NC0025534_Wasteload Allocation_19930212

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
AMON
NPDES Permit:
NC0025534
Hendersonville WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Correspondence
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
February 12, 1993
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the rezrerse side

7 W
NPDES WAS IE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0025534
PERMITTEE NAME: City of Hendersonville
FACILITY NAME: Hendersonville WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 3.20 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 95 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 5 %
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM:Mud Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-03-02
Reference USGS Quad: F 9 SW
County: Henderson
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
no change
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
PL
Charles Lowe Date: 10/16/92
JAA
Date: o2%!a./93
ate: 7{tZ{g3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
jinx% rei
lobs/5v
7/.i60
l
Drainage Area (mil ) 5-2. 7 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): /05-
7Q10 (cfs) / 7 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 02 S 30Q2 (cfs) Y/
Toxicity Limits: IWC a a % Acute/Chronic
�c may ret tt.i PQr x4-F SckteLte . Cor - Ago,
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters -c C°^mil, C 1 Col, , le...e
Upstream
Downstream Location (tud Ck Q+- MC 2 S
Location fMad Ck abe✓e
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/l)
3 d
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
_
D.O. (mg/1)
v►zo .i.rdo r
wt, v,.;-i-. r
TSS (mg/1)
30
30
F. Col. (/100 ml)
a e 0
a 00
pH (SU)
6 - 1
C - 9
G A to i -e Cv 9 i t)
v-,A a .,, 7. r
Ylq (! vt,T't. ,-
f
" N (Mg h)
vvt ONt+r
tiMA��►'
A'Itu4i 392 u ii
CYQnicie_ ..-,/e?.Sv.51h
Ch✓o✓rtiKM ,..2as- I
Mercu-ry . OS- onll
Comments: Matutrv/L. CO2 Nrc4I ) (App r- Lead,
ti

NPDES WAS 1'h LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0025534
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
City of Hendersonville
Hendersonville WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 6.00 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 95? %
Industrial (% of Flow): 5?
Comments: �xPan5,-0,
RECEIVING STREAM: Mud Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-03-02
Reference USGS Quad: F 9 SW (please attach)
County: Henderson
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
no change
Requested by: Charles Lowe Date: 10/16/92
Prepared by: 4
Reviewed by: _ k
Date: a//a/93
Date: 21n !'('?
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
--/k/
"09/4 v
7/ S7 (B
Drainage Area (mil ) Sa. -7
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): io.s
7Q10 (cfs) / 7 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) a S 30Q2 (cfs) //
Toxicity Limits: IWC 55- % Acut
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters -DC, C6 n d/ ca./
Location At,c1 Ck I'd re ea d
Downstream `' Location Rae( Alc z s
Upstream
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
/0
v?o
NH3-N (mg/1)
R
y
D.O. (mg/1)
G
6
TSS (mg/1)
3d
3 0
F. Col. (/100 ml)
doe'
Roo
pH (SU)
6 _ 9'
G - `J
e4tni.t<. (09 //)
WI ols 1-7,-
/146 rur O r
- (. .9/(%
Ike i't470 r
i'tnb n t'ta) r
TA 'frij II)
Yl40 el4
YNDi1,�r
Muria , a.Iq ugll
Cyan; I `{ uq l I
Cl4/orni,s.n 11 3 vt ll
ilercur, • 0 3 uq i 1
Comments: 11104;1,r For : (odvniun , Copper, 11ii��tel,
l-2ar.(/ Zinc, I rcr►, S;Ever, Plum; fie.
IA) CC 1rtv;1at
3

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
Hendersonville WWTP
NC0025534
95% Domestic
Existing
Renewal
Mud Creek
C
04-03-02
Henderson
Asheville
Charles Lowe
10/16/92
F9SW
Request #7
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #0344638055
Date: 881020
Drainage Area (mi2): 52.7
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 17
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 25
Average Flow (cfs): 105
30Q2 (cfs): 41
IWC (%): 22 (3.2 mgd)
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Hendersonville currently holds permits for 3.2 and 6.0 mgd. A field -calibrated
QUAL2E model has been completed for Mud Creek. Revised permit
allocations are recommended for all new and expanding discharges to the Mud
Creek watershed. Facility has failed 8 toxicity tests in the past 5 years.
Additional limits and monitoring for metals will be required based on self -
monitoring, pretreatment, and pollutant scan information.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
REeocia/E-Aii) P•C). /iV E (Ai 11. /kit/AelUOA ['iLLE Ta
4/0TIP7' 4 o IF 77)X/ciTY @ 22.. % /NI2/c#TC--5 Pore-M-ri- - cofi//'t.iMvcF
P&o7ce-0r:
Recommended by: Date: /19/23
Reviewed by
Instream Assess ent:
Regional or:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Bet nson
Gy
Date:
Date: Date: 21/
FEB 2 0 1993

2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (pg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (pg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Monthly Average Monthly Average
Summer Winter Summer Winter
3.2
3.2
6.0
6.0
30
30
30
30
monitor
monitor
�1-:5--
1,1<5J-
30
30
30
30
1000
1000
1000
1000
6-9
6-9
6-9
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average Monthly Average
Summer Winter Summer Winter
3.2
3.2
6.0
6.0
30
30
10
20
monitor
2_-
�i
_monitor
L'f
6
6
30
30
30
30
200
200
200
200
6-9
6-9
6-9
6-9
monitor
monitor
28
28
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
CIA"
?sc--eonliheub ywlurr"KJ DD
,v
Parameter(s) Affected
toxicity
BOD, NH3
Fecal, C1
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new
flows, rates, field data, interacting discharges)

