20140910 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report 2013_20140808

D
FN"R 8 2014
,. ±rA T QUALITY
WELLS CREEK #2 -- NCEEP Project #92688
2013 Monitoring Report: MY -3
Alamance County NC — CAPE FEAR 03030002
20 1 4091 0
Conducted for the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
North Carolina Ecosytem Enhancement Program (NC -EEP)
Final Report Submitted November 18, 2013 to:
tem
PROG*A/R
Robert J Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
- -- RJG &A Environmental (RECEIVED
ED
FEB 7 - 2014
NC ECOSYSTEM
Et+1tiANCEMENT PROGRAM

1#
WELLS CREEK #2 -- NCEEP Project #92688
2013 MONITORING REPORT — YEAR 3
CONDUCTED FOR THE NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL
RESOURCES, ECOSYTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................... ............................... 1
1.1. Project Description ................................................................... ............................... 1
1.2. Goals & Objectives ................................................................... ............................... 1
1.3. Vegetation Condition ................................................................ ............................... 1
1.4. Stream Channel Condition ....................................................... ............................... 2
1.5. Easement Integrity ................................................................... ............................... 2
1.6. Summary Data ......................................................................... ............................... 3
2.0 Methodology ............................................................................ ..............................3
2.1. Stream Methodology ................................................................ ............................... 3
2.2. Vegetation Methodology ......................................................... ............................... 4
3.0 References ................................................................................ ..............................4
APPENDICES
A
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table IA-13 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2.1 -2.2 Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Figures 3.1 -3.8 Permanent Photopoints
Figure 4. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
e- Tables Raw CVS vegetation data sheets
Wells Creek #2 — EEP #92688 2013 Final Monitoring Report
RJG &A Environmental Consultants Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1.0 Executive Summary
1.1. Project Description
Wells Creek #2 (NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program # 92688) is a stream mitigation project
located near Snow Camp in southwestern Alamance County, North Carolina (Figure 1.0). Wells
Creek is a tributary to Cane Creek which flows east into the Haw River in Cape Fear River Basin
14 -digit HUC #03030002 - 050050. NCEEP identified this HUC as a Targeted Local Watershed
in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priority report.
Wells Creek #2 consists of two separate parcels: 1) The Northern (Enhancement) Reach is
located along Wells Creek upstream and downstream of Carl Noah Road and along tributary
UT3. The Southern (Preservation) Reach is located along Wells Creek tributaries UT and UT2
downstream of Longest Acres Road, 4000 feet southwest of the Enhancement Reach. The
stream segments immediately downstream of each project reach along Wells Creek and UT1
were previously restored ( NCEEP project #414, Wells Creek). Tributary UT flows into Wells
Creek approximately 2,000 feet downstream of the Preservation Reach, just north of Beale Road.
Fencing was installed along both the Enhancement Reach and Preservation Reach to exclude
hogs and cattle, and both reaches received herbicide treatments between August 2010 and May
2011 to control invasive exotic plants. The Enhancement Reach also received tree and shrub
plantings in non - forested (former pasture) areas along Wells Creek south of Carl Noah Rd, and
understory shrubs were planted beneath the forest canopy along UT3 where livestock had
destroyed the understory. Planting was done between November 2010 and April 2011. This
project does not include any direct stream channel improvement work.
1.2. Goals & Objectives
The goals of the Wells Creek #2 project are to improve water quality and restore riparian habitat.
To achieve these goals, the project has the following objectives:
• Reduce direct nutrient loading and fecal coliform inputs into the streams by fencing out
cattle and hogs and providing an alternative livestock water system;
• Reduce excess sedimentation into the streams by eliminating livestock impacts from hoof
shear to forest floor and stream banks;
• Reestablish and enhance native forested buffers by planting native plants, removing
invasive exotic vegetation, and preventing future negative impacts within the buffer;
• Increase surface runoff infiltration and non -point pollutant removal through the buffer;
• Preserve existing natural, well - established riparian plant communities.
1.3. Vegetation Condition
CVS Plots: Two vegetation monitoring plots (20m x 5m) were established in April 2011 and
resampled in September 2011, September 2012 and October 2013. The two plots contained 15
Wells Creek #2 — EEP #92688 2013 Final Monitoring Report
RJG &A Environmental Consultants 1 Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Page

and 12 live planted woody stems in 2013, with an average density of 546 planted stems per acre,
a decrease of 7% from 2012. Both plots exceed the MY3 planted stem density success criterion
of 320 stems per acre for stream enhancement. Native volunteer woody seedlings are abundant
in both plots, and average density of planted plus native volunteer stems was 1760 stems per acre
in 2013.
Enhancement Areas Beyond CVS Plots: Based on visual assessment of the former pasture
areas along Wells Creek outside of the CVS plots, planted woody stem survival and native
volunteer recruitment appears to be good throughout the easement area, despite dense growth of
tall grasses and herbaceous weeds, including both native and exotic species. Visual assessment
of the understory enhancement area along UT3 revealed good to fair survival and slow growth of
the planted shrubs. Some of the shrubs reported as having stunted leaves in 2012 have died, but
the survivors (mainly buckeye, pawpaw, and spicebush) now appear to be growing normally, with
normal -sized leaves. Some also appeared to have deer browsing damage. Invasive Microstegium
grass is abundant along UT3 especially near the head and near the confluence with Wells Creek
(photo - points 8 to 11 and 14). Numerous green ash and sweetgum volunteer seedlings are also
becoming prominent in this area.
Invasive Species: The Enhancement Reach and Preservation Reach were treated in 2010 -2011
for invasive species, including multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), tree of heaven (Ailanthus
altissima), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
Most appear to have been killed or substantially reduced, but some resprouting patches noted in
2012 and spring 2013 are growing and may need further treatment. Most are under forest canopy
and pose minimal threat to established trees, but some patches of rose and privet at the southern
end of the Preservation Reach (adjacent to the Wells Cr #1 restoration project) and along the
powerline right -of -way north of Carl Noah Rd (Enhancement Reach) are overgrowing small
trees. The more prominent patches are mapped in the CCPV figures.
1.4. Stream Channel Condition
Based on the permanent photopoints and overall visual assessment in 2013, there are no new
areas of channel instability in the project area. The lower portion of UT3 near its confluence
with Wells Creek (near photopoint 8) remains incised with steep and sparsely wooded banks,
similar to its pre - project condition. The livestock exclusion fence is close to the north (left) bank
of UT3, which limits the potential for woody vegetation recovery along this bank segment.
1.5. Easement Integrity
Wells Creek Main Stem: At the two cattle crossings on the Wells Creek Enhancement Reach,
south of Carl Noah Rd, the fencing wire is disengaged from the fence posts in some areas, as noted in
the 2012 and spring 2013 reports. Cattle were present in the adjacent pasture, but were excluded
from the conservation easement by a temporary portable electric fence. No livestock encroachment
or damage inside the conservation area along the main stem of Wells Creek was evident. The
segment north of Carl Noah Rd has no fencing and no adjacent pasture.
Wells Creek #2 — EEP #92688 2013 Final Monitoring Report
RJG &A Environmental Consultants 2 Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Page

