20140887 Ver 1 - ASHBURY Ph2_Revised Impact Exhibits_09-12-2014 - 9/12/2014

Strickland, Bev
From: Smith, Cherri L
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:29 PM
To: Montalvo, Sheri A; Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: ASHBURY (UNCLASSIFIED) - Revised /Minimized Impacts Requested
Attachments: ASHBURY Ph2_Revised Impact Exhibits_09- 12- 2014.pdf
Importance: High
Hi Sheri and Beverly,
Please include this email and attached revised impacts to DWR #14 -0887 Ashbury Subdivision Phase 2 Central and
Laserfiche files. Thanks so much.
Cherri
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:bzarzecki @sandec.com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 4:23 PM
To: Brown, Craig J SAW; Smith, Cherri L
Subject: RE: ASHBURY (UNCLASSIFIED) - Revised /Minimized Impacts Requested
Importance: High
Craig & Cherri:
Please find attached the revised impact exhibits and justification letter from the applicant. They were unable to avoid
the impacts on lots 60B & 61B, but were able to significantly reduce the impacts to the back of lots 62B & 63B.
W1 Impact (Previously Requested) = 3,500 sf or 0.081 acres
W1 Impact (Revised /Minimized) = 2,031 sf or 0.047 acres
Total New Requested Wetland Impacts = 0.064 acres
Don't hesitate to let me know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Bob Zarzecki
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 9:39 AM
To: 'Brown, Craig J SAW'
Cc: cherri.smith @ncdenr.gov
Subject: RE: ASHBURY (UNCLASSIFIED)
1

Thanks Craig and sorry to hear about your Mom. Hopefully, I'll have the info to you later today, if not the first of next
week.
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Brown, Craig J SAW [ mailto :Craig.J.Brown @usace.army.mi1]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 9:36 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: cherri.smith @ncdenr.gov
Subject: RE: ASHBURY (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
:.•
Thanks
Condolences to you and your wife. My mother passed away this past June, so I have an idea of what you and your wife
are going through.
Craig
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:bzarzecki @sandec.com
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 9:32 AM
To: Brown, Craig J SAW
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: ASHBURY (UNCLASSIFIED)
I was just going to send over the revised impact exhibits with a cover letter. I got the draft from the client and provided
comments back on Wednesday. I haven't heard back yet. Looks like they'll be able to minimize impacts a decent
amount. No need to put on hold, and consider this email if you can our acknowledgement that the application review is
on hold pending this information. I hope to have it to you later today.
(On a side note, my wife just heard that her father died last night, I'm going to take her to the airport, work out the day
and then head to NY. Not sure how that will affect my schedule right now though.)
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Brown, Craig J SAW [ mailto :Craig.J.Brown @usace.army.mi1]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 9:17 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Subject: RE: ASHBURY (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hi Bob,

Were you going to resubmit the PCN today. My 30 day review deadline is up soon.
Craig
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:bzarzecki @sandec.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 9:28 AM
To: Brown, Craig J SAW; Cherri L Smith
Cc: spangdevco @aol.com; keith.gettle @civil - consultants.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL] ASHBURY
Craig and Cherri:
Thanks for meeting Bill and I on site this morning. Per our discussion, Bill will go back and work with his engineer and
building to develop house plans for lots 62B and 63B and also try to minimize wetland impacts around these two lots
further. No need to send out an on hold letter, we'll have you the revised plans by next Friday 12th or sooner.
Thanks!
Bob Zarzecki
S &EC
Sent from my iPhone
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Craig and Cherri
Following our meeting on site September 4, 1 have contacted the builder, Cimarron Homes, and my
engineer, Civil Consultants, and propose the following revision of the wetlands impact at the proposed
Lots #62B and 63B of Ashbury Phase 2.
The lots of Phase 2 are to be cleared and graded to flat pads for homes to be built on slab foundations.
