20221132 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220818

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/27/2022
BIMS # Assigned*
20221132
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
O $240.00
O $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
la. Name of project:
Blake Landing
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jeff Harbour
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
8/18/2022
Nearest Body of Water
White Meadows Branch
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-IV
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.3687
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.8434
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
E✓ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes ®No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner EO Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
CHATHAM CAPITAL GROUP LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
1064 N LAKESIDE DR
Address Line 2
City
Smithfield
Postal / Zip Code
27577
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Andrew Ross
3b. Business Name:
Triangle Land Partners, LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 5548
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27512
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jeff Harbour
4b. Business Name:
Terracon
4c. Address
Street Address
2401 Brentwood Rd
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27604
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Lillington
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0548-68-9957.000
2b. Property size:
125
2c. Project Address
Street Address
NC Highway 210
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Lillington NC
Postal / Zip Code Country

3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
White Meadows Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HOC in which the project is located.
030300040205
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
Undeveloped land partially wooded with areas that have been used for silviculture. Agriculture field along road. Land use is rural residential primarily
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No O Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
35
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,950
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
Develop a residential community to meet housing needs in this part of Harnett County
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
This is a mixed -residential development of both traditional single-family lots and town homes. We have a total of 363 lots, with 168 single-family lots and 195 townhome units. Project will
have gravity sewer to an on -site pump station and Town of Lillington water service. Approximately 26 Ac. (21 % of property) open space is provided in accordance with Town standards for
cluster subdivisions. There are approximately 11,507 LF of public roads.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
( Yes
Comments:
0 No 0 Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
O Preliminary 0 Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-02333
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Terracon
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USAGE 2-11-2022
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
0 Wetlands O Streams -tributaries 0 Buffers
O Open Waters O Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts

3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Utility Crossing
Temporary
Excavation
White Meadow Branch (T2a)
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
12
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
12
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
12
3j. Comments:
Temporary impact to install 6" force main. Work will be performed in the dry using pump around methods. Stream bed and banks will be returned to
preconstruction contours.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The project has been designed to avoid impacts to wetlands and streams. One utility crossing will temporarily impact a small stream channel
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The project has been designed to avoid impacts to wetlands and streams. One utility crossing will temporarily impact a small stream channel. The area
will be returned to original contours after construction. One additional utility line will be aerial and will not impact any features.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
0 Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Does not exceed mitigation thresholds
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes O No
If no, explain why:
Not a State buffered area
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes • No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
0Yes ONo
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local govemment stormwater program?
r.)
Yes O No
0 N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
RI Local Govemment 0 State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
O Phase II 0 NSW 0 USMP O Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Harnett County
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation

la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes O No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
O Yes O No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
single and complete project with independent use
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0 Yes * No O N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes U No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes U No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0 Yes ® No
O No ;0 Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes ® No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0 Yes ® No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
OYes ONo
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Terracon assessed the area for potential habitat for the species listed by USFWS (IPaC) for this area. Potential habitat was not identified for any of the
listed species. NCNHP data from August 2022 does not identify any listed species within at least 1 mile of the site
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes ( No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes G No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO GIS
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
0 Yes J No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Maps

Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Blake Landing Permit Drawings.pdf 7.74MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
@I By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jeff Harbour
Signature
Dew
Date
8/18/2022

\WETLAND "W1"-\
\ AFT
\\
9/9
GENERAL UTILITY CO
PIN # 0549-50-2048
DB 686 PG 210
TRIBUTARY "T1" -.
'TRIBUTARY'T
N7
ROBINSON ROBERT E &
ROBINSON PATRICIA E
PIN # 0548-47-7032
DB 264E P6 488
WETLAND "W4"
,-
)
61
CROSSING #1 (UTILITY)
WETLAND "W2"
WETLAri"W3"
TRIBUTARY "T2B"
9/9
FINE LAND HOLDINGS LLC w
PIN # 0548-67-9804
DB 3723 P6 799
MCLAMB ANN MARIE
N M 0548-] IM"
P DB800 PG 040.3
9/9
JOHNSON LINDA & MARTIN
MEGAN LANE JOHNSON
PIN # 0549-61-4424
DB1032 PG482
r WETLAND "W5"
LILLINGTON STAR
REFORMED FWBC & AKA
LILLINGTON STAR FWBC
PIN # 0549-80-5569
DB 3253 PG 594
9/9
FINE LAND HOLDINGS LLC
PIN # 0548-899755
DB 3710 PG 938
�I1
WORLD CHANGER F
CENTER & MINISTI
PIN # 0549-90-3
DB 3475 PG 71:
PERMANENT IMPACT TOTALS
STREAM IMPACT (UTILITY)
75 SF
12 LF
SHEET 1
CE G OUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
400'
NORTH
0 400'
SCALE: 1" = 400'
800'
REVISIONS:
BLAKE LANDING
OVERALL KEY MAP
LILLINGTON, NC

