20140916 Ver 1_Application_20140826

r U
9
Attachment L: Low Impact Bridge Replacement Process ooFy� G'19
Low Impact Bridge Project No. 17BP.2.R.59 : County Beaufort
qy ��.�
Bridge No.105 over Broad Creek WBS Element Number 17BP.2.R.59 °s'�o r�
This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October 6,
2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval procedures
under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge Replacements. This project
meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria Rules.
Date:
July 14, 2014
Applicant Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Applicant Address: P.O. Box 1587
Greenville NC 27835
Primary Contact for Project: Jay B. Johnson
Phone No.:
252 - 439 -2800
Is this an after- the -fact application: Yes X No
River Basin: Tar - Pamlico
Stream Classification: Broad Creek C: NSW
0 1 40 e 1 J
Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity
Federal: USACE Nationwide General Permit 3 — Maintenance
State: General Water Quality Certification #3687 and/or Buffer Authorization
Local: None
Project Description — This project involves the replacement of Beaufort County Bridge No. 105 on SR
1326 (Turkey Trot Rd.) over Broad Creek. The existing 137' long by 20' wide timber deck on timber joists
will be replaced with a 140' long by 33' wide cored slab bridge at the same location. The project aslo
includes 425' of approach roadway improvements and the relocation of two drives on the east side of the
bridge. In accordance with Tar - Pamlico Buffer Regulations: the proposed bridge does not contain deck
drains. All stormwater will be collected by a storm drainage system and discharged into the wetland
outside the buffer limits in the northwest quadrant.
Signature:
Print Name: ay o son
Title: Division Environmental Officer

Low /Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet
Completed by; lt:iiz, >ri
Lead Ed
Division
TIP NO
17BP.2.R.59
WBS Element No.
17BP.2.R.59
County
Bridge Number
Description
SR 1326 Turkey Trot Rd
Basin
Tar - Pamlico
Classification
C; NSW
Stream
SIN
29- 10-(1)
Type
perennial /inland
Size
50'x5'
1 @17'- 10 ",1 @17'- 4 ",1 @16' -10 ",1
Type
@16'- 9 ",1 @16'- 11 ",1 @17' -0 ",1@
Existing Structure
17' - 3 ", 1 @ IT
Size
137'x20'
Suff. Rating
41.02
Proposed Structure
Type
Bridge
Size
140'x33'
Stream
USACE (LF)
0
NCDWQ Impacts (LF)
0
USACE Impacts (AC)
0.03
Wetlands
Non 404 Impacts (AC)
0
CAMA Impacts SF
0
NC DWQ Buffers Impacts (SF)
Zone 1 537 Zone 2 1238 = 1775
Buffer Applicaton Required (Y /N)
Y
State Stormwater Permit Required YIN
N
Habitat
No Habitat
T&E
Species Present
NIA
Bio Conclusion
No Effect
Moratorium
Type
In -Water Work
Dates
February 15 - June 30
Native /Hatchery
Trout Waters
Trout Species Present
Trout Conditions (YIN)
WRC Reviewer
CAMA AECs
Yes
Essential Fish Habitat
No
Nay. Opening
No
USCG Permit
No
Historic Properties
No
Archaeological Resources
No
Tribal Lands
No
4 Resources
No
6 (f) ILWCF ] Resources
No
Wild and Scenic River
No
Federal Lands
No
TVA Area
No
FEMA Buyout
No
FEMA Flood Study
Yes
USTs Haz Mats
No
Relocatees
No
Location
LAT
35.520352
LONG
- 76.984107
Project Comments
IMOA
Required
Completed by; lt:iiz, >ri
Lead Ed
Division

