090016_Routine Inspection_20220804

ivrsrerihh,....b'xater&Reshh.ourewes�l$) ul
3Dit'groin D 'gSoi7;aidxki'ateir Cdnser",
xx'#si "kx• r e tr
:/l4M .A.T^^• ki A$$F$54iT.,4 i4•tr5 b-Xtl
Cy�3bt
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
6if22
Arrival Time:
Farm Name: Nolen 1 e n t_%
(-i•.aa
Owner Name: Ham t19nK f1tlj; u
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CU I
Onsite Representative: come
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
12ob 01 Mon
Departure Time:
tee,
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: hladefl
Region: fiz o
Title: Tech cPec. Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Ei] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
ESI No ❑NA ❑NE
111 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
No
No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 9
0
Date of Inspection: 8 H '%1.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 11
Spillway?: n1 o No
Designed Freeboard (in): 19 I
Observed Freeboard (in): 31
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 7�
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes r) No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes t] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
s: coQ tat tetrmiid� uJH g e , corn
12. CroType(s):
ypeO
13. Soil Type(s):
not for K, 9`oldShoro
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes I No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes t No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes lip No ❑NA ❑NE
VI Yes 70 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 14No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes IX] No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes E4 No ❑NA ❑NE

Facility Number: c(
ce
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
XIYes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Fri iQ3(390111 TO i1-I20IP
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes IYQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes itl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
rlta quessti�
+ors AWgg;
t`a"diMityrt
1. u. orK on Kigoon tooKC good, Keep wo1<lnq on area tear
►�. 'EQtGH for weeds in spray freed No Befrouda in field b/ Iggoon y:
tone
farm herd IeaKing v2hh on moon 3 repairs hav-e, been
(-MU. ks
95.move c>wd9* itig4 - rov )3)04 % pump a` Si` 4 92 e 71 Aiab2/ourr"
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Key I I Q f O
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: k(0\tUa l
Page 3 of 3
ferio r, (Ave, ciV3 —ON
M-VriV I ,
Phone: 942 —50.3'2/ 7
Date:
5/12/2020