Wells Creek UT3: The September 2011 monitoring report noted livestock encroachment (hog
wallows and paths) in areas along tributary UT3 (Enhancement Reach) that hogs had used prior
to fencing, and which were still accessible to small hogs that could get under the fence. The
hogs were subsequently removed from the adjacent pastures, which are now used for cattle only.
During the spring 2013 assessment we noted cattle hoof prints and dung (apparently a few
months old) just inside the fence south of UT3, but no detectable cattle damage to trees or shrubs
within the easement. No break in the fence or obvious point of entry was found. Three dead
calves had been left inside the fence to decay, near the lower end of UT3 about 50 feet from the
stream bank. In October 2013 there was no further evidence of livestock encroachment, no new
carcasses placed in the easement, and the easement fence remains intact.
Wells Creek UT1 & UT2 (Preservation Reach): Livestock exclusion fencing along the
northeast and southeast boundaries of the Preservation Reach appears to be intact in October 2013,
and no livestock encroachment or damage inside the conservation area was evident. A gap under
the fence is present where it crosses UT -2, but the existing fence appears adequate to exclude cattle.
The fence segment previously broken by a fallen tree (noted in the spring 2013 assessment) has
been repaired. There is no fence along the roadside (Longest Acres Rd) or along the southwest
easement boundary, which is bordered by forest.
1.6. Summary Data
Summary information, data and statistics related to performance of various project and
monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative
background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the
mitigation and restoration plan documents available on EEP's website. All raw data supporting
the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
2.0 Methodology
Monitoring methodologies follow the current EEP - provided templates and guidelines (Lee et al
2008) including Level 2 Protocol sampling in the CVS vegetation plots. Photographs were taken
digitally. A Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping -grade unit was used to collect vegetation
corner, photopoint, and problem area locations. Problem areas identified in the 2012 and spring
2013 assessments were re- evaluated.
2.1. Stream Methodology
As outlined in the 2010 Existing Conditions Report, the Preservation Reach (southern reach)
consists of two unnamed tributaries to Wells Creek. UT1 is a perennial stream with a rocky
substrate. Channel width ranges from eight to 12 feet; overall channel morphology is stable.
UT2 is a five -foot wide intermittent stream that is slightly incised. At the Enhancement Reach
(northern reach), Wells Creek is an eight to 15 foot -wide perennial stream with a rocky substrate
and some areas of channel instability. UT3 is an intermittent stream with eroding banks due to
livestock damage. Photos in the Existing Conditions Report and Figures 3.0 -3.7 in this report
depict typical channel morphology.
Wells Creek #2 — EEP #92688 2013 Final Monitoring Report
RJG &A Environmental Consultants 3 Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Page

This project does not include direct stream channel improvement work or stream geomorphology
data collection. Success of stream enhancement level II reaches will rely on using fixed
photopoints to evaluate stream stability and the absence of further channel degradation. Photos
taken during data collection for the Existing Conditions Report will serve as baseline photos.
Based on available data, no new areas of channel instability were identified during the spring or
fall 2013 site visits.
2.2. Vegetation Methodology
Two representative vegetation survey plots were selected and installed along Wells Creek in
April 2011. Each plots measures five meters by 20 meters and is 100 square meters in area.
Pursuant to the guidelines, the four corners of each plot are marked with metal pipe.
Level 1 (planted woody stems) and Level 2 (volunteer woody stems) data collection was
performed in all plots, pursuant to the most recent CVS /EEP protocol (Lee et al 2008).
Within each plot, each planted woody stem location (x and y) was recorded, and height and live
stem diameter were recorded for each stem location. All planted stems were marked with pink
flagging. Vegetation was identified using Radford (1968) and Weakley (2011). Photos were
taken of each vegetation plot from the 0,0 corner.
3.0 References
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2008). CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.2. Retrieved September 2011, from:
http://www.nceep.netibusiness/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell (1968). Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.
Weakley, Alan (2011). Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas.
Downloaded in December 2011 from: http:// www.herbarium.unc.edu/flora.htm.
Wells Creek #2 — EEP #92688
RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Page
2013 Final Monitoring Report
4 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1.
Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table lA -B
Project Restoration Components
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table
Table 4.
Project Attributes Table

Figure 1. General Location Map. Wells Creek #2 Preservation
and Enhancement Project. Alamance County, North Carolina.
�r j �r It'. �''•.
'- �l ,'j ��f r –t ; i'-- '� rf j�. t r'! �— .``�.� r/ +f( r;%i�J�ry4l`' }� 'E� Jj`'����I~,` �iL,.-J•
-..r ! "t>
f f
...y'���� < i �1' ��' -- `�•'.` _� -� % f ,f }�� ,,''� fr'' y( �'l` "!� ?+I+ rf r'+ �,�. • 7 `'.I t •�` �'�' j�•• _ !
+
rr �r+$ �!'�'� r - r 4 �f � _ .'i 1� '^ Iii. - �� � 'y', 't'•t -. �lt__,1.r f�ll,`� �li i I �,ti... � 1 1 !.
y�'• }'` � � It l 4' � } �.% � � -r� �` 1 ,t5, !r ,\ ,� i' �1 � , + '7 '' t `t ��• 1 ..r`�� rr r! ti�}t + � ;t��/ t "...F
� r
49
~I 4- -r � T' -ti `_ +t ti . ?\ ^6� S --I'-1 t r �. i �� r ( 5 �`-_� Jt IZ l , _ ' � i � ��. _ . I . � r `• ^ �, • — ''c ,I ' (f r j' r � r r `�J= , I , I 7r r � l `,— ! • �� I ! � r• '' s * +J f � 1 •` r.� ' - _I•` , • . } ; �/ . . � .+ .ff ' r� '- ' )� 1� = � ;` ; r + J ' � r r a �^ I � .� � � �_ Y .I � _ ` r ! +� l� + i , \ { � ti r ! f r. ; ` .✓ • r , � .,' ' . , . . . _ � r • =, _ f ~-•,� ' r, � j� � - •' Sf ,. y � r' '. .'_f •� f - �~ ` �_ }1 1 r1 � rI _– • _ { y 1 : . ^ , ) � -�'`� C Y_: , �;' .! u . '' (' y7'ti rJ , z` _ ., r. ` . l'I r - ', �I1 ,'` , d 1 �- , �,''` , '1 ,, � y Ks . I � "� ' 't : 1 � Z '�1 syt , � '+I Id f � �A W " .r �r � _ l ' t r ma+ -' ' +l i l y '.I. . 'yy + I `} .i ` .l .� � '..�� ti� � `'� - 1 + �, t ' 1 '`I�r` 1 , � i _� . - 1 ; .„ . .� , , ~ � V , �- �"• � �� l 1 �r_ i , ;r . (� 5} ' i 1 f" � I r rI r _ •r ! �"• j ._r `t�l_. J `� � f��X r .l; +� \ - � .1 = �{i �' • ' " I ` - � 1 .t,.�1 '�� ,,, �i �` �+' firI f '. f !i ir ' ! ''r ,r , — � �, , l i q ~ ' j_� � � ^ � � tij l b, � . "•I .� v• l� 1 . r ' t ` ?'-_ '~ � r 1�' '-I ' � ' � `� �� , -`J S: c�� . �•I i ;• tc e� ��,� s�f '! J` ' . f /. s t! ' o f• 'I f'/ , lI� F �/,+ � rErf �:f • �. n' r rh ` `r ' ' Y • i '�� 1 + �— + � a• � nc'e,�I mI , e~ n' t IiI ' t RI � e r ,f J 1 I
�� aJ ( i c 1 r,h t � / +, I i ,j f i f r = t r ^I fif f � `r 1` y ' 1 ti -`� i �Jf~ ; = � ': f _ l ti w I} •t i ; —I ( �' `. 1 ��ti S!r e`ms� .,ti � ! r� . ,- �_ J' ` � Ji /;� r � lt 'y 1 'f ' ' � 1 �r , • � �t �._ �/ '
, �`:r �+J r I I �' F r y r S ' - , r ' +� - S� ti � - .n --ti. � . � r� ` sl r '� , f: j'I •• �r
ail N
1
J Accessto r
Preservation Reach �P L
'
f
Directions to the Project:
8.9 miles. Take a left on Beale Road�� . Take NC Highway 49 South for approximately
` ` Enhancement Reach: After approximately
0.4 miles, take a left on to Carl Noah Road.
6 The access point is approximately 0.8 miles
down Carl Noah Road, where Wells Creek
passes under the road. The conservation
Wells Creek (#414) Conservation Easement Boundaries easement extends north and south of the roa'`l tif �
f
' d
,
f
j
. A
. " '
I f
Wells Cr #2 ( #92688) Conservation Easement Boundaries r' 4 Preservation Reach: After approximately -
USGS Streams 1f -' 1.3 miles, take a left on Longest Acres Road.
The access point is approximately 0.8 miles
0 1,000 2,000 et ,� r down the road. The conservation easement
�, }� starts south of the road.

