Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220284 Ver 1_More Info Received_20220428Strickland, Bev From: Camden Brunick <cbrunick@sandec.com> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:54 PM To: Cohn, Colleen M Cc: George.L.Phillips@usace.army.mil; Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) Subject: [External] RE: Cadence Meadows DWR#20220284 Attachments: Cadence Meadows 401 responses 4 27 2022.pdf; 19-0103_Cadence-Meadows- Impacts.pdf; Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form UPDATED 4-28-22.pdf CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Good afternoon Colleen, I hope you are doing well. In response to your previous email requesting some additional information, please see the attached responses above. Please note that buffer impacts for greenway impacts 7 & 8 have changed and have been updated in the PCN attachment above. Please also note that a 3' retaining wall 5' away from the top of bank has been added to keep the grading from the top of the bank for Impact 3. These questions and other comments have been addressed within the "Cadence Meadows 401 response" attached above. Please let me know if this additional information will suffice. Thank you, CAMDEN BRUNICK Environmental Consultant Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA North Quarter Office Park 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27615 (919)219-6162(cell) From: Cohn, Colleen M <colleen.cohn@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 1:25 PM To: Camden Brunick <cbrunick@sandec.com> Cc: George.L.Phillips@usace.army.mil; Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Samantha.J.Dailey@usace.army.mil> Subject: Cadence Meadows DWR#20220284 Good morning, I am beginning my review of the above referenced project, and in order to complete the review, some additional information is required: 1) The NC Wildlife Resources Commission has submitted comments on this project. I've attached a copy for your convenience, but they are also located in the public Laserfiche file for the project. Please provide a response to the comments and concerns from NC WRC. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)] 2) Please provide more details regarding avoidance and minimization of buffer, stream, and wetland impacts for Impacts 2 & 3. Please provide additional information as of why this plan for the activity cannot be practically accomplished, reduced, or reconfigured to better minimize disturbance. i 3) Impact 3 appears to have fill for the roadway at or below top of bank of the stream channel. I've included a snip of the plan sheet below. Please provide additional information on this impact, including how this activity will not result in de -stabilization of the stream bed or bank. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(c)] 7WABLEi sr - • 31 11111001111+ r + + LJMIT OISTIlLBAE I ,PERMANENT 5TRF,AM IMPACT 72LF/ 430 SF TEMPORARY ' 3TRCAMI IMPACT 10.1F)47SF 1� 7/ Ifr PERMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT ROADWAY• f y T •TOX• cx 101 4) Please provide additional details on the greenway impacts in Impacts 7&8. than 10-feet-wide with 2-foot-wide shoulders through the buffer based on 02B .0714(11)(j)(iii)] Thanks, Colleen Cohn Environmental Specialist II North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office 380o Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Office: 919-791-4258 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. STRE J. PERMANEh- L6 28L-I-E Av The greenway appears to be wider the scale of the maps. [15A NCAC 2 it SUMMIT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Deborah Shirley North Quarter Office Park 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27615 RE: Cadence Meadows PCN Submittal Additional Information DEQ Permit No. 2022-0284 Dear Ms. Shirley: April 27, 2022 We have reviewed the correspondence from Colleen Cohn with DWR on April 22, 2022 and Gabriela Garrison - NC Wildlife Resources Commission letter dated April 13, 2022. We offer the following information for further evaluation on the permit application. When developing the roadway configuration, we immediately discarded the concept of extending the roadway to the west across the Little River. We did not discuss this as avoidance and minimization for the project, but this is something that should be noted for the record. There are three roadway stubs to the parcel from the Pineview subdivision. Southland Drive on the west, Azalea Drive and Smokey Mountain Drive on the east. In the rezoning of the property, we mentioned to the Town that it is very unlikely that both Smokey Mountain Drive and Azalea Drive would be permitted. Smokey Mountain connects back to Southland Drive just north of the stream crossing. Therefore there is no advantage to making this connection. Azalea Drive provides a better connection to NC Highway 97 and was chosen for more detail design. For avoidance and minimization, we are only providing connections at two of three possible locations. Culvert Crossing 2 location was chosen to minimize the stream impact and wetland impact. The stream begins just to the left of the centerline of Azalea Drive, with the stream impact limited to 22 lineal feet of permanent impact. The culvert will be provided with 8" high baffles and riprap at the outlet to minimize the head cutting potential. Fill slopes of 2:1 are used to shorten the slope impacts and pipe length. A 3:1 slope would increase the stream impact by an additional 10'. If the culvert is moved to the east, while stream impact will be decreased, wetland impact will increase. Culvert crossing 3 location was locked into connecting into the existing pavement for Azalea Drive. We noticed that the stream goes north / south for a short distance. To avoid this north / south jog, a reverse curve in the roadway pulls the improvements away from the stream to limit channel impact. If the roadway is shifted more to the east, the centerline crossing will be at a larger skew angle than is shown. We added a 3' high retaining wall 5' away from the top of bank to keep the grading from the top of bank. Note we revised the size of the culvert to 72" RCP as requested by the Town. Raleigh Office 1110 Navaho Drive, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27609 919.322.0115 // www.summitde.com We agree with Gabriela Garrison that the Little River is a highly sensitive area. Due to the overall size of the property, we probably didn't communicate properly how the overall site was being developed in relationship to the existing Little River. The attached overall site PDF has been modified to show the entire parcel and labels the distance to the closest point of the development. There is a distance of 600' from the Little River to the greenway. This distance exceeds the 200' buffer mentioned in her comments. For the creek running along the northern property line (north of Southland Drive), the roadway network will have a storm sewer system beginning near the existing pond. The storm sewer will outfall into SCM 3. This storm sewer system will minimize the impact to the northern creek since it will not be hydraulically connected to it before Little River. The rear of lots will drain to the creek, but the drainage from the roadway and street sidewalks will be connected into the curb and gutter /storm sewer system. As mentioned earlier, the stream impacts have been minimized as much as possible and the roadway crossings are designed to allow for passage of aquatic organisms. The criteria listed for culverts is part of the nationwide permit criteria and will be part of the culvert construction. The majority of the wetland impacts are at the extension of Southland Drive. The Town allowed for the standard collector roadway width of 35' be reduced to 31' at the stream and wetland crossing location. Sidewalks are required on both sides of the roadway throughout the development and will connect into the proposed greenway system. On a project this size, we evaluated the possibility of using LID techniques early on. The Town of Zebulon had a requirement of sidewalks on both sides of the street. With ditch sections, it is much more complicated to grade for the sidewalk, have street trees, and underground utilities for water and sewer. This typically requires at least a 70' right of way instead of the proposed 50' right of way. For the proposed lot width of 60', standard zoning would have required rear alleys at single family lots for the project. This would have increased the impervious area of the development. This compounds the issue of trying to incorporate LID into this project. The townhome area does have alleys as required by the Town. The perimeter trees will be maintained as much as practical. An extensive landscaping plan for street trees and perimeter buffers have been developed for the project. The erosion control plan provides for an extensive network of sediment ponds and temporary diversion ditches parallel to the streams. These ditches are designed for a 10 year design storm during construction, and will be removed and the area outside the lots will be seeding and planted and allowed to reestablish itself to a natural state. 