Beaufort 105 BEAUFORT 105
SR 1326, TURKEY TROT ROAD
BROAD CREEK
BUNYAN USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 7 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
-- OF BEAUFORT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5695
MAP NUMBER 3720569500)
PAMLICO 03020104
BROAD CREEK SB; NSW
TAR- PAMLICO BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.59
JULY 17, 2013
rz
.•, .� � • � : • d..� :�= ".�r�' iii- ypy�; � -i �._, ���� ,;1Y � ✓ ;E.�
SR 302``
370 a fij�
z
4
! -1�►
_.�,([ ;� - .I / I .f_ _ . � ` fPfl ^: , _ L,��,�` ✓fit i
S
s- BEAUFORT`105
N 650400.3500
E 2599804.2298
-_� N 35 -31 -13
W 7659 -03 _' ''- '', r . )��. _s 3_. ''I l ::� • �1,
• N 35.520352 = arti1�+.��,R_
W 76.984107 _ ; r
`� •' �i. - • -�_ y� �I _ t��i�;l ice` \ ��_. • .1131y _ 1,�.. �� �, �..� r
r < ,
yam. f :`��.` •'� -�'O. , s II:. � I .;J �_ ,y� i �('1 }}1` � •�.� �_�. f� ' `V��"� i
I� ,ti' 'tom �`" �... 4 ,. 1` 1� ~ /•'�' -.,. � X11 ��• 's'ti ! ---_` -�--
'�
I 0n
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet } s'` 'u•` l�s.,a ,- �.� s

Beaufort 105
�-'
t
fJ
tj
BEA UFORT 105
SR 1326, TURKEY TROT ROAD
BROAD CREEK
BUNYAN USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 7 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF BEAUFORT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5695
MAP NUMBER 3720569500.1
PAMLICO 03020104
BROAD CREEK SB;NSW
TAR- PAMLICO BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.59
JULY 17, 2013
�S
US2�
o
SR1302
SR13;10 ti
SRil?
SR1326
BEAUFORT 105
N 650400.3500
E 2599804.2298
N 35 -31 -13
W 76 -59 -03
N 35.520352
W 76.984107
>t0
^� S
�
SR1331
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet

Aoject Tracking No. (Internal Use)
13 -10 -0015
HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Beaufort
WBS No.:
17BP.2.R.59
Document
Type:
MCC
Fed Aid No:
Funding:
State Federal
Federal
Permits):
Yes No
Permit
Type(s):
NW3
Proiect Description:
Replace Bridge No 105 on SR 1326 (Turkey Trot Rd) over Broad Creek.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of 1 PO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on November 14, 2013. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, SL, or SS in the
project area. There are no structures in the APE.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predictint: that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the Proiect
area:
Using HPO GIS website and the Google Streetview website provides reliable information regarding the
structures in the APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the
likelihood of historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT
Date
0
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Pagel of 2

Projecl Tracking No.:
13 -10 -0015
0€�7� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
a s v This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
00. valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Bridge 105
WBS No: 17BP.2.R.59
F.A. No:
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document:
Beaufort
MCS
Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP14
Project Description: This project proposes to replace Bridge 105, which carries SR1326 (Turkey Trot Rd) over
Broad Creek in Beaufort County, North Carolina. According to the environmental input request, the undertaking
involves the in place replacement of the structure along the existing alignment, thereby minimizing potential
surface and subsurface disturbances at this location. An off -site detour route (SR1326 to NC32 to SR1313 to
SR1326) is anticipated. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) is centered upon Bridge 105 and
measures 600ft in length (300ft from each bridge end point) and 15017 in width (75ft from each side of the
SR1326 center - line).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The project area is located in the central portion of Beaufort County, a short distance southeast of Washington and
north of the Pamlico River. In the APE, the subject watercourse appears to constitute a channelized drainage
feature carved through natural wetlands. Roughly a mile to the southeast, the canal transitions into a more
naturalized portion of Broad Creek. It then empties into the Pamlico River a couple of miles further to the south.
The general project location is mostly characterized by low elevation, poorly drained marine floodplain ground
surfaces at Sft -10ft AMSL. Partially drained agricultural lands are present beyond the far eastern and western APE
boundaries. According to aerial and on- ground imagery, those areas beyond the limits of the uptrended and
impacted right -of -way are distinguished by forested, frequently flooded, and often undrained land surfaces.
First, construction design data and other pertinent project information were examined for determining the
character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces surrounding Bridge 105. Once an APE was
defined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Friday,
October 25, 2013. This background work determined that no previously documented archaeological sites are
located in the archaeological APE, or within a one mile or more radius of the bridge location. An inspection of
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible
(DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website evidenced an
absence of these historic resources within the project area. In addition, historic maps of Beaufort County were
appraised for former structure locations, land use patterns, or other confirmation of historic occupation in the
Bridge 10S vicinity and archaeological /historical reference materials were inspected as well. In general, the cultural
background review established an absence of NRHP listed properties, archaeological sites, or cemeteries within the
APE. Based solely on cultural - historical factors, the APE is considered to have a low potential for the recovery of
archaeological artifacts, features, or deposits.
Further, topographic, geologic, environmental, and NRCS soil survey maps (Me) were referenced to evaluate
pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in
past occupation at this location. Aerial photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street View
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qeml fed in the 2009 programmatic Agreement.
1 of 2

