20200349 Ver 3_ePCN Application_20220823

DW R
mrlsloa of ware.Besourcrs
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13,2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre-Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/24/2022
BIMS#Assigned* Version#*
20200349 3
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required What amout is owed?*
Fee received $240.00
Fee needed-send electronic notification $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Central Office-[phone] Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Information for Initial Review
1a.Name of project:
Blue Ridge Road(SR 1670)Widening(TIP#HL-0052)
1a.Who is the Primary Contact?*
Mackenzie Richards,PWS(Kimley-Horn)
1 b.Primary Contact Email:* 1c.Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
8/23/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.829862 -78.688101
A. Processing Information
County(or Counties)where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
Yes No

1a.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit(wetlands,streams and waters,Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit(navigable waters,tidal waters,Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?"`
Yes
No
1 b.What type(s)of permit(s)do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit(NWP)
Regional General Permit(RGP)
Standard(IP)
1c.Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit(NWP)Number: 14-Linear transportation
NWP Numbers(for multiple NWPS):
1d.Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification-Regular 401 Water Quality Certification-Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le.Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? "
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f.Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h.Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j.Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d.Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant(other than owner)
le.Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2.Owner Information
2a.Nari on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh
2b.Deed book and page no.:
N/A(Linear Transportation Project)
2c.Contact Person:
Rich Kelly,Director of Engineering Services
2d.Address
Street Address
One Exchange Plaza
Address Line 2
Suite 801
City State/Province/Region
Raleigh NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27601 USA

2e.Telephone Number: 2f.Fax Number:
[phone]
2g.Email Address:
[e-mail]
4.Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a.Name:
Mackenzie Richards,PWS
4b.Business Name:
Kimley-Horn
4c.Address
Street Address
421 Fayetteville Street
Address Line 2
Suite 600
City State/Province/Region
Raleigh NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27601 USA
4d.Telephone Number: 4e.Fax Number:
[phone]
4f.Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.Project Information
1b.Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c.Nearest municipality/town:
Raleigh
2.Project Identification
2a.Property Identification Number: 2b.Property size:
N/A(Linear Transportation Project) 53.8
2c.Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Postal/Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a.Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Crabtree Creek
3b.Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s)is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d.Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010803
4. Project Description and History
4a.Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project corridor is located along areas of residential development and commercial mixed use.The project corridor is bounded by Crabtree Creek to the north,1-440 to the east,
Duraleigh Road to the south,and Edwards Mill Road to the west.The project vicinity is primarily composed of moderately dense residential development and scattered commercial
development.
4b.Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project(including all prior phases)in the past?*
Yes No Unknown

If yes,please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID(exp.SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2018-00496;DWR#20200349 ver 2
The existing NWP 14(SAW-2018-00496)was previously issued by Lyle Phillips of the US Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)on May 5,2020 and the associated 401 General Water
Quality Certification 4135(DWR#20200349 ver 2)and Neuse Buffer Authorization was previously issued by Rob Ridings of the NC Division of Water Resources(NCDWR)on July 1,
2021.Due to unforeseen scheduling conflicts,construction of the project has not started,and the project cannot be completed within the 12-month grace period following the expiration of
this permit on March 18,2022.
Rob Ridings of the NCDWR sent Kimley-Horn a Request for Information(RFI)on March 17,2020 and Kimley-Horn responded via phone and email on March 24,2020.Rob Ridings issued
the Section 401 Permit on March 25,2020.Lyle Phillips of the USACE sent Kimley-Horn an RFI on March 23,2020 and Kimley-Horn sent a response combined with a Section 404/401
Permit Modification Request on April 23,2020.This Section 404/401 Permit Modification was approved by the NCDWR on May 7,2020 and by the USACE on May 5,2020.Following this
approval,Kimley-Horn requested a correction to the compensatory mitigation section of the issued permit on July 1,2021.Documentation of these RFIs and modifications has been
attached as part of this reauthorization request.
