20221070 Ver 1_aurora industrial_data package_20220809

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Aurora Industrial Park
2. Work Type: ❑Private nlnstitutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Approved jurisdictional determineation
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Mary Guilford Thompson
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Paul Farley - LMG
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Hwy 33 and SR. 1925
35.299081, -76.784292
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B la]: 6567-1 1-1 165
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Beaufort
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Aurora
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: South Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: 03020104
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑ Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Pre -Application Request
n Unauthorized Activity
n Compliance
n No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: NC 33 and S.R. 1925
City, State: Aurora, NC
County: Beaufort
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 656-11-1165
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Paul Farley, Land Management Group
Mailing Address: 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
❑
EI
o
Wilmington NC 28403
910-452-0001 (910-471-0507 cell)
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Mary Guilford Thompson
Mailing Address: 820 Vinyard Drive
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
New Bern NC 28562
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
✓❑
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 51.16 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.299255
Longitude: -76.782975
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PR (:.):P
Jurisctictioru Deters i < tion uest
ESS CERT!FiC:
Si n_n.° bc[m 1 autho,izc representatives of the Wilmington ;ton District. L.S. -army Corps s of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if ne_cessar ', and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean. Water Act zindior Section W or the Rivers and !"[arbors Act of 1899. f, the
undersi,ned. am either a duly authorized owner of record ofthe property identified herein, or
aenng as the duly al_Ithorized agent of the owner of record ofthe property.
Mary Thompson Gilbert
1'rini'Name
)acity: �' I Owner
_ 60_0
Date
Sit2,naturt
Authorized Agent'
E. .REASON FOR ,.1 D REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
Cn 1 intend to construct/develop a project or pertt,rm activities on this parcel which i'~°t:altid be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
111 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhichvould be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
i intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which na.ay
require authorization from the Corps; and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts tojurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permit:6r1LE
process.
nI intend to construct!da hrc>jcci or perform activities on this parcel which tzaa�r
require authorization from the C'€>rps; dais request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the laotatnittinc_i, process;
n1 intend to construct develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water or the
U.S. which is included on the district Sect:iori 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
L_J A Corps JD is required in order obtain local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
conjInn that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource- on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
0Iher:
For N1CDaOT 3 e ;u: .. i , ow i r;_, FFhe current NCI >OI>`i.;S CE protocols. yi: t , 1' !r-i Pl.
t r _here are rnuhi pie putucis o;: r,c_': by difierem rti- ease' provide tiio boliow p�. please t �( • each udc11£io_zal parcel on .t
c. nti nuati'ofn s oot.

LMG
1.At'+t) #M A,.eS(AEf IL,N 1. i<RO
i
a wA C.f.._;3ri4
AG IT i( i ii'i aN' .FORM
OM IT MAY CONCERN:
Uwe. the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
determination ofjurisdictional wetland boundaries on the subject property. Aurora
Industrial! Park . By way of this than, 1/we additionally authorize access to the site by
representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or the NC Division of Coastal
ianagetnent for the purpose of reviewing the flagged wetland boundary and prcyiding a Thal
jurisdictional determination. Any questions regarding the jurisdictional wetland determination
should be directed to Land Management Group,
Please provide wing 'affirmation:
Property Address and Parcel ID Number: 6567-1.1-1 165, :PLC 3 and SR 1925 .(51.16 acres
Current Property Owner .Name: Mary Thompson Guilford
Owner Address, Phone Number. & Email Address: 820 Vinyard Dr_ New Bern NC 285562.
Notice: This aiithoriiation, for liability fessiona! courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials
to enter the property when accompanied l
site meeting prior to visiting the site.
nagement Croup staff. Please call [MG to arrange a
_ i f/ (Tzir► -iciVeJSe.r),1
Print. Owner's Name
Date
7/3z>/ C-c
11'► n.imertltitl.t}et • rho Eli`: 910 452,
3803\ rirfhtsville Avenue, Suite 15,
4� 1 il.452.006O
n, NC 28-40 a

•
-71
N4 3i
JC 365
rot 30b
rr.
van
adn ans
Ertiorstrttr
F.nl
s i
.
- ©,OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC -BY -SA
L:\wetlands\Img19.438\datapackage\maps\figurel_vicinity map. mxd
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Open Street Map
N
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
Hwy 33 Tract -Aurora
Beaufort County, NC
Map Date: 5/27/2020
LMG # LMG19.438
'LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY, company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Figure 1. Vicinity map.