0 2 The Town has on its master plan a greenway running along Little River from Business US 64 to NC 97, and an additional greenway trail (Corridor 8 Trail — see excerpt) running along the stream (Gill Creek) on the southern property line. We have designed the greenway to minimize environmental impacts while meeting the intent of the greenway location. Note that the greenway trail is showing a stream crossing for Little River that we feel will be difficult to achieve. At impact 7, the greenway trail is 10' wide with 2' shoulders on both sides. At impact 8, we have added a 12' wide boardwalk that spans the majority of the zone 2 to minimize grading in this area. The boardwalk has a concrete approach slab 12' x 15' which will be the only impervious area in zone 2. This completes our responses. Please advise if you need any further clarification. Sincerely, Don Sever, PE Senior Project Manager • 3 LITTLE RIVER STREAM CENTERLINE HINTON & HINTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PU PIN 1795319786 GROUND ELE REAL ESTATE ID 0211817 DB 4442/258 PROPERTY LINE CONFLUENCE OF LITTLE RIVER / FEATURE G STREAM CENTERLINE 5 BM 200 /1888 AREA = 620,423 SQ. (14.24 AC) 946 4 SOUTHWIND LAND CO. INC. PIN 1795525142 REAL ESTATE ID 0248170 DB 17511/512 BM 1998/1721 N`AA� 4 G H&K PARTNERSHIP PIN 1795511912 CZ. REAL ESTATE ID 0233665 O DB 6506/30 BM 1997/431 TOWN OF ZEBULON PUBLIC GREENWAY EASEMENT, (TYP.) PATRICIA ROBERSON PIN 1794595860 REAL ESTATE ID 0360257 DB 12604/29 BM 2007/1160, TRACT 2 EXISTING SAN SEW MANHOLE GROUND ELEV: 249.5' GILBERT L. TODD, SR & GLENN A. TODD PIN 1795604391 REAL ESTATE ID 0093648 ESTATE BOOK 00—E-000808 BM 1959/301, PART OF LOT 3 Know what's below. CaII before you dig. 1 i SITE BOUNDARY, (TYP.) CITADEL GETHSEMANE MEMORIAL PIN 1795639241 REAL ESTATE ID 0079469 DB 9959/817 BM 1979/425 STREAM CENTERLINE -/GRIFFIN TODD, JR. PIN 1795609826 //"---- REAL ESTATE ID 0435017 DB 16261/68 GILBERT L. TODD & JACQUELINE TODD PIN 1795608424 REAL ESTATE ID 0070902 DB 15760/449 BM 1959/301, LOT 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 75 0 37.5 75 150 /r-& / 4°: ALLEY /4,1 16• TOZ 1111111101 : 1 ID in./ �` +hs al �� HUNTERpA A E-4II HUNT _ P -BLIC RAN 300 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 150 ft. GILBERT L. TOD GRIFFIN TODD, J PIN 1795703906 REAL ESTATE ID 0103724 DB 16261/72 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "NC811" (811) OR (1-800-632-4949) AT LEAST 3 FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION TO HAVE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ANY LOCAL UTILITIES THAT PROVIDE THEIR OWN LOCATOR SERVICES INDEPENDENT OF "NC811". REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. ROPERTY LINE REAL ESTATE ID 0186160 DB 8622/986 ALLEY 3 16' BM 1988/24 TOZ R/W EXISTING SAN SEW s MANHOLE ROUND ELEV: 295.5' SS ai 1 gar ALLEY 6 16' TOZ R/W SILVER SPRINGS HOUSING ASSOCIATION LLC PIN 1795728646 GWENDOLYN TODD HOUSTON PIN 1795717011 REAL ESTATE ID 0347381 DB 12053/2690 MB 2006/1339 LOT 1 i i V) < 0 V) < 0 V) a 0 DAS >- m 04/06/2022 04/06/2022 02/25/2022 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS f•-• CO LO M CV N— DRAWING ALTERATION w zOO�ZWLI= >— w cn d' J W W zctu zcnwo_ 12° Q U Q¢ H W 0 0 W W C WWOZ~ U-2a¢W¢wa¢ LLJwJ� W gW�¢¢rOOm�� w z H U E Q OO B O H W OD=0mZm=w<O ZO U O Z O I= X w 0 Z Z a g W Z H LL I- 0<0w Wozma 04zw= _ mzwm0I-~O5O w W Z O OO Q 2i p O W -Z0z¢go O 1-= wJr�mZ 1- w I- IY ce N. w z z w U w 0 AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) PROJECT MANAGER 1 LDAS(DON.SEVER@SUMMITDE.NET) m JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET IRST ISSUE DATE f N LY %.i CC W N C'3 Ce W W CZ W CI Q C3 Co) W C State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court 1' 1 1 PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: 19-0103_s.dwg SHEET NO. C-13 Zebulon Greenway, Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Corridor #8 At approximately 2 miles long, Corridor 8 will connect Downtown Zebulon to the future Little River Trail and to the Pineview neighborhood. It also connects to roadside improvements along Business 64 / Mack Todd Road. A major road crossing would be required at Bus. 64 and a smaller crossing would be required at Pony Road The portion of the corridor between Mack Todd Road and Downtown follows an existing sewer easement. Roadside improvements along Horton Street would be recommended to strengthen the connections between Downtown and the greenway trail system. West of Bus. 64, the corridor follows FEMA floodplain along property lines and will tie into the future Little River Trail. A spur connecting to Southland Drive in the Pineview development is recommended. Southland Drive dead ends, making it an easy connection point and potential trailhead for the neighborhood. Example of a trailhead with parking - Raleigh, NC Example of a trailhead without parking, Raleigh, NC photo courtesy of Google Maps .74 Dead End at Southland Drive in Pineview - photo courtesy of Google Maps Bullock's Mini Storage & Flea Market on Pony Road photo courtesy of Google Maps Sewer Crossing at Business 64 (Mack Todd Road) photo courtesy of Google Maps Dead End at W. Horton Street photo courtesy of Google Maps Trail System 167 CORRIDOR 8 Corridor 7 -Trail DESCRIPTION: Approximately 2.0 miles R C I— y V O1 C N_ "6 �O C N N t0 3 w v m E y IL-3 .- s N N E C V_ y N _2 N o C N C v m E J y C C d O N O L ?i N C> v •J E +' O N O o C -O H C V Q W N N A N C C O1 C 'A d) V -.5 O A C m O c_ " c 3 O)s R fl. C ¢ O C N 2 d O x a y m m )o O C C O "O O 3 Q O 7 C Ot rr A Y v C • N V Y 0 0 'O a w o A a -8 To Fa ¢ v 2,)2 0 E -a s coJ s0 2 �1 0 NVId H]ISVW AVMN33HD NO1f183Z z�; Trail System 69 2 �253 253253 yL--.0.-- 4(( , ,/,.., ,, . ••44#44' rli' , 4, '/4,/, Ap9-41J-Agr 1. 4r Ism .. CO , ___ 03 ,-------- -- , _-_- ‘ 74/ N ___ / N Q J %' -- _I , f0 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10.0 20 40 80 (IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. Know what's below. Call before you dig. PVI STA:41+56.44 PVI ELEV:256.24 - HIGH PT STA:41+43.47 HIGH PT ELEV:255.591 K:18.05 LVC:100.00 - i D\\ \� N LOODW�Y 100-YR FLOODPLATN 0446, / • FT o S q 96. o,00 04 9 74' /p 90 626,0/03j2 I /// 4 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET PP-28 1- • • BVCE: 255.21 r Timber Guardrail with Chain Link Fencing 1"x6' Ipe Rub Rail, Bottom at 34" Above Finished Boardwalk Decking Surface Figure 8.3.3.A EVCS: 42+06.44 EVCE: 254.49 -3.49% PVI STA:42+59.23 PVI ELEV:252.65 LOW PT STA:42+60.97 LOW PT ELEV:253.492 K:14.83 LVC:100.00 GREENWAY TRAIL PROFILE STA 41+00 TO 52+14 20' EASEMENT - 10' ASPHALT PVI STA:44+00.00 PVI ELEV:257.23 HIGH PT STA:44+25.00 HIGH PT ELEV:257.388 K:19.07 LVC:50.00 BVCS: 43+75.00 BVCE: 256.42 / EVCS: 44+25.00 100-YR FLOODPLAIN BFE = 258.00' N GREENWAY SAFETY FENCE MIN. 18' LONG BOTH SIDES 15'LX12'W CONCRETE APPROACH FLUSH W/ BRIDGE DECKING I/ / START BOARDWALK STA I/ A49+10 1 I /,; } // v, 200 OF BOARDWALK 12' MIN. INSIDE WIDTH 2y6 f- 15'LX12'W CONCRETE APPROACH FLUSH W/ BRIDGE DECKING 10' BUI 'IN SETBACK LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 2' MIN. OFF EDGE OF ASPHALT 1 . 1 PET WASTE 7! , STATION (TYP.) (1) BENCH (TYP.) i EVCE: 257.39 FINISHED CENTERLINE GRADE EXISTING CENTERLINE GRADE \ y' START BOARDWALK AT STA 48+65 15'LX12'W CONCRETE APPROACH FLUSH W/ BRIDGE DECKING 100-YR FLOODPLAIN BFE = 258.00' izoc"°3 1 Taper Aggregate Shoulder Into Approach Figure 8.3.4.0 4004 • rti 0 Min.12' Clear 245' OF BOARDWALK 12' MIN. INSIDE WIDTH BOA 12' WIDE RDWALK 100-YR FLOODPLAIN BFE = 258.80' Edge of Concrete Approach Flush with Bridge Decking Min.12Width Concrete Approach Edge of Greenway Trail Flush with Concrete Bridge Approach 15'LX12'W CONCRETE APPROACH FLUSH W/ BRIDGE DECKING TIMBER PILE EVERY 10' DESIGN BY OTHERS Composite Safety Fencing. (See Standard Detail G8), Taper End Fence Section Down to Finish Grade. Typical on Both Sides of Bridges or Boardwalk Approach. 