20201347 Ver 2_Attachment L - Response to Agencies_20220805

k__‘
To:
CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte Regulatory Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Date: April 30, 2021
Subject: Response to Agency Comments (SAW-2021-00521, DWR # 20-1347)
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Dear Mr. Kichefski, Ms. Amschler, and Mr. Johnson,
Thank you for your emails requesting additional information and clarification regarding the Lower
Coddle Creek Interceptor Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 and 13 application and the Water Quality
Certification application. This letter is in response to your comments on the project.
NCDEQ Comments:
For wetlands:
- You have "construction disturbance" as Temporary — what does this mean?
Temporary Fill? Is this a separate area from the temporary clearing? And permanent
clearing?
- You have temporary and permanent clearing, that make sense.
- Are plantings proposed for the temporary impacts. I assume that is outside the
permanent easement.
There are three types of wetland impacts for this project: 1) permanent clearing impacts (forested
to herbaceous), 2) temporary clearing impacts (forested wetlands will be cleared for construction
and the reforested), and 3) temporary disturbance impacts. The temporary disturbance impacts
are related to the already herbaceous wetlands that will have temporary fill in them in the form of
timber mats for construction (i.e. no tree removal will occur within these areas).
Plantings are proposed for the areas where there will be temporary clearing,outside of the
permanent easement.
For streams:
- Construction disturbance — temporary - Fill — is this for the temporary culverts or
fords to cross the stream? 1700 of temporary fill. Ranging from 18 ft to 90 linear ft.
each impact area. Does this overlap with permanent "fill"/culverts?

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor April 30, 2021
Response to Agency Comments CWS Project No. 2019-0109
- If stream stabilization is associated with the stream/utility crossing. Proposed is
—3,000 ft of bank stabilization
- Culvert/fill crossings — you have 152 ft of permanent crossings. You use "fill" and
also "culvert"(culvert and/or ford?). Mitigation required???
The temporary fill associated with the streams includes dewatering devices, coffer dams, and
temporary bridgemats. The temporary disturbances do not overlap with the permanent impacts.
In regards to permanent crossings, there are 5 at grade crossings at 12 If each (60 If) that are
listed as "fill" and 4 permanent culvert crossings at 20 ft each (80 If) totalling 140 If of permanent
impacts, therefore mitigation was not proposed. During Kryta Stygar's initial review of the project
she determined that she would not be requiring stream mitigation since the proposed stream
impacts were below the current mitigation threshold.
Bank stabilization:
- Given 3,000 ft of proposed bank work, our first preference is soft stabilization, not
riprapping the channel. EC -13, EC 15, EC -11 might be good candidates to look at.
Also, rather than laying on fabric, why isn't it feasible to embed into the bank and tie
to stream elevation at toe of slope.
- Protection of the line should not require maximum hardening, but minimal hardening
in the area of greatest concern. The point the pipe enters the bank. Given the size of
coddle creek,
- I would think class I would be undersized for large flows.
- Are some of these values for two side stabilization vs one sided stabilization
- I put in a couple of pages above that might be good indicators to go take a look. I
feel the proposed stabilization is excessive. How much impact is associated at the
sewer line crossing and how much just stabilization.
A site visit involving NCDEQ, CWS, and the engineers from Gavel and Dorn was conducted on
April 14, 2021. During the site visit it was determined that the construction corridor would be
limited to 40 If and that bank stabilization would occur only within those 40 If of disturbed area.
The stabilization occurs on both sides of the stream and varies between rip rap and boulder toe.
A hard copy of the revised impact table has been attached as Attachment E.
USACE Comments:
1. 'The PCN requests the use of two different Nationwide permits (NWP 12 & NWP 13)
to construct a sewer line replacement along Coddle Creek. Currently NWP 12 which
was re -verified as of March 15, 2021 is now specifically for "Oil and Natural Gas
Pipelines" this no longer fits the description of what your applicant proposes to do.
The more appropriate NWP is NWP 58. I wanted to be sure that your applicant
understands that when there is a combination NWP 13 & NWP 58 with different
expiration dates [ NWP 58- March 15, 2026 and NWP 13- March 18, 2022] that this
would mean the expiration date for work to be done is March 18, 2022. : Please let
USACE know if your applicant is willing to work with this timeline.
2. The PCN and submitted documents indicate that, "No Jurisdictional Determination"
is requested at this time. While the delineation does not need to be verified by the
Corps, a delineation report is still required. Please include the Aquatic Resource
Page 2 of 4

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor April 30, 2021
Response to Agency Comments CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Table, datasheets, photographs, maps/figures in order for the Corps to process this
application. (see attached ORM_Upload sheet)
3. Please clarify what the project purpose is. You have indicated that this project is for
a sewer line replacement, but it appears that the applicant proposes to build a new
one, and leave the relic one in place. What is the exact purpose of this project?
4. The Corps will require mitigation for the wetland conversion impacts. The impacts as
proposed are currently (0.34 acres of wetland) at a 1:1 ratio. The stream impacts that
have been proposed at (140 LF or 0.11 acres) is below the automatic mitigation
threshold and the Corps will not charge mitigation for these impacts. I want to point
out : Please provide the proposed restoration plan
** General Condition 11: Temporary Access Fills. The permittee shall submit a
PCN to the District Engineer prior to commencing the activity if the activity will
involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into more than 0.1 acres of wetlands
or 0.02 acres of stream channel for the construction of temporary access fills and/or
temporary road crossings. The PCN must include a restoration plan that thoroughly
describes how all temporary fills will be removed, how pre -project conditions will be
restored. and include a timetable for all restoration activities. (In you PCN you have
described Temporary fills for wetlands of 0.254 acres and 1726 LF of Stream
Temporary fills (open -cut, de -watering) Please provide the restoration plan, and
timetable for meeting this general condition of the permit.
1. The client would like to proceed with applying for the NWP58 and the NWP13. The
work is expected to begin prior to the expiration of the NWP13 and if the work is not
completed by March 18, 2022, then the client would ask for the one year extension
to complete construction.
2. I have attached a copy of our Wetland Delineation report, as well as the completed
ORM_Upload sheet with this letter.
3. The purpose of this project is to increase sewer capacity to this area. The existing
sewer line will be left in place and remain active, and the new sewer line will be
installed parallel to the existing line.
4. A copy of the stream bank and wetland restoration plan has been attached with this
letter. All disturbed wetland areas will be returned to original grade and seeded with
a native seed mix within 90 days of completion of the project. All stream areas
disturbed by the work shall be re -graded to leave the area in a smooth condition,
sloped for drainage and stabilized.
Page 3 of 4

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Response to Agency Comments
April 30, 2021
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Please do not hesitate to contact Megan Bollero at 757-576-6433 or [e-mail] should
you have any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
R&raO
Megan Bollero, WPIT
Project Scientist
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Attachments: Attachment A: Original comments from the USACE and NCDEQ
Attachment B: Wetland Delineation Report
Attachment C: ORM_Upload Sheet
Attachment D: Wetland and Stream Restoration Plan
Attachment E: Revised Impact Table
Page 4 of 4

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor April 30, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Attachment A:
Comments From Agencies

4/22/2021 Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. Mail - Fwd: Lower Coddle Creek Sewer, DWR: 20-1347
Ilk Gmai
Fwd: Lower Coddle Creek Sewer, DWR: 20-1347
8 messages
Megan Bollero <[e-mail]>
Aliisa Harjuniemi <[e-mail]> Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:34 PM
To: Megan Bollero <[e-mail]>, "Johnson, Alan" <[e-mail]>
Alan,
I have forwarded this to Megan. She is the project manager for this project.
Thanks,
Aliisa
Forwarded message
From: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:33 PM
Subject: Lower Coddle Creek Sewer, DWR: 20-1347
To: Aliisa Harjuniemi ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>, Stygar, KRYSTYNKA B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Krystynka. [e-mail]>
Krysta, this is for Cabarrus, so pass along to whoever is taking over the county.
Thanks, Be well
Alissa,
For wetlands:
- -You have "construction disturbance" as Temporary — what does this mean?
Temporary Fill? Is this a separate area from the temporary clearing? And permanent
clearing?
- -You have temporary and permanent clearing, that make sense.
- - Are plantings proposed for the temporary impacts. I assume that is outside the
permanent easement.
For streams:
Construction disturbance — temporary - Fill — is this for the temporary culverts or
fords to cross the stream? 1700 of temporary fill. Ranging from 18 ft to 90 linear ft.
each impact area. Does this overlap with permanent "fill"/culverts?
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=2de3f0327d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1695324368342845194&simpl=msg-f%3A16953243683... 1/9

4/22/2021 Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. Mail - Fwd: Lower Coddle Creek Sewer, DWR: 20-1347
If stream stabilization is associated with the stream/utility crossing. Proposed is
—3,000 ft of bank stabilization
Culvert/fill crossings — you have 152 ft of permanent crossings. You use "fill"
and also "culvert"(culvert and/or ford?). Mitigation required???
Bank stabilization:
Given 3,000 ft of proposed bank work, our first preference is soft stabilization, not
riprapping the channel. EC -13, EC 15, EC -11 might be good candidates to look
at. Also, rather than laying on fabric, why isn't it feasible to embed into the bank
and tie to stream elevation at toe of slope.
Protection of the line should not require maximum hardening, but minimal hardening
in the area of greatest concern. The point the pipe enters the bank. Given the size
of coddle creek,
I would think class I would be undersized for large flows.
Are some of these values for two side stabilization vs one sided stabilization
I put in a couple of pages above that might be good indicators to go take a look. I
feel the proposed stabilization is excessive. How much impact is associated at the
sewer line crossing and how much just stabilization.
Thanks
Alan
DWR
Division of Water Resources
https://mai I.goog le. corn/mai I/u/0?i k=2de3f0327d&view=pt&search=al I&permth id=th read-f%3A1695324368342845194&si mpl=msg-f%3A16953243683... 2/9

4/22/2021 Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. Mail - Fwd: SAW-2021-00521: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
114 Gmai
Fwd: SAW-2021-00521: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
2 messages
Megan Bollero <[e-mail]>
Aliisa Harjuniemi <[e-mail]> Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:24 AM
To: Megan Bollero <[e-mail]>
Forwarded message
From: Stygar, KRYSTYNKA B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:19 AM
Subject: SAW-2021-00521: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
To: Aliisa Harjuniemi <[e-mail]>
Cc: Amschler, Crystal C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>, Kichefski, Steven L CIV
USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Aliisa,
On March 11, 2021, we received the Pre -Construction Notification you submitted on behalf of the Town of Concord (Water
and Sewer authority) on properties located in Cabarrus County, North Carolina. I have completed my initial review of the
report and I have determined that it is incomplete. The following information is necessary before I will issue a
determination:
A. 'The PCN requests the use of two different Nationwide permits (NWP 12 & NWP 13) to construct a sewer line
replacement along Coddle Creek. Currently NWP 12 which was re -verified as of March 15, 2021 is now specifically
for "Oil and Natural Gas Pipelines" this no longer fits the description of what your applicant proposes to do. The
more appropriate NWP is NWP 58. I wanted to be sure that your applicant understands that when there is a
combination NWP 13 & NWP 58 with different expiration dates [ NWP 58- March 15, 2026 and NWP 13- March 18,
2022] that this would mean the expiration date for work to be done is March 18, 2022.: Please let USACE know if
your applicant is willing to work with this timeline.
B. The PCN and submitted documents indicate that, "No Jurisdictional Determination" is requested at this time. While
the delineation does not need to be verified by the Corps, a delineation report is still required. Please include the
Aquatic Resource Table, datasheets, photographs, maps/figures in order for the Corps to process this application.
(see attached ORM_Upload sheet)
C. Please clarify what the project purpose is. You have indicated that this project is for a sewer line replacement, but it
appears that the applicant proposes to build a new one, and leave the relic one in place. What is the exact purpose
of this project?
D. The Corps will require mitigation for the wetland conversion impacts. The impacts as proposed are currently (0.34
acres of wetland) at a 1:1 ratio. The stream impacts that have been proposed at (140 LF or 0.11 acres) is below
the automatic mitigation threshold and the Corps will not charge mitigation for these impacts. I want to point out :
Please provide the proposed restoration plan
a. ** General Condition 11: Temporary Access Fills. The permittee shall submit a PCN to the District Engineer
prior to commencing the activity if the activity will involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into more
than 0.1 acres of wetlands or 0.02 acres of stream channel for the construction of temporary access fills and/or
temporary road crossings. The PCN must include a restoration plan that thoroughly describes how all
temporary fills will be removed, how pre -project conditions will be restored, and include a timetable for
all restoration activities. (In you PCN you have described Temporary fills for wetlands of 0.254 acres and
1726 LF of Stream Temporary fills (open -cut, de -watering) Please provide the restoration plan, and timetable
for meeting this general condition of the permit.
Please Note:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=2de3f0327d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1696841226948222743&simpl=msg-f%3A16968412269... 1/3

4/22/2021 Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. Mail - Fwd: SAW-2021-00521: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
1. NWPs do not obviate the need to obtain other federal, state, or local permits, approvals, or authorizations required
by law.
2. I will be on Maternity Leave from April 14, 2021- July 19, 2021. I have CC'd the potential Corps PM that may take-
over this project in my absence.
Regards,
Krysta
Krystynka B. Stygar
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Field Office
Office : [phone]
Mobile : [phone]
We at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch are committed to improving service to our customers. We
would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Project Manager
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 E. Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Direct: 980-259-1222
Office: 704-527-1177
www.cws-inc.net
2 attachments
ORM_Upload_Sheet_Consolidated_
- 270K
ORM_Upload_Sheet_Consolidated_
- 270K
Rapanos_20210312.xlsm
NWPR_20210312.xlsm
Aliisa Harjuniemi <[e-mail]> Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:26 AM
To: "Stygar, KRYSTYNKA B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)"<[e-mail]>, Megan Bollero
<[e-mail]>
https://mai I.goog le. corn/mai I/u/0?i k=2de3f0327d&view=pt&search=al I&permth id=th read-f%3A1696841226948222743&si mpl=msg-f%3A16968412269... 2/3

4/22/2021 Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. Mail - Fwd: SAW-2021-00521: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Cc: "Amschler, Crystal C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)" <[e-mail]>, "Kichefski, Steven L CIV
USARMY CESAW (USA)" <[e-mail]>
All,
I have forwarded this to Megan (cc:d) here. She is the primary contact for this project.
Thanks,
Aliisa
[Quoted text hidden]
https://mai I.goog le. corn/mai I/u/0?i k=2de3f0327d&view=pt&search=al I&permth id=th read-f%3A1696841226948222743&si mpl=msg-f%3A16968412269... 3/3

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor April 30, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Attachment B:
Wetland Delineation Report

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
June 10, 2020
Mark Lomax
WSACC
232 Davidson Highway
Concord, NC 28027
Subject:
Dear Mr. Lomax,
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project limits is approximately 30,000-foot long, by
60-75-foot wide corridor and is approximately 55 acres in extent. The corridor extends from
Coddle Creek Drive SW, southeastward to Rocky River Road in Cabarrus County, North
Carolina (Figure 1). WSACC has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to
delineate the extent of jurisdictional features within the project area.
Street Address of Project: Coddle Creek Drive SW, southeastward to Rocky River Road in
Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
Waterway: Coddle Creek
Basin: Yadkin Pee -Dee (HUC1 03040105)
City: Cabarrus County
County: Cabarrus
Tax Parcel No(s): Encompasses multiple Cabarrus County tax parcels
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.346003°,-80.61756°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Harrisburg and Concord SE, North Carolina (2019)
Current Land Use
The project area consists of undeveloped forest, a maintained sewer line right-of-way, a
maintained powerline right-of-way, gravel roads, and maintained lawns. On -site elevations
range from 520-600 feet above mean sea level (Figure 2). Land cover within the project area
consists of deciduous forest, mixed forest, herbaceous areas, woody wetlands, and emergent
wetlands (Figure 3)2.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation
Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County3 (Figure 4) and the NRCS
"HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
2 MLRC. National Land Cover Database, 2011. https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcdll_leg.php
3 United States Department of Agriculture, 2019. Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, North Carolina. Accessed at
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HornePage.htni
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 7

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
June 10, 2020
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Published Soil Survey for Cabarrus County4 (Figure 5), on -site soils consist of 10 different soil
types (Table 1). Of the on -site soils, Armenia loam (ArA), Chewacla sandy loam (ChA), Iredell
loam (IdA), and Wehadkee loam (WeA) are listed on the Web Soil Survey as containing hydric
inclusions.
Table 1. Summary of On -Site Soils
Soil Unit Name and Description
Hydric
Coverage (%)
ChA
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
59
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
6
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
0.7
IdA
Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Yes
5.8
MeB
Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
9.9
MeD
Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
3.3
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes
No
1.2
PoD
Poindexter loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
2.3
PoF
Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
No
1
WeA
Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
10.8
Total Coverage:
100%
National Wetlands Inventory
Wetlands are an important source of biodiversity and provide a multitude of ecological services.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a
program that provides wetland data and analysis to the public. A review of the NWI GIS layer
depicts potential freshwater forested/shrub wetlands and riverine systems throughout the project
limits and an emergent wetland in the north -central portion of the project limits (Figure 6).
FEMA National Flood Hazard Map
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer was reviewed for the project area (FEMA Panels
3710550900K, 3710551900K, 3710551800K, 3710552800K, and 3710552700K). Various
sections of the project area are located within the Regulatory Floodway Zones, 1 % Annual
Chance Flood Hazard, and 2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zones (Figure 7).
Jurisdictional Delineation
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
define wetlands as: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions."' The USACE
uses three parameters to identify jurisdictional wetlands. These parameters are as follows: 1)
hydrophytic vegetation, 2) wetland hydrology, and 3) hydric soils. Except in certain atypical
situations, all three parameters must be present in order for an area to be determined to be a
jurisdictional wetland.
4 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1988. Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, North
Carolina.
5 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Page 2 of 7

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor June 10, 2020
Jurisdictional Delineation Report CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Jurisdictional wetlands were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and mapped with a
sub -foot Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the (USACE) Routine On -Site Determination Method.
This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Delineation Manual,6 the 2007 USACE
Jurisdictional Form Instructional Guidebook,' with further technical guidance from the 2012
Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement.8 Data representative of on -site
non -jurisdictional upland areas were collected and reported using Wetland Determination Data
Forms (DP; Attachment A).
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified (perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral) according
to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) guidance based on
biological, hydrological, and physical characteristics. These classifications include sampling
with a D-shaped dip net, collecting photographic documentation, and defining approximate
breakpoints (location at which stream channel changes classification) within each on -site stream
channel. NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms representative of on -site stream channels were
used to document stream conditions (SCP; Attachment B). A stream classification form is
typically not prepared for perennial streams that are mapped and named on the USGS
Topographic Map.
Representative photographs were taken of on -site jurisdictional features and existing site
conditions (Attachment C). Locations of mapped wetlands and other waters, stream
classification points, Wetland Determination Data Forms, and representative photographs are
depicted in Figures 8-8E.
Results
On February 21, 25, 26, 28, March 2, 4, 9, April 28 and 29, 2020, Carolina Wetland Services,
Inc. (CWS) scientists Megan Bollero, WPIT9, Amie Hoy, WPIT, Julia McGuire, Staff Scientist II,
and Ian Dunning, Staff Scientist II, delineated on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including
wetlands. Based on the results of this field investigation, there are 32 jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. located within the project boundary totalling approximately 1.99 acres, including 2,578 feet
of jurisdictional stream channel (Figures 8-8E). These waters consist of 14 jurisdictional
wetlands (Wetlands AA, BB, BAA, CC-JJ, LL-NN), and 17 jurisdictional stream channels
(Streams A-G, I-N, P-R, and BB). The potentially jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are
summarized in Table 2.
6 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating
Procedures for conducting an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD.
USACE Headquarters, Washington, DC.
8 US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern v
Mountains and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
8 Wetland Professional in Training, The Society of Wetland Scientists Professional Certification Program
Page 3 of 7

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
June 10, 2020
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Table 2. Summary of On -Site Potential Waters of the U.S
Jurisdictional
Wetland
Cowardin Classification,o
Photograph(s)
Linear Feet
(If)
Acerage
(ac.)
Wetland AA
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
1
N/A
0.01
Palustrine Forested Wetland
2
N/A
0.04
Wetland BB
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
3
N/A
0.02
Palustrine Forested Wetland
4
N/A
0.08
Wetland BAA
Palustrine Forested Wetland
5
N/A
0.001
Wetland CC
Palustrine Forested Wetland
6
N/A
0.02
Wetland DD
Palustrine Forested Wetland
7
N/A
0.002
Wetland EE
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
8
N/A
0.03
Palustrine Forested Wetland
9
N/A
0.25
Wetland FF
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
10
N/A
0.01
Wetland GG
Palustrine Forested Wetland
11
N/A
0.01
Wetland HH
Palustrine Forested Wetland
12
N/A
0.04
Wetland II
Palustrine Forested Wetland
13
N/A
0.01
Wetland JJ
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
14
N/A
0.01
Palustrine Forested Wetland
15
N/A
0.004
Wetland LL
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
16
N/A
0.01
Palustrine Forested Wetland
17
N/A
0.003
Wetland MM
Palustrine Forested Wetland
18
N/A
0.02
Wetland NN
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
19
N/A
0.03
Wetland Total:
N/A
0.60 ac.
Jurisdictional
Stream
Jurisdiction
NCDEQ Stream
Classification
Score
Photograph(s)
Linear Feet
( I
Acreage
ac.
( )
NCDEQ Flow
Classification"
Stream A
Perennial
31
20
35
0.002
Stream B
(Coddle Creek)
Perennial
N/A*
21
1,394
1.28
Stream C
Perennial
31.5
22
128
0.01
Stream D
Intermittent
22
23
71
0.004
Stream E
Perennial
30.5
24
179
0.02
Stream F
Perennial
30
25
34
0.002
Stream G
Intermittent
24
26
49
0.003
Stream I
Intermittent
27
27
86
0.01
Stream J
Perennial
30.5
28
121
0.01
Stream K
Intermittent
19
29
50
0.001
Stream L
Intermittent
19.25
30
50
0.003
Stream M
Intermittent
19
31
82
0.01
Stream N
Perennial
31.5
32
74
0.01
Stream P
Perennial
33.5
33
76
0.01
Stream Q
Intermittent
21
34
51
0.002
10 Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979.
" NC DEQ. 2017. Wetlands and Streams - Frequently Asked Questions.
https://deq. nc. gov/about/d ivisions/water-resources/water-resou rces-perm its/wastewater-branch/401-wetlands-buffer-permitting/wa
ter-resources-faq. Accessed February 20, 2020.
Page 4 of 7

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
June 10, 2020
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Stream R
Intermittent
29
35
68
0.01
Stream BB
Perennial
30
36
30
0.002
Stream Total:
2,578 If
1.39 ac.
Total Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.:
2,578 If
1.99 ac.
* Stream is mapped and named on the USGS Topographic map, so a stream classification form was not collected
Jurisdictional Wetlands
14 jurisdictional wetlands (Wetlands AA, BB, BBB, CC-JJ, LL-NN) were delineated within the
project area (Figures 8-8E).
Wetlands BAA, CC, DD, GG, HH, II, and MM are palustrine forested wetlands located
throughout the entirety of the project limits. The forested wetlands are dominated by willow oak
(Quercus phellos), common hackberry (Celtis occidentialis), and sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua) in the tree stratum, and shallow sedge (Carex lurida) and soft rush (Juncus effusus)
in the herbaceous layer (Photographs 5, 6, 7, 11-13, and 18; DP3 and DP7).
Wetlands FF, and NN, are palustrine emergent wetlands located throughout the entirety of the
project limits. These emergent wetlands are dominated by boxelder maple (Acer negundo) in
the tree canopy, and soft rush and shallow sedge in the herbaceous layer (Photographs 10 and
29; DP6 and DP8).
Wetlands AA, BB, EE, JJ, and LL are both palustrine emergent and forested wetland. The
emergent wetland areas are dominated by shallow sedge, and giant cane (Arundinaria
gigantea) (Photographs 1, 3, 8, 14 and 16; DP2, DP4, and DP8). The forested wetland areas
are dominated by willow oak, common hackberry in the tree canopy, willow oak and green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) in the sapling/shrub stratum, and shallow sedge in the herbaceous
layer (Photographs 2, 4, 9, 15 and 17; DP1 and DP5).
Jurisdictional Streams
Eight intermittent streams (Streams D, G, I, K-M, Q, and R), and nine perennial streams
(Streams A, B, C, E, F, J, N, P, and BB) were delineated within the project area (Figures 8-8E).
Stream B (Coddle Creek) first enters the site at the northern portion of the project limits. At this
location, it has approximately 100 feet of on -site flow before exiting the project limits. Coddle
Creek continues to flow near the project limits for the entirety of the site, intersecting the project
limits at various locations for a total of 1,394 linear feet of flow (Photograph 21). Since Stream
B is a named, perennial stream depicted on the USGS map, an NCDEQ Stream Classification
Form was not collected.
The other eight perennial streams (Streams A, C, E, F, J, N, P, and BB) either have a known,
on -site confluence with Stream B or have an assumed, off -site confluence with Stream B.
These perennial streams occur throughout the project limits and have varying lengths and flow
directions. Each perennial stream exhibits stream characteristics typical of year-round flow
including moderate to strong baseflow, soil -based evidence of a high water table, and a lack of
fibrous roots or rooted upland plants in the streambed (Photographs 20-22, 24, 25, 28, 32-33,
and 36; SCP1, SCP2, SCP4, SCPS, SCP8, SCP12, SCP13, and SCP16).
Page 5 of 7

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor June 10, 2020
Jurisdictional Delineation Report CWS Project No. 2019-0109
All eight intermittent streams (Streams D, G, I, K-M, Q, and R) either have a known, on -site
confluence with Stream B or have an assumed, off -site confluence with Stream B. Intermittent
streams occur throughout the project limits and have varying lengths and flow directions. Each
intermittent stream exhibits stream characteristics typical of seasonal flow including moderate to
weak in -channel structure, soil -based evidence of a high water table, and moderate to weak
sinuosity along the thalweg (Photographs 23, 26, 27, 29-31, 34 and 35; SCP3, SCP6, SCP7,
SCP19-11, SCP14 and SCP15).
Non -Jurisdictional Upland Areas
No additional waters of the US were delineated within the project area. Wetland Determination
Data Forms representative of upland areas were collected throughout the project area (DP9-19;
Photographs 37-47).
Page 6 of 7

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor June 10, 2020
Jurisdictional Delineation Report CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Recommendations
CWS recommends submitting the results of this delineation to the USACE for verification.
Wetlands and other waters are present on the site, which are regulated by the USACE and/or
NCDWR. The jurisdictional delineation provided by CWS represents our best professional
judgment regarding the boundaries of on -site wetlands, streams, and other water features that
can be used for preliminary project planning. However, until a Jurisdictional Determination (JD)
is issued by a regulatory agency (USACE), the delineation can only be considered preliminary
and is not an official governmental approval. CWS recommends that before any construction or
other earth disturbance activities occur on site, a formal JD should be obtained.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Aliisa Harjuniemi at 980-259-1222 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Ir ail.
Megan Bollero, WPIT
Project Scientist
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Figure 4: USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County
Figure 5: USDA-NRCS Published Soil Survey of Cabarrus County
Figure 6: National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7: FEMA National Flood Hazard Map
Figure 8: Overview of Jurisdictional Boundaries
Figures 8A-8E: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Attachment A: USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP1-DP19)
Attachment B: NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP16)
Attachment C: Photopage (Photographs 1-47)
Page 7 of 7

' -r•141r1[a
Coddle Creek Drive SW
Qwvris
0
oc Charlotte
krb to r
Speedway
i 'kb
I '�o
1 41Yp
1 J-1mrIisb
ty_ city- Blvd . .
,
R�•
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, 2020.
■ - r
mac
Frank
Lrske Park
Cons❑
0
s�.
S,S
,0Q
P
1 W arran C Cos" an
Legend
Project Limits (55 ac.)
5,000 2,500
0
cha
5,000 Feet
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 5,000 feet
7/5/2020
CWS PROJECT NO:
2019-0109
7 S
DRAWN BY:
ALH
COORDINATES:
35.346003, -80.61756
CHECKED BY:
AVH
CAR❑ LI NA
WETLAND SERVICES
Vicinity Map
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
FIGURE NO.
1
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consul ing Projects\2019-0109 Lower Coddle Creek\JD\ArcGIS\Revised 7.5.2020\Figurel_Vicinity.mxd

REFERENCE. uses Fs MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES HARRISBURG AND CONCORD SE, NC (2019) .
e
Legend
Project Limits (55 ac.)
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
JJ—
th
FE
TI
�z
USGS Topographic Map
FIGURE NO

LIPPq�,LgNEiE
IVIELIS AgE3
E ioE,,1'L° GE'0q:
uoeoomo om wveuiEPuEAu dvE HHUS GUMI VV bI LIEPA ImEI,L IImmm.
AN,
Dalnua
r,
1 it
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
— Roads
Tax Parcels
1,600 800 0 1,600 Feet

E1
EGO
PoD
MEI
Pad
MeB
EnD
MeD
Description
towiAl r
eDIdA
WHEATIDR SW
JUANITA DR SW
ROCKY RIVER PL
MUM
MENUr
mME=
®'
0®
mMI=
::
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes
Poindexter loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Total Coverage
WAW
Coverage (%)
tHENI, USLAN12I,SVurd5oILkoSGUM IV,No,nNIrn21»yr>,K1,kooNnbISWVHAS) PkwInrndv koSW,o IvbI5nEPAHIMENI, E,d,tI,.
al ' au
a
GREEN ST
i
CuB2
ROBIN LN
CcB2 CcD2C
ChA
ChA
CuD2
CuB2
CoB
W W
CoD
IdB
MeB CuB2
, of W Me
CUD2paF
Po
eD
PaF
Co: ChA
MeD
En
Cu:2
C,P A
GPo C.: Pa
CuD2
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
— Roads
1 �+ 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
�► a I
USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County

kW
i•
tiMFt� a
Shc Unit Name and Description
EGO
LIU
PoD
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slcpes
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes
Poindexter loam, 8 to 15 percent slcpes
Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
SZE
REFERENCE USDA-NRC S PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY OF ...RR. COUNTY, NC , SHEETS 5 AND 6, DATED 1988
N -v•
-
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
zy
an
FIGURE NO
5

LEATIHERWOOD`L`
MORRIS
Z �o
h CRIMSON OAK
oo
sW
d S'Y's�0 S� e
�G0 '
HEAT DR SW
h Q
S S
m G
JUANITA DR SW
emN, ew,KoeI CIF, DAIAPHI, DELI oUmo wvEIR(S) FISH AND
BV CABARRus COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2020�
col lvT `
MELISSA OR
ERSIDE.o
v
OlEN100V v...
ROBERTAR�ND��
CREEK
HO SHOUSER
MARS ALL DR
i
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
— Roads
National Wetlands Inventory
® Freshwater Emergent Wetland
- Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
Q
<3
J,r,
FIGURE NO
6
.M1arad drive,consulting Team Drrve21,19 2019 Consulting Projects21:119,109 Lower Coddle Craek,IDAreGlalievisad 5.21:121:1Tigur

PANELi
it 4nM'E)
STALLINGS
BRIDGE
WHEAT
•�/
°O
05506 6,\-°
51900K
61201
SHAMR®.
PANEL
3710551700K
11 /16/20118
MULBERRY RD
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED 2020. BACKGROUND
GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY CABARRUS COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2020.
FEMA NATIONAL FLOOD HAZARD LAYER PROVIDED BY FEMA, DATED 2018.
co
Qc
CREEK
DILEEN
J AI
Legend
Project Limits (55 ac.)
Roads
Flood Hazard Zones
Zone Type
1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodway
Special Floodway
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
VIFuture Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
FIFA Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
111101 later' !IL1
3,000 1,500
0
3,000 Feet
IMO
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 3,000 feet
7/6/2020
CWS PROJECT NO:
2019-0109
DRAWN BY:
ALH
COORDINATES:
35.346003, -80.617560
CHECKED BY:
AVH
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
FIGURE NO.
FEMA National Flood Hazard Map
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
7
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive \2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0109 Lower Coddle Creek\JD\ArcGIS\Revised 7.5.2020\Figure7_FEMA.mxd

LLA DR D
SON DR DR
HEDGEMORE CT CT
ODSIDE DR D
LLEL DR DR n
LOS
V KE DR sw
' ah
tl ERSIDE DR DR �O
RertHEN, Hm,KHR omHbmwveAS) vRwiHm Hv cALwRRoS GUM I v em DEP. IMEN I, oNi m2
a 9 APRIL28 AND 292 H0Ju TIONAL FEATURES HA, NOT BEENBY THE USACE
- ' f 4 1 1
MA ASSASDRDR
MARSH
VER FOX DR DR
ED FOXI
DILEEN DR DR 5
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
- - - Intermittent Stream
— Perennial Stream
® Emergent VVetland
DTI Forested VVetland
Coddle Creek
Culvert
— Roads
2,000 1 000 0 2,000 Feet
r
i
FIGURE NO
0
GIS...Revs. 520.FigureB 0
2
Team Drive 20192019 Co

I
1 inch = 50 feet
Perennial Stream A
35 If
Perennial Stream B
(Coddle Creek)
1,372 If
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
— Perennial Stream
Coddle Creek
® Emergent VVetland
Forested VVetland
- - - Matchline
— Roads
SDP Data Point
.scP Stream Classification Point
Indicates Flow
N Photo Location and Direction
Wetland AA
Emergent: 0.01 acre
Forested: 0.04 acre
Her EHEN, e41,U1,121JUrvU bIS wvEH)5) PFwiUEU ev U/.wHHUS GUM I v bm UEPAH I Mery I, UA EU zuzu
m =amiry inrmw:1c NU
4,9,...,1,1E8A020. JURISDICTION, FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN vERiFiEo av iFIEUSACE
Or
Wetland BAA
Forested: 0.001 acre
inch = 50 feet ann s
\I
1 inch = 25 feet)
Perennial Stream C
128 If
CgRRIAI
Wetland BB
Emergent: 0.02 acre
Forested: 0.08 acre
.,�.,�
ASCP2
1 inch = 50 feet
1 1 = 50 feet
400 200 0 400 Feet
r / r
FIGURE NO
Q
Iting Projec.2019-0109 Lower Coddle Craek,DAreGlalievisad 52020Tigure

Perennial Stream E
130 If
Perennial Stream BB
30 If
1SCP16
1 inch = 25 feet
Legend
Project Limits (55 ac.)
- - - - Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
- Coddle Creek
MForested Wetland
Culvert
- - Matchline
Roads
•DP Data Point
•SCP Stream Classification Point
Indicates Flow
H Photo Location and Direction
.E��`GNojl
REFERENCE. BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY CABARRUS COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2019.
NOTE JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND
MAPPED USING A SUB -FOOT CAPABLE GPS UNIT BY CWS, INC., ON FEBRUARY 21, 25, 26, 28, MARCH 2
4, 9, AND APRI L 28 AND 29, 2020. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.
SCALE
1 inch = 400 feet
CWS PROJECT NO:
2019-0109
COORDINATES:
35.346003, -80.617560
7/10/2020
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
1 inch = 100 feet
1 inch = 50 feet
1SSCP5
Cs7
1 inch = 50 feet
Perennial Stream F
34 If
CAR❑LINA
WETLAND SERVICES
Intermittent Stream G
49 If
Intermittent Stream D
71 If
1 inch = 75 feet
Jurisdictional Boundaries
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
G:\Shared dnves\Consul[ing Team Dnve\2019\2019 C nsulOng Projects \2019-0109 Lower Coddle Creek\JD\ArcGIS\Revised 7 5 2020\Flgure8B_JD_Portralt mod
FIGURE NO.

Matches Fi: ure $B
0
0
hp
590
Perennial Stream B
(Coddle Creek)
1,394 If
SCP74.
570
Forested Wetland CC
0.02 acre
DP 3•
1 inch = 50 feet
Forested Wetland DD
0.002 acre
N
oc
Pa
6Q
Ibiltob.Perennial Stream J
81 1f
= 25 feet‘iffi.
litivAbali...1 inch iffil‘...N7
Wetland EE
Cr
D P r Emergent: i3a1
cre
N
1 inch = 50 feet
Intermittent Stream I
86 If
e,
REFERENCE
MEN BACKGROUND
zSI
VE (PRo0DE BV� ARRUSCOUNTY
R
Hr rIrw)
BRUARY 21 25 26
8 NR �r�r �� APRIL2. JURISDICTIONAL
FE
DP4•
a
1 inch = 100 feet
Matches Figure 8D
SC
1 inch 100 feet
—.011111
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
- - - Intermittent Stream
— Perennial Stream
Coddle Creek
® Emergent Wetland
noi Forested Wetland
Culvert
- - - Matchline
— Roads
•DP Data Point
.scP Stream Classification Point
< Indicates Flow
H Photo Location and Direction
Q
D▪ o
24
▪ 5
V3
7
400 200 0 400 Feet
IGURE NO
8C

Intermittent Stream K
50 If
.40cp11
1 inch = 1000feet
asVERIFIEDRSG ay
ygo f=o AANaEsAGE
1 inch = 50 feet
Perennial Stream B
(Coddle Creek)
1,394 If
Forested Wetland II
0.01 acre
Intermittent Stream M
82 If
Wetland JJ
Emergent: 0.01 acre
Forested: 0.004 acre
ROBIN LN
Emergent Wetland FF
0.01 acre
1 inch = 50 feet
Forested Wetland GG
0.01 acre
Perennial Stream N
74 If
finch = 100 feet
Forested Wetland HH
0.04 acre
IZE▪ s
1 inch = 100 feet
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
- - - Intermittent Stream
— Perennial Stream
Coddle Creek
® Emergent Wetland
Forested Wetland
- - - Matchline
— Roads
SDP Data Point
.scP Stream Classification Point
Indicates Flow
H Photo Location and Direction
400 200 0 400 Feet
i
IGURE NO
8D
G.norod driv.consulting T.m Crsen2019‘2019 Consulting Projects2019-0109 Lower Coddle Cr.k,CAreGlaRevis. 752020‘Figuren

Perennial Stream P
76 If
Wetland LL
Emergent: 0.01 acre
Forested: 0.003 acre
1 inch = 50 feet
tHEN,HALHI,HDUN bISwvER(S)PHUVIDED GALAHHUSGUMIVbISDEP.IMENIDAIED2LtIJ
tJ,I=1UviIN IHt Htw�,C HL, o,y
APRIL]H,AND 29 2mn. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THEUSLCE.
I !
`inch = 50 feet
Matche's Figure 8D
1 inch = 25.feet
Forested Wetland MM
0.02 acre
Emergent Wetland NN
0.03 acre
OFORMED C}T CT
Perennial Stream B
(Coddle Creek)
1,372 If
• DP19
SILVER FOX DR DR
1 inch = 50 feet
Intermittent Stream R
68 If
`LSCP15
1 inchf- 50 feet
Intermittent Stream Q
51 If
Legend
Q Project Limits (55 ac.)
- - - Intermittent Stream
— Perennial Stream
Coddle Creek
® Emergent Wetland
Z7> Forested Wetland
Culvert
- - - Matchline
— Roads
SDP Data Point
acP Stream Classification Point
Indicates Flow
N Photo Location and Direction
300 150 0
300 Feet
Q
FIGURE NO
8E

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10, 2020
Jurisdictional Delineation Report CWS Project No. 2019-0109
ATTACHMENT A:
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP1-DP19)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.363513
Sampling Date: 2/21/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Soil Map Unit Name: Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (IdA)
Long: -80.643834 Datum: NAD83
NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands AA and BB.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
X High Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Hydrogen
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Ulmus rubra
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer negundo
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
30 Yes FACW
30 Yes FAC
90 =Total Cover
45 20% of total cover: 18
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4. Ligustrum sinense
5. Platanus occidentalis
6.
7.
8.
9.
15 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
10 No FACW
10 No FACU
5 No FACW
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Lamium amplexicaule
2. Carex lurida
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Ligustrum sinense
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
15
5
5
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
30 =Total Cover
UPL
OBL
FACU
FACU
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3. Toxicodendron radicans
4.
5.
40
10
5
Yes
No
No
55 =Total Cover
FACU
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
60% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 2/2 100
4-8 10YR 2/2 90
8-12 10YR 6/1 80
12-20
10Y 6/1 50
Redox Features
Color (moist)
5YR 7/8
5YR 7/8
5YR 7/8
Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
10 C M Loamy/Clayey
20 C M Loamy/Clayey
30 C M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Prominent redox concentrations
Prominent redox concentrations
Mn-concentrations - 20%
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.363256
Sampling Date: 3/9/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.641829 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (WeA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetlands AA and BB.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_True
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0.25
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carexlurida 15 Yes OBL
2. Arundinaria gigantea 10 Yes FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-3 10YR 4/2 90
3-20 7.5YR 5/4 70
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
5YR 5/4 10 C PL/M
10YR 6/2 20 D M
7.5YR 6/6 10 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.348032
Sampling Date: 2/26/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.623344 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands BAA, CC, DD, GG, and HH.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent _Crayfish
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _Saturation
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Algal _Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Celtis occidentalis
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
60 Yes FAC
20 Yes FACU
80 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer negundo
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
15
20% of total cover: 16
5
Yes
Yes
20 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carex lurida
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3. Rosa multifibre
4. Scirpus atrovirens
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
30
5
5
5
Yes
No
No
No
45 =Total Cover
OBL
FAC
FACU
OBL
50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3. Vitis rotundifolia
4. Toxicodendron radicans
5. Bignonia capreolata
10 Yes FACU
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
2 No FAC
2 No FAC
24 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12 20% of total cover: 5
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
Prevalence Index
Multiply by:
x 1 =
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
(A)
= B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is S3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
62.5% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3
Depth
(inches)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-3 7.5YR 4/2 95
3-10 7.5YR 4/2 80
10-20 5YR 4/3 80
5YR 5/6 5 C
5YR 5/6 15 C
10Y R 6/6 10 C
Remarks
M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
10% Mn-concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340790
Sampling Date: 3/2/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.609189 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetlands EE and JJ.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) X Sparsely Vegetated
_True
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on
_ _Thin _
X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carexlurida 40 Yes OBL
2. Alisma subcordatum 5 No OBL
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
45 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-10 10YR 6/1 65
10-12 10YR 6/1 55
12-20 7.5YR 5/6 90
Redox Features
Color (moist)
5YR 5/4
5YR 5/4
Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
35 C M Loamy/Clayey
25 C M Loamy/Clayey
7.5YR 5/6 20 C M
10YR 2/1
10 D M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Prominent redox concentrations
Prominent redox concentrations
Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340977
Sampling Date: 3/2/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP5
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.609413 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands EE and JJ.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated
_True
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _Drainage
X Saturation (A3) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_Oxidized
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on
_ _Thin _
X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) X Stunted or Stressed
_Other
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP5
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Quercus phellos
2. Celtis occidentalis
3. Platanus occidentalis
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
20 Yes FACU
15 No FACW
10 No FAC
85 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 43 20% of total cover: 17
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Quercus phellos
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Celtis occidentalis
4. Platanus occidentalis
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20
20
5
5
Yes
Yes
No
No
50 =Total Cover
FAC
FACW
FACU
FACW
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carex lurida
2. Juncus effusus
3. Alisma subcordatum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
40
10
5
Yes
No
No
55 =Total Cover
OBL
FACW
OBL
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
Yes
5 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
83.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-3 N 6/ 95
3-8 N 6/ 75
8-15
N 6/ 90
Redox Features
Color (moist)
5YR 5/6
5YR 5/6
5YR 5/6
Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
5 C M Loamy/Clayey
25 C M Loamy/Clayey
10 C M Loamy/Clayey
15-20 5YR 5/4 70 N 6/ 20 D M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Prominent redox concentrations
Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.338062
Sampling Date: 3/2/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP6
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.602265 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetland FF.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent _Crayfish
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _Saturation
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Algal _Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0.25
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP6
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer negundo 15 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex lurida 40 Yes OBL
2. Juncus effusus 40 Yes FACW
3. Rosa multifibre 10 No FACU
4. Chasmanthium latifolium 10 No FACU
5. Rubus argutus 5 No FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
105 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 53 20% of total cover: 21
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UP species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is S3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP6
Depth
(inches)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-3 7.5YR 5/2 80
3-20 10YR 6/1 70
7.5YR 5/4 20 C
N 6/ 10 D
M Loamy/Clayey
M Loamy/Clayey
7.5YR 5/6 10 C M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Distinct redox concentrations
Mn-concentrations at 10%
Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.334754
Sampling Date: 3/4/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP7
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.600149 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands II and MM.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_True
X High Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Hydrogen
X Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
X Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0.25
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP7
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Quercus rubra
2. Quercus nigra
3. Quercus phellos
4. Fagus grandifolia
5. Acer rubrum
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
15 Yes FACU
15 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
5
5
No FACU
No FAC
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Quercus phellos
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carex lurida
5
5
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FAC
8 20% of total cover: 3
2. Juncus effusus
3. Allium vineale
4. Lonicera japonica
5. Ranunculus bulbosus
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
10 Yes OBL
5 Yes FACW
5 Yes FACU
3 No FACU
3 No FAC
26 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
5
5
Yes
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FACU
FAC
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 72.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
72.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-5 10Y 5/1 80
5-10
10Y 5/1 70
10-12 7.5YR 5/4 70
12-20
N 6/ 70
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
7.5YR 6/6 20 C PL/M
7.5YR 5/4 30 C PL/M
10Y 5/1 30 D M
10YR 8/4 30 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.326778
Sampling Date: 3/4/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP8
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.595778 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetlands LL, and NN.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(C2)
Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated
_ _
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
X Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8)
_Sediment _Recent _Crayfish
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on
_ _Thin _Saturation
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed
_Algal _Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP8
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1. Carex lurida 40 Yes OBL
2. Cynodon dactylon 20 Yes FACU
3. Persicaria maculosa 20 Yes FACW
4. Saururus cernuus 5 No OBL
5. Plantago major 2 No FACU
6. Scirpus atrovirens 2 No OBL
7.
8.
9.
10.
89 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UP species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is S3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
66.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP8
Depth
(inches)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-4 10YR 4/1 85
4-10 10YR 5/3 80
10-20 5YR 6/6 80
5YR 5/6 15 C PL/M
5YR 6/6 15 C
10Y R 5/3 20 D
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
M Loamy/Clayey
M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.366703
Sampling Date: 2/21/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP9
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.645342 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (WeA) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of forested non -jurisdictional upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_High _Hydrogen
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP9
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Celtis occidentalis
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
50 Yes FAC
20 Yes FACU
70 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Poncirus trifoliate
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20
10
Yes
Yes
30 =Total Cover
UPL
FACU
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex lurida
2. Ligustrum sinense
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Juncus effusus
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
60
15
10
5
Yes
No
No
No
90 =Total Cover
OBL
FACU
FACU
FACW
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
Yes
5 =Total Cover
FACU
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
33.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 5/4 90
4-10 10YR 5/4 80
10-14 7.5YR 5/4
Redox Features
Color (moist)
7.5YR 5/6
7.5YR 5/6
Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
10 C M Loamy/Clayey
10 C M Loamy/Clayey
10YR 6/2 10 D M
50 N 6/ 30 D M Loamy/Clayey
14-20 7.5YR 5/4 90
7.5YR 7/6 20 C M
7.5YR 5/6
10 C M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Distinct redox concentrations
Distinct redox concentrations
Distinct redox concentrations
Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.364154
Sampling Date: 2/21/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP10
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Slope (%): 0
Long: -80.642393 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (WeA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of emergent non -jurisdictional upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP10
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Celtis occidentalis 40 Yes FACU
2. Acer negundo 10 No FAC
3. Acer rubrum 10 No FAC
4. Quercus phellos 10 No FAC
5. Prunus serotina 5 No FACU
6.
7.
75 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2. Acer rubrum
3. Acer negundo
4. Quercus phellos
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10 Yes FACU
10 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
5
No FAC
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carexpensylvanica 30 Yes UPL
2. Lamium amplexicaule 15 Yes UPL
3. Allium vineale 10 No FACU
4. Plantago major 5 No FACU
5. Ligustrum sinense 5 No FACU
6. Potentilla indica 3 No FACU
7.
8.
9.
10.
68 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 34 20% of total cover: 14
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
5
5
Yes FAC
Yes FACU
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
37.5% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 5/4 100
4-10 10YR 5/4 90
10-20 5YR 5/4 70
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
7.5YR 6/6 10 C PL/M
7.5YR 6/6 10 C M
10YR 4/2 10 D M
10YR 6/2 10 D M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): MLB/ALH
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.352703
Sampling Date: 2/25/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP11
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Long: -80.628732 Datum: NAD83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: PEM
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of emergent non -jurisdictional upland areas.
NOAA states that Cabarrus County, North Carolina experienced above normal precipitation during the month of January 2020.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_True
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP11
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1. Allium vineale 5 No FACU
2. Festuca heterophylla 40 Yes UPL
3. Ranunculus sceleratus 5 No OBL
4. Taraxacum officinale 2 No FACU
5. Rumex crispus 2 No FAC
6. Trifolium repens 20 Yes FACU
7. Digitaria ciliaris 2 No FAC
8.
9.
10.
76 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
0.0% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP11
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 4/3 100
4-8 10YR 4/4 85
8-12 10YR 4/2 75
12-20 10YR 5/6 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
10YR 4/2
10YR 5/8
Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
15 D M Loamy/Clayey
10 C M Loamy/Clayey
N 2.5/ 15 D M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): MLB/ALH
Sampling Date: 2/25/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP12
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.356063
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Slope (%): 2-5
Long: -80.629854 Datum: NAD83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: PFO
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of forested non -jurisdictional upland areas.
NOAA states that Cabarrus County, North Carolina experienced above normal precipitation during the month of January 2020.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_High _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP12
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Quercus rubra 35 Yes FACU
2. Betula nigra 30 Yes FACW
3. Juniperus virginiana 15 No FACU
4. Fraxinus americana 20 Yes FACU
5.
6.
7.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acernegundo 15 Yes FAC
2. Fraxinus americana 15 Yes FACU
3. Acerrubrum 10 Yes FAC
4. Celtis occidentalis 10 Yes FACU
5. Ligustrum lucidum 5 No UPL
6. Nandina domestica 5 No UPL
7.
8.
9.
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Vinca minor 2 Yes UPL
2. Stellaria media 10 Yes UPL
3. Lamium purpureum 2 Yes UPL
4. Quercus phellos 2 Yes FAC
5. Ilex opaca 2 Yes FACU
6. Fragaria vesca 2 Yes FACU
7.
8.
9.
10.
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 13 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30.8% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30.8% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-3 10YR 3/3 100
3-20 10YR 4/3 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340354
Sampling Date: 3/2/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP13
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.607683 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_High _Hydrogen
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP13
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Acer rubrum
4. Celtis occidentalis
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
30 Yes FACW
20 No FAC
20 No FACU
110 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acernegundo
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
5
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
20 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FACW
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carex lurida
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Woody Vine Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
80
Yes
80 =Total Cover
OBL
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
(Plot size: 30 )
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-3 10YR 4/3 100
3-9 10YR 5/3 90
9-20
5Y R 4/3 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
7.5YR 5/4
Type' Loc2
10 C PL/M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340377
Sampling Date: 3/2/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP14
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.607459 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_High _Hydrogen
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP14
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Acer rubrum
4. Celtis occidentalis
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
30 Yes FACW
20 No FAC
20 No FACU
110 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acernegundo
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
5
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
20 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FACW
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carex lurida
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Woody Vine Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
80
Yes
80 =Total Cover
OBL
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
(Plot size: 30 )
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP14
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-3 10YR 5/2 80
3-5 10YR 5/3 90
5-10 7.5YR 5/4 100
10-20 5YR 5/4 90
Redox Features
Color (moist)
7.5YR 5/3
7.5YR 5/3
10YR 5/2
Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
20 C M Loamy/Clayey
10 C M Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
10 D M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Faint redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340135
Sampling Date: 3/2/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP15
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.608253 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_High _Hydrogen
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP15
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Acer rubrum
4. Celtis occidentalis
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
30 Yes FACW
20 No FAC
20 No FACU
110 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acernegundo
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
5
5
Yes
Yes
Yes
20 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FACW
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carex lurida
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Woody Vine Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
80
Yes
80 =Total Cover
OBL
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
(Plot size: 30 )
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-2 10YR 5/3 100
2-10 10YR 5/4 100
10-18 7.5YR 5/4 100
18-20 7.5YR 4/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340134
Sampling Date: 3/2/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP16
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.607828 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional emergent upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_ _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP16
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1. Carex pensylvanica 70 Yes UPL
2. Juncus effusus 5 No FACW
3. Potentilla indica 2 No FACU
4. Lamium amplexicaule 2 No UPL
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
79 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
0% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP16
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-4 7.5YR 5/4 100
4-15 7.5YR 5/4 90
15-20 7.5YR 4/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
7.5YR 2.5/1
Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
10 D M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.336928
Sampling Date: 3/9/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP17
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.600922 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_High _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP17
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Juniperus virginiana
2. Quercus phellos
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Quercus nigra
5. Quercus rubra
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
25 Yes FACU
20 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
10 No FAC
5
No FACU
70 =Total Cover
35 20% of total cover: 14
2. Quercus phellos
3. Juniperus virginiana
4. Ligustrum sinense
5. Acer rubrum
6. Fagus grandifolia
7.
8.
9.
15 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
10 No FACU
5 No FACU
5 No FAC
5 No FACU
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Ligustrum sinense
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Ilex cornuta
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
25 Yes FACU
20 Yes FACU
5 No UPL
50 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Toxicodendron radicans
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
10
5
Yes
Yes
15 =Total Cover
FACU
FAC
8 20% of total cover: 3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
50% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP17
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-5 7.5YR 3/3 100
5-20 7.5YR 5/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.330615
Sampling Date: 3/9/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP18
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.596592 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional emergent upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_High _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP18
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1. Ranunculus bulbosus 50 Yes FAC
2. Lamium amplexicaule 30 Yes UPL
3. Sorghum halepense 20 No FACU
4. Lamium maculatum 10 No UPL
5. Potentilla indica 5 No FACU
6. Allium canadense 5 No FACU
7.
8.
9.
10.
120 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 60 20% of total cover: 24
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
50% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP18
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-8 10YR 4/3 100
8-20
5YR 5/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Applicant/Owner: WSACC
City/County: Cabarrus
Investigator(s): JKM/ITD
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.330971
Sampling Date: 3/9/2020
State: NC Sampling Point: DP19
Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -80.596241 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_Surface _True
Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10)
_High _ _Drainage
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_Water _Presence _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP19
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Acer negundo
2. Celtis occidentalis
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
10 No FACU
5
No FAC
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acernegundo
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20
5
Yes
Yes
25 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Ranunculus bulbosus
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Viola sororia
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Woody Vine Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
5
5
3
Yes
Yes
Yes
13 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
FAC
7 20% of total cover: 3
(Plot size: 30 )
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
83.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP19
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
0-5 7.5YR 4/4 100
5-12
5YR 4/4 100
12-20 10YR 5/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10, 2020
Jurisdictional Delineation Report CWS Project No. 2019-0109
ATTACHMENT B:
NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms
(SCP1-SCP16)

