20190866 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2022_20220815

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190866
Version* 1
Select Reviewer: *
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 08/15/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/15/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Matthew Reid
Project Information
ID#:*
20190866
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
DMS Mitigation Bank
Huntsman
Wilkes
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Huntsman_100123_MY0_2022.pdf 70.36MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Matthew Reid

d- -.
if*, ..,...
i
V
daJ}P`• cif . �"� - P t �cl- �'4w"H & T : R� _. j
l i
MONITORING YEAR 0 HUNTSMAN MITIGATION SITE
Wilkes County, NC
ANNUAL REPORT Yadkin River Basin
FINAL HUC 03040102
DMS Project No. 100123
August 2022 DMS Contract No. 7891
DMS RFP No. 16-007728; Date of Issue: Nov. 13, 2018
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2019-00836
DWR Project No. 20190866
Data Collection Dates: April - May 2022
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

Ftrc STATE f o t,
1.tiF� '3 OI P
i 1, y,,
ROY COOPER A
Governor %,u, - '+
ELIZABETH S.BISER .111 r a
"^�e iz n'w
Secretory ,far Q,q,vmE°'`_
MARC RECKTENWALD NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
July 18, 2022
Ms. Kristi Suggs
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Huntsman Draft MY0 Report Review
Yadkin River Basin—CU#03040102
Wilkes County
DMS Project ID No. 100123
Contract# 7891
Dear Ms. Suggs,
The Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) received the Draft Mitigation Plan for Huntsman from
Wildlands Engineering, Inc on July 6, 2022. The Project is expected to provide 5,816.952 SMUs. The
following are the DMS review team's comments on the draft report.
• Recommend shortening November to Nov. on Title Page when listing 'Date of Issue' so the
entire date will fit on one line.
• Table 1: There is a discrepancy of.001 credits in the credit total shown on Table 1. The
total credits for the site should be 5,816.952. This is the official amount used on the
projects debit ledger. This error appears to occur when the Restoration credits are summed
and/or how Excel rounds. The lower table shows Restoration credits as 5,397.863 but the
upper table sums to 5,397.862. Please revise.
• Table 1: The credit summation for the upper section of the table following the stream
reaches includes the additional credit from the buffer, but the 181.720 additional buffer
credits are not shown as a segment. Please correct to either show 5,635.232 OR add a line
for the wider buffer credits in this section and include in summation.
• Appendix D was not included in the draft hard copy. Please verify all sections are included
with final submittal.
• 2.1.15 Vegetation Monitoring Plots: Mobile Plot 2 and Permanent Plot 6 locations were
switched. As a result, there is not a permanent plot in the old pond bottom on UT1. DMS
recommends including a mobile plot in the pond bottom during MY1 to monitor vegetation
survival in the area.
• 3.4 Stream Areas of Concern: Thank you for providing photos of the Stream Areas of
Concern in Appendix A. Please add these locations to the CCPV. Are there any maintenance
activities planned to correct these issues at this time?
• CCPV: The Fence Line appears to be within the conservation easement in many areas on
the CCPV. The asbuilt survey shows fence locations outside or on the conservation
D E Q North Department Environmental Quality I ision of t
��� 217 WestCarolina Jones Street 1 1652 Mof ail Service Center I RaleighDiv,North CarolinaMitiga 27699-1652ionServices
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental quality 919.707.8976

easement line. Please verify the fence was not installed inside the conservation easement
and ensure correct line work is shown on CCPV.
• CCPV: Recommend changing the color/line type of the conservation easement so it is easily
discernable from other line work.
• Photo Points for Trapper Trib and Rifle Trib do not seem to indicate a defined channel with
bed and bank. These credits are potentially at risk if these tribs are unable to maintain
stream features and become wetlands. Please provide an update in MY1 regarding the
condition of these two tribs.
Digital Deliverable Review:
• Please review the digital data submission 'Surveyed AB Steam Alignment'. The data
submitted is missing two credited reaches from the attribute table and the reported lengths
do not equal the lengths reported in the in the Quantities and Credits Table. The internal
crossing lengths appear to be incomplete and do not equal the platted crossing spatial
extents. The linear feet reported extends outside of the easement boundary on at least one
reach.
• The recorded plat for this project indicates a utility ROW 50 feet in width on UT 1 Reach 1,
and a 30' Utility ROW on North Little Hunting Creek reach 2; the ROW on UT 1 reach 1 has
been attributed as an internal crossing, please verify this is accurate
• The Conservation Easement Boundary submitted differs from the DMS Conservation
Easement Boundary, the restricted convenance area is indicted in note 11 on the recorded
plat as not being included in the conservation easement boundary; please remove this area
from the digital CE submitted.
• There is conflicting language in Tables 2 and 3 as submitted in the report and the digital
table submitted; the performance standards are different for at least one metric and the
project and drainage areas differ. These table must be duplicates with no deviations
between report and digital submission. Please use consistent language in the report and
digital data submission; a crest gauge and a constant stage recorder may measure data
differently and meet differing performance standards.
• The CCPV should include clear Conservation Easement boundary lines; these are obscured
by the parcel lines in a few locations in the report.
At your earliest convenience, please provide a written response letter addressing the DMS
comments provided and one final hard copy of the revised/updated Baseline Monitoring Document
and Record Drawings. The comment response letter should be included in the revised report after
the report cover page. Please include a full final electronic copy with electronic support files on a
CD or USB drive.
Sincerely,
Matthew Reid
Western Project Manager
NCDENR—Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
828-231-7912
D
E A NorthWestCarolinaJ DepartmentStreet11652ofMEnvironmentalService QualityRaleighDivisionNorthofMitigationCarolina276991652ServicesNoarH caaoNn /J/ 217 ones ail Center ,
CAROLINA
of Environmental Quality � 919.707.8976

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
August 2, 2022
ATTN: Matthew Reid
Western Project Manager
NCDEQ— Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: Huntsman Draft MY0 Report Review
Yadkin River Basin — CU# 03040102
Wilkes County
DMS Project ID No. 100123
Contract # 7891
Dear Mr. Matthew Reid:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) has reviewed Division of Mitigation Services' (DMS)
comments from the Draft Monitoring Year 0 (MYO) Report for the Huntsman Mitigation Site.
The report has been updated to reflect those comments. The following Wildlands responses to
DMS's comments are noted below.
DMS Comments, Matthew Reid:
1. Recommend shortening November to Nov. on Title Page when listing 'Date of Issue' so the
entire date will fit on one line.
Wildlands Response: Title page has been updated as recommended.
2. Table 1: There is a discrepancy of .001 credits in the credit total shown on Table 1. The total
credits for the site should be 5,816.952. This is the official amount used on the projects debit
ledger. This error appears to occur when the Restoration credits are summed and/or how
Excel rounds. The lower table shows Restoration credits as 5,397.863 but the upper table
sums to 5,397.862. Please revise.
Wildlands Response: The credit totals have been revised.
3. Table 1: The credit summation for the upper section of the table following the stream reaches
includes the additional credit from the buffer, but the 181.720 additional buffer credits are not
shown as a segment. Please correct to either show 5,635.232 OR add a line for the wider buffer
credits in this section and include in summation.
Wildlands Response: A row has been added to Table 1 for the wider buffer credits.
4. Appendix D was not included in the draft hard copy. Please verify all sections are included
with final submittal.

Wildlands Response: The exclusion of Appendix D from the draft hard copy was an
oversight. Appendix D has been added to the final submittal.
5. 2.1.15 Vegetation Monitoring Plots: Mobile Plot 2 and Permanent Plot 6 locations were
switched. As a result, there is not a permanent plot in the old pond bottom on UT1. DMS
recommends including a mobile plot in the pond bottom during MY1 to monitor vegetation
survival in the area.
Wildlands Response: Since all mobile plots established in MY0 will remain in the same
location for assessment in MY1, mobile plot 2 will be monitored in its current location,
the pond bottom, in MY1.
6. 3.4 Stream Areas of Concern: Thank you for providing photos of the Stream Areas of Concern
in Appendix A. Please add these locations to the CCPV. Are there any maintenance activities
planned to correct these issues at this time?
Wildlands Response: Stream areas of concern have been added to the CCPV maps for
the final submittal. Depending on contractor availability, maintenance activities for
areas of concern will be conducted in either late MY1 or early MY2. Wildlands will
provide a status update in the MY1 report.
7. CCPV: The Fence Line appears to be within the conservation easement in many areas on the
CCPV. The asbuilt survey shows fence locations outside or on the conservation easement
line. Please verify the fence was not installed inside the conservation easement and ensure
correct line work is shown on CCPV.
Wildlands Response: Wildlands verified that the fence line polygon was obtained from
the as -built survey file. The issue was with symbol that was used to reflect the
placement of the fence. The symbol has been corrected and updated, and it now
correctly reflects the alignment of the fence.
8. Recommend changing the color/line type of the conservation easement so it is easily
discernable from other line work.
Wildlands Response: The conservation easement color was changed to red so that it is
easier to see in the CCPV figures.
Digital Deliverable Review:
9. Please review the digital data submission 'Surveyed AB Stream Alignment'. The data
submitted is missing two credited reaches from the attribute table and the reported lengths
do not equal the lengths reported in the in the Quantities and Credits Table. The internal
crossing lengths appear to be incomplete and do not equal the platted crossing spatial
extents. The linear feet reported extends outside of the easement boundary on at least one
reach.
Wildlands Response: The layer submitted was included in error. It was not the correct
finalized layer. The correct finalized layer is now included in the digital submittal.
10. The recorded plat for this project indicates a utility ROW 50 feet in width on UT 1 Reach 1,
and a 30' Utility ROW on North Little Hunting Creek reach 2; the ROW on UT 1 reach 1 has
been attributed as an internal crossing, please verify this is accurate.

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Response: UT1 Reach 1 has been updated to reflect that it is a ROW.
11. The Conservation Easement Boundary submitted differs from the DMS Conservation
Easement Boundary, the restricted convenance area is indicted in note 11 on the recorded
plat as not being included in the conservation easement boundary; please remove this area
from the digital CE submitted.
Wildlands Response: The restricted covenant area was incorrectly labeled as the
conservation easement. As requested, Wildlands separated the two areas into two
separate layer files in the digital submittal.
12. There is conflicting language in Tables 2 and 3 as submitted in the report and the digital
table submitted; the performance standards are different for at least one metric and the
project and drainage areas differ. These table must be duplicates with no deviations
between report and digital submission. Please use consistent language in the report and
digital data submission; a crest gauge and a constant stage recorder may measure data
differently and meet differing performance standards.
Wildlands Response: Tables 2 and 3 of the digital submittal have been updated to
match Tables 2 and 3 of the report.
13. The CCPV should include clear Conservation Easement boundary lines; these are obscured
by the parcel lines in a few locations in the report.
Wildlands Response: The symbol for the parcel boundary line has been changed and
should no longer obscure the Conservation Easement boundary.
As requested, Wildlands has included one hard copy of the revised/updated Baseline
Monitoring Document and Record Drawings. A copy of the DMS comment letter and our
response letter are also included in the report after the cover page. A full final electronic copy
of the report and support files are included as well. Please let me know if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Kristi Suggs
Senior Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]

PREPARED BY:
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

HUNTSMAN MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: Section 1: Project Overview 1-1
1.1 Project Quantities and Credits 1-1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1-3
1.3 Project Attributes 1-5
Section 2: Section 2: As -Built Condition (Baseline) 2-1
2.1 As-Built/Record Drawings 2-1
2.1.1 North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1 2-1
2.1.2 North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2 2-1
2.1.3 UT1 Reach 1 2-1
2.1.4 UT1 Reach 2 2-1
2.1.5 UT1 Reach 3 2-2
2.1.6 UT2 Reach 1 2-2
2.1.7 UT2 Reach 2 2-2
2.1.8 UT2 Reach 3 2-2
2.1.9 UT2 Reach 4 2-2
2.1.10 Rifle Tributary 2-2
2.1.11 Trapper Tributary 2-2
2.1.12 Old Bus Branch 2-2
2.1.13 Barn Branch 2-2
2.1.14 Vegetation Planting List & Plan 2-3
2.1.15 Fencing Overview 2-3
2.1.16 Monitoring Components 2-3
Section 3: Monitoring Year 0 Data Assessment 3-1
3.1 Vegetative Assessment 3-1
3.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern 3-1
3.3 Stream Assessment 3-1
3.4 Stream Areas of Concern 3-2
3.4.1 North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1 3-2
3.4.2 UT1 Reach 1 3-2
3.5 Hydrology Assessment 3-2
3.6 Adaptive Management Plan 3-2
3.7 Monitoring Year 0 Summary 3-2
Section 4: Methodology 4-1
Section 5: REFERENCES 5-1
TABLES
Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits 1-1
Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements 1-3
Table 3: Project Attributes 1-5
FIGURES
Figure 3.0 — 3.2
Current Condition Plan View
Huntsman Mitigation Site
41, Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL

APPENDICES
Appendix A
Table 4a-e
Table 5
Visual Assessment Data
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
MY1 Maintenance Photographs
Appendix B Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6a-b Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Appendix C Stream Geomorphology Data
Pebble Count Plots
Cross -Section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Table 8a-e Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9 Cross -Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Appendix D Project Timeline and Contact Info
Table 10 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 11 Project Contact Table
Appendix E Record Drawings and Sealed As -built Survey
Appendix F Correspondence
DMS Technical Workgroup Memo (10/19/2021)
Pebble Count Data Requirements — M. Reid (10/27/2021 email)
Huntsman Mitigation Site
41, Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL ii

Section 1: Section 1: Project Overview
The Huntsman Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Wilkes County approximately 5 miles south of Ronda
and 8 miles southwest of Jonesville, North Carolina. The Site is located within the North Little Hunting
Creek targeted local watershed (TLW) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040102020030 and will provide
warm stream credits in the South Yadkin 03040102 (Yadkin 02) Cataloging Unit (CU). North Little
Hunting Creek and its tributaries are classified as Water Supply III (WS-III) with additional protections for
Class C uses. Table 3 presents information related to the project attributes.
1.1 Project Quantities and Credits
Mitigation work within the Site included restoration and enhancement II of perennial stream channels.
Table 1 below shows stream credits by reach and the total amount of stream credits expected at
closeout.
Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits
PROJECT
MITIGATION
QUANTITIES
Project
Segment
Mitigation
Plan
Footage
As -Built
Footage
Mitigation
Category
Restoration
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Comments
Stream
North Little
Hunting
Creek Reach
1
722.905
717.000
Warm
R
1.0
722.905
Restoring dimension, pattern,
and profile, reconnecting
channels with floodplains and
wetlands, riparian planting,
fencing out livestock, invasive
species treatment, and
protecting with conservation
easement
North Little
Hunting
Creek Reach
2
1 027.718
1 033.000
Warm
R
1.0
1 027.718
Restoring dimension, pattern,
and profile, reconnecting
channels with floodplains and
wetlands, riparian planting,
fencing out livestock, invasive
species treatment, protecting
with conservation easement,
and bridge crossing
UT1 Reach 1
1,432.561
1,433.000
Warm
R
1.0
1,432.561
Restoring dimension, pattern,
and profile, reconnecting
channels with floodplains and
wetlands, riparian planting,
fencing out livestock, invasive
species treatment, protecting
with conservation easement,
and bridge crossing
Huntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL
1-1

Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits
PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITIES
Project
Segment
Mitigation
Plan
Footage
As -Built
Footage
Mitigation
Category
Restoration
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Comments
UT1 Reach 2
244.166
244.000
Warm
R
1.0
244.166
Restoring dimension, pattern,
and profile, reconnecting
channels with floodplains and
wetlands, riparian planting,
fencing out livestock, invasive
species treatment, protecting
with conservation easement,
and road crossing
UT1 Reach 3
217.715
217.000
Warm
R
1.0
217.715
Restoring dimension, pattern,
and profile, reconnecting
channels with floodplains and
wetlands, riparian planting,
fencing out livestock, invasive
species treatment, and
protecting with conservation
easement
UT2 Reach 1
299.853
300.000
Warm
Ell
2.5
119.941
Partial channel restoration,
riparian planting, fencing out
livestock, protecting with a
conservation easement, and
bridge crossing
UT2 Reach 2
286.763
287.000
Warm
R
1.0
286.763
Restoring dimension, pattern,
and profile, reconnecting
channels with floodplains and
wetlands, riparian planting,
invasive species treatment,
fencing out livestock, and
protecting with conservation
easement
UT2 Reach 3
568.949
569.000
Warm
R
1.0
568.949
UT2 Reach 4
522.002
522.000
Warm
R
1.0
522.002
Barn Branch
287.612
289.000
Warm
R
1.0
287.612
Old Bus
Branch
87.471
88.000
Warm
R
1.0
87.471
Restoring dimension, pattern,
and profile, stormwater BMP
implementation, reconnecting
channels with floodplains and
wetlands, riparian planting,
fencing out livestock, protecting
with conservation easement
Rifle
Tributary
252.855
245.000
Warm
Ell
2.5
101.142
Stormwater BMP
implementation, partial channel
restoration, riparian planting,
fencing out livestock, and
protecting with conservation
easement
Huntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL
1-2

Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits
PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITI
Project
Segment
Mitigation
Plan
Footage
As -Built
Footage
Mitigation
Category
Restoration
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Comments
Trapper
Tributary
40.718
41.000
Warm
Ell
2.5
16.287
Partial channel restoration,
riparian planting, fencing out
livestock, and protecting with
conservation easement
Net Credit Gain for buffers wider than 30-ft.
Total:
181.720
5,816.952
Restoration Level
Stream
Warm
Cool
Cold
Restoration
5,397.862
Enhancement I
--
Enhancement 11
237.370
Preservation
--
Credit Gain: Buffers > 30-feet3
181.720
Totals
5,816.952
Total Stream Credit
5,816.952
1. Crossing lengths have been removed from restoration footage
2. No direct credit for BMPs.
3. Detailed calculations to determine the net credit gain for buffers wider than 30-ft. are in Appendix 11 of the Mitigation Plan.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits. Table 2 below describes expected
outcomes to water quality and ecological processes and provides project goals and objectives.
Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements
Goal
Objective/
Treatment
Likely Functional
Uplift
Performance
Criteria
Measurement
Cumulative
Monitoring
Results
Improve the
stability of
stream
channels.
Construct stream
channels that will
maintain stable
cross -sections,
patterns, and
profiles over time.
Reduce sediment
inputs from bank
erosion. Reduce
shear stress on
channel boundary.
ER over 1.4 for B-
type and 2.2 for C-
type channels and
BHR below 1.2 with
visual assessments
showing
progression towards
stability.
16 Cross -sections
will be assessed
during MY1, MY2,
MY3, MY5, and
MY7 and visual
inspections will
be assessed
annually.
No deviations
from design.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL
1-3

Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements
Goal
Objective/
Treatment
Likely Functional
Uplift
Performance
Criteria
Measurement
Cumulative
Monitoring
Results
Reconnect
channels with
floodplains to
allow a
natural
flooding
regime.
Reconstruct
stream channels
with designed
bankfull
dimensions and
depth based on
reference reach
data. Remove
pond above T2.
Allow more
frequent flood flows
to disperse on the
floodplain.
Four bankfull events
in separate years
within the 7-year
monitoring period.
Three automated
crest gages were
installed on
restoration
reaches and will
record flow
elevations and
durations.
Reported in
MY1.
Restore and
enhance
native
floodplain
and
streambank
vegetation.
Plant native tree
and understory
species in riparian
zones and plant
native shrub and
herbaceous
species on
streambanks.
Reduce sediment
inputs from bank
erosion and runoff.
Increase nutrient
cycling and storage
in floodplain.
Provide riparian
habitat. Add a
source of LWD and
organic material to
stream.
Survival rate of 320
stems per acre at
MY3, 260 planted
stems per acre at
MY5, and 210 stems
per acre at MY7.
Twelve (12)
permanent and 4
mobile one
hundred square
meter vegetation
plots are placed
on 2% of the
planted area of
the Site and
monitored during
MY1, MY2, MY3,
MY5, and MY7.
All 16
vegetation
plots have a
planted stem
density greater
than 320 stems
per acre.
Improve
instream
habitat.
Install habitat
features such as
constructed riffles,
lunker logs, and
brush toes into
restored/enhanced
streams. Add
woody materials to
channel beds.
Construct pools of
varying depth.
Increase and
diversify available
habitats for
macroinvertebrates,
fish, and
amphibians leading
to colonization and
increase in
biodiversity over
time.
There is no required
performance
standard for this
metric.
Visual
assessment.
N/A
Diffuse
concentrated
agricultural
runoff.
Install stormwater
BMPs in areas of
concentrated
agricultural runoff
to diffuse and
provide vegetated
infiltration for
runoff before it
enters the stream
channel.
Reduce agricultural
and sediment inputs
to the project,
which will reduce
likelihood of
accumulated fines
and excessive algal
blooms from
nutrients.
There is no required
performance
standard for this
metric.
N/A
N/A
Permanently
protect the
project Site
from harmful
uses.
Establish
conservation
easements on the
Site.
Protect Site from
encroachment on
the riparian corridor
and direct impact to
streams and
wetlands.
Prevent easement
encroachment.
Visually inspect
the perimeter of
the Site to ensure
no easement
encroachment is
occurring.
No easement
encroachments.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL
1-4

1.3 Project Attributes
North Little Hunting Creek originates offsite to the west in the steep, forested Brushy Mountains. The
stream gradually widens and flattens in slope as it travels downstream out of the mountains and flows
through several agricultural parcels before it enters the Site. UT1 originates within the Site limits, north
of Ingle Hollow Road, and flows under Ingle Hollow Road to join North Little Hunting Creek. Land use in
the drainage area of UT1 includes agricultural fields and chicken houses. UT2 begins in steep woods
offsite, enters the Site from the south, and joins North Little Hunting Creek within the project area. Old
Bus Branch, Rifle Tributary, Trapper Tributary, and Barn Branch all originate within Site limits and are
tributaries to UT2. Within Site limits, North Little Hunting Creek, UT2, and the UT2 tributaries all flow
through actively grazed pastures.
Table 3: Project Attributes
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name
Huntsman
Mitigation
Site
County
Wilkes County
Project Area
(acres)
17.7
Project Coordinates
36.140689, - 80.932189
PROJECT WATERSHED SUMMARY INFORMATION
Physiographic
Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin River
USGS HUC 8-
digit
03040102
USGS HUC 14-digit
03040102020030
DWR Sub-
basin
03-07-06
Land Use Classification
74% forested,
22% agriculture,
2% shrubland,
1% developed, 1% open
water
Project
Drainage
Area (acres)
1,274
Percentage of Impervious Area
0.23%
RESTORATION TRIBUTARY
SUMMARY
INFORMATION
Parameters
North Little
Hunting
Creek
UT1
UT2
Barn
Branch
Old Bus Branch
Pre -project length (feet)
1,646
996
1,707
247
90
Post -project (feet)
1,750
1,894
1,678
289
88
Valley confinement
(Confined, moderately
confined, unconfined)
Unconfined
Moderately
Confined
Confined to
Unconfined
Moderately
Confined
Confined
Drainage area (acres)
1,274
70
43
10
5.2
Perennial, Intermittent,
Ephemeral
Perennial
DWR Water Quality
Classification
WS III
Dominant Stream
Classification (existing)
G4
C4/B4
A6, E5b
B5a
G5
Huntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL
1-5

Table 3: Project Attributes
ESTORATION TRIBUTARY SUMMARY INFORMATION
Parameters
North Little
Hunting
Creek
UT1
UT2
Barn
Branch
Old Bus Branch
Dominant Stream
Classification (proposed)
C4
B4a/C4b/C4
B5a, B5, C5
B5a
A5
Dominant Evolutionary
class (Simon) if applicable
Stage IV-V
Stage II -III
Stage III
Stage IV
Stage III -IV
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Water of the United States
- Section 404
Yes
Yes
USACE Action ID
No. SAW-2019-00836
Water of the United States
- Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 2019 0866
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion in Mitigation
Plan (Wildlands, 2021)
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Coastal Zone Management
Act (CZMA or CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Wilkes County — No Rise Certification
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
N/A
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 1-6

Section 2: Section 2: As -Built Condition (Baseline)
The Site construction was completed in April 2022. The as -built survey, which included developing an
as -built topographic surface; as well as, surveying the as -built channel centerlines, top of banks,
structures, and cross -sections, was completed in May 2022. The Site's construction planting was
completed on 04/05/22. Monitoring device installation and vegetative and substrate data collection
were completed by 04/12/2022.
2.1 As-Built/Record Drawings
A sealed half-size set of the as -built survey and record drawing which includes the post -construction
survey, alignments, structures, and monitoring features are in Appendix E. Field adjustments made
during construction that differ from the design plans are shown as red lines on the record drawing.
These adjustments were made during construction, where needed, based on field evaluations, and are
listed below.
2.1.1 North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1
• STA: 100+19 — Riffle material added for stream stability.
• STA: 100+45 — Rock added to stabilize ditch.
• STA: 103+51— Boulder toe added for bank stability.
2.1.2 North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2
• STA: 118+07 — Stone added to stabilize channel.
• STA: 118+20 — Log J-hook, boulder toe, and geolift replaced rock J-hook for added stability.
• STA: 118+68 — Riffle added for stream stability.
2.1.3 UT1 Reach 1
• STA: 200+12 — Riffle added for stream stability.
• STA: 200+66 — Log sill moved upstream for additional grade stability and changed to rock sill for
habitat diversity.
• STA: 201+54, 201+69, 201+85, 202+00, and 202+15 — Surveyed sills are part of the originally
designed rock cascade with pools.
• STA: 202+44 — Log sill added for stream stability.
• STA: 207+30 — Rock added to stabilize ditch.
• Rock added to stabilize ditch outfalls in left floodplain
• STA: 210+94, 211+11, 211+30, 211+47, 211+65, 211+82, and 212+00 — Surveyed sills are part of
the originally designed rock cascade with pools.
• Grass swale installed to stabilize ditch in right floodplain.
• STA: 212+12 — Log sill added for stream stability.
• STA: 214+16 — Brush toe replaced geolift due to extra available material.
• Farm crossing with 85" x 44" envirospan bottomless culvert installed instead of CMP culvert.
• STA: 214+38 — Riffle materials added for stream stability.
• STA: 214+78 — Riffle material added for stream stability.
2.1.4 UT1 Reach 2
• STA: 214+94 — Brush toe and log sill replaced rock toe and rock sill due to extra available
material.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 2-1

• STA: 216+33 — Log sill replaced rock sill for habitat diversity.
• STA: 216+72 — Log sill replaced rock sill for habitat diversity.
• STA: 217+16 — Riffle material added for stream stability.
2.1.5 UT1 Reach 3
• STA: 219+27 — Log J-hook replaced log vane for additional grade control.
• STA: 219+81— Rock sill replaced log sill for habitat diversity.
• STA: 219+94 — STA: 220+26 — Profile adjusted to meet the tie-in elevation of North Little Hunting
Creek.
2.1.6 UT2 Reach 1
• STA: 301+64, 301+83, 301+99, 302+11, 302+27, 302+42, 302+59, 302+73, and 303+05 —
Surveyed sills are part of the originally designed rock cascade with pools.
• Farm crossing with 85" x 44" envirospan bottomless culvert installed instead of CMP culvert.
• STA: 303+33 — Rock sill installed for stream stability.
• STA: 303+47 — Rock sill installed for stream stability.
2.1.7 UT2 Reach 2
• STA: 303+63, 303+79, 303+94, and 304+20 — Surveyed sills are part of the originally designed
rock cascade with pools.
• STA: 304+41, 304+59, 304+79, 305+00, 305+26, 305+49, 305+65, 305+81, 305+95, and 306+18 —
Surveyed sills are part of the originally designed rock cascade with pools.
2.1.8 UT2 Reach 3
• STA: 307+50 — Riffle was added for stream stability
• STA: 308+45 — Rock sill moved upstream in place of log sill for stability.
• STA: 310+71— Log J-hook installed instead of log vane for additional grade control.
2.1.9 UT2 Reach 4
• No deviations from design.
2.1.10 Rifle Tributary
• BMP redesigned as a step pool stormwater conveyance prior to construction.
• STA: 251+47 — STA: 252+47 — Profile adjustment due to change in topography from the existing
conditions survey.
2.1.11 Trapper Tributary
• No deviations from design.
2.1.12 Old Bus Branch
• STA: 260+09 — Rock sill added to BMP for additional grade control
• STA: 260+36, 260+47, 260+55, 260+69, 260+81, 260+93, 261+04, 261+17, 261+28, 261+41, and
261+54 — Surveyed sills are part of the originally designed rock cascade with pools.
2.1.13 Barn Branch
• No deviations from design.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 2-2

