HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160393 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20220812Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20160393
Version* 1
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 08/14/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/12/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Ryan Medric
Project Information
ID#:*
20160393
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
DMS Mitigation Bank
Maple View
Orange
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Email Address: *
rmedric@res.us
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Maple View_MY4 Report.pdf 10.88MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Ryan Medric
MAPLE VIEW
NUTRIENT OFFSET SITE
ORANGE COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA
RES CAPE FEAR 02 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
MONITORING YEAR 4 REPORT
. ;-: f ::'.
„...06416 .-
�' � w .:
" ra"- yj4 v ✓.
\paw y ��*N''.,*4-1:1:4;_..;
� i
` x `�6 a xt z -; �: V
k t gy
f
z , Y ,er * E
ti x �4
por-/----, :,: -,:: ..,-,-V.t•,',If.'„,1z.T:,., ''';„t21-.00,.,;;-'1470 VA'-$!fi'iV. '4.::,-i,--, ',.,.'
.'''''Y ' ' . ' .%'--- ''T,'''''Z' '''''. ' -'-..,...' .i.':‘,.':':!.'+'4 ,. ,' '',.411,70,'!-IP..i,-C..,:"..' '-:N:-,- ).,;,.,-'t.7!gt.,
•r va ff a 4 0 s 4 J
I.4:,...,.*t'.
-rt
1 ZY, v. 1! 5 >-h / .1 n a ems._ .4
Provided by:
0 res
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh,NC 27605
919-829-9909
September 2020
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 2
1.1 Project Location and Description 2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 3
2.0 Project Area — Pre -Construction Condition Summary 3
3.0 Bank Site Conditions 3
3.1 Restoration Plan 3
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots 4
3.3 Photo Documentation 4
4.0 Monitoring Conditions 4
5.0 Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation 5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2.1: Conservation Easement Area
Figure 2.2: Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 2.3: As -Built Exhibit
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Visual Assessment Data
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Appendix E: Memos
MY1 Remedial Action Memo
MY2 August 2018 Landowner Conservation Memo
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
1
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Location and Description
EBX-EM, LLC (an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC) acting as the Bank Sponsor, is
pleased to provide this As -Built Report for the Maple View Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank ("Bank").
This Bank is designed to provide nutrient offset mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to
development within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed in the Cape Fear
River Basin. This project is in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B.0240 and the Cape Fear Riparian Buffer
& Nutrient Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) made and entered into by EBX-EM, LLC acting as the
Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) on
October 9, 2009 and modified on February 17, 2014. Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A.
The Maple View Parcel is located in Orange County in Hillsborough, NC (Figure 1). Within the Parcel, a
section of Morgan Creek and two unnamed tributaries traverse the site and exhibit diminished habitat value
as a result of past and on -going agricultural activities and impervious watershed conditions. The Parcel is
located within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed USGS 14-digit HUC
03030002060070 and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Sub -basin Number 03-06-
06.
The site is located near the intersection of Green Rise Road and Dairyland Road (SR 1177). The site is on
the south side of Dairyland Road with the main drainage feature flowing west to east. The coordinates of
the site are 35.973056°N and-79.147778°W.
The conservation easement on the Maple View Parcel totals approximately 7.63 acres and includes two
unnamed tributaries. Stormwater runoff from adjacent land flows directly to Morgan Creek. The Parcel is
located in an area dominated by agriculture, livestock, and residential land use. There is a dairy operation
on the north side of Dairyland Road, but a majority of the Parcel is utilized for row -crop production. Land
use in the project area is hay field, row crops, and existing riparian forest. No livestock are on the Bank
Parcel, therefore livestock access is not a concern.
The Maple View Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank provides water quality benefits through elimination of
nutrient intensive agricultural practices and re -forestation of riparian areas that extend out to 200 feet from
the stream channels. The riparian restoration activities within the Parcel results in improved water quality
within the downstream watershed. Unnamed Tributary "A" is a perennial channel which flows in an easterly
direction along the southern project boundary. Unnamed Tributary `B" is a perennial channel which flows
in a southerly direction to its confluence with unnamed tributary "A". Unnamed Tributary "C" is a
perennial channel flowing in a southerly direction to its confluence with UT -A. Stream Determinations
were verified by DWR staff onsite on July 7, 2015 and in correspondence dated July 16, 2015. Site
viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset was determined onsite on July 7, 2015 and in
correspondence dated August 5, 2015.
The Maple View Parcel provides off -site mitigation for development (both existing and proposed)
requiring nutrient offset credits. The nutrient offset credits generated on this Bank are being
submitted under the terms and conditions of the Cape Fear UMBI modified and signed on February
2, 2014 between EBX-EM, LLC and the Department of Environmental Quality.
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals associated with the nutrient offset restoration plan include improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat through the creation/restoration of forested
riparian areas adjacent to stream channels within the Parcel. The restoration of natural plant communities
within the Parcel will not only provide stabilization and improve water quality within the easement limits,
but also provide ecological benefits to the entire watershed.
Goals Objectives
1. Improve water quality • Eliminate nutrient intensive agricultural practices
2. Enhance flood attenuation • Re -forest riparian areas, extending out to 200 feet from
3. Restore wildlife habitat stream channels
• Control non-native invasive species to ensure the
establishment of a diverse native plant community
2.0 Project Area — Pre -Construction Condition Summary
The Final BPDP (November 2016) describes the pre -construction conditions on the Maple View site. The
site was planted in April 2016 and post -construction conditions are also described in the Final BPDP.
