20220239 Ver 1_Other Agency Correspondence_20220426

Strickland, Bev
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 9:37 AM
To: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Cohn, Colleen M
Cc: Tommy Craven
Subject: [External] RE: Kinsley Subdivision DWR#20220239
Attachments: ER-22-0865.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Thanks April!
Colleen — Attached is a letter from SHPO for your files confirming they have no comment/concerns
about the project. Hopefully, the information provided and changes to the plans satisfy any DWR
concerns. We eagerly await your decision. Thanks.
BOB ZARZECKI
Wetlands Department Manager/Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 7:43 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>; Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tommy Craven <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Kinsley Subdivision DWR#20220239
Bob,
The Corps' request for additional information has been satisfied. The permit verification from the Corps would not be
issued until after the WQC has been issued by DWR.
Thanks,
April
April R. Norton
Regulatory Division
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 1:32 PM
To: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>; Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
1

<[e-mail]>
Cc: Tommy Craven <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] RE: Kinsley Subdivision DWR#20220239
Collen & April:
As it's been a couple weeks, I assume that you've got what you need, are simply swamped with work,
and are in the process of finalizing the approvals. But, please don't hesitate to let me know if that's
not the case.
BOB ZARZECKI
Wetlands Department Manager/Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Bob Zarzecki
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 12:47 PM
To: 'Cohn, Colleen M' <[e-mail]>; 'Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)'
<[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Tommy Craven' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Kinsley Subdivision DWR#20220239
Importance: High
Colleen & April:
To address question #3, the engineer revised the design to replace the existing pipe with a new 36"
pipe that outlets in the same location as the existing pipe.
No changes to the stream/wetland/buffer impacts.
Please replace the original permit drawings / impact maps with these new revised plans.
As to question #2, the engineer response is as follows: "The SCM will also be providing stormwater
detention in the 1 through 10 year design storms which will help lower the velocity. There is a 15 foot long rip
rap dissipater pad at the end of the culvert."
Please let us know if you require any additional information.
Kind regards,
BOB ZARZECKI
Wetlands Department Manager/Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Bob Zarzecki
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2022 5:00 PM
To: 'Cohn, Colleen M' <[e-mail]>; 'Tommy Craven' <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Kinsley Subdivision DWR#20220239
Colleen:
2

Good catch on Question #3. Tommy is going back to his guys to see what they can do. We hope to
have you the information on Monday morning.
Honestly, whatever they do will be a great improvement from the current situation as that existing 30"
CMP is not functioning, connects to different types and sizes of failing pipe sections, and a ton of
random fill material essentially just dumped over the stream. See attached photos all taken in this
area of the existing crossing and future impact #11.
BOB ZARZECKI
Wetlands Department Manager/Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Bob Zarzecki
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2022 3:48 PM
To: 'Cohn, Colleen M' <[e-mail]>; 'Tommy Craven' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Kinsley Subdivision DWR#20220239
Importance: High
Colleen:
I've copied the project engineer Tommy Craven on this response and asking him to respond to
questions 2 & 3.
As to question 1, Impact #1 crossing was measured as per the attached exhibit. The head of the
stream bends to the southeast. It is close at 76 degrees, but we felt that it just met the requirement.
The buffer impacts at 0.2403 acres are also under 1/3 acres. I've found that crossing meandering
stream origins like this can be tricky compared to a simply crossing with retained stream sections
above the origin.
Attached are some photos of the stream origin and stream. It was excavated and channelized from
past farming practices. It was probably excavated down to seasonal groundwater to help provide
water to the stock pond below.
One thing to point out here is that we took into consideration the fact that we were crossing at the
origin, and as such located a Primary SCM across the road from it, such that the road essentially acts
like a pond dam/road crossing, even though the actual impoundment structure is outside the road
footprint. The discharge from the Primary SCM will also help to ensure hydrology is maintained to the
retained stream section below. The end result will be a pond (Primary SCM), road, +/- 200 If of
stream, then the farm stock pond, which then drains directly to a culvert under North Main Street.
BOB ZARZECKI
Wetlands Department Manager/Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
3

Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2022 2:51 PM
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: Kinsley Subdivision DWR#20220239
Good afternoon,
I am reviewing the above reference application, and some additional information is required to complete the review:
1) Please provide additional details on how Road Crossing Impact #1 meets the definition for a perpendicular
crossing of streams or other surface waters. [15A NCAC 02B .0714(11)(y)]
2) Please provide additional information on the SCM and stormwater discharge entering the proposed culvert
under the Road Crossing in Impact #1. Will large storm events result in high velocity discharge from the pipe and
increase the potential for scouring? Will a rip rap dissipator pad be used at the end of the culvert as it discharges
to the stream?
3) Am I understanding correctly that the 30" pipe between impacts 11 and 12 is to be removed completely and not
replaced? Will hydrology between the two sections be maintained?
Thanks,
Colleen Cohn
Environmental Specialist II
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
380o Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office: 919-791-4258
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
4

eWs. STATE 4,
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
April 25, 2022
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
April R. Norton April.R.Nortongusace.army.mil
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Construct Kinsley Subdivision Residential Development, 1167 North Main Street, Wake Forest,
Wake County, ER 22-0865
Dear Ms. Norton:
Thank you for your email of March 7, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(ai)ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
�Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
cc: Bob Zarzecki, Soil & Environmental Consultants
bzarzackiksandec.com
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898