2.1.14 Vegetation Planting List & Plan
Changes within the planted riparian buffer were minimal and consisted of one species change within the
Streambank Planting Zone. Species replacements were made due to availability of the species at the
time of planting. All species replacements were approved species or alternate species within the Final
Mitigation Plan's planting list (Wildlands, 2021), so no approval for the inclusion of the species is
needed.
Streambank Planting Zone
• Tag alder (Alnus serrulatta) was excluded from the streambank planting list and replaced with
black willow (Salix nigra).
2.1.15 Fencing Overview
• No deviations from design.
2.1.16 Monitoring Components
Installed monitoring devices and plot locations closely mimic the locations of those proposed in the
Site's Mitigation Plan. Minor deviations from these locations were made when professional judgement
deemed them necessary to better represent as -built field conditions or when installation of the device in
the proposed location was not physically feasible.
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
• North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1
o Permanent vegetation plot 8 (VP8) was moved further into the left floodplain to better
assess this area of the reach.
• North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2
o VP4 was moved from the left floodplain to the right floodplain.
• UT1 Reach 1
o UT1 was constructed in a confined valley, resulting in a narrow floodplain. Hence,
several permanent and mobile vegetation plot locations had to be adjusted to fit in the
narrow floodplain; however, the same number of permanent and mobile plots were
used along this tributary.
■ VP5 was moved from the left floodplain to the right floodplain.
■ Mobile vegetation plot 2 (MVP2) and VP6 locations were switched along the
reach and from one floodplain to the other.
■ VP7 was moved from the left floodplain to the right floodplain.
• UT2 Reach 4
o VP12 was moved from the right floodplain to the left floodplain to capture more of the
existing wetland.
Cross -sections
• Cross -sections 1 and 2 on North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1 were moved two meanders
upstream due to a nesting killdeer in the floodplain.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 2-3

Section 3: Monitoring Year 0 Data Assessment
The as -built and MYO data collection was conducted between April and May 2022 to assess the baseline
condition of the project. The vegetation, stream, and wetland success criteria for the Site follow the
approved Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2021).
Performance criteria for vegetation, stream, and hydrologic assessments are located in Section 1.2 Table
3: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements. The first annual monitoring assessment
(MY1) will be completed in the fall of 2022, at least 6 months after the MYO assessment. The Site will be
monitored for a total of seven years, with the final monitoring activities scheduled for 2028.
3.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 16 vegetation plots, 12 permanent and 4 mobile, were established throughout the project
area. Mobile plots established in MYO will be used for vegetative assessment in MY1. Baseline
vegetation monitoring resulted in a stem density range of 445 to 648 planted stems per acre which is
well above the interim requirement of 320 stems per acre required at MY3. Average stem density was
579 planted stems per acre. All 16 vegetation plots met the interim success criteria and are on track to
meet the final success criteria required for MY7, and no species dominance per plot was greater than
50%. Refer to Appendix A for Vegetation Plot Photographs and the Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table and Appendix B for Vegetation Plot Data.
3.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Vegetation management and herbicide applications were implemented prior and during construction to
prevent the spread of invasive species that could compete with planted native vegetation. Chinese
privet (Ligustrum sinense), tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora)
were treated with herbicidal applications. During construction, any remaining invasive species
vegetation, treated, dead, and/or surviving were mechanically removed to prevent post -construction re-
establishment within the conservation easement. Invasive species will continue to be monitored,
mapped, and controlled as necessary throughout the monitoring period.
3.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys conducted throughout the Site show all streams as stable and functioning as
designed. Most reaches on Site were constructed similar design parameters; however, a couple riffle
cross -sections are larger than designed. Though the dimensions are larger than designed on couple
cross -sections, the parameters for all the cross -sections are within those defined for the channel's
stream type, and all cross -sections are stable and functioning as intended. It is anticipated that cross -
sections will narrow, and cross -sectional areas may decrease in size due to natural channel adjustments
such as the establishment of herbaceous vegetation along the tops of banks and slight bed and or bank
deposition. Bank height ratios are less than 1.2, and entrenchment ratios are greater than 1.4 for B-type
and 2.2 for C-type channels.
Reachwide and 100-count riffle pebble counts were conducted in April of 2022 to establish stream
classification at baseline conditions and characterize pavement at as -built. Riffles along most reaches
have a median particle size classification of coarse gravel to small cobble. Based on a DMS Technical
Workgroup memo from 10/19/21 and concurrence received on 10/27/2021 from the DMS project
manager for the Site, pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring years unless
requested by the IRT or deemed necessary by best professional judgement. A copy of the DMS Technical
Workgroup Memo (2021) and the email confirmation from the DMS project manager (Reid, 2021) are
located in Appendix F.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 3-1

3.4 Stream Areas of Concern
The Site is largely performing as designed; however, several areas of concern were documented during a
post -survey Site walk. Wildlands will address these areas of concern in either late MY1 or early MY2
based on contractor availability. Maintenance details will be included in the MY1 report. Wildlands will
continue to assess the Site and will report any additional issues as needed.
3.4.1 North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1
• STA 102+60: Localized scour behind top of bank.
3.4.2 UT1 Reach 1
• STA 210+50 - 215+70: Riffle substrate was swept out of multiple riffles in this section from storm
events.
• STA 212+75: Riffle material from upstream displacement areas was deposited in the pool.
3.5 Hydrology Assessment
In total, 3 automated crest gages (CG) were installed throughout the Site to monitor bankfull events.
One CG was installed on North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2, UT1 Reach 2, and UT2 Reach 4. Hydrologic
data will be collected and reported during MY1.
3.6 Adaptive Management Plan
No adaptive management plans are needed at this time.
3.7 Monitoring Year 0 Summary
Overall, the Site looks good, is performing as intended, and is on track to meet success criteria. All
vegetation plots are exceeding the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre, and streams
within the Site are stable and meeting project goals. Herbaceous vegetation is becoming well
established across the Site. Invasive species were treated and/or physically removed across the Site
prior to and during construction and will continued to be assessed throughout the monitoring years.
Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. All raw data supporting the tables and
figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 3-2

Section 4: Methodology
Annual monitoring will consist of collecting morphologic, vegetative, and hydrologic data to assess
project success based on the goals outlined in the Site's Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2021). Monitoring
requirements will follow guidelines outlined in the NC IRT Stream and Wetland Mitigation Guidance
Update (2016). Installed monitoring devices and plot locations closely mimic the locations of those
proposed in the Site's Mitigation Plan. Deviations from these locations were made when professional
judgement deemed them necessary to better represent as -built field conditions or when installation of
the device in the proposed location was not physically feasible.
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). All Integrated Current Condition Mapping was collected by
either a professional licensed surveyor or an Arrow 100' Submeter GNSS Receiver and processed using
ArcPro. Crest gages, using automated pressure transducers, were installed in riffle cross -sections to
monitor stream hydrology throughout the year. Stream hydrology and vegetation monitoring protocols
followed the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update (NCIRT, 2016).
Vegetation installation data collection follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et
al., 2008); however, vegetation data processing follows the NC DMS Vegetation Data Entry Tool and
Vegetation Plot Data Table (NCDMS, 2020).
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 4-1

Section 5: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Retrieved: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
5. pdf.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP), accessed at:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation %20Services/Watershed_Planni ng/Yadki n_River_Basi n/2009%
20U pper%20Yad ki n%20RBRP_Final%20Fi na l%2C%2026feb%2709. pdf
NC DMS. 2020. Vegetation Data Entry Tool and Vegetation Plot Data Table. Raleigh, NC.
https://ncdms.shinyapps.io/Veg Table Tool/
NC DMS and Interagency Review Team (IRT) Technical Workgroup. 2018. Standard Measurement of the
BHR Monitoring Parameter. Raleigh, NC.
NC DMS and IRT Technical Workgroup. 2021. Pebble Count Data Requirements. Raleigh, NC. October 19,
2021.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) 2008 Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basinwide Water
Quality Plan, accessed at:
https://fi les.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Qual ity/Planning/BPU/BPU/Yadkin/Yad ki n%20PIans/2010%20
Pla n/Yad ki n%202008% 20PIa n % 20with % 201 R%20a nd%20Bio%20Append ice. pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS). 2017. NCGS Publications.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/north-carolina-geological-
survey/interactive-geologic-maps
NCGS. 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina: Raleigh, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development, Geological Survey Section, scale 1:500,00, in color.
North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update. Accessed at: https://saw-
reg.usace.army.mil/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-Mitigation-Update.pdf
Reid, M. 2021. Email Correspondence, Pebble Count Data Requirements. October 28, 2021.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 5-1

Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 14(1):11-26.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
2019. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed August 2019.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (2021). Huntsman Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
WHuntsman Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 0 Annual Report - FINAL 5-2

Sheet Boundaries
Project Parcels
•=\\
.:;„.„. „ _ Conservation Easement
Sheet 3.1 • 'W Restrictive Covenant
w`z
Utility Easement
Internal Crossing
Existing Wetlands
Stream Restoration
III
Stream Enhancement II
BMP
+ No Credit
1
— Non-Project Streams
x — Fence
Topographic Contours(20')
Vegetation Plots-MYO
nCriteria Met(Permanent)
Reach 1 I cn �;,: ,. O Criteria Met(Mobile)
o
Cross-Sections
x / 4- BaroTroll
Ns [1;
4- Crest Gage
` ",, \\?' 0 Photo Points
,
sz
mot . 0 Reach Breaks
! f {R
1
•
Reach 2 ►
v
°> Sheet 3.2 "
s5. '. \ •..l- ,.z.. Reach 3 I
X l
' IngIA�Hollow Rd •.----
roy
Ingle Hollo
o-
---..„... \ I , ' • P- „-Al Or
DMA �,;
-x —x �x
x bating Creek. w + +,x•
ii
t•, + /
0, + + "� +
+ Q
k
.. —
x'
x
„• \
{ ` \ a
> ,. '' i
o .
\
BranchIJINI
Id Bus u
- - ° +
v
I
f`3 \ A II
xIti. s•
ri
R
1220 J,` �, `��
�732p 128. 1240 ♦�
��\� _ . . I Reach 1 ' _
AO
26
Figure 3.0(Key)Current Condition Plan View
kiii/416 Huntsman Mitigation Site
W I L D L A N D S 0 110 220 Feet Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
ENGINEERING
i i i 1 N
Wilkes County, NC

x^
Project Parcels
I` X r- Conservation Easement
1 )I I - Restrictive Covenant
X `( X 1 NM Utility Easement
I 1 1 x Internal Crossing
X 1 T
I ( /j Existing Wetlands
(( X
X i 1 -Structures
X II
1 /1/1 X —Stream Restoration
I \\ X No Credit
5 11 1 Non-Project Streams
// X
x — Fence
1 • �)1 X -- Top of Bank
X if
1 //r 1 Topographic Contours(20')
X
X • Stream Maintenance Areas
1 l ) 11 X Aggradation
X /. 1
1 �� Scour
X
X Vegetation Plots-MVO
1 �' X
X n Criteria Met(Permanent)
Ia.
1. ��❑� 6 X �� Criteria Met(Mobile)
X ��� 1 — Cross-Sections
1
X 06+00 op BaroTroll
' - l • Crest Gage
X
4• 0 Photo Points
' ` 3` i7+01) 1 , ® Reach Breaks
PP9 -- . ..,.. I
• CGS 208+0i• ;
x+r
209+00 • j.
.11
'ro.
1
210+00 ;� s2r�wr ' ��
PP10 - r.~- r..
211+00 ''L..y,G II _
` c I
212+00 "' �• ,
1 I
.,;, , y \ /
'1
213+00
.- *-, ) . 1-,
214+p11 +.: n, .
'k,;, PP11
+ i �+A, *
�.
., o PP12+ }am 5� :�
y
216+ i
IP
.! ti''. . ..
• PP13 % ''" -
♦ 2�L7+00 __
l
r 5Y 3
s
� AIR
J
) �" aO„ PP14 w
'
.' ,a, ' t).}7 I, .
X -*. • .- • "',•----„.".".. ' — 7 /17
_.s
\Rc. .,�,, r • �q+�pp. �� 11 a `)C
v., R v.,:„,.. .`, 4 2 PP4 r r �J 1 +00
�, 07+00 ;TI :l
, 111+00•
GG1 113
41,
X p h7i.: Af a r,/ ,T �. _X — x —x —X — X —X X + �� PP
i
/... - / i+ + _J)
o- -I- 100(+00 gcla + \� �+
018 Aerial Photography "'+82 X --X
a .Ia. I �� +
Figure 3.1 Current Condition Plan View
kiiii416 WI LD LAND S Huntsman Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 100 200 Feet Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
I I 1 I N
Wilkes County, NC

Project Parcels
Conservation Easement
,, T Y - Restrictive Covenant
Utility Easement
""` - '. �. fj Internal Crossing
•P11 �j D�j� Existing Wetlands
4l aat
-Structures
4 -Stream Restoration
i
�„ -Stream Enhancement II
}, �, �BMP
f b_
,`-�5� a - - i —No Credit
/ tj
/ � i;' ri Non-Project Streams
216+Q0" a` _ X — Fence
© • FJ
-Top of Bank
i' •
sPP13 Topographic Contours(20')
., a'.
F10
r ' Stream Maintenance Areas
4 \ •X `. • ® Aggradation
® Scour
► •`r,'i AV,' �' , '1,M Vegetation Plots-MVO
00 Criteria Met(Permament)
✓�A I
+44 Fy 1►0 .r- .. r-... . t.�. It ' ; _ E Criteria Met(Mobile)
' Lr Cross-Sections
....,,_... BaroTroll
ti Et Crest Gage
Q$ �' �3 � Photo Points
»•40 %� Q Reach Breaks
221 00 ' ( © / �\ +PP7 -
/ 1 0
, / ,, \ 5�\ 18+94
fi, 7+00 ;D', \ \ // \ o ,_ _.. , 7+0• _ 118,00 1a t:
PP4
�- r`/ �r —x —x —x — x —x x - x -\ `—PP6 © ( .Xx
k )) + •_ •
�•
1___ �� / 6 -.v 4�.
x/it4A'\ ±/ ,0-,, . . .,, . ..
. \IX C;'):0\0); ... ._. NN'1' . . , _ :
_, , k J'. \\ X i
.t
, .. s' k PP28 1 `� \ -
y ' k +1 \
x.. I XS16) 11 )40\
o k
. I ii
-.. -.e�: , I 1- ��
ii • Al
e.•^ r 1 PP19 \ .. f PP27•_ 260+00 •
''', '. k + Nis + oTs � -
Af k 261+77
a
x s
A 4'1 2 .) 0 4 .
l'il'' ‘ ...
k- 1r S.k,.,. \ .401**, / '
// X —X \ - PP24
/ / i0
PP17I' \ PP23 '
/- 1 I
+\ '0-\
„}
x 1� K l 1 .
ram-. i X
3u24`Oe; \
d• ,�q A�y,� X -
.
�. \ 7220 x .,,•1 k -
r 1 • .. v 301+00
•
----:\ • 7.,, ,. it''' ,'r 'A '‘. ,i, 4 . t" I t
00+00 . .
7 �260 �O
28 \ti
2018 A; a{.Photography 0
Figure 3.2 Current Condition Plan View
%iv* Huntsman Mitigation Site
W I LID LA N D S 0 100 200 Feet Yadkin River Basin (03040102)
ENGINEERING
I I I I N
Wilkes County, NC

APPENDIX A. Visual Assessment Data

Table 4a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
North Little Hunting Creek Reach Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
Major Channel Category
Number
Stable, Total Amount of
Number i Unstable
Performing
As-buil Footage
as Intended
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
717
Assessed Bank Length
1,434
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
18
99°
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
18
99%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
8
8
100%
North Little Hunting Creek Reach Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
N umber
Stable, Total Amount of
Major Channel Category Metric Number in Unstable
Performing
11.1 as Intended As -built Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
1,033
Assessed Bank Length
2,066
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
10
10
100%

Table 4b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 Reach 1
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
Channel Category
Number
Stable, Total Amount of
Number i Unstable
Performing
As -built Footage
as Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
1,433
Assessed Bank Length
2,866
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
27
27
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
8
8
100%
UT1 Reach 2
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
Number
Stable, Total Amount of
Major Channel Category Metric Number in Unstable
Performing
11.1 as Intended As -built Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
244
Assessed Bank Length
488
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
5
5
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
2
2
100%

Table 4c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 Reach 3
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
I Number
Stable, Total Amount of
rChannelCategory Number in Unstable
Performing
As -built Footage
as Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
217
Assessed Bank Length
434
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
5
5
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
1
1
100%
UT2 Reach 2
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
Number
Stable, Total Amount of
Major Channel Category Metric Number in Unstable
Performing
11.1 as Intended As -built Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
287
Assessed Bank Length
573
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
14
14
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
0
0
100%

Table 4d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 Reach 3
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
' Number
Stable, Total Amount of
for Channel Category Number in Unstable
Performing
As -built Footage
as Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
569
Assessed Bank Length
1,138
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
12
12
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
1
1
100%
UT2 Reach 4
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
N umber
Stable, Total Amount of
Major Channel Category Metric Number in Unstable
Performing
As -built Footage
as Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
522
Assessed Bank Length
1,044
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
0
0
100%

Table 4e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Old Bus Branch
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
or Channel Category
Number
Stable, Total Amount of
Number in Unstable
Performing
As -built Footage
as Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
88
Assessed Bank Length
176
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
13
13
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
0
0
100%
Barn Branch
Date Last Assessed: 06/01/2022
Number
Stable, Total Amount of
Major Channel Category Metric Number in Unstable
Performing
As -built Footage
as Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
289
Assessed Bank Length
578
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
8
8
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
influence does not exceed 15%.
1
1
100%

Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Date Last Assessed: 6/1/2022
Planted Acreage within Easement 16.00
Vegetat ategory
ac
Acre
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.10
0
0%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on
current MY stem count criteria.
0.10
0
0%
Total
0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates
Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY
Performance Standard.
0.10
0
0%
Cumulative Total
0.0
0%
Easement Acreage
17.66
Vegetat ategory
Invasive Areas of Concern
Definitions
Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the
easement and will therefore be calculated against the total
easement acreage. Include species with the potential to directly
outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term or
community structure for existing communities. Invasive species
included in summation above should be identified in report
summary.
T
(ac)
0.10
0
of
asement
Acreage
0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Encroachment may be point, line, or polygon. Encroachment to
be mapped consists of any violation of restrictions specified in
the conservation easement. Common encroachments are
mowing, cattle access, vehicular access. Encroachment has no
threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of
impact area.
none
0 Encroachments Noted
/ 0 ac

Stream Photographs
MYO

.
•a `
t -�r•-• 'Y-. . _
•
•
" s ..,.-� .., 2'a.fir- '.°""
•
__
W. Vie.. -.r .:'� ...> `�$?:
•
-- _:r.',.---.,,,,,_..,._.'1' -,„.,'.":-,,...5...t.„.1..i,.u"v...:„.''.,.v..,w-.,„-,i,-„„„,.,„,.:.=,,,,k--f,`„„.-L.--,':-e
1 e_" bra• �1
_ .y' :.� ,tea
"„ . - - c .fir"
•
0z`' - _ - _ _ -
vt.r y 1 L �� - - gif
f x a-�s. ZSSt''t 52 �7$ # ^. _�S • ` $ . sti as` € !
Photo Point 1-NL Hunting R1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 1-NL Hunting R1,view downstream (4/5/2022)
,--------1:::,' ,.tee,t.:'
j i v k 4 8+� R,1
' '',7",:r4-t',-4,-.--
b )
�.
/
- - t ' : ,.a + e:I 1. •
} � g\ r` "w` , ,` � s� �'+ a
a . 2ry --
1er
Photo Point 2-NL Hunting R1,view upstream (4/5/2022)) Photo Point 2-NL Hunting R1,view downstream (4/5/2022)
" " ' yr' - ,* .z,..,.,�.�t - -
sr� '' }.
•
-.,V a-0 .- ..YEA - r `
,.,t.,t it-V.k 7rk:,;6i-a--I.A,,,i-f,-:,-.p,--..4..-,,4.',..-.,--...,:N.4_-,...":.c°."-.:i"c,.t,e-:.W-,-,,,-A.i4w-,,',,0.P,-,--,•-.,,s..1-..4..-.4,,"_-1,,,,,...s:.:C-t*-,--.-...i,k„!-.,,-,.::,.-,-.•,1..:,''.,"--,:-,S.-,r%'_.,-'-t.-..-,
r4 Sri,
d
Photo Point 3-NL Hunting R1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 3-NL Hunting R1,view downstream (4/5/2022)

it•,1,-•': Fes"
w
x" }P - — _ •` '''IV,.,,-txl'' ''_" 74; a - i 'i J -,^se. n � *_„,-'r. ?_�'`�., ."
i,; _ • - � - S'. emu:
2
A. x µ
b F '" � ask
x,. 3, - .n..,s r Sr '` p:'ham
•i. ? ,1 , , ....,,,,�; _.--.;`'i4 v+i ;ter.._ 'n=. ;v .. u.,.... - C'� ''e-..<. ...
Photo Point 4—NL Hunting R1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 4—NL Hunting R1,view downstream (4/5/2022)
.-n :=
,ter, = ".sru ptiG � ,,,, --. k '. ` _
.- S k �t 'y , .y " t a Sa1��'
,,+tea r -..,A a ;,- y -ett.
Photo Point 4—UT1 Reach 3 view upstream (4/5/2022)
. rlory
_ - •
. .
,: - T-sk G'.' n`, s�.a� - p - _ - - Kos:
... ._,. et
a
+, .' #, ,._<,..,„,., .:. .....e.. _ _..y...,....„.„.„,,a,,..,..,,..,..,._t. ,.. .... _. ,:„ . A.° 7"--,t0 OA *,-,'.7•:,,,t?,•4,r,c,..,, .
•
` �' • y e, �,,� f i g :,-�*
, -v :ig y� - `ate:E - r a
,4z °+4. ,-r ', P �, .k g?�'`.s�' ,�„' :`•'�
41E,
w
s rt s ': ' f T r..cx- 1i-�Y -
Photo Point 5—NL Hunting R2,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 5—NL Hunting R2,view downstream (4/5/2022)

aF a�u - - AS
.-e ,� -sw ._! - h `� ,Fe, v°' 'r` ,i_. fib b* '.• - •- .g,- .
jr ':
y , 'fin --+ y- .yam •,••- -
• 1,j c . L < a,�^A'd,� •`i .-,d4L y may}4� -
„4".
t;VW::.W �.
C ��aIV .L r"y
Photo Point 6—NL Hunting R2,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 6—NL Hunting R2,view downstream (4/5/2022)
, al � "w ` ce- a w� .P ` .
•
w E - , ,4,,,- c -, x '+ _� em s, a�,
▪ •
<yw t % "-- ems,; ;—'-' _5 '. s
,�- c,ifd*,ff y� 4:dxA � 0. '��:��.▪ q�i▪a ^C�..._i c z:fi"3- -
Photo Point 7—NL Hunting R2,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 7—NL Hunting R2,view downstream (4/5/2022)
•
e
,fi d - te F , '� - +-ri.i-- =y +2� -' # a es , � - 4_ e y^ . *- . , ,-. ,-.e �. ....,c,i,-.. ''.;4,-- -..;.; ' „ � • �x + M ye ' u ,.. k k a 3 f yx r � a` s: s-Y 4` ' x -
:: _:._:,._,;...t,.. , ,,,...,,z_- ,,r72-.4,.,„„4„;„.„ _-_,,,,,,
'� c$ f i ay -� :, a-C ,, -▪- , ; -1 r','•: '', 93. 7 ;5;,,: - ". 4-:..
1•. ,- t.' : ;s dr' y. f`'fir pyt Y -a 4 „� Yc,,-,'
Photo Point 8—UT1 Reach 1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 8—UT1 Reach 1,view downstream (4/5/2022)

-�.,F`vss."fir' R -.4.
' - x R9e� , `Z, :,Ir*w wda '_' �.''".'1 -'-a 3 - 3t r -s' 'ram", 'e''=s
3 �3 �- r�.R'A �°b[8 ,��� pia_T f�"8,� �f ��'gyp,a} � � 'ia� 4 '� * ' "��`"� � .
c` * � it r ,,• �,�` +16^ �.stt `, i - ems€ 1 >.
€t - x, x� a x1a. - fir y
_ `- tom, E 3 -
.ltrat
E - r �� f
F' 'u K-.' �� •' r v' �,,.'. t�'b ( .-mom..
Photo Point 9—UT1 Reach 1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 9:UT1 Reach 1,view downstream (4/5/2022)
''''':A.
Ya ?-qi x , , * . [ rc 4w i1:3' 'cam' "% ' 'a , .. a,8"' ""' i^"^a " . 's, ,---. s ,.
t.
$ks ..' ➢ ',-.' :41/, - 4y' • ;"3-'fig i J 3kwW'; F -7'1+F t". .5r y"z
w, .� .a _ M1 k rs�,n .„„,,3-,,, qA t `r - r _ A . a �F- ^k'vW, �- k't i Y`
'� '� '", ,""+ ,fi -} Soh ..., 'rC " :ate , 4 'V. -. ,..,
6k
`' _ k - - - '¢ yes � ly- 1
,4,004:4;"":1„:9.tegol:1'‘::
2:144:
moo , s,3 q i$ .pm' " rr
0
_
Photo Point 10—UT1 Reach 1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 10—UT1 Reach 1,view downstream (4/5/2022)
-1,'..,,_- :r..e<* .$,k 'rl , e�,,i ,'�-` - _ - -_--if'"--- -- -'-''`` ' r`r- fix' '* � �;
•
--y �R„v`-n�� .: �' y3�'. '+.�'• � -lr ,.?�`.� ,�,�'A k 1 s' °,��- .• p ^�-�`y �' � '§��t ysr
z.
,f� mow ) s� _ L F '',.:-,;:-..1."-''
r 2 -^' .,% � .� � - f! •
xv v f`r� 1 a tI
lp.4'14,%,f .e� 4,-, f i7.$ •�'`'} } t'�- {n '�T 7'i r a
Y: RR 4 /'�,J ,-,., ..Y-�r1i a T. S d' 3
Photo Point 11—UT1 Reach 1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 11—UT1 Reach 1,view downstream (4/5/2022)

�-, -- ate �, ', k �
rY
� ss`�- 9r� _.. � �"� x q+ •�-`a "'". �ti x'.` „'"a ��., •• iF.�'�� A.§.�,-+w"#✓��✓cr'-r�."
ww z +*„ _ g c�- fir+ w.�`�p `
" .s --7".2_ y� - ,, �" .y k R▪ .v ape 5e d.5u9> 0� e, p-2.;*i...e.
.. ` s• - ;,.r .-?^s ' om ' + --..r t 4 -�,n
r• fir - - 4,-, ti .. i e „:
.,: . Es < `�` ' - < • - r -n �.. "- i � ,
41,
- ." 4 k n,� , ' i st .iR a ',=. : .., . I -3-Z!„...,,,,,v,-,.:N
riz. l h-a
Y ��Y' F ` ' "n. 9 �'. �4. n ..rt irk,
Photo Point 12—UT1 Reach 2,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 12—UT1 Reach 2,view downstream (4/5/2022)
t � rJ ' • r c �
4..h 1a..t � -��s � .�. # �c -:�S .,,r ~ „�.9x�^ac� a„2se ++,,'�''F- r". 3'y � o *s p �� �.3ne
�,e �a -ry a $ '3 rt f :. "" C. - .:�:; E=�' i , =1,* ,
4 c
Tit Ef • t t .�,, t... , `. „. '-.7.4, " �F ,,: Ps - .; � .
g`Y: i� S• h' f=Fw�.a�d�e� y� IRA •
p�n .yY �,Y'E.vc= 't•�" -.iM E, "'":� -+may �-• j - % ', -'.�
.7 .':... 14 hw k 't ,{, 4, .. *,.., ,'Y s - - 9 '.ate'.
Photo Point 13—UT1 Reach 2,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 13—UT1 Reach 2,view downstream (4/5/2022)
. "N4 __�'
ar
.eC 1r�4*--'. - -
. ?.re.1- '3'k • .tic= —z-Av�+�
Ii
-t` 1 �. y -yy! ,,a. n ,�, �c"> '4 ,ram- y°' ?" �°FJ4,� t
'':-, - .4 r r t ate,_ 4a 1 �A�
?r bra b T4 x 1,4, " 3• $' ": ' c' , y �
's- p, - `Y # ,,,�._,.�.x-TcN�:Y_:�•eR�"t ♦ rw rq fi,.,, \ _
^ ! , ,• G- `F,9. =et a>..�s- -! 'N,""7S€k Yam' w- t `« '•
"spa= "` - .4 � ' r1 �y y, �K ',, „r
-:: ,- 1 "' t 'TY ?<:,_+Ltriii% .- , 4":af -.-4. " , .°;,.::S _'-4 .�e--` ,. i M "`;,ii
Photo Point 14—UT1 Reach 3,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 14—UT1 Reach 2,view downstream (4/5/2022)

