com/sites/IRT-DMS/SitePages/Home.aspx

UT to Rush Fork_100068_MY0_2022
UT to Rush Fork_100068_MY0_2022.pdf

UT to Rush Fork_100068_AB_2022
UT to Rush Fork_100068_AB_2022.pdf

RIBITS is currently down, so I’ve attached the files for your convenience.

Please let me know if you have questions or call to discuss. Thanks for your participation,
Kim

Kim (Browning) Isenhour
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers l 919.946.5107

2

As -built Baseline Monitoring Report FINAL
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project
Haywood County, North Carolina
French Broad River Basin: 06010106
DMS Project ID No. 100068
DMS RFP #16-007335 (Issued 9/8/2017)
DEQ Contract No. 7535
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2018-01171
DWR# 2018-1034
Baseline Data Collection Period:
March 2022
Submitted to/Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
INTERNATIONAL
Submission Date: August 2022

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
August 8, 2022
Paul Wiesner, PM
NCDENR, Division of Mitigation Services
S Ravenscroft Dr. — Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Response to DMS Comments (June 24, 2022) for Draft As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report.
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project, Haywood County
French Broad River Basin: 06010106
DMS Project #100068
Dear Mr. Wiesner,
Please find below our responses to the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) review comments
dated June 24, 2022 in reference to the Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project's As -Built Baseline
Monitoring Report. We have revised the Draft document in response to review comments as
outlined below.
• Cover Page: Please update the cover page to; UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project,
so the project name matches the DMS accounting system (CRM) and the project's Credit
Ledger. Please update the project name report wide as necessary.
RESPONSE: Revision made as requested.
• Section 1.1 Project Description: This section notes; "Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
(Michael Baker) restored approximately Z 865 linearfeet and enhanced an additional 1, 185
linear feet of stream along seven reaches of unnamed tributaries (UT) to Rush Fork creek."
These footages do not appear to match Table 1. Please review and update the report
accordingly. Please also review and confirm the uncredited wetland acreage noted in the
report.
RESPONSE: Revisions and review made as requested.
• Section 1.6 Design Change Deviations: In this section, please also note and discuss any
monitoring device location changes from the IRT approved mitigation plan.
RESPONSE: Two monitoring changes were noted: the addition of a flow gauge on UT4 and
the relocation of one vegetation plot from the right floodplain to the left floodplain on UT1-
R4.
• General: Based on recent IRT feedback and requests, DMS recommends including
upstream and downstream project crossing photos in all future monitoring reports (MY1-
MY7).
- 797 Haywood Rd. Suite 2011 Asheville, NC 28806
MBAKERINTL.COM Office: 8Z8-412-61o1I Mobile:[phone]

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
RESPONSE: Additional photos of upstream and downstream project crossings will be
included in future monitoring reports (MY1-MY7).
• Appendix E: This appendix should be labeled "Record Drawing Plan Sheets".
RESPONSE: Revision made as requested.
• Appendix E - Record Drawing Sheet 5: Sheet 5 shows a portion of the crossing
infrastructure (pipe and headwall) installed inside the conservation easement. This
infrastructure encroachment was confirmed in the field by DMS and Baker on 6/14/2022.
The crossing infrastructure should be moved outside of the recorded conservation
easement, or a conservation easement modification will be required. Any
conservation easement modification costs will be the responsibility of the full delivery
provider (Baker). Please discuss a proposed resolution in the comment responses. The
proposed resolution will need to be reviewed and approved by the IRT as part of the
MYO/ As -built IRT review prior to implementation.
RESPONSE: Baker has worked with the contractor to move the crossing infrastructure just
upstream of the CE line. This modification was completed on July 25, 2022.
• Appendix E - Record Drawing Sheet 7: Please confirm that the pre-existing soil road shown
within the conservation easement has been either moved or extinguished as part of the
project construction. In the revised record drawings, the sheet should be updated to show
the soil road relocation area or a call out should be provided noting that the soil road was
extinguished as part of project construction and implementation.
RESPONSE: We acknowledge the soil road is shown on Sheet 7; however, this is only
intended to describe a topographical and historic feature on the landscape. The road has
long been abandoned for any use and is currently vegetated with mature trees and lacks
any connection to any usable roadways. Moreover, there is no existing Right of Way, and
the old roadbed was not used during construction of this project.
• Appendix E - Record Drawing Sheet 8: Sheet 8 shows a portion of the project BMP located
within the conservation easement and a portion of the BMP located outside of the
conservation easement. Please explain why the BMP is partially located in the
conservation easement and indicate if BMP maintenance will be required in the monitoring
term or in long term Stewardship. If a conservation easement modification is required
based on the comment above and IRT review, DMS and DEQ Stewardship highly
recommend including the entire BMP and associated infrastructure inside the modified
conservation easement. Please discuss a proposed resolution. As noted above, this should
be reviewed and approved by the IRT as part of the MYO/ As -built IRT review prior to
implementation.
RESPONSE: The capacity of the designed BMP needed to increase to function as intended.
This design was implemented after the establishment of the conservation easement,

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
resulting in a portion of the BMP being located outside the conservation easement
boundary. It should be noted that livestock fencing surrounds the entire BMP with
permission and cooperation from the landowner. This arrangement was shown in the
approved Mitigation Plan on Sheet 9 of the included project plans, thus review and
approvals have already taken place. Functionality of the BMP will be assessed in future
monitoring years to determine if maintenance will be required; although no maintenance
outside the conservation easement boundary is anticipated.
DMS conducted a field visit on June 14, 2022. The following comments/observations are a result
of that visit:
• Areas of multiflora rose were noted within the conservation easement at the upstream
portion of UT3. Please treat the existing invasives within the entire conservation easement
during MY1 (2022) and through the monitoring term. Please provide invasive treatment
details in the MY1 (2022) report.
RESPONSE: Multiflora rose was treated on June 291", 2022, at the upstream portion of UT3
and invasive plants will continue to be treated as needed in future monitoring years.
Details of these treatments will be included in all monitoring reports.
• The conservation easement corners along the unfenced section of UT1-R4 from stations
24+00 — 28+00 (soil farm road) are not currently marked. Each conservation easement
corner must be marked with a durable witness post and signage. Conservation easement
corners greater than 200 feet in distance or stretches that cannot be seen by direct line of
sight should be supplementally marked between the easement corners. All conservation
easement marking must be complete prior to approval and payment for Task 6 (MYO).
RESPONSE: Signs were added to these posts on June 29, 2022. Additional durable witness
posts were added on August 16, 2022.
• Signed durable wooden posts mark the conservation easement corners on reach UT1-R4
(stations 31+00 — 38+00). Metal t-posts are installed between conservation easement
corners but are not currently signed. DMS recommends adding signs to the t-posts to
clearly mark the conservation easement boundary. While not required, Baker should
consider adding PVC poles on this reach to avoid easement encroachment and easement
scalloping.
RESPONSE: Signs were added to these t-posts on June 29, 2022. Additional signage and/or
t-posts may be added along with PVC poles to clearly delineate the conservation easement
boundary.
Digital Deliverable Comments:
• The MYO 2022 Background Tables file -Table 5 vegetation table, is incorrect/ not complete.

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
The data sheets and individual vegetation tables submitted appear to be complete
and accurate. Please verify that Table 5 should be deleted from this submission or
submit a revised and accurate Table 5 with data as presented in vegetation data files.
RESPONSE: This revision has been made as requested. Table 5 has been changed to Table 6
due to the addition of the new Table 2, Summary: Goals, Performances and Results and is in
the Background Tables file. The blank file has been deleted. An accurate Table 6 is included
in the vegetation data files.
• The cross-section morphology table used is not the current version of the template and is
missing attributes required for baseline morphology summary, please see the current
(2020) version of the DMS Monitoring Table templates and include all missing attributes
noted on the morph table template.
RESPONSE: The cross-section morphology table has been updated to the current DMS
monitoring template and missing attributes have been added. The revised table is Table 8 in
Appendix D.
• The goals table (table 2 of DMS template) is missing from the submission.
RESPONSE: The goals table has been included as Table 2 in Appendix A.
• The cross section and longitudinal profile raw data is incomplete, please refer to the DMS
monitoring digital data templates, XS Raw Survey and Raw Long Pro Data, for features
requiring annotation and revise the submission to include missing features.
RESPONSE: Grade control structures have been added to the profile and a note has been
added to the XS graphs indicating the location of the left and right pins. A table has been
added to the Geomorphology folder in the digital deliverables indicating the type of
structure, it's stationing and elevation by reach.
• Photo Point 58 is missing from the Rush Fork —As —Photo —Poi nts file. Please update
accordingly.
RESPONSE: Photo Point 58 is included the Stream Station Photo Points within the As Built
report and is also included in the digital submission files under Support Files — 2 Visual
Assessment — Photos — Stream. Photo Point 58 is the last file in this folder.
• Please provide a .PDF of the standalone PLS sealed project as -built drawings in the
revised digital submittal.
RESPONSE: A standalone copy of the PLS sealed project as -built drawings has been included
as requested.
• Please verify the soil road indicated as having been relocated on the As -built and the
fencing previously identified in the conservation easement plat in the vicinity of veg plot 3
have both been relocated outside the conservation easement.

We Make a Difference
I N T E R N A I D N A L
RESPONSE: Both the soil road and the fencing previously identified in the conservation
easement have been relocated outside of the conservation easement in these areas.
As requested, one hardcopy of the revised Final As -Built Baseline Monitoring report has been
included with this response. A full electronic copy with support files is also included on a USB
drive. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions regarding our response
submittal.
Sincerely,
Jason York
Environmental Scientist

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................3
1.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................................................3
1.2
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................................................... 3
1.3
PROJECT SUCCESS CRITERIA............................................................................................................................4
1.4
MITIGATION COMPONENT SUMMARY...............................................................................................................4
1.5
PROJECT TIMELINE............................................................................................................................................6
1.6
DESIGN CHANGE DEVIATIONS...........................................................................................................................6
1.7
VICINITY MAP.................................................................................................................................................... 7
13
TECHNICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL DESCRIPTIONS AND REFERENCES........................................................ 8
APPENDICES
Appendix A Background Tables and Figures
Table 1
Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits
Figure 2
Project Asset Map and Credit Map
Table 2
Summary: Goals, Performances and Results
Table 3
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 4
Project Contacts
Table 5
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Map
Figure 4 As Built Stream Station Photo -Points
Figure 5 As Built Vegetation Photo Log
Figure 6 Monitoring Device Photo Log
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Planted Stem Counts by Plot and Species
Appendix D Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 7 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 8 Cross -Section Morphology Data Summary
Figure 7 Longitudinal Profiles
Figure 8 As Built Cross -Sections
Appendix E Record Drawing Plan Sheets
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 2
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1 Project Description
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Michael Baker) restored approximately 2,843.58 linear feet and enhanced
an additional 1160.43 linear feet of stream along seven reaches of unnamed tributaries (UT) to Rush Fork
creek. Additionally, 0.996 uncredited acres of adjacent riparian wetlands were enhanced and protected
within the conservation easement of the project. The project lies within the French Broad River Basin,
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 06010106-020010 (named the Pigeon River/Crabtree Creek Watershed),
which is identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the NC Division of Mitigation Services' (DMS
2009) French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report. The project is located in the Blue
Ridge Physiographic Region, within the Southern Crystalline and Mountains Level IV ecoregion. The
project watershed drains into Rush Fork Creek, which flows for approximately 2.8 miles to its confluence
with Crabtree Creek which continues for approximately 0.7 miles where it flows into the Pigeon River.
These tributaries and streams are designated as Class C waters by the surface water classification system
of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR).
The UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project (project) is located on two adjacent parcels of an active
cattle farm in Haywood County, North Carolina, halfway between the unincorporated communities of
Crabtree and Fines Creek as shown on the Project Vicinity Map (Figure 1). The project site entrance is 5.9
miles down Route 209 from exit 24 off of I-40, on the right at 9503 Rush Fork Road. Coordinates for the
approximate center of the project are 35.644607 N Latitude,-82.940170 W Longitude. Current agricultural
use on the project site is predominantly livestock pasture; however, past use may have included row crops
and apple production. These activities have negatively impacted both water quality and streambank stability
along the project stream reaches. The resulting observed stressors include streambank erosion,
sedimentation, excess nutrient input, channel modification, and the loss of riparian buffers.
The project is being conducted as part of the DMS Full Delivery In -Lieu Fee Program and is anticipated to
generate a total of 3,533.610 cold -water stream mitigation credits and the site will be protected by an 8.26-
acre permanent conservation easement (Appendix B).
1.2 Goals and Objectives
The goals of this project are identified below:
• Reconnect stream reaches to their floodplains,
• Improve stream stability,
• Improve aquatic habitat,
• Reestablish forested riparian buffers, and
• Permanently protect the project in a conservation easement.
To accomplish these goals, the following objectives were identified:
• To restore appropriate bankfull dimensions, and/or raise channel beds, by utilizing either a Priority
I Restoration approach or an Enhancement Level I approach.
• Stabilize eroding channel banks and arrest incision by utilizing an Enhancement Level II approach.
To construct streams of appropriate dimensions, pattern, and profile in restored reaches, slope
stream banks and provide bankfull benches on enhanced reaches and utilize bio-engineering to
provide long-term stability.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 3
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

• Construct the correct channel morphology along all stream channels, increasing the number and
depth of pools utilizing structures including geo-lifts with brush toe, log vanes/weirs, root wads,
and/or J-hooks.
• Establish riparian buffers at a 30 foot minimum width along all stream reaches, planted with native
tree and shrub species.
• Establish a permanent conservation easement restricting land use in perpetuity. This will prevent
site disturbance and allow the project to mature and stabilize.
1,3 Project Success Criteria
The success criteria and performance standards for the project will follow the NCDMS's templates As -
Built Baseline Monitoring Report Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance (June 2017), and the
Annual Monitoring Report Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance (June 2017), and as
described in Section 7 of the approved Mitigation Plan. All specific monitoring activities will follow those
outlined in detail in Section 8 of the approved Mitigation Plan and will be conducted for a period of 7 years
unless otherwise noted.
1.4 Mitigation Component Summary
The project involved the restoration or enhancement of seven reaches, all unnamed tributaries to Rush Fork.
Reach UT1-RI, is a steep, 206-foot long perennial reach that had been impacted historically through the
removal of riparian vegetation, channelization, and agricultural activities (most recently livestock). The
channel had been experiencing active erosion on over 50 percent of the streambank upstream of a degraded
old ford crossing. An Enhancement Level 1 approach was implemented on this reach, which involved
rebuilding new, stable channel dimensions as a B-type stream, raising the channel elevation to allow
floodplain access, installing in -stream structures, and building a stable culverted crossing just upstream of
the old, degraded ford.
Reach UT1-R2 is a steep, roughly 275-ft reach that was not as impacted by the historic land use as the
reaches above and below it. A narrow line of established walnut trees growing along the banks of this reach
provide greater stability to this section. As a result, the channel is not deeply incised here, and bank erosion
along R2 was minimal in spite of the fact that livestock had access to the reach. As such, an Enhancement
Level II approach was implemented here. This involved the reestablishment of a full riparian buffer, the
rebuilding of new channel dimensions along most of the reach (stabilizing the few sections of eroding
banks), and the installation of three in -stream structures. Some of the black walnut trees were removed in
the buffer to reduce their impact on other vegetation and an abandoned cabin within the conservation
easement was also removed.
Reach UT1-R3 is a steep, roughly 601-ft reach that had been impacted historically through the removal of
riparian vegetation, channelization, and agricultural activities (most recently livestock). As a result, the
channel is experiencing active erosion for well over 50 percent of the streambank length, and the absence
of woody vegetation along the banks also contributes to the instability. An Enhancement Level I approach
was selected for this reach, which involved rebuilding new, stable channel dimensions as a B-type stream,
raising the channel elevation to allow floodplain access, and installing in -stream structures, several of which
act as grade control features. Additionally, areas of multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) were removed and
treated during and after construction. There is also a 40-ft conservation easement break for a powerline
right-of-way located near the top of this reach. Stream enhancement work was conducted through this
break, though no trees were planted here.
Reach UT1-R4 is a steep, roughly 1,530-ft long perennial channel, though only 1,224-ft are located within
the conservation easement due to the break from NC Route 209 and associated utility lines. The reach had
been quite incised and had exhibited bank scour ranging from 50-60% over its length, and mass wasting
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 4
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

along an additional 15-20%, with numerous headcuts present. Reach R4 was accessed by livestock and
had little or no vegetated buffer with only a few scattered trees found along the stream, predominantly
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). A Priority Level I Restoration approach was implemented on R4 in
order to fully restore the stream and its associated buffer functions. A channel of appropriate dimensions
was constructed and was raised to reconnect the reach to its historic sloping floodplain as a B-type stream.
This will promote more frequent overbank flooding thus reducing erosive stream energies during storm
events greater than the bankfull discharge and will also improve adjacent groundwater hydrology.
Numerous in -stream structures were installed along the reach to promote bank stability, improve habitat,
and provide grade control. A full, 30-ft riparian buffer of native species was planted, and the Chinese privet
was removed and treated during and after construction. The reach also has extensive wetland areas on the
right bank above Route 209, which are now protected within the conservation easement. Livestock have
subsequently been excluded from this reach. A fence encroachment was corrected after the As Built survey
was completed.
Reach UT2 a roughly 78-ft intermittent channel that flows into UT1-R3 from a culvert that carries drainage
from a small field and the hill slope to the east of R3. It had been incised in the lower portion as the channel
cut down to meet R3 and it had a pronounced hydrologic disconnect at the culvert outlet. The channel also
lacked a full riparian buffer, especially an herbaceous layer, due to livestock impacts. An Enhancement
Level 11 approach was selected for this reach. A full buffer of native species was planted, and the channel
was raised in the lowermost section to ensure a stable tie-in with R3. Additionally, areas of multiflora rose
were removed and treated during and after construction.
Reach UT3 is a steep, roughly 1,577-ft perennial channel that begins as a series of springs just upstream of
the project boundary. It had been impacted historically through the removal of riparian vegetation,
channelization, and agricultural activities (most recently livestock). UT3 had been incised over most of its
length, with varying degrees of bank scour, including sections of mass wasting where the stream flowed up
against a steep bank or where cattle trails crossed the stream. The reach only had a few pools primarily
associated with headcuts in the channel. The uppermost section of UT3 began with a partially buffered
forested area, mostly along the left bank, consisting of a narrow row of crabapple (Malus sp.) trees.
However, the vast majority of the reach buffer consisted primarily of herbaceous pasture grasses. A
Priority Level I Restoration approach was implemented on UT3 in order to fully restore the stream and its
associated buffer functions. A new channel with the appropriate dimensions was constructed and was raised
to reconnect the reach to its historic sloping floodplain as a B-type stream. This will promote more frequent
overbank flooding thus reducing erosive stream energies during storm events greater than the bankfull
discharge and will also improve adjacent groundwater hydrology. Numerous in -stream structures were
installed along the reach to promote bank stability, improve habitat, and provide grade control. A full, 30-
ft riparian buffer of native species was planted, and the pasture grasses were treated around the planted
stems after construction (ring -spraying) to help with tree establishment. A degraded ford crossing was also
rebuilt as a stable culvert crossing and relocated to coincide with an existing powerline easement, thus
allowing for only one CE break on this reach. UT3 also has extensive wetland areas along both banks,
which are now protected within the CE and livestock have been fully excluded.
Reach UT4 is a roughly 42-ft intermittent channel that begins from an existing culvert flowing under and
then paralleling Route 209 before turning through a culvert under the access road and onto the project tying
into UT1-R4. This short section of channel was nevertheless highly degraded, mostly due to the presence
of livestock. It was incised as it cut down to meet the similarly incised UT1-R4, had eroding banks, and
lacked a riparian buffer. As such, Restoration was implemented on this reach, wherein a new channel was
built of appropriate dimensions, which was also raised to meet the restored R4 channel. A full buffer of
native species was planted along the reach. And while only the lowermost section is included within the
project easement, the upper portion between the access road culvert and Highway 209, also had fencing
installed to exclude livestock, thus protecting the entire reach.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 5
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Additionally, a small BMP was installed at the top of UT3 to capture and treat the runoff from a vegetated
swale (an old abandoned roadbed) that had conveyed stormwater from its 4.3-acre drainage area directly
into the reach. The BMP was sized for a 1-inch design storm and has been planted with native shrub and
herbaceous vegetation to ensure stability. It also has a stable rock outlet feature to convey overflow into
UT3.
1.5 Project Timeline
The Rush Fork Mitigation Project was instituted in April 2018. The Mitigation Plan was approved by the
IRT in April 2021. Project construction of the streams was initiated in October 2021 and completed in
February 2022. Planting of live stakes and bareroot stems was completed in February 2022 and the
vegetation plots were installed in March 2022. The As -Built survey was completed in March of 2022. All
monitoring devices including 18 cross -sections, 3 crest gauges, and 3 flow gauges were installed in March
2022. All crest gauges and flow gauges are continuous logging Van Essen DIVER gauges. Livestock
exclusion fencing and gates were fully installed by March 2022. The CE pins were located and the
boundary fully marked by March 2022 as well. Monitoring Year 1 is on schedule for 2022 as shown in
Table 2.
1.6 Design Change Deviations
During project construction, there were a few, relatively minor deviations from the original design plans as
marked in red in the as -built plans (Appendix E). Primarily these were a few substitutions made on in -
stream structures replacing log structures with rock/boulder structures due to material availability. In two
cases, an additional structure was added to the channel not originally in the plans. Additionally, the sizing
of several of the crossing and access gates were changed from the proposed due to landowner preference,
and a few extra gates were installed for improved easement access.
There were a few minor deviations from the approved planting plan due to lack of species availability.
American basswood (Tilia americana), rosebay (Rhododendron maximum), and umbrella tree (Magnolia
tripetala) were unavailable and were replaced by planting additional stems of several other species on the
approved list; yellow buckeye (Aesculus (lava), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), winterberry (Ilex
verticillata), American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), and Carolina silverbell (Halesia carolina).
One additional flow gauge was added to UT4 following the IRT approval of the mitigation plan.
Additionally, a vegetation monitoring plot shown on the right floodplain of UT1-R4 in the approved
mitigation plan was moved to the left floodplain of UT1-R4.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 6
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

L7 Vicinity Map
rF
`r Fines Creek
7
r06010106020040
Im
0601
Site Location
06010106020010
N
A
/05120010
it
I
06010105090030
f
n.
r
^�010106030040 1
—=_ Project coordinates:
35.644607 N,-82.940170 Note: Site is located within Targeted Local
Watershed 06010106-020010
Haywood County
Haywood County Site Figure 1.
Location Project Vicinity Map
UT to Rush Fork Project
DMS Project No. 100068
76
Michael Baker
4W 1 INTERNATIONAL
French Broad River Basin 0 0.5 1 2
Miles
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 7
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

L8 Technical and Methodological Descriptions and References
Stream survey data was collected to a minimum of Class C Vertical and Class A Horizontal Accuracy using
a Leica TS06 Total Station and was georeferenced to the NAD83 State Plane Coordinate System, FIPS3200
in US Survey Feet, which was derived from the As -built Survey. The survey data from the permanent
project cross -sections were collected and classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification System to
confirm design stream type (Rosgen 1994).
The six permanent vegetation -monitoring quadrants (plots) were installed across the site in accordance with
the CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.1 (Lee 2007) and the data collected from each
was input into the DMS Veg Table Production Tool (2021).
All of the crest gauges and flow gauges are Van Essen brand Baro-Diver data loggers.
References:
Lee, M., Peet R., Roberts, S., Wentworth, T. 2007. CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.1.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources. 2011 French Broad River Basin Classification
Schedule. NC Department of Environmental Quality. Raleigh, NC. Available at:
https:Hdeq.nc.gov/river-basin-classification-schedule
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services. 2021. DMS Vegetation Table Production Tool.
NC Department of Environmental Quality. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services. 2009. French Broad River Basin Restoration
Priorities. NC Department of Environmental Quality. Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, Colo.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 8
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

