The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20011617 Ver 2_401 Application_20140923Bonterra Village NWP # 29 Submittal Prepared For WB Village LP Andy Rathke 10735 David Taylor Drive, Suite 150 Charlotte, NC 28262 704.879.2480 Prepared By: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 (704) 904 -2277 September 20, 2014 of D 6// !0 /.7-vJ' - RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2014 DENR -LAND QUALITY STORMWATER PERMITTING ,0 A C-ir-A. NC®ENiR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Michael Ellison, Director John, E Skvaila, III Governor Ecosystem Enhancement Program Secretary August 6,20,14 AnJ%. Ratlike Walton I)evelopntent'and Management (tAA) 11 535 Cannel,C'ommons Blvd Suite 102 Charlotte NC 28226 Expiration of Acceptance 1 chtuar\ 6 -'fi 15 Project: Ronferra Vilkige County: Union the purpose ot'thts letter is to notiR you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Ell11,11I .Cnlellt Pioauni (NUI-fl)as willing to aa,ept pa}ment for cornpen,atot) milluation fur inipatt, [,SULidtcd %oith the above I,LfClcrILelt project ,i, nnlii metl ill the table below Please note that this decision does not as,uie that partu.tpation in the NC CEP will be ippiovcd by Ill c ptnniI' itiau mu <teenue, ib ntttreauoii for project impacts It is the responsibility of the applicant to contactAliese agencies to detet Ill lie it pa\ Ill eIII to the NCI I P wall he approved Yowntust,alsu tumor, w,th a I I other state federal or local 11eimits.fguIaliow pit a Lit hoi r7ltion, associated tvrth tilt nronotied acUxit�_rneludmgSL 1009_3'37 An Act to Promote'the_t sz qt C.'r ±mpcntiatoiy_M ilig,it'itm liatth�.as amended by S 1 20111-343, 171tti,iccep14Incc'is valid, foi ,n months fiom the date ofthis letter and °is not,tian,f.Iable, If,,% ha%c,not rectoed axop) ofthe issued 404 Permit /401 (- ertificationkAV1A permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It t, the applicant', ieyorsibility to send copies of the permits to NC EEP (lntc NCECP recent, a (np) of t)1( pernint,) in invoice w ill he t,tiued besird on the ieyuired ruitwatton' In that permit andipayntent mutit,bcniade prior to,utnduc.ttng thc,,,iulhunic i wol,h 1 he amount of the In- 1 ieu Fee to he pate to N('FFI' b% an,apphc,utt I5 calutldt.d based upon the 17 cc Schedule and 1)011001 li,,cd a. www ntccp net. Bmed,on'the infoillmliull,supphcd h} you ul N iur request io,use the NO IT, the tmp,itt -, 111,11 in,i\ iryunL Umtpcnsatot, ill tt1--alloll are summarved in rile following table Hic amount of nwtgatron required rind ac,igned to \N(Tl 1' 661 this milmtl i, dttemimed by pcnnitUr sigrnt u•s ,+nil 111,1% V Cet.d the unpact,antounts shown below = -- - - - - - -- — - T'- Kn-cr I (,IJ Strcant,(li:ct► � W'ctl:tnd, lactc,) � 13ulfei I 13uf1er LI I�(isln Locahori I't) (�q 'i t Impact Yadkin Cold To- t Ph Warm R ..man Non -Rli ai tan I Coa,tal N1.11 ,h - - - - -- — — _ — U 0 0 0 Sn (} fl — - -(3 ` 0 - - - - -- = - -L – - -- Upon receipt tit paynicrit hl:ll will tabs tespow ibiliiy lot providing the compen5,con mitt "ItIon the ntiu<<,Uon kill be performed in accordance xttth`thc N C- Department of Lnvlronment and Natural Resources' Cco,y,tcm Enhan(ement Plop ant In -1 ru I ee Inat'runtcnt daled Jul\ ?fl 201'0 I,hdnk %till 101 %out "ntalcsl in the NOXI'. 11 you 11,1ve any question, or need atlditiollA 111101111,111011 j)IV,V c (ont,ltt Iscllr Wilham„at 6 <)14)) 7O7 -8414. Si1ltCICIN. .Ii1111Cti, wlailflll A�,;,cl Manageni(:ni 'iupciwr,ni K,,iolt fli,j6�inb Na T)Wlz "Ietlands'401, t;nif Sieve Kichefsl,i- t SAf`h- Asheville A an I'ohnson. I`%C0Wk- r✓1o0rcaviHc I'Vil 16u fivi ,tt roI I'lle 1662 Mail Seivir e Centor, Raleigh, f lorth Ga,uini 27699-1r,52 Phoorr 91 9.0 8975, lriternet wwW ncderlr Jov A,ii,p;l ,ai (,;I)j,ontraly, , ANirmaGvf,Aclion Gn,pinyQr– Made,in pan,hy rPryd,rl pa(i °r r �I LEONARD S. RINIDNER PLL• C - Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105 Land Planning Tele: (704) 904 -2277 October 16, 2013 'Mr.:Steve Kichefski Mr. William Eliot United, States Army-Corps of Engineers 151 -Patton,Avenue, Room 208 ,Asheville, NC 28801 -5006 Re: Jurisdictional Determination Request — Bonterra 253.544 Acres, Indian Trail, Union County, NC Dear Sirs: On behalf of Walton NC, LLC, I am requesting your review and approval of the jurisdictional determination and surveys. We met with you on the site on April 16, 2013. Thank you. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Leonard S Rmdner, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant E A L E N E April 24, 2013 Ms. Jennifer Rabon Walton Development & Management (USA), Inc. 11535 Carmel Commons Blvd., Ste 102 Charlotte NC 28226 ke: Bonterra Village, Indian 'frail, Union County,, NC Dear Ms. Rabon:, In order to interface with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources we will need your authorization. Please sign the following statement: This letter authorizes Eagle Engineering or their consultant Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC to represent the property owners in matters related to Waters of the U.S. and Waters of North Carolina for the referenced project site; provided, however, that'such representation shall ,not include the authority to bind the owners. This includes interfacing with the United States Army Corps' of Engineers° and the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources. See attached signature page Signature Date. Please contact me, if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you. Sincerely, EAGLE ENGINEERING, INC. Jo H. Ross, P.E. ncipal Atlanta 2610'13ethany Creek Court Alpharetta, GA 30004 Ph 7,04x8931255 Fax 678 3390534 www cagleoniinc nct Charlotte 2013,Van,Buren Avenue, Suite A Indian Trail, NC 28079 Ph 7048824222 Fax 866 775,0329 ENGINEERING Signature: Walton North Carolina, LLC, a,North Carolina limited Iiability, company, as operator or manager, as applicable, for and on behalf of the owners By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: Walton International Group, Inc. SIGNATURE PAGE TO Bonterra Village — Wetland Authorization,Form (4.18.13) o�6F W AT Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ® Yes ❑ No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ® No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bonterra Village REM IVED 2b. County: Union County 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Indian Trail SEP 2 3 2014 2d. Subdivision name: Bonterra Village DENR 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: STORMWATER PERMITTING 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: WB Village LP 3b. Deed Book and Page No. DB 6091 630 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): WB Village LP /Andy Rathke 3d. Street address: 10735 David Taylor Drive, Suite 150 3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28262 3f. Telephone no.: 704 879 2480 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: arathke @walton.com Page 1 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Apphcant'is 0 Agent ® Other, specify 4b Name Mr Andy Rathke 4c - Business name (if applicable) WB Village LP 4d Streetaddress 10735 Dawd'Taylor Drive, 150 4e City, state,,zip Charlotte, NC 28262 4f Telephone no 704 879 2480 40 Fax no 4h Email address- arathke @walton com 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name Leonard S Rindner 5b Business name (if applicable) Leonard S Rmdner, PLLC 5c Street address 3714 Spokeshave Lane 5d City, state, zip Matthews, NC 28105 5e Telephone ,no - 704 - 904 -2277 5f Fax no - 5g Email address 'Len Rindner PWS @gmad com Page 2 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December'10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 07 021 001 Latitude -35 0953 Longitude - 80 6051 lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) (DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD) 1c Property size +/- 253 544 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to North Fork Crooked Creek 03040105 proposed,project- 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water Water Classification C 2c River basin Rocky 3. Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land' use in the vicinity of the project at the time of'this application The site is a previously disturbed urban•site with pockets of woodland in mid succession with some mature pockets The site is adjacent to existing and developing residential subdivisions and thoroughfares 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property Approximately 17 acres including streams 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property Approximately 3405 linear feet 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project Preparation for development of road crossing and typical subdivision construction 3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used The project is 'a single family subdivision Project includes roads, utilities, landscaping, and required stormwater management features 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Havejunsdictional ,wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ,project (including all,pnor phases) in the past? ®Yes El No ❑ Unknown Comments Coordination with Steve Kichefski was conducted on April 16, 2013 Wetland surveys were submitted October 16, 2013 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ Preliminary ® Final of determination was made? 4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company Leonard S Rindner, PLLC Name (if known) Leonard S Rindner /Patrick Kealy %Jeff Levi Other 4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation Wetlands,and streams were field'verified by Steve Kichefski on 4/16/13 5. Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown this project (including ,all prior phases) in the past? 5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help,file" instructions Page 3 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased ,project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes, explain Project,has been determined tdbe,single'and complete by °the USACE Page 4 of 12, PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary 1a Which sections were completed, belowJor your project (check all'that apply) ® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent ',(P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P [-IT NWP 29 PSSIIA/PF01A Disturbed ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ® DWQ 40 W2 ® P ❑ T NWP 29 PSS1A - Disturbed ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ® DWQ 02 ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ El Yes ❑ Corps W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ _ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts +/-042 2h Comments Minor temporary impacts adjacent to construction will be restored and revegetated All temporary construction in wetland areas adjacent to road corridor will occur on mats or other means to minimize wetland disturbance 3. Stream Impacts If there are-perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site', then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e- 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ❑ T Culvert Construction North Fork Crooked Creek ® PER ❑ INT ® Corps ® DWQ 15' - 25' < LF 00 ❑ PER ❑ Corps S2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ [I PER ❑ Corps S3 El [:IT ❑ INT ❑ `DWQ [-]'PER ❑ Corps S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑_DWQ ❑ PER ❑, Corps S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts 100 LF 31 Comments Impacts4o the stream including temporary construction,will be less than 150 linear feet Page 5 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 ,3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water, of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact'(acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary T -- - 01 ED] P ❑T 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑ PEI T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g Comments 5. Pond, or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, th_ en complete the chart below 5a 5b.' 5c '5d 5e Wetland' Impacts,(acres) Stream Impacts (feet), Upland Pond, ID 'Proposed ,use or purpose (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled' Excavated, Flooded number of pond P1 P2 5f. Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 5) Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6. Buffer Impactsffor DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this,form 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b 6c 6d- 6e 6f 6g Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) of for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary T impact required? El Yes B1 ❑ P�,❑ T _ ❑ No El Yes B2 �❑ P' ❑� T ❑ No, ❑ Yes, B3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No 6h Total buffer'limpacts 6r Comments Page 6 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 1,0, 2008 Version Page 7 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project Impacts are limited to less than 150 linear feet of stream The road crossing will be designed so that that normal flow utilizes the central culvert The additonal culvertare designed to not impede flood events as required by FEMA regulations The prolect.has also been designed to avoid rip rap in the streambed in order to maintain natural stream flow Headwalls are proposed to minimize stream impacts,and and wetland impacts This crossing will also be used to faciltate construction of the subdivision 1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Project is subject to strict enforcement of erosion control plans and clearly marking or barricading areas to be preserved 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State? ® Yes ❑ No 2b If yes, mitigation is required by-(check all that apply) ®DWQ ®Corps 2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ®Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt,and letter) Type Quantity 3c Comments NA 4. Complete'if Making a Payment to In- lieu'Fee Program 4a Approval letter'from in -lieu fee program iskattached ® Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If,using stream mitigation, stream temperature. ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only,) square feet 4e Ripananwetland mitigation requested 50 acres 4f Non- npanan wetland mitigation, requested- acres 4g Coasfal'(tidal),wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5. Complete if Using a, Perm ittee,Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee, responsible mitigation,plan,;provide a description of theproposed mitigation plan Page 7 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in.an, impact within aprotectedAparian buffer that requires ❑Yes ® No buffer mitigation? 6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required 6c 6d 6e Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square,feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1 5 6f Total buffer mitigation required: 6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page 8 of 12 PCN ,Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse�Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1'a Does�the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow,plan,included? If no, explain why ❑ Yes No Comments 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a 'What is the overall percent,imperviousness,of this project? +/- i ng on 40 to 65 dependdrainage basin % 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why-' 2d If this project DOES require,a,Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative,descrnption of the,plan The site is subject to the NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Requirements °delegated to the town of Indian Trail Minimum TSS removal is 85% See Exhibits prepared by the Engineer /Plannerfor the project Streets within the proposed development will be dedicated to the Town of Indian Trail for ownership and maintenance as public streets The 20 acre parcel designated, and currently deeded to the Bonterra Village Home Owner's Association can be utilized forwater quality and amenity features, but can not be utilized for the construction of public streets to be dedicated to the Town ® Certified Local Government 2e Who will be, responsible for'the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review °3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Indian Trail', Union County ®, Phase II 3b Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply)- ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other- 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a W,hich,of the following state- implemented,stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the,appropnate requirements? FE] Yes ❑ No Page 9' of 12, PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met'? ❑ Yes ❑ No F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a Does the project involve an expenditure of'public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No use of public (federal /state)'land? 1b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to'1he requirements of °the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c If',you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized, by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes El No letter ) Comments 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC,2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (1'5A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after - the -fact permit,application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) 1 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project,(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby'downstream water, quality? 3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description The project'utilizes existing road network and infrastructure 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods,and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility Will connect with existing municipal sewer,system Page 10 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No im pacts? El 5c If yes, indicate'the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ ,Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or,Designated Critical Habitat? Site was evaluated during the wetland delineation process for the presence of Schweinitz's Sunflower Ecotonal edges along roads and clearings were inspected, to determine if Schweinitz's sunflower was present The site is a disturbed construction site including timbered and agricultural areas The presence of protectedispecies is not'not,expected' Project site is not in a watershed that has been identified as habitat for the Carolina 'heeisplitter Based on a field evaluation Schweinitz's:sunflower or it's habitat were determined' not to be present 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near-an area designated as essentiaLfish habitats ❑ Yes ® No 6b What data sources,did you use to determine whether yoursite would impact Essential Fish Habitat? http / /www-nmfs noaa gov/ habitat /habitatprotection %efh /GIS _ inven htm 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in, or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation El Yes No status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties,significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources-did you use to determine whether your site,would impact historic or archeological resources? According to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, this site is not registered property or property listed as being,eligible forinclusion in the Register ThereRare no known existing structures on the site 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project,occur ima FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ®')(e§ ❑ No 8b If yes, explain how project -meets FEMA requirements Floodplain crossing is sized such that there is no adverse impact on adjoining properties and with less than 0 1 feet of rise on'the adjoining upstream, property Plans'for the crossing are currently -under permit review by the floodplain administrator 8c What,source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determinations Own engineer provided'information -,FEMA Map, No 371Q541900J Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC Update 9/1,9/14 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent'/ibnature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Page 11 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version is provided Page 12 of 12 PCN Form — V&sion 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 'Avr,✓ 0 n G 7r0 7�.ti ¢S C. r Ffy7�'L,%f U BONTERRA a, :r7 Nil Rr> 0 le. Fairview � r0 w � Hemby Bridge Ilings�, � � Unio Indian Tail SITE 0 (D2313'Microsoft Corporatiory •, ,.