Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141016 Ver 1_More Info Received_20141001NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Governor September 22, 2014 Carolina Wetland, Inc Attn: Thomas Blackwell, PWS 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd Charlotte, NC 28273 Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION North Prong Clarke Creek Sanitary Sewer Dear Mr. Blackwell: John E. Skvarla, III Secretary DWR # 14 -1016 Mecklenburg County L M4 L- ,i ;; . r ,- -, .Es On September 22, 2014, the Division of Water Resources (Division) received your application requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division for the subject project. The Division has determined that your application is incomplete and cannot be processed. The application is on -hold until all of the following information is received: Need Agent Authorization Form (401 and Isolated Only) Page 13 of 13 of the Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form carries the signature of Thomas Blackwell. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0502(f) in order for Thomas Blackwell to sign, the application package requires an agent authorization form from the applicant. An example can be found online: httP: / /www.saw.usace._ army. mil / Portals /59 /docs /reguIatory /regdocs /Permits /SAMPLE AG ENT AUTHORIZATION FORM.pdf. Please submit four (4) copies of this documentation Application Form was not Signed Page 13 of 13 of the Pre- Construction Notification (PCN) Form was not signed. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0502(f) the application form must be signed by the owner or the owner's agent. If an agent of the owner signs the application form, an agent authorization form must also be included. An example agent authorization form can be found online: http: / /www.saw.usace. army. mil / Portals /59 /docs /reguIatory /regdocs /Permits /SAMPLE AG ENT AUTHORIZATION FORM.pdf. Please submit four (4) copies of this documentation Pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 02H .0502(e) the applicant shall furnish all of the above requested information for the proper consideration of the application. If all of the requested information is Division of Water Resources — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919 - 807 -63001 FAX: 919 - 807 -6494 Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org O�OF W A TF9OG 9 Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 13 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ®Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ® Yes ❑ No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. ❑ Yes ® No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: North Prong Clarke Creek Sanitary Sewer 2b. County: Mecklenburg 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Huntersville 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Multiple - Linear Project 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 13 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑ Agent []Other, specify Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Department 4b Name Mr George Brantl 4c Business name (if applicable) 'Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Department 4d Street address 5100 Brookshire Boulevard 4e City, state, zip Charlotte, NC 28216 4f Telephone no 704 - 391 -5170 4g Fax °no 4h Email address gbrant @a' charlotte nc us 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) ,5a Name Thomas Blackwell, PWS 5b Business name (if applicable) Carolina Wetland Services, Inc 5c Street address 550 E Westinghouse Blvd' 5d City, state, zip Charlotte, NC 28273 5e Telephone no 704- 527 -1177 5f Fax no 704- 527 -1133 ,5g Emad;address tom @cws -inc net Page 2 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) lb Site; coordinates, (in decimal degrees) Latitude 35 418772° Longitude 80 803198° (MDDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD) 1 c Property size 13 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc) to proposed project North Prong Clarke Creek ,2b Water Quality Classification of "nea'rest receiving Water, Class C 2c River basin Yadkin (HU# 030401,05) Page 3 of 13 PCN Torm — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 3. Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application The�North Prong ,Clarke Creek,Sanitary Sewer project,corridor is approximately 13 acres in extent The protect corridor runs, southeast -from the Ramah Church Road to Huntersvdle- Concord Road,and south to the confluence of South Prong Clarke Creek in Huntersvdle, North Carolina (Figure 1 USGS Site Location Map, attached) The project area consists of forested and agricultural floodplain adjacent to North Prong Clarke Creek Typical on -site vegetation mclude,greeri ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), box elder (Acer negundo), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), red maple (Acer rubrum), willow oak (Quercus phellos), and cottonwood (Populus deltoides) An aerial photograph of the project is attached (Figure 2) 3b List the total estimated acreage of. all existing wetlands on the property 0 36 acre 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 353 linear feet 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The purpose of;the project is to construct approximately 12,470 linear feet (LF) of 18 -inch through 24 -inch trunk sewer along North Prong Clarke Creek and,to eliminate an existing sewage lift station (Ramah Church Road Lift Station) This project is required to provide sewer service for future,development to take place south of Ramah Church Road The entire basin