kK
k�
Ea
°w
L)w
\2
0
of
f �
2 �
�
0 \
/ 2 \
t =I
® o =
§ 0
b /f
E _
k O
E E#
R : E
= R $
0\ �§
I 3 0
c _0
00 2 0
\ / ƒ 0
\c \ &
5 .0 7 \
4 \ = 0
y q b
CL -E
c— >_
:3 ¥_ L)
c §d°
z »
3 0 ° �
ID
4 2
o m o
G § f f c
# = m =
E , -j \ §
0 (D
> a)r
> . .
\ E E A
L7 \ k 2 \
m -J m 2 0
U-&EE%
_ =
.2
E2\f\
X24 /-0
11 m 11 o %
n
'n
_ = 6 = _
O = E
.0 c = _ _
y 5 ƒ .E f
" \ = � Q)
0 m <
2 E O '\ $
\
m U- § D
��� )
/ �/
= %
/ %
/ E
2
$
m = m
k
# = m
# _ c
%
k
%
k
E
.% .-
—
0)- .-
0) .-
E
a)
>yy
a)
>77
= % £
>yg
_
>g
®
>g
> = a
e a
> e E
> =
> =
a/
>
a/-
a/-
a E
a E
G
Co = �
@ _ �
_ � ®
M 7
= #
/ f _0
/ ƒ -0
/ ƒ \
/ f
/ f
E
7 2
7 c
7 e
2
8=
e=
B=
s
Q
CL a
a) a)
a) a)
/
/
/
E
f \
= \
\
f
f
\�
\�
=
\�
\
\
E .
m
g =
®
7
/
\
/
�r-
E
r
A
N
cn
o
\
\
\
\
\
R m
. S
e
o
It
o
=
\
\
\
\
\
o
o
o
2
2
a
a
2
2
$
t
/
/
/
m
/
+
+
+
+
/
/
/
/
/
\
c
Cl)
%
/
_
q
7
t
� CD
q
0
_
=
e
e
g
M
2
2
2
:
=
CL
0
0$
I
w
w
I
I
�
§
�
m
�
&
®
o
Cl)
n
\ a
%
2
w a)
o
,
'f
$ 0
$ °
f
°
2
2
rO
E%
E(
2 0—
O a
O o
u
a
a
E \
I
® /
/
I
\ S
auw
\-
\3
D
\a.
\�
�
0 \
/ 2 \
t =I
® o =
§ 0
b /f
E _
k O
E E#
R : E
= R $
0\ �§
I 3 0
c _0
00 2 0
\ / ƒ 0
\c \ &
5 .0 7 \
4 \ = 0
y q b
CL -E
c— >_
:3 ¥_ L)
c §d°
z »
3 0 ° �
ID
4 2
o m o
G § f f c
# = m =
E , -j \ §
0 (D
> a)r
> . .
\ E E A
L7 \ k 2 \
m -J m 2 0
U-&EE%
_ =
.2
E2\f\
X24 /-0
11 m 11 o %
n
'n
_ = 6 = _
O = E
.0 c = _ _
y 5 ƒ .E f
" \ = � Q)
0 m <
2 E O '\ $
\
m U- § D
��� )
/ �/

N
C
O
R
E
7
cn
C
07
C
O
O.
E
O
U
m
T
m
R
H
m
(6
U
C a-
0 d
Z Q
a
m
U
7
Q
m
+tm
C
U
O
Q
R
r
C �+
O
�
U
r
01 En
t! C
� J
O
i C
C 'C
O O
U
Z
C
Q
Of
a
m
_a
a�
C
r--
CO
M N
E
M
m
00
CO
T CO
M O
N
c
(a
=
O
O
C
c
CD
C
a)
(1)
0
i
O
o
E
E(D
E
o
c
(6
M
U
U
C
U
M
O
M
O
N
O
(6
m
(6
fn
�
J
�www./
2
m
(6
U
C a-
0 d
Z Q

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Wells Creek #2 ( #92688) - Monitoring Year 3 (2013)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: n/a
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 35 months
Number of Reporting Years': 3
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or Delivery
Conservation Easement Option Signed
n/a
May 12, 2008
Conservation Easement Survey Plat Recorded
n/a
October 8, 2008
Permanent Conservation Easement Executed &
Recorded
n/a
December 31, 2008
Cattle Exclusion Fencing & Livestock Watering
System
n/a
December 2009
Existing Conditions Report
January 2010
March 2010
Final Design — Construction Plans
January 2010
April 2010
Containerized plant installations*
n/a
November 2010
Invasive Exotic Vegetation Treatments
January 2010
December 2010
Baseline Monitoring /As -built Baseline Report
(Year 0 - baseline)
May 2011
June 2011
Monitoring Year 1 Report
September 2011
September 2011
Monitoring Year 2 Report
September 2012
March 2013
Monitoring Year 3 Report
October 2013
November 2013
* Saururus cernuus and Lobelia cardinalis planted within UT3 wetland seep in May 2011.

Table 3. Project Contacts
Wells Creek #2 ( #92688) - Monitoring Year 3 (2013)
Designer Robert J. Goldstein & Associates
1221 Corporation Parkway, suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
Design POC - Gerald Pottern, Sean Doig, (919) 872 -1174
Farm BMPs Design Alamance County SWCD
Burlington NC
POC - Phil Ross, (336) 228 -1753
Planting / Invasives Contractor Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28262
POC - Karri Blackmon, (704) 841 -2841
Nursery Stock Suppliers Cure Nursery, 919 - 542 -6186
Parks Seed, 800 - 845 -3369
Coastal Plain Conservation Nursery, 252 - 482 -5707
Habitat And Restoration Plants (HARP), 704 - 841 -2841
Monitoring Firm Robert J. Goldstein & Associates
1221 Corporation Parkway, suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
Monitoring POC - Gerald Pottern, (919) 872 -1174

Table 4. Project Attributes
Wells Creek #2 -- EEP #92688
Project County
Alamance
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Carolina Slate Belt
Project River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project 14 digit)
3030002 - 050050
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
Cape Fear 03 -06 -04
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priority Report
WRC Hab Class Warm, Cool, Cold
Warm
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed during design p hase?
INo
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Preservation
Enhancement
Drainage area
377 acres
958 acres
Stream order
1
1
Restored length feet
n/a
n/a
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Intermittent /Perennial
Watershed type Rural, Urban, Developing etc.
Rural
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution (e.g.)
Residential
4
4
A -Row Crop
2
0
A -Livestock
57
21
Forested
28
73
Etc.
9
2
Watershed impervious cover %
2
2
NCDWQ AU /Index number
16 -28 -1
16 -28 -1
NCDWQ classification
C -NSW
C -NSW
303d listed?
No
No
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
No
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
n'a
n/a
Total acreage of easement
4.62
7.52
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
4.62
6.07
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
0
2.99 (including areas with
existing oversto
Ros en classification of pre-existing
n/a
n/a
Ros en classification of As -built
n/a
n/a
Valley type
n/a
n/a
Valley sloe
n/a
n'a
Valley side slope ranee. . 2 -3.%
n/a
n/a
Valley toe slope ranee. . 2 -3.%
n/a
n/a
Cowardin classification
n/a
n/a
Trout waters designation
n/a
n/a
Species of concern, endangered etc.? (Y/N)
N
N
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Colfax
Colfax
Depth
65
65
Cla %
19
19
K
0.17
0.17
T
4
4
Use N/A for items that may not apply. Use"-" for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown

Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2.1. -2.2
Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5.
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Figure 3.1 -3.8
Permanent Stream Photopoints
Figure 4.
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

N
L
Y
O1
c
0
C
O
co
W
w
tD
N
s
Y
m
U
N
3
C
N
E
Lo
N
d
N
Q
C
'd
w
m u
> Q
ui
d
N C
a m
�a
a
rd
o E ca
`
o
N
0
O
M m
o
0
0
0
0
a m
O
O
O
O
O
w u
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O Q
U
� C
�
a
d N
E
Q
U
O
C
d
O
o
O
o
O
O
O
o
O
0
E O
O
o
O
o
0
O Q
U
° U
O
d
a
U
c_ O
L
O
tl
U
N
c
N
O
C
`y
� r
H
�
O
U
n
E
m
y
c
0
m
O
O_
N
m
O
y
n
m
m
ti
C
0
0)
T
O
n
N
m
o
C
m
m
y
4 a
E c
O
O
O
O
O
Za
O
W
°
• C
O
ti
m
C
D
¢
N
C
O cr
/0
G
> .2
@
@
O
@
m
d L7
C
G
f0
C
y
U
0
N C)
0
m U
O
0
m U
Z
G
s
d
ms
d
N
m
d
7
N
c
W
>
V
E
U
jp
N
N
N
C O
@
N
@
m d
m
`n
0
C
O
E
0
N
)n
N
L_
O
_
C
N
O
M
-
E
N
@
0
>
m
ti
o
E
@
L
>
L
N
J
N
O
O
U
N
N
@
m
-2
>
N
cu
L
m
L
c
C
m
@
3
�
@
U
@
p
N
N
0
O
T
-
N
@
3
`)
`o
L
N
U
N
N
E
N
>
O
T
O '
00 N
C
Q
2
L CT
C
E
w
00
N c0
o
>
C E
O
_rn
>
O
N
N
N
d
m
Q
r
O
O
(�
y
N
°
U
E
a
o
Q
N
y
O
N
N
m
O
J
a)
Q
>
N
M
d
o E ca
`
o
N
0
O
o N V
o
0
LQ
W
d N
C
a y
o
0
E
0
0
O Q
U
� C
�
a
O
E
Q
U
O
o
Z d
C
O
�
C
�
C
> ._
d U
m
C
m
c
U
U d
U
° U
O
d
a
c_ O
L
O
tl
U
N
c
N
O
� r
H
�
CL
C
J
N
m
U
n
E
m
y
c
0
m
O
O_
N
m
O
y
n
m
m
ti
C
0
0)
T
O
n
N
m
o
C
m
m
y
m
�
C
N
m
0
0
N
0
0
N
c
C
Vo
C
c
o
O
W
°
• C
O
ti
m
O
N
m
D
¢
Q
nm
Q
°c
U
c
0
N
E
O
U
m
N
O
N
O
u
f0
?
w
C
Q
C
O
N
m
m
m
N
>
N
N
c
W
>
V
N
a N L 2-0 N
m N N a
3
3
>
mr
U c NQ)E
m o E QTY Ta E m
u 2 n c o"
c c
m N O N -_
LN 3 m N d m m
O N L o C E O m N N
m o - o c
_m � C .-
r 'a o .N. N O c N m N
U O J C N N
O N N N L Q O C
co a M oa) Y30 =_om
C m H �o 0o
N LN. 3mm wmmocoym
«
O N L C a) N m
O C
a m N N o 6-a
o m
,) « a
° o � `.0)
m L N C N tl)
E (D O Q L N
C N N N C 3 L
L o N C
m N m N C N E m O y co U
ID N y N, N N E >.ID m N
E O 2,-6 N N o> - 'y N
N o -a) Co n n
a a cJ Eaa m °a
W m U j -o fn m u-c C co
O m o T N -o a, -ca J E
U i6 ... E O U 3 V U
U o- m3LL -oy�mc
J N F `N 'O . - m o n o
y
0 o m E E c cD '- Q v c o
m o o o r a-
N O C (D.LN. aM.L.. C QTo
n a) L
3 _m ai« 0 0O o-o a�
m C N N O 5 O J y L
« >
q) 4-- o _T m N TM m 0> Y_
y N U m U o)- U D N N
-O (D m O Q Q U m m> O)
to C N N O Y m T C m«
a) y y.N a c m E N o
N N t/ N C N o 01'- O-
m m N a) S« C N U
m m f «m vo,-
nay
N 6 L .r C o 1/
U = m m
E C O L O> m
y
E _C N N -o o Y N .N J N
Z5 (D T .L. O T« EO .. N n O
com m�O'�oLL
T m m o c'n >= 3 o E
c �- maN w 3 v rn
m o m m 0 m m m o N
omc a
o
E
N Ym m.c �N »�moU
m U
m m E UC fa L L_ f/) - N C m N
co C m J
N m 3 N m�°n -o m o 30-3 m
U m to d N N m C« y n+co
w co m mm (D 'c uE«ami
C mr> oEoo,v'�Eo N
N N N N V '` J Q Q C m
E O '. N y '� N O C
N U N L m° 'O a) tN/) > N 01
am) i6 -- _r n2� oL° a1 3 T
N NE 3"oc(m oF-m3a
« �N gym )T a) o
m a) mcEaioo > «oom
a) o E) ma'cm . - aao - E-aE
E o E
o a) FD (D
to d �C N .L. o 0 .L.. d N O a) 0 U U
0 0 o N
�« N m .- O� 2 N-° «E m N
Eo �� m J_oOa�- >EaO�C«
n U
C C 3 T N L N m m> N
m � L O n:J L y O
r °- T -° y &P N N m> °) N C
. D oa c N o L n I _o C N U
o n N
�c WE `C) 'o I'D a)�OT)o1 W
m m o-0 O-NEd mmom>
m °- � � m E � a) Lu 75 n u
NO SON mwC _U to .Nm
a) U J J L O U T O N C m m
N N cl, O N C J
« L N m 0 m N N C n N w N
C� o m °-T N.L. O m y o d«
L C E L N O y o C U U N m a C
3 N vo 3 m o o m Y 3 n° N OC o
C h
o f amo o _� o 0 0 3 E a) N,
N N « U C m T o- o
v C T O j C m a o E
ao s m N c0 o 0 Q) oL 0 E U O a
N ) E m o a N-o .� N n C O Q (0
c 0 N c N >` N c m U N a) P m y
_m >. m N« m y m 1a N N y N
U C' O d U
«o U E >3 n� «Nm LOaun
a o) aa)) �L cu Co «aac>n� o
C C L c m > O m
E ) C J J a) N w a
n o u c u m N L N
JO m `m y o aC a
U N M