3
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
Chlordane (ug/):
Cadmium (ug/1):
Chromium (ug/1):
Copper (ug/l):
Nickel (ug/1):
Lead (ug/1):
Zinc (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/1):
Aluminum (ug/1):
Mercury (ug/1):
Iron (ug/1):
TOXICS/METALS
Chronic, quarterly
11 % (3.2 mgd) and 23% (at 6.0 mgd)
22% (at 3.2 mgd) and 35% (at 6.0 mgd)
Nov, Feb, May, Aug
3.2 mgd 6.0 mgd
Daily max WO or EL Daily max WO or EL
Recommended Limits
Aluminum (ug/):
Cadmium (ug/l):
Chromium (ug/1):
Copper (ug/l):
Nickel (ug/l):
Lead (ug/1):
Zinc (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/1):
Iron (ug/1):
Mercury (ug/1):
Silver (ug/1):
Fluoride (ug/1):
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Failing toxicity test
Other (pollutant scan)
moto
-
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
3.2 mgd 6.0 mgd
Daily max WO or EL Daily max WO or EL
392
249
monitor
225
WQ
143
WQ
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
22.5
WQ
14
WQ
monitor
monitor
.05
WQ
.03
WQ
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Parameter(s) Affected
metals
metals
metals

4 •
4
_x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the
available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed.
This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect
future allocations.

5
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Mud Creek above outfall
Downstream Location: Mud Creek at NC 25
Parameters: DO, Temp, Fecal, Cond
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with
existing treatment facilities? Yes No _x
If no, which parameters cannot be met?_BOD5, NH3-N
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No X
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not? XNT61 J YE z//VG oiC'
i iGr iy & A Z % IS /64om/116/0 ' , /P 11b6' Le-45 ARe
,(Jmettr 7 Rrol? --re, Prowl- /5s LI '1M e MtIiir Stiv bOJL6
4441y $e- I / oRPaR.
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not
modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits
into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with
ttachments.

Facility Name /1/44de.-5,4 r11e 41Gc/77'
Permit #/VCoo 1553A/ pipe # 6
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent ciicrharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is 35- % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
per ormed after thi days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
�ov.reb, ivla yy g . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluenrdisrharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well 'as all dose%response data Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 l 7.41 cfs
Permitted Flow 6 • o MGD
Basin & Sub -basin C711°3 — J?
Receiving Stream
Nfvd C- t
County Nendrr.sow Date / /.'
Recommended by:
4
QCL P/F Version 9/91

Facility Name Ne/l cip xvi!(e , /AV Permit #, %C6 a ;9.5 s 3 / pipe # 601
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration al which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is dg % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall performQuarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
V re , A4? tv . , . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent did-harge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 17. `f cfs
Permitted Flow J. z MGD
IWC n? %
Basin & Sub -basin o`f- c 5 -6A
Receiving Stream Nlctd Creek
County Ilekiderson
Recommended by:
Date //9%98
QCL PIF Version 9191

C< y of 149Auftvretalle Wia?
Ntud C•-peek
ehr
. c;57 .v5 cva.1 s1.4' 3.2 /116-D . jh cove as ren.ac, ./ € 6 . o M6°
no A-TC 4.re a. oesZ yam f- a ee - as ba c-•}
�} Co,7sv«Kt e any vas fed am opd Seci toi4k 3/a CM,
,
5eace. Z14e1 a Ovitit.Z,er "te ats l Nub a-d Clem- Creek's k s b �e-•-•-
co, /A . Teased - l •rg:�s are etc.° tvfr e.Ided.
s ;cddnArs- 4.4esi 173
30
-�j
5frearet
4. 0
30
I1.S
1000
30
rnoruVo 4.923
r-e co w� •wa a cCa. •-
Racy' SEP (. j Mtrs
3. R - G . 0
30 10
no
aoo• 2oo
3o 30
G-9 C1
h.� t+-•n:4- }°
'Li S.C.5 p0;.1.4- a �.C'c-& . i?pJy
-' y hea.... (( 100 /441"-- vP.s l4•s a«--
0Lc Stls4 vvt obi Pia Csek_ Jove Go't'171...0Kc.c.
wig Clew eavek
mt,vie
3.9 Z (49t L.i'sop

-z-
Flow
CA/
19
C lo,-d4,t , Cl/, Zn , Cyr, Ck , f-f g ��' t4 f e , �.
70k«t - �jvai�c�l ni a 3 0
( 5. z f2& ) - �; /cj f 4s h g:;- /wS/
poa(- bioIotSt ten, l qua, /. a-boY.� j oc✓ L) rF
T.s, Z e -5
Itaiet
64,
CtG4.4.,UT-4-417 4pt ;'+•. /ex. C4/ -da a,
?PA Ivs-l-/s
heck A I 1 4 j G!n /ord.� •�
F/o,J
(v.0 /116p
6- !it ty//
Ct,S //
.03 LJ5//
s y,-
c�, , 4, ? ,
«L'G rnan-e,,,L d p Go bV f re%
trsctl-6 rf 7 e y4;Gi)xi ;,Gfti.{
-peA

Y, 57
A L //0 v -
fedn-
5!`� ( ii)
C7 y4c,,{c )
, ooy3
- ,lad tpq su/fi-
-d' s '` f
425/ z - ced/
✓KUc i 9,44)"-t
3 . yi ti
,o09 a Of 1
? P01114 An 5\5
0b5 - 1 alio,04 (e.
N
Fil 06wuv{iolA o o% $q Set' aZ ,iitp
A- c\Aav,(1, pi\coo 3301000 rs3r"5+ 660 nino
��� ��o i��n -BOO 5460
`ea_d 3 a: --1 \a .5 ,
....wic 6'7 -5 D A 35 N.:: (7':
63)
M
/at° =
Po -Co
c
(a -y; : i)
5
S30
620
Ito-1?
3 z G.0
M6 12 M.69
L L
L
/1.1 .
V AA
Lit) 5
0
a2
(I-41z
'3 0 7 3 l.y 1,0.1
taK
6IZ