to be ser Rc(is approximately 2,500 acres Of,the 2,500 °acres, approximately 1,000 acres is currently being served by the existing, lift station, whi&Will be abandoned The proposed, sanitary sewer wil Hie into the existing sewer located at the Ramah Church Road Lift Station and will extend,downstream, paralleling North Prong Clarke Creek until tying into the existing Clarke Creek Sewer, Phase IV outfall near the confluence of North Prong Clarke Creek and Clarke Creek, from there wastewater will be carried to the Rocky River trunk sewer system for treatment at WSACC's Rocky River Regional WWTP located in Cabarrus County The proposed sewer has been designed to handle flows for the build -out of the service area based on'existing zoning The proposed project will consist of gravity sewer only No new pump-stations are,proposed 3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used Approximately 12,470 linear feet (LF) of 18 -inch through 24 -inch trunk sewer along North Prong Clarke Creek and to eliminate an existing sewage lift station (Ramah Church Road Lift Station) This project is required to provide sewer service for future development to take place south of Ramah Church Road The entire basin to be served is approximately 2,500 acres Of the 2,500 acres, approximately 1,000 acres is currently being served by the existing lift station, which will be abandoned The proposed sanitary sewer'wdI tie, into the existing sewer located at the Ramah Church Road Lift;Station,and will extend downstream,, paralleling North Prong Clarke Creek�untd tying into the existing Clarke Creek Sewer, Phase IV outfall near the confluence of North Prong Clarke CreeK;and Clarke Creek, from there wastewaterwdl be carried to the Rocky River trunk sewer system for treatment at'WSACC's Rocky River Regional WWTP located in Cabarrus County The construction corridor will not exceed the-40-foot maximum corridor width through wetlands as a condition of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification The construction corridor has also been limited to a 40 -foot width at all stream crossings The permanent maintained portion of the,right -of -way (RAN) corridor will not exceed 15 feet in width °through wetlands and at stream crossings Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream ,waters Anti-seep collars will be installed at the,downstream wetland boundary and every 150 feet up the ,gradient until the sewer trunk exits the wetland Sewer trunks will be sited greater than 10 feet from parallel `stream channels All unavoidable stream crossings will be at a near perpendicular angle All channel work °will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No 3884 In addition, all permanent maintained right -of -way through wetlands will be permanently marked in the field to avoid mowing and maintenance of additional wetland areas A track hoe and other typical construction equipment will be used to construct this project Page 4 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained,for this property / project (includmg,all prior phases) in the past? Comments El Yes ®No El Unknown 4b If thehCorps,rnade the jurisdictional determination, what type of determmation,was, made? ❑ Preliminary ❑'Final 4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? . Name (if known), Agency /Consultant Company Other 4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State, determinations and attach documentation, 5. Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all pnorphases)imAheapast? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ ,Unknown 5b If yes, explain in detad,accordmg to "help file" instructions 6. Future Project Plans 6a Is this,a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes, explain Page 5 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary la Which sections were completed below for your protect (check all thatsapply) ®'Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are,wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area;impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P ❑ T Crossing Wetland AA- PEM1 E ❑ Yes ® No, ® Corps ❑ DWQ 0 014 W2 ❑ P ®T Clearing Wetland AA- ❑ Yes ®, Corps 0 026 PEM1 E ® No DWQ W3 ®P F1 T Conversion Wetlands BB, CC, ® Yes ® Corps Oil EE- PFO1 E ❑ No ❑DWQ W4 ❑ P ®T Clearing Wetlands BB, CC, ® Yes ® Corps 0 20 EE- PFO1 E ❑ No DWQ' W5 ❑ P ®T Clearing Wetland DD- El Yes ® Corps 0 009 PEM1 E ® No El DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No, ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0 36 acre 2h Comments Permanent Wetland Impacts total 0 12 acre 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps- 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear , Temporary (T) (INT) other) (feet) feet) Si ❑ P ®T Utility Line Perennial RPW ® PER ® Corps 10 -15' 80 Crossing Stream A El INT El DWQ S2 El P ®`T Utility Line Perennial RPW ® PER ® Corps ' 83 Crossing Stream B and C ❑ INT [-I DWQ S3 ® P ❑'T Ford Crossing Perennial RPW ® PER ® Corps 15 Stream B ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P ®`T Utility Line, Seasonal RPW ;❑ PER ® Corps 145 Crossing Streams D and E ® INT ❑ DWQ S5 ® P ❑`T Ford Crossing g easonal RPW ❑ PER ® Corps 30 Streams D and E ® INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ JINT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts 353' 31 Comments Permanent'impacts to jurisdictional streams are limited to 45 If as a result of ford crossings Page 6 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U S then individually list -all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number = (if applicable) Type ohmpact Waterbody