Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201347 Ver 2_Attachment E - USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms_20220805U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.363513 Sampling Date: 2/21/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Soil Map Unit Name: Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (IdA) Long: -80.643834 Datum: NAD83 NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands AA and BB. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True X High Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10) _Hydrogen X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP1 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3. Ulmus rubra 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Acernegundo Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 30 Yes FAC 30 Yes FACW 30 Yes FAC 90 =Total Cover 45 20% of total cover: 18 2. Liquidambar styraciflua 3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4. Ligustrum sinense 5. Platanus occidentalis 6. 7. 8. 9. 15 Yes FAC 15 Yes FAC 10 No FACW 10 No FACU 5 No FACW 55 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Lamium amplexicaule 2. Carex lurida 3. Lonicera japonica 4. Ligustrum sinense 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 15 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes 30 =Total Cover UPL OBL FACU FACU 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Lonicera japonica 2. Vitis rotundifolia 3. Toxicodendron radicans 4. 5. 40 10 5 Yes No No 55 =Total Cover FACU FAC FAC 50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 10 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 60% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 0-4 10YR 2/2 100 4-8 10YR 2/2 90 8-12 10YR 6/1 80 12-20 10Y 6/1 50 5YR 7/8 5YR 7/8 5YR 7/8 Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey 10 C M Loamy/Clayey 20 C M Loamy/Clayey 30 C M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Prominent redox concentrations Prominent redox concentrations Mn-concentrations - 20% 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.363256 Sampling Date: 3/9/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP2 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.641829 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (WeA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetlands AA and BB. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0.25 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP2 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. =Total Cover 20% of total cover: =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carexlurida 15 Yes OBL 2. Arundinaria gigantea 10 Yes FACW 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 25 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-3 10YR 4/2 90 3-20 7.5YR 5/4 70 Color (moist) 5YR 5/4 10YR 6/2 Type' Loc2 10 C PL/M Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 20 D M Loamy/Clayey 7.5YR 6/6 10 C M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Distinct redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.348032 Sampling Date: 2/26/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP3 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.623344 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands BAA, CC, DD, GG, and HH. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _ X Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _ _ X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) _ _ X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _ _ _ Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8) _Sediment _Recent _Crayfish Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _ Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Algal _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP3 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 2. Celtis occidentalis 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 60 Yes FAC 20 Yes FACU 80 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Acernegundo 15 2. Ligustrum sinense 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 15 5 Yes Yes 20 =Total Cover FAC FACU 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 2. Smilax rotundifolia 3. Rosa multifibre 4. Scirpus atrovirens 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 30 Yes OBL 5 No FAC 5 No FACU 5 No OBL 45 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Lonicera japonica 2. Smilax rotundifolia 3. Vitis rotundifolia 4. Toxicodendron radicans 5. Bignonia capreolata 10 5 5 2 2 Yes Yes Yes No No 24 =Total Cover FACU FAC FAC FAC FAC 50% of total cover: 12 20% of total cover: 5 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 8 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index Multiply by: x 1 = x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 62.5% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Color (moist) Oh 0-3 7.5YR 4/2 95 3-10 7.5YR 4/2 80 10-20 5YR 4/3 80 Redox Features Color (moist) Ok Type Loc2 Texture Remarks 5YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 5YR 5/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 10Y R 6/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 10% Mn-concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340790 Sampling Date: 3/2/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP4 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.609189 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling NWI classification: none Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetlands EE and JJ. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (C2) Aerial Imagery (C9) Plants (D1) (D2) (D4) _Surface X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) X Sparsely Vegetated _True X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on _ _Thin _Saturation X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP4 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. =Total Cover 20% of total cover: =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carexlurida 40 Yes OBL 2. Alisma subcordatum 5 No OBL 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 45 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-10 10YR 6/1 65 10-12 10YR 6/1 55 12-20 7.5YR 5/6 90 Color (moist) 5YR 5/4 5YR 5/4 Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 35 C M Loamy/Clayey 25 C M Loamy/Clayey 7.5YR 5/6 20 C M 10YR 2/1 10 D M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Prominent redox concentrations Prominent redox concentrations Prominent redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340977 Sampling Date: 3/2/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP5 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.609413 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands EE and JJ. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (C2) Aerial Imagery (C9) Plants (D1) (D2) (D4) _Surface X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated _True X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _Drainage X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on _ _Thin _Saturation X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) X Stunted or Stressed _Other Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP5 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Quercus phellos 2. Celtis occidentalis 3. Platanus occidentalis 4. Liquidambar styraciflua 5. 6. 7. Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 40 Yes FAC 20 Yes FACU 15 No FACW 10 No FAC 85 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 43 20% of total cover: 17 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Quercus phellos 2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3. Celtis occidentalis 4. Platanus occidentalis 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 20 20 5 5 Yes Yes No No 50 =Total Cover FAC FACW FACU FACW 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 2. Juncus effusus 3. Alisma subcordatum 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 40 10 5 Yes No No 55 =Total Cover OBL FACW OBL 50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Toxicodendron radicans 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 5 Yes 5 =Total Cover FAC 3 20% of total cover: 1 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 83.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-3 N 6/ 95 3-8 N 6/ 75 8-15 N 6/ 90 Color (moist) 5YR 5/6 5YR 5/6 5YR 5/6 Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 5 C M Loamy/Clayey 25 C M Loamy/Clayey 10 C M Loamy/Clayey 15-20 5YR 5/4 70 N 6/ 20 D M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Prominent redox concentrations Prominent redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.338062 Sampling Date: 3/2/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP6 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.602265 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetland FF. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _ X Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _ _ X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) _ _ Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _ _ _ Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8) _Sediment _Recent _Crayfish Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _ Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Algal _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0.25 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP6 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Acernegundo 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 15 Yes FAC 15 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) 1. Carex lurida 40 Yes OBL 2. Juncus effusus 40 Yes FACW 3. Rosa multifibre 10 No FACU 4. Chasmanthium latifolium 10 No FACU 5. Rubus argutus 5 No FACU 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 105 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 53 20% of total cover: 21 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UP species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP6 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Color (moist) 0-3 7.5YR 5/2 80 Redox Features Color (moist) 7.5YR 5/4 Type Loc2 Texture Remarks 20 C M Loamy/Clayey 3-20 10YR 6/1 70 N 6/ 10 D M Loamy/Clayey 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Distinct redox concentrations Mn-concentrations at 10% Prominent redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.334754 Sampling Date: 3/4/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP7 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.600149 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional forested Wetlands II and MM. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _True X High Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10) _Hydrogen X Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ X Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0.25 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP7 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Quercus rubra 2. Quercus nigra 3. Quercus phellos 4. Fagus grandifolia 5. Acer rubrum 6. 7. Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 15 Yes FACU 15 Yes FAC 15 Yes FAC 5 5 No FACU No FAC 55 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Acer rubrum 2. Quercus phellos 3. Liquidambar styraciflua 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 50% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes 15 =Total Cover FAC FAC FAC 8 20% of total cover: 3 2. Juncus effusus 3. Allium vineale 4. Lonicera japonica 5. Ranunculus bulbosus 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 10 Yes OBL 5 Yes FACW 5 Yes FACU 3 No FACU 3 No FAC 26 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 6 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Lonicera japonica 2. Vitis rotundifolia 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 5 5 Yes Yes 10 =Total Cover FACU FAC 5 20% of total cover: 2 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 11 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 72.7% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 72.