As we deal with the site's topography, adjacent lots will step in concert with the street, but never
changing elevation by more than 2' -00" from one to the next. Lots #63B and 62B will be graded to
666.6 and 664.6 feet of elevation, respectively, approximately 2' -0" and 4' -0" above the elevation of the
wetland in rea of the lots.
Cimarron plans six different house models for Phase 2. Several are one story plans. By restricting two of
these plans, the model with the deepest footprint of the remainder models measures 61 feet from the
leading front wall to the deepest rear wall. The lots have a 15 foot front setback and 12 foot deep patios
are planned. Then we expect to grade from the finished pad elevation into the wetland at a 3:1 slope.
These dimensions allow us to reduce the impact to the wetland by 13 feet of depth across the full width
of both lots. This plan reduces the impact by 32% and still allows the builder to market several model
styles to their buyers. Please see the attached plan.
I appreciate your cooperation to find a workable plan. I trust this revision meets with your approval. If
you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Bill Spang

STRUCTURE DATA
I
PIPE DATA
Structure
Number
Structure
Type
Detail
Number
RimtTOC
Elev
Invert
In
Invert
In
Invert
In
Invert
In
Invert
Out
To
Pipe
Length
Pipe
Slope
Design
Diameter
Pipe
Material
#
TO THE BEGINNING OF DEMOLITION AND /OR CONSTRUCTION.
z
(north)
(east)
(south)
(west)
$
%
in
fps
Outfail
PER NCDOT INSPECTOR.
OM
7. INFORMATION ABOUT EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS INDICATED
J01
COM-CI
402
654.55
649.66
649.92
rr^�
649.46
F03
141.00
0.50
30
RCP
J02
COM-CI
402
658.85
BE ENCOUNTERED DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT WORK, AND THEY MAY IMPACT THE
653.52
651.22
651.02
JO1
219.30
0.62
24
RCP
J03
COM-CI
402
664.20
652.21
STRUCTURE LOCATIONS, ORIENNS,
OA
652.01
J02
158.10
0.50
24
RCP
J04
COM -Cl
402
665.33
653.15
OFFSETS, CLEARANCES, SETBACKS FROM CURB, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS. MODIFY
STRUCTURES AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE- DIAMETER PIPING, MULTIPLE PIPE
652.95
J03
149.00
0.50
24
RCP
J05
COM -CI
402
663.86
~t W
653.76
653.56
J04
81.10
0.50
24
RCP
J06
COM-CI
402
661.12
656,23
654.95
654.85
J13
100-00
0.60
24
RCP
J07
COM -01
402
664.72
659.92
659.71
J06
172.00
220
15
RCP
J08
COM-CI
402
664.72
660.25
J07
33.40
1.00
15
RCP
J09
COM-CI
402
654.55
650.25
J01
33.40
1.76
15
RCP
J10
COM-CI
402
658.85
65185
J02
33.40
1.00
15
RCP
J11
COM-CI
(2)403
661.80
654.10
654.40
654.00
J05
48.20
0.50
24
RCP
J12
COM -CI
402
663.20
658.00
J11
65.00
5.50
15
RCP
J13
COM -CI
402
661.80
654.35
654.25
J11
29.40
0.50
18
RCP
J14
COM-CI
402
661.12
656.56
JO6
33.40
1.00
15
RCP
J15
FES
659,50
65250
J16
151.00
1.00
24
RCP
J16
JB
661.20
656.00
654.50
J17
28.00
1.00
24
RCP
J17
JB
663.50
654.30
654.20
J18
133.00
3.20
24
RCP
J18
FES
652.00
650.00
24
J19
HEADWALL
643.00
638.80
J20
110.00
3.45
60
CMP
J20
FES
640.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
635 O0
Apron
0 00
0 00
60
CMP
\ t
�
\ \
6x70.8 \ f
JAI
67B I r A
��>•_' t = x - �� «« ti -� pad 670.x§\
FFE 671.5
� F
1
1
f
k V- - \ r 'ti\ . \- A ` 1 - J s .8 pad 664.8
V 0;65.0 FF 669.5
6688 f �96 672.6 �� l
\ FFE 673f3 \
\t t -V
fil
6
6668 FFE 667.5
pad 666. 1 vv v t�A
/ \
pad 670.6,
664 FFE 71.3
I o �y
\ \ \ \
\
\� ly, \
r
r
ad 664 5
P A \
FFE 665.2 RaE
tf't ( \ ���V " 1 _ _ x v I Pad 666s v \
-� �,1 r! 664.6 y _F-EE .669.3
{
--
r
66
r/ !�' % t ff r .`I' ! v - "t y v {• !� / v v Q\ v 31 sf WE
v V 1
Ri? RA [APRON ^\ FFE�664.2 \ 1 0 ^ 636 D ���
/ f t ARE
Rz
ad $63.5 0
-1 N i
( \ t J r \ \ -}2' / 63,ygt FFE 666 6 3 l •
WDTw 14
6 "
5 /SF 726
� FFE 864.2
F'L� \ ad &63.5
01, T 7 t E
I
.FFE 664.6 , 5
C�
f ,r ! I.. J / ! / %�• \ \ \ \ \ \� \. \ f ` r �- -1 663,
/ l / / l f/ \.\ 1\ f 1 736
\ tr / _
t `\
!! /, \ i \\ 1� 6635 "'fFFE 664.2 1 i RIP RAP /APRON (CLASS/ ��l f
ad 663.5 -LEN Tii- 1( B) / 1
P / rG -6'. /
DEPTH =1
663
� 665.3 ���� 1 pad/664.6
/tit / / /� �� ! // fS6 6 F E
pars $56.6 / r
_ FFE s6 7.3, /Pad 66.6
2 o --
Jt / / / s / a FFE�669.3,
p ad 665.6_ a+ / r
✓ - \ �' \✓ / f O c� 882 g8q / / r I
x.27 / sss o
_ ( t ss
I /
\ f ' o° / ( / r - X77- 1-.N
•7- �yf' j / Sj �' / - / ��" r �r- ::i /1 f / / 756
Iry / / s-
ad 666.7
r _ �f�! FFE `(6701.27 \1
FFE 667.37 j ! � 1
/ r
X ll�o�/
t!
�f PAD 66641 -FFE- -666.5
/`> % /\ \ \� / 'r r t /J 1 j ` r FFE 567.27 r _ pad 665.8\
f 77
PROPOSE4 ENDWALLS // tr / RY IMPAGt l �j @o ( J664. 54B 668 \ 57B // I
/ f l ! I r` HEADWALLf. T tEMPORA J i f 77B / �7-
`1 �.' tf0,;S4%F EA` RFj / / /,A 0 FF'€-- 867.3 - i f t1 r
% ;�• r '1 \ \ <> -fix ���� `� FOR 9"(PS FxTt04I pad 665.6 % / ` pad 666.6 r °r at 672.6
tNST LL, t / r / �' FF 673.3 r
/ / 112 "x75 "x1
- POSED
99 6 K
0 - 9 `00 ` \
- 0 r
t r
�_�-
\N
.�
�
co kll\
.1f If
AP
CCQ
If
\\cci- semerNProjecs\ 10022110022 -LDD\ DWG \CD\10022- Phase2_NewLots.dwg, [ -21 C.A5- Grading & SD, 9/12/2014 4:04:48 PM
f NG�ETu ,f FFE 666,27 ssas ce r 665.0 / I
_R EINE RCD C6 / , / J..6 UON�TEISL /OPE ° mss / X
dTE�T(ON// / 6645 B x ` r
/ 7
SHAPED, AJA ALONG
;. t 11:1 SLOE_ / .3
\ '
FFE 671.3
SE DETAIL. pad 668.6 r 1 -' 6'J1 1a
r a r
FFE \65 7.3
�` t b0 666 s 11 666 -3 f 688.5
so 1 \ is Pod 665.6 , a
660.8 ? i v 666 3 1 �� S
658 661.0 FFE 666.3 f \� N 6)
s5 ._ �• _ --� �t 1 pod`665.6 , -� 0[�'a', �v \\ \
659.0 \ 496 \ ..663.4 \ t 9 \
\,`,AG I t ' k i I \ \ 6 4 v `FEE 664.3 t, >� ti -.4 �> V -
1 \ 478 \ 1 t '� , q^ \
pad 663,6__.. f ` • Ci
✓ r : ( { FFE `6£Z0.3 \t \ s 1 _ ss3. c J_
l I \ 659. pad ss1 J \ \
� 1 , pad,s5s�v
csos
658.4
\ \ l
t \
>k:•�1200 sf F( ND ILI� �`. -.. A �vvv - v v v - - .�•.
