040010_Routine Inspection_20220829

Facili
Dila� of a -Es
0 Division of Soil. and. Wate
0 Other Agency
0
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:.--e'Ifoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
5//acib;
Arrival Time:
2I t
Departure Time:
,7Feze.4-7-)
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
661-1-€46dzi:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: 67/s..47,;-7
Region: PM)
77,6;4 tj-e-
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
it
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
poultr Ca aci Po *
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
▪ Yes...,EiN ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
O Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _.11-1c'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: -- `Q
Date of Inspection: �`,�7,0-,2.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
�9
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes „aRo D NA ❑ NE
D Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
Yes
Fit
.01
I] NA El NE
Yes No ❑NA NE
-Et'Ires ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesJNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
n Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (L% l j
v
13. Soil Type(s): )/7 � Ps V L
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard fraDraste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking .rop Yield 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 4E''No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes y❑'No 0 NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued
(,),yz„,,,/Se-feee74, 9,1444 l'ez5
❑ Yes , No
❑ Yes J'No
❑ Yes .p.No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes j- No
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes J],No
❑ Other:
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
,Fl/ ' o
❑ Waste Transfers
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code

Facility Number: (,2
/6
Date of Inspection: gll
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes .1=1-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes .El-Iko ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? D Yes ,"pro ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes -Eno ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes L- No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes .❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ,®'&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes .. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
E Yes .-No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 4E1" No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
270 Ned euu/J/rJee4L -7(h2-1-) eefi/&ec7/04447-
-e0-e4YLZ Q,-4g,a41-k) f2Le2Oz.,
„eceeA tea,, �,e65
jr-p7r) ht,nic
e4c/ P-tbw-4) ..-eeeetev7i
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
E� e /- /e/eiSei
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: .1/4.' jti,"1-
5/12/2020

FACILITY #: ° d FARM NAME:
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD YES OR NO
LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
NUMBER OF ANIMALS 35?1:J
G2 (id
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#2i)
- GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 3/Ai / g 2 NITROGEN LEVEL Z/i 0
DATE /61-4 /' NITROGEN LEVEL#2i
DATE Yt tt?-'l 1 NITROGEN LEVEL )a14
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE 51 L�[ X
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (#21)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (#24)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIB ATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
- DATE OF CALIBRATION L% q/i )
FLOW RATES / .
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
RAIN FALL (#21)
SS THEN THE
DESIGNED
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT ISS GNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE(#21&25)
-DU EVERY YEAR: DATE / �!s�
0: i 1.5 P: %,5-.� % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
RAIN BREAKER FORM
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
271
42- Gfc'-
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31 st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1st -Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1st- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st