Project Tracking No.:
map application (when amenable) were also examined /utilized for additional assessment of erosive disturbances,
both natural and human induced, which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites. Fundamentally,
ecological factors do not suggest a heightened archaeological site potential in the project APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE.
The project APE contains no NRHP listed historic properties, previously documented archaeological sites, or
cemeteries. Predicated on soil data, aerial imagery, and other information, poorly drained and frequently flooded
ground surfaces dominate the APE. Therefore, practically no potential for the recovery of significant archaeological
artifacts, deposits, or features exists. No further work is recommended for this in- place, state - funded NCDOT
Division 2 bridge replacement project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ® Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
ARCHAEOLOGY SUR YEY REQ UIRED
/ U /.'S- loo 1
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for Minor Transportation ProJects as Qualified in the 1007 Prograamatic Agreement.
2 of 2

Beaufort 105 BEAUFORT 105
SR 1326, TURKEY TROT ROAD
a' BROAD CREEK
BUNYAN USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 7 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF BEAUFORT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5695
MAP NUMBER 3720569500J
PAMLICO 03020104
BROAD CREEK SB; NS W
TAR- PAMLICO BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.59
JULY 17, 2013
•�t�.1��. � i � AACfl[�. J. ,.•�.• � �. _.�� �Jiti. �' / +- - {may_ ..! '�,�� . � J�'_�y _• I� /" -. -.
�=1•*ti. r B
l' 'r .¢ --.; ti: _-,i -'y..a..1,� -fir �S 1,/. +.• i'�- ! .M. -,1:'_ ;'w,�AQi _'�i _
-V , .` � \ • �� , : ; yam_: -as- ` ` �.�' �'°s ..l - ' - `- Str.� -•` �``�.�' y-=•i.
302 SR ; .i _ ,-��,'' / l � •,. � r..r; •�� ""��-_ _ -� "• ;dad-- ; r -�' -•-- ' .� � .._ -� a� �. ,.� a-.� •.
{ •t 54
Jcp
Ail•�1 - .- ' -`: _,-4F� tit: �.�,% �iY- t•`.i5i�: / -1~� •IS i -�4. ��V ���r �`'`__ �_ '�,'` /•• vr - `ti.,�p..�
;'•'J •1�_ :.'', -' =:'° i S R „1 O. -•' -�, �` -4 - `: iii”' ti``L'. J -r�;�
.. BEAUFORT 105
N 650400.3500
E 2599804.2298
.. N 35 -31 -13 •. j'i,.�.. �� > J :�, +( 'i, ` ``
_- : j�'g r. ;�'��1. :� } `.rte°/ •'� `•��`�,
'~ N 35.520352 _'".; w• �'?ci 'S .yy r.�l-� _.:; ' ;':, 1
r W 76.984107 ,, °.- ,, -- ;Y'. �'� i r.;'... ���.!� �'" �•�� � •r .. .. �, '�. �`:�'1� '�. -..•._
I (' �'��..` _ _ _`_�`s`+�- • t+,'; �` V� �,�.. � ���.'•`• .Lift �,• •�` - ; �� ''�: !v
.ry 'ice � � _ � �•', ; -'
' +f xa' -`tea. i I i " `.•`�� .` ��l�, _ % ;� �y, I ( \t (1
;Ciyi �yx7• ?l �. r `� �jQ� _ L =e -� _ ��' t r. :AI +� \7 Y
�qr -V — Tt7 - .���'!'y ^•�b'I, ' +` is lt.
y 1 +
Al
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
{� j' •1 „ • . � {Ir`. -:,,. � -fie• • ' • �.