, • •-•- '•,' •-:,.-•.-•,- ::::""
• '--''' :'' `• • .--'7•41e,'::,•,-4",*4't"':---:` :•;•*;•''-Q' `•7'''',':•••i4_,#7.-W•A!'----T_:-:;`,.iF;--rr.:-','
-,,t. •F-.,... ... . ,,,,,,.. --..,,,,:,..,9,..,) 7 4.;.4.;.,,i'w-.."....14-"J-k"iti%•':‘,,,"1: .. ,_ .-,,.,..,!'7 . -.-:=,--,..,,,ir,• :. •, , -f•,;•,•.„ ...s: .. .0.-,..., .,„,..--_,-F. ,„,
-t- : '1.,• "IN,-;•-:.:.,,:,...'.244Q„.",041,if-Vb.„.,,ift.2 4011‘,. .,*,,ait,i74,- ,,,,,,,,,,,„„4,'::...,e0-23- -..'7:;-:..., ..-.'-4.:',1Z-',.-V•S`',',A,-1*,'.;.-'-',.,..-7 ':•: ''. '•''''-'7.-L,ALW'r•!.0.1- -•::Yt..r..s.'''144..." ''.,7';'•"'a
V:'.'.1k.:i .4.?:' '''..' • PN-**5.3. ::,-,• 711M—Ztx•ii..2Vilif..?. .!V-440'"-------7,.,--%--47,:i.-r:--, 2-::..:;4.1:4:4;:i4.77-","T, •'.:1,,;•r•-•::.:,•.•,,.'-•••,,,,,-L-t,1-1 .,-, A,, ,',: 3:4 •":•.•••••,firA5: ..1.-•;,:-..,.. ...re..0,
,' ::47,- '-",. .:,.: . •-•,,,,:4i.,'":.-;.-::',1':.12-..-- 4.1 .4.....4,,,e- -_,. " ,._,,-.547,, ,•-•.'"?.:k4. ....''.7.:''•'-.. .1;,,,,.'. ..7-;').&.*','''.-1.'•.°...-,:•-!',.,‘.. .,-,•'",-.-.:.1-7...!'/,'-". ...:., • .,:', •-•;-.V:.,,,ic-.4.:7,..,,-4
•le,'.t.'-'!",''. •f,,,,Xkitti,.,"--•,",...:;,',, '": -.,-..„0„,-;;44,,,,,,,,,• :-.54":"-'-v•',.-:'.ii, ", .-:.' ".*-b-itta,,,i.••:'.'•'•iVIP4':.'.,..,,„-..."-,:;--7*"'"4.;. •••-r-4,i'-*Ir'-- *•-*V-4.4.e.-2...*-Nt"0,.L
4--.'1;Z: •‘,. --',,,,"4:-,;S-•••,---7z,'"'06010**„.4.477-4,''. ...i0K fg:::,°•-•;:• •-f- ,!'•''''-_;:ir•-•.•:--•,44-_,-,_•.:-••-.,,.:."'-'4, ---s,••!,,r--7,---,ff. *: .....!....0,..-„„-- ...- ---0.r.,,,D,V,L*---...*"":44:-
•- ..-. :2,44, ..-!-p4 . ----,:::-„4,...,;,.-•,;,-•*.mo4.•!-*•7,7?-•-••..-.:-:'•.Z:.'..---•,,...;,-•••:•..-..vr'•:!: ,4•:' :,•::•' ""-;? '-,34fge‘if.-..'--..-•••..,:••• •;.:',-;X --''''"--,-2.1-''''''' -ic " --.-,'"710..,--. .,-,,,,,T--,.:4,,-..~f-.,••;-•-,•
Yr'.,.. .alltZ-A.:.•,-.. -'.1-.•:;:::::;`: .re•AgE. Nt.'••,."-,,f`.-:`• ,-41-••=•• :-ff,..... ---,..„..*-• i.‘,:',..-•:-*.,:rf-.'",- -ke...r;.,..:. :wog* , ,,, ,.„...-.,.:-... wkiwz-1.444,- -.-,',.
: '''''4,*?..,,,...-"...-.--:,,,,,-. .-,,,...;r,;-.,,,-.•;:_. . .,-:.. -,';';',.r,,r;r ••*r.,-1- •..:;;:.:..:-,,,,u..;::: '4,...,-....,,,r,r,7.--,:t,-,- yif:-:?.,:,,,,,-...-7.-%-;,,i;-;+?,,,,4..t .- .-L-v.,-..w-r..., . . i'.7,4*..,---,.: - .---.;,,
----,. -..-*T-41:6*-w.:4-- ri .....-5,,,,, ,,u-,.-.-..---. ...---`--- •`:,',..44 ..':' ''V -"'•;•*.•-•••• • -'•:',.."-:•-•.--$`.:•:. •-•',',,,,,:•*.4.7", ".-_ '•-•• •:74,,:,,,• :::.*4",if., .• , ' _•,,,
,•••,.,-'t• - -:.•'7•• :.:,;",.i:•.V.,t-ti-=.41•LgAt..i•4.44$04.,-,;-:-.,4*.• :2.4'2_ . •-•-...,,r...;•,„..,:-••'-%.'-',",•';':,1 ::','/:•••4 _ . ' •."•'••••Wi-.•;,,•-:„.•.-•,• •-F!.:7• :.-': -:- ''-:- ' ..,..• •,,,N;:!-'.'",,•;',-1';:s4•4 --,'",'.Y.-:'
4.,
.. ''''•-•!•:.,i -,2ir.ii-ti•44-44,:-,.. "--.-"•'•'"--..:•.;,•-4--:'"•,"L-=, `cook".,,,,, •--- . -,'',,-,'moilk=•=••-.--'= •- •-:--.•-:,":-2,-. -.. .••. 4i::-,470.,•,--,,.. .--,.,„,---,R.ft.,-;4.,;-,...-' _t::-.4"..- • --,:• -. - -i •:%-t.,--.--.%.--.,%,.."- , ..w.:-
:-,i•z -7'"..rs.0.---,.. -,,:;.J..--1'-"?.,•.-."0-.:••t:', .'-'-:.- -=-,. -. .---:',•-•.,• .• • —. .:14-t---..-..:10.:1$14-i,•"4--ic.,------4. • .).,..-------..-,•
-t,.-:,,,, ...•-, --.0.- , - •• • . ._.. •t,4•-,-z- ...:--u,;, •
• -'..'••'' ' • •- . •."''''•,fait". :.---• ' ':Ad--.2/:.Az:40k '''-':.*;1„,,,,,a4A—.....„P -'-4oNi•w"‘',"•-'',,, '''.,•-••-•'---- ..._..,..-..•-•,..-- • . -i• ••. .-'"'-., -.' ' ',. .7.•-•'-i.-,.:,-..-:...
-_-Ot.,'U,...." .:•,'Aor. • f.;-:r.....'*.i,'•..1!'"-, .: ;-222-.A,---.,v * ,1•;c7::%'•,.
k;-,1". .13--,..- • .:4„_,y2.• •,,T.' ,-..1 ,,.,r•Zz..q,,,,;-,;.142EV.'•----'1.'•:•-•- --_-. ., .,_ .• r,. ,-,,. -.:y:".ii.,•-'4-v...---,.. • '
• ,• ..• .
''if7;...'--r-: •;:',• :7•.% '•- --'7,,r,:, '''.. "•':,-_-•1'eX4.4 .44i4i'V - •.;"'ir'40%--....... ;-;,,r..•":"Ve.*. '''',-. ; ,,,e4;;Y,.',:s,t1:,-;-...;:tj,•.
ettE,
._ ,, . . , .• .• ..-,.. ... ,... ... . ,---
4i1Pr'.."!'fb•
'5/".-.,..14,„„•,-,: !.••"'?••• ':"=,4:•"0:'It.,:#•,-,":*-L-14,1p*:00#4,-•••,:. •i: -•••2:.•-•;•141 -",-"i'l,V4-",..•:,..--0,..L'kr.17,-''' ''..,...,_... • `‘..:1,.. - • .. .-
1.---f--,P,;*--,-•,7.-s.-14--r=.7'•-e•-"•"'''',.„„ ' ..."';'•;:4.1";A:e•;:c'''-• :•,,•,„:: -,,,ii'il'-,,..4-'L.:..4;-, '.' ..tit,44.• .c..;=.,::,;;...,-.4.-.4eiNn„,?"..• •••,..., ;:::::likr„....,,•:, • ,..-:•,:: •.,,,;,_ • '''.1"0"•:-.,•,..K,74
-,...,•iz-..7vt...r.-'- .'...tAito:.,r::;,._„L-.:4;4:i-, .,.,-.•:•, -,.,.....1-.•_<•:;-.-,•;.,..,..,••.:4-;-,,, ,,,•:;„:4•-- ;„„.......t., . -:- ••::.-R_J,•- -:Znffr.•'t-f•.'-'•::''-•:".--oN•f:,;.-.t,;•---- ••'''-:k• ., •.:,•,-,A- 4--, ,,,,r• Nt--7fr
::-Fi.,;*;4.7A,4:::.,../ ;. ,'-vi.'-,-.- ,, .,, -,..,.,...K.34.,v.t.:., ,...:-' :.:,,,,,...,:i.::,-
, '..-..c. -,.. ....for',1.:4.. -.1!)“..: - - ''.'-:•,4,7:L'4,4."1,'''....,!_.7..7 ..7itt:',Fk.'. :t!;_.,' ',44.t.;t4tel'..-t-it _ .-:"..^.. .f.17,' '''''..'(.14[::,:.'''')044:9rA,Agiel,,. .,,,,*'''1,' .L2*'77; --• - '
'-':'fi".;.- •,"- • • .•, .:'••••.:T-,T,...."-:-.'r-,-••• .•••''-'-'4--•;*;:-.-,.:,'-' -,''7!,,.•"7"••.__. -7:•;;,7:‘:-S,-'''',4....;**.N..:';'"I<Ai,7...-'`,';:-:-.1.-1'-'''...:,1:,-,4•';')e--riti-.... ::L4:°*:,11 ,..•*•.. -::i.:,...„1-.'11--,' '',-'7•ft.-'''...-f`-'''.‘:'3‘":':;,
': .•V•t '- ....,.iiier.,,,Af.,,g,...,,..,..-•'•ttaL,:17.1:-.', -5.-Virt..s.r,.,',.'4: ••".:•.•,?,;:':•,;',iviz,....•,,,•:.:,....:'..iwi. ...! ,,Ai.,'„"1r- N..0,Orr',...,..z...:',4,..;(2..:.41-....-..,A, ''..-.' .,'••:".-",,.!,-.1,,,,,.,'Z''...:,,n'4'j:,,./7'
. ''''''. .."..-.• '''-'-'"':-?. ..:!:-.777.-rr'• ,•4,74!.,!:TIli,i;';:.- :,,i',W7.,;,:';'-''''''47';‘Y • •L'.'4.if':.•-•":"..4.--7,e.s.':-''.::-..t','.!r:r-- 1`"47-01,4"4_.; •';.:. .'i',"":,:::, -".4'''.'- ',i'lVO'..
• . . .
•-' ...01 • •..f;-•,7"3.0,1;YiPt., ::"•'.1:17 Air • - ,.• .. ,-•. .
',I:41 •••••:__,•.:•.•.: --,,.._!A• --_-=',' •••••- -'-, ` ''-' -
Photo Point 15-UT2 Reach 1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 15-UT2 Reach 1,view downstream (4/5/2022)
..' -..„... 7 .
• . - 1,. .,g.s,,..p:f,L, ..::::,;:,4i.A.f4,, ,,' ,:',-:;:.:-,'';''..:,;,...-... .. • 7.-..--.14.6,t‘ft,,, ,,A,$.•.
• . .•
„, •,. :.•
_. , _.. • • • • _.
•.....:-...;',,..• ,....-..:.„
. , • .. ,.- - .-..
• -,..°'#77,1044 ,r;V-t•:.•:.".•'•,,,,:::-,rer .• ,wo.,.., r.,,,w.r-,-,--..4-. .:M.''..,.,,F,,,;••••-,
.-k.'-•••-•:-Pfir'r•,.:1%:.,i.r.,•...•:.:..• - .. .. •• .„0:r.,;.--.., ;*„,t,,,,R.K,,-0.40 4,..„..-h... .••."-....„...•:-..4„......,„-'..- 4.1,.M.,:.:.:::-'-...,,,,,!•;,_•;.•',... 7,"""rirtivohoggimialrhisillitamoorpYli
.,,,t.,,,:•-.,-?•'L.;!..:•:-::::.:.-,.-"•.---.-•-. ....:,,- .• --.. .. •••:. -:•-•,:;:<,..4:=4--.•fr."4;:1747:k4•" 0:-'-4,.-: .- ,i,.g,-•:,'''''',W`-ti.;,-",-"...'.7.$4*„.::•:.C..,...-;;`.. .:•:•:4•?,:]!•14...`,„- '4',--•,•-
]:---:•41f01„;:e.10,:.:.i.V.r-F,•,,:7,-:55:';'-'•...--4,. .---g*.11,--,.i07.1-'71.:.4:65:..,":g,::;=.!1:,,•"7:', •-•::4„:::74,:kt•ma 0:1%•:-..4.:•::_•,•:V1-44•':;-f..•44-.?7,,.:.T:6•,•-•:i..•::•;•::"•:1?:,44 :'•:'.-4.:: .'
'-•,,,WeA.It*, `,,;"ji.i;i.A.V.,•`-. . •. - .,;.",•',-,:'* 4:10:re'''':.`7:::',-.•."-,r,...r r-.--tt.,Wifv.:-- ",..,-4.,:•-••::;!..,•.'..'.-::-..-..:vt?,_-..:7•:,••!.y:.,,ii ,:44,4,4_,.,-x;;,,,-,5',-,,iuiv::„.: .::-., ...
eNiAtIcA'":;'::-.::';',t:';'.::*P.'::'''Vr''''.;.r.'''','.,',..!,,,,"i,-..,,;?;;.V.,••4.4.r.rX-:•••':-:•''.";,.-.P!"•'7i0, ..1t,r'. ,-.4. ...,•"40•:!, :,:-;.r;f:::'•vtl*VIZe,",0:=•;-*: ,-.1,"-, ,-;ir.-,,,,.:,_ ,„.•,:,,,,'17.44.....-,,..,4,,,-
.,.r.,0,:,,,±,-t„ ,17.---,„.4.,,...,,,, -z:••,--7-;,*;':-E',.%..-,;f-kr-k.:44‘...".. ''•',V,I'.;:.4-Fit, •0,41:,,zi.,4-4*.,14-,:e.: ' -74.ig."::• FL'il•;,7'''?'"•''',,..','•-;•-','''. ..',-i.,--i,.'"<:.-.."-"--' "-',t'.••4,":1'5'•.-...' .,,,,.';'-'-'
•-,:•,.4,-,rz.4.,,-,...,i,,v,._-;:yi'',p...,.,:t;T::t.:,.-zm,..-;,*;.,-44:*„..A .4,,,F.u..„.*;...„,,tv..-,..,•-,,. ...,?1,!: .,,,;i.,A,45,1.,?,,:.*:.,.,„",,,cr,.4. .,?:::.,..A7` '',"'Vi:Ite.-14,,i,:;°;....'":;,41,-:,',.,1:;. /A-,,t,t,1;•::'',',..;-.: ;,.:;;,:,',ii-I'..,:',.
.'::::•:,n12:*:, 35.',..;`'',.:' ''''''4':2,::A.;:.-`1k:7=4,A0-7..'':'.n.:..:.:t-'::'--.'.Fir.:4'?-rtatli ---:"'"177. 1.4.a:i ,;-14.4NC•e''•;1•:;•A?••:;.:•.:::r.: ;."-'•:, -"".'. .-±if.',q4Z.-:i..;.' .,,-..''':'"-:.;j:''.11*F.-:.*-;:ie',':--."7-;-:.iZA'.
t:;:.4..a..7:,;..k...i.,;;,...;f;:it,10].,..,. .-',.: ,.'...w.,,,,..t.',. --,:4?0!,..4,....t:,. .q.:;!:..,',-:".,:-.,.,_,,,,,- ;;,.:.i.k:1•5....,ti:' '', :-.:•'i,•.; :xfk.i..;,,,_0A:',3:: ;...tit,'... 7.0,4-A'.,:••;,.,.,'. '''----.•'.,r ,r.,`, ••R--.:7-',--•;0'i'',.7.,.-•.:-••;•:''. '''-;.,,
ALItt,-4411;-INC.;`,;,r:744:;.'.., :,•-r".,.,;•!„-•,_ r.,••• •,1-:::',..!:,:Wi...k.n.,,'W.-!..,;;,,.:V..',4.','•..r,•;,,....;,::•fr.4:::,',:,,:,it'kA •:•,...f..e,••;....,--r-1r,r *- .:' ••,-,, .7.k..,..::.„1-sg.:• ,.::,,r4.,,,g.;',.:-.,.,:.1.,-,•;,.:.,. .',..-. la.41/4-ifyskli
.tikti, ...:roi.. ;.,,,,,•,,:]..:i,,,44,',L.P:.:W"-•, --;..-.:N.v.;.. .:,.t.';.;.„,::%,.:'.:'4-7.--biAe.";-.1,.4,V? :'...:',4'''''' 1,,,,.V.it•'..,.:3••-;':.•:•'-:? '""•••.•,.:':.,,-1::.'" .A4-!.,!.-.-,..t7,...,,t-V,•.. 1.41"1,,,,,r?'..'*0... 4.*•,;,&..f4
..7,:fAir.',--il,p,a4,;;;;;;,,Nikt,_-., 4?i.l'ri.i.,:•:•*7•„.;.•,1,-4441.":;":',-,:::$1,f4-,11,,,:4.,•,- .,,;: 4.1t..64: ;40-,,,,,,,• .,144.1....:"'.::',!:.'1":-:•,•,-.,.:. ,=••:":,4"" :-. ''''''-,,r-',"-A.7'.2-141".,.:-.;-;>-',",-,...-,t7,,•:.-:.P,:,Ziki-••"":1.'":"7(
:::!:'.:'"..,'12..",::',:,..;.:1.•, ''."-:7:4Vi4.ii.wt17,54-4'..t4tA"I'-=.,'S•`'T4i-,1•7N_;-,it,-41,Vt,"*"-,..4.'?".1,•,?•••''::', "."-.-:-.- ••:.*:' ,Ar'l..i.".::','•:'''`:':`-!:',...,3:,:*•;,..-•-•.:r.?.40•:-.:,lrgitgf -1. ...-2%,ikl :41•!-MA•410.
`5,.."':_.,,•...•.•::: :!:•4W-t•:!;1;i';!.-•';* .. .,:/1.1*,,,,H.7:-•'•!:t*,T.93**,,,,,,.:*$,gt•,: .,--,4.4.: ..::::;:;i: 04,.....:.,:%:;;IT.":-.",,,, -.40,,,,,, ,•••. ......A.,..ilt-.:4,„:44:Mi.gatAkozwv.t,..v,„:
:;.::L•:,...,':,';.,:t'.',:z-:;..1...414.:1A.3:,;:oil•,::1;0::`iigi.:44:',"..;,61.1.. 04-illUtfik:',04::':?:1.,,,: 474.:4,_:#_,.:t.7:!..1,.7, ,:4.1,4,2i.i ..F'>",":7';',V:.;• :‹.4,-4.A-re..: -, -;''''4.-iak z&A.'1:;;;'•!'-';''.....,:i:•.r:•::W.4%El*:44Ml!':."
t
,-.:',1Iii,t:7,447,',Z,N9-•::i" gi`-''''.:F-Ct; _',;4Li:''':1/4t.:„-.441-:::: fe0V-:4Ntitill
.'',1..4.-c. , :";::,•:•1,:,.k.•1•z;.•,:•.•:::,;..,••:,,•...;•'•:.:.,,,.•.•; :iA'. •':.7sily•:40-f*-#F,+,4f•- •/•,.7.,,,:i:Lf%Xt4.]h,::::: :••;;7,..'.•;.!:".! il.:, ::::::,",4,,7•2•i,, p•''Og.,4?4:''":1•::.• _:'.3,t..,.... -,1,-:,•1.,••;-,70.•Xi.Atriiptilikprii,„-4,,k
;::";,_+•:,,•,:f:54.,i;!,,--1;. .z.,;,'::::•;-:;;.•;;•,..-•.,.:..:'•: •if•::i:.•7bte•or;!,,,,4.,316*.r .,,'.1.:'nz,T4'r•ag7.,..:1-.:,,;:4-4,1• :r7,..:',$,07„„;;;;„i`fdr-f-:•.:•'•-' . •.• r;,",,',.'0,?..6,-4,,*,'.r:7,449.:;,::::!tetk Ai..7in:'t".. -1,T;.• ... 4'7.4'_., .
:Vpt..,45. -417i.kfroaici:e,*c;•,•,,:•:.•.:,r.„,-... .w.„-&,, 4,..:0;11P?:.•‘..AW-t,".-'`..•r:A....;11:-;.'-,:•SWP:• -,' •;•A''''' •r4:;;':5.2-'iI,r.r: •••-• ` ..i 4.1firiiNgli ;A•;.-:4,r•••.`r •-•i-..-7.?:•••=•:, •;.-
"•::.3.•.:r.."•;K:c0.::' le'agt-i:P4::• .:.-•°•`:•-':• ,:`;t1).Y,iit :';I:rg,•-4:. ':410??..%ii :-••'..'"• •.;‘,,'P'.:•r:',I-ft ...''' J:•=..• ;',.44:,•,;-; .•:..'7.:-.:,-,:•' , ‘44444.• '',Wc-'. ft..4,!!:-•!.'0!.epAt..f.ii_,::,c.•• &,',;.;i::.'.'•4.•,''-,•
,..::::..,•41,r•:..'4...4-4!:"W.,_: •WiVIZt.W.%,,:*'..W::::,.:"•:.`::•V•54i'f4e"•:;.:"-:•;•-....,., ::'-,Tt-- „Irt•r N.;ih--::,,..........,--:.••. ."-_-••:::,;‘,-,Telsov 3-vr.a,:14,,,r4-4,0".% _ig',,t:',.,',v5-:•-,- .'5,"..1 ,?,,,N4,,:•:°,
.-i7.-"."...:MW ."44..:45:-Tef,:;7;',41.1. ,W:.,'"i•,,,k,"--&144,%...1‘c•:::.E':•:• :•• •:""',,.....1_,•1,''''.1,,'",--„,i,";er:=-,,=,-...:4 •?,','"r..!7i::.4.t.'7':'.',.••;.-: ' .,..•:-.:490t4itt.n,..a„,:-;4.44"6,,,,,,•,.*AXIi',.',,,;1,'-•:';'-ilMi4.";:,„'::
:2.:.-,.....0..,45i,;F!,,,,!,%:'.4-tos:4431,64:&k:::;:c•ii"..7k,•'''''g.2,,,,V,F,-:-,`,&.,. '''''''`Iik.kr,l'‘•Ni''''''''''':.'t:i4.' 'r•t• ••';'.:•••':;r .1.•r'.474:ke;21,..'''j.itiktOWPati41- 4::k,r•IL 4'•..,,,,Plq''',
4:7•4'?:..-'...1,4"'5,t5 e.S...47'''.,i'...St4'..-ii7rlitk**'•-,.1t-L•7';'4:,','`:'.:d LtS::'''1b0,:'"'Al''',.. c..(1,.. ..r.''''.. •• 44..!•'''-'.'"'•
j- :)2'14 j''4";ter....e,:'el,i''r.'il!i IVeir.rr;•4,'.::',.A.:'•‘.,,j,.,.$!.'.:'.. •!',...,...:.':.,r:....1,:,,',.. ".1...!. :.,-•,.'.: 1 P._.. ,ii.:‘A',.'..!..'.. ' , • .,•,.r..'4.4•'•..4..14'..-4r t."';;"..''.'•:.;4:4:1•47.5":r:'.4:'-*A';:7..-•'1'.T.'• .'(..‘ ";'''• M'.
'"'''''''-':':::'''Y..':''',-4'.*'',.'1'.':''',,44"'`.2•-,..1^',' :41''41,-.E5«: ':':,:)7',,,,'.!.4,46.,. k: ,,,-.,,, .. - - -
Photo Point 16-UT2 Reach 1,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 16-UT2 Reach 1,.vie7c,1:7Ainstre.a 7 (.z!/.,5/2022)
..L,--., .
. ._.... ...„..... . . ,.._. „. •1;15.Wg,'',...,..-'1,7.4t.f,r—
--,..... . ,.,,, ,:.,.7,,,,,.„,.,„,-- - "° •••-s.. .,,,,•-•.:_-:..:•-.-!.;11#,•,•:;•,.-P--- -.'-'----,,-4.-"--.:
, ..
.•,. ,- "•,•:?..",....:.-.:•:,.,.;•*•,::.:!. .:',..7.-. --. .. ,•_•_••'-•:'-•:•...:.;.,V.Aii*t.P. ,i;rti ..r''!:"4:1'':'•,',007ir ..-ii--,.--,tomo-, -,.,....______. --...--,imeas, - •''.7'.,'4',.......„19.4.:i . i'i,,,,,.,--..,,-...-r ,i.474.
,..._:...,._;..,.- 1,t.r,,,,,,,,,,;....,,,.,,..,,:....7:-._..,,401,,:,,• • ...,,A.„.,,,,i-,,,;•,.„,,,•e,.,=,,,,,M,.,.::,,.:,-',.'-"i1;, ..:.„.„',,,;.n.,r,:, :-,-_-_,..„4,-.,-4i,....,...-7- --,,,--._.•• ..-"..-..'. --,•- •,r,,r,r,:,,.,;:•-;,:.,i,„ ,,,i,:`,,-•*•_•,;.•:-.5,.„.; .:,.f. -4.,„1-.-,,,,3-'
'....r."'A .41•,*''' ,."'"4 "i°,14..,''Pr .4::'',.14,., 47 •• - -'sr--1;'-7--- '•• •-•'-'•-,i'VAIStr!' .:•';.i:.,''•-.1-:•• . r;;:i:;'":.'"'".;',..7-,7:77e.-_'.:,r7'7;7:-:;',Wr.ki4. -:.N.1".,,rii;',!„-'7 ,,,,:1•4.k.,•;kv.:-.4;,•:',01.
4.4VO.:_k`';.2. (''---.'..'-7:::=•:',-7.-,-
:a:ef-•''' '''''.+.r#,:AVC 7:r.t4f''.;7et''•'' 'A7''. ': -'-.- . '-4414 l'X'n:„ ''',-.7.''',•', 1, r,,.. n..,,,,,%:.,,T::!...,,'..,e,,,,'' ,1,'.1144.-'4Xi.a.:7i.,..4114W'..,'..4*'..."4'4'9,4.0.72" ..
'' '..f.i;,::'-::7.0-'"'°'."' • ' ..L:Vrli:'''' l'Pe''W;;'W':it:V 1:•'... ,;'.Z.L'''''1,•''''''.'-:'r'rg:.:''''';'.L,..,..t.,'U':bi'A.,‘",•''...:'';'.:.'n;'VZ1,16,.*A,,,:ei, .':,v.„Fg.:?;
-.....:Ve.'415.: "..-547.%rf• WI '•:'•r 4rf.-'7.::,:-.,:,-;:',i' •'S'iikj ',,.,•'•:•:•; .::,•!':i,i4i,,,,, ,k.,„,,,7„:;;`.. ...,. r'•'' •°;,-.'-7-.1:4-rti:"T• .,rt:ZSZ.4.77*:'t•rt,VL'I77;:lki.;47:4.,:e.arf:
.4.54A,;.,.t.,,,,...:;:,,;.*,;,,,..0.. .v.-.,.,,. . ..;...t:n,,_.1%, ,74,„‘. ..,../.,_,....,.w...-,,,,,,,,]..,...1,--;,-,0„,.:"... .ali-fi.„•,•-::,,,43'.1,:,4?4,,,,V.,• ••••7i*.:r:TP.,-4,-44..y0.',1*,,;,•
, r";•'7":;-•-'•.'" -*.H••••:,. .,k,,,. , .
•,,,,e 4.43V.',,'.'''. .r;'".CA:.,4,,,,,t'•-:!NO%.'44,4-?.:04:.!:.:A iNg,ii.,W;-;,.,M00,,oft:,•,..::;•i:,.,::,r,
,...„.7,...;_ 44.4.4„.,,,•:_,,,,,,,,,„,,,;-:,.„-e,-,1 4,.;•",„.„.„,..„.•...„„•_. • ---,:,::44;!.-:,z.. - --•,,,,..t..,.,:'',vw,-,.-,4 •,...,:r-,;..,,,,, .:',,,„,:.''.?1; ,,,•''':'.:;!'N'I'. 1.P;',1,, i:.
.',,i,:,°-.e.o,".•i,-4'.',.':-,t-,•..". .:"-.. -•-:',::,.''•,',f,•,:::?,"---,,-..'74. ..::::-.:,•-:,.",714,t;: '.4k-'77,... ,-.*4-,,,,- ....0X-,y.,4k,,;-.4:,-'14k4Vi-'-jk',,, .."•:• -i'•!',"-•*'m.,,,,_-"ff-.7--701:2<,;7.mg,.'
,,,,.-,7*...i.,,-.-.-- ,q."*.,•,,,,,,,n,:-41100.:--,,- -.*: ...44,.. ••,-..--livoigi,;,•'..-.4.,,,,•-'`UV",,,.",,'04)V,%-,,..44:::,.,,-...,...:..,;,;-',.=,-R4f::-Aavi.5,..filw:. ;:.
-':,-...,:,,.",,-10k,r-?''':,.,•-.',. .-. .,..-..:.....:z......•- ..4,-... ' ,-.- ,,,,v-, ,-..?:,:,,,.- ,-_;::: -.1,1g,,,-:,.,41. ::'.,,,=7,,,,,J.'4.-...-,..t,. ifi.A..-•r-,-,44.--:,,;,,. ..,: -ii.!4•,v.:',-"';24 .,,,,,i..k.,:,,,,-,-,..,,. ;.„;_ -,-;;;,... tr.i.h•pm:**0.?.
'''''',...••,#•-'•!;,*"...,:-•,-:-',-."-•'me r •-••••'-..'•••W4.----,117-''..)-0'`,.% . .A...,;•••'•':-*"d-Lii::••••':'.;•••-.:,-::::.•0,41:,•:,'Zr:'.,'•:'.• ':::''`':',.•,•-.7;ptT'.01'.;4:,.:7;7•:•.•:;‘'."*• ,:•...:4k9::•t'`: ",':(2•15--,:: •`:!ifa'..1'.,-,,,:;;-•,#, V-!:•: :.;Ititt)W-•
!7'••:',46•41.4r:''';•;-;47••„-..trf:':. •'L'Aie":7".rij'."1.A.:-'14",n•e•ilk;K.'„4:•`,;::,..»,^.:4"...4,. .N5"..-:::,'' :,.....:.'ir,',:''.;[.:77.4:".:':':;:"''.:`;'•':".'rki 4.**,..,y,:*44.41,,,V,:::,Isi"-,400:4.4'N.i,,,,,,,:::',?7,',4";,,..,-v.:,,,,,,zio
3.1"... --_„„,k;- =•1;41 .'",':':,,it,4,.. „-,1,,,,IP'::......,‘,...:.!:•"0:f-•-•AL..1.4;-.114:42:;N"-'•Ft.:164V.::.*4'.4t „LVF-*'-':'L.',._•:*'-.\',••••,.•- 4,:-;#7•M'''-*,4.4,11;',',*:.i?'- '41'L';',-;,',1,,.,:lt;*•2,1,-ittg1.ri.:!:',:-..k-
4.4.*,,i.0.7,„4,;,.;,,e-.4.:, „,:-•;:t!ri,•46.4,4rmoo.ii.,,..•?.;.,,,!•,ri.;:,i:','d;,e.??,:vrtIsrit,•gt:OF.irit,:rr:';• .•,:!';,;-•:,fri:J,.: ::"j"..,-14,-.. .,,,...244,,,pc„,41.,.•:17:4VW1 ,,,,,.'•r.:?,t7,,,%,=',:g',:.7.'.-ZL.'4,yo.:•:'..„-..:1•06'%,:,!•,,v,•„.-•.irif..M. ,2;
7:-.;:r:,,, ,,,,,t,W=4,1*,, r=',„: 441.K::. :,".4'. ...•-0,..7"6:71''' e.Y.:,:.-ri:,i;i7P-0•••:,- 1.1.k. •,•"".'"::.-•••,,"'" ......,,,-,w,,...._4104',,....,-,%.'.,,,,,tgot :4,, ,:.L::!-.9,.,:.r.t-, •-.-
,:0-4i.1:':',4;SA'&',:*0.:•;-;.:' •.4.-.44.,,.., •. :,.,C;..,,?q.:.5,',..;7.'1.%:3::::r-.,:c,•'.,..'4', .J.. .-,.;:,,....,••,,:-.,.:: ....:;r:.
'.:4.44if.,'W44.0....,..,,,,.Z:7,-.'.-,!,•;..,...,4, ••• .i,:-..4...k,=,-ViA. ."'5.".T.,;•;-,L Iii,•,.:,4••• •4.,fit:k.'•,- ;'. 7,!•,:ir:..4.,,,;;•,..,,,.::,,...,k,;=:,:,.,,,t,-z-,:],i,,..,:,•,,,z,.. .. i.;,, ,,,,,--„,-!••7:-.10,--,:,-.',,,-•••• ••,;_:•..1•4 :. „,„:iv,;,,-,,,,..•,.,
-:•,. 41:414::•.::10.5241.::::,—*N,S..:41t::•, •kr:f:';47.:i:*' • 7;.14.:V.;:giV1.51iI-44. ';-:6- ji;.,;r41.441,:•':,',"4 :'';,:.•'3'...'• ,'••.4P'?4":-i'e.-'4A-WL: -14,•";•*4,•:-.. '13,•-: •1:?::::.:44.
''.?W:;,' •4. -,.k.•"`4ti.':,;•&•-•::•;•:r.i'r''':,,_N;,,,i,,?,:iiit-ii0,74:4!i4° :',.ii.::104Z.e.,'-..Ve,g;.;•-.'.:T..e40 •::,..:b.N:ii::••4n-,*.1.4-FN,;.`2W;:r.!a4:•;•i",:"?•:'01AfiZ ti:41.44i,.•.,: k.VAT
.-414V17:::'..1.5.;.:7:•,•7,..,,,:4-4-#14:'74:#047:•'•;`•7••;.-401,irt,it, 14::;:s•-'7".7_,,j••,..::',,pliW.3,-.,21,--53-;.'!.a.. .,T;,-**131.'•':.-::,'%?:• *4'.%.RF404K
41,
--i.ov..,„!,..±4.0-0,z,:.„..,.,;tiKi-:•epiitli,.. ,,Jz„.).mi. .:'..i:'!:.,,:,,-•A_isg-.0.7r.t .,-1,,..te:. .'.c'..,:„,,.._,-f,4i,rtAzka:iwfg..-•;')I.r:!!... r:tV:'!',:t•';'•:.'r.'<,i,---:;::4..:•'.;'•... .,'-n';--
„341,0,..0,,,,. ..,:::-,,,-"..:,,,.,-01,-,:,._,„7.,Avi, it,-„.f-•,.,,t-,,:,..k:..i,:i1,:f"-,.,','!!''..-,:-:-aljt.,_71;'45: 4,"27V1M-.. '-`....-.;ati,:$VOr'4:w;'^,ei.4'i,,,'''.--:,7'if..14,;',.`7 •:=,''n i,:,..';',''e -
Aik•40,41,k..-...,;;- .:,..:,-,,,,,,:-,..,91A.,..,,i.,,v, .!..41,1.'i.'1;;;:Z•.:•!.'rr.:1_11:.i',-,'.''.3.:,:tr.M4--r-g:r-.;•• 'f'41141.ki-y;'.• 1-47°--.A'',-,c..•,;:%•x4-,,:••! ,,,n.q...:-,:m,,,,,• ;",;•,-..14.%,•.-4i731.7,,,,J-:•?t,•,A.C-A.._......- -•;',-,'••:J-• -,.•-,;!,-.,'•![. .
-',..:11/X0:W.,4.-.•••t••:..4,1e, .riVf"..:44:.A;i•I'•••7---2' 14-.,••".: ...'"•':-iX4'; ' ''''• '''•"'N'47-0-'itik,*";',_'. .*:‘,r.°I.;•;•t;s„.,,,.;',1.:::-,,i-'',:-•;, ,r,5_•';:,'"t''''''•"4V.,,:_• k. -''.•• •' • ..
$,
'...,";1''-:-.:44 .,--#"-44-0,,,,,:tv''.".'I;',.:.40P'. •P' ,.....:..Y.4;;!.vq,:::...i.-,::,....,.. -',..--•: 4.:..,fr...,'2,,...V.;•=N'..A7r,-,'., ?.,.'tt...•_....: e -... -„,/,.. , ..• •,
.","••• •,41,X14,',..•"T.:••,'...,;t4.,!.g., 'A., ..w.,•-:- •• . • . .
Photo Point 17-UT2 Reach 2,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 17-UT2 Reach 2,view downstream (4/5/2022)