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-5 10Y 5/1 80 5-10 10Y 5/1 70 10-12 7.5YR 5/4 70 12-20 N 6/ 70 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 7.5YR 6/6 20 C PL/M 7.5YR 5/4 30 C PL/M 10Y 5/1 30 D M 10YR 8/4 30 C M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.326778 Sampling Date: 3/4/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP8 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.595778 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Data point is representative of jurisdictional emergent Wetlands LL, and NN. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (C2) Aerial Imagery (C9) Plants (D1) (D2) (D4) _ X Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated _ _ X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) _ _ X Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _ _ _ Deposits (B2) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Burrows (C8) _Sediment _Recent _Crayfish Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on _ _Thin _ Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed _Algal _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP8 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: (Plot size: 15 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 40 Yes OBL 2. Cynodon dactylon 20 Yes FACU 3. Persicaria maculosa 20 Yes FACW 4. Saururus cernuus 5 No OBL 5. Plantago major 2 No FACU 6. Scirpus atrovirens 2 No OBL 7. 8. 9. 10. 89 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UP species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 66.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP8 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Color (moist) Oh 0-4 10YR 4/1 85 4-10 10YR 5/3 80 10-20 5YR 6/6 80 Redox Features Color (moist) Ok Type Loc2 5YR 5/6 15 C PL/M 5YR 6/6 10Y R 5/3 Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 15 C M Loamy/Clayey 20 D M Loamy/Clayey Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.366703 Sampling Date: 2/21/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP9 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.645342 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (WeA) NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of forested non -jurisdictional upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10) _High _Hydrogen Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP9 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 2. Celtis occidentalis 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 50 Yes FAC 20 Yes FACU 70 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Poncirus trifoliate 2. Ligustrum sinense 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 20 10 Yes Yes 30 =Total Cover UPL FACU 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 2. Ligustrum sinense 3. Lonicera japonica 4. Juncus effusus 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 60 15 10 5 Yes No No No 90 =Total Cover OBL FACU FACU FACW 50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Lonicera japonica 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 5 Yes 5 =Total Cover FACU 3 20% of total cover: 1 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 33.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP9 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-4 10YR 5/4 90 4-10 10YR 5/4 80 10-14 7.5YR 5/4 Color (moist) 7.5YR 5/6 7.5YR 5/6 Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 10 C M Loamy/Clayey 10 C M Loamy/Clayey 10YR 6/2 10 D M 50 N 6/ 30 D M Loamy/Clayey 14-20 7.5YR 5/4 90 7.5YR 7/6 20 C M 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Distinct redox concentrations Distinct redox concentrations Distinct redox concentrations Distinct redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.364154 Sampling Date: 2/21/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP10 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Long: -80.642393 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (WeA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of emergent non -jurisdictional upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP10 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. Celtis occidentalis 40 Yes FACU 2. Acer negundo 10 No FAC 3. Acer rubrum 10 No FAC 4. Quercus phellos 10 No FAC 5. Prunus serotina 5 No FACU 6. 7. 75 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Ligustrum sinense 2. Acer rubrum 3. Acer negundo 4. Quercus phellos 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 Yes FACU 10 Yes FAC 10 Yes FAC 5 No FAC 35 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex pensylvanica 30 Yes UPL 2. Lamium amplexicaule 15 Yes UPL 3. Allium vineale 10 No FACU 4. Plantago major 5 No FACU 5. Ligustrum sinense 5 No FACU 6. Potentilla indica 3 No FACU 7. 8. 9. 10. 68 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 34 20% of total cover: 14 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Smilax rotundifolia 2. Lonicera japonica 3. 4. 5. 5 5 Yes FAC Yes FACU 10 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 8 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 37.5% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP10 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-4 10YR 5/4 100 4-10 10YR 5/4 90 10-20 5YR 5/4 70 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 7.5YR 6/6 10 C PL/M 7.5YR 6/6 10 C M 10YR 4/2 10 D M 10YR 6/2 10 D M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): MLB/ALH Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.352703 Sampling Date: 2/25/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP11 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2 Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Long: -80.628732 Datum: NAD83 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? NWI classification: PEM Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of emergent non -jurisdictional upland areas. NOAA states that Cabarrus County, North Carolina experienced above normal precipitation during the month of January 2020. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP11 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 50% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 1. Allium vineale 5 No FACU 2. Festuca heterophylla 40 Yes UPL 3. Ranunculus sceleratus 5 No OBL 4. Taraxacum officinale 2 No FACU 5. Rumex crispus 2 No FAC 6. Trifolium repens 20 Yes FACU 7. Digitaria ciliaris 2 No FAC 8. 9. 10. 76 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 16 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 0.0% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP11 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-4 10YR 4/3 100 Color (moist) 4-8 10YR 4/4 85 10YR 4/2 8-12 10YR 4/2 75 10YR 5/8 12-20 10YR 5/6 100 Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey 15 D M Loamy/Clayey 10 C M Loamy/Clayey N 2.5/ 15 D M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): MLB/ALH Sampling Date: 2/25/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP12 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.356063 Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Slope (%): 2-5 Long: -80.629854 Datum: NAD83 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? NWI classification: PFO Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of forested non -jurisdictional upland areas. NOAA states that Cabarrus County, North Carolina experienced above normal precipitation during the month of January 2020. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP12 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. Quercus rubra 35 Yes FACU 2. Betula nigra 30 Yes FACW 3. Juniperus virginiana 15 No FACU 4. Fraxinus americana 20 Yes FACU 5. 6. 7. 100 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Acer negundo 15 Yes FAC 2. Fraxinus americana 15 Yes FACU 3. Acer rubrum 10 Yes FAC 4. Celtis occidentalis 10 Yes FACU 5. Ligustrum lucidum 5 No UPL 6. Nandina domestica 5 No UPL 7. 8. 9. 60 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Vinca minor 2 Yes UPL 2. Stellaria media 10 Yes UPL 3. Lamium purpureum 2 Yes UPL 4. Quercus phellos 2 Yes FAC 5. Ilex opaca 2 Yes FACU 6. Fragaria vesca 2 Yes FACU 7. 8. 9. 10. 20 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 13 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30.8% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30.8% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP12 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-3 10YR 3/3 100 3-20 10YR 4/3 100 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340354 Sampling Date: 3/2/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP13 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.607683 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10) _High _Hydrogen Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP13 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3. Acer rubrum 4. Celtis occidentalis 5. 6. 7. Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 40 Yes FAC 30 Yes FACW 20 No FAC 20 No FACU 110 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Acer rubrum 15 2. Acer negundo 3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 5 5 Yes Yes Yes 20 =Total Cover FAC FAC FACW 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Woody Vine 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 80 Yes 80 =Total Cover OBL 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 50% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP13 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-3 10Y R 4/3 100 3-9 10YR 5/3 90 9-20 5Y R 4/3 100 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 7.5YR 5/4 10 C PL/M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340377 Sampling Date: 3/2/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP14 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.607459 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10) _High _Hydrogen Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP14 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3. Acer rubrum 4. Celtis occidentalis 5. 6. 7. Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 40 Yes FAC 30 Yes FACW 20 No FAC 20 No FACU 110 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Acer rubrum 15 2. Acer negundo 3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 5 5 Yes Yes Yes 20 =Total Cover FAC FAC FACW 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Woody Vine 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 80 Yes 80 =Total Cover OBL 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 50% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP14 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-3 10YR 5/2 80 3-5 10YR 5/3 90 5-10 7.5YR 5/4 100 10-20 5YR 5/4 90 Color (moist) 7.5YR 5/3 7.5YR 5/3 10YR 5/2 Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 20 C M Loamy/Clayey 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 10 D M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Faint redox concentrations 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340135 Sampling Date: 3/2/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP15 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.608253 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True Water Table (A2) Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10) _High _Hydrogen Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3. Acer rubrum 4. Celtis occidentalis 5. 6. 7. Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 40 Yes FAC 30 Yes FACW 20 No FAC 20 No FACU 110 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Acer rubrum 15 2. Acer negundo 3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 5 5 Yes Yes Yes 20 =Total Cover FAC FAC FACW 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Woody Vine 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 80 Yes 80 =Total Cover OBL 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 50% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP15 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-2 10YR 5/3 100 2-10 10YR 5/4 100 10-18 7.5YR 5/4 100 18-20 7.5YR 4/4 100 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.340134 Sampling Date: 3/2/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP16 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.607828 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional emergent upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP16 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 50% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 1. Carex pensylvanica 70 Yes UPL 2. Juncus effusus 5 No FACW 3. Potentilla indica 2 No FACU 4. Lamium amplexicaule 2 No UPL 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 79 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 0% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP16 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-4 7.5YR 5/4 100 4-15 7.5YR 5/4 90 15-20 7.5YR 4/4 100 Color (moist) 7.5YR 2.5/1 Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey 10 D M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.336928 Sampling Date: 3/9/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP17 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.600922 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP17 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Juniperus virginiana 2. Quercus phellos 3. Liquidambar styraciflua 4. Quercus nigra 5. Quercus rubra 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Liquidambar styraciflua Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 25 Yes FACU 20 Yes FAC 10 No FAC 10 No FAC 5 No FACU 70 =Total Cover 35 20% of total cover: 14 2. Quercus phellos 3. Juniperus virginiana 4. Ligustrum sinense 5. Acer rubrum 6. Fagus grandifolia 7. 8. 9. 15 Yes FAC 15 Yes FAC 10 No FACU 5 No FACU 5 No FAC 5 No FACU 55 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Ligustrum sinense 2. Lonicera japonica 3. Ilex cornuta 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 25 Yes FACU 20 Yes FACU 5 No UPL 50 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Lonicera japonica 2. Toxicodendron radicans 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 10 5 Yes Yes 15 =Total Cover FACU FAC 8 20% of total cover: 3 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 8 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 50% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP17 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-5 7.5YR 3/3 100 5-20 7.5YR 5/4 100 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.330615 Sampling Date: 3/9/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP18 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.596592 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional emergent upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP18 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 50% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 1. Ranunculus bulbosus 50 Yes FAC 2. Lamium amplexicaule 30 Yes UPL 3. Sorghum halepense 20 No FACU 4. Lamium maculatum 10 No UPL 5. Potentilla indica 5 No FACU 6. Allium canadense 5 No FACU 7. 8. 9. 10. 120 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 60 20% of total cover: 24 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 50% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP18 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-8 10Y R 4/3 100 8-20 5YR 5/4 100 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Applicant/Owner: WSACC City/County: Cabarrus Investigator(s): JKM/ITD Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.330971 Sampling Date: 3/9/2020 State: NC Sampling Point: DP19 Section, Township, Range: Cabarrus County Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-1 Long: -80.596241 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional forested upland areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave _Surface _True High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Patterns (B10) _ _ _Drainage Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ _ Marks (B1) of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _Water _Presence _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _ _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants _Other _Stunted Iron Deposits (B5) Position (D2) _ _Geomorphic Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP19 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Acernegundo 2. Celtis occidentalis 3. Liquidambar styraciflua 4. 5. 6. 7. Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status 40 Yes FAC 10 No FACU 5 No FAC 55 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Acernegundo 2. Liquidambar styraciflua 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 20 5 Yes Yes 25 =Total Cover FAC FAC 50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Ranunculus bulbosus 2. Lonicera japonica 3. Viola sororia 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Woody Vine 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 5 5 3 Yes Yes Yes 13 =Total Cover FAC FACU FAC 7 20% of total cover: 3 Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 50% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x 3 = x4= x 5 = (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 83.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP19 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) 0-5 7.5YR 4/4 100 5-12 5YR 4/4 100 12-20 10YR 5/4 100 Color (moist) Type' Loc2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey Loamy/Clayey 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Indicators of hydric soil are not present. ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0