NC0024244_Renewal (Application)_20140408

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0024244
Albemarle /
Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Renewal Application
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment
(67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
April 8, 2014
This document is printed on reuiae paper - ignoY-e any
content on the relirQrse side

—� CIVIL/SANITARY/ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
ww -- _ ■ (---
III
License No. C-0281
Engineering
Company, P.A.
SITE PLANNING/SUBDIVISIONS \ ` SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING (SUE) \..
April 8, 2014
Ron Berry
NCDENR — NPDES Wastewater
512` North Salisbury Street
9th Floor — Archdale Bldg.
Raleigh, NC 27604
RECEIVED/DENR/DWR
APR 9 2014
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Reference: City of Albemarle NPDES Permit Renewal — Long Creek WWTP —
NPDES Permit No. 0024244
Dear Mr. Berry:
On behalf of the City of Albemarle I am submitting the attached NPDES Form 2A
Renewal Application for Long Creek WWTP. Along with this submittal is the supporting
documentation for the basic application information as well as supplemental application
information. Appendices have been added for lab data used for the three toxicity tests,
topographic map, process flow schematic, and respective lab data used for the
expanded effluent testing requirements.
Please note that under Part D Volatile Organic Compounds, Acid -Extractable
Compounds, and Base -Neutral Compounds were marked with an asterisk to indicate lab
data used to calculate average daily concentrations and maximum daily concentrations
originated from two different Tabs. These Tabs reported the respective pollutants with
differing MDLs, which in turn skewed the averages which are reported within this
submittal. The 2010 and 2011 lab data indicated a higher MDL that the second lab which
furnished the 2013 data which affected the data for Maximum Daily Discharge as well as
data for Average Daily Discharge. Included within the attached submittal are the three
referenced lab reports.
If you have any questions or need additional information during your review of this
NPDES Permit Renewal please contact me at [phone].
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Ben Clawson, P.E.
Project Engineer
CC: Michael L. Leonas, Albemarle Public Utilities Director
File
PO Box 97, Garner, North Carolina 27529 [phone] PO Box 349, Boone. NC 28607 [phone]

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WVVfP. NC 0024244
FORM
2A
NPDES
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (Sills) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
Mailing Address PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 08002
I I l
Contact Person Brandon Plyler 6 pi/ I.Q,C{1 [ d C.+ Ct,l ` -e )Ytitrt�c %1 ts L,t/6-.
Title Chief Operator/ORC
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 1040 Coble Avenue
(not P.O. Box) Albemarle. NC 08001
the following:
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide
Applicant Name Same as above
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
® facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC0024244
UIC Other
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
City of Albemarle Collection System 15,903 (2010 Census) Separate Sewer City of Albemarle
Town of New London Collection System 600 (2010 Census) Separate Sewer Town of New London
Stanley County Collection System 1,230 (Estimated from Flow) Separate Sewer County of Stanley
Total population served 17 733
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Dee Pee
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12"' month of "this year occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 12mgd
b. Annual average daily flow rate
c. Maximum daily flow rate
Two Years Apo
5.26 MGD
16.47 MGD
Last Year This Year
4.98 MGD 6.29 MGD
11.04 MGD 18.81 MGD
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
Separate sanitary sewer 100%
0 Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? X Yes 0 No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
N/A
N/A
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks) N/A
v. Other N/A
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? 0 Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location: N/A
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) N/A
Is discharge
0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
X No
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? ❑ Yes X No
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location: N/A
Number of acres: N/A
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application ❑ continuous or
N/A
❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
N/A
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name N/A
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name N/A
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
(
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge N/A
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. N/A
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
N/A
Annual daily volume disposed by this method: N/A
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 22

•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location Albemarle NC
(City or town. if applicable) (28001)
Stanly NC
(County) (State)
35' 19'27" N 80° 12'56" W
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) N/A ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) N/A ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 6.29 mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs: N/A
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes ❑ No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Long Creek — Index # 13-17-31 (Class C)
b. Name of watershed (if known) Long Creek
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): Yadkin — Pee Dee River Basin
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek VWVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced ® Other. Describe: Tertiary Disk Filters
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 85 %
Design SS removal 85 51,
Design P removal N/A %
Design N removal N/A _ %
Other
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorine gas
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes 0 No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ® Yes 0 No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number:
PARAMETER
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value
Units
Value
Units
NumberofSamples
pH (Minimum)
5.7s.u.
pH (Maximum)
7.3
s.u.
!//A
Flow Rate
18.81
MGD
6.29
MGD
Temperature (Winter)
20
C
5
C
368
Temperature (Summer)
31
C
13
C
531
' For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
BOD5
37.1
mg/I
5.76
mg/1
249
SM5210B
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
2800
Pem100
158.25
Pem100
249
SM9222D
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
92
mg/I
22.35
mg/I
250
SM2540D
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 mgd must answer questions 8.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
- 471,000 w/ average weather gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
system that proved to have the highest levels of I/1 based
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
A project is currently underway to repair some of the collection
On a resent I/1 report. The project budget is $3 million.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within Y. mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? 0 Yes ® No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: ( )
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.S. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
One
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
® Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
City of Albemarle entered into a Special Order of Consent (SOC) with the State of North Carolina.
d. Provide dates imposed
applicable. For improvements
applicable. Indicate
Implementation Stage
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational
e. Have appropriate
Describe briefly:
by any compliance schedule
planned independently
dates as accurately as possible.
Level
permits/clearances concerning other
or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed
of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion
Schedule Actual Completion
MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
below, as
dates, as
Yes 0 No
06/01/2014
requirements
/ /
03/01 /2015
/ /
03/15/2015
/ /
03/30/2015
/ /
Federal/State
been obtained? ®
An Authorization to Construct (AtC) has been obtained to perform the construction tasks outlined in the SOC
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must
effluent testing required by the permitting authority
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes
based on at (east three pollutant scans and must be
Outfall Number: One
ONLY).
provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide
for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include
the indicated
information
conducted
other appropriate
data must be
reported must be based on data collected through analysis
must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing
no more than four and on -half years old.
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
4.5
mg/I
.74
mg/I
249
EPA 350.1
.045
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
48
ug/I
29.29
ug/I
249
HACH
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
12
mg/I
8.86
mg/I
249
METER
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
5.7
mg/I
4.63
mg/I
3
EPA 351.2
.26
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
16
mg/I
10.93
mg/I
3
EPA 353.2
.80
OIL and GREASE
5.3
mg/I
4.3
mg/I
3
EPA 1664E
2.60
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
5.7
mg/I
2.68
mg/I
12
EPA 365.4
.025
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
220
mg/I
177.67
mg/I
3
SM 2540C-1997
10
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 8 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
E Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
El Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
0 Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document
designed to assure that qualified personnel
manage the system or those persons directly
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there
for knowing violations.
Name and official title `
Name
and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
j�yOM �-
' 1�t0.ei L . L P�7i�G�s — ✓ i r- cb - 17L),61 Le_ t fie..
Signature
/�
Telephone number (7Di t:1S4 9&GS
Date signed ti'�c 'R 1 `"f
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUM
DL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE,
PHENOLS,
AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
0.070
mg/L
0.054
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0059
ARSENIC
0.005
mg/L
0.005
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0054
BERYLLIUM
0.002
mg/L
0.001
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0001
CADMIUM
0.005
mg/L
0.002
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.00036
CHROMIUM
0.056
mg/L
0.046
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0014
COPPER
0.147
mg/L
0.116
mg/L
3
EPA200 8/EPA200.7
.0016
LEAD
0.005
mg/L
0.004
mg/L
3
EPA200 8/EPA200.7
.0021
MERCURY
11.50
ng/L
11.30
ng/L
2
EPA1631
.00017
NICKEL
0.010
mg/L
0.008
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0018
SELENIUM
0.005
mg/L
0.003
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.005
SILVER
0.010
mg/L
0.007
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200 7
.0019
THALLIUM
0.058
mg/L
0.020
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200 7
.0058
ZINC
0.080
mg/L
0.065
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0038
CYANIDE
0.005
mg/L
0.005
mg/L
3
LQC10-204-00-1-X
.0049
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
86.6
ug/L
53.8
ug/L
3
EPA 420.1/EPA 420.4
30
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
60.00
mg/L
45.367
mg/L
CALC/SM2340B-1997
.14
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: One (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
<50'
ug/L
34.67*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
4.0
ACRYLONITRILE
<50'
ug/L
34.5*
uglL
3
EPA 624
3.5
BENZENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.383*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.15
BROMOFORM
<5.0*
ug/L
3.407
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.22
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
<5.0*
uglL
3.39'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.17
CHLOROBENZENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.39'
ug!L
3
EPA 624
.17
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
<5.0'
uglL
4.667'
uglL
3
EPA 624
.17
CHLOROETHANE
<5.0*
uglL
3.41'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.23
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
<10.0*
ug/L
7.033*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
1.1
CHLOROFORM
7.8
ug/L
5.9
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.18
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
<5.0'
uglL
4.4'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.17
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<5.0*
uglL
3.38*
uglL
3
EPA 624
.13
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<5.0'
uglL
3.403*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.21
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.403*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.21
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<5.0*
uglL
3.403*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.21
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
<5.0*
uglL
3.37'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.10
CIS - 1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
<5.0'
uglL
3.4*
uglL
3
EPA 624
.20
ETHYLBENZENE
<5.0'
uglL
3.38'
ug!L
3
EPA 624
.13
METHYL BROMIDE
<10.0'
ug/L
6.71'
ug!L
3
EPA 624
.14
METHYL CHLORIDE
<5.0'
uglL
3.38*
uglL
3
EPA 624
.13
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
<5.0'
uglL
3.410'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.23
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
<5.0'
ug/L
3.43'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.28
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<5.0*
ug!L
3.39'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.17
TOLUENE
<5.0'
ug/L
3.38'
uglL
3
EPA 624
.14
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: One (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<10.0'
ug/L
6.71*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.12
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<5.0'
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.14
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<5.0'
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.15
VINYL CHLORIDE
<5.0*
uglL
3.44'
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.32
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.167'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.5
2-CHLOROPHENOL
<10.0'
ug/L
7.067'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.2
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<10.0'
ug/L
7.133*
ug!L
3
EPA 625
1.4
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
<10.0'
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.3
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
<50.0*
ug/L
34.3'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.9
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
<50.0'
ug/L
34.20*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.6
2-NITROPHENOL
<10.0'
ug/L
7.03'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.1
4-NITROPHENOL
<10.0'
ug/L
7.33'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
<30.0'
ug/L
20.60'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.8
PHENOL
<10.0'
ug/L
7.13'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.4
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
<10.0'
ug/L
7.03'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.1
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid-extractab e compounds reques ed by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.13'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.4
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.07*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.2
ANTHRACENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.20'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.6
BENZIDINE
<50.0*
ug/L
33.87'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.6
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.10'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.3
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.10'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
<10.0'
uglL
7.0*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.0
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<10.0'
ug!L
7.47'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.4
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
<10.0*
ug!L
7.10'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.3
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.13"
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.4
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
<10 0'
ug/L
7.07*
uglL
3
EPA 625
1.2
BIS (2-CHLORDISO-
PROPYL) ETHER
<10.0'
ug/L
7.10*
uglL
3
EPA 625
1.3
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.53'
uglL
3
EPA 625
1.7
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
<10.0*
ug/L
7.00'
uglL
3
EPA 625
1.0
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.33"
uglL
3
EPA 625
2.0
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.00'
uglL
3
EPA 625
1.0
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
<10.0*
ug/L
7.20'
uglL
3
EPA 625
1.6
CHRYSENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.33'
ug!L
3
EPA 625
2.0
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
uglL
7.17'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.5
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.70'
ug!L
3
EPA 625
3.1
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.43'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.3
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10.0*
uglL
7.03*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.1
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10.0'
uglL
7.03*
uglL
3
EPA 625
1.1
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.0'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.0
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
<20.0*
ug/L
14.43*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
3.3
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.37'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.1
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.13*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.4
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<10.0'
ug/L
7.47'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.4
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.17'
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.5
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
<10.0"
ug/L
7.30*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.9
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.37*
ug/L
EPA 625
2.1
FLUORENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.23*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.7
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.0*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.0
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.07*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.2
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.03*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.1
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.40*
ug/L
EPA 625
2.2
ISOPHORONE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
NAPHTHALENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
NITROBENZENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.07*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.2
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
<20.0*
ug/L
13.83*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.5
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
<20.0*
ug!L
14.03*
ug/L
EPA 625
2.1
PHENANTHRENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.13*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.4
PYRENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.37*
ug/L
EPA 625
2.1
TRICHLOROBENZENE
<20.0*
ug/L
13.73*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.2
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g , pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 14 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek VWVfP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent
Ei chronic ® acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the
column per test (where each species
toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number: 4 Test number: 5 Test number: 6
a. Test information.
Test Species &test method number
Fathead Minnow / EPA-821-
R-02-013
Fathead Minnow / EPA-821-
R-02-013
Fathead Minnow / EPA-
821-R-02-013
Age at initiation of test
-17 hours
-18 hours
-18 hours
Outfall number
1
1
1
Dates sample collected
10-06-13 , 10-08-13 , & 10-
10-13
12-01-13 , 12-03-13 , 12-05-
13
1-05-14, 01-07-14 , 01-09-
14
Date test started
10-08-13
12-03-13
01-07-14
Duration
Seven Days
Seven Days
Seven Days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
X
X
X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
X
X
X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek VVV TP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
Test number. 4 Test number: 5
Test number: 6
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
at DMR sampling location
at DMR sampling location
at DMR sampling
location
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
X
X
X
Static -renewal
Row -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
First Test Senes
45%
45%
45%
Second Test Series
67.5%
67.5%
67.5%
; Test Serve Thirds :' :ff"
90%
90%
90%
Fourth Test.Series:
95%
95%
95%
-r tip 1 , , Frfih Test Series'
100%
100%
100%
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
6.54
6.84
6.92
Salinity
Temperature
24.9
24.6
24.8
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
7.9 mglL
8.2 mglL
8.1 mglL
I. Test Results. •
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
95 %
90 %
92.5
LC50
>100 %
>100 %
>100 %
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 22

95°% C.I.
%
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100%
Other (describe) Pass / Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Other —
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek VWVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
Chronic:
NOEC
100 %
100 %
100 %
IC25
>100 %
>100 %
>100 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Plant Effluent Only
Plant Effluent Only
Plant Effluent Only
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DDIYYYY)?
/ /
/ /
/ /
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
E Yes ® No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1.8 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
(SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number
works.
1
of each of the following types of
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge to the treatment
a. Number of non -categorical Skis.
b. Number of Gills.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER
Supply the following information for each
provide the information requested for each
0
INFORMATION:
SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: International Automotive Components
Mailing Address: PO Box 580
Albemarle, NC 28002
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Tufting Dyeing Finishing, and Coating of Automotive Carpet.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Dyed Automotive Carpet
Raw material(s): Nylon Yarn. Polyester/Nylon Substrate, Pre -met Acid Dyes, UV stabilizers Anti -microbial, and other auxiliary chemicals
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1,304,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek VWVfP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
® Yes 0 No If yes, describe each episode.
The SIU exceed their permit allocation for Chromium. The LCWWTP also violated their NPDES permit for Chromium during the same time
frame. Civil penalties were assessed per the Enforcement Response Plan.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
® Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
Groundwater remediation from abandoned textile mill. Expected to receive this discharge 2ntl quarter of 2014 and after.
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
Tetrachloroethylene with a maximum daily flow of .005 MG. Concentration is 7.7 uq/L discharge (based on 3 samples)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
Air-strippinq treatment process
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
® Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 20 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
G.1. System Map. Provide a
a. All CSO discharge
b. Sensitive use areas
outstanding natural
c. Waters that support
G.2. System Diagram. Provide
includes the following information,
a. Location of major sewer
b. Locations of points
c. Locations of in -line
d. Locations of flow -regulating
e. Locations of pump
CSO OUTFALLS:
map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
points.
potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
resource waters).
threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
and off-line storage structures.
devices.
stations.
G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
Complete questions G.3 through
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location N/A
N/A
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
N/A
(County) (State)
N/A
(Latitude)
c. Distance from shore
d. Depth below surface
e. Which of the following
❑ Rainfall
❑ CSO flow
f. How many storm events
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of
(Longitude)
(if applicable) N/A ft.
(if applicable) N/A ft.
were monitored during the last year for this
0 CSO pollutant concentrations
volume 0 Receiving water quality
were monitored during the last year?
CSO events in the last year.
events (0 actual or 0 approx.)
CSO?
0 CSO frequency
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (0 actual or 0 approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 21 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek V V TP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
G.5.
G.6.
c. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (0 actual or 0 approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code
c. Name of State Management/River Basin:
(if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit
CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational
code (if known):
by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 22 of 22

UtV,1 aN
C 1 G f ►{ :cis
City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Wastewater Treatment
Application Sites
Fields 1 & 6
i Field
la
6a
6b
6c
REFERENCE USE ONLY
Location: Stanly County
Owner: City of Albemarle
Permit Number. WQ0002616
Map Type: Application Map Fields 1 & 6
Scala: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
1 inch e als 625 feet
Legend
- WWTP_Property
Stream Buffer 50ft
- CountyRoads
I WVYrP Property Buffer 50ff
Land Application_Fields
- streams
Ab_Building_Foolprint_Poiygone
Barter of Alb_But6ng_Footpdnt_Potygone
Fences
City of Albemarle
.F. Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]
Sc, Oki Pu try
l�tl�
3d.3-,+) r5,
ocri- I )
D61

LONG CREEK WWTP
ALBEMARLE , N.C.
1. : 'iUIb " •
:Xo*r►e
3. ~MA'IN`PUMP`'?STAIONs`
6. DISTRIBUTION BOX
.7. 'AERATION • BASIN
•
r
i5
8. CLARIFIER
Al RETURN: SLUDGE. METER
w
ON
MAIERTMKRrT&ETER
13.CHLORINE CONTACT BASIL:
14..-T ErCr 1 r A Ni n o -4 4 LILIP4ss
17
r
TO LONG
CREEK
Io Lc��1�►
A cO"I dN)
TO LANDFILL
15 . S-L •d g +v ti t'�"c. N J°
:'"OPERATIONS'" BU'Ii��i1G
Pi V eN� F )ow n1VI -le
'2 � • G er a Q.rc.kgr

Page 1 of 4
Lab Location R'
NCIW/V Cert# 067 NCIDW Cert.* 37731
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
--TEST
Laboratory Report
Lab Location 'C'
NCIWW Cert# 103 NC/DW Cert# 37733
6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012
Ph: [phone] Fax [phone]
Project No.: 01
Project ID: LONG CREEK WWTP; PPA
— Prepared for —
HOLLY OVERCASH
Albemarle WWTP, City of
P. O. BOX 190
Albemarle, NC 28001
Lab Location 'FP"
NC/WN Cert.#: 075 NC/DW Cert.#: 37721
6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wlmington, NC 28411
Ptr [phone] Fax [phone]
Report Date:
Date Received:
Work Order #:
Oust Code:
Gust. P.O.#:
1/6/2011
12/14/2010
1012-00901
AL0131
02000380-00 FY 2002
No. Sample ID
001 EFFLUENT
Date Sampled Time Sampled
12/14/2010 7:40
Matrix
WW
Sample Type
Composite
Condition
4 +/- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method Results
Analyzed --
Lab Loc Date Time Qualifier
Ammonia
- Total Phosphorus
'otal Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Nitrate -Nitrite
Total Nitrogen Calculation
Total Dissolved Solids
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
^� Copper
Lead
Nickel
,M, Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW)
Calcium
Magnesium
Total Hardness Calculation
SM 4500 NH3 F
SM 4500 P E
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
CALCULATION
2540C
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
CALC.
1.3 mg/L as N C 12/21110 9:30
1.4 mg/L C 12/31/10 8:45
5.68 mg/L R 12/22/10 8:52
11.5 mg/L as N R 12/21110 13:00
17.2 mg/L R 12/22110 8:52
168 mg/L C 12/14/10 15:30
0.064 mg/L R 12/16110 15:15
<0.005 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
<0.002 mg/L R 12116/10 15:15
<0.005 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
0.031 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
0.086 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
<0.005 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
<0.010 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
<0.002 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
<0.010 mg/L R 12/16110 15:15
<0.001 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
0.046 mg/L R 12/16/10 15:15
R 0:00
9.66 mg/L R 12/17/10 12:02
2.29 mg/L R 12/17/10 12:02
33.5 mg/L R 12/17/10 12:02
No. Sample ID
—. 002 EFFLUENT
Date Sampled Time Sampled
12114/2010 7:50
Matrix
WW
Sample Type
Grab
Condition
4 +1- 2 deg C
fest Performed
Method Results
-- Analyzed - —
Lab Loc Date Time Qualifier
Oil 8 Grease
Cyanide
Phenols
VOCs by 624
EPA 1664A
LQC10-204-00-1-X
EPA 420.4
EPA 624
5.3 mg/L
<0.005 mg/L
86.6 uglL
R 12/16/10
R 12/15110
R 12/17/10
R 12115/10
13:00
7:40
9:31
14:47

Mr1
6701 Conference Drive Page 2 of 4
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NCIWW Cert. #: 067
Fax: [phone] NCIDW Cert. #: 37731
OIER Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1012-00901
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/14/2010 7:50 WW Grab 4 +/- 2 deg C
rwl
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc larvaaed Time Qualifier
M'
Benzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15110 14:47
Acrotein EPA 624 <50 ug!L R 12/15/10 14:47
Acrylonitrtle EPA 624 <50 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
row, Bromodichtoromethane EPA 624 <5 ugll R 12/15/10 14:47
Bromoform EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Bromomethane EPA 624 <10 ugiL R 12/15/10 14:47
rnn Dibromomethane EPA 624 <2 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Carbon tetrachloride EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Chlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Chloroethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
mil
''-9-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 624 <10 uglL R 12115//10 14:47
.:hloroform EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Chloromethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
rum Dibromochloromethane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
Pori 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12115/10 14:47
1,1-Dichioroethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
mit 1,1-Dichloroothene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
ran
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Ethylbenzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Methylene chloride EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Pr 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12115/10 14:47
Tetrachloroethene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
Toluene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
m 1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 624 <10 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
1,1,2-Trichioroethane EPA 624 <5 ug1L R 12/15110 14:47
Trichloroethene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12115/10 14:47
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
riot
Vinyl chloride EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 12/15/10 14:47
••---cis-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 12/15/10 14:47
3VOCs (A&BIN) by 625 EPA 625 R 12/17/10 12:00
FREI Acenaphthene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Acenaphthylene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117110 12:00
Anthracene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117/10 12:00
ran Benzidine EPA 625 <50 uglL R 12/17110 12:00
Benzo(a)anthracene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00

Pal
meg
G
rim [[FF°TEST
6701 Conference Drive Page 3 of 4
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NC/WW Cert. #: 067
Fax [phone] NC1DW Cert. #: 37731
Laboratory Report
ram
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/14/2010 7:50 WW Grab 4 +/- 2 deg C
Work Order #: 1012-00901
lanai Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc at ed Time Qualifier
rmn Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12117110 12:00
Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17110 12:00
Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
rr Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Benzyl butyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117/10 12:00
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
my, Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Bis(2-chioroisopropyl)ether EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
rairl
•—/-Chloronaphthatene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117110 12:00
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117110 12:00
2-Chlorophenol EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12117/10 12:00
rim 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12117/10 12:00
Chrysene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117/10 12:00
ran Di-n-butyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine EPA 625 <20 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
rm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1217/10 12:00
2,4-Dichiorophenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Diethyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
mil
2,4-Dimethylphenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Dimethyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12117/10 12:00
2,4-Dinitrophenol EPA 625 <50 ug!L R 12/17/10 12:00
rim 2,4-Dinitrotoluene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117110 12:00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Di-n-octyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Fluoranthene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Fluorene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Hexachlorobenzene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Hexachlorobutadiene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
ma
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene EPA 625
<10 ug/L R 12/17110 12:00
• Hexachioroethane EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
ma Isophorone EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1217/10 12:00
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol EPA 625 <50 ug/L R 12117110 12:00
Naphthalene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17110 12:00
rail Nitrobenzene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
2-Nitrophenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00

vTEST
6701 Conference Drive Page 4 of 4
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NC/WW Cert. #: 067
Fax [phone] NCIDW Cert. #: 37731
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1012-00901
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/14/2010 7:50 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc tat d Time Qualifier
poi 4-Nitrophenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine EPA 625 <20 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
Pentachlorophenol EPA 625 <30 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Pm Phenanthrene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 42/17/10 12:00
Phenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17110 12:00
Pyrene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene EPA 625 <20 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
Fel
2,4,6 Trlchlorophenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12/17/10 12:00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine EPA 625 <10 uglL R 12117/10 12:00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine EPA 625 <20 ug/L R 12117/10 12:00
`,2-Dlphenythydrazine EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 12/17/10 12:00
r#w
No. Sample ID
003 EFFLUENT
Date Sampled lime Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
12/14/2010 8:20 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method Results Lab Loc Da ed Time Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 ':1.1:5 rigfL.: R 12/16/10 6:17
ram No. Sample ID
004 BLANK
Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
12/14/2010 8:20 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
rat Test Performed Method Results
Fate zed
u
Lab Loc a lime Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 <1.0 ng//L .R 12/16/10 6:17
Reviewed by:
'�' for Tritest, Inc.

Chain of Custody
oat
TRITEST
0 6701. Contarence Drive, Raleigh. NC 27607
ph: [phone]. tam [phone]
iCWW Cert#67. NCDW Cert#37731
.. 6624 Gordon Road, Unit G, Wilmington. NC 28411
ph: [phone], fax: [phone]
NCWW Cert#75, NCOW Cert#37721
O 6300 Ramada Dr.. Suite C2, Clemmons. NC 27012
ph: [phone]. tax: [phone]
NCWW Cert#103, NCDW Cert#37733
Report Results To:
Company: 'n 11) 4
Address: ir Io> /90
, Attn: 1kliy rdt,d
Fal
Fel
1219
tarn
fail
far
Pori
Pah
Phone:
•Fax:
Sampled by (signature):
�bfirp1930
Tritest W.O. # /)/.Z -MD
BIN To:
Project Reference: -reA
• Project Number.
Purchase Order #:
0 Standard Report Delivery
0 Rush Report Delivery (&su ge
..Rush protects are subject to prior approval by
the laboratory
Requested Due Date: '
imp Description
Co°wacaea
Start Date
• End Date
Matrix
wMr t�v sw
cw. sa. «�.
Analyses Requested
• -
Tides*
�
f req,K
G.9D •
Start Tone
End Tana
/243-l°
MINA1
WIff,16,Tr
- 'j'
JlKA),4/1�T.
2{fLf-
C
OWO
CT*
---
litn)
MS
.C.-
w►1
A TA,#;fJ ,T zn
-
- C.
\
.
mot/
Il�e,C.r�tiCrCy
rd�
C.
‘6
/141-14)
,_
fr/of
C,/+ f-e _
-i Sp
1) .
wild
C_A/ - - . . .
V
14/14/
trArov-e
0,
)(
_
wv1
& 62
C
, ,
wt./
cE/'6.2 S-`
C
r
, J. b
1„/ if
/..._t_ it, .
.
v
C
y
o,„
,
e bem
LI-
F 6J-z.
C-
r
- , F.• 3'•. AO ., ( •..l, t)
Date
Time
Refiiquished by (
.. ••C
``li
Aeoeived • - ,. ' re)
��
Date
itio
Date
Time
0140
Time
Refaiquished by (.., -„
•
• _
Received by (sign i=
•
Receipt Conditions (!.abOnly)
i7 412°C .0 Tarty • °C
Res. Chlorine:
r Esent 0 Present CI nfa
Arid preserv. <2?
:des 0No 0Na
Base p >12?
Ents D No Orin

Lab Location R'
NCNWV Cert# 067 NC/DW Cert_#: 37731
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607
Ph: [phone] Fax [phone]
TEST
Laboratory Report
Lab Location 'C
NC/VVW Cert.#: 103 NC/DW Cert#: 37733
6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project No.: 01
Project ID: LONG CREEK WWTP; PPA
— Prepared for —
HOLLY OVERCASH
Albemarle WWTP, City of
P. O. BOX 190
Albemarle, NC 28001
Page 1 of 4
Lab Location 'W'
NC/MN Cert#: 075 NC/DW Cert#: 37721
6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Report Date:
Date Received:
1/12/2012
12/30/2011
Work Order#: 1112-01965
Cust. Code: AL0131
Cust. P.O.#: 02000380-00 FY 2002
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 EFFLUENT 12/30/2011 7:36 WW Composite 4 +/- 2 deg C
&nalyzed
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc at Time Qualifier
Ammonia ' SM 4500 NH3 F 5.9 mg/L as N C 12/30/11 11:45
Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P E 1.7 mglL C 12/30/11 11:00
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen - EPA 351.2 5.70 mg/L R 1/11/12 14:00
Nitrate -Nitrite EPA 353.2 5.30 mg/L as N R 115112 15:08
S. Total Nitrogen Calculation CALCULATION 11.00 mg/L R 1/11/12 14:00
Total Dissolved Solids , 2540C 145 mglL C 12/30/11 14:45
Antimony ; EPA 200.8 •0.029 mg/L R 1/6/12 12:52
Arsenic EPA 200.8 ''<0.005 mg/L. R 1/6/12 12:52
Beryllium EPA 200.8 <0.002 mg1L R 1/6/12 12:52
Cadmium , EPA 200.8 <0.002 mg1L R 1/6/12 12:52
Chromium' EPA 200.8 ,0.056 mglL R 1/6112 12:52
Copper EPA 200.8 ,A:114 mglL R 1/6/12 12:52
Lead 7' EPA 200.8 .,.<0:005 mg/L 1? 1/6/12 12:52
Nickel XEPA 200.8 _ -. 0.010 mg/L.. Tr' 1/6/12 12:52
,� Selenium
EPA 200.8 /0.002 mg/L Ti 1/6/12 12:52
Silver / EPA 200.8 , <0.010 mg/L R 1/6/12 12:52
Thallium / EPA 200.8 •'<0.001 mg/L /? 1/6/12 12:52
Zinc EPA 200.8 '0.068 mg/L R 1/6/12 12:52
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW) R 0:00
• Calcium EPA 200.8 11.7 mg/L R 1/9/12 11:24
Magnesium EPA 200.8 3.25 mg/L R 1/9/12 11:24
Total Hardness Calculation.," CALC. 42.6 mg/L R 1/9/12 11:24
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/30/2011 7:41 WW Grab 4 +/- 2 deg C
Wed
Performed Method Results Lab Loc ate Tire Qualifier
Oil & Grease ' EPA 1664A <5.0 mg/L R 1/4/12 14:00
Cyanide / LOC10-204-00-1-X , <0.005 mglL R 1/4/12 10:30
Phenols EPA 420.4 44.8 ug1L R 1/9/12 9:32
VOCs by 624 EPA 624 R 1/6/12 13:48

PER
r
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
9[ : 'TEST
TEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
Laboratory Report
coR Work Order # 1112-01965
Page 2 of 4
NCIWW Cert #: 067
NCIDW Cert. #: 37731
No. Sample ID
002 EFFLUENT
Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
12130/2011 7:41 WW Grab 4 +l- 2 deg C
r,.,, Test Performed Method Results
Lab Loc Dated Time Qualifier
Benzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
fjAcrolein EPA 624 c50 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
V Acrylonitrite EPA 624 <50 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
ratI
Bromodlchtoromethane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
f Bromoform EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
i4romomethane EPA 624 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
twi /Dlbromomethane EPA 624 <2 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
✓Carbon tetrachloride EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
✓, Chlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
rall hloroethane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
,. 2-Chtopoethytyinyl ether EPA 624 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48 /
joroorm EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6112 13:48
hioromethane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
twl
hibromochloromethane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 116/12 13:48
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
rail 11 4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
0,1-DIchloroethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 116/12 13:48
1-Dichloroethane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
,1-Dichloroethene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
tint
t ns-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
✓ 1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
riwi trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
9thYIbonzene EPA624 <5 ug1L R 116112 13:48
ethylene chloride EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
rs1 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
Tetrachloroethene EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
Toluene EPA 624 <5 ug1L R 1/6/12 13:48
J1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 624 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
PEI
,/1,1,2-Trichioroethane EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
Trichloroethene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
lin Vinyl chloride EPA 624 <5 ug/L R 1/6/12 13:48
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 624 <5 uglL R 1/6/12 13:48
'--- SVOCs (A&B/N) by 625 EPA 625 R 1/6/12 11:00
ran,cenaphthene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6112 11:00
Acenaphthytene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
Anthracene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
enzidine EPA 625 <50 ug!L R 1/6112 11:00
mt Benzo(a)anthracene EPA 625 <10 ug!L R 1/6/12 11:00

agn
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
I9TEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order it: 1112-01965
Page 3 of 4
NC/WW Cert. #: 067
NC1DW Cert. S: 37731
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/30/2011 7:41 WIN Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
Fig Test Performed
Method
Results Lab Loc DaOrzed Time Qualifier
✓Benzo(b)f€uoranthene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6112 11:00
/Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
✓6enio(a)pyrene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
WI
Wfienzo(g,h,i)perylerie EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
✓gzy butylphthalateEPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6112 11:00
en I
t41s(2-chloroethyl)ether EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6112 11:00
rim (Aifs(2-chloroethoxy)methane EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
t4 s(2-chtoro€sopropyl)ether EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 116112 11:00
t/Bis(2-ethythexyl)phthalate EPA 625 <10 ug!L R 1/6/12 11:00
mil yBromophenyl phenyl ether EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
•---."l-Chloronaphthatene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
4-Chloro 3-methylphenol EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
✓2-Chtorophenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
fml
�4-Chlorophenyi phenyl ether EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
,//Chrysene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6112 11:00
�/ Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
mil Kii-n-butyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6112 11:00
/3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine EPA 625 <20 ug/L R 116/12 11:00
,/r1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6112 11:00
t/t,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 625 <10 ug/L .R 1/6/12 11:00
Pm
V 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
Dichlorophenol EPA 625 c10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
Diethyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 ug!L R 1/6112 11:00
min
4-D€methylphenoi EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
Dimethyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
�2,4-Dinitrophenol EPA 625 <50 ug/L R 1/6112 11:00
p t ,4-Dinitrotoluene EPA 625 <10 ug!L R 1/6/12 11:00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene EPA 625 <10 uglL .R 1/6112 11:00
/Di-n-octyl phthalate EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
f luoranthene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
mil ✓Fluorene EPA 625 <10 ug!L R 1/6112 11:00
t4iexachtorobenzene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
vi4exachlorobutadiene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
Mel Hexachlorocyclopentadtene EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
,/flexachloroethane EPA 625 <10 ug!L R 1/6/12 11:00
-- iideno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6112 11:00
rail Iophorone EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
2-Methyl-4,6-dlnitrophenol EPA 625 <50 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
4laphthatene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
,titrobenzene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
fun
f 2-Nitrophenol EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00

Cyr
Pal
PIO
Pit
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
"TEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order#: 1112-01965
Page 4 of 4
NCIWW Cert. #: 067
NC/DW Cert. #: 37731
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/30/2011 7:41 WW Grab 4 +/- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method Results Lab Loc Datzed Time Qualifier
✓ 4•Nitrophenol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine EPA 625 <20 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
b%Pentachlorophenol EPA 625 <30 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
rum 16henanthrene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
7Phertol EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
rene EPA 625 <10 uglL R 116112 11:00
mi 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene EPA 625 <20 ug/L R 1/6/12 11:00
V2,4,6-Trichiorophenoi EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6112 11:00
A-Nitrosodimethylamine EPA 625 <10 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
6-Niitrosodiphenylamine EPA 625 <20 uglL R 1/6/12 11:00
mil
-^-t4 2-Diphenylhydrazine EPA 625 <10 ug/L R 1/6112 11:00
rP
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
003 EFFLUENT 1213012011 8:00 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method Results Lab Loc tnared lime Qualifier
Low Level Mercury) EPA 1631
A1.1 ng/L R 1/11/12 5:15
ranNo. Sample ID Date Sampled lime Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
004 BLANK 12/30/2011 8:00 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
r'R► Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc Da ed Time Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 <1.0 ng/L R 1/11/12 5:15
ran
•
rim
Reviewed by:
for Tritest, Inc.

-TRiTEST Chain of Custody
U 6701 Conference Drive. Raleigh. NC 27607
ph: [phone]. fax: [phone]
NCWW Cert#67, NCDW Cert#37731
6624 Gordon Road Unit G, Wilmington. NC 28411
ph: (910) 7634783. tax: [phone]
NCWW Cert#75, NCDW Cerf#37721
D 6300 Ramada Dr., Suite C2, Clernmons. NC 27012
ph: [phone]. fax: [phone]
•• NCWW Cert#103, NCDW Cert#37733
raa
P
Pal
Pal
Pal
PER
Fag
PER
POI
Report Results To:
Company: /4414,
Address:
Attn: ;14 t)etop...„.2.04..
Phone:
Sampled by (signature):
Tritest W.O. # (t—aj77
BM To: ,p
Project Reference: /✓ %1
4-C
Project Number. -_
Purchase Order It:
O Standard Report Delivery
D Rush Report Delivery (wrsurcharge)
—Rush projects are subject to prior approval by
the laboratory
Requested Due Date:
Sample Description
Start Date A
End Date
ww4Maaixsiv
r Sat sic.
Analyses Requested
.
iht ass
saw
Icoris=4.0.
9"°
Start Tune
End Tarle
j?-] g.11
10).36 t t
j4( A)
dili Tr ! 14, ,' An / 7-4/
__._.
(44. Oir
-
4
, 1 tl
,
,
6--
:ThJ
5.1., /r A aCii P,l ,V I f j 7-1
C__
Cgreri4007---
\
f�-�. r t
a ! / �-o'/-ems
.
.
/1/4
sit
I
,
4/ -
C-
x
,
,
oakk,,,a
r
C
X
)(
NO
i
6-it-i-y
_
L',1_ k2 5----
If
a
y
,
417
1-L/4
G
G-
QQ::
"070:
Li._iis,
elail
)(
Relinquished by (s )Received
byprrr,
Date •
ii.))•,
.
ime
,
Relinquishecifiln,T
11--
Received by (signature)
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature)
Received by (signature)
Date
Tune
Receipt Conditions (Lab tlix Only)
O 4*2°c Q Tempo 'C
Res. Chlorine:
went 0 Present 0 nra
Acid rV. <2?
Yes Q No O n/a
Base misery. >12?
0Yes 0No nla

www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: LG Effluent
Matrix: Water
Project Misc. Subcontract
Lab Sample ID:C311168-01
Sampled:09/i8/13 08:05
Sampled By:Client
Received: 09/19/13 11:30
Work Order: C311158
d
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analyte fCAS Number)
1,1,1-Tridloroethane[71-55-6)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane [79-34-5)
1,1,2-Trichloroethane [79-00-5)
1,1-Dichloroethane [75-34-3]
'� 1,1-Dichloroethene [75-35-4)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene [95-50-1]
1,2-Dichloroethane [107-06.2)
1,2-Dlchioropropane [78.87-5]
1,3-Didilorobenzene [541-73-1)
1,4-Dichlarobenzene [106-46-7]
2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether [110-75-8]
Acrolein [107-02-8)
Acrylonitrile [107-13-1]
Benzene [71-43.2]
Bromodichloromethane [75-27-4]
Bromoform [75-25-2)
Bromomethane [74-83-9)
Carbo rTetrachloride-f56-23=5]-
Chlorobenzene [108-90-7)
Chloroethane [75-00-3]
Chloroform [67-66-3]
Chloromethane [74.87-3]
.�. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene [10061-01-5)
(rc)DibromochIoromethane [124-48-1)
Ethylbenzene [100-41-4]
Methylene Chloride [75-09-2]
NMI
Tetrachloroethene [127-18-4]
Toluene [108-88-3)
trans-1,2-Didtloroethene [156-60-5)
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene [10061-02-6]
Trichloroethene [79-01-5]
Vinyl chloride [75-01-4)
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene
D/bromofucromethane
Toluene-d8
Results [aag Ur._ i a MDL PQL
< 0.12 ug/L 1 0.12 1.0
< 0.28 ug/L 1 0.28 1.0
< 0.14 ug/L 1 0.14 1.0
< 0.13 ug/L 1 0.13 1.0
< 0.21 ug/L 1 0.21 1.0
< 0.19 ug/L 1 0.19 1.0
< 0.21 ug/L 1 0.21 1.0
< 0.10 ug/L 1 0.10 1.0
< 0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0
< 0.19 ug/L 1 0.19 1.0
< 1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 5.0
< 4.0 ug/L 1 4.0 10
< 3.5 ug/L 1 3.5 10
< 0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0
3.2 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0
< 0.27. ug/L 1 0.22 1.0
< 0.14 ug/L 1 0.14 1.0
`<.0:17' - ug/L 1 0:17 1.0
-
< 0.17 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0
< 0.23 ug/L 1 0.23 1.0
7.8 ug/L 1 0.18 1.0
< 0.13 ug/L 1 0.13 1.0
< 0.20 ug/L 1 0.20 1.0
4.0 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0
< 0.13 ug/L 1 0.13 1.0
< 0.23 ug/L 1 D.23 1.0
< 0.17 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0
< G.14 ug/L 1 0.14 1.0
< 0.21 ug/L 1 0.21 1.0
< 0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0
< 0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0
< 0.32 ug/L 1 0.32 1.0
Batch Method Analyzed
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051- EPA 624'---'09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3I24051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
3124051 EPA 624 09/25/13 16:11
Results OF Spike L vl % Rec % Rec Limits Batch
46 1 50.0 92 % 51-122 3124051
44 1 50.0 89 % 68-117 3124051
47 1 50.0 95 95 67-127 3124051
Method
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
Fly
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
REF
Notes
Analyzed LT Notes
09/25/1316:11 REF
09/25/13 16:11 REF
09/25/1316:11 REF
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analyte (CAS Number]
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene [120-82-1)
1,2-Dichlaroberrzene [95-50-1]
1,3-Dichlorobenzene [541-73.1)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene [106-46-7)
rr.
1-Methylnaphthalene [90-12-0)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol[95-95-4]
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol [88-06-2)
Results Flag ni 1 OF MDL POL Batch Method Analyzed 61 Notes
< 1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.1 ug/L 1 1.I 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.7 ug/L 1 1.7 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.0 ugIL 1 1.0 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.1 I.S/L 1 1.1 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
NMI
FINAL This re?ort reln:es only to the oarnnle es received by the laboratory, and r zy only De reproduced In full. Page 4 a 25

www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: LG Effluent
Matrix: Water
Project: Misc. Subcontract
Lab Sample ID:C311168-01
Sampled:09/18/13 08:05
Sampled By:Cient
Received: 09/19/13 11:30
Work Order: C311168
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analvte [CAS Number' Results Flaq Units QE Mk ]'4.4 Batch 14etlad Anahfzed Al Notes
2,4-Didibrophenol[120-B3-2] < 1.4 ug!i. 1 1.4 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
2,4-Dimethylphenoi[105-67-9] < 1.3 ug/L 1 13 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
2,4-Dinitrophenol[51-28-5] < 2.6 ug/L 1 2.6 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene [121-14-2] < 2.4 ug/L 1 2.4 10 3175007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
"M 2,6-Din7rotoluene [606-20-2] < 1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
2-Chbronaphthalene [91-58-7] < 1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
2-Chlorophenol [95-57-8] < 1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
2-Methyl-4,6•dinibophenol [534.52-1] < 2.9 ug/L 1 2.9 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
imi 2-Methylnaphthalene [91-57-6] < 1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
2-Nltrophenol[88-75-5] < 1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
3,3'-Dichbrobenzidine [91-94-1] < 3.3 ug/L 1 3.3 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DPI
VW 4-Bromophenyi-phenylether[101-55-3] < 1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 . 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
4Chloro-3-methylphenol [59-50-7] < 1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
4-ChlorophenyI-phenylether[7005-72-3] < 1.6 ug/L 1 1.6 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
4-Nitrophenol [100-02-7] < 2.0 ug/L 1 2.0 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
irk Acenaphthene [83-32-9] c 1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Acenaphthylene [208-96-8] < 1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3125007 EPA 625 30/02/13 13:55 DFM
_- Anthracene'[120-127) ---<1:6--... • 1 -1.6--10-3125007--- EPA-625 I0/02/13-13.'55- DFM
Benzidine [92-87-5] < 1.6 ug/L 1 1.6 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
ma
Benzo(a)an hracene [56-55-3] < 13 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DPI
Benzo(a)pyrene [50-32-8) < 1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DPI
Benzo(b)fluoranthene [205-99-2) < 1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
� , Benzo(g,h,l)perylene [191-24-2) < 2 <. mil- 1 2.4 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DPI
Benzo(k)fluoranthene [207-08-9] < 1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Benzoic add [65-85-0] < 1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 50 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DR4
Bis(2-chloraethoxy)rnethane [111-91-1] < 1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
s Bs(2-chbroethyl)ether [311-44 4] < 1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/1313:55 DFM
Bis(2-dlbroisopropyl)ether [108-60-1] c 1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Bis(2-ethylhexyi)phthalate [117-81-7] 2.6 1 ug/L 1 1.7 5.0 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
am Butylbenzylphthalate [85-68-7] < 2.D ug/L 1 2.0 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DRI
Civysene [218-01-9] < 2.0 ug/L 1 2.0 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene [53-70-3] < 2.3 ug/L 1 2.3 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DPI
Diethylphthalate [84-66-2] < 2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02J13 13:55 DPI
um D'mtethylphth&ate [131 11 3] < 1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3175007 EPA 625 10/02/1313:55 DFM
Di-n-butylphthalate [84-74-2] < 1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Di-n-octylphthalate [117-84-0] < 3.1 ug/L 1 3.1 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/1313:55 DPI
DPH (as Azobenzene) [103-33-3] < 1.9 ug/L 1 1.9 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
gm
Fluoranthenc [2D6 440] < 2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Fluorene [86-73-7] < 1.7 ug/L 1 1.7 10 3125007 �A 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Hexachlorobenzene [118-74-1] < 1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DPI
OMHexachtorobutadiene [87-6i8-3] < 1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3I251107 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Hexachlorocydopentadiene [77-47-4] < 1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Hexadiloroethane [67-72-1] < 1.1 ug/L 1 1,1 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Indeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrrne [193 39 5] < 2.2 ug/L 1 2.2 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DRd
imil lsophorone [78-59•1] < 13 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
Naphthalene [91-20-3] < 13 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DR4
Nitrobenzene [98-95-3] < 1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 20 3I25007 EPA 625 1.0/02/13 13:55 DFM
N-Nitosodimethylamine [62-75-9] < 1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DPI
FINAL This repcet relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 5 of 25

www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: LG Effluent
Matrix: Water
Project: Mi5C. Subcontract
Lab Sample ID: C311168-01
Sampled:09/18/13 08:05
Sampled By:Client
Received: 09/ 19/ 13 11:30
Work Order. C311168
i
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analyte [CAS Number]
r.n
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine [621-64-7]
N-N itrosodiphenylamine/Oiphenyl amine
[86-30-6/122-39-4]
Pentachlorophenol [87-B6-5)
Phenanthrene [85-01-8]
Phenol[108-95-2]
Pyrene [129-00-01
Surrogates
14,6-Tnbromop hence'
2-Huoroblpheny1
2-fluor ophenol
... Nitrobenzene-d5
Phenol-d5
Terphenyf-d14
Results Flaq Units DF MDL POI, Datch Method Analyzed Ay Notes
< 1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.8 ug/L 1 1.6 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3I25007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
< 2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55 DFM
exults OF Spike L vl % Rec % Rec Limits Batch Method Analyzed
100 1 100 100 % 18-157 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55
34 1 50.0 68 % 15-139 3125001 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55
49 1 100 49 % 10-104 3125007 EPA 6.25 10/02/13 13:55
32 1 50.0 64 % 16.140 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55
42 1 100 92 % 10-83 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13.•55
43 1 50.0 86 96 23-164 3125007 EPA 625 10/02/13 13:55
Notes
DFM
DEM
DAM
DF14
DFM
DFM
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
Analvte [GAS Numbgr]
Antimony [7440-36-0]
Arsenic [7440-38-2)
Beryllium [7440-41-7]
Cadmium [7440-43-91
mmol Calcium 17440-70-2]
Chromium [7440-47-3]
Copper [7440-50-8]
Lead [7439-92-1]
Magnesium [7439-95-4]
Nickel [7440-02-0]
Selenium [7782-49-2]
Silver [7440-22-4]
Thallium [7440-28-0]
Zinc[7440-66.6]
Results Flag Units
70.4 ug/L
< 5.4 ug/L
< 0.10 ug/L
< 0.360 ug/L
17300 ug/L
50.3 ug/L
147 ug/L
< 2.1 ug/L
4220 ug/L
3.3 3 ug/L
< 5.0 ug/L
< 1.9 ug/L
< 5.8 ug/L
79.7 ug/L
Df MDL PQl ig.th Method Analyzed
1 5.9 10.0 3124025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 5.4 10.0 3124025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 0.10 1.00 3124025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 0.360 1.00 3123044 EPA 200.7 09/24/13 13:47
1 20.0 100 3124025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 1.4 10.0 3123044 EPA 200.7 09/24/13 13:47
1 1.60 10.0 3I23044 EPA 200.7 09/24/13 13:47
1 2.1 10.0 3123044 EPA 200.7 09/24/13 13:47
1 23 100 3124025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 1.8 10.0 3I24025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 5.0 10.0 3124025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 1.9 10.0 3123044 EPA 200.7 09/24/13 13:47
1 5.8 10.0 3I24025 EPA 200.7 09/25/13 13:42
1 3.8 10.0 3123044 EPA 200.7 09/24/13 13:47
@y Notes
JDH
3DH
JDH
JDH
3DH
JDH
JDH
3DH
JDH
JDH
JDH
3DH
JDH
JDH
Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods
Analvte rcAs Number]
Mercury [7439-97-6]
Results Flag Units of MDL POL Batch
< 0.170 ug/L
1 0.170 0.200 3I26008
Method Analyzed
EPA 7470A 09/26/13 14:23
Ay .'rotes
T1 D
[Classical Chemistry Parameters
Analyte rcAs Number.'
sm., Ammonia as N [7664-41-7]
Cyanide (tool) [57-12-5]
Hardness [ECL-0028]
Nitrate/Nitrite as N [ECL-0010]
Phosphorus [7723-14-0]
Total Dissolved Solids [ECL-0156]
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen [ECL-0162]
Results Jag Units DF MDL POL Batch Method Analyzed Et Notes
0.080 J mg/L 1 0.045 D.10 3I25001 EPA 350.1 09/25/13 10:15 (qv
< 0.0049 mg/L 1 0.0049 0.010 3I24004 EPA 9014 09/25/13 14:11 clv
60 mg/L 1 0.14 2.5 3I24025 5M 23408-1997 09/25/13 13:42 3DH
16 D mg/L 19.5 0.80 2.0 3124028 EPA 353.2 09/24/13 18:10 A)B
0.91 rng/L 1 0.025 0.10 3120004 EPA 365.4 09/23/13 12:09 clv
220 mg/L 1 10 10 3123039 SM 2540C-1997 09/25/13 08:35 HMS
2.5 mg/L 1 0.26 0.48 3120003 EPA 351.2 09/23/13 10:33 clv
F1r:At
This re t re tes only to The sernpt< a5 received by the leborztory, and may eery be reproduced in fo'-i. Page 6 of 25

ANALYTICAL RESULTS
www.encolabs.com
Description: LG Effluent Lab Sample ID:C311168-01 Received: 09/19/13 11:30
Matrix Water Sampled:09/18/13 08:05 Work Order: C311168
Project Misc. Subcontract Sampled By:Client
Classical Chemistry Parameters
Analvte fCAS Number]
Oil & Grease (HEM) [C-0007)
esul flag ni
< 2.60 mg/L
OF MDL PQ.1„ Batch Method Analyzed y
1 2.60 5.00 3126001 EPA 1664B 10/01/13 09:15 MJF
Notes
Classical Chemistry Parameters
J
Malyte (CAS Number)
Phenolics [ECL-0123]
Results Flag Units a MDR POL Batch Method Analyzed NoteS
< 0.03
mg/L 1 0.03 0.05 3I23035 EPA 420.1 09/24/13 17:57 RMM
F1NhL
This report relates Cniy to the Sample 3: received by The iab9retory, and tray onhbe reproduced in Poi!. Fr
age 7 of 25

Anal
ical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
Entered 9/18/2013
Reported: 10/7/2013
For: PPA
111.
MUNI
NC 28002
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID
RECEIVED
PUBLIC UTILITIES
Result Units Method
Date
Analyzed Analyst
130918-14 PPA
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
Eff LC
See Attached
see attached
10/2/13 ENCO
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

Analytical Results
- City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
Entered
Reported:
9/10/2013
9/27/2013
For: Sampled 9/l0
NC 28002
- Sample ID Parameter Cust ID
Result
RECEIVED
OCT 0 7 20/3
PUBLIC UTILITIES
Units Method
Date
Analyzed Analyst
130910-35.1
130910-35.1
130910-35.1
130910-35.1
130910-35.1
- 130910-35.1
130910-35.1
130910-35.1
130910-35.1
130910-35.1
- 130910-35.1
130910-35.1
- 130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
- 130910-35.2
130910-35.2
1111.
Arsenic-Fur/liquid
BOD
Cadmium-Fur/Iiquid LC Inf.
Chromium-ICP
Copper-ICP
Lead-Fur/liquid
Molybdenum-
NH3N
Nickel-Fur/liquid
Selenium
TSS
Zinc-Flame/liquid
Arsenic-Fur/liquid
BOD
Cadmiurn-Fur/liquid
Chromium-1CP
Copper-ICP
Fecal Coliform WW
Lead-Fur/liquid
Molybdenum-
NH3N
LC lnf
LC luf
LC Inf
LC Inf
LC Inf.
LC Inf
LC Inf
LC Inf
LC Inf
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
LC Inf <0.005 mg/L
LC Inf 164 mg/L
0.0036 mg/L
141 ug/L
230 ug/L
0.0034 mg/L
<2.5 ug/L
11.5 mg/L
0.013 mg/L
<0.005 mg/L
552 mg/L
0.12 mg/L
<0.005 mg/L
3.4 mg/L
0.0022 mg/L
33.9 ug/L
138 ug/L
5 CFU/100mL
<0.0025 mg/L
<2.50 ug/L
<0.1 mg/L
SM3113B-2004
SM5210B-2001
SM3113B-2004
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
SM3113B-2004
EPA200.7
SM4500NH3E-1997
SM3113B-2004
SM3113B-2004
SM2540D-1997
SM3111 B-1999
SM3113B-2004
SM5210B-2001
SM3113B-2004
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
SM9222D-1997
SM31136-2004
EPA200.7
SM4500NH3E-1997
9/24/13
9/11/13
9/17/13
9/17/13
9/19/13
9/18/13
9/17/13
9/17/13
9/18/13
9/27/13
9/13/13
9/19/13
9/24/13
9/11/13
9/17/13
9/16/13
9/19/13
9/10/13
9/18/13
9/17/13
9/17/13
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
ENCO
MD
MD
MD
HM
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
DM
MD
ENCO
MD
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687. 704/872/4697

City of Albemarle
- PO Box 1,90
Albemarle
Entered 9/10/2013
Reported: 9/27/2013
For:
NC 28002
Sample ID Parameter Gust ID Result
Units Method
Date
Analyzed Analyst
130910-35.2
- 130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
130910-35.2
- 130910-35.2
Nickel-Fur/liquid
NO3NO2 WW
Selenium
T. Phosphorus
TKN
TSS
Zinc-Flame/liquid
Respectfully submitted,
- Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
PERI
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
0.0049
15.6
<0.005
3.1
1.9
26
0.06
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
SM3113B-2004
SM4500EF-2000
SM3113B-2004
SM4500PE-1999
SM4500orgB-1997
SM2540D-1997
SM3111B-1999
9/18/13
9/26/13
9/27/13
9/20/13
9/18/13
9/13/13
9/19/13
MD
CL
MD
DM
MD
HM
MD
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

OMNI
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
Entered 12/4/2012
Reported: 1/4/2013
For: TOX
Analytical Results
NC 28002
;ample ID Parameter Cust ID
Result Units Method Date Analyzed Analyst
121204-2 C.dubia Pass/Fail EffLC
Pass
Respectfully submitted,
3 Myers
JC Cert #440,
JCDW Cert #37755,
_PA NC00909
EPA600/4- 12/5/12 ETS