� D,. \ G 2L12 Nokiat Pi ice k Qy G3 b Sl n Hnc,A L% t , ;C• ty i,•� r, x3'3 " Y of 00 V&ari 5 Cf ry {ville indiay �! rJ ,r FIGURE NO. LEONARD S RINDNER PLLC Wetlands &,Environmental Planning Group 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 (704) 904 - 2277 LEN RINDNER PWS @gmail com tit -1 � 2DA3 blicr�z rrft� Garpnrm[lun 9.2�i12 NcY.ia'� BONTERRA Indian Trail, NC VICINITY MAP *Approximate Boundary SHEET DRAWN NRN REVIEWED BY BY BY DATE 1 PAGE 02111113 Remed 0311813 10/02113 BONTERRA q7 3,-' ny" L '36 -39, 41WIDLAA-01 Cl e 4 Mm 5,m s N m q5, Z'g ,70 *N' A 91 p I Is ICA, , j'L, "rem, rl bF A- zmgg 't , , • av 4-- 1 h�, An, 3 SI t- 0-0, REVIEW in, 15� e. SIR TRI AREA , A —1 W, 46 g N ell yx NO T �s R ,7 4-1 W Ah , 'My "I A FRF�1' F IM -M -Y61 vt g, P", pq L Xu, IkO j 5"o v V As V 4• V WIN. 14 "fs R, V11 vt LOCATION • SCALE LAfrfUDE LONGITUDE 24010 1200 0 2400(Feet) z;, 3�'09593 N 80 60517 W HLIC 03040105 ROCKY FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC BONTERRA SHEET Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group UNION COUNTY, NC DRAWN REVIEWED LSR BY PJK BY 1714,Spoleslave Lane DATE PAGE Matthews, NC 28105 USGS LOCATION MAP (704) 904 —2277 02111113 LEN RINDNER,PWS@gmail com BAKERS (NC) QUADRANGLE 'Revised 1971 Photo revised,1987 10102113 BONTERRA FIGURE NO. I LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 (704) 904 — 2277 LEN.RINDNER. pWSOg n-all.com BONTERRA Indian Trail, NC SOILS MAP *Approximate Boundary SHEET 1 of Z DRAWN NRN REVIEWED BY BY BY DATE: PAGE. 02111113 1 Revised 10102113 Ya _.; �' SITE REVIEW Yr ALUATED AREA NOT Ey' M FOR WATERS OF THE US No development proposed for this, area Mdk� w �P • ` r - rw ! Y y�N .��t, .i l i -r �,�•-��`.� �. i,�F � ,,,1� '" y\ ;� T �� tie -� \�'� .. I \ `� �+}. I sf n. i . fifi BONTERRA FIGURE NO. I LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group BONTERRA Indian Trail, NC SHEET. 1 of 2 DRaAWN NRN IREVIIEWED LSR BY 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 DATE PACE. (704) 904 — 2277 SOILS MAP 02111113 1 LEN.RINDNER.PWS @gmail.com *Approximate Boundary Revised Rews13 da /. 1 n YS•_ >j I 1 r _ � F 3 � I 1L .I f Fix i LAI , SS .f ,%` ot Do ID W Z Z _0111 'So Z o I OD (T) C3 a_ le c� ffy 11c, t1. Do z C) 13 SE' Z LU rz => C) 16S3 a o iL `6 C) ZI Zg go 0 OR z C3 LLI 04 ot Do ID W Z Z _0111 'So Z o I OD (T) C3 a_ le c� ffy 11c, t1. Do z C) 13 SE' Z LU rz => C) 16S3 a o iL `6 C) BONTERRA PHASES 4 WETLANDS IMPACT AREA - LESSER WB VILLAGE, LP 10735 DAVID TAYLOR DR: SUITE 150 CHARLOTTE, NC 28262 APPROX 768 SO FT OF PERMANENT WETLAND DISTURBANCE GRAPHIC SCALE 0 40 80 Sheet ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. WETLANDS M'PACT 620 615 610 605 600 595 590 585 580 Top Flight Drive PROFILE 21 +00 22 +00 23 +00 24 +00 25 +00 I Ilk IL' PHASES 4 CROSSING ELEVATION WB VILLAGE, LP 10735, DAVID TAYLOR DR. SUITE 150 CHARLOTTE, NC 28262 620 615 610 605 600 595 590 585 :I Sheet CROSSING ELEVATION ------- - - ---- - - - - -- - -- - •------ -� - - -- - - -- - -- -------------�----------i :� n ■: -:� c -r:� rr.�..�------- -- '-------------- - - - - -- .� u ■ l01 - '. ■ i1 i- - - - --- - ----------- ---------- --��'� - - - - - - -- CARRYING ACTIVE FLOW FROM STREAM CHANNEL SHALL NOT BE RESHAPED FOR FLOOD FLOWS ONLY 1 ALL CULVERTS FILLED 0 21 +00 22 +00 23 +00 24 +00 25 +00 I Ilk IL' PHASES 4 CROSSING ELEVATION WB VILLAGE, LP 10735, DAVID TAYLOR DR. SUITE 150 CHARLOTTE, NC 28262 620 615 610 605 600 595 590 585 :I Sheet CROSSING ELEVATION Wet Detenion Pond Bonterra Vdiage!P 4 Client 4698 Date BMP -HOA Designer NC BMP Manual (NC Ordlnanc( Water Quality Volume _9 urainageArea - ,20,037; �940,.47�1, Square Feet 2159 Acres Area of�Pavement 22;589 j" 324;8651 Squar&Feet Impervious Area,per Lot 43,'0213 '--.3',500)1 SquarelFeet .Z9 °5 Lots, Total Impervious Area 9 " 2f,96-fl 13.85 Acres Impervious Fraction 30,58 0.641 64 % Runoff Coefficient 35,241 0 627 117,413 Rainfall,Design Depth ' --40,057,r - � "11 Inch Required Water Quality Volume Estimated Depth SA /DA,Ratio Est- Perm Pool Area Water Quality is Acieved at Elev Design WQ Elev Water Quality Vol at,Elev 599 14 Provided Water Qual ity Vol ume Area of Bottom Shelf Area of Perm Pool rea of Bottom Of Pond Depth verage Depth Elevation arge Coefficient [ational,Acc ated Driving Head argetime Desired I Driving Head I Discharge I Discharge Time ater Needed Sectional Area ided Forebay Volume ox Forebay Surface Area ided Forebay Surface Area ant of Permanent Pool 49,152 Cubic Feet ^"3,5 Feet 2.39 lSquare,Feet (Int_erpolated for Impervious) 22,482 Water Quality'Desi 599.14 1 599 251 30,582 35,241 20,037 4 378 bic Feet bic Feet Water 5985 0 "6 32 2' Ft/S2 0.213 Feet Days ,0143 Feet 0 249 CFS' 2 29 Days 500 Inches 0.136 Square Feet 23,483 CubiciFeet 23;350 Cubic,Feet S,871 Square Feet 8,048 Square Feet 20% E ANGE L E Walton +Dev 7/23/2014 2013A VanfBuren Ave ARP Indian Trail, NC 28079 Area Volume Net Volume 'F594 - ,20,037; 0 0 595 22;589 21,313 21,313 596 43,'0213 23,893 45,206 597 9 " 2f,96-fl 26,529 71,735 598 30,58 29,222 100;957 r "598'5' 35,241 16,456 117,413 S99 ' --40,057,r 18;825 136,238 _ 600 ` ' 43,022 41,540 177,777 601 '46,044 _ 44,533 222,311 602 49,122 47,583 269,894 603 ,r 'S2'257L 50,690 , 320;583` 598,5' : - 35;241. - 0.128 599 _,40,057] 37,6491 37,649 6001, 43,'0213 83,080 1 120,729 Discharge Table Days Flow Cross - Sectional Area Diameter 2 0.28 0.128 SF 5 00 Inches 3 0191 0 085 SF 4 00 Inches 4 014 0 064 SF 3.50 Inches 5 0.111 0 051 SF 325 Inches Contour Area 'Volume Net Volume - 595 3;431' 3,127 3,127 596 4;094 3,763 6,890 597 ,41810, 4,452 11,342 598 , _ , 15,580' 5,195 16,536 599 - '8,048' 6;814 23 ,350 Underdrain,Calculation Flow I 6930 CFD Minimum Drawdown Rate 0.080 CFS Filter Bed Depth Flow with Safety 0.802 CFS Coeffici'ent.of Perm Average Head MinimumWl) 0.49 Provided N *D 8.00 Manning's Coefficient Slope of'Pipe Average Discharge 0.121 CFS Number of Orifices '`2 Number of Pipes Total Q 0.243 CFS Diameter of'Pipes Orifice Diameter Onfice,Inv Elevation's Temp Pool Elevation Discharge,Coeffiaent X- sectional Area of Orifice Gravity Maximum Driving Head 0.050 CFS, 1 Feet 3.5 FT /Day 0.5 Feet 005 FT /,FT 0 Al -- :'- �,. 41 Inches Inches I, 5971 Feet,ASL . � -,, 6034 Feet,ASL 0.0218 Square,Feet FT/S 2 _ T. Feet Sand Filter 1 IN E ` Project Bonterra Phase IV Client Walton Dev. Project # 4698 Date 7/24/2014 2013A Van Buren Ave. Designation SF -LEFT Designer ARP Indian Trail, NC 28079 NC BMP Manual (NC Ordinance) Water Quality'Volume Total Drainage Area 8328224 Square Feet 7,.53 Acres Impervious Area ; 13,4'4 =19 Square feet I 3.09 Acres Impervious Fraction 0.41 411% Runoff Coefficient 0.42 Rainfall Depth 1' Inch WQVR 11449 Cubic Feet WQVADJ 8587 Cubic Feet Sand Filter Geometry Minimum AS 163 Square Feet hMaxhlter 'hA AS +AF Qa 0.1325 Cubic Feet per Second 0.5 0.25 17174 E '0 9,000 1.0 0.50 8587 w 0. 0004 Feet per Second 1.5 0.75 5725 2.0 1.00 4293 Minimum AF 1314 Square Feet 2.5 1.25 3435 DF - - l Feet 3:0 ;1.50 2862 K „ . 3-5; Feet per Day 3.5 1:75 2453 T T 66 Days 4.0 2.00 2147 hMaxFilter 1° 4.51 2.25 1908 hA 0.5 5:0 2.50 1717 5.5 2.75 1561 Minimum AS+ AF 2627 Square Feet 6:0 3.00 1431 hMaxFilter 3.29 hA 1.64 Design AS 1320 Square Feet Design AF 1320 Square Feet As +AF 2640 Square Feet hMaxFilter 3.27 Feet hA 1.64 Feet WQVTreated 8638 2 1 8587 0 Sand Filter 2 E A NGE L G Project Bonterra Phase IV Client Walton Dev. Project,{# 4698 Date 7/24/2014 2013A Van Buren Ave. Designation SF -RIGHT 'Designer ARP Indian Trail, NC "28079 NC BMPManual (NC,Ordinance), Water Quality, Volume Total Drainage Area 2749411 Square Feet I 6.31 Acres Impervious Area - 16101}31 Square Feet 3.70 Acres Impervious Fraction 0.59 591% Runoff 'Coefficient 0:58 Rainfall Depth r .7-1- 111, Inch WQVR 13222 Cubic Feet WQVADJ 9916 Cubic Feet Sand, Filter,Geometry Minimum AS F 881 Square Feet hMaxFlter hA As +AF Qo 0.1530 Cubic Feet per Second 0.5 0.25 19832 E - 0.9000; 1.0 0.50 9916 w ;0 0004' Feet per Second 1:5 0.75 6611 2.0 1.00 4958 Minimum AF 1517 Square Feet 2.51 1.25 3966 DF 2; Feet 3.0 1.50 3305 K 3 5, Feet per Day 3.5 1.75 2833 T ` " ' 1.66 Days 4.0 2.00 2479 hMaxNter 2' 4.5 2.25 2204 hA 1 5.0 2.50 1983 5.5 2.75 1803 Minimum.As +AF '3034 Square Feet 6.0 3.00 1653 h MaxFllter 3.29 hA 1.64 Design A, 1520 Square Feet Design AF, 1520 Square�Feet As +,AF 3040 Square Feet hMaxFilter 3.28 Feet hA 1.64 Feet WQVTreated 9974 Z 99161M Flow 7980 CFD 0.092 CFS Flow with Safety 0.924 CFS Minimum N *D 1 0.56 Provided N *D 8:00 Average Discharge 0.121 CFS Numberof`Orifices n i,,_2! Total Q t 0.243, CFS Und'erdrain Calcu Minimum Drawdown Rate Filter Bed Depth Coefficient of Perm Average Head Manning's Coefficient Slope of Pipe Number of Pipes Diameter of'Pipes Orifice Diameter Orifice Inv Elevations Temp Pool Elevation ,Discharge Coefficient X- sectional Area of Orifice Gravity Maximum Driving Head 0:058 CFS 2 Feet 3.5 FT /,Day 1 Feet 0`014 0-005 FT /FT `'° `41nches =s2 Inches 59.7. Feet ASL 601{ Feet ASL 0.0218 Square Feet 4L2 '; FT /S2 :4 Feet Iau-..u,uary9vwer Oew-61L (90 zzzrzss (tOA 6000[ vio* 4dltl 6L08Z:) \'Itil•WuI 1 SS aos od VAS'- V —Fl •A CIOZ, _ f �S 3 1133" IdIC3 SIMHCOO MA)ARH U9d 'JJO EII60 /6 E SIN9WNoa MM,A3d Pd JJO MOM z SINdWK(X) MdIAda Mdd -.1w ' /si%R I 9flssl I A9 3Ltl0 ON W 0'o U STN O UZ B89Y azva am� £N£QH .005 =.