APPENDIX A
Background Tables and Figures

Table 1. Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Proiect - NCDMS Proiect No. 100068
Project Segment
Original
Mitigation
Plan*
Ft/Ac
As -Built
Ft/Ac
Original
Mitigation
Category
Original
Restoration
Level
Original
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Stream
Reach UT1-R1
206.20
206.410
Cold
El
1.3
137.467
Reach UT1-R2
275.00
275.000
Cold
Ell
2.5
110.000
Reach UT1-R3
612.10
600.860
Cold
El
1.5
408.067
Reach UT1-R4
1,216.33
1,224.370
Cold
R
1.0
1,216.330
Reach UT2
86.24
78.160
Cold
Ell
2.5
34.496
Reach UT3
1,584.45
1,577.530
Cold
R
1.0
1,584.450
Reach UT4
42.80
41.900
Cold
R
1.0
42.800
Total:
3,533.610
Wetland
N/A 0.996 0.996
E
Total:
N/A
*The lengths shown for each reach are the creditable lengths and were calculated after all exclusions were accounted for, such as easement breaks, utility impacts, stream crossings, etc.
Proiect Credits
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian
Non -Rip
Coastal
Warm
Cool
Cold
Wetland
Wetland
Marsh
Restoration
-
-
2,843.580
-
Re-establishment
-
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
-
-
Enhancementl
545.534
Enhancementll
i-
-
144.496
Creation
Preservation
-
-
-
Totals
3,533.610
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Reach
Approach
Length (ft)
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Reach UT1-RI
El
206.20
1.5
137.467
Reach UT1-112
Ell
275.00
2.5
110.000
Reach UT1-R3
El
612.10
1.5
408.067
Reach UT1-R4
R
1,216.33
1.0
1,216.330
Reach UT2
Ell
86.24
2.5
34.496
Reach UT3
R
1,584.45
1.0
1,584.450
Reach UT4
R
42.80
1.0
42.800
Total Footage for Credit
4,023.12
Restoration
2,843.58
2,843.580
Enhancement 1
818.30
545.533
Enhancement II
361.24
144.496
Total Credits
3,533.610
UT4
--
UT1-R4
r
North Carolina
Michael Baker Division of
Mitigation Services
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L DMSProj.No. 100068
Conservation Easement N
BMP (no direct credits)
Stream Centerlines by Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
, UT1-R1
r
UT3
UT1-R2
LUT2
7qqw
w W'.
UT1-R3
Figure 2. Project Asset
0 125 250 500 and Credit Map
Feet UT to Rush Fork Project
Haywood County

Table 2. Summary: Goals, Performances and Results
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Goals
Objectives
Functional Level
Performance Criteria
Monitoring
Cumulative
Measurement
Monitoring Results
Tool
Reconnect stream channels to their floodplains
To raise channel beds and/or
Hydraulics
Four bankroll events within
Stage recorders loacated
slope stream banks which
monitoring period.
upstream on U73, UTl-RI,
serve as floodplains as is
and middle of UTl-R4.
appropriate for a B stream
Supplemental data from flow
type by utilizing either a
gauges on UT3, UT2, UT4.
N/A
Priority I Restoration
approach or an Enhancement
Level I approach.
Improve stream stability
To construct streams with the
Geomorphology
Restored streams will
Cross -Sectional Survey
appropriate dimension,
maintain bank -height ratios of
Visual Inspection
pattern, and profile in
less than 1.2 and
Restored reaches or
entrenchment ratios greater
dimension and profile on
than 1.4 (B-type) or 2.2 (C-
Enhanced I reaches. Also
type) provided visual
N/A
slope stream banks, install
inspections also reveal
grade control structures with
stabilization.
plunge pools, and utilize bio-
engineering to provide long
Improve aquatic habitat
Increase the heterogeniety of
Geomorphology
Inventory comparisons of in-
Profile Survey
habitat by increasing the
stream structures and features
Visual Inspection
number and depth of pools,
from existing conditions and
increasing the amount of
as -built project surveys and
woody debris, utilizing
assessments. Increased
N/A
structures including geo- lifts
number of pools and woody
with brush toe, log
structures and debris
vanes/weirs, cross -vanes,
compared to the existing
and/or J-hooks.
conditions.
Reestablish forested riparian buffers
Establish riparian buffers at a
Geomorphology
Survival rate of 320 stems per
Vegetation Plots
30-ft minimum width along
acre at MY3, 260 planted
Visual Inspection
all stream
stems per acre at MY5, and
N/A
reaches, planted with native
2I0 stems per acre at MY7.
tree, shrub and herbaceous
Permanently protect the project
Establish a permanent
Biology
Conservation Easement
Visual Inspection
conservation easement
documents. Visual inspections
restricting land use in
to confirm no encroachments
perpetuity. This will prevent
into CE.
N/A
site
disturbance and allow the
project to mature and
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT, DIMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Table 3. Project Activity and Reporting History
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Grading Completed in February 2022
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 3 months
All Planting Completed in February 2022
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 3 months
Number of Reporting Years: 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Project Institution Date
N/A
April 2018
Mitigation Plan Approved by IRT
N/A
April 2021
Final Design — Construction Plans
N/A
October 2021
Construction Grading Completed
N/A
February 2022
Livestake and Bareroot Planting Completed
N/A
February 2022
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (MYO)
March 2022
June 2022
As -Built Strream Survey
March 2022
N/A
As -Built Vegetation Monitoring
March 2022
N/A
Year 1 Monitoring
-------
-------
Year 2 Monitoring
-------
-------
Year 3 Monitoring
-------
-------
Year 4 Monitoring
-------
-------
Year 5 Monitoring
-------
-------
Year 6 Monitoring
-------
-------
Year 7 Monitoring
-------
-------
1= The number of monitoring reports excluding the as-built/baseline report
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT, DIMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Table 4. Project Contacts
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Designer
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Katie McKeithan, Tel. [phone]
Construction Contractor
1000 Bat Cave Road,
Baker Grading & Landscaping, Inc.
Old Fort, NC 28762
Contact: Charles Baker, Tel. [phone] x. 11
Survey Contractor
88 Central Avenue
Kee Mapping and Surveying
Asheville, NC 28801
Contact: Brad Kee, Tel. [phone]
Planting Contractor
1000 Bat Cave Road,
Baker Grading & Landscaping, Inc.
Old Fort, NC 28762
Contact: Charles Baker, Tel. [phone] x. 11
Seeding Contractor
1000 Bat Cave Road,
Baker Grading & Landscaping, Inc.
Old Fort, NC 28762
Contact: Charles Baker, Tel. [phone] x. 11
Seed Mix Sources
9764 Raider Hollow Road,
Roundstone Native Seed, LLC
Upton, KY 42784
Telephone: [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
797 Helton Creek Road, Lansing, NC 28643 Telephone: [phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery (livestakes)
Dykes and Son Nursery
825 Maude Etter Road, McMinnville, TN 37110 Telephone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Cary, NC 27518
Stream Monitoring POC
Katie McKeithan, Tel. [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
lKatie McKeithan, Tel. [phone]
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Table 5. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
UT to Rush Fork Stream Miti¢ation Proiect - NCDMS Proiect No. 100068
Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project
County
Haywood County
Project Area (acres)
8.26
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.644607 N,-82.940170 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
7.3
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
French Broad
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
6010106
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
06010106-020010
DWR Sub -basin
04-03-05
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
308 acres/0.48 square miles (at downstream end ofUT1)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
0.18% impervious area
CGIA Land Use Classification
79,8% forested, 17.1 % hay/pasture, and 2.9% developed (open space).
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
UT1
UT2
UT3
UT4
Length of reach (linear feet)
2,464
99
1,618
18
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Moderately
Confined
Unconfined
Moderately
Confined
Unconfined
Drainage area (Acres)
308
24
98
27
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Perennial
Intermittent
Perennial
Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C
C
C
C
Stream Classification (existing)
134a
B
A to B4
B
Stream Classification (proposed)
134a
B
A to B4
Cb
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
IV — Degradation
and Widening
III —Degrading
IV — Degradation
and WideningIII
—Degrading
FEMA classification
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
No
PCN
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
No
PCN
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Notes:
Source: USGS National Land Cover Database (NLCD) for 2016
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

APPENDIX B
Visual Assessment Data

�-• ..
t .0.
North Carolina Overview Map: Current Condition
Michael Baker Division of 0 250 500 Plan View (CCPV) MYO
Mitigation Services Feet UT to Rush Fork Project
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L DMS Proj. No. 100068 Haywood County

XS-1
VP2: 688
stems/ac
North Carolina
Michael Baker Division of
Mitigation Services
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L DMSProj.No. 100068
VP1: 688
stems/ac
XS-3
I
XS-4
UT3
RVP-MYO:
567 stems/ac
Conservation Easement
Livestock Fencing
A Photo Points
Gauges
0 Crest Gauge
® Flow Gauge
Overhead Powerlines
Veg Plots
BMP Feature
Cross -Sections
Stream Top -of -Bank
Streams by Mitigation Type
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
No Credit
i JD Wetlands
Figure 3A. Current Condition
125 250 Plan View (CCPV) MYO
Feet UT to Rush Fork Project
Haywood County

k UT1-R1
- ,XS-13
A
CG-2
VP5: 972 >
stems/ac
XS-14 —-
r
XS-6 XS-15 VP6: 648 xS-16 L� UT1-R2
stems/ac
Cabin Removed
I`� XS-7 FL-2 estock Fencing
1 UT4 Conservation Easement
IIII
�XS-17 -. ._
Photo Points
XS-18 e Gauges
- UT2
e• 0 Crest Gauge
xs-s
FL-3 r ® Flow Gauge
Overhead Powerlines
UT1-R3 Veg Plots
Cross -Sections
Stream Top -of -Bank
Streams by Mitigation Type
k..
Restoration
xs-9 UT1-R4 Enhancement I
VP3 729 Enhancement 11
stems/ac
No Credit
i JD Wetlands
North Carolina
Michael Baker Division of 0
Mitigation Services
I N T E R N A T I O N A L DMS Proj. No. 100068
Figure 313. Current Condition
125 250 Plan View (CCPV) MYO
Feet UT to Rush Fork Project
Haywood County

UT4
k. s . FL-3
PP
�'°� stems/ac
UT1-R4
r'
ji
VP4: 810
stems/ac
UT1-R3
UT1-R4
Conservation Easement
Livestock Fencing
Photo Points
Gauges
p Crest Gauge
® Flow Gauge
Overhead Powerlines
Veg Plots
Cross -Sections
Stream Top -of -Bank
Streams by Mitigation Type
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
r_a
No Credit
JD Wetlands
North Carolina Figure 3C. Current Condition
Michael Baker Division of 0 125 250 Plan View (CCPV) MYO
Mitigation Services Feet UT to Rush Fork Project
I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L DMs Proi. No. 100068 Haywood County

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-1: UT 1, Reach 1, Station
11+00. Facing Upstream.
PP-3: UT1, Reach 1, Station 12+10
Facing Downstream
PP-6: UT1, Reach 2, Station
13+25. Facing Upstream.
PP-2: UT1, Reach 1, Station
11+80. Facing Upstream.
PP-4: UT1, Reach 1, Station 12+33
Facing Downstream
PP-7: UT I, Reach 2, Station
14+60. Facing Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-7: UT1, Reach 2, Station
14+60. Facing Upstream.
PP-9: UT1, Reach 3, Station
16+50. Facing Upstream.
P-11: UT 1, Reach 3, Station
17+35. Facing Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL)
PP-8: UT1, Reach 2, Station
15+50. Facing Upstream.
PP-10: UT1, Reach 3, 16+80.
Facing Upstream.
PP-12: UT I, Reach 3, Station
18+25. Facing Upstream.
All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-13: UT1, Reach 3, Station
18+90. Facing Upstream.
PP-15: UT2, Station 10+15. Facing
PP-17: UT1, Reach3, Station
19+70. Facing Upstream.
PP-14: UT1 Reach 3, Station
19+55. Facing Upstream.
PP-16: UT2, Station 10+85. Facing
PP-18: UT1, Reach 3, Station
20+60. Facing Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-19: UT1, Reach 3, Station
22+00. Facing Upstream.
PP-21: UT I, Reach 4, Station
PP-23: UT4, Station 10+50. Facing
Upstream.
PP-20: UT1, Reach 4, Station
22+75. Facing Upstream.
PP-22: UT1, Reach 4, Station
PP-24: UT1, Reach 4, Station
25+25. Facing Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-25: UT1, Reach 4, Station
26+00. Facing Upstream.
PP-27: UT1, Reach 4, Station
PP-29: BMP at Top of UT3.
PP-26: UT1, Reach 4, Station
27+00. Facing Upstream.
PP-28: UT1, Reach 4, Station
PP-30: UT3, Station 10+00. Facing
Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-31: UT3, Station 11+10. Facing
Upstream.
PP-33: UT3, Station 13+15. Facing
PP-35: UT3, Station 14+85. Facing
Upstream.
PP-32: UT3, Station 11+75. Facing
Upstream.
PP-34: UT3, Station 14+15. Facing
PP-36: UT3, Station 15+95. Facing
Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-37: UT3, Station 17+35. Facing
Upstream.
...r,�;r.• .., wr:,::=.._tom;.,
PP-39: UT3, Station 18+75. Facing
PP-41: UT3, Station 21+20. Facing
Upstream.
PP-38: UT3, Station 17+65.
Facing Upstream.
PP-40: UT3, Station 20+40. Facing
PP-42: UT3, Station 22+10. Facing
Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-43: UT3, Station 22+15. Facing
Downstream.
PP-45: UT3, Station 24+40. Facing
PP-47: UT3, Station 26+30. Facing
Upstream at confluence.
PP-44: UT3, Station 23+15
Facing Upstream.
PP-46: UT3, Station 25+35. Facing
Upstream.
PP-48: UT1, Reach 4, Station
30+50. Facing Downstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-49: UT1, Reach 4, Station
31+20. Facing Upstream.
PP-51: UT1, Reach 4, Station
33+10. Facing Upstream.
PP-53: UT1, Reach 4, Station
35+00. Facing Upstream.
PP-50: UT1, Reach 4, Station
32+50. Facing Upstream.
PP-52: UT1, Reach 4, Station
PP-54: UT1, Reach 4, Station
35+60. Facing Upstream.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 4: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Stream Station Photo -Points
NCDMS Project No. #100068
PP-55: UT1, Reach 4, Station
36+15. Facing Upstream
PP-57: UT1, Reach 4, Station
37+50. Facing Upstream.
PP-56: UT1, Reach 4, Station
37+00. Facing Upstream.
PP-58: UT1, Reach 4, Station
37+60. Facing Downstream. End
of Project.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) All Photos taken on April 13, 2022.

Figure 5: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Vegetation Photo Log
NCDMS Project No. 100068
Vegetation Plot #1: Photo 3-17-22
Vegetation Plot #3: Photo 3-22-22
Vegetation Plot #5: Photo 3-22-22
Vegetation Plot #2: Photo 3-17-22
Vegetation Plot #4: Photo 3-17-22
Vegetation Plot #6: Photo 3-17-22
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL)

Figure 5: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Vegetation Photo Log
NCDMS Project No. 100068
Random Vegetation Plot #1: Photo
3-17-22
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL)

Figure 6: Rush Fork: MYO As -Built Monitoring Device Photo Log
Crest Gauge #1, UT3
Crest Gauge #3, UT Reach 4
Flow Gauge #2, UT2
Crest Gauge #2, UT 1 Reach 2
Flow Gauge #1, UT3
Flow Gauge #3, UT4
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (FINAL) Photos taken April 13, 2022.

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Plot Data

TABLE 6. PLANTED STEM COUNTS BY PLOT AND SPECIES
Planted Acreage
7.3
Date of Initial Plant
2022-02-23
Dates) of Supplemental Plant(s)
NA
Dates) Mowing
2022-03-22
Date of Current Survey
2022-03-22
Plot size (ACRES)
0.0247
���000000®©©©000
����©©00000000�
Included in
Plan
lex—ticillat,
Quercusalba
Quercusimbri
Sambucuscanadensis
Performance Standard
Mitigation
Proposed Standard
Current Year Stem Count
Mitigation
Stems/Acre
Plan
Species Count
Dominant Specie, Composition N
Average Plot Height (ft.)
Current Year Stem Count
Species Count
Dominant Species Composition I%)
Average Plo Height (ft.)
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring
year (bolded), species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)

TABLE 6. PLANTED STEM COUNTS BY PLOT AND SPECIES
Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Veg
Plot 1
F
Vag Plot
2 F
Veg Plot
3 F
Stems/Ac.
Av.Ht.#S
(ft)
Species
p
%Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. ft
(
#Species
%Invasives
Stems/Ad.
Av. Ht. (ft)
#Species
%Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
688
0
688
30
0
729
10
0
Veg
Plot 4
F
Veg Plot
5 F
Veg Plot
6 F
Stems/A,.
Av(t't.
#S pecies
%Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
#Species
%Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
#Species
%Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
810
972
12
0
61
9
0
Veg Plot
Group
1 R
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht'
#Species %Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
567
10
0
'Each monitoring year represents a different plot for the random vegetation plot "groups". Random plots are denoted with an R, and fixed plots with an F.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)

APPENDIX D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Table 7. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project: DMS Project No ID. 100068
UT1 - Reach 1-3 (Enhancement)
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Composite
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
Min Mean Med Max
Min Mean Med Max
Min Mean Med Max
BF Width (ft)
7.1000
9.65
-----
12.2000
9.90
11.39
-----
12.88
9.00
9.50
-----
10.00
7.79
9.28
9.28
10.76
Floodprone Width (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
15.09
27.03
15.09
38.96
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.2700
0.58
-----
0.8900
0.55
0.86
-----
1.16
0.65
0.68
-----
0.70
0.59
0.65
0.65
0.70
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
0.80
0.90
-----
1.00
0.96
0.98
0.98
0.99
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft2)
3.3300
4.85
-----
6.4
5.4
8.76
-----
12.1
5.9
6.45
-----
7.00
5.44
5.90
5.90
6.36
Width/Depth Ratio
7.9800
26.62
-----
45.2600
8.97
13.49
-----
18.00
13.80
14.05
-----
14.30
11.13
14.69
14.69
18.24
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1500
1.43
-----
1.7100
1.70
1.67
1.63
1.40
2.20
1.94
2.78
2.78
3.62
Bank Height Ratio
1.0000
1.43
-----
1.8600
1.00
1.19
1.38
1.10
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
d50 (mm)
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
----
----
N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
Meander Width Ratio
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
4.30
14.60
15.40
20.50
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-0.0950
-0.0680
-0.0630
-0.0400
Pool Length (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
2.00
9.50
10.00
14.00
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
14.00
42.10
35.00
240.00
Pool Max Depth (ft)
----
----
----
----
-----
-----
-----
-----
1.50
1.75
-----
2.00
2.33
2.46
2.47
2.55
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / Bo%
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
---
---
----
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
-----
168.14/256/80
-----
-----
I -----
I -----
I -----
I -----
I -----
I -----
I ----
I ----
I ----
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
-----
0.21
-----
-----
0.15
0.32
0.49
0.15
-----
-----
0.21
0.15
----
0.21
Impervious cover estimate (%)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
----
----
----
Rosgen Classification
-----
B4a
-----
-----
134a - B4 - Ba
-----
-----
-----
B4a
-----
-----
----
B
----
----
BF Velocity (fps)
3.00
3.82
-----
4.64
3.42
5.11
-----
6.80
2.15
3.58
-----
5.00
----
----
----
----
BF Discharge (cfs)
10.00
19.75
-----
29.50
23.90
31.16
-----
38.41
12.60
14.95
-----
17.30
----
----
----
----
ValleyLength
-----
-
-----
-----
-----
- ---
-----
-----
----
-----
-----
----
----
----
----
Channel Length (ft)
-----
1,164
1,693.30
-----
1,082.27
Sinuosityl
1.06
1 1.07
1 -----
1 1.07
1 1.02
1 1.08
1 -----
1 1.14
1 -----
1 1.05
1 -----
I -----
I ----
I ----
I ----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Table 7. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project: DMS Project No ID. 100068
UT1 - Reach 4 (Restoration)
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Composite
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
BF Width (ft)
8.7300
11.07
-----
13.4000
9.90
11.39
-----
12.88
12.50
12.75
-----
13.00
12.93
14.21
13.36
15.90
Floodprone Width (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
21.96
30.86
24.30
46.32
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.7300
1.01
-----
1.2800
0.55
0.86
-----
1.16
0.90
0.93
-----
0.95
0.69
0.71
0.87
1.11
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
1.20
1.25
-----
1.30
1.35
1.46
1.43
1.60
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft')
9.8600
10.48
-----
11.1
5.4
8.76
-----
12.1
11.3
11.70
-----
12.10
11.01
13.27
14.33
14.48
Width/Depth Ratio
6.8200
12.59
-----
18.3600
8.97
13.49
-----
18.00
12.00
15.00
-----
18.00
11.65
15.94
13.13
13.13
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4800
2.45
-----
3.4200
1.70
1.67
-----
1.63
1.40
1.80
-----
2.20
1.59
2.13
1.88
1.88
Bank Height Ratio
1.0000
1.31
-----
1.6200
1.00
1.19
-----
1.38
1.00
----
-----
1.62
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
d50 (min)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Meander Width Ratio
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
12.30
19.30
17.70
19.30
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
-----
-----
----
-0.5800
-0.0220
-0.0377
-0.0790
Pool Length (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
-----
-----
----
2.00
13.40
14.00
22.00
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
-----
-----
----
18.00
44.80
40.00
117.00
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
2.50
-----
-----
2.55
2.72
2.72
2.89
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / Bo%
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
-----
156/180/100.3
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
----
----
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
-----
0.48
-----
-----
0.15
0.32
-----
0.49
-----
----
----
----
Impervious cover estimate (%)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
----
----
----
Classification
-----
B
-----
----
B4a - B4 - Ba
-----
-----
----
B4
-----
-----
---
B4
----
----
BF
BF Velocity (fps)
3.17
3.61
-----
4.04
3.42
5.11
-----
6.80
4.00
5.00
-----
6.00
----
----
----
----
BF Discharge (cfs)
31.24
38.03
-----
44.81
23.90
-----
-----
38.41
37.88
38.13
-----
38.37
----
----
----
----
Valley Length
----
-----
-----
----
-----
-----
----
----
----
----
Channel Length (ft)
1,300.00
-----
-----
-----
1,216.33
-----
----
1,224.37
----
Sinuosityl
1.08
1 1.11
1 -----
1 1.14
1 1.02
1 1.08
1 -----
1 1.14
1 1.10
1 1.15
1 -----
1 1.20
1 ----
I ----
I ----
----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Table 7. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project: DMS Project No ID. 100068
UT3 - Restoration
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Composite
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
Min Mean Med Max
Min Mean Med Max
Min Mean Med Max
BF Width (ft)
-----
6.58
-----
-----
9.90
11.39
-----
12.88
7.50
8.00
-----
8.50
7.04
8.29
7.60
10.92
Floodprone Width (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
11.96
15.37
14.41
20.71
BF Mean Depth (ft)
-----
0.82
-----
-----
0.55
0.86
-----
1.16
0.57
0.61
-----
0.65
0.52
0.61
0.58
0.77
BF Max Depth (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
0.70
0.78
-----
0.85
0.71
0.89
0.89
1.07
BF Cross -sectional Area (ft')
-----
5.4
-----
-----
5.4
8.76
-----
12.1
4.6
5.30
-----
6.00
3.64
5.05
5.16
6.23
Width/Depth Ratio
-----
8.02
-----
-----
8.97
13.49
-----
18.00
-----
13.10
-----
-----
10.32
13.88
13.02
19.16
Entrenchment Ratio
-----
2.17
-----
-----
1.70
1.67
-----
1.63
1.40
1.80
-----
2.20
1.70
1.85
1.86
1.97
Bank Height Ratio
-----
1.83
-----
-----
1.00
1.19
1.38
1.00
-----
-----
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
d50 (min)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
----
Meander Width Ratio
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
-----
N/A
-----
-----
----
N/A
----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
10.20
18.70
16.90
37.20
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
41400
-0.0660
-0.0649
-0.0330
Pool Length (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
2.00
5.70
6.00
12.00
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
10.00
37.00
34.00
70.00
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
1.70
1.75
-----
1.80
2.16
2.54
2.53
2.94
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / Bo%
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
---
---
----
----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-----
I -----
I -----
I ----
I ----
I ----
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
-----
0.15
-----
-----
0.15
0.32
-----
0.49
-----
0.15
-----
----
0.15
----
----
Impervious cover estimate (%)
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
----
----
----
Rosgen Classification
-----
Ba
-----
-----
134a - B4 - Ba
-----
-----
-----
Ba
-----
-----
----
134
----
----
BF Velocity (fps)
-----
3.48
-----
3.42
5.11
-----
6.80
4.42
4.71
-----
5.00
----
----
----
----
BF Discharge (cfs)
-----
18.8
-----
-----
23.90
31.16
-----
38.41
19.00
24.50
-----
30.00
----
----
----
----
Valley Length
-----
1,541
1 -----
-----
-----
- ---
-----
-----
-----
-----
----
----
----
----
Channel Length (ft)
-----
1,618
-----
-----
1,584.45
-----
1,577.53
----
----
Sinuosity
-----
1 1.05
1 -----
I -----
1 1.02
1 1.08
1 ---�11
-----
1 1.02
----
----
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Table 8. Cross -Section Morphology Data Summary
UT to Rush Fork Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 100068
Stream Reach
UT3
Cross-section X-1 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-2 (Pool)
Cross-section X-3 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-4 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY-
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
3063.86
3048.03
3028.13
3010.84
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
3062.99
3045.87
3027.42
3007.90
LTOB2 Elevation
3063.86
3048.03
3028.13
3010.84
LTOBZ Max Depth (ft)
0.87
2.16
0.71
2.94
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft')
4.20
11.12
3.64
15.11
Stream Reach
UT3 UT 1 Reach 4
Cross-section X-5 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-6 (Pool)
Cross-section X-7 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-8 (Riffle)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
2998.75
2985.03
2976.51
2970.37
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
2997.84
2982.50
2975.44
2969.02
LTOB' Elevation
2998.75
2985.03
2976.51
2970.37
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
0.91
2.53
1.07
1.35
LTOBZ Cross Sectional Area (ft)6.23
15.51
6.11
11.01
Stream Reach
UTl Reach 4
Cross-section X-9 (Pool)
Cross-section X-10 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-11 (Pool)
Cross-section X-12 (Riffle)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
2954.14
2922.10
2913.15
2904.41
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
2951.59
2920.67
2910.26
2902.81
LTOB2 Elevation
2954.14
2922.10
2913.15
2904.41
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)l
2.55
1
1.43
2.89
1.60
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
27.56
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 14.50
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 31.24
1
1
14.33
Table 8. Cross -Section Morphology Data Summary
UT to Rush Fork Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 100068
Stream Reach
UTl Reach 1
UTl Reach 2 UTl Reach 3
Cross-section X-13 (Pool)
Cross-section X-14 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-15 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-16 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY-
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
3051.49
3025.48
3008.35
2998.87
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
3049.01
3024.52
3007.37
2996.54
LTOB' Elevation
3051.49
3025.48
3008.35
2998.87
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
2.48
0.96
0.98
2.33
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
12.13
5.44
6.36
12.06
Stream Reach
1UT1 Reach 3
Cross-section X-17 (Pool)
Cross-section X-18 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
2986.75
2976.03
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
2984.29
2973.48
LTOB' Elevation
2986.75
2976.03
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)l
2.46
1
2.55
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
17.60
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 17.29
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT, DMS NO. 100068
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (FINAL)

