Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201354 Ver 2_More Info Requested_20220823Homewood, Sue From: Homewood, Sue Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 9:21 AM To: Hales, Jason C. Subject: RE: [External] Support pier protection - City of High Point - Richland Creek Aerial Sewer Pipe Replacement, Guilford County; SAW-2020-01802; DWR # 20201354 Good morning Jason, I was reviewing this permit modification request and realized that we didn't discuss buffer impacts. The original impacts were all covered under "existing uses" because they were temporary vegetation impacts to within the existing maintained corridor, however this culvert extension doesn't fit in that same category because technically some buffer is completely lost. I can authorize this under "protection of existing structures" but I will have to issue a formal buffer authorization to do so. The maps you sent show the buffer, can you just provide me with a calculation of square feet of Z1 and Z2 that will be "lost" adjacent to the extended culvert please. Thanks. Sue Homewood Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 336 776 9693 office 336 813 1863 mobile Sue.Homewood@ncdenr.gov 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 From: Hales, Jason C. <halesjc@cdmsmith.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 10:32 AM To: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Subject: [External] Support pier protection - City of High Point - Richland Creek Aerial Sewer Pipe Replacement, Guilford County; SAW-2020-01802; DWR # 20201354 CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Hi David and Sue. The contractors doing the aerial pipe replacement work at Richland Creek came across a piling for the 48-inch sewer line that is experiencing erosion from the adjacent stream (intermittent stream SL). We would like to stabilize this piling for the aerial sewer infrastructure. To ensure there will not be future erosion we're proposing a culvert extension past the piling vs. just fill and rip rap on the stream bank next to the piling. Some figures and plans with notes are attached. Hoping we can modify the existing approvals for this project to include this work. This area is currently designated as temporary stream impact S7. I'm not sure the exact length of culvert needed but just enough to get it past the pier. The extension shown on the attached plans is —12 feet. We would want to add some riprap and filter 1