{ �v am M-W 000 VAY was asaa AA Qi1Ti1L AB YMVlO ,JN °oz) NoiNfl `W" L Ntllaw ao NMQL xZx3aomd xr t ` lft5lsxog z dsl1M 31a no2i Noi&vwn iaa saNv r. am • e ,I O � • • • ui n ^t y t :.v _ I t u non Iq y m yy U �bt�ppq�p�CCy2�y2115`sk'�� Z�AWmS��Gi� ��yZZ�j�zWU�o i TWFT� � 02 <Eg Psi zz k �gg� �W� q AW Fg �t Ito O 5 zz k �gg� �W� q AW Fg �t I uaw6u (.9) UZ17ZOe (t0c) 6000E VO Vu-gdW "L O\ `P.l-.PW, ISS 3.09 0 V VnS`�V uMP wA E IOZ N,b3 NIrl n &DOM000 M91A911119d JJO EIPoOl6 E SIAlHW11O:) MH1A911 Had 0O0 [YOM z UMMIA0.7 MdIAJV HAd -X)O EMUS I Sass] 1 A8 1 3LV0 ON ru 4J_u � � x W z Q o 1 rump ° I m1 =.1 mid I SOO V/N 3N'00 NO[Nn `V"L NWONi 30 MAML AIM51JOM,FJ' 1'f `VM3 LK0ff Z ASnM 3H L" HOA NOLLIV3MP17Q SQNV7. aM Lu LN Wpp�W o'°$o Z$ w a 10 ✓J ��Y co Qz' oom °UmI �ffYI\ NqY <2��i�O <�� ° v,g xz <h * * * * * LO O N h W .N��b\� Z� ° m z, v k' ° 'tA o:n ox 2! r °'gym x w w W � w I * :� 3 ,•+ - 3i �4 A b Lu LN Wpp�W o'°$o Z$ w a 10 ✓J ��Y co Qz' oom °UmI �ffYI\ NqY <2��i�O <�� ° v,g xz <h * * * * * LO O N W .0 �Uo W zoa w " C F o U $ C7 0 h W .N��b\� Z� ° Ho o:n ox 2! r °'gym u � � 3 I * :� 3 ,•+ - 3i �4 A b W .0 �Uo W zoa w " C F o U $ C7 0 h W .N��b\� Z� ° Ho o:n ox LLOCiUU20 N W .0 �Uo W zoa w " C F o U $ C7 0 P'al 4 \ \ as W \s � Yll � y3 . 'S83 ^g�t W g$K U ' W q h W � ° C o:n ox °'gym u � � 3 I * :� P'al 4 \ \ as W \s � Yll � y3 . 'S83 ^g�t W g$K U ' W q h % ° � o, a 0 :� 3 ,•+ - 3i �4 P'al 4 \ \ as W \s � Yll � y3 . 'S83 ^g�t W g$K U ' W q INP PaN �agb: H I V app z�60H WW'W ofzn� � a I 2h��Z��ywy 3Q Olh��nF �L, I Nii Oily §�F 1 a�1�w g� � pp I Lu �h��E5i�g8 y+ (W�'a� a �m J J ` v 1 „ i 3 wu L � o W � $ a9.C815t 3Lzzw CCs .Z[ ZSZ •' OZC M.C6u^Z.CEN S / 0 ZI y d .0 i w o a p rW, o a 4. wY 00 �e�wo8 � I y< miYy� V[ W N v 987 o < k I W Z o N 0 0 jQ� p ?� L107 L100 a 'x "+ x v Y k �sr t x`AN x 'N `x, ♦,1 k x yQy � C � K' S r x II orri q 7 00 6 x FFFIII Ye /� 4 ' I FW 6 `t i{n l -'7)'+ IL g 8 8$ ry v � a 8 R R puawjunal3m wMM 8896 nmt�v onr f!/EN6 AZ{ _.{ � (I"Ef(SL9) ZZZYZ884OL) ,M7a A. ¢a . JJO I nvMVea V/N •o au..ysaa 6000£ VJ %p-4d1V 6LwZ3\"Iwf"'P -1 ISSa08 Od OMS'- VSO -A[IOZ a N la 3 wl N3 SLNaWNOJ A1a1AaxWad SLN3MOJ d6ainaa Had cLnLdwL\tr7mdlAdanda a.7a DOG i oxt fl/6016 £ILO£/, nLSILa [ z I ON `00 NOlr4n `wvwL � apa 30 NMOJL A.LN3dOM&, :)-F -F `VNN3.LNOg Z 3Sf1M 311.E sod NOI.LV3NI73a SaNivuaM anssi I aLva ON INP PaN �agb: H I V app z�60H WW'W ofzn� � a I 2h��Z��ywy 3Q Olh��nF �L, I Nii Oily §�F 1 a�1�w g� � pp I Lu �h��E5i�g8 y+ (W�'a� a �m J J ` v 1 „ i 3 wu L � o W � $ a9.C815t 3Lzzw CCs .Z[ ZSZ •' OZC M.C6u^Z.CEN S / 0 ZI y d .0 i w o a p rW, o a 4. wY 00 �e�wo8 � I y< miYy� V[ W N v 987 o < k I W Z o N 0 0 jQ� p ?� L107 L100 a 'x "+ x v Y k �sr t x`AN x 'N `x, ♦,1 k x yQy � C � K' S r x II orri q 7 00 6 x FFFIII Ye /� 4 ' I FW 6 `t i{n l -'7)'+ IL g 8 8$ ry v � a 8 R R 9 pu�uryml90 eer O601P6CC Wq) ZZZYZAA WJ 60001 W)VU— 1Y 6LOUZ O \'l -J. -,PSI lssaOfl_Oa V'MS'- V,-wA- A,C1OZ 3N11" Nlr3 SCNMAMOO IMILM V3d 930 EI/60 16 £ amavUIOJ'M3LA3a v3d gm EI/OE/A z 41NdWN(X) MdIA4H Mdd -Y)CI £1 /SI /A I 3f)SSI A8 3.LV0 11 ON BR" E)ICN6 00, =.l simv��orc azvu aw M161 Soo Vw ae mien Aa vvvea as aar;arma ON `OO NOINn ` FWNJL K"GN, AO NMO.L A. M3JOxa3'F-I`VNN3.LN gz3SCIMIHi MOA,NOLLVW41'IHMSGNV'UaM _ LO a W o z d o off\ ;n— \� O \ b W CL W Q ` \� v /VZ4[ �ry Q ul F t \I sav x Vu u��—% \ i O V g J �o i < Ll- 0�'cY �ggq�qz us Sc W C O ms-` a _ ,oto o'Q ®n Nil Y_11.15 0 �oUu m�W St an a 0 7V 40 LZ9 3.BELO.SN = om d cc \ o W a y Y \ Z 1 \ 'a 1��r �18o wtrr vay, EllC4ro 0690-6[[ (VL9) ZZLYZ88 (oOLI �ra�r uva aex 6000E VD NM--,q I 6LMZ J \'L-.L ""I M7a DO0 VM ISS x0a Od tl�6'�+tl �fl wA C IOZ AB mi no AB Vnvw �uau.is¢a VXMSAO0 MMA" nad DJa EII60 /6 E aN `Oj NOW 11 `TWNJL limos 30 NMO.L N lg 3� P1 I N3 -SINdWAW MHIA3V HU OJ0 EI%OM z A:Lmadowa O'T7 `VNN3.LNOg Z,9Sf1M am SIrIJ"k\OO MdlAda HAd '1')U 11/91/8 1 2109 NOLLV -5WI9Q SQA[t'`1.L9M anssi 1 Ag 1LV0 ON aWoz bh " LO W Yi LO z o,ai g MOM IGI� � 883 y fling g w sr m m % I�NnO "°°as0^�mNm�� a H 8 8 m m ^ a a a 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w R R w w'.1 w I: }� ww �� W ^ W R rj =l 1P �1�1 P� b m ' igr � l Q i� �n 1: b J o•� rMf a mi N V qr' O `3 s'r�oa�g'sa'o J W . 8 b 'x w a m 7w b gb o 'A lD N dt� fS \ < b O m % %° H H 8 8 m m b 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w R R w w'.1 w I: }� ww �� W ^ W R rj =l 1P �1�1 P� b m ' igr � l Q i� �n 1: b J o•� t m % %° H H 8 8 m m b 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w R R w w'.1 w I: }� ww �� W ^ W R rj =l 1P �1�1 P� b m ' igr � l Q i� �n 1: b J o•� rMf a mi N V qr' `3 s'r�oa�g'sa'o t m % %° H H 8 8 m m 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w R R w w'.1 w w p p Wp w w w w R R $ ' ia' i� �n 1: _CCC o•� O r� $23 iW W wi W W W W lip w IW 1w W Jry iW� R W W ,r C Fri O m 1b P HI FI a m a o� O 4 r J g C B 3. S m R' m tbtOp b' �"b' M1N m r�i qN g bl N N P n, N b h :E n R m >>N ?R m n h R n N fw W I W W 3 8 W tri Iq R Y 'Z `Z �Ooh rX^ N x 'm �I , „ m % %° H H 8 8 m m 3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w R R w w'.1 w w p p Wp w w w w R R a 0 lip w IW 1w W Jry iW� R W W ,r C Fri O m 1b P HI FI a m a o� O 4 r J g C B 3. S m R' m tbtOp b' �"b' M1N m r�i qN g bl N N P n, N b h :E n R m >>N ?R m n h R n N fw W I W W 3 8 W tri Iq R Y 'Z `Z �Ooh rX^ N x 'm �I , „ g C B 3. S m R' m tbtOp b' �"b' M1N m r�i qN g bl N N P n, N b h :E n R m >>N ?R m n h R n N fw W I W W 3 8 W tri Iq R Y 'Z `Z �Ooh rX^ N x 'm �I , „ S m R' m tbtOp b' �"b' M1N m r�i qN g bl N N P n, N b h :E n R m >>N ?R m n h R n N fw W I W W 3 8 W tri Iq R Y 'Z `Z �Ooh rX^ N x 'm �I , „ b h :E n R m >>N ?R m n h R n N fw W I W W 3 8 W tri Iq R Y 'Z `Z �Ooh rX^ N x 'm �I , „ WETLAND DETERMINATION' DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site Bonterra Applicant /Owner in „eew,�rnrrel LSR /JAL /PJK City/County Indian Trail /Union Cty Sampling Date 03/07113 State NC Sampling Point Mid XY Section, Township, Range Landfomi (hrllslope, terrace, etc) floodplain Local relief (concave, convex,,none) Concave Slope ( %) 0 -5% Subregion (ERR or MLRA) MLRA 136 Lat 34 0959 N Long 80 6052 W Datum WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name ScA - Secrest -Cid complex, 0-3% slopes NW' classification Are ch matic,/ hydrol ic° conditions on the Site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No,Q i If no, explain in Remarks ) Are Vegetation M Sod ❑, or Hydrology = significantly disturbed? Are 'NorikaFCircunistances' present ?' Yes= No Are Veyel,itim=, Sod ❑,, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,�expiain'any answer,, in Remark,, ) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point,locations, transacts, Important features, etc. Hydrophytir Vegetation Present? Yes �0 No Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1_� No within,wWetland? Yes 0 No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No, Remarks HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators (minimum'of two required) PrlmdrV ndic atur5 6nuunrurn of one'rs re(1urfed c.hei k ,ill that apply) Surface Sod Cracks (66) ❑✓ Surface'Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely, Vegetated Concave Surface (88) [E] High Water Table (A2), ❑ Hydrogen Sulflde,Odorr(C1) ❑✓ Drainage Patterns (13=10) ❑✓ 'Salurddon (A3) Q,Oxidiked Rhi[o,,liheres,on Livirtt) Rout,, (C3) ❑ MgtiS Tani Lines (1316) ❑'Water Marks,(B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑,Dry- Season Water Table (C2) ❑„Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (CO) ❑ Crayfish Burrows,(CB) ❑✓ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑°Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed r /ants (D1) ❑ Iron Doposns (B5) ❑✓ Goomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Shallow Aquitard,(D3) Water- Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑Aquatic Fauna (B13) 2r -FAC Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations. - � Surface Water Present? Yes t L I No= Depth (ncho ,) 0 - 3 Water Table Present? Yes Q No= 'Depth (inches) 0 0+ n Saturation Present? Yes No= Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No inrhidP- ra illa fnn F Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring Well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available, Remarks Inundated with flow along SS line US Arnry'Corp% of Enyureev, Edstern,Mouritdrm and Piedmont - Version 2 0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific, names-of plants. Sampling Point: Wtld XY 20 = Total Cover 90% of total'ccrier, ,10 20 %,of total, cover 4 Woody Ville SlraWm (Plot Wp: 30' ) 1 Lonicera japonica 35 Y FAC 2- Campsis radicans 15 Y FAC 3 Toxicodendron radicans 1'S Y FAC Hydrophytrc 85 - Total Cover vegetation 50%of total cover 32.5 2070 of total cover 13 _ Present? Yes FV-1 , No= F49m,vk, -,, (IncltrdH fiR a or on a separate sheet I IJS filthy Cullr.r olf (:nt)ilfkftrf;l Edstern Mountdlrr, and Piedmont - Ver,,iun 2 0 Absolute, Donondnl IIxJR.dl01 Donnndnce Test worksheet. Tree Stratum (Plot aze -30' ) % Cover Soec,es? ,S atu s Number of Dorn Ina nt, Spec les 1 Quercus phellos 20 Y FAG That Are,OBL, FACW, or FAC 11 (A) Total Number of Dominant 12 Species Across All Strata (B) Percent of`13L, FA nt Species 92 That 'Are OBL, FACW, or(FAC (A, B) = _ 2 Acer rubrum 15 Y FAG Fraxlnus enns Ivanlca 15 Y FACW 3 p Y 4,Llquldambarstyraclflua 10 N FAC 5 Ulmus americana 10' N FACW 6,,Llnodendron tullpifera 5 N FACU 75 = Total Cover Prevalence Index�worksheet 50% of'total cover 37 5 20% of total cover 15 Total %D Cover of. Mulhnly by size 30' 0131- species x 1 = Sapling Stratum (riot 1;Framus pennsylvanlca 20 Y ;FACW FACW +species, x 2 = FAC species x 3— FACU species x 4 = UPL Species x s = column Totals (A (B) Prevalence index = BIA- 2 ,Lfquidambar styraciflua 15 Y FAC 3 Acer rubpjm 15 Y FAG 4 Ulmus americana 10 N FACW 5 Quercus,phellos 5 N FAC 6 Ulmus alata 5 N 'FACU 70 = Total Cover Hy- Vegetation Indicators 1% 50 of total cover 35 20% of total cover 14 Idrophytrc 01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub,Strdturni (Plot site 30' ) Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Llgustrum sinense _ 10 Y FACU D 3 - I?rovalenco index is s3 0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportinq 2 data in Remarks or on a separate Sheet) 3- - ❑ Problematic Hydrophytrc Vegetatiori' (Explain) 4 5 'Indicators of hydncsoil and wetland hydrology must 6 be present unless disturbed or problerf,at,c 0 =Total Cover Defrnftions,of FIvemegetation Strata %n 50 of total cover 5 to'io of total cover 2 Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' ) Tree - Vuoudy pl,m w, ex(-ludmggwoody vmw,; approximately 20 it (6 m) or more,imherght and I in 1 Boehmena cylindrica 10 Y FACW (7 6 Lill) or Idrgef III diameter at bredSt,herght (DBH) 2 Lycopus virginicus 10 Y OBL Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody ernes, approxin,alely,20 it (6 m) or more in herght°and less than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH 3 4 5- Shrub -, Woody plants,. excluding, woody vine,, approximately 3 to 10 ft (1 to b m) in helght. 