360090_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_19990216

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation, Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
® Other Agency - Operation Review
O Routine ' ;' -:Complaint' Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review
Facility Number
ther
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
/U7a-
24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified /0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: 17 /7 • , ,�-4.,‹/.
Owner Name: R.fir• I t'1 l• l� l..f�Y✓2�r�/ Phone No: .-> .-2-.5 S2 S
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: <(.)!/c /i% 3es5 ..e.t'r/t-f ( %(0i ..
Onsite Representative: 4c r F Integrator:
0 Not Operational
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Va
County:
Date Last Operated:
s �r-4
Operator Certification Number: 2,Q,�,n -D
►..«J':k. �',�Ec c- //�c) n, 4)t7 :4. 1-1-01 /r Z79 6 wt. ....CPI- CPI -cc -icy 0: 1(
l Z.,...& .lT//c�.�l.X�t- jn�S.-t¢\- Po r ...c t ' lY�n ScLt-oa` ec\t
Latitude
Longitude FT • ih—T1'
N
CC
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
/Farrow
to Finish
Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imriacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
tic,❑ Yes ❑
❑ Yes ,Kj, No
❑ Yes isitNo
❑ Yes 10 No
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number:
•
Date of Inspection
' 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding 0 Nitrogen
❑ Yes l&No
❑ Yes p No
kYes ❑ No
[Yes ❑ No
r;Iktres 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 0 Yes 0 No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) 0 Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? 'Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 0 Yes 0 No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El -El: No .violations: or. deficiencies .were noted. daring .this:visit:. You will.receive no further . •• . • .
•:•correspondence;about.this visit.:•:•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•••'•'•'•'•'•••'•'•••••••••••••••••••••••••'
❑ Yes ❑ No:
❑ Yes ❑ No;
❑ Yes ❑ No:
❑ Yes VI__No
❑ Yes 124.No
❑ Yes igNo
❑ Yes Q,No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
) C fr n y AT, 14(5 Te/ei— C 44 # ? revi o u s D us rt.%•.
'x- Iv,r1 4c) reIN,ALL2
s : w.bems 1 - l 'S` itbe_ .►. Ce
31- s ll (d.k l d �o.� �rt��- D cw �\ er-e-e w•a 6-‘ cr N RCS D �'— : ^.
�i �1 0� 2 o�,L 0.55 � 5-1�v�c �
•
why�,�c re_�:6,-- •
1r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
4izSD/'1.
Date: 2` /2—
1 /6/99

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 22, 1998
R. Van Harmon
808 N. Main St.
Bessemer City, NC 20380
Subject: Animal Operation Site Inspection
H-N-H Farm, Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Harmon:
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10 (Senate Bill 1217) states that swine
operations with 250 head or greater must be permitted. Because your facility is not
certified and because of the type of operation (farrow to finish) you are operating, you
must reduce your sow population below 25 animals until the facility is permitted. The
25 animals limit is based on the amount of waste generated for a farrow to finish
operation. It is requested that you notify this office in writing by April 1, 1999 that the
population has been reduced below'25 animals.
To begin the permitting processyou must notify Sue Homewood at the following
address: Nondischarge Permitting, Archdale Bldg., DWQ, P.O'. Box 29539, Raleigh,
NC 27626. Please indicate how long you have been in business, the type of operation,
the number of animals, and the facility's, maximum design capacity. Please provide as
X.r much documentation as possible. Also, if the operation has had no animals on site for
any period greater than a year, please include this information.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
enc.
cc: Gaston SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA2B115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER