20140851 Ver 1_401 Application_20140814

Michael Baker Engineering, inc.
797 Haywood Road
suite 201
Asheville, Noah G—Ma 211806
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
August 6, 2014
Mr. Andy Williams
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Ms. Jennifer Burdette
NC DWR (Archdale Building, 9th Floor)
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: City of Mount Airy Greenway Connector Project
Pre - Construction Notification Application and request for JD Determination
Dear Mr. Williams and Ms. Burdette:
Enclosed for your consideration and approval are the Pre - Construction Notification for the US Army
Corps nationwide 23 permit for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters and a request for
jurisdictional determination of wetlands identified on the project site by Michael Baker Engineering.
This project is located in the City of Mount Airy in Surry County, NC. Also enclosed are copies of the
Permit Drawings, maps, wetland field forms, and agency correspondence for your reference in reviewing
the PCN application.
These impacts to jurisdictional waters (Two wetlands with a total impact area of 0.036 AC)
have been limited to the extent possible. The two impacted wetlands are inside a NCDOT
Right -of -Way. The impacts are unavoidable due to clearance and utility conflicts which
precludes the use of boardwalks to further minimize impacts. The alignment of the greenway is
also constrained in these areas due to existing topography and structures. Other wetlands
identified in the vicinity of the project have been avoided by aligning the greenway in such a
way to eliminate all possible impacts.
The project impacts less than 0.1 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and as such this notification is
being provided to NC DWR for the record only.
If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at (828) 350 -1408 X 2001
Sincerely,
Jacob Byers, PE
Enclosures: PCN, Agent Authorization Forms, Figures, Agency Correspondence, Plans, and JD Determination
Request forms and information

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name City of Mount Airy Greenway Connector Project
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: _City of Mount Airy
3. Name of Consultant /Agent: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. / Jacob Byers, PE / 828 - 350 -1408 X 2007
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address: US Highway 52, Mount Airy, NC
6. Subdivision Name: N/A
7. City: Mount Air
8. County: Surry
9. Lat: 36.4803480 Long: - 80.6005030 (Decimal Degrees Please
10. Quadrangle Name: Mount Airy South
11. Waterway: Lovills Creek and the Ararat River
12. Watershed: Yadkin -Pee Dee
13. Requested Action: Attachments:
❑
Nationwide Permit # 23 Agent Authorization; Completed PCN;
❑ General Permit # Permit Drawings;
USGS 7.5' Topo. Quad.;
® Jurisdictional Determination Request NRCS Soils Survey Map;
❑ Pre - Application Request Request for Preliminary Determination
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
Begin Date

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO.
PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: Project consist of designing permitting and construction approximately
2 2 miles of greenwav trail alone Lovills Creek and the Ararat River.
Please print:
Property Owner: Proiect Owner is the City of Mount Airy. NC
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jacob Byers. PE
(Contractor / Agent)
of Michael Baker Engineering. Inc.
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
300 South Main Street Mount Airy, NC 27030
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
uthonzed Signature
Date: " .2i• t
�� C,///
Authorized Sign re
Date: S Z 7'

L
��llll
Mount Airy
1i
I
■
el
N
C1
CD
7 -03
see
1m
.t
�= a Bus �C
II, �-
�a
�s
rr��►�i�•'/lii�wa��j►fj�l�
r
lProject Location
i
I
"a
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Mt. Airy Greenway
Surry County, NC
ti� �E Clly
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway
Su11a 600
Cary., North Carolina 27
518
Phone: [phone]
Fax'. 919.463.5496
0
0.5 1
Miles

Legend
Proposed Connecting Greenway
Ararat River Greenway (existing)
Emily B Taylor Greenway (existing)
Streams
IL
Z
%
,a
1
52
"`— rte- - . i '� I 3 � •i
-"N , �° • °'� • • '`Fi 3(�' �+ 'may _,
P
■ ; + 1 601 * ` iy ■�, "7 �ti
I slope
r ■r �r -r
bt
t �' a;sti , ■
PO
i
� x
r?s �J
IJ 4A
Dispas
NO1 f kti r
5
C, .�
s, r t IL
r■ r � r � � �°r� � � 1r f
W
c} TH e
v
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. w�. 1 }`-�. Figure 2.
8000 Regency Parkway \� 7 O COO
Suite 600 u •� r J 1,000 Project Map
Cary, North Carolina 27518 z Mt. Airy Greenway
Phone: [phone] a�• Feet
Fax: [phone] Slurry County, NC

` TwC RbQ I u t N
TwC TwC
Q rB
TuB
TwC
Ud - Ur
RbQ '
CsA w
Wetland WA
iQ.
No Impact
- � Ur
Wetland WG Wetland WB
AFC! No Impact No Impact
TC T B '°
nan
Ur.
T601
TwC
TWC
TO
_ Wetland WF R
C No Impact TtC , `
CsA RbQ TwC
Ud sA
U Wetland WC
U d
86.24 ftZ Impact
% TuB Ur
Wetland WE Wetland
No Impact No Impact t
ION RbQ
2000 TwC TwC
ua
'tc RbQ
TwC Ur
G6 RbQ
1 3 - 216 CsA B
o
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 4' 1 } �.. Figure 3.
- 6000 Regency Parkway I \� "�
Suite 600 ° 0 500 1,000 NRCS Soils Map
r
Cary, North Carolina 27518 v Z Feet Mt. Airy Greenway
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone] 'y� Surry County, NC

IL
'■
Wetland WG
No Impact
�:�;� ���::':•� fir"
- v �:
N
Y.
10
I
Wetland WA
ti
No Impact
., r Wetland WB V
v.."
i No Impact
II
,-.,
y�`�-•�� },�� 4 �{ •i * Win. ,rt rL 7 #.: {:
i L * Wetland WF i ®
1 � ti4 No Impact
46;,
} L 1 r ti
f
I
' t1
Wetland WC
l 86.24 ft2 Impact
Wetland W
Wetland WE D �. � � No Impact �'y
• i �M No Impact y
Yom 0
r � �^ x '
- r 0
lrlll�. L'
'j''
r.
Ir T I I
d 10
c} TH E
TI'
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. w�. 1 }`-�. Figure 4.
_ 8000 Regency Parkway
Suite 600 'u ° 0 500 1,000 USGS Topo Map
r z
� Cary, North Carolina 27518 v Z
Phone: [phone] a'• Feet Mt. Airy Greenway
Fax: 9'9.463.5490 Slurry County, NC

fl i
01W - _ s
Y ^ + Wetland WA
No Impact (r
� e
~' Wetland WIG Wetland WB
No Impact No Impact
a
5
Wetland WF
!' 0.03 Acres Impact
1,
i, Wetland WC
y V& 0.006 Acres Impact
f V4 i Wetland WD
Wetland WE No Impact l
�•� _ No Impact
�►. �} `
IF
4 � _
4t _
fr _
M
Of THL(.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 4�w moo. Figure 5.
8000 Regency Parkway 11
Suite 600 0 500 1,000 Wetland Impacts Map
Cary, North Carolina 27518 Mt. Airy Greenway
Phone: [phone] ay Feet
Fax: [phone] 'rye• • Surry County, NC

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: A44, '4,,r. -, 11reeA r.,.sa. r,r City /County: nLE, ir /"S, �crs , Sampling Date: 01 t? z, 1
v 9
Applicant/Owner. _ ef °fti a {� /�1 %. %% €" sr State: h (L Sampling Point: 16 14, to — (,gip
Investigator(s): 9°
Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex none): r! c7rr Slope ( %):
�— v.=
Subregion (LRR or MLRAA)): (%3 � b'i P Let: x ' �� a �.. ,�^ Long: " `A,5, af!, `, 3 d,', � - Datum: 7{'
Soil Map Unit Name: d R i1aAr.� -A� c :�.+.^°,.» �Ar,, l C,C NWi classification: 't-lrrinc
r /�
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes L✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation �, Soil , or Hydrology A significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes J No
Are Vegetation , Sof T.r , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No t
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No v°'J
Remarks:
•, r
�., v v, r,,,7s'a re r# � rx � - L-m,. , �✓ -�,� : be �` x -r �mx �!. d, ,�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth
—
Water Table Present? Yes
(inches): /
No /Depth (inches):
_
Saturation Present? Yes
No U',"Depth (inches): > r '
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: (r A,T � )V
Tree Stratum (Plot size: v'°' y )
1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
414 21e " C�'t'-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: S (B)
Percent of Dominant Species %"
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ��_ (A/B)
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply 6v:
8.
OBL species — x 1 =
FACW species x2= V
FAC species o' x3= '2:'7^
FACU species d$- x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: I36— (A) 396 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 918
=Total Cover
Saplina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �'� )
1. Ar e c'° n r u' Fes-
.Crc�a
3
4
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
/�1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is - <3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
8.
9.
10.
Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: <i J )
1
2. d _ b rear.
3.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5.
6.
7
8.
9,
10.
,.
11.
12.
Woodv
Vine Stratum (Plot size: 'y )
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes_ No
2. Yr, v5e-s/1r,...- %-ws reta vn,:Q.l Y0s �D 76 F/LG_
3. G 4'
4'
5.
6
L(� = Total Cover
Remarks:II (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
s7
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1) _
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2) _
Redox Depressions (F6)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
��'%N l� F #',:
^34'i
r11)
wn:Nx'"�F' �,I✓rul srF'...
p�.p:.R'H+F.'!
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
,f Klz -r) / Pro t ec VSite: I1�7, A ^r.n y fiN City/County: t� +, 1 i r Sampling Date: 'r'
.tea
r � {
Applicant/Owner: �' 4� y d 7 Ii "- />3 : ` �- State: N (:— Sampling Point:
r ��7 A
Investigator(s): D. � �n ��t /' ��1� r^.;.. �%' A/.ut )Section, Township, Range: Nff
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
✓ r`�(A+O,r�;rf ,f7 %LiJrr Local relief (concave, convex, none): nxrs e'. � Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRAA)): )1)36 to Y' k` f Let: aF"� 4" ,!l 56'—q A Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ( r;E r..� Pr G; ,.._ '� �'° +c.»��. 4- •t/.i/ NWl classification: Ve)n<_
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ , No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ,�^'`
Are Vegetation �, Soil , or Hydrology ,AJ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation iR.d , Soil e�.,i , or Hydrology 6'�-° naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area ,%
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Li No within a Wetland? Yes L-- No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: i
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) -
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131) -
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
eomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
__�/FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_
No Depth (inches): 71j
Water Table Present? Yes
_Z
No� (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _
/Depth
No (! Depth (inches): ./i .I
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes i% No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Ij
r,
� I
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 'A/ k,, l m'ied g'
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ''^' )
1,
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: - (B)
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: o (A/B)
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply bv:
B.
OBL species -- x 1 = ' -- -
Saplino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ,�a )
1 �r
= Total Cover
�'tz. fti� /I {;
_
FACW species i x2= (,5 6
FAC species _Z16 x3= 40'
FACU species _. x4= °_...
m_
UPL species -- X5=
Column Totals: `) 5 (A) -2 F ki (B)
2
3
4
5.
Prevalence Index =B /A=
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_/ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
`� 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
8.
9'
10.
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
r
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
C c,
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
V
2. � � i r rl f-,fi
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
7,
height.
Sapling /Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 If (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb —All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
^
Total Cover
1. M,+
3.
rc
4.
5.
Vegetation
Present? Yes V No
6
Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: , -8 _. i, r
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Lee
Texture Remarks
It
�I) I
h ivt ...
�(;f.. ...
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Cloyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
lbepleted Matrix (F3)
- (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
"No
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes =''� _
Remarks:
( � �1'�f'!(z
�` y't'• ! �* pan,
,� �_,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

ddWETLANN�D DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
PrcjecVSite: � 'r • )`, , . t' = -.a #1, r«�c ,r- � City /County: ��-� �F ir.� /' »t e , Sampling Date:
f
Applicant/Owner /1; a r.,, State: /eJ e- Sampling Point -i„_� e.�'--
P B
Investigator(s): D- ��vr�Q�.. P >�,e t^.;:. x" M- ,5t-4jSection, Township, Range: P1 ,1
t q �
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex none) n err e Slope (% ):
�r dd r g ,f ` "_ Datum: ?Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat:
7r
Soil Map Unit Name: [ fi d r t&,r k 1 s r'> a ,d / N0 .«A, g e'' ,» /{-� NWI classification: Vr>n c
q /l
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation fs✓ Soil %,% , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes :r'. No
Are Vegetation ��.� , Soil i...e) , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 1J s -No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes _ZNo
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _AL' No
Remarks: rr'j
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
, Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (81 4)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ H h Water Table (A2)
_ H- ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_Drainage Patterns (BI 0)
_L/ Saturation (A3)
_L/Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
l—Goomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
, FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
_ No ._i Depth (inches): ? J
Water Table Present? Yes
_/ No i / Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
J / No_ Depth (inches): I a-
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes tI�No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
�.(� "�
✓ Af;r
��
fr• ";.r li'
Oar, ✓r
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: -aiz f
Tree Stratum Plot size: 3 J
( )
L poi f �>/ h •,-
Absolute
% Cover
��
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
to OIL'
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species _
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: a. (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
2. �ir^ r "' v'� ' ���" `��" !J t--,4 �f
3, y'
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
0131 species I � x 1 = 15,
FACW species _%` x2= 1 !F(J^
s
FAC species ,A . s- X3= i
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5= r-
Column Totals: I` D (A) L D (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
i { D =Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
(=/a -C
2
3
4
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
rf�1 r -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
i
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
, Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
8.
9'
10.
r
(� = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 �1 a
2. 'n "3 {., p- .a-..�. IJ`fs r Ct.r1
" r °
3 (� n, r r „a - t( �' "- v.D
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5 .-, er� e 1 p /c
u ,' }
6. l o t „�.,; fir., �.wi I fa Y °`
7.
B.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation .r'
Present? Yes --'- No_
2. too
3.
4.
5.
6 {
Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Li yam/,D!0,7f.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: I O -- t...) `,4...
Profile Description: ,(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) ` _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)_
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
plated Matrix (F3) -
_ (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
,D�
�'''Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes •�'� No
Remarks:
Yc(o-_`i 1..t aiJT
1 R"^ w "$W'F }� � �• kN4� 4ti�3.Jr%A eA?x "..')
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: ll/J r`, f�. }rc.,n / >t're'r°i L..s�,b> City /County: tll-Ai r� �`s+�fr�r(. Sampling Date: Rf �'�r ``�`l Sf
Applicant/Owner: C -�� b r In i- � �% . r r.+ State: h/ C Sampling Point: 1 fD -- op
p
s� P
Investigator(s): vn P� 1 a! _15.. % %�. u'"^- wlSection, Township, Range:. A( e
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): r r-�DUs6°� %l.�r Local relief (concave, convex, none): ri c >rr e Slope ( %): K)
i
Subregion (LRR or MLRA^): 136 �i- f`° Let: � �. (i'�`� a� �' ( Long: °'� �. (zta r"� 4. °���"s � Datum: ��7�
Soil Map Unit Name: ( A0rearl -A�f- &aeA �c •' /f S NWI classification: grins
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes f/ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
A
Are Vegetation �l , Soil 0 , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation !v , Soil i0 , or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ""r °� No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No L__ within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No L_-^
e"� r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two recuired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No @ Depth (inches): E
_'�
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): > t
_
Saturation Present? Yes
No - ^bepth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca ilia fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
6
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point. ) t. Ca oy-
Tree Stratum (Plot size: -,) o )
1 �krf,. ��r<�
Absolute
% Cover
;,
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
elf F�f e Lr
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ��77
That Are OBL, FACW; or FAC: Ill (A/B)
2. "' "' �_
3. Ar, p- �%,'e, `a' (
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
8
OBL species x 1 = ""� --
FACW species 2 9 x2= 4 r
FAC species lI z3= -2,5SF
FACU species x4=
UPL species ��� X5=
Column Totals: —16— (A) 3 r (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = -
Total Cover
Saplinp /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 `c r%J ..
2
3
4
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
K2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-1-9--Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
g'
10.
SS = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: '' U )
L
2. f . t'��
3.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5. \�
�
6. �-�---
7
8.
g,
10.
11,
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size � )
1. fir.. �; ✓�d , 1` (�od
�'"
=Total Cover
�
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes - No
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
Zj = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
yJ
"
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
to
or confirm the
Sampling Point: 1. -'C, it 't LX'
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Dark Surface (S7)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Lee
Texture Remarks
(MLRA 147, 148)
(a&
. _. __ -
Zy,,P
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol(At)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
1147,148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
0I d' c- 'ye) i/u
educed Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL =Pore Lining M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Y r�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: A -f, ref "rx..a ,A,,, City /County: i r 4 /'Nt'r r , Sampling Date: 0 6 j 201.
�-
ApplicanUOwner: I'l -14 b {-' L 4 1 14 ; r w State: N (L Sampling Point: IJ�. `! ? -7'-
Investigator(s):
Township,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): /+drrJ^,re,J {A1 r, Local relief (concave, convex, none): vv rD,^r e Slope 1%):
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): 136 @i 6^° Let: -, �i -" '� � -' Long: 6C, �0-& Datum: - alt
Soil Map Unit Name:
NWl classification: N
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes t/ No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation K) A , Soil r) , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _LeKlo
Are Vegetation A) , Soil Tu , or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes i,f No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ^" No within a Wetland? Yes ,.- ''lYNo-
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes (. --'`!- No
Remarks:
�lG /'l•Gi (ilJ ^r�,i'1' . S 4..4.s
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely -Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
G- =Drainage Patterns (1316)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ SStudnted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
j,�eomorphi, Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (69)
ic4otopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (BI 3)
T-' FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes —
No i,d r� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes —
No Depth (inches):" 1 ,3
Saturation Present? Yes _
No ��Depth (inches): f `�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes U No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
r.', "'.�
�", �J Pf s.A �^ ,.e,. AFr-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: VX oe
Tree Stratum (Plot size:' )
1 /I }
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant yy
Species Across All Strata: P (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �-�`' (A/B)
2.
3,
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by;
8.
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
=Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
I �{ ,t'i.
2
3
4
5. ";
6'
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
8.
g'
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: '� £ )
azo
2 efAf -e%'
3.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5.
6.
7.
8.
g,
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. �/ r
L- =Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ®
4° Present? Yes No_
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�.f�F✓ r9°,5 p�'f6�"� °� �dba',°=F R"d F°Y S,er m.-. �rN.e:.Y'�Y/ x,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: LJG 6n_4
Profile Description: ,(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) Twe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 Z:' (7 )Z (per
g/
_.. k.C*• d_
E>an uva
(11
0 d .. ! iJ �_
4 11 �. eU C U'n'
(� �� ✓d.�
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Linin , M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
R dox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
pleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

n % WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont f
Project/Site: /" 17 .,ya �'1"• ("..� C7 f "Le sw c•r � ,yv .,r City /County: %� f , > r . /T S , Sampling Date: Ou 4 y w l
Applicant/Owner: L. , � Ua ) (° ' -.. .=i a g � State: Sampling Point: fie'
Investigator(s): ;✓ - Phi 4 -1 c ' -a-" F .' a r"?,w; �... eciion, Township, Range: A14
7 "t
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): i %O�CJ�o : s-s Local relief (concave, convex, none): hu> n e... Slope (�% )': n Q- 1�$
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 13/, A 71` f Lat: Z6/, of % n7 <-'' tong: '- ga ('16 ti�1q Datum: r JJ b 'Irr -�
Soil Map Unit Name:
C 4F 1 NWl classification: A)oe_.
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Q , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation k,` Soil is l or Hydrology _� naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes "� No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes i--- No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes :::LZNo
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
i Ih Water Table (A2)
H�
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
?aturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
j,�G°eomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
-L, AC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
-7{5
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No
✓ pe pth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Alo
J Depth (inches): ✓ t J
Saturation Present? Yes _ No_
Depth (inches): 16 "
/.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _Z No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: i,3
i
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: C) )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species v
4^'
1. _
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (A)
Total Number of Dominant '
2.
3.
��
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bw
8.
T
= Total Cover
OBL species °"' x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species )� x2= (ud.
1.�)G �.. �J U:7 �� -;.-. ^�'�•cn �.zr:i.�
P s. G,2G U�
FAC species 2 x3=
FACU species "- x4=
UPL species -- X5=
Column Totals: �� (A) 2 15 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 7
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
-I - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1_2 - Dominance Test is >50
8
g
/'3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
10.
—
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: +�+ V� )
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1
f -°°
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
3
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
7.
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft It m) tali.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
3 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: %rG+ )
height.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
-.
5'
6.
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
p.
� , � r t� >,.� „° „�. s:r .w,
�;oT� ,- 1,.., ,�q,:T.
.�"'�v 4�,
4�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: L.) 4a F7`
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) ' "% Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
j
`fib bt7 2 �(3 E ri __
to d JK ;51.3 05
10 n, `1 l 2 40 Rn_ r�
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
' (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loa Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
/ epleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes k No
Remarks:
r
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Proiect/Site: A4q - /Y � r Citv /County: tl+, Air. / r , , Semolina Date: q7 -) i i'T
Applicant/Owner: 4', 4" State: /tJ C Sampling Point: L-) F-_ ' -«..-�
Investigator(s): Q- Fi �n ems., ( 7 % �f. �ScxgSection, Township, Range: N,y
Landform (hills et°c.): r ��DUs.�GO {at; rs Local relief (concave, convex, none): n &� e Slope (% ):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): g�g,a Let: > �, (% `� �. i. AA Long: �" `f6. 6s=c V) 3 z - Datum: - 9,4f
Soil Map Unit Name: if n L t, A, _ e- .• w.. 43zm � -' /t� NWI classification: Vdn e.
p /`
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil c , or Hydrology &las significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation %1 , Soil X , or Hydrology _p= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V/ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No r✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No d�
Remarks:
r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
( � Depth % f S
_
Water Table Present? Yes No
• (inches):
U //Depth(inches): (
Saturation Present? Yes _ No
U` Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
.�pp{ /p 9
p °
! "1P
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version
r