Additional construction activities since the BPDP approval include supplemental re -planting of 0.23 acres
along the easement boundary, installation of easement signage, and amending the conservation easement
to address DWR comments. The easement edge portion of Maple View that was lacking planted stems was
planted with 150 one -gallon trees. This is an approximate density of 650 trees per acre over the 0.23 acre
area. Additionally, a 0.10-acre area on the eastern portion of the site was replanted with 50 one -gallon trees
and the 0.23-acre replant area was also remarked. Information regarding this can be found in the MY1
Remedial Action Memo in Appendix E.
3.0 Bank Site Conditions
3.1 Restoration Plan
The majority of the site was maintained as a cleared agricultural field for hay and corn production. As such,
these areas required little site preparation other than select herbicide treatment and soil preparation (i.e.
ripped and scarified). The riparian areas were planted with native bare root tree seedlings at a minimum of
8 by 8 foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. The buffered channels will provide
water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Jordan Lake watershed. Some areas adjacent to the
forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species.
Riparian restoration began at the outer limits of the existing tree lines and extend out to 200 feet from the
top of bank from reaches A, B and C (Figure 2.3). Approximately 3 acres of mature forest will be protected
within the conservation easement, but no buffer or nutrient offset credits will be generated.
DWR staff (Katie Merritt) performed a site inspection on April 10, 2017. At that site visit an area
approximately 0.23 acres along the easement boundary was found to be lacking planted stems (Figure 2.2)
and additional easement marking, and signage was requested. RES performed these remedial actions in
May 2017. At the end of 2017, RES performed more remedial actions by remarking this area and replanting
50 one -gallon trees in a 0.10-acre encroachment area on the eastern portion of the site. The MY1 Remedial
Action Memo is in Appendix E.
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
3
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Revegetation of the site includes planting bare root trees and controlling invasive species growth. Piedmont
Alluvial Forest is the target community type for all areas within the project. The community is defined by
Schafale and Weakely (1990). The initial planting of bare root trees occurred during mid -April 2016 and is
described in the BPDP. Initial Plot data is provided in Appendix B. Vegetation plots were installed in
November 2016.
3.3 Photo Documentation
Photo documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success criteria of the Bank Site. Photographs
provide a visual representation of the onsite vegetation conditions. Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
will provide a photograph of each vegetation plot every monitoring year. Photographs are located in
Appendix B.
4.0 Monitoring Conditions
The Site will be monitored for one more consecutive year or until the required success criteria have been
met as determined by DWR. The Site is performing as planned and is on track to meeting its success criteria.
Overall the site's vegetation has established well in Year 4. An abundant amount of herbaceous ground
cover as well as volunteer tree species were present during Year 4 monitoring activities. The two problem
areas that were noted during Year 2 monitoring activities on the Maple View Bank Site were no long
problems in Year 3. The narrow strip of encroachment along the edge of the easement was replanted in
2017 and monitored through 2018. The gallon trees that were planted have established a well-defined
physical boundary to the easement. The second problem area was another encroachment area near VP7
where the farmer mowed through the easement along the cornfield about 0.10 acres in size. This area
appeared to be untouched in Year 4 and the trees that were mowed have re -sprouted. Additional information
on the remedial action and correspondence regarding these areas is in Appendix E.
In 2020, a new area of encroachment was discovered. A path about 15 feet wide was mowed from the farm
field through the easement to a ford crossing in the preservation area. The area totals about 0.08 acres. The
path was mowed so the landowner could access timber on the other side of the easement. The landowner
believed there was an access right of way on that part of the easement, however, this right of way failed to
make it into the final recorded easement. RES plans to amend the easement to include an access easement
to the timber.
If site conditions or tree survival rates require remediation, supplemental planting and additional site
modifications will be implemented. DWR will be notified if supplemental planting is to occur within Site.
The Maple View Bank Site contains seven vegetative monitoring plots, all of which are monitored and
reported in general accordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2).
Seven ten (10) by ten (10) meter square plots have been permanently established following completion of
the planting phase and at least two opposing corners have been permanently installed and surveyed for
future use. The plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable, have been
recorded within each plot. All vegetation plots are sampled and reported annually. The primary focus of the
vegetative monitoring will be solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species encountered
may also be recorded but will not be counted towards the success criteria.
Success criteria is based on the survival of a minimum density of 320 trees per acre after five years of
monitoring. Year 4 vegetation monitoring activities occurred on September 1st. As of Monitoring Year 4,
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
4
the Maple View Bank Site yields 705 planted stems per acre and 1,174 total stems per acre counting
volunteer species. The average stem height was 15 feet. Vegetation monitoring data is in Appendix B.
5.0 Jordan Lake Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Maple View Bank generates 4.54 acres of nutrient offset credits and preserves 3.10 acres of riparian
buffer for a contiguous conservation easement. The total nutrient offset credits that the Maple View Bank
generates are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 2.3.
Table 1. Maple View Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset Credit Summary
Buffer
Zone
Mitigation
Type
Credit
Type
Total
Acreage
Generated
Credit Per
Acre
Delivery Factors
Delivered
Credits
Zone Delivery
Zone A
(0-200')*
Riparian
restoration
Nitrogen
4.54
2,169.26 lbs
9
89%
8,765 lbs
Zone A
(0-200')*
Riparian
restoration
Phosphorus
4.54
143.81 lbs
7
71%
463 lbs
Jordan
Buffer
Preservation
n/a
3.10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
*areas within existing forest are
included as Preservation Type
Total Delivered Nitrogen Credit
8,765 lbs
Total Delivered Phosphorus Credit
463 lbs
6.0 References
Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Comstock, J.A., Schafle, M.P., McNab, W.H., Lenat, D.R., MacPherson,
T.F., Glover, J.B., and Shelburne, V.B., 2002, Ecoregions of North Carolina and south Carolina,
(color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S.
Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,00).
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NCDENR. 2010. "N.C. Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 4.1." N.C. Wetland
Functional Assessment Team.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
5
APPENDIX A
Site Maps
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
6
_..' 1, iv '1....: - 1 1
l. E
J
t : i
� r L ",3 _
' e -F. t*
tom" ,
,ksu. I ,
�d a..m-��...
I - i _ ' s
t
,
iAiii
'k-7FMM°° a i
�.v yam, a �
W '`�/ -
ay
e R
d a Fiji • Rd ►:.
r 1t.-
44 ' ' '
.;..`. Maple View
r Nutrient Offset Site -
..,AL ' I ' Ai •*-*"1.--"'
s
� ,
a
Legen_ "
(Fipme'
need
1111,
m
Conservation Easement f i` I`'
:. I
al
FIGURE 1
11.11
eS
s►�1�:yj�;Aj R�►��,►1 �1 Site Location Map s
440;#`� Maple View Nutrient Offset Site o os 1 res
Mil? Orange County, North Carolina Miles
z=
Basemap:1 - ' '• ' l'ili .' '144144,61
Google Earth WMS service,NCMHTD. ... 1 p *i1;y , to 'a'
Horizontal Datum is North Carolina State Plane NAD 83. / . it ,,,,`.Zs 7�
Project limits are approximate. 11+ t it .
The parcel data information/property boundaries t; a , ,. , • ( . t , F ,. _ r-
depicted on this map is for prospect assessment r ,. „'r yi'� �, • - Legend
E. purposes only.It is not to be used as final boundaries. ,r. } t --iv', ,ik �A ',' a
XIIr
' , 4;r,. r -� r. � }� Maple View Nutrient Offset Sit
FIGURE 2.1 Date: 6/20/2017
w- �—E
Drawn by: BPB
Conservation Easement AreaPres
0 50 100 200 Maple View Nutrient Offset Site Checked by: DI
iraal
..,
Feet Orange County, North Carolina
• .
. . • , I, •
Legend ..
- .... -. - - . , ••-3'•
t• . ..
= Maple View Nutrient Offset Site(7.3 ac) . - - -. • _. — - . -:• •. -t 0
" '
MY4 Mowed Area(0.08 ac) - - ' - i.• .
.. ,
MY1 Replant Area(0.23 ac)
• . Vegetation Plot -- . - ... r.,.,-: _,:i - • r '/4 i
, ," • •, 4 '.
, • ,A.
MY1 and MY2 Encroachment(0.11ac) ---- _-__„---->e'"-• ._ - ,-•.4 - • -",,,i . I ---•
•.-r,-A•-, --.----; ' , ' -. -- 1-4-0:..ir..,. . -
i•
Mitigation Assets
...
Nutrient Offset(4.54 ac) _-...------- ----... -•-,-- - - ' _ „„._...---- , - • - .. -. •
,. •ilts•W`,•"'
' ' :-.. ,:r=sz',.is.01',4'1- '..--: --4
' _. _ .L •
Buffer Preservation-No Credits (3.10 ac) _ ,. - - - .--- -."--..,-- -- ,-..-:- -- -- -- --.: - •'- '-',1 -,'. • „i ' ...!.. ,
- -
. -- -;---- • - -4,- 7/ •.K77; ' 7,- - k
;. t:g -'•?-'`..'•--- "• • . X4, - . '-
- --Stream ,' , _ _. .,-• . ., . -. t;-'•• .', . -.1'..„.. l•" ' .."-‘-- ,---..%:- -1'....-"-.-
.-- . 4' -' 10.0"' - 1 .. •:.*-... -.-- . ,..4,..- .-.'''..r .... -,...,
: - ,.. . - 4...,,c..',". ,_..--•"',,,..,---'"2„..- ,,,.,;.).,, ',.-.,:ri--- --•:" ----- •-•.'.!..-'--- - -r."-< .al, 7:- - -- .7.4te ..,..r.;... ..., _7
. ,,..,;.,,ze:44:.8.,,:z..:;:t,..‘,...j.,,,1:L2. ..7_,,?.k..__..::::-...:...,..,-;, --‘7-•..,,,....., _.;,,-._..,.::,,,..--.,,z,77:-. .--._-;,--__-...,-, , ,...:.-____---s---.... '-------_7,-- ......,. . ,....,-- --;,-. --::'''.
-. .."; -- .. - %,,..,t• .- •' _.t'ils's'':-----...?-'7=77.-f' - - '
-. .4a...,---7,f,-- - - --...------. .:.------- ,_- . ----.7 7••-. . =.. -•.'''7-..4c1r-.5...?.. -Vpi''----..-.: ' '' . — r.' ‘-.--'2.1- ''.4'''''''''-' '- . -'
. \ •;•t.-••-• -•-•--.-.. ..--- -•-•"-. ..4•--'.-..1-r- -••••••`''':-:""--'-'-. -,_,,- ..,•'--'----.1',.0•;-:',---- -a- ---.-'-'-'''
.. -- .
