20210606 Ver 2_As Built Report_20220811

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20210606
Version* 2
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 08/11/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/11/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
ID#:*
20210606
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
DMS • Mitigation Bank
Thunder Swamp Phase 2
Wayne
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Existing Version
Thunder Swamp Phase II Bank Parcel As Built
17.36MB
Report_Combined.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Jamey McEachran
iatel

Report As-Built Baseline Monitoring
DRAFT
Thunder Swamp Phase II Mitigation Project
DWR Project # 2021-0306 Version 2
Wayne County,North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Wt
,. ! ', ' L
it 3 �&i.„:„.,. ,;- ''. '- sa.
"24
+ 5
+sue t
a�.. a4 ri. ^? $ is s�
, ,/olt.2' ''',,,,,,..,'Or,. ,:,:2,,,,,,,of 47.... --.-',4 '; .g.':A .'',, -,.„-;, !".0,',.„3,,%' • .1` '4:',:',i,'":4.ii,i+.41j
lik
i ASP" aH . ',4( r ya �� r N R� Y, ,
.: 7.' ',Pc ,,..'.' . ►cam' # C.., - 1
- ` is1 8 �r 'a Y
"��.,�,-4 " �N 4 t Tat l� S �� � �� ��1 A Eh
: e gym"-., I�y y/" w, r 1 h
Prepared By:
res
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
For Environmental Banc &Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27612
919-209-1052
August 2022

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary 1
1.1 Project Location and Description 1
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria 1
1.3 Project Components 3
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach 3
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions 3
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance 4
2 Methods 4
3 Reference 5
Appendix A: Site Maps and Credit Table
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. As -Built Plat
Thunder Swamp Phase II Project Credits
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Plant Species Summary
Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Monitoring Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
General Conditions Photos
i

1 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC ("EBX"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental
Solutions ("RES"), is pleased to provide this As -built Baseline Monitoring Report for the Thunder Swamp
Phase II Mitigation Project ("Project") under the proposed RES 2022 Phase II Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument that is being made between the Bank Sponsor, EBX, and the NC Division of Water Resources
("DWR"). This project provides riparian buffer credits and nutrient offset credits for unavoidable impacts
due to development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit
Cataloguing Unit 03020201 (Neuse 01), excluding Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 1). This Project is in
accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and Nutrient Offset Credit
Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. The Project was codeveloped with the Thunder Swamp Buffer
Mitigation Project (DWR # 2021-0306v3) that is contracted with the NC Division of Mitigation Services
("DMS") and extends riparian areas associated with the DMS project as well as incorporates additional
stream features on the property.
The Thunder Swamp Phase II Project is within the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit HUC 03020201,
14-digit HUC 030202011170030 and DWR Sub -basin Number 03-04-12. The Project is located in Wayne
County in Mount Olive, North Carolina, just west of downtown Mount Olive off NC Highway 55 (Figure
1). To access the Project from Raleigh, take I-40 East to US-70 East. Then take exit for NC-50/NC-55
toward Newton Grove and turn left onto NC-50 South/NC-55 East. Continue and take the third exit at the
traffic circle. Continue for approximately 16 miles and take a right into the driveway adjacent to the Project,
at address 680 NC-55, Mt. Olive, NC 28365. The upper reaches of the Project will be in the fields to the
right. The coordinates are 35.205212° and-78.095683°.
The Thunder Swamp Phase II project consists of a conservation easement that totals 30.53 acres and is
collocated with the DMS Thunder Swamp Buffer Mitigation Project. The Project extends riparian areas
associated with the DMS project as well as incorporates additional stream features on the property. Thunder
Swamp Phase II is comprised of portions of the Thunder Swamp main stem and several of its unnamed
tributaries. Thunder Swamp is a USGS-named stream that eventually drains to the Neuse River. Much of
the Project area has been used extensively for agricultural purposes for at least 70 years. Prior to riparian
restoration activities, the Project reaches and riparian areas were in either crop production or forest. Water
quality stressors that have affected the Project include heavily manipulated/relocated and maintained stream
channels, nutrient loadings from active crop production, and lack of forested riparian buffers.
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Vegetation will be surveyed at
established vegetation plots across the site that are representative of the riparian restoration areas (Figures
2 & 3). Data will be presented each year in annual monitoring reports, including a Current Conditions
Plan View map (Figure 3).
Thunder Swamp Phase II 1 As -built Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project August 2022

