820493_Routine Inspection_20220809 (2)

Type of Visit:-0—Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
j4, Arrival Time:
51:3-d
Departure Time:
9tt //c
L'M/r.ti- y.g,nf La/ L G
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: Facility Contact: /- ` a rsc#' Avk Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: CLLCh 42/J —
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
face
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:�yBegion:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
rs.%i,Zd
Certification Number: l % fl'1
Certification Number:
Longitude:
y
Wean
f�tlk
3 Ii
e
to
t f
s
Finish
�"
r d,jg
I
tt
Layerii
1
t1
Dairy
Cow
da i
f It
I
IA'
Wean to Feeder
i
-(
Non La er
Dairy Calf
■■;`
to Finish
Da Heifer
{:
#t�Feeder
arrow to Wean -,
#
e
Dry Cow
! 1E
Farrow to Feeder ,
@ «°
a.
.
i),
'
ry Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish
Layers
.
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
If Pullets Boars -- {, Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
d
ti jE
Turkey Pouets
j'i
it
f
r
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 2 es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Q'ico ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
'Date of Inspection: lire ''02j4--
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
ik e,qc lire MA
37 Z
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
12-3/6 ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
s
❑ Yes
ai ❑ NA ❑ NE
LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
9-k% ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes EliVV ❑NA ❑NE
El NE
❑ No ❑ NA
D1Cro El NA
❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window /❑ EvidenceofWind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (i i'mpt�Ia, 4 r top�iY/�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
fixes
nib
Rims ❑No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes (]moo
❑ Yes alCro
❑ Yes 1No
❑ Yes g-No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
[:1 NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes IJ "o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
�No El NA ❑NE
911O ❑NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Date of Inspection: 1.4-9-.110441--
Facility Number: -11
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes j —No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes° ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes LJ CIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes al< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
POW
a xpleu
Lvo04-J Esc. fiic i kcq COU_2,s 0
diets APdcCky_` itiajt
.t- S1eX 0G/%dun Mafte H—
fl ©q lzau� — u/ ri 7at;J pent_Ak-v-VM Aacsr_ d-cn&
Wad' Z4'Z w-r-d1"`
/S �DNdd1 p5fl ©r r-dJt(-1afi63-momky e)/,ya//s
�3 6r4rt_ yoct p ;*you pus? 16 ij .4 e,v72757 /
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: // 0—
Date: ,45)'--- 09n-2_
5/12/2020