6 - 7 -_ Herb - All herbaceous (non - moody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody pl lilt,,, except woody Vine,, letivlhdn,dpproxnudtely, 3 8 9, ftt(1 m) mmheight 19 Woody vine - All woody,vrne,, rpgardle— of height 11. 20 = Total Cover 90% of total'ccrier, ,10 20 %,of total, cover 4 Woody Ville SlraWm (Plot Wp: 30' ) 1 Lonicera japonica 35 Y FAC 2- Campsis radicans 15 Y FAC 3 Toxicodendron radicans 1'S Y FAC Hydrophytrc 85 - Total Cover vegetation 50%of total cover 32.5 2070 of total cover 13 _ Present? Yes FV-1 , No= F49m,vk, -,, (IncltrdH fiR a or on a separate sheet I IJS filthy Cullr.r olf (:nt)ilfkftrf;l Edstern Mountdlrr, and Piedmont - Ver,,iun 2 0 SOIL Sampling Point Wtid XY Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators ) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % -T-me, Loci Texture Remarks 0-4 2 5Y 614 95 10 5YR 5/8 5 C PL Sandy Oay Loam 4-16 2 5Y 6/2 85 1,0 5YR 5'/8 1'5 C PL Sandy Clay Loam H ric Soll'Indicators _ Histosol (Al) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Black HISUC (A'3) ❑ t lydroqen Sulfide (A4) [] Stratified Layers (n5) ❑ 2 rm Murk (A10) (LRR;N) ❑ Depleted Below'Dark Surface (All) D Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Sandy Mucky'Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Sandy Gleyed,Matnxd54) ❑ Sandy Redox (95) ❑ Stripped Matnx (S6) 'Location PL -lore Lining,_M- Matrix, Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑ Dark Surface (S7) 13 2 cm Muck (A10),(MLRA 147) ❑ ,Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast'Praine Redox (A16) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9)4(MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matnx n) ❑ Piedmont Fioodplain Sods (r19) ❑✓ Depleted Matrx (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Redox Dark Surfara (F6) ID Vary, Shallow r)ark Surface (TF12) ❑ Depleted'Dark Surface (F7) ❑Other (Explain in Remarks] ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑✓ ron Manqanese Messes (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) ❑ iJmbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer,(dobserved) Type Depth (inches) Romdrks Nearby beaver activity'on the main RPW "'indicators ofhydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be,present, unless di-turbed or problematic, Hydric Soil Present? Yes No OF) Airily Coip,, of E iiyuitxiv; E&Aern Mountain~ and Piedmont - Version 2 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastcrn Mountains and Piedmont Region project/site Bonterra Applicant /Owner Investigators) LSR /JAL /PJK cayicotmty Indian Trail /Union Cty Sampling Date 03/07/13 State NC Sampling Point UPl,above J Section Township_ Range Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc ) valley Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope ( %) 0 -5% Subreq#on (LRR or'MLRA)- MLRA 136 Lat. 34 0959 N Lanq 80'6052 W Datum WGS84 SoiLMop UniuName SCAT- SecreSt -Cid' complex, 0 -3% Slopes NW classification, _ Are climatic,/ hydrolopcconditions on the site typical for this time of year.? Yes F No Q r if no, explain in Remarks ) Are Vegetation Sod 0, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Nornknl Circumstances' present? Yes= No = Are VeyetdtionL---j Sod LJ or Hydrology L__j n.iturally, problemdtiO (If needed, expidin any dnswerspn Remarks ) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling,polnt locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytrcvegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area HydncSotl °Present? Yes= No within a Wetland? Yes 0 No Wetland Hydrologyhresent Yes No Remarks HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology indicators Secondary Indicator s (minimum of two required) Prrnidry ndi,dlors 6nirniiium,of one is ieuuired ehetXcill'thdl apply) ❑ €Surface Sod Cracks (136) ✓ Surface Water (Al) ❑ ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated'Concave Surface (68) Q High Water Table (A ?) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Drainage Patterns (610) ❑✓ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidi[ed Rhitospheres on Livrrxl Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ WaterMarks (81) ❑ Presence of Reduced iron (C4) ❑ Dry- Sea,on Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron'Reduction in Tilled Sotlss(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑,Saturation Visible on Aenai'Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat`or Crust (84) ❑ Other (Explain in Remark=_) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) ❑ Iron Doposits (135) Q Geomorphic Position.(D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on,Aenal Imaqery (87) Shallow Aqurtard (D3) ❑✓ Water - Stained, Leaves (69) [] Microtopographic Relief '(D4) ❑Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ❑ Depth (rncho ^) 3 Water'Table Present? Yes No Q Depth (inches) 0 0 + n Saturation Present? Yes Q No Depth (inches) wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes ra ilia frin v Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks US Acriiy Corps of"Enymeers Edtiterii Mountain-,,and Piedmont - Version 2 0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. 65 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 32 5 20'Yo,of total cover, 13 Sapling Stratum (riot size 30' ) 1 Ulmus alata 40 Y FACU 2 Acer rtibrum f51 Y FAC 3 - 4 5 6 _ 55 = Total Cover, 50% of total cover 27 5 20`io of total cover 11 Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 30' ) 1 Llgustrum sinense 10 Y FACU 2 3 4 5 6 10 = Total Cover sago of total' cover- 5 zo% of total covet 2 Herb Strat.im (Plot size 30' ,,Impatiens pallid 10 Y FACW 2 Allium vineale 10 Y FACU 3 Claytonla virginlca 10 Y FAC 4 5 - 7 13 g, 1 w�, 11, 30 = Total Cover 50% of,tobal coder 15 2o% of total cover 6 ryLVi e� Strawni (Plot ins, 30' ) Lonioera japonica 40 Y FAC 2 ToMoodendron radicans 10 Y FAC 3 Sampling Point, UPL above J Dominance Test,worksheet Number of Dommant Species That',Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 7 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata 11 IB) Percent of Dominant Species 64% That Are bBL, FACW, or FAC (AB) Prevalencedndex worksheet-, Ab,,olule Dommmil IixLcalui Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1 Liquidambarlstyraciflua 25 Y FAC 2 ,Quercus, phellos 15 Y FAC 3 Ulmus alata 15 Y FACU 4 Framus pennsylvanica 10 N FACW 5 6 - 65 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 32 5 20'Yo,of total cover, 13 Sapling Stratum (riot size 30' ) 1 Ulmus alata 40 Y FACU 2 Acer rtibrum f51 Y FAC 3 - 4 5 6 _ 55 = Total Cover, 50% of total cover 27 5 20`io of total cover 11 Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 30' ) 1 Llgustrum sinense 10 Y FACU 2 3 4 5 6 10 = Total Cover sago of total' cover- 5 zo% of total covet 2 Herb Strat.im (Plot size 30' ,,Impatiens pallid 10 Y FACW 2 Allium vineale 10 Y FACU 3 Claytonla virginlca 10 Y FAC 4 5 - 7 13 g, 1 w�, 11, 30 = Total Cover 50% of,tobal coder 15 2o% of total cover 6 ryLVi e� Strawni (Plot ins, 30' ) Lonioera japonica 40 Y FAC 2 ToMoodendron radicans 10 Y FAC 3 Sampling Point, UPL above J Dominance Test,worksheet Number of Dommant Species That',Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 7 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata 11 IB) Percent of Dominant Species 64% That Are bBL, FACW, or FAC (AB) Prevalencedndex worksheet-, Total % Cover of. MuRmlv,hy OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5- Column Totak (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations "(Provide supporting data,in Hemarks,or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must be present unless distui bed or problematic Definitions ofiFlve Vegetation Strata Tree. - Woody phtnts excludiny woody vine,,, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more msheight,and 3,in (7 6 -in) or larger m diameter it bred ,-t height,(DBH) Sapling = Woody plants, excluding woody vines approximately 20 fl (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in (7 6`cm) DBFI Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to zo ft (1 to b m) in height - Herb - All herbaceous.(non- moody) plants including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody pI,mB „exceplwcwdy vines, le!.,, thmi dpproxim,iiely, 3 ft (1 m)tin height` Woody vine - All woody vines, regardle— of'height J. Hydrophytic 50 - Total Cover Vegetation 5fY% of total icazc�r- i � 25 20'. of total cover 10 Present? Yes t - ' No= fAam�3r „ ,pric,14do ptiorn r+umt>Rrs here or orl a separate sheetl 0 Amoy r"Amjrs,d Cmiliist u 5 Eastern Mumilmm-mid Piedmont - Version 2 0 SOIL Sampling Point, UPLaboveJ Profile Description (Describe,loithe depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absencedof'mdicators ) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) %_ Twe, Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 6 '10YR 6/3 95 7 5YR 5/8 5 C M Sandy Clay Loam 6-16 10YR 6/4 95' 7 5YR 5/8 15 C M Sandv Clay Loam 'Type C- Concentration, D -De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix; MS =Masked Sand Grains. 'Location PL -fore Lining, M- Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils- HiStocol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) 1 2 cmtMuck (A10) (MLRA 147) _❑ ❑ Histic'Epipedon,(A2) ❑ Polyvalue%elow Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast,Praine,Redox,(A16) ❑ Black,HisUc (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ I lydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (1-2) EJ Piedmont Floodplain, Soils (F19), ❑ Strati_fieftayers•(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ 2 rm Murk (A10)'(L'RR N) ❑ Redox nark SurfarP (F6) ,❑ VaryShallow�nhrk c;urfare (TF12) ❑ Depieted,Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface,(F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Thick Dark Surface Al 2) D✓ Redox Depression-, (F8) `Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1),(LRR N, ❑ ron- Manganese Masses (F12)'(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) ❑ Sandy Gleyed'Matrix 64) ❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Redox (55) [] Piedmont Flood plain,Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑'Stnpped fvlatnx,(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material' (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive, Layer (if observed) Type: Depth (inches) Reuidrkti Hydric Sod,Present? Yes, ❑ _ No 21 tj5 A my Cufp., of riglinfwr, Edstern'Mouri6mrs dnd`Predmonl - Version 2 0 e � STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM Perennial RPW B 10Date 311/1`3 � Evaluator ,PUK JA W06 P.,_' -447 -a - r r . ,' - � a = NortHin 35'09298'1N�� J ,Pro ect ' �Bonte�ra_�P�e_rennialoRP�1N�.6 : ��.'- ��-��F, ,.a: ;_�z , � =ax ��_ � Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 orperennial if> 30'` right- click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points) A. Geornorpholpigy Geomorphology _Absent, Weak Moderate Strong z, SCORE 1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 —;b`� 1,`,- << 2 Sinuosity of channel along thalwe 0 1 2 3 3 In- channel structure nffle- / step- pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4 Partcle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 = -:2'?; ' s t 5 Active /relic flood lain 0 _ 1 2 3 -' =-2 K 6, Depositional bars, or benches 0 _ 1 2 �3 a _j- �` 3= w,`�'�P¢ 7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 kl_i !131- '1_. 6 8 Headcuts`' FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1 5, Other= 0 0•��',`_� -- Biology Subtotal 9 Grade controls 0 0 -5 1 _ 1 5 10 NStiural valley 0 05 1 1 1 5 11 Second or greater-order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 Geomor holo Subtotal 'Man -made ditches are not ratea see aiscussion In NLuvvu ivianual n UISAW 10%ri.. 12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13 Iron Oxidizin Bacteria _ 0 1 2 3 —;b`� 1,`,- << 14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 05 0 - 15 Sediment on plants,or debris 0 05 1 1 5 16 Organic debris Imes -or piles Wrack lines 0 05 1 1 5 17 Soil -based Evidence of high water table? No = 0 Ye's = 3 3.• M' - " Hydrology Subtotal c Rir%i,%n� 1,8 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 _ 0 19 Rooted upland lants'in streambed 3 2 1 _ 0 20 MacrobentKos, note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 "s '`^ 21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22 Fish 0 05 1 1 5 23 Crayfish 0 05 1 1 1 5 24 Amphibians _ 0 `0 5 1 1 5 P �0 5' ;, Cfi'' 25 Algae 0 0 5 1 1 5 A_ 9�; 26 Wetland plants in streambed 26 FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1 5, Other= 0 0•��',`_� -- Biology Subtotal erennlal streams may also oe `I! O e-'1fa-q 1 lhl =l� � l- ,l r ,@. '-^U _ 1h U ` rspl• l= l V°=fllle'.l , I Ia�Ia 'tC uI AVUP D ` JeC`3 �d rC ;< ar.r ��e1nQ a� G eJJ •.:, -) e ik v'F-':-` ,i a« lq. i K o% m a ry n `' ,gna a.� ors 1r an, a. uh s ', -g a� l 7Notes X1, 'peenniam .atesAoffs te',C ` z--h ;r- San Y),tseibs-trate',(cobble�tand small4b ould ers�nN.biw` ._is�h- Sndfcr' ish,oliseved: "x : 1 s 1 4 �' "�3��,r�. YY— � "'2 A �'"��'£?se t.. _ar - tiF �` ,S vet K� ,'�,'a�x�"t4k .''' °'" ;`i - _:�� F- �.• - �t� ,?' f>,,..,`�K � -^*b -" �,"ar�n�",, L, ri'± �w? V"` �µa'.`_ b�•$ -e�a��ctccn_x �cY r ,''�a '$ -;,�� _ ,.s � .,e=.. ns�,Et' �;�= �� "'�- �ts� --..�f ....�:.r„ ate... -a .T,,. „a�v"sµ �':�•'�. =,�: �. �'�w`= c�.�_..��`i Adapted from NCDWO- Methodology for'Identificat►on of'lntermittent and`Perennial, Streams and their (version 4 -11) ora ns STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM non -RPW Date ` 1 Evaluator LPP%041JAL �.= Aare "` : � _ ' : �'_ I Eastmg._ Total Points: Stream is,at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30* (nght- chck,the purple number and left -click Update Field, to summarize points A. Geomorphology Absent Weak 1-Moderate-' Strong SCORE' 1a Continuity of channel bed,and bank 0 1 2 3 9 =341,�"�1,`„;` �•� 2 Sinuosity of channel along thalwe ° 0 1 2 3 :Z ,j 3 In- channel structure nffle- / step- pool sequence 0 1 2 3 y '7= ,_ -0 4 Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 - 5 Active /relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 - ;` 2 6 Depositional bars or benches _ 0 1 2- 3 7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3`'� 8- Headcuts _ 0 1 2 3 9 Grade controls 0 0 5 1 1 5 10 Natural valley 0 0 5 1 1 5 11 Second or greater order channel No = 0 - Yes =,3 Geomorphology-Subtotal —a Man -made ditcties,are not rated seediscussion�m,NCDWQ Manual R'_ Hudroloev 12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2, 3b� ll 1 gar ,ter' 1'3 Iron Oxidizing Bactena 0 1 2 3 _ 9 =341,�"�1,`„;` �•� 14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 05 0' Y.s. S"' of x� -n^ `giA:. �v - f`��T� Ae.�j,js .✓'��✓�?_G -`` '��',�'�'C- �S� ?�>'.,tk `• 15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 05 1 1 5 16 Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines 0 05 1 1 5 - 17 Sod -based Evidence of high watertable? No = 0 Yes' = 3 .1`0" r , Hydrology Subtotal C. Bioloav 18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 i Inconsistent bedrLand;bank,00fly defined channel,, bntains ruts from timber ;prod "uction 19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 Y.s. S"' of x� -n^ `giA:. �v - f`��T� Ae.�j,js .✓'��✓�?_G -`` '��',�'�'C- �S� ?�>'.,tk `• 21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 _ 3 22 Fish 0 05 1 15 „Oa• ;- c E; 23 Crayfish __ 0 05 1 24 Amphibians 0 05 1 1 5 25 Algae 0 05 1' 1 5a5 26 Wetland lants'm streambed FACW =,O 75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 Biolo Subtotal * nPrennial streams,mav also be identified using other methods See page 35 of NCDWQ mandal - _. Notes ri^r "' , `*^" �, .ra T >a.-a4 .T ,: ;, y ' -;3 r «r�_� .• `" "�ur � y _� 3�. , �''ss.v'^.t•.n' .. �'�:, ®ownL- 5Iopeaof yWetlandiK�Q0. slope.of i Inconsistent bedrLand;bank,00fly defined channel,, bntains ruts from timber ;prod "uction •g -'- a. fi' - e': yi - 7S :. y.f zt.r ,�, q -1•ti 5 ,. Yom.. r ..:rte - -f ��y F °��'F . �C_ la_, y ";;sah�d,sutistjat'e: °�Fib_ro_ us oots� °;��,� f �� :y�,;`�_ : _�_�_;��.�, ';,�� -.;,� �2� ;.�r'�=�:';.��_ f _ -'- -xy.•S _ '�< �'r _f °'/'- i..o• -• - = �uir�Yv e' 3I?3'.��r'sc;..� y�" r. J-`1 �T' „�•- c= _�'ry`l� c, A r � Y ��+ � i� ?i5t... =fir= • _ _ J`F #k F'y9 � �.. ry��... �C� Y �� "c,`c -. y�v ,..� } fit._ •_ 2 F ti.' ,�•�'^„� °tea `� - <�h�� "k�� -'��'- �e�A'��_ '`3- 'h'_' -t ^v ay��"$'.^�,*z°'V3."efl oS,.� u'%iy``i r, .xe NY `' �''e,'� '� "'• -n k ;- • y " %fig e _ . ' -,J > "� a' " Y.s. S"' of x� -n^ `giA:. �v - f`��T� Ae.�j,js .✓'��✓�?_G -`` '��',�'�'C- �S� ?�>'.,tk `• < �.q — y..L F. .� ! *r�,� s � \, .,.F ' <''-:� .. s' - w', 1'.c � _ .: �`. +�.,: }s..- ` a • - � � r_L.x. I5: `'�� cy - 7_ l.�t` � ,� Adapted from NCDWQ Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and ,Perennial Streams and their (version 4 11) Ongins APPROVED J_ URISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U:S. Army Corps of Engineers ThWform should'be completed by following the'mstructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)e 13. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILENAME, ANDNUMBER: ASHEVILLE,REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue,, Room 208' Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006 Applicant: C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bonterra State NC County/pansh/borough UnUMI City 16 W Trail' Center coordinates of site (latAong'm degree decimal format) Lat 35:0959,3 " 4 Long 80 0317" W Universal Transverse Mercator F-17 Name of nearest,waterbody I orky�C Creek Name of nearest Traditional Navigable�Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows Rooky Iiriver Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 0 0430 043 0 70VJCC , ® Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request El Check if other saes (e g , offsite mitigation,sites, disposal, sites, etc ) are associated with this action and aresecorded on a different JD form D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL,THAT APPLY): a Office (Desk) Determination Date ® Field Ueternmation Date(s) 04/16/F13 SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There Ace o "navigable waters of the US " within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part-329) in the review area [Required) El Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce Explain- M B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There W "waters of the US" within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required) 1. Waters of the U.S. a. indicate presence of waters ofU.S, in review,area (check all that apply): TNWs, including territorial seas ® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs ® Relatively permanent watersz,(RPWs) thavflow directly or indirectly mto1NWs El Non -RPWs that flow.directly or,mdiiectly into TNWs U ® Wetlands duectly,abuttmg�RPWs that'flow,+directly or indirectly into TNWs g Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or mdirectly'mto TNWs ® Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or, indirectly into TNWs ® impoundments of junsdtctional,waters Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including, isolated wetlands b, identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area: Non - wetland waters: ( +" 7,` "I 051linear'feet ( +'x%)4190' S width (ft) and /or (+ 0,703 acres Wetlands: (175aXO 14. acres. 