MEM
eV.
0.0
Mel
PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
.. LS Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase I1 Chronic Ceriodapltnia dubia
Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Facility: Statesville Analytical NPDES #: NC• 0024244
City of Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
Comments:
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testin S� s�t�
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: .
Samples:
Date: December 28. 2012
8569
121205.02. 121207.01
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaC01):
Hardness (mg/L CSCO ):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mWL):
Sample Temp. at Receipt ('C):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (Sul):
initial DO (mg/L):
Final D0 (mg/L):
initial Temp. ("C):
Final Temp. rC):
Organism Number
Control Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
30 (28
Number of Young Produced 130, 29 I 28
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead 1 L L L
30
L
321 30
L L
31 31 3) 30
L L L L
L L
Mon
IStart dale: End date: Stan time; End time:
It 12-05.12 1 12-12-12 1 1427 1 0756
sun
90%
7.26
7.44
7.6
8.0
25.1
24.9
30.0 I
Effluent Percentagel 90%
Treatment 2 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 h+an
4Number of Young Produced 331 31 28 133 I 35 j 30 l 35 1 33 36 I 33 I 34 } 33 I 32.8 l
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead L L L f LLLLLL L L L v -9.4
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms
lNumberofvounProdticcd I l i 1 1 1
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent percentage
Treatment 4 Organisms
Number of Yoang Produced I
111!
1 I
f
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Men
1
i
% Reduulon
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 { 12 Mean
I I {
1 12
% Rcdu<don
Treatment 5 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
t
�
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
H
)(
j
1{}{}l
%amt...
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Man
Number of Young Produced 1 { I 1 { { { } 1H I
(Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead I 1 xRee e,;on
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV:
>90%
Renewal t
90%
7.16
7.62
8.0
7.8
25.2
24.9
Rump! 2
90%
7.55
7.54
7.8
7.9
25.0
24.9
Sun
Control
7.76
7.58
8.0
8.0
24.8
24.8
Itai !
Control
7.71
7,68
8.0
8.0
25.0
24.7
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
% Control with 3rd Broods:
Control Reproduction CV:
Control:
IWC:
Significant?:
48 Hour Mortality
0 lof
0 of
Final Mortality' Significant at.
ace .at 2
Control
7.77
7.48
7,9
7,9
24,9
24.9
0.0
100
4,0
12
12
No
No concentratior.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
Reproduction NOEC:
Overall Method:
>90%
90%
Homoscedasnc
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Sha,siro•W:lk's
Statistic:
0.929
Critical Value:
Equal Variances:
Method:
0.884
Yes
F-Test
Statistic:
Critical Value:
3.479
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
90%
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
December 28, 2012
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 8569
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the City of Albemarle — Long Creek
WWTP received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. December 05 through
December 07, 2012.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final
Result
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
TGP3B Toxicity Procedure
(Ceriodaphnra Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
December 03, 2012 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit a copy of the DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
January 31, 2013.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate hCarolina Numbers:
Certificate Number: SeClean, WateriAcrW99053-p086 Wastewater: 600

ETS
V hMmnmmYl r.,tlrq adWlM4 Inc
Page 1 of 1
Control Information, North Carolina Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA-821-R-02-013,
Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) Species: Cerlodaphnia dubia
Test grouping information:
1 CONTROL
Project #
Control # l Date 12-c6- iZ--
of Male Adults (5 20%):
n,
% Adults having 3'd Broods (z 80%):
WO.
% Mortality (5 20%):
(f )
Mean Offspring/Female
(Z 15 offspring/surviving female):
3o,n
% CV (< 40.0%):
'4.01.
Test organism source information:
Test information:
Organism age:
< 24-hours old
Randomizing template color:
$LACK
Date and times organisms were born t- .om-r2. 014.1 "D
between:
1301
Incubator number and shelf
location:
�� l
Culture board:
li t�
li' tl_ 1!6
Replicate number:
board cup number:
34
:Jr-
$e{1 s
9Iio
n
12
YWT batch:
10-18.1-LCulture
2s. .I I
�3�b31
N,,, 3�
Z
4
Transfer bowl information:
pH =1. *0 SU Temperature = -v4.'
°C
Selenastrum batch:
11'-Lb 1 L
Daily renewal tnjormatton:
Day
Date
Test initiation, renewal,
feeding, or termination time
Control/Dilution water Analyst
batch used (Soft synthetic)
0
1
1Z- OS- 11-
Initiation aed Feeding l` i 41
ii
11-2b-1-L- al
1
1
12-017- 11__Feeding
o8,4 k
KE K
L7.a
2
, Z' �- 1Z
Renewal I and Feedin�� 1• t
�'1
3
p
11-'0d- lZ
, y
Feeding in0
Ln
1<E>t
K 1"C.iL
4
12'CPI ' 11,..
Feeding OASO
1
--Renewal
5
iZ-raly
2 and Feedin
661-
6
12-l�-1i._
_
Feeding 010b
7
11.-12-11--
Termination r15 b
Daily chemistry:
Analyst
pii (S.u.)
Parameter
Initiation
Renewal One
DO (mg/L)
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
Alkalinity (mg CaCO3/L)
Hardness (mg CaCO3/1„)
Temperature (°C)
Survival and rerroduction data:
-.1b
8•
1�
Initial
S1ii
l�Lti
tsi
41•0
-I. • 1 S- o
Final
Initial
rntkt
Final
Renewal Two
A
Initial
7.816
7.1
Z .
Final
4
s
xepncaic
6
...mu,.
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2 i
3
Day
2
Adult mortality
1.
--
L
\_._
�--
L
1--.
1*
L'
(L - live, D - dead)
1..
11
L,•
1
1 S --"
1.
13
--
1
I1 `—
.L.Z
:`J J
t
`
t io—
114
L
1
`
1 S—.
-1,._1
11
L
t
`
,_ I
► t
1`1—
1_
,��
'L.5
11—
L
I 3.__
1,
L
S
1"
Number
Young of Brood
�-,
l-
l�
-
11,
1—Z..
l`-�`
1 _.�
produced
Adult mortality -
(L - live, D - dead)
l--
L._._
L
6 or 7
I Numbs
Young of Broods
l
+Li—
,
1 2 _
J
t
`4 —
1
1 L,—
produced
Total young
produced
30
-Z e1
28-
So
-S L
k---
3o
k.—
31
-
?
31
71
31
k.._
7
30
�.
/X
3o
L
>&J...L
Z.1
Final Adult Mortality
live, D^dad)
1.._,
L__.
\-__
(L-
X for 3`d Broods
/—
Notes: M = Male, AB = Aborted brood observed.
SOP AT12 - Exhibit AT12.3, revision 07-

Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0)
Species: Ceriodavhnia dubia Date �2-OS't--L-
Paired with Control #
Client:
Facility:
Comments:
Full -siren: h chemis
pH (S.U.)
Conductivity
mhos/cm
Chlorine
(m: )
Dilution
Sample 1
oration:
Test concentration:
mL Dilution water:
Total volume mL :
Test concentration chemist :
Conductivi hos/cm
Young
produced
Number
of Broods
Adult mortality
•live,D -dead
Young
produced
Number
of Broods
Total young produced •
Final Adult Mortality
five. D - dead
Notes: M = Male, AB = Aborted brood observed.
Sample 2
NPDES #: NC
Outfall/Pi e:
Sample information:
Collection start date:
Collection end time:
Grab/Composite
duration :
Temperature (°C) upon
recei r t:
Physical characteristics:
ETS r ro' ect number:
ETS sam $ le number:
Initiation •
Final
Sample 1
-LA-A0A_
P 1 tTe.
Llgtkr BRO+a�
C LeAk.
Renewal One
3y8
'LS • Z-
Initial
kart
f)iito
Initial
Survival and re,roduction data:
Re.6icate number
10
1 2 4 5 �_ irdifi
ssis
�� owls
oo�o:inamenownwe Ems
Test results:
% Mortality:
Mean Offspring/Female:
% Reduction from control:
t-Stat or RS:
1-Tailed Critical:
Pass or Fail
P ATl
2�:fachlb
SD ,

1 1 1
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Start Date: 12/5/2012
End Date: 12/12/2012
Sample Date:
Comments:
Conc-% 1
D-Control 30.000
D-Control 30.000
90 33.000
90 34.000
2
29.000
28.000
31 .000
33.000
Ceriodaphnia Survival and Reproduction Test -Reproduction
Test ID: CdPFCRNC Sample ID: Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type: DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species: CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
28.000 30.000 32.000 30.000 31.000 31.000 31.000 30.000
28.000 33.000 35.000 30.000 35.000 33.000 36.000 33.000
Conc%
D-Control
90
Mean N-Mean
30.000 1.0000
32.833 1.0944
Mean Min Max CV%
30.000 28.000 32.000 4.020
32.833 28.000 36.000 6.852
Auxiliary Tests
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01)
F-Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.05)
Hypothesis Test (1-tail, 0.01)
Homoscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences
Treatments vs D-Control
Transform: Untransformed 1-Tailed
N t-Stat Critical MSD
12
12 -3.845 2.508 1.848
Statistic Critical Skew Kurt
0.92941 0.884 -0.8116 1.33366
3.47917 5.31963
MSDu MSDp MSS MSE F-Prob df
1.84823 0.06161 48.1667 3.25758 8.8E-04 1, 22
1 I_..r r r, vole 17-0.5-12

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Ceriodaphnia dubia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0 - North Carolina Modification
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Client: Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
Test dates: December 05 - 12, 2012
Project number:
Reveiwcd by:
8569
Concentration
(%)
Day
2
3
4
Number of young produced by replicate number
8 9 10 11 12
5
6
7
Survival
(%)
Average
reproduction
(offspring/female)
Coefficient of
variation
(%)
Percent reduction
from control (%)
Control
5
14
16
14
14
17
13
15
16
16
14
17
13
7
16
13
14
16
15
17
16
15
15
16
13
15
90%
Total
5
30
18
29
28
30
32
30
31
31
31
30
30
28
100
30.0
4.0
Not applicable
16
15
17
18
15
20
20
18
17
19
18
15
15
13
16
17
15
15
13
18
16
15
15
Total
33
31
28
33
35
30
35
33
36
33
34
33
100
32.8
6.9
-9.4
Dunnett's MSD value: 1.848 MSD = Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD: 6.2 PMSD = Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of test precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared
statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity test.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10ih percentile) = 13%.
Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (90't percentile) = 47%.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the 10th and 90th percentile, respectively. of PMSD data from EPA's WET
lnterlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA. 2001a: USEPA.2001b).
USEPA. 2001a.2001b. Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study of EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test tvlethods, Volumes 1 and 2-Appendix. EPA-821-B-01-004 and EPA-821-B-01-005.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati. OH.
Albemarle Long Creek 11-03-12

IMO
MIN
aaA
(irk -
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc,
7-day IC25 (g/L NaC1)
1,14
1.12
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.02
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.8 ,` `` `1 \ `, ,„„Al , y 11 11 ,1 �1. `1. `y `1 Nis,1 �1 �1
Q� le �5" 1Q , 1\, ,A r ,1 pe w n10' oy.v Sa.\s )6\° ug oa' p wa Cr05 0 l�° og o�' oqA� ,apt ot' ,1 oe
Test date
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIII
USEPA Control Limits (i 2 Standard Deviations)
...............`........._.............................•...................
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I r r 1 1 1 I
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90'h Percentile CVs)
• • •
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10th and 25th Percentile CVs)
—•-- 7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean 1C25)
Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA 10 or SA f5)
Control Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.25' SA or or 2 Standard Deviations)
Graphs generated from associated excel spreads
Excel spreadsheet entgred by: 1. Sumner
Reviewed by: ,�A\

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
— Entered 9/17/2013
Reported: 10/2/2013
For: TOX
NC 28002
;119111M11110
NbAgstio
Date
Sample ID Parameter Gust ID Result Units Method Analyzed Analyst
130917-1
C.dubia Pass/Fail Elf LC Pass
'—' hespectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
AWN
EPA600/4-91/002 9/18/13 ETS
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

001
On
011
MIS
PO Box 7565
Asheville, 14p 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: Jim©etsnjclab.com
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
September 27, 2013
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9269
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the City of Albemarle — Long Creek
WWTP received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. September 18 through
September 20, 2013.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final
Result
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
TGP3B Toxicity Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please entEir a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
September 16, 2013 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit a copy of the DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
October 31, 2013.
"" If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
umner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety. without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

•
•
fif
• Environmental Tasting Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase Ii Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Boz 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: September 30. 2013
Facility: Statesville Analytical
City of Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Char e:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
NPDES #f: NC. 0024244
Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Comments:
Project: 9269
Samples: 130918.02. 130920.02
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
162I Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1621
Sample information
Collection start dale:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaC0r):
Hrrdness (mg/L CaC01):
Conductivity (prnhosIcm):
Total residual chlorine (m$IL)'
Sample Temp. at Receipt (^C):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg`L):
initial Tamp. (°C):
Final Temp. CC):
5tan date: 09-18-13 I End 09 25-13 Start 045tc: Ent' time:
i
Sun
90%
6.84
7.17
8.1
8.0
24.9
25.1
Organism Number
Control Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ma*
'Number of Young Produced I 30 1 32 281 28 I 291 30 128 I 29 I 27 I 29 ( 29 1 28 I
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (Dead LLLL LLLLL LLL
Effluent Percentage
90%
^�+ Treatment 2 Organisms
'Number of Young Produced I 27 i 321 31 128
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead L L I I_ L
..w
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms
Number of Young Produced I I I i
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 4 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
1
Treatment 5 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival (L)ive, (D)ead_
Effluent Percentage
28.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Man
29 132
L L
301 33
L L
32129
L L
31 30
L L
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
I4
f
30.3 I
-4.9
%Rakc+inn
Mrs,*
Y. RaLctan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 t.,e.n
4Rcduetbn
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mr^n
% Rchrclnn
1 12 Ns.
Treatment 6 Organisms t
Number of Young Produced
-
I I
I
i
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead Will
%Raanan
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV:
>90%
Rrncwal I
90%
7.13
7.44
8.3
7.8
24.8
25.0
Racwal 2
90%
7.44
7.37
7.8
7.9
24.9
24.8
Sun
Control
7.52
7.59
8.0
7.8
24.8
24.9
Renews, I
Control
7.59
7.68
7.9
8. I
25.0
24.9
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Morudity (%):
%Control with 3rd Broods:
Control Reproduction CV:
48 Hour Mortality
Control: J 0
IWC: 0
Significant?:
Final Mortality Significant at:
of
of
Renewal
Control
7.71
7.69
8.1
7.8
24.9
25.0
1.o
too •
4.5
12
12
No
No concentration
Reproduction Analyses;
Reproduction LOEC:
Reproduction NOEC:
Overall Method:
Normal Distribution:
Method:
Statistic:
Critical Value:
Equal Variances:
Method:
Statistic:
Critical Value:
>90%
90%
Homoscedasuc
Yes
Sh 4io-Wilk'a
0,985
0:884
Yes
r• 1Test
1.938
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent %
90%
Rank Stun
Critical Sum
DWQ form AT-3 (8191) Rev. 11/95

Test grouping information:
Project #
Y
6•ft•s
5 A...•btN Nue - L01,X7
°1'2-4741
4 A3•14S�i1 t2.
T1d,Fa ,
3 'Sul Sri • r-r>a
°1'ZSoS
2 & tIt,NSVNue-
-u t.
1 CONTROL
Test o anism source information:
Organism ege: •
Date and times organisrns were born
between:
Culture borrd:
Replicate number:
Culture board cup number:
Transfer bowl information:
Daily renewal information:
Da te
Day
0
1
2
3
4
< 24-hours old
Page 1 of 1
Control Information, North Carolina Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA-821-R-02-013,
Method 1002.0, NC Modification - December 2010, Version 3.0) Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
CR•1F•t-$
Control # \ Date
Acceptance Criteria:
% of Male Adults (5 20%):
% Adults having 3rd Broods (2 80%):
% Mortality (5 20%):
Mean Offspring/Female
(2 15 offspring/surviving female):
% CV (< 40.0%):
01:1-14•13, 01.0 -Co 1063
i • og•to-s e,
tb10
ilt
to
°C
pH =—j .°t'L SU Temperature = 'L .
CA- Lt. t
lI1'•1�S
oi• 2o• %3
Dail chemistry:
Parameter
Analyst
S.U.
L.)
Conductivity (pmhos/cm)
Alkalinity (mg CaCOyr-)
Hardness (mg CaCO3/L)
Temperature (°C)
21-t3
Test initiation, renewal,
feeding, or termination time
Initiation and Feeding yr
10
Feeding
(MS
Renewal 1 and Feedi g t S
Feeding
Feeding
Initiation
'1.52
Survival and reproduction data:
Day
2 Adult mortality
(L � livy D deed)
5
Young
produced
Number
of Broods
Adult mortality
— live. D ^ dead)
Young
6 or 7 1 Number
of Broods
produced
Total young produced
Initial
1
L.—
L
tS
2
Is
c
6 ASS
Final
3
13
IS
Test information:
Randomizing template color:
Incubator number and shelf
location:
YWT batch:
Selenastrum batch:
Control/Dllution water
batch used (Soft s2othettc)
sow mr&PolliJii
Renewal One
K.z
1.5 ct
4
Initial
5
Lr
110
LB
•t
Final
I
Replicate number
6
13
11
1
7
8.9
14.59,
eI+JY.
Z� 3
0C.11 "1
Analyst
Renewal Two
1 -
Lti
13
S
1
Initial
8
L
1s
1
"I:e9
-LS. tz)
Final
9
L
13
1
10
L'.
t3
30
3Z
zs
zg
3U
Zg
Z1
7-1
11
t2
1
Zg
1
Final Adult Mortality
(L livq D • dead}
X for 3rrBroods
Notes: A4 = Male, AB = Aborted brood observed.
SOP AT12 - Exhibit AT12.3, revision 07-131-1:

NMI
Page 1 of 1
L �:+
re w .-
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0)
Paired with Control # Date 0 Species: Cerioda hnia dubia q
--�
Comments:
NPDES #: NC
Outfall/Pi e:
Full-stren chemistry: Sample information:
Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2
--r Collection start date:
Collection end time:
Grab/Composite
duration :
pH (S.U.)
DO (mg/L)
Conductivity
(µmhosicri
Chlorine
(m /I-) -
Dilution
Test concentration:
mL Sam •le:
mL Dilution water:
Total vol:ime mL
.5
Test concentration chemist
Parameter
Anal st
4.D . l0 Temperature (°C) upon
recei t•
Physical characteristics:
O1.
1.-to
3•
ETS ro'ect number:
ETS sample number:
Initiation
W
S.U. •1
_ c L) l
Conductivity (µmhos/cm ) 3 9
erature (°C) om.. �.�el
Initial
Test concentration: 6107
Day
2 1 Adult mortality
- live, D - dead
Young
produced
Number
of Broods
.Adult mortality
L live, D-dead
6or7 ( Young
produced
Total ycung produced
Final Adult Mortality
(L - live, C - dead
Notes: M = Male, AB = Aborted brood observed.
Number
of Broods
Sample 1
crmt
0
C-ol"tosLIe
0.g•C,
+PPornC.t..QS
Renewal One
W
Z i1 �l•��
-Ls.1 1.4•e
Final Initial
Survival and re
Re • licat
d S 6
Oti't�•i7L
Renewal Two
Final Initial
roduction data:
number
7
Test results:
Mortality:
Mean Offspring/Female:
% Reduction from control:
f-Stat or RS:
1-Tailed Critical:
Pass or Fail
Final
�t3
2.
SOP AT12 - Exhibit AT12.2, revision 07 01-12

I 1 1
1 1 1
s
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Start Date: 9/18/2013
End Date: 9/25/2013
Sample Date:
Comments:
D-Control
D-Control
90
90
30.000
29.000
27.000
31.000
32.000
28.000
32.000
30.000
Test ID: CdPFCRNC Sample ID:
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type:
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species:
•
•r. �� y. L.*,..'.......
28.000
31.000
� K '
28.000 29.000
28.000 29.000
D-Control 28.917 1.0000 28.917 27.000 32.000
90 30.333 1.0490 30.333 27.000 33.000
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01)
F-Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.29)
Hom oscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences
Treatments vs D-Control
30.000 28.000
32.000 30.000
4.535 12
6.019 12
0.98488
1.93833
Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
29.000 27.000 29.000
33.000 32.000 29.000
-2.183 2.508
0.884
5.31963
1.628
0.00789 -0.1187
1.62768 0.05629 12.0417 2.52652 0.03998 1, 2
dlAD, "Trio 1 rmrr ("rn.L 110_ 1R_ 1 7

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Ceriodaplinia duhia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0 - North Carolina Modification
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Client: Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP
Test dates: September 18 - 25, 2013
Project number: 9269
Reveiwed by:
Concentration
(%)
Day
Number of young produced by replicate number
Survival
(%)
Average
reproduction
(offspring/female)
Coefficient of
variation
(%)
Percent reduction
from control (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Control
5
15
15
13
14
13
13
13
15
13
16
12
15
100
28.9
4.5
Not applicable
7
15
17
15
14
16
17
15
14
14
13
17
13
Total
30
32
28
28
29
30
28
29
27
29
29
28
90%
5
13
16
16
15
12
15
16
15
17
14
16
16
100
30.3
6.0
-4.9
7
14
16
15
13
17
17
14
18
15
15
15
14
Total
27
32
31
28
29
32
30
33
32
29
31
30
Dunnett's MSD value:
PMSD:
1.628
5.6
MSD = Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD = Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of test precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared
statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity test.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10th percentile) = 13%.
Upper PMSD bound detcrtnined by USEPA (901° percentile) = 47%.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the loth and 90th percentile. respectively, of PMSD data from EPA's WET
Interlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA. 200Ia; USEPA, 2001b).
USEPA. 2001a, 2001h. Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study of EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods. Volumes 1 and 2-Appendix. EPA•821-B-01-004 and EPA-821-B-01-005.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati. OH.
Alhemarle long ('reek 09-1X-13

i
Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
Entered 11/4/2013
Reported: 12/2/2013
NC 28002
For: LC Eff sampled 11 /471 3 '1'OX
STATESVILLE
ANALYTICAL
Date
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID Result Units Method Analyzed Analyst
131104-8
P.promelas Full- LC Eff >100%
Respectfully submitted,
\:\.,-\\\„ \-1\-7"-\
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
EPA821/R-02/013 11/5/13 ETS
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

INII
•
•
•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
November 29, 2013
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9364
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Dear Ms. Moore:
•� Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. November 05 through November 08, 2013.
- Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method
Number Final Result
Code
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
THP6C Larval Survival and Growth, EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV > 100%
Test Method 1000.0
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
growth.
.,. If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >100% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
November 03, 2013 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
December 31, 2013.
0111
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
im umner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety. without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
.� The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

Ian
ta-
■at
Mal
MIMI
•
i
•l
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Date: November 29.2013
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc. Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 9364
Samples: 131105.02. 131107.03. 131108.19
NPDES 11: NC- 0024244 Pipe 8: 001 County: Stanly
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
EMI
% Effluent
MEM
% Effluent
90%
Replicate number
2 3
4
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.575
0.638
0.532
0.627
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Wright/original (tngAanac)
0.582
0.660
0.607
0.580
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/oriental (mg/larvae)
0.562
0.580
0.618
0.587
Emuent
19-'% I
°% Effluent
100%
Surviving number of larvae
l0
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.544
0.597
0.662
0.673
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
9
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.602
0.599
0.578
0.552
Surviving number of larvae
9
9
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae)
0.615
0.530
0.633
0.627
Water Quality Da
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. CC):
High Concen
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L)
Tanp. ("C):
Sun date: 1 End daf 3 1 Snit n J End
1220 l time:
1
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Avenge WI
surviving (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
100A
0.593
0593
100.0
0.607
Survival (%) [ 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.587
Survival 1%,)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt Img)
100.0
0.619
97.5
0.583
95..0
0.601
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
Ilatch date.
Hatch time
Aquatox, Inc.
11-04-13
1600 ET
a
Day 0
Da 1
D 2
Day 3
p 4
-S
Da 6
Initial I Find
Initial I Final
Initial 1 Final
Initial Final
Initial 1 Final
Initial Final
Initial I Final
7.65
7.65
7.78
7.51
7.69
7.46
7.85
7.51
7.63
7.47
7.75
7.41
7.76
7.41
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.9
7.9
7.8
7,9
8.1
8.4
8.2
8.4
7,4
8.0
7.5
24,7
24.4
24.8
25.0
24.7
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.7
24.4
24.7
25.0
24.8
24.7
ran0n
6.74
7,18
7.24
6.98
7.14
7.07
7,37
7.19
7,27
7,25
7.49
7.17
7,57
7.23
8.5
7.9
8,1
7,8
7,8
7 6
7.9
8.1
8.3
8.1
8.4
6,8
8.0
7,6
24.9
24.5
25.0
24.7
24.9
24.7
24,8
24,5
25,0
24,3
24.9
24.5
24.7
24.6
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab.
call Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/1. CaC0r):
Hardness (m8/1- CaCO3):
Conductivity. (µmhoslcm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
taut Sample Temp at Receipt CO:
Overall Analysis:
Sample 1
11-03-13
24-h
Sanyle 2
11-05-13
24-h
Sample 3
11-07.13
23,75-b
11
18
24
54
52
48
348
<0.10
1.0
396
< 0.10
0.2
380
<0.10
1.8
33.32
42.40
152-158
Analyses
Normal:
liom. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yea
Yes
Yes
100%
100%
>I00%
>100%
>100%
>100%
Visual Insp.
Dunnett's
Survival
Growth
%Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
45%
2.410
-0.475
67.5%
2.410
0.20B
909k
.
2.410
-0.866
95%
I.410
0.341
100%
2.410
-0.275
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
DWQ form AT-5 (8/03)

MOM
iETS
• to onm mel Testing Solutions. Inc.
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1000.0)
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NPDES #: NC 0024244
Project #: Pat.A
County: Stanly
Outfall #: 001
IWC: 90%
Page 1 of 5
Dilution preparation information:
Dilution prep (%)
45
67.5
90
95
100
Comments:
Effluent volume (mL)
450
675
900
950
1000
Diluent volume (mL)
550
325
100
50
0
Total volume (mL)
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
Test organism information:
Test information:
Organism age:
Z.o.*N'S }><oQtrts OLA
Randomizing template:
s4 ..ovt
Date and times organisms
were born between:
11..pk x3 1bCO
Incubator number and
shelf location:
3 Cr
Organism source:
ftrby, $tx tk ila 1V4`1• U
Artemia CHM number.
CHt111.O
Drying information for
determination:
weight
Transfer bowl information:
pH = 1.108 S.U.
Temperature = L . 1 °C
Date / Time in oven:
11-‘2-V3
too- (...
Initial oven temperature:
Average transfer volume:
1.1t.1aS-4.-0
Date / Time out of oven:
v1- vb-'tS
Final oven temperature:
1.00*C
Total drying time:
-1-1,- nloo#S
Daily feeding and renewal information:
Day
Date
°
I1-oS.t3
I
11-oc0.13
2
II •o1.13
3
ti-ois.t3
4
li-o9.13
5
it •IO.13
6
tl•u•13
7
Ii- t t•13
Morning feeding
Afternoon feeding
Test initiation, renewal,
or termination
Time
Analyst
cn
it
Analyst
Time
1b3Q
tb0a
1'%00
US
1•5`1S
Time
1'1. LO
11-LCt
t t'LO
11ZD
1\Za
Analyst
at
Sample
number used
1-
ISMS. 01..
13%101. c2
13tt crb
1311 OS ci
3013
tbeel
SSW
batch used
It -CA -lb A
11-01-13
1l-01- 13
1�-d�'►13
11-01-11$
Control information:
Acceptance criteria
Summary of test
endpoints:
% Mortali :
1-
s 20%
7-des LCso
> 100.
Average weight per initial larvae:
d S'Nb
NOEC
10bt.
> t007.
Average weight per surviving Larvae:
p .SC13
>_ 0.25mg/larvae
LOEC
ChV
> (Qo1
IC25
> 1007
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