Photos are taken at all vegetation plot origins during each monitoring year. Visual inspections and photos
are taken to ensure that restoration and preservation areas are being maintained and compliant. These
monitoring activities will continue to be done for each monitoring year.
The measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree
species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the stems, established at a density of at least 260
planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the
performance standards as determined by NC Division of Water Resources. Invasive and noxious species
will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or alter the desired community structure of
the site.
A visual assessment of the conservation easement will also be performed each year to confirm:
• Easement markers are in good condition throughout the site;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• No invasive species in areas where invasive species were treated,
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
Component/
Feature
Monitoring
Maintenance through project close-out
Vegetation
Annual Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
vegetation community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
monitoring supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species
shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be
documented and reported in annual monitoring reports. Vegetation maintenance will
continue through the monitoring period.
Invasive and Nuisance Visual Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become
Vegetation Assessment dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. Locations of invasive
and nuisance vegetation will be mapped and reported.
Beaver
Visual Routine site visits and monitoring will be used to determine if beaver management is
Assessment needed. If beaver activity poses a threat to vegetative success, EBX will trap beavers and
remove impoundments as needed. All beaver management activities will be documented
and included in annual monitoring reports. Beaver monitoring and management will
continue through the monitoring period.
Project Boundary
Visual Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
Assessment mitigation project and adjacent properties. Boundaries are marked with signs identifying
the property as a mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward
and a contact number. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post,
tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by Project conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as -needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/ signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Thunder Swamp Phase II 2 As -built Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project August 2022

1.3 Project Components
This Project generates up to 378,316.131 ft2 riparian buffer mitigation credits and 25,031.596 lbs. of
Nitrogen (N) nutrient offset credits within a 30.53-acre conservation easement as depicted in Figure 3.
These are derived from riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation. The credits generated will
service the Neuse 01 watershed, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. Also, some of these proposed buffer
mitigation credits, where viable, can be converted to nutrient offset credit in accordance with the Nutrient
Offset Credit Trading Rule, 15A NCAC 02B .0703. In accordance with the UMBI, any credit conversions
must be calculated using the guidance provided in the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer
Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits letter issued by the DWR.
Upon receiving written approval by the NCDWR, buffer restoration credits, within the 0-100-foot zone,
(294,613 ft2) along DJ3, DJ4, DJS, and DJ7 can be converted to nutrient offset credit, generating up to
15,373.300 lbs ofN. The total potential buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits that the Thunder Swamp
Phase II Mitigation Project will generate were calculated using the DWR "Project Credit Table Template
(Updated October 2020)" and are presented in Appendix A.
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
The Project provides riparian buffer restoration and nutrient offset in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n), 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3) and (7), and the Nutrient
Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. Restoration and nutrient offset activities included the
planting of bare root trees. These restoration activities were carried out from tops of the stream banks and
extend a minimum of 30 feet from the stream outward to a maximum of 200 feet perpendicular to the stream
channel Notably, there is a small portion of riparian restoration along reach DJ4 that is greater than 30 feet
but less than 50 wide and therefore is not viable for nutrient offset credit. Restoration occurred where
cropland was currently present and in the non -forested area along Thunder Swamp. All reaches within the
Project include riparian buffer restoration and/or nutrient offset (Figure 3).
Restoration and Preservation activities also include the permanent protection of the riparian buffer and
adjacent riparian areas from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the
functioning of the buffer through a conservation easement that have clearly visible easement markers and
signs. Preservation areas are also being treated to control invasive species. No more than 25 percent of the
total area of buffer mitigation was used for preservation credit pursuant to 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5).
Furthermore, Buffer preservation only generated buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into
nutrient offset credits.
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions
The initial planting of bare root trees occurred in May 2022. All riparian restoration areas are planted from
top of bank back at least 50 feet from streams with bare root tree seedlings on a nine by six-foot spacing to
achieve an initial density of approximately 800 trees per acre. In addition, soil was amended with potash
according to a soil fertility test, and these areas were seeded with an herbaceous seed mix to provide rapid
herbaceous cover and promote immediate buffer effectiveness as well as habitat for pollinators and other
wildlife. The seed blend contains both temporary and permanent seed and includes taproot species. The
Thunder Swamp Phase II 3 As -built Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project August 2022

