Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050732 Ver 06_More Info Received_20070910MEMO Date: 10 September 2007 To: Monte Matthews U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office From: Allison Weak/ey, Chair Chatham County Environmental Review Board Subject: 404 permit modification request by Newland Communities (Briar Chapel), ACTION ID #: 200121252 Dear Mr. Matthews: Thank you for the extension of the comment period on the proposed Briar Chapel 404 permit modification. Unfortunately, the 15-day extension (to September 10, 2007) does not allow the Chatham County Environmental Review Board (ERB) enough time to meet and discuss the request, as our next meeting is 27 September 2007. We would appreciate an extension of the comment period through September 30, 2007 to allow for full discussion by the Board. In lieu of such an extension, please consider the following comments. 1. The ERB has drafted Riparian Buffer recommendations, at the request of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners, which should be considered by the Army Corps and NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in their evaluations of the proposed modifications, especially the recommendations regarding road and utility crossings. Please see the recommendations for Section 304 of the Chatham County Watershed Protection Ordinance on the ERB website at http://www.chathamnc.org/Index.aspx?page=778). Please pay particular attention to the recommended requirements for stream crossings, which should be avoided and designed to minimize intrusion into the riparian buffer. 2. It is our understanding that several stream crossings have been re-engineered and additional impacts at these crossings are due to piping (culverting) streams. The ERB Riparian Buffer recommendations require bridge crossings or open bottomed culverts over perennial streams to reduce impacts. Piping (culverting) streams should be avoided. If culverts are used, they must be sized to ensure that downstream bank and bed scour does not occur during or following major storm events, and allow for safe passage for wildlife. 3. One of the proposed modifications requested involves a change in location of a utility crossing that does not follow a road. The ERB Riparian Buffer recommendations do not allow utility crossings within riparian buffers of perennial streams unless no practicable alternative exists. Where stream crossings are necessary, the preferred methodology for crossings are (1) by attaching to bridges as permitted by NCDOT or private bridge owner; or (2) by directional boring under the riparian buffer and perennial stream. When crossing intermittent streams, initiation of construction of crossings is allowed only when the intermittent streams are dry. Utilities should be required to follow roads, and crossings of streams and wetlands should be avoided and minimized. 5. The ERB Riparian Buffer recommendations prohibit bents or other support structures for bridges within the bankfull area of perennial streams, except where necessary on the Haw and Deep Rivers. The ERB also makes specific recommendations for restrictions on fill within the floodplain, and recommends direct discharge of road or driveway ditch drainage into riparian buffers be prohibited. 6. The cumulative impacts of the proposed modifications need to be addressed 7. Potential impacts to the federally-endangered Cape Fear shiner and other federal species of concern need to be assessed, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, NC Natural Heritage Program, and NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NC WRC) should be consulted about potential impacts. The Army Corps should not be making calls on impacts to the Cape Fear shiner and other federally tracked species without consultation with these agencies. 8. The NC WRC made some good comments on the original 404 permit application. Have these recommendations been incorporated into the original permit, or will they be considered for the modified permit? 9. The modification application states that there are 61.4 acres of "adjacent" wetlands, which we assume means adjacent to streams on site. Please consider requesting preserved buffer areas be extended to the limit of the wetland boundary or the widths stated in the permit, whichever is greater. 10. All preserved buffer areas should be included in a conservation easement donated to a third-party, such as the County, State, or a local land trust. Deed restrictions or covenants enforced by Homeowners' Associations are not sufficient for preservation in perpetuity. 11. The proposed permit modification states only that the approved mitigation in the existing permit is thought to be adequate. This is not the case where the wetland mitigation is a calculated payment to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). 2 The payment amount should be increased by the amount of the proposed increase in impact. Additionally, we request that the specific wetland mitigation site be identified by the EEP prior to the occurrence of the proposed impact. Mitigation should be required, and such mitigation should have to take place within the same Hydrologic Unit (HU) in which the impacts occur. The previously approved permit allowed mitigation in the Harper's Crossroads area, which is not part of the Haw River watershed. This should not be allowed in the future. 12. Condition #11 placed on the original 401 certification issued in May 2006 by the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) required water quality (physical, chemical and biological) monitoring for at minimum the first 5 years of construction. Have these data been submitted as required, and if so, are water quality standards being met? The ERB would like to review these data. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. The ERB asks that you strongly consider the recommendations for Riparian Buffers (referenced above) to avoid or mitigate impacts to water resources in Chatham County. We also request that you notify our Board directly in the future regarding any 404 permit requests or modifications for development projects in Chatham County. Please contact me if you have any questions or would like additional information. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Allison Weakley Chair, Chatham County Environmental Review Board 919.942.9731 aeweakle~earthlink.net CC: Charlie Horne, Chatham County Manager's Office George Lucier, Vice-Chair, Chatham County Board of Commissioners Kevin Whiteheart, Chatham County Attorney Keith Megginson, Chatham County Planning Director Chris Walker, Chair, Chatham County Planning Board Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality Ian McMillan, NC Division of Water Quality Ed Timoney, Newland Communities 3