X/eS -L. i7-5
Li kneCwl;u.r
Cyaii,cle
a" ercw,,i
Coe
N� ckel
Leach
Z,nc
SIVeR
Pk() de
M

�e See Mud CNA< modLL; i5
SC: w ut 4 VnCxk) rQSuAS
CO,,, ftc JCL

10/22/92 ver 3.1 T OXICS REVIEW
Facility: HENDERSONVILLE
NPDES Permit No.: NC0025534
Status (E, P, or M) : E
Permitted Flow: 3.2 mgd
Actual Average Flow: 2.6 mgd
Subbasin: 0.0
Receiving Stream: MUD CREEK I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ----
Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI
7Q10: 17.4 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY
IWC: 22.18 % I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic
Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria
Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violations
(ug/1) (ug/1) I % (1/d) (1/d) (1/d) (4/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (1vio/#sam)
Cadmium S 2.0 1 92% 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.0 0.007 1 I
Chromium S 50.0 1 76% 0.0 0.0 0.04 0.1 0.110 1 40.0 1 I
Copper AL 7.0 1 82% 0.4 0.2 0.54 0.1 0.486 1 30.0 1 N
Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.2 0.1 0.31 0.1 0.330 i 1 P
Lead S 25.0 1 81% 0.4 0.1 0.43 0.1 0.450 1 1 U
Zinc AL 50.0 1 77% 0.8 0.3 1.13 0.3 1.140 1 81.0 1 T
Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.1 0.097 1 6.0
Mercury S 0.012 1 86% 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.002 1 1 S
Silver AL 0.06 1 94% 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.008 1 1 E
Selenium S 5.00 1 0% 1 1 C
Arsenic S 50.00 1 0% 0.1 1 1 T
Phenols S NA 1 0% 1 1 I
NH3-N C 1 0% 1 1 0
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 I 0% 1 1 N
Pollutant
ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM
Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ?
(i/d) (ug/l) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO)
Cadmium S 1 2.88 9.016 0.060 0.024 0.00 1 1 A
Chromium S 1 23.98 225.403 0.485 1.241 8.87 Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 N
Copper AL 1 4.48 31.556 4.593 4.111 6.65 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Monthly YES 1 A
Nickel S 1 14.89 396.710 9.810 10.545 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 1 L
Lead S I 15.14 112.702 3.795 4.018 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 1 Y
Zinc AL 1 25.02 225.403 12.170 12.322 17.97 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Monthly NO 1 S
Cyanide S 1 1.40 22.540 0.385 1.869 1.33 Monitor Monitor Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 I
Mercury S 1 0.01 0.054 0.003 0.011 0.00 Monitor Limit 1 1 S
Silver AL 1 0.12 0.270 0.028 0.023 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 I
Selenium S 1 0.58 22.540 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R
Arsenic S 1 5.75 225.403 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 E
Phenols S 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 1 1 U
T.R.Chior.AL 1 76.637 0.00 1 1 L
I I I T
I I I S

10722/92 ver 3.1 T O X I C$ REVIEW
Facility: HENDERSONVILLE
NPDES Permit No.: NC0025534
Status (E, P, or M): E
Permitted Flow: 6.0 mgd
Actual Average Flow: 2.6 mgd
Subbasin: '040302
Receiving Stream: MUD CREEK I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ----
Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI
7Q10: 17.4 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY
IWC: 34.83 % I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic I OBSERVED of Chronic
Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total I Eflluent Criteria
Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load i Conc. Violations
(ug/1) (ug/1) I % (f/d) (f/d) (4/d) (4/d) (f/d) 1 (ug/1) (fvio/4sam)
Cadmium S 2.0 1 92% 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.0 0.007 I I
Chromium S 50.0 1 76% 0.0 0.0 0.04 0.1 0.110 1 40.0 1 I
Copper AL 7.0 1 82% 0.4 0.2 0.54 0.1 0.486 1 30.0 1 N
Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.2 0.1 0.31 0.1 0.330 1 1 P
Lead S 25.0 1 81% 0.4 0.1 0.43 0.1 0.450 1 I U
Zinc AL 50.0 1 77% 0.8 0.3 1.13 0.3 1.140 1 81.0 I T
Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.1 0.097 1 6.0
Mercury S 0.012 1 86% 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.002 I 1 S
Silver AL 0.06 1 94% 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.008 1 I E
Selenium S 5.00 1 0% 1 1 C
Arsenic S 50.00 1 0% 0.1 1 1 T
Phenols $ NA 1 0% 1 1 I
NH3-N C 1 0% 1 1 0
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 1 0% 1 1 N
Pollutant
ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT 1--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream I Recomm'd
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM
Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ?
(f/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO)
Cadmium S 1 2.88 5.742 0.060 0.024 0.00 Monitor 1 1 A
Chromium S 1 23.98 143.548 0.485 1.241 13.93 Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 N
Copper AL 1 4.48 20.097 4.593 4.111 10.45 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Weekly YES 1 A
Nickel 5 1 14.89 252.645 9.810 10.545 0.00 Monitor Monitor I 1 L
Lead S 1 15.14 71.774 3.795 4.018 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 1 Y
Zinc AL I 25.02 143.548 12.170 12.322 28.21 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Monthly NO 1 S
Cyanide S 1 1.40 14.355 0.385 1.869 2.09 Monitor Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 I
Mercury S 1 0.01 0.034 0.003 0.011 0.00 Monitor Limit 1 1 S
Silver AL 1 0.12 0.172 0.028 0.023 0.00 Monitor Monitor I I
Selenium S 1 0.58 14.355 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R
Arsenic S 1 5.75 143.548 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 E
Phenols S 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 1 1 U
T.R.Chlor.AL 1 48.806 0.00 1 1 L
I I I T
I I I S

