The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140964 Ver 1_Application_20140908j R�� . GY ��e . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT L. MCCRORY GOVERNOR September 8, 2014 Mr. Steven Kichefski Asheville Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers I51 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 Aiv rxo� J. TATa SECRETARY SUBJECT: Bridge #170 Replacement, SR 1802 (Colt Thornburg Road), Gaston Counry Dear Mr. Kichefski: The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorizafion to replace a deteriorafing bridge on SR 1802 (Colt Thornburg Road) in Gaston County. NCDOT proposes to replace the eicisting two-span, 22 foot wide bridge with a 60-foot long, double 10 foot x 10 foot box culvert. Inlet and outlet riprap-faced floodplain benches (48 feet total) will be constructed to maintain `naturaP channel dimensions upstream and downsiream of the proposed culvert. Coir fiber matting will be utilized to stabilize the benches. Impervious dikes and pump around system will be utilized to manage stream flow during construction. Any areas affected by the staging and temporary impervious dikes will be restored to pre-project conditions. The total scope of the work will result in 108 feet of permanent impacts to Coley Creek, which is classified as a WS-IV watershed by the N.C. Division of Water Resources. The project is not located within �/z mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR 1802 a rural or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill basin checklist. The proposed project has been cleared by the cukural resources office. (Project Tracking # ER04-0168). This office has conducted a threatened/endangered species survey within the project footprint. The federally listed species for Gaston County (USFWS listed date September 22, 2010) include Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) and bog turtle (Cdemmys muhlenburgii). National Heritage Program records document the nearest sunflower location 5.8 miles southeast of the proposed project area. The sunflower is usually found in upland open azeas protected from shade or excessive competition. The project area is an urban neighborhood and there is little potential habitat within the proposed project azea and no species were observed during the site visit. No impact on this species is anficipated. Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest bog turtle location appro�mately 1.7 miles south of the proposed project area. Bridge #170, SR 1802, Colt Thomburg Road Page 2 September 8, 2014 Bog turtles aze typically found in bogs, marshes, and wet pastures. There is no suitable habitat located within the project footprint. T/SA species aze not subject to Section 7 consultation; however, no impact on this species is anticipated. I have enclosed a pre-construcrion notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned acfivities and location maps relative to tiie project. Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedwe is as follows: • Work order number: 150472-55120005-17BP12.R36-3372 • TIP#: NA • Project Category: $240.00 Fee If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (704) 480-9044. Thank you for your time and considerarion on this matter. Respectfully yours, Reuben Chandler, P.E. Division Engineer 'I�velfth Division � �� BY: �i�:!E'" \ � ,�✓L'�z'—_._ Trish Beam Division 12 Environmental Supervisor Enclosares O��ti W??�RQG � �� > y O � Offce Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Noti�cation PC Form A. A licant Informafion 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sough[ from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional Ge�eral Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge #170 Replacement, SR 1802 (Colt Thornburg Road) 2b. County: Gaston 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Dallas 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 176P.12.R.36 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Right of Way 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f applicable): 3d. Streetaddress: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Reuben Chandler 4c. Busines s name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street 4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020 4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 4h. Email address: rchandler@ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) Sa. Name: Trish Beam 5b. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street 5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044 Sf. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 5g. Email address: pdbeam@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA Latitude:35.355699 Longitude: - 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 81.172743 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.10 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Coley Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV 2c. River basin: Gaston 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Site is located on a paved secondary road. Landuse designation is vicinity of project is forested and cropland. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the propeAy: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 120 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed work is to replace a deteriorating bridge for the safety of the travelling public. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: NCDOT proposes to replace the existing timber deck bridge with a 60 foot long, double 10' x 10' box culvert. Inlet and outlet floodplain benches will be constructed to maintain channel dimensions. Temporary impervious dikes and pumpt around will used to manage the stream flow around the construction site. Any areas affected by temporary cofferdams will be restored to pre-project conditions. All Best Management Practices will be utilized during the course of the project. The Project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.) 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by Division 12 DEO. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T W� � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ WZ � P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ WS ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 � P❑ T Culvert Coley Creek � PER � Corps 10 60 ❑ INT � DWQ InIeUOutlet Riprap � pER � Corps S2 � P 0 T faced Floodplain Coley Creek 10 48 benches ❑ INT � DWQ Bypass pumping � pER � Corps S3 ❑ P� T for culvert Coley Creek � �NT � pWQ 10 112 construction S4 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and trib�tary impacts `108 3i. Comments: � Permanent Impacts Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P�T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. Sc. Sd. Se. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: Si. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Sk. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar im act re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Floodplain benches constructed to maintain 'natural' channel dimensions and stabilized with coir f ber matting. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 26. Ifyes, mitigation is �equired by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b_ Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 761inearfeet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: � warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: Mitigation required shall be provided in accordance with the procedures detailed in the USACE letter dated September 1, 2004, from Mr. Ken Jolly to Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe. Attached is a copy of the EEP mitigation request letter for culvert construction and the stream relocation impacts. 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Complies with NCDOT's individual NPDES permit NCS000250. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? NA ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review Sa. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes° to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in additional development which could impact water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No sewage generated from project. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field O�ce you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program database. 6. Esseatial Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as havi�g historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Cultural Resources review/clearance (ER04-0168). 