4f.List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
4g.List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,237 linear feet
4h.Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The City of Raleigh proposes to widen Blue Ridge Road(SR 1670)from Duraleigh Road to Glenwood Avenue and construct a grade separated greenway crossing below Blue Ridge Road
to improve pedestrian and vehicle safety.
41.Describe the overall project in detail,including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of widening Blue Ridge Road(SR 1670)from a basic two-lane roadway to a three-lane curb and gutter section with bicycle lanes and sidewalks on both
sides from just north of Duraleigh Road to Glen Eden Drive.From Glen Eden Drive to Crabtree Valley Avenue,Blue Ridge Road will be widened to the extent feasible,to a multi-modal 2-
lane avenue,divided section with curb,gutter,bicycle lanes,and sidewalks on both sides.The project extends from Duraleigh Road(SR 1664)to Glenwood Avenue for approximately 2.1
miles.The streambanks of House Creek will be stabilized in conjunction with the widening of Blue Ridge Road.Additionally,the project proposes to construct a grade separated greenway
crossing and pedestrian tunnel below Blue Ridge Road.The City of Raleigh has received funding through the NC Department of Transportation(NCDOT)Locally Administered Projects
Program(LAPP)for the northern half of the project.The LAPP funded portion of the project extends from north of Homewood Banks Drive to Crabtree Valley Avenue(TIP#HL-0052).
There have been no design changes made to the proposed project since the previous authorizations and,therefore,impact quantities and impact types to jurisdictional features have not
changed.Equipment typical of roadway projects would be used,including pavers,skid steers,screeds,and cement trucks.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
Kimley-Horn staff conducted a delineation on February 1,2018 and identified two streams(Crabtree
Creek and House Creek)within the project study area.
5b.If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2018-00496
5c.If 5a is yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name(if known): William Sullivan,PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
5d.List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request(SAW 2018-00496)was submitted to Tasha Alexander of the USACE on March 2,2018 and was confirmed via email on April 17,2018.
The official Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination letter was issued on May 5,2020 with the previously issued Section 404 Nationwide Permit for the project.Andy Neal of the NCDWR
issued a Buffer Determination Letter(RRO#18-077)on March 15,2018.Documentation for both determinations,the previously issued NWP 14 verification,and the previously issued 401
General Water Quality Certification 4135 and Neuse Buffer Authorization are attached as part of this reauthorization request.
6.Future Project Plans
6a.Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s),regional general permit(s),or individual permits(s)used,or intended to be used,to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
The proposed project is a single and complete undertaking and no additional phases or permits are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory U
1. Impacts Summary
1a.Where are the impacts associated with your project?(check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts

3a.Reason for impact(?) 3b.lmpact type* 3c.Type of impact* 3d.S.name* 3e.Stream Type* �3f.Type of 13h.Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Site 1 Permanent Bank Stabilization J
House Creek Perennial Both 15 149
Average(feet) (linear feet)
S2 Site 2 Permanent Bank Stabilization J
House Creek Perennial Both 15 61
Average(feet) (linear feet)
S3 Site 2 Permanent Culvert House Creek Perennial Both 15 57
Average(feet) pinear feet)
S4 Site 2 Temporary Other House Creek Perennial Both 15 37
Average(feet) (linear feet)
S5
Site 3 Permanent Culvert House Creek Perennial Both 15 15
Average(feet) (linear feet)
S6 Site 3 Permanent Bank Stabilization House Creek Perennial Both 15 41
Average(feet) (linear feet)
S7 Site 3 Temporary A
Other House Creek Perennial Both 15 69
Average(feet) (linear feeQ
31.Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31.Total permanent stream impacts: 31.Total temporary stream impacts:
323 106
31.Total stream and ditch impacts:
429
3j.Comments:
There have been no design changes made to the proposed project since the previous authorizations and,therefore,impact quantities and impact types
to jurisdictional features have not changed.
