20140983 Ver 1_401 Application_20140914

optimizing
resources ( water, air, earth
215 Jamestown Park, Suite 100 o Brentwood, TN 37027 - (615) 373 -8532
September 10, 2014
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: 401 Wetland Permit Application
152 Davis Road
Richland, NC 28574
Reynold NC, Site Number 280904
To Whom It May Concern:
147566
12 (KC-171 M 0 W 9
LEP 1 5 2014
DENR - WATER RESOURCES
AquAeTer, Inc. has prepared an application and supporting documents for a 401
Wetland Permit for the proposed construction of a communication tower in Richland, Onslow
County, North Carolina on behalf of American Tower Corporation. Since this proposed
communication tower project will affect less than one acre of wetland and does not impact any
streams, this project is considered a minor water quality application. Enclosed are the required
four copies of the application and supporting documents and, also, the $240 fee required for a
minor water quality application.
If you have questions or comments pertaining to this proposal, please contact us by
telephone at (615) 373 -8532, by facsimile at (615) 373 -8512, or by electronic mail at
ncarmeankaquaeter.com.
Sincerely,
AquAeTer, Inc.
Nicholas Carmean
Project Scientist
Enclosure
faoz J�- /J��
Pamela Hoover
Technical Director

0983
of wArF9
o�, pG Office Use Only:
- Corps action ID no.
o < DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes X❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Reynolds NC
2b.
County:
Onslow
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Charles Blake
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 3577, Page 299 p
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
014
3d.
Street address:
152 Davis Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Richland, NC 28574 DENR • WATER RESOURCES
3f.
Telephone no.:
910.340.3458
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a ,Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Leasee
4b
Name
Margaret Robinson
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Amencan Tower Corporation
4d
Street address
10 Presidential Way
4e
City, state, zip
'Woburn,, MA 01801
,4f
Telephone no
781- 926 -4512
,4g
Faz no
781- 926 -7011
4h
Email address
enviro services @amencantower com
5:
Agent/Consultaritllnformation (if applicable)
5a
Name
Nicholas Carmean
5b Business, name
(if applicable)
AquAeTer,'Inc
5c
Street address
21'5 Jamestown Park, Suite 1.00
5d
City, state; zip
Brentwood, TN 37027
5e
Telephone no
615- 373 -8532
5f
Fax no,
61,5- 373 -8512
5g
Email address
ncarmean @aquaeter com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and'Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax,PIN or parcel ID)
Portion of deed Book 3577, Page 299
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
I Latitude 34 180522 Longitude_ -77 602716
1c
Property size
052 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name,of nearest body of water to proposed project
Ninemile Swamp, 1 27 mi to the southwest
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C, Sw
26
River basin
Cape Fear
3.
Project-Description
3a Describe'the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time ofthis
application
The project area consisted of a pocosin bog'habitat,and a pocosin habitat in the compound lease area and guyed -wire locations, and a mowed grassy
area that was previously artificially raised in the access and utility easementaarea The surrounding area includes residences and;forestland
3b
List the total estimated - acreage of all existing wetlands,on the property 0 52
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams '(intermittent and perennial) on the property 0
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Construct a communicatiorntower designed to accommodate future collocations to provide cell phone coverage to an,area witkoinimal coverage
3e Describe the overall project in detail; including the type °of equipment to be used
This�project includes'the construction of a 300- foot`guyed communication tower, with-an existing access way See attached construction drawings
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have'jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by'the
Corps or State,been requested or obtained for,this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes, ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments
4b
Ifthe Corps made,the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made
Preliminary El Final
4c_
If.yes; who delmeated'the jurisdictional areas?
Name (ifknown) Tyler Crumbley = USACE
Agency /Consultant Company
Other
4d-
If yes, list the dates of the,Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been,requested or obtained for
'this project (including'all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain,in,detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this,a phased project?
❑'Yes ❑X No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
X❑, Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open' Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland Impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area Impacted
2a
Wetland Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
2b
Type +of Impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps'(404,10) or
DWQ (401„ other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Pocosin
No
Corps
026
W2
Choose,one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3
Choose,one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose,one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose,one
Yes /No
-
W6
Choose�one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland;lmpacts:
026
2h Comments
The attached map indicates the areas where the clearing and subsequent -fill placement.will occur Areas highlighted in color on the map include the
area that will be disturbed, and occur in a wetland Fill amount for the the;guy wire areas in
3. Stream Impacts
If'there are perennial or Intermittent stream Impacts, (Including temporary Impacts) proposed on the site; then complete this
question for all stream sites Impacted
3a
Stream Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary' (T)
3b
Type of Impact
.3c,
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
'feet)
S1
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
ffthere are - proposed impacts,to lakes, ponds, ,estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivii ually list all open water'im acts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent, (P,), or
Tem ora
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose,
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
'5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond.or lake construction proposed, then complete th&chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
'Flooded
Filled
,Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments
5h Is a dam'high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres),
5j' Size, of pond watershed (acres)=
5k Method of construction -
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impacta protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If an aim acts require mite ation, -then vou MUST fill out Section D =of this form
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —•
Permanentr(P) or
6c
ReasonJor impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
—Temporary
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer, Impacts:,
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe, measures taken to avoid or'minimize the proposed impacts In designing project
This,site was chosen because the location better meets AT &T's objectives for coverage;for Hwy 53, Hwy24, and Hwy 111 in Onslow County The,
search ring had only one accepted lease agreement The current proposed location owner owns an approximately 45 +/- acre parcel which'is located
within the >search�ring The location chosemon,the landowner's parcel was governed,by „both.the search ring and by his desire for where the
compound'would be placed on his property The site utilizes an existing access road to minimize additional impacts to,wetland areas
1'b� Specifically describe measures taken to,avoid or'mmimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
North Carolina Best Management Practices (BMPs)`for the Protection °of Surface'Waters will be enforced and the'existing access road will be utilized
as -much as possible for,construction traffic
2 Compensatory Mitigation for'Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of'the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory,Mitigation °for
impacts to Waters, of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b If yes; mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑Q Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to In -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if 'Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name,of'Mitigation Bank- Hoffman'Forest
3b Credits Purchased,(attach receipt and letter)
Type Non - riparian wetland
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity 0 26
Quantity
Quantity
etter,is attached in correspon ence wit _ r Gatts Will proceed with mitigation it eeme appropriate
3c Comments
4. Complete if Makirfg a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation;- stream temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer 'mitigationtrequested,,(DWQ, only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested_
acres
4f Non- npanan,wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation,requested ,
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if'Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a 'If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan-
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 14 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — .required by DWQ
6a Will the.project result in an impact within a protected, riparian buffer that requires
buffer,mitigation'?
Yes, X❑ No
6b If yes, then identify `the square feet of impactto each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
,amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason- for�,impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type,of mitigation is proposed (e g,, payment'to private mitigation bank„
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h , Comments
Page 7 of 10

'E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse,Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one.of the NC'Ri anan Buffer Protection .Rules?
1b
If yes, then,is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this - project?
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes, ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why-
s"
2d
If;this,project DOES require a Stormwater'Management Plan, then provide a,brief, nairrative descr'iption,of the plan
2e
Who wdl,be responsible for'the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction,is this project?
NC 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit,Staff
❑ Phase II
❑NSW'
3b
Which of the following'locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the,approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑,No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review _
ElCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater rnanagement'programs apply
MORW
(check,all,that apply)
❑Session Law,2006 -246
❑Other,
4b
Has "the approved Stormwater Management'Plan with proof of approval been
"❑ Yes r_1' No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit �Stormwater'Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management,Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have,all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1 4 January_ 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure;of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
X❑ No
use.of public (federal /state) land?
1 b_
If'you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant,to the,requirements of the National or State.
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c 'If you answered `!yes "'to the above, has,theAocument review been,finalized by, the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copycof the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter )
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
,2a
Is,1he site,inwiolation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500); Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H '1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,,
❑ Yes
❑X No
,or Riparian Buffer Ru1es,(15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this awafter- the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c
If you answered ",yes" to one,or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ. Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on, past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative, impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide, a short narrative °description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition, (non - discharge or discharge),of'wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — 'Version 14 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS endangered and threatened species lists and critical habitat maps.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The site is not adjacent to any streams, lakes, rivers, or oceans.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC HPOWEB GIS database was reviewed, there were no National Register of Historic Place listed or eligible sites in the project area. In addition,
the NC Historic Preservation Office responded via the NC Tower Form on September 30, 2013 that the project would not affect historic properties.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The FEMA mapping website.
")4-a.�
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applic nt/Agent's Signature
nt
(Age's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

July'16, 2014.
,U.S. Army,Corps of "Engineers
Subject: Permission /Access.to Private Land for Inspection Purposes-'and'
Designation of Primary Contact for Agency Coordination
American7owers LLC --28Q9". Reynolds, NC
Telecommunications Toinrer Site
Tax Parcel ID: 46769, 36=9:2
I52-Davis, Rd, Richland, Onslow County, North, Carolina
Td,Whom It May Concem:
As the, lease molder of the above mentioned property, as allowed per 1 the lease
agreement between, American 'Towers, Inc. (lease holder) and' the property 'owner, 1
grant permission for ,the State of North. Carolina, US Army, Corps of Engineers,. -and
American Towers,, Inc., its employees, agents and independent contractors to enter
upon the Property,to conduct ,and_ perform some: or all of ,the following actwities: surveys,
geotechhical' soil, borings and analyses, Phase I environmental audits, boundary
surveys, radio propagation studies, and such other,tests,and .inspections�of the `Property
which above_ organizations may deem necessary or,advisable. American Towers, Inc:
,will be responsible for any 'and'.all,, costs related `to the .Permitted Activities, 'including
installation on the =Property as well as operation and removal of equipment on the
Property. Per the referenced lease agreement, American Towers, Inc: may obtain the
necessary local, state, and federal permits required to construct and operate the
,proposed telecommunications °facility4nd may,serve as the-pri,tn`ary,point of contact'with'
local, state, and federal agenciesiregarding development -of the lease site.,
'Sincerely,
.r�
.Name:
Margaret Robinson
Title: Senlor Counsel
y
m�

Nicholas Carmean
From: Glenn Catts <glenn catts @gmail com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2 -27 ,PM'
To: 'Nicholas Carmean
Subject: Re- Available Non - Riparian Credits
Dear Nicholas Carmean,
Hofmann Forest has more than 200 non- riparian credits for sale,.
Credit prices are tied to EEP in -lieu fees. http: / /Portal.ncdenr.org /web /eep /fee - schedules
Current EEP in- liewfee prices for non- riparian credits in the coastal, hydrological unit you identified
Is $50,313 /credit;
s010.34 credits -would require payment'of $17,106.42
Let me know if you require any additional information.
Thank you for your interest,
Glenn
Glenn P. Catts
College of Natural Resources
North Carolina State, University
5219 Jordan Hall Addition, PO Box 8002
Raleigh, NC 27695 -8002
office [phone]
cell (919) 802 -1236
On ,7/16/2014 10:31 AM, Nicholas Carmea -h wrote.
Mr- Catts,
Per�our telephone conversation earlier todayl am writing to check on availability of non - riparian
credits in the Hoffman Forest mitigation bank, specifically 0 34 credits Our site, Reynold's NC, is located
in Onslow County, with the coordinates of the center of the compound as- 34.780522,,-
77.602716 Attached you will find a srte:sketch and aerial imagery of the site.
Thanks for your time,
Nicholas Carmean
AquAeTer, Inc.
2.15 Jamestown Park, Suite 100
Brentwood, TN 37027
Phone. [phone]
Fax (615)373 =8512
www aauaeter com