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/21/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.364910
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.647284
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
31
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP1/Stream A
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 14.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
i
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream bed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/25/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.360277
Evaluator: MLB/ALH
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.639960
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
31.5
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP2/Stream C
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
10
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream bed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/25/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.354561
Evaluator: MLB/ALH
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.630029
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
22
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP3/Stream D
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 7_5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8_5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream bed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/25/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.358659
Evaluator: MLB/ALH
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.630862
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
30.5
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP4/Stream E
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 14
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
_
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
i
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream bed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/25/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.350895
Evaluator: MLB/ALH
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.625796
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
30
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP5/Stream F
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 14
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
_
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
10
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream bed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/28/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.350143
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.622269
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
24
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP6/Stream G
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 9
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2 1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
12
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream bed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2/28/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.345527
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.621824
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
27
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP7/Stream
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 12
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/2/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.341768
Evaluator: JKM/ITD
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.610850
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
30.5
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP8/Stream J
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 14
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 a
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/2/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.340070
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.605707
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
19
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP9/Stream K
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 5_5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
MIL
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8_5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
f2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/4/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.335170
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.600428
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
19.25
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP10/Stream L
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 6
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
IN
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8_5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
4.75
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/4/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.334590
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.599985
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
19
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP11/Stream M
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 6_5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
MIL
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7_5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
12
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/4/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.333443
Evaluator: JKM/ITD
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.598634
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
31.5
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP12/Stream N
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/4/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.329530
Evaluator: JKM/ITD
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.595724
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
33.5
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP13/Stream P
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/4/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.328108
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.594415
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
21
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP14/Stream Q
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 7_5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
f2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8_5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
12
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/4/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.327330
Evaluator: ITD/JKM
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.594681
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
29
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP15/Stream R
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 12.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
IN
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 4/28/2020
Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Latitude:
35.358269
Evaluator: MLB/ALH
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:
-80.631181
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if 19 or perennial if 30*
30
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP16/Stream BB
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 14
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
12
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
, No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10, 2020
Jurisdictional Delineation Report CWS Project No. 2019-0109
ATTACHMENT C:
Photopage (Photographs 1-47)