15° to 30° END BOARDWALK AT STA 51+10 TRASH RECEPTACLE (TYP.) CONNECT GREENWAY TO SIDEWALK RETRACTABLE BOLLARD 25-FT FROM START OF DRIVEWAY APRON W/ 4" THERMOPLASTIC REFLECTIVE STRIPING / PVI STA:52+30.00 PVI ELEV:264.62 HIGH PT STA:52+55.00 PVI STA:51+55.11 PVI ELEV:262.00 LOW PT STA:51 +30.11 LOW PT ELEV:261.842 K 17.45 L4:50.00 BVCS: BVCE: 261.84 -100-YR FLbODPLAIN BFE = 258.80' EVCS: EVCE: 262.87 BVCS: 52+05 olo IGH PT ELEV:264.814 K:18.42co LVC:50.00 w tY m BVCE: 263.74 EVCS: 52+55.00 N U w 780 AINTAIN 12" MIN: COVER P-306 23' OF 12" RCP INV. IN: 260.50' INV. OUT: 260.00' SLOPE: 2.19% P-265 NOTES: ALL STORM DRAINAGE CULVERT PIPES SHALL BE CLASS III REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE W/ 12" MIN. COVER REFER TO DETAIL SHEETS D-8 AND D-8A FOR GREENWAY ITEMS WATER AND SEWER PERMITS The City of Raleigh consents to the connection and extension of the City's Public Sewer System as shown on this plan. The material and Construction methods used for this project shall conform to the standards and specifications of the City's Public Utilities Handbook. City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department Permit # W-3863. The City of Raleigh consents to the connection and extension of the City's Public Water System as shown on this plan. The material and Construction methods used for this project shall conform to the standards and specifications of the City's Public Utilities Handbook. City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department Permit # S-4937. CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations. Electronic Approval: This approval is being issued electronically. This approval is valid only upon the signature of a City of Raleigh Review Officer below. The City will retain a copy of the approved plans. Any work authorized by this approval must proceed in accordance with the plans kept on file with the City. This electronic approval may not be edited once issued. Any modification to this approval once issued will invalidate this approval. City of Raleigh Development Approval City of Raleigh Review Officer 275 0) O CO N I I w J w 270 265 260 255 250 245 240 235 230 225 DAS DAS DAS DAS BY) 04/06/2022 04/06/2022 N N 0 N O N N 0 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS i` Cfl LO M N r 1 DRAWING ALTERATION w OO�z�= a O W Q o'L _o y WW- LL'J WmH oW z�~zz�w�LL�a o "2,7)0z<_ wZctO°Hw wwowwaW QZ08OmDHwzVFp0ELLoo)�ZO U, Z 0 = X W U. ZF- JW~LLJf nOaV���?tea0<WWOz=w mzWQ) O 0 aw U_(7Z°0«0W 0 �W��x}O r�mz i rPROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) PROJECT MANAGER \- DAS(DON.SEVER@SUMMITDE.NET) >- co JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET) FIRST ISSUE DATE 1.61 CZ CC 1.61 1.61 CZ 1.61 CZ GI State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court Fax: (919) 732-6676 00 oo 1-1 0 ai 11.1 z; u.„ ,z zo 0_, zN_ Lu rY PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: co 10 O N oo O O N O O O N co O O O N O O O N N O N O O N 41+00 41+50 42+00 M M O N O O O N 42+50 O O N O O O N co O O N O W O N r` O O N N O N 43+00 43+50 44+00 O O r• O N O N 44+50 O W O N O N 00 W O N O O N O co O N CO O N 45+00 45+50 OJ OJ O N 0° O N 46+00 46+50 CO Cr; O N LC) O N O O N CO O N CO O O N CO CO O N 47+00 47+50 O CO N CO CO O N 48+00 48+50 O CO N CO CO O N CO N O O N N O N co O N M O N 0) O N O O O N O N co N co N O O N M co N O O N 49+00 49+50 50+00 50+50 51+00 51+50 co N O N a1 O N 220 52+00 52+50 52+67.10 SHEET NO. 4INTON NERSHIP 19786 D 0211817 /258 CULVERT 1 too o a -0 411 1 - 1,0 % SOUTHWIND LAND CO. INC. PIN 1795525142 REAL ESTATE ID 0248170 DB 17511/512 BM 1998/1721 itt' H&K PARTNERSHIP PIN 1795511912 REAL ESTATE ID 0233665 DB 6506/30 BM 1997 431 / f/ IMPACT (SHEET C-12A) oa • O LA t^I J 0� e . Know what's below. Call before you dig. • ° 0 • d a o �. • I )‘M )0A\ 0 • )\ j,,(4/ ff \Y) WETLAND UTILITY IMPACT (SHEET C-12F) I) o 0 / / .((./( � ova CULVERT 2 IMPACT (SHEET C-12B) IMPACT 3 25o/ CULVERT 3 IMPACT (SHEET C-12C) CITADEL GETHSEMANE MEMORIAL PIN 1795639241 REAL ESTATE ID 0079469 DB 9959/817 BM 1979/425 0 i► it it u rj 3p0 0-\ WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT 29 JJr LBERT L —JR NN GRI " PIN 1795703906 REAL E PINS1 BUFFER 2 GREENWAY IMPACT 7 & 8 T, DB (SHEET C-12G) nts SILVER SPRINGS HOUSING ASSOCIATION LLC PIN 1795728646 REAL ESTATE ID 0186160 DB 8622/986 BM 1988/24 ,261,1 �"i��itfhtt8 Ik\-4/Z-C 7/7 ✓ ° 11 (\c ' REAL ESTATE ID08 0070902 DB 15760/449 BM 1959/301, LOT 4 GILBERT L. TODD, SR & GLENN A. TODD PIN 1795604391 REAL ESTATE ID 0093648 ESTATE BOOK 00-E-000808 BM 1959/301, PART OF LOT 3 GRAPHIC SCALE 75 0 37.5 75 150 — 300 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 150 ft. IMPACT 7 INN J GWENDOLYN TODD HOUSTON ' PIN 1795717011 REAL ESTATE ID 0347381 DB 12053/2690 MB 2006/1339 LOT 1 V 7/ ( D LEGEND: SF— TP— LD Etlati SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT GRADING & STORM LEGEND: EXIST / PROPOSED 111111 SD CURB INLET ■ DROP INLET O JUNCTION BOX FLARED END SECTION (FES) LD/TP TP LD 100 98 100 LD/TP TP 98 EXISTING STORM PIPE PROPOSED STORM PIPE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE & TREE PROTECTION FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR WOODS LINE Q 0 Q 0 < 0 < 0 } m 04/06/2022 N N O N 02/25/2022 N N O N DATE \ \ 0 O 0 \ \ p O REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS DRAWING ALTERATION w 1 OO;1=6.zWWIB } z a°O::-. W¢O5-`O_ } W ¢JWwQHaw Z - .3_ oi d K � � p U Q ,wwowO W ���W W O Z J LL�LLQ�Q�LLQQ QWUQQ3UwmD2 LL Z H w O Q OO ! n W H l L OoxpxzDi:w0O z�UzoZ=xw�z OUwww--_-LuE OQzW� _ N z W cD O F p U �tA W Zp�Q?iH� W coZJZg(�2JO ° H D W H. m Z / H U w H 2 U w w z z w H U w 0 N. AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) PROJECT MANAGER 1 / LDAS(DON.SEVER@SUMMITDE.NET) >- z A (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET ST ISSUE DATE IL l=m DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: 19-0103_ec.dwg SHEET NO. EXH-IMP 1 r PHASE I - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. PROVIDE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS AROUND PROPOSED UPSTREAM END WALL TO ALLOW STREAM TO CONTINUE NATURAL FLOW THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 2. INSTALL BYPASS PIPES/ PUMPS AS NEEDED TO HANDLE BASE FLOW CONDITIONS. 3. INSTALL PROPOSED PIPE AS SHOWN. 4. CAST OR INSTALL PRECAST END WALL, INSTALL AND EXTEND PIPE UP TO THE HEADWALL. 5. TAKE EXISTING PIPE OFFLINE BY DIVERTING STREAM INTO PROPOSED PIPE. 6. BEGIN BACKFILL OF PIPE PER DETAILS AND MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS. DO NOT BACK FILL WITH WASHED STONE. DISCHARGE PIPE PROVIDE DIVERSIONS AS CLOS DURING INSTALLATION AND DIVERSIONS SHALL DISCHARGE TREATMENT I PROVIDE TEMPORARY EA LINER. CONTRACTOR SH CONVEY BASE CONTRACTOR ACTIVATED AS CREEK CROSSING - PHASE I SOUTHLAND DR. CULVERT 1 SCALE: 1" = 20' END EXISTING PAVEMENT SOUTHLAND DR PERMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT 3160 SF STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS SOUTHLAND DR. CULVERT 1 SCALE: 1" = 20' :V<7 / CULVERTI - STREAM CROSSING G - WETLAND W4- IMP.ACT.1 IMPACTED AREA PERMANENT TEMPORARY(10`} WETLAND (SF) 11E40 STREAM ( LF) 70 20 STREAM (SF) 343 127 ZONE 1 BUFFER (SF) 6216 ZONE 2 BUFFER (SF) 2692 IMPACT 1 ./ 'Di dj=iy��? �1► �y �7��� .fir 3�dr�z'%z��s-mac �� �c • ��►• J PHASE II - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. CONTINUE FILL EFFORTS TO REACH THE DESIRED GRADES ENSURING THAT ALL COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 2. WHEN CONSTRUCTING FILL FOR EMBANKMENT AT CROSSING PROVIDE ROLLED EROSION CONTROL MATTING TO TOP OF FILL SLOPE AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 3. FOR DOWNSTREAM EMBANKMENT, PROVIDE TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE AS SHOWN WHEN BUILDING SLOPE. FOR UPSTREAM EMBANKMENT, PROVIDE ONE ROW OF SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. / / CREEK CROSSING - PHASE II SOUTHLAND DR. CULVERT 1 SCALE- 1" = 20' 4 "t4r ffe/P 235 230 W/ 225 220 215 CREEK CROSSING PROFILE SOUTHLAND DR. CULVERT 1 SCALE. 1" = 20' 64 LF 72"X120" TYPE 1 BOX CONDUIT OR DUAL 72" W/ NCDOT HEADWALL 1' HIGH BAFFLES AT 10' SPACING 0.C. INV IN - 222.0 INV OUT - 221.5 MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATER RM DRAINAGE PIF AN[ ) STO 'ES 1 CULVERT 1 I FINISF NC. CUL\ GRADE /ERT r EX. GROUND AT C/L PIPE MAINTAIN 12" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCEBETWEEN STOF3M DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES (DIP) WATERLINE co w N N N SANITARY SEWEF LINE (DIP) N 0 N N N 235 230 225 220 215 LEGEND: SF— TP— LD SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 40 <<<< CI CI CI Cr) 0 co 04/06/2022 04/06/2022 N N O � 0 N N 0 n 0 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS N- LO CO N N- DRAWING ALTERATION (- PROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) PROJECT MANAGER DAS(DON.SEVER@SUMMITDE.NET) JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET) FIRST ISSUE DATE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court /0 z J 2 0^, 1 Z� J �V O o zl O I— 0 z w O -J D 0 `W 0 J PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: 19-0103_ec.dwg SHEET NO. 