duovAilitt,J ...
I N C 0 R P 0 A A T E 0
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
December 31, 1992
Mr. Scott Chovan
Hendersonville (City of)
P.O. Box 1760
Hendersonville, NC 28793
RE cEIVED
JAN 0 4 1993
POTW
RE: PACE Project No. A21208.509
Client Reference: Priority Pollutant A
Dear Mr. Chovan:
Enclosed is the report of laboratory analyses for samples received
December 08, 1992.
Footnotes are given at the end of the report.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free
to contact us.
Sincerely,
Kay Parris
Project Manager
Enclosures
430 - (attic( -r),
1 Le pp A ax s v.otk. sfee r
le.l}el- 1454 vuo;L —d,AF L
30 days - I1- SlotAd 1,, i p
►'low _ ware_ e_ Goff,- Cam
e cl L„ t
s_
o.2e
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving: Minneapolis. Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver, Colorado
An Equal Opportunity Employer

I N
THE
CORPORATEOace
ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Hendersonville (City of)
P.O. Box 1760
Hendersonville, NC 28793
Attn: Mr. Scott Chovan
Client Reference: Priority
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Parameter
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chloride
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide, Total
Fluoride, Total
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Pollutant A
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
METHOD 608-PESTICIDES AND PCBS
a-BHC
b-BHC
g-BHC (Lindane)
d-BHC
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan I
Dieldrin
IN WATER
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Units
December 31, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21208509
93 0094821
12/07/92
12/08/92
WWTP
MDL Effluent
ug/L 50 200
ug/L 50 ND
ug/L 1 ND
ug/L 100 ND
ug/L 20 ND
ug/L 1 ND
ug/L 1000 21000
ug/L 5 ND
ug/L 2 ND
ug/L 2 4
ug/L 100 110
ug/L 1 3
ug/L •0.2 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 1 ND
ug/L 5 ND
ug/L 10 67
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
0.05 ND
0.05 ND
0.05 ND
0.05 ND
0.05 ND
0.05 ND
0.05 ND
0.05 ND
0.10 ND
RECEIVED
JAN 04 1993
POTW
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL [phone]
FAX: 704.252•4618
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
lowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver, Colorado
An Equal Opportunity Employer

INCORPOR ATE D
' THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Mr, Scott Chovan
Page 2
Client Reference: Priority Pollutant A
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
•
METHOD 608-PESTICIDES AND PCBS IN WATER
Endrin
4,4-DDD
Endosulfan II
4,4-DDT
4,4-DDE
Endrin aldehyde
Endosulfan sulfate
Toxaphene
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
Chlordane (tech)
VOLATILE ORGANICS-624
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
If
December 31, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21208509
93 0094821
12/07/92
12/08/92
WWTP
MDL Effluent
ug/L 0.10 ND
ug/L 0.10 ND
ug/L 0.10 ND
ug/L 0.10 ND
ug/L 0.10 ND
ug/L 0.10 ND
ug/L 0.10 ND
ug/L 5.0 ND
ug/L 1.0 ND
ug/L 2.0 ND
ug/L 1.0 ND
ug/L 1.0 ND
ug/L 1.0 ND
ug/L 1.0 ND
ug/L 1.0 ND
ug/L .2.0 ND
ug/L 2.7 ND
ug/L 4.3 ND
ug/L 4.0 ND
ug/L 7.1 ND
ug/L 1.8 ND
ug/L (2.5 ND
ug/L 4.1 ND
ug/L 6.3 ND
ug/L 4.5 ND
ug/L 4.7 ND
ug/L 3.0 ND
ug/L 4.4 ND
ug/L 3.9 ND
ug/L 6.5 ND
RECEIVED
JAN 0 4 1993
POTW
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville. NC 28801
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serval Minnegois, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, lava
San Francisco. California
Kansas City. Missouri
Las Angeles. Catania
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver. Cobrado

I N C 0 R P 0 R A T.E 0
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 3
Client Reference: Priority Pollutant A
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANICS-624
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
Ethyl Benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl Chloride
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-625A
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrodiphenyl
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
BASE/NEUTRAL SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-625B
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene 'J
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/ L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
December 31, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21208509
93 0094821
12/07/92
12/08/92
WWTP
MDL Effluent
3.7 ND
*3.0 ND
5.0 ND
5.0 ND
4.2 ND
10 ND
1.8 ND
7.1 ND
4.3 ND
4.3 ND (1)
3.1 ND
3.5 ND (1)
5.9 ND
6.0 ND
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
RECEIVED
JAN 0 4 1993
PCTW
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
laws City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte. North Carallna . An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Berner. Cabrsdo

ac
I N C O R P O RATE D
THE ASSURANCE Of QUALITY
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 4
Client Reference: Priority Pollutant A
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
BASE/NEUTRAL SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-625B
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ehtylhexyl)phthlate
4-Bromophenol phenyl ether
Benzyl butyl phthalate
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-ottylphthalate
Fl uoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Units
December 31, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21208509
93 0094821
12/07/92
12/08/92
WWTP
MDL Effluent
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L .10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 60
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L .10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 20 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
ug/L 10 ND
RECEIVED
JAN 0 4 1993
PC�TW
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving Mnnsepo6s, Minnesota
Tempi. Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte. North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville. North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver. Colorado

