090107_Routine_20220728

Facility Number
IDS'
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: lo Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 4k,Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
as�2
1-urniAll fA(1rif0 firrfl' ItiG
a:vo
Arrival Time:
Owner Name: uu
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Departure Time:
,ar7,o
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
q�e�
Region: fgt1
Facility Contact: ClOtti C b I Wl W,
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: ROI cp. Phone:
Smlfif Q
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
/6 95:3
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
000
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.,
Layer
Non -Layer
Dr v Poultry
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA El NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
0%
Date of Inspection: 1.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes \No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'y No ❑ NA
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ NE
mental threat, notify DWR
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA El NE
N,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No
No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop WindowDp ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift 1� ❑Q /Appplication Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 9 flij�"i D�UIyI,G� co,Dt `tv\IVa PY-Jb m J grain soronvm(nr-.Avg)
13. Soil Type(s): NCID , W Him, 10
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes kl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking El Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
Yes `SC' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IA]No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes IV No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes k]No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
9
- 10-1-
Date of Inspection: 1.2B' 22,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ri
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
igNon -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
‘c S1oiQ9e
ra a►- gI ► rwtit cv1 h )
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ip No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes N
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes kl No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes '] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes Nil No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes IS] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional °recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
yeast ►agoon nQs feii,EON Mi. Xe \,a0��a
iti. 10v PumQed mote ton 30 401 PCB ?taut iN mat(tr,f1n1S11 boj!rnci
hates ft-Qld fo ho��> 3 tontTDl ofigt4ss w22l c..
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Ot[e fo.qmot
r144°Jt
{
sieve MJ 11)N Phone: IIQ 7A/ III/
i� /
Date: 1 o . B- 2-
5/12/2020