Z7
C
o
. �4GINEe .-
��l7sTy
�
U
'xi, cxa
P. G
2. FINE GRADING AND SWALES BETWEEN LOTS TO PREVENT STORMWATER FROM FLOWING FROM ONE
�
O
i
�•-+ W
Q
N G
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
L)
TO THE BEGINNING OF DEMOLITION AND /OR CONSTRUCTION.
z
z
;
U
ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST NCDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND
PER NCDOT INSPECTOR.
OM
7. INFORMATION ABOUT EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS INDICATED
Z7
C
a,
t) A
NOTES
3
. �4GINEe .-
��l7sTy
(PERMIT
'xi, cxa
P. G
2. FINE GRADING AND SWALES BETWEEN LOTS TO PREVENT STORMWATER FROM FLOWING FROM ONE
aw
PROPERTY TO ANOTHER SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOME BUILDER.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO THE BEGINNING OF DEMOLITION AND /OR CONSTRUCTION.
�O
O �
'd'
r
m�
a,
t) A
NOTES
1 PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF NPDES PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES NO. NCGO10000). SEE SHEET D.A2 FOR SOME OF THE RELATED OBLIGATIONS.
. �4GINEe .-
��l7sTy
(PERMIT
P. G
2. FINE GRADING AND SWALES BETWEEN LOTS TO PREVENT STORMWATER FROM FLOWING FROM ONE
PROPERTY TO ANOTHER SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOME BUILDER.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO THE BEGINNING OF DEMOLITION AND /OR CONSTRUCTION.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN DURING
ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST NCDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND
PER NCDOT INSPECTOR.
6. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY WITH NCDOT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
7. INFORMATION ABOUT EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS INDICATED
ON THE DRAWINGS IS BASED ON INFORMATION READILY AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER. THE
h+i
or-t
ENGINEER HAS NOT CONDUCTED AN EXHAUSTIVE INVESTIGATION OF SUCH FACILITIES OR
rr^�
CONDITIONS, AND THEREFORE MAKES NO WARRANTY TO THE CONTRACTOR OR ANY OTHER PARTY
REGARDING THEM. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT THIS INFORMATION MAY NOT BE COMPLETE,
AND EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE INDICATED ON THE
DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO ADVISED THAT IF DIFFERING CONDITIONS EXIST, THEY MAY
O
E-4
BE ENCOUNTERED DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT WORK, AND THEY MAY IMPACT THE
^
PROJECT SCOPE AND TIME REQUIREMENTS.
U
^
W
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE EXACT POSITIONING OF STORM DRAINAGE PIPING
A
AND STRUCTURES, AND SHALL MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE PROPER CONNECTIONS,
STRUCTURE LOCATIONS, ORIENNS,
OA
I
DRAINAGE. PPE LENGTHS SHOWN E AIPPROXIMATE, AND¶OCONNECTION POINTSCETOE STRUCTURES ARE
GLi
Qt L.1
SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. REFER TO STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DETAILS FOR DIMENSIONS,
Q
OFFSETS, CLEARANCES, SETBACKS FROM CURB, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS. MODIFY
STRUCTURES AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE- DIAMETER PIPING, MULTIPLE PIPE
Z
PENETRATIONS, AND PIPE CONNECTION ANGLES.