INCORPOR ATE D
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 5
Client Reference: Priority Pollutant A
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
BASE/NEUTRAL SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-625B
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
N-Nitrosodi-n-methylamine
HERBICIDES PRIMARY DRINKING H2O
2,4-D by PDW
2,4,5-TP Silvex by POW'
NORTH CAROLINA ADDITIONAL PESTICIDES
Demeton-0
Demeton-S
Mirex
Parathion
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS •
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
These data have been reviewed and are approved
Barbara M. Miller
Supervisor, Inorganic Chemistry
actE f.:1110e-a-
Walter L. Miller
Regional Director
1
for
December 31, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21208509
93 0094821
12/07/92
12/08/92
WWTP
MDL Effluent
10 -ND
10 ND
10 ••. ND
10 ND
10 ND
10 ND
10 ND
10 ND
10 ND
0.50 ND
0.10 ND
0.52 ND
.0.52 ND
0.02 ND
0.52 ND
release.
RECEIVED
JAN 0 4 1993
PC TW
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville. NC 28801'
TEL [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving Minneapolis. Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver, Colorado

cice
INCORPOR ATE 0
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS -
Mr. Scott Chovan FOOTNOTES
Page 6 for pages 1 through 5
Client Reference: Priority Pollutant A
MDL
ND
(1)
December 31, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21208509
RECEIVED
JAN 0 4 T993
Method Detection Limit
Not detected at or above the MDL. P o T W
Analyte is reported from an analysis that exceeded the EPA recommended holding
time. Analyte carry-over was found in original run. Analyte reanalysis was
1 day past EPA recommended holding time.
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville. NC 28801
TEL [phone]
FAX: 704-252•4618
Offices Serving Mealeapcls. Minnesota
Tampa. Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Caro5na An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, North Car lira
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver, Colorado

•
-
Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement +�
Reporting Form A RECEIVED
(Revised June 1990)
JAN 0 4.1193
i. Facility information.: • ?age 1 of 9
NC0025534 Discharge iPioe) No:. 001 y..-.P tiJ9W2
NPDES �_.mit Nc: his... . c.
Facility Name: Hendersonville WWTP Class:_ III County: Henderson
Person(si Collecting Samples: Scott Chovan
Status of faciiity wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical: des - No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory: PACE, Incorporated
Il. Sampling:
24 hr composite for main sample / grab sample for purgeabie fraction
Date Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
• Sampling begun (date, time): 1'/7/92 9:00 am Yes
Sampling finished (date, timed: 12/8/92 8:40 am No
Date and time sampled (grab sample): 12/8/92 8:40 am
Instructions
The purpose of this cccument arc the acccmoanying memo is :c standardize ;he sampling, anaiys►s arc recorting ;.ro:acures :c be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Recutrement as describer in the permit.
Sampling
1 - Take a 24-+hour campcsita sample Tram the final affluent curing ,mic.wee.l !Wednesday througr =-cay1. Gills_: a ;rat samcie for :ne volatile
organic traction wren c.:iI c cn of the 2441our cmoosite sample is . ornOietec. Follow any other sampling instn:=s :rcvice::y :she iaoaratcry
performing the analysis.
2 - indicate in Me saaca :novices at :he too of this page whether a carresconcing samote fcr :oxiC:ty Las::r; was taxer.
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating ccncittons ocoumng on the lay of sampling in ::.a soace ?rcvicec :,n trie form.
Analysis
4 • Analyze :he effluent or :ollutants listed on the AFAM form. inc:ucing :hose to be identifies aria aoorcx:mately Quantified sneer the 10
significant peaks rule. using aoorooriate E.?A-aporovec :metnocs for _acn of the analytic tractions. Cater analytical .aetnocs can be sucstitutec
only with prior. written a:crovai of :he Oirec:or of the Division of Environmental Management (GEM). Reac arc :istrtbuze :c :ne :aooratcry
performing :he analysis :re accompanying memo (Teener. Oc:ooer 1990) o:anfying analytical re:uirements.
5 • Iaentify onemicais :c :e anaiyzed for according to the 10 significant aeaxs rule (as describes in item 2 cf :he Annua: ?o:lutant Analysis
Monitoring Requirement :h tne permit) using a GC;MS iibrary search. Tentative identification is ai::;tat is re.:::rec: confirra:ton :y stancarc
injection is not necessa:y. Estimate me concentration of each Cases on an internal stancarc laving :he closest retention :ii;te.
Reporting
8 • Guantitation Limit 'a•;sts mat snouic be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Pcr n A. Repot': me use of any nigner suantita-
tion limit and an explanation as to wny the listed quantitation limit :arget :mulct not be met. 5xampies of ac:a::asie reasons tor not meeting
a quantitation limit target could be high backgroune concentrations in a sample. or the necessity for samote frac:icn dilution :o bring a cnemicai
to within a quantifiaote concentration. List any quantitation limit oiffertent (whether higner or lower) from the :arget in the column provided
for this purpose.
7 • If a chemical is fours to oe below the Quantitation Limit. resort :he concentration detec:ec as less than :or '<') the :uantitatien limit
in the approoriate space. ?roviae a concentration estimate for chemicals cetec:ed in concentrations greater :-an he cetec:ion limit and less
than the ouantitation limit. Enter the cetec:ion limit in oarentneses oesioe the estimate. Chemicals detected in ::ncentrations aoove :ne quan-
titation limits must be Quantified. Ouantitation limit and cetec:ion limit are defined in the ac :omcanying memo .Teaeer. Oc:ooer 1990). Eater
the total number of peaks retested in each analytic fraction in the aooroonate space on this Reviseo APAM Edith A. Report ail concentrations
in units of micrograms per liter (ugll) and metals as total recoveraate metal. if no peaks to be icentiiiec uncer :he 10 significant peaks rule
are ooserved. enter "none" in the space orovidec for "other" compounds in eacst appropriate analytic fraction sec:ion. Provice the concentra-
tion estimate and retention time for ~unknowns" as well as for significant peaks" for which a structural assignment :an :e mace.
3 • if "significant oeaxs" are founa. providetOrooaoie molecular weight. library match prcoapility. retention :irate. identification oasis. and
MS scan numoer for eac » °n accition. list internal s:ancares ant: their retention times.
9 - In tne sec:ion lapetec "Organic Analytical information" (p. 9). inctuae for each organic frac:tan the methoc. extraction :ecsnlaue. GC
operating conditions. and surrogate recovery. Report the size of :he GCMS library tieing utiiizsc in me ac:m:nate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Anatysis .Mcnitonng Revised Form A to report the results of :ne artatys:s. Both :ne analytical :aoorator!
representative and the taciiity operator in resoonsioie charge snoule sign completed forms (last rages.
11 - Mail two comnetec =pies of the form land the iacoratory report. if submitted to the facility do a different farm to: A: 'N: Central Files.
Division of Erivironmentat Management. NC OE:-INR. P.C. Sox i. :! °aleign. NC =: 4. Mail the APAM form seoaateiy from Disc:large Monitonng
Reports. ,Z9 53s