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 1+56.92 Know what's below. CaII before you dig. ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. J C-12A PHASE I - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. PROVIDE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS AROUND PROPOSED UPSTREAM END WALL TO ALLOW STREAM TO CONTINUE NATURAL FLOW THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 2. INSTALL BYPASS PIPES/ PUMPS AS NEEDED TO HANDLE BASE FLOW CONDITIONS. 3. INSTALL PROPOSED PIPE AS SHOWN. 4. CAST OR INSTALL PRECAST END WALL, INSTALL AND EXTEND PIPE UP TO THE HEADWALL. 5. TAKE EXISTING PIPE OFFLINE BY DIVERTING STREAM INTO PROPOSED PIPE. 6. BEGIN BACKFILL OF PIPE PER DETAILS AND MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS. DO NOT BACK FILL WITH WASHED STONE. A'\W 4, I W 4, 9, • JLd$D CREEK CROSSING - PHASE I CULVERT 2 AZALEA DR. \ J dIJSL- LD `Jb� D 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER SCALE: 1" = 20' d.UJS LD ♦ 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER \" WETLAND AREA i y/1/ Iif( \ j11 69.60 L.F. - 3 " CIRCUkAR RCS ��D01NN 4 .58' INV. UP 25 .t5' IJJ r 1-1l 1 1 1 4' 4, dS 4, 4 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, W 4, W W 4' 4 4, IMPACT 2B CREEK CROSSING - STREAM I, BUFFER, AND WETLAND W5 IMPACT CULVERT 2 AZALEA DR. PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT LOT FILL (DEEMED ALLOWABLE) 873 SF * WETLAND ♦ • 4 4, TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 10LF/11 SF 4' 9, PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT LOT FILL (DEEMED ALLOWABLE) 1773 SF RIPRAP PERMANENT NO PERMANENT LOSS 73 SF SCALE: 1" = 20' PERMANE ZO1JE 2 B 3632 SF J IMPACT 2 PERMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT 3248 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT 3549 SF LIMITSF 4' W DIS'FTURBXCNCE p50' RIPy,ARIAIBUFW si, W5 ,W 4' �A 4, ,t 4, CULVERT 2 - STREAM I CROSSING - WETLAND W5 IMPACT 2 IMPACTED AREA PERMANENT TEMPORARY (1[') IMPACT 2A ROAD CROSSING WETLAND (SF) 3549 0 STREAM I (LF) 22 10 STREAM (SF) 32 11 R I P RAP PERMANENT-N O P ERMAN ENT LOSS (SF) 73 ZONE 1 BUFFER ( SF) 3248 ZONE 2 BUFFER (SF) 3632 IMPACT 2B ZONE 2 BUFFER - LOT FILL (SF) (DEEMED ALLOWABLE) 761 IMPACT 2C ZONE 2 BUFFER - LOT FILL (SF) (DEEMED ALLOWABLE) 1856 PR VIDE GROUNDCOVER A THEE END9OF EACH WdRK DAY `4 '' ONCE AREA IS GRUBBED. * 9 4, 4, 9\ 4, PHASE II - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. CONTINUE FILL EFFORTS TO REACH THE DESIRED GRADES ENSURING THAT ALL COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 2. WHEN CONSTRUCTING FILL FOR EMBANKMENT AT CROSSING PROVIDE ROLLED EROSION CONTROL MATTING TO TOP OF FILL SLOPE AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 3. FOR DOWNSTREAM EMBANKMENT, PROVIDE TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE AS SHOWN WHEN BUILDING SLOPE. FOR UPSTREAM EMBANKMENT, PROVIDE ONE ROW OF SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. 4, 4, 4, z o�\ STREA'M TOP OF BANKS CREEK CROSSING - PHASE II CULVERT 2 AZALEA DR. J1fdD dJJJSL 30' ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER • l WI j SCALE: 1" = 20' 30' ONE RIPARIAN B.U11 BLIZE SLOITH ROLLED ION CONTR©L-PRODUCTS 4, * 4, 4, 4, *ALONG ENDI/OF HEADWALL OF PIPE, ON EACH SICIE, SUCH TH4T ALL ,I,BYPASSING RUNOFF IS TREATED BY THE gzILT FENCE CrUTLETS SHOWN. 4, 260 255 250 245 co cd CREEK CROSSING - PROFILE CULVERT 2 AZALEA DR. SCALE: 1" = 20' MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATER AND STORM DRAINAGE PIPES INV. DOWN 248.58' INV. UP 250.35' BAFFL S 8" HIGH AT 10' CENTERS IPRAP PLUNGE POOL CLASS B 10' L X 6' W X 22"TH EXTEND WIDTH TO 12' AT OUTLET. TOP ELEVATION OF RIPRAP NOT TO EXCEED PRE-CONSTRCTION ELEVATION OF STREAM BED / cd 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 260 255 250 245 1+87.10 LEGEND: SF TP LD SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT Know what's below. Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE 40 1 inch = 20 ft. DAS DAS DAS o Ca 04/06/2022 CV CD NI Ln 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES DRAWING ALTERATION cu uozb' Liz'7' :z> uz j:L. L :co> -1 ww • <• I; ->• > 02: 0; C LU L 00• . owz• < ,,u)i u !- 0: Hc! :th • L Itf .1)0( c> z8H0 ) (PROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) PROJECT MANAGER LDAS(DON.SEVER@SUMMITDE.NET) JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET) DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court 00 eV en 00 7.1 • • 4-4 cEn o fin O co LLI 0_ LI PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: SHEET NO. PHASE I - CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. PROVIDE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS AROUND PROPOSED UPSTREAM END WALL TO ALLOW STREAM TO CONTINUE NATURAL FLOW THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 2. INSTALL BYPASS PIPES/ PUMPS AS NEEDED TO HANDLE BASE FLOW CONDITIONS. 3. INSTALL PROPOSED PIPE AS SHOWN. 4. CAST OR INSTALL PRECAST END WALL, INSTALL AND EXTEND PIPE UP TO THE HEADWALL. 5. TAKE EXISTING PIPE OFFLINE BY DIVERTING STREAM INTO PROPOSED PIPE. 6. BEGIN BACKFILL OF PIPE PER DETAILS AND MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS. DO NOT BACK FILL WITH WASHED STONE. CREEK CROSSING - PHASE I CULVERT 3 - AZALEA DR. PROVIDE DIVERSION DITCHES AS CLOSE TO PIPE AS POSSIBLE DURING INSTALLATION AND INITIAL FILL ACTIVITIES. DIVERSIONS SHALL DISCHARGE AT COFFER DAMS FOR TREATMENT IN THE STILLING BASIN. • / / ,51y 43Jas dydS t.D = �D / /J r � 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER PROVIDE TEMPORARY EARTHEN OR SANDBAG COFFER DAM WITH IMPERMEABLE LINER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PUMP(S) AND LINE SUFFICIENTLY SIZED TO CONVEY BASE FLOWS OF STREAM. IF BASE FLOW IS NOT SUBSTANTIAL, CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR POOLED WATER TO ENSURE PUMPS ARE ACTIVATED AS NEEDED TO AVOID OVERTOPPING THE TEMPORARY DAM. ( / 1 3 I SCALE: 1" = 20' I / i / / STILLING BASIN / 7 \5, / T yri / , /- -// / DISCHARGE PIPE / BAFFLES AT 10' CENTERS / / / / INV. DOWN 244.5 / INV. UP 245.1 / / / / �/ //i" I I i / f% / / \ / I / / 7 / ! 7 SUCTION LINE / / PUMF / rz,/ 60 L.F. - 72" RCP WITH 1' HIGH CONSTRUCT COFFER DAM WITH IMPERMEABLE LINER JUST BEYOND END WALL TO dAPTURE FLOWS THAT BYPASS UPSTREAM COFF R DAM, COME FROM GROUND WATER OR C ME FROM RUNOFF DURING RAIN EVENTS.rUNOFF CAPTURED BY COFFER DAM SHALL B PUMPED INTO A STILLING BASIN PER NCDOT STD 1630.06 AND RELEASED ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE QF COFFER DAM. / II Yl / 7 7 CREEK CROSSING - STREAM, BUFFER, AND WETLAND IMPACT CULVERT 3 - AZALEA DR. LD 7 / SCALE: 1" = 20' IMPACT 3A d11� LD ail ID PERMANE ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPAC IMPACT 3A PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT LOT FILL (DEEMED ALLOWABLE) 3306 SF BUILDING SETBACK ROADWA 2600 IS dy dS dll�LD J / LIMITS r DISTURBA CE / / j / o\ PERMANENT STREAM IMPioc / 50' RIPARIAN BUFFE / / '72\F\/ 430 / ' \ TEMPORARY / STREAM IMCT / 10LF/47PApp / // \ PERMANENT I 30' ZONE1 RIPARIAN BUFFER 1 / / / 67i/N/ \J 1 20 ZONE- 2 / �3 1 /\ I CULVERT 3 - STREAM G CROSSING - IMPACT 3 IMPACTED AREA PERMANENT TEMPORARY STREAM (LF) 72 20 STREAM (SF) 430 125 ZONE 1 BUFFER (SF) 7779 ZONE 2 BUFFER (SF) 4552 IMPACT 3A ZONE 2 BUFFER - LOT FILL (SF) (DEEMED ALLOWABLE) 160 IMPACT 3B - UTILITY CROSSING ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT (SF) 137 IMPACT 3B - UTILITY CROSSING ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT(SF) DEEMED ALLOWABLE 786 IMPACT 3C- ZONE 2BUFFER - LOT FILL (SF) DEEMED ALLOWABLE 183 ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT ROADWAY - 3860 SF I \4'411 W6 yl V')d,s; � I 7 1% / q\x„ j v v I / / 4 4 _� - 1 IMPACT 3 ZONE 1 BUFFER [MPACT 137 SF IMPACT/3B / PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMP 30' ZONE1 7 RIPARIAN BUFFER 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER // SETBACK CT UTILITY 242 / 786 SF IMPACT 3C PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPAC"( LOT FILL DEEMED ALLOWABLE 183 SF 241 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. CONTINUE FILL EFFORTS TO REACH THE DESIRED GRADES ENSURING THAT ALL COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 2. WHEN CONSTRUCTING FILL FOR EMBANKMENT AT CROSSING PROVIDE ROLLED EROSION CONTROL MATTING TO TOP OF FILL SLOPE AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 3. FOR DOWNSTREAM EMBANKMENT, PROVIDE TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE AS SHOWN WHEN BUILDING SLOPE. FOR UPSTREAM EMBANKMENT, PROVIDE ONE ROW OF SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. PROVIDE GROUNDCOVER AT / THE END OF EACH WORK DAY ONCE AREA IS GRUBBED. / 50' RIPARIAN BUFFE / E5A°S' SETNr°T\--/ / (i 4 ( / , 0,v, 20,2, (J 1 1 1 30/ ZONE1 RIPARIAN BUFFW- CREEK CROSSING - PHASE II CULVERT 3 - AZALEA DR. SEGMENTAL BLOCK WALL STABILIZE SLOPES WITH ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS 14, W;\"! 1a.\ ‘// STRE‘IVI CENTERLINE E/TEND SILT FENCE UP EMBANKMENT \ ALONG END OF HEADWALL OF PIPE SUCH THAT ALL BYPASSING RUNOFF IS TREATED BY THE SILT FENCE OUTLETS SHOWN. TOP OF BANKS HEADWALL \ RIPARIAN BUFFER 7 21 260 255 250 245 240 CREEK CROSSING - PROFILE CULVERT 3 - AZALEA DR. FIN. GRADE TOP OF PIPE CONCRETE WINGWA BAFFLES AT 10' CENTERS INV. DOWN 244.5 INV. UP 245.1 EX. GROUND AT CL STREAM — MAINTAIN 12" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN STORM DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES (DIP) CULVERT 3 SANITARY SEWER LINE (DIP) \—MAINTAIN 18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATER AND STORM DRAINAGE PIPES 1.6 CO 0+00 0+50 1+00 260 255 250 245 240 1+50 1+57.76 LEGEND: SF TP LD IN II I SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT Know what's below. Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE 40 1 inch = 20 ft. DAS I DAS DAS DAS >- co 04/06/2022 04/06/2022 02/25/2022 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 co z 0 w DRAWING ALTERATION : :0 (cil - - zw< 01 —w ! : xzw wu - 0: : —5. <C)L - z:z ww: L. uz:3 wc t; 2cy): _I': ):: 01 =-1 : c twc: °EL L ( ol = : : z - a> ww : — IL' 1 c- : I ' 1 (PROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) >- co JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET) IA 661 Lu 661 661 661 CI Lu State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court 00 CV en 140 0 LIJ 0 Lo co PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: 19-01 03_ec.dwg SHEET NO. r SF/TP 275 99 SF/TP 97 IMPACT 4E - GREENWAY TRAIL WETLAND IMPACT 144 SF IMPACT 4E SILT/TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP.) EXISTING POND 96 0 A WETLAND W1 IMPACT SCALE: 1" = 20' 94 PERMANENT W 93 TLAND IMPACT W1 ROADWAY FIL 250 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT W1 SCM FILL 854 SF ERMANENT - NO PERMANENT OSS WETLAND IMPACT W1 UTILITY CROSSING 88 SF SA. 5' CONCRETE WALKWAY SF/yp SF/TP 28, 92 TEMPORARY 18" HDPE SLOPE DRAIN PIPE SF/T\ �TP V 90 RIPRAP TO DEFINE BOTTOM OF DRY POND (SEE SHEET D-14 FOR DETAILS) �\ SS SF/TP \ \ SF/pp SS PERMANENT GRADING — CONTOURS PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY OUTLET PIPE i J r / \ 5' CONCRETE / WALKWAY y� \ START OF STREAM STREAM TOP OF BANKS EMERGENCY SPILLWAY UNDER BOARDWALK (32' LONG) SEE SHEET D-14 FOR DETAILS a STORMWATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT WETLAND W1 IMPACT 4 IMPACTED AREA PERMANENT PERMANENT- NO PERMANENT LOSS 4A - WETLAND W1 SCM FILL (SF) 854 4B -W1 UTILITY CROSSING (SF) 288 4C - W1 ROADWAY FILL (SF) 250 4D - W1 LOT FILL (SF) 415 4E - W1 GREEN WAY LOT FILL (SF) 144 LEGEND: SF— TP— LD lbs SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 40 I DAS DAS DAS co} om 41 04/06/2022 NN NN 0 ;; Co 0 o 0 0 N N 0 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES DRAWING ALTERATION wows OOJ Z' wJ_ OZQOOz� � 0 O O U W J 0 Z L } w-} J w w F w Z K w~ Z W a l Owo<w}wwoZJ w�aa<LAI u < LLo1NF<OWeilw O:xoOLzu,=CLZO Z U Z O r= X w O z OZQ J W w~ uJC7O Ppa O a o w>> w O z= 1 ,zw(OOJ~O v (PwzOQ -(5 Cn J J Z Q0� J~ wJ�,m° (PROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) PROJECT MANAGER LDAS(DON.SEVER@SUMMITDE.NET) m JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET) DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court 00 N n M N 5 ZN• M � S 7.1 v` 0 ON 0 N r 0 00 Z Zz ZO 0_ LC) CCI LLJ rnNJ PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: 1 9-01 03_ec.dwg SHEET NO. Know what's below. CaII before you dig. ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. C-12D 1 EVCE: 272.54 TRAIL/ GREENWAY PROFILE STA 11+00 TO 12+70 -1.82% O 0 M + H w w Q 0 0 0 rn N I I J w -0.01% SCALE: 1" = 20' BVCS: 11+58.84 BVCE: 271.99 BOARDWALK OVER C/L STREAM I PVI STA:11+83.84 PVI ELEV:271.99 K:10.54 LVC:50.00 EVCS: 12+08.84 0 c .) N co 0 w U w 0 PVI STA:12+48.00 PVI ELEV:275.03 K:10.54 LVC:50.00 01. EVCE: 275.02 N N N N N N N N 11+00 \ \ \ SILT / TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP.) EXISTING POND 11+50 A 12+00 SAS SF/7p 12+50 SF/Tp Sp Tp 5' CONCRETE WALKWAY SF/Tp O co SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL SF/Tp -\�TP SF/TP STREAM I UTILITY IMPACT SCALE: 1" = 20' EMERGENCY SPILLWAY UNDER BOARDWALK (32' LONGJ' SEE SHEET D-14 FOR DETAILS PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY '011TLET PIPE SF/Tp \ SF/Tp\ IMPACT 5B AAA GREENWAY OVER STREAM TEMPORARY IMPACT 10 LF AND 32 SF FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOARDWALK TOP OF BANK / I IMPACT 5A —215 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT FOR UTILITY 34LF/133SF 9+8 / N N SANITARY SEWER PROFILE STA 0+00 TO 1+70 C/L STREAM I SCALE: 1" = 20' 215.31 LF OF 8" PVC @ 0.50% N N N O O N O O N 0)oO (0 I- CO CO N N II II ZZ SS-33 RIM = 281.12' ww ▪ 285' z w 1- X w 0 0 co 1- CO N II H O N O N 1+50 IMPACT 5 1+00 0+50 zzz 280 275 270 265 O N 0+00 STREAM I UMW IiMPACT 5 IIMPACTEDAREA PERMANENT TEMPORARY (10') IMPACT 5A UTILITYSTREAM(LF) 34 IMPACT 5A UTILITY STREAM (SF) 133 IMPACT 5B - WALKWAY STREAM (LF) 10 IMPACT 5B - WALKWAY STREAM (SF) 32 LEGEND: SF— TP— LD 01.47 SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT Know what's below. CaII before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 40 r DAS DAS DAS co o 1 } m 04/06/2022 EN N 0 ;; oCD \, oN 0 N N 0 o 0 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS �CO���NNJ (- PROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) PROJECT MANAGER \- DAS(DON.SEVER@SUMMITDE.NET) JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET) FIRST ISSUE DATE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court r o cI 1-1 C!� r T, O w • ZQ(i CnAzz Fi O o l Lo co - U O)NJ PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: 1 9-01 03_ec.dwg SHEET NO. C-12E ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 1 • 260 255 250 245 240 235 • 6p p �� COuivrr &/w • \ \ • ♦ \ /& NI 1 \/ / \ \ ♦ ♦ '' / / 1+00 S PROPERTY BOUNDARY STREAM TOP OF BANKS /�/���� 4, i 9' � W� /W 4'Iy �/ /9/�W 4'_ �/9' / / o4, 4, r ,% 9, TOP,QF BAk1K� i 4, 4 9 9' 4',..,,Y� - 4 4' 1' 4, 4, 4, i 4, 4' mil, 4, 4, mil,' 4, /4, V 4, 4, 4' V W < �L W IL 4' / )s 9, W A. u, ' ' 1 * 4, I 4, O 4, 4, 4, \ 4, 4, 4, / mil, /, \ 4, 4,J 4, 9, 4' 4,//�� 4, 4/ 4, 4, 4, 4, 4' W 50 I IPA IF�ff�B IER -\ 4, wCONNECT EXVSTIN W 7- 4' 4' � W W W W \W �\ 4, 4' &ANITA�RRY SEWER MANHOLE `i'� f` O�Z�N 1 �' 9' 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, �l, mil, 2k- d, mil, * <l, �l mil, �l, d, mil, mil, \ sb \/ W ‘120'Z9NE2W.00 \ Wc. -. - d, mil, 4, d, 4,/ y 4, y 4, 4, J� 4, I �- d, mil, 4, 4, mil, Ir11°111F-11.°P'-ligi011iALIS 'I/ 4, 4, 4, ,i, PERMAt IEN`f 410 PFRMANFNT LQSS WETLAND DEEMEIQLLOWABLE) W6CFLIT IMPA6T 4 PI' 4' 4, A BUFFER IMPACT'ZONEfr1 �) (DEEMED ALLOWABLE) 4, (,. UTILITY IMPACT 961SFj I i IMi'ACT 6'�A BUER If�YPACTsZONE '/441 l'� 4' '(DEEMED LLOWABLE) 4' 4' u' 4,\ UITY IMPA i ,�, s, * W'4 4' / 14' ill STREAM G 4, 4, u, \ 4, 3 / \ ♦./ 4, 4, 4. 4, 4,\ '.y,/`�\ \4, 4, w 4, 4' 4' 4'/..N1' 4, 4, � v 4\ 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 9, . w c-ct, N 1, 7 9, 4, 4, 4, 4' 9, 4 9' 4 9' W6 4, 4' `1' 9 y 9' 4, . 4, V 4, 4, PROPOSED * 4, 9, 4, 4, ‘1, SANITARY, 4, S WER OUTFALL 4' CONNECTNON 4, 4, * 1' 4' 4, 4, 4, 1' 265 BUILDING / SETBACK W / 4, V, W I\ CO I I 4, 4, 4, " \ \ WTLAND ARA (TYP.) 4, 4' \\c\I\c‘)\j\I'3.‘ \a cnv NNN 5 ss � r ungli \ I LOTLINE / SS-84 EX RIM STA: 6+17.29 150.19 LF OF 10 SS-85 EX RIM = 248.56 STA: 7+63.19 CO 0 WETLAND W6 IMPACT SANITARY SEWER AZALEA DR. ED o SS-87 RIM CO CO cci csi INV OUT = 238.23' SCALE: 1" = 20' ci SS-88 RIM = 254.0 0 Lu Lu Lu STA: 22+81.95 260 255 250 245 240 235 IMPACT 6 237 LEGEND: SF TP LD MEM SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT PERMANENT PERMANENT - NO PERMANENT LOSS IMPACTED AREA BUFFER IMRACT(SF) DEEMED ALLOWABLE 961 IMPACT 6A - UTILITY CROSSING ZONE Z BUFFER IMPACT(SF) DEEMED ALLOWABLE 700 811 Know what's below. Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 DAS DAS DAS 04/06/2022 EN EN CN N 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 REVISIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES DRAWING ALTERATION 0LXI (-)°L o<LI tjC 0<- -<Z Ogi M: DC tL UC :CI- I ILIU L:aj z5U- u:ozOL: i!