/
TRIBUTARY "T1"—
ROBINSON ROBERT E &
ROBINSON PATRICIA E
PIN. # 0548-47-7032
DB 2648 PG 488
�I! %/ds,,i/////(���r--= =s \1
=� ,�
)
WETLAN D'Vl-�f /
GENERAL UTILITY CO I, }( ` l
PIN #0549-50-2048 �I I �� I �1 �/% S (/r r�/ \ �' \� ./-') \•
(0)?)4(0i'ty\
l/r ��� ��_ �/ ��/�{ 1 1 DB 3253 PG 594
\��=\� 74 -
I�r�;, 1//I�>���' �II 1 �l
JOHNSON LINDA & MARTIN
MEGAN LANE JOHNSON
PIN # 0549-61-4424
DB 1032 PG 482 LILLINGTON STAR
/2/ REFORMED FWBC & AKA
? / I} � ��� LILLINGTON STAR FWEC
' a � —�1gT PIN # osas eo-ssss
1,Yk-u41�\`\N���% f `--=ram, faJ'lt77
\5'11 r 1/)&/r)%? 5.0-
//1 r , oZ
/� �Cf ���• ��� WETLAND"W3"e�/�J// / 11 "' r i �'•% _ lJ
l
��rf �J1111111r()(1t�.�— 1
�lr Jll f//1� I f 1 N \ w
�i��fJiiJf�,�vl fr r jr1� l f
fit(///111/r111 I I
Jl Jll �1 l ti �
/l3'�o—rim/11�iS {� / / 1/ t tS( f I I
T�2IBUTARY"Ti / /
�.�%--14(/)/rf(f1 ti��11� ��`� -- _-
( 141510,11 11�`' \ L\ ` -- i
ifi, ::..,„ ,_,_-„,-__„-----
y-,. tiff \ � \_-'0' -12, ,-cA .
ls�1_
ET.Alp
FINE LAND HOLDINGS LLC
PIN #0548-67-9804
DB 3723 PG 799 MCLAMBx
ANN
eoovco PIN Q
063
DB
ct-
Q5 FINE LAND HOLDINGS LLC
J PIN # 0548-89-9755
G Q DB3710 PG938
= 00
WORLD CHANGER HARVEST
CENTER & MINISTRY, LLC
PIN # 0549-90-3472
DB 3475 PG 714
SHEET 2
CE G OUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
400'
NORTH
0 400'
SCALE: 1 " = 400'
800'
REVISIONS:
BLAKE LANDING
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
LILLINGTON, NC