Unavoidable permanent impacts to House Creek will result from the replacement of an existing culvert,rip rap outlet protection,and bank stabilization to
support the proposed road widening and greenway realignment.The replacement of an existing culvert as part of the road widening will result in 72
linear feet(0.0192 acre)of permanent impacts to House Creek.All three culvert barrels will be buried 1 foot below the stream bed as to not impede
normal baseflow and will allow for the movement of aquatic species within the stream.The proposed culvert was sized to meet the hydraulic capacity
needed to comply with NCDOT hydraulic design requirements and FEMA requirements.Additionally,the pedestrian culvert has been designed to
provide some floodplain capacity for the higher storm events.The culvert detail displaying the cross section is included as part of this permit application
package(See CSR).
Additionally,streambank stabilization to support the proposed road widening will result in 251 linear feet(0.0672 acre)of permanent,no net loss of
waters or aquatic function to House Creek.There are two types of proposed streambank stabilization that would result in permanent stream impacts to
House Creek.At the proposed inlet and outlet of the culvert that runs under Blue Ridge Road,Class II rip rap will be keyed-in to the banks only and not
the streambed.No rip rap will be placed within the streambed.In the uppermost section of House Creek,the stream banks will be graded back,and live
stakes will be installed to create a more stable channel and prevent erosion along the reach.The proposed rip rap bank stabilization extends from the
top of bank adjacent to the bridge supports and to the toe of the channel.The geometry of the stream channel and banks in this reach were designed to
most closely match the upstream and downstream sections and will result in no net loss of streams to House Creek.
106 linear feet(0.0228 acre)of temporary impacts to House Creek will occur as a result of construction access as part of the culvert replacement and
streambank stabilization.Temporary impacts will be restored to pre-construction conditions upon completion of the proposed project.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a.Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse Tar-Pamlico
Catawba Randleman
Goose Creek Jordan Lake
Other
6b.Impact Type 6c.Per or Temp 6d.Stream name 6e.Buffer mitigation required? 6f.Zone 1 impact 6g.Zone 2 impact
Site 1-Greenway P House Creek No 725 2,366
Site 1-Streambank Stabilization P 11 House Creek No 7,029 163
Site 2-Greenway P House Creek No 501 1,999
Site 2-Perpendicular Roadway Crossing P House Creek Yes 3,417 68
Site 2-Perpendicular Roadway Crossing T House Creek No 2,994 2,650
Site 3-Greenway P House Creek No 2,967 4,309
Site 3-Utility P House Creek No 0 143
Site 3-Perpendicular Roadway Crossing P House Creek Yes 4,356 1,060
Site 3-Perpendicular Roadway Crossing T House Creek No 526 0

Site 3-Parallel Roadway P House Creek Yes 1,299 0
Site 4-Parallel Roadway P House Creek Yes 5,169 3,472
6h. Total buffer impacts:
... .. ....... ....... . ... ... ........... ........... ... ... ........... ........ ... ... ...... . ...
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 3,520.00 2,650.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 25,463.00 13,580.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 28,983.00 16,230.00
61.Comments:
There have been no design changes made to the proposed project since the previous authorizations and,therefore,impact quantities and impact types
to jurisdictional features have not changed.
Unavoidable permanent impacts to the protected riparian buffers associated with House Creek will result from the proposed roadway widening and
sections of parallel roadway,streambank stabilization,realignment of the adjacent greenway system,and modifications to existing utilities.Temporary
impacts to House Creek buffers will occur as a result of construction access as part of the roadway widening.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.Avoidance and Minimization
1a.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to the streams and protected riparian buffers within the project corridor were minimized and avoided to the extent practicable.The widening will
be constructed mostly within existing right-of-way and the alignment was designed to minimize stream and buffer impacts.Where possible,grass ditches
will be utilized to intercept and slow stormwater drainage,retaining walls will be constructed to protect adjacent streams,and fill slopes have been
tightened to 2:1 to avoid additional impacts to features.For hydraulic efficiency,the proposed pedestrian bridge was aligned as close to perpendicular to
House Creek as possible in this location.The House Creek banks below the pedestrian bridge will be armored with keyed-in rip rap to reduce the
potential for erosion and ensure long-term stability of the stream and the bridge in this location.The proposed culvert has been sized to allow for high-
flow events and will be buried to allow aquatic movement through the system.The maximum NCDOT standard culvert spans were used to meet this
capacity,because a bridge was not determined to be feasible at this location based on the existing roadway profile.NCDOT or FEMA requirements
cannot be met without utilizing the full capacity of the culverts,which would not be possible if any of the barrels included a sill.Higher floodplain culverts
were not feasible because the roadway cover is minimal in this area.Enough capacity needed to be provided so that the BFE would not be exceeded
since there are structures in the floodplain,so additional sill height was not feasible.A 12"water line that will need to be relocated was designed to be
located below Blue Ridge Road in order to reduce permanent impacts to the Neuse River Basin riparian buffers of House Creek.