•
vETS
mina
EnvitonmentalTesnnq sohefons. Inc.
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: 1(' 0613
th Data
Page 2 of 5
Y^ ^
Day
CONTROL
45%
67.5%
A
BCD
F
F
r
G
H
I
J
K
L
0
10
IV
10
Io
(0
10
10
IC)
10
l0
10
1
l
10
10
10
_
10
10
/0
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
t0
10
10
10
10
10
10
%o
(0
10
10
1p
3
10
/0
10
10
10
10
i0
IQ
10
10
10
10
4
10
/0
10
10
10
10
10
16
10
10
10
10
5
10
10
10
10
!0
10
10
!0
10
/0
/0
/0
6
/0
10
10
10
10
10
10
t0
/0
lb
(0
!0
7
10
/0
/0
10
10
(0
10
10
10
10
10
/0
A= Pan weight
:: It A►1
Tray color code:: 9
(J�,�'
�5.10
15.30
��,yy
1L1•(p1
15.Zb
1tn.31v
lb
I 5.2Z
I+
(5.y�1
1Q
t ioci
1fl. ��
Analyst: 1Lv.7 �!
Date: tO — 22: 1SB=
Pan
Analyst:+ Larvae weight (mg)
7 t o
O
21 y p
20.(0221,1
k
2049
Z .%b
72g321.0
104
21.14
2Or122
o
Date: «-tt;-11
C = Larvae weight (mg)= B — A
Hand calculated. J
Analyst: ....-------
5.-15
1..3%
S. 2,
1,2.1
5.4Z
1..t•0
(e.(51
S.&O
S.102
Vitt
6.1e
s.1
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
=C / Initial number of larvae
Hand calculated,
4
471%
p.
%
•o2
O.
ry
h�
p'
/.
O'
v
('i�
p•
V O
t).
14.
�t�
o
o
��
0'
Sry
O-
4, O
O
�8
6
C.
S�
Analyst: ,—`�
Average weight per initial
number oflarvae(mg)
Percent
reduction
from control
(%
0.'
O.(c'
--zAl•
O'Sk—1
1. %'-
Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small,
Ig = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w — wounded.
Comments:
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

Envn°nmen .I Testing Solutions. Inc.
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: l 1'05 l 5
a
Page 3 of 5
- »...... ..........
Day
90%
5%
100%
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
0
to
to
lv
10
10
io
to
10
10
10
10
1
/D
10
Id
IO
10
10
10
I
10
10
10
/0
2
l p
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3
10
(0
'0
1D
to
10
10
to
Ip
10
10
ID
4
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
la
10
10
/0
10
5
ID
10
it
10
lO
10
10
/0
10
10
/0
ID
6
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
I
l0
11,)
10
ID
1D
CO
ID
I
1D
•
10
c
a"L
i4(
(0
to
A = Pan weight (mg�
Tracode:: trn�,
15,b6
16.59
I(4.53
15,bi
IS, a
1(0.3500,2.2113
Flo
15.'i(c,
15:1-
Ib.yo
15.so
Analyst:lyst:
Date: 10-72,-‘1
B = Pan + Larvae weight (mg)
Analyst: >ti�
'IA 10
2l.SbZI.IS
22:/tf
WO
223`�
ZZ•c0l2
4Z
21.bi
2101221322.0
Date: tt-t' 13
C= Larvae weight (mg)=B-A
Hand calculated. f
sA`'`
S•'Vt
1...o1.-
V'13
i,.6 -
�'"�
SIR
S•S -
�.,tS
$.SD
b.33
te.21
Analyst: �""
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
= C /Initial number of larvae
Hand calculated.
�aJ.
O
yam^
0.
vN
b•
XI)
1p
p•
4
to'
�C�
0
�^CL
O.
'V
O.
J'
O•
�0
h
Q•
/ti
,�
O.
ry^
V
d
Analyst: Sc._
Average weight per initial
number of larvae (mg)
Percent
reduction
from control
(%)
IJ• OV\
„ yt .1 .
6 .5t3
\.-11.
0 • toU `
7
^ l.''� ,
Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small,
1g = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded.
Comments:
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Pimephales promelas Chronic Whole Effluent toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Test dates: November 05-12, 2013
Project number:
9364
(oreentr.nnnCA)
lirpH. it
I,IILI ..mho-(
Ian se
naaJ ...Mr of tan se
A- Paa.reI II
(mat
B-Pas l Lamm
might OW
lenat"elaat (sm.)
- A -B
W,Iaat( San 1. MA
aumMrdian.lma)
Mean .,4 b(r
Ssrvbine numb., d
tam. (nxl
CoeflMeal of..rlatton
Nor .'/ae.-^"ae
...r.er..,(K)
WOO)/ lenl.laamber
dIse...ro11
Mess minis al
(Yet
Mum irelp hII
101114 somber nr
%nw(mal
rl.tn,kntof
arise.. (0.)
Perms iredurIMn (mt.
mnlml (111
ControlC
A
10
10
15.41
21.16
5.75
0.575
0. 593
83
0.575
100.0
0543
a.3
Not applicable
B
10
10
15.10
21.48
6.38
0.638
0.638
10
10
159ri
20 62
5.32
0.532
0.572
D
10
10
15.44
21.71
6.27
0627
0.627
q
a.
F.
10
10
14.67
20.49
5.82
0 582
Ob07
6I
0.582
100.0
0.60;
6.1
-2.d
F
10
10
15.26
21,86
6 60
0.660
0.660
G
10
10
16.36
22.43
607
0.607
0607
H
10
10
16.89
22 69
5.80
0.580
0.580
67.55L
1
10
10
15.22
20.84
5.62
0.562
0 58?
4 0
0.562
100.0
0.587
4.0
1.1
r
10
10
15.44
21.24
5.80
0 580
0.580
K
10
10
15.69
21.87
6.18
0.618
0.618
L
10
10
16.39
22.26
5.87
0.587
0.587
90%
M
10
10
15.66
21.10
5.44
0.544
u61�
0,544
100.0
0.619
4.7
a.d
N
10
10
16.59
22.56
5.97
0.597
0.597
O
10
10
14.53
21.15
662
0.662
0.652
P
10
10
15.61
2234
673
0.673
0673
94
Q
10
10
15.08
21.10
6.02
0.602
0.598
0.602
97.5
0.583
4.0
1.7
R
10
10
I6.35
22.34
5.99
0.599
0.509
S
10
10
1622
2.2.00
5.78
0.578
0.578
T
10
9
16.90
22 42
5.52
0.613
0.552
I (10•h
U
10
9
15.46
21.61
6.15
0.683
(1633
6 1
0.615
qc•n
a6o1
8.0
t.a
V
10
9
15 77
21.07
5.30
0,589
0.530
NV
10
10
16,40
22.73
6.33
0.633
0633
X
10
10
15.80
22 07
6.27
0.627
0.627
Outran oof
Dunnett's MSD value:
PMSD:
0.0723
12.2
MSD -
PMSD -
Minimum Significant Difference
Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of tat precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can he declared stalisunally significant in a whole effluent toxicity teal.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10th percentile) - 12%.
Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (90th percentile)... 30%
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the loth and 90th percentile. respectively. of PMSD data fmrn EPA's WET Intetlaborattory Vanabllity Study (USEPA. 2001a; USEPA,
2001b).
USEPA 2001a. 20016 Final Report. Interlabtnatory Variability Study of EPA Shon•term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods, Volumes 1 and 2-Append+s EPA-821-B-01-004 and EPA-821-B-01-005 US Environmental Protection Agency. Cincinnati, OH
File Albemarle-J.ong_ll-05.13_pp.xh
Entered by. J. Sumner
Reviewed by

Oft
•
•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
Start Date:
End Date:
Sample Date
11/5/2013
11/12/2013
Larval Fish Growth and Survival Test-7 Day Growth
Test ID: PpFRCR Sample ID: Long Creek WWTP
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type' DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species: PP-Pimephales promelas
Comments:
Conc-% 1 2 3 4
D-Control 0.5750 0.6380 0.5320 0.6270
45 0.5820 0.6600 0.6070 0.5800
slot 67.5 0.5620 0.5800 0.6180 0.5870
90 0.5440 0.5970 0.6620 0.6730
95 0.6020 0.5990 0.5780 0.5520
100 0.6150 0.5300 0.6330 0.6270
MEM
Transform: Untransformed 1-Tailed Isotonic
Conc-% Mean N-Mean Mean Min Max CV% N t-Stat Critical MSD Mean N-Mean
D-Control 0.5930 1.0000 0.5930 0.5320 0.6380 8.276 4 0.6015 1.0000
45 0.6073 1.0240 0.6073 0.5800 0.6600 6.134 4 -0.475 2.410 0.0723 0.6015 1.0000
67.5 0.5868 0.9895 0.5868 0.5620 0.6180 3.978 4 0.208 2.410 0.0723 0.6015 1.0000
90 0.6190 1.0438 0.6190 0.5440 0.6730 9.726 4 -0.866 2.410 0.0723 0.6015 1.0000
95 0.5828 0.9827 0.5828 0.5520 0.6020 3.966 4 0.341 2.410 0.0723 0.5920 0.9842
100 0.6013 1.0139 0.6013 0.5300 0.6330 7.998 4 -0.275 2.410 0.0723 0.5920 0.9842
Auxiliary Tests
Statistic Critical Skew Kurt - Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 00.94814 0.884
-0.448 -0.5513
88
Bartlett's Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.58)
Hypothesis Test 0-tail, 0.05) NOEC LOEC ChV TU 0.07234 MDu MSDp 0.12 9 0.MSB DSE01e F-Prob Sdt
Dunnetts Test 100 >100
18
Treatments vs D-Control
Linear Interpolation (200 Resamples)
man
WEI
Point °/ SD 95% CL(Exp) Skew
IC05 >100
IC10 >100
IC15 >100
IC20 >100
IC25 >100
IC40 >100
IC50 >100
0
0.
cc
1.0
0.9 -
0.8 -
0.7 -
0.6-
0.5 -
0.4 0.3
02-
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0
50 100
Dose
150
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0
(7 0.4
m
0.3
1-
0.2
r� 0.1
0
Dose -Response Plot
0
m
•
1-tail. 0.05 level
of significance
0
File: Albemarle-Long.11.05-13„pp.xls
Entered by: J. Sumner
Reviewed by: __, ts„.

•
•
R
E+Mmnmental 'Testing Sdutbu Inc.
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Daily Chemistry:
Date: n.o •t3
Page 4 of 5
Day
(Analyst identified for each da , performed pH, D.O. and conductivity measurements only.)
0
1 2
Anal st
t,t4
`-I . %AS•
'-l.lp
Kw
1.-1 '•
10.0
-? .
40
Ey
? 60.)
1• (O
Concentration
Parameter
CONTROL
pH (S.U.)
DO (mgfL)
'•D
%• O �•0
15-7
-'7. et
' 5E
[i
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
152.
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO3/L.)
3'
32-
O
*Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
%-17_
*Temperature (°C)
Z4-1
-Li IA. i
1S. 0
Z4• f
-1•33
Z
Iffill
pH (S.U.)
?-%O
-7 • SO -t • t o3
7 . q
Nil
45%
DO (mg/L)
$. 3
1 • ' i •
2
I-
W+40 2(9Z..
Conductivity
(µ nhos/cm)
24b
*Temperature (°C)
IA.
r . L' • 1
1~•l 't
1 --1
pH (S.U.)
"1.O
1 -VA
•SZ
'i.1i'
-7.32
67.5%
DO(mg/L)
I•3
.•
.1
zit1
1-QConductivi
••
312.
(yrnhos/cm)Y
2g 1
*Temperature CC)
-1,y•'1
`•L • 1.
•-7.,4•1
i)•i•"l
'1-y •S
pH (S.U.)
to.in
-1.24
'7.35
-1.01
`1.1
90%
DO (m:
-L • t
..
-7• •
•
} -1.a•e
Conductivity
(µmhoslcm)
325
'62 (
i
' 6IS'
0
1t;.1
-L. • `
*Temperature (°C)
L' .1
pH (S.U.)
(D. I
1.20
-1 .SO
-7.00
-1. tS
1 • ILI
95%
DO m:
:.
-1.••
Conductivity
{µmhos/cm)
33(P
-. S
-
*Temperature (°C)
1.4•k-
-t.A..S •L5. 0
"L L io
1.Lt. &
•b
pH (S.U.)
(a: 4
•J .1 . '7 .24
to •fig
-7.141
` 7.01J
.3s 3
n(
�'
1.1
Conductivity
(p.mhos/cm)
3y3
1 g
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO3/L)
1
was,
*Hardness
(mg CaCO3lL)
s
•"L • AS. ► ( -I4•1
< 0. 1
Zj,C
*TR chlorine (mg/L)
C 0. 10
*Temperature (°C)
i. -
Initial
Final Initial
Final
Initial
Final
*Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal information table located
on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by: rk
""" SOP AT20 - Exhibit AT203, revision 07-01-12

EnvitonmenulTe.nrg Solution/4 Inc.
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: 11'06'13
Page 5 of 5
Day
(Anal st identified for each d: , .erformed ,H, D.O. and conductivi measurements onl .
3 4 5 6
Concen-
tration
Anal st
Parameter
4.0 R W1
WN EMI
1' !)
MOW
111Nall
ECM
CONTROL
D I
•%S
M
l MAE
=
DO )
1.4
MM.
m:
Conductivity
153
IS-3
___
iSb
*Alkalinity
L
Ma
may_
H rdness
"Hard oess
MI
W
—
m: CaCO3/L)
�I_
*Tem erature (°C)
EMPUIIIIMUIIIEVEMIIIMMIIME101
t�"�
mem
DO L)
Kimil, 1,`'
' 0 3. ti
CV= maw
45%
m:
Conductivity
mhos/cm
16(o
2,S'y
ZSS
�• k
01�
1y+• to SWIM
owe.
*T'em . erature (°C}
�'
-1.
'k • V
-LA. II
H(S.U.
Elliel11.11111M111
MIi
��,I 1-10
IIMINII
MIN 8 I
fWWII.
67.5%
DO mI
a.
S . 0 MIMI
Conductivity
31
3 O
3 n
3U°I
mhos/cmer
i`-t- to
'1.�t•S 1 • t
MIll =MI
EIMIll
IIIMMINIMIEWPIN
.'2,0 1.Sc
.H SU)ature(°C}
96%
DO (m
Ele.11111001.1
Conductivity
'2 (3
•7
3 140
q
1
`t'�. to
mhos/cmer
*Tem.ature (°C)MEM
1�• 8
Wan st��
-1'`4.
'761
MIMI
lannallINIMMIIIIMMI
.oMie
WSW ELME
C MIll
95%
DO m
INIMIE
8.0 MUM
E,,1111111 IN=
-71
Conductivity
`2 '1 S
3k0 to
3
,0�
mhos/cm
�j
t .'
WM
. �M.
.®�I
���7
i[1LR -1. 2.7
it,
M
23
. H (S. U.
tp.tg •
DO(m:
NMI
2• 1 MMEMSEESE
.0
IfiO%
Conductivity
mhos/cm
*Alkalinity
m: CaCO3/L
3q2
3 80
'Z,Vl
3 l be)3
*Hardness
(m: CaCO3/I
IAO
*TR chlorine (mg/L)
t O , f
MEMOWI 1`i. (o
Z.'i. S 1S • 0
MEM MM
Final
Initial Final Initial
Final Initial
Final Initial
'Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located
on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and total sidual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by:_.
SOP AT 20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility:
Species:
Test type:
Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Pimephales promelas
Chronic Definitive
NPDES 41: NC0024244 Pipe 41: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Stan date: 1 1. 3 1 3
End date:: (I - €-(-13 Time: t; 7 LI 0
Number ofsamples per hour: j7a.,. Q I'u (>p t-%,,,. 6.1
Method of transport to laboratory: .5. P •
Chilled during collection? i e5 Comments:
Sample location: aFFLLt r
Time: C. '7 ``1 t Volume collected for testing: q L ti e t•S
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
If chilled, specify temperature: 1 C_
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody:
Sample collected by:
1,i VIA. La Yrf
Relinquished by:
(to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
p 7-i v
tI `i-ij
Dag and umc
41VA Lays.%Q
Prim
Relinquished by:
Ib 1C)Mor\
Sample receipt information:
Relinquished to ETS by:
1.4..4
1
(to be completed by E7S personnel)
als4I
Prue saw°R
I1,064?,
0138
Custody seals intact?`f1
Yes
No
Samples received in good condition?: `Iss 1
Tracking number: ZL(111-SYtpS
Comments:
Ina
Data and lute
1 1
Received by:
4rUak-b"
Print
Received by:
uaid gnd nnK
c..._.,..,. Dgeadtime
Pnnl
Received at ETS by:
Prute
tJ-0 -1 3
1 �-s-� v Jl� u930
umv
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence:Ab sCcnsc Indicator. MDL y 0.10 mpg -)Project number'.'1t Sample number:
-c 1
Preaaa
A/
�311Cf •02

351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 2880I
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facilftti: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe 0: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: I I - 5- — I.3
End date: 1 j - 6 — 13
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Time: fi Ci 1 a
Timef:� 9 i..L
7c s
j"C
Sample location: i-FLU.E.AXT
Volume collected for testing: 9 Liters
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
Method of transport to laboratory: 5.A. Gv« ,-r e
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Ilected hy:
, lwk t_t.t ,,.,D
J i3 ('
‘wv,
;w,n
. II - -1-\
Prim
ed bv:
Gana er•:
i
1)
t\\N,tiN LA _ (1
.` ,n
, 1- c -1
are
Relinquished by:
f:.U.,t, npt13,,,,
1-
tp
3
Received by:
n
ua�aratge • (3
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
pc/ut
Custody seals intact?:
Yes
(MI3 ,
Signe..oe Datc and time
to Not ascd
Samples received in good condition?:
E — f
ho
Tracking number: (2)0aq 1AV 3q€33
Comments:
Si tOral
ved at ETS by:
Bipolar.
Siyw nae
q
'.gyp
Date and woe
lac and time
1` .
vk--
i[iti s
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DP() Prescnce/Absense indicator. MDL - 0.10 m 'L)
Project number: qP1p4 Sample number: 131l01.03

•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order.
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95,100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: 1 j . - 7 `I 3
End date: 1 1 -15--
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
if chilled, specify temperature:
Time:01�5cJ`r
Time: CIS Vc
ie S
I'cr
Sample location: 'I -UEi-) 7-
Volume collected for testing: 13 1.-Ae -S
Number of containers filled for testing: LI
Method of transport to laboratory: 5 A.
Comrnents:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice_ The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody:
Sample collected by:
,�iw.iccw / l3P
Prada
(to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
5:3� t
11•S-l3
?rsz:C)
Onte and,m+e
.Nvv. Lam{)
NNAt4_
1 • ts'-1 1
s
•
Ci
f}�,r
:
ti�
I 1
iJ
Print
Signature
Received by:
332OU r'
Received In:
T r ^/� Ainl rti S: :c
��jT o.l1 1., ir-C7 L. �. L
t information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Sample receipt
•
f
!t- 3 -13
\.,) ..�-.(�;,,,,,
/at) / 1713 7
13%1
rya
Custody seals intact?:
—1
vn
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number:
Comments:
Received at ETS by:
EC 61)
_ 13
Dmmc and ,xnc
'Dinc.id la
II--ime
7
J' t,,naturc
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS ("C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence/Absense Indicator. MDL = 0.10 mg/L)
Project number i iG Sample number: 311D8 l
t\- is
17j1`
D,:_ mid ill=
1.%
Preitn:
A1nc:
Ili

7-day IC25 (g/L KCI)
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
1 1 1 1
Pimephales promelas
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
Organism Source: Aquatox, Inc.
1 I I 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
I 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90th Percentile CVs)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 r 1 11 I I 1
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10th and 25th Percentile CVs)
1 1 1 2 L i i ''0 i '� 3 1 'i 3 3 3 3 3 1 3
111E o 11 ,6 sf, 1 Aar �.1 .1 1 AS.1 Ay1 Al f3 0- 111 .cf) pk+1�ASY 1�.1oosv 1A�.1
�' 1a ,y0' t1 OS or 01 09 O3 Od 0 OS 06 01 Oa
CP
Test date
•— 7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of potassium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Pimepholes growth for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean IC25)
— Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA_10 or SA_75) Graphs generated f ram associated excel spre,dsheer,
;xul spreadshees ente y: 1. Sumner
Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.25r SA.90 or 2 Standard Deviations) Reviewed by:

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
Entered 10/7/2013
Reported: 10/25/2013
For: Fathead LC
NC 28002
rryi$P�
1 1d K}i
Date
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID Result Units Method Analyzed Analyst
131007-2 P.promelas Full- Eff Pass
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
EPA821/R-02/013 10/8/13 ETS
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

•
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
October 30, 2013
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical. Inc_
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9294
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. October 08 through October 11, 2013.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number Final Result
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
THP6C Larval Survival and Growth.
Test Method 1000.0
EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV > 100%
Noie: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
growth.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >100% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
October 06, 2013 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
November 30, 2013.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety. without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certfficate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater. 600
South C'arohna Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Date: October 30, 2013
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
Signature of Operator in Rcponsible Ch e:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: %�
NPDES 8: NC- 0024244 Pipe 4: 001 County: Stanly
Comments:
Project: 9294
Samples: 131008.05, 131010.03. 131011.21
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences 13ranch
1621 Mail Service: Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
Effluent
459E
Effluent
67_5%
% Effluent
90%
a Effluent
95%
% Effluent
100 %
Replicate number
1 2 3 4
Surviving number of larvae
Original numbc of larvae
Weight/original (niF/Ianne)
10
10
0.624
10
10
0.495
J0
10
0.552
10
10
__ 0.726
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weiglworiginal (mgrlanae)
0.557
0.502
0.542
0.506
Surviving number of larvae
Original number of larvae
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
10
10
0.527
10
10
0.558
10
10
0.559
10
10
0.500
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
9
Original number of lan•ae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (nig/lar ae)
0.516
0.617
0.579
0.509
Surviving number of lance
10
10
J 0
9
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (nttelarvae)
0,604
0.630
0.674
0.513
Surviving number of larvae
10
9
10
9
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weighvoriginal (ntg/larvaei
0.594
0.533
0.579
0.548
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg1L):
Temp. (C):
High Conecn
p1't (SU):
DO (mg/L).
Temp. a.):
Stan date.
End date
Start time:
End time:
10-08-13
10-15-13
1030
0930
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Average wt;
surviving ling)
Sun•i.al (%)
Average cut (mg)
Survival (°,5)
Average cut (mg)
Survival (Y°)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt tmF)
Survival (%)
,Average cut Irngl
100.0
0.599
0.599
1 00 .0
0527
100.0
0.536
975
0.555
97_5
0.605
95.0
0.564
Test Organisms
Charmer supplier.
Aquatox.Inc.
Hatch date:
Batch time:
10-07-13
1600 ET
Day 0
Initial I Final
Day 1
Initial 1 Final
Day 2
Initial Final
Day 3
Initial Final
Day 4
Initial Final
Day 5
initial Find
Day 6
initial I Final
7.68
7.33
7.70
7.35
7.52
7.26
7.53
7.25
7.63
7.24
7.46
7.04
7 58
7.61
8.0
7.6
80
7.8
8.0
7.9
79
7.7
8.0
7.8
8.0
7.0
7.9
8.2
24.7
24.6
24.8
24.6
24,7
24.5
_ 24,7
24.6
24.8
24.4
24.7
24.5
24.8
24.5
6.54
6.60
6.81
6.60
6.60
6.55
6.70
6.47
6.52
6.71
6.91
6,54
6.87
6.67
7.9
7.6
8.0
7.7
7.9
7.8
8 1
7 5
8.3
7.8
7.9
7.2
8.0
7.8
24.9
24.7
24,9
24.4
25.0
24A
25.0
24.4
2.5.0
24.6
24.8
24.5
25.0
24.4
Sample information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mgt. CaC00:
Hardness (mg/L CaCOt):
Conductivity (pathos/an).
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt Mr
Overall Analysis:
Sample 1
10-06_ 13
24.25-h
8
Sample 2
10.08.13
24.25-h
7
Sanple 3
10-10-13
56
54
389
<0.10
0.4
394
4.- 0.10
0.5
24-h
8
56
385
'- 0.10
1.4
32.34, 32
42, 40.40
150-154
Analyses
Nomtal:
Hone. Var.
NOEL:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival
Growth
Ya
Yes
Yes
Yes
100%
100%
>100%
>100%
>100%
>100%
Visual lnsp.
Dutman's
Survival
Growth
%Emuent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
45%
2.410
1.797
67.5Ya
2.410
1.568
90%
2.410
1.090
45°
2.410
0.149
100% -
•
2.410
0.886
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
DWQ form AT-5 (8/03)

•
3 Eno...m.4T.,tinoolutlonti hu.
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1000.0)
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Albemarle, Long Creek WWTP
NPDES #: NC 0024244
Project #: °0_4
County: Stanly
OutfaIl #: 001
IWC: 90 %�
Page 1 of 5
Dilution preparation information:
Comments:
Dilution prep (%)
45
67.5
90
95
100
Effluent volume (mL)
450
675
900
950
1000
Diluent volume (mL)
550
325
100
50
0
Total volume (mL)
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
Test organism information:
Test information:
Organism age:
11. S t1oLIetc Ot..p
Randomizing template:
tR
Date and times organisms
were born between:
to-
Incubator number and
shelf location:
...4Q_.
3A
Organism source:
4coleiSatC1i Ak, 1 O-a1• t.'S
ATb7C
,grtemia CHM number:
04wvto ,
Drying information for weight
determination:
Transfer bowl information:
pH — -1.1.0$ S-U.
Temperature = 24. °C
Date / Time in oven:
to •tS . i3
initial oven temperature:
t„p •L
Average transfer volume:
1. 1to1.5..I
Date / Time out of oven:
1 O -it,. r3
Final oven temperature:
top .`
Total drying time:
ZA RDAS
Daily feeding and renewal information:
iL 4S
Day
Date
Morning feeding
Afternoon feeding
Test initiation, renewal,
or termination
Sample
number used
SSW
batch used
Time
Analyst
Time
Analyst
Time
Analyst
•
• re • '16
1 b,0b
A
%
> 3tboa • C5
to 2E • 11
k
1
LO cf-H•t3
67bo
A
1�30
1
(lib()
4
Abi00g- 83
Oct -z2• 13
2
l
le" 1013
6i30
ik
t33o
Ai
ld3o
j
1.31o1o.a3
0-0q.l3
3
1
10.11.13
lrj-r30
' 33 O
rYk. X
13‘b 10 . c
to-u-t- i2
4
to•ta•t3
onesc11
1400
e
4
ails
31
,3io 11.-74
10-OP 1.
5
p
p•th•t3
1Y1'40
31
13`IS
milt
1310i1.Z1
10-08-13
6
10.1`-F•13
0 .s
10.
(3(
rnao
cg
i1. z
�t
to. l 5• t3
.
or,'5o
.
Control information:
% Mortality:
Average weight per initial larvae:
Average weight per surviving larvae:
01,
0• Sii
o•S1'
Acceptance criteria
s 20%
>_ 0.25mg/larvae
Summary of test endpoints:
7-day LCso
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
>Iat) 7.
CC)7•
>1 obi.
>1007.
IC:s
?ibp7.
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20-3, revision 07-01-12

yp Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc,
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: 1,()•US•1.3
Page 2 of 5
Day
CONTROL
45% —
67.5%
A
BCDE
F
Gill
J
K
L
0
k-
1.�
tv
tc
to
t0
lb
to
to
to
10
10
1
10
10
10
10
l0
1b
/0
(0
/0
10
/0
/0
2
1p
10
it)
10
i 0
/0
/0
10
10
(0
10
10
3
(0
fD
(0
/0
10
I0
/0
10
l0
to
10
10
4
10
I O
10
to
it)
/0
/0
/0
10
16
/0
/0
1D
10
to
10
10
10
10
10
10
ID
10
10
6
t0
to
10
1p
to
10
to
to
10
10
10
t0
1D
10"
10
/0 �'
10
(0
t0
10
/0
l0
10
ID
A = Pan weight (mg)
Tray color code:: 0rar\ 2-
1590
15.51I-I.74149
l6:11
15,S2.
I'-L21
ty.
1495
lb.ol
14.93
ItI92
Analyst: ic,�
Date: O4(-10•13
B = Pan y Larvae weight (mg)
Analyst: 1
--
22.W
20
2113b
23.$0
Z2. -I
20
19.69
Iq.55
2.0.zz
Z1.59
205Zt4.9
Date: 10-(-1-13
c- Larvae weight (mg) = B - A
Hand calculated. `r
Analyst: , Y `�
le.i.A
`A"S
S.S2.
1. U
S,S1
S. t
V-11-
S•bb
S.21,
s.S$
5„S°t
'S• a•
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
= C / Initial number of larvae
Hand calculated.
Analyst: �t��
O.
ash
v
41
O
n�
O'
Lj^
O
Cp
p
aN
O•
O
A.
p
h�
O•
ix.
O
Average weight per initial
Dumber of larvae (mg)
Percent
reduction
from control
G . SGlGl
O. Sri
,Z . l 7
O. 53L
( b .0.
Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small,
lg = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded.
Comments:
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

a
0
Environmental Testtnp Solutions, inc.
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: IC). CA • LS
Page 3 of 5
Day
90%
./../ .«n..s ..+sue va V /WM YKii[
95%
100%
MNOPQR
S
T
UVWX
0
, K
[0
t0
to
1c
io
ld
to
ICI
10
(0
1
10
la
(0
10
16
/0
ro
.16
10
,
10
10
I0
(0
2
10
(0
10
10
I0
1(
(0
/0
10
10
10
/0
3
ID
10
lb
10
10
10
/0
/0
1D
l0
10
/0
4
/0
Ib
10
/0
/0
10
/0
/0
f0
/0
/0
10
5
10
10
10
10
(0
10
10
so
10
/0
10
6
/0
10
10
°It
1D
10
10
(0
c0
1
lO
10
7
,
10
to
to
Q
ro
to
ro
94
10
'1
10
9`4
A = Pan weight (mg)Traq
code::<" r�J�
15:19
I1030
15.y315.59
isAS
163515.25147b
ilo!{o
15.1q
14901,!.�
`1 2
A alyst
Date: Oet• 30.13
B = Pan + Larvae weight (mg)
Analyst KIP
20515
ZZ.53
�1. 2Z
ZO•(o$
2 1.
ZZ (L
Z 194
1 Q.
ZZ.n�
.'-r
ZQ 7
ZQ �oq
2p• Z0
Date: 10 --t1 -t3
C = Larvae weight (mg) = B - A
Nand calculated. j......-----
S.111
L11
S•1'
Sall
6.04
6.30
(0.14
S,t3
S.)4
5.33
S-1i
5.ttgAnalyst
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
= C / Initial number of larvae
Hand calculated.
Analyst: / "'`..
e
(4
0. 0.
N
.o
INN
62
V
0.
y0
O,
b'
o
SD
0'
A�
%p
o
Aj
yi
0•
'r,
62
fl'
1,
4'
O-
^�.
L'
0-
34i
h
p'
Average weight per initial
number of larvae (mg)
Percent
reducti
from conontrol
(%)
el. SSs
.1 •'s.7-
p .1e 0S
-- 1. GI.
O , S.-.A
b . pi.
Comment codes- c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small,
Ig = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded.
Comments:
SOP AT20 - Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