-.7.. .., . -
2 ''''.. .1.'';.''--"-•,----1-.---g----i--1:.:.-.-. -,1..0-4--g --7 - ' 1••-,-''''-'1.1°' ''''''' '- ,--; i• -;-A4- '4.,'J'-'` ' '.4,,,
''. •:--‘-c"•-'-' .. -' .- '--------- --- ''.- ,, "-' '''t-•;''' 1• wi6',--i-- • 11.-77,,, .- '
r•;",.4 .;: • 4'''-. ...-7:-.
.- ..•••,.1.--,- ...., ..., VP3
.' ---f•-,„ - ' • -.-4..---. -4,-- ., , - ----- _ ,, ..,
'-- '61'."' .
i -, ,_it ...• .741 ,
. .
•., •.-A . . .1.•-•.•-
_ „.
VP2 - ..
--, :•F
,. VP1 /
•
.t •• ' t; •. ., .1. :. ' .. i, •''', -4cift ••.- '•
x, ----
.1 • - . .. .
e ' •.• xi iT, -
';;,' - It*•
• , .-
..;
••
-3 . '''•t••,.
g • -,e
34_
4.!
1 . ,
, . -;-, _.., --.-•',,„',IL: '•' Ye-7, --!'i• , ylif ..:$0 t--,t.,„ph i- .0
.i.* •--x. ,c • . .,,,,--x - ,47, _
if 1Y 7.11111 ti ,, , . . ,,. • . r -ile• . . • ., * .9t,V ' !..„, ..1"§, NV.S..,' . -. ' .A.!`,_!•t- . . _ „
F '"i ' ili• '-
...- ',- • ',.i.::k ••, 41/4114 i, 4.....*:-' `. lifit ait. i'r viit,,iLli- . _..,..,,a,: . . _144
,. . . ,..,.. i,,... ,lb* of.der,Iv- .'Mir 'I,- iltic '',;ge .. ,..tot •. %F-
.. .
g '4 g lit*-'' - 140 '-'''‘ • 41‘,.,4 1 'kW VA . , -.4 . , .
..1. ....„ , ...„ , • . ..._
.2.
FIGURE 2.2 Date: 9/2/2020
w-i---
,
Current Conditions Plan View
MY4 2020 Drawn by: RTM
0 75 150 Maple View Nutrient Offset Site
.`drres Feet
Orange County, North Carolina
Checked by. MB
Mitigation Generated Delivery Factors
Buffer Type Credit Total Credit Per Delivered
Legend Zone Type Acreage Acre Zone Delivery Credits
Mitigation Assets Zone A Riparian
0-200' * restoration Nitro•en 4.54 2,169.26 lbs 9 89% 8,765 lbs
1 I Nutrient Offset(4.54(Ac.)
Zone A Riparian
Buffer Preservation-No Credits (3.10 Ac.) 0-200' * restoration Phosphorus 4.54 143.81 lbs 7 71% 463 lbs
Stream Jordan Preservation
Buffer n/a 3.10 n/a n I a nia n/a
Maple View Nutrient Offset Site(7.3 Ac. +/-) *areas within existing forest are Total Delivered Nitrogen Credit 8,765 lbs
ExistingConservation Easem included as Preservation Type
Total Delivered Phosphorus Credit 463 lbs
/ r--
•
.i°eiee. °S '° e• e•.e• e4e •.u , °�°�•°.. ° �e°i° e°�°ii°.i°ei°.�.i°e i�°�i°.ie.ei�.i.e�e.i�eie.�.i�eie�.i ee��ie�.�iieie��i��ie�i
,,.,")
®e1°i°nsei .�•I ri°°:°ii.411:14"°° 84 o°r. .4., �®i �4►4:•44°,, L, ii i4` /*II..a°y.e
- i °iii # %.#4ii 4ift°ieo.••° eee � re 9*9*4#*i •
*to* °e °i °s4, ..°i °ii± i iiiiie iysi °* ii°iii °°e�� ° yi . e°° ,i
®®i °iee ® °ii°°® °��o°° s %%i° ° °e° •��oii *vi . !ii •i ,T, •• • 94! eei � �- ° !e � ° � * i44 :
��,, • ee°•���� �e •e•e4e .... .. e,
Basemap:Google Earth WMS service,NCMHTD. a eeeeeeeeeeeeee♦eeeee•eeeeeeeeeee• eeeePoT. rleot Datum
as oxrtmate rolina State Plane NAD 83. ������� ee:eeeeeeee�e�e�eeee�:.�e�eeee�eeeeeeeee� r,,,,,.„. ..„.
"*Ili 41,.. .4.