°o
n
0
°o
O
O
O
N
O
K
W j
J
Q
U
0

0
0
O
O
O
N
D
W y
Q
U
0

Me— Muckalee loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 200 to 280 days
Map Unit Composition
• Muckalee, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Muckalee, Undrained
Setting
• Londform: Flood plains
• Down -slope shape: Concave
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Frequent, None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
• Land capability (nonirrigated): Sw
• Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
• D to 24 inches: Loam
• 24 to 80 inches: Sandy loam

I
Ap— Arapahoe fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 Inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
• Frost free period: 190 to 270 days
Map Unit Composition
• Arapahoe, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
• Arapahoe, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
• Minor components: 0 percent
Description of Arapahoe, Drained
Setting
• Landform: Depressions, flats
• Down -slope shape: Linear
• Across -slope shape: Concave
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Very poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Typical profile
• 0 to 17 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 17 to 30 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 30 to 42 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 41 to 80 inches: Loamy fine sand
GoA— Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 20 to 330 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 Inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 200 to 280 days
Map Unit Composition
• Goldsboro and similar soils: 90 percent
• Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
• Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
• Landform position (two - dimensional): Summit
• Down -slope shape: Linear
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material. Loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent

• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Moderately well drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 2w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
• 0 to 7 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 7 to 13 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 13 to 40 inches: Sandy clay loam
• 40 to 80 inches: Sandy clay loam

� t
� Ji • Ln r
-
`,` r � ark �. a i � t •�� � � Q, '��°'S,�
rjr ,
,- 1'.Qo, ��1 • "°�� _�, . ,s+i�a» n'....�: 3 r� f� �.� �\�?'
1.n 4D
ly
Ali-
.--'' ,•„�" �•T - ....._ -% 1 ;,, � '' ,.,� ,�W:— --�._. -_moo
Washin�ion
Rd
vo 00
FEE �� �, - . -_ _ .•
'1
N4
OHO � � �L.1 .+k — � '�"" _ .L. — '� .. � ,: �� •s_ +.i .1�.� _ , �' stir
1' �.� ��� ��• �_' ___ • �'�- ,p°' 1� -. -"�� ,�G. � .fit
O ap �a •� �'. _ .. ��,'7 ter^ *�
i> Z+= -•. � ;��'" �'' ,,,E - � s �'�'�* --
Ic
ad
AN

O
9
aP
tL
dY
Cf
yd
O
O
dY
filvew %4
i . I
LL
filvew %4
i . I

�i
w
IDS
t.
i
A
IN.

,J �' _'v
�� + r
�i �'
���� '
a�_
1
/,
�I
,y "� N
,,.�+ �,
c � .':, �
s .j'`� �
,,, _-
..� f �
,.
t
[ ��
j
.e `r . � A:�t1,
��
�'`,
,.
`,
� � if
.�
.e `r . � A:�t1,
��
�'`,
,.
`,
� � if

J . .
Projec! Trackin No. n na! Use)
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL I I �3 /d' D O /S
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM L
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyner, Human Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598
Send Electronic Submittals to: PAtracker @ncdot.gov Q ����3
ATTENTION: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor EiO
Mary Pope Furr, Historic Architecture & Landscapes Su ery r
FROM: BILL BRAME JR
DIVISION 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST 3
OCT o 12013
DATE- OCTOBER 1. 2013 i
PR(1_IRCT INFORMATION uuL.4vv
Project No:
Beaufort 105
County:
Beaufort
WBSNo * *:
17BP.2.R.59
Document
Minimum Criteria Sheet
Existing ROW.
60'
Type:
60'
Fed. Aid No:
N/A
Funding:
State Federal
USGS Quad
Bunyan
Project
Feb, 2015
Name:
Schedule:
Project Description:
Timber Floor on Timber
Structure
Replacement of Bridge 105 over Broad Creek.
Replaced:
Joist
S4 /3 Z (0
Additional Design Information:
** Work cannot begin until a charge number is provided that can be billed to by statt in the human
Environment Section.
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length:
500' from each end of
Detour
SR1326- NC32- SR1313 ro
existing bride
Route:
SR1326
Existing ROW.
60'
Proposed
60'
ROW.-
Existing X-
N/A
Proposed X-
N/A
section:
section:
Structure to be
Timber Floor on Timber
Structure
1959
Replaced:
Joist
Build Date:
Additional Design Information:

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission =I
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Maria Rogerson, P.E.
Division Bridge program Manager, NCDOT
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: August 29, 2013
SUBJECT: Division 2 Bridge Replacements
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661- 667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699 -1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Bridge Memo Page 2 August 29, 2013
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist should be
notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be required.
NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for information on
requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
11. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long -term erosion control.
12. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
13. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
14. Only clean, sediment -free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
15. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be

Bridge Memo Page 3 August 29, 2013
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40 -50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100 -year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
• Pitt County, replace bridge No. 208 on SR 1907 over Ditch: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County, replace bridge No. 119 on SR 1538 over Hunting Run: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Craven County, replace bridge No. 124 on SR 1433 over Mills Branch: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 150 on SR 1530 over Fork Swamp: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.