W
is
~t W
COORDINATION NOTE:
COORDINATE THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON WITH
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITY SERVICES SHOWN ON
OTHER SHEETS.
SEE SHEETS RIM, R.A2, R.A3 CONSOLIDATED VIEW OF STORM
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY WORK IN STREET AREAS.
K:l
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
(Or call: 1-800-632-4949)
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET)
i inch = 50 ft
to
O O
a � p
0W5
U
° W LU
W It Ir
r r
r T
rn
Ir T N

GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
( IN FKET )
1 inch = 30 ft.
\``11111111111//���i
o�''FES i 2
A
913 =
• •. FNGINE.e'Qi
FFE 669.3
jl
I j
\ 1 j
1 1
61 3F 1
II
I1
1
1
PTH_ »,' TIDiTH! 6
1 1g 1
608 I
l �
Paid 66 5 B
6.F M
w
Wa
0
a�
is
z
z
PG �
8
l�
UQ
3$
�a
c
r
it
SHEET NO.
CAUL BEFORE YOU OIO... WS THE LAW.
/� �i�� amrww rax inuna ��arinmmiaw' -m u ���rwsr
x �onimic own vxicn ro e[mwwc w.owc ox rowuaxc
xc �u m M m -im

pAr
POSED 112"x75 "x106,
CIMP CULVERT
j / / % J )c
PROPOSED CULVERT
HEADWALL/ENDWALLS,e' C
f f'3 01
- SO FT EMPORARY 'IMPACT
cl
'OR BYPASS MEASURES
I
/00
DURING 4INSTALLATION
C
FIBER REIN ORQED QONCRETE.
SLOPE PRIOTECTION
I
MEMO
V! FM -M
�58
RIP.—RAP APRON T
-ED FFE '6,60-3
E BELOW STI14AM I. cj ELEVATION, R (J Pad 659.\6-,
cl
C' c
r
7-L
AIV
F'ILL
N
N C
cf
I 00 661
L.
GkiPHTC SCALE
&SWdM. 0' 15 30
A
P9,d 665.6
FFE 666.27
(INS)
I inch = 30 ft.
Lill
I 0\1111111illif
"'//
tAL
91
GIN
FS
is i� 00�)
z,g
R
. P
fid
I LE
0
SHEET NO.
C3A
C�mm��N�E2
z
o
Z
I 0\1111111illif
"'//
tAL
91
GIN
FS
is i� 00�)
z,g
R
. P
fid
I LE
0
SHEET NO.
C3A
C�mm��N�E2

656
654
652
650
648
546
644 CMP END SO
642
640 INVERT OUT 6;
638
636
634
CLASS 1 RIP RAP APRON —I
NOTE: APRON TO BEGIN 4' BEHIND PIPE INVERT
I lzl�suam (rwuy 9lILAI��S'0l'.Am
VEGETATIVE SLOPE PROTECTION
EXIST. GRADE
CENTER OF (
e
9,
cn
o s
CROSS SECTION OF PROPOSED �� s
STREAM CROSSING
ROW
4' CONC.
WALK 1
2%
106' PIPE LENGTH
112 "x75" CMP (ALUMINUM) CULVERT
ROW
4" CONCRETE SLOPE PROTECTION
HEADWALL
INVERT 638
EXIST. GRADE ® CENTER OF CREEK
NOTE:
INSTALL CHECK DAM APPROXIMATELY 10' -15' FEET BEYOND PIPE INVERT
UPSTREAM PRIOR TO PUMPING ACTWITES TO BYPASS STREAM
DURING CULVERT INSTALLATION PROCESS
656
654
652
650
648
646
644
642
640
638
636
634
rn `z
� a
z
z
U] �
�i
w
Z.: 0 ;
0 913
GIN
.Ch
00
V U
Lei,
SHEET NO.
C4A