8. Flood 2one Designation (COrps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics coordination with FEMA Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panel number: 3710355900J j�, IJ - C h c�� , � ��G%��. � �-�� / ApplicantlAgenYs Printed Name ApplicanUAgen4s Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. Page 11 of 11 nn�i c,,..., v...,.:..., n o n,.,,,,._w.._ an �nno �i.....:..., NCDOT HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST Division: 1 � County: Gaatnn P,-oject ID: 17BP.12.R36 River Basin: _ Catawba Bridge No: NA Route: SR 1802 Water Quality Criteria: Stream: Coley Creek Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS ORW WSI WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area Roadwav Criteria: Route Designation- Additional Site Information: Yes No Arterial Urban �` �' Arterial Rural � � Yes No Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? �'" iy Criteria Based Upon NCDOT `Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters" (Nlarch, 1997). Yes No � i r� � �` � �` � } Il it�1 �'ra �III .-� ��F?'�l�i lc'.fll �(�I ' 1�=li }�I i 1( �.1"ltii ' I l�l �tiI �� '� L�Y:�.�'�', h'ati�,Ic�rr�r�� i��i�h�� I � 9isori, U�icctur f,iUVcYIl01` �-:COS)/Sh8�1 LI":h2�.flCiil"li^cIl! i'IOQfnII'i September 4, 2014 Ms. Trish Beam Division 12 EnvironmenTal Supervisor North Carolina Department of Transportation Post Office Box 47 Shelby, Nortl� Cainlina 28151-0047 Dear Ms. Beam: Subjeot: EEP Mitigation Acceptauce Letter: Ju�i�i _. �tt?�e.ld. Ifi �;ECl��ait��. Replace Bridge 170 on SR 1802 (Colt Thomburg Road) over Coley Creek, Gaston County; WBS number 17BP.12:R36 The purpose of tlus letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enliancement Prograzn (EEP) will provide the compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project Based on the infomiation supplied by you on August 27, 2014, the impacts are located. in CU 03050102 of the Catawba Kiver basin in the Southe�n Piedmont (SP) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Catawbn 03050102 Sp Cold Impacts (feeUacres) I 0 3ome ofChes[ream impacts may Stream Wetlands Cou] I Warni � Riparian 60.0 to be mitigeCed a[ amitigation retio less than Buffer (Sq. Ft) Coasta] .. , Zone 1 Zone 2 for details. "Pl�is impact aud associated mitigation need were uuder projected by tl�e NCDOT in die 2014 impact data. EEP wiLl commit to implement sufficient conlpensatory stream mitigatiov credits to offset the impacts assooiated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timetine lieted in Section F3.c.iii of fl�e N.C. Department of Enviromnent and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Euhancement Program In-Lieu Fee &strument dated 7uly 28, 2014 If the above refereuced impact amounts are revised, theu this mitigation acceptanca letter will no longer be valid and a ilew mitigation accepta�lce letter will be required from EEP. If you have any questions or need additional iuformation, please conCact Betl� Harrnon at 919-707-8420. Sinc�e�ly, t ' ;:��.. " �r, t; `.h,,'i"u'�".r f�. , "' `s,.� �� ...d, / �i � i James„$"�. Stanfill . EEP Asset Management Supervisor cc: Mr. Sfeve Kiehefski, USACE — Asheville Regulatory Field Office Mr. Alan Johnson, Division of Water Q�ality, Mooresville Office Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA FiLe: SR 1802—Bridge 170—Division 12 165'M,si:Seriu (-�r lia.l irh Plx;h��]si 'm. �fig9-1(i52 °hane�.8�370r ��97G11n ii= �avW. icdenr.r�av ,. �.�J � u ucy r .;��r F i � liu'6 i[_.g��_:y4ir+i�f�G°r BK-5120_Hyd_prm_psh.dgn 8/27/2014 2:49:37 PM TGS BK-5120_Hyd_prm_psh.dgn 8/27/2014 2:49:25 PM TGS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS GASTON COUNTY 202010 40 20 10 20 40 4 2 4 8 0 0 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) PROJECT LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY DATE: LETTING DATE: STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 0 00 $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ C O N T R A C T : T I P P R O J E C T : GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE ON SR 1802 (COLT THORNBURG RD) JIMMY TERRY, P.E. TRAVIS COOK, E.I. P.E. R/W & UTIL. CONST. N/A N/A N/A SUB REGIONAL TIER RURAL LOCAL FUNC CLASS = (TTS=3% & DUALS=3%) T = 6% V = 60 MPH ADT (2034) = 8900 ADT (2010) = 3800 VICINITY MAP OFFSITE DETOUR 4 AND VERTICAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE. DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL CURVATURE TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED ENGINEERS TGS CORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 PH (704) 476-0003 SHELBY, NC 28150 804-C N. LAFAYETTE ST TGS ENGINEERS SHELBY, NC 28152 1710 EAST MARION ST. DIVISION 12 C REEK C O LEY See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets C O LEY C REEK BRIDGE NO. 350170 OVER COLEY CREEK 1 7 B P . 