\( \ \ \1 \1 \\ i /r /' / / / J / // // / / // //,' / /-- �/ /j/ ///'/////
\ / 1 / / // / / / / / / / /
\ ( \ I ( \ / / / / // / �/ /// / / l/l�//i /
\ \ I ) \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / WETLANDS 1 /� // / / / / / /
\ li \ — // / / / / ///// / / / / / ///(TYP.) /: <v / / // / / //
\ SSMH 0 l 1 I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ( / / / /
1 RIM=177.34 \ —� r/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /1 % / / /
INVIN=168.00 \ \.__-) r // J // // ///7/// /// //_ /// / / / // / /
/ / T• // / // // / / / / ��" l 1 I I / / / / //
SSMH 1 J / / f / / / / / / /
\737 )
/ / / / / / / / / / / // / / ( ' / / / / / // / / / / / /
I II INVIN=168.40 SSMH2/ / / // / /�//� //// // / // / / / / / / / / / / / / //
V� INVOUT=168.20 f / / / /// / / / / / / / / // ( / / / / / / / / / / / /
_ .; ♦ RIM=180.20 /
1 \ `♦ INVIN=1-6880/ / J// % // / / / / / // ( / / / J / / / 1
♦ INV OUT=168.60 --� �i / / / / / / / / / 1 I ' / / / / / / / /
/ ♦ ♦ d- / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I TOP OF BANK I ( / /
♦♦♦ 'Py ��' ♦♦® �\/ / / // /// / / / / / / // ( / / / 1/ /////// / 1 �1 \ 7
♦ ♦ / / ,/ ./ , ,/ / / / / 1 f / 1 / //
i
♦ ` ` \ ♦ ♦ rSTREAM IMPACT (UTILITY) 12 LF, 75 SF / ^ / I / // / / / / // / // // ' / /) /
♦ �, ♦♦ / / / / //�' \ / ///l/ / / l l / /l l j ♦♦♦♦♦\////// /"//// // // /
///// // / /
I /
\ •♦ ♦♦ --4 z //l// / ///I/ /// /// / / I / / j (
\•♦ /T /// / // / /// / / / / / / / / /
\ / PROPOSED TREELINE 2 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ �f i ♦ ♦ /� �% / / / /401PU LI(l/UTI�IT / / / / /
/DISTURBED LIMIT / / ♦ (� r / / VAS�MEiVT( / / / / /
1 1 LINE (TYP.) / ' ♦ ♦ f \ ( ( / / /
I �� , / //22/
�j( j;� _, ♦�♦ ♦♦♦/ / i l I I / / / /
/
7�//,,,/
/ /•♦ ♦ ♦♦ )/ / / //SSMH3 °
I /♦fC
/1///,__///j////// ,/2///y�
\\ /° j/ /j j l / l / /0/ RIM=181.91 I
/ /// �I ♦ ♦♦ ♦INVIN=17o.20 '
• INV OUT=170.00
---- / / /�/ �6� % // //// V' / I / / / / / / / 6"FORCE \ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦
_�-- //// 1 (/ /16,/ �j/// / I I I I 1 I l / / / MAIN(TYP.) ` /
/ i i / / / /// / % // / / / �J / / /
//ii/�//6�/ //�A�\ //// // / ////7 //// �;/I/ l i♦
- —� ��/ �/ i//�l 160�J, — \ '/r1 t/ //l / / /// / / / / / / 1 / ♦♦
--"--/i•
,./ / / / /r _ 7//`� I / // / f / //// / / /// / / / / j ♦
- — --/// i�r / / ) /�/ti /// // / //// / / // / / / S / / / / /
/, / / %f�/ // );�/ ^6c ��/ // // / // / / / / / / 2 / / 7
—// _/ / j// < \ l////// /(//° / //////
i / //
/ / / / / / / / / /
--/// // /// \ r- J// /// / �// / /'''\'/^/ / / / / / / / l / / /
7 V 2( ..>2)II ////I / / / /I I (//i / i / / / / � // ,
/ / r /
cCa
PERMANENT IMPACT TOTALS
STREAM IMPACT (UTILITY)
75 SF
12 LF
STREAM IMPACT (UTILTY)
AE$
NORTH
SHEET 3
CE GROUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
REVISIONS:
BLAKE LANDING
CROSSING #1 (UTILITY)
(PLAN VIEW)
LILLINGTON, NC

180
170
160
150
oo
\
\
\•
,�/
TsN
\
/
/��
N
\
/
\
\
/
/
/
\
EXISI ING
GRADE
/
\
/
—
239
F tl UL 0 CIP
©
0.50%
37 LF
301E
6
(ci) 0 54 %iN�,
/
CL350 DIP
\
/
�
\
\
/
\
1
*AERIAL
PIERS (TYP.)
f
!
\ /
/
6
6" )-ONCE MAIN
(TYP )
I r
V
MIN.
36BEL W
STING GRAI'
20'
FM
STA 15-F12.46, 0.0()
RIM ELEV=180.20
INV IN=168.80(3)
IPJ1T=168.60
4'0 MANHOLE
STA 15+49.64, 0.0()
RIM ELEV=177.37
INV IN=168.40(2)
INV OUT=168.20
SSMH-3
4'0 MANHOLE
o"
o rn v o
o
w
O) O
crj II o
r` i II
0
=
N J II I—
N— w Z O
N Z
= cG
U) E Z Z
CO V
(O
oo (o
4 r
oo
CO
(o
pp
(o
co
N
00 M
up (o
(p
M r7
(O p)
M of
O
0)
6 i<
E
6)
co
E
12+50 13+00 14+00 15+00
ALIGNMENT - UTILITY CROSSING
PV - (25)
180
170
160
150
16+00
SHEET 4
CE Ci3OUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
REVISIONS:
BLAKE LANDING
CROSSING #1 (UTILITY)
(PROFILE VIEW)
LILLINGTON, NC

