20221145 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220823

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/23/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221145 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone] Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Creekside Oaks
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Deborah Shirley
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
8/23/2022
Nearest Body of Water
North Prong Anderson Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.308050
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.974387

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Woodshire Partners, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 3446 DP: 0969
2c. Contact Person:
Watson Caviness
2d. Address
Street Address
639 Executive Place, Suite 400
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28305
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c. Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Lillington
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0506-88-4099
2c. Project Address
Street Address
East of Nursery Road
Address Line 2
City
Lillington
Postal / Zip Code
27546
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
North Prong Anderson Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040407
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
+/- 72.59
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of forested land with a few dirt paths. Specifically, there is one (1) wetland (W1) feature and one (1) perennial stream (SA) located on the
property. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of forested land with some single-family residential developments and maintained yards. Nursery Road bounds the property
to the west while an existing residential development bounds the property to the south and east.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 9.3 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 2,121 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of this project is to construct a single-family residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project consists of the construction of a single-family residential development including but not limited to; roadway infrastructure, residential lots, utilities, and SCMs.
Specifically, there are seven (7) utility crossings that impact wetlands and/or streams, one (1) road crossing that impacts wetlands, and one (1) wetland impact associated with an SCM
outlet (riprap apron). Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Steven Ball
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE: JD has not been issued to date and JD packet is forthcoming
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Impact 1
Utility Crossing
(Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.108
(acres)
Impact 2
Utility Crossing
(Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.029
(acres)
Impact 3
Utility Crossing
(Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.016
(acres)
Impact 4
Utility Crossing
(Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.224
(acres)

Impact 5
Utility Crossing
(Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.197
(acres)
Impact 6
Utility Crossing
(Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.006
(acres)
Impact 7
Utility Crossing
(Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.096
(acres)
Impact 8
Road Crossing - Culvert
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.066
(acres)
Impact 9
Rip -Rap Apron
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.006
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.748
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.748
2i. Comments:
Total permanent wetland impacts = 3,131 SF (0.071 acres) and total permanent -no permanent loss wetland impacts = 29,423 SF (0.675 acres)
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Impact 1 - Utility Crossing
Temporary
Other
Stream A
Perennial
Both
6
Average (feet)
29
(linear feet)
S2
Impact 4 - Utility Crossing
Temporary
Other
Stream A
Perennial
Both
6
Average (feet)
53
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
82
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
82
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC completed a wetland delineation for the entire property so that natural resources could be identified and impacts minimized to the maximum
extent practicable. It should be noted that these utility crossing impacts are necessary to provide sanitary sewer to the development as well as connect
to the existing sewer line that is located to the east of the property. Impact 1 is proposed temporary stream and permanent -no permanent loss wetland
impacts for a utility crossing. This impact is necessary to serve the proposed development and provide sanitary sewer. The crossing will occur at a
perpendicular angle to the stream and wetland to minimize impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio has been
proposed to offset permanent -no permanent Toss wetland impacts. Impact 2 & 3 are proposed permanent -no permanent Toss wetland impacts for a utility
crossing. This impact is necessary to serve the proposed development and provide sanitary sewer. The utility crossings are perpendicular to the smallest
portion of the wetland to avoid higher impact totals. Compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio has been proposed to offset permanent -no permanent Toss
wetland impacts. Impact 4 is proposed temporary stream and permanent -no permanent Toss wetland impacts for a utility crossing. This impact is
necessary to serve the proposed development and provide sanitary sewer. The crossing will occur at a perpendicular angle to the stream and wetland to
minimize impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio has been proposed to offset permanent -no permanent loss
wetland impacts. Impact 5 & 6 are proposed permanent -no permanent loss wetland impacts for a utility crossing. This impact is necessary to serve the
proposed development and provide sanitary sewer. The utility crossing has been placed as close to the edge of the wetland as possible to minimize
impacts. Compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio has been proposed to offset permanent -no permanent loss wetland impacts. Impact 7 is proposed
permanent -no permanent loss wetland impacts for a utility crossing. This impact is necessary to serve the proposed development and provide sanitary
sewer. The utility crossing has been placed as close to the edge of the wetland as possible to minimize impacts. Compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio
has been proposed to offset permanent -no permanent loss wetland impacts. Impact 8 is proposed permanent wetland impacts for a road crossing. This
road crossing is necessary to connect the eastern portion of the development with the western portion. The crossing wit occur at the thinnest part of the
wetland and wit be perpendicular to minimize wetland impacts to the maximum extent practicable. A culvert wit be utilized to provide a hydrologic
connectivity for the remaining wetlands. Compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio has been proposed to offset permanent wetland impacts. Impact 9 is
proposed permanent wetland impacts for an SCM outlet. The SCM is in the lowest point of topography and will treat stormwater before exiting into the
wetland. A plunge pool and riprap will be utilized to minimize velocities and wetland degradation. Compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio has been
proposed to offset permanent wetland impacts.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fence, diversion berm and ec matting will be used to minimum impacts.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
0
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
0
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.82 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
0 0
4h. Comments
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
State Stormwater Programs
Phase II Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW Other
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silviculture! operations. The Creekside Oaks project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Lillington ETJ,
therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Phase II
NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to
post -construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Non -discharge wastewater will be generated
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on
July 12, 2022. The USFWS has 30 days to respond from the date of the sent request. S&EC received no response from USFWS within the 30 days
meaning that they concurred with the determinations made by S&EC that the proposed actions is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed
endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). Please see attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report. S&EC will provide feedback from USFWS once received.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No

6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on June 22, 2022 no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. S&EC completed an Environmental Review request to SHPO where
it was determined that the project would not have any archeological or architectural impacts. Additionally, no structures exist within the property
boundaries. Please see attached response from SHPO.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PCN Attachments - Creekside Oaks.pdf 26.4MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Deborah Shirley
Signature
.S : rTd3>'-i�kkOec* Skr�g
Date
8/23/2022

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Creekside Oaks
Date: (Q/23/22,
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
S&EC Project # 12263
Attn: Liz Hair Field Office: Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0506-88-4099
Site Address: East of Nursery Road
City, County, State: Lillington, Harnett County, NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Wahon it &wrae5S
Mailing Address: (039 Execu.J 've Pla.ee. Su1'1-e 400
Telephone Number: i,o) y $l - 0503
Email: Wa#son Cgvinessandca.4es.Com
Wa'son G. CaYiness to- z4-2Z
Applicant (please print) Date
ature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Camden Brunick
From: Camden Brunick
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2022 9:05 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -filing Meeting Request - Creekside Oaks
Attachments: Ph 7 - overall.pdf; Ph 8 - overall.pdf
Good morning Chad,
This email is for a pre -filing meeting request for the Creekside Oaks project located East of Nursery Road in Lillington,
Harnett County, NC. The project is approximately 72 acres and is proposing the construction of a single-family residential
development. The overall project involves the construction of a single-family residential development including but not
limited to; roadway infrastructure, utilities, residential lots, and SCMs. Specifically, there is one road crossing that
impacts streams and a utility crossing that impacts a stream and wetlands. Existing conditions onsite consists primarily
of forested land with some dirt paths throughout the property. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of
forested land and single-family residential developments. Nursery Road bounds the property to the west and a
residential neighborhood bounds the property to the south and east. Please see the attached site plan above. Please
note this may change as we work with the engineers on minimizing impacts.
Project Name: Creekside Oaks
County: Harnett
Applicant Name: Watson G. Caviness
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Thank you,
CAMDEN BRUNICK
Environmental Consultant
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone](cell)
1

rCA
KRA
RANSAW
1
A (North Prong
Anderson Creek)
Wr *pip
iiiiiftilivi
Wil
WIon
RI,
4,,, - „,.....,-vpiwilimr, ,
4....,.... ti.
,_
--Z ir— 4116*
f
At
G4,
imw-\ VAhlk
00
f
400 0 ,� ,w:
all
ail cci
ik
Ti_ itatio,"111.
5 1
M1CAH5 WAY:N Z r01/ z�B
. I AtiStif "501%11.6"- 4 4
rlikr):0„,fil-11141117�� f f NC —Center for:eographi, nfo`mation : Analys s
�f
Project Number:
12263.W4
Project Manager:
SB
Scale:
1" = 1000'
Date:
05/23/2022
Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Creekside Oaks
Source: Harnett County
Anderson Creek 2019
0 1,000 2,000
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Feet
S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Nense Road. Suite 104, Raleigh. NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fay: [phone]
sand, corn

Project Number:
A (North Pro) iy
'derson Creek)
Cab
12263.W4
Project Manager:
SB
Scale:
1" = 1000'
Date:
05/23/2022
Map Title:
Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map
Creekside Oaks
Source: Harnett County
Soil Survey Sheet 10
13nB
LaB
WaE
GaD
G
CaB
NC Center for Geograph'as4Lormation `Analysis
0 1,000 2,000
1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1
Feet
S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandee.com

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
roa roe— TOP OF BANK
WETLANDS
I�r
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
www.4DskesoW6ons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
CLIENT
��Cavindess
..Lan
Building and Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=500'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
w-1
OF 9

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
—"—"—"—CREEK
WETLANDS
- Toe Toe— TOP OF BANK
— HOC— HOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
IMPACT AREA #1
WETLAND IMPACT: 4,725 SF PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT FROM SEWER INSTALLATION
STREAM IMPACT: 29 LF (174 SF) TEMPORARY IMPACT FROM
SEWER INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #2
WETLAND IMPACT: 1,245 SF PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT FROM SEWER INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #3
WETLAND IMPACT: 684 SF PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT FROM SEWER INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #4
WETLAND IMPACT: 9,749 SF PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT FROM SEWER INSTALLATION
STREAM IMPACT: 53 LF (318 SF) TEMPORARY IMPACT FROM
SEWER INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #5
WETLAND IMPACT: 8,593 SF PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT FROM SEWER INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #6
WETLAND IMPACT: 243 SF PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT FROM SEWER INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #7
WETLAND IMPACT: 4,184 SF PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT FROM SEWER INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #8
WETLAND IMPACT: 2,880 SF PERMANENT IMPACT FROM ROADWAY
& CULVERT INSTALLATION
IMPACT AREA #9
WETLAND IMPACT: 251 SF PERMANENT IMPACT FROM RIP RAP
APRON INSTALLATION
TOTAL IMPACT
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 492 SF
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS WETLAND IMPACT: 29,423 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 3,131 SF
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
I 1
- IJLIY Y
3OM �— n»>m,\ FDuuun ilttllnnnmu ',11
'I 1511 /tag.
�.�t
_ y
Q.
NURSERY ROAD;414__
nlS1,
IMPACT
AREA#9
1
IMPACT
AREA #5
GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 500
1,000
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 500 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civit engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suife 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
www.4DskesoW6ons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
CLIENT
��Cavindess
..Lan
Building and Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=500'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-2
OF 9

40
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40
80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
11t
III►
2 l t I
MH-17
INSIDE DROP — 5' DIAM
EPDXY INTERIOR
1+96.26 0.00
LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
- TOB TOB— TOP OF BANK
— HOC— HOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT —NO PERMANENT LOSS WETLAND
IMPACT: 4,725 SF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 29 LF (174 SF)
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND WILL BE
IMPACTED BY INSTALLATION OF A NEW 8" SEWER
MAIN AS SHOWN.
RIM 289.99
k
c(257 �s e
fs �O k
e
• CP k ��y k WETLAND 1
11
k
k
k
k
**TESTING METHODS MUST MEET
WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR
PIPE BETWEEN MH-17 AND MH-18\
e
♦
INV OUT 269.25 (MH-18)\ \i< S. \
I 33
10 \ SS
275
270
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
Its UHT ur JAIvuAIGr , A.U., LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PR(1FFCCI(1NAI I ANTI CI lPVFY(1R — I _4J 71
k
e
k
PERMANENT WET POND
WATER SURFACE: 279.50'
k
eo0.k
k �
\k
—a STREAM A k
r
k k
k1
1` -���
k�4.
.4�
k 44- t- 4-11•til:1•1 114:00%, t ,
's�47 - Pic ..\,,v arilitillitifiliffillititiliallirafb***41' k
�%�'4 t44A 174*A•�nx� e k k
k
k
•
•
k
e
e
e
•
•
e
e
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
e
e
e
k
e
k
k
k
k ♦ \
k
k
k
e k e e
k
k
k
k
k
k
e
k
k
e
e
k
k
\ \ MH-18
O a\ 5+39.12 0.00
RIM 275.72
O \ c.INV IN 263.35
O \ 1INV OUT 263.2
e
MH-1I'. 8 1
5+39.12 0.00
RIM 275.72
INV IN 263.35 (MH-1
INV OUT 263.25 (MH-
\
STREAM A
—
342.86
LF ®1.72Z 8" C900
PVC
Cr;Cd
r
N
0
r
N
CO
N
0
N
M
r
N
N
3+00
4+00
5+00
275
270
265
262
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
www.4DskesoW6ons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
IMPACT AREA #1
CLIENT
Oliaavn
ndess
Buildingand Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY: CALEB
DRAWN BY: CALEB
CHECKED BY: SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER: 1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-3
OF 9

LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
- — — - CREEK
WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
IMPACT AREA 2
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS WETLAND
IMPACT: 1,245 SF
IMPACT AREA 3
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS WETLAND
IMPACT: 684 SF
DESCRIPTION
♦v
0
SS
.-LOC -
•
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
INSTALLATION OF A NEW 8" SEWER MAIN AS
SHOWN.
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
Its UHT ur JANUAIGT , H.U., LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
ParwrccinMAi 1 ANn CI IMVFYna — I _AJ 71
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
•
0
1-
v,
IMPACT
AREA #2
30
270
00
,Z. °;c° dry
o 007
Ol 2�
231.15 LF ©0.95% 8" C900 PVC
SS
30' UTILITY EASEMENT i ^^
LOCH .
i
�„ v, `t, Si, Si, SP v
v,
sk
v'
(30TOB
..i TOBv=
270
265
260
255
M
Lri
CO
N
v,
STREAM WA
v-
v-Tap.
r;
v.-WETLAND 1\I,
v,
v,
v,
001,
w \ \ v, c
\t
v,
v,
•�
290
Q:V QV
rL\ 6Lppp� `\
�� ,xx`LJ`L�
<Z`-�JJO
I
MH-20
11+91.85 0.00
RIM 267.49
INV IN 257.30 (MH
INV OUT 257.20 (fv
PL—
i,
��,�__�
--
--EXISTING
—
/
_,
GROUND
f
369.56 LF
Cgt 0.97% 8"
SDR 35 PVC
231.15 LF 0 0.95%
8" SDR
—'
35 PVC
CO
N
CO
Ln
CO
N
Ln
CVCO
N
N
N
C1J
N
11+00
12+00
13+00
s`r
.
HOC 'S9
270
265
260
255
14+00
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
www.4DskesoWBons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
IMPACT
AREA #2 & 3
CLIENT
Oliaavn
ndess
Buildingand Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY: CALEB
DRAWN BY: CALEB
CHECKED BY: SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER: 1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-4
OF 9

40
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40
LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
- — — - CREEK
- - WETLANDS
— HOC— HOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
IMPACT AREA
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
d d d d d d d d d STREAM A d
80 d d d WETLAND 1 d d d d
A d A d d d d d d
J y d d d d d d d d ����I
d d d d d d d d d/� d
d d A d d
d d d d d d d d d d °may d d
S(Jl Q)
E 801
d d
1 r
_
-_
---��
�iilvti��cu�����.��.�:._.-
--
is:;emu
MISIMIX.M.1
i.161
i����
401.79 LF © 0.61 % 8" C900 PVC
WET
i
11111
M���M�NI��I
II
I IMPACT
—M��
—M--
1
30'
UTILITY EASEMENT,
.
I•
AREA #4
d
d
d
:
_:
d
/
e
e
L
,
•
•
�M
.
Q'
►n
1 rL06
_.,�
rrx n
•
`OC
LOC
LOC
i-AG
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS WETLAND
IMPACT: 9,749 SF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 53 LF (318 SF)
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING WETLAND AND STREAM WILL BE
IMPACTED BY INSTALLATION OF A NEW 8" SEWER
MAIN AS SHOWN.
260
255
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
Its UHT ur JAIvuAKr , H.U., LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PR(1FFCCI(1NAI I ANTI CI IPVFY(1P — I _AJ 71
I
d
A
Li d
TCE— TCE
—
A d d d d\ d
A d d d d d
ICE E Tg TCEd-9 TCE—ATCE TACE—A— TCE--- J '— E=
d d d d\ d y d d d d d d d d d d
d d d d d d d d d d >I d d d d
�I d d d ► d d d d d
d d d d d d d d / d
d d d d d/ d A
d A j A A A
d d d/ A d d d
A
A
A\A
d A
d d d d d d d A d
d d d d d d d A d
d d d A d A d d A
d d d A d A d d d
'TCE
TCE
d d d d d d A d d d d
°y d d A d A d d d d A d d d d A
d d A d d d d d d d d d d d A
A d d d d d d d d d d d d d d `mac \ ?S
d d d d d d d d d d d d d d S_ ,
A d d d d d d d d d d d d d O �- 4 F
Or-
d d / �•01-L'
y 8 d d d d d d d d d \ A o c` '
TyCE d /r -- TCEd—y TCE��TCE TOE —A— TGa--'1- TCE ,FCE i �7�
/
_
R
p,/£��6ti
\
\
N
N I
I =
\
MH-2I3
19+28.97 0.00
RIM 262.54
INV IN 250.05 (MH-
INV OUT 249.95 (M
\\
\
\
STREAM A
——
— — — — -,I
EXISTING
__-____
GROUND
—
40.79 LF ® 0.61%
8" C900
PVC
v7
Ln
N
v7Ln
Ln
N
N
rd
N
Ln
Ln
N
Ln
N
r7
Ln
N
20+00
21+00
22+00
/
/
0
TCN
260
255
250
248
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
www.4DskesoWBons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
IMPACT
AREA #4
CLIENT
��Cavindess
..Lan
Building and Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-5
OF 9

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — CREEK
WETLANDS
1L
16
16.
v-
v-
b �
rCE TCE� V-TCE�'
16.
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
IMPACT AREA 5
PERMANENT —NO PERMANENT LOSS
IMPACT AREA 6
1L
1L
16.
16
TCE —
1L
1L
1L
V-
16
1L
16.
1L
T TCE TCE A4—\TCE—TCE
V /
V- \
416.78 LF © 0.79% 8" C900 PVC
�► r- t"i• ♦ -. Via
— TCE TCE—,TCE— TEE TCE
sv-
1 ♦ \a,
WETLAND IMPACT: 8,593 SF 4.
PERMANENT —NO PERMANENT LOSS WETLAND IMPACT: 243 SF
DESCRIPTION:•
16.
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY INSTALLATION OF A NEW 8" SEWER
MAIN AS SHOWN.
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS 1
Its UHT ur JANUAKT , A.U., LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PR(1FFCCI(1NAI I ANTI CI IRVFY(1R — I _4J 71
255
250
245
243
40
�E\1� TCE
1G
1L
16.
16
1L
kWETLAND 1
16
16.
TCE — T
V-
-V— TCE
1L
16
16.
1L
1L
16.
16.
1L
TCg TCE
1G
1L
1L
V-
V-
V-
TCE —V— TCE
1L
16
1L
1L
v
v
o00 ���°lry6�
�
1� �X 1bN9-N° OO 16.
TCf� \�� \� J� CE TZ`E��C5 — TCE
\� IMPACT
��rREA#6
166.45 LF
AA;••IAR� 17"1"1
: •��`30' UTIL• �S NT ����•�0.13'i�G� TCE E-� TCE
1L 1L/
w
1L
1L
16
16.
1G
1G
1L
1L
1L
1L
16.
1G
1G
1L
1L
1L
8
16
1L
1L
OC — LOC -LOC
TCE TCE , WE TCE/ TBE
/ /
i
/
•i
1L
v_1
416.78 LF ©0.79% 8rr SDR 35 PVC
EXISTING GROUND
N
N
N
Ix
0
0 0
o
MN� N
LC) N F-
Lc) D
N?O
NEZ
ss
— LOC
TCE — TCE
166.45 LF ©0.72%, 8" SDR 35 PVC
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40
80 -
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
N
co
O
N
25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
255
250
245
243
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office1910-426-6777 fax license number 1C-2354
www.4DskesoW6ons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
IMPACT
AREA #5 & 6
CLIENT
��Cavinandess
..L
Building and Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-6
OF 9

LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
- — — - CREEK
WETLANDS
— HOC— HOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS WETLAND
IMPACT: 4,184 SF
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
INSTALLATION OF A NEW 8" SEWER MAIN AS
SHOWN.
4.
WETLAND 1
� w w w w �� w W/ w w .I' w
TCE TC�— TCE TCE-- TCE TCyE TCE T9E TCE TCE
IMPACT
Oc\ 215.83 LF © 0.51 % 8" C900 PVC AREA #7
4:?:.
Inr --
4.
�co cv
w v v 00 �g
y
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL 255
THIS
Its UHT ur JAN LJAKT , H.U., LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PRnFFCCInNAl I ANTI CIIRVFYnR — I —4-Ri71
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40
80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
250
245
241
M
CV
N
C —9C
TCE TCE
TCE
C. o tv.
ry� tgcV
rV2
E � 0
- TCE
TCE — TCE
• \ • • sfr
—
TCE TCE -
-1 — 4Y
Ma
W
TCE
TCE TCE T
•
N
•♦
/
TCE we
TCE
/
• TCE TCE
156.83 LF ©0.46% 8" SDR 35
S'
roc- SS /
OC
TCE TCE �`�C—mot TCE— TCE
TCE TCE
H'C
N
N�
/
MH-27
31+29.80 0.00
RIM 255.43
INV IN 241.60 (MH-
INV OUT 241.50 (M
0
00 N -
/
NK)NZO
2
10 O
m M> >
_ _
�
_ —
M
N E
Z Z
215.83 LF ©0.51% 8" SDR
35
PVC
56.83 LF
• 0.46% 8"
_
SDR 35 P'
M
N
N Ln
N
OG
O
N
O
N
N Ln
CO
Ln
N
d
CO
Ln
CV
29+00
30+00
31+00
255
250
245
C
241
32+00
NC GRID NAD 83
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office1910-426-6777 fax license number 1C-2354
www.4DskesoWBons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
IMPACT
AREA #7
CLIENT
��Cavindess
..Lan
Building and Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-7
OF 9

LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
- — — - CREEK
- WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
FINAL DRAWING
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAY AND
STORM DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE AS SHOWN.
134.02 LF © 5.93% 15"
�. ,/ .
27.46 LF © 4.59% 18" RCP/
�52.23 LF © 6.17% 15" RCP
26.50 LF © 0.75% 15" RCP
/1
4 84.42 LF © 5.09% 24" RCP (2)
32.90 LF 0.97% 24" RCP
84.93 L'' © 1.00% 24" RCP
/t \ I \\\Nll.l�
33.50 LF © 0.60% 18" RCP
WETLAND 1rsa F/G 1
24"
RCP
t--
2
0
0
�A'
N ®Sp99 i
G.
FXjSr�N��
cR
241
Rop �._
_ _I
�UNp — (Op
- (Jej
i
i
o
N
r
N
rn co
n
� N
00
•
Ln 40
N
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
www.4DskesoWBons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
IMPACT
AREA #8
CLIENT
��Cavindess
..Lan
Building and Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-8
OF 9

ACCESS EASEMENT/ / / /
//
/
1 1
N
MAINTENANCE & �Op�
ACCESS EASEMENTS �\
278�,5 212�1
LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
- — — - CREEK
- WETLANDS
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
FINAL DRAWING
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 251 SF
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
INSTALLATION OF A RIP RAP APRON AS SHOWN.
PLUNGE POOL
TOP: 269.00' s
BOTTOM: 266.00'
♦
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number 1 C-2354
www.4DskesoW6ons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
CREEKSIDE
OAKS
IMPACT
AREA #9
CLIENT
��Cavindess
..Lan
Building and Development Company
Builder rr'Excellence
1041 B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 18, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-9
OF 9

aL ME
PO 21.01. PO 121111
0
L �)
oUN� 4,
e TIM
MY WTI
WIMAW
ODUT MAN
0
mom an.
MY OUT Wan
t91504F.ffi
I
60' R/W (PUBLIC) -___-
NURSERV ROAD -sR„17
�Jao—}—,ao—,ne Is—M1s uo—,m—,ae—Im ,ee Im—,ne—�ae1,n�,ae—lao— Im—Ine ,et�lm—,6e—,m=sae m—,ee Sao—,ne1�ao—,ao—sae me—u• Lao—Im—uo� ,a�,a6—Ie6—ue ue ,ae— __w�-'ISe=gee— lee=lee��a'�Iro—,ae—,ao—,ee—Im,ee—Im—
_ _
ea'I—m �m—am —tm �m—TM �61—am �m—MI —6pa �al� man �ol�n-=oeI�mSl�m �1 viol—ml col.e,—oel�xf�'—slim—eel �.eaf�n ��e,—ae'I�m—ae'I �roi men Lei =atn an �m—ae'I gel—an—ml �.i-Nv aem
_.. _..r .. _.. _.. _.. _...._.._.._.._..1.._.._..�.._.._..1.._.._.\_.. _..L.. _.. _.. _.. _.. �yt�,. .... ..011lo,
=001 101=901�ael�e,lm�m —am—am—am —9m� —ten —am �e1 �1alfie'+ eal �Jo, �I �waaz •�� _ _ --1-0_ ••-••— •--• \
i V
/
AN/
/ /�>
ZOOS. PO MD
0011,.2.1.e1r
x 0a
I-IARBORWOO STREET
as (PUOLC.o, wrash/ wans•no
1r QA NKr - ,.ram .5--� T
���
0
as v. 3.130 a' 11011w300017, ions
rrn
NE
WAY
mars
marmot *me me
r7
Kamfor".
'
oPNEwA K
0
(47
cur aom
aff
Im—Iae— Im—Im—Iee—Im—Iee—WO—IAC—MO—aOe—,
;
„
_"\ \ \ /I_- QI
74)
r \ \\� ,� --- - _ram - r
>\ ,
s 1\ i
s. �i_ I , i'_
_ �L
11 ---- -- --�/
------ 111 _-'_'—/
`\` \`', \ c\ /
/ /
I (7 \ ,
\ - /
,_ 1 1 /
0
v
\\ IIII111 1 1
Ca.)\ () .\- liI'1 ii�0.1,
\ \\\ \ 1 1) 1 1
\ \ 1 ~~ 111
\ \\\ I ,111
\ \ 1 (1 i
\ \\\ I•!.i1
lot
)-----
—/—___ \''III
'
// / /,
/// ii);,c.2::‘,/_ \
//N
/
/ /i
•
40,
•
•
ircir „it
\\\\\\11;1'..‘:‘,.,‘ \‘:,‘ \111: \
wi
AtO
10 STUD? ORM MY
WES ARE MATE MS

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
August 22, 2022
Watson Caviness
Woodshire Partners, LLC
639 Executive Place, Suite 400
Fayetteville, NC 28305
Expiration of Acceptance: 2/22/2023
Project: Creekside Oaks County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.82
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Debbie E. Shirley, agent
fD_E
DepaftreMl of EEY'un fl t I Qhle
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
July 21, 2022
Camden Brunick
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[e-mail]
Re: Construct Creekside Oaks residential development, Nursery Road, Lillington,
Harnett County, ER 22-1699
Dear Mr. Brunick:
Thank you for your email of June 22, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
July 5, 2022
S&EC Project No: 12263.W7
Re: Online Project Review Request, Creekside Oaks North/South, Lillington — Harnett
County, North Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We
completed our review July 5, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of: A planned residential development.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Creekside Oaks North/South (35.310894, -78.970933). The site is located off Nursery Road, Lillington
— Harnett County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package
2. S&EC T&E Species Report
3. Vicinity Maps
4. S&EC Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS Official Species List
7. NIIP Report
8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
9. FWS Self -Certification Letter

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
July 5, 2022
S&EC ProjectNo.: 12263.W7
To: Woodshire Huff, LLC
Attn: Scott Brown
2919 Breezewood Ave., Ste. 100
Fayetteville, NC 28303
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Creekside Oaks (+/- 72 acres)
East of Nursery Road, Lillington, Harnett County, NC
Dear Mr. Brown:
On July 5, 2022, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Creekside Oaks property
shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located East of Nursery
Road in Harnett County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into North Prong Anderson Creek in the Cape
Fear River Basin, which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to
Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as C.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Creekside Oaks North/South - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 5

July 5, 2022
S&EC Project #12263.W7
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered
• American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Threatened
• Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Endangered
• Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate
• Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia), Endangered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within one mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP
report identified one natural area and one managed area within the project area or within one mile of
the project area. These are listed out in the attached NHP Report. The NHP report shows the West Park
Natural Area within the project area. However, this is not correct as this natural area only abuts the
proposed project, and no direct impacts are proposed to this natural area.
RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees) and
individual Red -cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. We found no individual
RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. We found marginal suitable habitat (e.g., Long Leaf pine
forests) within the project area. The site consisted of mixed Longleaf and Loblolly pines throughout
the uplands that were +/- 50 years old. Most of the site had dense pine saplings, or dense hardwood
understory. Dominate species include Red Oak (Quercus rubra), Sassafras (Sassafras albidum), and
Dogwood (Corpus Florida). During our evaluation no evidence of RCW or cavity trees were observed.
Given the lack of species present within the marginal habitat, S&EC believes the project will "May
affect, not likely to adversely affect" the RCWs. S&EC utilized the new RCW SLOPES manual
prepared by USFWS and USACE when making this determination. Please note that this survey did not
include a Foraging Habitat Analysis (FHA).
Creekside Oaks North/South - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 5

July 5, 2022
S&EC Project #12263.W7
AMERICAN ALLIGATOR (Alligator mississippiensis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat for the American Alligator. The
NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrences within the project area or within one mile of
the project area. Suitable habitat for the American Alligator consists of lakes, rivers, creeks, marshes,
swamps, and ponds. Due to these observations, S&EC believes that the project would "May affect, not
likely to adversely affect" the American Alligator.
CAPE FEAR SHINER (Notropis mekistocholas)
During the preliminary survey for the Cape Fear Shiner we looked for any suitable habitat and
evidence of the species being present. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence
within the project area or within one mile of the site. These species are found in the Upper Cape Fear
River Basin. The suitable habitat these species are found in are streams with rocky substrate with slow
flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence
of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. North Prong
Anderson Creek was +/-4 feet wide with low baseflow and had a sandy silty substrate. Please note
there are no proposed impacts to North Prong Anderson Creek. The proposed development will occur
in two sections, one on each side of North Prong Anderson Creek with access off Nursery Road and
thereby avoiding the need to cross the creek and adjacent wetlands. Due to these observations, we have
concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Cape Fear Shiner.
MONARCH BUTTERFLY (Danaus plexippus):
The Monarch Butterfly is currently listed as a candidate species, and not yet listed or proposed for
listing as threatened or endangered. Due to the current status of Monarch Butterfly, consultation with
USFWS under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required. FWS recommends conserving
pollinator habitat where practicable.
ROUGH -LEAVED LOOSESTRIFE (Lysimachia asperulaefolia):
S&EC personnel conducted a preliminary survey of the site for potential suitable habitat for the
Rough -Leaved Loosestrife. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
Creekside Oaks North/South - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 5

July 5, 2022
S&EC Project #12263.W7
project area or within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species is edges between
longleaf pine stands, and pond pocosins. This species can also be found alongside roads and
maintained easements. During our assessment we found no species of Rough -Leaved Loosestrife.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat exists on -site. There are disturbed
areas along the road, easements, and paths. In addition to the wetland boundary, these disturbed areas
were surveyed in detail. Since no species were observed within the areas believed to be suitable
habitat, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Rough -Leaved Loosestrife.
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is "Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Myotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities." Due to the nature of the project being residential development, we
concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS.
Creekside Oaks North/South - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 5

July 5, 2022
S&EC Project #12263.W7
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. May 23, 2022.
7. NHP Report: May 23, 2022.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. July 5, 2022.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. July 5, 2022.
References:
- North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
- US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp.
Creekside Oaks North/South - S&EC Threatened & Endangered
Species Report Page 5 of 5

ru
III L E.)
KRA
0
RANSAW .L
1
A (North Prong
Anderson Creek)
400
Project Number:
f4k-or
12263.W4
Project Manager:
MM
Scale:
1" = 1000'
Date:
07/05/2022
Map Title:
G,1).„
4'
11P8
k"\
i/
0
0
co
MICANS WAY-'N
USGS Map
Creekside Oaks
North/South
Source: Harnett County
Anderson Creek 2019
P
oQ
z
NC —Center for 'eographi,nfo`mation : Analystis
0 1,000 2,000
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Feet
S&
EC
Soil St Environmental Consultants, PA
84I2 Falls of guise Ro.d Side 1Oa. Ha1uigh NC 17615 • Phnsr [phone]• Fu: (9199 846-9467

BnB t nU
BnB �aB LaB
Project Number:
A (North Pros iy
'derson Creek)
CaB
12263.W4
Project Manager:
MM
1" = 1000'
07/05/2022
Map Title:
Soil Survey Map
Creekside Oaks
North/South
Source: Harnett County
Soil Survey Sheet 10
CaB
NC Center for Geograpffic Information & Analysis
0 1,000 2,000
I I I I I I I
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
84l3 Falk c! Nem, 0.4145. Sun: 104. &al:igli NC 214 L 5 • Phan:: L919184659 W • F.: [9191 &16-946'1

GI Evaluation Area
d62.==. Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
8412 Falk of Nellie Road_ Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com

Job #: 12263.W7
July 7, 2022
Threatened and Endangered Species Photo Report for the Creekside Oaks Property
Photo 1: Wetland Boundary
Photo 2: North Prong Anderson Creek
1

Job #: 12263.W7
July 7, 2022
Photo 3: Uplands
Photo 4: Uplands
2

Job #: 12263.W7
July 7, 2022
Photo 5: Path
Photo 6: Nursery Road
3

Job #: 12263.W7
July 7, 2022
Photo 7: Path
4

I:\Caviness Land\1070-Woodshire Phase 7\CIVIL 3D\DWG \1070-DESIGN.dwg • C3.0 G&EC • 1.17.2022 3:32:07 PM
SITE
KRAMER ROAD SR 7177
SR
NORTH
5
ir-
5/8"
ERB
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
i
r\3
WOODSHIRE PHASE ONE
PB 2001, PG 1298
5/8"
ERB
3 "
5/8"
- ERB
ERB
5/8"
ERB
I' 1 -\
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS AND HOLD
PRE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
2. INSTALL STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY SILT
FENCE, SILT FENCE OUTLETS, AND DIVERSION BERMS WHERE
SPECIFIED.
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SKIMMER BASINS.
4. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE AS NEEDED.
5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE AND APPLY TEMPORARY SEEDING TO
AREAS REMAIN GRASSED.
6. INSTALL TEMPORARY CHECK DAMS IN SWALES AS SHOWN.
7. INSTALL UTILITIES.
8. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON ALL NEW STORM WATER INLETS.
9. PERFORM FINE GRADING.
10. INSTALL AND PREPARE BASE COURSE.
11. PAVE ROADWAYS.
12. FERTILIZE, SEED AND MULCH ALL REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS.
13. UPON SITE STABILIZATION, SEEK NCDEQ APPROVAL TO REMOVE
ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES.
14. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS
OUTLINED IN THE DETAILS WITHIN THE PLANS AND ACCORDING
TO THE NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL MANUAL.
15. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE UNDER THE NPDES GENERAL
STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE
REQUESTED BY THE PERMITTEE VIA A NOTICE OF TERMINATION
(NOT). THE NOT IS AVAILABLE AT:
HTTPS: //EDOCS.DEQ.NC.GOV/FORMS/NCG01-TERMINATION.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CLOSE OUT INSPECTION REPORT MUST
BE UPLOADED AS PART OF COMPLETING THE NOTICE OF
TERMINATION PROCESS.
18" RCP
DUNBAR DRIVE - SR 2241
50' R/W (PUBLIC)
LEGEND:
PK O PK-PK NAIL
EIF Oa EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE
EIS 0 EIS -EXISTING IRON STAKE
ENLO ENL-EXISTING NAIL
ERBO ERB-EXISTING REBAR
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
PVC - POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CI - CURB INLET
PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
SANITARY SEWER LINE
FORCE MAIN LINE
STORM DRAINAGE
WETLANDS
PERMANENT EASEMENT
X FENCE LINE
ss
FM
SD
TREE LINE
X 208.47' SPOT ELEVATION
0- BENCHMARK
N WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
❑❑Y WATER METER
® CATCH BASIN
TREE
GRAVEL
SOIL
WETLANDS
330 MAJOR CONTOUR
337 MINOR CONTOUR
- Lac- Lac- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
- SF - SF - SILT FENCE LINE
- J -.r1 - JUTE NETTING
OINLET PROTECTION
GRADING NOTES
CI #15077
TC 368.28
INV IN 364.88
INV OUT 364.71
L
0
0
rn 0
0 0
70
- 5/8"
ERB
C0m
r
0 '
(n 5/8,
t
r
5/8"
ERB
LOC-
I\27;
L.- /8"
ERB
WOODSHIRE PHASE ONE
PB 2001, PG 1298
•
ERB
(\26
5/8"
ERB
NOTIFICATION OF COMBINED SELF -MONITORING AND
SELF -INSPECTION FORM:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN
2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH
PHASE OF THE PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING
FOLLOWED. RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE
INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010.
TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS
AND NPDES SELF -MONITORING REPORTS, DWQ AND DEMLR
DEVELOPED A COMBINED FORM. THE SELF -INSPECTION
PROGRAM IS SEPARATE FROM THE WEEKLY SELF -MONITORING
PROGRAM OF THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE FOCUS OF THE
SELF -INSPECTION REPORT IS THE INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF
THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND
COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE FORM CAN BE ACCESSED AT:
HTTP: //PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE AT (910)
433-3300.
N/F
FLORENCE C. WELLONS
DB 1594, PG 382
GROUND STABILIZATION CHART
SITE AREA
DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
TIME FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITHCES
AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY
WATER (HQW)
ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER
THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR
LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1,
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR
FLATTER
14 DAYS
7-DAYS FOR SLOPES
GREATER THAN 50 FEET
IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS
WITH SLOPES FLATTER
THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE
(EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND
HQW ZONES)
INV
�.� c-� - - -NURSERY ROAD - SR 1117_ 5.04
�+.■ -t. � ,e_. �� 3 �?-= 3 ��� �--�.--��-c ""-_ < -,' 7_▪ 35 5L � -35R 3S \ \.e_ sso▪ ) Q�os/ ' / / \\60 R/W (PUBLIC)c8� O55 /�3 54 �i-
i3 /=�� /�OO1Ego._4-P _ -� - - - .•', o lb* •��_� 00 S \ INV }T -
•
q\� tlt� I<'t t;i t PAY I'1\7t y n t t� :� N r �j'� any �� rztiz�a����. t
----______-M K-l=-=WW.MMMW WWWWWI•WWWWWWWWWWI•UMWM MUMMM�irUM_lfl=MI•MUMWW WVAW MUNI
r
•
N
15" ' CP-
1
0
0
1/2" 1/2"
T..1
/2 ERB
ERB CI #15001
ERB TC 367.78
I INV IN 364.55
1 INV OUT 364.49
I\ 154
(153
CI #15085 / LTC 366.02
INV IN 362.19
1. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK AND
MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS
ARE TO THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. ALL SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN WALKING SURFACES SHALL HAVE A
CROSS SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2% AND LONGITUDINAL SLOPE NO
STEEPER THAN 5%.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL LAND
DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND CLEAR ANY
DEBRIS LEAVING THE SITE ON NEIGHBORING ROADS.
4. EXISTING GROUND UPON WHICH FILL OR BASE IS TO BE PLACED SHALL
BE CLEARED OF WEEDS, DEBRIS, TOPSOIL, AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS
MATERIALS; NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL PREPARATION OF THE
EXISTING GROUND HAS BEEN COMPLETED
5. PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR AND THE
OWNER TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY, THE PUBLIC AND UTILITIES
DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY
FOR THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS, OR STRUCTURES,
WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT ON THE PLAN
6. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE
LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES ABOVE AND BELOW
GROUND, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THEY WILL BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE TO ANY UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES
CAUSED BY HIS OPERATION.
7. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BOTH DURING AND
AFTER GRADING BY THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE IF ANY SLOPE
STABILITY PROBLEMS EXIST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THERE IS A
SLOPE STABILITY PROBLEM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD BE
NOTIFIED.
8. STOCKPILE AREAS THAT WILL EXCEED 10' IN HEIGHT SHOULD BE GRADED
WITH 3:1 SLOPES AND SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE.
9. APPROVED COPIES OF THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS
SHALL BE ON THE PERMITTED SITE WHILE WORK IS IN PROGRESS.
10. ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE COURSES THROUGH THIS SITE SHALL REMAIN IN
A CONDITION SUCH THAT THEY CAN TRANSPORT THE NATURAL
DRAINAGE UNTIL FACILITIES TO HANDLE THE STORM WATER ARE
CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
DAMAGE DUE TO OBSTRUCTING NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
11. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN SHOULD BE
REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION OF
THE CHANGE.
12. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER THAT EXTEND TEN FEET OR MORE SHALL
BE LINED WITH NORTH AMERICAN GREEN S75 TEMPORARY EROSION
CONTROL BLANKET OR EQUAL SUBSTITUTE.
13. STORM PIPE DISTANCES SHOWN ARE TO THE CENTER OF THE BOX FOR
ALL STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
14. ALL STORM PIPE TO BE CLASS III RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1/2"
ERB
( 152 )
1/2"
ERB
rn
r3'641
363
150
CI #8609 •
HOOD 361.39 WOODSHIRE PHASE FOUR
362
360
SE-
--- 3
361
EL
36O
I c j
35b-
1.13
356
001
354
001
352
349
49
■
■
■
CO
347
•
M
340
3p *
co
335
3
330
510
coup
M
M
32S
•
coco
508
r
1
507
?o
d
505
361
9
OMNIIN
/
360
(457)
358
h
M
355
M
INV
OUT 357.62
PB 2006, PG 316
358
INV
351.34
I\ 149) /
5/8'
ERB
CI #8700
HOOD 358.01
INV OUT 355.00
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
357
148
/
351
3
I I
N
M V
355
i 353
CO
0
0
J
1-
0
� J
03
0
0
M
MMTM
� 50 /NR( OB WOO DTSTREET ACCESS) EIDEIDNIII11121 �
352 \ !� �
346
-3-;-
4�
337
1
� :
- 349
��
340�(�
\
M
460 \
N
M
461
I I
(0
(462)
I
463
c
CO
I
(464}
�V
CO co
(465)
N
M
O
M
M
(466)
l
�W
CT
(467)
w
3S�
350
3Q9
�__.r�
o
3g,
`
�,RS
".3A�,
3��a
�A o
r do
335
3q5
•
co co v�
I
I (.478)
COM
C4777 1
M
m 1
I
340
C476) M
if%
C475)
N
CO
M (474.
\
M
I
330
473
M C4722 O�
I N
O co
- M�v�j�M
�aa
v 3 9
335 I.
332
32g
3`2.
2 %
\\�
11W
� 1�"i_�
w
w
355
353
1)
j
• 33� 3Z9 ..
as
L0
I�I
O I
488 •crM110490
-
1
t n�R t
I55
\.
485
1
N.
486
354
1 1
o
487
_ 352, 0
����'. Mh
-_7 ___ u
'
L
I
11
LO
I
I� W .
W
W .
_ ��\
•,,, • �' W W W
W y y
v W v
W W W W
1 2'
/
ERB %
5/8"
ERB
I\147
/
/
5/8"
ERB
1. ALL INLET/OUTLET PROTECTION WILL BE CHECKED FOR
MAINTENANCE AND FAILURE EACH ACTIVE DAY ON SITE.
SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT TRAP AND
INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WHEN THE STORAGE CAPACITY HAS
BEEN APPROXIMATELY 50% FILLED. GRAVEL WILL BE CLEANED
OR REPLACED WHEN THE SEDIMENT POOL NO LONGER DRAINS
PROPERLY. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE
SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES ABOUT 0.5' DEEP AT THE
FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO
MAINTAIN A PROPER BARRIER.
2. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AND/OR PERMANENT
FACILITIES INTENDED TO CONTROL EROSION OF AND EARTH
DISTURBANCE OPERATION SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY
EARTH DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS TAKE PLACE OR AT THE
EARLIEST POSSIBLE POINT DURING CONSTRUCTION.
3. TEMPORARY & PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL
BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE DETAILS HEREIN, OR SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL.
4. THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE NCDEQ
OFFICE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 910-433-3300
5. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE
DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS.
REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING
OCCURS.
6. LOCATE SOIL STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN FIFTY (50) FEET FROM
ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF
REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZE THE
/
1 /2"
ERB
5/8'
ERB
�182)
/
/5/8"
/
I183;
50' R/W (PUBLIC & UTILITY ACCESS)
LQC
L $ L
(492)
LV V I 1
W W W
1y7 j / / I1 1 j 1�11� /// ilk I I
Loci///%////i/////l///////// 1/�
/1�//,f/�ll//l//ll// ///II / W W W W _
/M/ //M/ // / // ///i" W W � W• 5/8" _
.�` l,/ .l, M//rIo//// ERB I'434 \
�. 111 MI I -
5/a • I I < �`°� N\\� /\N
ERB/ l , 1 � `�`"\ 435
/ h184 y �5/a" s
ERB
ERB
WOODSHIRE PHASE FIVE
PB 2007, PG 948
5/8"
ERB
5/8"
ERB
438)
/
5/8
ERB
( 436)
STOCKPILES BY VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS.
CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT
BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES
LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN FIVE
FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE
COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24 HOURS.
7. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA
HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE
DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES IMMEDIATELY.
8. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DENUDED AREAS
WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED, AND ALL DENUDED AREAS IN
WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN,
WIND AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 14 DAYS. USE SEEDING AND
MULCHING, EROSION CONTROL MATTING, AND/OR SODDING AND
STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS AND OTHERWISE APPROPRIATE
MEASURES. USE EARLY APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON
AREAS TO BE PAVED.
9. DO NOT REMOVE ANY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES AFTER THE PROTECTED AREA HAS UNDERGONE FINAL
STABILIZATION AND PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN
ESTABLISHED, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT NCDEQ APPROVE THE
ACTION PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
10. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED
CONCURRENTLY WITH THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION
ACTI VI TY.
11. THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL
TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
12. THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS
/ �--
•
L W W
W V
W W
W
W y
V W W V. W V
v' W . W . .L
W y. .
• 5/8"
W
W ERB
I
•
0
`,0
468
330
325
•
ERB
469
•
•
322 -1
•
(
Inii
7-Omit__ mart
310
315
•
16;/A0
414
Nir
ERB
/ I
AND PERFORMANCE OF ANY OTHER PARTIES PERFORMING WORK
ON THIS PROJECT.
13. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE
CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN
ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE
IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
14. PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(2), THE ANGLE FOR GRADED
SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN THE ANGLE
THAT CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER
ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES. IN ANY
EVENT, SLOPES LEFT EXPOSED WILL, WITHIN 7 OR 14 CALENDAR
DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING, BE PLANTED
OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT
GROUND COVER, DEVICES OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO
RESTRAIN EROSION. PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(3), PROVISIONS
FOR PERMANENT GROUND COVER SUFFICIENT TO RETAIN
EROSION MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS
WITHIN 90 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT.
15. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN AND ANY ADDITIONAL MEASURES
REQUIRED TO CONTROL THE SEDIMENT DURING THE COURSE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
16. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS
NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS HEREIN.
17. THE CONTACT PERSON FOR EROSION CONTROL ISSUES THAT
ARISE ON SITE IS PJ GAY. CONTACT 910-237-0572.
ERB
•
306
4
.1 ,,T _ ,_7-:_f_.\-=,.77, jp 7,..‘ _ ‘\\. t\ \\\\N\_. '1:7\.\\.\__\\\ \\. \2_\ \\ \\.\C__1,\\ \\. \‘.\\\\ .\\.,\.\\\, \\.\.\\_\ ... _ . . _ ‘. . _ .. _\ . . _ . .
*1:1\.* ..\ .„, 1. ,_..y. /....* I' 1..; :\*.\\\:, \...\\ \\\:---, ‘.\\, \\ \\\.\ \‘ \I \I \\ \\ ,\ \\ : ,\ \\ \\ ,\ \\ \\ \\, \\\\\\\\:, ', ,\ \\ \\ \\‘ \
..'...*%%.*%.,:./._/,/....".*...\\%;.<*\:...*:%.*:..:*,\*:\\„4\\)\)\\'\'\\ \ \ \I \\ \I \ \\ \ 1\ 1\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\,
. . 1 i I hiHI i i I 1 ( \ \ \ \
292
ERB
•
ERB
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
•
•
ERB
ERB
1PB ---20-;3,:i;5N-/\\ \\I\ \ ..„.....-‘...,_. ----. \
W\ \ \\ N NNx \:„„_ \< ':\
WOODSHIRE PHASE SIX '
WOODSHIRE NP/AFRTNERS,
DB 2668, PG 901
\\ //i 1)/.\4(// 1.)bi i / I i / i
•
\\i'4"1-1;willi
, 7\ -T\\-- ,.7/
1 / /
/ j k/
/ //
100
50
GRAPHIC SCALE
100
200
v.
v.
•
400
1 inch = 100 ft.
THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL CENTER AT 1-800-632-4949 A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING IN ORDER TO HAVE THE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED
•
•
•
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
k.G1N ric.P
con e
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
Creek Side Oaks
North/South
OVERALL
GRADING AND
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
CLIENT
02avnirdless
Bui Nine: and Development Company
Builder o 'Excellence
1041B Robeson Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1070
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=1001
DATE RELEASED
JANUARY 17, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
C-3.0

:\Huff Family Office\1775-Woodshire Phase 8\CIVIL 3D\DWG\1775-DESIGN.dwg • C3.0 G&EC • 1.26.2022 6:11:29 PM
KRAMER ROAD
SR 1177
SITE
O
Ct-
NORTH
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
NOTIFICATION OF COMBINED SELF -MONITORING AND
SELF -INSPECTION FORM:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN
2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH
PHASE OF THE PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING
FOLLOWED. RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE
INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010.
TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS
AND NPDES SELF -MONITORING REPORTS, DWQ AND DEMLR
DEVELOPED A COMBINED FORM. THE SELF -INSPECTION
PROGRAM IS SEPARATE FROM THE WEEKLY SELF -MONITORING
PROGRAM OF THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE FOCUS OF THE
SELF -INSPECTION REPORT IS THE INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF
THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND
COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE FORM CAN BE ACCESSED AT:
HTTP: //PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE AT (910)
433-3300.
LEGEND:
PK 0 PK-PK NAIL
EIP Oa EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE
EIS 0 EIS -EXISTING IRON STAKE
ENLO ENL-EXISTING NAIL
ERBO ERB-EXISTING REBAR
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
PVC - POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CI - CURB INLET
PROPERTY LINE
- ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
SANITARY SEWER LINE
FORCE MAIN LINE
STORM DRAINAGE
WETLANDS
- PERMANENT EASEMENT
X FENCE LINE
TREE LINE
x 208.47' SPOT ELEVATION
0- BENCHMARK
N WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
6 WATER METER
IM CATCH BASIN
TREE
ss
FM
SD
GRAVEL
SOIL
WETLANDS
330 MAJOR CONTOUR
337 MINOR CONTOUR
- HOC- HOC- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
- SF - SF - SILT FENCE LINE
-.1‘1 - JUTE NETTING
OINLET PROTECTION
GRADING NOTES
SHEET KEY
1. ALL 15" AND 18" RCP IS CLASS IV RCP. LARGER PIPES ARE CLASS III
RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN.
2. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK AND
MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS
ARE TO THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. ALL SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN WALKING SURFACES SHALL HAVE A
CROSS SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2% AND LONGITUDINAL SLOPE NO
STEEPER THAN 5%.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL LAND
DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND CLEAR ANY
DEBRIS LEAVING THE SITE ON NEIGHBORING ROADS.
5. EXISTING GROUND UPON WHICH FILL OR BASE IS TO BE PLACED SHALL
BE CLEARED OF WEEDS, DEBRIS, TOPSOIL, AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS
MATERIALS; NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL PREPARATION OF THE
EXISTING GROUND HAS BEEN COMPLETED
6. PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR AND THE
OWNER TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY, THE PUBLIC AND UTILITIES
DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY
FOR THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS, OR STRUCTURES,
WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT ON THE PLAN
7. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE
LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES ABOVE AND BELOW
GROUND, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THEY WILL BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE TO ANY UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES
CAUSED BY HIS OPERATION.
8. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BOTH DURING AND
AFTER GRADING BY THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE IF ANY SLOPE
STABILITY PROBLEMS EXIST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THERE IS A
SLOPE STABILITY PROBLEM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD BE
NOTIFIED.
9. STOCKPILE AREAS THAT WILL EXCEED 10' IN HEIGHT SHOULD BE GRADED
WITH 3:1 SLOPES AND SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE.
10. APPROVED COPIES OF THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS
SHALL BE ON THE PERMITTED SITE WHILE WORK IS IN PROGRESS.
11. ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE COURSES THROUGH THIS SITE SHALL REMAIN IN
A CONDITION SUCH THAT THEY CAN TRANSPORT THE NATURAL
DRAINAGE UNTIL FACILITIES TO HANDLE THE STORM WATER ARE
CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
DAMAGE DUE TO OBSTRUCTING NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
12. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN SHOULD BE
REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION OF
THE CHANGE.
13. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER THAT EXTEND TEN FEET OR MORE SHALL
BE LINED WITH NORTH AMERICAN GREEN S75 TEMPORARY EROSION
CONTROL BLANKET OR EQUAL SUBSTITUTE.
14. STORM PIPE DISTANCES SHOWN ARE TO THE CENTER OF THE BOX FOR
ALL STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
15. ALL STORM PIPE TO BE CLASS III RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
INV c
--275.04
ECS -
LO LOC LOC LOG LOC LOC_
- -= 1- 1
1____:
:::
�\\r\��\7;\\Y\\\\\I \))\1\\��1�'illl ((' r\\\\\\II�JI I`I
\ �- -� \� \\ \\ �' /) I / I ID ♦ I \ '
\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ I I//ice �/ / I r� - 1
V A\V\V 1 l l\ \ \ \\ \\ \ 1\1 )) l ll �� ! � �/
\\\\ � \\\\1111111IIIli
\\ \\\\ 1 111111 I I \ \1\ \\ I \II 1\III\I t
\ \ 11 I 1 1\l,h 1 I11 \ ,
III 11 WOODSHIRE PARTNERS, LLC IIIII DB 3446, PG 969
I l l l l i' 1 111' \' \1\\\\�\\I \\ �• W
\\\\I11 \\\\\\I\' ,1 \\ \\\\\\\\\\\�\\\\, \\ \\
1 WO \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\i
\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \, \\ \\\\ 1
\ \ \\\\\N \I
\ \ \ \\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ I I
\ 1\ \ \\\\\\\\\\ \0\\ \\\ \\\v\\\\\\\\1 \\'l
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\0\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\�\ M
\ \ \ I \1 \III\\\\\\\\� ��� \\\\\\\\\1\\`\ \
)III 1 1 1 I 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\//?('\.\\\\\\\\\\\\\ s \
///lI 11) 1111 I\\\\\\\\\\\\�\y \�\\\\\\ \.
// i///,/ / /I 1 I !I) 1 \\ \ \\\\,\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\ \ • W .... ��.
V. `L
W
'L W /W
- /i
��/7 //// / /I , /� 1 \ \ � \W\" \W\. 1, t .
// / /, // / 1 LW,�, ,�i\
-_--=_/i i ///// / I\\\I1)\ \ 1\\\\\\ ti
- __;-_%7/,�/�'/ / //-/ 1, IIIII I 111
1 11 \ 1 \\'
. =\\ ^-�///// i /i///i/i// �/1J11�111IlIII 1 1 I \ ) 1 1�
l��-!///�/////j/i//�/iii%//11111 ' I I I I I\ I I ��
//� // j' ///// 1/1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\ /
/ // / / /i i // / /l 1) I / j N 567,403.47
• //// l� --// / / / I E 2,008,481.37
♦ / j j �Jl • �� , , / NC GRID NAD 83
i , �� , r _ / (2011)
..�-� 5/8"
NURSERY ROAD (SR 1117)
- - 60' R/W (PUBLIC) i
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
L
5/8"
5/8 ERB 5/8"
ERB__ �� ERB
- �'�(422)
1. OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS AND HOLD
PRE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
2. INSTALL STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY SILT
FENCE, SILT FENCE OUTLETS, AND DIVERSION BERMS WHERE
SPECIFIED.
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SKIMMER BASINS.
4. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE AS NEEDED.
5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE AND APPLY TEMPORARY SEEDING TO
AREAS REMAIN GRASSED.
6. INSTALL TEMPORARY CHECK DAMS IN SWALES AS SHOWN.
7. INSTALL UTILITIES.
8. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON ALL NEW STORM WATER INLETS.
9. PERFORM FINE GRADING.
10. INSTALL AND PREPARE BASE COURSE.
11. PAVE ROADWAYS.
12. FERTILIZE, SEED AND MULCH ALL REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS.
13. UPON SITE STABILIZATION, SEEK NCDEQ APPROVAL TO REMOVE
ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES.
14. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS
OUTLINED IN THE DETAILS WITHIN THE PLANS AND ACCORDING
TO THE NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL MANUAL.
15. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE UNDER THE NPDES GENERAL
STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE
REQUESTED BY THE PERMITTEE VIA A NOTICE OF TERMINATION
(NOT). THE NOT IS AVAILABLE AT:
HTTPS: //EDOCS.DEQ.NC.GOV/FORMS/NCG01-TERMINATION.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CLOSE OUT INSPECTION REPORT MUST
BE UPLOADED AS PART OF COMPLETING THE NOTICE OF
TERMINATION PROCESS.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. ALL INLET/OUTLET PROTECTION WILL BE CHECKED FOR
MAINTENANCE AND FAILURE EACH ACTIVE DAY ON SITE.
SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT TRAP AND
INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WHEN THE STORAGE CAPACITY HAS
BEEN APPROXIMATELY 50% FILLED. GRAVEL WILL BE CLEANED
OR REPLACED WHEN THE SEDIMENT POOL NO LONGER DRAINS
PROPERLY. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE
SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES ABOUT 0.5' DEEP AT THE
FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO
MAINTAIN A PROPER BARRIER.
2. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AND/OR PERMANENT
FACILITIES INTENDED TO CONTROL EROSION OF AND EARTH
DISTURBANCE OPERATION SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY
EARTH DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS TAKE PLACE OR AT THE
EARLIEST POSSIBLE POINT DURING CONSTRUCTION.
3. TEMPORARY & PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL
BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE DETAILS HEREIN, OR SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL.
4. THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE NCDEQ
OFFICE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 910-433-3300
5. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE
DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS.
REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING
OCCURS.
6. LOCATE SOIL STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN FIFTY (50) FEET FROM
ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF
REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZE THE
ERB
420 )
( 419;
PROPOSED SEWER LINE
ERB
STOCKPILES BY VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS.
CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT
BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES
LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN FIVE
FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE
COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24 HOURS.
7. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA
HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE
DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES IMMEDIATELY.
8. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DENUDED AREAS
WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED, AND ALL DENUDED AREAS IN
WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN,
WIND AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 14 DAYS. USE SEEDING AND
MULCHING, EROSION CONTROL MATTING, AND/OR SODDING AND
STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS AND OTHERWISE APPROPRIATE
MEASURES. USE EARLY APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON
AREAS TO BE PAVED.
9. DO NOT REMOVE ANY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES AFTER THE PROTECTED AREA HAS UNDERGONE FINAL
STABILIZATION AND PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN
ESTABLISHED, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT NCDEQ APPROVE THE
ACTION PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
10. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED
CONCURRENTLY WITH THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY.
11. THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL
TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
12. THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS
©MI
N /F
WOODSHIRE PARTNERS, LLC.
DB 2668, PG 901
INV INV
311.21 312.22
INV �A24 RCP A A INV INV
310.05s� - 313.84'c 3� 24" RCP
/ /
MIA
1
1
1
1
AND PERFORMANCE OF ANY OTHER PARTIES PERFORMING WORK
ON THIS PROJECT. •
13. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE
CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN
ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE
IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
14. PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(2), THE ANGLE FOR GRADED
SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN THE ANGLE
THAT CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER
ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES. IN ANY
EVENT, SLOPES LEFT EXPOSED WILL, WITHIN 7 OR 14 CALENDAR
DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING, BE PLANTED
OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT
GROUND COVER, DEVICES OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO
RESTRAIN EROSION. PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(3), PROVISIONS
FOR PERMANENT GROUND COVER SUFFICIENT TO RETAIN
EROSION MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS
WITHIN 90 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT.
15. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN AND ANY ADDITIONAL MEASURES
REQUIRED TO CONTROL THE SEDIMENT DURING THE COURSE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
16. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS
NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS HEREIN.
17. THE CONTACT PERSON FOR EROSION CONTROL ISSUES THAT
ARISE ON SITE IS WATSON CAVINESS. CONTACT 910-481-0503.
1/2
ERB
■
■
INV
323.29
N/F
WOODSHIRE PROPERTIES,' INC.
DB 1899, PG 868
11 1 \
THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL CENTER AT 1-800-632-4949 A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING IN ORDER TO HAVE THE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED
PPit
rn
ARV# 15588 PP
RIM339.03
OECS
TBM
4D ECS #181
N 568,836.892
E 2,008,250.099
ELEV 339.17
NC GRID NAD 83
(2011)
NAVD 88
N 568,828.20
E 2,008,278.20
NC GRID NAD 83
(2011)
554
i
GROUND STABILIZATION CHART
SITE AREA
DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
TIME FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITHCES
AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY
WATER (HQW)
ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER
THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR
LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1,
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR
FLATTER
14 DAYS
7-DAYS FOR SLOPES
GREATER THAN 50 FEET
IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS
WITH SLOPES FLATTER
THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE
(EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND
HQW ZONES)
©Oa
■
� ■
■
■
N/F
HARNETT FORWARD TOGETHER COMMITTEE
DB 2193, PG 653
■■ow'''.
1 /2„
ERB
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100
200
400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering 1 land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwAD site solutions.com
ZO,.fSSi07 yi
•SEA ICI� '
027
.?VGjNE ••
ii,� S' • ••••••con go'
��
O 1-2 -22
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
Creekside Oaks
North/South
GRADING AND
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
CLIENT
WOODSHIRE HUFF,
LLC
2919 Breezewood Avenue - Suite 100
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28303
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
BRETT
DRAWN BY:
BRETT
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1775
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=100'
DATE RELEASED
JANUARY 26, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
0-3.0

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0045605
Project Name: Creekside Oaks
May 23, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

05/23/2022 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see hops://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

05/23/2022 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

05/23/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

05/23/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0045605
Event Code: None
Project Name: Creekside Oaks
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: This project is located in Harnett County, NC and is approximately 70
acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.30913015,-78.97301323343298,14z
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

05/23/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Fishes
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate

05/23/2022 4
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

05/23/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/6177
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug
31
Breeds May 1 to
Sep 30
Breeds May 1 to
Aug 20

05/23/2022 2
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul
31
Breeds May 10 to
Sep 10
Breeds May 10 to
Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )

05/23/2022
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Bachman's Sparrow
— +�� ++++ -..---.--;-
BCC Rangewide —+�� ++++—�+
(CON)
Eastern Whip -poor -
will
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
— +-- ++++ �—�+
— +�� ++++-.---.--I-
III■III ■III - - ---- - 1- +-
.-. 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111
---- +—+ +—++
++'- ::: 1111 IIII 111- -_-+ ---- _+-+ +-++
1111 F-- —._..
+++- .11III11■I
!lir _--.--I- ---- -.--I---1- -1---1-1-
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds

05/23/2022 4
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds hops://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab

05/23/2022 5
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be

05/23/2022 6
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

05/23/2022 7
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:
Name:
Address:
Address Line
City:
State:
Zip:
Email
Phone:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mason Montgomery
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
2: Suite 104
Raleigh
NC
27615
[e-mail]
7047732837

■ Mr'S' NC DEPARTMENT OF
U MW
NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
•
May 23, 2022
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Creekside Oaks, 12263.W7
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Directtrr, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-18051
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4) 121 W. JONES STREET, PALEiGh 1_ NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC Vi9 707.9120 • FAx 919.707.912i

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Creekside Oaks
Project No. 12263.W7
May 23, 2022
NCNHDE-18051
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal Thtate Global State
Group Observatio Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
la Date Rank =
Natural 10434 Pine/Scrub Oak 2016 D 2-High G3 S3
Community Sandhill (Blackjack
Subtype)
Natural 19211 Xeric Sandhill Scrub 2016 CD 2-High G3? S3S4
Community (Typic Subtype)
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name
West Park Natural Area
Representational Rating Collective Rating
R5 (General) C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area NameOwner 111111kvner Type
Harnett County - Anderson Creek Park Harnett County Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on May 23, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Creekside Oaks
Project No. 12263.W7
May 23, 2022
NCNHDE-18051
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
i
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Vascular Plant
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
33751
10434
27072
19211
3242
J.
Somatochlora
georgiana
Pine/Scrub Oak
Sandhill (Blackjack
Subtype)
Sandhill Streamhead
Swamp
Xeric Sandhill Scrub
(Typic Subtype)
Pyxidanthera barbulataSandhills
var. brevifolia
Coppery Emerald
Element
Observation Occurrence
Date inom Rank
2004-Pre H?
2016
2006-07-07
2016
Pyxie-moss 1992-06-16
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
West Park Natural Area R5 (General)
D
NR
CD
X?
Accu racy
l
5-Very
Low
2-High
2-High
2-High
3-Medium
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
Federal
Status
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Harnett County - Anderson Creek Park Harnett County Local Government
State
Status
M 1
Significantly
Rare
Global State
Rank Rank
1
G3G4 S1?
G3 S3
G4? S4
G3? S3S4
Threatened G3 S2
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on May 23, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

Managed Area (MAREA)
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Buffered Project Boundary
Project Boundary
NCNHDE-18051:
Creekside Oaks
Sources: Esn, Airbus DS. USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, OS, NMA, Geodataslyrelsen, Ritkswaterstaal, GSA, Geoland. FEMA,
Inlermap and the GIS user cdmn unity
Sources! Esti, HERE, Gasmin, FAO, NOAA. USGS. ® OpenStreedMap
centnbatars, and the GIS user Community
Page 4 of 4

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Creekside Oaks
Date: July 5, 2022
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
(Picoides borealis)
Suitable habitat present,
Species present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on June 21, 2022.
American Alligator
(Alligator mississippiensis)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on June 21, 2022.
Cape Fear Shiner
(Notropis mekistocholas)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on June 21, 2022.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife
(Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on June 21, 2022.
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Unlikely to disturb nesting
Bald Eagles
No Eagle Act permit required
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on June 21, 2022.
Northern Long-eared Bat
Myotis septentrionalis
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on June 21, 2022. Relying upon
the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic
Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities
Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill
our project -specific section 7
responsibilities.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montgomery / Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA
Signature /Title
July 5, 2022
Date

L7.li
FE LI Y W ILD JFE
SLiNV Lct
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: July 5, 2022
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Creekside Oaks
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Camden Brunick
From: Mason Montgomery
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 9:40 AM
To: Raleigh, FW4
Subject: Creekside Oaks North/South T&E submittal
Attachments: S&EC Creekside Oaks T&E Report Signed.pdf
Hello,
Attached is the threatened and endangered species report for the Creekside Oaks property located in Lillington, NC.
S&EC is submitting for concurrence. If any additional information is needed to make the determinations, please let me
know.
Thank you,
Mason L. Montgomery
Soil And Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.
1