0o4@s,dwkW below shall be supported by completing thus appropriate sections in Section III below € For purposes of this form, an RPW is deemed as a tributary that ii not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow, at least "seasonally" (O's" typically 3 months), c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on if "7 =Malin atipn;Mannal Elevation of established OHWM (if known) Non - regulated waters/wedands (check,if applicable):3 ® Potentially ju n sdictional waters, and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and, determined to be not ' Supporting documentation a presented in Section III.F. SECTIONJII: CWA ANALYSIS A. 'TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs The agencies will,assert jurisdiction �over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the,aquatic resource is a TNW, complete Section III.A.1 and Section III D 1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent'to,a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2 and Section tll.D.l.; otherwise, see Section III.B below, 1. TNW Identify TNW Summarize rationale supportingAetermmation = 2. Wetland adjacent to TNW Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland,is "adjacent" ,, B, CHARACTERISTIC&OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW),AND ITS ADJACENT, WETLANDS.(IF ANY): This section summarizes information, regarding characteristics of the tributary and,its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps determine "whether or'not,the standards for jurisdiction, established under ^Rapanos have been met. Thetagencies'will'assert jurisdiction over non- navigable,tributaries of TNWswhere the tributaries are "'relatively permanent waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have'continuousflow at least,seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months). A wetland that, directly ,abuts an RPW isalso jurisdictional. If the,aquatic resource,is,not a TNW,'but'has year -round ,(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is,a wetland directly abutting,a tributary with - perennial flow„ skip to Section III.D.4. A wedand'that is adjacent to but that,does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus,between a relatively, permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a4raditional navigable water, even though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law. If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluatiowniust consider the tributary in combination with`all of its,adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that,combines, for analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identifted,in the JD request is the tributary, or its'adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands,, complete Section IIIAL1 for, the tributary, Section II1.112 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.K3 for all wetlands adjacent to- that,tribbtary,,both, onsite and onsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below. 1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly-or indirectly into TNW (i) General Area Conditions: Watershed size 04(1105aeatiredfa IIya'ge)1"4,13.Sgre miles Drainage area wetlaadstudyatea./ )_190 ,acres Average annual rainfall- X43 inches Average annual snowfall - 4,,mches (ii) Physical Characteristics: (a) Relationship with TNW. Tributary flows directly mto TNW. ® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW Project waterware 211=25 river miles from TNW Project - waters are 1�(0 river miles from RPW Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW Project waters are lj(o le�sa) acnal,(straight) miles from -RPW Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain ' flow route to TNW5- 4 Np4e that the Instructional Guidcbook contains additional informationiregarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and West, 'Flow route can be,described by identifying, cg, tributary s, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW Tributary stream order, if knownM (b) General Tnbutary Characteristics (check'all'that apply) Tributary+is ® Natural Artificial (man -made) Explain EJ�Mampulated (man- altered) Explain Tributary propertreswrth respect to,top of bank,(estrmate) AverageFwrdth +/ 10 U feet Average depth 2,�,feet Average side slopes 2_:1! Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply) IN Slits ® Sands Mconcrete ® Cobbles ®- Gravel E;Muck Q Bedrock D Vegetation Type /% cover PM El Other 'Explain Wj 1---.�, Tributary condition /stability [e g , highly eroding, sloughing banks] Explain Generallyystable Presence of run /riffle /pool complexes Explain Fe pr sent Tnbutary geomefry Me`an_dering Tributary gradient (approximate °average slope) b�-'tl' % (c) Flow Tributary provides for hckfI Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year :20 (orr gre'a —' to ) Describe flow regime Pen ►al 1tPW BSaiid1Pe�""renntal ltl?WE?flow_yesi =round Other information on duration and volume Surface flow is Dise rite a 6n d. Characteristics Subsurface flow Unlm_""o_wn_ Explain findings El Dye'(or other) test performed Tributary has (check all that,apply) R Bed and banks ® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply) ® clear, natural line impressed on the�bank ® the presence of litter and debris changes in the character of sod ® destruction.of terrestrial Vegetation ® shelving the presence of wrack line vegetation matted down, bent, or absent sediment sorting ® leaf litter.disturbed or washed away ® scour ® sediment deposition ® multiple observed or predicted flow events El water staining Q abrupt change in plant community ® other (list) M El Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain njs If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply) El High Tide Line indicated by. 0 Mean High Water Mark indicated by ® oil or scum line along shore objects survey to available'datum, fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ® physical markings; ❑� physical markings /charactenstics ® vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types tidal gauges ® other (list) (iii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize tributary (e g , Explain,'. Identify specific pollutants, water color is clear, discolored, if known. etc ) aA'natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not "nccessanlysever jurisdiction (e g, where the stream temporarily flows underground, -or where the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break'rn the OHWM tharis unrelated to the waterbody's flow icgimc (c,8, flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break 'Ibid. , , 1 0 (iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply): ® Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width) f ro ested"00 ® Wetland fringe Characteristics Adjacentland ;abutttng,foressted�tl Habitat for Q Federally Listed species Explain findings Q Fish /spawn areas Explain findings M fl Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings *' 10 Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Cr bait els maysupport macro vertelicates, amp}ttlitans „andgfi h $s motes 2. `Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) Physical Characteristics: (a) General Wetland Characteristics Properties Wetland size (J) 1_449,0 004(F) 0 027; (I) _ !018 acres Wetland type Explain Forestedy Wetland quality Explain M Project wetlands cross or-serve as state boundaries Explain No (b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW Flow is WiermittentEflow Ex lam Wetlan�ds,'wi” 1 dtsch e,mtoithe;ail aeentsRP�W s: n'o iM ,dung0'' " p anB J Pe Y' 8 13ron81 season Surface flow is: 1 '0"''p CharacteristicsNotflow atyttme of�stirvey, Subsurface flow Unlmo'_w_n_ Explain findings El Dye (or other) test performed (c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW Directly abutting ® Not directly abutting i® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain Wetland�K flowstintoa�oulveit connectedto alnon,, judctioaa noneRPW- _flowstn into WdJ Ecological connection Explain ® Separated by berm/bamer Exnlam We'''tland Fsandwetland J =areiF� live mall oartari�.b m a (d) Prowmi (Relahonshrol to TNW Project wetlands are 2 river miles from TNW Project waters are 1520 aerial (straight) miles from TNW Flow is from Wetland to nevi Me'w ta"e>`"s Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 50100Fy". 