Bridge Memo Page 4 August 29, 2013
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 105 on SR 1326 over Broad Creek: Anadromous
species are found in this portion of Broad Creek. NCDOT should follow all stream
crossing guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in -water work moratorium
from February 15 to June 30. We recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge.
Standard recommendations apply.
Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 249 on SR 1336 over Duck Creek: Duck Creek is
designated as a Primary Nursery Area. NCDOT should follow all stream crossing
guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in -water work moratorium from
February 15 to September 30. We recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge.
Standard recommendations apply.
Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 119 on SR 1520 over Beaverdam Swamp: We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at (919) 707 -0370. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.

C)
D
-i
v
v
W
ca
"(D
O
Z
3
m
n
Z
v
0
m
0°
CD
m»
»
3
N
..
p
W
m
0
f
-4
°
�4
�S
d
n
O
w
C
r
m
CO)
7'
z
°
�
p
(D
m-
m
3
m
m
rA
0
9
y
""
y
v
S.
3
O
°
<
m
»
z
u
d
zd
m
o
—
m�
m
`°
g
°.
ID
»
3
3
a
w
` ;
<
vm
N
v
C,
?
m
A
N
v
7
O
w
N
Q
o
T.
a
m
3
a
?
3
0
'm
O
7
m
=
3
N
N
m
O
X 6 3 I `G
m N
W
co
w
Q
N
+� O
—w w o o m
o
w
o
m
N
O
en O U,
w
V
W
(°D N 0 w f V
m
m 0
-0
m
Q
D
S
7
7 W-
W
-O
O Q. O (� A
N'
o
�- y
3 SI)
3m
n
3
3
O
W
�. x n
O
fV
O n m
A'
«
CI
m
m
Ci
3
(D
m O
S
37
N 0- Q O Q s 3
C
(mn
°
W
Jc
°
3
7
co
Z N
431
(D
I'D'
w 7- < 0 0
c
'O
(n
'
Z
Z
0
L
C)
N S
3
o ems N 'rnmm
ID
w
CD
>>
<'
m
y
ID O In
<
m Z
O
Dl O _
3. '. S i7 O m
w
c
7
N
C 3 3
f^^
G
O
w?
3
»
N 3 2
3 7 'G n
N
f�
<
O° Cn
u Q m
N
41 °0 Q37 w v3
CD (D vl < m
w
w
3
3
W
0 o w m
Q, o
<
°
V
o
m
3 om co n
C
y
3
m
m
o m o P� CD
7
o
c
°
m
(�
i
O
m
m
O
0
Z
W O 3 W (D q I p
cD
-V
O
m
CD
°
rn o8 Qa ja
4
c
a
°
m
--4 >
Q 5 c _
A?
0
(°
3
S c m w a
(D m cD
3
y
A
T y S mn
m
O
m 3 3
(D y (O (� •�
pi
m
y
0
m
3
°
m
3
70 O
r J
< w_
=r
Q'
w
C
m
m
z p
m -i
m
: L O m W V�
O
N
l°D
(A m
CD
c O p (D
N
c
°�
m O 6
tD
m
3
m in o O ..' �
a °moo m�W
Q
m
°
M
O m
gD3 3
0
a
m0
ISD
c
0
D
(°D
w
m OL o
vim
0
-
v
3
0
0
p
o
< Q m
4/ » 6�
Q o
Q
C
D
3
m»
m
I
v m� _0
m C v
,O m W 3
Cl)
m
0
0
:3
A
n
0
3
m
o m 1 1
o
Q—
Q m
w
m
N
c
m
p
n -ZI so
3 °3 °m w�iFw
mnm
v�o
o
(iil�3 v
° mNm 3,N
Q
<
w
3
.a..
m
D o
3 Q p (D V O
m
N
y
Z N
n
C)
rL
•+
FD-
C7 (D O
N»
(D
(D
O
3
Q w 3 3
0 w-
m
x
Z
_
Q-
6 N o
3 3 6
m
x
o
O
d
CL
m
0 0D� m �� °
N
4
tzn
co
3
J
0
'm
m
m U N m m
S
w
-<
(D
m
=
7
m
N
N
2)
Er y4 Q .O C',
CD
N -0 p�j rn .n... <
Q
O
C
O
d
co m
W
3
p 4 m
? ° >
?
N
? (n
U)
Z
N
O— O 3 W
7 y
W
A
Z x
y
m 7 3 - ... O
CD p w
m
41
N
(D
6
O
A
C7 -n
O
S
-° W cD 3 c 6 Q
Q
0
O
co
N X-
i7
w
o x Q m (7
CD Er y w N .(D
`o_
n)
m
3
(1 ur
0 7p
°-
5 m
v�
m
o o
w
m
w
3 c (a
N
°
-0
(Nil
m 0 3 ° n m
y
m
w•
Q
D
n
m-w0 4) X
::;-
w
7
0
q-
m
p
Q— y
C
o
c
N
Dl
m
Al 2
N
C
O
CD
( D
w v 3
J S m O
W
m
N
m
m
N
r(O
m m (D
Q1
o
D
v
m (n O 0 Q
il
W
m
3 0 (D o
m
m
i
m 3 w o
Q _-D < ?. 3
0.
0.
v
w+ o 3� N'
m
N
°' y
m
0
w (can cwi 3
cn 0 O
41
A
('u (mn (<D �F
3
? CD A�
°
O cr v o
3 C m w
0
m CD o
CD
a CD s
(D m O
Q