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: \0 L' o?
- d
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3r) )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: �" (B)
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ('P„i'i (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply bw
8.
OBL species x 1 =
f =Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: $, )
FACW species x2=
1
FAC species X3=
2 ( -
{--j
FACU species x4=
3
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
10.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
=Total Cover
-
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 U )
Problematic Hydrophytic Ve etation' (Explain)
)
1 �tv � .
din
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3. �o �.r i / 0 °'° ^` 0 n.
i ...
4. ✓�-r 1 % _> < " I'-- SG (� "� ° `�" S
--
/ �5 uq
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 R (1 m) tail.
10.
Herb - Ali herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plat size: � J )
height.
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation //
Present? Yes- it No
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
f ' 4 j(�ro�j 0^• w� 7 f t" 6.�'e' ti �,. ti-: ; , r
x , r., w r��- "+i'.. c,' ±./
,m�_ h��. €, ;.6'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: (A) C?F
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
/0- /.9' 10 ` r "1�L �o
/0 yr yZ4 _-LQ_ nAOR' i_ bu wt ,- o, le)
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
re 5e L
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: /W it , °! 'Ir.. 4(r,SV' . City /County: it �i r-, r Sampling Date:
r
Applicanf/Owner. �,'EH D �"1 �a /% . (a, State: Sampling Point:'
Investigator(s):
Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 16106,1 (O is2: rr Local relief (concave, convex, none): rY rDei e Slope ( %): f� °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): /3Z 61� P^` n La49861°3 Long: „.y *''° 6" ' °a I z, = Datum: _
Soil Map Unit Name: C6 l ue (C � /t J
i NWI classification: /yn<
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes v l./ /No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0 Soil , or Hydrology AJ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation A) , Soil fs✓ , or Hydrology P1 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -" ~No within a Wetland? Yes z"'� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L, No
Remarks
}
r-
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one
is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B 14)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Hig Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ rainage Patterns (810)
aturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ St ed or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Mjorotopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
AC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
/'�
Surface Water Present? Yes_
No li�D'gpth (inches): ?/5_
Water Table Present? Yes
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
eN-o..:,g"
�°' No_ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:g,.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W C -1, Sc "
-
Tree Stratum (Plot size: f may,
1. [>,x p1 /r 1 "le,�n..
o' Absolute
) % Cover
yr0,. 4, 'ire, le)
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
A) �
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species ff"�//
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant (�
Species Across All Strata: t (B)
2. % u r `"x� l� "I
3,
4.
Percent of Dominant Species � L-�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
8.
=Total Cover
3p°
Saolino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1
_
FAC species X3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3 Hp
4
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
10.
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: -. -? )
a T
2. Cr�S P 5�+� � � r � �
�
3. e�_ -
4. , r ,�+�" *
i ^'
(-
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
6.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
6.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine -Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
Edy )
=Total Cover
2."
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes- No
5.
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�' (upt9�tZ>ar;�' ➢t/�(d!
(�°' � `f" k,.$r°',k��
t
'. ,� ''+';.a'; at -#r:.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1/UE_ r_)P
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
(1 -;3 ;'O r 3 13 loo
!VA
loan,
3- 10 10Yr313 70
t o Vr a, gyp RM Ali
L DU
5
p
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) 1147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
epieted Matrix (F3)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
-
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yeses No
Remarks:
�ILkf lf' .S'd ✓d
/J is �',a'e•^`f r',?/ �f ✓2; /`�N��a
�,�...
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
g1
Project/Slte: t ! i1 ,/� ��� r f'7 (� �"- t'+'r"' 4,;��`� City/County: �'/ - �% � r 7 � � �' 1 ° �J' Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: C �� 4 r) � , r v State: ) C-- Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): 1 i, ,{f V,roe,s Y'7f ` Section, Township, Range: "T(
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): '9 Y�+4s`.'J t ^.` Local relief (c
Subregion (LRR or MLRj/
A�): i � 4' t t Let: rfr% - t� ✓
Soil Map Unit Name: L� tube'«" e r°+ ,a ea
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of years Yes _
Dncave, convex, none): Slope ( %): S .- °...
Datum: 0,.'JJ �9�2
NWI classification A' 1$�
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ' or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes `- No
I r '
Are Vegetation '" , Soil ? f% or Hydrology A, °". naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
8` ""
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes_ No L-�
withina Wetland?
Yes No ( °• - " " "'"
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No L�
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Remarks:
1 G.'97 d`d�
n•y vae4 �'`
r.
�,r .: fy aW.... at
.v;°rd a.
y
„�- Qii)iC$14� d
B
21 r"apV 1s0 y �°,. d" 'V�d�.., w'us n
7.. r.. �.x
e.,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
8` ""
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is
required; check all that app v) r1°
_
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
_
No ��.m''� Depth (inches): ' IS
Water Table Present? Yes
_ No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No ,,Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
L=A
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W P' ,J(" u e
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
_ r
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
2. „1: -��i�. �'F ° � �
3
4.
Percent of Dominant Species ;^ 0
5
That Are OBL, F. — - - — 10 (A/B)
6.
\
Prevalence lndexworksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
0131- species x 1 =
r.
d
=Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
Saplinq /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ,,,J` )
3 =
1
FAC species x
FACU species x 4 =
2 —
'A
UPL species x=
3. ;I`"r d" .f'�pY .„, f,`
Column Totals (A) (B)
�
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B /A=
6.
Hydrop ytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
, "•`--
,�`,n Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
ORapid
1.,2- Dominance Test is >50% -
g.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
10.
—�q—
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ° )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
_
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. C�
3
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
7
B.
Sapling /Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
g
10.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11
12.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
`
_ = Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
Present? Yes _ No
6.
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

SOIL
/
Sampling Point: LL E �' °- fa §"7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
A,4
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Location: PL =Pore Linin , M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Dark Surface (37) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Cloyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No
Remarks:
I
-(
ell;
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

Project/Site: _,
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s): _
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
/j y�
l`( ( °f (IT v, I'o rr,` -9 Ci /Count .L 4 � ���'`rJ�f � �, Ali3 /'
j� + '9 p�. ty y: Sampling Date:
4✓r r? 7- ! ! i o A w rL State: LJC-- Sampling Point: tW "ems
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name: A 4
Section, Township, Range: _ LV a -
Local relief (concave, convex, none): In b"P Slope ( %): ! `%
Let: ��. -t Z�� . (' t�l '� Long: Datum: 1
��AY`!�'� j6p.r� - +. �d° C ,1 NWl classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 4 :-,'No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 1 -!1se_, Soil or Hydrology Iv significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation 3br'� , Soil, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes I," No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes L.r7 -No _ Is the Sampled A?ea
within a Wetland. Yes `- No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �! No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re wired
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Hi Water Table (A2)
ydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Oxidized
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
aturation (A3)
i' Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
eomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
Micrgtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
F C-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
//
Surface Water Present? Yes t/ No
Depth (inches) �+
-
Water Table Present? Yes No
� / Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes = / No
_' -Depth (inches). E%
//
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca i lary fringe)
_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant >
2. ����� �
3.
Species Across All Strata:. (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
OBL species x 1 =
=Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: l<"�
)
FACW species x2=
1
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2 &'1�°,,d f �+° > �^ r':'-
3
4 _�
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
\
\
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50
9'
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
_
Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
,.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1 9'34 ( +"' p w
_
—
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
p
3.s"'N^a x- Ca'��' ?��
4. .1 8, a4
1j F&
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5 w..
-� -
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7,
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall,
12.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: .k °i
)
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic -
Vegetation //
Present? Yes o
4, N
5.
6
),t� =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
IV le ipe
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: (-, I,.? a _ 4°" ef,
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
Q La ! 7dD
U
it —..,.
r4.
Ion,
/U - -
1
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
C-Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
'. Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
;
jJ
US Army Corps of Engineers 41 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: A44, '4,,r. -, 11reeA r.,.sa. r,r City /County: nLE, ir /"S, �crs , Sampling Date: 01 t? z, 1
v 9
Applicant/Owner. _ ef °fti a {� /�1 %. %% €" sr State: h (L Sampling Point: 16 14, to — (,gip
Investigator(s): 9°
Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex none): r! c7rr Slope ( %):
�— v.=
Subregion (LRR or MLRAA)): (%3 � b'i P Let: x ' �� a �.. ,�^ Long: " `A,5, af!, `, 3 d,', � - Datum: 7{'
Soil Map Unit Name: d R i1aAr.� -A� c :�.+.^°,.» �Ar,, l C,C NWi classification: 't-lrrinc
r /�
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes L✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation �, Soil , or Hydrology A significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes J No
Are Vegetation , Sof T.r , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No t
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No v°'J
Remarks:
•, r
�., v v, r,,,7s'a re r# � rx � - L-m,. , �✓ -�,� : be �` x -r �mx �!. d, ,�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth
—
Water Table Present? Yes
(inches): /
No /Depth (inches):
_
Saturation Present? Yes
No U',"Depth (inches): > r '
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: (r A,T � )V
Tree Stratum (Plot size: v'°' y )
1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
414 21e " C�'t'-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: S (B)
Percent of Dominant Species %"
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ��_ (A/B)
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply 6v:
8.
OBL species — x 1 =
FACW species x2= V
FAC species o' x3= '2:'7^
FACU species d$- x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: I36— (A) 396 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 918
=Total Cover
Saplina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �'� )
1. Ar e c'° n r u' Fes-
.Crc�a
3
4
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
/�1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is - <3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
8.
9.
10.
Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: <i J )
1
2. d _ b rear.
3.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5.
6.
7
8.
9,
10.
,.
11.
12.
Woodv
Vine Stratum (Plot size: 'y )
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes_ No
2. Yr, v5e-s/1r,...- %-ws reta vn,:Q.l Y0s �D 76 F/LG_
3. G 4'
4'
5.
6
L(� = Total Cover
Remarks:II (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
s7
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1) _
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2) _
Redox Depressions (F6)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
��'%N l� F #',:
^34'i
r11)
wn:Nx'"�F' �,I✓rul srF'...
p�.p:.R'H+F.'!
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
,f Klz -r) / Pro t ec VSite: I1�7, A ^r.n y fiN City/County: t� +, 1 i r Sampling Date: 'r'
.tea
r � {
Applicant/Owner: �' 4� y d 7 Ii "- />3 : ` �- State: N (:— Sampling Point:
r ��7 A
Investigator(s): D. � �n ��t /' ��1� r^.;.. �%' A/.ut )Section, Township, Range: Nff
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
✓ r`�(A+O,r�;rf ,f7 %LiJrr Local relief (concave, convex, none): nxrs e'. � Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRAA)): )1)36 to Y' k` f Let: aF"� 4" ,!l 56'—q A Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ( r;E r..� Pr G; ,.._ '� �'° +c.»��. 4- •t/.i/ NWl classification: Ve)n<_
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ , No (If no, explain in Remarks.) ,�^'`
Are Vegetation �, Soil , or Hydrology ,AJ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation iR.d , Soil e�.,i , or Hydrology 6'�-° naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area ,%
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Li No within a Wetland? Yes L-- No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: i
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) -
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131) -
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
eomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
__�/FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_
No Depth (inches): 71j
Water Table Present? Yes
_Z
No� (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _
/Depth
No (! Depth (inches): ./i .I
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes i% No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Ij
r,
� I
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 'A/ k,, l m'ied g'
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ''^' )
1,
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: - (B)
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: o (A/B)
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply bv:
B.
OBL species -- x 1 = ' -- -
Saplino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ,�a )
1 �r
= Total Cover
�'tz. fti� /I {;
_
FACW species i x2= (,5 6
FAC species _Z16 x3= 40'
FACU species _. x4= °_...
m_
UPL species -- X5=
Column Totals: `) 5 (A) -2 F ki (B)
2
3
4
5.
Prevalence Index =B /A=
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_/ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
`� 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
8.
9'
10.
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
r
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
C c,
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
V
2. � � i r rl f-,fi
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
7,
height.
Sapling /Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 If (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb —All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
^
Total Cover
1. M,+
3.
rc
4.
5.
Vegetation
Present? Yes V No
6
Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: , -8 _. i, r
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Lee
Texture Remarks
It
�I) I
h ivt ...
�(;f.. ...
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Cloyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
lbepleted Matrix (F3)
- (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
"No
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes =''� _
Remarks:
( � �1'�f'!(z
�` y't'• ! �* pan,
,� �_,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