it
�,,..,.�,� . ..,.,_'� - ��;;.,r„ ter,•'
b Vi" :;�-
x
'e
,. .- _ . .,L .. , :-.. ,•,y ��. ':%x�t+'� ���--' '� .'`P'z. '��� �*ter ,�.
�•. .:. ,.: ,, .-5 . . , >:..., ze,5 - ..,;aT -~' x' , .~ = Vim.
. .. .., . ::-..,',-iv.,,--
_ a� ..' '_ `ems: t��
<. .::. :y vl . a,,n, s�: `*AV:
_ � .'4".:. �.zC,•'.- "'''"r` '�• s:A. 'fir=:.:::_ 'ems'?.= ``' � .�::d+ :
. a• r .. .` �- b`` ::"• .tea p'O, _ '.
r
qp'
�c? R-
�'v P,
ter. �;
>* - ! ';� �� '`,�2yy -,•�='i'* Rom• �''i .„ 'r'-�� :� -''�s:�.
s�»� '� °F .,.ins V L' '-x..3,5 ,;8` '�,:.,_:�;. •� y;[,y: ` x" 'br q �rw, +"� ..t - .; :�„,.
0.,4,. .;.4k • 4 ,.p-., -i;: = .�,,.-�-a' :.was 'r+A, 4.r - - , ,- ta�
•: ;;�:": " ':>, � _ a.: :_.fie_ ^:���
k. azs rt.,". ''!"- .P.ti" ,[ma' ;• c,n- ,§�.. a=-
.44,.. � :�° .ei#.` Cam ",t a #. �+f.' �. •r'G:.�,,,,;"1...-, ...?,44:4 4-%'4M14,4 .,tAf"--::.1:4 illl ' ' 4?"':','..'', ("t''''''' '4'' ,,4=,'''''''' � �� : F�' —�si�.F'g"%� �'' .s: :-.k��..
: -:: ,, s r �5+: ,„, _Wt" ^4�' -----.2
- IFS - :"y,8"
'?,�- - ''m .,k{'., :!3 `a: ,ti:"'�, 1.¢,•'-r.^ `. p+ _ ,.j.' s:a ,�' ri�v>` 4• _ .£,say.
+K7 '� S4 ay .eY ry - Hr.0",4 3. '- .�':b: _ ->:..�Fi. .. ,,el l:'.".r
Photo Point 18—UT2 Reach 2,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 18—UT2 Reach 2,view downstream (4/5/2022)
..
c�."-_�_' -.:{, - ' }� ",., � - '.ter. . . •'
:.s.
�J
- � ,- 4 `, -:`'�''_ 'T aK,,0, .s;? -ram ,,
may
�,�''-�:��..�'.. . :. ;:+f: :... „-".:.-'..:.,. �Y'=�r f� - ~-n�--"ram" - ��•` `'` • -
.- ..z iy:g4.a �s+5?'."� -.Y•-.:- .,.._. -.e1e" r:k:. :'.v R.yy'N^n 4y, h,,rv'�.;, ,.%z.t.:_:.-�' - ":'bF'i.`"w$i
N--;
.,�. .. .... . w.m...;,a:� `f.'-.. .,zf- -�[. .3T - .'*erg a'. a,; _ �_s•s- _ -
;r
rx >
414
ti s
.x ~. •.. , c�:.::-!G„'H� .- .� � ., - �':Ve. 3 :S`-:-, i': - _ `fir
'8`* � ':�s .kx .� '�'w,f .'.�•. . ° __ ..� ,.<p#. e. - +ky =:H?i. '�l i.�, uc- ,
�':,�y_...r - :� - '�:s_. ','-�' ;li¢,'.•�" - ....C;�y Ex"�.�: - .3.'�n'.[�..';!.,�'-� µyr; _ - metro
wr.. y p sue, . ' s e "" x
'A .�^' .r x.'� x, . :1.:-. _:Sad .-y:r : �pS
° - �' ,,k' 'RAG- - .+�r ,_���' nYK� - Vt� v>{
-ice' ..x.':a ,... ..:„.,4'Y.:`, '"w:'
:T
a.
3� x� �.�.: -,, : '-�.�.ir�ft"��dt..: . ..t: '"try �'k,�
Photo Point 19—UT2 Reach 3,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 19—UT2 Reach 3,view downstream (4/5/2022)
n :A
- -,~
c.
. "..
P'
tit '�s9 '. �1w4 cs - ' ' •cAa.-:°,,, - ' N!l . } '' - , ,,l ,vdrn t �i4r,:4: - r`�.,ti . _� ,• a , i - _ r. e-i7. "i :)i jM1,i t•_ 1.k;; t, „ i , H4 •*.is_
"Wat
._4. _ a .y rT y -w W :. K � . d `r'+° „_•j ::e ,.[.n.. ti1J .•�r ): - J- P <E - .f" N: , d>. ,. i .r<F .4 „ Gamy - :cr ._ 7:'� .;' - _�;rtas tts
•
t ,'� ^ ."•::, �y Vic �" +. .„ F _ t�
-- -k(r'.. .i,--.-,,70 ,Wide.. . •RF�• .'`.ti:Y'1 Iwto '..c3,t15k�s.. y
l "
a
Photo Point 20—UT2 Reach 3,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 20—UT2 Reach 3,view downstream (4/5/2022)

*afiir'7'� ' R�' :.�,�w.' - - �'"t, R •Cc+`.,^-tea
d:t: pain .. Y w,`c 6 � _
.�w ktT v�y t '1' �°g2 v' '�y.,,,L.� NF§�-`. 'h;-•- , '; 4 a'
CSC �`t `'9 - '°.'€$ '�- i 4,b'4+� - + S 3 ,,tl sxy ,.
ie
qs •--,v r .-.°~ f :+ 'tea'c s s-• 4 C am:¢ a yA-'b F_ °" 4"17.i'.'
":.,,`'Wr,,,,ct,,`.T:,'4-.,--:"." '.‘,.---`-ZZ,14:;..».k.::::;.,..1,P.,f;;;...4iii4, 77- - ' :: ,..-,.....;L',2;:,,; "-?,
._. �ilr''..:-at " ,"N '?l'.'�, • .:• ,a -- y' . 3' -a.r,Y r . �r�'� .•' '.a_ ..F- - '!�.
Photo Point 21—UT2 Reach 4,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 21—UT2 Reach 4,view downstream (4/5/2022)
•
girt,, ,�r
_-ram- 4^� �, 'c +ma'sSiYs3 '�' .. •, - _ - - _
y t
t' _ s "
- , -'-^ g.
.z a, d v i �
-s
a. •^fi
•
•
•
ti 4' • ? _ x 1 % '1" ,�rw n s-*_, `} -'; .- " a " - S'' '-7 -' :. 'f k` 6axr , �k F- p . ' _ � ? {t ar � 3E 4 Y ue Fa 4 _ ` . k h �i ' �, a.,- : _ " ? ` ` - ,. 3S r a Ai'-] a �� - ' " a 5z t _ - .� v .s.�.t, r '". ".. _ _ 'a$ - s n • -'.. _ V "" s ig o a r y ' x Vi"� °0 • » ? a ..• -' t -,..!�'''� �
4 & ' . k T i,,r,,,,..„ .
Photo Point 22—UT2 Reach 4,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 22—UT2 Reach 4,view downstream (4/5/2022)
" :sue. , � �7� 4 � �„ � 'k � 0.Yf <-' xr qti � " �5�";��" $'p
r
...;...,24,72-.- .4*,:4:,-,--*, rs..44-_,-,.-,-.---,.-e,,,..'7,-.:w3-.,k, ,,--TT-., --_,,,,. .,-; ..,,,,,-744- ,,m4,-.4.5id,‘„„i.p.,-.:s-,.-r.,:-,-,''It_.-, ..4.,.,;,2,.;..,;;..v-.'''F'''.'=';;;''''',''4:t.,i,..',-=:n*w-t1-',,,-
? t, J $ t a ;. t gip -,-1 ',- van G,. �€§. ? �` _ y s '
i =1 ;1 , '-P ?^4 .,.�- �;, 1 " .'. ..em s, F ?; w ,. xf
Sys" ,. - a
of ��,
� v _ 3 - •OIL-, s,r. ffix' _ �.�ii na - •_ r'1` e r
3„ a+ %..Ali '. -'�'it.I.: `n - `-e:�." .� i. `,s?et-
n:y � --s .?'.k.4..4, .e:_rr. '.s.. .
Photo Point 23—Rifle Tributary,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 23—Rifle Tributary,view downstream (4/5/2022)

rT T.. _ i.� ,
. -;.. �. ., T :::,' ,n i..
h
' .
" sr; „r^i`, � :':;p.! Rd 'is 'YA'X�"i� -� .ke. •ry ;�, .. .
a
T
.. ,,Y..-.-.a e�..SE .>.a ..Y.:;:•._,4 h N �,.�. _ �5�..� �r1F :$4'-5«-s _ j`�:T.S�
C'.' ': ' .�:.. ..-,• ? ...2-' .. :I. .,, rh.., n:' - - - %."E.� NIi`'. _ -yF-�:p.«.L.�.s9.'w ".;.
rim •. :.. -�';�>�•� ,
k.
+.jE,. ;,�."',�f. �'� - - ° � - o� ,r� '��' is"a,;�;�:�,. .,v 'h'fin: ? S' ��, 1
..: �.: i..r` .�^_.: �..,,.: _::..�,: .: :n. - .b..<d- ..yy, f• ,=i''.��F•�' J..,_, '`�:�a:..reP1 .-'�r:��d-
y.
14- - .� _- - _ ti-�r,•;�;'.. +y,. ?!� ;fit:* - �. - �-Y'„LL»r'`�,.r, zFr'
....q': �;9.. i � <w¢a_.�.�� Yam ;ti' �: _ _ ., .�x."�.:," 'eta-, c �„�. .
_. � .". � '� - :tip'. sc _ .;
i ,:yY... ,. _ � ... r� s-" vpa'' : „i�� _ty4'�p" T,.e�."s:',v.,'�'k�'w`,'-�i •'�;,�_-i , ''�'. ,., :�;.�y
? v ,,,,...:: '?' . $ A., Niy- 3'ts'i+<• _ _ y 4,-" tl• -r..� +t_ • -•at
e
� :per ,y"
,: y
r
w.,.
;'µ"' a .;d6;'k ��. ft, - 9�' h�F -'� . ;.'>a: ,r`'r- - -- . n - ,�e i�..�P.
d �
,
< s.ra, -, '. „ x, ..-. .f cam.-. ' k - `��,2- tyII ��- f
�:�•:;: �;+^. ':'�::�i•= ;, . _ • ''"��' :--. rt ,r�(:�.:`, '.,� '.' R`,^k,,•"?" ,u Fes' i. _
� r
-...af; _... �^�'�s:•t:R m: _ r�x: . �I, u` �_ l '� : s .�..v
Photo Point 24—Rifle Tributary,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 24—Rifle Tributary,view downstream (4/5/2022)
-
'Y .R
x� •.a' q: �,. -g .--, .�7y.,.,,-a s:ri•`''r;`• ...., :,f:s, gym.r.
.4dr e
.. ... .ram y • -
• A'T3Y�
K-'Y.k:E. �^ 4+ .^qq\ [s-- .r ,a,�: M.� • yr�;•:....4_i'aN M�
a. '-•za p^',:«?. _ ..,,,. :... ,;.. ' : n`.%_ ,;:* '}?r T-. 't- .:5.:
5 .1.. e'.,. .n . "?!L .,FR,a... _ bm"'v%v '.,A'G�R;. - - y°,�0._..} _
•�^!:: v.-�:`,i`I''= � .._.. :a. ,f �.,j�.. �,.b'Sr" ',f �;!°�' -.:` ,=mot Y�' ?•! '.�(
d � :p v Y
' � ,�y.. i .,: :.. is
sy _
_ :e
.
Yqt 5
f.
`f 4.-
T.:ts. . 1.-' ,',� � I:.. ,_.:.:.%.: }a< :..'.Jk:^"'.' _ �,�_ - �'x 2& off" - ::rct'r ::�,':,,� -
• , "fi
�r
.: �>:s � �"`::�`:' taxi�>„ _ ��°�:'�"`v_�
F-':y t,=�a�" .ik - !,"_ 'ih ' : ,t5'.'- -;:k.:', f"''', Lwzv ;
la';-
a
_ n
p•: jT
N . v.
r`i-ka" gyp_ - � _ 4.6 i.
. �'-. , :su'``'., mot is �' :W P.- ; x_'"•g: jA $,e
d 3�
x
;4
i
i
• Yy.
emu,- y=:' �� .
Photo Point 25—Rifle Tributary,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 25—Rifle Tributary,view downstream (4/5/202,2)
,.y
•
:
�,{
• i'y
•
=
' ' A.,'>: : ,k-s.
ah.
a,
w:.:e•
.:'
I.
.11
tk Ns
• n„ .� 1n z�;, K �+, e`ery� "t�. ' ' ix d S`, - -4ry `d ep "'$" �-� : i:-- 'g � : ` i, '
"__ �P�/ r - r;N t:� � 'y5 '- d: i* pr . ' .q ' ` ''k' s:w - � :eK'' 'a� :` :,w.` - 3 } - N r„ � y *�'' x04 3lm ".� :�a 'fi ' `.•- z
•
- y°5;: 5� • ;; " Fd E",-• ..4ii .. f'="5 3b-' ;3ce .; Y 'a• 9 ,1 ..�.s.:;,' v+ '? � `e rya _ ti ` ". p � : , F: �y r �;r: ' :ay :w ,.n r - ,, . ✓ / '- ' ,,'v * - -"-'t�},W .. a, 'i .l -' - ' .�";, — n Y l k;, ,. -e . »s.Ate,.. ', ', fi . i T'l iu"/.F` . � 'Pi: -•£ `'Sf'r ,Ii' ,a �S _ _ r i :. 3r „,. - `� .'� � -Y�V l ' f, : ,, � i g� b1 4 ? ,, � ' ';� �. . :- I �`7: y � _ r L yp , ' `.f .?' -r� '" ' 'Sh �,,"c. • N : i ,\, 36� emu ..t 4 ' T}7 C , S . -wt.
_ �: }-'`i'w'�, iGm , MAT ? $.u' gW • �c:- i4 t;av: -
•
Photo Point 26—Trapper Tributary,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 26—Trapper Trib,view downstream (4/5/2022)

•
� ,r 0.4sue ch i'- y.... It` ' � ,
,„.,. : *,,,,,.:,,.,-,„1„,„:,,,,,kfe -;._- ...tu,,,,,e„.,7-t 4,4--4.---'''..: ,, - ,.-.- --7'.;:-..-,-,--- '7. ...7 Arc':
�,5 T,M "Y t ' } `.. , r,Y' ' ''' °p��, -z:'� i.' s^" "'Maw y6.,4 -'y OS.,,a�„
� me sn 3 .ir 4.y k,x� -. -a. fie.:, �$ a. f:i
- y � em � _
3 �
� - s, i� it ,e` - . max .,'-' � ' a�� ' '''',
;15A.-14:14.f.val:;-, �,;� 'Y r
4 - ,. sq" '« `'.t s 74 -1. a._,. `i r -` . - --' „ r ,17'd try r ! s y 1''
Photo Point 27—Old Bus Branch,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 27—Old Bus Branch,view downstream (4/5/2022)
� ``� as - ' -a . - w �Y�✓h k-a - - -.�r
edk
fi v s A',R`;ta -, `maG,," 'f'"` --'� ka,' . ir,,.. , "4, '' a
t=_' ;-. '' s'-'I-.' V-, _", 7f:e -`4
1 • i �a ,a at 't. S 5 ¢ r-,'
rc rgL, e` y- w. ✓ yam. „ } y .,Er'_- 2,
'�-- -,--," , � ,7 a Va .z - i - 'e'er;ros -ar c'
r.
's 3" -ors t "f y,� Via. ,. a •^= ,-,..„.N.,,'
Photo Point 28—Barn Branch,view upstream (4/5/2022) Photo Point 28—Barn Branch,view downstream (4/5/2022)

Vegetation Plot Photographs

tom . ram- -
r'' , 's,. , `°cep ffi -
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 1(04/06/2022) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 2(04/07/2022)
, ,
III
s ',r r° fro _-
'.�'
r:
KAh -
_ '',5' l
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 3(04/06/2022) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 4(04/06/2022)
T * ham?•C
S
• R'4".4.''-',':.:"—,',4tkr'''14":11•00Afitliti:Vitii•if.AW*441 :4:otifi..:A7i.1,.4.0:4:'
` € yr - •_ ,-
x
•
";.. •f,''» � ��' -_ 4.4- fig 4yy
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 5(04/06/2022) PERMANET VEGETATION PLOT 6(04/06/2022)

'15*
• • s ra
T q �'"4- „p o f ,.� '•'5 4 .. �
_^
• � a
H r.
n .e, k : . Sri ,6,�s�- -.
'.• saw SAA S -:4 .1" i
:::..;;.:IL...is..:."`..r:' ...,?,,,,:,,,:* . a s - 3€".� rw "" .•• 4 ti '`"4 r-.. fit.
-cam "
a �
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 7(04/07/2022) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 8(04/06/2022)
•
w
1
'. vrfY
F
1
•. '
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 9(04/07/2022) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 10(04/07/2022)
•
Ti
fr n '� •
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 11(06/01/2022) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 12(04/07/2022)

:z
q
F
��s aka tm a
"- .. 'i � " '. x.`.�. tee- W .a : i " Y ti��
MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 1 (04/07/2022) MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 2 (04/07/2022)
A
•
a'mom
-� := \ _ . .
q r
s5
2` �Sx i'^�24 1. ✓". _ '.�.'... _ ,.. «� ..
MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 3 (04/07/2022) MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 4(04/07/2022)

MY1 Maintenance Photographs

J Ik _,'!r i"Y -, .yyRFi+¢bry 1
�, :
it
t" el, ram" rh
--."- s_,_ _.. -_,. st ems' • -
, "' z+- ar fx '.
. ti
'f ` , }t' .k-e te, ; '-' -
. 5 $ry i'' yi ,h N� :tea j a r` r11 o +t s, l '" *�,
, - A
rr, ''+: 'gyp ` �1 • i
Displaced Riffle Material—UT1 Reach 1 STA 210+50-212+50 Displaced Riffle Material—UT1 Reach 1 STA 211+20
(06/01/2022) (06/01/2022)
i.
g . s al X '' • i ->4-g ,'„;,
f* � F y , a-., �� } 'fig;
s; - ..:� ,} may _• _ tvA y
Displaced Riffle Material in Pool—UT1 Reach 1 STA 212+75 Floodplain Scour behind Top of Bank—NL Hunting Creek R1
(06/01/2022) STA 102+60(06/01/2022)

APPENDIX B. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 6a. Vegetation Plot Data
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
16
2022-04-07
NA
NA
2022-04-12
0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/Shrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 1 F
Veg Plot 2 F
Veg Plot 3 F
Veg Plot 4 F
Veg Plot 5 F
Veg Plot 6 F
Veg Plot 7 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
FAC
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
2
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
FAC
1
1
2
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
Calycanthus floridus
eastern sweetshrub
Shrub
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
FAC
2
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
FAC
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
Sum
Performance Standard
15
15
15
15
14
14
15
15
14
14
14
14
15
15
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
15
15
14
15
14
14
15
Stems/Acre
607
607
567
607
567
567
607
Species Count
9
10
8
9
9
9
10
Dominant Species Composition (%)
20
20
29
20
21
21
13
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
%Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
15
15
14
15
14
14
15
Stems/Acre
607
607
567
607
567
567
607
Species Count
9
10
8
9
9
9
10
Dominant Species Composition (%)
20
20
29
20
21
21
13
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
% Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through
a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation
plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 6b. Vegetation Plot Data
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
16
2022-04-07
NA
NA
2022-04-12
0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/Shrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 8 F
Veg Plot 9 F
Veg Plot 10 F
Veg Plot 11 F
Veg Plot 12 F
Veg Plot 1
R
Veg Plot 2
R
Veg Plot 3
R
Veg Plot 4
R
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
FAC
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
Calycanthus floridus
eastern sweetshrub
Shrub
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
FACU
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
Tree
FAC
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
FAC
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
3
3
2
2
2
2
4
4
1
1
1
4
3
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
FACU
2
2
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
3
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
FAC
2
2
1
1
1
1
Sum
Performance Standard
16
16
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
14
15
13
13
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
16
14
14
15
15
14
15
13
11
Stems/Acre
648
567
567
607
607
567
607
526
445
Species Count
8
9
10
8
11
9
11
7
7
Dominant Species Composition (%)
25
14
14
27
13
21
20
31
27
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
%Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
16
14
14
15
15
14
15
13
11
Stems/Acre
648
567
567
607
607
567
607
526
445
Species Count
8
9
10
8
11
9
11
7
7
Dominant Species Composition (%)
25
14
14
27
13
21
20
31
27
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
% Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through
a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation
plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Data
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Veg Plot 1 F
Veg Plot 2 F
Veg Plot 3 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
607
9
0
607
10
0
567
8
0
Veg Plot
4 F
Veg Plot
5 F
Veg Plot
6 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
607
9
0
567
9
0
567
9
0
Veg Plot
7 F
Veg Plot
8 F
Veg Plot
9 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
607
10
0
648
8
0
567
9
0
Veg Plot 10 F
Veg Plot 11 F
Veg Plot 12 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
567
10
0
607
8
0
607
11
0
Veg Plot Group 1 R
Veg Plot Group 2 R
Veg Plot Group 3 R
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
567
9
0
607
11
0
526
7
0
Veg Plot Group 4 R
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species % Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year
445
7
0
*Each monitoring year represents a different plot for the random vegetation plot "groups". Random plots are denoted with an R, and fixed plots with an F.