>m/
I`
_
�z$
00
m&
§}
-
,T
z�
C)
-
}cn23w
m
-4
.�
/{
/E}
}\
/ %
I
m
=
7 ƒ
//
( \\
}R
a
i
CD CO,
CL 0
-
�
/
a
\
w
\
wk
( \
/ \
(
\
°
°
In
_
°
m
2
C \
�2
CD
CL
a]
co
co
_
\
\
\
\
}
/
k -
\
z
z
}
}
\
Cl)
(
§ o
i\
z
z
z
z
i
o
\
(�
# i
;
>
¥
s
>
�
&
E §
k\
§�)\
CD
;� §\
0
(D
\g§
§K
kk�2
(D
ij
;�E\
E
.mIE
J
(
,
�
2 m
§
mom; §
\
oa
[z
��3 k
�)
■n
z
$
9
g
g
9
§ §
\
§
)
k
)
)
} k
§
CD
0
7
@
z
z
z
z
m
)
)
) 2
C
) \
o
}k
0
;
.
o
e
m
�
z
z
z
z
w
>
>
w
■ E
(0
°
\
/
z
z
z
z
�
\/-
>
>
$
&
0
CL
EL

0
F&
\
/@
�\
{
�
0
_2
%/
\®
D
ID
» ƒ
A \
» a
CD
°
cD
3
CL
� p
\
/
} e §
6
(
§
m
Ua
C) CD
\//
&7
§
/ Qk
m
m
$ 0
//_
2
\
>
0
-u
m
-q
CO)
=2222
e ¥
■
»
» 2
@
,7f
\\
_
m
§
CD C)
] = ;w4
0 g R
q
CD ED
J
/
2 / /
j
°
-
omz
°
°J
ƒk§
e�

-�
Ln
o
m�
m
D
z
r
-
c
o
�
�
C
n
3)
_
N
N
m
m
n
m
�
m
N
T
OD
O
AO
v
OZ
o
m m
W
(n O
D
^
�
Z �
m
<
�%
x
0
e
m
m
m
_v
�D
D
D D
r
n
r
N
O
CA
C
D
O
�
N
m
m
" N
D
C7
aj
m
--i
o
� Z
m
N
N
co
m
o
r
m
Z
rC
D
�
mm
N
M
Z
N

�4
RGc • •.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED farm for Mtnar 'Transportation Projects as QuaWrred in the 1007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 2

Projed Tracking No. (Internal Use)
13 -10 -0015
.r
f . HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
.' NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Beaufort
WBSNo.:
17BP.2.R.59
Document
T e:
MCC
Fed Aid No:
Funding:
E State El Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
Yes No
Permit
T e (s):
NW3
Project Description:
Replace Bridge No 105 on SR 1326 (Turkey Trot Rd) over Broad Creek.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of 1 PO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on November 14, 2013. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, SL, or SS in the
project area. There are no structures in the APE.
Why the available information Provides a reliable basis for reasonably predictinz that there
are no unidentified sirnircant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project
area:
Using HPO GIS website and the Google Streetview website provides reliable information regarding the
structures in the APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the
likelihood of historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
NMap(s) OPrevious Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ODesign Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
0
NCDOT
Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 1007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 2