7
CO)
d
L
M
r
N
O
O
r
L
U
N
N
w
O
w
C
d
N
N
!0
N
a1
C
O
m
U)
C
Y
O
O
J
I
N
IL
IL
F
0
m
rn
0
L
U
w
m
w
O
c
d
E
d
IA
R
d
c
O
m
co
C
Y
O
O
J
I
N
CL
a

N
CO)
d
L
v.
N
O
O
r
L
U
N
3
�o
L
R
3
0
c
as
E
d
w
R
O
E
0
L
w
N
R
W
01
C
Y
O
O
J
a
a

vi
ri
d
L
3
u.

M
L
7
LL
M
r
N
O
O
C
d
L
d
3
_O
E
O
L
w
M
H
D
O.
7
C
Y
O
O
J
co
a
a
rn
0
cD
rn
o_
c
m
L
m
3
O
E
O
L
M
H
Q
3
01
c
Y
O
O
J
co
a
a

ui
6.
M
d
7
LL
01
O
t`O
r
OI
O_
M
F-
O
C
O
is
w
W
�o
m
r
tp
C
3
O
'O
O
C
Y
O
O
J
I
IL
IL
M
r
N
O
O
r

t0
cri
m
ii
g'
o,
o_
v
m
m
s
M
H
w
C
3
0
a
c
0
J
1
r
r
d
a

f`
M
d
3
W
o�
0
m
o�
o_
M
H
V
L
R
Y
m
4
IL)
N
d
O
O
V
C
d
3
C
O
V
I
a
a

06
ri
a�
L
iz
M
r
N
O
O
L
V
l9
d
C
O
Y
4)
N
d
a
D
i
CL
IL
M
r
N
O
O
L
V
l9
d
C
O
Y
N
d
a
T
it
IL
IL
0
M
O
O
L
V
R
G
d
w
R
d
CL
CL
IL

w
00
co
N
01
r+
V
C1
O
a`
M
O
Cl)
L
C
�L
O
CO
CN
C
*k
d
d
L
V
N
01
y
O
r
O
t
a
O
a.
c
O
r
R
G1
d
m
L
a�
LL
M
O
N
N
O
m
v
0
4
t
M
O
N
N
O
d
w
u
O
O
N
r
N
Q
Q
N
a

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. CVS Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. CVS Stem Counts, Total and Planted by Species, Plot and Year
e- Tables Raw CVS Vegetation Data Sheets

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Wells Creek #2 ( #92688)
Year 3 (2013)
Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Riparian Stream/ Unknown
Buffer Wetland Growth
Plot # Stems' Stem S2 Live Stakes Invasives Volunteers3 Total4 Form
0001 n/a 15 0 0 25 40 0
0002 n/a 12 0 0 35 47 0
Wetland /Stream Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Stream/ Success
Wetland Criteria
Plot # StemsZ Volunteers3 Total4 Met?
0001
607
1012
1619
Yes
0002
486
1416
1902
Yes
Project Avg
546
1214
1760
Yes
Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Riparian Success
Buffer Criteria
Plot # Stems' Met?
0001 n/a
0002 n/a
Project Avg n/a
Stem Class characteristics
IBuffer
Stems Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
2Stream/
Wetland
Stems Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes. No vines
3Volunteers Native woody stems. Not planted. No vines.
4Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl. exotics. Excl. vines.
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