type Area of impact�(acres) Permanent (P)'or Temporary T 01 [-]POT 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑P ❑T i 4f. Total open water impacts 4g Comments 5. Pond or Lake +Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose ' (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam�high hazard permit required - ❑'Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 5j Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then. complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico El Other Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b 6c- 6d 6e 6f 6g Buffer impact number — Reason 'Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (squareJeet) (square,feet) Tem ora impact re uired*7 B1 ❑P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P ❑T, ❑Yes ❑ No 6h Total'buffer impacts 61, Comments Page 7 of 13 1 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project Jurisdictional Waters of the U S have been avoided wherever possible Other constraints on the sewer route -were also taken into account These constraints include,sigrnficant trees, site, topography, and geology, In areas where impacts,to Jurisdictional "Waters of the US are unavoidable, steps have been taken to minimize both the - extent and severity of the impacts The construction corridor will not exceed the 40 -foot maximum corridor width through wetlands,as a condition of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification The construction corridor has also been limited to a 40- foot,width at all stream crossings The permanent maintained portion of the right -of -way (R/W) corridor will not exceed 15 feet in width through wetlands and at stream crossings Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters Anti -seep collars will be installed at,the downstream wetland boundary,and every 150 feet up the gradient until the sewer trunk exits thevetland Sewer'trunks will be sited greater than 10 feet from stream channels All unavoidable stream crossings will be at a near perpendicular angle All channel work will be constructed in the dryain accordance with Water Quality Certification No 3884 In addition, all permanent maintained right -of -way through wetlands will be permanently marked in the field to avoid mowing and maintenance of additional wetland areas 1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U S have been reduced to the maximum extent °practicable The North Prong Clarke 'Creek Sanitary Sewerproject has been designed to avoid `impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U S wherever possible and minimize the extent of necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters All work will be constructed in the dry in,accordance with Water Quality Certification No 3884 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters,of the U S or "Waters of the State! 2b. If yes, mitigation is required'by (check`all that apply)- ❑ DWQ ® Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ®Payment to in -lieu fee program projects i ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c Comments 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is,attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d 'Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested 0 12 acres 4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments A request'for credits has been made,for 0'25 acre (0 12 acre rounded to nearest 0 25 acre) A response is awaited 5. Complete ifUsing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan Page 8 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 5a If using'a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes, then, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required Zone, 6c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1 5 6f Total buffer mitigation required: 6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer - restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page'9 of 13 PCN Form — Versio,n 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan la Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? lb If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No 2c if this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management, Plan, explain why There is no change in impervious area associated with this project 2d If this project DOES °require a Stormwater 'Management Plan, then provide a brief; narrative description of the plan ❑ Certified Local Government 2e Who will be responsible for'the review of the Stormwater,Management,PlaO ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Huntersvdle ❑ Phase II 3b Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached ?, 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs,apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 ❑ Other 4b Has the, approved Stormwater Management'Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the,Stormwater Management Plan meet,the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Mave'all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 10 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ,Requirement) la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? lb If you answered "yes "'to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements -of the National or State ❑ Yes ®' No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document,review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter ) ❑ Yes ❑, No Comments 2. Violations (DWQ. Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation,of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑'Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an,after- the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the; above questions, provide an explanation of,the violation(s) 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project- (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis, in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative-description Development in the watershed is controlled by the Town of Hunterswlle Zoning 4. Sewage'Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility Sewerage will be directed to the Rocky River Regional WWTP located in Cabarrus County Page 11 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3, December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species•and Designated Critical' Habitat (Corps, Requirement) °5a Will this project occur in or near amarea with federally;protected;species or ❑Yes' ®' No 'habitat,*? 5b Have ou checked with'the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act you _ _ _ .- _ 9 9 P El Yes ®'No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c If yes, indicate the USFWS, Field Office you havecontacted ❑ ,Asheville 5d What data,sources did you use to determine,,whethei your site would impact Endang6red,Spe-6bs =or Designated,critical Habitat? A letterwas forwarded to the North Carolina Natural, Heritage Program (NCNHP) on July 9, 2014 to determine the presence of anysfederally- listed, candidate, endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located'within the protect-area As ofthe date of this submittal,,,a response,from the NCNHP has not yet been received Additionally, �CWS consulted, Element 'Occurrence sites provided by NCNHP anflound no,occurrences °of protected "species, within the project limits '6. Essential`Fish, Habitat (Corps Requirement), 6a Will this prolectoccur'in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes, ®'No 6b What data sources did you use to determine,whether,your, site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? 'NOAA Fisheries hW,#sha_rpfin nmfs -noaa gov/website /EFH= Mapper /map aspx 7. Historic or- Prehistorictultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 76, Will this protect <occur,in or near an area that,, the, state, federal ,or tribal governments have designated as having historic,or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e g -, National Histonc,Trustxdesignation or properties significant in North Carolina historyand archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determne,whether,your site would impact historic,or archeological resources? 'A letter was forwarde0o the State Historic Preservation iOffice (SHPO) on July'g ;,2014 to determine the presence of any areas,,of architectural, historic, or archaeological significancesthat would be affected by the protect CWS also consulted' the SHOO online GIS;service and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission database and found one site of historical significanceswithm the project,limits The, Charlotte- Mecklenburg Histo6c,Landmarks, Commission (CM HLC) includes,the Oehler Nature Preserve on, its, list of historic properties in Mecklenburg County '(CMHLC, 2012) , The,property known as the Oehler Nature Preserve is located at -14401 Huntersville- Concord Road along Huniersville- Concord Roa&in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, 'The project corridor crosses the northerwportion,ofrthis, propert The�proposed project will temporarily impact the northern portion of ,the Oehler Nature,Preserve`which is designated as a historic;laridmark by the,'CMHLC `Impacts to this property Will be,temporary, All,,grades will be _returned to their pre - construction condition Therefore, there will be no significant impacts -to the Oehler,Nature Preserve 8'. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplam? ® Yes [--]'No, 8b If yes, explain how,project meets FEMA,requirements The4malonty�of °the project.corridor wdl,,be located within the FEMA 100 yearfloodplain, The,site will be returned`to pre- construction;grades and there;wdl be no above Oradefll,placed within the,floodplain 8c,What source(s),did you useto make the,floodplain determination ?'Mecklenburg County GIS and FEMA FIRMS Page 12 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 1'0 „2008 Version, r Mr. Thomas Blackwell, PWS r. 09 -18 -2014 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name I Applicant/Agent's Signature I Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided ) Page 13 of 13 PCN Form— Version 1 -3 December 10, 2008 Version AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTIIORIZATION 1, George Brant, representing Charlotte- Mecklenburg Utilities Department, hereby certify that I have authorized Thomas Blackwell of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached. We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. Applic 's ignature Date L�kg P4'j Agent's signature Date 7/10/14 Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence. 1 OCT 1 2 014 4 DENR - WATER REcOUr2CE$ 401 R Ri icc�_ I AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION I, George Brant, representing Charlotte - Mecklenburg Utilities Department, hereby certify that I have authorized Thomas Blackwell of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached. We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. Applic 's ignature 4 l Date ,' 4 4Uj Agent's signature 07/10/14 Date Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence. o•' Mr. Thomas Blackwell, PWS 09 -18 -2014 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name I Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) N, Page 13 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version