- 01.dgn
a
z
W
Z4
O�
r
II
p
a
O Q O O
U)
N
Wm
z-mi co
-Imo >
xxx
� m
7 �
i
i o
0
0
II II n
om14
gmFm mLn "("
-_
_ _ O
'
3361-
C)QC)il7jgx
�
II
(D'1OZ>
H
Mi
F
AZ
< Nz
�M,
1
rn
OONON
2 n,
mta
O
3Mw
N � � No
n D
sP
3
�o
A
tf
NO
w
%
�
n
y
y � ti � ti 4A tn
(A crt 4A tn
m m
Z co
N L O _'
0 0 O O
REVISIONS
III \\ :.
mo qo
sa mo
ou
Z-
0
z
mm3m
m
2
n
!m?rn
W-ZNZi
v
oy
9�0
O
3 AZ
aX I
-_
_ _ O
'
3361-
I
�
II
(D'1OZ>
H
Mi
F
AZ
< Nz
�M,
1
rn
OONON
mta
O
3Mw
~N
CIA
n D
sP
3
�o
A
tf
NO
O P
oy
%
z
T=m
n
>
D
m m
Z co
-i
N
ml III'II
�N
�
T
s CY7
0
S
—z ze
n
�y
z�
z
�
z$
nn
dm
o
51
y33y� ��fl
�� CREEfi
Sti
m ST
�.2.
='o
ZQ
,Y,
\ '
y
� Y
It II my
It
ooZ
TT0o
eD
ow
00
n T
O
N
I I
.s .
."i
� -3'
mrn m
m
x
n
�m?m
<�m �r
m m m r
�z
v
33cZi_
ni -niZD
II II my
SII
° °Z
0
^i+�o
u�
00
0-
^ T
O
T
7/99
m m m m
n
ox
v
D
v
y m Z m
>a Z r+Z
{1m-1
v
v
336i_
DD->
ZD
n
II ,II � rn N
�II
Z,
Ti+0o
II D
O per.
O V
n�^
O T
T
m
Z
v
90
m
3t
D
n
CA
1
aX I
Y
O
m m m
S
T
�zKz
Mi
F
AZ
< Nz
�M,
1
rn
°
mta
O
3Mw
~I'
sP
3
�o
A
mN
°m
33c�_
z
nDD-�
-zD
z
m m
Z co
-i
It II my
It
ooZ
TT0o
eD
ow
00
n T
O
N
I I
.s .
."i
� -3'
mrn m
m
x
n
�m?m
<�m �r
m m m r
�z
v
33cZi_
ni -niZD
II II my
SII
° °Z
0
^i+�o
u�
00
0-
^ T
O
T
7/99
m m m m
n
ox
v
D
v
y m Z m
>a Z r+Z
{1m-1
v
v
336i_
DD->
ZD
n
II ,II � rn N
�II
Z,
Ti+0o
II D
O per.
O V
n�^
O T
T
m
Z
v
90
m
3t
D
n
CA
1
Y
Z
Mi
�m
.o
Tn
X09
xo
maa
mta
O
0
v
sP
3
�o
A
mN
°m
N
z
Am
z
m m
Z co
z
Z o
z ^C
s CY7
0
S
n
�y
z�
z
�
z$
nn
dm
o