•
•
tat
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1'isnupliales pramelas Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013,14lcthod 1000.0
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Test dates: October 08-15. 20 t 3
Project number:
9294
Con<ninth. 11.)
Reptkarr
Waal nnher++r
Leas
n,.l.. mt.er orlon..
A- Po. wash.
(mill
a- Pa.a Len lit
weight (mRt
1an.e 13 Lisa Iimp
- a •0
W,Ip If3.n$l.R
number M l.n.r (mat
Mu. wdshu
San Ms, .ember M
Cea:akkat orndula.
0/......m./...1”.en
Wrlahtl lnln.1 n.mber
orl.rr.e ins)
Mean .mt.l
(Y.)
Mean .etshN
Initial number of
ism.. ftnit)
Cowlick., or
v.datlo. (%)
P,, .1 re4.abu fn.m
.a.trwt I•e1
Control
A
10
10
15 90
22 14
6 24
0.624
0599
)y.(,
0.624
IIi0.0
0.599
tr.r�
Vote applicable
PV
a
10
10
15.52
2047
4.95
0,495
0.495
C
10
10
1484
20.36
5.52
0552
0.552
0
10
10
16 54
23.80
7 26
0 726
0.726
15 %
F.
10
10
16 77
22.34
5 57
0.557
0 527
5 1
0.557
100.0
0.527
5.1
11.1
F
10
10
15 32
20 ,34
5.02
0 502
0.502
G
10
10
14.27
19.69
5.42
0 542
0.542
11
10
10
14 49
19.55
5 05
0.506
0.506
67,6%
I
10
10
14.95
20.22
5.27
0 527
0.53b
5.3
0.527
100.0
0.536
5.3
0.4
10
10
16.01
21.59
5.513
0.55g
0.558
K
10
10
14 vJ
20.52
5.59
0 539
O.S59
1.
10
10
14 92
19.92
5.00
0 500
0.500
905'.
AI
10
10
15 79
20.95
5.16
0 516
0569
_
0 516
97.5
0.555
9.2
;.3
N
10
10
16.36
2I.53
617
0617
0617
0
10
10
1543
21.22
5.T9
U57Y
0.579
P
10
9
15.59
20.68
5.09
0.566
0.509
9S,A
Q
(0
t0
15.45
21.49
6.04
0.604
0620
71
. ...0.604
97,5
11.1105
11.2
-l.n
R
10
10
1635
22.65
630
0.630
0.630
S
10
10 i
15.25
21.99
6.74
0,674
0.674
T
10
0
1476
1989
513
0,510
0513
100%
U
10
10
1640
22.34
5 "1:
0.594
0.594
2.1
U 594
95.0
0.56.1
5.0
.0
V
If)
9
15.14
20,47
5.33
0.592
0.533
N'
10
10
14 90
20.69
5.79
0.579
n 579
X
10
9
14.72
20.20
5.48
0.609
0 548
Ou(fall QQ1;
Donnell', MSD value:
Pa15D:
0.0972
16.2
MSD
PMSD
Minimum Significant Difference
Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PhISD is a measure of test precision The PMSD is the minimum percent d)ITerenct between the conlml and treatment That can he declared atomically significant in a whole effluent Toxicity test.
l Duce PMSD bound determined by IJSEPA (10th percentile., - 1251
Upper PMSD hound determined by USEPA (90th percentile) » 30i
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined fmm the 10th and 90th percentile, resp.ec(aely. or PMSD data fiom 1PAS WET Interl.boratory Variability Study (USI61'e1, 20(I1n. IJSI(PA.
2001h)
USEPA 2001a. NO l• fmal Report Interl.botawry Vanahilny Study of EPA Short -tent Chronic and Acute Whale Effluent Toxicity Teat Methods, Volutes 1 and 2 1ppendi.. EPA-82141•01.00I and LPA•821-11-0I.005. US Enwronmentul Protection Agency. Cincinnati, 0(1
File Albemarle-Long...10.08.(),,,ppxis
Entered I.y: J. Suntntr
Reviewed b5•

.. Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
Start Date: 10/8/2013
End Date: 10/15/2013
Sample Date:
Comments:
Larval Fish Growth and Survival Test-7 Day Growth
Test ID: PpFRCR Sample 1D: Albemarle. Long Creek WWTP
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821 •R-02-013 Test Species: PP-Pimephales promelas
Conc % 1 2 3 4
D-Control 0.6240 0.4950 0.5520 0.7260
45 0.5570 0.5020 0.5420 0.5060
67.5 0.5270 0.5580 0.5590 0.5000
90 0.5160 0.6170 0.5790 0.5090
95 0.6040 0.6300 0.6740 0.5130
100 0.5940 0.5330 0.5790 0.5480
Transform: Untransforrned 1-Tailed Isotonic
Conc-% Mean N-Mean Mean Min Max CV% N tStat Critical MSD Moan N-Mean
D-Control 0.5993 1.0000 0.5993 0.4950 0.7260 16.625 4 0.5993 1.0000
45 0.5268 0.8790 0.5268 0.5020 0.5570 5.130 4 1.797 2.410 0.0972 0.5574 0.9301
67.5 0.5360 0.8945 0.5360 0.5000 0.5590 5.266 4 1.568 2.410 0.0972 0.5574 0.9301
90 0.5553 0.9266 0.5553 0.5090 0.6170 9.333 4 1.090 2.410 0.0972 0.5574 0.9301
95 0.6053 1.0100 0.6053 0.5130 0.6740 11.226 4 .0149 2.410 0.0972 0.5574 0.9301
100 0.5635 0.9403 0.5635 0.5330 0.5940 4.957 4 0.886 2.410 0.0972 0.5574 0.9301
Auxiliary Tests Statistic Critical
Shapiro-Wiik's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.96448 0.884
Bartlett's Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.15) 8.12632 15.0863
Skew Kurt
0.-6227 0.94792
Hypothesis Tost (1-tail, 0.05) NOEC LOEC ChV TU MSDu MSDp MSB MSE F-Prob df
Dunnett's Test 100 >100 1 0.09724 0.16227 0.00415 0.00326 0.31711 5. 18
Treatments vs D-Control
Point
IC05' 32.179
1C10 >100
IC15 >100
IC20 >100
IC25 >100
IC40 >100
IC50 >100
Linear Interpolation (200 Resamples)
SD 95%CL(Exp) Skew
indicates IC estimate less than the lowest concentration
v
c
0
1.0
0e
0.8
D.7 -
0.6
0.5 -
0.4
03
0.2 -
0.1
00�
-0 1
0
50 10C
Dose %
150
C8
0.7
Dose -Response Plot
0.
0.5 -
0
V 0.4
m
D.3
0.2
0.1
c
0
O
U
c.
to0
Q ^ L7 rr 0
m
1-tail, 0.05 level
of significance
Fiic: Aibernarle•t.Ong_10•98.13_pp xls
Entered hi : J. Sumner
Reviewed hy: -_ ..

Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Lon2 Creek WWTP
rry:
Page 4 of 5
Date: 10.08.13
J
Day
(Analyst identified for each da , performed pH, D.O. and conductivity measurements only.)
0
1
2
Analyst
Kv-)
"-t 8
W
d}
<
IMI
KW
BEI
Concentration
Parameter
CONTROL,
pH (SJJ.)
DO (mg/L)U
i •0'}b
QZ
Conductivity
(mhos/cm)
tr, E
�'i
153
"SZ
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO3/L)
-5-2_
err5
-0.- IQ
3a�
—LA'S
''Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
`41.—
t{ 0
*Temperature (°C)
1'-V
%A• la
"LA• L
IAA
45%
pH (S.U..)
(
2.01
1.41
-1.19
7. On
1.13
DO (mglL)
, ,
a
. %
.$
• 9
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
Z51
0�
A6
t0
Zb�
'L4• 3
*Temperature (°C)
-L4• El
1\ .3
'-N,J-
134.3
'2. -�
67.5%
pH(S.U.)
-.01
le•t58
'-3i
.1,0'Z.
-7,O
.'.7.03
DO (mg/L)
—j .9
-4.
p
•'
%.
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
Si 1
324
`L4•S
-�1 Lf
r
itt• 6
*Temperature (°C)
•L''3..
b • S
Id-8
1`t• f
90%
pH (S_U.)
(.0.1'1
b•(03
4.0)
(o :IS
(o•SO
(o.1 S
DO (mglL)
`7.9
.
. 0
'2 -
••
Conductivity
(µnrhos/cm)
362
31z
,-•
f3
"L•t • IQ
*Temperature (°C)
1-1A • if
134 • S
1t{ • $
Ali .4
• •
95%
pH (SAL)
(p. (aS
10.51
' •41.
Lp. (c9
b.-1 I
(D GOAD
DO (mg/l.)
--/ •g
i-. •
6.0
�� CJ Q
-1•
3-7Q-
v
Z.t1 •'-1
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
3..7 S
*Temperature (°C)
14. -
14. S
`VI. d'
`I.'{• S
-
pH(S.U.)
Co. S-
&o.t,b to. $61
tj •(oO
(.(n0
(-o•S- -
100%
DO (mg/L)
1.9
0.0
Sciv
1
1 .1 i;
39 N
Condu( mhos/cm)
3%9
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO3/L)
g
.r' O
*Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
•S
S` l
*TR chlorine (mg/L)
e.-0,10
(0,10
7S •
*Temperature (°C)
'Z,4. 1
I
Initial 11 Final J Initial Final Initial Final
'Temperatur s performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located
on Page I. Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by: 6.
SOP AT20 - Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

a
•
EmdmnmentUl Testing Solutions Inc.
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: IC. V$ •13
Page 5 of 5
Day
(Analyst identified for each day, performed pH,1).O. and conductivity measurements only.)
3
4 1'41 5
6
Concen-
tration
Anal st
Parameter
btJ
V1/4-
� diO3
k
�"
4. to�T
M
.•
N
.•
k'r)
CONTROL
pH (S.U.)
(mDO
MINIl
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
j 50�
1
'K
I52.
1i11r
.
*Alkalinity
L
*Hardness
(mg CaCO3IL)
LI b
'7S{."1
acy+9 *'
-Li •�i
*Temperature(°C)
--LA•1
1L4-10
-1 -$
Y-`U`4
pH (S.U.)
—1.'?
to;13
' .1 4,
7 tt
7 •y9
-7. lto
45%
DO(m: )
'l-
0.l
•
b�1�
.1 (G3Sl
S,O
•c7
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
-7 t _3
C.14
2.to0
*Temperature (°C)
'l.`V• I
-1_,‘ (
/A.`}
1-I, to
i`{.
-1:4 •lo
•
v{-b
pH(S.U.)
—1. 1 ci
to.ge)
to Au
3.•S
7.Sit
G83
ltx)
3-n3
67.5%
DO (m•
..O
0.1
:
'4, t
S 0
g .o
Conductivity
(µmhos/'cm)
31 6
3 k t
3 (Z
lel
*Temperature (°C)
L . e
Z.'` to
IA.1
`•1,b
Z1•1
-,..1_tp
•
Z-`l-lo
pH (S.U.)
(0.
id.ti3
111 •'43
lo• IS
T. �
lade'}
1.o
t., •/3
90%
DO (m:
..0
1
6,2
.S
4-1
0,0
Y.
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
'to-1
"au,
3(10
395
*Temperature (°C)
LA. al
';•S
1'4-'1
Z'{.to
1-.1
111•
-1-9 • ,
IAA..
pH (S.U.)
(p.I
10,53
(p 51
l,.. 0
1-do
latdL
Me
6-75*
95%
DO (rn /L)
..
,lo
9
3m
-t`C
.Z
385
V J
i.-a
Conductivity
{µtnhos/cm)
3I,'y
Zj'�
"6� o
-7 �y
b1.5
lg. S-1,W.9
*Temperature (°t:)
1 - • S
15-I.1
-LL1•
1...4.9.
144
pH (S.U.)
10
tfp.`fl• to.S2
U-1 l 4.411
0,94
1o•61- •
to- V7
100%
DO m:'L
• t
i•
i !
A
7 •?
Conductivity
� mhos/cm'`y
*Alkalinity
(m • CaCO3/I-)
314
3 65
a - 0
340
Z`i - 6 v4. V
1y. S
3ei3
1S. 0
Z -
S�
Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
C 0.1
15 .0 1.4. Zs- 0
*TR chlorine (mg/L)
*Temperature (°C)
Initial Fihal initial
Final Initial Final
Initial
Final
`Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located
on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by: A.
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20,3, revision 07-01-12

351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
.,*e, Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: 1 C — (, — f 3 Time: 0.7 iffj
End date: ) C - 7— 1 3 Time: C 7 3_
Number of samples per hour: FJuw Propc.i.
Chilled during collection? Ye. 5
If chilled, specify temperature: 3c
Sample location: r L ui: ti
Volume collected for testing: 9 L t 1 e-\•
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
Method of transport to laboratory: 5. A. Crv-r 1( r
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0`C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody:
Sample collected by:
(to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
m La.Yrip / 13) m' Mj1
iTln! 1 gnat¢C�
Relinquished try:
o7.3 7
!e .�-).3
Dal.^ did tn. K
O'OQA`r
-31 rn Ltic v
,,4,w, -X 2t '9
! D - -I 3
pyrnt
Relinquished by:
ire
Date and time
6c.NA--)
C �
it")•9ri3
Received by:
J
Pnni
Received by:
Signaturc
Print
TtsfYy,
Stwanurc
1 Ci e.-A)
)0 13
Data and talc
IL) 1.11,
Date and tine
Sample receipt information: (to he completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to EIS by:
(0.Ue)t3
Print
Custody seals intact?:
Ycs
S,,,anne
No
Samples received in good condition?:
Nut uaa!
Tracking number: eva4 3zi
Comments:
Date and tvmc
Nr
Received a1 EIS by:
t�L
V �
I � -00-13
Print
Sirnamrr
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD PresenccAbscnse Indicator, MDL ^ 0.10 mg'Li
Date and terra
man
Project number:92q'1 Sample number: 1310D6.63

•
•
411
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Statesville Analytical
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Long Creek WWTP Purchase order.
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Stan date: / C:,1 — " / 3
End date: /CI ^ l — l3
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled. specify temperature:
Time: (y: % 36
Time: t`a 7 _! 5 -
�a, iZ0Potz7ro<-h{_
1e S
3" c.
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling.
Sample location: ;= LU* ,v I
Volume collected for testing: q -,Le r5
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
Method of transport to laboratory: SA. . v:_ct-
Comments:
Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be <6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
LF'L/B9
1),t.
Relinquished by:
Print
Relinquished by:
I° 7Y>
Dale and time
i
.ill
j I' ._ (1 - 1)
Dine sad time
i
RCitti
Sample receipt information:
Relinquished to ETS by:
'` IQ� (O-gII3
)� !
(to be completed by ETS personnel)
I
/0 0 i3
O9so I
D.R and tvnc
Prim
Custody seals intact?:
IIIIE
Yes
Signature
C 1
Samples received in good condition?:
NI
1 1
Tracking number: 6024 941 )-e3�i it
Comments: (C-O —1 1
Received by:
{ 7 8e8
Print
Received by:
12,:prti-m„
Received at ETS by:
I IA--
Y;‘)
Sm ate Dieandtan
Si um
Signature
I.
o - i.-)
fo.fu'3 1
UYSo
Date ad lime
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence✓Absense Indicator, MDL — 0.10 rapt)
D.5 C I
I 1
Abtw,I
Project number: '"im lq Sample number: 1313i0-0

351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Long Creek WWTP Purchase order:
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: il= / b - 1 3
End date: j G - 11- 1 3
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled. specify temperature:
Time: C' 7
Time: /'s"7y0
tc�
1° c..
Sample location: Fr-PI-Lcu !
Volume collected -for testing: f 3 l i t E 1 S
Number of containers filled for testing: L!
Method of transport to laboratory:
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.4°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
1l� 1-4 ir310
Ain
Relinquished by:
vv.()
Ain
Relinquished by:
I &8ANl
i
Sample receipt information:
fRelinquished to ETS by:
Date and time
cs:p<
lc-il-l�
Date and time
iv. 5_
;0.i)-�.
Sigaatwc s m
i
i
Received by:
G 81z,,
Prim
Received by:
Si}yr°ec
Damned time
• - mom
(to he completed by ETS personnel)
Pnat
Custody seals intact?:
I �I
Yes
pan. Date c
Wo
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number.
Comments:
iI
d teBed
Ica
I I
Kn
Received at ETS by:
•t
Pate and time
t61— (/—r?
it5S
‘it-i erl,
Pint Sigatwc
rv-11- 13
t2�0
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(Dm Presencei4bsense Indicator, MDL 0,10 mgfL)
Project number:6aq `( Sample number:
ii31e Br. !rrK.
Present
A^.�1
1Mon. 24

7-day IC25 (g/L KCI)
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.0
0-9
0.8
Pimephales promelas
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
Organism Source: Aquatox, Inc.
0.7 F-
0.6
0.5
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6}-
0.4 r
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
•
J
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90th Percentile CVs)
I —
I I
1.4 , 1
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits
1.2 r
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
1 1
(10th and 25th Percentile CVs
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I t 1 t I
0�.�t�0 _1�" AZ 45 1 .16 �� .06 �, ow
10 A$ 6,� 1s 0 �.05.� 3 0�13 A5.15 O . �� sp. .13 1�� �,�_\' A9A 061� 10A 1� �7 a 1'5
0 O� OA O� Oy 06' 01 0$ 09' 09' 10-0 .
Test date
7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration- An estimation of the concentration of potassium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Pimephales growth for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean IC25)
Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.10 or SA 75)
Control Limits (mean ± Graphs generated iron asocaa:ed excel spreadsheet
IC25 SA 25 SA g0 or 2 Standard Deviations) Excel spreadsheet en ertl by: J. Suave
Revievetl br ��

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
Entered 12/4/2013
Reported: 1/7/2014
For: Long Creek WWTP
NC 28002
Sample ID Parameter Gust ID
Result Units
Method
Date
Analyzed Analyst
131204-4 P.promelas Full- Eff >100% EPA821/R-02/013 12/3/13 ETS
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina. 28687 • 704/872/4697

•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
December 27, 2013
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9428
Dear Ms. Moore:
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. December 03 through December 06, 2013.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPI Method
Number Final Result
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
THP6C Larval Survival and Growth, EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV > 100%
Test Method 1000.0
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
growth.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >100% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
December 01, 2013 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
January 31, 2014..
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
im umner
Laboratory Director
This report should not he reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis. ...��
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

•
•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Dale: December 27, 2013
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
NPDES #: NC- 0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Facility: City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Char e:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor.
Comments:
Project: 9428
Samples: 131203.02. 131205.02. 131206.31
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource
DWQ! Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
145%I
% Effluent
I67-5 I
% Effluent
190%
% Effluent
195% 1
Effluent
100"/.
Replicate number
2 3
4
Surviving macho of larvae 1
10 f 10
10
10
Original number of larvae Ill
10 jl 10
10
10
Weight/original (mgllarvae)
0.534 0.589
0.568
0.579
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original numlxr of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.546
0.546
0.539
0.594
Surviving number of larvae
9
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/ awae)
0.582
0.570
0.585
0.615
Surviving member of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/havoc)
0.596
0.527
0.668
0.535
Surviving number aflame
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.479 _
0.552
0.566
0.574
Surviving number of larvae
9
9
9
9
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weightioriginal (mg/larvae)
0.594
0.537
0.473
0.527
Water Quality Dat
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L).
Temp. (°C):
High Colleen
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
Start date:
12-03-13
End date:
12-10-13
Start time, End time:
1130 1032
Survival (%)
Average vd (rag)
Average wt /
surviving (mg) Hatch date:
Hatch time:
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
100.0
0568
0568
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
100.0
0,556
97.5
0.588
100.0
0.582
100.0
0543
90.0
0533
Test Organisms
Outside supplier.
IAquatox, Inc.
12-02-13
1600 ET
1
0
Da(v 1
Day 2
Day 3 l
Day 4
I Da 5
Day 6
`Ds
Initial I� Final
{ Initial 1 Final
Initial 1 Final l
Initial I Final
Initial I Final
Initial I Final
Initial Final
7.63
7.55
7.71
7.52
7.66
7.35
7,71
7.21
7.78
7.48
7.73
7.56
7.58
7.51
f
SA
8.
8.38.J
17.1rt
{
I 244 .7
24,4
24.. 7
24.624.6
-4.8I
24.7
24.3
24 8
24.4
24.7
24.5
24.7
24.7
.ration
6.84
7.11
7,15
6.99
7.13
7.05
7.26
6.95 '
7.43
7.17
7,45
7.34
7.38
7.25
8.2
7.9
8.2
8.5
7.9
8.0
8.2
7.6
8.1
7.9
8.3
8.4
8.2
7.9
24.6
24.6
25.0
24.6
25.0
24.4
24.8
24.7 t
25.0
24.4
24.8
24.5
25.0
24.7
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mug/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mart CaCO3):
Conductivity (limbos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
Sample 1
12-01.13
24-h
11
48
287
< D.10
0.3
Sample 2
12-03-13
23.75-h
15
44
347
<0.10
2.2
Sample 3
12-03-13
24-h
18
50
397
<0.10
1.1
33.33, 32
40,40,40
151-160
Analyses
Normal:
Horn- Var.
4OEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
100%
>100%
Yes
100%
>10036
>I00%
Visual insp.
>100.36
Dumnen's
Survival
Growth
% Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
45%
2.410
0.386
67.5%
2.410
-0.703
90%
2.410
-0 480
95'%
2.410
0.849
lam%
2.410
1.192
DWQ form AT-5 (8/03)

Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1000.0)
Species: Pimephales pramelas
Client: Albemarle, Lona Creek WWTP
NPDES #: NC 0024244
Project #: q 1 e)
County: Stanth
Outfall #: 001
IWC: 90%
Page 1 of 5
Dilution preparation information:
67.5
Dilution prcp (%)
45
90 95
100.
Comments:
Effluent volume (mL)
Diluent volume (mL)
Total volume (mL)
450
675
900
950
1000
550
325
100
50
o
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
Test organism information:
Organism age:
Date and times organisms
were born between:
Organism source:
ransfer bowl information:
Average transfer volume:
14k.$ Ao -S, c b
t-L • oi: t3 t
A---c. '6a-vc.l\ Pe rt-cri.: Eb
pH = -i .1a i S.U.
Temperature = 2 `ll. to `C
information:
Test information:
Randomizing template:
Incubator number and
shelf location:
Artemia CI-LM number:
Drying information for weight
determination:
Date / Time in oven:
Initial oven temperature:
Date / Time out of oven:
Final oven temperature:
Total drying time:
Test initiation,rrenewal,
nit termination
or
Day
Date
Morning feeding
Afternoon feeding
Time
Analyst
Time
Anahyst
Time I
��0
3
10-50
Analyst
U�
g
0
1
n •fly +3
68,00
►boo
2
la,0-13
Oigot0
t`{00CV
' IVV-1
1-Csb4
. 45 'SI
4
12.-01- t3
0 e 3S
11
1`iiS
5
,z-ed'• 13
(A00
IL-0(2)
6
11_ 13
0 °+-30
1530
1-2..• 10-tA
0231--
Control information:
Mortality:
01.
.54 R
Average weight per initial larvae:
Average weight per surviving larvae: O . SyR
Acceptance criteria
5 20%.
>_ 0.25mg1arvar
Sample
number used
Summary of test en
7-da LC50 > 1 Ob t.
NOEC 1037.
"DEC > 10 0i.
ChV > � 007.
IC25
oints:
7.
%zit.
-13
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 0 7 -01-12

Environmental Testing Solutions. ln..
Species: Pirnephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: !Z (
ival and Growth Data
Page 2 of 5
Day
CONTROL
45%
67.5%
A
BCDEF
GH
I
J
K
L
0
10
10
l0
/0
10
I0
Jo
/0
10
t0
/0
/0
1
to
10
10
10
10
/0
10
(0
11)
(0
(0
ID
2
t0
l0
/0
!p
/0
to
t0
to
/C,
10
/0
/0
3
/0
ID
10
tO
(0
rb
to
10
to
10
10
1 0
4
ip
10
ICI
16
lb
1t
lb
lb
/0)
/0
/0
/0
5
i0
(0
10
(b
io
J0
to
t0
/C,
10
10
10
6
10
I
t0
ID
to!
!o
to
10
Qd'
10
10
I
7
tO
� '{0
1t
lta.(S
10
110,0
rb
1(0.01
JD
15.C(ia;1g1215.51
/0
/0
/b
11029
1
110.›5
ID
110.‘a
10
15.435
10
RO-Z%
A = I'an weight (mg)
Tray color code:: eIIOW
Analyst: l(tu.J
Date: i(-21,—ice
B = Pan + Larvae weight (mg)
Analyst: lCW
2.1.Li3
22.1
2i.`.10
Z1.�
21.
l
20, 1Z20.
Cyb
1
22
2 3
u•i1
77 !!
4f. s9
p�
Z1.�
22. ��
Date: 12-1$.17i
C= Larvae weight (mg)=B—A
Hand calculated.
Analyst: {
S
SeVi%
S.(e&
S.11
SA‘..S.'�L
S.-A
5•`k`l
.g2
S.1b
S.85
1C�
�3
t7'
p`
�p�
O
yam
O.
y� j.��6�
O'
0.
��a
4.
(�
0*
���
aI
0.,
Q•
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
C / Initial number of larvae
Hand calculated.
Analyst:
Lip'
0•
Average weight per initial
number oflarvae (mg)
Percent
reduction
from control
0.sLa
ice,.,
:;
a•srj(a
-Z. 07.
0 •S&8
— 3.0.
Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small,
lg = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded.
Comments:
SOP AT20 — Exhibit .AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

tETS
E.,rkoeu W 6a„O Solutions, Inc.
Species: Pirnephales promelas
Client: Lone Creek WWTP
Date: tom. • t l• t"
Page 3 of 5
---
Day
90%
95%
100%
MNOPQR
S
T
U
V
W
X
0
I
10
lb
to
10
10
10
/0
10
/0
10
/0
. 1
10
II)
10
10
10 jl0
10
10
10
t0
/a
10
2
l0
10
(0
10
!0 1
/0
10
(0
t0
c'4
/0
10
3
10
10
10
lb
10
10
1u
10
ah
al
to
to
4
, 0
i4
It
1t
t0 1
/1
lb
to
l0
i
t0
/a
5
1Q
to
10
10
i0
10
10
10
i0
'.
t0
to
6
10
Id
to:
10
toj
0
to
10
10
ci
10fo
7
to
10
10
10
15710
10
10
/4
AA
1
'ILA
c1id
A = Pan weight (mg)
Tray color code:: ,i�0u.?
qq��
1
110. t016.IZ-1i
ll
l
Q
tb.2$
�p
!SITS
tb51
,, !!r
i55Mss
(IA
Analyst: K.�
%b2
t o.t
D'
.1 D
A
Date: it-7A-rb
------
B = Pan + Larvae weight (mg)
Analyst 10.0
22a%
2l•52
a.ob
axis
zo.Qt
21.ita
ZZ.00
ZZ.ot
2I.52
VAR
Zo.ti8
i4. 1 o
Date: 17•t-3- r5
C = Larvae weight (mg) i= B — A
calculated.
Hand calculated. ak
Analyst: �'•`"„,
5Ft'
Sal
la.lea
S.*,
' =11
SSA
� S.
s r1
S. li
5.S1
►�.13
S.%.1Hand
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
= C /Initial number of larvae
Hand calculated.
Analyst: --��
L�
06
.
el-:
�
Q.
y4It.
O.
��
47
O,
.o
O�
O
�•
�.
to'
�•
Average weight per initial
number of larvae (mg)
Percent
reduction
from control
e$2)
Q SS 2-
-- -Z .S7.
0.
S2
4.4 1
o . 533
1.. 1 Z
Comment codes:
c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = musing,
sk = sick, sin = unusually small,
lg = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded.
Comments:
•
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT203, revision 07-01-I2