LAwetlands\Img19.438\datapackage\maps\figure_USGS topo map.mxd
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS topo map (Beaufort County Mosaic)
• ,.• .2-_-•—
•..,b1Lo CaOf •
rehd. \
1. • '
• 1'3.!
Pm.).
Ch
-Rcryal.
•• • 1::
) - ,
OW -ra'r
• • _Esri , HERE, Garmin, (o) OpenStreetMep contributors
N
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
A Feet
Hwy 33 Tract -Aurora
Beaufort County, NC
Map Date: 5/27/2020
LMG # LMG19.438
tLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEYI company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wlmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Figure 2. USGS topo map

r _V• 7'• . . .
I •" f •— + � . J 'y7 r+ 1. .4-. Y . ` `Ie+ _{.' i #ram p 4.t L� re -' - •_ �—_—. ., " a .
_ =- -` ..
_
.1 tUrlifg. :4 ''
.416111144: ' . -
fie __._ , -_ r�?' �` Jj �
0.
:.,4 i
ry ..0.
a _ . _te r - y 1 : ' j:.s: 4.7.
�' 1. 11 !jj;j;
it its. .: ' '
• '1. I I . • 1 mPe- 1priffigilEt .r 1,. .-1 -r -..J - • , h ! il- .,. ..•.- 0 . lb. • .". .,.. ...1-7
I r i
r ' I: li- 4 P i i: .er..... ••
' rr ,�.,r- -) ,'!' ! .'1i'3' . '�k ' r: !l t -- —
f IIPX:11:rr. .....II. d3..4--r-1.- , •Pl...- .-1 ' . .-. .i 1 4...1 • .....41•,.._._ ! 7.1..... .... 4 , i I -
, :rd.::if ii.-!4,7-4r-F- - 11,71:: ,1!;:.7..11. -_: '...!./..1-L11-iii-:-.F.71771:117::7;::iip-:::.: ii111:::....--:;:::,-...„•,,;::::;.:7...103,L;71-5t..011'rj;.--31::..piet.7..)1 ,7%).6!_ 4. 41W14"541 ,. . .. ...,_,,, . r 4r 7-11 -. .. - '''..- -Lt j
•
•
F ka I' .l I, I -
I`+ 'R��, ' I l I. +f l ii.,l �.11 ' } '•' '. - i� `
1 r ,i� �, ,I I' .� I '11,
�. �1I' { �I 1 � �. k �Il1i1� .
1.
rii ;
.i . • --. . -.,- .15:firc.
. ddi 111
l r :
, . :; 1 ..,k,, !_' lid :, ,,,i ....ii .; 1 .:1 1 r, ....., 1, ._i•. ,.. :: !. .._ svir•
Ti 1 '+ .rrI J' i fl 'r i 'iI I fl J ?i Hi ,I. - -. - 11
_ :" j I, • ' , A
... .
•'' 1. PI I ...P „ ' .. A ' .1. 1 , . ! - .I r..- ': 'I i'- .Ari.
iieU . - - .-•
L:\wetlands\Img19.438\datapackage\maps\figure3_lidar map N
.mxd 0 200 400 800
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. Feet
Map Source: NC DOT Lidar Data
Hwy 33 Tract -Aurora _ILMG Beaufort County, NC
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Figure 4. Lidar map
Map Date: 5/27/2020 a DAVEY .company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # LMG19.438 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

�---' .--' -'"' • " . '7' ' r '-� . r. " � NOTE: All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
I.'
i . -. ,ii..-� ; ;• I: -��r * J7 ' { ., ' ] ; 1,-,
. represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of
;::I i i, .' ,ri,. ,'!I I . - "_T T " r, .! delineated areas and review and approval by the U.S. Army Corps of recommended prior tokJ-
{ 'T•« +A # .a. .i', - " �.
III ! r ..., J�,.*.T�I,_ _.__- • i , ,
LI �
-' 611%
1 •
1 -� - -P r 'r-1 t. `;'J_C'* f r it I- + • ' ":- l , ; = r a J .' . • •
. . ": +la
' F1'=' IL I ! i la+T e!ZJI� I
I .1 . rr'� -:--1. tin',-. . -•- - I
Z„ '. Hr '
- - r �: ��:
f
— iia � + i � ' I
tt ! i
- ,h
IC
e 1• r . 4- i i f .�1. t
l'
"!-e" -
o-p,L.,pi d.i-i •••;1.f-tk•.ii,;-•pj-,•••
.r'r•.i"ii.•'-:,...i.A'Z..-4t::7.'-.
1-Tl-..i_nI;f.t.Oli
•
- 1/,
1 x '. -.!; "I.r.r. «•
'« ..�«.?2« «.«�«fw-«-«J . .ram` -
1. .'.Mil - .
Legendjpr. .-f2,:r-..7r;
•l I II•7ilr7—.i•*r?''..
'F r
Project Area 50 acres `* `iY .. ii
Flagged wetland boundary • "
«-«-«- Identified US waters r=r+ F 1
- ' Identified non-jurisdictional farm ditches i 1
. _ •:
L:\wetlands\Img19.438\datapackage\maps\figure3_lidar mapw wetland overlay.mxd N
0 200 400 800
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. A Feet
Map Source: NC DOT Lidar Data
Hwy 33 Tract -Aurora
Beaufort County, NC ILMG Figure 4. Lidar map with wetland
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP boundary overlay
Map Date: 5/27/2020 a DAVErt company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # LMG19.438 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