Figure 7. Longitudinal Profiles
Rush Fork: UT-1 (111, R2, and 113) Longitudinal Profile
3060
—
3055
—
3050
—
R1/R2
-
Reach
Break
3045
—
XS-13
7
Culvert
3040
_
Crossing
3035
—
0
v
w
S-14
3030
— —
3025
R2/R3
Reach Break
3020
3015
3010
3005
1050
1100 1150 1200 1250
1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550
1600 1650
Reach Stationing
Grade Control Structure
TWG LTB RTB------- WSF Cross -Section Reach Break
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

Rush Fork: UT-1 (R1, R2, and 113) Longitudinal Profile (cont.)
3015
XS-1s
3010
3005
XS-16
3000
2995
F
-
c
o
Y
XS-17
> 2990
v
w
2985
XS-18
2980
2975
2970
—
2965
1650
1700 1750
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300
Reach Stationing
Grade Control Structure TWG LTB RTB------- WSF +Cross -Section
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

Rush Fork:
UT1 (114) Longitudinal Profile
2980
2975
2970
2965
-
Xs-9
2960 Xs"8
2955
c
°
Route 209 Road
0
2950
Crossing
w
2945
2940
2935
2930
2925 —
224C 23z' 2440
2540
2640 2740
2840 2940
Reach Stationing
Grade Control Structure
LTB
RTB------- WSF Cross -Sections
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

Rush Fork: UT1 (114) Longitudinal Profile (cont.)
2935
2930
t Xs-10
2925 ;
2920
Culvert
Crossing Xs-11
2915 ."
c
0
2910
a,
w
2905
2900
2895
2890
3025 3125 3225 3325 3425 3525 3625 3725
Reach Stationing
Grade Control Structure TWG LTB RTB------- WSF t Cross -Sections
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

Rush Fork: Reach UT2 Longitudinal Profile
2998
2996
2994
c
2992 —
ai
w
2990
2988
2986
1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100
Reach Stationing
�TWG �LTB �RTB------WSF
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

3090
3080
3070
3060
3050
0
v
w
3040
3030
3020
3010
950
Rush Fork: Reach UT3 Longitudinal Profile
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800
Reach Stationing
Grade Control Structure TWG LTB — RTB------- WSF —0 Cross -Sections
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

3018
3013
3008
3003
2998
2993
0
v
w 2988
2983
2978
2973
2968
1820
Rush Fork: Reach UT3 Longitudinal Profile (cont.)
1870 1920 1970 2020 2070 2120 2170 2220 2270 2320 2370 2420 2470 2520 2570 2620 2670
Reach Stationing
Grade Control Structure TWG LTB RTB------- WSF Cross -Sections
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

Rush Fork: Reach UT4 Longitudinal Profile
2969
2968 -
2967
2966
c
0
.m
u 2965
2964
2963
2962
995 1005 1015 1025 1035 1045
Reach Stationing
—TWG LTB RTB
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Permanent Cross -Section 1
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
B
4.2
7.25
0.58
0.87
12.5
1.0
1.81
3063.86
3063.86
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT 3, Cross -Section 1
3070
3069
3068
iK 3067
0 3066
.2
M
3065
----------------------------------------------------
—
w
3064
� As -built
3063
Left and right pin are flush with ground
surface and are represented by 0 and the
--- o--- Bankfull
3062
furthest point on the X axis.
---0--- Floodprone
3061
0 10 20
30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Permanent Cross -Section 2
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
C
11.12
14.64
0.76
2.16
19.26
----
----
3048.03
3048.03
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT3, Cross -Section 2
3051
3050
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3049
c
0
3048
------------------------------------------
m
w
3047
As -built
Left and right pin are flush with ground
3046
o- Bankfull
surface and are represented by 0 and the
---o--- Floodprone
furthest point on the X axis.
3045
0 10 20
30 40
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 3
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
B
3.64
7.04
0.52
0.71
13.54
1.0
1.7
3028.13
3028.13
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT3, Cross -Section 3
3031
3030
Y
W
O
a 3029
>
d
-----------------------------------
W
3028
---------------------
As -built
Left and right pin are flush with ground
o BankfUll
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
---e--- Floodprone
3027
0 10
20
30 40
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 4
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
E
15.11
13.05
1.16
2.94
11.25
----
----
3010.84
3010.84
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT3, Cross -Section 4
3015
3014
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3013
Left and right pin are flush with ground
surface and are represented by 0 and the
3012
furthest point on the X axis.
c
0
3011
d
w 3010
x--- Bankfull
3009
--- --- Floodprone
*As -built
3008
0--- Bankfull
o--- Floodprone
3007
0
10 20
30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Permanent Cross -Section 5
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
tl�r:w4J�
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
B
1 6.23
10.92
0.57
0.91
1 19.16
1.0
1.9
2998.75
2998.75
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT3, Cross -Section 5
3002
3001
Y
W
r_ 3000
0
is
d
w 2999
---------------------------------
2998 Left and right pin are flush with ground
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
2997 +
0
10
20
Station (ft)
As -built
o--- Bankfull
o--- Floodprone
30 40
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 6
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
E
15.51
12.07
1.29
2.53
9.36 1
----
----
2985.03
2985.03
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT3, Cross -Section 6
2989
2988
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2987
c 2986
.2
w
2984
s As -built
Left and right pin are flush with ground
2983
surface and are represented by 0 and the
---&-- Bankfull
furthest point on the X axis.
---o--- Floodprone
2982
0 10 20
30 40
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Permanent Cross -Section 7
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
B
6.11
7.95
0.77
1.07
10.32
L .0
1.97
2976.51
2976.51
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT3, Cross -Section 7
2981
2980
2979
c
0
2978
--------------------------------------------------------
2977
---------------------------
s As -built
2976
Left and right pin are flush with ground
o BankfUll
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
---o--- Floodprone
2975
0 10 20
30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 8
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
kTd
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
11.01
15.9
0.69
1.35
23.04
2.91
2970.37
2970.37
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 4, Cross -Section 8
2973
2972
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2971
0
Y
w 2970
As -built
2969
Left and right pin are flush with ground
0--- Bankfull
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
---&-- Floodprone
2968
0 10 20 30
40 50
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 9
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
B
27.56
19.55
1.41
2.55
13.87
----
----
2954.14
2954.14
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT 1 Reach 4, Cross -Section 9
2958
2957
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2956
Left and right pin are flush with ground
_
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
c 2955
.2
M
_'m 2954
----------------------------------------------------------
w
2953
s As -built
2952
e--- Bankfull
o--- Floodprone
2951
0 10 20 30
40
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 10
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
B
14.5
13.79
1.05
1.43
13.13
1.0
1.59
2922.1
2922.1
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 4, Cross -Section 10
2926
2925
2924
--------------------------------------------------------------------
a 2923
d
w
2922
------------------------------------------
�As-built
2921
Left and right pin are flush with ground
o BankfUll
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
---0--- Floodprone
2920
0 10 20
30 40
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 11
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
k�!d
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
E
31.24
17.43
1.79
2.89
9.74
----
2913.15
2913.15
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 4, Cross -Section 11
2917
2916
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o
Left and right pin are flush with ground
2915
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
_
2914
c
0
2913
------------------------------------------------------
d
w 2912
2911
s As -built
2910
o--- Bankfull
o--- Floodprone
2909
0 10 20
30 40
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 12
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Restoration
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
B
14.33
12.93
1.11
1.6
11.65
L .0
1.88
2904.41
2904.41
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 4, Cross -Section 12
2907
2906
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2905
2
Left and right pin are flush with ground
surface and are represented by 0 and the
m
Lu 2904
furthest point on the X axis.
s As -built
2903
e--- Bankfull
o--- Floodprone
2902
0
10 20
30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 13
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Enhancement
U
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
t!�!d
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
E
12.13
9.45
1.28
2.48
7.38
----
3051.49
3051.49
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 1, Cross -Section 13
3056
3055
3054
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S 3053
c
0
3052
------------------------------------
w 3051
3050
As -built
Left and right pin are flush with ground
0--- Bankfull
3049
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
---&-- Floodprone
3048
0 10 20
30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 14
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Enhancement
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
B
5.44
7.79
0.7
0.96
11.13
1.0
1.94
3025.48
3025.48
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 2, Cross -Section 14
3030
3029
Left and right pin are flush with ground
surface and are represented by 0 and the
3028
furthest point on the X axis.
c
0
3027
m
3026
--------------------------
t As -built
3025
0--- Bankfull
o- Floodprone
3024
0 10 20
30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Permanent Cross -Section 15
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Enhancement
og
''..k
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
Feature
Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
6.36
10.76
0.6
0.99
1 18.24
1.0
3.62
3008.35
3008.35
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 3, Cross -Section 15
3011
3010
Y
v
0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a 3009
d
W
3008
----------------------
�As-built
Left and right pin are flush with ground
surface and are represented by 0 and the ---o Bankfull
furthest point on the X axis.
---0--- Floodprone
3007
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 16
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Enhancement
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
12.06
11.68
1.03
2.33
11.34
2998.87
2998.87
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 3, Cross -Section 16
3002
3001
r 3000
c
0
2999
Left and right pin are flush with ground
y
----------------------------------------
surface and are represented by 0 and the
W
furthest point on the X axis.
2998
�As-built
2997
o--- Bankfull
e--- Floodprone
2996
0 10 20
30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 17
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Enhancement
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
B
17.6
12.06
1.5
2.46
8.26 j
----
----
2986.75
2986.75
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 3, Cross -Section 17
2990
—
2989
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o
Left and right pin are flush with ground
2988
surface and are represented by 0 and the
furthest point on the X axis.
c
0
M 2987
>
0
---------------------------------------------------------
w
2986
s As -built
e--- Bankfull
2985
o--- Floodprone
2984
0 10
20
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

FIGURE 8. MY-0 CROSS SECTIONS
Looking at the Left Bank
Permanent Cross -Section 18
(As -built Survey Data Collected: March 2022)
Enhancement
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool
B
17.29
15.15
1.14
2.55
13.29
----
----
2976.03
2976.03
Rush Fork Mitigation Site
UT1 Reach 3, Cross -Section 18
2979
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o
2978
2977
c
0
2976
--------------------------------------------------------
Leftand right pin are flush with ground
d
surface and are represented by 0 and the
W
furthest point on the X axis.
2975
*As -built
2974
o--- Bankfull
e--- Floodprone
2973
0 10 20 30
Station (ft)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
UT to RUSH FORK STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT (DMS #100068)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

APPENDIX E
Record Drawing Plan Sheets

Qf
V
w
N.T.S.
PROJECT
AREA
VICINITY MAP
INDEX OF SHEETS
1 • • • • • TITLE SHEET
1-A . . . . . STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
GENERALNOTES
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
VEGETATION SELECTION
1-B . . . . . NCDOT CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
2 - 2F DETAILS
3 - 10 ..... PLAN VIEW
11 - 15 ..... PROFILES
16 ..... BMP DETAIL
NOR TH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
HAYWOOD
COUNTY
LOCATION: FROM EXIT 24
ON
INTERSTATE 40,
TRAVEL NORTH FOR
5.75 MILES ON
NC
HWY 209 RUSH
FORK ROAD
TYPE OF WORK:
BEGIN UT3
A. 10+00.38
RECORD DRA WINGS
0
END UT1 REACH 1
BEGIN UT1 REACH 2
(;TA_ 13+25_00
END UT1 REACH 2
BEGIN UT1 REACF
';TA 1R+nn-nn
BEGIN UT2
STA.10+05
END UT2 S'
TOB UT1 R
i
EN
-�� TO
r
-C
�s
TOB UT1 REACH 4
r,
STATE
BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NQ
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
\3
--___����---
-- -� --
END U Th REACH 3
------------------- I
-f
--------------- - I
BEGIN Ohlj REACH 4\�\
A. 22+50.94
\
BEGIN UT4:
STA.10+00.0061
�.
END UT1 REACH 4
STA. 37+80.92
1
\�
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
GRAPHIC SCALES
MITIGATION SUMMARY
PREPARED
FOR THE OFFICE OF:
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
PROJECT ENGINEER
STREAM
STREAM
STREAM
Michael•
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary. NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone:[phone]
20 0 20 40
REACH
RESTORATION
ENHANCEMENT I
ENHANCEMENT II
I NTE R NAT I O
Fax [phone]
N A L Lcense#: F31084
NCDEQ
UT1 Rl
0
206.41
0
NC DIVISION
OF MITIGATION SERVICES
���o��HCARpli�'.
'
.�'�° •'FEssio• �9'�-,
PLANS
UT1 R2
0
0
275.00
217 WEST
JONES STREET, SUTIE 3000a
SEAL
20 0 20 40
UT1 R3
0
600.86
0
RALEIGH, NC 27603
028432
'
UT1 R4
1224.37
0
0
Pam,`.
KATHLEEN M. MCKEITHAN, PE�'�
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
UT2
0
0
78.16
LETTING DATE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
UT3
1577.53
0
0
5 0 10 20
UT4
41.90
0
01111-
CONTACT.
PAUL WIESNER
-.09990
2843.80
807.27
353.16
PROJECT MANAGER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
PROFILE (VERTICAL)TOTAL

CC
L
Go
Q
CD
2
m
Q
L
2
(n
L
n
U�
z
co
STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
SUPERCEDES SHEET I-B
�C,, J-HOOK VANE
c\\�
GRADE CONTROL J-HOOK VANE
ROCK VANE
OUTLET PROTECTION
ROCK CROSS VANE
FP 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
cE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
----435----EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
- - - - - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DOUBLE DROP ROCK CROSS VANE
PROPERTY LINE
LOG AND ROCK STEP / POOL
FOOT BRIDGE
TEMPORARY ROCK DAM
----
�__�,
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
ROOT WAD
°Ire°
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
o 0
LOG J-HOOK VANE
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
GRADE CONTROL LOG J-HOOK VANE
TREE REMOVAL
LOG VANE
TREE PROTECTION
MONITORING WELL
-
LOG STEP
DITCH PLUG
RAIN GAUGE
LOG CROSS VANE
0
CHANNEL FILL
LOG ROLLER
-
CREST GAUGE
�
SOD MAT WITH WOOD TOE
I N STREAM
00000000O0
NMI
8000
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
GEOLIFT WITH BRUSH TOE
O
FLOW GAUGE
00 0
BOULDER CLUSTER
ROOT WAD REVETMENT WITH LIVE
BRUSH
a� o�
BOULDER STEP
BOULDER TOE PROTECTION
As
SAFETY FENCE
x
PROPOSED WETLAND RE-ESTABLISHMENT
TF
TAPE FENCE
PROPOSED WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
- -WEB- -
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED WETLAND REHABILITATION
"NOTE: ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT
Proposed Bare -Root and Live Stake Species
UT to Rush Fork Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Botanical Name
Common Name
Planted byWetland
Species
Tolerance
All Buffer Plantings at 680 stems/acre using 8' X 8' spacing
General Riparian Zone - Overstory/Canopy Species
Betula ni ra
River Birch
10%
FACW
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
10%
FACW
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tulip Poplar
10%
FACU
Betula lenta
Sweet Birch
10%
FAC
uercus alba
White Oak
10%
FACU
Tilia americana
American Basswood
0%
FACU
Aesculus ava
Yellow Buckeye
7.5%
FACU
N ssa s lvatica
Blackgum
5%
FAC
Fraxinus americana
White Ash
5%
FACU
Diospyros vi r i ni ana
Persimmon
7.5 %
FAC
Ulmus americana
American Elm
5%
FACW
General Riparian Zone - Understory/Shrub Species
Rhododendron maximum
Roseba
0%
FAC
Lindera benzoin
S icebush
2.5%
FAC
Ilex verticillata
Winterberr
5%
FACW
Car inus caroliniana
American Hornbeam
5%
FAC
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
2.5%
FAC
Magnolia tri etala
Umbrella Tree
0%
FACU
Halesia carolina
Carolina Silverbell
5%
FAC
PERCETAGES SHOWN IN RED ARE THE CONSTRUCTED PLANTED PERCENTATGE.
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
MARCH 2O09 (REV 20 13)
6.06 TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
6.24 RIPARIAN AREA SEEDING
6.60 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
6.62 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
6.63 TEMPORARY ROCK DAM
6.70 TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
GENERAL NOTES
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 1 1-A
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
I
C A R
APPROVED BY:
SEAL -
028432
M.
DATE:
I
I
M4MicMichael Baker Engineering Inc.
hael Bake8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone:[phone]
Fax: 919.46
1 N T E R N A T 10 N A L License #: F310840
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL IN -STREAM STRUCTURES USING A TRACK HOE WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB OF
SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PLACE BOULDERS (3'x2'x2'), LOGS AND ROOTWADS.
2. WORK IS BEING PERFORMED AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE ALL REASONABLE
EFFORTS TO REDUCE SEDIMENT LOSS AND MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE WHILE PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION WORK.
3. CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED FOR THE SPRING OF 2020.
4. CONTRACTOR SHOULD CALL NORTH CAROLINA "ONE -CALL" BEFORE EXCAVATION STARTS. (1-800-632-4949)
5. BOULDER SIZES FOR IN -STREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3'x2'xl' AND CAN BE CHANGED PER STRUCTURE OR THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
6. ALL ON -SITE ALLUVIUM SHALL BE HARVESTED AND STOCKPILED PRIOR TO FILLING ABANDONED CHANNELS.
7. TOPSOIL SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 8" AND STOCKPILED SEPARATELY FROM UNDERCUT SOIL. 8" OF TOPSOIL SHALL
BE PLACED ON ALL BANKFULL BENCHES AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
8. ALL DISTURBED EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE MATTED WITH COIR FIBER MATTING OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
9. ALL STREAM BANKS SHALL BE LIVE STAKED.
10. UNLESS THE ALIGNMENT IS BEING ALTERED, THE EXISTING CHANNEL DIMENSIONS ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
11. CONTRACTOR WILL ENSURE THAT FENCING IS INSTALLED ON OR OUTSIDE THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS BUT NO MORE THAN 1' OUTSIDE.
12. WHERE PROPOSED FENCE CROSSES EXISTING STREAMS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE A SECTION OF BREAK AWAY FENCE,
A FLOOD GATE, OR ELECTRIFIED CHAINS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
13. ANY BORROW OR WASTE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT MUST COME FROM OR GO TO A PERMITTED SITE AND/OR FACILITY.
VEGETATION SELECTION
Wetland
Zone - Overstory/Canopy Species
Betula ni ra
River Birch
15%
FACW
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
15%
FACW
Betula alle haniensis
Yellow Birch
10%
FAC
uercus imbricaria
Shingle Oak
5%
FAC
N ssa s lvatica
Blackgum
5%
FAC
Acer ne undo
Box Elder
5%
FAC
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
5%
FACW
Ulmus americana
American Elm
5%
FACW
Wetland
Zone - Understory/Shrub
Species
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
15%
OBL
Ilex verticillata
Winterbe
5%
FACW
Lindera benzoin
S icebush
5%
FAC
Ce halanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
2.5%
OBL
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
2.5%
FACW
Xanthorhiza simplicissima
Yellow -root
2.5%
FACW
Aronia arbuti olia
Red Chokeberry
2.5%
FACW
Streambank Live Stake Plantings
Salix sericea
Silky Willow
25%
OBL
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
20%
FACW
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
10%
OBL
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
25%
FACW
Salix nigra
Black Willow
20%
OBL
Proposed Permanent Seed Mixture
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Botanical Name
Common Name
% Planted
by Species
Density
(lbs/ac)
Wetland
Tolerance
A rostis perennans
Autumn Bent ass
10%
1.5
FACU
El mus vir inicus
Virginia Wildr e
15%
2.25
FACW
Panicum vir atum
Switch ass
15%
2.25
FAC
Tri sacum dact loides
Eastern Gamma Grass
5%
0.75
FACW
Polygonum pennsylvanicum
Pennsylvania Smartweed
5%
0.75
FACW
Schizach rium sco arium
Little Blue Stem
5%
0.75
FACU
Juncus effusus
Soft Rush
5%
0.75
FACW
Bidens rondosa or aristosa
Beggars Tick
5%
0.75
FACW
Coreo sis lanceolata
Lance -Leaved Tick Seed
10%
1.5
FACU
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Tioga Deer Tongue
15%
2.25
FAC
Andro 0 on gerardii
Big Blue Stem
5%
0.75
FAC
Sor hastrum nutans
Indian Grass
5%
0.75
FACU
Total
100%
15
Note: Final species selection may change due to refinement of site conditions or to availability at the time
of planting. If species substitution is required, the planting Contractor will submit a revised planting list to
Baker for approval prior to the procurement of plant stock.