1 b.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Impacts to the streams and protected riparian buffers within the project corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction
process by avoiding these features with equipment,materials,and access corridors.Where feasible,equipment staging and construction access will be
located in upland areas throughout the corridor,and silt fencing will be installed around the permitted limits of disturbance to ensure all equipment is
located within the permitted areas.Sediment control measures will be used to reduce stormwater impacts to receiving waters and minimize runoff from
the construction sites.
2.Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a.Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c.If yes,mitigation is required by(check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d.If yes,which mitigation option(s)will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.Name of Mitigation Bank:
EBX-Neuse I,LLC Mitigation Bank(Polecat Site and Hannah Bridge Site)from Resource
Environmental Solutions,LLC(RES)
3b.Credits Purchased/Requested(attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Riparian buffer 49,623 sq.ft.

3c.Comments
Unavoidable permanent impacts to the protected riparian buffers associated with House Creek will result from the proposed roadway widening and
sections of parallel roadway,streambank stabilization,realignment of the adjacent greenway system,and modifications to existing utilities.Temporary
impacts to House Creek buffers will occur as a result of construction access as part of the roadway widening.To offset the buffer losses resulting from
the proposed roadway impacts,in accordance with the previously issued Buffer Neuse Authorization,a total of 49,623.00 sq.ft.of riparian buffer credits
have been purchased from Resource Environmental Solutions,LLC(RES)from their EBX-Neuse I,LLC Mitigation Bank(Polecat Site and Hannah
Bridge Site).The Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates from RES are attached as part of this permit application package.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b.Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet) 4c.If using stream mitigation,what is the stream temperature:
72 warm
4d.Buffer mitigation requested(DWR only): 4e.Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(square feet) (acres)
4f.Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g.Coastal(tidal)wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h.Comments
In accordance with the previously issued Section 404/401 Permit,compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio for the 72 linear feet of permanent impacts to
House Creek due to the culvert replacement was purchased from NC Division of Mitigation Services(NCDMS)In-Lieu Fee Program(DMS ID#MR-
07457)on May 11,2021,and the NCDMS Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form(MRTF)is attached as part of this permit application
package.Compensatory mitigation is not proposed for the permanent,no net loss of water impacts to House Creek resulting from the streambank
stabilization associated with the project.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)- required by DWR
6a.Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation?If yes,you must fill out this entire form-please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
6b.If yes,then identify the square feet of impact.
6c.Reason for impact 6d.Total impact(square Multiplier 6e.Required mitigation
feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 Perpendicular Roadway Crossing;Parallel Roadway 14,241 3 42,723
Zone 2 Perpendicular Roadway Crossing;Parallel Roadway 4,600 1.5 6,900
6f.Total buffer mitigation required
49,623
6g.If buffer mitigation is required,is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
Yes No
6j.Comments:
Unavoidable permanent impacts to the protected riparian buffers associated with House Creek will result from the proposed roadway widening and
sections of parallel roadway,streambank stabilization,realignment of the adjacent greenway system,and modifications to existing utilities.Temporary
impacts to House Creek buffers will occur as a result of construction access as part of the roadway widening.To offset the buffer losses resulting from
the proposed roadway impacts,in accordance with the previously issued Buffer Neuse Authorization,a total of 49,623.00 sq.ft.of riparian buffer credits
have been purchased from Resource Environmental Solutions,LLC(RES)from their EBX-Neuse I,LLC Mitigation Bank(Polecat Site and Hannah
Bridge Site).The Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates from RES are attached as part of this permit application package.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance(lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale(higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30%nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a.Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes No
2b.Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2)?