PUMP -AROUND PRACTICE
Silt Bog os shown
in detail 3.25.
pumps should discharge
onto a stable velocity
dissipator made of rip rap
PLAN VIEW
discharge hoses
WORK AREA
LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED
THAT WHICH CAN BE
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
SECTION A —A
moos sheeting
work oreo
stream
diversion pumps
in take
flowOSe
�r—
sump-hole
or pool
(12" to 18" deep
w/ 2' diameter)
base flow + 1 foot
(2 foot minimum)
cross section of sandbag dike
PUMP -AROUND PRACTICE
DESCRIPTION:
The work should consist of installing a temporary pump around
and supporting measures to divert flow around in -stream construction sites.
IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE:
Sediment control measures, pump -around practices, and associated channel and bank
construction should be completed in the following sequence (refer to Detail 2/SE1):
1 Construction should not begin until all sediment and erosion control measures
have been installed and approved by the engineer and the sediment control inspector
The contractor should stay within the limits of the disturbance as shown on the plan
and 'minimize disturbance within the work area whenever possible.
2 Upon installation of all sediment control measures and approval by the sediment
control inspector, the contractor should begin work at the upstream
section and proceed downstream beginning with the establishment of stabilised construction
entrances. In some cases, work may begin downstream if appropriate. The sequence of
construction must be followed unless the contractor gets written approval far deviations
from the engineer or local authority. Work should not be conducted in the channel durini,,
rain events.
3 Sandbag dikes should be situated at the upstream and downstream ends of the work
area as shown on the plans, and stream flow should be pumped around the work area.
The pump should discharge onto a stable velocil.y dissipater made of riprap.
4 Excavated topsoil and subsoil should be kept separate, placed on the upland side of
the excavation, and replaced in their natural order.
5 All construction should take place during stream low flows. The length of construction
time should be limited to a maximum of 2 days for each crossing.
6 Water from the work area should be pumped to a dewatering bag as shown in detail 3.25.
The measure should be located
such that the water drains back into the channel below the downstream sandbag dike.
7 Traversing a channel reach with equipment within the work area where no work is proposed
should be avoided. If equipment has to traverse such a reach for access to another area,
then timber mats or similar measures should be used to minimize disturbance to the channel.
Temporary stream crossings should be used only when necessary and only where noted on the
plans or specified.
8 All stream restoration measures should be installed as indicated by the plans and all
banks graded in accordance with the grading plans and typical cross -sections. All grading
must be stabilized at the end of each day with seed and mulch or seed and matting as
specified on the plans.
P After an area is completed and stabilized, the clean water dike should be removed.
After the first sediment flush, a new clean water dike should be established upstream
from the old sediment dike. Finally, upon establishment of a new sediment dike below
the old one, the old sediment dike should be removed.
10 The contractor is responsible for providing access to and maintaining all erosion
and sediment control devices until the sediment control inspector approves their removal.
PUMP AROUND PRACTICE
SHEET 5
CE G OUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
REVISIONS:
BLAKE LANDING
DETAILS
LILLINGTON, NC