C
m
0-1
Q
i
00
ro
112
C
a�
0
L
O
LL
C-
7
00
*S.U.E = SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEER
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.-
State Line ..... -----
County Line --
Township Line --
City Line -
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Property Corner
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line -x
O
EiP
Proposed Woven
g
Wire Fence
Proposed Chain
Link Fence
Proposed Barbed
Wire Fence
Existin Wetl nd
Bo nda - - - —WLB— - - -
a u I
Proposed Wetland Boundary WLB
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
O
Sign
O
Well
W
Small Mine
Foundation
Area Outline
Cemetery
F t
Building
FL�i
School
Church
r% - - -
VUM
HYDROLOGY.-
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
C r% Y l r► ry
. V....Z2
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
False Sump
BZ 1
BZ 2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
1DIj'lISION OF HI17HWA1'S
CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge " " " '
CSX TRANSPORTATION
RR Signal Milepost MILEPOST 35
Switch 0
SWITCH
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled --------
RIGHT OF WAY.-
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker 0
Existing Right of Way Line -
Proposed
Right of Way Line
R
Proposed
Right of Way Line with
R
Iron Pin
and Cap Marker
Proposed
Right of Way Line with
%R
Concrete or Granite Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed
Control of Access
Existing Easement
Line
E
Proposed
Temporary Construction Easement -
E
Proposed
Temporary Drainage Easement
TDE
Proposed
Permanent Drainage Easement
PDE
Proposed
Permanent Utility Easement
PUE
Proposed
Temporary Utility Easement
TUE
Proposed
Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin
and Cap Marker
0
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement —
Existing Curb —
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
- - - C - - -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
- - - F - - -
Wheel Chair Ramp
0
,Proposed
Existing Metal Guardrail
T T T
Proposed Guardrail
T T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail
n n n
Proposed Cable Guiderail
n n n n
Equality Symbol
z
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION. -
Single Tree {;
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vi neya rd Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
Recorded U/G Power Line
Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)
CONC r
CONC WW
CON —CH —W
>----------<
11 CB
—P-
- — — —P— — — —
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
-0-
Proposed Telephone Pole
-0-
Telephone Manhole
O
Telephone Booth
0
Telephone Pedestal
❑T
Telephone Cell Tower
�
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole
"H
Recorded U/G Telephone Cable
T
Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - -
- - —T— - - -
Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit
TC
Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*)- -
- - —TC— - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable
T FO
Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*)- -
- - -T FO- - - .
A
SSIp.,.tiq��� '
9l•: i
SEAL _ i
APPROVED BY:
039201
i
DATE:
WATER:
i
Water Manhole
Water Meter
o
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
.0
Recorded U/G Water Line
w
Designated U/G Water Line
(S.U.E.*)' -
- - -W- - - -
Above Ground Water Line
A/C Water
TV:
TV Satellite Dish C�
TV Pedestal
TV Tower
U/G TV Cable Hand Hole "H
Recorded U/G TV Cable TV
Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - —TV— - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable TV FO
Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*�-- - — — —TV FO— — —
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
Recorded U/G Gas Line
Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
Recorded SS Forced Main Line
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) —
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
0
---G----
A/C Gas
OO
G
SS
A/C Sanitary Sewer
FSS
FSS
0
El
O
❑s

(V
Z
m
m
m
Q
00
c9
QO
c9
i
C
i
m
Q
i
c
T
aD
0
i
i
0
L�
m
00
cD
c9
QO
i
0
+-
(V 0
(V
CD
NO
\ L
�Q
\ o•
Ln
Wbkf
SRO D-Max
ZO
Wb
RIFFLE or PLUNGE POOL
.04 Wbkf 111110.
�O,0O
Wb
POOL (MEANDER)
TYPICAL STRUCTURE PLACEMENT
ROOT WADS
COVER LOGS
GRADE CONTROL
LOG J-HOOK VANI
(SEE SHEET 2-D)
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
(SEE SHEET 2-D)
TOP OF BANK
TYPICAL RIFFLE, POOL, AND BANKFULL BENCH CROSS SECTIONS
VARIES
but z 30'
•�7
TOP OF TERRACE
Wbkf VARIES
but Z 30'
31
I 0Q�
C�S�O D-Max S
Wb
RIFFLE WITH BANKFULL BENCH
ENCH LIMITS
TOP OF TERRACE
VARIES Wbkf VARIES
but z 30' but z 30'
Wb
POOL WITH BANKFULL BENCH
G�\C;�
loe
O
0000 z l
00
00\
000
00 OQ0OD°IOROo�U)O ° '
CVp �p J,°pV °o 0°0�� LU
0 Qw�
00
o0p ° O°O�� /
OON
loll
i
MAT BANKS WITH COIR FIBER MATTING /
I /
GEOLIFT WITH BRUSH TOE
(SEE SHEET 2-D)
STRUCTURE NOTES:
1. GENERALLY CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES, ROOT WADS, LOG VANES AND COIR FIBER
MATTING WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION AND SEQUENCE AS SHOWN.
2. ANY CHANGES TO NUMBER OR LOCATION OF STRUCTURES DURING
CONSTRUCTION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
3. COIR FIBER MATTING TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL RESTORED STREAMBANKS,
FLOODPLAIN BENCHING, AND TERRACE SLOPES AS DESCRIBED IN THE
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.
4. ROOTWADS MAY BE REPLACED WITH GEOLIFT.
/1
N
SILL
B
Y
Z
Q
m
LL
O
LU
O
H
BENCH LIMITS
WIDTH OF BANKFULL (Wbkf)
AVERAGE DEPTH
MAXIMUM DEPTH (Dmax)
W/D (Wbkf/Dbkf)
BAN KFU LL AREA (Abkf)
BOTTOM WIDTH (Wb)
RIFFLE SIDE SLOPE (X:1)
INSIDE POOL SIDE SLOPE
OUTSIDE POOL SIDE SLOPE
FLOW
1/3 BOTTOM WIDTH
C
B GRADE
�� POINT
VANE
ARM
VANE ANGLE
20' TO 30'
SCOUR
POOL i
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
166680
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
��.�`�N► CAR pl!�,�
�s S / p •.,'1'q �i� I
SHEET NO.
2
• SEAL I APPROVED BY:
I
028432
GIN
i ►► ��,, ,,
DATE:
I
I
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 N T E R N A T 10 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
UT1 R1, R2, &
R3 UPPER
10+00 - 19+50
UT1 R3
LOWER
19+50 - 22+61
UT1 R4
UPPER
22+61 - 28+00
UT1 R4
LOWER
28+00 - 37+95
UT2
UT3 UPPER
11+50 - 16+50
UT3 LOWER
16+50 - 26+45
UT4
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
9.00
11.50
10.00
12.50
12.50
16.50
13.00
17.50
4.50
6.60
7.50
10.00
8.50
12.00
5.80
7.50
0.65
1.11
0.70
1.40
0.90
1.70
0.95
1.80
0.45
0.70
0.57
1.10
0.65
1.30
0.45
0.70
0.80
1.50
1.00
2.00
1.20
2.50
1.30
2.50
0.60
1.00
0.70
1.70
0.85
1.80
0.50
1.00
13.80
10.40
14.30
9.20
13.90
9.50
13.70
9.80
13.00
9.50
13.10
8.90
13.10
9.50
12.90
10.30
5.90
12.80
7.00
17.00
11.30
28.80
12.10
31.30
2.20
4.60
4.30
11.20
6.00
15.10
2.60
5.50
5.80
5.50
5.00
4.50
8.10
6.50
8.50
7.50
4.00
2.60
4.70
3.20
4.90
4.80
3.60
3.50
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
ROCK CROSS VANE
NO GAPS SILL
BETWEEN
BOULDERS
C.
6' MIN.
PLAN VIEW
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS.
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
3. CONSTRUCT ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS AS SHOWN.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
8. ON -SITE ALLUVIUM SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE STONE BACKFILL WHERE
AVAILABLE.
9. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
10. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
FLOW -►
FILTER FABRIC
TOE OF BANK
BANKFULL STAGE
B
FLOW
o1
STREAM BED o
ELEVATION:------
LEVATION C
FLOW
6' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
2'
� 2 N7
CH-- =NFL BED
WELL GRADED MIX
47 TO 77 VANE ARC LOB
PROFILE VIEW B - B'
VANE ARM
CROSS VANE INVERT/GRADE POINT
FILTER FABICPROFILE VIEW C - C
HEADER ROCK
STREAM BANK
FOOTER ROCK
•ALE

m
0
Q
i
c
T
0
(1)
0
i
i
O
L�
0
m
0
00
cD
c9
r-O
i
0
+>
(V O
(V N
o
C\jOa
� QS
Ln:F E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
ROCK VANE
BOULDER STEP
166680 1 2A
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
1/3
A
I
"N1CARol7,,,
BOTTOM
WIDTH
TOP TOE
OF BANK
,���p. •,........,, •('�'. I
CHANNEL
o
•:�pFESSIpSEAL APPROVED BY:
! • I
=
U
Ir
_
= 039201
- : I
FLOW
e°O /� ° 00
0�8�
% •:,••�N 4•�' �. I
.,���9
l0®
5000$
O,G..... ,%
�� �
1
`�
g oo g
0O °Ooo c) -.0 o
�i �u►`
I DATE:
N 20° TO 30°
1 °
��
00 00, W000°9p
p °9yo �
J p � ...
N
oo�
mr°6 � 1 0&8
A
0 0-0
e°��°°o°��
�90 ° Og® o °
o ® o o �C�
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
�_ 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
0 00
�� °°CJ
9 °0?0
Michael
Phone: [phone]aker Cary, NORTH 8 INA 27518
Q
STONE BACKFILL ° A NO GAPS BETWEEN ROCKS
�°��
OZ
0® o o $
6)(!540 ,�
Fax:[phone]
INTERNATIONAL License #: F-1084
HEADER ROCK i"-' .
° 0 6bo 0 o
o0o°00 o0o�o °�
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
°°
°° STREAM BED ELEVATION
o® °° °moo ° °oo
ono � �o
(SCOUR POOL
BANKFULL
/
i
HEADER ROCK
BOULDERS - - - - - - ,----- _
FLOW
SLOPE
HEAD OF RIFFLE
SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
4% TO 7%
FOOTER ROCK PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
O ---
--- ----
00 0
LA:
BOULDER
04 BOTTOM WIDTH STONE
BACKFILL
G�\OE o o �� °
° ^ 3pn, ®00 oso RIFFLE
°�°c
FOOTER ROCK
Sooaood'oo 0 'Do0 0
8
0 0
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SCOUR
POOL (EXCAVATED)
000° °°°`b° 600
PLAN VIEW
�0 g0
�00 000 pO
POOL
PLAN VIEW
PROFILE VIEW
PROFILE A - A'
BACKFILL
SHOULD BE CONVEX
STREAMBED
HEADER ROCK
NOTES:
STONE BACKFILL
1. HEADER AND FOOTER BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 1' X 2' X 3'.
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
2. FOOTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT 1/4 TO 1/3 OF THE LENGTH IS DOWNSTREAM OF
0 0o
THE HEADER.
1.
DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS.
°O��oo°O- 5oo°Ogc°
3. SOIL SHALL BE WELL COMPACTED AROUND BURIED PORTION OF FOOTERS WITH THE BUCKET
2.
START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
o°Qo(�Q °°QOPQ o°Q0�
OF EXCAVATOR.
3.
CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
O�00 (yo- oW 0°°°O
4. INSTALL NON -WOVEN FILTER FABRIC UNDERNEATH FOOTER BOULDERS.
4.
AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
5. UNDERCUT THE RIFFLE ELEVATION 12 INCHES TO ALLOW FOR A LAYER OF STONE.
5.
USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ALONG COMPLETED BANKS SUCH THAT THE EROSION
6.
INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
CONTROL MATTING AT THE TOE OF THE BANK EXTENDS DOWN TO THE UNDERCUT ELEVATION.
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
FOOTER ROCK
7. FILL TRENCH WITH GRADED MIX OF CLASS A, CLASS B, AND #57 STONE TO THE BED ELEVATION
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
OF THE CHANNEL.
7.
AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
10' MINIMUM
8. BOULDER STEPS MUST BE EXTENDED TO A MINIMUM OF 2' INTO THE BANK. USE SILL BOULDERS
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
IF NECESSARY.
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
9. THALWEG AND STEP INVERT WILL BE CONCAVE AND SHAPED PER DIRECTION OF THE DESIGNER.
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
10. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
8.
START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
SECTION A - A
9.
ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
GRADE CONTROL ROCK J-HOOK
VANE
ROCK J-HOOK VANE
1/3 BOTTOM 1/3 BOTTOM
1/3 BOTTOM 1/3 BOTTOM
WIDTH OF WIDTH OF
WIDTH OF WIDTH OF
CHANNEL CHANNEL
CHANNEL CHANNEL
FLOW
FLOW
LEAVE GAPS (OPTIONAL)
PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER STREAM BED ELEVATION
STREAM BED ELEVATION
20° TO 30° BANKFULL
20° TO 300 _ STONE BACKFILL
o°QooQQo°Qo��
BANKFULL
HEADER ROCK
STONE BACKFILL
�00
FLOW�i
HEADER ROCK
00 o 00 o0O0°O
4% TO 7% SLOPE
FLOW ��
A 0
- - -
Ogg
j� °O�(
A °° °°Qo
4%T07%SLOPE
O
°O°
w oQ°�o� °oQ°o
O
g
- -- ----
LU
c� oa°O °o °O�O0C
Q ° 0 0 (°
0Qo °Q°o°Q
�00 00
_
q STONE BACKFILL
U) QO° A -''�
STONE BACKFILL
j
FOOTER ROCK
/ �•
FOOTER ROCK
ooQo°° \
Y a`9 i GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
J��o i
�,
Q �80 / \ w
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
-)00
Z °° i
m °�oQ SCOUR ` SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
00 °°0 i Q
`.`
X - POOL PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
co �'°0° i' SCOUR
J
PROFILE VIEW
�, & `
PROFILE VIEW
° POOL
N Jo° O� I
N LL
Y
;Oc Z
3�
--
� ° i
-- -
BACKFILL SHOULD
STREAMBED
BE CONVEX
°
��
HEADER ROCK
.�ogr
O°Q FOOTER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
of 0 SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
STONE BACKFILL
�° PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
°0000°°0800°°00�°
_oQO°QQDoQ040ooQ°�
NO GAPS BETWEEN ROCKS
BACKFILL SHOULD BE CONVEX
0 GAPS BETWEEN ROCKS
000( 000
STREAMBED
HEADER ROCK
60 00 00
HEADER ROCK
HEADER ROCK
STONE BACKFILL
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
FOOTER ROCK
�
do 10' MINIMUM
Q�oQ ��4OQ0 0
�00 o CJ( o �00
000°
°�00° °�00° °�
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
SECTION A - A
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS.
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
FOOTER ROCK
3. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
3. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
10' MINIMUM No
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
SECTION A - A
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
8. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
8. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
9. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
9. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.

LOG AND ROCK STEP / POOL
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
166680
SHEET NO.
2B
C
m
(V
z
Cn
m
Q
00
c9
QO
i
C
n
m
\L
i
C
aD
0
i
V
i
0
L�
00
c0
c9
QO
A
No
PROTECT BANK
USING TRANSPLANTS
PROTECT BANK
USING GEOLIFT
PLAN VIEW
LOG BURIED
BELOW STREAMB
A
PROTECT BANK USING
ROOT WADS
BANKFULL
GRADE CONTROL LOG J-HOOK VANE
STONE BACKFILL
HEADER LOG
O C9.
ANY GAPS BETWEEN LOGS MUST BE FILLED WITH OTHER
RECENTLY HARVETED BRANCHES OR COBBLE AND GRAVEL
BEFORE INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC AND BACK FILLING ARM
TER FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
1/2 - 2/3 BANKFULL
1.0 6' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
ROOTWAD
SECTION A - A'
BASF FI nW
SECTION 6 - 6'
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
FLOW
STREAMBED ^-1
i
FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
ANY GAPS BETWEEN LOGS MUST BE FILLED WITH OTHER
RECENTLY HARVETED BRANCHES BEFORE INSTALLING
NOTES: FILTER FABRIC AND BACK FILLING ARM
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10" IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, RECENTLY HARVESTED, AND FOOTERED.
2. BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 2' x 2' x 1'.
3. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOG.
4. ROOTWADS SHOULD BE PLACED BENEATH THE HEADER LOG AND PLACED SO THAT IT LOCKS THE HEADER LOG INTO THE
BANK. SEE ROOTWAD DETAIL.
5. BOULDERS SHOULD BE PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ACHORING.
6. HEADER BOULDERS TO BE PLACED 0.5 TO 0.75 FEET APART.
7. FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
8. TRANSPLANTS OR BOULDERS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF ROOWADS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
9. BOULDER SILL MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 6'.
10. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WITH WELL GRADED MIX
OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM
WHERE AVAILABLE.
PLAN VIEW
ROOTWAD
BURIED IN
STREAMBANK
AT LEAST 6'.
BOULDERS CAN
ALSO BE USED.
PROFILE VIEW
LOG BURIED
BELOW STREAMBED
\'
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
C AR p1 *
S /0
SEAL ! I APPROVED BY:
I
039201
- : I
• •.•F41G I
DATE:
I
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
Michael 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
NOTES:
DEADER LOG 1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8" IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED
AND EXTENDING INTO THE BANK 3' ON EACH SIDE.
2. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOG.
3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
4. BOULDERS SHOULD BE 1' X 2' X 3' AND PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ANCHORING.
5. TOEWOOD OR TRANSPLANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF BOUDERS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
6. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WITH WELL
GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK.
INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE.
-ER LOG
PLAN VIEW
LOG VANE
:OTEXTILE FABRIC
ROOTWAD
LOG BURIED IN
STREAM BANK AT LEAST 5'
NOTES:
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10" IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. BOULDERS MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ANCHOR LOGS.
3. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOGS.
4. ROOTWADS SHOULD BE PLACED BENEATH THE HEADER LOG AND PLACED SO THAT IT LOCKS THE HEADER LOG
INTO THE BANK. SEE ROOTWAD DETAIL.
5. BOULDER SHOULD BE PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ANCHORING.
6. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
7. TOEWOOD OR TRANSPLANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF ROOTWADS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
8. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WITH WELL
GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK.
INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE.
STONE BACKFILL
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
6' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
1/2 - 2/3 BANKFULL
ROOTWAD
FLOW
STREAMBED o
BOULDER
FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
PROFILE VIEW

is
QC
n
1/3
1/3
1/3
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
WIDTH OF
WIDTH OF
WIDTH OF
CHANNEL I
CHANNEL
I CHANNEL
ROCK DOUBLE DROP CROSS VANE
FLOW
STREAM BED ELEVATION ---\
1/2 - 2/3 OF BANKFULL
200 TO 300
_
-/0 0 (50 -
b O, y�
LU
A o �OC�008C� 0
�° 00
00 0�LU
00C
FLOW -�
LL Q
00
Cao Q� '
O ~
' 0
�o
CO
M
N
J�I(n'�
N
ILL
,
00 ,
g(JC
oho c�
J
N
OC
STONE BACKFILL
N Y
SCOUR
Y
z
m'°O�
g �- _ POOL_
_,
00o
Q
CIDGEOTEXTILE
FABRIC-
0
i
O
)o
O
\� \�-� `--�--� -� �� QO
'04..._.—————
J0
o
SCOUR POOL
t
`--�
---------------
NO GAPS
SCOUR
POOL
BETWEEN BOULDERS
(EXCAVATED PER DIRECTION
OF ENGINEER)
PLAN VIEW
STREAI
STONE BACKFILL
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
3. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
8. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
9. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
C
C
U
(V
z
m
m
I
m
m
Q
I
00
LO
�o
i
C
n
i
m
Q
i
c
aD
0
i
V
i
O
L�
m
CO
c0
c9
rL/\IN VICVV
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
CHANNEL PLUG
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
1.5' MINIMUM
HEADER ROCK
4% TO 7% SLOPE
16EW-1
FOOTER ROCK
SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
PROFILE VIEW
I VV I Lf\ f1VCK
6' MINIMUM
SECTION A — A
NOTES:
1. COMPACT BACKFILL USING ON -SITE HEAVY EQUIPMENT IN 10 INCH LIFTS.
2. BACKFILL OF PLUGS SHOULD INCORPORATE ANY OF -SITE CLAY AVAILABLE.
BEGIN HEAD OF RIFFLE INVERT
ELEVATION F
TOP OF BANK
BEGIN TAIL OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION AND Ic
PLAN VIEW
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
RGER STONE MAY BE PLACED
REDIRECT LOW FLOW AT
ZECTION OF ENGINEER
F4
TONE BACKFILL
NOTES:
1. UNDERCUT CHANNEL BED ELEVATION AS NEEDED TO ALLOW FOR LAYERS OF STONE TO
ACHIEVE FINAL GRADE.
2. INSTALL COIR FIBER MATTING ALONG COMPLETED BANKS SUCH THAT THE EROSION CONTROL
MATTING AT THE TOE OF THE BANK EXTENDS DOWN TO THE UNDERCUT ELEVATION.
3. INSTALL STONE BACKFILL, COMPACTED TO GRADE.
4. FINAL CHANNEL BED SHAPE SHOULD HAVE THE ELEVATION OF THE BED 0.2 FT DEEPER IN
THE CENTER THAN AT THE EDGES.
5. STONE BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF 10% CLASS I, 20% CLASS B, 40% CLASS A, AND 30%
ON -SITE ALLUVIUM BY VOLUME OR #57 STONE.
6. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES SHALL BE 12" THICK.
7. LARGER CLASS I & B STONES MAY EXTEND ABOVE THE BED SURFACE, BUT NO HIGHER THAN
HALF BANKFULL AND SHOULD PROVIDE A "NATURAL LOOK". ENGINEER SHALL HAVE FINAL
APPROVAL OF EXTENDING ROCK.
8. SATURATED WOODY DEBRIS THAT IS EXISTING WITHIN THE CHANNEL CAN BE RELOCATED
INTO THE NEW RIFFLE AREAS.
LOG WEI
COIR LOG
A
----------------
----------------
A'
SCOUR
POOL /
0
J
LL
IF
PLAN VIEW
TrIA"IC`MI A"ITC`
CROSS SECTION VIEW B — B'
5'
COIR FIBER
""^TYING
RIFFLE D-max
00
9,Q)
- OC1r�
J I l.JIN _ UP"Ur\I ILL
SECTION B — B'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
166680
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
,`,Nun►►►►►�,
.. �� C A R,01j,1!�, I
BANKFULL = SEAL i APPROVED BY:
OOF 028432
oil
Jilli ►► I
DATE:
TOE
1/4 OF BEGIN HEAD OF RIFFLE INVERT
GLIDE ELEVATION AND STATION
LENGTH
� STONE BACKFILL
GLIDE
LOG DROP
TRANSPLANTS
OR LIVE STAKES
LOG
PROFILE A - A'
SHEET NO.
2C
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
N T E R N A T I 0 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
114 OF RUN LENGTH
1
L
�� 9 00 POOL
TOP OF STREAMBANK
FLOW
STREAMBED
STONE BACKFILL .
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
4' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
NOTES
BEGIN TAIL OF RIFFLE INVERT
ELEVATION AND STATION
SOUR PO%
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10 INCHES IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT,
HARDWOOD, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. TOP OF HEADER LOG SHOULD BE SET AT SAME ELEVATION AS THE STREAMBED.
3. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WITH COIR LOGS TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS.
4. PLACE TRANSPLANTS ALONG BANKS TO PROTECT AGAINST BANK EROSION.
5. THE HEADER LOG SHOULD BE NOTCHED 2 - 3 INCHES DEEP IN THE CENTER AND
FOR 20 - 30% OF THE CHANNEL WIDTH.