ddWETLANN�D DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
PrcjecVSite: � 'r • )`, , . t' = -.a #1, r«�c ,r- � City /County: ��-� �F ir.� /' »t e , Sampling Date:
f
Applicant/Owner /1; a r.,, State: /eJ e- Sampling Point -i„_� e.�'--
P B
Investigator(s): D- ��vr�Q�.. P >�,e t^.;:. x" M- ,5t-4jSection, Township, Range: P1 ,1
t q �
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex none) n err e Slope (% ):
�r dd r g ,f ` "_ Datum: ?Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat:
7r
Soil Map Unit Name: [ fi d r t&,r k 1 s r'> a ,d / N0 .«A, g e'' ,» /{-� NWI classification: Vr>n c
q /l
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation fs✓ Soil %,% , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes :r'. No
Are Vegetation ��.� , Soil i...e) , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 1J s -No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes _ZNo
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _AL' No
Remarks: rr'j
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
, Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (81 4)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ H h Water Table (A2)
_ H- ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_Drainage Patterns (BI 0)
_L/ Saturation (A3)
_L/Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
l—Goomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
, FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
_ No ._i Depth (inches): ? J
Water Table Present? Yes
_/ No i / Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
J / No_ Depth (inches): I a-
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes tI�No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
�.(� "�
✓ Af;r
��
fr• ";.r li'
Oar, ✓r
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: -aiz f
Tree Stratum Plot size: 3 J
( )
L poi f �>/ h •,-
Absolute
% Cover
��
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
to OIL'
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species _
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: a. (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
2. �ir^ r "' v'� ' ���" `��" !J t--,4 �f
3, y'
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
0131 species I � x 1 = 15,
FACW species _%` x2= 1 !F(J^
s
FAC species ,A . s- X3= i
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5= r-
Column Totals: I` D (A) L D (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
i { D =Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
(=/a -C
2
3
4
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
rf�1 r -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
i
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
, Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
8.
9'
10.
r
(� = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 �1 a
2. 'n "3 {., p- .a-..�. IJ`fs r Ct.r1
" r °
3 (� n, r r „a - t( �' "- v.D
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5 .-, er� e 1 p /c
u ,' }
6. l o t „�.,; fir., �.wi I fa Y °`
7.
B.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation .r'
Present? Yes --'- No_
2. too
3.
4.
5.
6 {
Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Li yam/,D!0,7f.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: I O -- t...) `,4...
Profile Description: ,(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) ` _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)_
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
plated Matrix (F3) -
_ (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
,D�
�'''Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes •�'� No
Remarks:
Yc(o-_`i 1..t aiJT
1 R"^ w "$W'F }� � �• kN4� 4ti�3.Jr%A eA?x "..')
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: ll/J r`, f�. }rc.,n / >t're'r°i L..s�,b> City /County: tll-Ai r� �`s+�fr�r(. Sampling Date: Rf �'�r ``�`l Sf
Applicant/Owner: C -�� b r In i- � �% . r r.+ State: h/ C Sampling Point: 1 fD -- op
p
s� P
Investigator(s): vn P� 1 a! _15.. % %�. u'"^- wlSection, Township, Range:. A( e
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): r r-�DUs6°� %l.�r Local relief (concave, convex, none): ri c >rr e Slope ( %): K)
i
Subregion (LRR or MLRA^): 136 �i- f`° Let: � �. (i'�`� a� �' ( Long: °'� �. (zta r"� 4. °���"s � Datum: ��7�
Soil Map Unit Name: ( A0rearl -A�f- &aeA �c •' /f S NWI classification: grins
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes f/ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
A
Are Vegetation �l , Soil 0 , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation !v , Soil i0 , or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ""r °� No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No L__ within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No L_-^
e"� r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two recuired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No @ Depth (inches): E
_'�
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): > t
_
Saturation Present? Yes
No - ^bepth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca ilia fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
6
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point. ) t. Ca oy-
Tree Stratum (Plot size: -,) o )
1 �krf,. ��r<�
Absolute
% Cover
;,
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
elf F�f e Lr
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ��77
That Are OBL, FACW; or FAC: Ill (A/B)
2. "' "' �_
3. Ar, p- �%,'e, `a' (
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
8
OBL species x 1 = ""� --
FACW species 2 9 x2= 4 r
FAC species lI z3= -2,5SF
FACU species x4=
UPL species ��� X5=
Column Totals: —16— (A) 3 r (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = -
Total Cover
Saplinp /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 `c r%J ..
2
3
4
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
K2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-1-9--Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
g'
10.
SS = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: '' U )
L
2. f . t'��
3.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5. \�
�
6. �-�---
7
8.
g,
10.
11,
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size � )
1. fir.. �; ✓�d , 1` (�od
�'"
=Total Cover
�
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes - No
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
Zj = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
yJ
"
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
to
or confirm the
Sampling Point: 1. -'C, it 't LX'
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Dark Surface (S7)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Lee
Texture Remarks
(MLRA 147, 148)
(a&
. _. __ -
Zy,,P
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol(At)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
1147,148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
0I d' c- 'ye) i/u
educed Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL =Pore Lining M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Y r�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: A -f, ref "rx..a ,A,,, City /County: i r 4 /'Nt'r r , Sampling Date: 0 6 j 201.
�-
ApplicanUOwner: I'l -14 b {-' L 4 1 14 ; r w State: N (L Sampling Point: IJ�. `! ? -7'-
Investigator(s):
Township,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): /+drrJ^,re,J {A1 r, Local relief (concave, convex, none): vv rD,^r e Slope 1%):
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): 136 @i 6^° Let: -, �i -" '� � -' Long: 6C, �0-& Datum: - alt
Soil Map Unit Name:
NWl classification: N
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes t/ No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation K) A , Soil r) , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _LeKlo
Are Vegetation A) , Soil Tu , or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes i,f No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ^" No within a Wetland? Yes ,.- ''lYNo-
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes (. --'`!- No
Remarks:
�lG /'l•Gi (ilJ ^r�,i'1' . S 4..4.s
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely -Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
G- =Drainage Patterns (1316)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ SStudnted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
j,�eomorphi, Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (69)
ic4otopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (BI 3)
T-' FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes —
No i,d r� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes —
No Depth (inches):" 1 ,3
Saturation Present? Yes _
No ��Depth (inches): f `�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes U No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
r.', "'.�
�", �J Pf s.A �^ ,.e,. AFr-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: VX oe
Tree Stratum (Plot size:' )
1 /I }
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant yy
Species Across All Strata: P (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �-�`' (A/B)
2.
3,
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by;
8.
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
=Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
I �{ ,t'i.
2
3
4
5. ";
6'
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
8.
g'
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: '� £ )
azo
2 efAf -e%'
3.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5.
6.
7.
8.
g,
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. �/ r
L- =Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ®
4° Present? Yes No_
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�.f�F✓ r9°,5 p�'f6�"� °� �dba',°=F R"d F°Y S,er m.-. �rN.e:.Y'�Y/ x,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: LJG 6n_4
Profile Description: ,(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) Twe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 Z:' (7 )Z (per
g/
_.. k.C*• d_
E>an uva
(11
0 d .. ! iJ �_
4 11 �. eU C U'n'
(� �� ✓d.�
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Linin , M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
R dox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
pleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

n % WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont f
Project/Site: /" 17 .,ya �'1"• ("..� C7 f "Le sw c•r � ,yv .,r City /County: %� f , > r . /T S , Sampling Date: Ou 4 y w l
Applicant/Owner: L. , � Ua ) (° ' -.. .=i a g � State: Sampling Point: fie'
Investigator(s): ;✓ - Phi 4 -1 c ' -a-" F .' a r"?,w; �... eciion, Township, Range: A14
7 "t
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): i %O�CJ�o : s-s Local relief (concave, convex, none): hu> n e... Slope (�% )': n Q- 1�$
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 13/, A 71` f Lat: Z6/, of % n7 <-'' tong: '- ga ('16 ti�1q Datum: r JJ b 'Irr -�
Soil Map Unit Name:
C 4F 1 NWl classification: A)oe_.
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Q , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation k,` Soil is l or Hydrology _� naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes "� No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes i--- No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes :::LZNo
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
i Ih Water Table (A2)
H�
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
?aturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
j,�G°eomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
-L, AC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
-7{5
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No
✓ pe pth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Alo
J Depth (inches): ✓ t J
Saturation Present? Yes _ No_
Depth (inches): 16 "
/.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _Z No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: i,3
i
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: C) )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species v
4^'
1. _
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (A)
Total Number of Dominant '
2.
3.
��
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bw
8.
T
= Total Cover
OBL species °"' x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species )� x2= (ud.
1.�)G �.. �J U:7 �� -;.-. ^�'�•cn �.zr:i.�
P s. G,2G U�
FAC species 2 x3=
FACU species "- x4=
UPL species -- X5=
Column Totals: �� (A) 2 15 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 7
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
-I - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1_2 - Dominance Test is >50
8
g
/'3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
10.
—
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: +�+ V� )
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1
f -°°
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
3
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
7.
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft It m) tali.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
3 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: %rG+ )
height.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
-.
5'
6.
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
p.
� , � r t� >,.� „° „�. s:r .w,
�;oT� ,- 1,.., ,�q,:T.
.�"'�v 4�,
4�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: L.) 4a F7`
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) ' "% Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
j
`fib bt7 2 �(3 E ri __
to d JK ;51.3 05
10 n, `1 l 2 40 Rn_ r�
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
' (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loa Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
/ epleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes k No
Remarks:
r
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Proiect/Site: A4q - /Y � r Citv /County: tl+, Air. / r , , Semolina Date: q7 -) i i'T
Applicant/Owner: 4', 4" State: /tJ C Sampling Point: L-) F-_ ' -«..-�
Investigator(s): Q- Fi �n ems., ( 7 % �f. �ScxgSection, Township, Range: N,y
Landform (hills et°c.): r ��DUs.�GO {at; rs Local relief (concave, convex, none): n &� e Slope (% ):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): g�g,a Let: > �, (% `� �. i. AA Long: �" `f6. 6s=c V) 3 z - Datum: - 9,4f
Soil Map Unit Name: if n L t, A, _ e- .• w.. 43zm � -' /t� NWI classification: Vdn e.
p /`
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil c , or Hydrology &las significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation %1 , Soil X , or Hydrology _p= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V/ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No r✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No d�
Remarks:
r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
( � Depth % f S
_
Water Table Present? Yes No
• (inches):
U //Depth(inches): (
Saturation Present? Yes _ No
U` Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
.�pp{ /p 9
p °
! "1P
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version
r

