820651_Routine Inspection_20220727 (2)

Y a'faps'
144„,4% • J**a�
litS164144t S3)L
A$ 444*444415444..
Type of Visit: `6
Reason for Visit:
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation
(fit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow -
Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
r c NS dOW( earn
Owner Name: r`rj(4tf'1J( doriLej
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: /' r
Facility Contact: 1 /V\tIf KR LK 1L
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Barite
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: ,7Q l l) P)U n Region: in
Title:
John daniR r
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
%4#pAdna
ie},
bid
##r
;;np
It/
Q4
a
4, d@Do3gqAop#d,4 *.b.o uVrvBsi n£
At:nv0idA j. S#1}
.ssadx•+.5N4Ykq:txR4*aapfr#iP%o-`d4sd/frAta% fiYYa xYn@4lT#6Y@CydS{$$MAkdtPpY§Yk =3NYkkaFf}#'Y'tFt.m-0}x4bRkCiX. xK6tIyY.$8Yx#ft}�v'+rta3xtrti$,�td@x..tr#. 'JAxYa". #Ek §k {3 t}55#4d£$vP+6.},;Wr:F�5i�+�eDp.Y]sjP62 .bp}xxT}^$#.Yk.'xkStl(�#'SdY�'�YY'+}k1d�ryT9M1pFY5€ �£ tM#aFftXt: ' .iY5£I9Qd#4Yh +#g4pY'.rtA+
'a,+x t# e£b eCOaCl n
.tl 544 Cyi4a4.bk4x 0..
x+
§MY••4#5fr5&{'tr4 S+at`%TS£huwAAtix1i#2..%iqIRS!bb aA4§. UNYX3 e##d§Y4Yb'rtF Ya%%N. ',,aDj`9Yv4 ^Xj"g�mi4U.l- aaNiy}Y` .�p}$��xA3.�Syyb93 �� t�#Smtfl�,A, �Y.JlBA£
�$h�}fry ` P3%qQ4$dllYt'..t
r#k
eapt
H yotik*wlne4
Wean to Finish
(r
Layer
(
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Xs
Non -Layer
) "
Dairy Calf
i az
Feeder to Finish
1 44,4.}'%YYq YSAt}t$
5*='*tratsq».a>, +.
m mxxzxmxaari s
+ aaiA§n'htBCtb.Agfn£'?`h
a#§@64fix a t>aat q
P. it1t P
4,4 4c.Y
£ft �$hi�-'A;q�
S
;> esi net
Pn kq +•#b%##
Cat@"d4�i'
F4h Yb pYry
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
3
ttl elite
}y
s �'¢ }; i
Dry Cow
+
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
.�
31
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker.
Gilts
;:Non
-La ers
_-F
Beef Feeder
sx
qk
Boars
Al?�Pullets
-_
Beef Brood Cow
+w gE ...p#Xth
Xtm 4SP$'1%A4N
$ %q
i*SYd Yy62b
"y'§#P {F3st kAtr##3#$k'�
btixW a„a#A{,*S4$
�t i�gEd
SSA"##q`d
b$$#
tki
t5 $,p#S$8�@
#'$.t#
'.4##$frAq
')
m.l
a
¢i#
i45
+4fr
riYR
#RM1
bWedetimdk i+t**
elbk Yik d! x}d }iGkt $t kdS C+iTSq# hu
NipYpe £@#tpp1 ya�RFA M'gt.4 k dW%tr R#qS k§{4$`.q'Xdt
a'hiQ#Y� §v NY�i ➢; u. ?*q5 tea
u9 t a YVS #SAx #+ik
G$
Turkeys
r£.X'F#
fpY
�F$h.A$
§My+AW@Ya,#jY. ST
4 at
ik 4Y to«u'Yt tr+e{x�
il3d kd tx.X'h .P§b vu
VX 1 R§t# Y45
+aXYafib4d iY .YYild
k
k{
a,}
Turkey Ponits
--Xfl%t
#a
TA
Other
x
dxi'ik5
--FY'iIS
a..Y..drxhx %.Y iiF £-fr
<T
{dS kN Y{iid t%FR d'mv4: yY##h'nt Arct d+.p '.M1 kWb^TYTtq
0*
AtY RF .xY..t $. � ,eta:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a.
b.
c.
d.
❑ Yes k No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Was the conveyance man-made?
Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes iv No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
dcl No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑NA NE
k]No ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
90- 70
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): goibQc, 1 rr) AQUA"
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
kt
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ructure 6
13. Soil Type(s):
PN
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes i❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
ElYes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,Rifo D NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ni No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes nNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes NO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
fort-D
Phone:
Date:
gict (Mc
'1 Z-1Z-
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015