. =--- - ...." r . .: - •
..„
•
#- } I „A.• ,— ...
......7
._. � r lr'-. _ter v -v '
•
•
`: v rlirti_ fiIII•
•
•
i - -" - •
• i. -
•
} "r Ds Ds
_- To Cu .. 1
Legend
4
Project Area — 50 acres
Esri, HERE,Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors
L:\wetlands\Img19.438\datapackage\maps\figure5_NRCS soils data.mxd N
0 200 400 800
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. Feet
Map Source: 2016 NC Onemap aerial photography
Hwy 33 Tract -Aurora —ILMG Beaufort County, NC
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Figure 5. NRCS soils data
Map Date: 5/27/2020 a DAVEY .company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # LMG19.438 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

•
*.1:: I -yam '. ,. .: ' ' :t .Y: :-'a ham.ry'._Y..' 'SP
} [ ; ' � 7`I " _ yN - }dux?'o-'. 31
•
.y - � 17 - _ } r4 - - r-- hit
:1 .7
;adip „. . s A ��:r is
. . ..5,„ :. .
.•::„;.-7...7.i,' - ....t. '.......:'.4 '.'..''''>• - •• ::
« ' r
. .
,-......., itt
....• .,..,.,.._.„.:..."....:..:.2.74.2,,:....:..... ......„. .
,...?.....w.„..
•
4 i V I 'l kT#* .. 4�[ .'1"�:�'• y{t• k M1
•
j •
•
•
o-.
Legend 1
PP • I
• Project Area - 50 acres
. r .'•S �iiF'}� 4I 4-•
S -
•
•
Esri, HERE,Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors
L:\wetlands\Img19.438\datapackage\maps\figure6_2016 aerial photo.mxd N
0 200 400 800
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. Feet
Map Source: 2016 NC Onemap aerial photography
Hwy 33 Tract -Aurora —ILMG Beaufort County, NC
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Figure 6. 2016 aerial photo
Map Date: 5/27/2020 a DAVEYI.company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # LMG19.438 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

