090186_Routine Inspection_20220728

Mg Tact
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Arrival Time:
Shannon brooK
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 1'
Facility Contact: C V\ H S b ar Y'IN
I
Q: 30
Departure Time:
g,00
Owner Email:
Phone:
f
County: blade Region:
Onsite Representative: S}illt
Certified Operator: gat Sp Dt/ N
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: UU I sI
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: wIll l'.I
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
#Yp8$ipm#k�$9'�gg#&p #� �%. ..99
'&sb#krva?#30rrpt#A$d kRga#e9a is++aop
s¢¢m#a�+xpas#�uq.uxi»xA��Ig� d��4tarrenAsa«p#�atabmpb#�4»s;,.pg#$s.�.a�a�
p#d:kd#at '#845hq#6i tr.##hgx,
k•.�y »d�Kn Bd$'U#.Y%Yq(�¢:®1 -} g}�,@�(##df-0'#93#k
Wille i'$ p¢%#$ Sb4pPP ac1tFYA{$J@kpd'k {$q,9
Y1.7p@tT,ygx#{,d RdAA-„deS q& 4p�gSM1tl$q
TUVJiUUuIiIIU13WftIV
--,
red■aar Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder --{
m�k"'�xa
#v#rapsxe a8n dxvadktY# $ $ $3}p. '#§ekskk Y}sff8ffi9H�a +uc q E#,
3teEp#k §mtm4rdhM%qD j jca nta.#itr aaa"d##ma3t mm#<gp»:adC*ta;k4y`1�1r�tl8:kd+
tr`" '�$.q##+&
Nay yo-A qX @#�k#kq.
erd�UnlyW�h�,ygt �i/�"�,�J`� �,dj}.($�k0 #�. #a'"'Sx@'8.�a4uu'4�$
A*4Y kkdd6iY 4. adiAF#n`4C #r0... It I$ .'figU
p#4.,qx s»nu .fit vim.
e $
�$
to-
Layer
g� Dairy•�
a#�+ Cow--ds$
• Dairy Calf -_
Non -Layer
�Feeder toFin ish --':I
IeakaI*fry
¢ # e#
,�,g�a"�,'� ,aa�$�a�'s
-nth gytl tryf ab
T
lay .
� h �i, �t
e1 j g qj t
�DairyHeifer
--
. �Farrow to Wean
�DryCow --tr
Farrow to Feeder
= Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish --_
� Gilts
*�4
j.a;
Layers
Beef Stocker --
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder Ni
$� -- a
Boars --*Pof
., a rr&x8q
Kz ae#Yred#raahasn easakaia
r$#�x$�a:de#k«ra #
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow'
Turkeys
dS BEvt#q##xffi sqN#a#wtritvbRffi$pt$'86i
Turkey Puults
#%&,
�z.ia Wino-w aaa Baas#mm�amazar•
#i '+#gaaaa +q{aa $sa9^�o-wa#a#gequ&';
Other
##� aIk r �`� } Y A b j f £@8#$k••GY
dddeskd ra.i.'�'. °: rvx¢e#Sdt p4SE xai ¢Sv. fl 1k Et id Sp'eAq i4 "iY+92 @#Iti#d`f}$#dnaagtm uki±„ $ 6.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
El Yes t INo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No
❑Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes fi No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑Ye No El NA ❑NE
0 Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 \Structure 6
!l
5. Are there any immediate threat to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site wh ch are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ en al threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need 0 Yes
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable
Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C, V'J)
13. Soil Type(s): MfaIK) goi4cboiro
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
N
❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes \No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes '\No ❑ NA 0 NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 0 Yes,No 0 NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP 0 Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps 0 Lease Agreements 0 Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes j No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
0 Rainfall ❑ Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspect ns 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
El
Yes
XYes
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes tcl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '.c No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
an3Fv'a.:@/.4Iyggttrutionitl':oSr!iSaA�.'t14tl?s;o
aFk
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ICJ U Date: 1 pt-iJ 29
-
Page 3 of 3
5/12/2020