1 2 . R . 3 6 17BP.12.R.36 17BP.12.R.36 17BP.12.R.36 17BP.12.R.36 TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BP.12.R.36 #350170 = 0.047 MILES LOCATION PROJECT BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.12.R.36 -L- STA. 12+00.00 END PROJECT 17BP.12.R.36 -L- STA. 14+50.00 SR 1802 -L- COLT THORNBURG ROAD 1 0 0 1 RS OT 5081 RS OT S O U T H F O R K Friday JHS William C Luth Ch Philadelphia 1800 1804 1802 1803 1001 1001 1836 1802 1802 1802 1805 1807 1875 1879 1865 1866 1876 1877 1805 1889 1872 18731884 1871 1896 321 Bapt Ch Hill Victory HS Senior Gaston North 157 P162 PLANS PREPARED BY: NCDOT CONTACT: PLANS PREPARED FOR: STEVE RACKLEY, P.E. N A D 8 3 / 9 5 Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Curb Proposed Slope Stakes Cut Proposed Slope Stakes Fill Existing Metal Guardrail Existing Cable Guiderail Proposed Guardrail Equality Symbol Pavement Removal Baseline Control Point RIGHT OF WAY: Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line h Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Proposed Right of Way Line C F Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement HYDROLOGY: Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Flow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring ; z v W K Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump Proposed Cable Guiderail MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Paved Ditch Gutter UTILITIES: ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole P U/G Power Cable Hand Hole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Existing Telephone Pole Proposed Telephone Pole Telephone Manhole Telephone Booth Telephone Pedestal U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole R } T p Q l e ] / b H-Frame Pole O O POWER: TELEPHONE: Telephone Cell Tower Recorded U/G Power Line Recorded U/G Telephone Cable Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*) Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydrant Recorded U/G Water Line 4 I H a TV: TV Satellite Dish TV Pedestal TV Tower U/G TV Cable Hand Hole Recorded U/G TV Cable Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*) r | I ] GAS: Gas Valve Gas Meter Recorded U/G Gas Line n c SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanitary Sewer Cleanout U/G Sanitary Sewer Line Recorded SS Forced Main Line Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) d o A/G Water Above Ground Gas Line A/G Gas Above Ground Water Line Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A/G Sanitary Sewer MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole O F S 3 Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line ? CONC CONC WW v v Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Storm Sewer Storm Sewer Manhole m U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY: State Line County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin Property Corner Property Monument Existing Fence Line Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence g F 123 Existing Wetland Boundary Proposed Wetland Boundary Existing Endangered Animal Boundary Existing Endangered Plant Boundary BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE: Area Outline Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap Church School Dam Sign Small Mine Well V M WW S x Foundation S Building y y VEGETATION: Single Tree X Y Vineyard Single Shrub Hedge Woods Line Orchard Vineyard RAILROADS: Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled S FLOW Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*) Designated U/G Water Line (S.U.E.*) Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*) Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) *S.U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering WLB EIP B ECM CONC HW CB CSX TRANSPORTATION MILEPOST 35 SWITCH Cemetery EXISTING STRUCTURES: Parcel / Sequence Number E AATUR End of Information E.O.I. Note: Not to Scale SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. 