APPENDIX C. Stream Geomorphology Data

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
NLHC R1, Cross -Section 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
1
1
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
Medium
0.25
0.50
3
3
4
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
5
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
6
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
8
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
9
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
11
Fine
5.6
8.0
3
3
14
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
16
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
3
19
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
29
Coarse
22.6
32
7
7
36
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
42
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
50
\ ..
\O
S((r
\\\ \
Small
64
90
13
13
63
Small
90
128
10
10
73
Large
128
180
7
7
80
Lar e
180
256
15
15
95
Small
256
362
3
3
98
Small
362
512
1
1
99
Medium
512
1024
1
1
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
11.00
D35 =
30.45
D50 =
64.0
D84 =
197.7
D95 =
256.0
D1oo =
1024.0
Inn Sih/Cby
NLHC
Pebble Count
1 Sand 1
R1, Cross -Section 1
Particle Distribution
Gravel
I Cobble
1 Boulder
1 Brock
alath
C
C
...lei
.
•
u T 1
0.01 0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MV0-04/2022
1
100
1
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
NLHC R1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
14
14
14
14
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
27
27
27
41
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
2
43
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
1
44
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
45
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
2
2
47
J0'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
47
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
1
48
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
49
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
2
2
51
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
2
53
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
1
3
3
56
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
1
4
4
60
Coarse
22.6
32
2
2
2
62
Very Coarse
32
45
4
1
5
5
67
Very Coarse
45
64
9
9
9
76
�5,
L0�
\\\
pppp,
Small
64
90
4
4
4
80
Small
90
128
5
5
5
85
Large
128
180
4
4
4
89
Large
180
256
7
7
7
96
Small
256
362
3
3
3
99
Small
362
512
1
1
1
100
0\' -
Medium
512
1024
100
00
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.07
D35=
0.11
D50 =
6.7
Da, =
119.3
D95 =
243.4
D100 =
512.0
I nn Si [/ I v
NLHC
Pebble Count
Sand
R1, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
1 Cobble
Boold�.
Bilrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to Cn V W 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
ii
l,
0.01
1
0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
100
1000
f
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
NLHC R2, Cross -Section 4
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
1
1
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
2
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
Medium
8.0
11.0
5
2
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
2
4
Coarse
22.6
32
8
8
13
Very Coarse
32
45
3
3
16
Very Coarse
45
64
7
7
23
\ ..
N\\O
\\ \F
lU o.
\
Small
64
90
12
12
36
Small
90
128
31
31
68
Large
128
180
14
14
83
Lar e
180
256
11
11
95
Small
256
362
5
5
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
95
100
Cross -Section 4
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
45.46
D35 =
88.10
D60 =
104.9
D80. =
184.7
D95 =
260.5
D1oo =
362.0
Inn Silt/Clay
NLHC
Pebble Count
1 Sand 1
R2, Cross -Section 4
Particle Distribution
Gavel
1 Cobble
1 Boulder
1 Bodrock
Percent Cumulative (%)
W A Cr, m J CO t0 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
O
•
— •
•
•
• •
0
• '
1
1
1
10
Particle Class
MY0-04/2022
Size (mm)
100
1000
1
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
NLHC R2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
41
41
41
41
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
2
43
Fine
0.125
0.250
5
5
5
48
Medium
0.25
0.50
48
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
48
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
2
50
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
50
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
50
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
51
Fine
5.6
8.0
51
Medium
8.0
11.0
51
Medium
11.0
16.0
51
Coarse
16.0
22.6
1
1
1
52
Coarse
22.6
32
3
3
3
55
Very Coarse
32
45
2
2
2
57
Very Coarse
45
64
10
10
10
67
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp,
Small
64
90
7
7
7
74
Small
90
128
10
10
10
84
Large
128
180
8
8
8
92
Large
180
256
3
3
3
95
Small
256
362
2
2
2
97
Small
362
512
2
2
2
99
J\' -
Medium
512
1024
1
1
1
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35=
Silt/Clay
D50 =
2.0
Da, =
128.0
D95 =
256.0
D100 =
1024.0
inn slvaaY
NLHC
Pebble Count
Sand
R2, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
I Cobble
Boulder
Bidrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to Cn V W 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
ii
60.17
•
l,
0.01
r
0 1 1
r
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
100
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 R1, Cross -Section 5
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
0
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine
0.125
0.250
3
3
3
Medium
0.25
0.50
4
4
7
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
8
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
10
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
10
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
10
Fine
4.0
5.6
10
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
11
Medium
8.0
11.0
5
5
16
Medium
11.0
16.0
6
6
22
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
32
Coarse
22.6
32
5
5
37
Very Coarse
32
45
21
21
58
Very Coarse
45
64
17
17
75
\ ..
\O
\\ \F
\ p .
pppppp
Small
64
90
10
10
85
Small
90
128
9
9
94
Large
128
180
6
6
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 5
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
11.00
D35 =
27.84
D60 =
39.5
D84 =
87.0
D95 =
135.5
D1oo =
180.0
inn Silt/Clay
UT1
Pebble Count
1 Sand 1
R1, Cross -Section 5
Particle Distribution
Gavel
1 Cobble
Bou_elder
1 Bodrock
:umi
D C
l,
0.01
1
0 1 1
1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MVO-04/2022
1
100
1
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 R1, Cross -Section 7
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
1
1
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
2
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
3
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
4
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
5
9
Coarse
16.0
22.6
7
7
16
Coarse
22.6
32
19
19
35
Very Coarse
32
45
17
17
52
Very Coarse
45
64
15
15
67
\ ..
\O
\\ �F
\\\ \
Small
64
90
18
18
85
Small
90
128
12
12
97
Large
128
180
2
2
99
Lar e
180
256
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 7
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
22.60
D35 =
32.00
D60 =
43.2
D84 =
88.3
D95 =
120.7
D1oo =
256.0
Inn Silt/Clay
UT1
Pebble Count
1 Sand 1
R1, Cross -Section 7
Particle Distribution
Gavel
I Cobble
Boulder
1 Bodrock
Percent Cumulative (%)
W A Cr, m J CO t0 C
J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
A
•
•
''
11.
T
0.01 0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-04/2022
100
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 R1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
20
21
21
21
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
7
8
8
29
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
9
11
11
40
Medium
0.25
0.50
4
6
10
10
50
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
2
2
52
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
52
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
1
53
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
53
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
54
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
2
56
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
1
57
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
5
5
62
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
2
5
5
67
Coarse
22.6
32
1
1
1
68
Very Coarse
32
45
4
1
5
5
73
Very Coarse
45
64
11
2
13
13
86
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
5
5
5
91
Small
90
128
7
7
7
98
Large
128
180
2
2
2
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35=
0.18
D50 =
0.5
Da, =
60.6
D95 =
110.1
D100 =
180.0
Inn Slvaav
UT1
Pebble Count
Sand
R1, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
j Cobble
old��
B ad:
il
F.,,
ii
:umi
c
D c
•7/".'"."..°..".'1".
0.01
r
0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIMVO
r I
100
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 R2, Cross -Section 8
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
1
1
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
1
2
Medium
0.25
0.50
5
5
7
Coarse
0.5
1.0
6
6
13
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
4
4
17
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
17
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
18
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
19
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
21
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
23
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
24
Coarse
16.0
22.6
7
7
31
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
41
Very Coarse
32
45
16
16
57
Very Coarse
45
64
20
20
77
\ ..
\O
\\ \F
\\\ \
Small
64
90
8
8
85
Small
90
128
9
9
94
Large
128
180
4
4
98
Lar e
180
256
2
2
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 8
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
1.68
D35 =
25.97
D60 =
38.8
D84 =
86.2
D95 =
139.4
D1oo =
256.0
Inn Silt/Clay
UT1
Pebble Count
1 Sand 1
R2, Cross -Section 8
Particle Distribution
Gavel
1 Cobble
Boul
1 Bodrock
Percent Cumulative (%)
W A Cr, m J CO t0 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
O
........°'''.....'''Ir.'all
T
0
'
1
1
1
10
Particle Class
t MV0-04/2022
Size (mm)
100
1000
1
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 R2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
18
19
19
19
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
4
4
4
23
Fine
0.125
0.250
9
9
9
32
Medium
0.25
0.50
5
5
5
37
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
3
3
3
40
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
1
41
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
41
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
1
42
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
43
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
44
Medium
8.0
11.0
44
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
1
45
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
1
3
3
48
Coarse
22.6
32
3
1
4
4
52
Very Coarse
32
45
3
5
8
8
60
Very Coarse
45
64
7
1
8
8
68
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
8
8
8
76
Small
90
128
11
1
12
12
88
Large
128
180
7
7
7
95
Large
180
256
5
5
5
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35=
0.38
D50 =
26.9
Da, =
113.8
D95 =
180.0
D100 =
256.0
Inn Slvaay
UT1
Pebble Count
Sand
R2, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
i Cobble
old��
Bilrod:
ii
:umi
c
D c
l,
0.01
r
0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO-04/2022
100
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 R3, Cross -Section 10
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
3
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
3
Fine
4.0
5.6
3
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
4
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
Medium
11.0
16.0
4
4
8
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
3
11
Coarse
22.6
32
6
6
17
Very Coarse
32
45
22
22
39
Very Coarse
45
64
22
22
61
\ ..
\O
\\ �F
\\
�ppppppp
Small
64
90
7
7
68
Small
90
128
16
16
84
Large
128
180
5
5
89
Large
180
256
9
9
98
Small
256
362
2
2
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 10
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
30.20
D35 =
42.30
D60 =
53.7
D84 =
128.0
D95 =
227.6
D1oo =
362.0
Inn Silt/Clay
UT1
Pebble Count
1 Sand 1
R3, Cross -Section 10
Particle Distribution
Gavel
1 Cobble
Boul
1 Bodrock
Percent Cumulative (%)
W A Cr, m J CO t0 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
O
• •
•
i
••
0 1
•
0
1
1
Particle
Class
MY0-04/2022
10
Size (mm)
1
100
1
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 R3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
33
33
33
33
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
33
Fine
0.125
0.250
5
5
5
38
Medium
0.25
0.50
3
3
3
41
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
42
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
42
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
42
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
1
43
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
44
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
2
46
Medium
8.0
11.0
7
3
10
10
56
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
2
58
Coarse
16.0
22.6
1
1
1
59
Coarse
22.6
32
4
4
4
63
Very Coarse
32
45
9
9
9
72
Very Coarse
45
64
8
2
10
10
82
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
10
10
10
92
Small
90
128
4
4
4
96
Large
128
180
3
3
3
99
Large
180
256
99
Small
256
362
1
1
1
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35=
0.16
D50 =
9.1
Da, =
68.5
D95 =
117.2
D100 =
362.0
Inn sl Voay
UT1
Pebble Count
sand
R3, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
1 Cobble
old�� ii
Bilrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to 0 V 0 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
0.01
1
0 1 1
r
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
100
i
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 R1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
16
17
17
17
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
10
10
10
27
Fine
0.125
0.250
27
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
2
2
29
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
2
31
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
5
5
5
36
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
36
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
36
Fine
4.0
5.6
36
Fine
5.6
8.0
36
Medium
8.0
11.0
36
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
4
4
40
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
3
3
43
Coarse
22.6
32
6
4
10
10
53
Very Coarse
32
45
10
10
10
63
Very Coarse
45
64
9
1
10
10
73
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
14
5
19
19
92
Small
90
128
3
3
6
6
98
Large
128
180
2
2
2
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35=
1.74
D50 =
28.8
Da, =
78.0
D95 =
107.3
D100 =
180.0
Inn Slvaav
UT2
Pebble Count
Sand
R1, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
i Cobble
old��
Bilrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to Cn V W 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
F.,,
ii
1
•
0.01
r
0 1 1
r
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
100
i
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 R2, Cross -Section 11
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
3
Coarse
0.5
1.0
3
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
3
6
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
6
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
6
Fine
4.0
5.6
6
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
8
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
10
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
11
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
4
15
Coarse
22.6
32
8
8
23
Very Coarse
32
45
29
29
52
Very Coarse
45
64
21
21
73
\ ..
\O
\\ \F
\ p .
pppppp
Small
64
90
18
18
91
Small
90
128
7
7
98
Large
128
180
2
2
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 11
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
23.60
D35 =
36.85
D60 =
44.0
Dso =
78.8
D95 =
110.1
D1oo =
180.0
Inn Silt/Clay
UT2
Pebble Count
I Sand 1
R2, Cross -Section 11
Particle Distribution
Gavel
I CobbleBoul
1 Bodrock
Percent Cumulative (%)
W A Cr, m J CO t0 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
O
•
•
•
•
. �•/•
01
1
10
Particle Class
t MVO-04/2022
Size (mm)
100
i
1000
i
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 R2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
7
8
8
8
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
1
1
9
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
2
11
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
7
8
8
19
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
2
21
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
6
7
7
28
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
28
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
28
Fine
4.0
5.6
28
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
2
3
3
31
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
2
33
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
4
5
5
38
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
4
8
8
46
Coarse
22.6
32
8
4
12
12
58
Very Coarse
32
45
11
4
15
15
73
Very Coarse
45
64
9
2
11
11
84
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
8
2
10
10
94
Small
90
128
1
1
2
2
96
Large
128
180
2
1
3
3
99
Large
180
256
1
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.39
D35=
12.78
D50 =
25.4
Da, =
64.0
D95 =
107.3
D100 =
256.0
Inn Slvaav
UT2
Pebble Count
Sand
R2, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
GjI1bbIe
old��
Bilrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to Cn V W 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
ii
•
•
l,
0.01
r
0 1 1
r
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
100
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 R3, Cross -Section 13
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
3
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
3
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
5
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
6
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
4
10
Medium
11.0
16.0
11
11
21
Coarse
16.0
22.6
15
15
36
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
46
Very Coarse
32
45
27
27
73
Very Coarse
45
64
10
10
83
\ ..
\O
\\ \F
\\\ \
Small
64
90
10
10
93
Small
90
128
4
4
97
Large
128
180
2
2
99
Lar e
180
256
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 13
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
13.49
D35 =
22.09
D60 =
33.7
D84 =
66.2
D95 =
107.3
D1oo =
256.0
Inn Silt/Clay
UT2
Pebble Count
I Sand 1
R3, Cross -Section 13
Particle Distribution
Gavel
I Cobble
Boul
1 Bodrock
Percent Cumulative (%)
W A Cr, m J CO t0 C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
O
?
0
• ~ 11.
1
1
10
Particle Class
t MV0-04/2022
Size (mm)
100
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 R3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
35
35
35
35
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
5
5
5
40
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
2
42
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
2
2
44
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
44
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
2
46
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
2
2
48
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
48
Fine
4.0
5.6
48
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
49
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
2
3
3
52
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
3
6
6
58
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
2
2
60
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
10
70
Very Coarse
32
45
8
8
8
78
Very Coarse
45
64
9
9
9
87
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
6
6
6
93
Small
90
128
6
6
6
99
Large
128
180
1
1
1
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35=
Silt/Clay
D50 =
8.9
Da, =
56.9
D95 =
101.2
D100 =
180.0
Inn Slvaav
UT2
Pebble Count
Sand
R3, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
I Cobble
old��
Bilrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to Cn V W 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
F.,,
ii
0.01
r
0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
r
100
I
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 R4, Cross -Section 14
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
3
3
3
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
1
4
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
1
5
Medium
0.25
0.50
3
3
8
Coarse
0.5
1.0
4
4
12
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
3
15
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
15
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
17
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
18
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
4
22
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
24
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
3
27
Coarse
16.0
22.6
8
8
35
Coarse
22.6
32
17
17
52
Very Coarse
32
45
12
12
64
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
72
\ ..
\O
\\ -S�
\ p .
pppppp
Small
64
90
13
13
85
Small
90
128
11
11
96
Large
128
180
4
4
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 14
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
3.35
D35 =
22.60
D60 =
30.7
D84 =
87.7
D95 =
124.0
D1oo =
180.0
1 nn Silt/Clay
UT2
Pebble Count
1 Sand 1
R4, Cross -Section 14
Particle Distribution
Gravel
Boul
1 Brock
yobble
:umi
D C
•
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••4fli
u 1
0.01
1
0 1 1
1
10 100
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MV0-04/2022
1
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 R4, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
33
33
33
33
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
10
10
10
43
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
5
7
7
50
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
1
3
3
53
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
53
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
53
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
53
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
53
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
54
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
55
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
2
57
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
2
59
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
5
64
Coarse
22.6
32
6
6
6
70
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
6
76
Very Coarse
45
64
10
10
10
86
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
3
3
3
89
Small
90
128
8
8
8
97
Large
128
180
2
2
2
99
Large
180
256
1
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
0.07
D50 =
0.3
Da, =
59.6
D95 =
117.2
D100 =
256.0
Inn Si vaay
UT2
Pebble Count
Sand
R4, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
I Cobble
old��
Bilrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to Cn V W 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
ii
•
■ •
Oa
l,
0.01
r
0 1 1
r
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
100
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
OBB, Cross -Section 15
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
5
5
5
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
7
Fine
0.125
0.250
7
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
2
9
Coarse
0.5
1.0
9
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
11
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
11
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
11
Fine
4.0
5.6
11
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
13
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
4
17
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
19
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
4
23
Coarse
22.6
32
5
5
28
Very Coarse
32
45
19
19
47
Very Coarse
45
64
21
21
68
\ ..
\O
\\ \F
\ p .
pppppp
Small
64
90
18
18
86
Small
90
128
6
6
92
Large
128
180
8
8
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 15
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
10.16
D35 =
36.28
D60 =
47.3
D84 =
86.7
D95 =
145.5
D1oo =
180.0
inn Sih/Clay
OBB,
Pebble Count
1 Sand
Cross -Section 15
Particle Distribution
1 Gavel
1 CobbleBould�r�
1 Bodrock
:umi
D C
0.01
1
0 1 1
1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MV0-04/2022
1
100
1
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
OBB, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
1
3
3
3
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
4
4
4
7
Fine
0.125
0.250
4
4
4
11
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
18
19
19
30
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
2
32
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
1
33
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
33
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
33
Fine
4.0
5.6
33
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
34
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
2
36
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
2
38
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
3
3
41
Coarse
22.6
32
4
3
7
7
48
Very Coarse
32
45
10
3
13
13
61
Very Coarse
45
64
8
2
10
10
71
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
16
1
17
17
88
Small
90
128
6
1
7
7
95
Large
128
180
2
2
4
4
99
Large
180
256
1
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.30
D35=
9.38
D50 =
33.7
Da, =
83.1
D95 =
128.0
D100 =
256.0
Inn Slvaav
Pebble Count
Sand
OBB, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
GjI1bbIe
old��
Bilrod:
Percent Cumulative (%)
NJ 0 A to Cn V W 0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
ii
••
•
•
..........r.......z
l,
0.01
r
0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIM'IO
100
1000
r
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
BB, Cross -Section 16
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100
Count
Summary
min
max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
4
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
1
5
Medium
0.25
0.50
7
7
12
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
13
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
13
40,
6°1'.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
13
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
13
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
14
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
16
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
17
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
19
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
24
Coarse
22.6
32
7
7
31
Very Coarse
32
45
9
9
40
Very Coarse
45
64
23
23
63
\ ..
\O
\\ �F
\\\ \
Small
64
90
20
20
83
Small
90
128
10
10
93
Large
128
180
6
6
99
Lar e
180
256
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
B DRQCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross -Section 16
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
8.00
D35 =
37.24
D60 =
52.4
D84 =
93.2
D95 =
143.4
D1oo =
256.0
Inn Silt/Clay
BB,
Pebble Count
I Sand 1
Cross -Section 16
Particle Distribution
Gavel
I Cobble
Boulder
1 Bodrock
:umi
D C
•
• •
0.01
0 1 1
1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MV0-04/2022
100
I
1000
10000

Reachwide and Cross -Section Pebble Count Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
BB, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
23
24
24
24
Q
Very fine
0.062
0.125
5
5
5
29
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
9
10
10
39
Medium
0.25
0.50
2
9
11
11
50
S
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
51
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
2
3
3
54
Jtr'
60.
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
1
55
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
55
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
56
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
57
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
1
58
Medium
11.0
16.0
58
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
5
63
Coarse
22.6
32
2
2
2
65
Very Coarse
32
45
4
4
4
69
Very Coarse
45
64
7
7
7
76
�5,
00�
\\\
pppp
Small
64
90
12
12
12
88
Small
90
128
10
10
10
98
Large
128
180
2
2
2
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
0\-
Medium
512
1024
100
0
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35=
0.19
D50 =
0.5
Da, =
80.3
D95 =
115.2
D100 =
180.0
I nn Si [/ I v
Pebble Count
Sand
BB, Reachwide
Particle Distribution
Gavel
i Cobble
old��
B
ad:
Percent Cumulative (%)
) N0 0 0 0 0 0 A In 01 0 0 0 V W 01 C
0 C
F.,,
ii
0.01
r
0 1 1
10
Particle Class Size (mm)
IIIMVO
r I
100
1000
r
10000