RECEIVED
A. Purgeable (Volatile Organic; Fraction, E?A Method 624 Pa e . a�
• Number•of s:�emicals detected in Fraction ,�aN 0 4 »9q
• Fraction STORET Number 84085 ••
- PoTw
f STO RET Compound
Number
Quantitation
Umit Target
Quantitation
Limit'
Concentration
Detected
GC/MS
Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed ;or:
(ug/1)
f (ugll)
!ugll)
Yes
No
34210
Acr olein
100
50
ND
34215
Acryfonitriie
100
25
ND
34030
Benzene
5
2.7
ND
32101 "
dromodichioromethane
5
4.3
ND
32104
8romoform
5
4.0
.
34413
Eromomethane
10
7.1
ND
32102
Carbon tetrachloride
5
• 3.8 1 ND
34301
Ch orooenzene •
6
2.5 ► ND
. 34311.
Chioroethane
10
4.1-
ND
: 34575
2-C,hloroethyi vinyl ether
10
6.3
ND
32106
Chloroform
4.5
ND
34418 { Chloromethane
10
4.7
ND l
32105• I 0ibromochforomethane
5
3.0
ND• � J
3d496 { 1,1.Dichloroethane
v
4.4
D !•
4 31
3 5 ! 1.2-�ichloroethane
/AC.. !
5
3.9
_ .. .
ND
•
34546
34541
34704
34699
34371
34423
34516
34475
34010
34506
34511
39180
34488
39175
ND
trans-1.2-0ichio roe thvlene
1,2-Dic hforoorooane
cis 1,3.Oichloroorooene
trans 1,3-Oichloroorooene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
1.1,2.2-T etrachioroethane
Tetrachioroethyiene
Toluene
1.1,1-Trfchloroethane
1,1,2•Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trfchlorofluromethane
Vinyl chloride
8
5
3.7
3.0
5.0
5.0
4.2
10 *
1.8
7.1
6 1 4.3
5 1 4.3
I 3.1
5 ! 3.5
10 1 5.9
10 I 6.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
If different from quantitation limit target
* Matrix interference in sample exceeded required quantitation limit.

Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Alcohol
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Mtn)
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Library
Match
Manual
interpretation
RT
Scan
Number
50
4.87
Complete only If non•tarpeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
• �r
0
v,
Other purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks)

'
• B. Acid Extractable Fraction, E?A Method
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45382
625
RECEIVER
•
. Page 4 of 9 •
0 4 1993
JAN
•POTW
•
STORET Compound
Number
Ouantitation
Limit Target
Ouantltation
Limit'
Concentration
Detected
GC/MS
Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ugil)
Yes
I No
3
34452
4-Chloro-3-methvlohenol
10 1
10
ND
34586
2-Chloroohenol
10 1
10
ND
34601
2.4-Dlchloroohenoi
10 1
10
-ND
34606
2.4-Oimethviohenol •
10 1
10
ND
34616
1 2.4-Dinitroohenoi
50
50
ND
34657
1 2-Methyl-4.6-dinitroohenoi
50 1
50
ND
34591 1
2-Nitroohenol
10 1
10
ND
I
3
34646 1
4-Nitroohenol I_
50 1
50 ti ND
39032 f
Pentachloroohenol
50 1
50 • ( ND
3
34694 1 Phenol
10 1
10 I
ND
3
34621 1 2.4.6-Trichloroohenol
10 1
10 I ND
.
• If different from quantitation limit target
•
1j
1I
i i
•
• •
•
•
• •
•

r •
Compound
Probable
Molecular
Wetphl
Estimated
Concentration
(up/1)
Library Match
Probability
(QM
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Malch
Manual
Interpretation
RT
Unknown
700
14.56
Unknown Phthalate
21
2
28.44
r
r
.
Unknown Phthalate
30
28.51
Unknown Phthalate
57
28.82
Unknown Phthalate •
44
2 01
Unknown Phthalate
60
29.08
. ,
r
Unknown Phthalate'
52
2
29.38
Unknown Phthalate
9
,q__
Unknown Phthalate
10
29.76
Unknown Phthalate
30
28.70
Complete only 11 non•tarpeted compounds are present;
Internal Standard
fidlenllon
Time
(Min)
emi
2. Other acid extractables (up
(seed }seybiy DI. 0
Pri
rn w
ro
0
0