Cr
is
QC
n
B
SEE CROSS
VANE DETAIL—,
C
0
(V
z
m
m
m
m
Q
00
QO
c9
i
C
n
i
m
i
Q
i
c
aD
r
i
V
i
O
L�
m
00
(-D
c9
QO
FLOW
A
�1A1�1f:a
A
Y �
Y
m z�
Q
z_j m
Q
Q z
Q z
wQ
wQ
U)
U)
PLAN
VIEW
TRANSPLANTS OR
TEMPORARY SEED
AND MATTING
PLUNGE POOL
FLU
TOP OF TERRACE
VARIES
SECTION A - A
.7
Wbkf
SECTION B - B
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
GEOTEXTILE FABRI
FILL MATERIAL
�j
FLOODPLAIN CULVERT
STREAM CHANNEL
NOTES
)WEST ELEVATION OF CROSS
\NE SHOULD BE SLIGHTLY
)WER THAN INVERT OF CULVERT
DTER BOULDERS
FEND BELOW DEPTH OF SCOUR
72"x48"xW"
VARIES
COVER FILL MATERIAL
WITH 6 INCHES #57 STONE
12" OR AS SPECIFIED
CULVERT
(SEE PLANS FOR TYPE / SIZE)
CROSS SECTION VIEW
SLOPES MAY VARY
EXISTING GROUND
FLOODPLAIN CULVERT
1. SIZE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PLANS.
2. APPLY SUFFICIENT FILL (2' MIN) OVER CULVERT TO PREVENT COLLAPSE.
3. STABILIZE SIDE SLOPES WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND FILL AROUND CULVERTS
WITH CLASS II STONE.
4. INSTALL HEADWALLS AND ENDWALLS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND IN THE DETAILS.
5. PRIMARY CULVERT SHOULD BE INSTALLED 12" OR AS SPECIFIED BELOW CHANNEL ELEVATION.
GEOLIFT WITH BRUSH TOE
NOTES:
1. LIVE BRANCH CUTTINGS SHALL BE THE SAME SPECIES AS THE LIVE STAKES
AND SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING VEGETATION DORMANCY.
2. LIVE BRANCH CUTTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A DENSITY OF 20-30 CUTTINGS
PER LINEAR FOOT AND A MAXIMUM DIAMETER OF 2.5 INCHES.
3. NUMBER OF SOIL LIFTS MAY VARY, IN GENERAL LIFTS SHALL EXTEND TO THE
TOP OF BANK OR BANKFULL STAGE.
STAKE TOP LAYER
OF MATTING IN 6" TRENCH
(SEE MATTING DETAIL)
FLOODPLAIN
UNDISTURBED
EARTH
1.0' LIFT OF
COMPACTED
ON -SITE SOIL (TYP)
4' DEEP (TYP)
BRUSH CAN BE LIMBS, BRANCHES, ROOTS OR ANY OTHER
WOODY VEGETATION APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 2D
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
"N► C AR p14
SEAL 9l •' i APPROVED BY:
039201
I
• •.•F41
DATE:
I
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
L "Al r Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L License #: F-1084
TOP OF BANK / BANKFULL STAGE
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
COIR FIBER MATTING
ENCOMPASSES LIFT
LIVE BRANCH CUTTINGS (SEE
f PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES)
BASEFLOW
W
FINISHED BED
ELEVATION
FOUNDATION APPROX. 1 FT
BELOW FINISHED BED ELEVATION
NOTES:
1. WHEN GEOLIFTS ARE BUILT ABOVE ROOTWAD CLUSTER, USE LARGE STONE BACKFILL BEHIND
ROOT MASS TO BUILT FOUNDATION.
2. CLASS I STONE MAY BE USED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER TO BUILD THE FOUNDATION
IN LIEU OF BRUSH MATERIAL.
BOULDER HEADWALL / ENDWALL
TOP COURSE OF
BOULDERS (TYP.)
B FLOW -
STREAM BED .'
A —\ —\
Y
Z _
LU
EMBEDDED FOOTER
BOULDERS
B, CULVERT Y
z
EMBEDDED FOOTER m
BOULDERS
Q
INCREASE OFFSET OF w
EACH COURSE TO ACHIEVE
0.5:1 SIDE SLOPES e7
PLAN VIEW
STAGGER
JOINTS
PLY
0.5:1 SIDE SLOPE
EARTHEN BACKFILL
-2
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
CULVERT
- - - 0 BASEFLOW
A �——,—�—,— — — — -
CHINK AND WEDGE 4-INCH STREAM BED
MINUS ROCK, AS NECESSARY, TO
LEVEL THE BOULDER COURSES CULVERT SHALL BE EMBEDDED
TO DEPTH INDICATED IN TABLE
BOULDER PLACED BELOW
EXISTING CHANNEL BOTTOM USE LARGEST BOULDERS
TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 2'. FOR FOOTER COURSE
STREAM BED
SECTION B - B'
REACH
BOULDER
SIZE
CULVERT
SIZE
EMBEDMENT
UT1-R1
1'x2'x2'
4 FT
12 IN
UT1-R4
1'x2'x2'
5 FT
12 IN
UT3
1'x2'x2'
4 FT
9.6 IN
UT4
1'x1'x1'
3 FT
12 IN
a L MAKE TOP OF FOOTER COURSE
AS LEVEL AS POSSIBLE NOTES:
EMBED TO DEPTH 1. BOULDERS SHALL BE TOUCHING SO THAT VOID SPACE IS MINIMIZED.
SHOWN IN TABLE 2. BOULDERS SHOULD EXTEND BELOW SCOUR DEPTH. FOOTER BOULDERS SHALL BEAT
LEAST Z BELOW THE EXISTING BED
3. GEOTEXTILE MATTING SHOULD BE PLACED BETWEEN BOULDERS AND SOIL.
SECTION A - A' 4. BOULDERS SHOULD BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED. VOID SPACE BETWEEN FABRIC AND
BOULDER OR ROCK FILL MATERIAL, SHOULD BE MINIMIZED.
5. BOULDERS SHOULD NOT BE HIGHER THAN THE TOP OF CROSSING ELEVATION.
6. FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE PLACED BEHIND BOULDERS, BURIED BELOW BOULDER DEPTH, AND
EXTEND INTO THE BANK.

w
N
Un
m
Q
Cb
c9
r-O
c9
i
ro
n
i
m
Q
i
c
T
0
0
i
L
O
L�
C_
0
I
00
cD
c9
(_O
i
CV O
CV N
O .�
C\1 0
\ L
Q Q
(V/
Ln�
LIVE STAKING
TOP OF STREAMBANK
PLANTI
6'-8' SPACING
9'-3' SPACING
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
SQUARE CUT TOP
BUDS FACING UPWARD
LIVE CUTTING
MIN.1/2" DIA
2'- 3' LENGTH
ANGLE CUT
30 - 45 DEGREES
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
NOTES
1. STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. DO NOT INSTALL STAKES THAT HAVE BEEN SPLIT.
3. STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH BUDS POINTING UPWARDS.
4. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO BANK.
5. STAKES SHOULD BE 1/2 TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3 FT LONG.
6. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED LEAVING 1/5 OF STAKE ABOVE GROUND.
1
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION, ROOTMASS, AND SOIL MATERIAL
CROSS SECTION VIEW
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION AND ROOTMASS
i
1�
------------ �`------------- r
-- (b
PLAN VIEW
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 1 2E
PROJECT ENGINEER
i
i
i
CAR017
�O / y%
SEAL l•• i APPROVED BY:
039201
i
08 � i� DATE:
i
i
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
�TERIALMichael 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
1 N T E R N A T 10 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
NOTES:
1.
EXCAVATE A HOLE IN THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED THAT WILL
ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE OF TRANSPLANT TO BE PLACED.
BEGIN EXCAVATION AT THE TOE OF THE BANK.
2.
EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT USING A FRONT END LOADER.
EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE ROOT MASS AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL
SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. IF ENTIRE ROOT MASS CAN NOT BE
EXCAVATE IN ONE BUCKET LOAD, THE TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE
AND ANOTHER SHOULD BE SELECTED.
3.
PLACE TRANSPLANT IN THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED SO THAT
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
4.
FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND COMPACT.
5.
ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
6.
PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH THAT
THEY TOUCH.
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS COIR FIBER MATTING
2.5 INCH
ROOFING
NAI L
NOTES: PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING IN 6 INCH DEEP
1. PLANT BARE ROOT SHRUBS AND TREES TO THE WIDTH OF THE TRENCH, STAKE, BACKFILL, AND COMPACT NOTES:
BUFFER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. T_PANRS SHOULD BE SEEDED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MATTING.
2. LOOSEN COMPACTED SOIL. TOP OF STREAMBANK 2. INSTALL COIR FIBER MATTING PER SPECIFICATIONS ALONG STREAM
TOP OF STREAMBANK 3. PLANT IN HOLES MADE BY A MATTOCK, DIBBLE, PLANTING BAR, BANKS OR IN OTHERS LOCATIONS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.
OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. 3. LARGE STAKES SHOULD NOT BE SPACED FURTHER THAN 36" APART.
4. PLANT IN HOLES DEEP AND WIDE ENOUGH TO ALLOW THE ROOTS 4. PLACE LARGE STAKES ALONG ALL SEAMS, IN THE CENTER OF BANK,
TO SPREAD OUT AND DOWN WITHOUT J-ROOTING. AND TOE OF SLOPE.
5. KEEP ROOTS MOIST WHILE DISTRIBUTING OR WAITING TO PLANT 5. MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON BANKS, STAKED, AND TRENCHED PRIOR
BY MEANS OF WET CANVAS, BURLAP, OR STRAW. TO INSTALLING CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL.
6. HEEL -IN PLANTS IN MOIST SOIL OR SAWDUST IF NOT PROMPTLY 6. ALL MATTING STAKES MUST BE 100% BIODEGRADABLE.
PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE.
TOE OF SLOPE
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
CROSS SECTION VIEW OF BARE ROOT PLANTING
PLANTINGS
TOP OF STREAMBANK
NOTES:
1. WHEN PREPARING THE HOLE FOR A POTTED PLANT OR SHRUB
DIG THE HOLE 8 -12 INCHES LARGER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE
POT AND THE SAME DEPTH AS THE POT.
2. REMOVE THE PLANT FROM THE POT. LAY THE PLANT ON ITS SIDE
IF NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE POT.
3. IF THE PLANT IS ROOTBOUND (ROOTS GROWING IN A SPIRAL
AROUND THE ROOT BALL), MAKE VERTICAL CUTS WITH A KNIFE
OR SPADE JUST DEEP ENOUGH TO CUT THE NET OF ROOTS.
ALSO MAKE A CRISS-CROSS CUT ACROSS THE BOTTOM OF THE BALL.
4. PLACE THE PLANT IN THE HOLE.
5. FILL HALF OF THE HOLE WITH SOIL (SAME SOIL REMOVED FOR BACKFILL).
6. WATER THE SOIL TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS AND FILL THE REST
OF THE HOLE WITH THE REMAINING SOIL.
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
CROSS SECTION VIEW OF CONTAINER PLANTING
TRENCH
TOP OF
STREAMBANK
LARGE
STAKES
LARGE STAKES
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
PLACE.COIR FIBER MATTING AT TOE OF SLOPE.
SECURE MATTING WITH LARGE MATTING STAKE
CROSS SECTION VIEW
TRENCH
TOP OF STREAMBANK
------------------------------------------------------
• • • • • • STAKES
COIR FIBER MATTING
• • • • • • • • • • • • TO BE EXTENDED TO
TOE OF SLOPE
PLAN VIEW LARGE
STAKES
TYPICAL LARGE MATTING STAKE
LEG LENGTH
17.00 IN 43.18 CM
TAPERED TO POINT
WIDTH
1.5IN
3.81 CM
THICKNESS
1.5IN
3.81 CM
TYPICAL SMALL MATTING STAKE
LEG LENGTH
11.00 IN
27.94 CM
HEAD WIDTH
1.25 IN
3.18 CM
HEAD THICKNESS
0.40 IN
1.02 CM
LEG WIDTH
0.60 IN 1.52 CM
TAPERED TO POINT
LEG THICKNESS
0.40 IN
1.02 CM
TOTAL LENGTH
12.00 IN
30.48 CM

C
0-1
LL
(V
t�
Z
m
Q
00
CD
�O
C.0
0
C
01-1
-
m
0
Q
C
T
0
Ql
0
i
O
L�
0
t�
00
(D
CD
r-O
1-1
0
A--)
(V O
(V N
O -_
(-\j O Q
0-
N/R
Ln7: E
BARB WIRE FIELD FENCE
STEEL GATES
PROJECT REFERENCE
NO. SHEET NO.
1
166680
2F
PROJECT
ENGINEER
I
I
C A R o,74,
I
SI0 : 9 .,.
SEAL 9!'
i APPROVED BY:
028432
oil ii ►►
I DATE:
END POST
i
6 INCH DIAMETER BY 8 FOOT LONG
BRACE POST
6 INCH DIAMETER BY 8 FOOT LONG
Michael
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
IF
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
BARB WIRE
3 INCHES (TYP.)
SEE PLANS FOR SPECIFIC LENGTH
4"
INTERNATIONAL
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License #: F-1084
X X X X X X X
NCDMS ID
NO. 100068
GRADUATED IN SIZE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM
GETTING LARGER IN SIZE TOWARD THE TOP.
X X X X X X X
48 INCHES
co
Q ~O
z
rC
z
X X X X X X X
LU
>�
Id
>U)
x x x x x x x
STEEL FRAME GATE
-
BARB WIRE
q
VARIES X X X X X X X
GROUND LINE
LJ
M
1
LJ
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
24 INCHES (TYP.)
>u
NOTES:
1. POST HEIGHT DIMENSION SHALL BE THE SAME AS REQUIRED FOR THE ADJACENT FENCE.
2. CONSTRUCT AN END OR STRESS PANEL, AS REQUIRED IN THE SPECIFICATION, ON EACH SIDE OF GATE.
NOTE:
3. HINGES AND LOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED BY GATE MANUFACTURER.
1. END POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A SPACING OF 10-15 FEET.
2. ALL FENCING AND FENCE POSTS SHOULD BE SET 1-2 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE CONSERVATION
EASEMENT FOR FENCE LINE MAINTENANCE ( LIKE HERBICIDE SPRAYING).

m
co
Q
00
Q0
Q0
ro
m
Q
1-1
a�
0
L
0
I
00
co
Qo
CONTROL POINT #305
GROUND COORDINATES
N: 713456.03'
E: 830566.09'
ELEV: 3065.15'
O \
M \
ROCK CROSS VANE (TYP.)
\\_ °o
vo
GRADE CON-T�0NaC
J-HOOK-VA N_t�fWP�
BOULDER STEP INSTALLED
IN PLACE OF LOG DROP
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
on, ,2
PIN: 8731-33-5998
DB: 838 PG: 400, TRACT IV
REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL: 6260
2 - 8' GATES INSTALLED
IN PLACE OF 16' GATE
WE KIRK
FARMS NORTH, LC
PIN: 8731-33r59 8
DB: 838 PG: 400,/TR/ACT IV
_n,
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
® CHANNEL PLUG
Ri
W
Lu
tn
uj
W
V)
W
Z
.J

r
h
m
I—
w
w
cn
uw
w
cn
w
Z
J
_
U
Q
E
_
(1�
m
03
CL
cn
0
L
0
LL
C3
Qo
CD
WE KIRK
FARMS NORTH, LLC
\ \ \ PIN: 8731-33-5998
\ DB: 838 PG: 400, TRACT IV
\\\ \\ REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
\\ \\ AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL. 6260
'I
"po
BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.) \_
/-%V-Liv1L I
TOP OF BANK (TY
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
AS—BULT
RFrIN IIT9
1 U+Ub.bb
12,CMP
N: 2997.97'
151, CPP
T: 2996.61' -
_n%
12" CUP �X�X
T NG GATE R'EHUI
VS LOCAAAON
W 00F6INAL DESI
WE KIRK
PIN: 8730-09-3258
DB: 838 PG: 404
REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL: 6260 & PC: C SL: 7314
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN
HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY
\(CONSERVATION EASEMENT)
DB: 917 PG: 978
� PC: C SL: 7314
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG

m
cn
Q
Cb
c9
c_0
c�
M
CL
cn
Q
M
a�
0
i
0
LL
C3
CD
CV U
CV
00
CV 0
\ Q
BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 1 5
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
CARoi
'44; ��ES S l0 9 :
• SEAL I APPROVED BY:
I
028432
HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY DATE:
I
(CONSERVATION EASEMENT)
\ \ DB: 917 PG: 978
\ \ \ \ Regency Parkway, Suite 600
\ \ Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
PC. C SL: 7314 Michael Bakel
800Cary0 , NORTH CAROLINA27518
Phone: [phone]
�w �\
Fax: [phone]
INTERNATIONAL License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
ROCK SILL I LLED
FLAGE OF LOG
k\X � CONFLUENCE STATION BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.)
�oT! UT1 REACH 4 STA. 24+19.91- _
x�x�x x�, x-
s UT4 STA. 10+50.55 END UT4 STA. 10+41.90 / x
CTOB UT1 REACH 4
GROSS VANE (TYP.) �\X\ /
/cam
�W�-_ _S-BUILT THALWEG (TYP.) �x x 6,0 ,' i/ /' // ,��
\--_ENS UT1 REACH 3 '`� ,- / LOG DF�P ff YP,a /
BEG N -UT 1 R EACH 4 -X - - _ - - A /r E Rt�CK VBrN��T P:) / � � � / 1-1
/
l8PL`B \ / PL
/ / �`, • PLC \ \ \ CONFLUE-NC-E-STATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i_ _-
/ GWt COROCK
--- — -29 %��ii2g7�ii— = _ ____ ��20"P P�AA—/ / /
U ST + p- — — /� =--. — —__—_ JrHOOK VANE P,a /
i --L9�-DRO_P INSTALLED-Z71 , /
/ N / �-— — — _ _ — — N-OT4 �R[GINA�D I GN- _ = 2965 7 �`N i�— _ _ _ - 01_-BAO 'o
LU
LU
In
LU
966---_—
1001*
_ _=S96Z==— �---mac=_ U
k
Or TOP OF BANK(TYP.)
-B-EGIN UT4 / x
EIgD_U-Ta-ST . -2Q-+24.64-\ � �� � , �_ � - - - , ; STA. 10 00.00
o96 �0D � AC 1� '+\ \ �0 ELEITR I vy 09
_ -A 4N-E-PA_LTM E� — — — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ _ / / /96 SLOW GAUG #3 / USN FORK R /
— — BARBED WIRE'_F xTYP) / WV WV OUT. 2967.i2 � X R -
- — —FAM I L.Y— " ��l \ \ \ \ ./fBROKENl2965.2 '
——P1�QPEBTIES, L.P. \ / �' ! - x� d 3�
— ---P-I N : 8721-72-6837 P
DB: 489 PG: 1683 S�3611
CONTROL POINT#500 �L�G f / / / / INV OUT.-�6 3�
STATE PLANE COORDINATES
N:712855.04'
E: 829608.53
ELEV:2989.63'
// .% GATES I TALLED
/ 0 N PLACE 16' GATE
/ // /
. /
� /
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG
WE KIRK
PIN: 8730-09-3258
DB: 838 PG: 404
REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL: 6260 & PC: C SL: 7314
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN
a3
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
UT to RUSH FORK
UTI & UT4
RECORD DRA WING
20 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)

r
h
Lo
H
Lu
Lu
2
to
w
w
cn
I
w
Z
J
E
m
Q
C3
CL
cn
0
L
0
LL
C3
Qo
CD
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
PIN: 8730-09-3258
FENCE ENCROACHMENT WAS CORRECTED
PIN: 8721-72-6837
a3
000.
00,
000,
oo
_ G AW CK STEP POOL (TYP.)
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG
8721-72-683
CV U
CV
O
cV 0
Q
\ o0

c
t
z
r
s
U
a
U
4
a
c�
c�
c�
G
c
a
a
rr
G
a
c
(
0
a
S
C
LI
S
G
a
U
c�
c�
G
CV
N Q
O
N
\ S
N,
L.n'5

cc
n
n
00
m
Q
00
ro
m
V)
1-1
V)
a)
0
L
o
W
D
00
c.o
co
Qo
BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.�l
/
'oo
/
/ / // // i%�// i
RQqK O/ROSSrV/ WE-(T�/P�
ROCK I IL/INPTALI
N P IAA �QC� /D,I�p p/ / / / / / i / / / / //, i
�13
��-
/
AS—BU /�/;////�/ //�°/ / / // / / I / / �/ol
TOP OF BANK
!'l
/ z?w / ZZ
/ // /!/ / /'� /
BEGIN UT3 / � //// i ��/'/ / �l Yl \ -- •�� \ �� •,
\ ` \B•DR
BE
DROL�C\
�40-
I \ \ \ CcTA303 — — —
\ v ---GROUND COORDINATES \
\
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
P I N : 8721—P--68-37—
- _
DB:�89 P�:
%//
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
PIN: 8721-72-6837
DB: 489 PG: 1683
/'
��---
// % 13MLD-ER STEP
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
FV.)/
1•2
W
_Z
J
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
® CHANNEL PLUG

0-
m
cn
Q
03
CL
cn
0
L
0
LL
C3
Qo
CD
N\3
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
PIN: 8721-72-6837
DB: 489 PG: 1683
BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.) AS -BUILT
_3040 TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
SURVEYED VEG_ / /' TRIN
PLOT�C,ORN-Ef / M FLOW C�AUC�E #'V
00
W w 4yd
O
uj
A7+ 0- ui
uj
cn w -- l �x T. r — OF BA
ui
W
�$,`.ST. Tc�e �F BAND\� W
U R K CROSS VANE (� YP.) �� — Z
'LOG AND R CIS'- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4.
L�p�*o-p fT\YP.)
Q \ \ \ \ \ RACK y-k100�\VAN E�(T�YP.) \� \ \ _ \ 2
STEP Pli (TYP �� �OULbER S�EP (TYP
if\\S F—
\\ O° Q
\� \\ \\ \\ \\ \\\
\ \ \ /\ \ \ \� \ \ S I-JIIL� �I i�L E �TY� \ \ oD' AWNS-TAL EDP
IN PLACE OFE_QLIF\ \ \ \ \ \
v� vvv � A\ \vim vv vv vv vvv
CONTROLPOINT#301 BARBED WIRE FENCE-(TYP.)
ANNE PALMER GROUND COORDINATES
/ FAMILY PROPERTIES L.P. N:713530.52'
E: 829447.33'
m PIN: 8721-72-6837 Ei 3021.99'
DB: 489 PG: 1683
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG

cc
n
rn
Q
00
i
r6
r
i
m
Q
1-1
a)
0
V
L
0
W
00
Q0
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
CONTROL POINT #300
GR ND COORDINATES
N: 13167.63'
E: 29461.72'
EV: 3014.21'
WATER SYSTEM
W L LIVESTOCK WATER SYSTEM
DRINKER &HARDENED PAD #2
I
�xJ
/ W ANNE PALMER
aLLQ/MILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
�F &K DOU-BLE—DROP
CROSS,VANE (TYP.)
LIVESTOCK WATER SYSTEM
DRINKER & HARDENED PAD #1
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
PIN: 8721-72-6837
DB: 489 PG: 1683
=---2990---
-- — — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
�Z9g5/ '__---
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
® CHANNEL PLUG

BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiii • • • : I
MENEEMEMEN
■\z\o\■Ail■
■■■■g��qq■i
■■■■■■\i��qm
■■■■■■■■■■.;tea■■�a■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■►ca■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.\fir=�
■■■■�\■■\�;�\■laic■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ail\\�7►_'\■iZA■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■.����\[■rme11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1INN ■,Cn\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■z7m■■■iAm■■■■■■■■■■■IINN ■■■■■l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■"■■■■■mpmmm■■■■■■Ilow ■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ *■■■■■■IIC,(mR■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■FEW ■OV►1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■■■fil\■`Am:LR!1■0mL•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
00000000000000.300000■■■■■`�l10iZ!!■■II■■■■■CR■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■ ie"p,Xv mo■C■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iZ!\11IIi►.•�i►'\■Cm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m■■wAA■■*w■■mmA■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■\r1■■■11 ram. \►\■C■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■f7II; I MI Eel L' oil; IFT1111I2CM 0000000000 ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■il■\�■■■ail■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ii■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■11■�� r�IRlIC!!1lI11l�l.�1�9�■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■1i■■\.�►_!it \■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■1�■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r�;:L��11L■!J■Ilil�L►'Id13�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■r►A\►�\■!1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■aw.�■■■i■ ■■■■■■■■■■ �1■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■��:y:� s,i 11 � ire■�i-r��� 1 i � I�>t■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■rC��■ram■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r�� !�■�➢min■�1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�i�■■■Au=mm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■\\.\■ ► w i■■ ■■■a:a emmm■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■awmanim nm\■■aimswmmmm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■\■s!N■■■rAC2R■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iN■■\ft._V■■■■■C■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o!■11■■Nmmw!q■■■■mmmmmm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,w:Lmmzn�=!R■■■iQ,■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMM=Z=J:-�-ftir.!!!\■■■.1■m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\'lam'.!■■■■■■■
■■a=rA■■■■■■ noman■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■'m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.;;li%a■■■R■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■b_.-.■■■EQe■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ff1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m:;-•■■■■Sail■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■!!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■:,,•■■■■■zg■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a:N\'7■RE;-EmiFo.Z49m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■macomm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ilmvp -:�q\znmmmICbaFmmmmm■■■mnammm■■C\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\zii■■\.\\li-nommiC■ClSi■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..z,-.-�-M!-N\■■■imQNw■■■■■■■■■■lid■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i�="0!mmmmmI■ompw■■■■■■dsmmm■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11\\■■■■■■■■■bmcmmm■■■Cs■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II■►I■:__==� -w■■■■■■■maN■►■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l'\►.a■■■■■■■■■■:z7 _•■■■aCVe■*■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►1■■■.---�rwaf=aam
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a=::d■■■i:;;Mq■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■h.:
rilf■r� \■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■W:

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■ice ���!■��■■r
■■■■■■■■■■■■■.��_�!■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ \!► ��==`�■■i■■■■ i i0Z'Ze!■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■JJ■! IIIII!7■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■[1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■it.!id■1:�■ems!\���\■■■■■Ca!*■i�'i!■■■■■■■■
�■■■■■■■mm
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\.��■��irt\ice!\■■■■■■r�'■�■iC!■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.���!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iWiamISPIRRIT1lp**■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\i�rrlRaw■■■■■■■■is■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■�!i■dire:iL\■■riiQ�*■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l\■■DIY■d::!■!■■i�v7■■■■■■�l■L*■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■L�i�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\�I.■■■■■■■id:,!!■d:■�lL�■■■■IIFCI�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1'�.��■■■■11■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■1■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■I ■■■■ ►\■■�iG =f�■■\ ice'_!■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■1 I■ ■■■■■ ■.� �■i 1■i■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■11
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■I1■■■■■■■■r1■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■fzltilY��■■■■■■■ds\■■Y�I:�C��!■1f■■■11■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■[ti■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ll�■=�'��.:�!■■■■■1Ir`iiii■■NWV■■■1I■*■■■■■■■■iTiCQ!■■■�■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Q19■■■■1:I■�:7w►C■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i.Z'Z'9
MENOMONEE
MENOMONEE
MEMEMMEMEM
■■■ice■.��__■■�__\■■■■■■ii■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■rig■mE�■ ■■/:`� /i■��!\■■■ ■�lQ�■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ewe___•■■ ■�;.■■■■■■■=sal■■■■■■

■■■ice �!��'..'�!■■ ■■■►�■
■■■■■■■■■ice �!�s�s�
-����i� �•ai11�■■Y■■■■■■■■\■saes■■■■■■A■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
�■�■■ ■��� �!��� era#■ ■■■\'! ■■■1!� l��i r�f�lNC\■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■�' ■■■■f►� ■■p�� ��.L•� ■■■:■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■AM MIST ■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■��_� ��� � _���� ���'+��
■■■■■;�■►i■►:�■■■:� �'•�:=�•■1,■■■.1�■■■■■■■■■�aaee*■■■■■■■■■■may
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■!An►,■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ilmmmm► mmmlr■mmmmmm
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■lI■■■■vmQim■_■ m"m
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Rmmmra1i■■■z==!■■■
BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiii • • • : I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■����!•■■■ice!■■■■■■■\'l�rQL'i9■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■V■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice= !_!
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice
MENEM
MENEM
MENEM
MENEM