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 1-North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1
201+61 Riffle
1122 -
1121 -
1120
1119 vir
�- . •
0
ai,i 1118
w
1117
1116 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
28.6 x-section area(ft.sq.) k -
22.1 width(ft)
1.3 mean depth(ft)
2.2 max depth(ft)
22.6 wetted
hydraulic perimeterradius(ft)(ft)
1.3 - j�'
17.1 width-depth ratio
78.1 W flood prone area(ft) `
3.5 entrenchmentratio _
1.0 low bank height ratio °"
Survey Date: 05/15/22
- ;1-- ---- _
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying ,.
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 2-North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1
201+41 Pool
1120 1
N
1118
/// 4--.
1116
c
0
----.-----.----.-----1\
w
1114
1112 T
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions ; 3 ; r
74.9 x-section area(ft.sq.)
30.8 width(ft)
2.4 mean depth(ft)
5.2 max depth(ft)
33.5 wetted perimeter(ft) „;"
2.2 hydraulic radius(ft)
12.6 width-depth ratio
. ,, ,
< s1." ,r, -4SAVIk,' 'tft,-:-4 ,,,,, _LL
f �
Survey Date: 05/15/22
Field Crew:Turner Land Surveying
y
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 3-North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2
201+41 Pool
1115 -
1113
1111
0
1109
1107 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
78.6 x-section area(ft.sq.) - %
35.0 width(ft)
2.2 mean depth(ft)
5.5 max depth(ft)
37.8 wetted perimeter(ft)
2.1 hydraulic radius(ft)
15.6 width-depth ratio
aT
_ � t
Survey Date: 05/15/22
Field Crew:Turner Land Surveying
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman to Site
DMS ProjectMitiga No.10i 01n23
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 4-North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2
201+61 Riffle
1116 -
1115 -
1114
f
c
1113 -
0
co
ai,i 1112
w
1111
1110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width(ft)
MYO(05/15/22) —Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions �+
37.8 x-section area(ft.sq.) - -
27.9 width(ft)
1.4 mean depth(ft) .. ,
2.3 max depth(ft) -
28.3 wetted perimeter(ft) a „; , ...` >r
1.3 hydraulic radius(ft) y-
20.5 width-depth ratio ,
61.2 W flood prone area(ft) -� " k L' �` .� `.
tv
2.2 entrenchment ratio {
1.0 low bank height ratio
eSs, K .
Survey Date: 05/15/22 �
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman o Si
DMS ProjectMitigati No.1001n23
Monitoring Year 0-2022te
Cross-Section 5-UT1 Reach 1
201+61 Riffle
1160 -
1159
___4_--------• \i/
• ♦
c
0
ati 1158
LT.,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions _
1.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) � 'a " -
5.2 Wldth(ft) °c ,,- v o- i
0.3 mean depth(ft) x� •L
005...632
.6 max depth(ft) )" .'
5.3 wetted perimeter(ft) sz � r
0.3 hydraulic radius(ft) `s ' " ; �,'
18.8 width-depth ratio +, *
41.3 W flood prone area(ft) � "°�"
8.0 entrenchment ratio
.0
1.0 low bank height ratio
, .
Survey Date: 05/15/22 ` y -`� -i ,
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveyingt. a , .
ash
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman ato S
DMS ProjectMitig No.1001in 23
Monitoring Year 0-2022ite
Cross-Section 6-UT1 Reach 1
201+41 Pool
1160 -
1159
c
1158
0
n,
Ls,w
1157
1156 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Ba n kfu I I
Bankfull Dimensions
7.5 x-section area(ft.sq.) y , r
10.0 width(ft) .. -$ram k "; '
0.8 mean depth(ft) � ��� sue _
1.5 max depth(ft) a -
10.6 wetted perimeter(ft) L �
., , '' a a
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft)
13.3 width-depth ratio
„� 6 '` �' � � '"- ate °
Survey Date: 05i15i22 I _ ter, '
Field Crew:Turner Land Surveying 41-*;;t 411m-.1, -
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 7-UT1 Reach 1
201+61 Riffle
1154 -
1 —
1153
c
0
a"i 1152
w
1151
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions .,. -
1.9 x-section area(ftsq.)
4.8 width(ft)
0.4 mean depth(ft) �
0.6 max depth(ft) r x
5.0 wetted perimeter(ft) ;`r � x
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft) � 4 '
12.3 width-depth ratio "• ` '
43.8 W flood prone area(ft)
9.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio F, ' x° $
w r
Survey Date: 05/15/22 � � -fi t ^'
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying • i•ns ¢
w t*
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 8-UT1 Reach 2
201+61 Riffle
1136 1
1135 •
c
1134
0
v
w
1133
1132
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(05/15/22) -Bankfull -Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions e-
5.2 x-section area(ft.sq.)
6.2 width(ft)
0.8 mean depth(ft)
1.5 max depth(ft) "�s �
7.0 wetted perimeter(ft) Y ^�
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft)
7.4 width-depth ratio -$ .> to
42.3 W flood prone area(ft) ,
r
6.8 entrenchment ratio ^ :W,.
1.0 low bank height ratio � ,
Survey Date: 05/15/22 T; ' �
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying ' t �
ALL:
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 9-UT1 Reach 2
201+41 Pool
1135 -
1134 41 ,6____.
c
1133 . N\ 1/ 4—
0
v
w
1132
1131 ,
0 10 20 30
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
5.3 x-section area(ft.sq.) >� ""
10.2 width(ft) 2, i s
0.5 mean depth(ft) x�� .-�v ,� r
1.2 max depth(ft)
10.5 wetted perimeter(ft) �:` .. 7 ±' !. -; _ s
0.5 hydraulic radius ft
Y ( ) mo w - . r
19.5 width-depth ratio " a �
Survey Date: 05/15/22 �{
Field Crew:Turner Land Surveying `--4fr-4.7 fr.k or ' 1 xy �
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 10-UT1 Reach 3
201+61 Riffle
1122 -
ex
1120
••
g —.------------- ----..\---------NiN....
m
ai,i 1118
w
1116 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width(ft)
— MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
3.4 x-section area(ft.sq.)
6.3 width(ft)
0.5 mean depth(ft)
0.9 max depth(ft) +, '' �- r
6.6 wetted perimeter(ft) r
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft)
11.7 width-depth ratio %;
18.4 W flood prone area(ft) ,. " }fr
2.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio �ct*` £
,*
:�.� '�. .ham„s �� te
�� .q�. *� � S
Survey Date: 05/15/22 , >ff"yf
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying i -, �
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 11-UT2 Reach 2
201+61 Riffle
1148 -
1147
%
1146
0
0
'� 1145
v
w
1144
1143
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions : , ,q )
1.4 x-section area(ft.sq.)
5.1 width(ft) w
0.3 mean depth(ft) � d mot '
0.5 max depth(ft) '' "
5.2 wetted perimeter(ft) Sa
0.3 hydraulic radius(ft) t4 ,--; O2.
18.0 width-depth ratio , -"
18.2 W flood prone area(ft) r '
3.6 entrenchment ratio '- ' �{
syyayJ L�r51p y.�
1.0 low bank height ratio � � • s �T �°
Survey Date: 05/15/22 4' �,' xr i
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying �`,. r* ,. ,-, ,!
�.' " ',� . 'Y�7t "
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 12-
1130 - UT2 Reach 3
201+41 Pool
1129
1128
1127 ,
0
a� 1126
w
1125
1124
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Ba n kfu I I
Bankfull Dimensions
8.8 x-section area(ft.sq.)
10.6 width(ft)
0.8 mean depth(ft)
,.;ate �,,:. *„
1.9 max depth(ft) _
11.6 wetted perimeter(ft) fang a _
0.8 hydraulic radius(ft)
12.7 width-de th ratio
p
Survey Date: 05/15/22 � �,
'� : m
Field Crew:Turner Land Surveying \ , „-
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 13-UT2 Reach 3
201+61 Riffle
1129 -
1128
1127
c
0
'p 1126
v
1125
1124 ,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
3.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) -
7.5 width(ft) ���
0.5 mean depth(ft)
0.8 max depth(ft)
7.7 wettedperimeter ft
( ) " '' :, � , -`. tea t-
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft)
w , ova .
16.3 width-depth ratios �w * I�
23.0 W flood prone area(ft) t �t „ ur
3.1 entrenchment ratio i.
1.0 low bank height ratio '- •a ' €�r
Survey Date: 05/15/22 ��" . �,
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying •
�`' , ly �
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 14-UT2 Reach 4
201+61 Riffle
1116 -
1115
0
0
m
u., 1114
w
1113
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(05/15/22) —Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
2.2 x-section area(ft.sq.)
6.0 width(ft)
0.4 mean depth(ft)
0.6 max depth(ft)
:
6.2 wetted perimeter(ft) "
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft)
16.3 width-depth ratio ,m
21.3 W flood prone area(ft) g � s �
3.6 entrenchment ratio
1.6 low bank height ratio '� t
,'. 44 � ,
Survey Date: 05/15/22 c
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying , �''If��
r
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 15-Old Bus Branch
201+61 Riffle
1140 l
1139 I
I1138
1137
1136
0 10 20 30
40
Width(ft)
MYO(OS/15/22) —Bankfull —FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions +p -;;
1.0 x-section area(ftsq.) * 3
3.7 width(ft)
0.3 mean depth(ft) �;
0.4 max depth(ft)
3.8 wetted perimeter(ft) s
0.3 hydraulic radius(ft) — *
13.7 width-depth ratio - ` A
6.4 W flood prone area(ft) s • (R
. ", , <-, A- . fir,
1.7 entrenchment ratio -: } #
1.0 low bank height ratio fF
�,et 4 -
Survey Date: 05/15/22 . '
4 c
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying
._
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100123
Monitoring Year 0-2022
Cross-Section 16-Barn Branch
201+61 Riffle
1127 -
\N
0
'� 1126
v
w
1125
10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
t MVO(05/15/22) -Bankfull -Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions s
5.6 x-section area(ft.sq.) ''4 �` ' " '
8.4 width(ft)
0.7 mean depth(ft)
A
1.1 max depth(ft)
8.8 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) -; �,_`
12.7 width-depth ratio a, . ,-x:,. e �} `
40.1 W flood prone area(ft) � `- s :�K .'' , .- 3
4.8 entrenchment ratio �"� `
1.0 low bank height ratios +� t`
a.- x
Survey Date: 05/15/22 `. t
Field Crew: Turner Land Surveying
View Downstream

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
North Little Hunting Creek Reach (STA 100+37 to 118+80)
Elevation (feet)
1,125
1,120
1,115
1,110
♦
♦
♦
•
♦ ♦
♦ ♦
1
1-
1
x
1
1—
1
N
x
Reach 1 Start
-
•
-------------------
I
--
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 1
I I
Powerline Easement
1 I
9900
9950
10000
t TW (MYO - 05/2022)
10050
WSF (MYO - 05/2022)
10100 10150 10200
Station (feet)
10250
10300
LBKF/LTOB (MYO- 05/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO- 05/2022) o STRUCTURE (MYO- 05/2022)
10350
10400
Elevation (feet)
J
n o
♦♦ 1 ♦ ♦
♦
i • ♦♦1
♦♦ ♦ •
1
--
♦ I •
I
1
IBridge Crossing
N
W
K
j1V 10400 10450 10500 10550 10600 10650 10700 10750 10800 10850 10900
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 05/2022) WSF (MVO -05/2022) LBKF/LTOB (MYO- 05/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO- 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 05/2022)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
North Little Hunting Creek (STA 100+37 to 118+80
Elevation (feet)
n o u,
I "
I
a
1 x
I
x
a
•
♦•
I
I
I
i--4,..........._._v....4\•._._._.e._+____*.
I
I
•.............._.....;
I
I
I
I
1v 10900
10950 11000 11050
11100 11150
11200 11250 11300 11350 11400
Station (feet)
TW 05/2022)
WSF (MYO - 05/2022) ♦
LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022) ♦
RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO - 05/2022)
t (MYO -
Elevation (feet)
J o
J o
•♦ ♦ ♦ AA Aa
• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
A
♦ • •
•
• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ •
•
♦ u r ♦•
•
---
_______
AA
Reach 2 End
j10
11400 11450 11500 11550 11600 11650 11700 11750 11800 11850 11900
Station (feet)
TW 05/2022) WSF 05/2022) LBKF/LTOB 05/2022) RBKF/RTOB 05/2022) STRUCTURE 05/2022)
(MYO- (MYO- (MYO- ♦ (MYO- o (MYO-

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1(STA 200+05 to 220+21
Elevation (feet)
♦
♦ ♦
♦ ♦
z
j1J 20000 20050 20100 20150 20200 20250 20300
Station (feet)
TW 05/2022) WSF 05/2022) LBKF/LTOB 05/2022) RBKF/RTOB 05/2022) STRUCTURE
t (MYO - (MYO - ♦ (MYO - ♦ (MYO - • (MY0-05/2022)
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.
Elevation (feet)
J Ti o
X
X
1
A. ♦
•♦ •
! ♦ y Al
♦
1
j1J 20300
•
20350 20400
TW (MYO- 05/2022) WSF (MVO -OS/2022)
♦
20450
Station (feet)
LBKF/LTOB(MVO -OS/2022) ♦
20500
RBKF/RTOB(MYO-OS/2022) •
STRUCTURE(MYO-OS/2022)
20550 20600
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1(STA 200+05 to 220+21
Elevation (feet)
n
X
1' 20600
20650
TW
20700
- 05/2022) WSF (MYO - 05/2022) ♦
20750
Station (feet)
LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022) ♦
20800
RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) •
STRUCTURE (MY0-05/2022)
20850 20900
—0,— (MYO
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.
Elevation (feet)
A
J 1, O
♦
1
r
♦
♦
1'20900
20950
TW
21000 21050
Station (feet)
(MYO- 05/2022) WSF(MYO-OS/2022) LBKF/LTOB (MYO-OS/2022) ♦
21100
RBKF/RTOB (MVO -OS/2022)
o
21150
STRUCTURE(MYO-OS/2022)
21200
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 (STA 200+05 to 220+21)
Elevation (feet)
1,145
1,140
1,135
1,130
g
r y
Internal CE Crossing
♦y
r
♦ . y ♦
r
r
♦
N
w
z
T
21200
21250
21300
TW (MYO - 05/2022) WSF (MYO -05/2022)
21350
Station (feet)
♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022)
21400
♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MY0-05/2022)
21450
21500
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.
Elevation (feet)
J o
♦ ' ♦ ♦ ♦
A♦
A _ ♦
•
r
Easement Break
I
I
1
I
♦♦
♦
♦
2
I
y
I
I
I
ao
I
I
m
I
�
1
_______ ________ ____ ___
1G 21500
21550
TW
05/2022)
21600
21650
Station (feet)
LBKF/LTOB (MYO- 05/2022)
♦
21700
RBKF/RTOB (MYO- 05/2022)
•
21750 21800
STRUCTURE (MY0-05/2022)
t (MYO-
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT1 (STA 200+05 to 220+21)
1,127
1,122
1,112
♦
♦
••
r
1
I
,,
..
X
Reach 3 End
m
••♦
♦
♦
•
I
r♦
I
I
21800
21850
21900
TW (MYO - 05/2022) WSF (MYO - 05/2022)
21950
Station (feet)
LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022)
22000
22050
♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MY0-05/2022)
22100
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 (STA 303+50 to 317+28)
1,165
1,160
r
1
1
j
♦
m4
1
•
Ln
Internal Crossing
1,155
v 1,150
1
M•
♦
•
•' .
1
1
`g
;
1
,
F
♦
•
1
is 1,145
1
-
w
M-�i�
1.
m
tri
N
1 _A
1
1
'
1,140
1,135
"
1
V
z
1
1
1
4
--♦ •♦
30300 30350 30400 30450 30500 30550 30600
Station (feet)
—e— TW (MYO - 05/2022) WSF (MYO - 05/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO - 05/2022)
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.
Elevation (feet)
o
i
n
♦
- Reach 3 Start
•.
♦
♦ ♦
1G 30600 30650 30700 30750 30800 30850 30900
Station (feet)
TW 05/2022) WSF 05/2022) LBKF/LTOB 05/2022) RBKF/RTOB 05/2022) • STRUCTURE 05/2022)
—6— (MYO- (MYO- (MYO- ♦ (MYO- (MYO-
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 (STA 303+50 to 317+28)
1,130
1,125
w 1,120
1,115
1
Mm+
♦
•
.
x
L
♦
_► •♦► • ♦ •♦ ♦ r►
30900
30950
t TW (MYO - 05/2022)
31000 31050
Station (feet)
31100
WSF (MYO- 05/2022) • LBKF/LTOB (MYO- 05/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO- 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 05/2022)
31150
31200
Portions of the reach were dry during survey.
Elevation (feet)
J o
Reach 4 Start
31200 31250 31300 31350 31400 31450 31500
Station (feet)
—4,—TW (WO -OS/2022) WSF (MVO -OS/2022) LBKF/LTOB (MVO -OS/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (WO -OS/2022)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
UT2 (STA 303+50 to 317+28
,,,0
Elevation (feet)
J
n o
1
I
1
1
Reach 4 End
I
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦
•
I
I
1v 31500 31550 31600 31650 31700 31750 31600
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO - 05/2022) WSF (MYO - 05/2022) LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) o STRUCTURE (MYO - 05/2022)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Old Bus Branch (STA 260+87 to 261+75)
Elevation (feet)
A A
O N O
Reach 1 Start
1
• i '
♦ f
t
. ' •
a
1-
m
a
2
m
•
—*—TW
26050
Station
(MYO - 05/2022) ♦ LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022)
(feet)
♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO - 05/2022)
26100
Channel was dry at the time of survey.
Elevation (feet)
A J
J O
I
♦ ♦ I
X
Reach 1 End
♦ I
♦
0 I
I
I +Q •
♦
I
I
yJ 26100 26150 26200
Station (feet)
tTW (MYO- 05/2022) LBKF/LTOB (MYO- 05/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO- 05/2022) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 05/2022)
Channel was dry at the time of survey.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Hunstman Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Barn Branch (STA 280+00 to 282+89
W
� o
14
1
Reach 1 Start
♦ ♦
♦
♦
♦♦
I
r
♦ ♦
I
i
♦
♦
♦ ♦
,
28000
TW 05/2022)
28050
WSF (MYO - 05/2022)
28100
Station (feet)
LBKF/LTOB (MYO - 05/2022) ♦ RBKF/RTOB (MYO - 05/2022)
o
28150
STRUCTURE (MYO - 05/2022)
28200
t (MYO -
Elevation (feet)
n o �
Reach. End
♦ ♦: . ♦ ♦ .♦ ♦ ♦♦
♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
j1128200 28250 28300 28350 28400
Station (feet)
t TW 05/2022) WSF 05/2022) LBKF/LTOB 05/2022) RBKF/RTOB 05/2022) STRUCTURE 05/2022)
(MYO- (MYO- (MYO- ♦ (MYO- o (MYO-

Table 8a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
PRE-EXISTING
CONDITIONS
MONITORING BASELINE
DESIGN (MVO)
Parameter
North Little Hunting Creek Reach 1
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min
Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
16.3
2
22.0
22.1
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
17.0
44.0
2
48.0
220.0
78.1
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.6
1.7
2
1.3
1.3
1
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.3
2
2.0
2.2
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
20.6
25.8
2
29.2
28.6
1
Width/Depth Ratio
7.5
10.3
2
16.6
17.1
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
2.7
2
2.2
10.0
3.5
1
Bank Height Ratio
2.0
2.3
2
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
15.00
--
64.0
1
Rosgen Classification
G4
C4
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
100-110
100.0
90.6
Sinuosity
1.1
1.3
1.3
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0073
0.0049
0.0053
Other
--
--
--
Parameter
North Little Hunting Creek Reach 2
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min
Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
16.3
2
23.0
27.9
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
17.0
44.0
2
51.0
230.0
61.2
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.6
1.7
2
1.4
1.4
1
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.3
2
2.0
2.3
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
20.6
25.8
2
31.1
37.8
1
Width/Depth Ratio
7.5
10.3
2
17.0
20.5
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
2.7
2
2.2
10.0
2.2
1
Bank Height Ratio
2.0
2.3
2
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
15.00
--
105
1
Rosgen Classification
G4
C4
C3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
100-110
110.0
114.8
Sinuosity
1.1
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0073
0.0066
0.0061
Other
--
--
--
1. ER for the baseline/monitoring parameters are based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.
2. Channel slope is calculated from the surface of the channel bed rather than water surface.
(---): Data was not provided, N/A: Not Applicable

Table 8b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
CONDITIONS
DESIGN
+
UT1 Reach 1
(MYO)
Parameter
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.2
13.7
2
4.5
5.7
4.8
5.2
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.0
35.0
2
10.0
57.0
41.3
43.8
2
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.8
2
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
2
Bankfull Max Depth
1.3
1.7
2
0.5
0.6
0 6
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
8.2
9.8
2
1.5
2.3
1.4
1.9
2
Width/Depth Ratio
12.7
19.1
2
13.5
13.9
12.3
18.8
2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.5
2
>1.4
>2.2
8.0
9.1
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.8
2
1.0
1.1
1 0
2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
27.00
--
39.5
43.2
2
Rosgen Classification
E4/C4
C4 & B4
C4b
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
7-11
7.0
3.4
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0296
0.0190
0.0595
0.0243
Other
--
--
--
Parameter
UT1 Reach 2
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.2
13.7
2
6.2
6.2
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.0
35.0
2
11.0
25.0
42.3
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.8
2
0.4
0.8
1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.3
1.7
2
0.6
1.5
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
8.2
9.8
2
2.6
5.2
1
Width/Depth Ratio
12.7
19.1
2
14.6
7.4
1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.5
2
1.8
4.0
6.8
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.8
2
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
27.00
--
39
1
Rosgen Classification
E4/C4
C4b
C4b
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
7-11
10.0
31.8
Sinuosity
1.1
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0296
0.0380
0.0399
Other
--
--
--
1. ER for the baseline/monitoring parameters are based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the
floodplain.
2. Channel slope is calculated from the surface of the channel bed rather than water surface.
(---): Data was not provided, N/A: Not Applicable

Table 8c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
_ . 1 ♦ • 1 • . 1 • 1
DESIGN
. , . . , (MYO) i
Parameter
UT1 Reach 3
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.2
13.7
2
6.6
6.3
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.0
35.0
2
12.0
26.0
18.4
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.8
2
0.5
0.5
1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.3
1.7
2
0.8
0.9
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
8.2
9.8
2
3.0
3.4
1
Width/Depth Ratio
12.7
19.1
2
14.3
11.7
1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.5
2
1.8
4.0
2.9
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.8
2
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
27.00
--
53.7
1
Rosgen Classification
E4/C4
C4b
C4b
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
7-11
11.0
15.3
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0296
0.0310
0.0366
Other
--
--
--
Parameter
UT2 Reach 2
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min
Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.5
1
5.0
5.1
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
5.0
1
7.0
12.0
18.2
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.8
1
0.3
0.3
1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.0
1
0.5
0.5
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
2.6
1
1.6
1.4
1
Width/Depth Ratio
4.7
1
15.4
18.0
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
1
1.4
2.4
3.6
1
Bank Height Ratio
2.8
1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
0.90
--
44
1
Rosgen Classification
A6
B5a
B4a
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
7.0
7.0
6.7
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0791
0.0830
0.0856
Other
--
--
--
1. ER for the baseline/monitoring parameters are based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.
2. Channel slope is calculated from the surface of the channel bed rather than water surface.
(---): Data was not provided, N/A: Not Applicable

Table 8d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
_ . 1 ♦ • 1 • . 1 • 1
DESIGN
. , . . , (MYO) i
Parameter
UT2 Reach 3
Riffle Only
Min Max
n
Min Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.0
1
6.6
7.5
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
10.0
1
9.0
16.0
23.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.1
1
0.4
0.5
1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.4
1
0.5
0.8
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.2
1
2.6
3.4
1
Width/Depth Ratio
2.9
1
17.1
16.3
1
Entrenchment Ratio
3.2
1
1.4
2.4
3.1
1
Bank Height Ratio
2.3
1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
0.90
--
33.7
1
Rosgen Classification
E5b
B5
C4b
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
9.0
9.0
13.3
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0254
0.0300
0.0319
Other
--
--
--
Parameter
UT2 Reach 4
Riffle Only
Min Max
n
Min
Max
Min Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.0
1
8.4
6.0
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
10.0
1
18.0
84.0
21.3
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.1
1
0.5
0.4
1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.4
1
0.8
0.6
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.2
1
4.5
2.2
1
Width/Depth Ratio
2.9
1
15.8
16.3
1
Entrenchment Ratio
3.2
1
2.2
10.0
3.6
1
Bank Height Ratio
2.3
1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
0.90
--
31
1
Rosgen Classification
E5b
C5
C4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
9.0
9.0
4.7
Sinuosity
1.1
1.3
1.3
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0254
0.0700
0.0128
Other
--
--
--
1. ER for the baseline/monitoring parameters are based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.
2. Channel slope is calculated from the surface of the channel bed rather than water surface.
(---): Data was not provided, N/A: Not Applicable

Table 8e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
PRE-EXISTING MONITORING BASELINE
CONDITIONS DESIGN 3 (MVO)
Old Bus Branch
Parameter
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.1
1
3.0
3.7
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
7.0
1
4.0
7.0
6.4
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.8
1
0.3
0.3
1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1
0.5
0.4
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.4
1
0.9
1.0
1
Width/Depth Ratio
4.9
1
10.3
13.7
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.7
1
1.4
2.4
1.7
1
Bank Height Ratio
6.3
1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
0.10
--
47.3
1
Rosgen Classification
G5
A5
B4a
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
4.0
4.0
4.9
Sinuosity
1.1
1.0
1.0
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0284
0.0900
0.1030
Other
--
--
--
Parameter
Barn Branch
Riffle Only
Min
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
1
4.3
8.4
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
9.0
1
6.0
10.0
40.1
1
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.9
1
0.3
0.7
1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1
0.5
1.1
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.3
1
1.4
5.6
1
Width/Depth Ratio
4.3
1
13.2
12.7
1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.5
1
1.4
2.4
4.8
1
Bank Height Ratio
2.5
1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
0.10
--
52
1
Rosgen Classification
B5a
B5a
B4a
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
6.0
6.0
30.2
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
0.0435
0.0520
0.0388
Other
--
--
--
1. ER for the baseline/monitoring parameters are based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.
2. Channel slope is calculated from the surface of the channel bed rather than water surface.
(---): Data was not provided, N/A: Not Applicable

Table 9. Cross -Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Cross -Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 2 (Pool)
Cross -Section 3 (Pool)
Cross -Section 4 (R ffle)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
1119.0
1118.7
1113.4
1113.1
Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.0
--
--
1.0
Thalweg Elevation
1116.9
1113.5
1107.9
1110.8
LTOB2 Elevation
1119.0
1118.7
1113.4
1113.1
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
2.2
5.2
5.5
2.3
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
28.6
74.9
78.6
37.8
Cross -Section 5 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 6 (Pool)
Cross -Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 8 (Riffle)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
1158.4
1157.9
1152.8
1134.0
Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.0
--
1.0
1.0
Thalweg Elevation
1157.7
1156.4
1152.1
1132.5
LTOB2 Elevation
1158.4
1157.9
1152.8
1134.0
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
0.6
1.5
0.6
1.5
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
1.4
7.5
1.9
5.2
Cross -Sect on 9 (Pool)
Cross -Section 10 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 11 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 12 (Pool)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
1133.2
1117.8
1144.9
1126.9
Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfulll Area
--
1.0
1.0
--
Thalweg Elevation
1132.0
1116.9
1144.3
1125.0
LTOB2 Elevation
1133.2
1117.8
1144.9
1126.9
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.2
0.9
0.5
1.9
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
5.3
3.4
1.4
8.8
Cross -Section 13 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 14 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 15 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 16 (Riffle)
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfulll Area
1125.7
1113.8
1137.1
1126.6
Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfulll Area
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Thalweg Elevation
1124.9
1113.2
1136.7
1125.5
LTOB2 Elevation
1125.7
1113.8
1137.1
1126.6
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
0.8
0.6
0.4
1.1
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.4
2.2
1.0
5.6
'Bank Height Ratio (BHR) takes the As -built bankful area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2LTOB Area and Max depth - These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (The same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and tracked for each year as above. The difference between the LTOB
elevation and the thalweg elevation (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.