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: \0 L' o?
- d
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3r) )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: �" (B)
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ('P„i'i (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply bw
8.
OBL species x 1 =
f =Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: $, )
FACW species x2=
1
FAC species X3=
2 ( -
{--j
FACU species x4=
3
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
10.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
=Total Cover
-
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 U )
Problematic Hydrophytic Ve etation' (Explain)
)
1 �tv � .
din
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3. �o �.r i / 0 °'° ^` 0 n.
i ...
4. ✓�-r 1 % _> < " I'-- SG (� "� ° `�" S
--
/ �5 uq
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 R (1 m) tail.
10.
Herb - Ali herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plat size: � J )
height.
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation //
Present? Yes- it No
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
f ' 4 j(�ro�j 0^• w� 7 f t" 6.�'e' ti �,. ti-: ; , r
x , r., w r��- "+i'.. c,' ±./
,m�_ h��. €, ;.6'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: (A) C?F
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
/0- /.9' 10 ` r "1�L �o
/0 yr yZ4 _-LQ_ nAOR' i_ bu wt ,- o, le)
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
re 5e L
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: /W it , °! 'Ir.. 4(r,SV' . City /County: it �i r-, r Sampling Date:
r
Applicanf/Owner. �,'EH D �"1 �a /% . (a, State: Sampling Point:'
Investigator(s):
Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 16106,1 (O is2: rr Local relief (concave, convex, none): rY rDei e Slope ( %): f� °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): /3Z 61� P^` n La49861°3 Long: „.y *''° 6" ' °a I z, = Datum: _
Soil Map Unit Name: C6 l ue (C � /t J
i NWI classification: /yn<
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes v l./ /No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0 Soil , or Hydrology AJ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation A) , Soil fs✓ , or Hydrology P1 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -" ~No within a Wetland? Yes z"'� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L, No
Remarks
}
r-
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one
is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B 14)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Hig Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ rainage Patterns (810)
aturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ St ed or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Mjorotopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
AC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
/'�
Surface Water Present? Yes_
No li�D'gpth (inches): ?/5_
Water Table Present? Yes
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
eN-o..:,g"
�°' No_ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:g,.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W C -1, Sc "
-
Tree Stratum (Plot size: f may,
1. [>,x p1 /r 1 "le,�n..
o' Absolute
) % Cover
yr0,. 4, 'ire, le)
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
A) �
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species ff"�//
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant (�
Species Across All Strata: t (B)
2. % u r `"x� l� "I
3,
4.
Percent of Dominant Species � L-�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
8.
=Total Cover
3p°
Saolino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1
_
FAC species X3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3 Hp
4
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
10.
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: -. -? )
a T
2. Cr�S P 5�+� � � r � �
�
3. e�_ -
4. , r ,�+�" *
i ^'
(-
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in, (7.6 cm) or
6.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
6.
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine -Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
Edy )
=Total Cover
2."
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes- No
5.
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�' (upt9�tZ>ar;�' ➢t/�(d!
(�°' � `f" k,.$r°',k��
t
'. ,� ''+';.a'; at -#r:.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1/UE_ r_)P
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
(1 -;3 ;'O r 3 13 loo
!VA
loan,
3- 10 10Yr313 70
t o Vr a, gyp RM Ali
L DU
5
p
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) 1147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
epieted Matrix (F3)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
-
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yeses No
Remarks:
�ILkf lf' .S'd ✓d
/J is �',a'e•^`f r',?/ �f ✓2; /`�N��a
�,�...
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
g1
Project/Slte: t ! i1 ,/� ��� r f'7 (� �"- t'+'r"' 4,;��`� City/County: �'/ - �% � r 7 � � �' 1 ° �J' Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: C �� 4 r) � , r v State: ) C-- Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): 1 i, ,{f V,roe,s Y'7f ` Section, Township, Range: "T(
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): '9 Y�+4s`.'J t ^.` Local relief (c
Subregion (LRR or MLRj/
A�): i � 4' t t Let: rfr% - t� ✓
Soil Map Unit Name: L� tube'«" e r°+ ,a ea
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of years Yes _
Dncave, convex, none): Slope ( %): S .- °...
Datum: 0,.'JJ �9�2
NWI classification A' 1$�
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ' or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes `- No
I r '
Are Vegetation '" , Soil ? f% or Hydrology A, °". naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
8` ""
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes_ No L-�
withina Wetland?
Yes No ( °• - " " "'"
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No L�
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Remarks:
1 G.'97 d`d�
n•y vae4 �'`
r.
�,r .: fy aW.... at
.v;°rd a.
y
„�- Qii)iC$14� d
B
21 r"apV 1s0 y �°,. d" 'V�d�.., w'us n
7.. r.. �.x
e.,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
8` ""
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is
required; check all that app v) r1°
_
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
_
No ��.m''� Depth (inches): ' IS
Water Table Present? Yes
_ No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No ,,Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
L=A
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W P' ,J(" u e
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
_ r
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
2. „1: -��i�. �'F ° � �
3
4.
Percent of Dominant Species ;^ 0
5
That Are OBL, F. — - - — 10 (A/B)
6.
\
Prevalence lndexworksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
0131- species x 1 =
r.
d
=Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
Saplinq /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ,,,J` )
3 =
1
FAC species x
FACU species x 4 =
2 -,t _
UPL species x =
3. ?.ry ;/"r d", ' i/ Y "a,,✓
Column Totals (A) ) (B)
4
5.
Prevalence Index = B /A=
6.
Hydrop ytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
, "•`--
,�`,n Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
ORapid
1.,2- Dominance Test is >50% -
g.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
10.
—�q—
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ° )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
_
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. C�
3
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
7
B.
Sapling /Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
g
10.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11
12.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
`
_ = Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
Present? Yes _ No
6.
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

SOIL
/
Sampling Point: LL E �' °- fa §"7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
A,4
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Location: PL =Pore Linin , M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Dark Surface (37) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Cloyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No
Remarks:
I
-(
ell;
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

Project/Site: _,
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s): _
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
/j y�
l`( ( °f (IT v, I'o rr,` -9 Ci /Count .L 4 � ���'`rJ�f � �, Ali3 /'
j� + '9 p�. ty y: Sampling Date:
4✓r r? 7- ! ! i o A w rL State: LJC-- Sampling Point: tW "ems
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name: A 4
Section, Township, Range: _ LV a -
Local relief (concave, convex, none): In b"P Slope ( %): ! `%
Let: ��. -t Z�� . (' t�l '� Long: Datum: 1
��AY`!�'� j6p.r� - +. �d° C ,1 NWl classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 4 :-,'No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 1 -!1se_, Soil or Hydrology Iv significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation 3br'� , Soil, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes I," No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes L.r7 -No _ Is the Sampled A?ea
within a Wetland. Yes `- No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �! No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re wired
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Hi Water Table (A2)
ydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Oxidized
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
aturation (A3)
i' Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
eomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
Micrgtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
F C-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
//
Surface Water Present? Yes t/ No
Depth (inches) �+
-
Water Table Present? Yes No
� / Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes = / No
_' -Depth (inches). E%
//
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca i lary fringe)
_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant >
2. ����� �
3.
Species Across All Strata:. (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
OBL species x 1 =
=Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: l<"�
)
FACW species x2=
1
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2 &'1�°,,d f �+° > �^ r':'-
3
4 _�
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
\
\
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50
9'
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
_
Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
,.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1 9'34 ( +"' p w
_
—
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
p
3.s"'N^a x- Ca'��' ?��
4. .1 8, a4
1j F&
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5 w..
-� -
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7,
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall,
12.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
=Total Cover
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: .k °i
)
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic -
Vegetation //
Present? Yes o
4, N
5.
6
),t� =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
IV le ipe
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: (-, I,.? a _ 4°" ef,
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
Q La ! 7dD
U
it —..,.
r4.
Ion,
/U - -
1
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
C-Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
'. Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
;
jJ
US Army Corps of Engineers 41 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Jacob Byers. PE
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201, Asheville, NC 28806
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Project is located in the City of Mount Airy in Surry County NC and consist of a 2.2 mile long linear greenway trail.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Surry City: Mount Airy
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36.47661 °N; Long. - 80.605513 W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Lovills Creek and Ararat River
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
14,216 linear feet: 40 -60 width (ft) and /or 026 acres.
Cowardin Class: PEMtPFo
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 026 acres.
Cowardin Class: PEM /PFo
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Michael Baker International, LLC
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
app ❑nt /consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
El
❑✓
❑✓
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5, Mount Airysouth
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Surry County
❑✓ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Mount Airy South
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: DFIRM Panels 5020, 5030, 5929, 5939
0 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: 990.6 - 1000.0 Feet
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): 2014 or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
ignaW re aild date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Multiple Waterbodies
Waters Name
Cowardin Code
Measurement Type
Amount
Units
Waters Type
Lat
Long
Class
Note
WA
PEM /PFO
Area
0.002843
Acres
RPWWN
36.487509
- 80.599818
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
WB
PEM /PFO
Area
0.128832
Acres
RPWWN
36.486513
- 80.60033
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
WC
PEM /PFO
Area
0.007677
Acres
RPWWN
36.47979
- 80.600641
Non - Section 10 Wetland
WD
PEM /PFO
Area
0.005356
Acres
RPWWN
36.479233
- 80.600492
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
WE
PEM /PFO
Area
0.054594
Acres
RPWWN
36.478952
1 - 80.606106
1 Non - Section 10 Wetland
I No Impact
WF
PEM /PFO
Area
0.028326
Acres
RPWWN
36.482407
- 80.607522
Non - Section 10 Wetland
WG
PEM /PFO
Area
0.03487
Acres
RPWWN
36.486227
- 80.614212
Non - Section 10 Wetland
I No Impact

"I0� WAS �G
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes NX No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
NX Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes NX No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Mount Airy Greenway Connector Project ( NCDOT TIP Project No. EB -5014)
2b.
County:
Surry
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mount Airy
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
EB -5014
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See attached sheet
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
See attached sheet
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
See attached sheet
3d.
Street address:
See attached sheet
3e.
City, state, zip:
See attached sheet
3f.
Telephone no.:
See attached sheet
3g.
Fax no.:
See attached sheet
3h.
Email address:
See attached sheet
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Mitch Williams (City Engineer, City of Mount Airy, NC)
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
N/A
4d.
Street address:
440 East Pine Street
4e.
City, state, zip:
Mount Airy, NC 27030
4f.
Telephone no.:
336- 786 -3580
4g.
Fax no.:
336- 719 -7540
4h.
Email address:
mwilliams @mountairy.org
5.
Agent /Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jacob Byers, PE
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Michael Baker International, LLC
5c.
Street address:
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
5d.
City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC, 28806
5e.
Telephone no.:
828- 350 -1408 Extension 2001
5f.
Fax no.:
828- 350 -1409
5g.
Email address:
jbyers @mbakerintl.com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See attached
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.480348 Longitude: - 80.600503
1 c.
Property size:
acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Lovills Creek and Ararat River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C and C
2c.
River basin:
Yadkin
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The land uses along proposed project are primarily fallow fields, existing maintained sewer easements, and wooded areas along Lovills Creek and the
Ararat River.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.26
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 14,216
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a new greenway trail.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Requested
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company: Baker Engineering
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A Jurisdictional determination request has been submitted simultaneously with this PCN.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Floodplain Pool
No
Corps
0.03
W2 P
Fill
Floodplain Pool
No
Corps
0.006
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.036
2h. Comments:
Impacts for W1 and W2 are due to unavoidable impacts near the US 52 bridges on Lovills Creek and the Ararat River. There are clearance and utility
conflicts at both of these impacted wetlands which are inside NCDOT right of ways which precludes the use of boardwalks. Also, NCDOT generally
discourages any structures within their Right of Ways (See Figure 5).
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T )
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes /No
B2 -
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The alignment of the greenway has been designed so as to avoid all possible wetland areas except for where topography and easement boundaries
would not allow. There are clearance and utility conflicts at both of the impacted wetlands which are inside NCDOT right of ways which precludes the
use of boardwalks. Also, NCDOT generally discourages any structures within their Right of Ways (See Figure 5).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Unimpacted existing wetlands will be surrounded by safety fence to protect them during construction. Best Management Practices and a
sedimentation and erosion control plan will be followed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
5
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Not subject to General Certifications 3704 or 3705.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑X Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑X No
letter.) A draft NCDOT Programmatic Categorical Exclusion has been submitted for review.
Comments: The approval will be submitted to USACE once received.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
(http: / /www.ncnhp.org) To be determined by site specific survey for Schweinitz/s sunflower during appropriate blooming windows. Small whorled
pogonia survey was completed in May 2014 and none were found. Sunflower survey scheduled for Sep /Oct 2014. Results to be provided ASAP.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
CWRC, NCDWQ, and USFWS website ( http:// nc- es.fws.gov /es /countyfr.htmi). A letter was also sent to USFWS. See attached.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Office of Archives and History website and NRIS database was searched. A letter was also sent to the NC Office of State and Archaeology and
the NC Historic Preservation Office. The response letter is attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A No -Rise Certification has been obtained and approved by the Suny County Floodplain Administrator.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
Jacob Byers
07 -10 -2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
A ent's Signature
gent's ignatura is valid only if an authorization
letter from the a li:ant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