seed was sown utilizing a no -till drill. Planting occurred in all areas proposed for riparian buffer restoration
and meets the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295. This includes treating
invasive species and planting of at least four species of native hardwood bare root trees. Mixed-Mesic
Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain subtype) (Schafale 2012) is the target community type and was used for
all areas within the Project. However, there were two planting zones with minor difference: a Wetland Zone
and Upland Zone. The Wetland Wone is located in the Thunder Swamp wetland area and includes bald
cypress and targeted obligate wetland species, whereas the Upland Zone does not include any bald cypress.
This tree community composition is highly diverse and is suitable given the Project's soil and landscape
characteristics and will provide water quality and ecological benefits. The initial planting of bare root trees
occurred on May 4th, 2022. There were no deviations from the initial planting plan. A list of the planted
species can be found in Appendix B.
All activities were completed in May 2022. The site was constructed in accordance with the Approved
Buffer Mitigation Plan. There were no easement changes between the submittal of the BPDP Approval and
the construction of the site. The conservation easement is marked every 50-100 feet with t-posts and signage
(Appendix C). No livestock are present onsite; therefore, fencing was not installed.
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance
The Thunder Swamp Phase II monitoring activities were completed in May 2022. All Baseline Monitoring
data is presented below and in the appendices. The Project is on track to meeting interim success criteria.
RES installed 16 permanent vegetation plots on site. Monitoring of the 16 permanent vegetation plots was
completed in May 2022. Vegetation data tables are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix
C. Monitoring Year 0 (MYO) monitoring data indicate that all plots are exceeding the interim success
criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 607 to 971 planted stems per acre
with a mean of 802 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 13 species were documented within
the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming
years. The average tree height observed was 1.4 feet.
Herbaceous vegetation will be monitored as it becomes established throughout the Project. There was no
encroachment observed or similar activities that would negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
Diffuse flow was also maintained throughout the conservation easement area. Additionally, initial invasive
species treatment was administered in May 2022.
2 Methods
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Monitoring plots were installed a
minimum of 100 meters squared in size and cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area. These
plots were randomly placed throughout the planted riparian buffer mitigation area (21.38 acres) and are
representative of the riparian restoration conditions. The following data is recorded for all trees in the plots:
species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are flagged with flagging
tape. Data is processed using the "Vegetation Table Shiny Tool" made available by DMS in December
2021 and is reported in accordance with the most recent DMS requirements and templates. In the field, the
four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other
corners. There are 16 fixed vegetation monitoring plots; 14 of which are in the "Upland Zone" and 2 in the
Thunder Swamp Phase II 4 As -built Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project August 2022

"Wetland Zone" (Figure 3). These plots are being monitored in conjunction with plots 1-9 of the Thunder
Swamp DMS project site.
3 Reference
NC Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services. 2021. Vegetation Table Shiny
Tool. https://ncdms.shinyapps.io/Veg_Table _Tool/.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2020. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0714 — Neuse River Basin:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Protection and Maintenance of Existing
Riparian Buffers.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2022. Thunder Swamp Phase II — Bank Parcel Development
Plan.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Thunder Swamp Phase II 5 As -built Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project August 2022

Appendix A
Site Maps and Credit Table

nder swamp Q
a1 Holiness...
NWevs Hill Rd
ca yam
eeq.
a
ac
Thunder Swamp
Phase II
Mitigation Project
500 1,000
Feet
Harrel's Hip Rd
Latter Days LTC Q
a olds
Se�P mtrh cha
Sa
Mt 01
Harrell's Hip Rd
Legend
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Thunder Swamp Phase II
Mitigation Project
Cashwell & Jones 9
ss Auto Aces of
Mount. Olive
Conservation Easement
Neuse River Basin - 03020201 (Excluding Falls Lake Watershed)
Date: 8/10/2022
Drawn by: MDD
Checked by: JRM
res
Wayne County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Restoring a resilient eor