APPENDIX D. Project Timeline and Contact Info

Table 10. Project Activity and Reporting History
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
ctivity or Deliverable
Data Collection Complete
Task Completion or
Deliverable Submission
Project Instituted
N/A
May 21, 2019
Mitigation Plan Approved
June 2019
June 2021
Construction (Grading) Completed
N/A
April 2022
Planting Completed
N/A
April 2022
As -Built Survey Completed
May 2022
May 2022
Baseline Monitoring
Document (Year 0)
Stream Survey
May 2022
June 2022
Vegetation Survey
April 2022
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 2 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Table 11. Project Contact Table
Huntsman Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100123
Monitoring Year 0 - 2022
Designer
Aaron Earley, PE
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St., Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
704.819.0848
Construction Contractor
Wildlands Construction, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St., Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
PO Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
Wildlands Construction, Inc.
Nursery Stock Supplies
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
Herbaceous Plugs
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
Monitoring Performers
Monitoring, POC
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Kristi Suggs
704.332.7754

APPENDIX E. Record Drawings and Sealed As -Built Survey

oar ante BaPti4
07.4
New Castle
SITE
Huntsman Stream Mitigation Site
Record Drawing
Catawba County, North Carolina
Yadkin River Basin 03040102
for
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
Stream Origins
Name
Northing
Easting
North Little Hunting Creek
875150
1428844
UT 1
877096
1429043
UT 2
874128
1429824
Rifle Tributary
87'1'1'13
1430197
Trapper Tributary
874452
1430094
Old Bus Branch
874715
1430204
Barn Branch
874755
1423951
Environmental
Quality
RECORD DRAWINGS
ISSUED AUGUST 2, 2022
Sheet Index
Title Sheet
General Notes and Symbols
Project Overview
Stream Plan and Profile
North Little Hunting Creek
UT1
UT2
Rifle Tributary and Trapper Tributary
Old Bus Branch
Barn Branch
Planting Plan
Fencing Plan
Project Directory
0.1
0.2
0.3
2.0-2.4
3.0
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. F-0831
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Aaron Earley, PE
704-332-7754
Surveying:
Turner Land Surveying
P.O. Box 148
Swannanoa, NC 28778
David S. Turner, PLS
919-827-0745
Owner:
Matthew Reid
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
828-231-7912
DMS ID No. 100123
NCDEQ Contract No. 7891
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2019-00836
NC DWR No. 20190816
0111111!!/��1
p
d�d •
Vi`
bA
•
ct
rt
o
a) U
•
� O
oz
ct
bA
0
c
rt
E
H
CD
z

Pre -Construction Features
— — Pre -Construction Property Line
RAW Pre -Construction NCDOT Right of Way
OU OU OU Pre -Construction Overhead Utility Line
— — — TB TB — — — Pre -Construction Top of Bank
OUE OUE Pre -Construction Overhead Utility Easement
PP
Pre -Construction Utility Pole
X X X Pre -Construction Fence
\\\\\\\\\\k
\\\\\\\\\\k
JIL AL AL AL AL AL Ail
Topographic Survey completed by Turner
Mapping and Surveying in March 2020. Parcel
Boundary survey completed by Turner Mapping
and Surveying in March 2020. Asbuilt survey
completed by Turner Mapping and Surveying in
May 2022.
Types of Constructed Riffles used at certain
locations may be modified at Engineer's
Discretion.
PROJECT NOTES:
1. DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN WILL BE
SHOWN IN RED
Pre -Construction Storm Pipe
Pre -Construction Building
Pre -Construction Wetland
Pre -Construction Farm Road
Pre -Construction Rip Rap
Design Features
10+00
100
LOD LOD
Design Alignment
Design Bankfull
Design Major Contour (5' Interval)
Design Minor Contour
Design Limits of Disturbance
Design Structures
a0
0
Design Angled Log Drop
Design Log 1-hook
Design Log Vane
Design Rock Sill
Design Rock 1-hook
Design Structures
2
III II II
_LLLLLLLLLI
_LLLLLLLLLI
_LLLLLLLLLI
_LLLLLLLLLI
Design Various Constructed Riffles
Design Rock Cascade with Pools
Design Brush Toe
Design Vegetated Soil Lift
Design Rock Protection
Design BMP with Rock Weir Outlet
Design BMP - Rock Cascade with Pools
Design Culvert Crossing
Design Debris Removal
Design Additional Grading
Asbuilt Structures
Etr °4S a0
Asbuilt Various Constructed Riffles
Asbuilt Rock Cascade with Pools
Asbuilt Brush Toe
Asbuilt Vegetated Soil Lift
Asbuilt Rock Protection
Asbuilt Gravel Road
Asbuilt Features
Asbuilt Alignment
Asbuilt Bankfull
CE CE CE Recorded CE
Recorded Internal Crossing
Recorded Restrictive Covenant
Asbuilt Major Contour (5' Interval)
Asbuilt Minor Contour
Asbuilt Culvert
X X X Asbuilt Fence
CE IX
ino
CE IX
Asbuilt Structures
OHO
°moo
Asbuilt Angled Log Drop
Asbuilt Log 1-hook
Asbuilt Rock Sill
Asbuilt Boulder Toe
Monitoring Structures
PPG6
Photo Point
Permanent Vegetation Plot
Barotroll
Crest Gage
Monitoring Cross Section
ct
o
+, U
cn
oz
ct
c
a)
cn
rt
E
General Notes and Symbols
H
z
u

0'
100'
STA: 200+00
UT1 REACH 1 - BEGIN RESTORATION
30' WIDE DUKE ENERGY .)'00 F
UTILITY EASEMENT
(DB 0602, PG 329)
150' 200'
(HORIZONTAL)
12
oo
oo \ v�FF
\O0 O\
STA: 214+84
UT1 REACH 1 - END RESTORATION
UT1 REACH 2 - BEGIN RESTORATION
N/F
JERRY A.
and
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0668, PG. 110
PIN: 4827-97-1278
N/F
SHELOMA JOHNSON
D.B. 0851, PG. 0469
PIN: 4827-86-2875
00
N/F
JERRY A.
a nd
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0621, PG. 14
PIN: 4827-96-5044
STA: 217+98
OJ�OJ, UT1 REACH 2 - END RESTORATION
/o O3 UT1 REACH 3 - BEGIN RESTORATION
a /
STA: 220+21
UT1 REACH 3 - END RESTORATION
0(
N/F
JERRY A.
a nd
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0653, PG. 160
PIN: 4827-95-0384
STA: 100+37
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
N/F
WILLIAM JODY GRAY
D.B. 1087, PG. 105
PIN: 4827-75-8017
30' WIDE DUKE ENERGY
UTILITY EASEMENT
(DB 0194, PG 054)
N/F
5. MARK
a nd
MICHELLE R. CASS
D.B. 0723, PG. 527
PIN: 4827-95-4754
szs
MIKE
and
PHYLLIS HILL
D.B. 0775, PG. 0423
PIN: 4837-06-1521
STA: 107+87
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
N/F
JERRY A.
a nd
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0986, PG. 193
PIN: 4827-94-1858
0 \e/
\G G\z"O
F.
N/F
JERRY A.
a nd
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0653, PG. 160
PIN: 4827-84-8574
N/F
FLOSSIE JOHNSON
PIN: 4837-05-5574
STA: 118+80
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
STA: 307+30
UT2 REACH 4- END RESTORATION
STA: 312+06
UT2 REACH 3 - END RESTORATION
UT2 REACH 4 - BEGIN RESTORATION
3
STA: 300+00
UT2 REACH 1- BEGIN
ENHANCEMENT II
N/F
FLOSSIE JOHNSON
PIN: 4837-05-5292
STA: 306+37
UT2 REACH 2 - END RESTORATION
UT2 REACH 3 - BEGIN RESTORATION
00
N/F
CAROL KURFEY
D.B. 0751, PG. 0048
PIN: 4827-82-6564
\
• : o
///7/4;1111111111�\\i
ct
I --I
o
a) U
• r
o
▪ z
ct
c
a)
cn
rt
E
Project Overview
H
z
u

3T
i
DESIGN
GRADE
\
/
—
AS -BUILT
GRADE
STA: 100+37
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
STA: 100+19
RIFFLE MATERIAL ADDED
FOR STREAM STABILITY
STA: 100+45
ROCK ADDED TO
STABILIZE DITCH
STA: 103+10
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
INTERNAL CROSSING
<<NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CR�—
toe,
D
GATE
Q
-- - -______---____ LOD
1 O0------- ----------------- LOD LODO
- -- � too I I I
zoo LOD
STA: 103+51
BOULDER TOE ADDED
FOR BANK STABILITY
STA: 103+43
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
INTERNAL CROSSING
LOD
LOD
vole
Its
11\1.2.3
��1.2.4
1.2.5
1.1.2 ! 1.1.4
MIME
'�;3rei
.4
1.3.3
1.3.2 �1.4.1
�
Sheet Index
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.1.3
e
Cxe
1.6.1
1.3.1
1.1.5
1.5.1
Cn

1125
1120
1115
1110
1105
-1POOL
SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED IN
WILL CLEAR AS THE
FLOODPLAIN
N
STABILIZES
/
1\
/
--
_
/
\
\\
\
\\
/
/
\
//
\
\
/
—
\
\
/
/
DESIGN
GRADE
AS
BUILT
GRADE
104+00
D
104+50
X1 1120
X 3�=
--
105+00
REEK I LOD _ LOD — LOD
106+00
107+00
107+50
/
1125
1120
1115
1110
1105
107+80
,Ar
0'
0'
2'
(VERTICAL)
20'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index
1.2.1
6'
60'
•
71)
czt
0
z
0
u
cn
•
LOD — LOD
105+50
33
LOD — LO
16
106+50
-------- BT'-----
GATE
4'
40'
1.3.1
1.5.1

BUILT
GRADE
\\
AS
".2.
//
\
`
DESIGN
GRADE
\\
\
107+80 108+00
108+50
STA: 107+92
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
INTERNAL CROSSING
1 4, ( d / 1'�. \
STA: 107+87
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
UT1 CONFLUENCE
0/ /
E,� 3� --X
109+00
STA: 108+52
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
INTERNAL CROSSING
j' ID
110+50
111+00
111+50
112+00
112+30
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
rt
0
rt
0
z
0
u
m
X 30 X 30X
109+50
110+00
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
X32

-
-\
___,..--------:"----/
AS BUILT
GRADE
DESIGN
GRADE
--- -------------------------
----------------
--------------------------------------------------------
STA: 115+75
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
UT2 CONFLUENCE

1100
POOL
FLOODPLAINWI
ACCUMULATED
WILL
CLEAR
STABILIZES
AS THE
SEDIMENT
IN
POOLOOLWILL
FLOODPLAIN
CLEAR
STABILIZES
IN
AS THE
SEDIMENTACCUMULATED
/
--
_
/
-------
/
1
/�
1
-
/
DESIGN
GRADE
—/1>‘
--
—J/
AS -BUILT
GRADE
116+30
116+50
117+00
1120-
ELL ELL ELL ELL
-1115
STA: 118+07
STONE ADDED TO
STABILIZE CHANNEL
117+50
0
0
J
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
1.2.1
1.2.2
4.
1.1.4
118+00
STA: 118+20
LOG 1-HOOK, BOULDER TOE, AND
GEOLIFT REPLACED ROCK 1-HOOK
FOR ADDED STABILITY
118+50
119+00
STA: 118+80
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
118+94
STA: 118+68
RIFFLE ADDED FOR
STREAM STABILITY
1.3.1
1.1.5
0
0
z
0
U
Lc)

1175
1170
1165
1160
1155
N
N
N
N
\
\
\/
/
/ `--
-.
\
\
/
/
N
N.
N
\—
\ /
\
\
DESIGN
GRADE
\/
\
e
/ \
/\
\/
\
1--
...,
..,
e
i
AS
-BUILT
GRADE
200+00
200+50
201+00
201+50
202+00
202+50
203+00
203+50
1175
1170
1165
1160
1155
204+00
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL)
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
O
STA: 200+00
UT1
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
O>
Op
Op
LOD
'vU
STA: 200+66
LOG SILL MOVED UPSTREAM
FOR ADDITIONAL GRADE STABILITY
AND CHANGED TO ROCK SILL FOR
HABITAT DIVERSITY
SEE NOTE 1
--!SEE NOTE 1
SEE NOTE 1
, SEE NOTE 1
STA: 200+12
RIFFLE ADDED FOR
STREAM STABILITY --:
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
STA: 202+44
LOG SILL ADDED FOR
STREAM STABILITY
LOD
LOD LOD LOD
-------------
p> QO,�Go,/-00T00T�0
Op, pp��p01/
co,
0) GOB/
NOTES:
1. SURVEYED SILLS ARE PART OF THE
ORIGINALLY DESIGNED ROCK CASCADE
WITH POOLS AT STA: 201+54, STA: 201+69,
STA: 201+85, AND STA: 202+00
Sheet Index
Cr)
H
z
u

1165
1165
0' 2' 4'
6'
1160
1155
1150
1145
/
/
/—
/
DESIGN GRADE
AS BUILT GRADE
/
204+00
204+50
205+00
205+50
206+00
206+50
207+00
207+50
208+00
1160
1155
1150
1145
208+50
0'
20'
(VERTICAL)
40'
60'
(HORIZONTAL)
2
LOD
I
\p0
\p0
\p0
UT1
STA: 207+30
ROCK ADDED TO
STABILIZE DITCH
001 001
001
001/
001
001
001
0
CG3
/I
+ —
CO
0O7 —' w-=
007
`O07 I J
Sheet Index
01_
-d
U
z

---
\
\
\\/
/
\
`
//`—
/
/-
\r/
/ \
\
\
AS -BUILT
GRADE
\
1
\l
\
\
DESIGN
GRADE
—
\
\
\l
1
\
208+50
209+00
209+50
ROCK ADDED TO
STABILIZE DITCH
ROCK ADDED TO
STABLIZE DITCH
210+00
210+50
93A
211+00
211+50
SEE NOTE 1
GRASS SWALE INSTALLED
TO STABILIZE DITCH
212+00
STA: 212+12
LOG SILL ADDED FOR
STREAM STABILITY j
1160 0'
0'
1155
1150
1145
1140
212+50
(VERTICAL)
20' 40' 60'
NOTES:
1. SURVEYED SILLS ARE PART OF THE
ORIGINALLY DESIGNED ROCK CASCADE
WITH POOLS AT STA: 210+94, STA:
211+11, STA: 211+30, STA: 211+47, STA:
211+65, STA: 211+82, AND STA: 212+00
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index

1145
1145
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL)
1140
1135
1130
1125
FARM CROSSING WITH 85" X 44"
ENVIROSPAN BOTTOMLESS CULVERT
INSTALLED INSTEAD OF CMP CULVERT
N v
AS -BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
\\I
212+50
00-1
oo
213+00
EAT
oo
X
213+50
214+00
214+50
STA: 214+16
BRUSH TOE REPLACED GEOLIFT
DUE TO EXTRA AVAILABLE MATERIAL
__________________
c-t_CYE
Xl3-----
VLIE >n >n >n >n Jn �11gs
STA: 214+33
'm` 'm` 'm` 'm` 'm` UT1
BEGIN INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 214+38
RIFFLE MATERIALS ADDED
00 FOR STREAM STABILITY ,
O
Oj
\Oo7
007
ti
UT1
ELL ELL ELL ELL
0
215+00
Dot
215+50
STA: 214+78
RIFFLE MATERIAL ADDED
-- FOR STREAM STABILITY
215+00
STA: 214+94
BRUSH TOE AND LOG SILL REPLACED
ROCK TOE AND ROCK SILL DUE
TO EXTRA AVAILABLE MATERIAL
STA: 214+84
UT1
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
END INTERNAL CROSSING
001
p01
216+00
1140
1135
1130
1125
216+50
STA: 216+33
LOG SILL REPLACED ROCK
SILL FOR HABITAT DIVERSITY
216+00
L.0;
Q=
In
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index
•
rt
I --I
rt
o
a
a) ▪ U
•
� O
O Z
rt
r
a)
cn
rt
E
H
z
u

\\
N.
N.
`
SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED IN
POOLS W LL CLEAR AS THE
FLOODPLAIN STABILIZES
\ /_--.
\
\/
,,
/
\---.\
\✓
r .
\
\
\
/�
PROFILE
STA: 219+94
- STA:
ADJUSTED
220
TON
EXISTING
36" CMP
\/
\\
\
/
"�
r THE TIE-IN ELEVATION
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING C
L
—
f
\`\
\\—��
DESIGN
GRADE
AS BUILT
GRADE
STA: 217+28
UT1
/ EASEMENT BREAK
STA: 217+16
RIFFLE MATERIAL ADDED
FOR STREAM STABILITY
iLD
7 <
NI,;,
STA: 216+72
LOG SILL REPLACED
ROCK SILL FOR DIVERSITY
yr
z
18" HDPE
INV. = 1124.51
36" CMP
INV. = 1123.17
STA: 217+98
UT1
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 3 - RESTORATION
STA: 219+27
LOG J-HOOK REPLACED
LOG VANE FOR ADDITIONAL
GRADE CONTROL
STA: 219+81
ROCK SILL REPLACED J
LOG SILL FOR DIVERSITY
STA: 220+21 '
END UT1 REACH 3
RESTORATION
Sheet Index
1.2.1
1.3.1
1.5.1
rt
O
Lt
u
0
z
0
u

0' 4' 8' 12'
1190
1185
1180
1175
1170
1165
1160
1155
1150
PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADE
AS BUILT GRADE
NN\
'4\\
FARM CROSSING WITH 85" X 44"
ENVIROSPAN BOTTOMLESS CULVERT
INSTALLED INSTEAD OF CMP CULVERT
DESIGN GRADE
300+00
300+50
301+00
301+50
302+00
302+50
303+00
303+50
1190
1185
1180
1175
1170
1165
1160
1155
1150
304+00 304+20
(VERTICAL)
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
300+00
STA: 300+00
UT2
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
X 3D
X 3D
X 3D
CEX
-
-TB_
CEY
CEE �X
CE X
CE X
TB PP15
— --301— Tg
CE X
Tg
0L— 91_-
81
81
0
SEE NOTE 1
STA: 303+00
UT2
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN INTERNAL CROSSING
SEE NOTE 1
SEE NOOTEE11
SEE NOTE 1
_/ SE ENOTE 1
SEE NOTE 1
SEE NOTE 1
SEE NOTE 1
00
0
0
0
GATE
31VD
X
STA: 303+50
UT2
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
END INTERNAL CROSSING
EE NOTE 1
EE NOTE 1
304+00
STA: 303+47
ROCK SILL INSTALLED
FOR STREAM STABILITY
STA: 303+33
ROCK SILL INSTALLED
FOR STREAM STABILITY
O
N
+
W
U
H
2
NOTES:
1. SURVEYED SILLS ARE PART OF THE
ORIGINALLY DESIGNED ROCK CASCADE
WITH POOLS AT STA: 301+64, STA:
301+83, STA: 301+99, STA: 302+11, STA:
302+27, STA: 302+42, STA: 302+59, STA:
302+73, STA: 303+05, STA: 303+63, STA:
303+79, STA: 303+94, AND STA: 304+20
Sheet Index
a1-
•
ct
I --I
ct
o
a)
a) ▪ U
C▪ r)
O
▪ z
biD
Ct
Ct
cn
rt
E
V7
n
H
z
u

0' 4' 6' 12'
1155
1150
1145
1140
1135
1130
1125
DESIGN GRADE
AS BUILT GRADE
\
i
304+20
304+50
305+00
305+50
306+00
306+50
307+00
307+50
308+00
1155
1150
1145
1140
1135
1130
1125
308+50
(VERTICAL)
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
, SEE NOTE 1
Ar-
:,a r
EE NOTE 1
SEE NOTE 1
ECQ
ELLEa. a. a.
a. a. a.L L
SEE NOTE 1
STA: 306+37
UT2
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 3 - RESTORATION
RIFLE TRIBUTARY CONFLUENCE
SEE NOTE 1
SEE NOTE 1
STA: 307+50
RIFFLE WAS ADDED
FOR STREAM STABILITY
NOTES:
1. SURVEYED SILLS ARE PART OF THE ORIGINALLY
DESIGNED ROCK CASCADE WITH POOLS AT STA:
304+41, STA: 304+59, STA: 304+79, STA:
305+00, STA: 305+26, STA: 305+49, STA:
305+65, STA: STA 305+81, STA: 305+95, AND
STA: 306+18
\
\
\
\
\
\
SEE NOTE 1
,lam
STA: 308+45
ROCK SILL MOVED UPSTREAM IN
-aa PLACE OF LOG SILL FOR STABILITY
PP19'i
STA: 306+89
UT2
OLD BUS BRANCH CONFLUENCE
O°
\
\
\
\
Sheet Index
.2.1
1.1.5
1.5.1
\\`\0�\U llllll/r� //
•
W°4.d o�%�
////0�\i
1111111111.\
H
z

0'
2' 4' 6'
1130
1125
1120
1115
1110
DESIGN GRADE
\
AS -BUILT GRADE
308+50
309+00
309+50
310+00
310+50
311+00
311+50
312+00
1130
1125
1120
1115
1110
312+50
0'
(VERTICAL)
20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
RAE
•
THE RAE
LL ELL
RAE
ELL ELL
ELL ELL
ELL 4--LL ELL
N
309+00 =-
VFr
VP11
RAE
RAE
RAE
EtH
STA: 310+71
LOG 1-HOOK INSTALLED
INSTEAD OF LOG VANE FOR
ADDITIONAL GRADE CONTROL
82
0
STA: 311+10
UT2
BARN BRANCH CONFLUENCE
31V9
PP20
4
C6-
/
C6-
/
i 1
STA: 312+06
UT2
END REACH 3 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 4 - RESTORATION
ELL ELL ELL ELL
LEL
[L ELL ELL ELL ELL ELL _
ML ML ML ML ML
ELL ELL ELL ELL ELL
ML ML ML ML ML
ELL ELL
ELL ELL ELL
ELL ELL ELL ELL
,ul, /\
l 9fnj „//ice ,fF
��2 5° �P,
SAP;
Sheet Index
u

1125
1125
0' 2' 4'
6'
(VERTICAL)
1120
1115
1110
1105
\//
DESIGN GRADE
1
AS -BUILT GRADE
312+50
313+00
313+50
314+00
314+50
315+00
315+50
316+00
316+50
317+00
1120
1115
1110
1105
317+30
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
>�q
A,
aiLL I
,II,VP12,II,
A
PP21
UT2
.��``.,'=, ---_.... e� •.emu
• *., ''� `I14f0 --,___ _ ,.O ff e
►; �5
®: �,_ = : moo. ---
CG2
i
CI
>u,ili,_ . ,ili,_O ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ ,ili,_ _ (Q
,m,_ ,m,_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,mL_ ,m,_ ,m,_ ,m,_ ,m,_ ,mL_ LoL
�1
93N
VP3
me
PP22
y
7
vEG
STA: 317+28
END UT2
LOD RESTORATION
LOD RaD
STA: 317+34
NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK
UT2 CONFLUENCE
>u�
J0
z
0
C.
.73
Sheet Index
ct
I --I
•
ct
a) U
•
ram-
ct
O Z
0
c
a)
cJ)
ct
E

/c/
\\\
STA: 70+00
BEGIN TRAPPER TRIBUTARY
ENHANCEMENT II
1150
1145
1140
1135
1130
7_
1
PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADE
STA: 251+47 - STA: 252+47
PROFILE ADJUSTMENT DUE TO
CHANGE IN TOPOGRAPHY FROM THE
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
�\ r
J r�
AS -BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRAD
250+00
LL ,uL °x0O. ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,ALL ,
,A, ,A, L 9A ,, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A,
F,ALL ,ALL ,ALL _ ,ul, �.
,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, c"�`\ PP24C ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, , „,A, ,A, ,A, -. i ,A, ,A, ,A,
N2IL,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. >�ip I� ,m.-,m. _,m.- „..x00 - - - ,m. ;,,,e- - ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. >��j. ,m. OO ,m. ,m. ,m.,�,,m��'Sii, ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m�u� ,m. ,m. ,m.
,m,- ,m,- ,m,- ,m,- ,m,- ,m,- ,m,- ,m,- 1,`,m,- ,m,- ,mV� ,uy, ,m,- ,m,- ,m,-TB / -- -- -- -_ y� LL
250+50
251+00
,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,ul, 70+41,u1, ,A, ,A, ;u�,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, ,A, A
0„1
001
STA: 70+41
END TRAPPER TRIBUTARY
ENHANCEMENT II
/
aiL a
STA: 250+00
BEGIN RIFLE TRIBUTARY
ENHANCEMENT II
//N
MP REDESIGNED AS A STEP POOL
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
X
251+50
252+00
252+50
, STA: 251+47 ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m. ,m.
RIFLE TRIBUTARY
BEGIN PROFILE REVISION
aD
1150
1145
1140
1135
1130
252+70
�' 1 ��= Sheet Index
0' 1' 2' 3'
(VERTICAL)
0' 10' 20' 30'
(HORIZONTAL)
4%mill.111
STA: 252+45
END RIFLE TRIBUTARY
ENHANCEMENT II
,aa
►tea n
3� 3J
vt$e 13s,
1.2.1
tt
1.2.4
2.5
ror
.6.121.4.1
1.3.1
.2.2
1.2.3
1.1.4
1.1.5
1.5.1
Rifle and Tr
rl

STA: 260+25
END BMP
I BEGIN OLD BUS BRANCH
RESTORATION
STA: 260+09
ROCK SILL ADDED TO BMP FOR
ADDITIONAL GRADE CONTROL
STA: 260+87
OLD BUS BRANCH
BEGIN RESTORATION CREDIT
STA: 261+75
END OLD BUS BRANCH
RESTORATION
NOTES:
1. SURVEYED SILLS ARE PART OF THE
ORIGINALLY DESIGNED ROCK CASCADE
WITH POOLS AT STA: 260+36, STA:
260+47, STA: 260+55, STA: 260+69, STA:
260+81, STA: 260+93, STA: 261+04, STA:
261+17, STA: 261+28, STA: 261+41, AND
STA: 261+54

DESIGN GRADE
olo
EAT EAT LILL
LILL EAT EAT
/ STA: 280+00
/ BEGIN BARN BRANCH
RESTORATION
SEDIMENT
ACCUMULATED
IN
POOL
FLOODPLAIN
WILL CLEAR
AS
STABILIZES
THE
N
1
/
V
\
/x.
\
>
•
SEDIMENTACCUMU
POOL
FLOODPLAIN
WILL
CLEAR
STABILI;
AS
\
/ ,
NN
^
GRADE
N. N.AS-BUILT
280+00
280+50
281+00
281+50
282+00
282+50
1135 0'
1130
1125
ATED IN
THE
ES
283+00
STA: 282+89
END BARN BRANCH D
RESTORATION
(VERTICAL)
20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index

Note:
Permanent Riparian seeding in
all disturbed areas within
Conservation Easement
Open Riparian Buffer Planting Zone
Buffer Planting Zone
Open/Graded Bare Roots
Species
Common Name
Indio.
Spacing
Min. Caliper
Size
Stratum**
# of Stems
Wetland
Indicator
Status
Platanus occidentalis*
Sycamore
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
15%
FACW
Betula nigra*
River birch
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
15%
FACW
Nyssa sylvatica
Black gum
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
5%
FAC
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
5%
FACU
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
5%
FACU
Ulmus americana*
American elm
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
5%
FACW
Ulmus rubra
Slippery elm
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Subcanopy
5%
FAC
Acer negundo*
Boxelder
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Subcanopy
10%
FAC
Cornusflorida
Flowering dogwood
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Subcanopy
5%
FACU
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
10%
FAC
Calycanthusfloridus*
Sweetshrub
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Shrub
5%
FACU
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Shrub
5%
FAC
Asimina triloba
Pawpaw
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Shrub
5%
FAC
Quercus alba
White oak
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
5%
FACU
*Species to be planted in wetter portions of the site
100%
** Only canopy species are subject to monitoring height requirements.
Shaded Riparian Buffer Planting Zone
Buffer Planting Zone
Shaded Bare Roots
Species
Common Name
Indio.
Spacing
Min. Caliper
Size
Stratum**
# of Stems
Wetland
Indicator
Status
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
15%
FACW
Betula nigra
River birch
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
15%
FACW
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
2%
FACU
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Subcanopy
5%
FAC
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
5%
FAC
Nyssa sylvatica
Black gum
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
10%
FAC
Euonymus americana
American strawberry bush
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Shrub
3%
FAC
Calycanthusfloridus
Sweetshrub
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Shrub
5%
FACU
Hamamelis virginiana
Witch hazel
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Shrub
5%
FACU
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
10%
FACU
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
5%
FACU
Quercus alba
White oak
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Canopy
10%
FACU
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Shrub
5%
FAC
Cornusflorida
Flowering dogwood
6-8 ft.
0.25" - 1.0"
Subcanopy
5%
FACU
** Only canopy species are subject to monitoring height requirements.
100%
Permanent Seeding
Buffer Planting Zone
Riparian Seed Mix
Species
Common Name
Stratum
Density
(Ibs/acre)
Wetland
Indicator
Status
Panicum rigidulum
Redtop Panicgrass
Herb
1
FACW
Chasmanthium latifolium
River Oats
Herb
1
FACU
Elymus virginicus
Virginia Wild Rye
Herb
3
FACW
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deertongue
Herb
3
FAC
Sorghastrum nutans
Indiangrass
Herb
3
FACU
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little Bluestem
Herb
2
FACU
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
Herb
1
FAC
Rudbeckia hirta
Blackeyed Susan
Herb
1
FACU
Bidens aristosa
Showy Tickseed Sunflower
Herb
1
FACW
Helianthus angustifolius
Narrowleaf Sunflower
Herb
0.6
FACW
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lanceleaf Coreopsis
Herb
1
FACU
Chamaecrista fasciculata
Partridge Pea
Herb
1
FACU
Heliopsis helianthoides var. helianthoides
Oxeye Sunflower
Herb
1
FACU
Juncos tenuis
Path Rush
Herb
0.4
FAC
Total
20
Disturbed areas outside easement.
41/4 11 11 11 "
41/4 11 11 11 "
Streambank Planting Zone
Buffer Planting Zone
Streambank Planting
Species
Common Name
Indio.
Spacing
Min. Caliper
Size
Stratum
# of
Stems
Wetland
Indicator
Status
Streams> 8' Bankfull Width
Salix nigra
Black Willow
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
14%
OBL
Corpus amomum
Silky Dogwood
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
24%
FACW
Salixsericea
Silky Willow
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
33%
OBL
Physocarpus opulifolius
Ninebark
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
14%
FACW
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberrry
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
15%
Streams < 8' Bankfull Width
Corpus amomum
Silky Dogwood
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
24%
FACW
Salixsericea
Silky Willow
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
33%
OBL
Physocarpus opulifolius
Ninebark
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
14%
FACW
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberrry
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
15%
FAC
Alms see rulete
Tng Alder
2 8 ft
0.5" 1.5" col
Shrub
15A
OBL
Salix nigra
Black Willow
2-8 ft
0.5"-1.5" cal
Shrub
14%
OBL
Plugs
Juncos effusus
Common Rush
3-5 ft
1.0"-2.0" plug
Herb
40%
FACW
Carex lupulina
Hop Sedge
3-5 ft
1.0"-2.0" plug
Herb
15%
OBL
Scirpus cyperinus
Woolgrass
3-5 ft
1.0"-2.0" plug
Herb
15%
FACW
Carex crinita
Fringed Sedge
3-5 ft
1.0"-2.0" plug
Herb
15%
OBL
Carex lurida
Lurid Sedge
3-5 ft
1.0"-2.0" plug
Herb
15%
OBL
Temporary Seeding
Approved Date
Jan 1 - May 1
Winter Oats (Avena Sativa)
55
Rye Grain (Secale cereale)
120
Ladino Clover (Trifolium repens)
5
Medium Red Clover (Trillium
pretense)
5
SoluCal Humic Plus
200
Neem Seed Meal
200
Fertoz 0-20-0
200
Straw Mulch
4000
May 1 - Aug 15
German Millet (Setaria italica)
40
Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum)
40
SoluCal Humic Plus
200
Fertoz 0-20-0
200
Neem Seed Meal
200
Straw Mulch
4000
Aug 15 - Dec 30
Winter Oats (Avena Sativa)
55
Medium Red Clover (Trillium
pretense)
5
Ladino Clover (Trifolium repens)
5
Neem Seed Meal
200
SoluCal Humic Plus
200
Fertoz 0-20-0
200
Straw Mulch
4000
Pasture Seeding
Pasture Seeding
Pure Live Seeding (501bs/acre)
Species Name
Common Name
Density(Ibs/acre)
Wetland
Indicator
Status
Doctylis glomerate
Orchard Grass
33
FACU
Trifolium pretense
Medium Red Cover
5
FACU
Trifolium repens
White Ladino Cover
5
FACU
Poepratensis
Kentucky Bluegrass
7
FACU
Total Planted Area: 24 acres
tt
I --I
tt
o
a) U
O Z
ct
ct
a)
cn
tt
E
U)
H
z
u