1-B Abandoned According to Utility Records WLB EAB EPB R W R W R W C A E TDE PDE PUE S P P T T TC TC T FO T FO W W TV TV TV FO TV FO G G SS FSS FSS ?UTL Jurisdictional Stream JS 1 2 / 0 5 / 1 1 Buffer Zone 1 Buffer Zone 2 BZ 1 BZ 2 Wetland Proposed Permanent Easement with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Temporary Utility Easement TUE Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with DUEProposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement AUEProposed Aerial Utility Easement CRProposed Curb Ramp STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. Geoenvironmental Boring UST Known Soil Contamination: Area or Site Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site Concrete or Granite R/W Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with C A Concrete C/A Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with 17BP.12.R.36 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 9’ WITH GUARDRAIL 4:1 ** * 2: 1 M AX 2:1 MAX 2:1 MAX 2: 1 M AX 4 :1 25’-0" PROP. WEDGING MILLING DETAIL NOTE: MIRROR FOR END OF CONSTRUCTION USE MILLING DETAIL AS FOLLOWS: EXIST. PAVEMENT C O N S T R U C T I O N B E G I N O R E N D W C1V MIN. Wedging Detail For Resurfacing Detail Showing Method of Wedging C SURVEY L MIN. MIN. MIN. MIN. C1 E2 C1 E2 3"3" 3" 3" 3" 0 to 3" DEPTH MILLING 3" P A V E M E N T S C H E D U L E C2 U C2 EARTH MATERIALT EXISTING PAVEMENTU MILLING EXISTING PAVEMENT (SEE MILLING DETAILS THIS SHEET)V VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE WEDGING DETAIL THIS SHEET)W CL 22’-0" 8’-0"6’-0"11’-0"11’-0"6’-0"8’-0" GROUND NATURAL GROUND NATURAL GROUND NATURAL GROUND NATURAL T -L- (SR 1802 - COLT THORNBURG RD) PROP. SURFACE COURSE (3") C1 E1 E2 C2 -L- STA. 14+00.00 TO -L- STA. 14+50.00 (END PROJECT) -L- STA. 12+00.00 (BEGIN PROJECT) TO -L- STA. 12+50.00 NOTE: TRANSITION BETWEEN EXISTING AND TYP. SECT. NO. 1 AS FOLLOWS: -L- STA. 12+50.00 TO -L- STA. 14+00.00 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 -L- STA. 14+25.00 TO -L- STA. 14+50.00 MILLING AND RESURFACING: -L- STA. 12+00.00 TO -L- STA. 12+25.00 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTIONDO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 217BP.12.R.36 PAVEMENT DESIGN 6 / 2 / 9 9 $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ NOTE: USE FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT FROM -L- STA. 13+05+/- TO -L- STA. 13+60+/- GRADE POINT FT/FT 0.08 FT/FT 0.08 C1 C1 U W E1E1 T SEE X-SECTIONS VARIES 18’ TO 20’THIS LINE GRADE TO THIS LINE GRADE TO FT/FT 0.02 FT/FT 0.02 7"7" " IN DEPTH2 1IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 5 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SQ.YD. PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE TYPE B25.0B, " IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 2" IN DEPTH.2 1IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SQ.YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. PROP. APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE S9.5B, PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.17BP.12.R.363 PA R C E L N o . S H E E T N o . P R O P E R T Y O W N E R N A M E AR E A ME A S U R E D I N TO T A L A R E A A R E A T A K E N AREA REMAININGPERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENTTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 1 4 E A R T H F A R M S A C R E S 1 0 7 . 7 0 - 1 0 7 . 7 0 0.02 - 2 4 J A S O N R . L I N E B E R G E R A N D L I D A C . L I N E B E R G E R A C R E S 4 2 . 8 8 - 4 2 . 8 8 0.03 - 3 4 J O N A T H A N A . W A D D E L L A N D E L I Z A B E T H A . W A D D E L L A C R E S 5 4 . 6 5 - 5 4 . 6 5 0.04 - 4 4 J I L L C O S T N E R S T I L L W E L L A C R E S 6 4 . 5 4 - 6 4 . 5 4 0.02 - R I G H T O F W A Y A R E A S H E E T ST A T E O F N O R T H C A R O L I N A DI V I S I O N O F H I G H W A Y S R E V IS IO N S DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS 640 644 648 652 656 660 664 668 672 676 640 644 648 652 656 660 664 668 676 672 *AND VERTICAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE. DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL CURVATURE N A D 8 3 / 9 5 ENGINEERS TGS CORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 PH (704) 476-0003 SHELBY, NC 28150 804-C N. LAFAYETTE ST TGS ENGINEERS SEE SHEETS C-1 THRU C-__ FOR CULVERT PLANS * SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 417BP.12.R.36 R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ FT= 663.2OVERTOPPING ELEVATION YRS= 500+OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY CFS= 1900OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE FT= 659.79BASE H.W. ELEVATION YRS= 100BASE FREQUENCE CFS= 1390BASE DISCHARGE FT= 658.4DESIGN H.W. ELEVATION YRS= 25DESIGN FREQUENCY CFS= 950DESIGN DISCHARGE CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA FT= 650.4AT DATE OF SURVEY APPROX W.S. ELEV = 2/11/2014DATE OF SURVEY WHICH OCCURS AT STA. -L- 13+26.90 LOWEST HIGH POINT ON DECK/ROADWAY ** OVERTOPPING ELEV REPRESENTS SEE DETAIL "A" SEE DETAIL "A" FOR GUARDRAIL PLACEMENT AT STRUCTURE. USE NCDOT RDY STD. 862.01, SHEET 10 OF 12 #170 BRIDGE SR 1802 COLT THORNBURG ROAD 19’ BST S R 18 0 2 C O L T T H O R N B U R G R O A D 19 ’ B S T 13’ GR D R IVE LIDA C. LINEBERGER JASON R. LINEBERGER AND COLE Y CR E E K 6 0 . 