•
•
•
0
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Pimephales promelas Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Test dates: December 03-10, 2013
Project number:
9428
Coacnlnaoa (X)
separate
I.le4I ...Mr of
larvae
Mel..mMr of tame
A Pilo safelt
Orval
8- P. Len.
.daht(ma)
L.n.. ,ntdt (ma)
-A•8
WeIIt I IS.trMa4
a.mteer of lane tow
Mesa,rddll
S.r.MI.aa.,,bee of
I.nae(ma)
CoefmMrea of reHLnw
at..."rrt e+r.."..1
"'e^11^i 1%)
WHOM le11141 aa at bee
of larvae(mN
Mean .nhal
[%)
Meal erdabtf
Initial member of
larvae (rep)
Coefficient of
veritable (%)
Perrnl red.c6m from
m.tml (%)
Control
A
10
10
16.09
21.43
5.34
0.534
0.568
4.2
0.534
100.0
0368
4.2
Nol applicable
D
10
10
16.15
22.04
5.89
0.589
0.589
C
10
IO
I6.02
21.70
5.68
0.568
0.566
D
10
10
16.01
21.80
5.79
0.579
0.579
45/s
E
10
10
15.86
21.32
5.46
0.546
0.556
4.6
0.546
100.0
Q556
4.6
2.0
F
10
10
14.72
20,18
5.46
0.546
0.546
G
10
10
15.57
20.96
5.19
0.539
0539
11
10
10
16.29
22.23
5.94
0.594
0.594
67.5%
1
10
9
16.35
22.17
5.82
0.647
0.604
5.6
0.582
97.5
0.588
3.3
-3.6
J
10
10
16.19
I1.89
5.70
0.570
0.570
K
10
10
15.95
21.80
5.85
0.585
0.565
L
10
10
16.28
22.43
6.15
0.615
0.615
�%
M
10
10
16 26
22.22
5.96
0.596
0.382
11.2
0.596
100.0
0.582
11.2
-1.5
N
10
10
16.25
21.52
5.27
0.527
0.527
0
10
10
16.38
23.06
6.68
0.668
0.668
P
10
ID
16.10
21.45
5.35
0335
0.535
__ ............
95Ye
..... _....__..._
I _
...----.._10-_
.. _. _..16a2----
----20:91---
--•'-4:79-----
----9479-__-_
____...- ...
0543
._ .__._..._....
8.0
.-0479-_..--��
---
f00'0
0.543
a.0
4.4
R
10
10
16.16
21.68
5.52
0.552
0.552
S
10
10
16.34
22.00
5.66
0.566
0.566
T
10
10
16.28
22.02
5.74
0.574
0.574
100%
U
10
9
15.58
21.52
5.94
0.660
0.592
9.3
0.594
90.0
0.533
9.3
6.1
V
10
9
16.31
21.68
5.37
0_597
0337
W
10
9
15.45
20.18
4.73
0.526
0.473
X
10
9
9.19
14.46
5.27
0.586
0.527
Outran 001
Duanetra MSD value:
MOD:
0.0703
12.4
MSD -
PMSD
Minimum Significant Difference
Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of lest precision. Thc PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity teat.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10th percentile) - 12%.
Lipper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (90th percentile) - 30 4.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the 10th and 90th percentile. respectively, of PMSD data from EPA's WET Interlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA, 2001a; USEPA,
20016).
USEPA. 2001a.2001b. Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study of EPA Shari -term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods, Volumes 1 and 2-Appendix. EPA-821-n-01-004 and EPA-821-13.01.005. US Environmental Protection Agency. Cincinnati, 011.
File. Albemarle -Long 12-03-13_pp.xla
Entered by. 3. Sumner
Reviewed by:

•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
Start Date: 12/3/2013
End Date: 12/10/2013
Sample Date:
Larval Fish Growth and Survival Test-7 Day Growth
Test ID: PpFRCR Sample ID; Long Creek WWfP
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type: DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species: PP-Pimephales promeas
Comments:
Cone-% 1 2 3 4
D-Control 0.5340 0.5890 0.5680 0.5790
45 0.5460 0.5460 0.5390 0.5940
67.5 0.5820 0.5700 0.5850 0.6150
90 0.5960 0.5270 0.6680 0.5350
95 0.4790 0.5520 0.5660 0.5740
100 0.5940 0.5370 0.4730 0.5270
Transform: Untransformed i 1-Tailed Isotonic
Conc-% Mean N-Mean Mean Min Max CV% N . tStat Critical MSD Mean N-Mean
D-Control 0.5675 1.0000 0.5675 0.5340 0.5890 4.216 4 0.5733 1.0000
45 0.5563 0.9802 0.5563 0.5390 0.5940 4_563 4 0.386 2.410 0.0703 0.5733 1.0000
67.5 0.5880 1.0361 0.5880 0.5700 0.6150 3.254 4 -0.703 2.410 0.0703 0.5733 1.0000
90 0.5815 1.0247 0.5815 0.5270 0.6680 11.244 4 -0.480 2.410 0.0703 0.5733 1.0000
95 0.5428 D.9564 0.5428 0.4790 0.5740 8.008 4 0.849 2.410 0.0703 0.5428 0.9467
100 0.5328 0.9388 0.5328 0.4730 0.5940 9.305 4 1.192 2.410 D.0703 0.5328 0.9292
Auxiliary Tests Statistic i Critical Skew Kurt
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.97243 ` 0.884 0.2178 0.33848
Bartlett's Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.32) 5.84536 15.0863
Hypothesis Test (1-tail, 0.05) NOEC LOEC ChV TU . MSOu MSDp MSB MSE F-Prob df
Dunnett's Test 100 >100 1 0.07028 0.12384 0.00188 0.0017 0.39325 5, 18
Treatments vs D-Controt i
Linear Interpolation (200 Rosampies)
Point % SD 95%, CL(Exp) Skew
IC05 94.690
IC10 >100
IC15 >100
IC20 >100
IC25 >100
IC40 >100
IC50 >100
1.0
0.9 -
0.8-'
0.7 -
0.6 -
0.5 -
0.4 -
0.3 -
0.2
0.1 -
0.0
-0.1
50 100 150
Dose %
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0
0 0.4
a 0.3
F
0.2
0.1
Dose -Response Plot
I
10 1-tail, 0.05 level
- of significance
S
C
0
o
m rn
o
File: Albemarle-Long_I2-03-13 .xis
Entered by: ). nner
Reviewed by: _....
3

nvIronmental Testing Sc uticns. Inc
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Lane Creek WWTP
...
Date:
Page 4 of 5
LINiy .f.ufswwJ•
I Day
(Analyst identified for each da , perormed pH, D.O. and conductivity rneasurements only.)
0 !
1 2
Concentration
Anal at
Parameter
Kb
/ . b3
WM. MEI
• ss ��
'. • .O
K
•
iiiM
cJ I
1.U0
g • 1
151
�_�
V..
,� '.
.O
MEI
CONTROL
pH (S.U.)
DO (mg/L)
1•Q
Conductivity
(µ nhos/cm)
' -'
MUNI
' +0
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO3/L.)
?)
I ..
'Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
q d
1 '1
i b
*Temperatitre(°C)
'l.A•"1
Z.`i'eQ
45%
pH (S.U.)
7.34
MEM • `
;MI •'3‘
DO (mg/L)
fr. 1
IliMplilli
ea
1111M11
241
• 'C)
1..4-S
Conductivity
(µmhoslcm)
2l2
-
2.
*Temperature (°C)
Lk- 1
{ •
Z•`i• •
pH (S.U.)
7. 1$
.41
.2t)
.2 •
. l i
1.. AO
2f0
MOM
Z$i�
.0
1MEM
Conductivity
mhos/cm
Z y
*Temperature (°C)
1. • to
1111M
`2- ••
90%
pH (S.U.)
b • °1$
1.2
—i .21
'1. OC
. 7
DO m:
.1
•o
ea
VEM
8. IiilL, IIIE
Conductivity
(pmhos/cm)
2.7 t
2..ii7
32-t
Z. .9 '1-1-{• -1
*Temperature (°C)
1A .'0
is. O
95%
pH (S.U.)
o. `I 2.
1.'Z1
1.01 7. %i ' —1- b
DO (mg/L)
8. 1-•
m ••Z
.
Conductivity
(gmhos/cm)
2.6o
29S-
33+b
*Tem erature CC)
-LA. le
• b
- .
100%
pH (S.U.)
li .84
.l . l
i .1S
CI." -1. t- -1 .O•
DO (mg/L)
g 1-.
q
G•2
-��`-1
^�nV:+
i' •
-
-� i
I a♦
Conductivity
(pmhos/cm)
237
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO3/L)
`,
--LA • to
. O
15
*Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
4 O
4�
*TR chlorine (mg/L.)
1 O. i b
<0. t 0
1.5 • •
*Temperature (°C)
1,t1.6
Initial
Final
Initial
Final Initial I Final
'Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table 1
on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by: .\(
SOP AT20 - Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

•
•
11,
.y En 1r nment.I Tasting Solvtlonn Im_
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: LonE Creek WW'TP
Page 5 of 5
Date: 1.2 t'31x13
l
Day
(Analyst identified for each day, performed pH, D.O. and conductivityteasurements
only.)
6
3 4 5
Concen-
tration
Anal st
Parameter
Kw
: .
� .`7 i
U- ]ti
16
•
7.-71
- '
ua
1.52
6.0
• I
CONTROL
pH (S.U.)
DO On/L)
g . a
a-0
_ $ . 7.
i $.
--.q
-1.5k
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
!�
`'
1410
t S 1
C
J (40
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO;/L)
*
-Si-
1 •S
`'z4b
1.• .-1
i z.A.-t
-I 4
*Hardness
(me CaCO-,/L):
ukO
*Tem,crature •
IA ..1
-1-4. k
;Mal
45%
pH (S.U.)
1. S3
,13
-7. b 7
-1 - 0
-7 . S`7
DO (mg/L)
. 1
4.0
I. ..
' .3
$. l
7.
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
2 31
2Vo
- Zy`1
-LA .t.
2_1 ¢
V?
.
,:,,
-LA. 7 y
*Temperature (°C)
• Li
'154 .S 7..9.c
L i. , f'
67.5%
pH (s.U.)
1 • q NIA!
• . .59
lrrr}},,''
-7• to
5�
' .31
DO (mg/L)
$ . l
.1 0
• . 3
. le,;l mited
C mhos/ rn)
21 g
1`�
S b
MOM
- •`a
.?,1 1. j
Z. .._
- .S
*Temperature CC)
-I. •
-1-'•ib `>•S.•t
90%
pH (S.U.)
32
V .91- 'l.so
SEEM
'Z -
1. 1
DO (mg/L)
g.2
q0 R��
3 la
B. 'o
•
Conductivity
(lrmhos/cm)
3 t q
r
1.
J ..
ir�l...
'kg 2
•-IA.
S . .
*Temperature (°C)
7 .1
I" Li •� �� . U
95 io
pH (S.U.)
_7.7ci
ID.gln .+ilA
f�Ql•� 7' 8
-1. i
DO (mg/L)
I .-2
i :.1
It. . _
g •
'..2
"I
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
p
S' 0
3
b7
��
•
Y
L ' S ..
*Temperature ('C)
-Ly.1
-'is{ •ita �`. h
I "i.` * 6 . t
100%
pH (S.U.)
1. 2t51
. ti.9s "a.4.13
-7-17 7-1f
i
-
-t
DO (mg/L)
B-2 !
•6 : •
L .
•ti
Z.L`t
Conductivityc.,
(mhos/cm)
t b
"I
�2 � �
J
3'8 8
, J , :.
', •
VI* i.
1 10
`1
•
.•
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO,/L)
I. G
*Hardness
(mg CaCO:JL)
S O
*T(m )
CO.10
*Temperature CC
Initial Final ( Initial Final Initial d Final 1 Inr6ap Ftna
*Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located
on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by: cy(\
SOP AT2O -Exhibit AT20.3, revi ioh 07-01-12

•
•
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephalespromelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order.
Effluent dilution:
Parameter code:
45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
T#1P6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: 12 - t — ( 3
End date: --13
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Time: O 73 0
Time:
Yt-)
07 3 S
Sample location: FFF N
Volume collected for testing: ' Li tt
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
Method of transport to laboratory: 5., -
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody:
Sample collected by:
(to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
13krn L0.,,, 4.1-1 I
Relinquisbed by:
Itoo73>
-a-13
Sitouune 11 Dote sod rime
Received by:
Dote rind tinsE Pflnl
r...tyuu.3..«..,,.
_
W pr‘
`r\Q,-1Ic
I
13,
Sample receipt information:
(to be completed by ETS personnel)
[i:;::LJ 1
,__ _
? I
1,... ,
Print
Custody seals intact?:
Yo
No Not uud
Samples received in good condition?: I\-4
Yes
No
Tracking number: goati3-egoot
Comments:
Received by:
Received at ETS by:
[ at:
lk-
Prins
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence/Absense Indicator, tvIDL - 0.10 mg11.)
Project number: Sample number: 13 I2o3•p2
Dose arid t00e
I03c
INN
Absent

T
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of AIbemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
NPDES #: NC00.24244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order,
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95,100%
Parameter code: [Tiii'6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: /o2- 3 -1 3 Time: 0 75
End date: 1. - cf— L3 Time: 07t-/0
Number of samples per hour: 'Flow Pro k)hk=i on et_\
Chilled during collection? %5
If chilled, specify temperature: 1 " C--
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling.
Sample locatidn:
Volume collected for testing: 9 L l4 er5
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
Method of transport to laboratory: S A Ccukirle.k
Comments:
Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be <6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
f/ �
\
O -76t 0
Pnm
Relinquished by:
Date end time
�11‘1v) 2-ctv,0
‘1tIA,, l
-1
la -`7 -I
Relinquished by:
Dane and tent
VJ
e0A,}0 6[32-Duor ko.- \3
Received by:
Print
Received by:
Signature
A.Da
Signature
'la:5b
ldt.dl�
Date nod vitae
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
I- e°Lb,/
IZ-DS•13
Pint
Custody seals intact?:
Yes
Signature
1,o
Samples received in good condition?:
Na toed
Tracking number: &0-14—'i18 `t b3q,
Comments:
Dar and time
No
Received at ETS by:
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presenc[/Absense Indicator, MDL = 0.10 mtrlL)
Project number: "Itti Sample number:
2.Z'c
IMO
iA
Ab ,i

35 ] Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
NPDES #: NC00.4244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 145, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: !THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: ja- S--/
End date: 1 D _ (-1
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Time: C 7 3
Time: 07 3 5
Y1Qr�1v t�{c \
,;as
J o L
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling.
Sample location:
Volume collected for testing: 13 LOcer5
Number of containers filled for testing: q
Method of transport to laboratory: ,S 4. C�v�rle�r
Comments:
Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
(�
\Ifte-90/ws
v73..5
tw. Lett qr)
A
►a- 6-1 3
Age end time
Relinquished by:
,),y, La_„n
\tiea4,4
o--c -cc
Rini
Relinquished by:
Date
R;m BnabYe .
ID'. 0
A-IQ•1`4
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
i J l t�
ri.,....L.),,,*
1 L-G'i3
i 32O
Pam
GYP —
Custody seals intact?:
Yes
No
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number:
k Comments: \ —1
MIIII
Na used
3
Yes
P(
D.to no lane
h:o
1Z:
Received at ETS by:
kuok-
14--
mi
Pant
Signature
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS CC):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD PresenCe/Absense Indicator, MDL = 0.10 mgiL)
Project number: 42 Sample number: 13 t 2 (...A.0 31
Date and time
l'tt'C.-
1111
Present
Absent

7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of potassium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Pimephales growth for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean IC25)
Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.10 or SA.75)
•
•
0
7-day IC25 (g/L KCI)
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
Pimephales promelas
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
Organism Source: Aquatox, Inc.
1 I I 1 1 I: I 1 I I
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
•
1 1 I i I I I I I I T 1: fill! i
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90th Percentile CVs)
I 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 1 I
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10th and 25th Percentile CVs)
1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
•izr Va16 1y1 1� 1 ov 01AS1O�A5 OS 10AA11Off O aSOe,L.� 10,"�l0a63 erSCY * l '>°1'. 11- 11".
Test date
Graphs generated from associated excel spreadsheet.
Control Limits (mean IC25 ± SA 25, SA 90, or 2 Standard Deviations) Excel spreadsheetante dby: J. Sumner
Reviewed by

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle
Entered 1/6/2014
Reported: 1/29/2014
For: Fathead
NC 28002
Date
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID Result Units Method Analyzed Analyst
14016-2 P.promelas Full- LC >100%
Respectfully submitted,
v
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
EPA821/R-02/013 1/7/14 ETS
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/469 7

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
January 27, 2014
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 9510
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the City of Albemarle — Long Creek WWTP
received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. January 07 through January 14, 2014.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number Final Result
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
THP6C Larval Survival and Growth,
Test Method 1000.0
EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV > 100%
Note: ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
growth.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV
value >100% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
January 06, 2014 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
February 28, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
t Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water. 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Date: J anuary 27.2014
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: City of -Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Envirotunental Testing Solutions. Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge -
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor.
NPDES #: NC- 0024244
Pipe #: 001 County: Sternly
Comments:
Project: 9510
Samples: 140107.13, 140109.04. 1401 10 23
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-162I
Control
Organisms
• Effluent
45%
• Effluent
1
Replicate number
2 3 4
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weighv'originat (mg/larvae)
0.531
0.644
0.610
0.599
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mgJ1arvae)
0.546
0.568
0.598
0.515
67.5
% Effluent
90%
% Effluent
95%]
Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
I 0
10
Weightioriginal (rn8/larvac)
0.596
0.571
0.530
0.572
Survivia numbs of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weighcoriginal (mg/larvae)
0.514
0.62!
0.520
0.678
Surviving number of larvae
9
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weighu'original (mgAanae)
0.496
0.570
0.575
0.572
100%
Surviving number of larvae
10
ID
9
8
Original number of lance
10
10
10
10
Wdght'originalOng/larvae)
0.585
0.661
0.569
0.516
Water Quali y Data
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. ("C):
High Concen
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. ("C:
Day 0
Initial Final
Day I
Initial I Final
nay
Initial Final
Stan date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
01-07.14
01-14-14
1143
1045
Survival (°%)
Avctagc wt (nig)
Average wt:
surviving (mg)
Survival (°%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (°%)
Average wT (mg)
Survival l%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (*it)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average vet (mg)
Da 3
Initial I Final
100.0
0 596
0.596
100.0
0.557
100.0
0.567
100.0
0.583
97.5
0.553
92.5
0583
Day 4 {
Initial t Final
Teat Organisms
Outside supplier.
Aquatox Inc.
Batch date:
Hsieh time:
Day 5
Initial I Final
01-06-14
1600 ET
Day 6
Initial Final
7.44
7.20
7.69
7.45
7.60
7.38
7.73
7.11
7.68
7.16
7.69
7.37
7.67
7.43
7.9
7.7
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.6
8.2
7,6
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.5
7.8
7.3
24.7
24.4
24.7
243
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.3
24.8
24.6
24.7
24.3
24.6
24,7
rauvn
6.92
7.06
7.39
7.01
6.91
6.98
7.30
6.94
7.41
7.04
7.45
7.13
7.40
7.03
8.1
7.6
8.1
7.8
7.7
7.7
8.3
7.3
8.3
7.9
8.2
7.6
8.2
7.4
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.6
25.0
24.5
25.0
24.7
25.0
24.4
24.8
24.5
24.7
244
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration.
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO I.
Hardness (mg/L CaC0t)'.
Conductivity (pmhovern)'.
Total residual chlorine (mg1L)
Sample Temp. at Receipt ("C).
Overall Analysis:
Sample I
01-05.14
24-h
15
45
225
< 0.10
1.2
Sample 2
01-07-14
24.25-h
15
45
197
<0.10
1.4
Sample 3
D1.09-14
24-h
20
45
267
= 0.10
0.9
Analyses
Normal:
Horn. a'ar.
NOEC.
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Suniva1
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
100%
100%
>100%
>100%
>I00%
>100%
Visual Insp.
Dunne -Ws
Survival
Growth
% Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
45%
2.410
1.086
67.5%
2.410
0.795
90%
2.410
0.353
95%
2.410
1.183
100%
2.410
0.367
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >I00%
DWQform AT-5 (8/03)

111
yy� FiMronm•M.l Testing Solutions. Inc
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1000.0)
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NPDES #: NC 0024244
Project #: °IS%0
County: Stanly
Outfall #: 001
IWC: 90%
Page 1 of 5
Dilution preparation information:
Dilution prep (%)
45
67.5
90
95
100
Comments:
Effluent volume (mL)
450
675
900
950
1000
Diluent volume (mL)
550
325
100
50
0
Total volume (mL)
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
Test organism information:
Test information:
f
Organism age:
t`i: lS t1por S Ot-t
Randomizing template:
15We.--
Date and times organisms
were born between:
Ot-Ote-ta POGO
Incubator number and
shelf location:
3 $
Organism source:
��� dl�Ob �`i
Anemia CHM number:
CAH120
Drying information for
determination:
weight
Transfer bowl information:
pH = -1 •1... S S.U.
Date / Time in oven:
01-t+1-1`1
Initial oven temperature:
Temperature = 7,4. O °C
60- (.
Average transfer volume:
Date / Time out of oven:
n1-t- t'4
'c
Final oven temperature:
1, tb�5
60
Total drying time: _1k•IIOJMS
d renewal information:
1210
17AS
Day
Date
Morning feeding
Afternoon feeding
Test initiation, renewal,
or termination
Sample
number used
SSW
batch used
Time
Analyst
Time
Analyst
Time
Analyst
°
of-n-im
Pt%StS
cv
leas
At
vab1al.i3
of-oz- �A
1
0oo
j
Goo
1
tLAS
t4010-133
of-ort4 6
2
o►-oY-1L1
6
o1-ID•ta
sc5a
ti3�
lbab
�y(,16.-�-tq
01-oi•"1
4
0
o
01- I • r
o �`
1•-ILK."
4
�l
.'1b5
.t
t,.‘ al to
of o' tq
Control information:
Acceptance criteria
Summary of test endpoints:
% Mortali r:
07,
s 20%
7-da LC50
I i' 1.
Average weight per initial larvae:
0 -S96
0 -VAL
>— o 25mearvao
NOEC
1C1j7-
LOEC
) 1007.
Average weight per surviving larvae:
Ch V
> 1037,
1C25 _
i I 00-1
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

EIW Tonmental Testing Solutions Inc
Species: pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date:
Page 2 of 5
and Growth Data
Day
CONTROL
45%
67.5%
A
BCDEF
G
H
I
J
K
L
0
(0
10
(0
(0
(0
tc0
to
to
1-0
to
10
l0
i
10
ft
(0
10
10
(0
10
to
lb
ID
10
10
2
10
(0
to
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
(0
3
10
10
(0
(b
ID
10
10
ID
10
10
10
ID
4
ID
(0
10
(0
10
(0
10
to
l0
l0
to
to
s
1b
I)
1p
to
10
10
/0
10
/0
10
/0
/0
6
10
t0
Cp
10
t0
10
10
10
tD
10
(0
I
7
i0
1D
10
tp
it)
10
(0
t0•10
/3
/0
10
A = Pan weight (mg)
Tray :or code::
155"1
iki 60
Ib58
IL(•3b
ly -tq
I1-i•$g
16 q-1
15�(4
15.`161y
A
15.Z2
15.ot
Analyst: �
,_-_
Date: tom--50-(3
B = Pan + Larvae weight (mg)
1(D
Zo•
Z2.'
p
2 .(
2
2035
� -6
2().%
7
LZR'S
2.9
Zt. t�12
(g.�5
2p52
?oz.
Date: O1_+'1- ILA
C = Larvae weight (mg) = B - A
Hand calculated.
Analyst: a .....----
S,. N.
(0.LA
b.%D
s.i
S .4.et
S..to$
5.9$
S.‘S
S.`1to
5.1k
S.- St,
S.'12
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
= C / Initial number of larvae
Hand calculated.
Analyst: ,i
•
l7
o•o
as
•
Q
'
a`
%'�
o
La
ti.
fl
�I�,
b•
y..
�0...
o
y,�`•
O-
CAI
O
`'n
p•
Average weight per initial
number of larvae (mg)
Percent
reduction
from control
(%)
O . S to
0.SC 1
la • b1'
0 . S bi
4, 0.
Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small,
lg = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded.
[Comments:
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date:
ox-
a
Page 3 of 5
Day
90%
95%
100%
MNOPQR
S
T
UVWX
/0
10
10
/0
/0
10
/0
10
/0
l0
/0
/0
0
1
10
I
10
tt
10
to
Ib
to
10
to
r0
10
2
10
10
10
10
'0
/0
ID
10
/0
IQ
10
/0
3
10
10
10
10
10
ID
ID
ID
10
10
/0
/0
a
ID
10
/0
t0
f0
10
/0
10
t0
/0
r0
10
5
10
10
ID
10
10
/0
10
10
10
10t0
10
6
10
ID
/0
!t)
414
10
10
10
10
tO
/0
10
7
10
to
10
10
q
10
t0
f0
i0
16
q"k
8zd
A= Pan weight (mg)
color code:: bYt r1
14.39
i�
11.
,,��
l4.
14
16.'1 I
)S-2
1(o A
f j r-
14.6G1
C 1
1534
t,
1( L f
t
(`Lt•�
1 S.00
i5.310
Analyst:
Date: 12- -13
B = Pan + Larvae weight (mg)
Analyst: 10-0
11.4Z
ZoaO
Iq SD
zz. VI
Zo.1 \
Z ig
/0.30Z12to
2,.10
Zt.(44
20 c1205Z
Date: Q1-lwlr1 y
C = Larvae weight (mg) = B - A
Hand calculated.
Analyst: 6 " "-r
S.I4
6.2N
5. -0
4.1 i
4.4.`lb
S.lb
5.1S
5.12
S. QS
6.Lt
5. V9
5, Ito
Weight per initial number of larvae (mg)
= C / Initial number' of larvae
Hand calculated.
Analyst: e _
��.
�j
0.
'
Na
o'
ivy
to
o`
ti�
O.
"
o'
�o
���'
0'
l.,NV
o
���
o•
N.
0�
A
6i�
�•
kp
(�
a
Average weight per initial
number of larvae (mg)
Percent
reduction
from control
(%)
� SFS5
, t `�.
b. SS'S
1. 2 7•
0 .S 83
-2. . 2 7
Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually sma
Ig = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded.
Comments:
SOP AT20 - Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

Pimephales pramelas Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
• -EPA-821=R-02-013, Method 1000.0
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Environmental Testing Solution 5, Inc.
Client: Long Creek WWII'
Test dates:
Project number:
January07-14. 2014
9510
Cnnle lira In (7:)
Rrrliratr
InIILI n.mIrrid
lam ar
Final namter dolma*
4- Pia .,lxkt
imp
a - Fan a Lamle
eirithtfmt)
Larva**eltbI fop
•A.a
WelaerISanh inn
anode* dl.n en fmt)
M,.. iielthil
Semh laR...h,a
Ion at(MO
CM*mdeatdntlatba
aa^•"w+r r,.,....
...a.•....VA)
Welaa,/1al.l.. ber
altanee fret)
Mru nmhal
1%)
Meea..10tl
Inlaid number.*
6narfinet
Coefficient of
iarletina 1%1
remelt redarIl fro,.
Moira (%)
Control
10
10
15.57
20.88
5.31
0.531
0.596
7 9
0.531
100.0
0.596
1 0
Nut applic0hlc
D
10
10
Iri 50
®®
0.644
O'G44
(7
10
10
®
22.68
®
0.610
0.610
D
10
10
14.36
20 35
5.99
0.399
0-599
45 %
E
10
10
14 79
20.25
5,46
0.546
0.557
fi I
0 546
100.0
0.5. R7
6.3
on
1:
10
10
14 88
20.56
5.68
0.568
0.568
llM�
10
'
10
22,95
5.98
0.598
0.598
15.74
20.89
5,15
0515
0.515
675%
1
10
10
15.46
2142
596
0.396
0.567
4.8
0.596
100.0
0.567
4.1i
I. A
J
10
10
1404
1975
5.71
0571
0.571
K
10
10
15.22
20.52
5 30
0.530
0.530
L
10
10
15.00
20 72
5.72
0.572
0.572
90•/.
Al
Io
10
1439
19 53
5.14
0.514
n 533
13 7
0.514
11)0.0
0.583
13.7
2.1
N
10
10
14.69
20.00
6.21
0.621
621
�'S
0
10
10
14.36
19.56
5.20
0.520
20
P
10
10
15 41
22.19
6.78
0.678
0.678
9cY
Q
10
9
15.23
20.19
4.96
0.551
U567
l0
0.496
a-,}
0s53
6,9
II
10
16.09
21.79
570
0.570
0.570
5
(0
10
14,61
20.36
5 75
0575
0.575
T
10
10
15.54
21.26
5.72
0.572
0.572
IOOY.
(1
10
10
16.41
22.26
5.85
0.585
06,'11
5.2
0.585
9t5
0.5A,1
10.3
2.1
V
10
10
14.81
21.44
6.61
0.661
0.661
Vs
10
9
15 00
20.69
5 69
0.632
0.569
X
10
8
15 30
20.52
5,16
0.645
0.516
93 411 Q91:;
Dmm.1 's MISD value:
PRIM):
0.0871
14.6
MSD
PMSD
Minimum Significant Difference
Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of test precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference bet+scen the control and treatment that tan be declared statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity teal.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (IOIh percentile) vi 12%.
Upper PMSD Mound determined by USEPA (901h percentile) * 30!.
Lower end upper PMSD bounds were determined Dorn the 10th and 90th percentile. respectively. of PMSD date fmm EPA's WET Imednbnalory Vmubility Study (I)SEPA, 2001a, USEPA.
2001b).
USEPA 2001a. 20016 Final Report Inlerlaburalory Variability Study of EPA Shon•term Chronic and Acute Whole EMucni TorrcityTest Methods. Volumes 1 end 2-Appendix EPA•821-B•01.004 and EPA-821-8-01.005. US En.ironmental l'roiedion Agency. Cincinnati. (311
Pile: Albemarle-I.on(t_(I I.01.14 pp.xls
Entered by. 1 Sum er
Reoiewed by...,.,,

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Start Date: 1/7/2014
End Date: 1/14/2014
Sample Date:
Comments:
Larval Fish Growth and Survival Test-7 Day Growth
Test ID: PpFRCR Sample ID:
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type:
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species:
Long Creek WWTP
DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
PP-Pimephales promelas
Conc-% 1 2 3 4
D-Control 0.5310 0.6440 0.6100 0.5990
45 0.5460 0.5680 0.5980 0.5150
67.5 0.5960 0.5710 0.5300 0.5720
90 0.5140 0.6210 0.5200 0.6780
95 0.4960 0.5700 0.5750 0.5720
100 0.5850 0.6610 0.5690 0.5160
Transform: Untransformed 1-Tailed Isotonic
Conc-% Mean N-Mean Mean Min Max CV°/ N t-Stat Critical MSD Mean N-Mean
D-Control 0.5960 1.0000 0.5960 0.5310 0.6440 7.949 4 0.5960 1.0000
45 0.5568 0.9341 0.5568 0.5150 0.5980 6.297 4 1.086 2.410 0.0871 0.5691 0.9548
67.5 0.5673 0.9518 0.5673 0.5300 0.5960 4.829 4 0.795 2.410 0.0871 0.5691 0.9548
90 0.5833 0.9786 0.5833 0.5140 0.6780 13.716 4 0.353 2.410 0.0871 0.5691 0.9548
95 0.5533 0.9283 0.5533 0.4960 0.5750 6.909 4 1.183 2.410 0.0871 0.5680 0.9530
100 0.5828 0.9778 0.5828 0.5160 0.6610 10.283 4 0.367 2.410 0.0871 0.5680 0.9530
Auxiliary Tests Statistic Critical Skew Kurt
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.94946 0.884 0.07231 -0,4372
Bartlett's Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.54) 4.0391 15.0863
Hypothesis Test (1-tail, 0.05) NOEC LOEC ChV TU MSDu MSDp MSB MSE F-Prob df
Dunnelt's Test 100 >100 1 0.0871 0.14615 0.00113 0.00261 0.81925 5, 18
Treatments vs D-Control
Linear Interpolation (200 Resamples)
Point % SD 95% CL(Exp) Skew
IC05 >100
IC10 >100
IC15 >100 -.0
IC20 >100
0.9
IC25 >100
IC40 >100 0.8
IC50 >100 0.7
agi 0.6
a 0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
50 100
Dose
150
08
07
Dose -Response Plot
06�
0.5
0
6- 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-p c ,n 0
c iat
0
0
v
0
1-tail, 0.05 level
of significance
Fi lc..4lbcmarle-Long_01-07-14 yp.'ls
Eniered by 3 S ner
Relicwcd by:

Environmental Testing SeWtlona. Inc
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: 01-t$1-1t1
Page 4 of 5
Y ..._--- --,-
Day
(Analyst identified for each da , performed pH, D.O. and conductivity measurements only.)
0
1
IA/ 2
Analyst
_
1.4
11�
'4-2-0/4.lift
k
w
.4 S
. w
ijblir-
'.' Qjjy —7•3%
I. • 1 1 - (4.
Concentration
Parameter
CONTROL
pH (S.U.)
DO (mg/L)
i .ef
.'k
0.4
1.1
Conductivity
(µrnhos/cm)
^
�J1_ /.
I ot
"A. S
.
-1A."1
*Alkalinity
CaCO3n-)
3t�
1.-1.
'2_(mg
*Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
L`�OI
1a.1
ii,
*Temperature (°C)
-'L 1
-LA.Q
pH(S.U.)
�-1-3Z
4,1I
%too
_7. '1
D�
—1•30
•
Conductivity
I -12j ry
rig'
u% •S
1- .10
*Temperature (°C)
-1_4.1
1... •
Ztk. 1
I{.1
67.5%
pH(S.U.)
-•1•TL
'4 42-
'4•5+
-1•?2
11
/
1.11
--t. -
-UA`lo
DO (mg/1.)
•-I.9
ig.
L • b
$.1
-LA .1
`1.
u1 • 5
..
I�I
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
, nZ
`i
*Temperature (°C)
1-`A•1
-lit
90%
pH(S.U.)
—I•0y
14.0y
1.41-
`7•r2)
CH
-)-CPi
DO(mg/L)
`1-
•10
8 •
1..
Z
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
2(3
�`4
���•
IC,,t 1
1
-1- •S
*Temperature (°C)
-Ztk •1
Zci • b
1`k •1
1 • S
•L •
95%
pH (S.U.)
1. Oo
''4.a5
'H3
`l .OS
y q6
1 • oy
DO (mgfL)
g • o
.10
Y
.
.1._,4 • to
I1els
•1 :1
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
2({o
Z(h
*Temperature (°C)
`1A -1
1. -
1L4 •cf
Zq.
100%
pH (S.U)
(D •Q'L.
-0(0
q .361
1. 0 % (At 94
(0.0(
DO (mg/L)
', 1
.1/
5,
•
'Z -1
Conductivity
(µmhos/cm)
`) �C.7
L
�
l
*Alkalinity
(mg CaCO3./L)
1S
1 .5
I
+
2ti-
-.. • 6
15
•Hardness
(mg CaCO3/L)
LI5
< O. 1
‘•\,5
*TR chlorine (mg/L)
LO.I0
• 0
*Temperature (°C)
14 .i
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
*Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table ocat
on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and tote residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by: _.
SOP AT20 - Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Species: Pimephales promelas
Client: Long Creek WWTP
Date: CA.- (.3-1-1`{
Page 5 of 5
Day
Anal st identified for each da , erformcd . H. D.O. and conductivi measurements onl '.
3
4
S
6
Concen-
tration
Analyst
Parameter
K}.°
IMMII
EMI
MM
l�
w
DIMA•Ci
O.,
las)
1-31
Gt..)
Ail
iau
-1
CONTROL
tH (S.U.
DO m
-1-
WENN:Mil
IIIEN1111
0A
liTill•
-13
Conductivity.
µmhos/cm)
*Alkalinity
(m CaC0s/L
` 3
fJ
-J , 1
` 1
i
'1-`1. t..
`q _ 1
NMI
!
j
1 Sy
51__
�,
*Hardness
m: CaCO}/L
I
4-1 t
't'
`
•'- - b
Mall
1-A-Z
A• 3
'VA - it'
*Tem t erature (°C
io .
OE
li t�$
MOM
"1.33
-1 Z$
45%
DO m
� •
���
�
8 .Z
� ��
Conductivity
mhos/cm)
(7 C•••
J
��
ZOO
;�
20t4
MEMQiM
i.;
WOMIiiiMli
ZZg
l' , S
NMI
ili
�'
*Tem t erature (°C)
-1.A-A
-IA '. o
MIMIlKOMIIIIMil.
.H (S.U.
—7.S0
IL�i�
�
67.5%
DO m
Mal
_7
J g t
MEIN
MUM
0
1111M1111
MO.
` 2.1
Conductivity
mhos/cm)erature
`1.y.1
„bk-
MIME
-1-AA�����
*Temtra{°C)
. H (S.U.
i i
10
EMIWWII'
1•ti
,•y,
.O�
90%
DO m
:1-
ttO
i
:
7 •to
E��MOE
Conductivity
mhos/cm)
I ('i (
Zsa
MUM
t/► lJ
Ago
MEM
i
Z5C•i
1-q•
1.4•
1 .6
IMMOMO
I
MEM
*Tem terature (°C)
H (S.U.
to A 1
t-P
Nth
`lVal
-1• 110
—7 •
7 -Oto
95%
DO (m )
ME=
t C
q 4
WPM
MAN
2-`(3
Wan
MOM
i
MIMI
Z5q
MIMI
Conductivity
mhos/cm)
*Tem terature (°C)
MOM
2 • S
1S - 0
111MMIIREIMI
1-4.
y.o
t' 'b
t H (S.U.
. 0
MIMI
NAM
.c�-i
feMli�E'�
1.0
100%
DO (m
MIMI
MUM
0.3
4
6 .2-
-t.'.P
Conductivity
*Alkalinity
m CaCOslL
Zo3
-0
Mill
1
-7-0
L
q5.0
MEM
}
MIMI
i
j
j
I
'L.oq
M�'�
*Hardness
(m: CaC0i/L
'TR chlorine (mg/L)
*Tem t erature (°C
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Initial Final
*Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located
on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and to residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and
transcribed to this bench sheet by:
SOP AT20 - Exhibit AT20.3, revision 07-01-12

351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc -
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order.
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: 1 • .> - i t{
End date: ) -- 6 --IL/
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled. specify temperature:
Time: ?Li()
Time:p ...c)-7y U
ew itaporllort.cLA
Lie-
C.—
Sample location: EFF
Volume. collected for testing:
Li-t,es
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
Method of transport to laboratory: 5.4_
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely till the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be <6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected hy:
J1vr. IC.1,r1,Q%AB
Prim
Relinquished by:
U7yv
1-� 1L1
Not a:d trot
?).4
Relinquished bv•
CI
-6-1Ll
D.ic wad time
Ccr
3o--
l 5i -Li
--4 .Si�atattcc.
`•c
Mac en. twx
t.0 ,
Received be.:
CQcl-pw,,
3 -J
I -6 l4-1
?nrl
Received bv:
sibl,awR
mean ;trot
?nat
t;
Sigtatute D. wad tome
::
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ITS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS hy:
01-o3.1`i
Ff
i i13
?rot
Custody seals intact?:
Ycx
Sty a..rt
Samples received in good condition?:
tia
Not wed
e•n
Tracking number: Vql 2011.4S
t= end tmx
Received at ETS by:
Ylf.a-
-
4II3
Pram
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
tDPD PrscnceAbsense indicator, MDL - 0.1(1 ni L)
Project number: C3150 Sample number: i yD1 )1 •l
I.1 (-
?:e,"at
11
Apt
Comments:

ly
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Statesville Analytical
Long Creek WWTP
City of Albemarle
Species: Pimephales promelas
Test type: Chronic Definitive
NPDES #: NC0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 45, 67.5, 90, 95, 100%
Parameter code: THP6C
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date: l 1 - i -
End date: { - -
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
if chilled. specify temperature:
Time: C 7 :3 7
Time: C 7'1 5
clovi
�f e.
I°C1
Sample location: L �-'
Volume collected for testing: C1 Lt'
Number of containers filled for testing: 3
Method of transport to laboratory: S-4r
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0'C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody:
Sample collected by:
(to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
I�i,. ,� i'i3
Am
Relinquished by:
ism
Relinquished by:
plat
107ys
Dow and nono
IA6 1'
1.3 Cl iL::U tTh
ttac
Received by:
Dale aid time Pane
Received by:
Siptkurc
7 .mot L `•5 1' i1 L
Prinl
cud
nate.,d omc
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by EIS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
n 1- U9.i`1
03e
Custody seals intact?:
Sconsaza
Yos
t 1
tic
Samples received in good condition?:
I 1
No: uscd
I- I
Dart and time
So
Tracking number: 19% V N 5IS 533
Comments:
Received at ETS by:
Signruto
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (CC):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPI) Presence:Absense Indicator, MDL = 0.10 mg/L)
Project number:"1SI b Sample number:
Dsc end tine
14(I0Q.b'I

7-day IC25 (g/L KCI)
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
Pimephales promelas
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
Organism Source: Aquatox, Inc.
i 1 r i 1 1 1 i
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90th Percentile CVs)
i 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1
1.4 1 I 1 1 1 1 -1-7 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 -r—n
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10th and 25th Percentile CVs)
1 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 ( l
1pibsl3' yJD0' 01 10.V a,Aer� 1�A`i ize 00110 1A• tfS13U1�1�'_cff- IP' 09�11}t,p210 AS" �As �A11s
Test date
7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of potassium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Pimephales growth for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean IC25)
Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.10 or SA.75)
Graphs generated from associated excel spreadsheet.
Control Limits (mean IC25 ±SA.25r SA.90, or 2 Standard Deviations) Excel spreadsheet em dby:'.Sumner
Reviewed by:

City of Albemarle
Residuals Management Plan
September 2011
Prepared by Municipal Engineering Services Company, P.A.
Based on Information Provided by City of Albemarle

r�q
Background
Due to increased concentrations of Copper at the City of Albemarle's application sites the
"° NCDENR directed Long Creek WWTP staff to halt sludge application at sites that
exceeded the specified metal limit. Once this issue was discovered the City of Albemarle
entered an agreement with the City of Concord in which sludge generated from the Long
Creek WWTP would be routinely hauled to the Concord WWTP for processing and
ultimate disposal.
MCI
1I
tug
ran
Pal
fan
ran
Peak Flows
The determination of peak flows should be based on strong empirical data. The historical
flow record for the City of Albemarle, as summarized from the monthly report forms
(MR-1) for 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 in Appendix A, yields the following
annual and seasonal peak factors.
Period
ADF
Max Month Avg
Max Day Avg
Max Day
Peaking Factor
2006
Annual
7.41 MGD
9.98 MGD
32.2 MGD
3.23
Summer
6.62 MGD
7.09 MGD
Winter
8.53 MGD
9.98 MGD
2007
Annual
7.39 MGD
10.24 MGD
29.62 MGD
3.18
Summer
6.70 MGD
8.37 MGD
Winter
8.39 MGD
10.24 MGD
2008
Annual
5.52 MGD
7.67 MGD
17.34 MGD
3.23
Summer
5.18 MGD
7.67 MGD
Winter
6.00 MGD
7.09 MGD
2009
Annual
6.08 MGD
9.09 MGD
18.11 MGD
1.99
Summer
5.26 MGD
6.12 MGD
Winter
7.25 MGD
9.09 MGD
2010
Annual
5.71 MGD
9.53 MGD
Not Available
Summer
5.00 MGD
6.01 MGD
Winter
6.69 MGD
9.53 MGD
2011
Annual
*5.12 MGD
*6.23 MGD
Not Available
Summer
*5.06 MGD
*6.23 MGD
Winter
*5.25 MGD
*5.81 MGD
'a^ *Incomplete Data
The peak flows above are the maximum daily flows, not the peak instantaneous flows.
Typical design for treatment facilities is on the basis of maximum day flows. The peak
day flow during the 6 year period was 32.2 MGD recorded in November 2006. It is
thought this recording is a misnomer due to the placement of the flow measuring device
upstream of the influent screw pump station "B". When high flows inundate the influent

screw pumps the water level at the measuring device leads to inaccurately high readings.
In addition the straightening veins, located upstream of parshall flume, have not be kept
free of debris.
The reported peak factors vary and some are more than the peaking factor used at the
Albemarle WWTP, which happens to be 2.5. It is thought that this is due to the
previously mentioned issues with the flow measuring device which was upstream of
influent screw pump station "B". The effluent flow metering is modestly influenced by
the equalization in the aeration basins at the WWTP, but this data is thought to be more
telling of the actual flows at the Albemarle WWTP. We will assume a peaking factor of
2.5 which is typical for municipal flows at WWTPs. This assumption results in a peak
flow of 30 MGD for the WWTP at the permitted flow of 12 MGD. It is significant to note
that wastewater flows have been declining over the last decade and historic data indicate
they may have reached an equilibrium point over the last two to three years. Flows over
the last three full calendar years have averaged 5.77 MGD. With low to moderate growth
predictions for the City of Albemarle in the next decade the city's wastewater flows are
not expected to greatly increase in the next ten years.
Using available data for influent BOD at the Long Creek WWTP, the plant has averaged
128.8 mg/L influent BOD from Feb 2003 to Jan 2010. For purposes of estimating solids
generated at the Long Creek WWTP the influent BOD level will be set at 130 mg/L and a
worst case scenario will be set for 225 mg/L. A ratio of 0.25 lbm solids / lbm BOD
Po, influent will be assumed to estimate residual biosolids production at the plant. This will
be looked at for the historically observed BOD levels of 130 mg/L as well as the high end
influent BOD estimate of 225 mg/L. Based on assumptions and calculations included in
Appendix -A the expected sludge production by the City of Albemarle Long Creek
WWTP would be approximately 285 tons/year based on historical data or 1028 tons/year
based on maximum flow and influent BOD assumptions.
Sludge Pumping
1.1 The return activated sludge (RAS) pumping and the waste activated sludge (WAS) drain
by gravity from the sludge draw -off boxes at each clarifier. The Long Creek WWTP has
two RAS pumping stations, and each is coupled between two clarifiers. A telescoping
valve at the top of each RAS station is used to divert WAS from all four clarifiers drain to
a "wet -pit" type well. This wet well is designed to hold and periodically pump WAS to
the northern portion of the Long Creek WWTP into a series of sludge thickening tanks.
The WAS pump station is configured in a "wet -pit"/ "dry -pit" configuration and has three
single stage vertical non -clog 4x4 inch Fairbanks Morse Pumps sized for a flowrate of
150 gpm and total dynamic head of 80 ft. Waste sludge is pumped from this pump station
to the thickening tanks through a 6" forcemain.
The RAS is metered before the screw pumps return the settled sludge exiting the
clarifiers to the distributions boxes where the RAS mixes with the influent wastewater
before entering the aeration basins. Each of the two RAS pump stations consists of 2
screw pumps with an available slot for a third screw pump to be added later. The two

RAS screw pump stations have two single flight units each with a 54 inch diameter screw
that operates on a 38 degree incline. The approximate lift for each screw is 21 feet. Each
screw has a speed of approximately 44 rpm with a 50 horsepower motor. The capacity for
each of the two RAS stations is approximately 4.3 MGD. The existing pumps in the RAS
pump station are adequate to continue to return the needed return sludge rates to meet
100% of Average Daily Flow (ADF) and to maintain the sludge age at 20 days in the
aeration basin.
The existing WAS pump station and RAS pump station were planned to handle the
design flows when the WWTP was expanded in mid 1970's to an (ADF) of 16 MGD.
The ADF of 16 MGD correlated to a resultant peak flow of 32 MGD. Knowing this
1.1
information both stations are adequate for the rerated ADF of 12 MGD and peak flow of
30 MGD at the Long Creek WWTP. It should be noted that the pumps at the WAS station
are in poor condition and it is recommended that these be replaced within the next five
years. The two RAS stations will each have one screw pump replaced as a result of the
upcoming rehabilitation project, and it is recommended that the second screw at each of
these two RAS stations be replaced within the next ten years.
Sludge Handling
The City of Albemarle's first stages in its sludge handling include two thickeners. The
aforementioned WAS pump station conveys sludge by a 6" forcemain to the original
portion of the WWTP where a pair of 76.5' diameter tanks begin to thicken the waste
sludge. Each of these thickeners has a depth of approximately 12', which equates to a
total volume of approximately 412,000 gallons per thickener. Long Creek WWTP
run operators decant from these tanks throughout the week with supernatant going back to the
head of the plant. Downstream from the thickeners are another pair of sludge tanks that
are used in the sludge handling process by the City of Albemarle. A pumping station is
used to convey the thickened waste sludge from the pair of 412,000 gallon thickeners to
the second pair of sludge tanks.
This second pair of sludge tanks each has a diameter of 65' and a depth of approximately
25'. The volume for each of these two tanks is approximately 620,000 gallons. The
original intent of this second pair of sludge tanks were to be used as sludge digesters.
They are currently not being aerated, and the City of Albemarle is working on installing a
system for aeration and mixing to help increase the percent solids leaving the Long Creek
WWTP. Operators at Long Creek WWTP decant from the pair of digesters throughout
the week with the supernatant going back to the head of the plant and eventually back
into Influent Pump Station -A.
r.9 The typical design criteria and the operating parameters for sludge digesters are presented
in below in Table 1.

TABLE 1- AEROBIC DIGESTER OPERATING PARAMETERS
Parameter
Criteria
Range Source
Solids Loading 0.1 - 0.3 M&E
(lbs VSS/day /Ft3) 0.1 Ten States
Solids Retention (d) 10 - 15 M&E
40-60 EPA 503
Oxygen Requirements 2.3 M&E
(lbs 02/Ib VSS / day)
"' VSS Reduction (%) 40 - 50 M&E
Mixing (Hp/1000Ft3) 1.0 Ten States
and (cfm/1000Ft3) 20 - 40 M&E
rI
A final pump station is used to convey the final thickened sludge to a tanker truck used to
haul the residual bio-solids from the Long Creek WWTP to the City of Concord WWTP.
Dewatering and Sludge Disposal
The sludge dewatering facilities currently at the Long Creek WWTP consist of three
sludge drying beds, each have an area of approximately 2,080 square feet. The total
square footage of drying beds is approximately 6,240 square feet. It should be noted that
the sludge drying beds are currently being utilized for drying alum sludge, which is
generated at Albemarle's two Water Treatment Plants.
The City of Albemarle also owns a centrifuge system and an accompanying sludge dryer
that were built in 1998. The high operating cost associated with the gas fueled sludge
dryer caused The City of Albemarle to discontinue use of this process soon after it was
installed. Recently the City of Albemarle has looked into examining the feasibility of
refurbishing these two units. Preliminary review lead to the decision to continue to
examine rehabilitating the centrifuge portion, but to leave the gas fueled dryer off-line
due to the high costs associated with operating this particular equipment. The centrifuge
needs new electrical components and reworking of the controls to modernize the
,29 telemetry. The City of Albemarle is examining the best way to proceed in getting the
centrifuge back in working condition and hope to have this accomplished in the next two
years.
City of Albemarle previously made use of a flotation type thickening equipment. This
equipment, located next to the sludge drying beds, worked well up until a major flood in
1997 destroyed most of the electro-mechanical equipment for this unit process. The

damage caused by the flooding in 1997 was severe and the costs associated with repairing
this process were not deemed to be cost beneficial and in part lead to the construction of
the centrifuge.
The current method of Sludge disposal for the City of Albemarle is a cooperative effort
Emil
with the City of Concord. The previous method of sludge disposal was at multiple sludge
application sites owned by the City of Albemarle. Recent tests showed heavy metal
concentrations which exceeded the safe level set by NCDENR and resultantly Albemarle
was forced to abandon applying on a large portion of these sights. Long term strategy is
to keep sampling soil conditions on these sights and hopefully return to applying sludge
on these sites in the future when metal concentrations have been reduced through natural
attenuation.
Currently the City of Albemarle hauls all of their residual bio-solids to the City of
Concord for eventual disposal through Concords current system. According to Long
Creek WWTP staff waste sludge is typically thickened to around 3 - 6% solids through
the series of thickening tanks and digester tanks prior to it being hauled to the City of
1.1
Concord. The current vehicle used to haul the residual solids is a 5,500 gallon tanker
truck. Long Creek WWTP staff indicates they average between two and three loads per
day that are hauled to Concord. The backup tank truck owned by the City of Albemarle
has a capacity of 6,500 gallons, and can be used should any problems arise with the
primary vehicle. The method of sludge disposal is meant to act as a temporary measure
until the City of Albemarle can determine a more feasible long term solution for its needs
of residual bio-solids disposal.
1=1 Sludge Disposal Alternatives
The City of Albemarle plans to evaluate Sludge disposal alternatives in the overall
�., evaluation of the WWTP and plan to look at the following in detail: land application,
drying, lime stabilization, composting, and continuing to haul to City of Concord
The sludge drying beds at Long Creek WWTP will not provide for the needs of the
facility. The City uses these beds to the maximum extent possible with the current
procedure of drying alum sludge from the water treatment plants. In an effort to maintain
some positive use of these structures the beds will continue to operate suitably. Long
Term this footprint along with that of the flotation thickening equipment would be an
ideal area for location of a new mechanical dewatering device.
1.1
Sludge stabilization is a newer technology that municipalities are examining as a solution
to their residual solids handling and disposal. However the choice of going to a Class -A
sludge will be extremely expensive. This transition will necessitate the construction of
enclosed buildings for sludge handling equipment as well as the purchase of pumps,
chemical equipment, possibly conveyors, and storage areas. All this equipment would be
in addition to a mechanical belt press or some other type of sludge press to handle initial
dewatering. Given the costs associated with producing Class -A biosolids, the most cost
effective alternate would be to move toward production of Class-B biosolids.