Evelocilel'
complete wireless solutions
Velocitel Engineering, PLLC
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 430
Cary, NC 27502
AT &T SITE NUMBER: 214 -063
ATC SITE NAME: 280904
ATC SITE NUMBER: REYNOLDS NC
152 DAVIS ROAD
RICHLANDS, NC 28574
(ONSLOW COUNTY)
1 -A CERTIFICATION (BY SURVEY FIRM)
LATITUDE: N34° 46' 49.880" (NAD83)
LONGITUDE: W77° 36' 09.777" (NAD83)
GROUND ELEVATION: 90.1' (NAVD88)
PROPOSED 300' (MAX HEIGHT) GUYED TOWER
(W /APPURTENANCES = 308')
Revision A
8/6/2013

L m
o
21, Vzo
- N e O J avi3 S FA U
o
W\my rc= N ZEN N s s a'
„8 m /m> 5 a o �aq YNx Wr���z Y
g £ i
C9 O�3 OWD 3N
�o
g�
�m
°
U�
ez o g$
gg�
°
n
O pbp 9
90 O
J
a
g�a °>
°
zzuNOHg um
°aoNS zin °mod /
xo'N
w
Z n
y
in
0
0
oW
ZNZ O
fad I°
N-
z �w
zxd °°z
g =am
KXW >
a mG
W W
X0 Zw
�-�SZw
M J1Y�060� \n��iu.
R 'l „J
S8
I I \ a cc
°g
atl
W
\
arar
8is § 1, <d
o IN
S a g
a
3�
:figg
6 ��X1i
7
W
o a w
o H z
Z w Z
Z Z` o_ O
Z,�6 Ziw
z Z �'N w'o 5, Q.N
a w,z a
0 z'5 ~w11oaiQ'��+a,>>
W �,Zii U z FEW
��� Z o z u w o U u 3
W000,wow >o
J u, u u z a�w o 3: w I= C7
oo ®a =� ®o
va

, § � .t -
§ MY &
\
§ 0�
�z 2 ) { g
C) E o L£ E / q
) , a# ' #o o. §t
,$ z. 11 =0
o '� \d; §o |
�i} �§§\2j
� ■\ � (\
(ca aN) GINO 3N
- - -� --
/
/
/
/
/
_§
) �
$ | §Nk |9
y
/
./
/
/
/
/
)p
�|
!r|
e
� \�
n
9 .
)
k

L_ 2
-a,)) z
pe) Z
0
U;,g z ENZ
0 14-
MOD
at
2j J`g 1 1 5 0. z
= $ \° � z >
')
M Z cc 04 LLJ
z
ou z
0
CL
E � ` ) /'�� (�� �)j�/
0�
JIM
1. . K OPH
z
ƒ \ ( k �� ■� � ��( � } G
ld Ed ci Rx
`ƒ �§ /2 §/ � §kk� �| ■@ �
\k §i |k |k § ` §9 | |§
z
0
- - - - \�
­T La
3.
LLJ z
0
IW T.0- OOC MiQ3 M IVIV V IHOGN MM a3SOdOVd
IDV,*.'O-.90C aOM ONiNimen o�iornw ik&3H a3SOd(Md

P
34 46 49.880 .- 77 °-36 9 777 1
E
Cypress Creek
�a ch Ian ds
�t
` CHalf
v
r,
T
QD
i •�S
b

4:-, 4c
(-,()oslc earth

i
y 2 rm
�,.
t Y.
Wil
Ve
r
� ..l .v'A I% `-:�. �t ��+,�'�` ��': i'i""� M • > y ��� fi�Yr��, at,��. ' �c jv+. 9,A',55�" � �-
y'J 1'F,
J'
i „vta m't t3:' 3 -`•` ].,_ '� rr"ir.1+�� =" t yh t �i, '4i 4r.,i�,'�.{` .3VI.
�e�fr
c a `f4xt{
' • "'•' ., .# � .,, a t �'I, fry` ,,
`p a ' ; :a-+'• yam. „ %� ! ',� �'}! � , �, 4#«` r� ;t
,:Ty y 4 v '� e r j! 1l . f'h ?z'z�• gf ` 1'U• l"+�,i
r:E
v
+ e t z .'r R� %1+ �"' K a t +E •�•. .yJj - �.- l3 M� F.i
. ��' t r �'r � ;� �'� �' sir /1t �•`�v} �°��� i '.•o-�.Ut- ,n.,.�'y"tS

C13
c
0
,6
U
L
C)
O
Z
0
0
U
3
0
N
q
d
m.
O
Z
O
LL
O
LL
Z
Ca
C
0
z
W
0
W
J
Ca
G
O
O
V
N
mCl-
CL
a)
m
E
m
a�
3
O
Q
0
N
E
f0j
T
Z
N
m
L
F-
m
C O)
O O iq
N N m
cc
U O C �
C CTJ 0 U
a)
O U N N
C U
N dm, Ca) ca
�
a o m
c—
E m 0 �
° c: ,E
N d
m v m a)
N E 3 m
> Lm o ° c
o
L C •m O N
C Ta'O C Ic
N O) m
T D 41 'O d
E d G]1
m
CL E t'
o c t v
o c m o
a>�cv
a E m m m
c rn0 E -'
m 7 V Ul
W 'E n m
't- cv)
0 0
N N
O a)
r 01
� m
CL
T
N
Z
0 m
m
o a�
co CL
a 0
_y O
tU
O
Z
d
v
N
d 41
� y
3 C
O O
� m
� 41
7 N
m O
2V
191
°?
o N m
0
N
0
O
c
rn
C
w °
m
p
U
d L
ag o
U N U
m�mm
.m.
m
�l0
�
Q
I
N .° N
3c
CL
U O)
m mo
2 0
�, °
m
m
O C
c
E
in N
° n
m a w' E
'C
al a
C c
U
o
N
6 )E
- Y
N
Vl
O
t3N
° U
mL dU
0
m
C
N
CL
m
-
- C.1
NL O�
O
10
m C 0O
f7
Z
w a) m ,N
C n y 7
CJ)
U
O M
m
,E
m
a, m N
..
0
N
T
a� a�C7
N�
o m
L ?- ' N
N� .O
z
Z
U N 0
L
L E 0)
U 0)
m
O :3
VJ W
,Na N '3
,� C y 7
Q
p
O N
'3
'O
N
L
L 0
3 m
m
U) 0
L m n L
Cn
Z ,V
d
c `N- N N
si
U
`1 o m N N
�`�
N
> o
_ Q
m
ami
'3 E'
Cavwom
w
°
m
o
n
m°CL
C
O
O N
.y �_ C m
O V d
3
E 0
O
U
d
O
,E , m N
O E.0
m
N n�
Q iL N
��a m
m a) 0 �6
O
d
C
i0 U3
N
n
N
N
N
'C', O N m
U
N
u`a
- Z O n O
L
N a)
m
N N
'C
D
3
a 0 E
N� .- y
I
a
m J
Z
U) N C C
a� Q V m
y
a`) =
m
N
L w C N
O ° `m
m
w
>m
T
m'?mmN
� t a''
(uS
m
m
m
N a,-o
° °-' a)
cN
«.
n,5,
- E
a) mmo
01.2
LA
--0
a)
�p
N
E
o-Omo
o
E
m °tp
=3v
m
Qm
m<
C',
Lana
f°- a
d
o'� Co
O C
�c
O 2's y-
o
O` N
Z Q
d
m
o r-
L� 7
m@
L p
Q N RR N V
N
fn Z
E m
m O
° n O (0
Eo
°o
u) U
m �a
2 n -o Q 0
t0
1- w
0,10,
U) Cn
'o
u) `o
co
p N
tomE
F U E o
't- cv)
0 0
N N
O a)
r 01
� m
CL
T
N
Z
0 m
m
o a�
co CL
a 0
_y O
tU
O
Z
d
v
N
d 41
� y
3 C
O O
� m
� 41
7 N
m O
2V
191
N
a/ N
a
C
11 U
N
t
L
O
m,
!n
al a
C c
_rn
=
N
Vl
O
N
C
m0
o O
d ,
Q O
.CO-.
(n O_
U
J N
m
a)
o
CY
a,
O C
Z, N
t
y� ca
N
m
iY
O
N
0
N
to rn
> o
Lo 7 to
o w
C
R
al
3
�
m
`-'
c
C
O
or
d
m
lA
"O
in
O
d J
CL
N
N
E
m
a)
y
c c
c
.-
d o
n
a)
O
,_,
d
n
U
>.
3
y
�o
LL
m
o
o
d
im
m'
°
v
o
U
o
N
o
to
°
W
°�.,
N
o,
o
d � ,a
°
'a O
m
LL °
O
a)
>
>
V
m Vl
a)
a)
c
U
C
-
T
C
j
L U
Y7 N
d Q
O O
Cn Cn
O, C O
u) ,p m
O
m U'
O
U
N
C7
N
f:)
N
J
t>p �,
J �;
C
N
N
d
O
K
l0
U
(a
,U
N
U
O
C = O
U' 'U U
w
a
A
d
�pC
El
o 0 1
al
Q
N
't- cv)
0 0
N N
O a)
r 01
� m
CL
T
N
Z
0 m
m
o a�
co CL
a 0
_y O
tU
O
Z
d
v
N
d 41
� y
3 C
O O
� m
� 41
7 N
m O
2V
191

Soil Map—Onslow Coufity,,North,Carolina
Map ap Unit Legend
USDA Natural Resources Web.Soil Survey 7/10/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page13 of 3
eli
U mt,N5
XPIP-1? — '
BaB
Baymeade fine sand, 0 to 6
ppi-cent,19lopes
59
208%
Ln
Leon fine sand
166
588%
Mu
Murville'fine sand
58
204%
Totals for Area of Interest
28.2
100.00/.
USDA Natural Resources Web.Soil Survey 7/10/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page13 of 3

n
a
v
c
2 °u
� O
N
b b
F o - c
to
�
(,
v o a°
w ti a
b t1 � S Lrr
LL l- W W LL C V
�¢o
�tm
N O
3`.
aid
-a;
�Sm
°ma
O
-m�a
m3£
vY'
co
O
cc
z
�
Y
I.L
L