A. Applicant Information
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
A - 3. Owner Information
B —1. Property Identification
Parcel ID 592907595624
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Dwayne M. Carter
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 00718, Page: 0528
3c. Responsible Party for LLC: N/A
3d. Street Address: 213 Apollo Drive
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336 - 789 -2979
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 1.38
Parcel ID 592907597737
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Bray Properties LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01426, Page: 00627
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address:
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336 - 786 -6182
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 3.1

Parcel ID 592907691355
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Rivertrack Crossing LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01204, Page: 0267
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 173 Pinecreek Trail
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 789 -4911
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 1.3
Parcel ID 592907694371
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Rivertrack Crossing LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01260, Page: 0385
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 173 Pinecreek Trail
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336 - 789 -4911
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 2
Parcel ID 592908788515
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: C Richard Vaughn Sr. Trust
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01404, Page: 0068
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: PO Box 1928
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030

3f. Telephone No.: 336- 719 -1754
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 25.58
Parcel ID 592908778604
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01271, Page: 0541
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 7800 Airport Center Drive, Suite 102
3e. City, State, Zip: Greensboro, NC 27409
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 662 -0002
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 4.94
Parcel ID 592912768943
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Dorothy A. Simmons
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 008, Page: 0076
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 829 West Main Street
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336 - 789 -2517
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 11.12
Parcel ID 592912971054

3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Mount Airy Church of God
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 00279, Page: 0499
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: PO Box 1445
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 789 -2517
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 9.13
Parcel ID 592908974645
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Mount Airy
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01260, Page: 1093
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 300 Main Street
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 786 -3501
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 0.15
Parcel ID 592908971858
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: HIRA Properties, INC.
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01394, Page: 1001
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 455 North Andy Griffith Parkway
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336 - 786 -3501

3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 3
Parcel ID 592908985064
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Mount Airy
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01054, Page: 0888
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 300 Main Street
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 786 -3501
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 6.33
Parcel ID 592908980400
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Mount Airy
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01054, Page: 0888
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 300 Main Street
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 786 -3501
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 2.18
Parcel ID 592908896311

3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Housing Authority of the Town of Mount Airy
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 00291, Page: 0273
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 300 Main Street
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 786 -8321
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 29.48
Parcel ID 592908996921
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Mount Airy
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01222, Page: 0185
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 300 Main Street
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336- 786 -3501
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 1.13
Parcel ID 502020907747
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Mount Airy City Board of Education
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 01218, Page: 1052
3c. Responsible Party for LLC:
3d. Street Address: 130 Rawley Avenue
3e. City, State, Zip: Mount Airy, NC, 27030
3f. Telephone No.: 336 - 786 -8355

3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email Address
Property Size (acres) 22.98
B — 3e.
The City of Mount Airy (Surry County) proposes to construct a new greenway trail that will connect the
existing Emily B. Taylor Greenway with the Ararat River Greenway. The proposed greenway will connect
to the Emily B. Taylor Greenway at Worth Street where it will then follow Lovills Creek to its confluence
with the Ararat River. The proposed greenway will then proceed north, following the Ararat River
upstream, ending at Tharrington Park at the southern end of the Ararat River Greenway. The proposed
greenway is approximately 2.2 miles long with a 10 -foot wide asphalt surface and will support bicycle
and pedestrian travel. The project vicinity and corridor are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Two small
wetlands will be impacted. The total impacts are approximately 0.036 acres. Unimpacted wetland areas
will be protected using orange safety fence. The greenway will cross Lovills Creek along a pedestrian
bridge. During construction of the bridge, no fill or construction materials will be placed below the
OHWM of Lovills Creek. A Sedimentation and Erosion Control plan and permit will be followed. This
includes, silt fence, pipe inlet and outlet protection, temporary rock dams, and temporary gravel
construction entrances. Excavators, bull dozers, dump trucks, a small crane, and various smaller tools
and equipment will be used during construction. All excavated materials and cleared and grubbed
materials will be disposed of as to not cause pollution. All disturbed areas will be stabilized with
temporary seeding and mulching. The greenway is proposed to be a 10' asphalt path that generally
follows the course of Lovills Creek and the Ararat River.

Renee Gledhill - Earley April 29, 2014
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -4617
Subject: Greenway Project in Surry County
Dear Ms. Gledhill - Earley,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) requests review and comment
on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources
associated with a proposed extension of the Ararat River Greenway to connect with the
Emily B. Taylor Greenway in Mt. Airy North Carolina. The project is included in the
current State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as project EB -5014.
A vicinity map (Figure 1), a USGS site map with potential areas of potential ground
disturbance (Figure 2), and a map from the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office GIS Web Service website showing the proposed extent of disturbance are enclosed.
No architectural structures or archeological artifacts have been observed during preliminary
surveys of the site. The site is in an urban area with substantial previous site disturbance.
As Figure 2 shows, the greenway will be located within the historic floodplains of the Ararat
River and Lovills Creek.
We conducted a site review using the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office GIS
Web Service website (http:Hais.ncdcr.gov/h /hpoweb /). The search found no listed sites in the
vicinity of the project area, as the nearest listed sites are the Mount Area Furniture Company
site (since destroyed), site SR0381, and the Mt. Airy Historic District (site SR0661).
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to
contact us with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance
associated with this project.
Sincerely,
/�� 4'�4-j
Ken Gilland, P.G.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Phone: [phone]
Email: kgilland @mbakercorp.com

7 -03
Ste
a
�s
T
Mount Airy
Bus
/ L 52
N
yawn
w`���i� �"�Ia�i �►�t+.1
77
poll
i
p,
_J�
4 d
Bus
1 Project Location
s
ed,C
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Ararat River Site
Mount Airy, NC
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway
Suite 600
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
I
I

was -W
Legend
h 5
� 5 " i I- i i i ��� �•� .. -�
Proposed Connecting Greenway 5 = x mss} r
Ararat River Greenway (existing)
Emily B Taylor Greenway (existing)
Streams
s •: Iy #
``'ti 5 M1F u y ry 5 5 x5 a +1y p, ,I { i 'i '`4 A•� v't "'t
' ,.. � ,. .`�.•'. � ..,'�: �•);��:�.' �+° ' 601 �::F, .`'6.; :��� -µ� ,• y` 'S �J'�„*'�` .r
1
r 5
_r
1 Ji^
YL-
IM 1 f a • ..,. 9` 5 , F-.,} �4 s 1,yt l ;fir f - (��a�
1 }�yy `�'� �� Fy• f "5S - h -y_ " -- LS 1r -4 I; 5f' } d � �'— �l
L ti 1' � � � 1 I �- I �. 511�}'e r y
i \ ljt I 5 ,L l � ti_ `4
' J 5 r 5, 5 J5 5 5Fr 0.t A �, J
w.,
'il{,• 5'^- �4x,5�i•'s.q .M1;_ti5 i ❑ � .'
iN ++ S
5�
y
1
it 1 �✓4 r ".:
L i f.
■ 601 r i ti
s
}
VL
L 1
1J f
* F
i 4 ,r /f f }� XN
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. Figure 2.
- 8000 Regency Parkway O C J oo .5'000
Suite Egg I Proposed River Project
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Phone: [phone] Feet Ararat River Site
Fax: [phone]
Mount Airy, NC

SR0425 Jim Affano House {Gone) (4
j"ti V4
lfC i�j � 5 10 ti th S' g312Trin.ity Episcopal Churoh 1988 y
+a� �� wrrel SRO Renfr Mi11244u um of Regiflnal History t
r �rw� p inia St CemetaN
Ton i c� 't'f SR O- BOiMountAiryHistoricDstric-t9 Ondl Inns se 21712' S RUt�WilliarhAlfredMmxeHouse1968
ROUI der Rd
�ovilt Si 5 �
SRO'D19 SM S 'I ' RU MtDUNTAIRY HISTO IC DISTRICT,9885
SR6452 Syk as- MosetyCorn NIi1I (Gone?) �C..g� r } � . ■SR038 r�6dward CjAgF y House 2+0]14
SR0450 Stewarts 6eelk Primitive Baptist Church (White) * #i°
tf
SRO 384 ,ad ley, Smith a Cd Plug Tots cm F, � _, �
SR0 3 . a i hRailmad Depot 1983 R€t88 n Airy Local- Hstorb Dis trict 1994 vt
' r,W?jj � # , SRO 9 W. F. Cartes House 1983
*.�
k6nvrood Dr „ a pry ; , SR0424 Keystone Bridge 1383
Ca;V -1rY Dr 1�t� ■
env od Dr face
St
,. �' HJFnbur.g St
o r SRQ'381 Mount Airy Furni�ureCompeny� {fsone),,1983 ��r,don tin a
V '�, ■ rte`'
Bauemont Rd CyOL. rile �Hilda [}r zn
�kl E MaYMOreSI sl
it, f 010% SR0422 Hd5 sW'KtOWn
{ �L' LP ,SRD421 House
SURRY
44 41
Pena St 69 19 � E
trr qo� id' s 1P, 4`
0tit�Et4
Sip y�1V1 QE i. Sunset Dr ;10
Jelferles Si 0 *'V'". IICW
AUStinn
10 4
RL'eV eg r CP
t SR4289 S. M. Inman House � mr �
M 4�ri 13J 1lOey d G01_q SR4420 Mrajah a Reeves Hous9—
ter jS e3tmeBl Rd
~ StO '6
,WWnS rn Ave " q`
� 00k1 en, Ave b Boones
a b?
$. L HIII
i
AP4t44 J5r __ � SourcesDEsri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS,'lntermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN,'Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),_Esri (Thailand), TomTom

l�� 1,1\1,1 •
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
May 15, 2014
Ken Gilland
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NC 27518
Re: Ararat River Greenway, EB -5014, Surry County, ER 14 -0905
Dear Mr. Gilland:
Thank you for your letter of April 29, 2014, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or renee.gledh&
earleykncdcr.go v. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: [phone] -6599