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■lit\a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\Sri1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.arIIIII■■op.■■■. "■■
!■■■1: ■IIWm�-�RN■IA■GaEN■
■■■.:•IM■■■MEN A■.�--�q■
1■ rC ■■■■■
WOWnIUMMIN
� is ■■■ i'■■■■ ■■iD■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■,\■�\■■�■■■■■lid■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■tea■■\.; •■■isaw■■tea■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■tea■■■��;�w■■c■■■■a.�■■■■
■■■►�■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ►1■ram■■i1■■■
■■■■►■rr■�w�■craw■*w�■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�,�
■■�;:e-�--•yam■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■r■■■■■
■1►■N■■r■■■
■■■■■h;q\Q
■■■■■■■fto.
■■►� ■�.■■■■ Ilia■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■\ice ����■■■C■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■:�.-,a■■tea■■■■■
�■*■ems _a■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ �..,■��■■� ii�■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►'.■■t: ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■WO-WANow Rq■■\■
■■■C' \■ 11■p! ■■■■■ m■■■■
■■■■■ \ill! ���■ ■■11m�
■■■■■■■rWrAOi—!\-s_'-m■■
■■■� ii: ��\■ ■fib■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■[ ■■■■WaR-11■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■11■ �I■■mi� ��C!\ ■■■C■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■'M ■■■■■ ■■� �� ��\■■ woram ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■[ I ivi'd'�'\■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11✓_�■D■����!
MENNEN BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiii • • • : I

MENOMONEE
MENOMONEE
IMMEMEMEME
MENOMONEE
MENOMONEE
MEMEMEMEME
MEMEMEMEME
■■■\ice!■■■\,�!:�■■■GQ!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■rf�71�`ii11c■i��fillll�l�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■C!■ ��J■ice!\■■ laic■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■�■rilliilr■iY YIr■illiiQiilr ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�lC!■■■■ice ��■■■■■ZS■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■ice■■■■.� 1•■�■O�■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\:\■■■■\�1■■■■■■■Cain!■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice!■■■11■1'�1•■■■■■■■■■■�■�■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■&-,=om■■■■■■■■.M=_���■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■iil�l�■■■■■■■■.��
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■.. i ■■■■■ ■iiC���L'_!! ■■■■■■■■■■ ■moil■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■ice ����!■■■■■■■riZ�''�■■■■■■
MEMEMEMEME
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■fir\�r.■s=-■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\moll■ ��i•�
■■■■_�■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■■■I. [�'m■*■■moll■
I,■■■■.�_-_-�.■■ ■■■■ rii■�fififi■CSC CZ
ii�=!9■■■■■ice �■�■.i:�� _••moll■
mill. ii=�! �\�ai' �w■■■
■■■�il!I■■ice __--���'■
FA■■■■■■■■
J■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
loom■■■■mis

00
< 10
Z IN
c
n
7-
m
cD
z
m
m
m
m
Q
00
(D
cD
c9
/
0
c
m
/
m
0
Q
/
C
0
a�
0
/
V
L
O
LL_
t
0
00
(D
CD
cD
Proposed BMP Planted Species
UT to Rush Fork Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Botanical Name Common Name % Planted by Wetland
Species Tolerance
Shallow Water Zone (50 Herbaceous Plants per 200 ft2)
Juncus effusus Common Rush 10% FACW
Peltandra vir inica Arrow Arum 10% OBL
Pontederia cordata Pickerelweed 10% OBL
Sa i ttari a lati oli a Broadleaf Arrowhead 10% OBL
Saururus cernuus Lizard's Tail 10% OBL
Scir us cyperinus Wool ass 10% FACW
Carex vul inoidea Fox Sedge 10% OBL
S ar anium americanum Bur -reed 10% FAC
Carex lurida Shallow Sedge 10% OBL
Polygonum pensylvanicum 1 Smartweed 10% FACW
Temporary Inundation Zone (8 shrubs per 200 ft2)
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 10% OBL
Ce halanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 10% OBL
Cornus amomum S&v Do ood 10% FACW
Ilex verticillata Winterbe 10% FACW
Rhododendron viscosum Swamp Azalea 10% FACW
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark 10% FACW
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 10% FACW
Leucothoe fontanesiana Highland Doghobble 10% FACW
Vaccinium corymbosum Hi bush Blueberry 10% FACW
Xanthorhiza simplicissima Yellowroot 10% FACW
Notes: -Final species selection may change due to refinement of site conditions or to availability at the
time of planting. If species substitution is required, the planting Contractor will submit a revised planting
list to Baker for approval prior to the procurement of plant stock.
-Shallow Water planting zone is from basin bottom to elevation 3085.5' while Temporary Inundation
planting zone is from elevation 3085.5' to 3086.5'.
-Embankments and perimeter fill slopes will be planted with non -clumping turf grasses (no trees or
woody shrubs).
Notes: -Final species selection may change due to refinement of site conditions or to availability at the
time of planting. If species substitution is required, the planting Contractor will submit a revised planting
list to Baker for approval prior to the procurement of plant stock.
-Shallow Water planting zone is from basin bottom to elevation 3085.5' while Temporary Inundation
planting zone is from elevation 3085.5' to 3086.5'.
-Embankments and perimeter fill slopes will be planted with non -clumping turf grasses (no trees or
woody shrubs).

Qf
V
w
N.T.S.
PROJECT
AREA
VICINITY MAP
INDEX OF SHEETS
1 • • • • • TITLE SHEET
1-A . . . . . STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
GENERALNOTES
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
VEGETATION SELECTION
1-B . . . . . NCDOT CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
2 - 2F DETAILS
3 - 10 ..... PLAN VIEW
11 - 15 ..... PROFILES
16 ..... BMP DETAIL
NOR TH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
HAYWOOD
COUNTY
LOCATION: FROM EXIT 24
ON
INTERSTATE 40,
TRAVEL NORTH FOR
5.75 MILES ON
NC
HWY 209 RUSH
FORK ROAD
TYPE OF WORK:
BEGIN UT3
A. 10+00.38
RECORD DRA WINGS
0
END UT1 REACH 1
BEGIN UT1 REACH 2
(;TA_ 13+25_00
END UT1 REACH 2
BEGIN UT1 REACF
';TA 1R+nn-nn
BEGIN UT2
STA.10+05
END UT2 S'
TOB UT1 R
i
EN
-�� TO
r
-C
�s
TOB UT1 REACH 4
r,
STATE
BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NQ
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
\3
--___����---
-- -� --
END U Th REACH 3
------------------- I
-f
--------------- - I
BEGIN Ohlj REACH 4\�\
A. 22+50.94
\
BEGIN UT4:
STA.10+00.0061
�.
END UT1 REACH 4
STA. 37+80.92
1
\�
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
GRAPHIC SCALES
MITIGATION SUMMARY
PREPARED
FOR THE OFFICE OF:
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
PROJECT ENGINEER
STREAM
STREAM
STREAM
Michael•
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary. NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone:[phone]
20 0 20 40
REACH
RESTORATION
ENHANCEMENT I
ENHANCEMENT II
I NTE R NAT I O
Fax [phone]
N A L Lcense#: F31084
NCDEQ
UT1 Rl
0
206.41
0
NC DIVISION
OF MITIGATION SERVICES
���o��HCARpli�'.
'
.�'�° •'FEssio• �9'�-,
PLANS
UT1 R2
0
0
275.00
217 WEST
JONES STREET, SUTIE 3000a
SEAL
20 0 20 40
UT1 R3
0
600.86
0
RALEIGH, NC 27603
028432
'
UT1 R4
1224.37
0
0
Pam,`.
KATHLEEN M. MCKEITHAN, PE�'�
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
UT2
0
0
78.16
LETTING DATE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
UT3
1577.53
0
0
5 0 10 20
UT4
41.90
0
01111-
CONTACT.
PAUL WIESNER
-.09990
2843.80
807.27
353.16
PROJECT MANAGER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
PROFILE (VERTICAL)TOTAL

CC
L
Go
Q
CD
2
m
Q
L
2
(n
L
n
U�
z
co
STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
SUPERCEDES SHEET I-B
�C,, J-HOOK VANE
c\\�
GRADE CONTROL J-HOOK VANE
ROCK VANE
OUTLET PROTECTION
ROCK CROSS VANE
FP 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
cE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
----435----EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
- - - - - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
DOUBLE DROP ROCK CROSS VANE
PROPERTY LINE
LOG AND ROCK STEP / POOL
FOOT BRIDGE
TEMPORARY ROCK DAM
----
�__�,
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
ROOT WAD
°Ire°
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
o 0
LOG J-HOOK VANE
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
GRADE CONTROL LOG J-HOOK VANE
TREE REMOVAL
LOG VANE
TREE PROTECTION
MONITORING WELL
-
LOG STEP
DITCH PLUG
RAIN GAUGE
LOG CROSS VANE
0
CHANNEL FILL
LOG ROLLER
-
CREST GAUGE
�
SOD MAT WITH WOOD TOE
I N STREAM
00000000O0
NMI
8000
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
GEOLIFT WITH BRUSH TOE
O
FLOW GAUGE
00 0
BOULDER CLUSTER
ROOT WAD REVETMENT WITH LIVE
BRUSH
a� o�
BOULDER STEP
BOULDER TOE PROTECTION
As
SAFETY FENCE
x
PROPOSED WETLAND RE-ESTABLISHMENT
TF
TAPE FENCE
PROPOSED WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
- -WEB- -
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED WETLAND REHABILITATION
"NOTE: ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT
Proposed Bare -Root and Live Stake Species
UT to Rush Fork Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Botanical Name
Common Name
Planted byWetland
Species
Tolerance
All Buffer Plantings at 680 stems/acre using 8' X 8' spacing
General Riparian Zone - Overstory/Canopy Species
Betula ni ra
River Birch
10%
FACW
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
10%
FACW
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tulip Poplar
10%
FACU
Betula lenta
Sweet Birch
10%
FAC
uercus alba
White Oak
10%
FACU
Tilia americana
American Basswood
0%
FACU
Aesculus ava
Yellow Buckeye
7.5%
FACU
N ssa s lvatica
Blackgum
5%
FAC
Fraxinus americana
White Ash
5%
FACU
Diospyros vi r i ni ana
Persimmon
7.5 %
FAC
Ulmus americana
American Elm
5%
FACW
General Riparian Zone - Understory/Shrub Species
Rhododendron maximum
Roseba
0%
FAC
Lindera benzoin
S icebush
2.5%
FAC
Ilex verticillata
Winterberr
5%
FACW
Car inus caroliniana
American Hornbeam
5%
FAC
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
2.5%
FAC
Magnolia tri etala
Umbrella Tree
0%
FACU
Halesia carolina
Carolina Silverbell
5%
FAC
PERCETAGES SHOWN IN RED ARE THE CONSTRUCTED PLANTED PERCENTATGE.
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
MARCH 2O09 (REV 20 13)
6.06 TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
6.24 RIPARIAN AREA SEEDING
6.60 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
6.62 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
6.63 TEMPORARY ROCK DAM
6.70 TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
GENERAL NOTES
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 1 1-A
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
I
C A R
APPROVED BY:
SEAL -
028432
M.
DATE:
I
I
M4MicMichael Baker Engineering Inc.
hael Bake8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone:[phone]
Fax: 919.46
1 N T E R N A T 10 N A L License #: F310840
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL IN -STREAM STRUCTURES USING A TRACK HOE WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB OF
SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PLACE BOULDERS (3'x2'x2'), LOGS AND ROOTWADS.
2. WORK IS BEING PERFORMED AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE ALL REASONABLE
EFFORTS TO REDUCE SEDIMENT LOSS AND MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE WHILE PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION WORK.
3. CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED FOR THE SPRING OF 2020.
4. CONTRACTOR SHOULD CALL NORTH CAROLINA "ONE -CALL" BEFORE EXCAVATION STARTS. (1-800-632-4949)
5. BOULDER SIZES FOR IN -STREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3'x2'xl' AND CAN BE CHANGED PER STRUCTURE OR THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
6. ALL ON -SITE ALLUVIUM SHALL BE HARVESTED AND STOCKPILED PRIOR TO FILLING ABANDONED CHANNELS.
7. TOPSOIL SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 8" AND STOCKPILED SEPARATELY FROM UNDERCUT SOIL. 8" OF TOPSOIL SHALL
BE PLACED ON ALL BANKFULL BENCHES AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
8. ALL DISTURBED EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE MATTED WITH COIR FIBER MATTING OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
9. ALL STREAM BANKS SHALL BE LIVE STAKED.
10. UNLESS THE ALIGNMENT IS BEING ALTERED, THE EXISTING CHANNEL DIMENSIONS ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
11. CONTRACTOR WILL ENSURE THAT FENCING IS INSTALLED ON OR OUTSIDE THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS BUT NO MORE THAN 1' OUTSIDE.
12. WHERE PROPOSED FENCE CROSSES EXISTING STREAMS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE A SECTION OF BREAK AWAY FENCE,
A FLOOD GATE, OR ELECTRIFIED CHAINS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
13. ANY BORROW OR WASTE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT MUST COME FROM OR GO TO A PERMITTED SITE AND/OR FACILITY.
VEGETATION SELECTION
Wetland
Zone - Overstory/Canopy Species
Betula ni ra
River Birch
15%
FACW
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
15%
FACW
Betula alle haniensis
Yellow Birch
10%
FAC
uercus imbricaria
Shingle Oak
5%
FAC
N ssa s lvatica
Blackgum
5%
FAC
Acer ne undo
Box Elder
5%
FAC
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
5%
FACW
Ulmus americana
American Elm
5%
FACW
Wetland
Zone - Understory/Shrub
Species
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
15%
OBL
Ilex verticillata
Winterbe
5%
FACW
Lindera benzoin
S icebush
5%
FAC
Ce halanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
2.5%
OBL
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
2.5%
FACW
Xanthorhiza simplicissima
Yellow -root
2.5%
FACW
Aronia arbuti olia
Red Chokeberry
2.5%
FACW
Streambank Live Stake Plantings
Salix sericea
Silky Willow
25%
OBL
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
20%
FACW
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
10%
OBL
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
25%
FACW
Salix nigra
Black Willow
20%
OBL
Proposed Permanent Seed Mixture
UT to Rush Fork Stream Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Botanical Name
Common Name
% Planted
by Species
Density
(lbs/ac)
Wetland
Tolerance
A rostis perennans
Autumn Bent ass
10%
1.5
FACU
El mus vir inicus
Virginia Wildr e
15%
2.25
FACW
Panicum vir atum
Switch ass
15%
2.25
FAC
Tri sacum dact loides
Eastern Gamma Grass
5%
0.75
FACW
Polygonum pennsylvanicum
Pennsylvania Smartweed
5%
0.75
FACW
Schizach rium sco arium
Little Blue Stem
5%
0.75
FACU
Juncus effusus
Soft Rush
5%
0.75
FACW
Bidens rondosa or aristosa
Beggars Tick
5%
0.75
FACW
Coreo sis lanceolata
Lance -Leaved Tick Seed
10%
1.5
FACU
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Tioga Deer Tongue
15%
2.25
FAC
Andro 0 on gerardii
Big Blue Stem
5%
0.75
FAC
Sor hastrum nutans
Indian Grass
5%
0.75
FACU
Total
100%
15
Note: Final species selection may change due to refinement of site conditions or to availability at the time
of planting. If species substitution is required, the planting Contractor will submit a revised planting list to
Baker for approval prior to the procurement of plant stock.

C
m
0-1
Q
i
00
ro
112
C
a�
0
L
O
LL
C-
7
00
*S.U.E = SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEER
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.-
State Line ..... -----
County Line --
Township Line --
City Line -
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Property Corner
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line -x
O
EiP
Proposed Woven
g
Wire Fence
Proposed Chain
Link Fence
Proposed Barbed
Wire Fence
Existin Wetl nd
Bo nda - - - —WLB— - - -
a u I
Proposed Wetland Boundary WLB
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
O
Sign
O
Well
W
Small Mine
Foundation
Area Outline
Cemetery
F t
Building
FL�i
School
Church
r% - - -
VUM
HYDROLOGY.-
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
C r% Y l r► ry
. V....Z2
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
False Sump
BZ 1
BZ 2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
1DIj'lISION OF HI17HWA1'S
CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge " " " '
CSX TRANSPORTATION
RR Signal Milepost MILEPOST 35
Switch 0
SWITCH
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled --------
RIGHT OF WAY.-
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker 0
Existing Right of Way Line -
Proposed
Right of Way Line
R
Proposed
Right of Way Line with
R
Iron Pin
and Cap Marker
Proposed
Right of Way Line with
%R
Concrete or Granite Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed
Control of Access
Existing Easement
Line
E
Proposed
Temporary Construction Easement -
E
Proposed
Temporary Drainage Easement
TDE
Proposed
Permanent Drainage Easement
PDE
Proposed
Permanent Utility Easement
PUE
Proposed
Temporary Utility Easement
TUE
Proposed
Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin
and Cap Marker
0
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement —
Existing Curb —
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
- - - C - - -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
- - - F - - -
Wheel Chair Ramp
0
,Proposed
Existing Metal Guardrail
T T T
Proposed Guardrail
T T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail
n n n
Proposed Cable Guiderail
n n n n
Equality Symbol
z
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION. -
Single Tree {;
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vi neya rd Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
Recorded U/G Power Line
Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)
CONC r
CONC WW
CON —CH —W
>----------<
11 CB
—P-
- — — —P— — — —
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
-0-
Proposed Telephone Pole
-0-
Telephone Manhole
O
Telephone Booth
0
Telephone Pedestal
❑T
Telephone Cell Tower
�
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole
"H
Recorded U/G Telephone Cable
T
Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - -
- - —T— - - -
Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit
TC
Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*)- -
- - —TC— - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable
T FO
Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*)- -
- - -T FO- - - .
A
SSIp.,.tiq��� '
9l•: i
SEAL _ i
APPROVED BY:
039201
i
DATE:
WATER:
i
Water Manhole
Water Meter
o
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
.0
Recorded U/G Water Line
w
Designated U/G Water Line
(S.U.E.*)' -
- - -W- - - -
Above Ground Water Line
A/C Water
TV:
TV Satellite Dish C�
TV Pedestal
TV Tower
U/G TV Cable Hand Hole "H
Recorded U/G TV Cable TV
Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - —TV— - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable TV FO
Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*�-- - — — —TV FO— — —
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
Recorded U/G Gas Line
Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
Recorded SS Forced Main Line
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) —
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
0
---G----
A/C Gas
OO
G
SS
A/C Sanitary Sewer
FSS
FSS
0
El
O
❑s

(V
Z
m
m
m
Q
00
c9
QO
c9
i
C
i
m
Q
i
c
T
aD
0
i
i
0
L�
m
00
cD
c9
QO
i
0
+-
(V 0
(V
CD
NO
\ L
�Q
\ o•
Ln
Wbkf
SRO D-Max
ZO
Wb
RIFFLE or PLUNGE POOL
.04 Wbkf 111110.
�O,0O
Wb
POOL (MEANDER)
TYPICAL STRUCTURE PLACEMENT
ROOT WADS
COVER LOGS
GRADE CONTROL
LOG J-HOOK VANI
(SEE SHEET 2-D)
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
(SEE SHEET 2-D)
TOP OF BANK
TYPICAL RIFFLE, POOL, AND BANKFULL BENCH CROSS SECTIONS
VARIES
but z 30'
•�7
TOP OF TERRACE
Wbkf VARIES
but Z 30'
31
I 0Q�
C�S�O D-Max S
Wb
RIFFLE WITH BANKFULL BENCH
ENCH LIMITS
TOP OF TERRACE
VARIES Wbkf VARIES
but z 30' but z 30'
Wb
POOL WITH BANKFULL BENCH
G�\C;�
loe
O
0000 z l
00
00\
000
00 OQ0OD°IOROo�U)O ° '
CVp �p J,°pV °o 0°0�� LU
0 Qw�
00
o0p ° O°O�� /
OON
loll
i
MAT BANKS WITH COIR FIBER MATTING /
I /
GEOLIFT WITH BRUSH TOE
(SEE SHEET 2-D)
STRUCTURE NOTES:
1. GENERALLY CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES, ROOT WADS, LOG VANES AND COIR FIBER
MATTING WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION AND SEQUENCE AS SHOWN.
2. ANY CHANGES TO NUMBER OR LOCATION OF STRUCTURES DURING
CONSTRUCTION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
3. COIR FIBER MATTING TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL RESTORED STREAMBANKS,
FLOODPLAIN BENCHING, AND TERRACE SLOPES AS DESCRIBED IN THE
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.
4. ROOTWADS MAY BE REPLACED WITH GEOLIFT.
/1
N
SILL
B
Y
Z
Q
m
LL
O
LU
O
H
BENCH LIMITS
WIDTH OF BANKFULL (Wbkf)
AVERAGE DEPTH
MAXIMUM DEPTH (Dmax)
W/D (Wbkf/Dbkf)
BAN KFU LL AREA (Abkf)
BOTTOM WIDTH (Wb)
RIFFLE SIDE SLOPE (X:1)
INSIDE POOL SIDE SLOPE
OUTSIDE POOL SIDE SLOPE
FLOW
1/3 BOTTOM WIDTH
C
B GRADE
�� POINT
VANE
ARM
VANE ANGLE
20' TO 30'
SCOUR
POOL i
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
166680
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
��.�`�N► CAR pl!�,�
�s S / p •.,'1'q �i� I
SHEET NO.
2
• SEAL I APPROVED BY:
I
028432
GIN
i ►► ��,, ,,
DATE:
I
I
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 N T E R N A T 10 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
UT1 R1, R2, &
R3 UPPER
10+00 - 19+50
UT1 R3
LOWER
19+50 - 22+61
UT1 R4
UPPER
22+61 - 28+00
UT1 R4
LOWER
28+00 - 37+95
UT2
UT3 UPPER
11+50 - 16+50
UT3 LOWER
16+50 - 26+45
UT4
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
RIFFLE
POOL
9.00
11.50
10.00
12.50
12.50
16.50
13.00
17.50
4.50
6.60
7.50
10.00
8.50
12.00
5.80
7.50
0.65
1.11
0.70
1.40
0.90
1.70
0.95
1.80
0.45
0.70
0.57
1.10
0.65
1.30
0.45
0.70
0.80
1.50
1.00
2.00
1.20
2.50
1.30
2.50
0.60
1.00
0.70
1.70
0.85
1.80
0.50
1.00
13.80
10.40
14.30
9.20
13.90
9.50
13.70
9.80
13.00
9.50
13.10
8.90
13.10
9.50
12.90
10.30
5.90
12.80
7.00
17.00
11.30
28.80
12.10
31.30
2.20
4.60
4.30
11.20
6.00
15.10
2.60
5.50
5.80
5.50
5.00
4.50
8.10
6.50
8.50
7.50
4.00
2.60
4.70
3.20
4.90
4.80
3.60
3.50
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
N/A
2.00
ROCK CROSS VANE
NO GAPS SILL
BETWEEN
BOULDERS
C.
6' MIN.
PLAN VIEW
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS.
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
3. CONSTRUCT ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS AS SHOWN.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
8. ON -SITE ALLUVIUM SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE STONE BACKFILL WHERE
AVAILABLE.
9. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
10. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
FLOW -►
FILTER FABRIC
TOE OF BANK
BANKFULL STAGE
B
FLOW
o1
STREAM BED o
ELEVATION:------
LEVATION C
FLOW
6' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
2'
� 2 N7
CH-- =NFL BED
WELL GRADED MIX
47 TO 77 VANE ARC LOB
PROFILE VIEW B - B'
VANE ARM
CROSS VANE INVERT/GRADE POINT
FILTER FABICPROFILE VIEW C - C
HEADER ROCK
STREAM BANK
FOOTER ROCK
•ALE

