820345_Routine Inspection_20220810

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection
u 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: fiJ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Pio•g•a
Arrival Time:
Farm Name: NCH IOR fa IIJ
Owner Name:
LCUN NayIa(z.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
o:oo flP
Departure Time:
I& 110
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: SQrnQstN
Region: fro
curtic Baruuic,K
Onsite Representative: me
Certified Operator: La 1 1 J nay I or
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
T J c,2g
Integrator: sm itl i f1 e cl
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
169113
Dairy
Wean to Finish
Layer
Wean to Feeder
j Non -La er
Feeder to Finish 199
0
1100
�3
�;
Dairy
Farrow to Wean
IiY'�l
t
°�a
� ,
t r
�
: t
�
�, �
t.
Farrowto Feeder
I C
l }"�
t.
a
e �1.
a'
' �
"
"�.
__________________________________
t
1',Gilts
Farrow to Finish
"
Layers
Non-LayersBoars
i
Pullets
Beef Broodm
`f
�l.11
3
Turkeys
Turke Poults
Other
x • Other
IfI{!til11lpl6tgtRilt @#I@IIIOG"Ntl{tt{gllllwmuIoflu
8p71flR(twrMffiu i, •, �,.c. E �t <t 3.. it �k' :' v: +
u'
��
t� ��"�
"
.{
:
@(Itanmrn
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Q,g. - $tf 5
Date of Inspection: Q 27_
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes N]No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes tKiNo ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Pt'? a I -
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 5 t
NO
lc]
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of' any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes 1\ I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Quc Acceptable yCropyWiindow ❑l Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
semi I
12. Crop Type(s): a) I o1' Lj cged
13. Soil Type(s): wag rain
l l
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Yes No El NA
❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes m No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Other:
N] No
NI No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes C No
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Thic No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
Page 2 of 3

Facility Number: - 34%5---
Date of Inspection: -/t7 97!:24 '
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
4.
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
l
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
IN No
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
farrn is wowing oh Ivo banKj, f<4 up good WOtK.
fl�lds I ooK good,
1791ti
ff�p�
Stodge", IO2IG ti
WQSfie&&9)2I7aa,li,vi
GO [ I bta i- 0- Due 12 g! °aa
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Katie Fontenot , r aiitr
«o L
Phone:
Date: er (0 9d-
Page 3 of 3
5/12/2020