Marella Buncick, June 16, 2014
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: NCDOT Greenway Project in Surry County (STIP No. EB- 5014).
Dear Ms. Buncick,
The City of Mount Airy ( Surry County) proposes to construct a new greenway trail that will
connect the existing Emily B. Taylor Greenway with the Ararat River Greenway. The
proposed greenway will connect to the Emily B. Taylor Greenway at Worth Street where it
will then follow Lovills Creek to its confluence with the Ararat River. The proposed
greenway will then proceed north, following the Ararat River upstream, ending at
Tharrington Park at the southern end of the Ararat River Greenway. The proposed
greenway is approximately 2.2 miles long with a 10 -foot wide asphalt surface and will
support bicycle and pedestrian travel. The project vicinity and corridor are shown in
Figures 1 and 2. The proposed environmental documentation for this project is a
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE). We are requesting your input as we prepare the
PCE and permit applications.
We have already obtained an updated species list for Surry County from your web site
(http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh/ species /cntylist /nc_counties.html). Currently listed threatened
or endangered species for this county are: Bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii), Schweinitz's
sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides).
Potential habitat for small whorled pogonia and Schweinitz's sunflower exists within the
proposed greenway slopestakes. Surveys were conducted for small whorled pogonia on
May 28, 2014 (within the survey window for the species) and the species was not found.
There are no listed occurrences of the species within two miles of the project area, based on
a review of a shapefile of known protected species occurrences provided by the North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) in 2013. For this reason, it is
anticipated that the project will have no effect on the small whorled pogonia.
There are also no known occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower within two miles of the
project study area. Surveys for the species (during the September survey window) will be
undertaken prior to submission of the permit for the project, and USFWS will be contacted
if the species is found.
The bog turtle is listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance and effects
determinations are currently not required for this species.
Please provide comments on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to protected
resources from the construction of this greenway project. If we have not heard from you in
30 days we will assume that our species list is correct, that you do not have any comments
regarding associated laws, and that you do not have any information relevant to this project
at the current time.

We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to
contact us with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance
associated with this project.
Sincerely,
h j
Ken Gilland, P.G.
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NC 27518
Phone: [phone]
Email: kgilland @mbakerintl.com

CITY OF
l'\ MT. AIRY
104 i
103
89
BUS
BYP 52
52 ,
PROJECT ' $9
r`
LOCATION ;= v
601 J
52
74
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF MOUNT AIRY
NORTH CAROLINA
LOVILLS CREEK AND
ARARAT RIVER GREENWAY
LOCATION
FROM WORTH STREET TO
THARINGTON P RK
BEGIN PROJECT
—L— STA 8 +47.46
INDEX OF SHEETS
1 TITLE
2 IMPACT SUMMARY &
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
3 -8 PLANSHEETS
DESIGN DA TA
DESIGN SPEED = 20 MPH
LEAN ANGLE = 15 DEGRESS
FUNC. CLASSIFICATION = GREENWAY
DESIGN DA TA
LENGTH OF PROJECT = 2.19 MILES
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 25 0 50 100
�llutlffiwww- L ali
PLANS
NCDOT TIP: EB -5014
WBS: 45522.3.1
FA# STPEB- 1117(15)
TYPE OF WORK:
GRADING, PAVING, STRUCTURE,
DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL
PERMITS REQUIRED:
NCDENR (DLR permit)
USACE (404 Permit)
al PENN STREET
O
Y
U
O
SUNSET DRIVE Zmo
0
01.
m�,
m.
404
PERMIT DRAWINGS
;END PROJECT
— L —ISTA 124 +11.04
�o
Ww
re
i
r%%
THARINGTON
PARK
J
I
c:) -- - --
Ul
GP'
P
LQ
Q
D�
zz
Qw
�w
w
wu
Uw
J �
J
i~
o�
J Q
Q
CD 00
= 7 N
ai
>,z
_ � J
W Q
Q
�C �Uri�a
(Q T CO
as cl) o cy) M
cc f2f ��Z��U)
C) (6 L (x6 2
coUa_ LL -i
f.
z
O
z
a
O
w
U)
oC
O
IPRELIMINARY PLANS I
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
REVISIONS:
NO. I DATE
NKUJtl.I NU.:
H13007.00
I 1

IMPACT SUMMARY
Multiple Waterbodies
Waters Name
Cowardin Code
Measurement Type
Amount
Units
Impact Amount (AC)
Waters Type
Lat
Long
Class
Note
WA
PEM /PFO
Area
0.002843
Acres
0.000
RPWWN
36.487509
- 80.599818
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
WB
PEM /PFO
Area
0.128832
Acres
0.000
RPWWN
36.486513
- 80.60033
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
WC
PEM /PFO
Area
0.007677
Acres
0.006
RPWWN
36.47979
- 80.600641
Non - Section 10 Wetland
WD
PEM /PFO
Area
0.005356
Acres
0.000
RPWWN
36.479233
- 80.600492
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
WE
PEM /PFO
Area
0.054594
Acres
0.000
RPWWN
36.478952
- 80.606106
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
WF
PEM /PFO
Area
0.028326
Acres
0.030
RPWWN
36.482407
- 80.607522
Non - Section 10 Wetland
WG
PEM /PFO
Area
0.03487
Acres
0.000
RPWWN
36.486227
- 80.614212
Non - Section 10 Wetland
No Impact
�
Y
Q
Q
ORIGINAL GROUND
2.1
MqX
T
INSET 1
2' SHLD.
0.02
I
10' -0"
I
I
Al
I
0.02 I 0.02
;111- 111 - 111 - 111 -11 , ,1 1 =111- 111 - 111 - 111 - 111 -111 -1 11-
6"
J1 I �_
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
12"
FIELD BEND (TYP.)
0.02
111 ? , MqX ORIGINAL GROUND
-1 18
III-
I -1
I I -1
E6" T
INSET 2
0
�
a
6 " PORTLAND CONCRETE CEMENT PAVEMENT WITH
#4 BARS AT 12" CENTERS (EACH WAY)
C1
PROPOSED
COURSE,
LBS. PER
z
J1
zz
4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE.
O
PROPOSED
QW
T
�
-L-
GEOTEXTILE SEPERATOR FABRIC.
W
z
2' SHLD. 5' 5' 3' W/ FENCING No
W
ct�
i 2'
W
V
Q
=
� GRADE 1 � POTENTIAL
ORIGINAL GROUND I POINT C1 FENCING
2jM i
qk
, `
v
LU
O
0.02 0.02* 0.02* � 0.02
~
24
T k ORIGINAL GROUND
J
W
W
T 8„ GRADE TO THIS LINE T
J2 T
I--I
%
Vl
Q
p�
_
<
TYPICAL SECTION #1- ASPHALT TRAIL
Q�
O
Q
ORIGINAL GROUND
2.1
MqX
T
INSET 1
2' SHLD.
0.02
I
10' -0"
I
I
Al
I
0.02 I 0.02
;111- 111 - 111 - 111 -11 , ,1 1 =111- 111 - 111 - 111 - 111 -111 -1 11-
6"
J1 I �_
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
12"
FIELD BEND (TYP.)
0.02
111 ? , MqX ORIGINAL GROUND
-1 18
III-
I -1
I I -1
E6" T
INSET 2
NOTE: TYPICAL SECTIONS AND MATERIALS ARE
SUBJECT TO FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
�o
_CD CO
L � r
� 7 N
_ J
W Q OJ
4: Q 10
YaUri�o
is T
m ��
7@ �o�,�;
t�Z
a) 0)
o�-
p (6 L M U
y
3' MIN 10' -0" 2' SHLD.*
SEE PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
ABOVE Al
0.02
ORIGINAL GROUND 2. M
1811 ' qX ORIGINAL GROUND DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
2. I- 1 -III -III, ,111 - III - III -III -1 I- _ I -1 REVISIONS:
6" I' 1 -1 I1 -1 1 -1 T NO. DATE
T T J1 12"
TYPICAL SECTION #2 - CONCRETE TRAIL
■
H13007.001
z
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Al
6 " PORTLAND CONCRETE CEMENT PAVEMENT WITH
#4 BARS AT 12" CENTERS (EACH WAY)
C1
PROPOSED
COURSE,
LBS. PER
APPROX. 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE
TYPE S9.513, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 224
SQ. YD.
J1
PROPOSED
4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE.
J2
PROPOSED
6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE.
T
EARTH MATERIAL.
V1
GEOTEXTILE SEPERATOR FABRIC.
NOTE: TYPICAL SECTIONS AND MATERIALS ARE
SUBJECT TO FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
�o
_CD CO
L � r
� 7 N
_ J
W Q OJ
4: Q 10
YaUri�o
is T
m ��
7@ �o�,�;
t�Z
a) 0)
o�-
p (6 L M U
y
3' MIN 10' -0" 2' SHLD.*
SEE PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
ABOVE Al
0.02
ORIGINAL GROUND 2. M
1811 ' qX ORIGINAL GROUND DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
2. I- 1 -III -III, ,111 - III - III -III -1 I- _ I -1 REVISIONS:
6" I' 1 -1 I1 -1 1 -1 T NO. DATE
T T J1 12"
TYPICAL SECTION #2 - CONCRETE TRAIL
■
H13007.001
z

I -
BRA Y PROPERTIES LLC
RIVERTRACK
Parcel ID: 592907597737
Deed Book: 01426 Pg: 0627 CROSSING LLC
\ �74v, T RACK Plat Book: 009 Pg: 0027 0 30TC CROSING LLC` IAL5HM07�69Ji Fl
�� O 1 1 LF 18 RCP Deems @&6.Z1� FX -QZ Ll
SO 17LF 24 RCP �� I FD? 842M769140 INV UP= 984.82
0 \ INV IN - 80.3 30 RCP t!� rJM FD. 842M769
\ INV OUT = 980.15 d�YJk^8'�6t Pg: 03 INV DOWN = 987.86
DWAY SEE DETAIL 1
CARTER � �^ ,
SLATE MO R CO I C . V SPECIAL CUT V DITCH D3 20TCB rnj
SLAT 624 \ "�/ - - 26+70 TO 28+55 LT
O G EDWA D rcel ID: 592907595
C/ a ��
D d Book: 00718 Pg: 0528 Q \ INV UP- 983.69 FALSE SUMP
Parcel ID: 59290 92915 �1Q lNV DOWN = 984.32 -
Deed Book: 0053 . 0434 - _ \ SEE DETAIL 1 -_ -------- _ _ \
D - - - - - - EADWALL
Plat Book: 012 P 173
�
0.
WET
- _ __—
_ - - - - - --
24L RCP '
P \, \ \ \ \ \;,, F 30 \ o - INV IN - 980 90 '
INV OUT= 980.60
— - - /
=; 066 ; \\ \ O N N
'-' - ,
--- _��� - -_ PROP CLASS I , RIP P °- p \
` L=10 FEET,. _7 /
� `` - -- - -_ `t56 17 � \� -_-� � `OVI�� --__ -_ �, -- H LL 17 SY FILTER FABRIC "�
O -__ - -__ - - - -- - -�_
o = ---- __ - - - -- __ - - - -_ CREEK PRO /CLASS 'I' RIP RAP \
N 00 L =$` FEET, 4 TONS W/
Nti 12 SY FILTER FABRIC
US 52 0 0 ---- _�_ -____ o
N O __ 1 P—
� 4
,
N N P—
N
DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
Not to Scale)
o Front
Ditch
Natural �et Slope
Ground .1 D ��O
d
-- ` Geotextile Min. D-1 Ft.
Type of Liner= B' Rip -Rap Max. d =1 Ft.
FROM —L— STA. 26 +70 TO STA. 28 +55 LT
°������'�'
'a
w ►�
Q Q
LU
LU
LU (D
LU
ul—
U
Uj
~
Q
O
p�
a
0
c
= � CO
L
d
C N
U)
a� , z
c _
W �
G) a
C d U L o
f3 U =
00 rf V (h
as � z
ca�z �
2 � � c'
O O X U
CD (6 0- @
mUau__,
I----t
-,
1
III
Hill
III
1 1
PRELIMINARY PLANS
D® NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
--
--
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—.
—.
—.
DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
_-
REVISIONS:
NO. DATE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
_
-
-
_-
-
___
_-
___
__
_
__-
-
___
_-
__-
__
___
_-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
_
_
_
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
PROJECT NO.:
-
-
-
-
L
H13007.00
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-