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
.f it'• .d • ,�....'!!fl1
f Vkt
•'•1.[ •i 'p..l..a. •.-. .�•.•!
�::' •7. °' .;r,. �' ••pi !' .I."p"rat ,R n" ..:'-...i '•a. • ;
ilt. . '. ,iN.,- nn •- �..7
•
' kft
: T`'r -:''c..`+*- j�,d Fn,l� Y.t 1
t.� :I�f'-��s�:.&r(- �� rp .;,�c•vr•.
%
4 777 �,. a , I�i,I•y � - .. r:
:jy I� _ ..3, arc "P. IA,r ''R°.} ko...- - .. ':. •' rr. .,. h'Y•y „-
. _.1' ,• .•. . 'rdti :.::::. r .rc l.1+. r�"-
tit,
isle. Y' .t.-.r,{1it,i ' yx. xa,_ �..
is%'+:. _:am'. ,•�' g.ss'-tr'... S] • u... a,.w?.r.,..:_`.l'..r::_.-�'��-.i�:>E.'3''T`i'-:i6:�. _
• ' :'T..-^ ,,' arc, .h • _ d. - `�3:-. ' Y ,SAC.'• ;i•::.�
-r• _ -^'1s. _ .. • .. • • '!'. _SIC." 'q``1,' e
_ - ,;jam. w- y +;Y,+'.,- ..F .iik, - • _ •`r ' ;:4i:i
?�_ .:f•'"•. �T�!`Y .%vim. 'y6'"'•'. _ •.'''
•
': - . . - . _ - ; is -4.:..i•..
...5. •fit_ ,. .., ..a '"5.• '%s - • si4. `'r: k..+1 .::.:
•
_ • •.r - a:.r'n.'. teye�;.:.1.y,e r•
L,�, r. '-•` • sir r �q;
' '.T.?"k.,C—.. .y-'•fix �,} fir. a C•
' � .J' -.:�� •- �.�y � - Yir�,��n4%' eFs.7. "��-F�'�i—h•••' p.' .�� '_
•
.. :6 _ •• - ,. ., ?:.c4." "`4P�" 'S 9't'ry �b..ef� .. a-7_�r� �'
.��_ fir'::}i ind`-'• =t+C ti� :�.
.,'.•..,. _ --:- . .. ..,.,,...' '� fie.a � �
- �,.: :S• ti..'-.�`iC•.. -�f�ew. n �':..,� ;;:' �-_ "ram y _
. .....�:ti�rw� r "__ � . .s'-.. •�'L s',j'`J�IP�1I�.vr �• • :Pi-.' '•..•�. "� .. .. .yLYa'
Photograph 1. View of Emergent Wetland AA, facing southwest.
• ,• . t:--),..;..,y.?s:.r.•Ifl ,:\•.:45.,on i,,,..k 1 •;• -..., ;,...• ??,-.....',.. . ; . w.,, 1,.,t.L' .Li'... r.;..,'...;•.:Ai. •?;• .''''''...''''-1-•.''•Z•1r'''ill:
• . • •'-• 011 :.?•". .11::•."` . o;,...• .4#0\;. . j. . \ • iii. it l': • ', ...„.:,..1,-!'• -,--1.1,.-1.1,..: ..:• . .,. .k r:• ,...1t.„.,:,,Nii?:, - ..)9;41.1!
:-, •lM:� ..! . l.. Y• i,,, ''l '�f r, i • rk el, 0,
.,..;;;•'.•‘--•:!-Vt'.. •,' ;,',::•• .i.,..(1••!7.,.! ., yo..,-, ,i • k• '9/.I.i••••iy.' •-.• •'•• ' • . r\''•::•-•- /V.:'•-'-:' • %, i:., -'•4 I,':Li. ..- •;:::i..•-•-..,,-• ,_
-'"•� NSF.=- '^1.`� - .:i'-'' '••• :'F J t - • + ._�- •?'Ak . ' • ''`d :A-r
.•,.„..„. .:.„.,,,...„,-...,..-.-. . ,,. . ,.. ,. -4.is.„6.._,,.,_ .. ,. _.r.„...,_:.i. .,,. .,....,., ..,..w. ,.e. ._ ,....,,,,,....„,„ „..,.„...,:,
:„...,......,, •_ •,.,,,,,..,,... . \ . „.. • . ., " y
I.•t*A•i.'•t-k'r40'j",i'Z.'4_"'..u-.'-_7.ff-.i.=_..-.46_!:•1:_-.,:',.!..4,-4'.-.1:-.._':.i'.k"s.2—•-r'>v.•4..b*r*„.4,,k'.,•'--,..-,.,..-.-:-,...-.o-.*.-_..-,4.•A1.,'1p-.:1-.-,.44r.4t-l.s
o- . 7P yr. " + 3:..r'••. {E: _ �,..
• Tom y 7.
>'.: -'".. " // ri. q'.r'' wV w`r•
v;' } ir• _ •.�V�. q ~.- Rim. r . _,irY.;'.e•��r: ''�'.ti�...�31�� ' •!i'.''-�,•e+. � �` �•R�k-`_i�.�., '�`. '-s R ..}� �•rr._ _ 1
•
- � _ �' Y.`...erg.:
•', Wi-7, r' ...y iF.r. s-•,'' • I .._ '• " -' �''."6•1 ...«.. Yam' :.:/ 4..--''' '• „r
rr; r \-�' .1 - Y . `�. f.Y:. sb ^ "r.r �k = .
r..- ;. y - t .. ,:6
Photograph 2. View of Forested Wetland AA, facing northwest.
Photopage 1 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
• • ' Y• R ,. :_ _ ,:-'iv 1 ' . ,, '•if ,�� is , :�' , 1 1 ° I (y � C' ' % '�' '. . ' �f ,, . $ d- yyy4 I . y 11` ; R .i f" �4 _ ..^ . �_ - a I
))` I y ; 1 :,4 )
4,+ R1 i el�1 ai �i +j, IIr t
�
is ?�• �_: '; �.�,
.4 yi .. • ./fir..' - .. ..,. .:V•". - - s- ?' - ..
.. `'. a-;,•- 4� �' • J: - -
Photograph 3. View of Emergent Wetland BB (DP2), facing south.
; ` :� '
n E fr rL , .N .
s� 'i 1 : i i: , ., ,, , i
'p 'i ..
., ,i i ., ',, j , .,. :i. ,.,,, :al::, :1 ,,..7,1 ..,1 ?_..li, yl. ' v'.,':
• �`- _•';e.. / 'rL• �d:�.c--e. '- .yam•'-.�, - .Y�i+i.-- •z 1 `��"
Tf ..k.{, £ +tad s} ; Y £,-u Y.
•
� 3• .:-.--4 •'t'ff- f •e 1. '
• 21 r�
�' � ` ;"': t o g 'N.
�ma'yy,�, r • _ • - :• t ��_-
•
_ _.sii,---- . ':7wi :s .,�_. ate. . , •aC+.: -. .k ...-
Photograph 4. View of Forested Wetland BB, facing southeast(DP1).
Photopage 2 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
•
4 0'i '
� t ;ti.: :E. mili .... _.
_44-f* .'-; ' '•:',i41..5:-;.„.--fL:.
, - 711--.i: te--
j•-'_
;.,
. ,
:,l- , __ } .: •re
• .2,..r ,..... __.).r.„...--.. F' .^ . .l , - r __... ... .. ...,I., .
wF••i• ,S,_,4 . ... ,,. -,-' Nk ' , :4�F•: • _. a . • -.
•
•
tip' --t t• gip' - 0 d ; L ' ,, 4' ,.. y'
•
+, ..E; - fri `i „'_ ►; *- ~gyp.••. xr;�yr.:. '• ;t
Photograph 5. View of Forested Wetland BAA, facing northwest.
' '' . -•- '".',:" '',',1-.4.:'' , 7,A;''.°4,'•'''''. • , itli.. .-.A .4,1,ma 1 t 1 F 41..' -•,,,,f,....:';...:. ." - --.71i;',.,,- ',.,L,I-P,144' ..-21.:,'"%....'''2.-d''''.."1.
..`': .:,�.�'..' ': vv -:3'! .fps I..'• '7� '.. •{.�■] _5 •Y�w!•_ l'4S :#.'!f i•I'! �,.F.';C'J
14
. l.. I :fit, S� k F of, F'%1 4'Y yY.'. e'�+^�l���' r�.4 1'. - : :l� .
:r:.: tt 1` i Se ;1 '..r.•�i ., u; F ,.` g,-
1 4
,� •.'jl Y.' '' .. I .t'.-,.• :I ,'err •/. ', ;. i... _ �i 1. -J ? -
^n� I
Ili
A
• ,,��:1 1 .�.tll�' r:F'r •4n :..✓L�j.r !;?'1. -a. -.'.. .-�3
,,,-.., ,,. .,.,4 ..,..,, .4.r.,
,,,..-„..-..,,,-....:.,.k.}.--,..„;.=.-,t, .r.iii
'ate'£`- -r• rs' r .ar -':Sr. "_ __ •i•. -s• _ s=k -...
t,' 14 h _ •`• 0 f+ st ,tom '. •ran _
'� -F ,.fir.,1..,3 }r :.,;e�P _ :a °'.-ii i:,f-, i� _s r
�- �..�� ,-,'',-,•-_:.-:: - .-R:.- "_'-:._ :. L•7�,:'' "A'� _ .e - _ -
"::� ;fir'- " +s.,an/ "��Fi'. - r;�'_�'.•7i1 rye:; :: r . i _r•: _ -
.r �9., y�q .1 s 5f. 1'} qp
:.ei- _ '.-•• ". VY_ :'i ,,':--`-tom -*; '. _-
'y 0,, •4 'q`_t- • 4,.,. . ..r' 3'3yy_ '•; g.liP;"a ..-, •_.1''y; 17• ': _% ,
,..,.. . --:,- . ---4",-.':''.•'75,--"..----,,, .:,4.41rE. ,..r4'. 'k4.,I.''s,!:T' •.,.. ,.:.-srveidr:•40- !igt-:4 irl• ','`--4,Lt\-= . '
. - -,-,,,:--- , ... •.. ::,.-.- -$),-1.0,4±; .1,..,...# , .,-, .-A:. -r..., , — — - - —
A. ,
Photograph 6. View of Forested Wetland CC (DP3), facing northeast.
Photopage 3 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
IffiN‘.A.:'.'"--•,,:i7:Li f Tli.,.-'4 -1, .':-:::)..:•' .",;'-'g..--••lea- a••`..--r-l'•'''.' ILt6 --. • • .84k6:14,-,::na.. 4`"' :'Arc..•r'•'•' ; - ' '
,•,••„,..,.....,
••,• •• ",-,,L,„.,, ...,.. . .,... ,• . .0 . ,
,,,...,,, „:„,• .:,,,,,.,:• •,._:
••A
c.:•.1 '. !: EMT • V.•_..• �" ;t " ya :° et• 3 .- ' r.'•0.•S, n .#4.
•n�']�,y�j�jyy��yy,,�' i++.1•- •>;f•� ` 's13. y f j-[f - r fir.
•
4'.. ^ Z, '} r.Y'`.,, :) . 'T• r 'w r�y Yz..�- -.-7. r A 4rY• ryY�
i 4 A 1: - .. •L �; :.L+..:.}r �!'•:1 d .y .ea,. :Y.r ' - r l•'; 40._
_Op
b.:'''N'-:"....<-:.:-44I:-.":'.c'r?''--'-:::'''".77-, IkijO-tklr".,'.•:.:- '4.-_,'..''...''.7'.•• .. ky.:' .....,:.''.;_--.4,--‘'*,'," '„,-.-;-;:ii,„4V..-7.-_.• '°:- ....'• N.-.'i'-"
,..-'....v..'-',7f......iN_.;A..,L.6t:.r.,7:o.,,v7„r...,i.,.tz:,i„...,.!.t.
:-..•.-.-'-'',,-.....-,.:4--.,:-,••_.,-.,'•_...-.•S.E,;i,.:.•:•-.`..-.'.3:..:::•1•K..::",'i.:.•.•‘'"::.:7..5..7.^,.•..Z-.•_
tea; 'lli.+ • ,r -' yy,:' •_
'.'.4..„.11•.t.4
-14•44'.4,-t.....:..,•
22 n�� 1�; r •.,-_,...„4._.-,Yi.
.„...,.,..,.r..-,..'/''7•.L.-."...,.,.s.-.._.•.•:.•-._7
, `off ., q.';`-. - .. .
.'.._1;,....I. ,,4k•,_-
U - .. :'.. '� ,r�,M1 - : ,
it.' �l 5.• �' _rw - .71" ' e. if. r + 'r..., .. mot. ::1-_. i 0. ;
•
•
_ S; i '-;� .-�• : • • :,tom, •y - `'- ' rr
'� % "tr may4"`q,r> *' tar s' at. ' , . .V_
.`.r. • .• L =•'• d'r� ti
Photograph 7. View of Forested Wetland DD, facing west.
• 'NvI -Te FA..,k tv.#11. moot.,,, vro.._,,ftrifirow
il if' 0.f1Valikir, . •,.• •,,,,..,It .. .. . ,.... .
li
'ti�•i. rL:�.� � :1 '..r.'..F.nA,��f' 4.+}•: •. ..�•'�-'�.'•,...� • .YR + �, I�-t. �rj•'. � '� !.g ,�•• • •.
•
•
' • • i S • Uj i • • f .: i� 1 r
•
`
s
i J r
..... ••
.•L
. . .•
._::.
„'.10,'i.!-..t-..fr!..•'.••
. .::••..•••'..- .,. . ._ I_?7. ` ;l::'T'- 1. t.,i' _ t: S.. 1
,•.:•..•1:.-,
. _:;,-. ..•._.
•
•
� '- jam. •. . '-"`.`� . is • �'1 - : ,
_..,-
ter...c, • . .. ' • . ..- .-.. - n"-',--.•--'-''' - i {{ • V.
. 0 I{wah G � . �
:r
4_... ....:1...7.,.......,...r;.,.,?• -..-::-.,...::..E.:2-•-•..,...,.-:•••-..... .. ...,.... : .......t.,„..-•_.•,... .t.:,.'.:i:,....,....•Ar..;-:_.,:;,...1.407.71.41f4..,.' ,..,,,: V.•f.:.: ?_......:,.,...0.41.0..:. ‘itv.:1410::4-34r1"'''"iit , -*rt. .;
Photograph 8. View of Emergent Wetland EE (DP4), facing north.
Photopage 4 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
L T Will 1 pigt V p N....y.:1. 10,;. rilill 11,t• I 1"''.-;''4.14.4.1t. twe '''•'••• I
‘—‘111111 4 . , ,.,.,,,, ...44, ,. , .., , 1, . p ..,fi'e :lc,. . 4440:0 i ;6,1:,4 1
al
•
l 11 i 11 r . ;
V ! .i, ': 0111, ) rdili-: A 4 1- r) Ilk, '4'. i i !.. -',,-C ," , -
� . .._,.,•-e'Aiii
;;i• i t 1 !R 1�: IMF r,� ,i f i r,
`h .. A.
is: ' .� Y_. 'ill ..
�`.y. �� s'py'- \ I _ '4' : - 'w' .. ram- A IIV `
L.
•
...-.!,, SS .;' -,.•fi:1�' - it ti-S .. , {' .. n.. .. .:3:r'... 7 '. :F a,yf''i •{_
�'7ti1b'm.' T 7 = •. ._ � ..`'� T r�.4 -1 $ • r ', `'b%':. --5- T�.ti- _
.. '.:�: :, •:"�.' fir .✓ r ix.! -.���:., ti,• -r,F'.
'2.T •,F .;r .-,o.r' _ ,• i•, ..py'. r ,•f,r'. ,fib ,�+ 3 ‘',
p , } -i' y :s,R ' ,,.Yet +1R. '- ".. :.'` :;, '- - .,,w•-.
_ .r', cam. ' fl •' 6i'i:::r_ y� .l- :•�.-I. , I�i IN t.:• ��f'F t:.
, _ - ,,'��d,.G� Srl�.,,�f1�'r .rF t 1 ••:I.,.: ,V,�1 •ryi•'.,ii� i. yam/._'f- : ��:"'
-- yw -` '-r' "•J"',� �%:.ti l O r f, ,. ..,� �, ,'. � �""`: ,':1 /`*'i,V Tri1�':4 .
. r l' .arr- --.„,, [ '._-'7':. •Yi.''Vf 3•• .4.
.r,. :. . �• .r ,2 ';'.•.4 ' ice `` -`
,p Ae
Photograph 9. View of Forested Wetland EE (DP5), facing northeast.
l'r
4.
L.
; .. " ;•av�`.�''_'•'Ft'.:'.I...•.
.
•
` � r "(.. N:rla,[ .i f - •'lc I '• .j r.•%� IkL 5-' 1
_ �f. ti ttr .�:.;
.;.V Y` .�4� V ' If• T_ -tr ,: F � . F. r.'9h,. .is;'s ':
�p ` ,.per • ..:.o .'�'• y .]y-,�. •"1-=- -- +.yiF'�1k ,'yr t � ��'�� ��•~ '� T _�
00
_ sit � ..w ,�.. ..-y��_ �A i,. �i�Y
F k., th," y.: err" �I _
• �� .'• ' •... x 'ir .;1; 'ridy.g." - ��. ��,3yr .Q: �s' 1,• •i,r�.�,_,: � } i•�'
4-5
w: 'K :a: �. _- ,,. a-, - ��' �.rSH:.F'L.-ti. bl[ �I i•.- [r+:•,:, .:�:r.;:...: }�y.,
Jos:, ' f;;.ti L� �.-� rr �,[ AA • " �� +i r� 1.. :a'•y i"_� _ y ' ��; �
" 'r���' ti rd�l` a �.�` r!Sb Y ?H• ".'-."f:.�:� la`;:���r'a;•'rr.4 T. .• r� ' - ,..:i+ v__•-: :4' :a�' ;'•-
Photograph 10. View of Emergent Wetland FF (DP6), facing west.
Photopage 5 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
i ( ' rail T II ki140 itil 1 g r 1 ir i
a.- ,'4-•e i fr rig !i. 4 , , ft
i ill lY! Z1
I it. a li
rk...,41 r � lei
. ,ill
4, .
t 11;
_.„.,.., I, oell',.''''(1 4:9,
74. P . .: , irr:_. , ;/.i,„,,-„,,, .i,-..,,.,, 1
}1 Itt I
I.
-. ' -"- '. .2t1.41 r,s' \ . 1 I. r'\ ' ''''' '-. 1.
ram• - A � t s_....' J•�L ` • LweA '•. - r - �� � �,.,
:.fig 1 ,, , .<,,_ 47A.1
.
- �{ :'
bee
\Ilk_
��' - -^.'�, 0
+�+ �1y1ylj•y�.:•.�}y k.: 7fp ,r41 r i; .a+q.
Photograph 11. View of Forested Wetland GG, facing south.
io •
N , - ¢s T ;i1:i' s J .1► lk�# r l: r: •,r �.
"r r i , r 4 Asp $d y .01V3. A: :°'
i V
,fir' ..5 1414• ‘ .j .• o- t :!.•1 i
'., F .. ,i - -
• r ,�•
- �•
Al:. 1
•• �l ` of.1.....:�- •3,.. . ..,�
�l _3. 7
.�.- cot '.' ti-ie N`, - y,-nJ ap 1� i� 7'.'i' 51,i Rif f• Y: :�+ - -
441.
'-' " • L.'. ' ' . -.7*,'• ..lr.'-,..,..'".
_ � :J M!: °Ir :.i 4. ;tit..
Yam- . y �� !/ fr'�r - ",
Photograph 12. View of Forested Wetland HH, facing northwest.
Photopage 6 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
',?.., ei ' •41%-*4• Aii '' %
'�41-4tP4. ilk i 'n4,i'll''',' ri..r.,,,,.-tvp.,, . . .e.)/ , 4, , , fir}
,i,,,,," , - .i_er ' 4,-;t:VT.',/r,.1.NJ ,:ii,,,!,- 'A
13 ` . ' {. AO' ,k...,-,"1„.:.•'
31
yr, •,r
�,� w�fie` - `" �•
,... ��•.:: � ter Yf:• �tl,��p��
• ,$�.� /. .- :.t."r,.� tt+.i..4L,. : :"err'- • _ ^- ..fir_ ,s
•
•
SRC: =r�' "4� ..> . . ''• 'r`•�''A. }�F•;- r3' - . -
.�:�� ., ". ..f' '•; .,' = .- .r:� `. ." :e'er': y -
5 s x; _ • Y .: s -e'r`'gip"; -_
- ��• e 1:• .-
. - 3 tl�y ^t.. �^" �'h� . a:•,. r-� ��F .� �.`• '� Atoithetoe ti::.
Agfi
Y . ::' a Z '''� a Sam' �: t F sue" `- �" I_
aor
y Y .�`.. VP'Ff •
I=•'F-'" •��.: '�'•'' "r b ram{ [.
ti„,ktike. Ilitv
Photograph 13. View of Forested Wetland II (DP7), facing southwest.
7.,t,.rwir- re.,
, _ _ , ,-; '„. 4:„.,,....- ,, •' =,.'rv.:C,,, ., v. ' "-. ', ..., ,.,. 4i1, , „?r Itzi j Rif
Y . i .4 1 .AM1 311;ii M.![' ar :i i'd!�,._f1,.1°:.
•
{ ,.•••• • it, i otk- 1.,'•' . `i , :aye ` '#' ''1a' Yr r :
1i'�•1 4` :1 3, � Yi;.r�j&' -. •1.• cf.u'` is -.'rNF i•• -R:. l: '
•
-:r.:r mow: ac.
'fir s•
_. _. _�+.•'� _ .;>rt�,� --".� N
M• .mow;
l-4-Yt �-.•_ _ ... -
•
�, ,ems ...i..,
� .." .; �'Xi: ;•n ; ` S^ Yc••fir' "• .�. .@a!r -.:.w s .4 Y3� , -�� . , -��' a•
Photograph 14. View of Emergent Wetland JJ, facing west.
Photopage 7 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
eta 4iI
E 1! •yT^— :;'� ._a...J c: :r: . ,•! 'i.'I -4 i- $k�
"r... AM } !'7= ��.'day •qg
j
tip' �.•Se;-• `� d^ '�, � .v r y1ye
4'• i i •S, � .}. I I``, '• '!••. is,*.
_ .;. 3 :� is� ,;.
t.tr, 4$w•r ' ' 'F. '
fffJJJ
4
' '- • • 'i'l.`_. •-..,,'A i
c� y:r _ a 1F_.
....1,‘„
'mac L\tit:' [''�J.:; ._'• -
1i,! ' :•l.:.- _ -:':RK 1` -" ;-',.. -3 _. . L at' l.` ..'.:._ [ -.' ..:-••—
.;max.. .
,.4??,;r
-h.N._ .. ; P. �lsi`..�l-.r- °r_'••Y. . ,' - .-- - _ - _.
.. :,(tom• *C •'t .•, 1iP -dP"{- y1 t:.. _
}y�, � AC( tom`'. 5 I.a' ,'• I,
.'e,i r. i. .Z. ,p--._ ". ls.{r'.' S -Wk?7.^Wdr'r,.$rSJ='s• r:— ;aa, v• ia
liout
df: . xa( 'zz.
Photograph 15. View of Forested Wetland JJ, facing southeast.
L.
•
-■ w
;r.
sty i '.. s'•
fie:- 4r
µ'.� Vi I tiY. R se rr;,..
4A II. 1' ''1;5''4 Itl ' filV1,2 ''L''4'r.'1'. '''.''%'' \ , : . 'e '. ''' ' '.,lia,C.'''''''''::W7''''' '211-4•,....' '
— ;;',/ -,--7. 440.vielj • -e- tew + ": 4.A-- -''k,\I-- -11` ' — - q- - - 714 '
• ,r*-i.0-1.;".., •i` *l t' y'9 G` ..,. .rr •. �y"�.--�` tea.i ,�.. i y .� -fix _..7
• } 4. :;"i,, 'ie r. •7F1!... _ti �. 4`.1''._ mac. .a: •- i•:.2:' `.
•
•
.9. gy l..i.. �1 y.t
Y ,{`` . . T`` r,�,vy, ,'' 1. ': T7.'„ ': H
Photograph 16. View of Emergent Wetland LL (DP8), facing northeast.
Photopage 8 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
•
- - i ;Pit- r :/ i Y ,
- •
.1•u 1�, .vi' , y� :4ri•' .: ,I - -ice .� . .. • .-R -9.i•; 4:A.
- �.`x'i ,x. eT-0•. ern- ,'.�- x ._ .q. �1i'�/' - r:
0
:3.__ - 7 ':1 V.11 fxas " f-� c.R� '?rxi' �` p .'+ ��i
�� yam. - '� .. '� �`a :-..�
...4k- -;•'', 1:tt.'',- . 1 1--'-1-:- '1.42:-.,.1:4i''":-,4;c :--,?."-'''--1,--=‘,..t. AL' Milip -.4-.-LI':--4-
:•.�-.: :_ 1,.....
"�-''y~ :- `�J �.r. -.-F~ '' '11 :—.- ' ..:fly '� �._. , �r�1. ■tom,
,.:�:: , 'av � - F 'iti } 1 ram., -iate• i� .- S9 T 'Ni.., .. . _ 11LL f..:_.s:. .' 4�: ' %• .I'I •.•..:T •
L' _y. f�.••M1 *
•
1, - .41g -..r,?gr R 41 s ` .'• i .N: 0I1,i. .iii C �1:.'•' ,rie k:;stir" ti:rr' ��' N_,
Itiii
. ,..
„.,,,, ,,,
41/
Photograph 17. View of Forested Wetland LL, facing southwest.
yyy-R iv I •��. Sv t $+$i7
r ' .r 1:1--
--_-ty.. ! I*,
•
T
0111*
• .. A
ti iii
i*if
`,f3l Y4' iY 64 -f' 4. Y f 7 I. h '' '�ZI�F y h' 1.., ,•
r--. -r:`'u� .. ''•`..;��z�,"';z. 40e�-.. ^ #'' ^yrwi�� ryi,�� :;�<-.''�� Ak.' .$§sh4L� .' i,�i- •''.�•
-�: •: �.ti��'`-_ �..�v .�`S ate .5•.�+� �=-H:, �
N.
.. - ��. �•.. : 6t:� :o �PA...1.1. .�.: '�-.hvi '.S Sf�`�-. '?'@1rr f
Photograph 18. View of Forested Wetland MM, facing north.
Photopage 9 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
i rr ti' .. �1 1 + • ----
- ;.774•.r :-...-. :-4..••$i
_1.. _ iy• 1 . 'SYC<1.�_- ��'.k.`..� :i o� r.✓rC3.y.L43'w•'�_^"
s a • •t:q-
'i
• t. t,-2 , ..2';'-..4"z.":" -:i..-Lf'r• -:-:',...,'4;'-i''.t.1,..::7.-4,$V .4i, , . .4 1 il,
i . , .
....L, _ .„ .,__..
.„ .,, ...__. _ . .,,,,, : „..
,,, ,,,„,...,.,„..„.„.,,, ,.,,, ., ,....„,, ,,. :4', A...., rY.1,,+
;,' •:Gr? • ''.e r •.+7 , c:. : 'AY YK'R+"osoir
)t %
Photograph 19. View of Emergent Wetland NN, facing south.
„!',,,..,"kL,-..,-,,,...,:'-t•zA,.,o
,/,,/t='i
...ter-... .-,1.',.--'-•[-,-=A..t--4., ')•-r f 1: y5- .l'-' 'A- y ,,„.„,„*_..,j.,,...4,,.i,7-,4,,i 7., D :.. f, -
„."'..,L..".,.;_,_„5.'1,
':aF:r Rr3. i'•'/,',_ reYv• .ice`• - ; �:��
•.k-\Aa,i,_.t.f_.L.,,0;t:_.‘,•
,-...A.1..-,...n.,,,.,,..;,,.
r',,..--z„e,'/,...'#'-4A,,._.i,-,_
N,.kA
,'1.jj
j I..v i.. III""" ,-..
-r
fe / �w+5;r,' wed '.#-' i ,'..-,
•14•1 _� •11 Cr
li
,may r .
t "a! Y .l.
Photograph 20. View of Perennial Stream A, facing downstream.
Photopage 10 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
• . • ..• .....„ . .....,
.. , ,..
„.••,.„:: „••,,v, ,,,„,,,,„ „,,:,, ..,,,r.;••.,_ ••.„,:... iit,„.,.. .. . ...:,•:•......_ •-.„..• .....4.„."...„.• i,.• ••,.. . .: • . ..,,
,,-,._ • ,,,- „,„.,„ L.,., ,:.,.• •,:••.,....,- .:•„,,,....i. .,•• .:,„.......„.,:...:. ,••..„...::-,•• •,..• . ..... ...,..
„,., • •,,, .•
. . . _. .. .
.,•:•,•.•,_ .• ,•L ••,,..„:„ • . ••.;.....,:•••„„ , . . . ,. ... . ...„.„..,..., ,..,;.•_:•.: ,,.. . • • • . ..
. .
• ,. :\ •••••,.. _ .••:-.::...._:•-„,. • . ..
: „ • ....,,,••:,,...g_7,.......: • ••,..• .„,_:• ,,. .-,..„ •••• : • • ..., ... ,. . .___. _. _.
,... . . :.. . .. . . .
, . •,.. . ...
• .
••..• \• ..
. .
,,. .
,....... .. ._.
. . .._2„,
. .. . . .
r'-.— - . .. , ... .
. . .
.. ..„•• ....._•.... •
,• .• .
• . ,,:-..
•. . ,,, ...... . ... . .
... „.....-.. ..,_•.,„,.._..,_...,..„.. ....„ • „..., . . ....,:,.. • , .c, .._..__.... . .. ...•
., . „,.- ....,-•,• f - '...• . ,.:. • ',"' • • . • .. 1• • .. '•"•-.. •.' . ', ":::-• • ':
1. •'
.T. 3
Y' .s '.--•; ".tea .-- 4.! i .
ilk :'• -
.),....,.,
\-\(., a''',,,i •
.-.416,„ .. .
,, , .1, . 4
,i, a' .-.1(2.-. . .--.----..
dii . ._ .. 1
-11•Ailitki . ' \- Ni- .'•'• ; .:' ' :... : -...."..-%'-'. '.,
Photograph 21. View of Perennial Stream B (Coddle Creek), facing downstream.
r
77l 1-1•4. :.. Y;: 'fi r.... - ✓R.' _.-- _ - _"A'L. - ,,:
c ' 1� - 4.?iK'. ,.mac.: _ .r-".`^!;i• ,}}�. ::..i
g �3:. • • .L.� ky. i s WINK'• • fX'•r .• '
•
ti
fir'::
•
.-� w S
�,5 • :i„"., - M1 - _ . 1:4' . . i< a•'� �.. A- • '
sfY a T".+^. _ 5 .. :-. yr -
•
= „�..
•
_t,
'�.: `= .;.. • • - day'•.
Y S•.y ..fit... • _ .r.a - ,'i -
1_1
"r r- +S•. - -si-.'`.. :,5-F - 1 mod.,
•
•
'`L w f=
•E_Zoier'-::' •• -. -."1' •.;..r.`- . ---
=e1� ''
• C.
'.fir'_ y:s. r Y '-7`' ., y' ,....,.. rt.')'.0 ...($ n- i
Photograph 22. View of Perennial Stream C, facing downstream.
Photopage 11 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
;:ti i }. F.
+� .a�'�,: r Ate. ..� _
,' -,- -'e i.:,./,„17,0`," s.1 21 4-?"74'., ,. - .' mit' aril,.
.. - - - y - - .s Piro
S ... ,. � .-. _ +Maw~ --� -
�-„. •.i a-4.. y�'l+ r• •Y 3',._-J^'d[r
,_ ,a 113. ''Y'.7.,..„s...,:ik-' ,__. Pr' 1 -1,14k:zoiot._'',.4*4
"soli .{r ;.. Yam, h' .. ._ai^-.: lr S Kt,•.-• �T�'�+,Sa '•"t_:5.
i�1' -'' a ff r. + i y1 _7 ,tea.24- Tom .*• ^/-
Photograph 23. View of Intermittent Stream D, facing downstream.
..'- ')3� ' (,. . ' 1. .^2Y ._�.� ! •T/1- `•. 7 •'�
- -a .F•' .. .' .. -I 1'
4 ',".' .. e r. 4
Photograph 24. View of Perennial Stream E, facing downstream.
Photopage 12 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
4i." '.-ii1_, '- Z*NL• •w-, i'.., J. —i-(1..", ) • ir N ' ,•F• ..'r• •-•1-•••=-.'" •',-••-. ; , '
..'7Z,,,,,,.*.•• .,,.._i'4,,p_ ' -_, ',j A. .• ' r
_ _- :;. v
4
Y..
cr
A r kr i l .:
I
_k, ,.,* '4 "''''',At, ,. . �'-...r - •Z xyam, ir 'NO
lip
Y4 l't�t- 4•e. ll\,, .' Y ..• z '. •d mot -. 41Ii
Photograph 25. View of Perennial Stream F, facing downstream.
*,.y'. •. .''.•asg �y 2 ,,y: '' '.
`
4. .ram a • ,. $ 1. '• ' -----. r At; .,• l z
_,. Fes• ' , . c . ;t..
•,r4-r ' =..4 •:*- ---:-.) : i . , , 1' 1' xL `4'
.R
. ., AT
•... A ,. sp! A' :Y r,
. .,
:� ,'�.r-'rtt A. 'V'�, t , -, \ + •-4 .may{ -. ,�'1,, !.a ,'it "'f
motif.:-'.[ ? 1- ..-.. •= 1 '��'
: . •.�_r . . 0.1'''' may,
for
fi. • ' ,L 7,- , --- w:i_ii...,,,,r,\:,,....4r.,;:c.,,,,,,'..4,•--....4ek,.,..‘„,1.,,..i:,..,...., :
1/ -„ilk. .,\i, -- ''tlik.
i __.
r ��/I
rfr1i e. r ry ✓.. i S i. ,r
•
r.'"•Aef,rt, '
fri
.• '• Imo,- r Y.' -- '} s �.� �.
Photograph 26. View of Intermittent Stream G, facing downstream.
Photopage 13 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
.As •7.
-✓'. ;•x 'i T:`'r• •tit•. , •C -j f� .r• ..- ;� -: s
tea, �..�;��.., :Yy ..:.; .�` � � • _'e � .: •k,t.- �
li .
•,-•••• r :,�"•.r?¢ �' •"_6 - Yy• ':r. } ••:-;).-,::',car•,
L.
err
Y L: .,
r r-. '7' - ram. ,i,g;.'.•::
.
fir..•
''��,,��11 ;Vie. •'•S .� ,�.
5 -
y
Photograph 27. View of Intermittent Stream I, facing upstream.
‘5
.a r
�'_�--;�K '_ - - -v . •fir r r 'i .1 "'7' •'rk� - z '
. *-sue•-.-.- .mac: sA F, ,;..:: . xx
3
- f..►•_;_ :s4a,:7" ..- -f'. -- - ;%:r�� � ra I'tnY.=''•",;i�:��J: ' !� ., r`4'
• ": -... - _ , S.. ti.__.. _ _ � �f. 'ram_•� -!
.,. ,F....,s. '''Zs'. .• �.,J hit.
k
. .:ti_`- .''s. -•a-1•..cam, ii-'n p -
- r - r . ..... —
- a - ,...-,yam•.— __.�6.:. �a�� �+- ��
_ •.;t''-;;,��
��. • '-- - ... .. r - - a ,�
Photograph 28. View of Perennial Stream J, facing downstream.
Photopage 14 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
•
.''z'.4r4V..
daL -zl• , i� .jtt v�V l ��"••
, 13
•
,. : - #.. - -r1".'-- "J' -
LL a z� .mot ,Y {"�ir' T' .
, • '
, • w7` _ • '. ____•_ ' te. _ - 1L
YW. S � }
N. •
f ? _ ��a� , � -,_•,..- v y�.- i� �'�.� x— ti _ _ .liir
740 1..,-.,•::! ,..0• • el* ...1. r . _
•
Fri. • / ' i �� , ys5. ran— cyr. 44 _"fj _ •,..r.
, .. _ _ ...-r - a lilit4:14, :
Y ' i
rY \-7; .lIJ • •
II..s..• .N.-"lyam r -? flr
' 1
Kei
r 5 r � It.,'
r {4 _ a .
•
d
kr
• ed
Photograph 29. View of Intermittent Stream K, facing upstream.
'y.�.�. •11. ,s !'s••-,�[ 1„-,.7,i
""
-' - - _ •',•• .5; :qi ;t-.+'f.t. -".wl. ' r .• -,ti ...r.P' '[�; ' ri "wn_ ._•,4___,_.„. ....irler. ..... _ . _,1,.._ ,•._._ . ,.... •_ •,„.. .1.___,..._,,,1,2,......,..,..,... i.,-..... ...., ,„..0.• ,?.. lir-4 ,. ,...._
,_...4.-1,-7,t;,,-..„ __ •-. f ,_ r.:_. _ — •' ,..•t r.k2.1. •'''' Ok.r-r. -°.•‘‘•k.t.44...,'.0. .r 741."' i- ". -Jt?,1 -• '': ' - ' ';
i,;--e.,' ,._, A.#: .._' r.---. ... • . - ,.. ,..„..4 .z.c.. _ , _.,...,,,w,__ ,---__ . ,4-_,„,,—. ._ : .c., . ,..„:„...„.,_ _. .: io
.. _i,lir.....r.:7,.....,...,..0..,. -• ._,_ _ , .•. ,.„..i- II; ,.. .„..,.., _.!...4641,.._.• ..,., i .•:••„ii.. zi„, ._ 7..... ,,_ _... .....,,..,
1..
... •.t., _ _-• ...• , • „iiii,„ - ,..,..,-z„... ,...c .:.,,,_,...,..ik. 4..., c.....,... ..,...._ ....• _ r '" ''.. '...
�.. '.-.yam. . a�w . .`", _ i
t. _ _`?: Y' ^.F: . r ` ~i
•
r.
•- l
. " r
T tp {- rC rP:
•
.•f '.0i , 1 ,1- ;:• 9.'- :-:"...-`,`.- yam• v"
•
r • _ '"••. `.A -�-
• •• - •, 140 . - -_„•.1 . .• • . 7 ,,,.-.., - 7,_.J. -0 - \..4
ems' , ••
•.. - - rl�.N.. ., '!:••4 ',I:. ."tc : --'~ • %1!z'.,� " .mob , :.._V-
Photograph 30. View of Intermittent Stream L, facing upstream.
Photopage 15 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
4z.
•
-` is
• rya_ .• "_$r•. ,.:• R =, s
,a �'. :- ,cam. + -
may 4. 9'•a
l`1• - - yr.r
-.. .� � l• '. ■�Y0
t: � wjy � ��.- may
4a.wla --44e
:.., .� .. iv '_i ?,• s t ` ,• `,y: ,• ti y 11•. r" �
t&:1/4/14.4'(a. A ,m,ur ..-,:r7 4, -,, •
Photograph 31. View of Intermittent Stream M, facing downstream.
EC cy ?lir ...- -, ir,-, . mirk , i fr.:1,
Ille
,.• - ,44,
...), .;. - •: ,=•: k, - -., ; I'�: �i '4%;. ; .: �..:. .may,
k.
, s.� ,i �• r � � � ^'"� ',v r �w .:`. : :..fi "g:�- �, fi- • ` ' tr� 5. . _: . ra. y,At
,..7
•
•
r.S :.ice ,_ k-� -- - . 2 �. 'd• -}
r.
. :1 :i w I .. =,-- - byA `.F �•s y, a. r. -
r �. r-v 1.
Photograph 32. View of Perennial Stream N, facing upstream.
Photopage 16 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
.:,:_ ��., .-i.�,N,_r .'.1 ; ,,, .a ::'Af ..J'r.'-.x r - S,.. ., ,._.y:
•
•....5 . • - - ' �- .
•
:+xa • may l4`
I. �n y ^A :). 1 � ..
•
ir
•''; -ate ,.�: t� •. _;:- .,n-:.
. .._... A.0
'.�.. - •. -.-•i�'S` • _ .tiz 'R•� �•r of 'R� ,'{w_4 •` ✓: :P.
•
4„,.
......, ..,.„..,., .
. ., .,.....,. ,.... .,„
. ....„,. „:_„.., .
- .
..1,.:
..,,,
. ..•:
__
.4 i -,
, T ... :.'GY.-.- �s..l �.f.� ..a. �G`� - . .._. _- . T i-e'1.54 , E.�.„ ._• -YR• tea. _s '+
.S Photograph 33. View of Perennial Stream P, facing downstream.
714 � .L�Y f - - w.`fir • k.r. s `'
•
' t -•�- •:q• .r�z*it,y, '' •.L' `Jf c 3r.M1: .,. �.q s•- rfy -.��•;
�-Z. y,r 'HJ•'#r;r�l.q•, 4 .ae -�i•c7F �' - :... .�••,, �s'. :. FY • A
11
' , "ik.•x, g '' -'_ .y . Y •." ••f.. •. • • '51
, ,_„.
_tA
Y -4'1r '� ,r' ,4' 3' -r'4- +l» .I - •1.r,,i :!�''�' .. r s�- a ':, � r
xT.. ,a�. r4- - f•'S';,. - '1 .i�C'�yq _ a:Y _t ;�y/n.• � :.,�
`+=r _ 'iTy �_ �• f ;,.• "ki•.+ .. .gin► 4Z14 •-, I,+Yrr'�
`fir -, -,,•'-- :, !. A: .`,i i, , •.;�C':,-•-. - - �' ••,- -
7. - S 4:4'g
ii,_20( _
. `�1. • 17c. - ' -• , 'ram•.:-- 91i;II:/, ':• ' • :.
. .rele
. K.ems[;_•., ,,;" __ �p
j .. _..; R. C.
:ss,1,r'Pk d, :1. ,'. 1'.�LP' �$ i fin:
It
. . .„.. _ __LI ..i.--,rk:., -. . \, ., ' .--1, , -7.:-",--:ferff!... 1..-4i---.7- $17,•-re.i.:' ,166, .. -.;\ .4,--Ae.:.;
- :�'^i.
ilk.
•
•
. J' y r^ -' .y` ..pi,,
s
,�1 I _ 4' •��{,([ it ce•'
AY''
_• LLl- .. _. • _ -.Ka-etl'i Isi,Jitu:....- , • .,-,7-4-.. _ .
�^ Photograph 34. View of Intermittent Stream Q, facing upstream.
Photopage 17 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
1. %.-.."Al ''''-•.1,_ ,_,.•ii.,:,:li "4.4;rt_l- ,-'.-,_,,"' ,L.1-L..--A-_,-.7 -‘-, 'i.,.. --N.......,1, ,. .- ., -1 i --.', •-
.� �_�-_ _ r ' '- . . ..ram -.1:.*..._ .._
4pTG ; • • • � �y�•
,�
4
......,„. .._ .. „?.. .,...,.._, .,_ _ _ .. ; ,.,,,:,--.,,,.......,,..,..„... , _ . , .. ..._ ... , ,... ....... .. ..„..._ „
r�'t ```•» A .1 r :.ill. -,
N.
- ._.rti.:��s..r .^ .ice,,�..'. , �.` '..�;`
4.
---"1114 y;; .,,, ,. i. le •i Or; :: ;
•
• • ir
4. ..d]�[ mil'• - •..- ,r4-.`. 1 . ..
•
Photograph 35. View of Intermittent Stream R, facing downstream. fs
'
f',.'..ZA i'fi.r •, .•_
. . ,. _ %,.....
if �. . •tom 1. ? _- - L7y.15'0 - -
, ;:'":x ' ... a
+F� ,.
- -f -Cyr - . iy,N•`
'`� 1�f� .Frey 4 r ... R _III
•
_ -�® '04 * I. - �, "•"` •SHY.•
�
- ti„L:w r. r�'f% / i Add` ='•t� _ ;Y, -
..,. ._ ,......._
, .
4.e- •e ir
f' :Z :,,- s r r.' Vie' rt
. :,
o, **.
A
ii.- __ 1--., ,- di , - , , , . ....,, ii Photograph 36. View of Perennial Stream BB, facing upstream.
Photopage 18 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
It
IF, .' ' Zi lit I ith
I ill*
•
air i•.tkip
. sy r .
403.km_
� r.. , 4
ill ,i ' f ••- ..
• 1 .,'y
Photograph 37. View of forested non-jurisdictional upland area (DP9), facing north.
riF • .
'.% , \ 'C'''''.1-\'', it,.' '' r ,..4sit;Ci 4f •':'.'?i- tk i
it
..,.,..,...:„,t.
4.
4
1,,
' ' L..4
'a �� , ,� --��Ei- . 1 } .P: pry- r aN
''1,'
:tY :,•. - ;y'.'''1At..r,mzr1'".,3.3_'2.17,-'.i,At-.r N.Vi'..0..''
Y[4fs+#I .'`r :i,"rsy;; ,,sue • ! rye ,I,: •z- _
1 f)•,it'11 t'..::1','-'2:•'.'1,
r'_'! a3. . . .:..; _ sL4 '? ;1 •, ,,
,-,4-L-1'..',-
�.il ..-csC-w-_y ='q{_ "��• ,... +c..' .awi.7 71E 1, Y .~r.. . c..
., Arl•Li,,,,,V ••L. •, .- '•,.• ,kkft.3,,V„.•
I' , y• 1,:,,,:.'.,
•)•:l, '•,r,. 'Xriii, 'r'--A:. • 1.• 1.: ' Y...-'4. [''•..Lyle,-:�^
� V•s`' _raV'� �, ' •r'i� 11in:}.•. L: '�; ' ,, 'r f
Photograph 38. View of emergent non-jurisdictional upland area (DP10), facing east-northeast.
Photopage 19 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
y 1 ' R 1iA.
�• 1"
J'.
y.' a. n .xs. Ti --»ry.-
w' r -.. ��x�: - h 'fi�. •
.- - • " . -_ .
,..,. _ , _. a C7 ri' _ 1-..- a._ . - --"
• ,'
el---a—•=-- I
3e-
Y;.k
li •
i'kVP l yt. .■v j1.
...iif,v
•
n yw::y:A 'r ,
'Irk J ktiti•
Photograph 39. View of emergent non-jurisdictional upland area (DP11), facing northwest.
- ''' .- t I ` 1n1r
' - �� � '.::_
-.,-.-.-‘-'-L�i. .",^ -- . s". r� / tip-'. R{-- LL �i.,-_ �y,,Ar
-:o:i5s •,-Ly9�q��� n �As.�"_-�' -aN,.y ia,'.,. Yzi',. ,� :•ar-�Y: �' E`,'. 1
li y �,,L` _ Oc"• .•.R.. { ; w :C..T^ `-,. 1G.L• . y p� t- .n ••
''[[ .1 R• = •" T..+,„6„,•'`�,3" •' -, -{.- zy',T,,H. " .lam•.L' +S•v+.x , •.
's'. tiF-'''" •.,_ w t` .+_ 4 _ _ i r• 1. r ,, f ti
VS 7 S
•`.f r - •d`. -_, f - - Avg'.$;° '.• f• ._::.. '• .. !'�4,i.1`%_ . • .i •
,' jy •'mow _ yy.•r': • ���..�,'w�, .i�' - �.' ..
ft
4. . .."'" .v. .,,1. ri' ."C y Esc ,w ! `- ,`
s sv; /: .f; •;_ ems. y.-, ,r__ :-- 3 • }
t.
0
Photograph 40. View of forested non-jurisdictional upland area (DP12), facing southeast.
Photopage 20 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
i I!1 77 )1 ..,.._ go p.m 107.41.-11i.
F I ill, 0 Nor ,I.o.-,-im. .1 „,, , 1 , - .
•
i 4 II 1.L.•'4'14 ' ‘. , N 4 , I i 'w''''• ,...'i-i.'ir
faink.."-'4 ..*.,..1. .... . 7 .....itk ....... e # .. • t. A i F • '
tA, .r7,i .:.:4,.,4! , 411 if4 •41 , r I -- ', 4,-- • i gr.- 'nil
,1 • ,
IA , vilkc I am Oit ;r1kr i•*,kr • ' '4
•-•., • , ' fit tr4 t: i. , IS NT ,.0 pc? v'' 4 - 1 .
' . '. ..!-• ?.L. bi: ,.. 0, ?'lird kt ,
I VI, .1.i: i AI LI 'Ai.Fi ir 1 11 i.k1 Iii A: " . *
ii r', . A if i'Ve,1.1."Lii 41,- 04 0 i Ot: 1, ,. ,g,,, r• •. _, _ ,..i, i • 1 -, -- __,.._. ,_ I
.',. .' ,, "it ..-k•L Yr ,, tilillp tal 11'..'t ..,,ati' iff'' 1..
4
.r, ,..„., , . r,... t a " ::el a,..,.0. -4, ii,,, - ly.
.4 ,„ , 4 •..i • t'`, 4,,T•••%1 ., • ,i .. .4 4:
Are. 't..;.• 4.:' " .1' °I‘;•11 .4 1, Pt
.ir1 'Wail- '. ;1 • 1 • 5, , •- -'7"."• ") If Is 0 , -4 •r•"7-. ..L... V 4 t'-;.,, .7'. ":.•-fr'' lit lt
,: .10%•...„, ,.; -. ••,,, . , _..,.r, •: t. . , 0..., ,c ifkl; ,,.-,;• ,;:
ril,!,.F.4-:ilf1,0:.1.., 74:1134,, . -••- ':1''...----.'4:41 :
'•E-,:e 1 I g 1 t q • -7.'- 4 . ",
. h • .
... li,. A . ...
Jk
1 , - 1 A• 1 4.
- ' P`'-•4c1 f ",,r,.1. - ii.
w
,iv••.n.•9.*". i 4i *401 ,....);.-74-: , At,Po'. -....- •-••• ' . '4- . .„ I ,, Nytid,ri...:.", . . _...,.. ...,...,,v, ,,...... , 1...,. : -- -,.....:,., -;.: -, .:-.--..,-.:,,: ,,,,,,,,t,... -.,--. .- . . ..•,..,-„...,., -5, .,..., .4,r-otr-4,04,; ...:z.,r - •-I.-
`" '%•' ' ,4?„....
ir ''-'11-„..„4 - .-'•-. 4 : ,,,/.,i67‘: -- , '''''..-,. ..,.'• J'..' „ --;-.1..,,,:.H:rt•---. .,,.:*;:-:,Iii-=..F.'• iy.•,•••, _,-*;•WY!. ''.__M-. .:,-,.. .-:-,..e.',35,'-'. IS:. .:-••.','••2:'''--• 1 T. 'kr:1,,,• , :-.44t,..3,''',..,.*;;.'_"T----;.!:•,..;,..,i ': „okr.4:..---':* ...f. ,, ',-b-s.'''.-=14, '-,'%-4F74.--- =--,,' '*•sinalh, '.. '' - ''''..-.%
..L..44. . A • •sr'- • N ' ' -r-''';'-- - - '.-•:14.' '-''''--<-. -.-: -' ''' -...''- R::'--,r''4'' 3-..'"4.-: -.*41 '&4;4'Wif '"--'6'-is.
.- -"-.6._ ::- -...-." '- , .-4'..'''- •-' "c••:•..- .,-i''--' ' 6-•"'' ' ••.-%?,,- -••-.... .4 . r.fT < iegt,' L•'-- 744 VE-.'P. -. , ' -., .1. _• .'" v
A-'.',..1'''t--., *3 '.ier'-'4,1M,:.-:' A--,... " '--.--.-'•.4 • ?--`-•',-''''--L-t".. litill:&-7',.' r41-',-.-'-:",t1 411 :''';i'7. °1,1tir'r`f.:44.7..
- -
-"-,..,.:, '.7--,011;,•',,.-- -_-•.,,:.,: .,.. V' ..F''• , - _ ''-" rft ,74-_4:1?.F.A1k,,T'‘','"', .-111,".r._-•'•:.•1`;,i,-,5e _
11-- y• ,...-- . ' ' -'7: .7,.. .0•4::AP., ',I,,- •,i,•'''d ir:?'L''''C';.4•'=:..-:,... • '. --1 -'47 tr--*H.F.'7,1-PO4-3;7441relf-
.4.- • Zea.z..7 ."' - i-.' .4.t."--"V. '•'. ''-}'''Iiiiii.ft.A. '' ''41'ir.'`."- .'-. '''-` ' -' ...•'".‹,,,:...'- ' ''''''' •" -l'''400 ' •‘7,.:3_ ''''I'roye. ''•-•/4`, '''•,c,,, ;, 1:r.- 'F-V.--`1-.'F.- --- --;•.--ra-r.•,/ ••:.46,7:c-1AV .1:,,,'‘
4-• ,,s,%:. '-. - --_... ,,,,..;?!.--:._ : - - ,-_,:- '.- -.:7-'. ,-.:-„„,..- , , -1,- -i.T., .4,-.76,, . - -.. -':_w-'4,,-.7:0---,.
•.'-' -:'-iiikk.164 ',- 2.--4.,41- .94114;; 17T:4.- -Pl. -.-
-_ 1 .1144-ft_AVT,.•,1-,,„
_..,---A'1,,,:.-,- -,A"; ,,,,,_,,Ic"': .'"'r-.,---.-- •- --, 4.,L i--• 0- 4'-1.:- : .. )•-",.-. . ' ...•._ - ' g4X-ii-q:. - ,f :
r-,-re.,- -• -_-_--,- q. - .., -----.- ....., .....;_... ••--43-r,?•:' - 1,.....,..,3.;.: ':-:',17"',_..4...•-::-4- w-,•'.7.'••<-,'•••';?...,;_.v, •••,,42k -...,,,• r.-,:- 1 N.,;..7,--'t,.. •_,4"-.,_,,g„..-. ,.- ...7. , 4..;,_' - 4,4t• . • . • r,F,..1'• ' --' ...14.Qr7.,',.._--441 ,, ''/4 l',•;.,,:,. r ,'
-'1%1_7.7r.,,51-1t?-r __./.46,7_,','• ' -',; '-.._ 1:- ..','',.,•,z4-,k.„...c''..-,4'..-.2 , ,, . :1.14114:- , .40401 •••-' I. -.•...&. ,.;. ",,,,\Ar:;t510;--1,;:.11.-_,'2', .
-,_..,_ :',r' C .411,:^7,77,„.-.7;,-,..,r1".,-,r-'all:,.-2 :'IF dg'-..-.:r.'-.'_'?.1•A' ri.. ..*\4,:31,..-,,,r;',1 ::t"0,10,',..;Z:„Ve:"•;;RI•_-„4, ,....," ,,r,:.__.,...„4±1.,. ,
' - 'r '''' n- - - ..' -• •7''• '.. "/ %,-_-_-_,_ •-,-,.....,-.. • _
Photograph 41. View of forested non-jurisdictional upland area (DP13), facing northwest.
Ai::trhfrfitIlL lil' . 11 i vi.i. , 9 itiil . .I i irt 1 4r -, 11, if 1 wilwiii-gpt,-. 160: A.,1.i. i 1 I iii
ill
., a, --• 4,,r • ....g., ......-00t
ur .. --nr;•••7.74.17.84.11;_ '
41,,,,,,., ;,, i , ,,i, h ...riff& IT ri."4' Pr i .tz.r--- -,,i,„••
tilo 4 , Ili '- 2 ' Ivo • 1 qz .- r- 1 iv
/ •,.-",yi,..-',,,,i.,.:,,,,i, i i•:#, , ill,''t, tYk Li i• i fil'i :."-- AY-
. 4.„..:.,It ;., .s.,,,,,,. ,..ki. . i ,Om..; ,, ...;_,• .,7 ,,,,, , FA,
ir,r.;,........1,,, fi.„,,,,.4 • .
0A,,• • A 41, 4 ', r, ' I 1;1,1',11,At iliTre.to i .7'2 3:`'1".'51' •r% ' .i L,lit r r , .. ,, ..;
.ii4.00, g 7.0 a '; 41 WV, ''• - I :1 '
0115,,,r.". t,-.4 ',,• :. •\A . .:• , •
- ;•'a•h•;V,r, r; .••N • -,., : - ' .1. 1 Lil 11.6:.',..P.9*.*' '4, -',. .-
'VW,1 ' v., • •'',.,• 'f- ,., L, • i 4 . •
'\., ‘:T,"A- , .,; • ' `' '--..: ' ' C V ' I • .., II •
.,. --7'e' . ...:"..1% 1;,. • . ....9.'V .. ... • •1• .. •4 r. ,.. r .,.. .. i ...
, ,, -,.---"6-t-# .1.14,... .„ -,•,Y ,.!.'•;0 ' :: 1•., '. ,,,
... .• . ,...
• ,:'. / i' -''' f • i y i V'''' ''F' 1 .. •
= J go-i • - 1 t. iiii /-„•. , I
i iik: ;it;'.4-1 , ,/.' :• 1. ', ,.i• L L - •- * _I 0,/,,_,:.. ,--,. ..,.,. a.al'''IP, tl Li.:‘...17 ,.1...t. e04..
I ''41. ' 'Akt.'Iii
r ,., - ---- '• •_.,..-A 4,--' '_ -•,::..= ',.
''' ,,.----,-/.,:`,. :;..i-..i5L-,?,,,,:..,.J.,--/#14'" Oge3 ''' '1',1''. 4'' ' •
t,- ,::,* ; ,,,--7- ±!'lY 1,4$41r -flf -, ,,,-. .--.x.7.? .:-..i...i .• .., , . g.0 ...;04..
INMr , • , ":, -4. !' . . , -... .
'2v'.1 .-lk-'L• '',-'-.':,`',1,,Si ... -•ry'F,.....l: •i.., '•-,":, -'„ ' '',i• .k '-.. ' -7.iii;.ki. ,_4"'•',-; 'Air''''A 41 74-' "Ir''1 'el /
a'- e.,,, •. .4-, • - ._.,-,'.,,,,, •• - ' • ---, . -_.__. ,e'"7:••... .,..._,-.1•41••,c,-. '''-0.4t6--JP',- ., : ..t
iA t )- '- ..,x.-11:1•`"''' ' ' ':•-- .' 1 : 47.=••• .P1.1'.'-' l'It--,-Si- -- ,-C-i,'Rrt 7,: ., 'I
'4 ''-'''Ilf,-. ;001,1""er.74,_ --'-',' - ' l'11,.,.... .-• • •,',„,--.,.!,',. 1,, -L, 1 ---- _ ' et- . ... - -,...,
1,' '; 7-rm •j., F.:1-11";•-; •„,,,,;•-, .1, 1, ''''.. ,,•,4,.,.- ' -,it :, ;- lettlf, ,, A V',--'/1;7?;_..;,..- '-4-71. '4'''•-• i,' .
i
'I.". .. .?' .(•'''' ' '.44 - 4.''-'j.' '.....:3- ''' :' .'',.'!.14...14.11) !-..Mi,; '. .;.:14.1
„:„..--.4ele_._•,,,-,--r,'--0:414, ,,,V,"7"•'4,1,,,,,,,..,:::;..4. -A-c::: . klci. .t. r. ,,,,,,*, i'......._,,4214,,,,,t:',;::1--,1.,;-1-• ,..-•_;..'
N. _ -;-0'..41.ft:00.1k)---,1410ki- .P ---', ---...-,.. . 4.:,Ne• ' - if".k •''''*-- ' -P -' •4 441. 1/4-,"
,-- ,,,,,,‘ I Vrir ,t4E.,,X ' k''''', "*,4, : --;-if"' ''' :'''77.---
rr:-e , ' - --_....,-- __,...._41 •t - ' •,...- -'' 7:1, -.1. --. . Ve>"''1,'',' ,..,.„. -•- 7
ivi.r#,nkf.: ',,,..,..,:,:".•„S„. .1,..-- • .., _ J.., pilly .._"i,-,..',•, .., ...1. .1r110....':y. Izi
'''..:. N.42t1 '-1`----7.7- 114114''' ''.1 '-,r-.t 34 '-,P''44111''.'''...!•1 F-' .-.- 1-.*:.'-4.T*'''.::1-c--.X4i-:=1- .1:-.t: I.:y•' . 'itq.''' --•TOM7, ' 'lir."*. ''''':4'..5
•---.• ''''.‘.11".L4-11';'A C "A'' 'citiNia -, ...--' . ,,,./..„.: N. - -.- -4v.•-......:-...:---,
ib p
,,i,),•• - ''-+ k- t -211,4-1,ftr'r . olil,,il,t11,,,: '.r•:' •,1--• - ,. .-e` :'e7c - '''`AL '1.-4'Or' ,ii41`t ;1i"-•§2r`S,74, AkS "\!• .',‘S._ . • .LA
r.Pr.r''4ti<4 Ar'''"'N •.''',1' pikINIVI'', ''.' 't 41-4;-:b• '- 4'-%01.'-'1kZ.4- 7*
OF
of1- - .:\ • ,.1' ' ,- ',e., \":,,t. -• ::.- ."L:..1,-;-*Itt..40,,,..i-
';. ei-- •'...t vrp 7.. .. bkl..,,_,:„;. i, •_ --,• ,-,,,,, ,oi.-.••,-A.-...,„..- Ire--4,
• ' ' ----`-*/, 4a. -••- ---.5 -, -_,Alit., .,.,, .i - :i. ,1,..- f;miti- ,:-.-:,--.A •,,.. • ••••4:•,- -,-..z. ,:r, _ • :. . •k..•
, .T, ,.-1 - ,' ..- -.N.•.- ..- -_,--
Photograph 42. View of forested non-jurisdictional upland area (DP14), facing west-northwest.
Photopage 21 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
1 Ter wilvi ir: ,..1.A..717fir,: eati i . tip,:e:6: 1',
'
1
t• / • - ' ...
--I , p=,1;'-r • , f, A -111 , t: "„1%r, ' -tp•L'',.''-, 4, ,iff t 1 t 01,. _.', iiTz..L
. : 1 fi k f ' ' ' 4 i -• ,0 rA ,., • A,_, 1, CI. ie. , / r, - _77.-
1 • , A. , 0. ft . -. . .,. I. 1 .4' $!IL' 0 1$1/
tiv `,,, ) kl ,_ ..- i 't . 9 ;41) 1 J 1 • ' ''
il •'•, '0 50 i I-0.1.: 4 'Oi 1 ;ref i, 0,,....-,,‹- i 1.)
.,14, f 1 El • _;--...-:' A r .',, i r 1 ,•• ':''' '11;,i1/41,°-;..4..r( ,,,,,,,' :v. /.,,,,--!,.. t!-- r-L
.
'..4_L....,... tf"•rt,.,4,e.„. a_,';1 g4.....is3'.,,...-•_',,1'-:,,;,,-;
,p i ,
• ,iI i y r .•,4p.-•.._.•I .f4t,,,,i i. 0:',,ii,:-q•,,,....!.',.,,','i`Lir'.',,,'-,,,..''.'.0,:F,,,,,..,..,,•,r,„..8.-..f,,_,,:?.-•; , -r.,,r,:*,... I.,._'...., •,.,1LLr.
,. r...
.. 4,
i •r. • ; ,... iiit.,. .:,.
, . ,1,.. , ' '''-• 1 ' a L.. .1 .4..1 1r.;Z..j -0..
.7 ' ' -- - e,. ., ,,.. - . ., , - 0 :._ !:'-- - L . - ,, '; ' :.,.- •
•' - .— -, .•.\, ,-.•,—, ,_,...-.. -,...: - ' _, .e.,..: :•,'•- •- --..-..- ,-7`A14.'''''' - ' -'t -.' z:4'.'"
110
, " :-, I ., : - ' r. ' -•'*„. 'C [I '''`., 4' ''.%.''','-.- '.''•' f •' "A . ..•' 'a ' r.' '' .:' - ' '1‘'''',_ i'->" '-'• a ':' ::....lirr:t.l.‘r'1'1›...-. 'L''` ',..1 t1'.' '..'''' .,.k.itil.Zr'''''''''.‘"-•'Z''' ' .2 '..''''.••
d 4:' ' '.'r'' '•••:' ,., 1 "'4.':'''' 4
'' '...t'<ir.''d.'d;VI' '•.','' ':'...!,'''. d7':..1..L'';C.4. '' : ' ' ' , ..,.!Z.4. •.....1;•.,••1,.•1, ' •.' •,. :.1 ••••
''',': r • ,Vit'...Z: 4° ,' :',...!.4'-...•:ip'' - .".-.4. ..-5,,,_.•-,fr:...Te,-Xsc-cl•, 13-,4-- .L.,c,,,i, , - ';:;.;',-„- ,.-,---- -, 4.- ••*. ,... ,
_'• ",.,''' '• ,w- ',2: ,'•\. --'' ' --r-.4....:1,-',.,.‘.--.4:j,..' c:.%ri:,-''t•;',V .,'-,, ' 4 '' , .r. - '4 - ,, - iw- •- --'N.--,_'-
- 4,_ ---••'-'et- , .,...•;-•-.4•,-.,-;;,7--,.:•,_ -:„,,1;:',-,•,:=-7,•:• :,7--.T.--•:,'--4,-,- •-,- ,,.• - ...: .--..--4”: -4. , ,:,:r -
..<2.'-'-' ' -• - '''''.--.'-•:''.--::-.,- I.--- --"--.. -'::.-' ‘V--.'Ai.'• - .,,,.?-'9:•!A.TV'44 , . ,:- .:1-.".'t,---4:,f',-
it irtivr,
. ,..: :.''' . , 1' 4.'' - --.*.'•,ri:::,,,k,.. •••''r: •44•,--•-•1:''',,,._-'-i, .a!-.--,L,-i-.,11-!1•:•,41,..i.'••_-••_ ....;•... •- iie..-',-,---,-, ,'
- . • . . . :.JV' rr'..;5°.,(d .• 4AilifSh .'''''1 Ar''• '-q-Pk":,.e-N. ., ."'''''4 v-.. -
' ''- a -. -•''',.4:i• .• ••.:: 'V,.. .r•d Vd.JS,:dif4: TO: r' 141r5.;'.7!....1 '7'...''. •d.'.: .i':;iLL '''4't'..r. "4],‘.‘1,..4,e'••''''::.' )'. l''''
' ' . .'' #4'. ;'4‘' ''''1 .'::•1 74!•'.4•:....k.'; ''''./4:'•'''' :44.145.':: 7t:i7'e 4,1r‘;' .14..: d:.. ::41,"";':.1V:
' r ... '.',:j%. •Or. .d.•471,,4.41,,' " •i'•d'\L 'ge,b4.'...vVtgr ALd-'''•;VoUrr.''.g**;41,T,"''m,:,...,'1, r.....,,...tj,..1 4t7' ...x:.• Z',t‘ek.A. .,
'. . 4 ,. As,..,) p ,-,, , •- 1.:;;-.7,,..., .6., ,,,,-, ,,N. ,k, .4„,„.,,, , • 7• ....._.„..._-. _
... - r -`r• T .„ ,,f'Lc,.L. . ' •
Photograph 43. View of forested non-jurisdictional upland area (DP15), facing northwest.
.,. --ccQA,..mk .1!1 ''' 1 ' -.4 'I -PC l'. '•
F --"Rtirk 1 trir•'4 -1k, ,. *4k.,,K ktkih'
.i.L Y. ‘'r 4? •_. lit I6k,i ., ,, 4114•14,I i..!.• .," ky ..%
Pr 1°21Pjlr-t*41rAj. '' IIIP141 411 ' t IF 1 ' • ."'i 1'4 ;
r ._- i, # "")• oiror.ft 44 1$.•Atift.21.70. '
, -.. ' 1 ti' ""Akii`IV.',!, '
-,.f I, r,- :,,... ... m•'.i ._,Iiiy, :;;Air: t , "ats.-41,111 ' L # ii
F ,41.,,,, .).•i , 1 ,I k
-r
, g .
! A, &f. iL,,,N „ •,•• , t-... 14•24: •ii'Lvit,,nt,.‘ .4 ii, --- 6'.• 7c,' ,i 1.':40, •li ' ' ‘4.1 vs 1‘T1% ' 4 i• '". :C1•1/4. 11'''r' 4.' qt 1 1 OA '. 4 Id'$ 1.01
I.A. 41,. 4 ' : ,hi -'r.,-lip-, .,'% g-. i .t ; '. . • TN&.1,c,:At', • ,., 'Iv i -4, ..ri.f'J 1
, to..ir-,,i-- h k, volt-#.4 1 0 tr i I .:. 4:.'k•L''. ..11,ViAlr ' ''''. ••";-, • t3eri i -
, ,•,..,, !AV' 1.. ''.10' .k C 1...t? : ' '':'',:s ':.... i,i ii.;301 I ill ne. .
i ii,V.41;14' .....:' 1 4: lk 1 li'l Ili 14 ..14 i: tiVt rb.- wr:'' ', ... ':..!,0:1- • • • ' '' 4 i
,r ,,*,,, ,,. ;,5,,. .„.t.4. 0 I 1 r i, 0 ---evii::•ftk , -,'• ,z, . •-, -v
. ,.„,t ,it k, ,',„t•-,,s-.,ift/10-,.,‘ .z, , A , ,,,,4•11,10,2::, ? ,,,,,', ..•::;; ; •... 41.11 i rrill..,.1 i .
' ' ...'.'411'I'''4*.T 4' 4'1''''''' '..114 t . .t: •A'4alt•-,.... •• ., r:,.• ..; ••
- -1'.• '-rL' '''tA.CI.#• L 4 III '''''''•'. 4:140 r lh •e-
r1- fkr *I' .''• . .,1 • -' ' •
r 1 ."f ',' •qt k!..1 'X' '11 :'.!L '. 1 ik ' '' 1
, , ' e r I I, •„.
• . '
. , .
- .--
, . .
.' '. •4'.4t,' ir7-qr-•'''.. •'—:.—-• ,• • .
' •`V.;.'f,f• 0A-.!''1-4='' :.'-'• . .,_: ' . _
, L .
',.'; •-•-',.,,. .ot - - • 1.• •-1.'LL - '',• -- -''''''--.. - al,a '" ''''.1'-'4 ' ii.lig:,--"..:g1;'-,'4'41. 447"-: ' "..' .-''
:,,' • •,:-..,.': :'21y1 -.•,_- :' ..'•;17 fia,"Vv aik'd:r 4 l'"•.-..:- "34.-.,', - • •" . • :r.A',.i.o. .71-2;:-,' ,•-•;.• K -'''''• '1,.Pr •., k
„,-sp...„,..,„,,,„;. ..,-„, .,,,, ,;., _,„,•,,,,,,4.,„„,.. ,....:0,,,., _, _.., ,,,%. ::,...,:,„k„,,,,,,,.-,..F.--,--L14-„#„,tr-_,-a .., im.k,, p,-",..c: ..:.
w,i/-,,,,i... ,,,,,..:, ,,.,,,,,,, .1-..ir..-,2,-Z•Piti.. 2Ar... .-F ''-'' ,41t. , ..›.:'-.."..r---7.P.r.,•-i-Wo4,' , .---"4.44.%,'''''''z41..s. 4....; -'''""-T• --
44T-,1-4:46.'r'',' "'tn.!,- 4''• 4--..' •-•'°-_'-'A't•L-4'• Y- ••• •-•''. .i"•,"..)--$4- ..
f,,.4...l-i-.4.'..., ,X-2-_4...'t,.:,-_1,.,&,.'-,,V.%,',.-..;._:-,',.•t•4.l,.,.!iy4:-,."•
r,---.-1_,..,,.".----•17,_,0•.,•tcN-•,,.S-„,...•k..*_•,.0i),c--•-,.„,,4,..,r.....••-•••••).-.,,,-,4.7.-•4....-,,...:"--4 er..•,,ei.,..4.t:. .- .-.(",,„.. •4T`•‘.,%'•*74,,k't..,.,.,ti','f ir,-.Y.,,•-,r,-4'4l...,e.=,.%...a.'.•',-
s . ;* ,•_4'.4‘t''4 1A':*,'?•1,.:;',1*..,.::,.„..'.iL-,•.,',',4,;:f.-,s;'...,.-. _-W,I tz• -'S c_'-,k•-,..,.3-4.,;,.
1,„,. •-..._,: •,., ,., .1,....,:,,....A.4..z. ...,,r.,.,, ,.... ._ 4.,,,,_:...„,,,44,=. '..-4r•• .; il,,;',4-,,',• •:..'''''''.' I''').'; dd''.:' 'd'r' . i It.. ''''''.;!::°V..4i,j*..t .' i'li%'. .16*kr• ::7.rr7;7'''''.:.., ::. ..;•'' .41''..,t' •'
1.4,.....44114, •i...,Y '.'ll..:14A":F 'I. ''..,...' :L'O,4'd.r.'.4'44...'t '^44,4'r;''..26iN 4:.....%.•''.,,*,.k.''.4:•.:L'• '•'•r':.' l•dfP'. .,. ,:t.,1,•.:,...••A..' .;:, ..'•„A,ZZ;C•
Or,
.4'.''1 i.' .d.•...••d ' ''..d ,4.:.,.i.1'.....1..T.'al-*..•„......"4,t.f" ., ''' ....a ,_ A v.-.„ .m....,:r,•54,....,,l, ,-, _4*,-4,7 ,-,L,,,•••_„_it.,,,m0v;,.., ,...:.s,,
,r-,.7.1-•.-4 .- -.J.04..i,•••:•' ..-!- -'41,V,4) 14. ":„-c. .;4'''''''': ,,.. • '..'. ..r•,-4.41,7?ry.c.f:-V.- --'"LP L.,10'.'r. (L• AI,..- '*' .1,1-. -.-7, -,
'i,..t. • -__&'6"-, ,. --tA••.;,.. `2,ii:,. ......•-' -•*". -, ,t.,.i.:. '''• .1 r ' -,`.7 '-,-.4 ,,,.*:,,i,' , ''..?..•&i. ' 4`.''''1, .' 1"..•.,... „a ..-4.19f.••••."1,'.A '
ii 1 417-•.. ...,ar:',a 't -....;1'..f:.•0-ra•'•• '' ','" 0, V. i': '' :I...'4 .k .1"41'''F''..,.%' , ••• .r.a=r'';F r' I. 1.' .-'r' •.4.,.i...rV1 ...
4,4yri
:1SIii•-' •'' :''.‘'I '. ',, : '.1 .' '4'•••' . ' '.....1 't re''..er.)"....•• ''''' ''••• 2',''.1 '•'1' '''' •Nia. •.- . A
-"r-' -Photograph j L 4 4:View of emergent non-jurisdictional upland area (DP16), facing east.
Photopage 22 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
, , _ -.i.;,. :...)--.2-4,.:,. .. LLwt.A•;.. _ . t. ., . ' ._- L :L.Lh.c. i,-L.—Ira e,% '%,,fr • ':,• .4%
ALo4ifl.r.,F.--.-1.;,.b0•ii-"•i-'.ii•;".il;-.e•%'.--,:6dI.,IIL•s.I 14•,•...,1I...!LL.i..•f%i"
fir. yCE / t - '`_._ '�,' .7 .L y t _.= ' .-• ,•T.• -
,::41-k,.•.r i,,."*,:,..rA.-9.e1-1:,0k'r..,;,,-',,-7Ek.-?
�': w w
`- 'L ,,. 0... r:_4' ' s R-. ,7t �_A i'- '. '.%:tY,,'7 _i11" ' .,rt ,- ,. .• .-.j•, •-
, , A.- . 07--.1-4, •,4 ,-.
4. t 4
. ':{R= .` �•s •3 — - k
'g,+". . ...tea 4:,
°�=Y, .•'. '-44
' y _ _ a.�:': � " ' �y �}•L' "!fi ' .'' .ty�:
L.
'.„ - •V_I-�G/,,. - 'i -I . J ism'.- ':k. W,i '.} F ' ,S•.;}',• !{As j
s'•fi'•:v •:Cw]; '' '1r .. .ti;i""i� TkL.,i .E:, _. I, LI i _
`�, '`4 r LS iM j .
4.
lor
Fr
i •- Vic. ' � Ti '• _
� J AF-_i. 1
+4,` ;sue ''- L• . :e4�:'Ji- • _ �•j:';..,I },. ::1 .r
key• .I�°. ^^ �Y. vi`A'":..,,, r' n' 1L. - `a:' .1+!' p,* �. -.r� i.' .-. `°A' • - -�e' -.'t'
• '`1: .��r .y-�7- y,�'l.i': •'�r •.8 P �•��' ter;- @ _4.
?.sue '• : .-r,': ... ,-;;,.. �f/ y- .., .' x 1 .. - _
- •i is.l ` 1:. 4 4 - .. _ --.: •-. '" yam.
`� �IL"�i4.'�.sw��iffw'.P �1 `•• - •f =i -t ; e''•:[. s .�=_'-c':�' ••.mow ���r•:Hn
Photograph 45. View of forested non-jurisdictional upland area (DP17), facing!south.
.- ?�0.�4�.,R N u`4 .f•rAi arc ►r. 7.-
11
Irr I.•0 i.fi. :',,: .f y .. I,ry ! j i .�;' 1. .i,
its,,,.� t r '- r Y- ,Al .[ if f'[i f'
4
n • tsar g �p a.. ,
•rF. � .. .- - - ems',. �_.
,...00..,
,•. Ate • .. • v
•
_.sit ` ia;r ,e w'_.' v j, ,a
n ti r:}.ya ...Am- .. .. S:' dr .,'Z^�`EriY J -. 4 -. �~tiiiiiii s'k ..,•:
Photograph 46. View of emergent non jurisdictional upland area (DP18), facing southwest.
Photopage 23 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor July 10,2020
Photopage CWS Project No.2019-0109
,, rn):401-7.41,., .i.7 11 , --§740 1 P- .4,r /..,: .
Nwt
111. . t.„.1.1,0,*:,,,,Anti.. .,..if t, p.4 i,,. , tit 3
. : ri Pr ./.,•,., •-. . ...'-,:• ‘ ,...-- 1
�Y - •��il ;PY� �• k • � ; flr •C /44?
.T�� '� t 'f El y.� 1 11 1 l� l :+!}1_�" 1� •� .1 ' : �'`.�{{}. I r ',fi . i*ity :i /_ r r.Y1 0�'E .}. � 4. ��-{5:.-�'./ `L.•
,„,t
T,(A • Oa
/ jr J V if (, n
Li:, •0.,,,,AN ik,,,.• ",ii • Vt. 1. 1. lir Vo..:) •,? •i• . .-i._._ ; -
10
. ,. ;V At fir } r' ...Ir• 1 ,....6l.« :.4.,` AMA 4
14111
•
•
Tyr _ •
• •-• ---.- • . 11, - •..-..• ,a, .. .•;,..,,,- , ._ . .... •.,_ . •
• ......; ._•.,..,,.._. 7'1 47016' :.-:7" ,•,•:`..4,:•.'.' •'-...-:' '--.-.--.1-••••,-.7-:'.7'--,.: :•. ::-.7.-.•-,;.Z.-.- _ •
'-
•
•
ry+i f •
Photograph 47. View of forested non-jurisdictional upland area (DP19), facing southeast.
Photopage 24 of 24