lierracon
October 22, 2021
Mr. Andrew Ross
FRE Investments, LLC
341 Kilmayne Drive, Suite 201
Cary, NC 27511
Re: NC Highway 210 Property
Blake Landing No. 70217527
Wetlands and Waters Delineation
And Agency Concurrence
Harnett County, NC
Mr. Ross:
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon), has completed the requested wetlands and waters delineation for
the west half portion of the approximately 125-acre Blake Landing property located in Harnett County, NC
(Exhibit 1).Terracon staff was tasked with evaluating features that may be considered subject to jurisdiction
and permitting requirements under Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and under the
North Carolina Isolated and Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters program.
Background Research
Prior to the initiation of field efforts, several available resources were reviewed, including the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle of Bunn level, NC, the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) published Soil Survey of Harnett County, NC, aerial photography, and other
publicly available mapping resources. Field work was conducted by technical staff in August and September
2021.
Topography
Topography in the study area is characterized by gently rolling hills. Elevations range from a high of
approximately 235 feet above mean sea level (MSL) down to approximately 145 feet above MSL (Exhibit
1) based on a review of USGS mapping and other online resources.
Soils
Exhibit 2 depicts eleven soil mapping units potentially occurring in the study area: Bibb loam, frequently
flooded; Blaney loamy sand, 2-8% slopes; Candor sand, 0-8% slopes; Chewacla and Congaree loams,
frequently flooded; Dothan loamy sand,2-6%slopes; Fuquay loamy sand,0-6%slopes;Gilead loamy sand,
2-8% slopes; Gilead loamy sand, 8-15% slopes; State fine sandy loam, 0-3% slopes. rarely flooded;
Vauclose gravelly loamy sand, 2-8% slopes; and Vauclose gravelly loamy sand, 8-15% slopes.
Bibb loam, frequently flooded; Candor sand, 0-8% slopes; Chewacla and Congaree loams, frequently
flooded;Gilead loamy sand,2-8%slopes;Gilead loamy sand,8-15%slopes;Vauclose gravelly loamy sand,
2-8% slopes; and Vauclose gravelly loamy sand, 8-15% slopes soil mapping units potentially occurring in
the study area are considered hydric soils per NRCS.
Wetlands and Waters
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires regulation of discharges into waters of the U.S.
(WOTUS). Although the principal administrative agency of the CWA is the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has major responsibility for implementation,
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Wetland and Waters Delineation
Blake Landing Harnett County lierracon
October 22, 2021 Terracon Project No. 70217527
permitting, and enforcement of provisions of the CWA. Water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and streams are
subject to jurisdictional consideration under the Section 404 program. However, by regulation, certain
wetlands are also considered WOTUS.
Currently WOTUS are assessed by the CWA's pre-2015 definition of WOTUS. This definition of WOTUS
includes the implementation of rulemaking as decided in the Supreme Court's decision of the consolidated
cases Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States.
Specifically, the following waters will be under federal jurisdiction pursuant to the CWA:
• Traditional navigable waters (TNWs)
• Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
• Non-navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters that are relatively permanent where the
tributaries typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (3 months)
• Wetlands that directly abut such tributaries
• Relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water "forming geographic
features" that are described in ordinary parlance as "streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes". These
are Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs).
The following waters will be considered jurisdictional if a significant nexus (contributes to the physical,
chemical, or biological integrity of downstream TNWs) exists between these features and traditional
navigable waters:
• Non-navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent
• Wetlands adjacent to non-navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent
• Wetlands adjacent to but that do not directly abut a relatively permanent non-navigable tributary
The following waters will be considered non jurisdictional under the CWA:
• Swales or Erosional features (gullies, small washes characterized by low volume, infrequent or
short duration flows)
• Ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only uplands and that do not
carry a relatively permanent flow of water.
However, wetlands and other waterbodies that do not fall under federal regulation per the CWA may be
subject to jurisdiction by the N.0 Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) under the state's Isolated and
Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters program.
Our delineation methodology generally follows the guidance outlined in the Regional Supplement to the
USACE Wetland Delineation Manual for the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region,which states that areas
must exhibit three distinct characteristics to be considered jurisdictional wetlands: 1) prevalence of
hydrophytic(water tolerant) plants;2) presence of hydric soils; and 3)sufficient wetland hydrology indicators
within 12 inches of the ground surface.
The study area was also reviewed for the presence of tributaries (stream channels) using criteria provided
by the USACE and the NCDWR. When present, intermittent and perennial tributaries, and certain other
surface waters, are also considered jurisdictional by the USACE and/or NCDWR.
Preliminary Delineation Results