1 pP ♦.e♦eee.♦.e.e.e..e.e.e.e.e.e..e.e.e.e.3 ,
The parcel data information/property boundaries 'e°e°ee e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°a°e�♦e°°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e°e° e',<; 1 Arlo, ✓/ X
•
♦aee.e.♦.♦.e.e..e.e.e.0ie.e..e.e.e.e.♦ 2 I
depicted on this map is for prospect assessment .weee.�e�.�e�.�e�.��♦.�e�.weeeee�•. e�•���e•eeeee�.�e�.�e •e• `
purposes only.It is not to be used as final boundaries. e.e.eeeeeeee•eee�e�••e� •e�ee•e••♦ee�e.�e�����e�.eeeee�e�
.....!! �*.♦ �ieeeee�.eeee.°eeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeee°e.e e
FIGURE 2.3 Date: 6/20/2017
w+-E As-built Drawn by: BPB
Ore.0
- Restoration Areas
0 50 100 200 Maple View Nutrient Offset Site Checked by DI
Feet Orange County, North Carolina
APPENDIX B
Vegetation Assessment Data
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
7
Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1
971
1214
2185
Yes
7
2
607
0
607
Yes
15
3
526
567
1093
Yes
12
4
526
243
769
Yes
8
5
809
405
1214
Yes
23
6
850
809
1659
Yes
16
7
647
40
688
Yes
24
Project Avg
705
468
1174
Yes
15
Table 3. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Maple View Farms
Current Plot Data (MY4 2020)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
000003-01-0001
000003-01-0002
000003-01-0003
000003-01-0004
000003-01-0005
000003-01-0006
000003-01-0007
MY4 (2020)
MY3 (2019)
MY2 (2018)
MY1 (2017)
MVO (2016)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
6
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
17
17
17
7
7
7
6
6
11
7
7
7
8
8
13
13
13
18
4
4
4
62
62
77
61
61
71
61
61
73
55
55
65
47
47
47
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
5
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
20
6
10
36
21
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
10
8
1
1
6
1
1
6
2
2
30
2
2
7
2
2
8
2
2
7
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
5
5
5
6
6
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
10
10
10
7
7
7
10
10
10
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
46
46
46
51
51
51
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
5
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
24
24
54
15
15
15
13
13
27
13
13
19
20
20
30
21
21
41
16
16
17
122
122
203
124
124
171
125
125
152
122
122
143
126
126
126
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
7
7
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
6
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
5
6
6
7
5
5
9
5
5
8
5
5
6
7
7
7
971
971
2185
607
607
607
526
526
1093
526
526
769
809
809
1214
850
850
1659
647
647
688
705
705
1174
717
717
989
723
723
879
705
705
827
728
728
728
APPENDIX C
Visual Assessment Data
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
8
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Vegetation Plot Photos
ry
oy
4
w, 4
•
; c ' - ', a r. , v
, '" ,3'" b , '� ----1... 9 fi '� .5...6 n _ 3
-� ��
- ,z • t t-d+„ , (,4r,'9` air, �d �U a j31.
jii'S' i --yy���� 'ten `'. -" S fv.:aA' ` 11 �F. .�
Vegetation Plot 1 (9/1/2020) Vegetation Plot 2 (9/1/2020)
•
y..�`r tine �qrq :5 i
11
r y e "etirek �..i 3
�r
ti
t \
Vegetation Plot 3 (9/1/2020) Vegetation Plot 4 (9/1/2020)
- =-11-i .,-atittlf:1 - .''..'' -14 '.1‘. 1,70,), ,g, '''. ..'.4,41-4' '-ZI`:,..-* it,:N. ::''''-t ..!t ' 101/11.,„ '* Alin
t
1 ii,„
a aes . �is �� �.*L a . y .r �`c _ .
. .-*1-e' : l`k -"I "- --TT- t-,V',4.4 ,],. .1 'P,.-;-,',.LAK',-,?`•!'...-4,-,-4,-.A14,`, -,w.,,1
/4 i
p 44 4,5•'''''""0:'1_,,,i;'*':: „..t_7.,,,,:,:,...:4-
� 1;
a
Vegetation Plot 5 (9/1/2020) Vegetation Plot 6 (9/1/2020)
a '.d • +ate r BAF)F -
aiir
{
ea vc
„a
•r ,W ,! x a -r<''
.ergr
� iq,
fizar if r�
ii,
4.
Nitolite
Vegetation Plot 7 (9/1/2020)
APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
9
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0001
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 000003-01-0001
VMD Year (1-5): 5 Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 80
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse o
entation for X and Y axis (Y
s 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
2 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 0.2 0.2 700.0 4.5 ❑
4 Platanus occidentalis R 2.7 0.3 550.0 4.7
5 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 4.1 0.5 500.0 3.8 ❑
6 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 6.7 0.3 550.0 4.0 ❑
7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 9.9 0.3 90.0 ❑
8 Quercus phellos O R 9.6 3.0 85.0 ❑
9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 7.1 2.9 130.0 DBH?
10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 2.4 2.7 85.0
11 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 0.7 5.7 155.0 0.3
13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 3.3 5.9 100.0
14 Fraxinus pennsylvanica @ R 7.1 5.8 135.0 DBH?
15 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 9.9 8.5 135.0 DBH?
16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 9.2 8.5 130.0 DBH?
17 Quercus phellos O R 7.2 8.6 115.0 DBH?
18 Fraxinus pennsylvanica R 5.8 8.6 160.0 0.2
19 Fraxinus pennsylvanica R 3.3 8.5 100.0
20 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.1 8.5 130.0 DBH?
256 Platanus occidentalis R 5.0 0.1 420.0 2.5
257 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 7.1 0.2 65.0
258 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 8.5 0.2 55.0
259 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 4.8 8.6 125.0 DBH?
395 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 4.8 5.9 180.0 0.5 ❑
396 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 5.9 5.9 180.0 0.4 ❑
397 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 8.2 8.5 105.0 DBH?
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 1
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0001
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
# sterns: 24
Species Name
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright.): LJ l0cm LJ 50cm LJ 100cm LJ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES —DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-50
50 cm
cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
* *Re quired ifcrt-off>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 01
I:2
• 3
`
I.• :4
"5
It:6
I
I:18
I
t10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, O=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
:�
n
O
,
nn
CO
O
C-
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 80 °
N
# stems: 24
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 3
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 000003-01-0002
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
5
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ /
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 80
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse o
entation for X and Y axis
Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
Height
lcm*
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm prout
21 Platanus occidentalis
23 Platanus occidentalis
24 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
26 Platanus occidentalis
27 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
28 Platanus occidentalis
29 Platanus occidentalis
30 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
31 Quercus phellos
32 Quercus phellos
33 Platanus occidentalis
34 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
36 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
# stems: 15
Species Name
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.1
5.1
7.1
9.1
9.9
8.3
4.4
2.3
2.3
3.9
7.6
9.1
5.7
3.8
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
5.6
5.7
5.5
6.0
8.6
8.7
8.4
850.0
800.0
280.0
140.0
700.0
95.0
800.0
800.0
500.0
109.0
67.0
900.0
360.0
135.0
500.0
7.7 ❑
7.4 ❑
5.5 ❑
DBH?