0 0 ’ EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 6 0 .0 0 ’ E X IS T IN G R /W E X IS T IN G R /W DB 3151 PG 69 DB 3360 PG 110 DB 4161 PG 628 JILL COSTNER STILLWELL DB 3375 PG 523 4-SBW WOODS WOODS GRASS GRASS PROPERTY LINE W/CTR. CREEK W/CENTER CREEK PROPERTY LINE RUNS T O S R 1001 TO SR 1805 #4 REBAR INV=658.60’IN V = 6 5 8 .11’ 36" CMP D R IVE 10 ’ GR 4SBW 4SBW S 42 59 ’16 " W 33.3 8’ S 3 0 14 ’19 " W 5 1.3 2 ’ N 3 1 14 ’2 9 " E 18 .7 5 ’ N 3 8 3 1’5 2 " E 3 7 .14 ’ N 5959’25" E30.30’ ELIZABETH A. WADDELL JONATHAN A. WADDELL and DB 4660 PG 738 EARTH FARMS N 7939’42" E 118.46’S 3120’18" E105.12’ ELIZABETH A. WADDELL JONATHAN A. WADDELL and DB 4660 PG 738 MAGNAIL GEOTEXTILE EST. 10 SY CLASS B RIP RAP EST. 5 TONS CUT TO FILL TRANSITION GRADE TO DRAIN EST DDE = 150 CY EST CFM = 100 SY EST CL II RIPRAP = 80 TONS LINE WITH COIR FIBER MATTING. SLOPE BANKS TO TIE INTO EXISTING CONTOURS. CHANNEL. EMBED THE ROCK INTO THE STREAMBED. CLASS II RIPRAP AT THE EDGE OF THE PROPOSED EST DDE = 110 CY EST CFM = 120 SY EST CL II RIPRAP = 100 TONS LINE WITH COIR FIBER MATTING. SLOPES BANKS TO TIE INTO EXISTING CONTOURS. CHANNEL. EMBED THE ROCK INTO THE STREAMBED. CLASS II RIPRAP AT THE EDGE OF THE PROPOSED ( Not to Scale) SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH D d 2: 1 EST PSRM = 30 SY FROM STA. 13+73 TO STA. 14+50 RT EST PSRM = 35 SY FROM STA. 13+57 TO STA. 14+50 LT Max. d= .5 Ft. Min. D= 1 Ft. DETAIL A Type of Liner= PSRM Ground Natural TO 4:1VAR. 2:1 Slope Fill 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 20 3 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 2 GRAU 350 TL-3GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 GRAU 350 TL-3 -L- PT 11+29.47 PI Sta 14+91.31 D L = 161.34’ T = 81.26’ R = 545.00’ PI Sta 10+64.88 D L = 129.47’ T = 64.88’ R = 780.00’ -L- CURVE DATA -L- PC 14+10.05 -L- PT 15+71.39 50’ TAPER TO EXIST + 5 0 TSIXE OT REPAT ’05 0 1 0 3 ’ 1 1 ’ 1 1 ’ 1 1 ’ 1 1 15 + 0 0 0 0 + + 2 5 -L- STA. 12+00.00 17BP.12.R.36 BEGIN PROJECT -L- STA. 14+50.00 17BP.12.R.36 END PROJECT 110 DEG. SKEW PROP. 2 @ 10’x10’ RCBC -L- STA. 13+27.00 25’ TYP + 2 5 30.46’ +86.00 55.00’ +86.00 55.00’ +25.00 29.63’ +27.00 30.32’ +37.00 55.00’ +22.00 29.61’ +95.00 1 2 3 4 3 55.00’ +80.00 ELEV.= 664.71 -L- STA. 14+50.00 END GRADE DS = 35 MPH 11 12 13 14 15 16 PI = 13+29.00 EL = 661.72’ (-)2.3953% (+)2.4711% VC = 240’ K = 49 ELEV.= 664.81 -L- STA. 12+00.00 BEGIN GRADE SKEW=110 DEGREES PROP. GRADE=663.18’ PROP. 2 @ 10’ x 10’ RCBC C/L -L- STA. 13+27.00 ELEV.= 663.18 -L- STA. 13+27.13 LOW POINT ELEVATION = 650.4 NORMAL WATER SURFACE REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE (+) 4.5455% (+) 7.4731% ELEV. 656.50 -L- STA 13+57 BEGIN DITCH GRADE LT ELEV. 660.00 -L- STA 13+73 BEGIN DITCH GRADE RT ELEV. 663.45 (LT) ELEV. 663.50 (RT) -L- STA 14+50 END DITCH GRADE F F F F F C C DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS 00 00 55 55 1010 1010 1515 1515 2020 2020 2525 2525 3030 3030 3535 3535 4040 4040 4545 4545 5050 5050 5555 5555 6060 6060 6565 6565 7070 7070 7575 7575 $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 2 3 / 9 9 PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0 660 660 665 665 12+00.00 660 660 665 665 670 670 12+50.00 650 650 655 655 660 660 665 665 670 670 13+00.00 X-1 -L- 2.5 5 17BP.12.R.36 664.80 663.62 0.030 0.0202:1 S.S. 660.47 4 : 1 S.S. 662.65 662.51 0.020 0.0202:1 S.S. 659.61 2: 1 S.S. 660.35 00 00 55 55 1010 1010 1515 1515 2020 2020 2525 2525 3030 3030 3535 3535 4040 4040 4545 4545 5050 5050 5555 5555 6060 6060 6565 6565 7070 7070 7575 7575 $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 2 3 / 9 9 PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0 650 650 655 655 660 660 665 665 670 670 13+50.00 660 660 665 665 670 670 14+00.00 660 660 665 665 670 670 675 675 680 680 14+50.00 X-2 -L- 2.5 5 17BP.12.R.36 662.25 0.020 0.020 2:1 S.S. 659.16 2: 1 S.S. 659.52RCBC PROPOSED 663.39 0.020 0.020 659.70 2: 1 S.S. 662.90 661.23 2:1S.S. 662.94 4:1 4 : 1 664.71