AAA AAA
AAA AAA A
AAA A AA
tie A
•
� ♦ ♦ ♦DJ4
♦♦♦♦♦
•
Thunder Swamp
Sealed Conservation Easement Boundaries
were provided by Ascension Land Surveying P.C.
(NC LICENSE #C-4288, Christopher Cole L-5008),
dated4/26/2022 . Top of bank linework
is based on field measurements also performed
by Ascension Land Surveying P.C. dated 4/15/2021.
Total Area of Mitigation
Riparian Mitigation Type Zone (ft.) Square Feet
209,320
20,857
Buffer Restoration (Ephemeral) 0-100 133,367
Buffer
Restoration
Buffer Enhancement
Buffer Preservation (Subject)
Buffer Preservation (Non -subject)
Nutrient Offset
0-100
101-200
0-100
101-200
0-100
101-200
0-100
0-100
27,983
8,591
165,343
114,245
52,976
42,743
101-200 436,961
res
Restoring a Resilient Earth fora Modem World
s
0 100 200
Feet
Figure 2 - As -built Map
Thunder Swamp Phase II
Mitigation Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
Date: 7/29/2022
Checked by: JRM
Drawn by: MDD
1 inch = 200 feet
Legend
thunder Swamp Phase II Recorded Easement (30.23 ac:
=Internal Crossing
=Thunder Swamp DMS Easement
P{Project Parcel Boundary
=Surveyed Top of Bank
=Vegetation Plot
Riparian Mitigation Approach
©Nutrient Offset (0-100')
=Nutrient Offset (101-200')
m Riparian Buffer Restoration (0-100')
=Riparian Buffer Restoration (101-200')
=Riparian Buffer Restoration (0-100'), Ephemeral
®Riparian Buffer Enhancement (0-100')
=Riparian Buffer Enhancement (101-200')
Riparian Buffer Preservation (0-100'), Subject
=Riparian Buffer Preservation (101-200'), Subject
Riparian Buffer Preservation (0-100'), Non -subject
Riparian Buffer Preservation (101-200'), Non -subject
REFERENCE
1) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Zone 17N
2) Map Projection is NAD_1983_StatePlane_
North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