9.0 ❑
3.0 ❑
DBH? ❑
5.5 ❑
❑
I
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS Plante Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
*Notes by ID:
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
27-rat damage
31-rat damage/ no leaves
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0002
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright.): LJ l0em LJ 50cm LJ 100em LJ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES —DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-50
50 cm
cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
* *Re quired ifcLt-off>l0cmorsubsample?100%. 01
I:2
• 3
`
I.• :4
"5
It:6
I
I:18
I
t10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0002
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 80 °
N
# stems: 15
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 5
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 000003-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
5
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ /
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 50
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse o
entation for X and Y axis
Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
Height
lcm*
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm prout
37
38
39
40
41
42
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
# stems: 14
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus phellos
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus phellos
Quercus phellos
Quercus phellos
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus phellos
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.9
3.3
8.2
9.9
8.6
6.9
0.3
0.3
1.2
2.6
4.4
9.9
9.9
8.5
1.4
0.1
1.2
0.3
4.0
4.8
4.4
10.0
9.7
9.1
8.4
6.5
9.3
9.8
800.0 5.5 ❑
1250.0 11.0 ❑
90.0
90.0
400.0 3.8 ❑
110.0 DBH? ❑
Missing
35.0
750.0 7.0 ❑
90.0
255.0
150.0
450.0
370.0
0.8 ❑
0.3 ❑
3.7 ❑
4.0 ❑
Species Name
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS Plante Woody Stems) Form:
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0003
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright.): LJ l0em LJ 50cm LJ 100em LJ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES —DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-50
50 cm
cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
* *Re quired ifcLt-off>l0cmorsubsample?100%. 01
I:2
• 3
`
I.• :4
"5
It:6
I
I:18
I
t10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0003
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 50
# stems: 14
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 7
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 000003-01-0004
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
5
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ /
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 75
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse o
entation for X and Y axis
Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
Height
lcm*
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm prout
53
54
55
57
59
60
61
62
63
64
66
67
401
679
# stems: 14
Species Name
Platanus occidentalis
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus phellos
Platanus occidentalis
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus michauxii
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus michauxii
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Diospyros virginiana
O R 3.3 1.8
O R 5.8 2.0
O R 9.5 4.5
O R 4.7 4.5
O R 4.3 7.3
O R 5.8 7.3
O R 8.7 7.3
R 9.9 7.4
O R 9.9 9.9
O R 8.6 9.9
® R 3.9 9.7
O R 0.1 9.9
® R 2.0 9.7
U ' 5.0 9.0
300.0
160.0
190.0
150.0
500.0
55.0
900.0
290.0
40.0
95.0
80.0
Missing
95.0
1.5 ❑
0.3 ❑
0.5 ❑
0.2 ❑
4.0 ❑
7.3 ❑
2.2 ❑
165.0 0.4 ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS Plante Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 8
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0004
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright.): LJ l0cm LJ 50cm LJ 100em LJ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES —DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-50
50 cm
cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
* *Re quired ifcLt-off>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 01
I:2
• 3
`
I.• :4
"5
It:6
I
I:18
I
t10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0004
Y: 5m
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 75
# stems: 14
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, O=dead,
M=missing.
p. 9
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 000003-01-0005
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
5
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ /
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 100
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse o
entation for X and Y axis
Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
Height
lcm*
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm prout
68 Platanus occidentalis
69 Platanus occidentalis
70 Platanus occidentalis
71 Platanus occidentalis
72 Platanus occidentalis
73 Platanus occidentalis
74 Platanus occidentalis
75 Platanus occidentalis
76 Quercus michauxii
77 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
78 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
79 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
80 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
81 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
82 Liriodendron tulipifera
84 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
85 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
86 Platanus occidentalis
87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
88 ' Platanus occidentalis
# stems: 20
Species Name
0
R 0.2 0.1 1300.0
R 0.9 0.3 800.0
R 1.9 0.3 1400.0
R 3.5 0.4 850.0
R 5.1 0.3 1000.0
R 5.9 0.2 1000.0
R 6.5 0.5 1200.0
R 7.3 0.4 1200.0
R 8.3 2.6 100.0
R 6.0 1.8 50.0
R 5.7 3.0 65.0
R 4.2 2.9 450.0
R 1.5 2.9 500.0
R 0.4 2.6 215.0
R 0.1 5.6 450.0
R 4.3 5.6 75.0
R 6.3 5.5 400.0
R 7.4 5.5 ' 1300.0
R 5.8 8.4 425.0
R 3.2 8.5 M 1250.0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
9.0 ❑
4.5 ❑
11.0 ❑
5.2 ❑
7.1 ❑
7.2 ❑
14.0 ❑
11.0 ❑
2.7 ❑
3.8 ❑
0.8 ❑
3.5 ❑
1.8 ❑
13.0 ❑
3.5 ❑
14.0 ❑
If more space needed, use blank PWS Plante Woody Stems) Form:
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 10
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0005
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright.): LJ l0cm LJ 50cm LJ 100em LJ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES —DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-50
50 cm
cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**12equired ifcLt-off>lOcmorsubsample?100%. �1
I:2
• 3
I.• :4 `"5
It:6
I
I:18
I
t10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0005
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 100'
N
# stems: 20
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, O=dead,
M=missing.