Our review of the Blake Landing Property identified five (5) potential wetlands and two (2) potential
tributaries (Exhibit 3). These features may be subject to Section 404/401 jurisdiction by the USACE and/or
NCDWR. Potential wetlands were flagged with pink-and-black and blue flagging and potential tributaries
were flagged with orange and blue flagging.
2
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Wetland and Waters Delineation
Blake Landing Harnett County lierracon
October 22, 2021 Terracon Project No. 70217527
These delineation results are considered preliminary and are subject to change pending site review by the
USACE. Exhibit 3 depicts the approximate locations and extent of the potential wetlands and tributaries
and was prepared using non-survey grade, sub-meter GPS data. Exhibit 3 is not a replacement for a
traditional survey. It is suitable for preliminary planning purposes only and for use by a surveyor to aid in
locating flags. It is Terracon's professional opinion that these potential wetlands and tributaries are subject
to Section 404/401 jurisdiction.
The following tables contain the specific information for the potential wetlands and tributaries that were
identified and delineated inside the property boundary. The potential wetlands were classified according to
the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM).
Table 1. Potential Wetlands Identified for the Blake Landing Property
Potential NCWAM Approximate Hydrophytic Hydric Soil Indicators of
Wetland Classification size (ac) Vegetation' (Munsell Hydrology'
ID color)1
Headwater Chinese privet, red 2.5Y 5/2 Water stained
W1 Forest 1.33 maple, blackberry with redox leaves, drainage
patterns
Riverine Red maple, bald 2.5Y 6/2 Surface water,
W2 Swamp Forest 32.39 cypress, netted with redox drainage
chain fern patterns
Headwater Red maple, Chinese 2.5Y 5/2 Saturation,
W3 Forest 0.47 privet, giant cane with redox drainage
patterns
Red maple, Water-stained
W4 Headwater 0.10 sweetgum, 2.5Y 5/2 leaves, drainage
Forest with redox
Japanese stiltgrass patterns
Red maple, Chinese Drainage
W5 Headwater 1.02 privet, Japanese 2.5Y 5/2 patterns,
Forest with redox
stiltgrass saturation
Total: 35.31
1 Does not include all hydrophytic vegetation or hydrology indicators
Table 2. Potential Tributaries Identified for the Blake Landing Property
Potential NCDWR Stream Approximate Amount in
Tributary Flow Regimel Subject to Buffer
ID Score Study Area (LF)
T1 Intermittent 23.5 Yes 315
T2 Perennial 31 Yes 1,639
Total: 1,954
3
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Wetland and Waters Delineation
Blake Landing Harnett County lierracon
October 22, 2021 Terracon Project No. 70217527
Clean Water Act Permitting
Most impacts to wetlands and WOTUS, which are deemed under the jurisdiction of either the federal or
state regulatory authority (USACE or NCDVVR, respectively) must first be permitted pursuant to Section
404 and Section 401 of the CWA and/or the State's Isolated and Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands
and Waters program. Activities so authorized are subject to additional requirements to comply with water
quality and storm water management. The Nationwide Permit (NWP) program, administered by USACE,
provides permitting of impacts which do not exceed pre-determined thresholds. Please note the potential
wetlands and tributaries appear to be hydrologically connected to other WOTUS based on our professional
opinion. These features will likely be subject to Section 404 jurisdiction. Terracon proposes to prepare and
submit a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request to USACE to obtain written concurrence.
Riparian Buffers/Setbacks
The study area is within the Cape Fear River Basin. Specifically, the study area is in Harnett County. The
Cape Fear River basin does not implement riparian buffers. However, Harnett County implements
Watershed Buffer Rules, a 30-foot riparian buffer may apply to streams that are mapped on either the
1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps (Exhibit 1) and/or the published Soil Survey
prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture
(Exhibit 2). Streams within the WS-IV-PA watershed district are subject to a 100-foot riparian buffer.
Tributary T2 is depicted on the 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps (Exhibit 1). T1
and T2 are depicted the published soil survey map (Exhibit 2) and are located in the WS-IV watershed per
online Harnett County GIS data. Tributaries T1 and T2 will likely be subject to a 100-foot riparian buffer.
Impacts to the riparian buffer will require coordination with Harnett County.
Recommendations
Potential WOTUS (wetlands and tributaries) have been identified on the Blake Landing Property. Terracon
proposes to prepare and submit a PJD request package for USACE. A PJD review is not a prerequisite for
Section 404/401 permitting; however, it is recommended. Terracon's professional opinion is that all
wetlands and waters will be subject to 404 jurisdiction and 404/401 permitting would be needed to impact
these features. Additionally, a buffer determination request can be prepared and submitted to the Town of
Gibsonville. Tributary T1 and T2 are likely subject to a 100-foot riparian buffer under current Harnett County
regulations. It is important to note that applying for a Section 404 permit from USACE also triggers the
need for compliance with the Endangered Species Act and the Historic Preservation Act. Terracon is
experienced with ensuring compliance with the above regulatory requirements as well as offering full
service permitting assistance.
Please contact our office if you have questions regarding this evaluation.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Rhiannon Graham Jeff Harbour, PWS
Staff Scientist Senior Scientist
Cc: Kirby LaForce
Mark Ashness, PE
4
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