M
d
'u
Cl
CL
C
co
0
a N
:M
Y
E
Ol
w L
N
f6
a
'O
C
f0
0
H
H
3
O
U
G!
r
V
n
a�
M
H
H
3
E
M
z
u
�O
a`
co
00
w
N
Q1
O
v
v
Gl
�O
a`
a
W
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0101010
O
O
O
O
-i
Ln
ri
ri
N
N
ri
lD
N
m
m
�--i
�-i
Ln
m
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Too
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ln
ri
o
M
c-I
c1
N
lD
M
m
c-I
Ln
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ri
m
2
h
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
M
r1
r1
N
LD
M
M
r1
Ln
N
m
I�
C
O
COL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
v
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Ln
r1
rl
m
.--I
Ln
r-I
N
M
LD
d'
Ln
d'
r1
Ln
r-4
r-1
ri
H
m
`,
N
rl
F
—
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
.1
O
N
(a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
ef\ 0
a
M
ri
r-4
�.D
M
T
-i
U')
Ln
O
YC
L
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
r1
00
J
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
0
0i
p
m
r1
r1
LD
M
v
ri
Lf)
-1
ri
m
00
a
Ln
M
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
O
ri
3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
00
N
O
C
M
N
LD
M
c-I
00
N
lD
N
Ln
M
ri
c-I
M
N
ri
r1
N
N
M
Q
H
N
o
O
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
rn
m
r,
N
—
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
.--i
00
�
M
r-I
ri
c-I
O
m
M
ri
M
N
ri
.-�
M
N
O
Ln
N
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a,
m
00
i
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
p
M
1-1
--�
r
--I
a
Ln
�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r�
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
N
LD
m
N
LD
Ln
r1
00
N
Ln
N
Ln
m
ri
ri
M
r1
ri
r1
N
N
M
M
c-i
N
rl
F
N
Ln
—
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
lD
IF
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
ry
O
M
M
r-1
r-1
r-1
L.n
M
M
ri
l
M
1-
"
ri
ni
O
Ln
a
o
O
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
m
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
r1
O
M
r1
r
Ln
M
M
ri
M
ri
-1
t-;
M
LD
CL
Ln
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
rl
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
O
00
r1
Ln
Ln
r1
Lfl
M
Cr)
N
H
ri
N
rNi
ri
o
F-
m
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
t\
tD
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ri
r1
O
ao
N
W
a
r-i
m
M
N
r1
r-i
O
V
Y
t0
N
J
O
O
O
O
N
01
W
c-I
r1
m
M
-i
f
00
;°
a
v
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
O
M
r•1
ri
m
N
N
lD
M
r-I
ri
e-i
r-1
N
m
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
u'f
O
O
O
rO
m
r1
r04
M
r1
r1
M
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Ln
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r1
W
O
C
m
N
m
ri
ri
ri
m
JIHE
N
uj
a)
u 0.
~
a)
°
v
a)
v
v
v
v
w
v
E
v
v
a,
v
a)
v
v
v
v
a)
a)
u: °, v
fa
L1
L
Ln
Ln
i)
�!
i1
a1
�1
H
v
w
w
V)
4)
�!
i)
�1
i1
f'-
�)
r"'
D
VI
v
v
t
N
Q
E N
6
E
E
N
00
�O
p
Z
O
T
7
�[
3
L
E
o
v
m
c
o
0
u
o°
Y
u
U
U
N
0
E
E
O
E
U
"�
]
L
i
Q
C
Q
T
i
u
aJ
E
Q
-O
-0
a
C
C
N
r0
C
=
aJ
E
U
E
Y
Y
C
E
�
a`
c
o
°
3
v
do
v°
u
u
Q
a)
ro
o
u
v
V
a/
U/
U
N
r0
E
Y
t
Y
Y
Y
t
O
Y
_�
a)
L
-°
rNa
��+
E
°OC_
E
•L
v
rVO
3
.°_
a'
E
E
a'
ra
cu
Q
E
-0
N
°U
m
00
-0
O
N
Y
.a
Q
-
N
O
Q-0
W
a)
Q
o
N
y
v
3
E
r0
r0
r0
°
`�
N
E
O
C
co
in
C
@
ra
>
U
_
_
'x
Z
U
r6
£•
N
O
•fl-
7
aJ
O
ro
C
E
M
L
=
O
L
c
O
yT,
�+
r0
rL
yam,,
ra
a+
O
f°
u
!�
O
(6
�O
R
>
a
a)
m
N
i
C
°
U
U
OL
v
'-
7
C
41
a)
�°
7
i
U
ra
>
0
Q
OD
>
O
+0+
in
a
>
=
EE
N
vii
an
.Q
ra
°U
O
O
3
r0
v>i
7
O CL
c6
rC
m
_@
EL T
G
C
C
ra
-O
ra
C
>
3
U
3
U
7
U
7
U
U
N
N
L
a
C
U
Q
L
L
=
O
°
O
3
U
m
ra
co
ro
a1
6
0
tla
C
O'
->-
T
a
O
L
3
3
7
:31
L
Q
Q
m
U
U
U
U
Lt
Lt
7
J
J
J
z
a
a
c7
CJ
CJ
C7
=1
D.
p
j

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VIVID) Datasheet
Plot 092688 -SD -0001
VMD Year (1 -5): 13 Date: laz / ocT-/ 2p
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 791407.026
(dec.deg.or m)
Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
/ /
Datum: NAD83 /W {{
Longitude or UTM -E: 1867889.853 I UTM Zone:n 17 l
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): 30
Date last planted:
Ne�v I riling date m /yy?
Chcck box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: ' -O, Y: I i ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for _,X and Y axis Y is 90 des to the right of X
Sep 2012 Data o 2013 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBII Re- Vigor- Damage* Notes
I Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m, lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
I
Viburnum dcntatum
O
P
1.4
4.0
46.0
❑
2
Alnus serrulata
Ot
P
4.1
3.3
53.0
❑
3
Quercus rubra
O
P
3.4
0.1
60.0
4
Nyssa sylvatica
®
P
7.1
1.9
99.0
❑
5
Nyssa sylvatica
O
P
7.9
0.2
80.0
[]
6
Platanus occidentalis
O
P
9.8
1.1
143.0
0.4 ❑
7
Viburnum dentalum
\P✓
P
9.9
4.3
48.0
❑
8
Lindera benzoin
O
P
12.0
2.0
82.0
❑
9
Alnus serrulata
O
P
12.8
4.3
96.0
Q
10
Quercus michauxii
®
P
14.4
2.0
135.0
DBH? E]
I I
Lindcra benzoin
O
P
15.6
0.5
77.0
O
12
Quercus rubra
O
P
15.3
4.2
110.0
DBH? ❑
13
Alnus serrulata
P
17.1
4.0
103.0
DBH? ❑
14
Nyssa sylvatica
0
P
18.0
0.2
96.0
❑
15
Viburnum dcntatum
P
18.9
2.8
41.0
16
Carpinus caroliniana
O
P
18.7
4.8
78.0
❑
®
,■
©_-
1
-tm,©_-
M-'XI©M
I I . 1
m-rm,
©®
'r.. l 0 -
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (nt) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*Notes by ID: 3•top broken olT
9 -top broken off
15-lop-broken
ti0U1tCf I r =Trap lani, L =Live stake B=H II and burla P =Porte Tu =Tubhn R =bare Root M= Mechanical) U= Unknown P. I
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =Fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the CVS -111iP Entry Tool vei. 23 I