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor April 30, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Attachment D:
Wetland and Stream Restoration Plan

SECTION 02224
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION AND WETLANDS RESTORATION
PART 1 GENERAL
1.01 SCOPE
A. The work under this section consists of furnishing all labor, equipment, materials and services
necessary to replace and restore all stream banks and wetland areas disturbed by this Work.
1.02 RELATED SECTIONS
A. Section 01300 — Submittals
B. Section 02223 — Stream Crossings
C. Section 02270 — Erosion and Sediment Control
D. Section 02900 — Landscape Restoration
1.03 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit shop drawings and materials data as specified in Section 01300 on the geotextile fabric, rip
rap, and selected vegetation.
PART 2 PRODUCTS
A. Rip rap and geotextile fabrics shall conform to Section 02270.
B. Live stakes shall be gathered locally or purchased from a reputable commercial supplier. Stakes
shall be at least'/2-inches in diameter and no more than 2-inches in diameter, between 2- and 3-feet
in length, and living based on the presence of young buds and green bark.
PART 3 EXECUTION
3.01 STREAM CROSSING RESTORATION
A. All areas disturbed by the work shall be re -graded to leave the area in a smooth condition, sloped
for drainage. All impacted stream banks shall be stabilized with rip rap below the high-water mark
and plantings above the high-water mark.
B. Stabilized stream banks shall include all bank areas disturbed by the work.
C. Banks shall be restored to their original contours.
D. The stream banks shall be stabilized with biodegradable coir fiber matting or other coconut fiber
matting.
E. Plantings shall consist of dormant native live stakes conforming to the NCDEQ requirements, and
shall be installed in the winter during the period from November to March.
Rev: 9/26/2017 02224 - 1