'NA
1
Sh'awlown
Z.
Pohrl, ran.��r.�
i11
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadh
Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMar
Blake Landing Parcel
0
1,000 2,000
Feet
DATA SOURCES:
USGS Topo tile base map service of The National Map
(TNM), data refreshed May 2020; Site Boundary based on
Harnett County Parcel Data.
Note: Vegetation removal or alteration of soils or hydrology
after initial site evaluation can affect jurisdictional status
and may require re-evaluation of wetland boundaries.
Project No:
70217527
Scale:
1:24,000
File Name:
NChwy210
Date:
October 2021
lrerracon
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Location
Blake Landing
NC Highway 210 Property Delineation
Harnett County,
North Carolina
EXHIBIT
NO.
1

Project No:
70217527
Scale:
1:6,000
File Name:
NChwy210
Date:
October 2021
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Phone: [phone]
lrerracon
Raleigh, NC 27604
Fax: [phone]
Bb Bibb loam, frequently flooded
BnB Blaney loamy sand, 2-8% slopes
CaB Candor sand, 0-8% slopes
Ch Chewacla and Congaree loams, frequently flooded
DoB Dothan loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
FaB Fuquay loamy sand, 0-6% slopes
GaB Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes
GaD Gilead loamy sand, 8-15% slopes
St State fine sandy loam, 0-3% slopes. rarely flooded
VeB Vauclose gravelly loamy sand, 2-8% slopes
VeD Vauclose gravelly loamy sand, 8-15% slopes
Blake Landing Parcel
250 500
Feet
DATA SOURCES:
USGS Topo tile base map service of The National Map
(TNM), data refreshed May 2020; Site Boundary based on
Harnett County Parcel Data.
Note: Vegetation removal or alteration of soils or hydrology
after initial site evaluation can affect jurisdictional status
and may require re-evaluation of wetland boundaries.
NRCS Soils
Blake Landing
NC Highway 210 Property Delineation
Harnett County,
North Carolina
EXHIBIT
NO.
2

1*1
h 4 414; t
label
T1
flag
TB
Length
315
411,
Shape_Area
58030.868312
1410897.377274
20451.537081
4373.629763
44454.624241
WE/WD
WC/WB
W3
W4
Acreage
1.332205
32.389747
0.469503
0.100405
1.020538
0
Blake Landing Parcel
Potential Wetland
Potential Tributary
300
600
Feet
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC
OneMap Server; 2017; Site Boundary based on Harnett
County Parcel Data.
Note: Vegetation removal or alteration of soils or hydrology
after initial site evaluation can affect jurisdictional status
and may require re-evaluation of wetland boundaries.
Project No:
70217527
Scale:
1:6,000
File Name:
NChwy210
Date:
October 2021
lrerracon
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Potential Wetlands and Waters
Blake Landing
NC Highway 210 Property Delineation
Harnett County,
North Carolina
EXHIBIT
NO.
3