RECEIVED
C. Base/Neutral Fraction, EPA Method
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 455433
JAN 0 4 1993
PO TW
Page 6 of 9
STORET Compound Quantitation
Number Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit'
Concentration GCJMS
Detected Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for. (ug/1) (ugll)
(ug/1) Yes
No
3405
Acenaohthene
10
10
ND
34200
Acenaonthv(ene
10
10
ND
3,1220
Anthracene
10
10
ND
39120
Benzidine
50
190*
ND
34526
Benzo (a) anthracene
10
10
ND
34247
Benzo (al ovrene •
10
10
ND
34230
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
10
10
ND
3
34521
Benzo (phi) oervlene
10
10
ND
3
34242
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
10
10
ND
3
34278
Bis(2-chlorcethoxyl methane
10
10
ND
3
34273
Eis(2 -chlaroethvl) ether
10
10
ND
3
34283
Bis(2-chloroisooroovll ether
10
10
ND
3
39100
8is(2-ethvlhexvil phthalate
10
10
60
3
34636
4-Bromoohenvi phenyl ether
10
10
ND
34292
Butyl benzvl phthalate
10
10
ND
3
34531
2-Chtoronaohtha(ene
10
10
ND
3
34641
4-Chloroohenvt phenyl ether
10 ;
10
ND
3
34320
Chrvsene
10 1 10
ND
3
34556
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene
10 1 10
ND
34536
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
10 10
ND
3
34566
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
10 j 19
ND
3
34571
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
10
10
ND
3
34631
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
20
20
ND
3
34336
Diethyl ohthalate 10
10
ND
34341
Dimethvt ohthalate 10
10
ND
3
39110
Di-n-butyl phthalate 10
10
ND
3
34611
2.4-Dinitrotoluene
10
10
ND
3
34625
2.6-Dinitrotoluene
10
10
ND
3
34596
Di-n-octvl Phthalate
10
10
14
34346
1.2-Diohenvlhvdrazine
10
8.2
ND
34376
Fluoranthene
10
10
ND
3
34281
Fluorene
10
10
ND
3
39700
Hexachlorobenzsne
10
10
ND
3
34391
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
10
ND
3
34386
Hexachlorocyclooentadiene
10
10
ND
3
34396
Hexachloroethane
10
10
ND
(
34403
Indeno(12.3-cd) ovrene
10
10
ND
34408
Isoohorone
10
10
ND
f
3
34696
Naphthalene , •
10
10
ND
3
34447
Nitrobenzene
10
10
ND
3
34438
N-nitrosodimethvtamine
10
** ND
j
3
34428
N-nitreso-dl-n-oroovlamine
10
10 ND
i
3
34433
N-nitrosodiohenv(amine
10
10 ND
3
34461
Phenanthrene
. 10
10 ND
(
3
34469 I
Pyrene
10 I 10 I 1a}
34551
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 10 ( ND
If different from quantitation target ** Not Analyzed for.
* Matrix interference in sample exceeded required quantitation limit.

Compound
Probable
Molecular
Wei 0 ht
Estimated
Concentration
(u /1} fl
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
Unknown Phthalate
10
29.88
Unknown Phthalate
16
30.30
Unknown Phthalate
20
30.36
Unknown Phthalate
19
30.48
30.54
Unknown Phthalate---
37
Unknown Phthalate
12
30.64
.'
Unknown Phthalate
10
30.72
Unknown Phthalate
13
32.53
Unknown Phthalate
10
32.91
[Unknown Phthalate
16
33.35
Complete only II non -targeted compounds are present:
internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)

•
D. OrganochIorine/Organophosphorus Pesticides and PCB's
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 608
Fraction STORET Number 00188
• STORET
Number
Compound
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit'
1. Pollutants
Organochlorine Pesticides/PCB's: EPA Method
39330 1 Aldrin
39337
39338
to be analyzed for (ug/1) (ug/1)
REPEIVED
•
JAN 0 4 1993 .: Page 8 of 9
PC TW
Concentration. • Confirmation?
Detected Dual Column! GC:Ms
(ug/11 Yes
No Yes No
0.05
aloha-BHC
0.05
Beta-8HC
34259 I Oelta 8HC
0.05 1
0.05 ND
0.05
0.05
ND
ND
39340 I Gamma-8HC (Lindane)
39350 I Chlordane
39310 1 4.4%000
39320 1 4.4'-DOE
39300 1 4.4'-00T
39380 1 Dieldrin
0.1
0.05
0.2
0.1
0.05
0.05
2.0 *
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.1
0.10
ND
0.1
0.10
ND
34361 ! Endosulfan I (aloha)
34356
34351
39390
34366
39410
39420
39480
39755
39400
34671
39488
39492
39496
I 39500
39504
39508
Endosulfan II (beta)
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
0.02
0.10 *
ND
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.06
0.2
Heptachlor 0.05
Heotachlor eooxide
Methoxvchlor
Mirex
0.8
0.5
0.2
Toxaohene 2.4
PCB 1016
PCB 1221
PCB 1232
PC8 1242
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.5
Nn
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02
5.0 *
1.0 *
2.0 *
1.0 *
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.5
PCB 1248 0.5
PCB 1254
PC8 1260
Organophosphorus Pesticides: EPA Method
39560
39540
Demeton
1.0
1.0
1.0 *
1.0 *
1.0 t
1.0
Nn
ND
ND
ND
Parathion (ethyl)
1 2.5
1 0.6
0.52
0.52
ND
ND
E. Herbicides, EPA Method
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 00148
STORET
Number
Compound {
• i
Quantitation Ouantitation Concentration
Limit Target Limit* Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Column
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for.
39730 1 2.4-0
39045
39740
(ug/1) I (ugll)
(ugll)
Yes
No
Siivex
2.4.5-T
12
2
2
0.50
0.10
0.10
ND
ND
ND
• If different from quantitation limit target
* Matrix interference in sample exceeded required quantitation limit.