p. 11
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 000003-01-0006
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
5
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ /
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 90
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse o
entation for X and Y axis
Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
Height
lcm*
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm prout
90 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
91 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
92 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
93 Liriodendron tulipifera
94 Platanus occidentalis
95 Platanus occidentalis
96 Platanus occidentalis
97 Platanus occidentalis
98 Platanus occidentalis
99 Platanus occidentalis
100 Platanus occidentalis
101 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
102 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
103 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
104 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
105 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
106 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
107 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
108 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
109 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
683 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
# stems: 21
Species Name
0
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
RI
U
0.2
1.0
2.5
8.8
8.0
7.0
6.0
4.7
3.5
2.6
0.8
3.2
4.5
5.3
7.3
9.0
9.1
7.5
2.3
1.3
3.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.9
2.8
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.7
8.5
8.6
8.6
8.7
0.1
a
410.0
270.0
290.0
300.0
1500.0
900.0
1000.0
800.0
500.0
1200.0
800.0
95.0
270.0
280.0
260.0
420.0
220.0
215.0
260.0
315.0
125.0
1.7 ❑
1.0 ❑
1.6 ❑
1.2 ❑
15.0 ❑
7.5 ❑
9.5 ❑
7.5 ❑
2.1 ❑
13.0 ❑
8.0 ❑
1.2 ❑
1.0 ❑
1.0 ❑
3.1 ❑
0.4 ❑
0.9 ❑
0.8 ❑
1.5 ❑
DBH? ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS Plante Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 12
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0006
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright.): LJ l0em LJ 50cm LJ 100em LJ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES —DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-50
50 cm
cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
* *Re quired ifcLt-off>l0cmorsubsample?100%. 01
I:2
• 3
`
I.• :4
"5
It:6
I
I:18
I
t10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0006
®
0
0
0
0
®
®
O
0
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 90 °
N
# stems: 21
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
p. 13
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 000003-01-0007
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
5
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ /
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 100
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse o
entation for X and Y axis
Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
Height
lcm*
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm prout
110 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
111 Quercus michauxii
112 Platanus occidentalis
113 Platanus occidentalis
114 Platanus occidentalis
115 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
116 Platanus occidentalis
117 Quercus phellos
118 Platanus occidentalis
119 Platanus occidentalis
120 Platanus occidentalis
121 Platanus occidentalis
122 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
123 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
124 Platanus occidentalis
125 Platanus occidentalis
126 Quercus phellos
127 Quercus phellos
# stems: 18
Species Name
R 1.9 0.3 330.0 1.7 ❑
R 2.6 0.2 35.0
R 4.4 0.4 1200.0 13.0 ❑
R 5.3 0.3 650.0 2.0 ❑
R 6.1 0.3 1600.0 14.0 ❑
R 8.5 0.2 230.0 0.6
R 9.5 0.3 1000.0 8.0 ❑
R 8.7 2.8 100.0
R 6.9 3.1 600.0 4.3 ❑
R 5.8 3.0 1300.0 12.0 ❑
R 4.6 3.0 1400.0 11.5
R 0.6 3.0 900.0 7.5 ❑
R 5.6 5.9 250.0 1.0 ❑
R 7.5 5.7 130.0 DBH? ❑
R 8.4 5.7 800.0 4.6 ❑
R 8.4 8.7 1000.0 10.5 ❑
R 2.2 8.8 Missing ❑
R 0.1 8.7 Missing ❑
❑
I
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS Plante Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0007
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2020 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why totheright.): LJ l0cm LJ 50cm LJ 100em LJ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES —DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-50
50 cm
cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
* *Re quired ifcLt-off>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 01
I:2
• 3
`
I.• :4
"5
It:6
I
I:18
I
t10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0007
0 C°
Y: 5m
0 0
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 100'
N
# stems: 18
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ba 1 and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 15
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, O=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
APPENDIX E
Memos
Maple View Monitoring Year 4 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2020
10
MEMORANDUM
res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
TO: Ryan Medric
FROM: Brian Hockett
DATE: September 17, 2018
919.209.1061 tel. 919.856.9672 fax
RE: Maple View Farms Landowner Notification/Contact
Regarding Ongoing Easement Encroachment
On August 13, 2018 RES (Brian Hockett) contacted Bob Nutter (Land Owner) of Maple View
Farms to discuss the ongoing encroachment issues with the conservation easement. Mr. Nutter
and RES discussed both occurrences (2017 and 2018) that had taken place and how to resolve
the encroachment. Mr. Nutter stated that the reason for removing the posts was primarily to
harvest the crops against the edge of the easement. Mr. Nutter offered to re -install the easement
posts; however, RES declined and re -installed the posts ourselves. Mr. Nutter was also informed
the mowing and driving within the easement was a violation of the easement terms. Mr. Nutter
agreed this problem would be resolved and would not continue.
fires
December 8, 2017
Katie Merritt
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street, Archdale Building 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27620
RE: Maple View — Year 1 Monitoring Remedial Actions Memo
Dear Katie Merritt,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
Per the September 29, 2017 email response from Katie Merritt (DWR) referencing the Year 1 Monitoring
Report for the Maple View Bank Parcel, RES is providing a summary for remediation as requested.