. •
' t
/ • ‘ res
, -s ,. -" '
?' ' ��v�'♦♦♦♦♦♦♦It" i>♦♦♦♦♦lb♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦tom♦i►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�"
..�♦4♦♦♦♦mow♦ ♦♦♦♦4►'>Ai.rt 1♦♦♦♦♦
4 .��♦♦♦♦\ ♦♦� ►� ♦♦♦"♦"♦-♦"♦.mow♦♦♦�. Re taring a Resilient Earth for a Modem World
.��♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ `�♦♦Im►.fr 1 ♦♦♦♦�.�.♦i ».`�.♦♦♦♦<
\♦♦♦♦• ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦��s♦♦♦♦t • ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦^♦.fit►/A♦�♦♦♦,;, i_ , •♦♦♦♦♦♦, i N
p♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦' I♦♦♦♦�♦♦ ♦♦♦1 ►♦A,r
• ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦I ♦♦♦♦�� •♦ AAI�mi♦♦
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦, 1 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦i.♦♦4
l ♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ��/ ♦♦♦♦ii»♦ ♦♦ii♦♦♦** • 4* •' w ---Av.--- E
J v♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦41 ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦�w�iw♦ `♦♦♦♦♦♦
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦' ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦v♦♦4"44'4 4. ',2r, ,:..1# ,N /74t, 4 - .
►♦♦♦♦♦
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ►♦♦♦♦♦♦Ai.w♦1 ♦♦♦
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦1 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•►♦ ♦♦
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ►♦♦♦♦♦♦Awt♦4 ♦♦ .
--I♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� A ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦4t,r.' ♦♦ i Feet
'�14 .���.�w��.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� ''►♦♦♦♦♦♦ww�♦1 ♦
'Aptly' ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ l ►♦♦♦♦♦�r♦r✓♦♦ it
I
" ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦< ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦0♦j♦♦♦♦♦♦64
•
•
-r�1♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦•��VI♦ / Figure 3 - CCPV MVO 2022
f • ...♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦j♦♦♦♦♦♦♦j♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦j♦♦♦♦♦♦� � ♦♦♦j♦♦♦♦`�►♦1♦♦♦j� i
.s♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ w♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
® •
*♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦,, .♦^♦♦♦♦♦♦!�o♦♦ ® h u rider Swamp Phase II
sip♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦o♦♦♦♦♦♦•�r ♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦' ,, �♦♦ . Mitigation Project
..�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.A^♦♦♦♦ ♦♦sww♦♦♦♦♦♦• ♦♦. .....
♦�♦♦♦�®►♦♦♦♦♦��♦.w r8 . ,�iw♦t�,♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦�i1.� �♦w ♦♦♦ Wayne County, North Carolina
♦♦ ♦4 ►♦♦♦♦ �4!»w♦♦♦♦♦� '♦♦♦♦♦♦Jt ♦♦♦ '
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� !♦wA♦♦ad*♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦•
�j 1,,�,♦`�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� I♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦t%♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦''�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.. Date: 7/29/2022 Drawn b MDD
7 .:-- ♦♦♦1 �111111 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦f Checked b :1RM 1 in=200 feet
/ . , 1 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦1y. � =Thunder Swamp Phase II Bank Easement
/ /` 1♦♦♦♦♦ I♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Olntemal Access Corridor
/♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦DJS ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦fr/ )• =Thunder Swamp DMS Easement
r // -..-- I♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦I Project Parcel Boundary
/ :a ♦A:♦:♦:♦:♦♦:♦:♦.t��►.♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦i
� vegetation Plot
4iiir �• ,�.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦^♦♦♦♦♦♦� Planted Area
5 i�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦��♦♦♦♦� .♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ • ®Upland Zone
r 0 Wetland Zone
�/ / . .�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦I ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦, ion Approach
=R pMitigarian Buffer Restoration(0-100')
.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ I♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
.�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦t4 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦t Riparian Buffer Restoration(101-200')
/ . 4♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ '♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦4 ®Riparian Buffer Restoration(0-100.),Ephemeral
5J .:_.:.•:Y.."/ . ._ \•�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦Ism•♦♦♦♦ ♦♦O♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦�,I ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦•, =Riparian Buffer Enhancement(1101 200'
=Riparian Buffer Enhancement(0-100')
:-"? ::'_::'•• -` '� ♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦t =Ri arian Buffer Preservation 0100' Subject
-' sl± -• -- "" - I, - %p♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦1,♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• • =Riparian Buffer Preservation(101-200' Subject
..." .: '.._ - -- • " - / - .,♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• ♦♦♦♦♦4• ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦4!,%/ =Riparian Buffer Preservation(101-200').Non,subject
__:_ .- Flu:::__..5: . : :.;••'., ..._-// >♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦It♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�m�♦♦♦♦1`!' :�. •�. Nutrient Offset 0-100' ( )
E .-:::: �._....•t-.. : / ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦j♦♦♦40 j♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦jt��j♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦�♦j♦�♦j♦j1� yy. SONutrient tream Type Offset(101-200')
Y ial
f l(� .__ =:. ,rr. ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�.♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�t� ♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦, nterm�ittent
.49 • , _ ..._. ".:' \\♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦���♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ •
•,♦♦♦♦♦ - - Ephemeral
r _ ••`.-::� 1Lr Th undc Q�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� / ♦♦ •
f
x ':::... ,I, _.. ?/ REFERENCE
/// c- • -' l '. .9Y j 1):z::::::D:::7N
17N/ 2) ne_
F� '' H t.. _'• •i • - North_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Feet
.
t O nStr-etMa• contributors
r _ �o o o Q�� p P