Project No. 70217527
1Ferracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientist.
NE
30 60�. 90
I • 1 • 1 • I • I • I • 1 • I • 1 • 1 • 1 • I • I • I • I • I • I • 1 • I •
SE S
1 120 150 180
0114°SE (T) LAT: 35.368579 LON:-78.845993 ±167ft ♦ 162ft
Photograph 1: Tributary T1 upstream.
NE E
SE S
30 60 90 1 120 150 180
1• I• I• 1• 1•1• I• 1• I• 1• 1• I• I• 1• I• 1• I• 1•
0110°E (T) LAT: 35.368565 LON:-78.846064 ±226ft ♦ 161ft
Photograph 2: Tributary T1 across.
Blake Landing

Project No. 70217527
1Ferracon
Consulting Engineers Si Scientists
0 34°NE (T) LAT: 35.379126 LON:-78.828997 ±14688ft • 158ft
Photograph 3: Tributary T2a upstream.
E SE S t~
90 120 150 180 210
• 1• I• I• 1• 1• 1• 1• I• I• 1• 1• I• I• I•
0125°SE (T) LAT: 35.367672 LON:-78.844289 ±656ft • 158ft
Photograph 4: Tributary T2a across.
Blake Landing

Project No. 70217527
l Ferracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
NW
300 330
N
NE
E
0 :.l 60 90 120
1• I• 1• I• 1• I• 1• I• I• I• 1
• I• 1• I• 1• I• 1• I• 1
0 30°NE (T) LAT: 35.368484 LON:
-78.843464 ±157ft ♦ 180ft
Photograph 5: Tributary T2b upstream.
0 9°N (T) LAT: 35.368752 LON:-78.843291 ±118ft ♦ 187ft
Photograph 6: Tributary T2b across.
Blake Landing

Project No. 70217527
1Ferracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientist.
0 234°SW (T) LAT: 35.371487 LON:-78.843704 ±52ft ♦ 195ft
Syr
I`
r y 1
t t b,
�'(� lB
8 Eil�,y J
�►<�
ft:3•
�sT
Photograph 7: W1 wetland.
0 308°NW (T) LAT: 35.380349 LON:-78.828126 ±14527ft ♦ 208ft
Photograph 8: W1 wetland.
Blake Landing

Project No. 70217527
1 ferr icon
('un,ulting Engineers 8 Scientists
SE
150 180 210 240 270 300
• 1 • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I •'• I • I • I •
0 225°SW (T) LAT: 35.370403 LON:-78.844220 ±288ft ♦ 184ft
Photograph 9: W1 upland.
NW
300 330
• I • I • I • I • I • I •.1 • I • I, • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I
N 1
NE E
0 30 60 90 1 .
0 26°NE (T) LAT: 35.371004 LON:-78.844446 ±85ft ♦ 195ft
Photograph 10: W1 upland.
Blake Landing

Project No. 70217527
1 Ferracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
SE S I SW W
20 150 180 211 240 270 300
Blake Landing

Project No. 70217527
lierracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
N
0
NE
30 60
E SE
90 120 150
•I•1•I•1•I•1•I•1•I•1•I•1•I•1•I•1•I•1•I
0 77°E (T) LAT: 35.371926 LON: -78.836536 ±15531ft • 197ft
• • ,':41," •
• . •• „
" •
-•••"" - ' •• •
- , • %--.= • „-. • 'No..,
2021, 04)2.:42-
,••
Photograph 15: W5 wetland.
60 90 120 I 150
•1•1•1•I•1•I•1•1•1•1•1•1•1 •I
NE SE
180
• I •
210
I• I • 1 •
0128°SE (T) LAT: 35.370830 LON: -78.840133 ±180ft • 215ft
Photograph 16: W5 wetland.
—
Blake Landing

Project No. 70217527
l Ferracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
E sE S
60 90 120 15(. 180
1• 1• 1• 1• 1• 1• 1• 1• 1• 1• 1• 1• I 1• 1• I• I• I• 1•
0153°SE (T) LAT: 35.370711 LON:-78.839804 ±121ft ♦ 216ft
Photograph 17: W5 upland.
SW
W
NW
N
210 240 270 300 330 0
I• I. 1• 1• I• 1• I• I• 1• 1• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I•
0 280°W (T) LAT: 35.368925 LON:-78.839642 ±475ft ♦ 228ft
Photograph 18: View of Ag field.
Blake Landing