m
0
Q
i
c
T
0
(1)
0
i
i
O
L�
0
m
0
00
cD
c9
r-O
i
0
+>
(V O
(V N
o
C\jOa
� QS
Ln:F E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
ROCK VANE
BOULDER STEP
166680 1 2A
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
1/3
A
I
"N1CARol7,,,
BOTTOM
WIDTH
TOP TOE
OF BANK
,���p. •,........,, •('�'. I
CHANNEL
o
•:�pFESSIpSEAL APPROVED BY:
! • I
=
U
Ir
_
= 039201
- : I
FLOW
e°O /� ° 00
0�8�
% •:,••�N 4•�' �. I
.,���9
l0®
5000$
O,G..... ,%
�� �
1
`�
g oo g
0O °Ooo c) -.0 o
�i �u►`
I DATE:
N 20° TO 30°
1 °
��
00 00, W000°9p
p °9yo �
J p � ...
N
oo�
mr°6 � 1 0&8
A
0 0-0
e°��°°o°��
�90 ° Og® o °
o ® o o �C�
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
�_ 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
0 00
�� °°CJ
9 °0?0
Michael
Phone: [phone]aker Cary, NORTH 8 INA 27518
Q
STONE BACKFILL ° A NO GAPS BETWEEN ROCKS
�°��
OZ
0® o o $
6)(!540 ,�
Fax:[phone]
INTERNATIONAL License #: F-1084
HEADER ROCK i"-' .
° 0 6bo 0 o
o0o°00 o0o�o °�
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
°°
°° STREAM BED ELEVATION
o® °° °moo ° °oo
ono � �o
(SCOUR POOL
BANKFULL
/
i
HEADER ROCK
BOULDERS - - - - - - ,----- _
FLOW
SLOPE
HEAD OF RIFFLE
SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
4% TO 7%
FOOTER ROCK PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
O ---
--- ----
00 0
LA:
BOULDER
04 BOTTOM WIDTH STONE
BACKFILL
G�\OE o o �� °
° ^ 3pn, ®00 oso RIFFLE
°�°c
FOOTER ROCK
Sooaood'oo 0 'Do0 0
8
0 0
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SCOUR
POOL (EXCAVATED)
000° °°°`b° 600
PLAN VIEW
�0 g0
�00 000 pO
POOL
PLAN VIEW
PROFILE VIEW
PROFILE A - A'
BACKFILL
SHOULD BE CONVEX
STREAMBED
HEADER ROCK
NOTES:
STONE BACKFILL
1. HEADER AND FOOTER BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 1' X 2' X 3'.
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
2. FOOTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT 1/4 TO 1/3 OF THE LENGTH IS DOWNSTREAM OF
0 0o
THE HEADER.
1.
DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS.
°O��oo°O- 5oo°Ogc°
3. SOIL SHALL BE WELL COMPACTED AROUND BURIED PORTION OF FOOTERS WITH THE BUCKET
2.
START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
o°Qo(�Q °°QOPQ o°Q0�
OF EXCAVATOR.
3.
CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
O�00 (yo- oW 0°°°O
4. INSTALL NON -WOVEN FILTER FABRIC UNDERNEATH FOOTER BOULDERS.
4.
AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
5. UNDERCUT THE RIFFLE ELEVATION 12 INCHES TO ALLOW FOR A LAYER OF STONE.
5.
USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ALONG COMPLETED BANKS SUCH THAT THE EROSION
6.
INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
CONTROL MATTING AT THE TOE OF THE BANK EXTENDS DOWN TO THE UNDERCUT ELEVATION.
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
FOOTER ROCK
7. FILL TRENCH WITH GRADED MIX OF CLASS A, CLASS B, AND #57 STONE TO THE BED ELEVATION
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
OF THE CHANNEL.
7.
AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
10' MINIMUM
8. BOULDER STEPS MUST BE EXTENDED TO A MINIMUM OF 2' INTO THE BANK. USE SILL BOULDERS
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
IF NECESSARY.
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
9. THALWEG AND STEP INVERT WILL BE CONCAVE AND SHAPED PER DIRECTION OF THE DESIGNER.
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
10. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
8.
START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
SECTION A - A
9.
ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
GRADE CONTROL ROCK J-HOOK
VANE
ROCK J-HOOK VANE
1/3 BOTTOM 1/3 BOTTOM
1/3 BOTTOM 1/3 BOTTOM
WIDTH OF WIDTH OF
WIDTH OF WIDTH OF
CHANNEL CHANNEL
CHANNEL CHANNEL
FLOW
FLOW
LEAVE GAPS (OPTIONAL)
PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER STREAM BED ELEVATION
STREAM BED ELEVATION
20° TO 30° BANKFULL
20° TO 300 _ STONE BACKFILL
o°QooQQo°Qo��
BANKFULL
HEADER ROCK
STONE BACKFILL
�00
FLOW�i
HEADER ROCK
00 o 00 o0O0°O
4% TO 7% SLOPE
FLOW ��
A 0
- - -
Ogg
j� °O�(
A °° °°Qo
4%T07%SLOPE
O
°O°
w oQ°�o� °oQ°o
O
g
- -- ----
LU
c� oa°O °o °O�O0C
Q ° 0 0 (°
0Qo °Q°o°Q
�00 00
_
q STONE BACKFILL
U) QO° A -''�
STONE BACKFILL
j
FOOTER ROCK
/ �•
FOOTER ROCK
ooQo°° \
Y a`9 i GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
J��o i
�,
Q �80 / \ w
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
-)00
Z °° i
m °�oQ SCOUR ` SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
00 °°0 i Q
`.`
X - POOL PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
co �'°0° i' SCOUR
J
PROFILE VIEW
�, & `
PROFILE VIEW
° POOL
N Jo° O� I
N LL
Y
;Oc Z
3�
--
� ° i
-- -
BACKFILL SHOULD
STREAMBED
BE CONVEX
°
��
HEADER ROCK
.�ogr
O°Q FOOTER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
of 0 SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
STONE BACKFILL
�° PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
°0000°°0800°°00�°
_oQO°QQDoQ040ooQ°�
NO GAPS BETWEEN ROCKS
BACKFILL SHOULD BE CONVEX
0 GAPS BETWEEN ROCKS
000( 000
STREAMBED
HEADER ROCK
60 00 00
HEADER ROCK
HEADER ROCK
STONE BACKFILL
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
FOOTER ROCK
�
do 10' MINIMUM
Q�oQ ��4OQ0 0
�00 o CJ( o �00
000°
°�00° °�00° °�
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
SECTION A - A
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS.
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
FOOTER ROCK
3. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
3. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
10' MINIMUM No
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
SECTION A - A
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
8. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
8. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
9. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
9. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.

LOG AND ROCK STEP / POOL
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
166680
SHEET NO.
2B
C
m
(V
z
Cn
m
Q
00
c9
QO
i
C
n
m
\L
i
C
aD
0
i
V
i
0
L�
00
c0
c9
QO
A
No
PROTECT BANK
USING TRANSPLANTS
PROTECT BANK
USING GEOLIFT
PLAN VIEW
LOG BURIED
BELOW STREAMB
A
PROTECT BANK USING
ROOT WADS
BANKFULL
GRADE CONTROL LOG J-HOOK VANE
STONE BACKFILL
HEADER LOG
O C9.
ANY GAPS BETWEEN LOGS MUST BE FILLED WITH OTHER
RECENTLY HARVETED BRANCHES OR COBBLE AND GRAVEL
BEFORE INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC AND BACK FILLING ARM
TER FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
1/2 - 2/3 BANKFULL
1.0 6' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
ROOTWAD
SECTION A - A'
BASF FI nW
SECTION 6 - 6'
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
FLOW
STREAMBED ^-1
i
FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
ANY GAPS BETWEEN LOGS MUST BE FILLED WITH OTHER
RECENTLY HARVETED BRANCHES BEFORE INSTALLING
NOTES: FILTER FABRIC AND BACK FILLING ARM
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10" IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, RECENTLY HARVESTED, AND FOOTERED.
2. BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 2' x 2' x 1'.
3. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOG.
4. ROOTWADS SHOULD BE PLACED BENEATH THE HEADER LOG AND PLACED SO THAT IT LOCKS THE HEADER LOG INTO THE
BANK. SEE ROOTWAD DETAIL.
5. BOULDERS SHOULD BE PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ACHORING.
6. HEADER BOULDERS TO BE PLACED 0.5 TO 0.75 FEET APART.
7. FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
8. TRANSPLANTS OR BOULDERS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF ROOWADS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
9. BOULDER SILL MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 6'.
10. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WITH WELL GRADED MIX
OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM
WHERE AVAILABLE.
PLAN VIEW
ROOTWAD
BURIED IN
STREAMBANK
AT LEAST 6'.
BOULDERS CAN
ALSO BE USED.
PROFILE VIEW
LOG BURIED
BELOW STREAMBED
\'
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
C AR p1 *
S /0
SEAL ! I APPROVED BY:
I
039201
- : I
• •.•F41G I
DATE:
I
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
Michael 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
NOTES:
DEADER LOG 1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 8" IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED
AND EXTENDING INTO THE BANK 3' ON EACH SIDE.
2. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOG.
3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
4. BOULDERS SHOULD BE 1' X 2' X 3' AND PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ANCHORING.
5. TOEWOOD OR TRANSPLANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF BOUDERS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
6. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WITH WELL
GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK.
INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE.
-ER LOG
PLAN VIEW
LOG VANE
:OTEXTILE FABRIC
ROOTWAD
LOG BURIED IN
STREAM BANK AT LEAST 5'
NOTES:
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10" IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. BOULDERS MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ANCHOR LOGS.
3. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOGS.
4. ROOTWADS SHOULD BE PLACED BENEATH THE HEADER LOG AND PLACED SO THAT IT LOCKS THE HEADER LOG
INTO THE BANK. SEE ROOTWAD DETAIL.
5. BOULDER SHOULD BE PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ANCHORING.
6. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
7. TOEWOOD OR TRANSPLANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF ROOTWADS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
8. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WITH WELL
GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK.
INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE.
STONE BACKFILL
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
6' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
1/2 - 2/3 BANKFULL
ROOTWAD
FLOW
STREAMBED o
BOULDER
FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
PROFILE VIEW

is
QC
n
1/3
1/3
1/3
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
WIDTH OF
WIDTH OF
WIDTH OF
CHANNEL I
CHANNEL
I CHANNEL
ROCK DOUBLE DROP CROSS VANE
FLOW
STREAM BED ELEVATION ---\
1/2 - 2/3 OF BANKFULL
200 TO 300
_
-/0 0 (50 -
b O, y�
LU
A o �OC�008C� 0
�° 00
00 0�LU
00C
FLOW -�
LL Q
00
Cao Q� '
O ~
' 0
�o
CO
M
N
J�I(n'�
N
ILL
,
00 ,
g(JC
oho c�
J
N
OC
STONE BACKFILL
N Y
SCOUR
Y
z
m'°O�
g �- _ POOL_
_,
00o
Q
CIDGEOTEXTILE
FABRIC-
0
i
O
)o
O
\� \�-� `--�--� -� �� QO
'04..._.—————
J0
o
SCOUR POOL
t
`--�
---------------
NO GAPS
SCOUR
POOL
BETWEEN BOULDERS
(EXCAVATED PER DIRECTION
OF ENGINEER)
PLAN VIEW
STREAI
STONE BACKFILL
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
2. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK.
3. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
4. AN EXTRA ROCK CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
5. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
6. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND
DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A
MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE
WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS B, CLASS A, & #57 STONE TO THE ELEVATION 2"-4" BELOW THE
THE HEADER ROCK. INCORPORATE ON -SITE ALLUVIUM WHERE AVAILABLE. FILL SHOULD BE
CONCAVE BEHIND THE VANE ARM TO ALLOW POOLING OF FLOW.
8. START SLOPE AT 2/3 TO 3/4 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
9. ALL REACHES, BOULDER SIZE 1' x 2' x 3' TO 2' x 2' x 4'.
C
C
U
(V
z
m
m
I
m
m
Q
I
00
LO
�o
i
C
n
i
m
Q
i
c
aD
0
i
V
i
O
L�
m
CO
c0
c9
rL/\IN VICVV
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
CHANNEL PLUG
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
1.5' MINIMUM
HEADER ROCK
4% TO 7% SLOPE
16EW-1
FOOTER ROCK
SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
PROFILE VIEW
I VV I Lf\ f1VCK
6' MINIMUM
SECTION A — A
NOTES:
1. COMPACT BACKFILL USING ON -SITE HEAVY EQUIPMENT IN 10 INCH LIFTS.
2. BACKFILL OF PLUGS SHOULD INCORPORATE ANY OF -SITE CLAY AVAILABLE.
BEGIN HEAD OF RIFFLE INVERT
ELEVATION F
TOP OF BANK
BEGIN TAIL OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION AND Ic
PLAN VIEW
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
RGER STONE MAY BE PLACED
REDIRECT LOW FLOW AT
ZECTION OF ENGINEER
F4
TONE BACKFILL
NOTES:
1. UNDERCUT CHANNEL BED ELEVATION AS NEEDED TO ALLOW FOR LAYERS OF STONE TO
ACHIEVE FINAL GRADE.
2. INSTALL COIR FIBER MATTING ALONG COMPLETED BANKS SUCH THAT THE EROSION CONTROL
MATTING AT THE TOE OF THE BANK EXTENDS DOWN TO THE UNDERCUT ELEVATION.
3. INSTALL STONE BACKFILL, COMPACTED TO GRADE.
4. FINAL CHANNEL BED SHAPE SHOULD HAVE THE ELEVATION OF THE BED 0.2 FT DEEPER IN
THE CENTER THAN AT THE EDGES.
5. STONE BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF 10% CLASS I, 20% CLASS B, 40% CLASS A, AND 30%
ON -SITE ALLUVIUM BY VOLUME OR #57 STONE.
6. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES SHALL BE 12" THICK.
7. LARGER CLASS I & B STONES MAY EXTEND ABOVE THE BED SURFACE, BUT NO HIGHER THAN
HALF BANKFULL AND SHOULD PROVIDE A "NATURAL LOOK". ENGINEER SHALL HAVE FINAL
APPROVAL OF EXTENDING ROCK.
8. SATURATED WOODY DEBRIS THAT IS EXISTING WITHIN THE CHANNEL CAN BE RELOCATED
INTO THE NEW RIFFLE AREAS.
LOG WEI
COIR LOG
A
----------------
----------------
A'
SCOUR
POOL /
0
J
LL
IF
PLAN VIEW
TrIA"IC`MI A"ITC`
CROSS SECTION VIEW B — B'
5'
COIR FIBER
""^TYING
RIFFLE D-max
00
9,Q)
- OC1r�
J I l.JIN _ UP"Ur\I ILL
SECTION B — B'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
166680
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
,`,Nun►►►►►�,
.. �� C A R,01j,1!�, I
BANKFULL = SEAL i APPROVED BY:
OOF 028432
oil
Jilli ►► I
DATE:
TOE
1/4 OF BEGIN HEAD OF RIFFLE INVERT
GLIDE ELEVATION AND STATION
LENGTH
� STONE BACKFILL
GLIDE
LOG DROP
TRANSPLANTS
OR LIVE STAKES
LOG
PROFILE A - A'
SHEET NO.
2C
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
N T E R N A T I 0 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
114 OF RUN LENGTH
1
L
�� 9 00 POOL
TOP OF STREAMBANK
FLOW
STREAMBED
STONE BACKFILL .
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
4' MINIMUM
SECTION A - A'
NOTES
BEGIN TAIL OF RIFFLE INVERT
ELEVATION AND STATION
SOUR PO%
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10 INCHES IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT,
HARDWOOD, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. TOP OF HEADER LOG SHOULD BE SET AT SAME ELEVATION AS THE STREAMBED.
3. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WITH COIR LOGS TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS.
4. PLACE TRANSPLANTS ALONG BANKS TO PROTECT AGAINST BANK EROSION.
5. THE HEADER LOG SHOULD BE NOTCHED 2 - 3 INCHES DEEP IN THE CENTER AND
FOR 20 - 30% OF THE CHANNEL WIDTH.

Cr
is
QC
n
B
SEE CROSS
VANE DETAIL—,
C
0
(V
z
m
m
m
m
Q
00
QO
c9
i
C
n
i
m
i
Q
i
c
aD
r
i
V
i
O
L�
m
00
(-D
c9
QO
FLOW
A
�1A1�1f:a
A
Y �
Y
m z�
Q
z_j m
Q
Q z
Q z
wQ
wQ
U)
U)
PLAN
VIEW
TRANSPLANTS OR
TEMPORARY SEED
AND MATTING
PLUNGE POOL
FLU
TOP OF TERRACE
VARIES
SECTION A - A
.7
Wbkf
SECTION B - B
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
GEOTEXTILE FABRI
FILL MATERIAL
�j
FLOODPLAIN CULVERT
STREAM CHANNEL
NOTES
)WEST ELEVATION OF CROSS
\NE SHOULD BE SLIGHTLY
)WER THAN INVERT OF CULVERT
DTER BOULDERS
FEND BELOW DEPTH OF SCOUR
72"x48"xW"
VARIES
COVER FILL MATERIAL
WITH 6 INCHES #57 STONE
12" OR AS SPECIFIED
CULVERT
(SEE PLANS FOR TYPE / SIZE)
CROSS SECTION VIEW
SLOPES MAY VARY
EXISTING GROUND
FLOODPLAIN CULVERT
1. SIZE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PLANS.
2. APPLY SUFFICIENT FILL (2' MIN) OVER CULVERT TO PREVENT COLLAPSE.
3. STABILIZE SIDE SLOPES WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND FILL AROUND CULVERTS
WITH CLASS II STONE.
4. INSTALL HEADWALLS AND ENDWALLS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND IN THE DETAILS.
5. PRIMARY CULVERT SHOULD BE INSTALLED 12" OR AS SPECIFIED BELOW CHANNEL ELEVATION.
GEOLIFT WITH BRUSH TOE
NOTES:
1. LIVE BRANCH CUTTINGS SHALL BE THE SAME SPECIES AS THE LIVE STAKES
AND SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING VEGETATION DORMANCY.
2. LIVE BRANCH CUTTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A DENSITY OF 20-30 CUTTINGS
PER LINEAR FOOT AND A MAXIMUM DIAMETER OF 2.5 INCHES.
3. NUMBER OF SOIL LIFTS MAY VARY, IN GENERAL LIFTS SHALL EXTEND TO THE
TOP OF BANK OR BANKFULL STAGE.
STAKE TOP LAYER
OF MATTING IN 6" TRENCH
(SEE MATTING DETAIL)
FLOODPLAIN
UNDISTURBED
EARTH
1.0' LIFT OF
COMPACTED
ON -SITE SOIL (TYP)
4' DEEP (TYP)
BRUSH CAN BE LIMBS, BRANCHES, ROOTS OR ANY OTHER
WOODY VEGETATION APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 2D
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
"N► C AR p14
SEAL 9l •' i APPROVED BY:
039201
I
• •.•F41
DATE:
I
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
L "Al r Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L License #: F-1084
TOP OF BANK / BANKFULL STAGE
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
COIR FIBER MATTING
ENCOMPASSES LIFT
LIVE BRANCH CUTTINGS (SEE
f PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES)
BASEFLOW
W
FINISHED BED
ELEVATION
FOUNDATION APPROX. 1 FT
BELOW FINISHED BED ELEVATION
NOTES:
1. WHEN GEOLIFTS ARE BUILT ABOVE ROOTWAD CLUSTER, USE LARGE STONE BACKFILL BEHIND
ROOT MASS TO BUILT FOUNDATION.
2. CLASS I STONE MAY BE USED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER TO BUILD THE FOUNDATION
IN LIEU OF BRUSH MATERIAL.
BOULDER HEADWALL / ENDWALL
TOP COURSE OF
BOULDERS (TYP.)
B FLOW -
STREAM BED .'
A —\ —\
Y
Z _
LU
EMBEDDED FOOTER
BOULDERS
B, CULVERT Y
z
EMBEDDED FOOTER m
BOULDERS
Q
INCREASE OFFSET OF w
EACH COURSE TO ACHIEVE
0.5:1 SIDE SLOPES e7
PLAN VIEW
STAGGER
JOINTS
PLY
0.5:1 SIDE SLOPE
EARTHEN BACKFILL
-2
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
CULVERT
- - - 0 BASEFLOW
A �——,—�—,— — — — -
CHINK AND WEDGE 4-INCH STREAM BED
MINUS ROCK, AS NECESSARY, TO
LEVEL THE BOULDER COURSES CULVERT SHALL BE EMBEDDED
TO DEPTH INDICATED IN TABLE
BOULDER PLACED BELOW
EXISTING CHANNEL BOTTOM USE LARGEST BOULDERS
TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 2'. FOR FOOTER COURSE
STREAM BED
SECTION B - B'
REACH
BOULDER
SIZE
CULVERT
SIZE
EMBEDMENT
UT1-R1
1'x2'x2'
4 FT
12 IN
UT1-R4
1'x2'x2'
5 FT
12 IN
UT3
1'x2'x2'
4 FT
9.6 IN
UT4
1'x1'x1'
3 FT
12 IN
a L MAKE TOP OF FOOTER COURSE
AS LEVEL AS POSSIBLE NOTES:
EMBED TO DEPTH 1. BOULDERS SHALL BE TOUCHING SO THAT VOID SPACE IS MINIMIZED.
SHOWN IN TABLE 2. BOULDERS SHOULD EXTEND BELOW SCOUR DEPTH. FOOTER BOULDERS SHALL BEAT
LEAST Z BELOW THE EXISTING BED
3. GEOTEXTILE MATTING SHOULD BE PLACED BETWEEN BOULDERS AND SOIL.
SECTION A - A' 4. BOULDERS SHOULD BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED. VOID SPACE BETWEEN FABRIC AND
BOULDER OR ROCK FILL MATERIAL, SHOULD BE MINIMIZED.
5. BOULDERS SHOULD NOT BE HIGHER THAN THE TOP OF CROSSING ELEVATION.
6. FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE PLACED BEHIND BOULDERS, BURIED BELOW BOULDER DEPTH, AND
EXTEND INTO THE BANK.

w
N
Un
m
Q
Cb
c9
r-O
c9
i
ro
n
i
m
Q
i
c
T
0
0
i
L
O
L�
C_
0
I
00
cD
c9
(_O
i
CV O
CV N
O .�
C\1 0
\ L
Q Q
(V/
Ln�
LIVE STAKING
TOP OF STREAMBANK
PLANTI
6'-8' SPACING
9'-3' SPACING
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
SQUARE CUT TOP
BUDS FACING UPWARD
LIVE CUTTING
MIN.1/2" DIA
2'- 3' LENGTH
ANGLE CUT
30 - 45 DEGREES
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
NOTES
1. STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. DO NOT INSTALL STAKES THAT HAVE BEEN SPLIT.
3. STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH BUDS POINTING UPWARDS.
4. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO BANK.
5. STAKES SHOULD BE 1/2 TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3 FT LONG.
6. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED LEAVING 1/5 OF STAKE ABOVE GROUND.
1
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION, ROOTMASS, AND SOIL MATERIAL
CROSS SECTION VIEW
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION AND ROOTMASS
i
1�
------------ �`------------- r
-- (b
PLAN VIEW
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 1 2E
PROJECT ENGINEER
i
i
i
CAR017
�O / y%
SEAL l•• i APPROVED BY:
039201
i
08 � i� DATE:
i
i
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
�TERIALMichael 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
1 N T E R N A T 10 N A L License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
NOTES:
1.
EXCAVATE A HOLE IN THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED THAT WILL
ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE OF TRANSPLANT TO BE PLACED.
BEGIN EXCAVATION AT THE TOE OF THE BANK.
2.
EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT USING A FRONT END LOADER.
EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE ROOT MASS AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL
SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. IF ENTIRE ROOT MASS CAN NOT BE
EXCAVATE IN ONE BUCKET LOAD, THE TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE
AND ANOTHER SHOULD BE SELECTED.
3.
PLACE TRANSPLANT IN THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED SO THAT
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
4.
FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND COMPACT.
5.
ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
6.
PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH THAT
THEY TOUCH.
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS COIR FIBER MATTING
2.5 INCH
ROOFING
NAI L
NOTES: PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING IN 6 INCH DEEP
1. PLANT BARE ROOT SHRUBS AND TREES TO THE WIDTH OF THE TRENCH, STAKE, BACKFILL, AND COMPACT NOTES:
BUFFER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. T_PANRS SHOULD BE SEEDED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MATTING.
2. LOOSEN COMPACTED SOIL. TOP OF STREAMBANK 2. INSTALL COIR FIBER MATTING PER SPECIFICATIONS ALONG STREAM
TOP OF STREAMBANK 3. PLANT IN HOLES MADE BY A MATTOCK, DIBBLE, PLANTING BAR, BANKS OR IN OTHERS LOCATIONS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER.
OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. 3. LARGE STAKES SHOULD NOT BE SPACED FURTHER THAN 36" APART.
4. PLANT IN HOLES DEEP AND WIDE ENOUGH TO ALLOW THE ROOTS 4. PLACE LARGE STAKES ALONG ALL SEAMS, IN THE CENTER OF BANK,
TO SPREAD OUT AND DOWN WITHOUT J-ROOTING. AND TOE OF SLOPE.
5. KEEP ROOTS MOIST WHILE DISTRIBUTING OR WAITING TO PLANT 5. MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON BANKS, STAKED, AND TRENCHED PRIOR
BY MEANS OF WET CANVAS, BURLAP, OR STRAW. TO INSTALLING CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL.
6. HEEL -IN PLANTS IN MOIST SOIL OR SAWDUST IF NOT PROMPTLY 6. ALL MATTING STAKES MUST BE 100% BIODEGRADABLE.
PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE.
TOE OF SLOPE
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
CROSS SECTION VIEW OF BARE ROOT PLANTING
PLANTINGS
TOP OF STREAMBANK
NOTES:
1. WHEN PREPARING THE HOLE FOR A POTTED PLANT OR SHRUB
DIG THE HOLE 8 -12 INCHES LARGER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE
POT AND THE SAME DEPTH AS THE POT.
2. REMOVE THE PLANT FROM THE POT. LAY THE PLANT ON ITS SIDE
IF NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE POT.
3. IF THE PLANT IS ROOTBOUND (ROOTS GROWING IN A SPIRAL
AROUND THE ROOT BALL), MAKE VERTICAL CUTS WITH A KNIFE
OR SPADE JUST DEEP ENOUGH TO CUT THE NET OF ROOTS.
ALSO MAKE A CRISS-CROSS CUT ACROSS THE BOTTOM OF THE BALL.
4. PLACE THE PLANT IN THE HOLE.
5. FILL HALF OF THE HOLE WITH SOIL (SAME SOIL REMOVED FOR BACKFILL).
6. WATER THE SOIL TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS AND FILL THE REST
OF THE HOLE WITH THE REMAINING SOIL.
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
CROSS SECTION VIEW OF CONTAINER PLANTING
TRENCH
TOP OF
STREAMBANK
LARGE
STAKES
LARGE STAKES
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
PLACE.COIR FIBER MATTING AT TOE OF SLOPE.
SECURE MATTING WITH LARGE MATTING STAKE
CROSS SECTION VIEW
TRENCH
TOP OF STREAMBANK
------------------------------------------------------
• • • • • • STAKES
COIR FIBER MATTING
• • • • • • • • • • • • TO BE EXTENDED TO
TOE OF SLOPE
PLAN VIEW LARGE
STAKES
TYPICAL LARGE MATTING STAKE
LEG LENGTH
17.00 IN 43.18 CM
TAPERED TO POINT
WIDTH
1.5IN
3.81 CM
THICKNESS
1.5IN
3.81 CM
TYPICAL SMALL MATTING STAKE
LEG LENGTH
11.00 IN
27.94 CM
HEAD WIDTH
1.25 IN
3.18 CM
HEAD THICKNESS
0.40 IN
1.02 CM
LEG WIDTH
0.60 IN 1.52 CM
TAPERED TO POINT
LEG THICKNESS
0.40 IN
1.02 CM
TOTAL LENGTH
12.00 IN
30.48 CM