Thunder Swamp Phase II, DWR# 2021-0306v2, Project Credits
Neuse 03020201 -Outside Falls Lake
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (fe/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
19.16394
N/A
Credit Type
Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch 1)
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (ftz)
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ft,)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N (lbs)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
0-100
DJ4, DJ7
132,224
132,224
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
132,224.000
Yes
6,899.625
-
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
Thunder Sag) mp (Non-
20,857
20,857
1
33%
3.03030
- Yes
6,882.817
No
-
-
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
DJ3, DJ5,
Thu nderSwamp
162,389
162,389
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
162,389.000
Yes
I
8,473.675
-
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
Thunder Swamp (Non-
46,931
46,931
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
46,931.000
No
-
-
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Enhancement
0-100
mp (Non-
Thunder Sag)
27,983
27,983
2
100%
2.00000
Yes
13,991.500
No
-
-
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Enhancement
101-200
Thunder SawPaamp (Non-
8,591
8,591
2
33%
6.06061
Yes
1,417.514
No
-
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
101-200
DJ4, DJ6, DJ7
158,980
1
33%
No
-
Yes
8,295.789
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
DJ1, DJ2, DJ3, DJ5,
Thunder Swamp
277,981
1
33%
No
-
Yes
14,505.420
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
0-100
DJ6, DJ7
42,743
1
100%
No
-
Yes
2,230.387
-
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
0-100
DJ4 (<50 ft)
1,143
1,143
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
1,143.000
No
-
-
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
879,822
400,118
364,978.831
40,404.896
0.000
400,118
400,118
479,704
N/A
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Total Ephemeral Area (ft0) for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft0):
Total Eligible for Preservation (ft):
Credit Type Location
Subject?
Feature Type Mitigation Activity
Rural
Rural
Rural
Yes
Yes
No
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
363,544
349,569.817
Enhancement:
36,574
15,409.014
Preservation:
133,373
13,337.300
Total Riparian Buffer:
533,491
378,316.131
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nitrogen:
479 704
25,031.596
Nutrient Offset.
Phosphorus:
0.000
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
0-100
101-200
101-200
Feature Name
DJ5, Thunder Swamp
DJ1, DJ5, Thunder Swam
DJ2
Preservation Area Subtotals (ft0):
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
133,367
133,367
133,373
25.0%
133,373
25.0%
Total (Creditable)
Total Area (sf)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ftZ)
165,343
133,373
114,245
0
52,976
0
332,564
133,373
Ephemeral Reaches as %TABM
Preservation as %TABM
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
10
100%
10.00000
13,337.300
10
33%
5
33%
last updated 08/03/2020

Appendix B
Vegetation Data

Bare Root Tree Species Planted at Thunder Swamp DMS and Thunder Swamp Phase II
Common Name
Species
of Total Species
Upland Zone
of Total
Species Wetland
Zone
Planted
Amount
River Birch
Betula nigra
10%
15%
2600
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
5%
15%
1500
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
10%
0%
2400
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5%
5%
1300
Swamp Tupelo
Nyssa biflora
0%
15%
300
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
10%
10%
2500
American Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
10%
10%
2500
Northern Red Oak
Quercus rubra
10%
0%
2400
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
10%
5%
2500
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
10%
5%
2500
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
10%
5%
2500
Shumard's Oak
Quercus shumardii
10%
0%
2400
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
0%
15%
300
TOTAL 25,700 Trees

Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Veg Plot 10 F
Veg Plot 11 F
Veg Plot 12 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 4
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
810
1
7
0
810
2
7
0
769
1
7
0
Veg Plot 13 F
Veg Plot 14 F
Veg Plot 15 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 4
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
729
1
9
0
769
1
11
0
972
1
10
0
Veg Plot 16 F
Veg Plot 17 F
Veg Plot 18 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 4
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
931
1
8
0
810
1
8
0
972
1
8
0
Veg Plot 19 F
Veg Plot 20 F
Veg Plot 21 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 4
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
850
1
9
0
850
1
7
0
810
2
8
0
Veg Plot 22 F
Veg Plot 23 F
Veg Plot 24 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 4
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
891
2
8
0
769
1
10
0
648
1
8
0
Veg Plot 25 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species % Invasives
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 4
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
972
1
8
0

Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
21.38
2022-05-04
NA
2022-05-12
2022-05-12
0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/S
hrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 10 F
Veg Plot 11 F
Veg Plot 12 F
Veg Plot 13 F
Veg Plot 14 F
Veg Plot 15 F
Veg Plot 16 F
Veg Plot 17 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
OBL
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
7
7
3
3
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
FACW
1
1
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
OBL
6
6
2
2
4
4
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
OBL
5
5
2
2
4
4
1
1
2
2
4
4
3
3
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
4
4
3
3
1
1
4
4
3
3
5
5
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FACW
5
5
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
1
1
4
4
2
2
4
4
6
6
5
5
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
FAC
3
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
OBL
Sum
Performance Standard
20
20
20
20
19
19
18
18
19
19
24
24
23
23
20
20
a 1
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
20
20
19
18
19
24
23
20
Stems/Acre
810
810
769
729
769
972
931
810
Species Count
7
7
9
11
10
8
8
Dominant Species Composition (%)
25
35
22
16
17
26
25
Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
%Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
20
20
19
18
19
24
23
20
Stems/Acre
810
810
769
729
769
972
93'1
810
Species Count
7
7
7
9
11
10
8
8
Dominant Species Composition (%)
25
35 a
21 a
22
16
17
` 26
` 25
Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
2
1
1
1
_
1
1
% Invasives
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring
years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard' section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard' includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/S
hrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 18 F
Veg Plot 19 F
Veg Plot 20 F
Veg Plot 21 F
Veg Plot 22 F
Veg Plot 23 F
Veg Plot 24 F
Veg Plot 25 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
OBL
1
1
2
2
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
FACW
1
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
OBL
2
2
1
1
4
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
2
2
3
3
3
3
7
7
4
4
2
2
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
OBL
2
2
4
4
1
1
1
1
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
5
5
4
4
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FACW
7
7
4
4
6
6
1
1
6
6
2
2
1
1
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
FACU
5
5
3
3
4
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
FAC
1
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
OBL
4
4
4
4
Sum
Performance Standard
24
24
21
21
21
21
20
20
22
22
19
19
16
16
24
24
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
24
21
21
20
22
19
16
24
Stems/Acre
972
850
850
810
891
769
648
972
Species Count
8
9
7
8
8
10
8
8
Dominant Species Composition (%)
29
19
29
35
27
21
31
17
Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
% Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
24
21
21
20
22
19
16
24
Stems/Acre
972
850
850
810
891
769
648
972
Species Count
8
8
10
8
8
Dominant Species Composition (%)
29
Al
29
27
21
31
17
Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
% Invasives
n
IL 0 A
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring
years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard' section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard' includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Appendix C
Monitoring Photos

Thunder Swamp Phase II MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
' °1111"Illir—r-,r----. — -
IOW
'S .^ L ifs>, K"` c2 �., I = x 'Ax 4 -
i'�, "3. FR a i r ;�ni�s �- 1�,�� a��,^Ir.:,, '�s'a' 1 P di' A, PC s
> a wr 3'` , ,, -.7_Y Y �. �,, fi fi' x; t1$ h ,,' F
,,
,„
`' .fir f i" 1 gr, til c,„.„a ,� .Ck'�,,' + ' j aL�
'r° _t A, Y v,:Flay .r,- +°i v: � C " a a r, #
1.4.„.f.,.„.,:tc,,,,_
� q 3 ofy� f- s
°� e -^aS: s Y k,...a�'•, r� -, " ro-5 t, y ,.vM _ �'� t.
4 � ""� ` •�� , ' �� *'a Jo-`;. r¢��y ? �,r tF �".y 74),f '"" p r 1T">-
v,„ .,,,...
Vegetation Plot 10 (5/10/2022) Vegetation Plot 11 (5/11/2022)
1P ,
3 n•: `
E t
a,s- a :,,, C
. 4 Jd is Q, ?L• , `
�' .. Oa— AO g 3
-gy '`!d Ss- ,
Vegetation Plot 12 (5/10/2022) Vegetation Plot 13 (5/10/2022)

qq Xi
F.
i
y S
y iF
¢
'9 4 +: a II,
I .7f
". -.; i t .. ��A< . °.**2,-.rt', ti p, '.4 m "S
9
Vegetation Plot 14 (5/10/2022) Vegetation Plot 15 (5/10/2022)
s �r , r
e
A
f a.
,gyp ,
.qYa e Y,N i_ f' ,g. ` .r` a?4 v"S '
Ffo- Y '� �-. v'K r
' � '�'�z,-. .. —'sue-. m� -c,.. .
'. x. -`tea - ""- •.:< `
Vegetation Plot 16 (5/10/2022) Vegetation Plot 17 (5/10/2022)