__ \1YBP.R59_ hYd_prm_02.dg�
F
N
w
a
r
11
L4
W
p
V
0
p p O O
N
-<m
omc
amm
7 �
i
i o
z
0
0
i��
11 II N
zz
or g
a10
Y
M 222
c n
I
I
mmn
z
g� r,
m
2
omnz
e�
0
m=x=
ONOD
�co
' Paz
I
rn
N N
N M N M 4 11 N M N
r
b N�$
� w
b,U
I
1
V
U
-D
o
n
iw
�o
y
7
y tn V)
V1 Y ti V1 Vf Vf Vf
Z�z
0 O O O
O
n
F
m
S
ZZm
y m y
O
Z
O
nnzy
n G
ooZ
T o
N
II D
0,
O A
Do
n �
\ T
REVISIONS
NO
im Zv
MY z
s o fo
0. m
3 Zx
o�
z y
0
z
Oy 000**�'
�O
/yam
9 �
�n3v
m m m m
v2
n
�ZDZ
m?rn
�?mz
O
A mA n 21
�1AZ
v
Z
�niZD
n
ooZ
r �
n�
O p\.
ov
D(n
T
O
a
m
Z
v
90
CA
70
m
D
n
CA
Y
I
I
c n
I
I
mmn
I
I
omnz
e�
0
m=x=
ONOD
�co
' Paz
I
NIA
oD
a�-n
w- v
wo
mn
NO
I
ro
EM
I
_ �zm
�n3v
m m m m
v2
n
�ZDZ
m?rn
�?mz
O
A mA n 21
�1AZ
v
Z
�niZD
n
ooZ
r �
n�
O p\.
ov
D(n
T
O
a
m
Z
v
90
CA
70
m
D
n
CA
Y
z
omnz
e�
0
m=x=
ONOD
�co
' Paz
oD
a�-n
w- v
wo
mn
ro
EM
gz
Z�
zf
z<
V
U
-D
O
y
z r~
�o
mm
AZ
m
z
Z�z
? ::o
Z
O
z�
eCn
O
z�
z
_�
AN
A

•,
A it
L L
is 1-1 it •
i. i5
A A
61D
if !1 1 t Ii
7 nor a m x
on
F- 0:6 'F!
10 O ;z
Am
1i 10
'j6
z
c
02
0
4L
Sk­ ., BROAD CRUK _ - StNG Im. No.. 01051.D. No. SF7 6 5 pMjedNo. -.1W.2.R.!59_ PDF File,
-S: 2 o
Z to
Z
q
0
m
-Z c
Z
�
qo�
-0
0
6 C)
z
I
0

?6W VINMIA'NOISM AJIMM IVJ'50103V S a 31VS 403
I/q e"91PA-MUN
1 CKV'01
IZCt of
o HWANCO P-1 9161 o-F'
4, WI,- W - "'�M'
3-)Sf, 1- vl'i IS, I
App—F Aq p4l,Iqld pIll P„
aiIP4
A.-IS "ll 4q P;•"ll`W
-4I
S6
�v
qj P-d �P-A
let";
'6
4.1
n 'I.
w,
"k-
;71
IV
Y6
0 1 9 N I H V Al
7
Z,
OUGSE
Ialpl
7�
MIHdV8OOdOi) 531839 310,IIW SL A3Amns ma;ZoNv IsYOD A3A21 ng -IVDiOO'I030
18oAnv:IO-VNIIOdV3 HIHON 3383WWOO AO IN3VJI8Vd30 80183-LWI 'AHI JO 1N3WJHv":311
NVkNnlg S31VIS 031INn sHiv-Ls o311Nn

OC)'- ]CZtco)
�
�bohc�0� y
C�
n �
O � �
yZy y �
�C
C
x
N
10
O
W
III
O
r
D
n
�z8
CA
to q
'j
O�
mxo
10
h 1�
M 1��
h
Z
Na
IA
O
OC)'- ]CZtco)
�
�bohc�0� y
C�
n �
O � �
yZy y �
�C
C
x
j,.
NL -'
0
0
Ln
m
0
0
0
m
m
m
ou
0
0
N f
m 1
o .
v
0
m
v
0
r
m
W
TIP PROJECT: 17BP.2.R.59
1
W
W
�
..
m C _
Z:o I •`
O.�
`n� l f— BROAD CRECK
o
n
III
m
�z8
to q
'j
O�
mxo
h 1�
M 1��
Z
Na
j,.
NL -'
0
0
Ln
m
0
0
0
m
m
m
ou
0
0
N f
m 1
o .
v
0
m
v
0
r
m
W
TIP PROJECT: 17BP.2.R.59
1
W
W
�
..
m C _
Z:o I •`
O.�
`n� l f— BROAD CRECK
N
:CY)
:71
G;
�.O
: N
29/0,8/91
bo II �
�a�lll'�1111��
o b lljl � l�lj
n I�jl
I II
b jllj � Ill �
x
kr7
O
a
0
i
III
N
:CY)
:71
G;
�.O
: N
29/0,8/91
bo II �
�a�lll'�1111��
o b lljl � l�lj
n I�jl
I II
b jllj � Ill �
x
kr7
O
a
0
i