740011_Inspection_20220802

Facility Number
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Techntcat Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow -up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access
Date of Visit: I%— J Arrival Time: • 3.54— Departure Time: JJ' jc�_ County: Region: 4,-▪ 4LJ
Farm Name: 0.r .,rk c n-.CI lNIC4twin V cal rY Owner Email;
Owner Name: F . re nool. 1 'ti_&.. Phone:
Mailing Address: c9I b l \oCd,oz r f r
Physical Address:
GfetRoae KJ C. J Z
Facility Contact: Zj -flew
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Hack -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
le:KIn trz
Title: Phone:
I.atitudc:
Integrator: Srvi
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
N
Feeder to Finish
(05 k)
I Cllt7
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Cults
Boars
Other
Design Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pap.
Layer
Non -Layer
I urkev
I nrke I'ultll5
Cattle Capacity Pup.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Call
Dr Cun
!t.el'Feeder
Ike l Brood Com
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I_ Is any discharge obsen.cd from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field 0 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made''
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes. notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system} (If yes, notify DWR)
2, is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Miters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page f 43
❑ Yes N{, [] NA ❑ itil•:
❑Yes ❑too ❑NA QNE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NA CI NI'
El Yes LIN ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Ycs No El NA CI NE
511212020 Continued

■
(Facility Number: `l\ -
1
Date of Inspection. Si -,-
i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Tess than adequate?
a. l f yes. is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
"rTf'
❑ Ycs [./N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Nu ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0 'Jo D NA ❑ N E
(Le., large trees, severe erosion. seepage, etc,)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a D Yes ❑'o 0 NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment I threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Podding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN . 1O% or 10 Ibs, ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ ID NA ❑Nl:
❑ NA ❑ NE
D. a
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NI-
0 NA ❑\L
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reuuircd Records & Documents
L9. Did the facility fail to hal,e the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? if yes. check
the appropriate box,
❑ WUP ❑checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Waste Application Q Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ElStocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers an irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes
Page2of3
0 Yes
0 Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Eli(o ❑ NA
1_1 N I=1 NA
do ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑- O El NA ❑NE
F: ❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑Other:
❑ Yes
040
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
5/J2 2O2O Comirtued

(Facility, Number: 9 7 -
Date of Inspection: 46i —a - {
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Ss the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) blow.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes Q N - ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andfor document ❑ Yes 07No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? D Yes Do ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately-
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e„ discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility'' 1f yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Ycs ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? ❑ Yes [JN ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -silt representative? ❑ Yes NNA ❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follcirw•-up visit by the same agency' Q Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No Q NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers andfor any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
o.l 1 D- k S-20
C rcL y .2e) 2 Z
P.`L . - S','3'
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3ofJ
Pho?n 'l -ICOSC1
Date: ` 2. —2
114/2U11
J