L 4,
:,, -- .
i
Vegetation Plot 18 (5/12/2022) Vegetation Plot 19 (5/12/2022)
F -+Piummi pi-
I
•
•
.
Vegetation Plot 20 (5/12/2022) Vegetation Plot 21 (5/12/2022)

k^4 , ;
r
i
•
.` . - - -
Vegetation Plot 22 (5/12/2022) Vegetation Plot 23 (5/11/2022)
ITN
cad +..,.A:- a '.
y _ i. 3 t� is „
14 - � yy* vk�P 4 FXA d `tt. 6'!I a
�' mqx w, �,•c' W r:. Qasa.. ,r�S .. . . x sa �;. r ` -; .'.
�+ «fit "�"adz, a �¢'- n *' ,, v y,,. 4�' . g 7'+.-
'. t 4 `�$, -;'::a. °;erg _ # �'; t .,4
h`9y r, t ssa9g '3 vl�s C,�t 7�i ..,ae" }�i Saw,, a,
A a m S"tt siil
X . ,mac �, m ::_4
,:ii.,TifftVil, '"•,..;.:;'';,.--!(!'•...4itti—:;:-,..--ff-4 k°14,-.41%
•
0).144144.Z.N.7 _ 3 r L "`1y a �. ? • - fix. `....
,i ,':-.:;*4,:lk L'
Tq
i f ai'p S - ,, �y9 ra�-M1v � 1
xii
Vegetation Plot 24 (5/11/2022) Vegetation Plot 25 (5/11/2022)

Thunder Swamp Phase II General Site Photos MYO 2022
�� - ..
.
_ � ►" ? li<a%r" • :x r -,F [a rm at
A =War 1• sti.,...II
NoMu nr .,,�
w
_--sn: -
�,y
Easement marker posts and signs installed(5/5/2022) Easement marker posts and signs installed(5/6/2022)
;,c. ...,,
c lir
'' i
'•\\ � I f_A/ `^ ' ;;ft + kl i�,YMr • _
ir i• . v / •
.,1 j' 2 • tL"ffar.'fiiiii s ; �i�.� w' �r Conservation MI 1f , Al* � •- _,_ (;onservat�on Area ,,
.4 ' `ems./..____
•
NoMo NoCon e t l'rv[uwSu.�fNnrth[erulina No 4 1, ieY I �, r t , ► I�{o Mowing No Cutting °" if mn. . ,^ No Vehicles ;4: -
L.,
::.
Y f �' t N�{cty�j �_•. - . T,� • nr i 'rb x',YF-
%
.�`( 1. Sn.i le.0,00000°:,r,,•sr,1,-4, 44 }� 1 `$ ft�'. _ •
Easement signs installed(6/27/2022) Easement signs installed(6/27/2022)

1" '+G Jos _
x
•
Ve etative cover(7/21/2022) Vegetative cover(7/21/2022)
11111
0 ..r '19eF:" w ,',0-6 ,,morg t d + IMd -64
ti
•
Vegetative cover(7/21/2022) Vegetative cover(7/21/2022)

t :
a
•
.. ' Y;
r
r
tir � � •yam
Swamp condition (7/21/2022) Chinese privet kill(7/21/2022)
ii
=..., . , , ,- g t V p -1701A,pi, ''',! t., —„ , ''',.' '.1,, L,'N 1 , ' '''',r( i''' '''''-: : : ='At '' " 11:":„A ikcityik,w -Afr av, c,
- --- '" , '. ifirii3.,',' -..:',1.,
ilk,14,.
i-gl
„. ' 'G �jy 'F' sl 1 b,3 F. _ L 44 '[''4,� ,Y !�Y V.,4 T41° 1 �',i tt 5� ' + :f,-gr,.,',„ . .. . ,: ,,,, :,,; ?.. it lot,,,,/,, -,,'', ..-,. -,-: , • ,- , ' • • • '--.,,i. -:`. 4.s.' , ,„ i -I, '). /- i)11 r':: Al. 1 e...4,A.,--,T.' ''
"7.'
74
r.. .gip u • ,q.� "ny 'y� eh:%. R -';.'"�
r 1 / C'r 1. 1 IS r� ri'-
7 - r .4._ rya 'k f .'x.,44,..) 1.. g-.'1 �s . - r."
1 _ ....•.,r�.:4 r..,,., _. . .. : L n �i f^` E 'bi `. T. ��h'..
Chinese privet kill(7/21/2022) Chinese privet kill(7/21/2022)