Nicholas Carmean
From: Glenn Catts <glenn catts@gmail com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2 27 PM
To: Nicholas ,Carmean
Subject: Re Available Non - Riparian, Credits
Dear Nicholas Carmean,
'Hofmann Forest has more,than 200 non - riparian credits for sale.
Credit prices are tied to EEP in -lieu fees. http: / /portal.ncdenr.org /web /eep /fee - schedules
Current EEP in -lieu fee prices for non - riparian credits in the coastal hydrological un "it you identified
is $50,313 /credit;
,so 0.34 credits would require payment of $17;106.42
Let me know if you require any additional information.
Thank you for your interest,
Glenn
Glenn P. Catts
College of Natural Resources
North Carolina State University
5219 Jordan Hall Addition,'PO Box 8002
Raleigh, NC 27695 -8002
office (919),5'13-3973,
cell (919) 802 -1236
On 7/16/2014 10.31 AM, Nicholas Carmean wrote.
Mr. Catts,
Per�our`telephone conversation earlier today I am writing to check.on,availabdity of non - riparian
credits in the Hoffman Forest mitigation bank, specifically 0 34 credits. Our site, Reynolds NC, is located
in Onslow County, with the - coordinates of the center of the,compound as 34.780522, -
77.602716 Attached you will find a site sketch and aerial imagery of the site
Thanksfor�your time,
Nicholas Carmean
AquAeTer, Inc.
215 Jamestown Park,,Suite 100
Brentwood ',`TN 37027
Phone- (615) 373 -8532
Fax:i(615);373 -8512
www aauaeter co"m

W
O o� r� «
O$ \ g r q c
J s Z� �� a �'�!
Lai py „� o5
Q 6�+ o c�! Q2 0
z ME W
F- o z p
0
c � a Qqr
R 0 0 J Q LY. , f. 2
0 0 ¢ e r F E LL
N �8 `� fs 4r o€
Z O U s ,e
a o E
p Z �B W E E j e LL
Py n W
c' La C c
OC A 09 o
t E
O IL Z? �I 8 °� �z w sLLLC
W
- - a
OE
a.
a �
Q h3baa
y'Y

T .l , ,"L, _ A F��
IVVIPRONMENT_ L L& vPRORERTY CONSUL'TAMT,,S,
.'e,Boul tai &§u_jtaAY- SsAftbvis. °h4usour'i °631'=41 `314 997`611T�wc tr gaf's`om
January 24, 20`14
Attn: Ms Brittney,Vander Heiden
Regulatory Compliance Specialist
American Tower Corporation
10 Presidential Way
Woburn,,MA 0180.1
RE: Wetland Delineation Letter-Report
ATC #280904 — Reynolds
152 Davis Road, Richlands, NC 28574
Dear Ms. Vander Heiden:
Thank you for allowing Trileaf Corporation ( Trileaf) the opportunity' to assist in your property
assessment endeavors. This letter is to summarize the field' observations for the above. mentioned
property.
On January 16, 2014, Trileaf evaluated the proposed Reynolds site and the surrounding area
located at 152 Davis Road, Richlands, North Carolina 28574 for the presence of wetlands. The
scope of the wetland delineation, as authorized by American Tower Corporation (ATC) was
limited to the proposed location of a wireless° communications tower compound, -the associated
access road %utility easement, and „a 36- foot'radius�surrounding the proposed development.
The area was evaluated according to the methodology outlined in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Each methodology requires the presence of a
predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Upon evaluation,
Trileaf determined' that the proposed communications tower location, the proposed lease area,
�1r
guyed wire locations, and 300 -400 ft. of area surrounding'the proposed developments are within
a jurisdictiona'lwetland while the northern section of the proposed access /utility-easement is not
within a jurisdctronal ;wetland. A description of the area surrounding the proposed, development
5.F- � +'S i�te� '�• =w
is includedbel`owand a;recent aerial photograph of the area, is attached.
�
The are �w ich -spl 1 through S4 were taken is best described as a pocosin bog habitat.
There was °not- apromment canopy, vegetative layer in this section of the surveyed area: The
dominant�vegetative,'species observed in the subcanopy were bushy bluesterh (Andropogon
to a atus a i acul't "atiue wet species; fetterbush L onaa: lucida , a'``facultative wetspecies;
Wl creepmglery( %cciium crassafolium), afa ltatespecle
sn�greenbrier, (Smilax
laur'i:' i ecle`s.,.None of the dorriiriant; eRetative svecies,�observed were identified

r
_'!!'T:_.: LE."-A-A-F'_'7'
j(gypp ..ENVtRbN{MEN =TAL` & TROPERTY'CONS,UL�TAMT "S`
j Oli:e Soulzvid Sutte'i6 -0 °Saint t ovis.'h4usoun 63fl 3t 3 99,7461",1'1 cca trilaf'com
as upland species. There was also an abundance of sphagnum moss (Sphagnum sp ) and lichen
(Cladonza sp ) in this area. The presence of hydrophytic plant species as more than half of the
dominant, species observed 'indicates that hydrophytic vegetation was present., According to the
Soil Survey of Onslow County, this area is underlain by Leon fine sand, which is considered a
hydrid,soil. In soil pits from the wetland'area, Trileaf observed the hydric soil indicators histosol,
organic bodies, muck presence, depleted below dark surface, sandy gleyed matrix; thick dark
surface,, and depleted matrix. The soil profile in these pits consisted of a layer of muck (IOYR
2'/1) to a depth of three inches followed by a layer of light gray sand (1'OYR 6/1) to a�depth of 12
inches. Trileaf observed standing water throughout the wetland as well as the hydrologic
indicators high water table, saturation; water - stained leaves, and iron deposits.
The area in which sample S5 was taken is best described as a pocosin habitat. There was not a
prominent canopy vegetative layer in most of the area surveyed, however when present, the
dominant vegetative species observed in the canopy layer of the area was longleaf pine (Pious
palustris), a facultative species. The dominant vegetative species observed in the subcanopy
were bushy bluestem (Andropogon glomeratus), a facultative wet species; yellow -eyed grass
(Xyris sp), an obligate species; and creeping blueberry' (Vaccinium crass folium), 'a facultative
species: None of the dominant vegetative species' observed were identified as upland species.
There was also an abundance of sphagnum moss (Sphagnum sp ) and lichen (Clddonia sp ) in
this area. The presence -of hydrophytic plant species as more than 'half of °the dominant species
observed indicates that hydrophytic vegetation was present. According to the Soil Survey of
Onslow County, ,this area is underlain by Baymeade fine sand with 0 to 6 percent slopes, which
is considered a hydric soil. In soil pits from the wetland area, Trileaf observed the hydric soil
indicators depleted below dark surface, 'thick dark surface, sandy gleyed matrix, and depleted
matrix. The soil profile in these pits consisted of a layer of dark,grey sand (IOYR 3/1) to a depth
of 4 inches followed by a layer of light gray sand (IOYR 6/1) with light gray (10YR8 /1)
depletions to a depth of 12 inches. Trileaf observed the hydrologic indicators high water table
and saturation.
The proposed access /,utility easement consisted of a mowed grassy area of land in which the
ground level had, en artificially raised above the elevation of'the surrounding wetland. Due to
the high level ofsoilkdisturbance and absence 6f hydrophytic vegetation in this area, no wetlands
=fib �
exist- in the pOrposed �access /utility easement. The edges of the existing access road were marked
with pink flags mdicat�ing the start of the wetland.
In conclusibfi � % >t i r, �l8af 's opinion that the proposed communications tower location, the
proposedi eas ar a;, guyed wire locations, and 300 -400 ft. of area surrounding the proposed
developmeiits arewithmgajurisdictional wetland while the northern section of the proposed
%uhdity eas "em n i
`t `s4n
access ot within a. jurisdictional wetland. Construction of the proposed
development vi%i'l " ave an,impact on wetlands in the area.

I • EM
?�'T` 3 'la
EIVVIROI11IUfEN,TAI &PROP�EFtTY SC'OIUSIJ'L'`TAINT;S'
1054�Olir' >'Boulatarr3�'Sutt�i6SewtL'ouis iffis" souri63I4I ";1t'.997''6~11I %%w�=trslsafco_m
Work in wetlands or their 50 ft. buffers may require permits from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, the Onslow County Planning -and Development Department, and /or the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. If the proposed, structure cannot be
located outside these regulated areas, Trileaf can assist in obtaining the appropriate regulatory
approval.
If any changes are made to the property's elevation or drainage, the results of 'this evaluation
may vary accordingly. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, (630) 227 -0202:
Sincerely,
O1, 1�
Alaina McDavid
Environmental Scientist

u
w
d
M
2 u
CD
p b b
O
E o o
z
uw LL °c a
d `b 10 10 u
n m
c m
j 'c c �
C
oc
1% I W W
�<o
oa
m E o
2
V
a3
_ ';
m
� « m
� a
t °c
cu
Eck'
N
Q.::Y.a..
r d 3
�.
Q
1
�
•
m
r.
0
m
z
L
L

ti
r
Wetland Boundary
Existing
f�- -
._With in:•
;- Wetland:
�S 4
Not
3 Surveyed
Proposed
Area
ti NS�/
TI�!!pp.. `�..� -'+rye. '�+i- • L 5 r... 3Y •.
a tg t 3
4P,

WETLAND - DETERMINATION -DATA FORM hilvan -,Gulf Cbaistal Plain Region
-Pr �j �Sqp iti4ounty Is Date V
Applicant/Owneir A�-CL -State, 'V4"L S;impli'nd Point
A]/',L'ht - 7
-lnvie�tlgitor(s) -I Sectibn jownship, Range.,
4nq'fq'--rm,(hilisiope;ierracel.,etc.), Pwz, Alk�,—jf",en -r Local relief (concave,- convex, none)' rl,0i1'e­ Slope( %)s
1:2
Sdb- "(LR�zorMLR� i� 3 6 - 1,14L.= - Datum,-
re iop_ L Long
I-E
e�
Soil Mao,Unit Na NWI'clasgificabon �k,, ,:;I
Are climatic /.hydrologiciconditions:on the site typical for this time of year?. Yes - No (if no; explain in Remarks)
Ar6'Vegdtation Soil or,00rolody ,s- nificanfly-,disturb6d? Are "N"armal Circumstances" present? yes -No
9
Are,Vdget5tion, ;,Soli - orHjdVol; y,.-rfaiuraily, problematic ?. (if need6d,;6iplainiaiiq, answerg in,Rernirks
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site maip,phowing sampling point' locations, tranrects,'impqrtant-,featur6s;, etc.
Hydrolphytiq Vegetation Present? -Yes No 18 the Sampiid,Area
Hydnc Soil'Present? yes No - I . -
�Vetj within,a WdtlaWd? Yes _L— Now;'—­-
a ? Yek--�L No , pd,�,90�ology.Prese�f
,Remarks
V,(, -Q,1, oh-
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hy-drology,16dicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reoulmM
;: FYirifar 'In di ars,(mlni mum,of ofte lve--Qu red.
chpck'sli
_NSurface Soil Cracks (136)
-k'S6rfacei:Waterfkiy
r 11Vateir ',9'tgihdd Leaves'(139)
-- Spa?sil) Ve66fafed;Concave'Surfii5e'(B8)
X High WaterTa6le'(A2),
Aguatic Fauna (B13)
Drainagb Patteffs (B10)
Saturatiqn#k3)
Mari Deposits (B115)'(LRR-U)
Moss jnmbnes (1311 6)
.,Watermarks t - (PI )
_,Hydrb4bh Sulfide,Odor_(6'
-
Dry- Season WaiefTible (C2)
^Sediment'Dgpbsfi (13-2);
��hizosl��-s- on ',-vin- Roofs (93),
6iidiied. ,re, Li
, - - , I , 9 , ,
Crayfish Burrow`f(C8)
bikbeposlts (63)
­�-- -�r
Pr6ience,of Reduced `Iron (C4)1
Saftifation Vlsibie,or,'Adhal lmagery;(Icg)
Algal Mat or 6rbit,(b4)
Recenflron ReductioFln Tilled Soils,(C6)
Geomorphic Posiborf(P2)
Iron Deposits (135)�
Thin Muck SUrface (C7)
Shallow Aqytard (Q3)
lndndatldnVisib[e onAiria(fmagery,(B7)
- - -Other (Explain En Remarks)
,--FAC-Neutral-Test (D5)
Fleld,016ser,vation-s—,
Suiface'Water,PresenO Yes- No
Depth jinchesj.
WateffableP6esient? Yes' ;.. ' - No
—<Depth 6nchesi.--­­-40-, .1
Satdiation Present? Yes No
'
Depth,(inchbsp,
-WiKland
Hydir6loby_,Present? No-
` includes
�Dbsdnbe., Recorded' Data.(stream, gauge, monitonng,well, aenal,photos, previous lnspecbons);if avadable-
,,PemaA s
;);q Mir
US? Amy Corps of Engineers
Atlantic 'and -Gulf,Coastal Plain Region =,Intenm Versidn

VEGETATIQW" Usescientific names ouplants
sampling Point
<4
Tree Stratum, (Plot slid - j % Cover _Species Statur, AUM ierof Dominant Sbeces,
That Ard,OBL, fA_CW„pr FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species ci 0 ss,Allgfrafa _(B)
4-
Percent,of Dominant Species
That I Are OB I L. FACW, or- - FAC:, (A/B)
6 =-
Prevalence Index worksheet,
T6tal',O.- Cover of, M611inlyli
,v -­
Total Cover
r77
Sapling Stratum (Ribt'size
1> -- - — .
3.-
6.
Sh!M b S traturn (PI61 s'iz'
30 -FACW
2.-',V a'0 Ya LAC
-OBL species
M icatoes- of hydiic.soil and wetland hydrology,'Must
,be_'preserit, unless- disturbed or problematic;
FACW species. '1 [.0
x 2
FAL,species
x
;,FACU species
tx 4
. �LU P L spebles
Tree — Woodyepl ante, pcl6d ing woody vines,
'tolumnJotals 116- 'A")
A "
; evaience ind BIA—, as 5
pq­ . _!qx,
Dominance Testis-50%
XPrevilence,1ndex-,is 53 01
..ProblEimati6'kydr6phytic-,Vegetati6fil.(EiolAin)•
4.
M icatoes- of hydiic.soil and wetland hydrology,'Must
,be_'preserit, unless- disturbed or problematic;
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7'
Tree — Woodyepl ante, pcl6d ing woody vines,
Cover
-HerbStMftjm,(PIqt size 'J
approximately,20 ft (6 m) or,,more, in 6eighCaridi3'jn-
(1 6 6m),o r' larger in d iaFheier at 6ie6kheijht(DBH)-
ST F r_ V4
Saping — Woody plapts: excluding wo6dyvines,
r
approximately 20-ft (6 in) or more 'in he_ ight'and less
than 3 in (7_1� cmYPBH
3. -
t'4
Shrub — Woody plbnts;,excluding,,woody vines,
approximately 3 t6,20,ftf(1•to,6'm) in height
Herb All hert)'addcu§,(ndn-Woody)(plants;-inclu'ding,
herbaceoue'vinei, Fe7g' irdless of size lhcludes woody
plants, except woody vines; less than approximately
'7
i8
3 ft (I m) in height.,
Woody vine -'All woody vines nigardl4si,iifheight
12
=-Tota-1 C- over
,.Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size-__
'Hydrpphytic
'°4
5-
V getatlow
total,,Cover
Pi'esenti yes No
k,Remsrkv (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
u0Ar_ffiy,Corps'of Engineers
Atlantic,and Gu If Coastal Plain Region 7 Interim Versiofi,

Sampling Point
-SOIL
Profile Description. ,(Descrlbe,to the depth needed to document thedndicator'or confirm the'absence of indicators )
a
Depth - Metnz
­Redo., -
u(inches)'• Color(moisfi 9�, ;,•
-Color (moist), �o'c� Texture ­Remarks
(07K,61f 8U- (o.XR.311 a'(7 (W'D 'A4 S'A'4 =
'Time- C= Concentration; D=De ietion, RM =Reduced,Matnx. CS= Covered or'Coated'Sand Grains 'Location ° =PL =Pore unin ,'M =Mainz
�p
rlc Soil Indicators:"
Indicators for Probleinatic+Hydric Sods
Histosol (A1)
T
Polyvalue Below,Surface�(S8) (LRR,S, T,�!J _ 1 cm Muck'(A9)_(LRR O)
Hi §ticEpipedom(A2)
_
_ Thm Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2,cm.Muck (A , (LRR S)
'
_
Black Histic (A3)
— Loamy Mucky;llAmeral (F1) (LRR O) — Reduced VeRic,(F18)-(ouEside MLRA'150A;B)
a
_ Hydrogen Sulfide'(, 4)
_ Loamy Gleye@h atnx�(F2) _- Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (LRR P;,S, T)
, 4
Strahfied,Layers;(A5)
Depleted'Matnx,(F3) Anomalous)Bnght Loamy +Sods'(F20)
O anic Bodies A6 LRR P T U
r9 _ ( )1 1'
Redoz Dark Surface` F6 (MLRA 153B)
_ ( )
}
5cm °Mucky Mmeral.(A7) (L'RR P, T, Uj.
_ Depleted, Dark, Surface, (F7): ;= ',RedjParentWatenal (TF2)
Muck Ffesence"(A8) (LRR U)
= Redo-x-, Depressions (F8) _ Veryr Shallow jDark�Surface.(TF12)'(LRR -T, U)
e' ;
_ 1 cm,Muck (A9) (LRR,P, T)
= Marl (F10) (LRR U) _Other (Explain m Remarks)
?
Depleted Belovu,t7erk'Surface (All),
_ Depleted Ochnc (F11),(MLRA 151)
_ Thick' Dark §urface (Al 2),
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR,O;,P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
}
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
- -- .Umbnc,Surface,,(F13)}(LRR,P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
A
'Sandy -Mucky Mineral O;'S)
_ Delta,Ochnc.(F17,) (MLRA 151) unless distiarbed.or problematic
*(S1),(LRR
A Santly Gleyed Matrix
_:Reduced'Veriic (F18) (MLRA 150A, +1508),
t
S-andy^Redox (S5)
_ Piedrnon(F'loodplam'Soils (F19) (MLRA�1) 49A).
'
_ Stripped.Matnz^(S6)
_, Anomalous Bright loamy Sods _(F20p(AALRA 149A, 163C, 163P)
_ Dark;Surf_ace (S7),(LRR P, S, T,, U)
Restrictive,Layer,(H observed):,
>
'Type
� \ -/'-
q
Depth,(mches).-
HydriclSoil'PresentT Yes. _ No _ -
Remarks:�
4
q$
ill
7�
-
.f
Ir
9F
_
,
1
US'Army Coips'of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf.Coastal Plain Region – interim'-Version
- �es'_.r' > - s rr, .... -. .,. ,.r=.. „ ' S .:' �`-
,�v t , ,F ..;+x " _ • - i.. .. ..a.,,�. tin' ^�� -. Nt ` - �:; 'y , ."- , . -

i:
WETLAND, bETEkMIN;k-TfON-bATA #,Okm: ��-.Atia7niid,bhd-Gtiif;c-oasial-Plaiii,Reaiori,
`p --,City/CouhN, �Se!TphngDate4 �/J*
r9jecti-s'ite. - 77
.Xpp�i['cant/0%kn'e-r State'.: JWL 'Sampling Point
rive-si
14, jA
7
cavc,convex,none Slone 4 %1
La1ndforrfi,',(hillsl6pq� terrace-,'etcy p r�U7 t() -166al relidf(con
.Su6giori,"([AR1orALhA) Eat a-raIC, "IS I'- 'L, 'D
*1l,MiP,WM W.ee -,NWlfc1assif4tion
,Are ciiifiatic'thydr-ofdgic�eohdiiid-6s6n�tffe;6lte,fy-oid An (If'66,,6Aplaifilin'Remarks.)
IflCarifl-d-isturbed? 6 es
�Ardy,qde atiori `,,Scifl, • -6r-'Hjclrology,­,%­�f�� Are��,Normil,,,Pirc Mstan(3eg",jires&6 ' 'Y
Y"
Are- �5119�pi�obl�dmafi6?, �flfn6eded�,-,exol`ih any anivierio6;Reft4rki):
Vpgeta ion,�. ,,Sbik.,,or Hydrology, natb a-
,SUKMAR,Y,-(5F FIN DINGS-- Atfach Mtb,, ooVving's�.jq" !nCi6ciftions.4ninsects, imporfarA-features� etc.
Aydro0if<Vegbtafio6 Piesbht-5 'y No is ike"Sampled -066
5 'Yes: -L4 , N 6
Z, -w_ iihn 4.Wetland? veli N
Remarks-
311
,HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydiblogyjndicatons"
Secondary- Inclicatorslifininfaurn of two required)
Primarv�tndroato rs�(inmtniumofoneYisrea` wired :cFieck'allttiat•aoolv)' = - -r - -- - =_•
-'SurfaceZoi!dCracks,(-
Surface Water,(Al)
WaterIS- tained. eaves �Bg)
Concave Surface (Q8) T
Veg9t@t e�q,
41ghMaier.7able (A2)
-
Aqua t i F au 4-
�S�arse4y,
hdgej Pa ni (B10)
Saturation (A3)'
_Mai
Mosi-Trifn Lines (B16)
,Witg'r Marks (B1)
)
Odor
ydrogdn SUfice (Cl))
by;fspason a t'er t IT
nt'Dep,q�sits;(132),
id i#qd,Rh k6ipibFe9�o6 Living
C�ayfish BuL T 4 s,(C4 ',-
it pgits�
Dri Dep (R3)
resenceofRedu-ceVr9rjj,4)
u�itio-n-Visible,on-Aerial,lmai��rV'��
a-e - � Mq
--,- - �
Algal; Mat, orLw4l(E34) -
Recent,lron�Rpi�u��inn­ lqdIS16il�,(C
't-, -
G&b-rfi6rphicMo6i46fi�(D2)
lron,Deposlts (135)
(§hallow Aquita - fd,(D3)1
inurfclationVibib eoijAer�dl irtiager)��137)
)c Remarks)-
_0�06,(E plan in,
1 7— T.-
Test (D5),_
Field ObservatioM
Surfice*-WdeerV,resent�r
Yes—k No,
A,'
Dep#0(66hes)-�-
_Tsent -
Waterjable Presents
Depth (66h&9)-.
,resent?,
turat'-d P
s-
�Witlalicil*iifblo
0 y-oiiiipfiii yois- No�-
n 68DR1664drigle) -
6 6,,disn
DescFibe Recorde Oat (strearn� ga ge,- monitoring
mi�ellVaedall hgto#v,prdvibuslirt4peetioiis).,Lf,available
Remarks
&
aI
0S kr1h0C6rpsofErfgineirs.
lantld'Md G6ff Coastal Plain Region = :16tbriff Wrilon,
1-4

plants, Samplin Point
VEGETATION --.Use Scientific names of p - - 9
-,Absolute Dominant Indicator
LDorninance,Testwoftheet '
�,-Tree Stratum '(Plbt_,sizoi;_)
% Cover Snecies? -,§iatus
f'Numberqf Doqniant Speci6s
That Are 013L, FACK or FAC- (A)
... . ........
Total'Number df�Ddrindnt
'(B)
�3r
Irs
Species A6oss*l Strata
Percent of 06mmani7Species
That Ard OBL,,FAdW, 6F AIC y (AB)
- -----
'14
6.
Prevalence Index,worksheet:
7
TotbI0%'C6v6i6f. -_--Multiply by_ -
:,7- - _. . - __ , � I
Total CMT,
'Savlina,Stratumq� (Plot size:
"OBL'species
FACW species 'W x 2
Q
FAC species -0 x 3
'FACU species x 4,=
1- , P�, - x,5
s
U pecies
4 ,
.........
aColumn Totals _(A) (B)
PPivalence, Index = B/A
-6
'Hlfdroph"c,VegOtAtion.Indicators:
�ShE, 91 (plot size to k�T 13( -,
atom
-Ti3taMover
1
;(Dominance'Test,ls >50%
-
5
Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Ex�6in)'
hc soil sndljvetlind,�ydrology irfust
-1fidicit6ri.,of hyd - - , 1 1­ 1
.be preieiit, unles§,distdrbe�i 6r-probfdhiatic
-----------------
F2 Q 0
5.
'-Definitions of Vegetation. Strata:
Tree' kWoodly`plants, exclud ing, woody' vines,
iheijht and 3 In
appro,ximatiily 264 m more n,
_
Total 0-over
t sze.
�7-6 cmkor larger Aianeiter'M breast height (DBk)
'(PI
AAT ropt*).
XT5
Sapilrig -.-Woody Olants,,,excluding wqody'vines,
approxi niately'20-ft (6,m)ldr� more ' in,h&ght and less
'than Tin ,(7 -6 6m).DBH'
,Shrub_- Woody plants, excluding Woody vines,
approximately-3 tojO'k(l mto 6 ri), in height
Herb -AlhKerbaceous (non-woody) plants, incl =
herbaceous vines:,regarillesi,6f9m e' Includss y
plants, except woody vines, less than apprbximately
4•
.
.... ....
5- . 74
F6.
3ft (t ffi) in height
Woody1vine - All woody vines, eegaMleis­,of 6g lit
0
X12
Total Cover,
Woody•ne Stratum' �I(Plot size,.�)
3.
4- r. _._ _- ,,, I . ..... ky#Rp
Ytic
Vegeta_�tion
=7otal Cover pr6sent?, Yes No.
Remarks- (If, observed.., list morphological Adaptations below)
OS'Am*qqrps�of Engineers -Ailantivand Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Int6hmVersion,
­', - .". '. , ­_­ a--, " - - I • ­v" I - , ,, ­ - ", 2 — I . a - - , ___1 I i " I - I- I - ­• — - - —

C
­(Ype�.
Depth (inches) Hydilc,Sbrl1,Present!,.
Remarks.
j"
,YS Army Corp
_s of Engineers Atlantic and GUlfCoastal'Plain Region - Interim Version
I I �
Profile Description.' (Deaciribe to'theldeoth'neededto document tlhe;indllcator or confinn'the absencelof-Indicators.)
-De6.th,, Matrix
Redok Features_
-6-niiiiiisi -Color (moist) %-
Color'(moist) TYv9'_7_L`oc
Texture Remarks
:, 160
aq
X,
6=CO410 o,2n,.*,S=_bi r&Wn.,R K4 =Reduccediiit& CS=d6vere'd�o-rCoated'Sand Grams7 -2Lkition PL=Po(iLJnIn _M=Matfix
Hydric s611 Indicators:
Indicatoiifor Protildmitic,Hydric SOIIS3:
X'Histosol,(Al)
= Po�lyvalue,Below Surface,`(SB) (LRR -S, TU)
1 6m Muck_(A9) (LRR 0),
Histic,Epipedon(A2)
Thi n,a rl� Suifice,(S9) (LRR S, T,' 6)
2,cm,MucJk,(A10) (LRR S)
,Loamy,Mucky M neraQF1j,(LRR 0),
Re ric, ( FI'8),(o.te�kde,MLRA,160&3),
'IBlack,Histic,(A3)'
H jdrogen��SUI (A4)
�oamy- Gleyed f Matrix (F2)
--Pii�dm6ntF[oodpl�in,Soili�(Fl9) (URRIP, S;T), -
Stratified Layers (A5)
I&rganic
-Depleted Matrii (0)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
bodies,(AB) (LRR P, T,-U►
Dark Su[rfa6d (F6)
IMILRX163B)
5 cm M.&�Winelhal;(A7)' !LRR Pjj U)
Del5lbted,Dark Surfdce (F7).
Red Parent Material,(TF2)
W6cik,Prese'n-6§, )
(A8 (LRR U),
.,Re�dok;Depressions (F8)
V6ry.Shallow DarkSu'rface (TF12)jLIRRj-,
T-6m,Muck.(A9),(LRR P, T)
MarQF1 0),(LRR U);
ain
094f,��i0l' in Re6irki)
P'ep(Oted Below _Dark Surface (A - 11)
Dboilktdd Ochnc,(Fl 1)_(_ML_RA 151)
ar 'face (�.Il 2)
T6,&-D k SUr_
I Masses - l-
,
Iron--Manganese (F12) (LRR 6, P,
3
T) lndicators,of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MIL" 150A)
_ PytIbric'Purfaokf13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present;
Sandy Mucky Mi efal,(Sl) (LRkO, S)
_ 07el-ta,Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
-rt
or,pr6blematic
SqndyA.Gfoye&katnx (S4)
RedGcft Ve Ic 1508)
Sandy ReabiL(S'O
Pie'd6onffloodplal.n S61l9'(r19)I,(MC",I49A)
Stripped Matnx (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C; 153D)
bark*rfacii_(S�7) (LRR P, S, T,U)
­(Ype�.
Depth (inches) Hydilc,Sbrl1,Present!,.
Remarks.
j"
,YS Army Corp
_s of Engineers Atlantic and GUlfCoastal'Plain Region - Interim Version
I I �

WETLAN-156-ETERMINATION DATA,r0_RM­,-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Region
'PfpjecVSite City /County"
sarlplirf91001:15 VIIA
Applqanvow�n-e_f A-T( State A C Sampling, Point
Investigaier(i)-, Section, Township,, Range.-.
e, --Local relief (concave, none) - ti of)c Slope (0�o)
. ills[_61�_ ;errace�et, 47)�.
"Landfo
9 0.turn 3
Subregion,(LRF,or, MILRA) �-0­36
,Soil Map'Unit Name classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the -site typical for this'time-of year'? Yes No (If no, explain in RemaFks
Are V6 e _t t- ion Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? -Yes — No
'Are,Vegetation -'Soil, or Hydrologyj_ naturaIjj,5 �r6bldmatic? fneeded, ex0lain any answers n Remaft-)
SU- M­ MAR- Y"- P F FIN, D'I_ N--G- S- , - A- ffac_h_ , sit, e,ma- p shI o winI g.-sa- m - jl, n_ g'pAint locat- io­ ns, tra- nse­ cts, inpo- rt- antTeazures,,ezcw,
-
Hydrophytc,Vebetatiori Piiise_nt? Yes, No
Hyd I c S�i[Rriseht? Yes No - Is the SaftipledAres
ri
' y ,
within
a Wetland?
d, �yd 'o(�6' qn t Yes, IN o
Remark§. -
HYDROLOGY
Yes,
14-
Wetland Hydrplogy'Indicators:
Secondary 11ndicatom (minimum of two required),
Surface Soil Cracks, (136)
S6)rfice Water,(kl')
Wiiter-Stairfed1iilves (139).
Spkidly Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
ater1TabI6j­A2)
_,Aouatic Fadia (03),
"r inag_e,Paftens'(B_10)-
,_!j ,Saturation (M)
-
Ma& Deposits (81 �),(LRFCU)
Moss7rim Lines j6 11 6)
Water WAs'(131)
gew , 1)
oydroge Sulfide 6dor (C;-
Dry -Seasqn Water able (C2)
— - - - , .
ed rit bevosits (13-2
Si6e
-
Oiidized'4izds�fieres O'K Living Roots (M)
-
_ grayfish Bur�dws (C8)
_ _
"
nit Deposits (B3)•
Presence of Red6ced,lron (C4_)
— Sbtu!a tion - VIsibld on-Ae­� rial Imager
(qq)
Algal MaforCrust (B4)
'Recent Iron ReductIofi1n'­TiIIed•SoiIs,(C6)
— Geomorphic Pos�ihon,(I)2)
: 4'!ran_,,Deposffs,(M),
Thin'Muck•S4face,(C7),
§hall6w�A4 _pitird (03)
nundai lonlVisible on Aenal� I Imagery_(B7)
bWer (Explain in Remarks)
—,-PAC'Neutral Test (D5)
Field, Observations:
Surface Water Presents Yes No.:
Depth,(inches)
Wat6r,Ta_ 61ePresen:t7.' Y65, No-
D epth (inches)
=7
Hydrology No,_
Yes. No-
Sat-uratiorf PresenV, es
Depthjin (inches): "D
Wetland
Yprosent? xsq�_)
(661udei�ap�liryfringe),
pesppe Recorded Data-(stream gauge, mc�ndqnng well., aerial-photos, -previous inspecti_orfs),,jf, available,
-Remarks
4,p rrijCory's of Erfgi6eers;
Atianti6,aind Gulf Cbastal Plain Region - IntefirriVersion
I

VEGETATION — Use - scientific names2of,plants Sampling Point -
-u ...., .. T
(2 "' Absolute Dommant Indicator-
.'Dominance Test worksheet. I'
.' %_Tree °Stratum (Plot,slze- j %Cover_ 'Soecies� ,Status ;
'Number.of'Dommant Species �=
°Are J '(A) i
z Fly,_
-That OBL „FACW, or FAC•
�2 -
Total Number of Dominant
' - —
k ? 3 - - - - -
• Species Across'All Strata - (B) l
Percent of Dominant Species
4,
-
- - - -- -
• That Are ,06L, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence'llndex. works hoot.'
Total-%Cover'of 1V1ul6ly -bv- - s
OBL species, x 1 =
” t _
= Total Cover.
Saolma stratum - )
_'(Piot;si'ze-
?U
FACW species �U x2=
FACvspe pis x 3 = i�
FACU,species x_4'=
'•UPL species x _5=
Column Totals -t7Q (A) (Bj
2 �> _ _
,15. _ __ _ _ _
r
a6 -
Prevalence'index, = B/A
Hydrophytic •Vegetation ,indicators:
i = Total,Cover
StiruD Stratum '(Plot sge 5- - r! ;)
Dominance Test is. >50%
yes- kw- ,
Prevalence,lndex is 53 6'
t 2' j/ ifll(f\ .Cd,�l'•'Il+rn �� %CS )^
.. PrablematicHydrophyttic >Vegetation'' =(F�cplain)
`• -
'indicators okiydnc,soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unle_ss_,distGrbed or problematic
n ,r3 _
i .4: - -
-- -
' g ,
'Definitions of Vegetation,Strata:'
Tree --Woody plar9ts;,excludmg,woody, vines,
approximately 20 ft (6?m) or,more m heigfrt an&3pm
larger diameter breast height
-= -Total Cover
Me t tuni (Plot`size - 104110 )
(T6 cm) or m at (DBH).,
_1 ` S = yes W
Sapling - Woody lants,'ezcludm wood- vines,
P. 9 YP_ 9 Y
} �.
W
approximately 20* (6 m) or more in Height grid less
� f F !
than 3,m_,(7, 6 cm) DBH
' 4•;
Shrub,-Woody,plants, excludmg;woodywhes,
' ;5_ „ _ _ _
approximately =3,to'20`ft (1' fo 61m) 'm height
h
6 • - _ - -
Herb - All herbaceous1 (non- woody)`plants,'mcludmg-
_
, :; -
�.
herbaceous vines; regardless of'size Includes woody,
blants, exceptwoody'vmes, less than approximately
-
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody'.vine „All woodywnes,- regardless of height:
=Total Cover
�12,%�° l U j ,
Woody Vine Stratum- (Plot,size
yfs
-30
Hydrophytic
4Vegetation \X/
\ No
= Total Cover
,Pres®nt? Yes
, Remarks "(If,observed; hst,morphological adaptations below) -1
Prser�,
US,Army,Corpsiof Engine'eis Atlanbc'and Gulf Coastal'Plain Region = Inte`nm Version

,5UIL sampiing Foint
Profile Descrlptlon:'(Rogcrk" o document tKe4ndicator or confInm,thq-?bsonco of Indicators.
jo the depth�jq�dqid It
i Depth Matrix
Redox Features
Onches)-- —Color (niolst)—, -,% -
oist) % Tvr)e"
Texture'
iP':, 3 R
tType:'-CF.!Concbniration,,,6-i:j; letToW,-,WM=keduced'Mitrii, -CSC overii&or Coated Siihd,Graihs, i6o,c a-do-h.- 01:4t 4 drifi,4, M=Mat' x
il rIc,SoII,IridIcato?s-
yiHistosol
Ifidicators for Problematic Hydr(c Soils
X
--Polyvaiue Below _Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) cm Muck7(A9) (LRR 0)
.
H (iti6 Epipeqon,(A2)
Thin Dark Su�aSurface (S9)-(LRR1Sj;,lJ)
2'cm Mud k Qk`1 0 - ) (LRR S),
1BInk Histic'(A3),
Cdamy.macklyLmineral (F1),(LRRiO
Reduced[ Verbc (F1 8) joultilde MLRA-1150A B)
Hydrogen,Sulfide
,Matrix (F2)
Piedrnio bdolain,Soils (F19) (LRR P,-;S,-t)' -
Stratified Layeri (A5)'
­­Depleted, Matn i�(F3)
gliiftoaryiy.Soils,(F20)
Xhomiloui�Bjr�
Orga6ic Bbdies (A)'(11Rfi
­Redlox Dark Surface (FEI)
(MLRA,153B)
- I I- — 1-1 z
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR-'P, T„ U)
6 c k'P r'e s eince' (A8) (LRR, U)
-
,Depleted Dark Surface (1�7)
Redox0epresitdris'(08),
' i�iatenal (TF2)
--Red Pa'rent
Very, SiialloW' (LRR T, LI)
bark Suffaci3JTF12)
1 cm,Muck,WHI-IRR,P,,�T)
l,
yr(FlO)'(LRR'U)'
6tAer-(Ex-pIa-fii�,Aemaft)'
77 bb6k4 d ';Dirk S.rfaci1(A11)
Debldte8 "Octrcj (Fl 1) - ( MLRA
Thick Dark,S6rface'(A 2)
Iron-Mangane4Massek(F12)'j 0, P;
3
T) Indicators of hydrophyticvegetation and
'JILRR
,(MLRA150A).- --U brIb,Suhace(F-13)(LRRP,T,U)
_�Pqast Prairie Redox (616)- -m
wetland hydrology must bwpresent,
Sandy Mui;4 Mineral (SI) (LRR O,sS)
......-Delta Ochnc'(F17),(MLRAA'51')
uniess,dis-tUrbed or problematic
.-:'ZSiiidg:Gliied�M-atnx,(S4)
VRedUded,vi6d(lE18*) (ML?RA'150A, 1508)
;S�ancfy,Reid ox;(§5)�
—°Piedmoni FlbodpiaiiiSoils (F,10)'(MLRA 149A)
`Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 14-9A,'153C, 153D)
L DA Surface (S7),(LkR P,,S, T,,O)
'Type'
Soil Present? Yes No,,,_-
ri
,US Ar y,Corps-°ofaEn6ineers- Atlantibiand G61f CEiast5l,Plain,Regloh_lritenm version

WET((L.�AND- DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlanjtic,atid Gulf Coastal Plain Region
'ProjecUSde: h2U'fl't1I%1tS - City /county Sampling D-ate:`
'Applicant/Owner, State U`e - Sampling Point S
Investigators) C- - Section, Township, Range -
f -Itit .� Local relief ( concave, convex, Mrie) „ / Landform,(hdlslopq, terrace; etc) •
Subregion_(LRRooMLRA)- Lat LongY - 77-3i�l�h - 'Datum -
SodMap.UnitName ^. "e,on'. `�yj��; __ NWI' classification uric_ a '
- y_ f _
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the,site typical for this time of year ? - Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are:Vegetati on; -- _Sod or Hydrology_ significantly disturtied? Are "Normal Circumstances "'pre "sent Yes No _
Are Vegetation Sod orflydrolog`y, _ naturally problematic? (If needed, ex am any answers in Rerriaiks )
'SUMMARYOF= FINDI_NGSF- Attach`` sitemap�showingsampling; poiiiflocatioris; stransects ;..Importantteaturespetc:-
,Hydrophytic ,Vegetation'Pr6sent? Yes No - Is the Sampled.Aiea u•
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No vGrthima Wetlands Yes No
Wetland Hydrology'Present ?, Yes
HYDROLOGY
Wetland, Hydrology Indicators:
-Secondary Indicators ,(miniraum'of,two�reauiredl-•
'Primary rndicato rmirnmum of o_ Jle is reauued
check ^all that oonlvl -
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
SurfaceWater(A1)
_ Water- StainedLeaves,(B9)
_ Sparsely: Vegetated4Concave•Surface-(BB)
i
High_WaterTable (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ Drainage Patterns.(1310)
x Saturation,(A3)'
_ Marl Deposits (1315)'(L'RR U)
=Moss Trim Lines (1316)
+_ Water MarKs,(131)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor'(C1)
_;Dry_Season 1NaterTatile +(C2)
_ SedimentOeposds (132)
_,Oxidized'Rhifospheres on Living Roots,(C3)
_t Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Dnft'Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduceddron ^(C4)
-_ 3Saturation,Visitile on AenalfPinagery (06)
7
_ Algal Mat or:Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction'in TdledSodss(C6)
= ,Geomoirphrc Posdrorr(D2),
Iron�Deposds (135)
— Thin-Muck;Sur`face (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_ Inundation Visible;on AenaLlmagery -(137)
Otlier,- (Explain,in Remaiks)°
_yFAC= Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations,}
Yes No
Depth•(Inches)
YiSurrace Watei'Present?
. _ -
- Watei• Table Present? Yes,,_ i�- > No
Depth pnches) . - •, -d - -
;Saturation Presents
DepOi (inches) ,
Wetland Hydrology,Present ?, Yes. No
m6iud6s ca ilia 'fin e s
- Describ6 Recorded, Data (stream,gauge „morotonng well, renal photos; previous inspections), if available'
=Remarks:
US Army "Corps of Engineers
Atlaniie,andGulf Coastal Plain Region,- Iriterim Version

MAM
VEGETATION,.= Use scientificnarrfes,of plants-, Sampling Point
Absolute -Dominant Indicator
Dominance.Test worksK6et*
rTree'Straium (Plot size _.)' %•Cover 7s6e&es? Status' �
Num ber qfq ominaht,Sbe i ' c as,
31
That'Are OBL, FAC or FAq, (A)
K
t
-Total Number of Dominant
`Sp
3. t
e6es,Across•All'Strata 7 (B)
Percent of Dom inaht'Species;
4-
5—
T6ii_Kie_OBL-_,,FACW,orFAC. (A/p),
Prevalence Index,worksheet,
-Lal,% Cover6f-• --Pyltir4
Total Cover
Sapling Strakiffi-ji(Plot,sire -
QBL,species, x 1
i_ $5
FACW'specles x 2.=
FAC species x'3,=.
TACLYS pqaes 'x`4°
_
LIPL species x 5'=
Column Totals (B)
v ''�
Z,�re alence,lfidex = B/A
Hydrophyt!c,Veqptation, Indicators,
.= Total Cover
aShrub -6traiiii '4 f
'Doftfinance Testis >50%
sl4ig-,
&
0
prevalencw :5index;s,3
Pioblerriatic Hydophyti6 Vegetation" (Explain),
2
"iKdicgtors,ofihydinc� oil and wetland Hjdioio9y_ifiusf
sent:,A�ii�jdistdrbed o problemak,
be pre -r,.-
�5.
t
1,6
_qf Ve etation Strata,
qeFinitions, 9
Tree - Woody plants, excludihg�woody vines,
ft(6,m)tormorep height arid 3,6r
Tota0cover
i
=Herb Stratum (Plot size
ap pf6ximately,2—(
(71& 6mj or 6 rge n'diimet erifbreast height (DBH)
M'WA
Sipling Woody plants. excluding Woody vines,
�2 04 trPA.
@pprqxjmateIy,20:ft (6.m) or more'm height and 16ss
than 31ih (7,6,cr�)IDBH,
r
13;
Wuiii - Woody plants; excluding Woody, vines,
approximatelyIZI'to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn),jn height--_'
. .........
Herb 7 1Al 1, herbaceous (non woody) plants, including,
7
herbaceous vines, rdgar6iesiloi'size 'Includes woody
1,e wood_ p
xcept y Vines' lbss,than,ap rox mately
-
3 ft (1 m) in height
- fhei§t�t
Woody vine All,wood vines, rega rdie si�ii
Yotal-,Covpr,
r_Wood j,V1ne)Sf2i 'RIOUsizd
beL
'2'
...............
,3.
i 'Hydrophytic
5
"40, "17-otal,Cover_° ',Present? Yes No,__,_
-(If,obseN
.Remarks ed.,Iistmorphologicalodootaflons,below),
§•Army,CorOsW Engineer
Atlariticand Gulf Coastal Plairi Region — Interim Version
7_1

—ze
SOIL
Sampling Point'
profile Dsscrlpti!on: (Describe to the 'deptKirfeeded,to-document the,lindicator.lorconfirm the absence-oflindicators.)-
•Depth MaInx
Redox Features,
-(rciesl iCdlor (moist)• —Color-(moist) OZL - -, -Type Loe,.-- Texture Remarks
0
'Tw,&=66ncehiraiion. 6=be pletion,,RM=Reduced, Matrix, CS =C,,erd or Coated i6d Grains Lor - ation .PL =Pore Uniiig;N=Matnx-
Hydric'Soll Indicators.
Indicators for-Problematic Hydric;Solls'.
PolyV61ue'Belbw,Surrace(SB),(L",§,,-T. U) _ 11%cm,tM6ck (A9)1(LRR'0),
HIs-tic�,Epipedor (A-2)
Thin Dark,Surface (Sft(kRRIS, T;U) — Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Bla -k-;s c (A3)
Loamy, !V[Ucky'Miheral (F1),(- LRR 0) "Reduced Vertic
----- (F1 8),(outside ML-RA I 50A.B)
n ul(ide'(M)'
Loamy, bleyedPA6 F2j Piedmont, F16odplaifi S&ifl 9) (LRR P,,n1§, T), ,
Stratrfied'Layeis,(M)
Dep`litdd Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
orill-n-ic bodfie&,(A6j jLkq P, t,,U►,--
ked6iDark-Surfacb (F@) (MLRA 1538)
5 ckku ,1Miriera(�k!j,(LRR P;, -T, U)
Depleted, Dirk, Sufface (177) R6'd Parent Maienalr,(TF2),
X Muck Oreien6w(A8) (LRR U)
Redox1Deprqssibns,(F8) Wry,Sfiallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,�U)'
Marl,(17110) (LRR U), Q _ther (Explain in Remarks)
Depl&ltedbctine(Fll)'('MLR'AlSl-),
lrbn-Manganese -'Ma'sses(F,1'2')(LRROiP,T) lindi6atorsidf hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Frame Redox (A16),jMLFiA iscA)
Umbric Surface (LRJR Pj, U) Welland hydrology -must be present,
' ' I -mu
'Sandy-Muqky, Mineral (Sl)�(LRWO S)
6hn Unless di§tUrb6d or problematic
Delta 0 ci
_XSan6;GleyedMitnx (-S-4)
Reduced Vertid(F18) (MLRA 150A,1160B)
Siniiy'Redox,(S5),
Pledrri6ht FIoodpIain1S6ds,(F19),(Ml-RA 149A)
Shipped—Main —(S6)
Anbmalous Bndht Loamy Sods (1720) (MkRAII 49A, 16 C, 1153113)
Dark kS-b-nfacb (S7MLRR P,'S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer,(ifobserved)*,
Type -
I -
Depthh orjches):k
Hydri6tbll Present? Yes NO
'Remarks:!
L
US' Army Corps
I - - of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf to6stal'Plaih Region= hterim,Ver=6
—ze

WETLANDDETERAAINATION,DATA FORK— Atlantic and,Gulf Coastal Plain Region'
�p R
Prolect/Sde Afi��tfri�� s = - C,tytcodnty :1�`iG�la+'1�' _ - Sarripling Date'—`
Apphcant/Owner,- - .State L Sampling Pomt s�
Investigators) Sectlori; Township, Range:s -
Local relief concave, convex,.none) Slope,h =4 Landfom,(tidlslope, terrace; etc ): A¢hC4
Subregion (LRR•or MLRA}, _ Lat • 3 �t6. %= S -f.? _ _Long "— 77
Soil Map Unit Name classification l Ar;,J1i
_Are climatic) hydrologic conditionV on-the,sde typical,for'this'time of,yeae-? ^Yes No (If no, explain in,Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrolody significantly disturbetl) Are "Norm al,Circumstances present? Yes No_
,Are Vegetabon­ Sod_ , oi� Hydrology naturallyTproblematic7 ;(If,needed; explain any, answers in Remaiks )
SUMMARY OF,FINDINGS = Attach §ite,mapii§howing; sampling point locations, ftansects, important,featu -res, etc.
' HydrophyticiVegetatlon,Present? Yes No, ( Is the Sam Ied�Area
',Hydnc Sod Present? Yes — No _ within -a Wetland? Yes< ✓ No
Wetland Hydrolody Present? Yes, 'No
HYDROLOGY,
`Wetland, Hydrology.lndicators•
' '
Secondary Indicators- minimum of two re ulred
Primary Indi6torsIminlmum of one is,rPmiired.
check all'that apply)
_ 'sufface:Soil Cracks1(B6)
_ Surface Wafer (At)
_ Water - Stained, Leaves (139)
_ Sparsely'Vegetated Concave,Surface,(B8),
High'Wat6fTable (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna,(613)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Mai_I Deposds;,(B15);(LRR U)
_ Moss,Trim'Lmes (616)
_ Water'Marks (81)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C9)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2), I
_ Sediment Deposits (92)
_ Oxid¢ed,Rhrzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows,(C8)
_ Dirft,Deposds °(133)
_'Rresence of Reduced, iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery,(C9) K
Aigal'Mm or-Crust (B4),
_ Recentilron Reduction' in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ GeomorphidPosition (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck,Surface (C7)
_ Shallow'Aquitard,(D3),
_ Inundation Vis 611 o_n Aenal,lmagery' (B7)
- o her (Explain imRemarks)�
_ FAC- Neutral Test,'(D5)
Field Observations
Y,es No Depth(mches)•;
SurfaeeWater_P,reseni?
Water Table_,Present? 'Yes, •No
,Depth,(,nches) i
I
'Yes*
Saturatron Presents Yes -� No
Depth (Inches): v
Wetland
Hydrology,Present9 -No
-mcludes'cid dla-_fnn'e _
-
Descnbe;Recorded�Data (stream gauge,; Tonitonng well,', aerial, photos, previous inspections).- If available
Remarks:
-US Army Corps of'Endi6eers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal PlaIn'Reglon - ,Interim Version'
.v � . . vr. F v 3 `CI �6+�_,., m9A:A.• _...n' 3 e < a .,< ...n . +m,: .i.., . �•K. F . ,_ � N._ -v ..! r � .,, a.. ,.a.,.'^i+ r r.♦ , n .. �G .. c >-.. yn , � .,-w'- s�

V,F-Ut: I All I N." use scientITIctnames OTC
oampiing rqiqt
Tree'StratuFfi ,(PIotsiz
% Cover _'Species? Status
-,Num6er ofOonrimant Species
That Are 613L, VAbW: or FAC (A)
14- cif,borninint
T6tal u mbir
2'
-,3
Spe6WsAcross-,All Strata
Percent of Dcrnifi-ant Species
-
5
4-
odiVine Stiaturn- (Plot siz6•- ­-
Wo7
� =,Tota C` over`
That,Are,O BL7,FACW, or,FKC: (AJ6)
'6
4.
Total
Prevalence Inclex,worksheet:
Total % Cow of. Multiply by.
OBU§7pecies
0'
Total'Cdver
Sa66k Stratum (Plot�i,zb
A
�ACW' x Z
',F species
',F AC spebl6s = x,3
FAW pecies x 4.=-
"UPL, pecles x 5,=
ColumnTotals (B)
-Prevalence Index B/A,=
�Z.
> 3: 0,1 _
Y
=Total CqVi r
Hydrophytic Vegetatiorf Inclicatom.
�ShrubrStrafilm, (Plot size
—�I/Z
Dominance.Test,is?-50%
:7
P;qyaleno Indldxjs 253 0'
'Problematic,,Hydrophy'tic Vegetation' (Expiaini
?12 -
---- ---
-lindidtors'offtdric soilland'wetliilnd+hydrology, must-
be present, unless -diistudbbd of piilililematic
;4:
15"
E6.
' s -TqfVegetatlon,Strata:,
'Definition
",7,.
Tree -'Woody plants, excluding woody` vine - s,
J
4?, V
=7otalCoQer
a Tp dkirfiai6lyii6 ft,('6 m) -or more.n height and 3 in
V cm) inrdiinieter at breast fieight(PBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot slZ6
'All
Q
YOU L?,
( orArddir
Sapling-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
ft,(6 rrfore'ifi heightandsless
f 3-11
—
approximateli,20 m ) o-r ,
than 3 in (T6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woodyplarits,jexcluding woody vines,
,1;Remarks (If observed, list'morph I I adaptations below)
SPh 0
_go
fic ben 5P� �If
M Sul
approximately 3 to - 20 ft (Tto 16jmih` height
- Pik
Herb= All herbaceous (non-woody), plants,, including
herbaceous vines, regaidless of sire. Includes woody,
­, , I - - itiiiy
plants, except.woody, vines, ie�ijh:a� approximately
­ , - - I- - - -
3 ft,,(,l in) in height
woody vine - All woody vines,, re§ardless,bf height
.1jyd-rophitla,
Vegititibn -X-
'reient? Yes No,
US Army Corps of- Engineers Atlantic and,Gulf,Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
---
'k
12
odiVine Stiaturn- (Plot siz6•- ­-
Wo7
� =,Tota C` over`
t2l
4.
Total
,1;Remarks (If observed, list'morph I I adaptations below)
SPh 0
_go
fic ben 5P� �If
M Sul
approximately 3 to - 20 ft (Tto 16jmih` height
- Pik
Herb= All herbaceous (non-woody), plants,, including
herbaceous vines, regaidless of sire. Includes woody,
­, , I - - itiiiy
plants, except.woody, vines, ie�ijh:a� approximately
­ , - - I- - - -
3 ft,,(,l in) in height
woody vine - All woody vines,, re§ardless,bf height
.1jyd-rophitla,
Vegititibn -X-
'reient? Yes No,
US Army Corps of- Engineers Atlantic and,Gulf,Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
---

SOIL Sa-fnplmg.Pbmt
Profile Description,jDascritre,to the depth needed to'document the Indleator or confirm the absence,of,indicators.)
Depth =,Mitnx
r
Redox,Features,
Loci,- T xt -Remarks,
-,fln66sj Color (moist) Color (moi§t)--- % e ure
jqy 4LL-
'Type: 6=Con cii6lw Pt*Por'e,LInina. M=Matrlx
ceintratlon. CoiDeplelion.-IRWIR'edoced Matrix, CS:FCoveii�&Xoate-d'San� Grains -�Lo
HyrdirldSoll'indicators:'—
Ind'i6stbri for Probleinatic'Hydric Sollst
HIstosd (Af)
Polyval"e�6elovi'Surface,(S8),(LRR 5, Ti-M — 1,,cm, MucK,(A9),(•kR 0)
Histic,E�jp don (A2)
6
Thin NRR S, T, U) 2cmMu (M0)<,(CRR'6)
n Ddrk'SUrface (S9) — Muck
AK ckflisti6 (43)
—,-Coamy'Mucky,Mireral'(Fl),(LRR 0) — Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside ML-RA 150A,B),
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
I1,oimji'GIeyqd'Matrx(F�)-, — jpiedrnofifflobd6liih Soils Is I (F1 9) (LRR P;,S,,T,)
-§tr-abfi-ed-Layers,(A§)
:,Ypepleted, matnx'(F3) — Anomal6bis Bright LoaimyS6ils.(F20)
b(ganicjBdaies -(A6)�(LRWP, f, U)
Redox,barkSujface'(F6)' %!MI-RA 1 - 53B)
;5,cm,M6&y,MiheraI (xi) (QRR'1P,-T-;V)
. Depleted,Ddrk,Silrfi6;(F!) — Red,' Parent'Matenal (TF2),
Muck;Presence (A�8) (LRR'U)
. f,�qdox�Depressjons (F8) 'Very Shallow Dark , SurficEQ#12�J�RR T, U)
4 1,qWMLick_(A9)'(I-RR P,'tT),'
'Marl (F1 0j (DiR Uf� Other (Explaifi imR&marks)
:.'X- - DdoletedBelow Dark'Surface (A,1 1),
Deplete Ochric(F11);(MLRA-11511)
_X'ih,ck,D6rIt-,Surficd (A1'2)
(fon-Manganese (LRR 0, P, T) -Indicators,of hydrophytic vegetation'and
- (L RR
9,ast!Prairie,R6-d6i(A16)'(NILRA-150A)
N
-,,UmbricSurf;i*,(F13)�(LfiR,P;t,,U) Wetland hydrology must be present,
Sbhdy Mucky Mindral (S1 �,(k!Ftk 0,S)
btematic
Delta Obhric,(F117)�(MILRA-1511) pnles� disturbed or pFc�
'Mdtnx (S4)
,T( lsandy,G,ileyedl
Reduced Verbc,(F18),(MLRA,150A, I SOB
Sandy,RedoR'(SS)�
Nidm6nt Fld6dolgin Soil �I(Fl 9),fMLRA,149A)
f—
SiiippedMatnx (§6)
114iA, i 3C, 163D)
-.Anoma]6us Briglitloamy Soils'(F20) JMLRjk -5-
Surf ,',q',T, Uj
Dark Sq-- r a- (§7). (�RR,Pc
'Restrictive Layer'((f obsorved)_'
Type
Yes
Depth (niche's)
i�HydrWsoil,j!iresent?
-'Remarks.
US-,Army Corp" 6f E Atlantic and 6ulf Coastal 1315m Regidn - Interim Vefsidh
rigmeers,

o ?oF wnrF9oa
�_ y
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
X❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes X❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
Z Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Reynolds NC
2b.
County:
Onslow
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville
2d.
Subdivision name:
NIA
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Charles Blake
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 3577, Page 299
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
152 Davis Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Richland, NC 28574
3f.
Telephone no.:
910.340.3458
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify; Leasee
4b. ,Name
Margaret Robinson
4c. Business name
(f applicable).
American Tower Corporation
4d. Streetaddress.
10,Presidential "Way
4e. City, state, zip
Woburn, MA 01801
4f Telephone no..
781- 926 -4512
4g. Fax no..
781- 926 -7011
4h. Email address-
enviro .services @americantower.com
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Nicholas Carmean
5b Business name
(if applicable)
AquAeTer; Inc
5c. Street address
215 Jamestown Park, Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip.
Brentwood, TN 37027
5e. Telephone no.-
615 -373 -8532
5f. Fax no::
615- 373 -8512
5g. Email address.
ncarmean @aquaetencom
Page 2 of 10

B. Project'Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (talc PIN or parcel ID)_
Portion of deed Book 3577, Page 299
1b Site coordinates - (in .decmal'degrees)
Latitude: 34.780522 Longitude: - 77.602716'
1c. Property -size:
0.52 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a: Name of nearest body of water to proposed project.
Ninemile Swamp, 1.27 mi to the southwest
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receivingwater
C. Sw
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. 'Project Description
3a Describe We existing conditions orrthe site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project area consisted of a pocosin bog habitat and a pocosin habitat In the compound lease area and guyed -wire locations and a mowed',grassy
area that was previously arttficiaffy,raised In the access and utility easement area The surrounding area Includes residences and forestland
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property, 0.52
3c List the total estimated linear feet of alt existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Construct a communication tower designed to accommodate future collocations to provide cell phone coverage to an area with minimal coverage.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used -
This project includes the construction of a,300 -foot guyed communication tower, with an existing access way. See attached construction drawings.
4. JurisdictionaMeterminations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
pi ect (including all prior phases) in the ast?
'0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments -
4b. If the Corps made the junsdictionaYdetermination, what type
of determination was made
© preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the'jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Tyler Crumbley _ USACE
,Agency /Consultant Company
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps,jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project, History'
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this,project ('mcluding.all pnor.phases) in the past?
❑Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file °'instructions
6., Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a p hased'project?
❑ Yes 0` No
6b. If yes, explain
,Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

,C. Proposed 'Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which, sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑, Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for, each wetland area iimpacted
2a
Wetland impact-
number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
2b.
Type,of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction,
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Pocosin
No
Corps
026
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.26
2h. Comments:
The attached map indicates the areas where the clearing and subsequent fill placement will occur Areas highlighted in color on the map include the
area that will be disturbed, and occur in a wetand Flit amount for the the guy wtre areas in
3. Stream Impacts
If there are ;perennial or intermittent stream impacts,(tficluding temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all.stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream unpact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary m,
3b.
Type of impact
3c
Stream'name
3d
Perenrual (PER) or
intermittent (Wt)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3
Choose one
-
-
S4
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
choose one
-
-
3ti. Total stream and tributary; impacts.
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10'
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there=are proposed impacts to lakes,,ponds, estuaries; tnbutaries, sounds „the, Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S then indry ually,list all open water impacts below
4a.
Opemwater
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
O1 -
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments.
,5. Pond or Lake Construction
If Pond or lake construction, proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of,pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts,(feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments-
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed_ (acres):
5k. Method of construction
"6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If,project will impact a protected, riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any im acts requir6 miti atton then you,MUST fill out Section, D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman '❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
-6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2,
impact
(square
feet
B1 _
Yes/No
62 -
YestNo
B3 -
Yes/No
y
Yes/No
B5 _
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h Total,Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a: Specifically descxibe measures taken to avoid or,minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
This'siie was chosen because the location better meets AT &Ts objectives for coverage for Hwy 53; Hwy24, and Hwy 111 in Onslow County The
search, ring had only ont accepted lease agreement The current proposed location owner owns an approximately 45 +/- acre, parcel which,is located
within the search ring The location chosen on the landowner's parcel was governed bylboth the search ring and by his desire'for where the,
compound would be placed on hls'property The site utiliies an existing, access road to minimize additional'impacts to wetland, areas
1b. Specifically descnbe measures taken to avoid'or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
North Carolina Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Protection of Surface Waters will be enforced and the existing access road will be utilized
as much as possible for construction traffic
12. Compensatory, Miti �atlon for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of'the State
2a. Does the,project requite Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes © No
2b If yes,, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for,this
project
� Mitigation bank
❑,,Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee, Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of; Mitigation Bank: Hoffman Forest
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Non - riparian wetland
Type: Choose,one
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 0..26
Quantity-
Quantity:
Letter is attached correspondence wiF Or Calls VV91 proceed with mitigatio—MrUe—emed appropriate.
3c. Comments-
4. Complete if -Makin a'Pa ment{to In -lieu Fee, Pro ram,
4a. Approval letter from iii -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one '
,4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wettand mitigation requested*,
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested-
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a pennittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
!suffer mitigation?
Yes © No
6b. If yes', thenAdentify the square feebof impact to each=zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1'
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required; discuss what'type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation'bank,
'pennittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plari Required ,by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does ^the project include or-is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Ri anan ,Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1b If yes, then'is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
215. Does,this project require a Stormwater Mana ementaPlan?
❑ Yes ❑ `No
2c. If this project -DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan-
2e. Who will be responsible forthe review of tlie,Stormwater Management Plan?
,3. Certified Local Govemment,Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmertfs jurisdiction is this project?
NC 401, & Buffer Permitting Unit Staff
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check ali.that apply):
❑ Phase,ll
❑ NSW
❑ Water Watershed
❑ Other*
3c. 'His, the approved Stomiwater Management Plan with proof of approyalibeen
attached?
❑Yes ❑ No
_4. DWQ Stormwater,Pro ram Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check an that apply)-
[]Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other.
4b. Has the approved Stomtwater`Management Plan with proof,of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater- keview
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑'No
Page 8 of 10
PCN -Form —Version 1.4 :January 2009,

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental,Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes
© No
use of,public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental doWment'pursuant to the,requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(Nor`th Carolina) Envirornmental'Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the.above, ihas,the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of'DWQ Wetland Rules,(15A NCAC 2H .0500); Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Vl/ill this project'(based on past and, reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit,a qualitative or-quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detaWthe ultimate treatment methods, and disposition (non4ischarge of discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project „or available capacity of the subject facility.
;NIA
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ❑x No
habitat*7
5b. Have,you'checked'with'the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes,'indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
,5d. What dais sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact, Endangered Species or Designated,Cntical
Habitat?
The USFWS endangered and threatened,species,lists and critical'habitat maps
,6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a, Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
0 Yes XD No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine, whether your site would, impact, Essential Fish Habitat?
The site is not adjacent to any streams, lakes, rivers „or oceans.
' 7 'Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement),
7a. Win this project occur in or near an area that�the stateJederal or tribal
governments have designated, as, having,historic or cultural preservation
Yes ©No
status (e.g ,., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history,and archaeology)?
7b. What data,sources,did'you use to determine whether your site would impact histonc or archeological resources?
The NC HPOWEB GIS database was reviewed, there were no National Register of Historic Place listed or eligible sites m the project area In addition,
the NC Historic Preservation Office responded via the NC Tower Form on September 30, 2013 that the project would not'affect historic properties:
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
0 Yes DX No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The FEMA mapping website
Applicant/Agent's Printed' Name
Date
Appit nUAgent's Signature
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10