• Organic Analytical Information:
Page 9 nt 9
organic Fraction
Method
GC Operating
Extraction Conditions
Column Description
- Surrogates (Soikesi
Batch
Continuous I Length X ID. Film Thickness.
Column Type. Carrior Gas & Fiow
Rate, Ternoerature Program
Compound
Recover/
.a
Purgeabie
8260 31543 Janx -0•.32 m, 1--8urn, DB-624
Toluene-DS 105
He 3mL/min -10 C 2inin, 10 C min! lire nauoro 96
.1290Cc 6 C/min 140 C, 20 C/min I id Diechorol
102
Acid Extractable
8270 1 30 m x 0.25 trm, 0.25 um ! Phenol-D5 I 15
ggc_rsis
aestek RT-S R FluoropheaoL 34
die 20cm3/min, 45 C(4.0mn) rgi ai5po0h�o1 1 77
Base/Neutral Extractable
8270
/17:1
i itro-
290iC at 10 C/min nzene-20I 59
ihitcyis
's
g ;uoroy i 67
1 frerp-lenyl
D14 68
Example: Acid Extractable
625
X
30m x 0.25mm, 0.25um, D8.5,
He. 30 cm/sec, 40°C (4 min) -
270°C. 10°!min
d5 • phenol
_.0
.+tea uorary size (number of reference spectral:
F. ivietais and Other Chemicals
Number of Metais and Other Chemicals las listed below) detected in Sampie
Fraction STORET Number 78240
STORET
Number
Compound
Cuantiiation
Limit Target
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for. (ugr1)
01104 Aluminum I 50
01097 Antimony 50
01002 Arsenic I 10
01012 Eervilium 2�
01027 Cadmium 2
01034 Chromium ! -
01042 C000er I
Ct1VED
JAN 0 4 1993
Cuantitation
• Limit'
(ugll)
50
P TI
Concentration
Detected
(ugl1)
200
50 1 ND
1 I ND
20
1
5
2
01051 Lead I 10
1
71900 Mercury I 0.2
01067 Nickel I 10
01147 Selenium 1 5
01077 Silver I5
01092 Zinc i 10
2. Other inorganics:
0.2
10
1
5
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
iYH
ND
ND
ND
67
01007 j 3arium 500
00940 ( Chloride 1000
00720 ! Cyanide 20
00951 I Fluoride t 100
' if different from quantitation limit target
100
1000
2
ND
21000
4
100 ! 110
fSlanted: _.__._.
j Analytical Laocrrattor, , e, esentati��) PACES Incorporated
Signed: •,t J 1..L.l�f? G �r� Date.: 42 -3[92'
i 'Facility Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC:
f I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.

ace.
INCORPORATED
THE SSURANCE OF QUALITY
• Cl ent • C.T.. 74ft•/2/44424^...ra e
Address • • ge.,' 4604, ;era'
• A t. C .•? .1 7 9.2 • •
Phone (70") 3077
Sampled By (PRINT): „feu 7
Sampler Signature
1.,.2
- 7 -
Date Sampled
ITEM
NCL
'FOP& Mk
;1;t1 t,x igi-W4I !-r%
ffiVt-
cooLER NOS.
• Additional Comments
L.
•
w
0
c.)
LL
o m
. • :
Report ToLf2-0/7 Ci.(4•>4•42,1->
98681
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECO'RD
Analytical Request
Pace Client No •
Bill To: tec/AXP-/- ep7.- Ad: Efok / .7i7 Pace Project Manager ' •
14/"2/e' •.78775Pace Project No. fril-Pfgr51:)°1
P.O. # / Billing Reference 43'..3-
Project Name / No. , • •*Requested Due Date:
PRESERVATIVES
•
'1 WI KRIM
•:.n.Y!;" r, Yr) ltf..
1F171V
.1' A
sIIIPMFNT f.WTHop
NV PATE RETURNgP/PATg
tr;It
: L;Ftil21:74-1`.' "440'-f
lif;ii• @Ft§ ":
• RECEIVED
JAN 0 4 1993
PPTW
ITEM
NUMBER
ANALYSES
REQUEST
ArriPtirigti
•qA
4M1 ,IMMITM111411"MAMMI
, • ?•;7:-C, ‘i • ".‘"?;:'r • • • : • • „.
• •
_ -
c-.. • •
5-1/:-.72/11, /... jj'4. 6:'.., .. :'*).-elfr'r:T/:'.:1,.'1
1-‘)'7°- i -r",7--4- -1
•
- - . :1
.,::2 ,-..-5,.....i.:•.‘4,
-.
GeA,. 45, 4//'‘;',./e.';-...2...-:.
c'00.43,4/ -."‘..44:0,, :A.,/ - •
,iII
.2- A: ..:71.../;s''''..?'..114(
Acc€PTgR 0Y I fiFFIHIVIIPIi
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS
Pgg
Phr
• ti
1.;#tV•-•',.---s..7,!,:Z:. • ..•-•
TIME
Mrt'
- ArM 4r7.
r:IPM
• -
. •