= :0[ f<C>: Ex: -; pOL = Lu5 L90 :!z : : :11 (— PROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) >- co JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY@SUMMITDE.NET) FIRST ISSUE DATE CD DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court oo es1 en 00 4-4 cEn C21 Z LC) CCI 0 0 Et 1- D PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: co cci co co LO co cci 0+00 0+50 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+31.91 40 1 inch = 20 ft. SHEET NO. I 0 I / I z J / s J / �( IJ . 7 / / I/ / y f /\ • / // /� //, ' 13 STREAM TOP QE BANKS 7 1.0 6 — r 260 \ / STREAM B _ CONCRETE APPROA \ SLAB / / f u � ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT STREAM B STREAM TOP OF BANKS SCALE: 1" = 20' G NW 0 SF/ Y�C / 2 BU/FFER'IMP CT \ 289 PROPERTYc BOUNDARY LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE + /-±` + + + + + + + + 30' ZONE 1 W N ( � zo ni ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT STREAM B ♦ 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER L STRBAM TOP OF BANKS IMPACT 7 IMPACT 8 245' OF 12' W BOARDWALK / 7 / / 4° LD / �( • • ♦ • ♦ ` 2b0' f 260 f b LEGEND: SF TP LD IN MI SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE INLET PROTECTION RIPRAP DISSIPATOR APRON CLEARING LIMITS DIVERSION DITCH SILT FENCE OUTLET STORM DRAINAGE PIPE PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACT PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACT STREAM B GREENWAY IMPACT 7 AND 8 IMPACTED AREA PERMANENT TEMPORARY (10') GREEENWAY (SF) IMPACT 7 6346 GREEENWAY (SF) IMPACT 8 2890 - Know what's below. CaII before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 40 i DAS W < N < 0 DAS N >- co0 N N O N O O 0 0 04/06/2022 02/25/2022 01/07/2022 DATE REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 03/24/2022 REVISED PER WAKE COUNTY REVIEW COMMENTS 12/14/2022 REVISED PER TOWN OF ZEBULON REVIEW COMMENTS 11/12/2021 L. REVISIONS N- CO LC) d- M N N DRAWING ALTERATION W 00�o_ZW�I= tiazo07) UW¢OLLO LU �w-zzpw�aga oO p U¢¢zW OOH W � W W O �¢�¢�=Wa¢ � gwU¢¢rUOm�� L O U E Q pO O H W p�=D�zp=w<O ZO U U Q Z �= X W U Z `~'ww�2WozW0 p4UwO _ >U W ZO¢�i�OW �Z�z¢)0=go �= wJr5mz rPROJECT ENGINEER/ARCHITECT AM (ALEX.MANGOT@SUMMITDE.NET) r JA (JIMMY.ASHLEY©SUMMITDE.NET) FIRST ISSUE DATE H N L Y %.i W CM LY LY LY a ca H W State License #: P-0339 320 Executive Court n 0' v 00 n N 00 00 M zN 0' 0 CA 8 i PROJECT NO. 19-0103 DRAWING NAME: 19-01 03_ec.dwg SHEET NO. SCALE: 1" = 20' (IN FEET) 1 inch = 20 ft. C-12G DWR Division of Water Resources Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits (along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications) December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2 Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk - below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered. Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form. Below is a link to the online help file. https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN % 20Help % 20File % 202018-1-30.pdf A. Processing Information County (or Counties) where the project is located:* Wake Is this a NCDMS Project* Yes No Click Yes, only if NCDMS is the applicant or co -applicant. Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes No This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project. la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: * Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Has this PCN previously been submitted?* Yes No 1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? * Nationwide Permit (NWP) Regional General Permit (RGP) Standard (IP) lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?* Yes No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 14 - Linear transportation Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 18 - Minor Discharges NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list. Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:* check all that apply 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Individual 401 Water Quality Certification le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express Riparian Buffer Authorization For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No lf. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* Yes No lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. Yes No Acceptance Letter Attachment Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document Buffer SOA - Cadence Meadows.pdf Neu -Con SOA - Blackbird - Cadence Meadows.pdf FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?* Yes No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?* Yes No 139.82KB 165.56KB Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx B. Applicant Information la. Who is the Primary Contact?* Camden Brunick 1b. Primary Contact Email:* cbrunick@sandec.com Id. Who is applying for the permit?* Owner (Check all that apply) 1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? * Yes No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: * PNC of NC, LLC 2b. Deed book and page no.: DB: 008740 DP: 00996 and DB: 012709 DP: 00235 2c. Contact Person: (for Corporations) Govind Chandak 2d. Address* Street Address 7930 Skyland Ridge Parkway, Suite 200 Address Line 2 City Raleigh Postal / Zip Code 27617-6815 2e. Telephone Number: * (xxx)xxx-xxxx (910)308-0804 2f. Fax Number: (xxx)xxx-xxxx 2g. Email Address: * bryantspencer@hufffamilyoffice.com 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: * Govind Chandak 2b. Deed book and page no.: DB: 008158 DP: 01032 2c. Contact Person: (for Corporations) lc. Primary Contact Phone:* (xxx)xxx-xxxx (919)846-5900 Applicant (other than owner) State / Province / Region NC Country USA 2d. Address* Street Address P.O Box 99104 Address Line 2 City Raleigh Postal / Zip Code 27624-9104 2e. Telephone Number: * (xxocxx-xxxx (910)308-0804 2f. Fax Number: (xxx)xxx-xxxx 2g. Email Address: * bryantspencer@hufffamilyoffice.com 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name:* Bryant Spencer 3b. Business Name: (if applicable) RHH Land Investors, LLC 3c. Address* Street Address 2919 Breezewood Ave. Suite 100 Address Line 2 City Fayetteville Postal / Zip Code bryantspencer@hufffamilyoffice.com 3d. Telephone Number: * (910)308-0804 (xxx)xxx-xxxx 3f. Email Address: * bryantspencer@hufffamilyoffice.com 4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name:* Camden Brunick 4b. Business Name: (if applicable) Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 4c. Address* Street Address 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 Address Line 2 City Raleigh Postal / Zip Code 27615 4d. Telephone Number:* (919)846-5900 (xxx)xxx-xxxx 4f. Email Address: * cbrunick@sandec.com C. Project Information and Prior Project History State / Province / Region NC Country USA State / Province / Region NC Country USA 3e. Fax Number: (xxx)xxx-xxxx State / Province / Region NC Country USA 4e. Fax Number: (919)846-9467 (xxx)xxx-xxxx 1. Project Information .^J 1 a. Name of project: * Cadence Meadows 1 b. Subdivision name: (if appropriate) lc. Nearest municipality / town: * Zebulon 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: (tax PIN or parcel ID) 1795511607, 1795616501 & 1794496945 2c. Project Address Street Address 705 Pony Road Address Line 2 City Zebulon Postal / Zip Code 27597 2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees 2b. Property size: (in acres) +/- 166.80 State / Province / Region NC Country USA Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.) Latitude: * Longitude: * 35.814724 -78.332385 ex: 34.208504 -77.796371 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: * Little River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: * WS-V;NSW Surface Water Lookup 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Neuse 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.* 030202011503 River Basin Lookup 4. Project Description and History 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:* Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of undisturbed forested land. Specifically, there are seven (7) wetland features (W1-W7), two (2) perennial streams (SB & SG), two (2) intermittent streams (SI & SJ), and one (1) pond feature (Pond 1) located on the property. Please see attached wetland sketch map for locations of each feature. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of forested land with residential neighborhoods to the north and west. South and east of the property consists of rural single family homes with field areas and some forested land. Pony Road bounds the northeast portion of the property. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? * Yes No Unknown 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: Approximately 41.65 ac 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: (intermittent and perennial) Approximately 9,889 LF 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: * The purpose of the project is to construct a mixed use single-family and multi -family residential development. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: * The overall project consists of the construction of a mixed use single-family and multi -family residential development including but not limited to roadway infrastructure, residential lots, utilities, SCMs, and greenway. Specifically, there are four (4) road crossings that impacts streams, wetlands and buffers, four (4) utility crossing that impacts streams, wetlands, and buffers, one (1) wetland impact for lot fill, one (1) wetland impact for SCM fill, and four (4) greenway crossings that impact streams, wetlands, and/or buffers. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project. 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?* Yes No Comments: 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A Corps AID Number: Example: SAW-2017-99999 SAW-2021-00606 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: Steven Ball Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Unknown 5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR. NCDWR: Site visit and determination made by Erin Deck on April 27, 2021 (DWR RRO #21-063). USAGE: Desktop determination made by Samantha Dailey on May 7, 2021. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. There are five (5) phases for construction shown within the plans. Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification. It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated. D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): Wetlands Open Waters Streams -tributaries Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. "W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland". Buffers 2a. Site #* (?) 2a1 Reason * (?) 2b. Impact type* (?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name* 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of Jurisdicition* (?) 2g. Impact area* Impact 1A Road Crossing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest W4 Yes Both 0.272 (acres) Impact 2A Road Crossing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest W6 Yes Both 0.082 (acres) Impact 4A SCM Fill P Headwater Forest W1 Yes Both 0.020 (acres) Impact 4B Utility Crossing (Permanent -No Permanent Loss) P Headwater Forest W1 Yes Both 0.007 (acres) Impact 4C Road Crossing P Headwater Forest W1 Yes Both 0.006 (acres) Impact 4D Lot Fill P Headwater Forest W1 Yes Both 0.010 (acres) Impact 4E Greenway Crossing P Headwater Forest W1 Yes Both 0.003 (acres) Impact 6 Utility Crossing (Permanent -No Permanent Loss) P Bottomland Hardwood Forest W6 Yes Both 0.086 (acres) 2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 0.000 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact 0.486 2g. Total Wetland Impact 0.486 2i. Comments: Total permanent wetland impacts = 17,052 SF (0.39 acres); total permanent -no permanent wetland impacts = 4,023 SF (0.09 acres) 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. "S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream". 3a. Reason for impact* (?) 3b.Impact type* 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name* 3e. Stream Type* (?) 3f. Type of Jurisdiction* 3g. S. width* 3h. Impact length* S1 Impact 1A - Road Crossing - Culvert Permanent Culvert Stream G Perennial Both 5 Average (feet) 70 (linear feet) S2 Impact 1A - Road Crossing - Temporary Construction Access Temporary Other Stream G Perennial Both 6 Average (feet) 20 (linear feet) S3 Impact 2A - Road Crossing Permanent Culvert Stream I Intermittent Both 2 Average (feet) 22 (linear feet) S4 Impact 2A - Road Crossing - RipRap (Permanent -No Permanent Loss) Permanent Other Stream I Intermittent Both 7 Average (feet) 10 (linear feet) S5 Impact 2A - Road Crossing - Temporary Construction Access Temporary Other Stream I Intermittent Both 1 Average (feet) 10 (linear feet) S6 Impact 3 - Road Crossing Permanent Culvert Stream G Perennial Both 6 Average (feet) 72 (linear feet) S7 Impact 3 - Road Crossing - Temporary Construction Access Temporary Other Stream G Perennial Both 6 Average (feet) 20 (linear feet) S8 Impact 5A - Utility Crossing Temporary Other Stream I Intermittent Both 4 Average (feet) 34 (linear feet) S9 Impact 5B - Greenway Crossing Temporary Other Stream I Intermittent Both 3 Average (feet) 10 (linear feet) * All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government. 3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 0 3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 174 3i. Total temporary stream impacts: 94 3i. Total stream and ditch impacts: 268 3j. Comments: Total permanent stream impacts = 164 LF (805 SF/0.018 acres); total permanent -no permanent stream impacts = 10 LF (73 SF/0.001 acres), total temporary stream impacts = 94 LF (428 SF/0.009 acres) 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts below. 6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)? * Check all that apply. Neuse Tar -Pamlico Catawba Randleman Goose Creek Jordan Lake Other Impact Type* (') 6c. Per or Temp* (') 6d. Stream name* 16e. Buffer mitigation required?* 6f. Zone 1 impact* 6g. Zone 2 impact* Impact 1 - Road Crossing P Stream G No 6,216 (square feet) 2,692 (square feet) Impact 2 - Road Crossing P Stream I No 3,247 (square feet) 3,631 (square feet) Impact 3 - Road Crossing P Stream G No 7,779 (square feet) 4,552 (square feet) Impact 3B - Utility Crossing P Stream G Yes 137 (square feet) 786 (square feet) Impact 7 - Greenway Crossing P Stream B No 0 (square feet) 5,946 (square feet) Impact 8 - Greenway Crossing P Stream B No 0 (square feet) 2,236 (square feet) 6h. Total buffer impacts: Total Temporary impacts: Total Permanent impacts: Total combined buffer impacts: Zone 1 0.00 Zone 1 Zone 2 0.00 Zone 2 17,379.00 19,843.00 Zone 1 Zone 2 17,379.00 19,843.00 6i. Comments: It should be noted that impacts 2B, 2C, 3A, Zone 2 of 3B, 3C, & 6 are all considered "deemed allowable" per the Neuse River Buffer rules. These impacts are still shown on the impact sheets but not included within the impact table above. E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:* S&EC completed and wetland and stream delineation for the entire property in order to identify natural resources so that impacts could be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact area 1 is proposed permanent stream, wetland, and buffer impacts as well as temporary stream impacts for a road crossing. This crossing is necessary to connect to the existing development located west of the stream. The crossing will be perpendicular to the stream and wetland and utilize headwalls at the ends of the culvert. A temporary diversion pump, coffer dams, dewatering pump, and discharge hose will be utilized during construction to divert stream flows and minimize the release of sediments during construction activities. Compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent wetland losses. Impact 2A is proposed permanent wetland, permanent and temporary stream impacts, and permanent buffer impacts for a road crossing. This road crossing is necessary to connect the northern portion of the development with the rest of the development. The crossing will occur perpendicular to the stream and wetlands and utilize head walls to minimize impacts to the maximum extent practicable. A riprap dissipator that will be utilized to reduce flow velocities and minimize stream degradation. A temporary diversion pump, coffer dams, dewatering pump, and discharge hose will be utilized during construction to divert stream flows and minimize the release of sediments during construction activities. Compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent wetland losses. Impact area 3 is proposed permanent and temporary stream and permanent buffer impacts for a road crossing. The road crossing is necessary to provide access to lots 243 — 243 and provide interconnectivity to the existing development to the north. The road crossing will occur perpendicular with the stream and headwalls/end walls will be utilized to minimize stream impacts to the maximum extent practicable. A temporary diversion pump, coffer dams, dewatering pump, and discharge hose will be utilized during construction to divert stream flows and minimize the release of sediments during construction activities. Impact 3B is proposed permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts for a utility crossing. The utility crossing has been strategically placed to avoid most buffer impacts for the adjacent stream. A small portion of Zone 1 will be impacted as the utility will need to connect to the manhole at the road. Compensatory mitigation at a 3:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts. Impact area 4A is proposed permanent wetland impact for SCM fill (dry detention pond). The location of the SCM was chosen based on the surrounding topography of the northeastern portion of the development. Stormwater from the adjacent roadway/lots will flow to the SCM and be treated before exiting via spillway to the adjacent stream that feeds into Pond 1. Compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent wetland losses. Impact area 4B is proposed permanent -no permanent loss wetland impact for a utility crossing. The crossing has been placed between the adjacent pond and proposed SCM and will cross the wetland at a perpendicular angle to minimize wetland impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent -no permanent wetland impacts. Impact area 4C is proposed permanent wetland impacts for a road crossing. This crossing is necessary to provide access to the adjacent lots. The crossing will be perpendicular to the wetland and is proposing compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio to offset permanent wetland impacts. Impact area 4D is proposed permanent wetland impacts for lot fill. This wetland fill is occurring at the top of the wetland drainage. Compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent wetland losses. Impact area 4E is proposed permanent wetland impacts for a greenway crossing. This crossing will occur perpendicular to the wetland and will be in the proposed utility easement to minimize impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent wetland losses. Impact area 5A is proposed temporary stream impacts for a utility crossing. The utility crossing will occur perpendicular to the stream to minimize impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Impact area 5B is proposed temporary stream impacts for a greenway crossing. This crossing will occur perpendicular to the stream and be constructed via boardwalk to avoid permanent stream impacts. Impact area 6 is proposed permanent -no permanent wetland impacts for a utility crossing. The crossing will occur perpendicular to the adjacent stream and is necessary to connect to the existing sanitary sewer manhole located just to the east of the stream that bounds the property. Compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio is proposed to offset permanent -no permanent wetland impacts. Impact area 7 is proposed permanent Zone 2 buffer impacts for a greenway crossing. The greenway was strategically placed between the adjacent lots and stream to avoid all Zone 1 buffer impacts. Impact area 8 is proposed permanent Zone 2 buffer impacts for a greenway crossing. The greenway was strategically placed between the adjacent lots and stream to avoid all Zone 1 buffer impacts. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: * The erosion control plans show pump around details for the culvert stream crossings. Silt basins have been designed to be placed at key locations around the site. At the bottom of the silt basins, additional silt fence has been provided to eliminate offsite erosion as much as possible. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWR Corps 2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: EBX - Neuse I, LLC -Blackbird Site (wetlands) & EBX-Neuse I, LLC Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank (buffer) 3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter) Type: Quantity: Riparian wetland 0.88 acres Riparian buffer 411 SF 3c. Comments S&EC reached out to four (4) banks within our project HUC 03020201 (Neuse) for available wetland and buffer credits. One (1) bank had all the credits needed, RES. Permanent wetland impacts 17,052 SF @ 2:1 ratio = 34,104 SF/43,560 = 0.78 acres; permanent -no permanent wetland impacts = 4,023 SF @ 1:1 ratio = 4,023 SF/43,560 = 0.09 acres. Total wetland mitigation = 0.78 acres + 0.09 acres = 0.87 acres. NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website. 6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information. Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below. 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 Utility Crossing (Parallel) 137 3 411 Zone 2 6f. Total buffer mitigation required 411 0 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed? Yes No 6j. Comments: F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 0 *** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section ..*** la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? - Yes No 1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be maintained. All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)s must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual. Associated supplement forms and other documentation shall be provided. What type of SCM are you providing? Level Spreader Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT) Wetland Swale (higher SHWT) Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer (check all that apply) For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? * Yes No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?* Yes No To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2). 2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?* Yes No N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre Hint: projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of community in -lieu programs should answer no to this question. 2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply (check all that apply): * Local Government State If you have a local government approval please include the SMP on their overall impact map. Local Government Stormwater Programs* Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.* Wake County Comments: G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? * Yes No 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?* Yes No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* Yes No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The Cadence Meadows project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Zebulon ETJ, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area, in addition Best Management Practices may be required that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved; 2) the Phase II NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* Yes No N/A 4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant. The City of Raleigh provides utility service to the Town of Zebulon. There is an existing pumping station at the roadway connection to Southland Drive that has the capacity to serve the project. 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* Yes No 5d. Is another Federal agency involved? * Yes 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?* Yes No No Unknown 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?* Yes No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?* Yes No Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?** Yes No 5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? * Yes No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?* S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. S&EC is in the process of finalizing the report for the client for review and will be sent to FWS for comment. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? * The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/ 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?* Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on November 20, 2021, no historic listings or study list entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures exist within the property boundaries. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* • Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The installation of roadway fill will meet the FEMA requirements to less than 1' rise in the flood plain area. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer. Miscellaneous Comments Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred. Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document PCN Attachments_Cadence Meadows.pdf 21.48MB File must be PDF or KMZ Signature By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: • The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and • The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time. • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name:* Camden Brunick Signature * Date 2/17/2022