NOTE: All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of
delineated areas and review and approval by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers is recommended prior to specific site planning.
Flagged uplands — 33.3 ac or 67%
Wetland waters of the US — 3.9 ac or 8%
Flagged coastal wetlands — 12.8 ac or 25%
Non wetland waters of the US — 3135 linear feet
Non -jurisdictional ditches — 5118 linear feet
L:\wetlands\2019\LMG19.438\data package\maps\figure7_preliminary sketch.mxd
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2018 NC OneMap Aerial Photography
Hwy 33 Tract -Aurora
Beaufort County, NC
Map Date: 05/27/2020
LMG # LMG19.438
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Brunswick City: Aurora
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.299081° I, Long. -76.784292° F
Universal Transverse Mercator: 18 S 337767.26 m E 390707343 m N
Name of nearest waterbody: South Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: South Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 030200401
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
IOffice (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pick List "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 1 "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
Z Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Z Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 3137 linear feet: 6width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 16.7 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section flLF.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III D 1 only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus fmding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are
Project waters are
Project waters are
Project waters are
Pick List
Pick List
Pick List
Pick List
river miles from TNW.
river miles from RPW.
aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: .
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b)
Tributary stream order, if known:
General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts
❑ Cobbles
❑ Bedrock
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Sands
❑ Gravel
❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pi-st
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: d Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain fmdings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain fmdings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain fmdings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain: .
Wetland quality. Explain: .
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain: Wetland surface water releases at higher rain events. Wetlands flow into the culvert and
then into the tributary.
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:Forested/ 100% cover.
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain fmdings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain fmdings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain fmdings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus fmdings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
fmdings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus fmdings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain fmdings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus fmdings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain fmdings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Z Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: 16.7acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Normal high water mark and professional judgement.
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
lin Tributary waters: 3135 linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
11 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain: .
❑ Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section DI.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
io Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
IWaters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other. (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:2000' Beaufort county mosaic.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS gis data.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2016 NC ONemap .
or ❑ Other (Name & Date): Site photographs.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify): .
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Aurora Industrial Park
Applicant/Owner: Mary Guilford
City/County: Aurora NC
Investigator(s): Paul Farley
Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 12/22/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: upland
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153B Lat: 35.29893
Soil Map Unit Name: Dragston
Slope (%): 1-2
Long: -76.78071 Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: upland
Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(LRR T, U)
_
Water (A1) Fauna (B13) ? Sparsely Vegetated
_Surface _Aquatic
High Water Table (A2) Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Patterns (B10)
_ _Marl _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Oxidized _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) Muck Surface (C7) Position
_Algal _Thin _Geomorphic
Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): 20
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): 20
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No observed hydrology indicators to 20"
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
upland
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' r ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Pinus taeda 65 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
65 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 33 20% of total cover: 13
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' r
1. Symplocus tintonia
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Persea palustris
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
5
No FACW
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30; )
1. Callicarpa americana 2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
No FACU
2 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UP species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-2 10YR 3/3
2-12 10YR 4/3
12-20 10YR 4/4
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Sandy
Sandy
Sandy
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(LRR S, T, U)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Aurora Industrial Park
Applicant/Owner: Mary Builford
City/County: Aurora/Beaufort Sampling Date: 12/22/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: wetland
Investigator(s): Paul Farley
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): drain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153B Lat: 35.29863
Soil Map Unit Name: Dragston
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-2
Long: -76.780595 Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: PF01Cd
Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(LRR T, U)
_
Water (A1) Fauna (B13) Vegetated
_Surface _Aquatic _Sparsely
X High Water Table (A2) Deposits (B15) (LRR U) x Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Marl
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) x Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) Muck Surface (C7) x Geomorphic Position
_Algal _Thin
Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X
No
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturated at suface, drainage patterns, geomorphic position (drain) oxodized root channels visible
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
wetland
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Pinus taeda 20 Yes FAC
2. Quercus nigra 15 Yes FAC
3. Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' r
1. Persea palustris
2. Vaccinium corymbosum
3. Morella cerifera
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10 Yes FACW
5
5
Yes FACW
Yes FAC
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' r )
1. Arundinaria tecta 5 Yes FAC
2. Morella cerifera 2 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
7 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UP species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-8 10YR 3/2
8-18 10YR 3/2
10YR 6/8 10 D
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) x
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(outside MLRA 150A)
? Reduced Vertic (F18)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

• Layers • Print Map
eacqlecti n " 1
Attribute F Value �/i �in.„` ; + _ �"� _
•
GPIN V CaSc�a rf'a l'__ '; i • • _ .�� V!/
GPINLONG 6567-11-1165 �• _ ----=----„..mit*
NAME1 �CP�SON MARY - , _ _ T ..
Ili
NAM E2^ I CIA-
_ �,, - _
it, i EVVB T''e3iAl2S -0� •N 11 Y 1tei � � ` ,
CITY NEW BERN .I .....1—1 1 1118
• t
Id1:1
i,
= II
",,,,_.,3
•ZIP i✓Is¢c�llaneous I • :1 ° M ik"+i '; n•. .�. �r�» :_'�Fll3'i `E — ~�{
49.75 AC .N G`3 H`I- Ear - .�— .�...�� •'`
PROP_DESC CHERRY/DOROTHY f - - !� - ' ! y
I FISCHER - i _— Ala 1 •"—+ ,,* • 3t •
•
in
LAN D_VA� 02081 � I r y
BLDG_VAL —1 1. .mil — -' ``
!ti
a d
TOT_VAL 110a0813ertie iy �� E •Dr -
TAXABLE_VA 132449 - ...
~ '
DEFR_VAL 16992 Craven 'I
.r - :r
PREV_ASS ES l 103088 .' �„ l ' •p •• •r * ,` r'
ACRES 51.T6 *eriOlr .'•--,- • •••i -
PROP_ADDR NC 33&SR 1925 • •I'_ - ..I _
TOWNSHIP 13 ...w ..I . wK j _ R '.i ,. ' _IL.i` '""
■ Pitt �Y�ft •
9 'A t " �- 1 3+�
-.Ins
-19
PIN_1 154Q22 shingfon 1 zr t 1 ;• �y
DATE 4/21/1999 ` - 4'" l ^4 -
DB_PG o 1134/ ECounty -, • 1 - . a• • I
STAMPS Li
' , ',
SALE PRICE 0.00
IRVIN •
h ti,
REID1 19492
ri.11
' '1!'sk__ - _
IP
III ,___ ,
----,__ —
a ,._ .., H . _ _ . .
_.
. ,
..
..
• : 1 . ..,
... 1
-1- . 1 .,.,
. . _.
__ -1P1E1 DrI comi.m.41— f
I: r-_?...
..-
IVY
&idygypd by MapCi ide 1 feature(s)selected on 1 layer(s) 1:14299.8065 5837.53 x 3299.47(ft)