820006_Routine Inspection_20220728

tter� fn>'br ��,3
51kX Islonof#,W®tg
p t ign br q4
age:
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
00
Departure Time:
FarmName:C0t0 \ Lea `Ulm
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:(` r j
Facility Contact: CAKtl 7 a W Wl t<
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
7�LL�1
l��
Region: HT
Title:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
5miMd
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
i iAt
X#d###i��j%%M1frydttk#a3MY#%#'f+l.atA4#
t#
IXI�
{# ##} 3###
tn.*##x a##Xi*ft a%U'f:XYe lik3..q#t#+ FR3rkyi,♦4♦+FMr 3'#1f rX ###urr+a ttY y���:.##kiM tr*it'.##RM
irt}}*1#itMs3 p, tfiYB 3X#xn'%#ij{xTMy+%f�#Ut%Ptkmi#3atx'ryrwx'dar4Y#'ptXttr'3X+&Kn{}f +'tjlY#i
Xi.,y4##*iit+c� y�f, f pa�,Vyf},.y�
### Y#3 FrFW###9'+YY+�ii �4Yt,:}ykt#Ma`tX#Y
XX.AfiF'.i#S¥X#..M'it#r.y3w#m# #i+#XXf*%xr+# ri##*�'
3 *1 -0sk rtAiP'fkMtIX 1iW#•#�* 'M4
i4. Yk AH �f �R #t ^46 '+,'q aF y 1Lti
i%f5#X�#y•{{}a�*#trkiA4#*Mr,Bk`y}r a;%}i{��F„kba
Wean to Finish --**+
Layer
a"'•
Da' Cow
--
--^
-- „
_-
Wean to Feeder --
Non -La e
Dai Calf
Feeder toFinish --'n*a*p*i*ggrpX
Farrow to Wean
"
i
u
��)�ry$p��(S+*
rI
■Dai
Heifer
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder -- I+;
Farrow to Finish --w
Gilts --
+* .i
1�Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Layers
Non -Layers
Beef
--*++:
Boars
Pullets
'"`�Beef Brood Cow
+#f
--#
r+r {•#X # * #;#SAY ♦,its
ax+#v*k1
�* i ��} 1t !P!X
*
# girt*ks+#*x Yi+r+�
f#%l yryr# #r%x m,rr mr .rtr'#;###r#}%+#X# X+iX+%s
Turkeys
'w4%+x##ff
x
�#t
%X�t,4.r n'r #rsK #i`a
#fK�+t+*MJ#iff{##rtXFb}#.i
%+° }� +~•arxs#%
Turkey Poults
# X#
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection:
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes h o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 4 '/
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes kl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 'El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Itj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? \
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
O Outside of Acceptable}�Crop Window //' 1❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):Bt\ CfiibOticc li)W �`IN
13. Soil Type(s): N) , Leo N 1 Col%Jbnr0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 'V Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tran fers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ti tl.191 �if
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes D] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) �c
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
N
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 133No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
farm dlk MR on bare aria( ru* fib icaf wot1 nod.
-Farm w\ ari-d -fit -nor cra 9 4 ! 14 w°11111 en
s -41g iing -PoArtbarrnvQai_
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
oth nano'
Date:
5/12/2020