Yes No
2c.Does this project have a stormwater management plan(SMP)reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state-approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A-project disturbs<1 acre
2d.Which of the following stormwater management program(s)apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Raleigh
Comments:
The project includes the addition of curb and gutter to sections that were previously grassed shoulder and ditch.Existing drainage features have been maintained to the best extent
practical.Drainage systems will be sized according to City of Raleigh standards.Treated stormwater will discharge through a rip-rap dissipater pad to ensure non-erosive velocities at the
bottom of the fill slope outside of House Creek.Additionally,stormwater from sections of the site will be collected and treated in two stormwater control measures(bioretention ponds).See
attached Erosion Control and Redline Drainage Plans for stormwater management features.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la.Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/statellocal)funds or the use of public(federallstate)land?*
Yes No
1 b.If you answered"yes"to the above,does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State(North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
1c.If you answered"yes"to the above,has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House?*
Yes No
Comments:*
The City of Raleigh has received funding through the NC Department of Transportation(NCDOT)Locally Administered Projects Program(LAPP)for the
northern half of the project.The LAPP funded portion of the project extends from north of Homewood Banks Drive to Crabtree Valley Avenue(TIP#HL-
0052).A Categorical Exclusion for TIP#HL-0052 is under review and will be approved prior to construction.The remaining southern section of the
project is not supported by state or federal funds,and therefore,it does not require NEPA or SEPA documentation.
2.Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a.Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0500),Isolated Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H.1300),or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a.Will this project result in additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes No
3b.If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a.Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a.Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b.Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c.If yes,indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh

5d.Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e.Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f.Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g.Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h.Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i.Does this project involve(1)blasting,and/or(2)other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines,such as jackhammers,mechanized pile drivers,etc.?
Yes No
5j.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Coordination with the USFWS was conducted on October 10,2019 for the six federally protected species listed for Wake County as of June 27,2018
(Cape Fear shiner,red-cockaded woodpecker,Tar River spinymussel,dwarf wedgemussel,yellow lance,and Michaux's sumac)as part of the FEMA
CLOMR requirements.The USFWS confirmed that the proposed project is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened
species or their habitat.
Additionally,as of August 19,2022,the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation(IPaC)database lists six threatened or endangered species
with potential to occur within the project vicinity.Table 1 shows the listed species and federal status of each of these species.Kimley-Horn reviewed the
NC Natural Heritage Program(NCNHP)element occurrence database(updated July 2022)to determine if there are any known occurrences of federally
listed species in the project area or project vicinity.A review of the NCNHP records indicates one known occurrence of Michaux's sumac within 1.0 mile
of the project corridor,however,no known occurrences of any federally protected species are recorded within the project corridor.
The red-cockaded woodpecker(RCW)typically occupies open,mature stands of southern pines,particularly longleaf pine(Pinus palustris),for foraging
and nesting habitat.The RCW excavates cavities for nesting in living pine trees,aged 60 years or older,which are contiguous with pine stands at least
30 years of age for foraging habitat.The foraging range for RCW is normally less than 0.5 miles.Suitable habitat(nesting or foraging)for red-cockaded
woodpecker(RCW)was not found within the project area.While pine trees are present throughout the project corridor,many of the suitably sized pine
trees are present as standalone landscaping trees near residential areas or are present within larger tracts of mixed hardwood/pine forest with a thick
understory and isolated from any suitable foraging habitat.In addition,a review of the NCNHP database records(updated July 2022)indicates there are
no known occurrences of RCW in or within 1.0 mile of the project corridor.Due to the lack of suitable foraging and nesting habitat within the project
corridor and the lack of known occurrences,it has been determined that the proposed project will have"No Effect"on RCW.