1. The live stakes shall be planted so that buds point upward and approximately 2 to 3 inches of
wood is above the ground.
2. At least three buds on each stake should be installed below ground to encourage root growth.
Live stake species should include silky dogwood, silky willow, and elderberry only.
3. Stakes shall be cut at an angle on the bottom end and driven into the ground with a rubber
mallet.
F. A diversion ditch shall be constructed 4 feet from the top of bank to divert water away from newly
planted vegetation.
3.02 WETLAND RESTORATION
A. Permanent impacts have been limited to a total 0.0 acres and are the result of clearing forested
wetlands that fall within the proposed permanent easement. These areas will be converted to
maintained herbaceous wetlands. All impacted areas will be returned to their pre -impact grades;
there will be no permanent fill in jurisdictional areas.
B. All impacted wetland areas will be returned to their original pre -construction grade and will be seeded
with temporary and native wetland vegetation seed mixes, as summarized in the following table.
Permanent Riparian & Wetland Seed Mix (apply at 25 lbs/acre)
Common Name
Botanical Name
Swamp Milkweed
Panicum rigidulum
Joe Pye Weed
Schizachyrium scoparium
Scarlet rose mallow
Coreopsis lanceolate
Cardinal flower
Chamaecrista fasciculata
Soft rush
Juncus effuses
Pennsylvania Smartweed
Polygonum pensylvanicum
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Fox sedge
Carex vulpinoidea
Showy Tickseed Sunflower
Bidens aristosa
Soft rush
Juncus effuses
Pennsylvania Smartweed
Polygonum pensylvanicum
Red -top panicgrass
Panicum rigidulum
Little blue stem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Lanceleaf tickseed
Coreopsis lanceolata
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista fasciculata
Black-eyed susan
Rudbeckia hirta
Beaked Panicgrass
Panicum anceps
River oats
Chasmanthium latifolium
Deer tongue
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Virginia wild rye
Elymus virginicus
Tickseed sunflower
Bidens aristosa
Temporary Seed Mix
Seed Mixture
Rye (grain) 120 lb/acres
Annual lespedeza (Kobe in Piedmont & Coastal
Plain, Korean in Mountains) 50 lbs/acre
Seeding Dates
January 1st — May 1st
Rev: 9/26/2017
02224 - 2

Seeding Amendments
Apply limestone and fertilizer per soil tests, or
2000 lbs/acre limestone and 750 lbs/acre 10-10-
10 fertilizer
Seed Mixture
German millet 40 lbs/acre
Seeding Dates
May 1st — August 15th
Seeding Amendments
Apply limestone and fertilizer per soil tests, or
2000 lbs/acre limestone and 750 lbs/acre 10-10-
10 fertilizer
Seed Mixture
Rye (grain) 120 lb/acre
Seeding Dates
August 15th — December 30th
Seeding Amendments
Apply limestone and fertilizer per soil tests, or
2000 lbs/acre limestone and 1000 lbs/acre 10-10-
10 fertilizer
C. All cleared forested wetlands (except for those located in the permanent maintained easement) will
also be reforested with native bare -root trees or live stakes as appropriate. Trees will be planted in
naturalistic drifts at an average spacing of 10-foot centers for an overall average density of 450 trees
per acre.
1. If containerized plants (1 gallon) are used they shall be a minimum of one year old with a height
of 12-24 inches tall, with a root collar diameter (base of stem) of 1/4 - 3/8.
D. Areas to be reforested shall be hand cleared to remove construction debris and rocks (larger than 6
inches in any dimension). Plants shall be planted in random mixtures of species which may include
the following species:
1. Trees
a. ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
b. box elder (Acer negundo)
c. willow oak (Ilex verticillata)
d. sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
e. green ash (Fraxinuspennsylvanica)
f. red maple (Acer rubrum)
g. persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
h. sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum)
i. black willow (Salix nigra)
2. Shrubs
a. silky dogwood (Corms amomum)
b. elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
c. silky willow (Salix sericea)
d. beauty berry (Callicarpa americana)
e. tag alder (Alnus serrulata)
f. arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum)
g. sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
h. elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
i. pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
Rev: 9/26/2017 02224 - 3

j. spicebush (Lindera benzoin)
k. doghobble (Leucothoe racemosa)
1. buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis)
E. A minimum of three shrub species and four tree species should be selected to revegetate the
appropriate wetland areas.
F. All areas with a survival rate of less than 300 plants per acre after one full growing season shall be
replanted to achieve this final planting density. Where plant survival rates are not met and damage is
the result of animals, Contractor shall be compensated at the unit prices in the Bid Form.
3.03 CLEANUP
A. After completion of each bank stabilization, topsoil, seed, and mulch the remaining disturbed areas
as specified in Section 02900. No fertilizer or herbicide shall be used as part of the restoration near
stabilized banks.
B. Remove from the site all removed vegetation, rock debris, and surplus materials resulting from the
work.
END OF SECTION 02224
Rev: 9/26/2017 02224 - 4

Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor April 30, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Attachment E:
Revised Impact Table

3/10/2021 Submission Completed
2h. Comments:
Permanent wetland impacts are the result of converting forested wetland to herbaceous
for the utility -line maintenance easement.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on
the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
3a. Reason for
impact* (?)
3b.Impact
type*
3c. Type of
impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream
Type* (?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*width*
3g. S.
3h.
Impact
length*
Si
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Culvert
Stream R
Intermitten
t
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
S2
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream R
Intermitten
t
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
S3
Stream bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream R
Intermitten
t
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S4
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream Q
Intermitten
t
Corps
2
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S5
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream P
Intermitten
t
Corps
6
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S6
Stream bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream P
Intermitten
t
Corps
6
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S7
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S8
Stream bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forrns/Forrn/Su brn it
13/25

3/10/2021
Submission Completed
S9
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Culvert
Stream N
Perennial
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
S10
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream N
Perennial
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
S11
Stream bank
restorarion
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream N
Perennial
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S12Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream M
Intermitten
t
Corps
2
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S13Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream L
Intermitten
t
Corps
2
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S14
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S15Stream
bank
restorarion
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S16Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream K
Intermitten
t
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S17
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream J
Perennial
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S18Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream J
Perennial
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S19
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S20Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forrns/Forrn/Subrnit
14/25

3/10/2021
Submission Completed
S21
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S22Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S23Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream I
Intermitten
t
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
28
(linear
feet)
S24
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Fill
Stream I
Intermitten
t
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
12
(linear
feet)
S25Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S26Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S27
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S28Stream
bank
restorarion
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S29Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream G
Intermitten
t
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
18
(linear
feet)
S30
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Fill
Stream G
Intermitten
t
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
12
(linear
feet)
S31
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream G
Intermitten
t
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
10
(linear
feet)
S32
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Culvert
Stream G
Intermitten
t
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forrns/Forrn/Su brill it
15/25

3/10/2021
Submission Completed
S33Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S34Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S35Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S36Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S37Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream D
Intermitten
t
Corps
2
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
S38
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Culvert
Stream D
Intermitten
t
Corps
2
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
S39Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
170
(linear
feet)
$40
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream BB
Perennial
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
18
(linear
feet)
S41
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Fill
Stream BB
Perennial
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
12
(linear
feet)
S42
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream E
Perennial
Corps
30
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S43Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream E
Perennial
Corps
30
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S44
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forrns/Forrn/Su brn it
16/25

3/10/2021
Submission Completed
S45Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S46
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
128
(linear
feet)
S47
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Fill
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
12
(linear
feet)
S48Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
4
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S49
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S50Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S51
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S52Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S53Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S54Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
S55Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
S56Stream
bank
restoration
Permane
nt
Bank
Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
Average
(feet)
80
(linear
feet)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forrns/Forrn/Su brn it
17/25

3/10/2021
Submission Completed
S57
Construction
disturbance
Temporar
y
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
S58
Permanent
crossing
Permane
nt
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
3
Average
(feet)
12
(linear
feet)
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
1,830
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
982
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
2,812
3j. Comments:
Temporary stream impacts are the result of open cut sewer crossings and dewatering
devices. Permanent impacts are the result of stream bank restoration, bank stabilization,
and permanent crossings via culverts and at grade crossings. Total loss of waters is 80 If.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 18/25