map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (em) sprout
lNplanation of art -off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampline• *:
lei ht Cut- IT (All stems shorter than thisare ignored. if >10cm, explain why to the tight.): ❑ 10cm CJ 50cm ii 100cm u 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
±� ins � � �
•
�i�Vv1uS 0'1
--
—
—Required ifcttol7 '>10cmorsubsample ?100 %. 01
:2
*3
•4
N5
b
�A
)
117 Eom1WS2.vcr9.1
Map of stems on plot H92688 -SD -0001
Pa F" ( )" - --
X-axis: 31)" #stems, 16
N niup vize:
I LANCE
V il� Cpl (.)
VIA
Iq�h
NISI VIh
�1�pat LthL( t�wttG
10.01 Qtab X:s 11
D N,.e
�A �1� � 6dsse5
X: 10111 X; t
*SOURCE: Tr- Transplant. L--Uve stake. B =Ball and burlap, P= Potted, Tu= Tublina, R =bare Root, M= Mechanically, U= Unknown p.2
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, 'DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
"HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the Cv,S -Ia:P Entry Tool ver. 2 3 1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot E92688 -SD -0002 -
VIVID Year (1 -5): 1 3 Date: / -20131- I /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 790858.058 ! Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) -- - - - -- ! s°
Longitude or UTM -E: 1867733.181 1 UTM Zone: 1q.w
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg):
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Party: Role: Date last planted:
n, New lanting date m /yy? 0
HCheck box if plot was not
Plot Dimensions: X: 20 Y: 51 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis
iv reason uclow
is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2012 Data z 1 X01 3 TH[S YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source*
X Y Height DBII
Name fD
ID Species N I g
P char 0.1m O.lm lcm * 1 cm
is
Quercus michauxii
Q
P
0.2
1.5
187.0
0.8 ❑
20
Quercus velutina
Ql
P
7.2
4.2
110.0
DBH?
21
Lindera benzoin
O
P
7.2
2.4
23.0
22
Quercus michauxii
®
P
9.5
1.4
102.0
DBH?
23
Liriodendron tulipifcra
O
P
2.5
1.1
65.0
❑
24
Lindera benzoin
O
P
11.9
1.5
46.0
Q
25
Liriodendron tulipifeia
©
P
13.4
1.9
102.0
DBH?❑
26
Liriodendron tulipifera
(g�
P
17.0
1.0
143.0
0.5 ❑
27
Quercus siellata
h
P
18.6
1.9
160.0
0.8
28
Lindera benzoin
Q
P
16.7
2.3
64.0
0
29
Praxinus pennsylvunica
C
P
16.9
4.7
51.0
30
Lindera benzoin
©
P
10.8
4,5
50.0
0
119
Diospyros virginiana
Q
P
6.7
3.9
62.0
Height DBI1 Rc- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
. /
®'M,©_-
mml•,©_-
®-um_-
mw"N
mm�
OR-IN,©_
-'
mml•,©_-
FMMI•II©_-
mmm©_
M-INIM_
* z
mmuom
-mmn
©-'•,©_�
M-LEII®_
-I
# srems: 13 New Steins, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (ml I em* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*Notes by Ill: j20- confirm species may be vol?
121 -yr0: confirm I yr2: resprout
22 -top dead
24 -yr0: confinn yr2 resprout
28 -yr0: confinn yr I : herbaceous are outcompeting plant I yr2: leader died
29- leader died
30- leader died
SO R ( C E Tr =Trans Cant L--Live stake B=Ba11 and burls P= Potted, *I*u=Tubl inz R =bare Root -M= Mechanically, U= Unknown
;'VIGOR: 4 excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0em if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the Cvs -Iii:P E,uq, Too! vei 2.31

Plot (Confiniled):
1;92688- Sl)-0002
I &:p LOI L I)aUt €p
r [
THIS YEAR'S DATA
11) Species
map source X Y
ddh llcighl DBFI
(dlt Height
DBII Re: Vigor* D:uuape, Noles
lsS -- DB11
char (nn) (nt)
(111111) (cnt) (cm)
(nun) (Cm)
(cnt) Sprout
50 cm-
100 cm-
Suh-
1•xplanation ff 011t !I
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species xultsttmnling —i
d 111 Cud- {)ti'(All stuns shoner that thisare ignored. If >10an. explain why to the right,): 1:3 10km u , ( m I::i 10(j to (.1 137cm
SIiCsI)I,INGS
-- Hi?,I(',H'I'
CI.ASSC-S
SAPLINGS
— DJU
'1'1tl
lsS -- DB11
S xcies Name
m
Sub-
10 cm-
50 cm-
100 cm-
Suh-
=10
t
Seed
50 cln
100 em
137 cm
Sttpl
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
(,«Tile DBn)
a
",tetpaimd if eu-o11 &1 Will nr subsaanple, 111046. •I
•z
• 1 •4
N5
rG �� �s
��
�lg I umt ws�, Vel'9.1
•
•• •
••
•
Map of stems on plot G92688 -SI) -0002
I
• ;i �lr.'•S
i.1t 1
W
Lth�1
X.10111
X -axis: 345 ° b srcmn l3
........_........
Cr)Fr� K
��1) IVold (10
(irrt w
X: 1.311
*SOURCE: Tr_Transplant• L=Live stake, B =BalI and .burlap, P= paged, Tu =Tuublin R =bare_ltoot, M.= MechanicallyU= Unknown_._.-_.— ............. __ _........_.._...._....... _... ....... .•.....p .4..
"VIGOR: 4 =excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE'•: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSecis, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
ll unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, human TRAMpled, Site'1'oo WET, Site'roo DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSessed, VINI?
M= massing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*14EIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2,5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the rvsd :l :P himy rood ver. 23. [