The Neuse River waterdog is known to occur in low to moderate gradient streams and low current velocity.The salamander needs clean,flowing water
with high dissolved oxygen concentrations.Suitable habitat for the Neuse River waterdog is not present in the project corridor.Surface waters within the
project corridor are degraded,urbanized streams that do not provide the proper substrate or in-stream structure for habitat,are not well-oxygenated,and
are subject to sedimentation from erosion.Additionally,the NCNHP database records(updated July 2022)indicate that there are no known occurrences
of the Neuse River waterdog in or within 1.0 mile of the project corridor.Due to the lack of suitable habitat within the project corridor and the lack of
known occurrences,it has been determined that the proposed project will have"No Effect"on the Neuse River waterdog.
The Carolina madtom is known to occur in riffles,runs,and pools in medium to large streams and rivers.Ideally,it inhabits fresh waters with free-flowing,
year-round flow and clean sand,gravel,and detritus substrate.Mollusk shells,woody debris,and other debris along the stream or river bottom provide
nesting habitat for the Carolina madtom.Suitable habitat for the Carolina madtom is not present within the project corridor.Surface waters within the
project corridor are degraded,urbanized streams that do not provide the proper substrate or in-stream structure for habitat,are not well-oxygenated,and
are subject to sedimentation from erosion.Additionally,the NCNHP database records(updated July 2022)indicate that there are no known occurrences
of the Carolina madtom in or within 1.0 mile of the project corridor.Due to the lack of suitable habitat within the project corridor and the lack of known
occurrences,it has been determined that the proposed project will have"No Effect"on the Carolina madtom.
The Atlantic pigtoe is known to occur in coarse sand and gravel stream substrate within small creeks to larger rivers.The Atlantic pigtoe requires clean,
moderate flowing water with high dissolved oxygen content.Suitable habitat for the Atlantic pigtoe is not present in the project corridor.Surface waters
within the project corridor are degraded,urbanized streams that do not provide the proper substrate or in-stream structure for habitat,are not well-
oxygenated,and are subject to sedimentation from erosion.Additionally,the NCNHP database records(updated July 2022)indicate that there are no
known occurrences of the Atlantic pigtoe in or within 1.0 mile of the project corridor.Due to the lack of suitable habitat within the project corridor and the
lack of known occurrences,it has been determined that the proposed project will have"No Effect"on the Atlantic pigtoe.
The dwarf wedgemussel inhabits streams with slow to moderate flow and sand,gravel,or firm silt
substrate.The streams must be well-oxygenated,with stable banks,and little sedimentation from erosion.Suitable habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel is
not present in the project corridor.Surface waters within the project corridor are degraded,urbanized streams that do not provide the proper substrate or
in-stream structure for habitat,are not well-oxygenated,and are subject to sedimentation from erosion.Additionally,the NCNHP database records
(updated July 2022)indicate that there are no known occurrences of the dwarf wedgemussel in or within 1.0 mile of the project corridor.Due to the lack
of suitable habitat within the project corridor and the lack of known occurrences,it has been determined that the proposed project will have"No Effect"
on the dwarf wedgemussel.
Michaux's sumac is a plant that prefers sandy or rocky open communities.The plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has
provided an open area(i.e.,highway rights-of-ways,roadsides,or on the edges of artificially maintained clearings).Potentially suitable Michaux's sumac
habitat was identified within the roadsides and associated maintained rights-of-way and along the edges of forested areas and maintained residential
lots within the project corridor.Kimley-Horn biologists conducted pedestrian surveys on June 1,2022 within areas of potentially suitable habitat along the
project corridor and no Michaux's sumac individuals were observed.Additionally,the regular mowing maintenance schedule and herbicide application
within these areas created conditions that would likely inhibit the plant's success.A review of the NCNHP database records(updated July 2022)
indicates there is one known occurrence of Michaux's sumac within 1.0 mile of the project corridor,but no known occurrences are recorded within the
project corridor.Due to the lack of observed individuals and the lack of known occurrences within the project corridor,it has been determined that the
proposed project will have"No Effect"on Michaux's sumac.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?"