C
0-1
LL
(V
t�
Z
m
Q
00
CD
�O
C.0
0
C
01-1
-
m
0
Q
C
T
0
Ql
0
i
O
L�
0
t�
00
(D
CD
r-O
1-1
0
A--)
(V O
(V N
O -_
(-\j O Q
0-
N/R
Ln7: E
BARB WIRE FIELD FENCE
STEEL GATES
PROJECT REFERENCE
NO. SHEET NO.
1
166680
2F
PROJECT
ENGINEER
I
I
C A R o,74,
I
SI0 : 9 .,.
SEAL 9!'
i APPROVED BY:
028432
oil ii ►►
I DATE:
END POST
i
6 INCH DIAMETER BY 8 FOOT LONG
BRACE POST
6 INCH DIAMETER BY 8 FOOT LONG
Michael
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
IF
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
BARB WIRE
3 INCHES (TYP.)
SEE PLANS FOR SPECIFIC LENGTH
4"
INTERNATIONAL
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License #: F-1084
X X X X X X X
NCDMS ID
NO. 100068
GRADUATED IN SIZE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM
GETTING LARGER IN SIZE TOWARD THE TOP.
X X X X X X X
48 INCHES
co
Q ~O
z
rC
z
X X X X X X X
LU
>�
Id
>U)
x x x x x x x
STEEL FRAME GATE
-
BARB WIRE
q
VARIES X X X X X X X
GROUND LINE
LJ
M
1
LJ
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
24 INCHES (TYP.)
>u
NOTES:
1. POST HEIGHT DIMENSION SHALL BE THE SAME AS REQUIRED FOR THE ADJACENT FENCE.
2. CONSTRUCT AN END OR STRESS PANEL, AS REQUIRED IN THE SPECIFICATION, ON EACH SIDE OF GATE.
NOTE:
3. HINGES AND LOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED BY GATE MANUFACTURER.
1. END POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A SPACING OF 10-15 FEET.
2. ALL FENCING AND FENCE POSTS SHOULD BE SET 1-2 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE CONSERVATION
EASEMENT FOR FENCE LINE MAINTENANCE ( LIKE HERBICIDE SPRAYING).

m
co
Q
00
Q0
Q0
ro
m
Q
1-1
a�
0
L
0
I
00
co
Qo
CONTROL POINT #305
GROUND COORDINATES
N: 713456.03'
E: 830566.09'
ELEV: 3065.15'
O \
M \
ROCK CROSS VANE (TYP.)
\\_ °o
vo
GRADE CON-T�0NaC
J-HOOK-VA N_t�fWP�
BOULDER STEP INSTALLED
IN PLACE OF LOG DROP
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
on, ,2
PIN: 8731-33-5998
DB: 838 PG: 400, TRACT IV
REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL: 6260
2 - 8' GATES INSTALLED
IN PLACE OF 16' GATE
WE KIRK
FARMS NORTH, LC
PIN: 8731-33r59 8
DB: 838 PG: 400,/TR/ACT IV
_n,
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
® CHANNEL PLUG
Ri
W
Lu
tn
uj
W
V)
W
Z
.J

r
h
m
I—
w
w
cn
uw
w
cn
w
Z
J
_
U
Q
E
_
(1�
m
03
CL
cn
0
L
0
LL
C3
Qo
CD
WE KIRK
FARMS NORTH, LLC
\ \ \ PIN: 8731-33-5998
\ DB: 838 PG: 400, TRACT IV
\\\ \\ REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
\\ \\ AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL. 6260
'I
"po
BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.) \_
/-%V-Liv1L I
TOP OF BANK (TY
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
AS—BULT
RFrIN IIT9
1 U+Ub.bb
12,CMP
N: 2997.97'
151, CPP
T: 2996.61' -
_n%
12" CUP �X�X
T NG GATE R'EHUI
VS LOCAAAON
W 00F6INAL DESI
WE KIRK
PIN: 8730-09-3258
DB: 838 PG: 404
REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL: 6260 & PC: C SL: 7314
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN
HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY
\(CONSERVATION EASEMENT)
DB: 917 PG: 978
� PC: C SL: 7314
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG

m
cn
Q
Cb
c9
c_0
c�
M
CL
cn
Q
M
a�
0
i
0
LL
C3
CD
CV U
CV
00
CV 0
\ Q
BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
166680 1 5
PROJECT ENGINEER
I
I
I
CARoi
'44; ��ES S l0 9 :
• SEAL I APPROVED BY:
I
028432
HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY DATE:
I
(CONSERVATION EASEMENT)
\ \ DB: 917 PG: 978
\ \ \ \ Regency Parkway, Suite 600
\ \ Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
PC. C SL: 7314 Michael Bakel
800Cary0 , NORTH CAROLINA27518
Phone: [phone]
�w �\
Fax: [phone]
INTERNATIONAL License #: F-1084
NCDMS ID NO. 100068
ROCK SILL I LLED
FLAGE OF LOG
k\X � CONFLUENCE STATION BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.)
�oT! UT1 REACH 4 STA. 24+19.91- _
x�x�x x�, x-
s UT4 STA. 10+50.55 END UT4 STA. 10+41.90 / x
CTOB UT1 REACH 4
GROSS VANE (TYP.) �\X\ /
/cam
�W�-_ _S-BUILT THALWEG (TYP.) �x x 6,0 ,' i/ /' // ,��
\--_ENS UT1 REACH 3 '`� ,- / LOG DF�P ff YP,a /
BEG N -UT 1 R EACH 4 -X - - _ - - A /r E Rt�CK VBrN��T P:) / � � � / 1-1
/
l8PL`B \ / PL
/ / �`, • PLC \ \ \ CONFLUE-NC-E-STATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i_ _-
/ GWt COROCK
--- — -29 %��ii2g7�ii— = _ ____ ��20"P P�AA—/ / /
U ST + p- — — /� =--. — —__—_ JrHOOK VANE P,a /
i --L9�-DRO_P INSTALLED-Z71 , /
/ N / �-— — — _ _ — — N-OT4 �R[GINA�D I GN- _ = 2965 7 �`N i�— _ _ _ - 01_-BAO 'o
LU
LU
In
LU
966---_—
1001*
_ _=S96Z==— �---mac=_ U
k
Or TOP OF BANK(TYP.)
-B-EGIN UT4 / x
EIgD_U-Ta-ST . -2Q-+24.64-\ � �� � , �_ � - - - , ; STA. 10 00.00
o96 �0D � AC 1� '+\ \ �0 ELEITR I vy 09
_ -A 4N-E-PA_LTM E� — — — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ _ / / /96 SLOW GAUG #3 / USN FORK R /
— — BARBED WIRE'_F xTYP) / WV WV OUT. 2967.i2 � X R -
- — —FAM I L.Y— " ��l \ \ \ \ ./fBROKENl2965.2 '
——P1�QPEBTIES, L.P. \ / �' ! - x� d 3�
— ---P-I N : 8721-72-6837 P
DB: 489 PG: 1683 S�3611
CONTROL POINT#500 �L�G f / / / / INV OUT.-�6 3�
STATE PLANE COORDINATES
N:712855.04'
E: 829608.53
ELEV:2989.63'
// .% GATES I TALLED
/ 0 N PLACE 16' GATE
/ // /
. /
� /
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG
WE KIRK
PIN: 8730-09-3258
DB: 838 PG: 404
REFERENCE: DB: 562 PG: 286, TRACT II
AND DB: 158 PG: 305
PC: C SL: 6260 & PC: C SL: 7314
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN
a3
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
UT to RUSH FORK
UTI & UT4
RECORD DRA WING
20 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)

r
h
Lo
H
Lu
Lu
2
to
w
w
cn
I
w
Z
J
E
m
Q
C3
CL
cn
0
L
0
LL
C3
Qo
CD
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
PIN: 8730-09-3258
FENCE ENCROACHMENT WAS CORRECTED
PIN: 8721-72-6837
a3
000.
00,
000,
oo
_ G AW CK STEP POOL (TYP.)
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG
8721-72-683
CV U
CV
O
cV 0
Q
\ o0

c
t
z
r
s
U
a
U
4
a
c�
c�
c�
G
c
a
a
rr
G
a
c
(
0
a
S
C
LI
S
G
a
U
c�
c�
G
CV
N Q
O
N
\ S
N,
L.n'5

cc
n
n
00
m
Q
00
ro
m
V)
1-1
V)
a)
0
L
o
W
D
00
c.o
co
Qo
BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.�l
/
'oo
/
/ / // // i%�// i
RQqK O/ROSSrV/ WE-(T�/P�
ROCK I IL/INPTALI
N P IAA �QC� /D,I�p p/ / / / / / i / / / / //, i
�13
��-
/
AS—BU /�/;////�/ //�°/ / / // / / I / / �/ol
TOP OF BANK
!'l
/ z?w / ZZ
/ // /!/ / /'� /
BEGIN UT3 / � //// i ��/'/ / �l Yl \ -- •�� \ �� •,
\ ` \B•DR
BE
DROL�C\
�40-
I \ \ \ CcTA303 — — —
\ v ---GROUND COORDINATES \
\
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
P I N : 8721—P--68-37—
- _
DB:�89 P�:
%//
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
PIN: 8721-72-6837
DB: 489 PG: 1683
/'
��---
// % 13MLD-ER STEP
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
FV.)/
1•2
W
_Z
J
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
® CHANNEL PLUG

0-
m
cn
Q
03
CL
cn
0
L
0
LL
C3
Qo
CD
N\3
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
PIN: 8721-72-6837
DB: 489 PG: 1683
BARBED WIRE FENCE (TYP.) AS -BUILT
_3040 TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
SURVEYED VEG_ / /' TRIN
PLOT�C,ORN-Ef / M FLOW C�AUC�E #'V
00
W w 4yd
O
uj
A7+ 0- ui
uj
cn w -- l �x T. r — OF BA
ui
W
�$,`.ST. Tc�e �F BAND\� W
U R K CROSS VANE (� YP.) �� — Z
'LOG AND R CIS'- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4.
L�p�*o-p fT\YP.)
Q \ \ \ \ \ RACK y-k100�\VAN E�(T�YP.) \� \ \ _ \ 2
STEP Pli (TYP �� �OULbER S�EP (TYP
if\\S F—
\\ O° Q
\� \\ \\ \\ \\ \\\
\ \ \ /\ \ \ \� \ \ S I-JIIL� �I i�L E �TY� \ \ oD' AWNS-TAL EDP
IN PLACE OFE_QLIF\ \ \ \ \ \
v� vvv � A\ \vim vv vv vv vvv
CONTROLPOINT#301 BARBED WIRE FENCE-(TYP.)
ANNE PALMER GROUND COORDINATES
/ FAMILY PROPERTIES L.P. N:713530.52'
E: 829447.33'
m PIN: 8721-72-6837 Ei 3021.99'
DB: 489 PG: 1683
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL PLUG

cc
n
rn
Q
00
i
r6
r
i
m
Q
1-1
a)
0
V
L
0
W
00
Q0
RECORD DRAWING LEGEND
PROPOSED DESIGN
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
KEE MAPPING & SURVEYING
4/14/22
RED LINE VARIATIONS FROM
ORIGINAL DESIGN SUBMITTED
WITH THE MITIGATION PLAN
CONTROL POINT #300
GR ND COORDINATES
N: 13167.63'
E: 29461.72'
EV: 3014.21'
WATER SYSTEM
W L LIVESTOCK WATER SYSTEM
DRINKER &HARDENED PAD #2
I
�xJ
/ W ANNE PALMER
aLLQ/MILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
�F &K DOU-BLE—DROP
CROSS,VANE (TYP.)
LIVESTOCK WATER SYSTEM
DRINKER & HARDENED PAD #1
ANNE PALMER
FAMILY PROPERTIES, L.P.
PIN: 8721-72-6837
DB: 489 PG: 1683
=---2990---
-- — — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
�Z9g5/ '__---
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
® CHANNEL PLUG

BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiii • • • : I
MENEEMEMEN
■\z\o\■Ail■
■■■■g��qq■i
■■■■■■\i��qm
■■■■■■■■■■.;tea■■�a■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■►ca■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.\fir=�
■■■■�\■■\�;�\■laic■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ail\\�7►_'\■iZA■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■.����\[■rme11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1INN ■,Cn\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■z7m■■■iAm■■■■■■■■■■■IINN ■■■■■l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■"■■■■■mpmmm■■■■■■Ilow ■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ *■■■■■■IIC,(mR■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■FEW ■OV►1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■■■fil\■`Am:LR!1■0mL•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
00000000000000.300000■■■■■`�l10iZ!!■■II■■■■■CR■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■ ie"p,Xv mo■C■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iZ!\11IIi►.•�i►'\■Cm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m■■wAA■■*w■■mmA■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■\r1■■■11 ram. \►\■C■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■f7II; I MI Eel L' oil; IFT1111I2CM 0000000000 ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■il■\�■■■ail■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ii■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■11■�� r�IRlIC!!1lI11l�l.�1�9�■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■1i■■\.�►_!it \■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■1�■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r�;:L��11L■!J■Ilil�L►'Id13�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■r►A\►�\■!1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■aw.�■■■i■ ■■■■■■■■■■ �1■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■��:y:� s,i 11 � ire■�i-r��� 1 i � I�>t■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■rC��■ram■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r�� !�■�➢min■�1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�i�■■■Au=mm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■\\.\■ ► w i■■ ■■■a:a emmm■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■awmanim nm\■■aimswmmmm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■\■s!N■■■rAC2R■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iN■■\ft._V■■■■■C■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o!■11■■Nmmw!q■■■■mmmmmm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,w:Lmmzn�=!R■■■iQ,■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMM=Z=J:-�-ftir.!!!\■■■.1■m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\'lam'.!■■■■■■■
■■a=rA■■■■■■ noman■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■'m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.;;li%a■■■R■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■b_.-.■■■EQe■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ff1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m:;-•■■■■Sail■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■!!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■:,,•■■■■■zg■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a:N\'7■RE;-EmiFo.Z49m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■macomm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ilmvp -:�q\znmmmICbaFmmmmm■■■mnammm■■C\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\zii■■\.\\li-nommiC■ClSi■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..z,-.-�-M!-N\■■■imQNw■■■■■■■■■■lid■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i�="0!mmmmmI■ompw■■■■■■dsmmm■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11\\■■■■■■■■■bmcmmm■■■Cs■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II■►I■:__==� -w■■■■■■■maN■►■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l'\►.a■■■■■■■■■■:z7 _•■■■aCVe■*■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►1■■■.---�rwaf=aam
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a=::d■■■i:;;Mq■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■h.:
rilf■r� \■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■W:

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■ice ���!■��■■r
■■■■■■■■■■■■■.��_�!■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ \!► ��==`�■■i■■■■ i i0Z'Ze!■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■JJ■! IIIII!7■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■[1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■it.!id■1:�■ems!\���\■■■■■Ca!*■i�'i!■■■■■■■■
�■■■■■■■mm
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\.��■��irt\ice!\■■■■■■r�'■�■iC!■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.���!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iWiamISPIRRIT1lp**■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\i�rrlRaw■■■■■■■■is■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■�!i■dire:iL\■■riiQ�*■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l\■■DIY■d::!■!■■i�v7■■■■■■�l■L*■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■L�i�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\�I.■■■■■■■id:,!!■d:■�lL�■■■■IIFCI�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1'�.��■■■■11■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■1■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■I ■■■■ ►\■■�iG =f�■■\ ice'_!■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■1 I■ ■■■■■ ■.� �■i 1■i■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■11
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■I1■■■■■■■■r1■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■fzltilY��■■■■■■■ds\■■Y�I:�C��!■1f■■■11■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■[ti■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ll�■=�'��.:�!■■■■■1Ir`iiii■■NWV■■■1I■*■■■■■■■■iTiCQ!■■■�■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Q19■■■■1:I■�:7w►C■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i.Z'Z'9
MENOMONEE
MENOMONEE
MEMEMMEMEM
■■■ice■.��__■■�__\■■■■■■ii■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■rig■mE�■ ■■/:`� /i■��!\■■■ ■�lQ�■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ewe___•■■ ■�;.■■■■■■■=sal■■■■■■

■■■ice �!��'..'�!■■ ■■■►�■
■■■■■■■■■ice �!�s�s�
-����i� �•ai11�■■Y■■■■■■■■\■saes■■■■■■A■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
�■�■■ ■��� �!��� era#■ ■■■\'! ■■■1!� l��i r�f�lNC\■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■�' ■■■■f►� ■■p�� ��.L•� ■■■:■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■AM MIST ■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■��_� ��� � _���� ���'+��
■■■■■;�■►i■►:�■■■:� �'•�:=�•■1,■■■.1�■■■■■■■■■�aaee*■■■■■■■■■■may
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■!An►,■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ilmmmm► mmmlr■mmmmmm
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■lI■■■■vmQim■_■ m"m
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Rmmmra1i■■■z==!■■■
BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiii • • • : I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■����!•■■■ice!■■■■■■■\'l�rQL'i9■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■V■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice= !_!
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice
MENEM
MENEM
MENEM
MENEM

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■lit\a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\Sri1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.arIIIII■■op.■■■. "■■
!■■■1: ■IIWm�-�RN■IA■GaEN■
■■■.:•IM■■■MEN A■.�--�q■
1■ rC ■■■■■
WOWnIUMMIN
� is ■■■ i'■■■■ ■■iD■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■,\■�\■■�■■■■■lid■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■tea■■\.; •■■isaw■■tea■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■tea■■■��;�w■■c■■■■a.�■■■■
■■■►�■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ►1■ram■■i1■■■
■■■■►■rr■�w�■craw■*w�■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�,�
■■�;:e-�--•yam■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■r■■■■■
■1►■N■■r■■■
■■■■■h;q\Q
■■■■■■■fto.
■■►� ■�.■■■■ Ilia■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■\ice ����■■■C■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■:�.-,a■■tea■■■■■
�■*■ems _a■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ �..,■��■■� ii�■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►'.■■t: ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■WO-WANow Rq■■\■
■■■C' \■ 11■p! ■■■■■ m■■■■
■■■■■ \ill! ���■ ■■11m�
■■■■■■■rWrAOi—!\-s_'-m■■
■■■� ii: ��\■ ■fib■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■[ ■■■■WaR-11■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■11■ �I■■mi� ��C!\ ■■■C■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■
■■■■'M ■■■■■ ■■� �� ��\■■ woram ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■[ I ivi'd'�'\■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11✓_�■D■����!
MENNEN BAKER PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiii • • • : I

MENOMONEE
MENOMONEE
IMMEMEMEME
MENOMONEE
MENOMONEE
MEMEMEMEME
MEMEMEMEME
■■■\ice!■■■\,�!:�■■■GQ!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■rf�71�`ii11c■i��fillll�l�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■C!■ ��J■ice!\■■ laic■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■�■rilliilr■iY YIr■illiiQiilr ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�lC!■■■■ice ��■■■■■ZS■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■ice■■■■.� 1•■�■O�■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\:\■■■■\�1■■■■■■■Cain!■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice!■■■11■1'�1•■■■■■■■■■■�■�■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■&-,=om■■■■■■■■.M=_���■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■iil�l�■■■■■■■■.��
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■.. i ■■■■■ ■iiC���L'_!! ■■■■■■■■■■ ■moil■ ■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■ice ����!■■■■■■■riZ�''�■■■■■■
MEMEMEMEME
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■fir\�r.■s=-■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\moll■ ��i•�
■■■■_�■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■■■I. [�'m■*■■moll■
I,■■■■.�_-_-�.■■ ■■■■ rii■�fififi■CSC CZ
ii�=!9■■■■■ice �■�■.i:�� _••moll■
mill. ii=�! �\�ai' �w■■■
■■■�il!I■■ice __--���'■
FA■■■■■■■■
J■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
loom■■■■mis

00
< 10
Z IN
c
n
7-
m
cD
z
m
m
m
m
Q
00
(D
cD
c9
/
0
c
m
/
m
0
Q
/
C
0
a�
0
/
V
L
O
LL_
t
0
00
(D
CD
cD
Proposed BMP Planted Species
UT to Rush Fork Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project No. 100068
Botanical Name Common Name % Planted by Wetland
Species Tolerance
Shallow Water Zone (50 Herbaceous Plants per 200 ft2)
Juncus effusus Common Rush 10% FACW
Peltandra vir inica Arrow Arum 10% OBL
Pontederia cordata Pickerelweed 10% OBL
Sa i ttari a lati oli a Broadleaf Arrowhead 10% OBL
Saururus cernuus Lizard's Tail 10% OBL
Scir us cyperinus Wool ass 10% FACW
Carex vul inoidea Fox Sedge 10% OBL
S ar anium americanum Bur -reed 10% FAC
Carex lurida Shallow Sedge 10% OBL
Polygonum pensylvanicum 1 Smartweed 10% FACW
Temporary Inundation Zone (8 shrubs per 200 ft2)
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 10% OBL
Ce halanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 10% OBL
Cornus amomum S&v Do ood 10% FACW
Ilex verticillata Winterbe 10% FACW
Rhododendron viscosum Swamp Azalea 10% FACW
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark 10% FACW
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 10% FACW
Leucothoe fontanesiana Highland Doghobble 10% FACW
Vaccinium corymbosum Hi bush Blueberry 10% FACW
Xanthorhiza simplicissima Yellowroot 10% FACW
Notes: -Final species selection may change due to refinement of site conditions or to availability at the
time of planting. If species substitution is required, the planting Contractor will submit a revised planting
list to Baker for approval prior to the procurement of plant stock.
-Shallow Water planting zone is from basin bottom to elevation 3085.5' while Temporary Inundation
planting zone is from elevation 3085.5' to 3086.5'.
-Embankments and perimeter fill slopes will be planted with non -clumping turf grasses (no trees or
woody shrubs).
Notes: -Final species selection may change due to refinement of site conditions or to availability at the
time of planting. If species substitution is required, the planting Contractor will submit a revised planting
list to Baker for approval prior to the procurement of plant stock.
-Shallow Water planting zone is from basin bottom to elevation 3085.5' while Temporary Inundation
planting zone is from elevation 3085.5' to 3086.5'.
-Embankments and perimeter fill slopes will be planted with non -clumping turf grasses (no trees or
woody shrubs).