1 �
LIM NS OROTHY A` PIEDMONT AUTHORITY
1 FOR REGIONAL
Parc ID: 592908777873 TRANSPORTATION
Dee Book: 01125 Pg: 09 8�
1 [at Book.- 26 Pg:
/ Parcel ID: 592908778604
1 Deed Book: 01271 Pg: 0541
/ Plat Book: 26 Pg: 37
C RICHARD VAUGHN
SR TRUST FBO
GRANDCHILDREN
Parcel ID: 592908788515
Deed Book: 01404 Pg: 0068 , -'" _ " -' ; ; ' ,' < ='
- - -_ _ ,- W
- - -- ---- - - - - -� -MEyT_ - - - - - -_ W
- -- W
C — — _��E
28LF DOUBLE 24" RCP WETLAND F \ --- -' -- -
�- -- �
INV IN = 983.00 e _ O
INV OUT = 982.30 F // - - - - == SEMEN=--== =F - —_c �� /�� F -- F - -� o
Z10N Ems__ -- _�� G �;_�-- - - =`- _ - O
G1 RV A �/ \
- - - -- -EONS �� F _ - - -f- \\
_ _ +
_- -
EAS MENT �� - - - -- - - _ - = =- - __ - -____ _`,' %'� C -_ C =_ - -= — = —E �� ��_� F
N - - --
ANNELIZATi� `, = -- - �`\ - ___ - -_= -� �_ -- _�� C _ -- --== = =____ __---- - - - --- -- -- ____ =_, " -> LO
50 E� F -_- - _ -_,' / _ - -= - --= ------ �' - -_ -\ _ ____ -__
,/
_ _
_ J _
-.Y�� E p O
—
�, ,PROP CLASS IP RAP =
L =16 FEE , 1'3 TO S W/ - - - -- �� -� J O `�
\ �� O-
/' 36 Y FILTER ABRIC
o __-- _ -___- - - - -__ -
�- D�- -- ,rte _��- _
Q
,rte
`r ►� a
W` r G
0 Z
z z o
w
Z
LU
w v a
U w
oC/
I-
V
O
0,
7 N
_ Q
Z
_ J
W � 0,0
d: Q 0
-V c) 120'
is T (O M
7 0 �
i Z
L) O T C C
0 L (X6 U
�2aoUdL�J
i
a
N
\. Q
ASPHALT LAYER
IMPACT = 0.03ac
a
CIO -
�ID®
--
CROSS
a
c
CIO
__ _
1,
000
SECTION
F — F'
1,000
V
°
D
1
\
-
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
_
TH
_
-
-
-.
DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
-
WETLAND
-
III
REVISIONS:
NO. DATE
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
.
xi
iiiiiiii
11111
1111
1
-
PROJECT NO.:
H13007.00
kH k
10 +00
TH
I d IMH H H_ 1 "= 2.5' Horizontal _
1" = 5' Vertical
Itt-
11 +00

SIMMONS DOROTHY
A
THE
Parcel ID: 592912768943
--
M`
Deed Book: 01125 Pg:
0968
== ss = ===
/ Plat Book: 008 Pg:
0076
ss:______ --
WETLAND E
Lu
U-1
W
W
— — —
zz o
C)
C)
,-
,
Q w
o
- - - - --
--
-
�-
W z
+
/
LO /6
LU
985 \\��
- - -_
(D
TZ
�c- \_
- ----- -
- - --" - ` - - --
- - -- _ _ __
- - -- --
=
=/ - -,__���
�{-p- /�----------- --- --_-__-
--- Ji_/-- --
--
-
__--------
- -_,
N
O
®}_ - -_� - -= -_ __= _= - o-= '�� - -
- - -- ,-
'�- - "___ /' - -;
J W Lu
LOVILLS CREEK
(D- g70
E--�
-==- = =-_ --
-- /
-
J
,-
.J
Q
O
1
1
V
C
1
CD
=OQp
L �
a1 Z
� � J
W 30000
m c. QLrnv
Y aUri� o
(C �. co M -
m C LL
d N 0 6j
Z
1
o ce i c
V p (6 L (u.2
co
�2 U�Li
1
1
PRELIMINARY PLANS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
D® NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
_ -.
_
-
rmm
DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
REVISIONS:
--
--
-
NO.
DATE
-
-
-
-_
_ -_.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
iiiii-k
_
PROJECT NO.:
H13007.00
-

MT AIRY CHURCH 0
GOD
- Parcel ID: 592912971054
Deed Book: 00279 Pg: 0499
.pps
- ; 1III,I 11 �I�I11 11I ' 1 %II 'II `'i 1I1I1i1I1I1I1 I/ I/I // /
/
q6
III;;
Q) vvvvvv vvvvv I'll I 1
\` �' �` \ \\ WETLAND D '
Is-
d
--
* O 0Q_- - -- - -__ --
' II 1
N ___ _ _ ,
UD
Qis
OZ6 \ ` \ \\ \ :� \ \ �/ '/' ' ✓/ lii/ ' iilill 111
;v;;v�
S
I
\I OF
LL
C
Lu
LU
L
V J
Lu
w
O
Of q
L m<Lo O V
d Q 0-)
1aUri'To
mLr)LL
W C � � LL
Z �Orn�st
.� of Z
V o L c c
c p (6 U
G OO U d LL J
I
1
PRELIMI4ARY PLANS
D® NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
--
--
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-- —.
—
—
..— —
—
DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
REVISIONS:
NO. DATE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HIH
PROJECT NO.:
-
-
-
-
H13007.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

/
BEROTH OIL CO
\
TiE
7:1
'
28LF 18 „ RCP INC
INV = 981.50 /
INV OUT= 981.25 Parcel ID: 592908972658
. / Deed Book 0 1260 Pg:
/
\
•
1093
CIO)
/
� i I
w N \
w C
_ HIRA / P
� � P TIE
ul) ';�' INC CENTRAL CONTINUING
w
cn = %' '' 11001 WETLAND C CARE ASSOC
o \ , , I
CD o , P el ID: 5929089718
o ;; Deed Book: 01394 Pg: 100
Ln CI OF UNT AIRY - - /;'' '
- - ='' Parcel ID: 592908980106
Deed Book: 00497 Pg: 1367
_- _ ; ; , _ _ , y Parcel ID: 592908974645
;
- - - -- -- � - , --,�_; _�__
- Plat Book, 25 �gT
U) _
6 '
_
� _ —_- ___ - �- - -- -_ I I I I I I' \ \_ \\ � \ \ \� \\
-R1�E - O`6- -_ -- S-0\ , II
, � �
Ep - --� ,�\ \ \I \ \ \\ \ � \ 1 // I 11111 /1111 �6 O
�
°
°
O O
° J
Q -
CITY OF MOUNT AIRY
Parcel ID: 592908985064
Deed Book: 01054 Pg: 0888
I� /
1111 1111111 I / I/ I 1
III 111111
/ ///
\ II 1111111
DC
Q
a
w ~
uj
Lu
Lu
� / ui
UJ
\\ T
O
oC
Q
° 00
L0
� 7 N
_�
W 3 J
O 0,
Q
Y d U ri v o
W-
�O�rn
��Z (1) 0.) N
o L)
o m 0- m -i
ooUaliJ
,
CROSS SECTION C - C'
111111
1
11
11
-JI
a
V1 O Q N
m m 0
a
ASPHALT LAYER 3 J
990
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
--
!
-_
-
-
-
--
-
-
- --
-
-
-
--
-
---
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
- --
-
_
_
PRELIMINARY PLANS
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
_._
_
_
_
D® NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
i
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
REVISIONS:
980
WETLAND IMPACT = 0.006ac
-
NO. DATE
- _.-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
\
--.
-
PROJECT NO..
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
III III III III
1 ” = 2.5' Horizontal
=
H13007.00
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
-
--
-
1" = 5' Vertical
\
--
-
--
10
+00 11 +00

HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE TOWN OF MT
AIRY
Parcel ID: 592908896311
Deed Book: 00291 Pg: 0273
- - - - --
-- --
- -_-
-"
-'
- - -
O
-—
O
o
I
I
SURRY COUNTY
I
'
Parcel ID: 502020901180
Deed Book: 01312 Pg: 0352
I
I
\
I
WETLAN D B
\ \ \ 990_�
� - - -- _ _ , , - , ; - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - - � �, ,'
- -- -- -- �� 1111H I
- --
-- _ - -- - - --
-: r-----
i
lit
--
o
CITY -OF MOUNT AIRY c°v �i oo� C-)
O � N
Parcel ID: 592908996g2�
O Deed Book: 012 g: 0185
28 " RCP Plat Book: 5 Pg: 0051
INV IN= 985.75
I NV OUT = 985.50
ARARAT RIVER -
_ p PROP CLASS 1"P­-RA
—�— -- ti L=16 f T',13 TONS W/
FILTER FABRIC
I
I
I
MT AIRY CITY BOARD
OF ED
Parcel ID: 502020907747
Deed Book: 01218 Pg: 1052
THARI N GTO N PARK
-
- - - - --
O
c\j
�
oC
Q
c-
C
Z Z �
Q LLJ
w Z
Lu rn
V
w a
J w
I-
Q Ln
J �C
,�/ �
0
= o
L r
U
_
_ � N
- Q
= J
W Y O co
C dUr>vm
a LL
CO Cz LL
d �OrnCF)
V c
C 0 (6 L @ U
C 00 U d LL J
-
-i
11
HI
11
1
Hill
1,000
1 000
990
990
-
PRELIMINARY PLANS
D® NOT USE FOR C®NSTRUCTMN
--
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-�
HIT
-1
DATE: JUNE 2, 2014
970
+H_
+H
-
++i
-
-_
-
970
REVISIONS:
NO. DATE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-----------
-
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
_
+F
-
_
_H_
__
___
__
-
_-
++1_++i++_
_-
__
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
_.-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
I
t
k
PROJECT NO.:
-
-
-
-
H13007.00
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
4-1
113 114 115 116 117 18 119 120 121 122 123 124 125
8