Yes No

6b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed on August 4,2022.No essential fish habitat was identified within the project area or within the
vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A review of the State Historic Preservation Office(NCSHPO)HPOWEB GIS Service database performed on August 4,2022 identified no National
Register,Study List,or Determined Eligible sites or districts within the project study area.However,eleven historic resources located within 1.0 mile of
the project study area:
-George Poland House(Study List)-moved from site in 2001;located approximately 0.1 mile northeast of the project corridor
Lyon Park Historic District(Study List)-located approximately 0.7 mile west of the project corridor
-Northwestern Mutual Insurance Company(Study List)-located approximately 0.9 mile west of the project corridor
-NC PTA Headquarters(Study List)-located approximately 0.9 mile west of the project corridor
-Owen F.Dorothy Smith House(Study List)-located approximately 1.0 mile west of the project corridor
Paschal House(Gone)(National Register)-demolished in 2013;located approximately 0.9 mile west of the project corridor
C.A.and Marion Aretakis House(Study List)-located approximately 0.9 mile west of the project corridor
-Marcellus Smith House(Gone)(Study List)-located approximately 0.6 mile north of the project corridor
Vallas House(Study List)-located approximately 0.9 mile north of the project corridor
-James R.Smith House&Cemetery(Study List)-located approximately 0.9 mile north of the project corridor
Warren Pony Truss Bridge(Determined Eligible)-located approximately 0.9 mile east of the project corridor
Due to the developed nature of the project vicinity and the minimal impacts anticipated,it has been determined that the proposed project will have no
effect on any historic resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b.If yes,explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)was applied for and has been approved.
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map(DFIRM)Panels 3720078500K(effective 07/19/2022)and 3720079500K(effective 07/19/2022)were
reviewed and FEMA regulatory floodway,100-year floodplains,and 500-year floodplains associated with House Creek and Crabtree Creek are located
in the northeastern corner of the project study area.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review.Documents should be combined into one file when
possible,with a Cover Letter,Table of Contents,and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
00_BlueRidge_PCN Cover Letter.pdf 31.18KB
02_BRR_Agent Authorization.pdf 41.2KB
03_BlueRidge_Figures.pdf 10.75MB
04_BlueRidge_StreamForms.pdf 140.62KB
05_BlueRidge_NCSAM Rating Calculator v2.1.pdf 107.2KB
06_BlueRidge_bufferletter.pdf 6.92MB
07a_SAW-2018-00496-NWP 14 Verification_SIGNED.pdf 10.94MB
07b_BlueRidge_401 Letter_Finalversion_Correction2_20210701.docx.pdf 661.83KB
8a_BlueRidge_Permit Drawings_Streams_(2020-04-27).pdf 4.04MB
8b_BlueRidge_Permit Drawings_Buffers_(2020-04-20).pdf 3.99MB
9a_BlueRidgeRoad NCDWR RFI_20200317.pdf 380.34KB
9b_BlueRidgeRoad_USACE RFI&401 Modification.pdf 1.53MB
9c_BlueRidgeRoad 40lCorrection_20210701.pdf 503.74KB
10_Blue Ridge Road(SR 1670)Widening MRTF&Mitigation Certs.pdf 587.35KB
11a_BRRW_South_100%Plans_20220505.pdf 25.2MB
11 b_HL-0052_PLAN.pdf 5.25MB
12_Blue Ridge_EC-Plans_Rev3_full-size_NO REV CLOUDS.pdf 38.68MB
13a_BRRW_South-Drainage_Calculations Report.pdf 33AMB
13b_HL-0052_Redline_Drainage_Plans.pdf 12.76MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Please see attachments to aid in the review of the permit application package.
Signature
*
By checking the box and signing below,I certify that:

• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief';and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true,accurate,and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Mackenzie Richards,PWS
Signature
Date
8/23/2022