1. In the 0.23 acre encroachment area along the easement boundary RES shall conduct a
transect survey documenting height and species type of the trees within the "Replant Area".
Also RES is to install poles or wire fencing/T-posts as a means of more permanent marking.
On October 12, 2017, RES surveyed a 990 foot transect along the edge of the "Replant Area"
closest to the farm field. RES identified and measured 82 trees. The same trees will be identified
and measured in MY2. Transect data is attached along with a map and photos showing the
transect line. Please note, temporary easement markers (wooden stakes with pink flagging) were
installed for photographic purposes only. Permanent easement markers (T-posts with
conservation easement signs) were later installed on December 7, 2017.
2. In the 0.10 acre encroachment area near Plot 7, RES is to install poles or wire fencing/T-
posts as a means of more permanent marking.
On December 7, 2017, RES installed permanent easement markers around the encroachment area.
The easement markers are T-posts with conservation easement signs attached to them.
RES has performed all requested remedial action items and is requesting the remaining 5% credit release
for MY1 from the Maple View site. Please let me know if you have additional concerns or questions.
Thanks,
letre-cikei)°4c
Ryan Medric I Ecologist
res.us
0
Photo Log
, :- . is . . ,„''.*,,,. ..''AL,,50...u.,..;F;,..,iit.,..\__ :4,,,:
41,
fi
ay; r a
A
It
Transect looking east.
9F
ip•'
t
1 , .
}
1 P - dn �r _ r
fp. _ x a- , l I1 y .. -
Transect looking east.
2
oitx
0
j: ' 4.; 1
f Spit -. ..a:'^"‘" '4? - l
:i o- ' r nia IT It'!",
- thi „ill-r-
Transect looking west.
,y -�
r ,
4
Y !
Transect looking east.
3
0
,. . i' ''
,S.
. .
i:
'i-"" ' ,:;.- f- +. i+ 4'
Permanent markers installed along 0.23 acre encroachment area.
..
',: 4. a�
ry: • • -
1
itti
�. a @_ , .;41$} . s
t •
r..
Permanent markers installed along 0.23 acre encroachment area.
4
erfi)nVer44‘ I IV ri iig j „ 4741% 14,:itot?:14,4,
eitt
.:,': ;. 1 'qg' ' • t.ik iv,'
A. .,1 : ',4.11.1• i AV I it Pt ...: . '0.!: '• :,,...r,':i foi:.:
vyi,„4.1,,,,, ... , II 1 a . "eh%•; 2..wi,,,T, ,yige.; iv. fAr, t . /.-• , .1, 'tv.ki,
Ni, '1'. . ' : I': 40, 'i' i.rt., ' rz. ' 1 ';4 00 file" • ' • Oa '
- ---.----,-' '.' -- ---- - .. _• -:= _-_. _"'._ ,0c44.
''SPII- - • _ '''r.:•. -
_ ... .
. , . . , - •„, •• .,'--.4,2e, , If- - -,..,,,__ .,-._ :._w.,-._ •
- .. - •',.
"---0,
i .• I .
.. -''N'N \ . ' L - . . -.•-- ... %.- :.'•\...
. ',. •* • .
-.
• \
' •t
Permanent markers installed along 0.10 acre encroachment area.
in. ..;,• 21.. ‘.:, `,,..4.,.' ir,,,, 4 ,,, -
.0--
• i ' ' '1r- *4',',. 'irAct903 , 4,
1 WV:A .t1-'• . 1. • 11
I
I
\
I, ..
1111
El
Permanent markers installed along 0.10 acre encroachment area.
5
.i a
Legend . 4� f -
Vegetation Transect X;
Replant Area n ,. .Y, b:
4.
MY1 Encroachment ,, 7r
Mitigation Assets .,a1: .
•Nutrient Offset(4.54(Ac.) 4-
.Jt .. '' I 1.' ')
CBuffer Preservation-No Credits (3.10 Ac.) -,''
Encroachment Area- 0.10 acres 4.
Stream # ;.. ,
Maple View Nutrient Offset Site(7.3 Ac.+/-) Tree#82 ` rK Ay
r,
AIM Replanted Area- 0.23 acres
Missing Easement Poles I - 0-
Tree#1
„idopik.,...... r__ __ _..........,.......
/ . . , . . ..
_ .
, ,,L i):4' , ,• L' y r .t r, , `, r' yt • zA"; i
tior 11,,i,..
•
/ - M•l� ,Ire . / lS-1 f 7 r,,fr.
, >.4 ,. `- ' ).- ' • .r,t r r -y f i •_�t• � `.
4x� `.' i � ., .i. ;t r .,, n 111-+ '' t,' M1 C},. -/ / r/.ii, III.(((
fit" y1 '':' , S i q n / .y — 1 '
Li Basemap:Google Earth WMS service,NCMHTD. 4.: t �`, A 4 r ^ • / „ , `• r
Horizontal Datum is North Carolina State Plane NAD 83.
Project limits are approximate. . `iz *.:', +"4"0 • r f-. ,, ' ,:^ex Mi N ' ` '• - 4 1 ' ifiu�[, + 7
The parcel data information/property boundaries ' s n ( ,
depicted on this map is for prospect assessment • •r/ '* ^'
purposes only.It is not to be used as final boundaries. ' '�/ " ,' �y/r e;'
Date: 10/12/2017
aa
FIGURE 3
0 res
w—47—E May 2017 Re-Planting Area Drawn by: RTM
0 50 100 zoo Maple View Nutrient Offset Site Checked by: DI
2 IraTaTI
Feet Orange County, North Carolina