ZZZZZ
ZZZZZZZZ
,,,,,,,,,
ZZZZZZZ
0'
200'
400' 600'
` (HORIZONTAL)
SHEET 2.2
ZZ
ZZ
z

0'
60'
Gj,
120'
180'
(HORIZONTAL)
ee O
OF
•100\O
OG
-100 DOGE
li
-100,'�O�OGF
\
'�O OG OGF
-100
ZZZZZZ
i i i i
',
ZZZZZZZZZ
0G 0GF
i
% % %
%' ' %%%
ZZZZZ i i i i i'
ZZZZZZZ
, i
'& '''Q
OG
O
FV°\�OO
O
i
ZZZZZZZZ
ZZZZZZZZ
z z z z z z z����,',
z z z z z z z z z z'
ZZZ
1Sxpz%%iiiiiii
///// %%
zzzzzz/z
G00 �00.
GFN OG
O
OJT\
/OJ OJT
cl
7
0
7
,sfy
u
H
7'
w

VI
Ki W
INGLE HOLLOW RD
R/W
MATCHLINE SHEET 2.2
., z z Z z z z 7�ll�lir ., o`•
�O 1"���'i 1/��i •`-�% ��? � i ' X . .o 2X2 ��, I�6��,% ��0i —-..111i�/. l_l�y�A', /' // ' „e?, / /,/^.
� -1•
'
Z 2 2
/
%
2���zzzh, R/W��7iz iizzzzzzzz • zjzzzz ////////00
0////„0zzz,00//%/z%z , A /iiiziiziz//izizzz000///"'"0000000
z00000000
/// zi'11 zozzzzoz izK�—�/7//zz,izi iizjzjz%�0z10izzi///iiiii3ORyW' mCR/W
w //00
0000000000000000000000000000000
000000
00000,-10
/00ziiiziiz�iii
�0zzzzzz-0zZz/i„0,,,,, „0„- z/'/. /%'/.z// z%zz%��zzzzi/z„�%z-, z:%:%ziz%i/iWi(/ % / 1/0"+2z0zi7iZORH z T�z i/2UNTzi%/CE"zi\/i�\1pQzzi Z i%22�i%„�z�:�,�zz,Yi/,i/���f���i� ��i/t���//,,i/%% %%zz 0//0
5�0ii/2z z i izz.„'% NTEHVGi
_ Yz2j/000/ 7 7/, z � iii,i
z.
zzzzZZZzzi z 2 z z 2 0
000000
• �%0ii
\ i
l/�zzzzzz z z z z ii z2ii' 0002000z002
MAW
zzzi0000zzz 2/34zzz /::i�a, •
0000000000
000000
00
'0zZz2zzzz2zz /0 zzizz/z2 i 00 /��2z2z�i 000zz2\30 0 0 % zzz //%//0iiizz2zzzil�zz2z i¢ 0 0�zzzzz-zzz400000
zz /// ,Dzzzzz 20 zzz2 zi 000z�0z1 ��zii/ _400000z //////02zz2zz0zzzzzzz.Uzi/z//z // /// /0zzzzi .:
allORMIORMIORMIMMEMPax
00000000//%- Lzz i0� ZZzzZz/zz00 z��zjzjzzz % z 4 /0 /zzzzzzz`z zzzz//zz000000//iicizzzzzz_' z' // /zzzZzLZzzz %Zz7z77zzzzzzjz /// z / , Miiz iiiizI zzzzz IUzi0 / 006z izzzvuz�zzzi//zGLz zzzz zi// �LWt�b +0/ ///////z z z z//zzzz0zzzzz //z z zz z z z z V
cR
z i���� dzzzz i i i
z i
z WI
i 0 z zzzizzzz �iitti
!
,�o o i
C
zzz /0 0��.r �� „z 0 0 • "'mu
„$,
lb
,�,
m w MATCHLINE SHEE
O
0
120'60'0'
180'
(HORIZONTAL)
bA
ct
I --I
1t
0 TDI
a
U
O
ct
bA
0
ct
c
E
O.
H
z
7

O
c
m
O O
0
c
r^
0
0 O
c
c
O
3n0
OUE
0u
3 n o
ou
OUE
no
�u-
+117
OWit
I.
M
N
0' 60' 120'
180'
(HORIZONTAL)
PP
mwt
r11
w
m
�117
�rr00
r
4 .. r�
00 I( (0 00
00
000 00
%0 /, 00
'0"
/, /.
0 2 -/, 0 '
0000
0 0 0 ,
zz , 0 , ,
,zzz,.
.. , , x 0 0 ;i
0 4410 i i i % ::0
T/ 400 i;310��� .Z 07/
4000:00Z00Z001/411:" 0:0:%E.
0.
0000000
:\E 0 _4;C:A
0000.000
00000000
00000000
0.00
,400 tll�
ff,: 0,00ii�77iiiiiiii0� ��i77777 l�
7%7: %0i%%ii%Aye, aM % i iii
%
M0.00
00
t ll�l// 00%00%D0 %0/� ice////wi�//iiii: l�0. ,„„0
:,/ <� O
zD
.. BUS
04,4400000
BRANCH
i
/ z z 0 z
000.
0 0 0
i 00,Eiii0Q,
ii iix
`Zi��ol lZ i�
/ i
0 0
i
i ,
0 %
i i
i 0.
0 0 i
0 i i
i % 0 0
% i i
„�;
00/. '/,
0
i
in;�.- ?S
7 C - ' „0,
0
MATCHLINE SHEET 2.3
N E
H
z
4
4
W

RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FENCING
N/F
WILLIAM JODY GRAY
D.B. 1087, PG. 105
PIN: 4827-75-8017
N/F
JERRY A.
and
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0668, PG. 110
PIN: 4827-97-1287
o4
o t,
-10o\\
\°G °OF
\O\'
OO
o
N/F
JERRY A.
and
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0653, PG. 160
PIN: 4827-84-8574
Ay
N/F
JERRY A.
and
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0621, PG. 14
PIN: 4827-96-5044
\ADO
OG
F �
30' WIDE DUKE ENERGY 0000
UTILITY EASEMENT
(DB 0602, PG 329)
N/F
WILLIAM JODY GRAY
D.B. 1087, PG. 105
PIN: 4827-75-8017
N/F
JERRY A.
and
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0653, PG. 160
PIN: 4827-95-0384
' 14/
30' WIDE DUKE ENERGY
UTILITY EASEMENT
(DB 0194, PG 054)
N/F
S. MARK
a nd
MICHELLE R. CASS
D.B. 0723, PG. 527
PIN: 4827-95-4754
N/F
JERRY A.
and
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0653, PG. 160
PIN: 4827-84-8574
SEE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FENCING
INSET FOR FENCE CONTINUATION
N/F
JERRY A.
and
DEBRA LYNN JOHNSON
D.B. 0986, PG. 193
PIN: 4827-94-1858
0'
100'
(HORIZONTAL)
150' 200'
u
MO

c
_1
HUNTSMAN STREAM
,fin SURVEY FOR: � �
c?, `P-p ATTN: AARON EARLY, PE, CFM o o 0F30
�" - PROJECT ENGINEER co
`�' I >
l �� \-D MITIGATION SITE As _ BuILT
1430S. MINT ST. z � > �'�
9- �d�° SUITE 104 0 01
coorn c '
z �. .-
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 O z N
SITE [phone] x109 zz }ca'
ahliAS-BU1LT SURVEY PERFORMED BY ( 3
�N ill
C5R TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
L,4i�<E N2 3A 1 APRIL-MAY 2022
'R� �%//%I # i/- i z
SHEET 2A �� ~
(4 o-, / 1 ! IsJI w
i ,fib
, „ = ce
DELIVERANCE
BAPTIST CH. RD• / z = CI
a Q
VICINITY MAP 4
o°° LEGEND: U
NOT TO SCALE l SHEET 2 B o
r'�Q - • - • - • - THALWEG �„ a-,A!,
E ' `;
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND 0z - - TOP OF BANK/TERRACE o ;,
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE z BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE }
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION, 1,;,. .,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS i AS-BUILT SURVEY LIMITS ' ='
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR - cc
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS-BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE l FARM PATH _
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, t 4 . M x
SHEET 3A FENCELINE
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 22nd DAY OF JUNE 2022. UT1---____.6...._ z
\��.���,�; ►caor'r�,. �� �- GATE 0
' .• CONTOURS
.„)±:i
6.--- p� Q�i 9
a�' p&22•?Z 9�.
TREELINE
DAVID S. TURNER, P .S. #L-4551 - SEAL - - fI-
r
-r- L-4551 fr: TREE o
�'ya <C,• Q z
�0 S 1�•Q ED GRAVEL
' l/f114 o1 s •• SHEET 3B
I, DAVID S. TURNER, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY 0.4 RIPRAP/STONE
DIRECT AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY I
SUPERVISION; THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE 95 `; BEDROCK
PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO MEET FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEEC:3 w
STANDARDS; THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
I I
FOR A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TO THE HORIZONTAL ACCURACY OF CLASS A AND I SHEET 4 LOG SILL I
THE VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO CLASS C STANDARD, AND THAT 0 W _
THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED IN APR-MAY 2022; THAT THE SURVEY WAS ! ROCK SILL �/ /�
COMPLETED ON 16 MAY 2022; AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD83 ! L1� V )
(2011) AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL Q
SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER, AND SEAL \o itll+r„,,
THIS 22nd DAY OF JUNE , 2022. �k\\NN CARO'io ti.�._ Q J-HOOK LOG SILL
. zi H OL W RD. r_s D W z }
0011
Q� g6-22 9 J ,� _ SHEET ROOTWAD (C z 0
f -r. SEAL r : ---- -------- - -- '...'� 0
DAVID S. TURNER, P.L.S. #L-4551 = .� L-4551 _1F- ? i !., "'� W
k. �:::z, ., , BRUSH TOE W/ SOIL LIFT
C,l� Q
-'f,p• S. r_c ky ``.\. - 2 < ..,.i
/ \,. -�R �..- t
„..,...........,.....,.........,...........4..
'' Ill 4 `, SHEET 5 _,,� _�' - R _ ; VEGETATED LIFT V
GENERAL NOTES: �' *��� V)
Sagge
CO
7 CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE1. ALL DISTANCES RRE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ! ► .2. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD83(2011) & VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88. �.- i / _�-
3. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY i I
WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS. NORTH LITTLE HUNTING CREEK i SHEET 6 MONITORING Eli Z
4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO SHOW THE AS-BUILT CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTSMAN "'N SHEET 8A --- CROSS-SECTION5. THE AS-BUILT CONTROL NETWORK WAS ESTABLISHED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING DURING / yTHE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY AND RECOVERED AND SUPPLEMENTED DURING THEUT2 / 1--
VP3 VEG PLOT
AS-BUILT SURVEY. THE COORDINATES ARE LISTED IN THE CHART BELOW.
6. NO PROPERTY RESEARCH, INVESTIGATION, OR INDEPENDENT SEARCH FOR ENCUMBERANCES,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OWNERSHIP, TITLE EVIDENCE, OR OTHER
FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE EXAMINATION MAY DISCLOSE WERE - 0 MOBILE VEG PLOT
PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY. A LICENSED ATTORNEY-AT-LAW SHOULD BE CONSULTED (Ip� v=i
REGARDING CORRECT OWNERSHIP, WIDTH, AND LOCATION OF EASEMENTS AND OTHER TITLE r ` SHEET 7 B aPP1 PHOTO POINT z
QUESTIONS REVEALED BY A TITLE EXAMINATION. o
7. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND/OR ENCUMBRANCES THAT MAY AFFECT BARN BRANCH ' re STREAM GAUGE F.,.
THE PROPERTY(S). TLSAONL CONTROL POINT w
8. THIS SURVEYOR DOES NOT CERTIFY TO THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF ANY g Q
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT EXIST WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES AS i SHEET 9 SHOWN HEREON.
I
OLD BUS BRANCH
z
AS-BUILT CONTROL j)ki DATE: 5/17J20212
PointNo. Northing(Y) Easting(X) Elev(Z) Description '
1 875524.607 1430185.539 1122.901 TLS#1RBC RESET f? SURVEYED BY:
2 875194.254 1429559.236 1145.980 TLS#2RBC GPS ---- DST/LDS J
3 875054.483 1429069.412 1151.401 TLS#3RBC GPS
20 875137.960 1429801.193 1117.800 TLS#20RBC=VP12 / DRAWN BY:
21 874839.840 1429880.206 1128.487 TLS#21 RBC-XS 13 / _ EGT/DST
22 874710.345 1430064.361 1139.323 TLS#22RBC=XS15 ► REVIEWED BY:
23 874595.853 1429973.619 1146.570 TLS#23R8C=XS11 i DST/EGT
30 875813.756 1429253.967 1133.617 TLS#30RBC=XS9
32 876450.981 1429080.301 1153.460 TLS#32RBC-XS7 ► PROJECT: 19-030
33 876747.564 1429070.938 1158.705 TLS#33RBC=XS5
60 8771 18.467 1429056.928 1174.306 TLS#60NL SHEET 10 FILE:
HUNTSMAN MS AB F.DWG
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
201, 400 600 SHEET
1 of 10 o�-�- � THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
ri

GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
LEGE\3:
6,1
:r
TLS#60NL
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
SHEET 2A SHEET2B
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE
AS —BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
FARM PATH
FENCELINE
GATE
CONTOURS
TREELINE
TREE
GRAVEL
RIPRAP/STONE
BEDROCK
LOG SILL
ROCK SILL
J—HOOK LOG SILL
ROOTWAD
BRUSH TOE W/ SOIL LIFT
VEGETATED LIFT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MONITORING
CROSS—SECTION
VEG PLOT
MOBILE VEG PLOT
PHOTO POINT
STREAM GAUGE
CONTROL POINT
3AN<
TOE
THALWEG
TOP OF
3AN <
\ 1
\ THALWEG
0
20
40
MATCHLINE S2A
MATCHLINE S2B
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
0
MATCHLINE S2B
MATCHLINE S3A
6) ,,fit'
o k► Nx
PQ
co
cx
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 6/17/20212
SURVEYED BY: ,
DST/LDS
'DRAWN BY:
EGT/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
c PROJECT: 19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS AB F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN
SHEET
2 of 10
,
_}J

1
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
SHEET 3A SHEET3B
MATCHLINE S2B
MATCHLINE S3A
LEGE\3:
XS11
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE
AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
FARM PATH
FENCELINE
GATE
CONTOURS
TREELINE
TREE
GRAVEL
RIPRAP/STONE
BEDROCK
LOG SILL
ROCK SILL
0 J-HOOK LOG SILL
VP3
6PP1
0
TLS#60NL
ROOTWAD
BRUSH TOE W/ SOIL LIFT
VEGETATED LIFT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MONITORING
CROSS-SECTION
VEG PLOT
MOBILE VEG PLOT
PHOTO POINT
STREAM GAUGE
CONTROL POINT
TLS#32R3C
(n
1'
•
EYE 3OLT
ELEV.=1 154.66
MATCHLINE S3A
MATCHLINE S3B
0) )
0
20
40
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
k\c rcr, \\_\\,—uc
MATCHLINE S3A
MATCHINE S3B
MATCHLINE_S3B
MATCHLINE S4
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
Elf:
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
1
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 1 6/17/20212
J
SURVEYED BY: ,
DST/LDS..
DRAWN BY: ,
EGT/DST..
REVIEWED BY: ,
DST/EGT i
PROJECT: ,
19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN.,
SHEET
3 of 10
J

GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
MATCHLINE S3B
MATCHLINE S4
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
\I,
41, N'
sviVF . •
0
20
3AN
0
E
TOP OF
3AN<
40
15"HDPE
INV=1 125.39
18"HDPE
INV=1 124.51
36"CMP
'.INV=1 123.17
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
36"CMP
INV=1121.66
------------
LEGE\ 9:
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE
AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
FARM PATH
X X FENCELINE
GATE
CONTOURS
TREELINE
TREE
GRAVEL
RIPRAP/STONE
BEDROCK
LOG SILL
ROCK SILL
XS11
J-HOOK LOG SILL
0
VP3
6PP1
TLS#660NL
ROOTWAD
BRUSH TOE
W/ SOIL LIFT
VEGETATED LIFT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MONITORING
CROSS-SECTION
VEG PLOT
MOBILE VEG PLOT
PHOTO POINT
STREAM GAUGE
CONTROL POINT
-----------------
CE CE
7
3
°MATCHLINE S41126
MATCHLINE 6
/ 1124
CE
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS. J
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 1 6/17/20212
`SURVEYED
BY: ,
DST/LDS..
DRAWN BY: ,
EGT/DST..
REVIEWED BY: ,
DST/EGT,
PROJECT: ,
19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN.,
SHEET
4
of 10

1
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
i
i
i
i
E
i
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
0
20
TOP OF
3AN K
40
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
A.
C)l THALWEG
TOP OF
3AN<
3AN
TOE
i
LEGE\
D.
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE
AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
FARM PATH
X X FENCELINE
GATE
CONTOURS
TREELINE
TREE
XS11
GRAVEL
RIPRAP/STONE
BEDROCK
LOG SILL
ROCK SILL
J-HOOK LOG SILL
0
VP3
6PP1
•
TLS#660NL
ROOTWAD
BRUSH TOE
W/ SOIL LIFT
VEGETATED LIFT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MONITORING
CROSS-SECTION
VEG PLOT
MOBILE VEG PLOT
PHOTO POINT
STREAM GAUGE
CONTROL POINT
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 1 6/17/20212
J
SURVEYED BY: ,
DST/LDS..
DRAWN BY: ,
EGT/DST..
REVIEWED BY: ,
DST/EGT i
PROJECT: ,
19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN.,
SHEET
5 of 10
J
J

1
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
TOP OF
3AN <
3
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
MATCHLINES4
MAfCHLIFSIE 56
THALWEG
1126/
0
20
40
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
12
ITHALWEG
EYE 3OLT
ELEV.=1 1 13.59
TOP OF
3AN ‹
LEGE\
[2:9
D.
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE
AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
FARM PATH
FENCELINE
GATE
CONTOURS
TREELINE
TREE
GRAVEL
RIPRAP/STONE
BEDROCK
LOG SILL
ROCK SILL
XS11
J-HOOK LOG SILL
0
VP3
6PP1
TLS#660NL
ROOTWAD
BRUSH TOE
W/ SOIL LIFT
VEGETATED LIFT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MONITORING
CROSS-SECTION
VEG PLOT
MOBILE VEG PLOT
PHOTO POINT
STREAM GAUGE
CONTROL POINT
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 1 6/17/20212
J
SURVEYED BY: ,
DST/LDS..
DRAWN BY: ,
EGT/DST..
REVIEWED BY: ,
DST/EGT i
PROJECT: ,
19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN.,
SHEET
6 of 10
J
J

1
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
�N N
-Cf) V)
LU LU
�zIz
U U
Q Q
__2
)P OF
3AN <
CE
•
1
MATCHLINE S2
/MATCHLIE S2
3AN
TOE
16
CE
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
CE
CG2
CE
1132
CE
__1114--------
THALWEG
PP22
1114
TOP OF
3AN'C
0
20
40
CE CE
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
CE
CE
CE
/
*SEE SHEET 1 FOH LEGE\3
G P\
,rn
rm
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
1
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 1 6/17/20212
`SURVEYED
BY: ,
DST/LDS..
DRAWN BY: ,
EGT/DST..
REVIEWED BY: ,
DST/EGT i
PROJECT: ,
19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN.,
SHEET
7 of 10
J
J

GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
TOP OF
ANC
3AN<
TOE
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
SHEET 8A SHEET8B
MATCHLINE S2
/MATCHLINE S2
3AN<
TOE
THALWEG
(XS14
EYE 3OLT
ELEV=1 1 15.26
THALWEG
`SEE SHEET 1 FOH LEGE\3
MATCHLINE S2
MATCHLINE S2
0
20
40
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 6/17/20212
SURVEYED BY: ,
DST/LDS
'DRAWN BY:
EGT/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
c PROJECT: 19-030
l
FILE:
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
`SCALE:
,
AS SHOWN
SHEET
8 of 10
,
_}J

GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
77>
0
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
3AN
TOE
THALWEG
1 13 8�
J
TOP OF
3AN<
MVP4
/TLS#22RC , _,,,
.\P P 2 7 �����:_-
`. rim „ I�� .0 . t7
THA W= G
116 II WOW
T ALWEG
0
PP24
20
40
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
3AN<
TOE
•
TOP OF
3AN<
LEGE\ 9:
L=J
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE
AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
FARM PATH
FENCELINE
GATE
CONTOURS
TREELINE
TREE
GRAVEL
RIPRAP/STONE
BEDROCK
LOG SILL
ROCK SILL
XS11
VP3
6PP1
TLS 660NL
J-HOOK LOG SILL
ROOTWAD
BRUSH TOE
W/ SOIL LIFT
VEGETATED LIFT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MONITORING
CROSS-SECTION
VEG PLOT
MOBILE VEG PLOT
PHOTO POINT
STREAM GAUGE
CONTROL POINT
MATCHLINE S9
MATCHLINE S10
\Ne,
•
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
I
1J1TP11
LAND SUR'
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 1 6/17/20212
J
SURVEYED BY: ,
DST/LDS..
DRAWN BY: ,
EGT/DST..
REVIEWED BY: ,
DST/EGT i
PROJECT: ,
19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN.,
SHEET
9 of 10
J

GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR CERTIFICATIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 1 FOR GENERAL NOTES
HUNTSMAN STREAM MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
0
20
40
60
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 feet
MATCHLINE S9
MATCHLINE S10
c(<
LEGE\
D.
c:D
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
BANK TOE/TERRACE TOE
AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
FARM PATH
FENCELINE
GATE
CONTOURS
TREELINE
TREE
GRAVEL
RIPRAP/STONE
BEDROCK
LOG SILL
ROCK SILL
X S 1 1
VP3
6PP1
TLS 660NL
J-HOOK LOG SILL
ROOTWAD
BRUSH TOE
W/ SOIL LIFT
VEGETATED LIFT
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MONITORING
CROSS-SECTION
VEG PLOT
MOBILE VEG PLOT
PHOTO POINT
STREAM GAUGE
CONTROL POINT
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
REVISIONS, DATE AND INITIAL: I
P.O. BOX 148
SWANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 [phone]
www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
z
I
1.1
AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR:
\I1
KES CC
DATE: 1 6/17/20212
J
SURVEYED BY: ,
DST/LDS..
DRAWN BY: ,
EGT/DST..
REVIEWED BY: ,
DST/EGT i
PROJECT: ,
19-030
FILE: ,
HUNTSMAN MS_AB_F.DWG
SCALE: ,
AS SHOWN.,
SHEET
10
of 10

APPENDIX F. Correspondence

Environmental
Quality
To: DMS Technical Workgroup, DMS operations staff
From: Periann Russell, Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
RE: Pebble count data requirements
Date: October 19, 2021
The DMS Technical Work Group met September 29, 2021 to discuss Interagency Review Team (IRT) and
DMS requirements for collecting pebble count data as part of monitoring (MYO-MYx). Agreement was
reached between all attending parties that pebble count data will not be required during the monitoring
period for all future projects.
Sediment data and particle distribution will still be required for the mitigation plan as part of the
proposed design explanation and justification.
Pebble counts and/or particle distributions currently being conducted by providers for annual
monitoring may be discontinued at the discretion of the DMS project manager. If particle distribution
was listed as a performance standard in the project mitigation plan, the provider is required to
communicate the intent to cease data collection with the DMS project manager. The absence of pebble
count data in future monitoring reports where pebble count data was listed as part of monitoring in the
mitigation plan must be documented in the monitoring report. The September 29, 2021 Technical Work
Group meeting may be cited as the source of the new policy.
The IRT reserves the right to request pebble count data/particle distributions if deemed necessary
during the monitoring period.

Kristi Suggs
From: Reid, Matthew <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 1:26 PM
To: Kristi Suggs
Cc: Mimi Caddell
Subject: RE: [External] FW: Pebble Count Data Requirements
I am absolutely OK with not doing pebble counts anymore!
As stated in the memo, please add a statement in the monitoring reports citing the policy.
Thanks!
Matthew Reid
Project Manager — Western Region
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
828-231-7912 Mobile
[e-mail]
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Dr
Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
%' lMthlrq Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Kristi Suggs [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 1:24 PM
To: Reid, Matthew <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mimi Caddell <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] FW: Pebble Count Data Requirements
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Matthew,
Jason Lorch in our Raleigh Office forwarded this meeting memo to me. It says that conducting pebble counts for DMS
monitoring (MYO — MY7) projects is no longer needed as long as it has been okayed by the DMS PM. Moving forward,
are you going to allow us to stop doing them on your projects? If so, will DBB projects be treated the same? Please let
me know. Thank you!
Kristi
1

Kristi Suggs I Senior Environmental Scientist
0: 704.332.7754 x110 M: 704.579.4828
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
From: Jason Lorch <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 9:05 AM
To: Kristi Suggs <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Pebble Count Data Requirements
FYI!
Jason Lorch, GISP 1 Senior Environmental Scientist
0: 919.851.9986 x107 M: 919.413.1214
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
From: Russell, Periann <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:05 AM
To: King, Scott <[e-mail]>; Catherine Manner <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J
CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Brad Breslow <[e-mail]>;
Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; grant lewis<[e-mail]>; Jeff
Keaton <[e-mail]>; katie mckeithan <[e-mail]>; Kayne Van Stell
<[e-mail]>; Kevin Tweedy <[e-mail]>; Reid, Matthew
<[e-mail]>; Ryan Smith <[e-mail]>; Melia, Gregory <[e-mail]>; Allen,
Melonie <[e-mail]>; Famularo, Joseph T <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Bryan
Dick <[e-mail]>; Ryan Medric <[e-mail]>; Kim Browning
<[e-mail]>; Kayne Van Stell <[e-mail]>; Worth Creech
<[e-mail]>; Jason Lorch <[e-mail]>
Cc: Crocker, Lindsay <[e-mail]>; Wiesner, Paul <[e-mail]>; Tsomides, Harry
<[e-mail]>; Reid, Matthew <[e-mail]>; Dow, Jeremiah J
<[e-mail]>; Horton, Jeffrey <[e-mail]>; Ullman, Kirsten J
<[e-mail]>; Ackerman, Anjie <[e-mail]>; Blackwell, Jamie D
<[e-mail]>; Xu, Lin <[e-mail]>; Mir, Danielle <[e-mail]>; Corson, Kristie
<[e-mail]>; Russell, Periann <[e-mail]>; Sparks, Kimberly L
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Pebble Count Data Requirements
Please review the attached memo documenting the agreed upon policy for pebble count data requirements.
Please reply (me only) to this email if accept that this memo represents (or misrepresents) our discussion on Sept 29.
Thank you.
Periann Russell
Geomorphologist
Division of Mitigation Services, Science and Analysis
NC Department of Environmental Quality
2

919 707 8306 office
919 208 1426 mobile
[e-mail]
Mailing: 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Physical: 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603
`Nothlrq COMM
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
3