'ear, floodplam (ii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize wetland system (e g, water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface, water quality,•general watershed characteristics, etc ) Explain No wets %at;timetof survey Identify specific pollutants, if known � (iii) Biological Characteristics. Wedand supports (check all that apply): ® Riparian buffer Characteristics (type, average width) orestetl'� F Mt)W ® Vegetation type /percent cover Explain [hydiophyhe;, - 0 ® Habitat for 0 Federally Listed species Explain findings ®'Fish /spawn areas Explain findings M Other.environmentally- sensitive species Explain findings F17-177M ® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Wetla' "rids vide bltat?f =o tpliilil8ns,,r phles` ,,and othersw_i181ife` 3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any) All wetland(s) being considered4n the,cumulative analysis 7 Approximately (i16X11) acres in total are being.considered,in the cumulative analysis i, 0, • For each wetland, specify the following Directly abuts9�(Y/N) Size in acres) Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres) Ff(N) H�(i� 1027V" 2858 Gf(1') f755' U_4-42 Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed an �Abovewwetlds dan iR4 C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS'DETERMINATION A significant nexus analysis will assess,the'.flow characteristics and functions of,the,tributary"itself and,thefunctions performed by any wetlands adjacent toithe tributary to,determine if they, significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of a TNW. Foreach of the following situations, a; significant, nexus exists,if thelributary, in combinadon,with all of its adjacent wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on th&chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Considerations, when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency,of the flow of water,in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the,tributary and all its adjacent wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific.threshold of distance (e.g. between a tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or outside of a,floodplain is not solely, determinative -of significant nexus. Draw,coenections between the features documented and`the effects on the'TNW, as identified,in4he Rapanos ,,Guidance and discussed in the .Instructionai Guidebook. Factors to'consider include,,for'example: • Does the'inbutary, m'combmation with its,adjacent wetlands (if any), have�the capacity to carry pollutants or floodwaters to TNW §, or to reduce the- amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW? • Does the tributary, in combination with,its adjacent wetlands (if any), provi&habitat and lifecycle,support functions for fish and other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or reanng•young for species that are present in the TNW? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that support,downstream foodwebs? • Does the tributary, m combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relation ships,to the physical, chemical, or biological,mtegnty of =the TNW? Note: the above list of considerations is,not inclusive and other functions observed or'known to.occur should be documented below: 1. Significant nexus findings for non- RPW`that has no adjacent wetlands and flows'directly or indirectly4fito TNWs. Explain findings ofpresencr or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then godo Section I1I`D — Significant nexus fmdings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section.11l D Significant nexus findings forwetlands adjacent,to.an RPW but that do,not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of presence orabsence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary m,combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D'.�A�fia""nificmtt,nexasais Dissent ?tietweenbthe.'adia nt wetlands .idowneloce.<<RPW«saandth'e TNW?kA m'all�nna i n D. DETERMINATIONS'OFJURISDICTIONAL, FINDINGS., THE suMCT'WATERS/WETLANDS ARE,(CHECK -ALL THAT APPVa ): 1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all,that apply and provide,size estimates in review area . . , El TNWs a5Iinear feet' Width (ft), Or, acres Q Wetlands,adjacent to TNWs 00acres RPWs that flow directly or „indirectly into TNWs. ® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional Provide that tnbutarv,is,verenmal I'd rennialt EW Brand Perenn'iallRPW E were obsen+edrtoshave M Tnbutanes of,TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally” (e g , typically three months each, year) are jurisdictional- Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally NO Provide estimates forjunsdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply) IN Tributary waters ( +/ 3405 linear feeUlU 1gwidth (ft) Other non - wetland waters acres Identify type(s) of waters Non -RPWss that flow directly or indi'rectlyinto'TNWs. Waterbody that is not a,TNW or an RPW; but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus mith,a TNW is junsdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided,at Section III C Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the'review area (check,all that apply) ® Tributary waters M,linear feet 1 width,(ft) , Other non - wetland Waters acres Identify type(s) of waters_ ; Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ® Wetlands directly abut RPW and'thus are jurisdictional as'adjacent,wetlands ® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tnbutanes,typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale mdicatmg that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2, above ;Provide rationaleandicating that wedand.is directly abuttine an RPW �Veti' i5di't H. and.WiW/W/Y/I� flow di rectiv!into,andR e'not�ed 0 Wetlands directly abutting,an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is seasonal,in Section III B and rationale;m Section III D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that,wetland,is directly abutting an RPW, VNEW Provide acreage estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area ( +'" %)- 1'4r.6 3 acres Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW`ihat flow directly,or indirectlyinto TNWs. ® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and withsimilarly situated adjacent wetlands; have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data +supporting this conclusion,is'provided at Section iII C Provide acreage estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area 1494acres Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into'TNWs. ® Wetlands adjacent to such waters, acid have when considered,in combination With�the tributary to whi ch'they, are adjacencand with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting Phis conclusion,is provided at Section III'C Provide estimates for junsdictional wetlands m,the review area .acres 7. impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9 As a general rule, the impoundment of jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional 0 Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the US," or El Demonstrate that water meets the;criteria'for one, ofthe categones;presented above (1 -6), or #See Foetnole # 3. 0 To complete the malyxix refer wthe'keyin,Seetion IH,T).6 of the Instrucuonal,Guideiwok III Demonstrate that water is, solated with a nexus to commerce (see E below,) E. - ISOLATED ]INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS,JNCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE''USE, DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE „INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10 ® which•are or could be used by interstate or foreigmtravelers•for recreational or other purposes from which fish or shellfish,are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce [] which are or could be used for industrial purposes'by industries in interstate, commerce Interstate isolated waters_ Explain ® Other factors Explain g Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: Provide est1mates forjunsdictional waters-in the review area (check all that apply) - 3 Tributary waters Mmear fee 'width (ft) El Other non - wetland waters acres Identify type(s) of waters 0 Wetlands 46acres F. NON4URISDICCIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements O Review areaamcluded isolated waters with,no substantial nexus �to,interstaw(or foreign) commerce ® Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC,” the review area would have been regulated (based sole on, the "Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR) Waters do not meet the ``Significant Nexus" standard, where such a findmg'is required for- Iunsdiction Explam,-�.-�. ® Other (explain, if not covered,above) r; . Provide acreage estimates for nonyunsdictional waters m.the review area, where the sole potential basis oflunsdiction is the MBR factors (i.e, presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water, forimgated agriculture), using best professional judgment (check all that apply) El Non - wetland waters (i c, rivers, streams) I , linear feet width (ft) El Lakes/ponds. '' P ,acres ® Other, non- wetland,waters SWAacres List type of °aquatic resource El Wetlands W.,-'2Wg acres Provide acreage estimates,for non junsdictional waters in the review area that,do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a,finding,is required for,iurisdiction (check all that apply) Non - wetland waters (i e, rivers, streams) Mlmiear feet, ;width (ft) ® Lakes /ponds ` Macres 0 Other non - wetland waters acres List type,of aquatic' resource- S.'' ® Wetlands WMacres A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check,all,that apply -checked items shall be included in, case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below) ® Maps, plans. plots orplat submitted by or -on behalf of the applicant/consultant y ,, IN Data "sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the'applicaht/consultant El Office concurs with data,sheets /delineation report 13 Office doesmot,concur with data sheets /delineation report Data sheets,prepared by the Corps ® Corps navigable waters' °study: G U.S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas, , ,. El USGS NHD data MVSGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps is Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction base&solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA,HQ for review consistent with the process described In the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA,Act Jurisduxion FoUowmg,Rapanos 1v-Ik �'b ® U'S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 47-1,4 Bak "(NC)�q d ® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation atural�Reso"a``roess CoriservationSeryice Web Soil Survey URL http / /websoilsurvey nres usda gov, National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name �] State/Local wetland inventory _ map(s) - FEMA/FIRM maps U Q 100 -year Floodplam Elevation is IM, (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of -1929) ® Photographs i® Aerial (Name & Date) Bonterra;,Aenal 0 pss03J1_8, 3 revlQO 12 3 or [].Other (Name & Date) ® Previous determination(s) File-no and dateiof response letter Applicable /supporhng;case law ® Applicable /supportmg,scientific literature El Other information (please specify) go B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO'SUPPORT JD: