20221137 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220819

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/8/2022
BIMS # Assigned*
20221137
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
O $240.00
0 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Doug Perez:eads\djperez
la. Name of project:
Tramore Station
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Amber Lipsky
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/19/2022
Nearest Body of Water
McKee Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.2827
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.6274
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cabarrus
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
E Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes ®No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner 2 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
John Thomas Howie
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
9556 Hickory Ridge Rd
Address Line 2
City
Harrisburg
Postal / Zip Code
28075
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
United States

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Alan Kerley
3b. Business Name:
Taylor Morrison
3c. Address
Street Address
11405 Community House Rd #150
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28277
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Amber Lipsky
4b. Business Name:
WEPG
4c. Address
Street Address
10612-D Providence Road
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28277
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
United States
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
tc. Nearest municipality / town:
Harrisburg
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
5516-42-6187-0000,5516-51-2789-0001.6,
5516-41-0869-0000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
2b. Property size:
50.43
State / Province / Region
Country

3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
McKee Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401050302
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Tramore Station (Hickory Ridge) site (+/- 51.43 acres) is located just west of Hickory Ridge Road, just north of Timber Ridge Road, and just east of McKee Creek, in Cabarrus County,
North Carolina. The site is primarily farmland and wooded slopes with hay fields, abandoned crop field, fencerows, dirt roads, houses, sheds, driveways, and landscaping. The elevation
ranges from 570 to 630 ft.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4.047
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
3216
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The proposed residential development will include impacts to one stream and one wetland for road crossing access and utility installation.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
O Yes
Comments:
0 No 0 Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary ® Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-01585
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Nic Nelson
WEPG
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
This site was field verified by USACE (Krysta Stygar) on 9/1/2021 and an AJD was issued based on the NWPR rules on 7/5/2021. An updated AJD request based on current definitions is
provided within this permit application.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity'?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
0 Buffers

2. Wetland Impacts
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Utility Installation
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland J
Yes
Corps
0.068
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.068
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.068
2i. Comments:
Wetland Conversion for utility installation
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Intermittent Tributary F
Intermittent
Corps
6
Average (feet)
75
(linear feet)
S2
Road Crossing
Temporary
Relocation
Intermittent Tributary F
Intermittent
Corps
6
Average (feet)
6
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
75
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
81
3j. Comments:
S2: No Loss Impact- riprap will be placed at pre-existing elevations
S1: 0.011 Acres of permanent stream impacts
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
6
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and access
routes. The site plan was designed to avoid onsite features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site access. Due to the
location/extent of jurisdictional onsite features, complete avoidance was not practicable. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization
efforts by dedicating open space and avoiding -97% of onsite streams and -98% of onsite wetlands.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 2:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize crossing impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes C) No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Due to limited site impacts, no mitigation is proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes
If no, explain why:
O No
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
UYes JNo
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
0 Yes • No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
O Yes No
0 N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
E Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Harrisburg
Comments:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to Town of Harrisburg but will be designed to meet their
criteria.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes • No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases proposed
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
OYes 0No0N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewerlines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes • No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes • No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0Yes ®No
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes ® No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0Yes ®No

5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes ) No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report. A request for concurrence has been submitted to USFWS.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes O No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes O No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
Report from R.S. Webb and Associates
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No net grading/fill in the floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
www.fema.gov
https://location.cabarruscounty.us/mapcabarrus/
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Tramore Station AJD_PCN Binder.pdf 7.52MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
A complete PCN package is attached.
Signature
i By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Amber Lipsky
Signature
Date
8/19/2022

Pre -Filing Meeting Request-Tramore Station
Amber Lipsky <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Daniel Kuefler <[e-mail]>
Amber Lipsky <[e-mail]>
Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:23 PM
Contact Name: Amber Lipsky
Contact Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Owner: Taylor Morrison
Project Name: Tramore Station
Project County: Cabarrus
Owner Address: 11405 N Community House Road, Suite 150, Charlotte, NC 28277
Transportation Project: No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: 401 Water Quality Certification (Regular)
Does this project have an existing project ID#?: No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?: Doug Perez
Please give a brief project description below and include location information: The Tramore Station site (+/-50.43 AC) is a proposed residential development
west of Hickory Ridge Road across from the intersection with Grady Harris Road in Harrisburg, Cabarrus County, NC. The site can be found on the Harrisburg, NC
USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude 35.2827 N, longitude -80.6274 W.
Amber Lipsky
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
www.wetlands-epg.com
401.339.4292
5. Hickory Ridge Rd Context Maps.pdf
1505K

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2021 - 01585
Prepare file folder n
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Tramore Station
2. Work Type: Private pi Institutional ri
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
1.e ± PHirl;ur=r, PLLC.
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Assign Action ID Number in ORM pi
Government n Commercial
PCN request for residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Taylor Morrison
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Amber Lipsky
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
35.2827, -80.6274
Hickory Ridge Rd, Harrisburg, NC
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 5516-51-2789-0001.6, 5516-41-0869-0000
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Harrisburg
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: McKee Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:Rocky/03040105
Authorization: Section 10 n Section 404 n Section 10 & 404 n
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Stand m
✓ Nationwide Permit #
n RegionaldarGeneralPeritmPermi29t t #
n Jurisdictional Determination Request
H
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
n Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
August 19, 2022
Assigned Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Subject: SAW-2021-01585-Request for a Pre -Construction Notification for NWP #29 for
the Tramore Station Site, Harrisburg, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern,
Enclosed is a Request for Nationwide Permit #29 for the Tramore Station site located on 51.43
acres west of Hickory Ridge Road across from its intersection with Grady Harris Road in
Harrisburg, NC. The site is a proposed residential development and consists of five streams, four
wetlands, and three isolated waters: two wetlands and one stream. The site was previously field -
verified and an AJD was issued under the NWPR rules. As such, an updated AJD request based
on the current definitions is included within this application. Please refer to the Jurisdictional
Determination Information section for information on onsite surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to one
stream for a required road crossing and temporary/conversion impacts to one wetland for utility
installation. Overall impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development
were limited through site selection location, design, and the location/orientation of the proposed
lots, utilities, and access routes. Total impacts proposed include 0.068 acres of temporary
wetland conversion (Wetland J), 74.5 linear feet (0.011 AC) of permanent stream impacts, and
5.8 linear feet (0.0008 AC) of temporary stream impacts for a road crossing (Intermittent
Tributary F).
The site plan was designed to avoid onsite features to the maximum extent practicable while still
incorporating necessary site access. Due to the location/extent of jurisdictional onsite features,
complete avoidance was not practicable. Construction techniques will implement approved
erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving
conveyances. Where possible, 2:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to
minimize crossing impacts. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization efforts
by dedicating open space and avoiding —97% of onsite streams and -98% of onsite wetlands.
Due to the minimal site impacts required, no compensatory mitigation is proposed.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area, and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
1

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact
me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
AfAbtl. Lf4kLy
Amber Lipsky, WPIT
Daniel Kuefler, PWS
Environmental Scientist Environmental Scientist
2

Permit Application
Permit Application

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit
X Section 404 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
X 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes X No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Tramore Station
2b. County:
Cabarrus
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Harrisburg
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
John Thomas Howie
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
9556 Hickory Ridge Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Harrisburg, NC, 28075
3f. Telephone no.:
(704)-305-2834
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
circlefan7©yahoo.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent X Other, specify: Developer
4b. Name:
Alan Kerley
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Taylor Morrison
4d. Street address:
11405 N Community House Road #150
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
4f. Telephone no.:
(704)-971-8854
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Amber Lipsky
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
5c. Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e. Telephone no.:
(401)-339-4292
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
5516-41-0869-0000, 5516-42-6187-0000,5516-51-2789.
lb. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.2827 Longitude: -80.6274
lc. Property size:
51.43 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
McKee Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin Pee -Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Tramore Station (Hickory Ridge) site (+/- 51.43 acres) is located just west of Hickory Ridge Road, just north of Timber Ridge Road, and just east
of McKee Creek, in Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The site is primarily farmland and wooded slopes with hay fields, abandoned crop field,
fencerows, dirt roads, houses, sheds, driveways, and landscaping. The elevation ranges from 570 to 630 ft.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 4.047
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,216
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed residential development will include impacts to one stream and one wetland for road crossing access and utility installation.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary X Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
This site was field verified by USAGE (Krysta Stygar) on 9/1/2021 and an AJD was issued based on the NWPR rules on 7/5/2021. An updated AJD
request based on current definitions is provided within this permit application.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes X No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
X Wetlands X Streams — tributaries
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Conversion
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.068
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.068
2h. Comments:
Wetland Conversion for utility installation.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Intermittent Tributary F
INT
Corps
6.5
74.5
S2 T
Relocation
Intermittent Tributary F
INT
Corps
6.5
5.8
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
80.3
3i. Comments:
S2: No Loss Impact- riprap will be placed at pre-existing elevations
S1: 0.011 Acres of permanent stream impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. The site plan was designed to avoid onsite features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site access.
Due to the location/extent of jurisdictional onsite features, complete avoidance was not practicable. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and
minimization efforts by dedicating open space and avoiding —97% of onsite streams and —98% of onsite wetlands.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 2:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize crossing impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
No
❑ Yes X
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Due to limited site impacts, no mitigation is proposed.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
14.5 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to Town of
Harrisburg but will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Harrisburg
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Harrisburg
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
X Phase II
NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑Yes X No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes X No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
X Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑Yes ❑ No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑Yes X No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases proposed
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewerlines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes
X No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report. A request for concurrence has been submitted to USFWS.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
Report from R.S. Webb and Associates
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ No
X Yes
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No net grading/fill in the floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
www.fema.gov
https://location.cabarruscounty.us/mapcabarrus/
Amber Lipsky
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

WEPG.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Tramore Station
Property Address: Hickory Ridge Road, Harrisburg, NC
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 5516-51-2789-0001.6, 5516-41-0869-0000
Select one: I am other
Name:
Alan etkl
Company: TaylorMorrison
Mailing Address:
11405 N Community House Rd, #150, Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: 7o y- 97i- 33 s y
Electronic Mail Address: a Keri 61. Gy Pr" of. rr s o/ - c.o'
7/i/ 24
Property Owner / Interested Buyer* / Other.
Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len [e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville. NC 28805

Maps/Plans

lC
rtEl
Nature
e Preserve
akirhollow L..%
Harrisburg
128041
[iak
SITE
M/I Homes Blumev
seem
-70
b
U �a
x
AAteay
�c,,o,8er qs
5Iteg‘Pea Ln
—yc`-6
9�
et�ai�
timber +eidge Rd
Ma data
Wetlands and Environmental.
Leonard 5. Rlndner, PLLC.
n.rindner[ wetlands-epg:cts
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.co
Prepared for:
TAYLOR MORRISON
TRAMORE STATION
Cabarrus Co., NC
VICINITY MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
ALL
FIGURE
1
07/02/21

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Gr
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
len.rindner [e-mail]
[phone]
www.w et la nds - e pg.c o m
fnr
Prepared for:
TAYLOR MORRISON
1
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
TRAMORE STATION
Cabarrus Co., NC
AERIAL MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Aerial Imagery Provided by
Cabarrus Co GIS 2020
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
ALL
FIGURE
2
07/02/21

to
4 )
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
LOCATION
Lat: 35.2827 N
Long: -80.6274 W
HUC: 03040105
ROCKY
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Gr
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
SCALE
_ 1:24,000
ACRES+/-
51.43
Prepared for:
[ MCKEE CREEK 1
USGS QUAD
Harrisburg, NC
1993
TAYLOR MORRISON
•
•
•
0
TRAMORE STATION
Cabarrus Co., NC
USGS MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
ri
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
ALL
1■
FIGURE
3
07/02/21

NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
Cabarrus Co 1988
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
Acres in AUI Percent of AOI
EnB
EnD
Chevracla sandy loam • 0 to 2
percent slopes. frequently
flooded
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam. 15 to 35
percent slopes
9.5
1 • u'
Totals for Area of interest
50.8 100.0
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Gr
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Prepared for:
TAYLOR MORRISON
TRAMORE STATION
Cabarrus Co., NC
SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
ALL
FIGURE
4
07/02/21

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Prepared for:
TAYLOR MORRISON
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
r"l�� '�
r
D no I•t
FEMA FLOODPLAIN AS
PER CABARRUS ONLINE
GIS MAPS
TRAMORE STATION
Cabarrus Co., NC
FLOOD MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
ALL
FIGURE
5
07/02/21

PARCEL: 5516-41-0869-0000
JOHN THOMAS HOWIE
9556 HICKORY RIDGE RD
HARRISBURG, NC 28075
N
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Gr•
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
len.rindner [e-mail]
[phone]
www.w et la nds - e pg.c o m
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
Prepared for:
TAYLOR MORRISON
PARCEL: 5516-42-6187-0000
CYNTHIA CHRISTINE HOWIE
17 TAFEL CT
FORT MYERS, FL 33912
TRAMORE STATION
Cabarrus Co., NC
PARCEL MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
PARCEL: 5516-51-2789-0001.6
JOHN THOMAS HOWIE
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
ALL
It"
FIGURE
6
07/02/20

JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND K
19602 SF
0.45 AC
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY
MCKEE CREEK
788 LF
0.12 AC
% 8'
ti�
0.21t FiATARANCE
ttaoo wEr.�LAD
JURISDICTIONAL
r' WETLAND J 1
134800 SF
r I 3.09 AC
K7
�w �,�C�/ CREEK PWOPEATY
/F LNE IXfOSiNC
WNW eo•
EkleilEHT
00
A
as
/4`aIv'�
/ r !!
' S 1 0..2%AtiNdAL
L CHANCE
' 1 i_OODti'47
APo
I0.2%ANNUAL CHANCE
RND HAZRRB
0 al
11
LEGEND
OO FOUND PROPERTY CORNER
■ CONCRETE MONUMENT
• SET PROPERTY CORNER
G CALCULATED CORNER
A CALCULATED CORNER
A POINT OF LOCALIZATION
CATCH BASIN
❑ DROP INLET
03 FLARED END SECTION
• STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
JQ JUNCTION BOX
® ROOF DRAIN
pS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
• CLEANOUT
® GREASE TRAP
LWRNAL.RD
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND I
19168 SF
0.44 AC
ELECTRIC VAULT
ELECTRIC BOX
TRANSFORMER
POWER POLE
GUY ANCHOR
LIGHT POLE
ELECTRIC METER
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
HVAC UNIT
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
TELEPHONE BOX
FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE
FIBER OPTIC VAULT
CABLE BOX
WATER VALVE
WATER LINE MARKER
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
WATER VAULT
WATER MANHOLE
IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
GAS VALVE
GAS METER
MAILBOX
BORE HOLES
SCHEDULE BII EXCEPTIONS
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY H
571 LF
0.035 AC
ELEC
616
CD
❑T
Fo
FI R
620
1.321
BFP
WTR
GV
N
LO
1J JURISDICTIONAL` 1 n\ILS�p
a
hp h
<0
if
PRGVEITY
o `1
0
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY G
164 LF
0.024 AC
W
SD
ou
UE
FO
G
ss
W
G
— X — X — X —
— SF -- SF
625'
615 WETLAND B l'
- WETLAND C
1830 SF
� z
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND E
549 SF
0.01 AC
r
��C) � �p
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY D
219 LF
0.032 AC
TREE UNE
RAILROAD TRACKS
GUARD RAIL
STORM DRAIN
OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE
WATER LINE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
GAS LINE
FENCE LINE (CHAIN UNK)
FENCE LINE (SILT)
SURVEYED PROPERTY UNE
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED
635
ISOLATED
TRIBUTARY A
301 LF
0.045 AC
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
400
1inch =200ft.
' coop
WETLANDS AND STREAM
IMPACT EXHIBIT
EXISTING SITE PLAN
EX-1
3
8
a
t
roducttonlE ruameeringlExhihir,VTMHO
olects\TM ATMwzp
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
MCADAMS

Pa
VICINITY MAP
NTS
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND K
19602 SF
0.45 AC
JURISDICTIONAL r
TRIBUTARY tM'
MCKEE CREEK
786 IF lei0.12 AC
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND J
134600 SF
3.09 AC
Ex- 0a' PIEDMONT
NAlLI A GALS
E0.47dT
WETLAND IMPACT NOTES
1. REMOVE 6-1f OF TOP SOIL OF IMPACT AREA. TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED ON FABRIC AND REPLACED UPON
COMPLETION, PERMANENT MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TO BE RE -SEEDED WITH NATIVE STABILIZATION
MIX.
2. NO NET/GRADING FILL
,,((fly"wfiff
MUM CONVERSION
IFACT ARE*
20e2 SF
0.066 AA
146MF
REFER TO I •
PROD SAM.T•ME. , ti I
IIPAL'T NOTE 7 MUER ur_ (1YF.] •.
" r
MM. DRMN
f C•-
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY F
1175 LF
0.18 AC
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND I
19166 SF
0-44 AC
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY H
571 LF
0.085 AC
-
` .^
_ iJ
\l1 I �;I\ �\,\
11l .LOT WC CFTI”
PRONOSUO SMaENIAI.N
TD RE STUBBED GUT
PROP- 20' SIMI
{MANAGE EAW.D.T
SRa=N1 IMPACT A
MO IC
S1'M JEL
RP -RAP OUTLET
(NO LOSS IMPACT
LENFINNAN ROAD
(50' PUBLIC Rim
•
TEMPORARY STREAM
MI
.r
_ _ .."
ISOLATED
__-z`. :,__ WETLAND _
-,.--- — 1830SF f.
_, ,,.� 0.037 AC LJ -J t
;+T�f� /
_ J • c/ ^-2 v/ -
r 1 f - J */
�-
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY G
164 LF
0.024 AC
TRAMORE DRIVE
(50' PUBLC R/W)
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND E
549 SF
0.01 AC
i
ISOLATED
WETLAND B
871 SF
0.02 AC
1 J1 • 1 �
A l /� .11
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY D
219 LF
0.032 AC
CP. ROW MP.).
PROP. 20' DWI
DERV EASBIENT
(ExsrP1 EASEMENT
U166Th N LIOGION M)
PROP. 20' STERN
—
DRAINAOC EASEMENT
ISOLATED
TRIBUTARY A
301 LF
0.045 AC
GRAPHIC SCALE
❑ 10❑ 200
40❑
1 inch = 200 ft.
(STING
ORY RIDGE ROAC
)60' PUBLIC R/W)
(NCDOT MAINTAINED)
PROP. DUKE
DERRY EAAIERT
I
WETLANDS AND STREAM
IMPACT EXHIBIT
❑VERALLSITE PLAN
EX-2
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
MY
c
0
E
3
3

VICINITY MAP
NTS
O
1
PROPOSED �.
HEADWALL
""".•NgTABILIZED
\ RIP -RAP ONTO!'
(NO LOSS IMPAO
/•••
sL—
\
1 I 1
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACT A
484 SF
0.011 AC
74.5 LF
I I
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 ft.
111
i
b
I
I
0
I
\
,1,bRAR,-wN-�'
IXIND PUM�
PROP
HEAD
INV OUT
600
600
DSED
1NALL
590
590
APROPOSI
e
24"
RCP
I
580
0
EXISTI
580
18"
PVC
/
574.22
570
• Lp
I \
�
\-
_
74.83 L
0 2.7 7:
(BURIED
!NV I
570
i /
\
'
1 ' '
/
.--N1
_
---
-
0+00
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40
0+83.73
80
linch =40ft.
D GRADE
G GRADE
F 72" RCP
1')
N = 575,29
WETLANDS AND STREAM
IMPACT EXHIBIT
IMPACT AREA
EX-3
ckson DeWeese
9
Z IQ N
OO
<OO No O,-i
2 = N N
G O II
Ce H N- l a-i O
Z zwmm
Z 1— 2
-' 0 —J
0 w w< a H
J
Om -U-00N0
0
uJ
0
U
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
E
0
E
E
3
3

Z
16.
A
SIT?
0.
VICINITY MAP
NTS
SS TIE IN
d
w
2
7
rl •
•
r
REFER TO WETLAND
IMPACT NOTE 1
1
1
•
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
REMOVE 6-12" OF TOP SOIL OF
IMPACT AREA. TOPSOIL TO BE
PLACED ON FABRIC AND
REPLACED UPON COMPLETION,
PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT TO BE RE -SEEDED
WITH NATIVE STABILIZATION MIX.
570
WETLAND J CONVERSION
IMPACT AREA
2962 SF
0.068 AC
94.5 LF
NV /
/ // / ' 560
/ J I
<r•
1
( / /
/ /
/'�—
/ /
PROPOSED SANITARY / / !
SEWER LINE (TYP.) /
1/ 1
r
/ r
J /
550
■
1 j
INV IN= 556 30 (SSA
INV IN=556 10 (EX.
INV OUT=555.10=
SM
EXIST
ING GRADE
238.43 LF E
4.71%
" DI
570
560
550
0+00
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 40
1 +001 + 15.42
80
1inch =40ft.
WETLANDS AND STREAM
IMPACT EXHIBIT
IMPACT AREA
EX-4
0
M:\pmjectATMHITMH. o lop19n_craductiun`Eng!ne,TingKHz) PP-OAS-1Mva
v 8 g
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
o
en Pi
o a
"
ri r! ..
ry
.BA
gig
m
a ,
a
E
O
E
U)
dtt

MITE
VICINITY MAP
NTS
t\
1
r
✓ r
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 14.5% OF SITE
\,0
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10o 200
SITE LEGEND
- SIGNRGE
11- 1 YARD UONIS
4 wart POLE
POWER POLE
TRAM DIRECTIONAL ARROW
ACC ACCESSIELE PARKING STALL
VAN VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
XQ PARKING SPACE COUNT
® H ACCESSIBLE RAMPS
TPE® TIPE® TPE©
.AA_AL _L=_II_1 -
MO
400
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
PI -SSE LINE
PROPERTY UNE
RICNFCF-WAY UNE
LOT UNE
EASEMENT UNE
CENTEOINE
IMPERVIOUS AREA
0
�Ir
ik
4•
WETLANDS AND STREAM
IMPACT EXHIBIT
EX-5
v�
v-
a a
_ � N
0
LL
Zzw00m
Z e UJ Z
20 -Jui
5 E3 ES 1-
a o 5! 25 2S i a
4
N
O
0
z
0
m
W
CC
0
2
1-
CONSTRUCTION ❑RAWINGS
HICKORY RIDGE ROAD
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 200 ft.
•;
m
m

Jurisdictional
Determination Information

Requestor:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01585 County: Cabarrus U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Harrisburg
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
TaylorMorrison
Alan Kerley
11405 N Community House Road # 150
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
akerley(&taylo rmorrison.com
Nearest Town Harrisburg
River Ba sin Upper Pee Dee
Coordinates Latitude:35.2827
Longitude: -80.6274
Location description: Undeveloped Parcel West of Hickory Ridge Road across from intersection with Grady Harris Ro ad in
Harrisburg, Cabarrus Co unty, No rth Carolina. PIN(s):5516-51-2789.6, 5516-41-0869-0000.
50.43
McKee Creek
03040105
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map date Therefore this prelim inary jurisdiction determination may be used
in the permit evaluation proce ss, including determining compensatory m itigation. For purposes o f computation of im pacts,
compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision m ade on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat allwaters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they
are jurisdictionalwaters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you m ay requestan approved JD, which is an appealable
action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction over all of the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision. We recommendthatyouhave the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above de scribed project area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® There are waterson the above de scribed project area/property subjectto the permit requirements of Section 404 ofthe Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there isa change in the law or our published regulations, this determination m ay be
relied upon for a periodnotto exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
® The waters on y our project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation m ap dated 7/5/2021. We strongly suggest you have
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey

SAW-2021-01585
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a periodnotto exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five y ears from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, pre sent on the above de scribed project area/property which are subjectto the
permit requirements of Section404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period notto exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of CoastalManagementin Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fillmaterialwithin waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department ofthe Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regardingthis determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystynka B Stygar at 252-545-0507 or
kry stynka.b.sty gar(Ousac e.a rmy.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Based on information submitted by the applicant and available to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the project are exhibits criteria for waters of the U.S. as defined in 33 CFR
328, Regulatory Guidance letter 05-05, the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, and/or the Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0. See the Approved
Jurisdictional Determination form dated 07/05/2021 included in the file.
D. Remarks: REMARKS
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions ofthe Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA program s, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Re sources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a NotificationofAppealProcess (NAP) fact sheet and Request forAppeal(RFA) form. Ifyourequest to appeal this
determination you m ust submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, FloorM9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PH I L I P.A. [e-mail] Y.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date o f the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 09/21/2021.
**It is not necessary to submit anRFAform to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 9/1/2021 ExpirationDate ofJD: 9/1/2026

SAW-2021-01585
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/.
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/Pp= 13 6:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Amber Lipsky
Address: 10612-D Providence Road
Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: 401-339-4292
E-mail: [e-mail]
Property Owner: COMPANY NAME
John Thomas
Address: 9556 Hickory Ridge Ro ad
Harrisburg. NC 28075
Telephone Number: 704-305-2834
E-mail: circlefan7nyahoo.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: TaylorMorrison, Alan Kerley
File Number: SAW-2021-01585 Date: 9/1/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
0
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
ISECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional inform ation may be found at orhttp://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appealthe permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address allof your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued a s previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for y our reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may acceptor appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appealthe declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appealthe denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appealthe approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appealthe approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appealthe approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed),
by conta cting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your rea sons for appea ling the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where yourreasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appealconference ormeeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer ha s determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide a dditional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appealprocess you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
If you only have questions regarding the appealprocess you may
also contact:
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
CESAD-PDS-O
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
PHONE: [phone]; FAX[phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appealprocess. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Krystynka B Stygar, 8430 University Executive park Drive, Suite
615 , Charlotte, NC 28262
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Co mmander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
c NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 9/1/2021
ORM Number: SAW-2021-01585
Associated JDs: N/A or ORM numbers and identifiers (e.g. HQS-2020-00001-MSW-MITSITE).
Review Area Location1: State/Territory: NC City: Harrisburg County/Parish/Borough: Cabarrus
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.2827 Longitude )0.6274
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A
J/A
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1) waters):3
(a)(1) Name
(a)(1) Size
(a)(1) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(1) Determination
Tributaries ((a (2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2)
Determination
Tributary D
205
linear
feet
(a)(2) Intermittent tributary contributes
surface water flow directly or indirectly
to an (a)(1) water in a typical year.
1
Tributary F
1200
Linear
feet
(a)(2) Perennial tributary contributes
surface water flow directly or indirectly
to an (a)(1) water in a typical year.
Tributary G
160
Linear
Feet
(a)(2) Intermittent tributary contributes
surface water flow directly or indirectly
to an (a)(1) water in a typical year.
Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do
NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors
Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently ofa request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river
or stream or other type ofwaterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-alone TNW determination should be
completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 2 of 2 Foim Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA11ON FORM (INTERIM)
c NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Tributaries ((a (2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2)
Determination
Tributary H
Linear
feet
(a)(2) Intermittent tributary contributes
surface water flow directly or indirectly
to an (a)(1) water in a typical year.
McKee
Creek
R25
Linear
feet
(a)(2) Perennial tributary contributes
surface water flow directly or indirectly
to an (a)(1) water in a typical year.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(3) Determination
N/A
N/A N/A.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4)
Determination
Wetland E
1.0
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland abuts an (a)(1)-(a)(3)
water.
Wetland I
0.55
Acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland abuts an (a)(1)-(a)(3)
water
Wetland J
3.05
Acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland abuts an (a)(1)-(a)(3)
water
Wetland K
Acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland abuts an (a)(1)-(a)(3)
water
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion
Determination
Water A
linear
feet
(b)(5) Ditch that is not an (a)(1) or (a)(2)
water, and those portions of a ditch
constructed in an (a)(4) water that do not
satisfy the conditions of (c)(1).
NI)
Water B
0.02
acres
(b)(1) Lake/pond or impoundment that
does not contribute surface water flow
directly or indirectly to an (a)(1) water
and is not inundated by flooding from an
(a)(1)-(a)(3) water in a typical year
Water C
0.05
acres
(b)(1) Lake/pond or impoundment that
does not contribute surface water flow
directly or indirectly to an (a)(1) water
and is not inundated by flooding from an
(a)(1)-(a)(3) water in a typical year
" Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so.
Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub-
categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply
administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 2
Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA11ON FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: WEPG for Taylor Morrison
This information is sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A or describe rationale for insufficiency (including partial insufficiency).
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .itle(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Aerial and Other: Site Photographs 1-8 taken 07/05/2021
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: 07/29/2021
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
C Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B.
❑x USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Figure 4: 07/02/2021, NRCS Websoilsurvey for Cabarrus County
❑ USFWS NWI maps: tle(s) and/or date(s).
Cx USGS topographic maps: Figure 3: 07/02/2021, USGS 1:24k USGS Quad- Harrisburg, NC
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
ivies.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
FEMA Flood Map 07/02/2021
USACE Sources
N/A.
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other information (specify)
NCSAM forms
B. Typical year assessment(s): APT tool run 07/05/2021 shows normal climatic conditions
C. Additional comments to support AJD: N/A or provide additional discussion as appropriate.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
(For Jurisdictional Status and Identifying Wetlands and Other Aquatic Resources)
I. PROPERTY AND CONTACT INFORMATION
A. Site Details/Location:
Site Name/Number: Tramore Station Request Date: 07/20/2021
County: Cabarrus Acreage: 50.43 Latitude*: 35.2827 Longitude*:-80.6274
Parcel ID Number (PIN) #(s): 5516-51-2789-0001.6, 5516-41-0869-0000, 5516-42-6187-0000
Property Address: Hickory Ridge Road City: Harrisburg State: NC Zip Code: 28075
File number(s) of previous determinations associated with the site:
*Coordinates must be provided in decimal degrees ONLY.
B. Property Owner Information (if there are multiple property owners, complete an additional owner sheet)
First Name: John Thomas Last Name: Howie
Company Name (if applicable):
Address: 9556 Hickory Ridge Road City: Harrisburg State: NC Zip Code: 28075
Daytime Phone: [phone] Email: circlefan7( vahoo.com
C. Requestor of Jurisdictional Determination/Delineation
First Name: Alan Last Name: Kerley
Company Name (if applicable): TaylorMorrison
0 Same as Property Owner
Address: 11405 N Community House Rd, #150 City: Charlotte State: NC Zip Code: 28277
Phone: [phone] Email: akerleyc taylormorrison.com
D. Agent Acting on Behalf of the Requestor (must include an agent authorization signed by requestor):
First Name: Amber Last Name: Lipsky
Company Name (if applicable): Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Address: 10612-D Providence Road City: Charlotte
State: NC Zip Code: 28277
Phone: [phone] Email: amber.lipskyc wetlands-epg.com
II. REASON FOR REQUEST
Jurisdictional Determination Request for a Residential Developement
III. TYPE OF REQUEST: (check all that apply)
I —(Approved' Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
I—IPreliminary2Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
I-1 I am uncertain and request and require additional information to inform my decision
Approved —An AJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, an AJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the presence or absence of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site, including their accurate location(s) and boundaries,
as well as their jurisdictional status. AJDs are valid for 5 years.
Preliminary — A PJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, a PJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the approximate location(s) and boundaries of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site that are presumed to be subject
to regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. Unlike an AJD, a PJD does not represent a definitive, official determination that there are, or that
there are not, jurisdictional aquatic resources on a site, and does not have an expiration date.
1 January 2020

IV. SUPPORTING INFORMATION (agents/environmental consultants only) — please list the number and date of all
figures/maps/datasheets included in the delineation report — all sources must be properly cited on the figure/map.
Delineation Map Figure 7 (07/05/21)
USGS Topo Figure 3 (07/02/21)
NRCS Soils Survey Figure a (07/02/21)
USFWS NWI
Aerial Imagery Figure 2 (07/02/21)
FEMA/FIRM Maps Figure5(07/02/21)
USGS NHD
USGS HUC
Navigable waters' study
Wetland Datasheet (data point labels) USACE Wetland Data Forms C and J (07/05/21), USACE Wetland Data Form Upland DP1 and DP2 (07/05/21)
Photo Log Photos 1-8 (07/05/21)
Other sources: Vicinity Map (Figure 1, 07/02/21); Parcel Map (Figure 6, 07/02/21), DWR Stream Forms A, F, H (07/05/21)
V. AGENT!REQUESTOR CERTIFICATION (agent or requestor listed in Section I (C) or (D) of this request)
By signing below, I certify that the information in this document and any attached documents is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge.
Alin Kerl 7/I/2-r
Printed Name an Date
VILEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY (owner listed in Section 1(B) of this request - if there are multiple property owners, complete
an additional owner sheet)
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a
jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record or easement holder of the property identified
herein or have other legal or statutory authority to allow right -of entry onto this property.
JD v 40414
Signature
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
Please use the Asheville Field
Office phone contacts for the
Charlotte Regulatory Field
Office until further notice
Add Aquatic Resource Table
John Howie
07-02-2021
Printed Name and Date
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
General Number: [phone]
Add Additional Owner Sheet
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
General Number: [phone]
Add Agent Authorization Sheet
Validate and Submit
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project
area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
2
January 2020

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES WITHIN REVIEW AREA
Waters
Name
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Quantity
of
resources
in review
area
(number)
Measurement
Type
Cowardin
Code
Geographic
authority (i.e.,
404 and/or 10)
U.S. State
Rapanos
Waters Type
(For AJDs
only)
Isolated
Stream A
35.2824
-80.6251
301
feet
R4
404
NC
Isolated
Isolated
Wetland B
35.2822
-80.6239
0.02
acre
PFO
404
NC
Isolated
Isolated
Wetland C
35.2825
-80.6254
0.037
acre
PFO
404
NC
Isolated
Intermittent
Tributary D
35.2819
-80.6264
219
feet
R4
404
NC
RPW
Wetland E
35.2819
-80.6266
0.01
acre
RP
404
NC
RPWWD
Intermittent
Tributary F
35.2826
-80.6281
1175
feet
R5
404
NC
RPW
Intermittent
Tributary G
35.2817
-80.6266
164
feet
R4
404
NC
RPW
Intermittent
Tributary H
35.2841
-80.6283
571
feet
R4
404
NC
RPW
Wetland I
35.2842
-80.6289
0.44
acre
RP
404
NC
RPWWD
Wetland J
35.2839
-80.6299
3.09
acre
RP
404
NC
RPWWD
Wetland K
35.2833
-80.6314
0.45
acre
RP
404
NC
RPWWD
Perennial Tributary
McKee Creek
35.2841
80.6303
786
feet
R5
404
NC
RPW
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whe her there are any aquatic resources within he project area subject to
federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a
public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),
which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor can a
jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

JURISDICTIONAL
Jumso/cnomoL
rmaurxnvovcKEE
CREEK
'ozsLp
-Shown a,Perennial
Stream onusmsMap
JURISDICTIONAL
-3.USA[
U 125 250 500
A^
�[�
J JURISDICTIONAL TRIBUTARY H
'
-lBA[
"M&
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
SU.43+/ AC
.��
Jumso/cnomuL
TRIBUTARY
-Shown a,Intermittent
Stream on0000Man
� ��
l
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND E
-0.0A[
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY G
EXCLUDED
WATER (b)(9)C
-lUSA[
° "
N
r '11
cXcLuoco
WATER (b)(9>B
` '0.02A[ ]
EXCLUDED
WATER (b)(S>A
Stream
Landscape p1hotoldirectioii
VMflami
�
i
a
Wetlands and Environmental Planning s
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Prepared for:
TAYLORK8OR0SON
HICKORY RIDGE ROAD
[abarrus[o, N[
DELINEATION MAP
For study purposes only Subject tnoSxcsyNcosqVerification
Drawn By:
mnm
Reviewed By:
ALL
FIGURE
7

f
NCDEQ 4
STREAM
FORM F
PROPERTY BOUNDARY,
STUDY LIMITS
50.43+/- AC
NCDEQ
STREAM
FORM A
■
Wetlands and Environmental Planning G
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Prepared for:
TAYLOR MORRISON
TRAMORE STATION -HICKORY RIDGE ROAD
Cabarrus Co., NC
DELINEATION MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification
Drawn By:
NRN
Reviewed By:
ALL
KS
FIGURE
7
7/5/21
Updated 7/13/22

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Taylor Morrison - Hickory Ridge Rd
Applicant/Owner: TaylorMorrison
Investigator(s): NRN
City/County: Harrisburg/Cabarrus Co Sampling Date: 7/5/21
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC Sampling Point: Wetland J
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.2839 Long: -80.6299 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla sandy loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification:
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C9)
_
x Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave
_True _Sparsely
x High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _Drainage
x Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _
x Water Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Presence _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent _Crayfish
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) x Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Algal _Other
Iron Deposits (B5) x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
x Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
x Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
x Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetland J
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Yes FACW
2. Platanus occidentalis 30 Yes FACW
3. Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC
4. Salix nigra 20 Yes OBL
5.
6.
7.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Sambucus nigra 15 Yes FAC
2. Alnus serrulata 15 Yes OBL
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes FACW
4. Platanus occidentalis 10 Yes FACW
5. Salix nigra 10 Yes OBL
6. Acer rubrum 5 No FAC
7.
8.
9.
65 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 33 20% of total cover: 13
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Juncus effusus 30 Yes FACW
2. Carex crinita 25 Yes OBL
3. Sagittaria latifolia 20 Yes OBL
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
75 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 90 x 1 = 90
FACW species 110 x 2 = 220
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 240 (A) 430 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.79
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wetland J
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-20 7.5YR 5/1
85 7.5YR 5/6 15 C PL/M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Taylor Morrison - Hickory Ridge Rd
Applicant/Owner: TaylorMorrison
Investigator(s): NRN
City/County: Harrisburg/Cabarrus Co Sampling Date: 7/5/21
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.2841 Long: -80.6297 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA: Chewacla sandy loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification:
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
(B8)
(C9)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave Surface
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Water _Presence _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent _Crayfish
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Algal _Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Fagus grandifolia 30 Yes FACU
2. Quercus rubra 30 Yes
3. Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC
4. Juniperus virginiana 20 Yes FACU
5.
6.
7.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Fagus grandifolia
2. Quercus rubra
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20 Yes FACU
15 Yes FACU
10 Yes FAC
45 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Asplenium platyneuron 10 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
20 Yes FAC
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
FACU species 95 x 4 = 380
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 145 (A) 530 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.66
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-3 7.5Y R 3/4 100
3-20 7.5YR 4/6 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Taylor Morrison - Hickory Ridge Rd City/County: Harrisburg/Cabarrus Co
Applicant/Owner: TaylorMorrison
Investigator(s): NRN
Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 7/5/21
State: NC Sampling Point: Wetland C
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.2825
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD: Enon sandy loam
Slope (%): 8-15
Long: -80.6254 Datum:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification:
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C9)
_
x Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave
_True _Sparsely
Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) x Drainage Patterns (B10)
_High _Hydrogen
x Saturation (A3) x Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
x Water Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Presence _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent _Crayfish
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Algal _Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
x Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetland C
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2. Platanus occidentalis
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Acer negundo
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
35 Yes FACW
30 Yes FACW
25 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2. Platanus occidentalis
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Microstegium vimineum
10
10
10
Yes
Yes
Yes
30 =Total Cover
FACW
FACW
FAC
15 20% of total cover: 6
2. Lycopus americanus
3. Dichanthelium clandestinum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Woody Vine Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
40
30
20
Yes
Yes
Yes
90 =Total Cover
FAC
OBL
FAC
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
(Plot size: 30 )
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 30 x 1 = 30
FACW species 85 x 2 = 170
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 220 (A) 515 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.34
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wetland C
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-6 7.5YR 4/1
90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL/M
6-20 7.5YR 4/6 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Taylor Morrison - Hickory Ridge Rd City/County: Harrisburg/Cabarrus Co
Applicant/Owner: TaylorMorrison
Investigator(s): NRN
Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 7/5/21
State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DP2
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.2824
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD: Enon sandy loam
Slope (%): 8-15
Long: -80.6254 Datum:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification:
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No x
No x
No x
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
(B8)
(C9)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave Surface
_Surface _True _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Water _Presence _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent _Crayfish
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Algal _Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Juniperus virginiana
2. Robinia pseudoacacia
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
35 Yes FACU
30 Yes FACU
30 Yes FAC
95 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 48 20% of total cover: 19
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Rubus argutus
2. Robinia pseudoacacia
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Microstegium vimineum
20
10
10
Yes
Yes
Yes
40 =Total Cover
FACU
FACU
FAC
20 20% of total cover: 8
2. Silphium compositum
3. Rumex crispus
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
50
30
20
Yes
Yes
Yes
100 =Total Cover
FAC
UPL
FAC
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
15
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FACU
8 20% of total cover: 3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
FACU species 110 x 4 = 440
UPL species 30 x 5 = 150
Column Totals: 250 (A) 920 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.68
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Upland DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-20 7.5YR 4/6 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
7/5/21 Evaluator: NRN
Easting:
-80.6251
Project:
Taylor Morrison -Hickory Ridge Rd: Jurisdictional Tributary A
Northing:
35.2824
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
24.0
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
10.5
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hvdrolo
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
8.5
C. Biolo
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
5.0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from
Origins.
NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
7/5/21 Evaluator: NRN
Easting:
-80.6281
Project:
Taylor Morrison -Hickory Ridge Rd:Jurisdictional Tributary F
Northing:
35.2826
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
32.5
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
16.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hvdrolo
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
10.5
C. Biolo
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
6.0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from
Origins.
NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
7/5/21 Evaluator: NRN
Easting:
-80.6283
Project:
Taylor Morrison -Hickory Ridge Rd:Jurisdictional Tributary H
Northing:
35.2841
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
24.5
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
12.5
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hvdrolo
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
7.0
C. Biolo
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
5.0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from
Origins.
NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
1
n n-
ri]
Fri
— Daily Total
- 30-Day Rolling Total
30-Year Normal Range
Dec
2020
Jan
2021
Feb
2021
Mar
2021
Coordinates
35.2827, -80.6274
Observation Date
2021-07-05
Elevation (ft)
594.59
Drought Index (PDSI)
Incipient wetness (2021-06)
WebWIMP H2O Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Apr
2021
May
2021
Jun
2021
Jul
2021
Aug
2021
Sep
2021
Oct
2021
Nov
2021
30 Days Ending
30th %ile (in)
70th %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2021-07-05
2.548819
6.126772
3.673228
Normal
2
3
6
2021-06-05
2.365748
4.649606
2.472441
Normal
2
2
4
2021-05-06
3.040551
4.856693
2.251969
Dry
1
1
1
Result
Normal Conditions - 11
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days (Normal)
Days (Antecedent)
CONCORD
35.4111, -80.5833
700.131
9.213
105.541
5.118
11347
90
HARRISBURG 0.8 S
35.3104, -80.6656
669.948
2.882
75.358
1.514
4
0
CONCORD 4.5 SW
35.3647, -80.655
636.155
5.875
41.565
2.888
2
0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Cabarrus City: Harrisburg
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.2827 ° N, Long. -80.6274° pt.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: McKee Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Rocky River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Rocky 03040105
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are and are not "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
® Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 2915 linear feet: 6 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 3.99 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: The site contains 0.057 acres of isolated wetlands and 301 linear feet of isolated stream that are being
considered isolated and non jurisdictional. Specifically, as identified on the attached delineation map, Isolated Wetland
B and C and Isolated Stream A are being considered isolated and non jurisdictional. Based upon on -site evaluations,
there are no signs of hydrologic connections from this stream and wetland areas to other jurisdictional features on/off
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

the site. There are no signs of overland flow, drainage patterns, ditches, grassed swales, or any other kind of drainage
system that may connect this area to downslope jurisdictional areas..

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 1417 square miles
Drainage area: 8.35 square miles
Average annual rainfall: 44 inches
Average annual snowfall: 0 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 3 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 5-10 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 2-5 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Project waters flow into McKee Creek (onsite) on the north-western area of the project
boundary which flows into Reedy Creek, then into Rocky River. Other jurisdictional tributaries located on the property
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

flow into unamed tributaries before entering McKee Creek, which flows into Reedy Creek, before entering Rocky River.
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 6 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands
® Cobbles ® Gravel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Generally stable.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: Few Present.
Tributary geometry: Raiiirmiguirminia
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: Jurisditcional tributary McKee Creek is perennial. Remaining juridictional tributaries D,F,G,
and H are intermittent and feed into McKee Creek off -site.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
® changes in the character of soil
® shelving
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
❑®®®®®®
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: No visible pollutants.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

Identify specific pollutants, if known:

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): Forested, > 50' .
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics: Wetlands downslope of tributaries.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Aquatic Vegetation.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 3.99 acres
Wetland type. Explain: Bottomland Hardwood Forest.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: N/A.
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Overland sheetflow
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknowi. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 5-10 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 2-5 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the i-year floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: Forested 80% .
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:Aquatic Vegetation .
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 4
Approximately (3.99) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N)
Wetland K (Y)
Wetland I (Y)
Size (in acres)
0.45
0.44
Directly abuts? (Y/N)
Wetland J (Y)
Wetland E (Y)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
Size (in acres)
3.09
0.01
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Jurisdictional tributary McKee Creek exhibits geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators
consistent with perennial flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream
Identification Assessment Form.
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Jurisdictional tributaries D, F, G, and H exhibit geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators consistent
with intermittent flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream Identification

Assessment Forms.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 2915 linear feet 6 width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
▪ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands K and J directly abut perennial tributary McKee Creek.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Wetlands I and E directly abut onsite intermittent RPW tributaries with no break in jurisdiction.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 3.99 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
® Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:The site contains
0.057 acres of wetlands and 301 linear feet of stream that are being considered isolated and non jurisdictional. Specifically,
as identified on the attached delineation map, Isolated Wetlands B and C and Isolated Stream A are being considered
isolated and non jurisdictional. As indicated by the attached topographic maps, the wetland areas in question are located
on a relatively flat topographic area. Based upon on -site evaluations, there are no signs of hydrologic connections from this
wetland and stream area to other jurisdictional feautures on or off the site. There are no signs of overland flow, drainage
patterns, ditches, grassed swales, or any other kind of drainage system that may connect this area to downslope
jurisdictional features and areas.
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): 301 linear feet, 6 width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: 0.057 acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Harrisburg, NC 1993; 1:24,000.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript Cabarrus County 1988.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:Figure 5 (07/02/21).
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Figure 3; Cabarrus County GIS 2020.

or ® Other (Name & Date):Photos 1-8, (7/5/21).
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law: .
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

Threatened & Endangered Species
Report
a--+
L
O
Q
cc
v)
a)
u
a)
Q
cn
75
aV
s_
aV
01
C
(11
75
C
w
06
75
aV
C
aV
"ICES'
s_
H

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Tramore Station
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
Field investigation conducted during the week of August 8, 2022
Charlotte Office:
106 12-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. ca m
www.wetlands-epg.co r i
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Tramore Station - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Tramore Station (Hickory Ridge) site (+/- 51.43 acres) is located just west of
Hickory Ridge Road, just north of Timber Ridge Road, and just east of McKee
Creek, in Cabarrus County, North Carolina. It can be found on the Harrisburg,
NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.2827 N, longitude is -
80.6274 W. The topography is gently to moderately sloped. The elevation
ranges from 570 to 630 ft. (Figure 1). The site is primarily farmland and wooded
slopes with hay fields, abandoned crop field, fencerows, dirt roads, houses,
sheds, driveways, and landscaping.
Figure 1:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LOCATION
II! Lat. 35.2827 N
Long. -80.6274 W
HOC.: 01040105
ROCKY
W.Oarda and F ''rwrrwrtal Planning Group
Leonard 5. Aidier. PLLC.
ronnndrrY49.e1031ds-epg.mm
7,34) 904.1377
.rw,..nc16 [s epvtom
STUDY LIMITS
SCALE
1:24,000
ACRES+/-
51.43
Pre :
VVEPGProi ect # 01164
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
MCi(EE CREEK
HICKORY RIDGE (TAYLOR MORRtSON)
Cabarrus Co., NC
USGS MAP
For study purposes only - Set cr to USAGE/NODEverificc tio7
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By
FIGURE 1
07/02/20
2
Leonard S. Rindnei , PLLC.

Tramore Station - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2: VICINITY MAP
WeJ�nds and Ernvnnmemal PWnvtt Grup
teuned 5. Fxdnce, PLLC
Im.nnpnva,wodanm opg.com
(7045941.3t77
Prepared fon
HICKORY RIDGE (TAYLOR MORRISON)
Cabarrus Co., NC
VICINITY MAP
For study purses only - Subject to UfACEMCDEO verfYioltion
Drawn By:
BLK
Reviewed By:
MURK 2
07/02/20
WE P G Proi ect # 01164
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
3
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Tramore Station - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 3: AERIAL MAP
Preparec for:
Wet ods and Ernrconm ntal Planning Group
Leonard S Red., PLLC.
ion nnd,crL vedads.opgcom
704) 904.2277
WE P G Proi ect # 01164
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
== r -• Frrerrirmp.c r• •_--.-.-- -s
ie.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMI75
Aerial Imagery Provided by
Cabarrus Co GIS 2020
HICKORY RIDGE (TAYLOR MORRISON) Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Cabarrus Ca, NC
AERIAL MAP
For study purposes Only -Subject to USACt/NLVta verification
BLK
FIGURE 3
07/02/20
4
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Tramore Station - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 4: NRCS SOIL MAP
•
--V i 111%11
at ant,
rd�l NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
(. T / Cabarrus Co 1988
Map Unit Symbol
,ifiefivr.{ �-
0-0
i(i
- - 41T •
Map Unit Name
�
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
s
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ChA
Chewecla sandy Warn, p to 2
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
9.5
18.8`:.
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
18_3
36.0%
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
21.3
42.0%
PaF
Pacoiet sandy loam. 15 to 35
percent slopes
1.7
3.3%
Totals for Area of Interest
50.8
100.O%
Prepared for:
wean& and ErmroP4rwpsi Hmnr.R Group
LaaiW 5-Pndner, PLLC.
lennedr ert3w.Pm-44-49i44 ,m
(/f. 904 2111
wrenu...we,d. ow.com
WE P G Proi ect # 01164
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
HICKORY RIDGE (TAYLOR MORRISONI
Cabarrus Co., NC
SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP
For study purposes only- Subject ro USACZM W EQ verification
Drawn by:
SLK
Reviewed By:
1!.1J 1?f. 4
07/02/20
5
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Tramore Station - Threatened /Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC website
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/JMKSYYCNP5AP7GCW3QGLEVPYCl/re
sources was referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened,
Endangered and Protected species for the Tamore Station site in Cabarrus
County, North Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1). Maps
and aerial photographs were assembled, and the site was investigated during the
weeks of July 18, 2022, and August 8, 2022.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
the Tramore Station site in Cabarrus County, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC
**Data search on July 18, 2022
Group Name
Vascular
Plants
Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii)
Vertebrate Northern Long -Eared Bat
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Vertebrate Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Federal
Status
Endangered
Threatened
Protected
Record Status
Current
Probable/Potential
Current
VYEPGProi ect # 01164 6
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Tramore Station - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
One plant species with federal protection was listed as potentially occurring on
the Tramore Station site:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
Two animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring on
the Tramore Station Site.
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
• Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
RESULTS:
The site is primarily farmland and wooded slopes with hay fields, abandoned
crop field, fencerows, dirt roads, houses, sheds, driveways, and landscaping.
The disturbed mixed hardwoods forest on the slopes and drainages. The canopy
is composed of White Oak (Quercus alba), Post Oak (Q. stellata), Red Oak (Q.
rubra), Southern Red Oak (Q. falcata), Willow Oak (Q. phellos), Pignut Hickory
(Carya glabra), Shagbark Hickory (C. ovata), Sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Cottonwood (Populus
deltoides), Hackberry (Celtis Iaevigata), American Elm (Ulmus americana), and
White Ash (Fraxinus americana). The subcanopy is composed of Flowering
Dogwood (Corpus florida), American Holly (Ilex opaca), Mulberry (Morus rubra),
Winged Elm (Ulmus alata), Black Cherry (Prunus serotina), Eastern Red Cedar,
and Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica). The shrub layer includes Black Haw
(Viburnum prunifolium), Pinxter Azalea (Rhododendron nudiflorum), Heart's-a-
burtstin (Euonymus americanus), Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), Chinese Privet
WE P G Proi ect # 01164
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Tramore Station - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
(Ligustrum sinense), and Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Vines present
are Japanese Honeysuckle, Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia),
Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Catbrier, and Poison Ivy. The herb layer includes
Wild Ginger (Hexastylis arifolia), Christmas Fern (Polystichum acrostichoides),
Ebony Spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), Spotted Wintergreen (Chimaphila
maculata), American alumroot (Heuchera americana), Running Pine
(Lycopodium flabelliforme), Downy Rattlesnake Plantain (Goodyera pubescens),
Curlyheads (Clematis ochroleuca), Beardtongue (Penstemon sp.), Solomon's
Seal (Polygonatum biflorum) and Japanese Stilt Grass (Microstegium vimineum).
There are large hayfields in the western portion of the site near McKee Creek.
The hay fields are dominated by forage grasses and common forbs including
Fescue (Festuca spp.), Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata), Kentucky Bluegrass
(Poa pratensis), Johnson Grass (Sorghum halepense), White clover (Trifolium
repens), and Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Summer forbs and weedy species
present include Queen Anne's Lace (Daucus carota), Plantain (Plantago sp.),
Pigweed (Amaranthus sp.), and Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum).
The assemblage of plants growing in the abandoned crop field, and more open
disturbed areas and roadsides includes Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza
cuneata), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Blackberry, Broomsedge (Andropogon
virginicus), Splitbeard (A. ternarius), Groundsel (Senicio sp.), Johnson Grass,
Rabbit Tobacco (Gnapthalium obtusifolium), Beggars Ticks (Desmodium sp.),
Thoroughwort (Eupatorium sp.), St. John's Wort (Hypericum punctatum), and
Toadflax (Linaria canadensis).
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower along the roadsides,
power line rights -of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were
examined, and the species was not observed. WEPG concludes
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) does not occur on the
site.
• No suitable habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no
sightings nor were any nesting sites observed. WEPG concludes Bald
Eagle (Haliaeetus /eucocepha/us) does not occur on the site.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htm Is/project_review/N LE B_in_WNC. htm I)
WEPG concludes the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no
further action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the
Northern Long-eared Bat.
WEPGProi ect # 01164 8
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Tramore Station - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
August 8, 2022
WEPGProi ect # 01164
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
9
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Tramore Station - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained Botanist and has conducted field work and
investigative studies covering thousands of cumulative acres in both North and South
Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 1997-1998. Organized,
directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 2000-2001. Organized, directed,
and worked in field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 45,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 - present.
• Located and identified at least six previously unreported populations of Federally
Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified four previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Located a previously unknown population of Federally Endangered Schweinitz's
Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC. This discovery led (in part) to
the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant Conservation
Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has become a Recovery
Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in Mecklenburg,
Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
WE P G Proi ect # 01164 10
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Cultural Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 • P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
July 22, 2022
Ms. Amber Lipsky
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Subject: Findings - Limited Cultural Resources Literature Review
Hickory Ridge Road Development Tract
Harrisburg, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates No. 22-649-193
Dear Ms. Lipsky:
BACKGROUND
During July 2022, R.S. Webb & Associates (RSWA) conducted a limited cultural resources literature
review for the proposed Hickory Ridge Road development tract near Harrisburg, Cabarrus County,
North Carolina. The project area covers approximately 21 hectares (51 acres) located west of the
intersection of Hickory Ridge Road and Grady Harris Road in southwestern Cabarrus County (Figure
1).
For this study, a cultural resource is defined as a discrete area of human activity that is at least 50
years old. Cultural resources include, but are not limited to, archeological sites, historic structures,
military earthworks, mines/mining features, historic cemeteries, and historic landscape features. The
purpose of the current study was to determine if previously recorded cultural resources are located
within the project area.
METHODOLOGY
Through the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWEB database, information was
reviewed regarding National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties, Cabarrus County
surveyed -only historic resources, local landmarks, state study -list sites and historic resources
determined by the SHPO to be eligible for the NRHP. During this limited literature review, the
North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was not consulted. Historic county maps were
examined online through North Carolina Maps, a collaboration of the University of North Carolina,
the State Archives of North Carolina, and the Outer Banks History Center. Historic aerial
photography and additional historic maps were accessed through Historicaerials.com,
Earthexplorer.usgs.gov, Legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/, and/or Alabamamaps .ua.edu.
The following primary sources were found to be useful in searching for historic resources within and
adjacent to the project area:
•
•
•
1891 Official Military Atlas of the Civil War (Davis et al. reprinted, 1983)
1910 USDA Cabarrus County Sheet Soil Map
Circa 1921 Rural Delivery Map of Cabarrus County

Findings - Limited Cultural Resources Literature Review, Hickory Ridge Road Tract, Cabarrus County Page 2
July 22, 2022
•
•
•
•
1938 and 1967 State Highway and Public Works Commission Map of Cabarrus County
1949 and 1969 USGS Harrisburg, NC 7.5-minute quadrangles
1949 and 1969 (Revised 1987) USGS Concord SE, NC 7.5 minute quadrangles
1956, 1968, and 1983 aerial photographs of Cabarrus County
1993-2018 Google Earth aerial photography.
RESULTS
National Register of Historic Places: There are no NRHP-listed historic properties located within
1.0 km of the current study tract.
Cabarrus County Historic Resources: The HPOWEB database identifies no local landmarks or
properties determined eligible for the NRHP within 1.0 km of the study tract. The database shows
one study list property and three Surveyed -only historic resources within 1.0 km of the study tract;
all are within 200 m of project area boundaries (Figure 1). Study list property No. CA513 (Baxter
Parks House) is located north of Grady Harris Road approximately 175 m northeast of the study
tract; it was added to the Study List in 1980. Of the surveyed -only resources, No. CA373 is the
historic Andrew Davis House located east of Hickory Ridge Road, 130 m northeast of the project
area. Resource Nos. CA462 (Lige-Howie Farm) and CA479 (McClellan -Alexander Farm) are
located 120 m beyond the southern study tract boundary (CA462) and 185 m north (CA479) of the
project area. Online records for No. 462 indicate associated houses built in 1830 and 1919 are
among a large cluster of buildings 120 to 190 m south of the study tract. The extent of historic
property boundaries for these two nearby farms are unknown.
Revolutionary War Actions/Features: There were no recorded Revolutionary War military
engagements in Cabarrus County. The closest such known events took place in central Mecklenburg
County more than 19 km southwest of the project area (Lewis 2021).
Civil War Actions/Features: Review of the Civil War military atlas (Davis et al. 1983) revealed that
no Civil War infantry engagements occurred in or near Cabarrus County. Maps indicate that
Confederate President Jefferson Davis passed from Richmond, Virginia to his capture in Irwinville,
Georgia on May 10, 1864 via Harrisburg (4.5 km north), but his Union cavalry pursuers moved
generally west from Concord (14.5 km northeast) then to Charlotte, thus bypassing the Cabarrus
County area. While bivouacking, scouting, or raiding could have taken place nearby, there is no
indication of Civil War military activity in or near the study tract (Davis et al. 1983).
Historic Cemeteries: The USGS topographic maps reviewed show no mapped cemeteries within at
least 1.0 km of the project area.
Structures and Features on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs: Maps from 1910 and circa 1921
show the intersection of Hickory Ridge Road and Grady Harris Road at the eastern study tract
boundary. A road passing through the project area, northeast -southwest, connects Hickory Ridge
Road with an east -west oriented system of secondary roads passing south of the study tract. These
early maps show no buildings within the study tract, but one building was located at an intersection
just southwest of the project area (Figure 1). Maps from 1938 and 1949 also show the road
intersection at the eastern study tract boundary, but indicate no use of the secondary road system to
the west. No roads or buildings were shown in the project area and the road to the south was
truncated east of McKee Creek, where a large outbuilding was depicted just beyond the southwestern

Findings - Limited Cultural Resources Literature Review, Hickory Ridge Road Tract, Cabarrus County Page 3
July 22, 2022
study tract corner (Figure 1). USGS topographic maps from the late 1960s show the road to the
south truncated still further to the east with dwellings located east, north and south of the project area
(Figure 1).
Aerial photographs dating to 1956, 1968 and 1983 show: scattered development along the west side
of Hickory Ridge Road, north of the project area; a large complex of buildings south of the study
tract; and cultivation or pasture in the eastern and western parts of the study tract. The aerials show
no trace of a road through the study tract and waning use of the road passing along the southwestern
study tract corner; a building remained present at the southwestern study tract boundary at least
through 2002. A single building in the northeastern part of the study tract was present after 1968
(tax record indicates 1976) and two additional buildings were present in the eastern part of the
project area as of 1998. The general distribution of roads, fields/pasture and woods in and near the
project area are unchanged since 1956, but a significant education complex was developed just north
of the study tract circa 2018.
CONCLUSIONS
There are no NRHP-listed properties, determined -eligible properties, study -listed resources,
designated local landmarks, cemeteries, or otherwise recorded historic resources located within the
study tract. Four recorded historic resources are situated within 200 m of the eastern study tract
boundaries and historic maps/aerial photographs suggest a historic association of the project area
with one or more of them. Historic maps and aerial photographs indicate early 20th century road
systems within and east or south of the project area; these routes appear to have been abandoned by
the middle 20th century. Maps and aerials indicate agricultural use of the study tract through the
middle 20th century and no occupation of the study tract prior to 1976.
CLOSING COMMENTS
Ms. Lipsky, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R S WEB & ASSOCIATES
G�
ell J. wen o rt S. ( eve eb
Senior istorian President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachments: Figure 1
REFERENCES
Davis, G.B., L. J. Perry and J. W. Kirkley, compiled by C. D. Cowles
1983 Atlas to Accompany the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
Reprint of the 1891-1895 edition. The Fairfax Press, New York.
Lewis, J.D.
2021 The American Revolution in North Carolina. Internet -Online. Found at:
http://www.carolana.com /NC/Revolution/home.html. Accessed July 2022.

Y 3
, CA479..�
n r (Mee 1'ellan-
Alaander_Farm,-,
fl -'�. Log:House) �i
H 672
' s,-3� 'A
A Structure on Historic Maps and Aerials
❑ Recorded Historic Resource
Map Reference: 7.5-Minute USGS Quadrangles
Harrisburg (1993) and
Concord SE (1969 PR 1987), NC
Road Course Present in Middle 20th Century
Scale
0 610 meters
0 2000 feet
Figure 1 Project Area and Recorded Cultural Resources