Class-B biosolids are more limited in terms of application sites and monitoring
throughout its disposal process, but it is a much more economical goal to meet in terms of
capital and operation outlay by the City of Albemarle. A detailed study is recommended
to examine the cost benefit analysis of the many choices in technology that would be
available to the City of Albemarle to ensure safe and proper long term handling of its
residual solids.
'a' Preliminary estimates of the total costs associated with the hauling method of disposal
show this to be very costly over a 20 year life cycle. The cost of fuel and wear and tear on
the City of Albemarle tank trucks make this less attractive that a more sustainable
method. The fees associated with the sludge acceptance by the City of Concord are
currently $200 per 5,500 gallon load. City of Albemarle estimates an average of 3 loads
per day which makes the approximate yearly cost for just this fraction of the total hauling
cost equal $219,000. It is estimated the additional hauling costs could be as much as
$110,000. This additional cost is based on the assumption of $1/mile for 165 miles of
travel per day for the tanker truck along with salary and overhead for one employee. The
estimated total for the current hauling option is $329,000. With the current residuals
leaving Albemarle having solids content of approximately 3 — 6% it would greatly benefit
the City of Albemarle to invest in dewatering equipment.
The intrinsic value of dewatering mechanisms is very attractive and would greatly benefit
the City of Albemarle. The dewatering equipment's ability to reduce the high cost of
liquid sludge hauling and or disposal should have a great return on investment. This
would make the purchase of such equipment an ideal solution to the current issues seen
by Albemarle.
In the event that the current sludge application sites to not improve in terms of metal
sin content and Albemarle still can not apply to these areas it would be suggested that
additional application sites be investigated for long term use by the City of Albemarle.
�., Recommendation
It is the recommendation of Municipal Engineering Services Company, P.A. that the City
of Albemarle perform a study to examine the best options for its long term sludge
handling and disposal. This study should consider the engineering, environmental, and
economic aspects of sludge handling and sludge disposal, and how current methods could
benefit the Long Creek WWTP. Because sludge handling is one of the more expensive
aspects of operating a WWTP, optimizing this process will improve the City of
Albemarle's ability to comply with regulatory requirements through the most cost
effective method available.
1.1
ral

MI
RIR
..a
RIN
PM
FM
MI
Al
Pan
ral
rai
MR
PM
rail
NM
rmi
Calculations for Dry Solids Production
225 ppm BOD concentration (high end assumption)
12,000,000 gal/day influent wastewater
45,360,000 I/day influent wastewater
100,080,000 Ibm/day influent wastewater
22,518 Ibm/day Influent BOD
5,629.50 Ibm/day Bio-Solids produced
2,054,768 Ibm/year Solids produced
1,027.38 tons/year Solids produced
130 ppm BOD concentration (Historical Data assumption)
5,770,000 gal/day influent wastewater
21,810,600 1/day influent wastewater
48,121,800 Ibm/day influent wastewater
6,256 Ibm/day Influent BOD
1,563.96 Ibm/day Bio-Solids produced
570,845 Ibm/year Solids produced
285.42 tons/year Solids produced
Assumptions
Influnet Plant BOD (Hist. data) = 130mg/I = 130 ppm
Influnet Plant BOD (High End) = 225mg/I = 225 ppm
Solids Production for Process = 0.25 ibm solids / Ibm BOD influent
Plant flowrate maximum = 12 MGD = Design Capacity
Plant flowrate current Average = 5.77 MGD = Avg Daily Flow from 2008 - 2010
Source
Env. Eng. Ref. Manual, Lindeberg, 2004
MR

/ Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. /. /6093 %-Y
Outfall b O l
Month pCce^" y�
Year 11:74`/•
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
1.0
' <0.21
1
EPA 624
µg/L
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.10
µg/L
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.20
µg/L
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.13
µg/L
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.14
µg/L
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.13
µg/L
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.23
µg/L
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.28
µg/L
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.17
µg/ L
1
Toluene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.14
µg/ L
1
1,1,1-triehloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.12
µg/L
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.14
IAg/ L
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.15
- µg/L
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
EPA•624
1.0
<0.32
µg/L
1
EPA 625
10
<1.5
µg/L
1
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
2-chlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.2
µg/L
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.4
µg/L
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2,9
µg/L
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.9
µg/L
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.1
µg/L
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.0
µg/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.8
µg/L
1
Phenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.4
µg/L
1
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.1
µg/L
1
EPA 625
10
<1.4
µg/L
Acenaphthene
Grab
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.2
µg/L
1
Anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.6
pg/L
1
Benzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.6
µg/L
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.0
µg/L
1
Benzo(ghi)perylenc
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.4
µg/ L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.4
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.2
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/ L
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5
<1.7
µg/L
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.0
µg/L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.0
µg/ L
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.0
µg/ L
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2

„{/G rya �f �! `f `dual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No.
Outfall b4:2
Month p
Year a c f y
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
10
10
<1.6
µg/L
1
Chrysene
<2.0
pig/ L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.5
µg/L
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10
<3.1
µg/ L
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.3
µg/L
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.1
µg/L
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.1
µg/ L
1
1,4-dichlorobenzcne
Grab -
EPA 625
10
<1.0
µg/ L
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10
<3.3
µg/ L
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.1
, µg/ L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.4
µg/L
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625 •
10
>2.4
µg/L
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.5
µg/L
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.9
µg/L
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.1
µg/ L
1
Fluorene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.7
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.0
µg/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.2
µg/L
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.1
µg/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.2
µg/L
1
Isophorone
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
Naphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
' 10
<1.2
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.5
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.3
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.1
µg/L
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.4
µg/L
1
Pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<2.1
µg/L
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10
<1.2
µg/L
1
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.”
Autho -d Representative naine
Signature
/124e- 46
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 3

Permit No. 4'.O024Z44
dutfall rit?l
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month 1-Cu+7,E52
Year ZO'
Facility Name: Long Creek WWTP
Date of sampling 12/08/2015
Analytical Laboratory: ENCO
ORC: Brandon W. Plyler
Phone: [phone]
Parameter
Sample
Type
t Ania1ptica1
Method
Quantlt'ation •"
Level
Sample
Result`
Units of.
•Measurement
`:`Nurnlier of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
EPA 350.1
0.1
<0.045
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Grab
300
0.5
10.1
mg/1
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
EPA 353.2
1.0
12.0
mg/1
1
Total Kjcldahl nitrogen
Composite
EPA 351.2
0.5
2.1
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
EPA 365.4
0.1
1.1
mg/1
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM2540C-1997
50.0
190.0
mg/l
1
Hardness
Composite
SM2340D-1997
2.5
62.0
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
50060
15.0
24.0
µg/L
1
Oil and grease
Grab
EPA 1664B
5.0
3.0
mg/1
1
Metals (totafrecoverable), eyanide
and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
29.8
µg/L
1
Arsenic
Composite
EPA 200.7
10,0
<6.8
µg/L
1
Beryllium
Composite
EPA 200.7
1,0
<0.1
µg/ L
1
Cadmium
Composite
EPA 200.7
1.0
<0.360
µg/L
1
Chromium
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
26.3
µg/L
1
Copper
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
62.9
µg/ L
1
Lead
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<3.1
µg/ L
1
Mercury
Composite
EPA 7470A
0.2
<0.170
µg/L
1
Nickel
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
2.6
µg/L
1
Selenium
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<5.0
pg/L
1
Silver
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
<1.9
µg/ L
1
Thallium
Composite
EPA 200.8
1.0
<0.110
µg/L
1
Zinc
Composite
EPA 200.7
10.0
43.3
µg/ L
1
Cyanide
Grab
EPA 9014
0.01
<0.0049
mg/ 1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
EPA 420.1
0.05
<0.03
mg/1
1
Volatile organic compouinds
Acrolein
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
<4.0
µg/L
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
EPA 624
10.0
<3.5
µg/L
1
Benzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.15
µg/L
1
Bromoform
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.22
µg/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.17
µg/L
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.17
µg/ L
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
1.1
µg/L
1
Chloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.23
µg/L
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
<1.1
µg/L
1
Chloroform
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
2.6
µg/L
1
Dich]orobromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.17
µg/L
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.13
µg/L
1
1,2-cichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.21
µg/L
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylcnc
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.21
µg/L
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1

Permit No. NCC324214-
Outfall cav I
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month 6.CEI,M3 1?.
Year 2.0 t S
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (cont.)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.21
µg/L
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.10
pg/L
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.15
µg/L
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.13
pg/L
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.14
µg/L
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.13
pg/L
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.23
µg/L
1
1,1,2,2-tctrachloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.28
pg/L
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.17
µg/L
1
Toluene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.14
µg/L
1
1,1,1-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.12
µg/L
1
1,1,2-trichloroethanc
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.14
µg/L
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.15
pg/L
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
1.0
<0.32
µg/L
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.5
pg/L
1
2-chlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.2
pg/L
1
2,4-clichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.4
pg/L
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
pg/L
1
4,6-clinitro-o-cresol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.9
µg/L
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.6
pg/L
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.1
pg/L
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.0
µg/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.8
pg/L
1
Phenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.4
pg/L
1
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.1
µg/L
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.4
µg/ L
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.2
µg/ L
1
Anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.6
µg/L
1
Benzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.6
µg/ L
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
pg/L
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
µg/ L
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.0
µg/L
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.4
pg/L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
pg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.4
pg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.2
µg/L
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
pg/L
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
<1.7
pg/L
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.0
pg/L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.0
ug/ L
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.0
µg/L
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2

Permit No.'lC002424-4-
Outfall n 01
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month C-Ei.A,Ee_
Year 2C
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.6
µg/ L
1
Sample-
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
• Number'of
samples.
Base-neutraleomponnds (cont .),..
Chrysene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.0
µg/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.5
µg/ L
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<3.1
µg/L
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.3
µg/ L
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.1
µg/L
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.1
µg/ L
1
1,4-diehlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.0
µg/L
1
3, 3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<3.3
µg/ L
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.1
µg/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.4
µg/L
1
2,4-diniti•otoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.4
µg/L
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.5
µg/ L
1
1,2-diphenylhyd razine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.9
µg/ L
1
F1u oranthenc
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.1
µg/ L
1
Fluorenc
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.7
µg/ L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.0
µg/ L
1
Hcxachlorobutadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.2
µg/ L
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
µg/ L
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.1
µg/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.2
µg/L
1
Isophorone
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
µg/ L
1
Naphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
µg/ L
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.2
µg/ L
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.5
µg/L
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.3
µg/ L
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.1
µg/ L
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.4
µg/ L
1
Pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<2.1
µg/L
1
1,2,4,-trich lorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
<1.2
µg/ L
1
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there arc significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of lines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Author'z d Represe�tativeAaat�
Signature
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

Permit No. NC DOa�yo�tl`l
Outfall c o/
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Facility Name: City of Albemarle Long Creek WW
Date of sampling: 09-18-13
Analytical laboratory: Enco/Statesville Analytical/City of Albemarle
Month e/7/d e
Year ,D o / 3
ORC Brandon W. Plyler
Phone [phone]
Parameter
Saniisle
.Type•
Anallyticali; '
Method
Quan titatio,n'
Level ,
Sample>':
�Reauit •
' Unite o£
Measurexne>i<t
+!' u�sabel�¢£
1 ��1 amR B
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
EPA350.1
0.1
•=.5
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Grab
Hach 10360
1.0
8.1
mg/I
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
EPA353.2
0.1
16
mg/1
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
EPA351.2
0.5
2.5
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
EPA365.4
0.1
0.91
mg/1
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM2540C-19
10.0
220
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
SM2340B-19
0.5
60
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
SM4500C1. G
15,0
31
ug/1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
EPA1664B
5.0
<2.6
mg/1
1
Metals (total recoverable),• cyanide
and•total+'phenols
Antimony
Composite
EPA 200.7
10
70.4
ug/1
1
Arsenic
Composite
EPA200.7
0.005
<5.4
ug/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
EPA200.7
1
<.1
ug/1
1
Cadmium
Composite
EPA200.7
0.001.
<.360
ug/1
1
Chromium
Composite
EPA200.7
0.0025
50.3
ug/1
1
Copper �FIix ti
Composite
EPA200.7
0.005
147
ug/1
1
Lead
Composite
EPA200.7
0.0025
<2.1
ug/1
1
Mercury "r,;
Composite
EPA7470A
0.0002
<.170
ug/1
Nickel 'h,t;r, ,,;U/1,_,t l ,
Composite
EPA200.7
0.0025
3.3
ug/1
1
,.,�.,nih hq v
Selenium nr^cSelNrl+Ap,
Composite
EPA200.7
0.005
<5.0
ug/1
1
Silver
Composite
EPA200.7
0.0025
<1.9
ug/1
1
Thallium
Composite
EPA200.7
10
<5.8
ug/1
1
Zinc
Composite
EPA200.7
0.05
79.7
ug/1
1
Cyanide
Grab
EPA9014
0.0025
<.0049
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
EPA420.1
0.05
<.03
mg/1
1
Voiaiiie organic compounds .:'
Acrolein
Grab
EPA624
10
Acrylonitrile
Grab
EPA624
10
<3.5
ug/1
1
Benzene
Grab
EPA624
1
<.15
ug/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
EPA624
1
<.22
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
EPA624
1
<.17
ug/1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
EPA624
1
<.17
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
EPA624
1
4
ug/1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
EPA624
1
<.23
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
EPA624
5
<1.1.
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
EPA624
1
7.8
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
EPA629
1
4
ug/1
1
1,1-dichloroethanc
Grab
EPA624
1
<.13
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
1
<.21
ug/1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA624
1
<.21.
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. N ocnaya. "/
Outfall 001
Volatile organic compounds:(Cont.)
Month Se/Vernbe"-
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA624
<.21
ug/ 1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
EPA624
1
<.1
ug/ 1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
EPA624
1
<.2
ug/1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
EPA624
1
<.13
ug/1
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Grab
Grab
EPA624
EPA624
1
1
<.14
<_1.3
ug/1
ug/I
Methylene chloride
Grab
EPA624
1
<.23
ug/ 1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
EPA624
1
<.28
ug/ I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
EPA624
1
<.17
ug/l
1
Toluene
Grab
EPA624
1
<.14
ug/ 1
1
1, 1 , 1-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
1
<,12
ug/ 1
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
1
<.14
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Grab
Grab
EPA624
EPA624
1
<.15
<,32
ug/1
ug/1
1
Acid: extractable cdmpoun
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.5
ug/1
2-chlorophenol
Grab
EPA625
1.0
<1.2
ug/ 1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.4
ug/ 1
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
10
10
<1.3
<2.9
ug/1
ug/ 1
1
1
Grab
EPA625
1.0
<2.6
ug/
1
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.1
ug/1
1
Grab
EPA625
10
<2.0
ug/
1
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.8
ug/1
1
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.4
ug/ 1
1
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
EPA625
10
<1..1
ug/ 1
Baser neutral compounds..
Acenaphthene
Grab
EPA625
10
1.4
ug/1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.2
ug/1
1
Anthracenc
Benzidine
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
10
<1.6
10
<1.6
ug/ I
ug/1
1
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab EPA625
10
<1.3
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
1.0
<1,3
10
<1.0
ug/ 1
ug/ 1
1
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
EPA625
10
<2.4
ug/ 1
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.3
ug/ 1
1
Bis (2-chlorocthoxy) methane
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.4
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
EPA625
10
<1.2
ug/]
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhcxyl) phthalate
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
10
5
<1.3
2.6
ug/1
ug/ 1
1
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
10
10
10
<1.0
<2.0
<1.3
ug/ 1
ug/ 1
ug/ 1
1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2

Permit No./l1Oortai'
Outfall 00
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
Paraer
Basatlaeutral ctsmpounds (coat.),"
Chrysenc
Grab
EPA625
Analytical''
'Method
EPA625
Di-n butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3, 3-dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA624
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
10
Quantlitatts.'fl
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadienc
Hcxachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
Grab
EPA625
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
EPA625
10
10
10
10
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
<1.6
ample:::
e9ult :,
<2.0
<1.5
<3.1
Month -SC'p{Nm 6tr
Year
ug/1
,Me surement:
ug/ 1
ug/1
ug/1
<2.3
<.19
<1.1
<1.0
<:3.3
<2.1
<1.4
<2.4
<1.5
<1.9
<2.1
<1.7
<1.0
<1.2
<1.3
<1.1.
<2.2
<1.3
<1.3
<1.2
<2.1
<1.3
<2.1
<1.4
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/ 1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/ 1
ug/I
ug/ 1
ug/1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/ 1
ug/1
ug/1
Grab
EPA625
EPA625
10
10
<2.1.
<1.2
ug/ 1
ug/1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Brandon W. Plyler
Authorized Representative name
��. "
Signature
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 3

a
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: Jim0;etsnclab.com
Date: January 27. 2014
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge -
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
NPDES #: NC- 0024244
Pipe #: 001 County: Stanly
Comments:
Pro act: 9510
Samples: 140107.13, 140109.04. 140110.23
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh- NC 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
Effluent
Replicate number
2 3
4
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.53I
0.644
0.610
0.599
45%
Effluent
67.5%
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
O[ievl number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mgflarvae)
0.546
0.568
0.598
0.515
Effluent
90%
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.596
0.571 _
0.530
0.572
% Effluent
95% I
% Effluent
100%
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
I 0
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.514
0.621
0.520
0.678
Surviving number of larvae
9
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/originailmolanae)
0.496
0.570
0.575
0.572
Sreviving number of larvae
10
10
9
8
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weightoriginal (mg/Larvae)
0.585
0.661
0.569
0.516
Water Quali y pat
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mgiL):
Temp. ("C):
High Concen
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. ("Cl.
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
01-07.14
01-14.14
1145
1045
Survival (%)
Average cut (mg)
Average wt
surviving (mg) Match date:
Hatch time:
100.0
0396
0.596
Test Organisms
Outside supplier.
Survival (%)
Average wi (mg)
Surma! (°'a)
Average w1 (mg)
100.0
0557
io0.0 {
10567
Sunvivat (pi,) I 100.0
Average wl (mg) 0 583
Survival (%)
Average cut Imgl
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
973
0.553
92.5
0583
Aquatox Inc.
01-06-14
1600 ET
Day 0
Dav I
Dav 2
Day 3 lr
Dav 4
Day 5
I
Day 6
Initial Final
Initial Final I
Initial Final
(
, Initial I Final 1
Initial Final
Initial f Final
Initial Final
744
7.20
7.69
7.45
7,60
738
7.73
7.11
7.68
7.16
7.69
7.37
7.67
743
7 9
7.7
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.6
8.2
7,6
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.5
7.8
7.3
24.7
24.4
24.7
24 5
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.3
24.8
24.6
23.7
24.3
24.6
24.7
ration
6,92
7.06
7.39
7.01
6.91
6.98
7.30
6.94
7 41
7.04
7.45
7.13
7.40
7.03
8.1
7.6
8.)
7.8
7.7
7.7
8.3
7.3
83
7.9
8.2
7.6
8.2
7.4
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.6
25.0
24.5
25.0
24.7
25.0
24.4
24.8
24.5
24.7
24.4
Sample Information
Collection start dale'.
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mp/L CaC0,1:
Hardness img/L CaCO,):
Conductivity (Irmhos ern):
Total residual chlorine (mg'LI'.
Sample Temp. at Receipt IC).
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
Sample 1
01-05-14
24-h
15
Sample 2
01-07-14
24.25-h
15
Sample 3
01-00-14
45
45
225
-0.10
1.2
197
a0.10
1.4
24-h
20
45
267
0.10
0.9
Control
32.34
39-41
149-155
Analyses
Normal:
Horn. Var.
NOEC.
LAEC:
CIA.
Method:
Survival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
1000.
100%
>100%
>100%
>100%
`100%
Visual Insp.
Diernen's
Sun ival
Growth
'Ye Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
45%
2.410
1.086
67.5%
2.410
0.795
90%
2.410
0.353
95%
2.410
1.183
100%
2.410
0.367
DWQ form AT-5 (&/03)

•
•
0
0
TS
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
NPDES #: NC- 0024244 Pipe #: 001 County: Stinly
Facility: City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Char�e:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor.
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Date: December 27, 2013
Comments:
Project: 9428
Samplee 131203.02, 131205.02, 131206.31
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources'
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
162] Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
145% 1
Effluent
1675 % I
Replicate number
1 2 3
4
% Effluent
19o% i
Surviving number of larvae 10 10
Original number of larvae 10 10
W601/06Iciml(1138/14rvae) 0.534 0.589
Surviving number of larvae
Original number of larvae
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
10
10
10 10
0.54
0.546
6
10
10
0.568
10
10
0.539
10
10
0.579
10
10
0.594
Surviving number of larvae
9
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.582
0.570
0.585
0.615
Surviving number of larvae 10
Original number of larvae I 10
Weight/orig(na1(mg/lanve) 1 0.596
10
10
0.527
10
10
0.668
10
10
0.535
I
% Effluent Surviving number of lame {j 10 10 jI 10 10
95 % Original rnarrba of larvae I 10 10 I 10 10
Waght/original(mtg/larvae) 0.479 0.552 Il 0.566 0.574
% Effluent
I100%I
Surviving number of larvae
Original number of larvae
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
Water Quality Data
I` Day 0
L initial I Final
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
9
10
0.594
9
ID
0.537
Day 1
Initial 1 Final
7.55
7.71
i7.63
8.0
8.0
1
14 8.0
24.7
24.4
24.7
High Concentration
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
6.84
8.2
24.6
Sample Information
Collodion start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/I. CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (pmhos/an):
Total residual chlorine (mg/I.):
Sample Temp. at Receipt ('C):
7.11
7.9
24.6
7.35
8.2
25.0
7.52
8.3
24.6
6.99
8.5
24.6
10 l 10
9 9
0.473
0.527
Dav 2 q
Initial 1 Final
7.66
8,1
24.8
7.13
7.9
25.0
7.35
8.0
24.6
7.05
8.0
24.4
lStan date: End date:
12-03-13
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Average wt /
surviving (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wr (mg)
Su vival (%)
.Average wt (mg)
Sravival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Stvvivel (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
12-10-13
100.0
0.568
0568
100.0
0.556
97.5
0.588
100.0
0.582
1100.0 I
0543
90.0
0.533
Day 3 Dap 4
Initial' Final Initial 1 ( Final
7.71
8.0
24.7
7.26
8.2
24.8
Sample 1
12-01.13
24-h
11
Sample 2
12-03-13
23.75-h
15
Sample 3
12.05-13
48
287
< 0.10
0.3
44
347
<0.10
2.2
24-h
18
50
397
< 0.10
1.1
33, 33, 32
40, 40, 40
151-160
7.21
7,8 i
243
7.78
8.0
24.8
6.95 7.43
7.8 8.1
24.7
25.0
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
C6V:
Method:
% Effluent
45%
67.5%
9046
95%
100%
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
7.48
7.9
24.4
7.17
7.9
24.4
Start time:
1130
End time: 1
1032
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
1 P.quatox Inc.
Hatch date:
Hard) time:
Day 5
Initial 1 Final
7.73
8.2
24.7
7.45
8.3
24.8
7.56
8.3
24.5
734
I 12-02-13 I
1600 ET
Day 6 I
Initia
l I Final
7.58
7.9
24.7
7.38
82
24.5 25.0
8.4
Survival
Yes
Growth
Yes
Yes
100%
>100%
>100%
Visual Insp.
Yes
100%
>100%
>100'3e
Dmuett's
Survival
Critical
Calculated
7.51
7.8
24.7
7.25
7.9
24.7
Growth
Critical
2.410
2.410
2.410
2.410
2.410
Calculated
0.386
-0.703
-0.480
0.849
1.192
DW'Q font: AT-5 (8/03)

•
FIMOI
•
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic
NPDE-S a#: NC-0024244 Pipe4: 001 County: Sternly
PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E mail: )im @etsnclab.com
Facility: City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Date: November 29.2013
Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Comments:
Prom:
Samples: 131105.02. 131107.03. 131108.19
9364
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
MMK Raleigh. NC 27699-1621
NNW
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
145%
Effluent
I67S%I
% Effluent
Replicate number
1 2 3
4
1,Surviving number of larvae
Original number of larvae
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
90 % I
% Effluent
95%
% Effluent
100%
10
10
0.575
10 1 10
0.53
10 10
0.638
2
10
10
0.627
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg.larvae)
0.582
0.660
0.607
0.580
Surviving number of larvae
Original number of larvae
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
Surviving, number of larvae
10 10 [ 10
10 1 jl 10 10
0.580 0.61
0.562
8
10 1 10
10
10
Original number of larvae
WcghJari8ia41(mglar•ne) 0.544 0.597
10
10
0.662
10
10
0.587
10
10
0.673
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
l0
9
1..Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Wcigltuoricinal(m0/lnrac)
0.602
0.599
0.578
0.552
Surviving number of larvae l
9 1
9
10
10
Original number of larvae
Il 10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mWIarL•ae)
0.615
jIl 0.530
0.633
0.627
{Stan dare: ( End date' Stan time: I End time: I
11-05.13 1 11-12-13 1220 1120
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
ALEfage wt i
surviving (mg)
100.0
0.593
0 593
Survival (%) I 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.607
Survivtd (a)
.Average wt (mg)
100.0
0.587
Survival (%) 1 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.619
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Survival (%1
Average wt mg)
0.583
95.0 I
0.601
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
IAquatox Inc.
Hatch date'
Hatch time: I
11-04.13
1600 ET
Water Quality Data
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Ir
Day 3 Day 4 Day S 1 Day 6
jl
Initial Final Initial Final initial Final I Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
Control
pH (SI.):
D0 (mgft.):
Temp. ("C).
High Conccnt
pl l (SU)
DO (mg1L ).
Temp. CC):
7.65
8.0
24 7
7.65
7.78
7.51
7.69
7.46
7.85
7.51
7b3
7.47
7.75
741
76
78.0
7.4)
1
8.0
7.9
79
7.8
7.9
1_
8.1
[ 8 4 1._
S.2
8.4
1
7.4
8.0
7.5
24.4
24.8
25 0
24.7
24.8
24.7
24.8
24,7
24.4
24.7
25.0
24.8
24.7
ration
7.18
7.24
6.98
7.14
7.07
7.37
7.19
7.27
7.25
7.49
7.17
7.57
7.23
6.74
8.5
7.9 J
8.1
7.8
f
7.8
7 6
1
7.9
8.1
8.3
8.1
8.4
6.8
8.0
7.6
24.9
24.5
25.0
24.7
24.9
24.7
24.8
24.5
25.0
24.3
24.9
24.5
24.7
24.6
..a Sample information
Collection start date:
Grab.
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/t- C aCO,):
PEW Hardness (mg1. CaCO. ):
Conductivity (µmhos/em):
'Total residual chlorine (tneJl.):
Sample Temp. at Rceipt ("C):
Overall Analysis:
Swnplc I
1 1-03-13
24-h
11
Sample 2
11-05-13
24-h
18
Sample 3
11-07-13
54
52
348
<0.10
1.0
396
< 0.10
0.2
23.75-h
24
48
380
<0.10
I.8
Control
33.32
42.40
152-158
Analyses
Normal:
Ilom. Var.
NOEC:
I.OEC:
ChV:
Method
Survival
Growth
Yes
Y cs
Yes
Yes
100%
100%
>100%
>100%
>100%
>100%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnett's
Survival
Growth
%Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calarlared
45%
2.410
-0.475
67.5%
2.410
0.208
90%
2.410
-0.866
9591,
2.410
0.341
100%
2.410
-0.275
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
DWQ form AT-5 (8/03)

T
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: Jim'ifttsnclab.com
Date: October 30, 2013
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Char e:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor. ]_
NPDES#: NC-0024244 Pipe#: 001 County: Stanly
Comments:
Project: 9294
Samples: 131008.03, 131010.03, 131011.21
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
45%
% Effluent
67 5%
% Emuent
90%
% Effluent
95 %
% Effluent
100%
Replicate number
4
Surviving number of Imvac
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Wdg.htioriginal (rng/Iervne)
0.624
0.495
0.552
0.726
Surviving number of larvae
i 0
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weighvoriginul (mg1arvac)
0.557
0.502
0.542
0.506
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg:7ar ae)
0.527
0.558
0.559
0.500
Sunning number of Iane
10
10
10
9
Original nuntba of larvae
10
10
10
10
Wdebdorie.inat (mgr7anae)
0.516
0.617
0.579
0.509
Surviving numbs of larvae
10
10
10
9
Original number of larvae
10
I 0
I 0
10
Weight'origina1Ongilanae)
0.604
0.630
0.674
0.513
Surviving number of larvae
10
9
10
9
Original number of lance
10
10
10
10
Weighroriginal (mg/larvae/
0.594
0.533
0.579
0.548
Rater Quality Data
Control
p11(SUJ):
DO (me1L):
Temp. ("C):
High Concen
pit (SUI:
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (T):
Start date.
End date:
Stan time:
End time:
10-08.13
Sunival (%)
Average wt (mg)
Average wt I
surviving (mg) Hatch date:
!latch time:
10-15-13
100.0
0.599
0.599
1030
0930
Test Organisms
Outside supplier
Aquatox. Inc.
Survival (%)
Average wt (mg)
100.0
0.527
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt(mg) 0.536
Survival(%)
Average an lug)
Survival (%)
Average wt (ntg)
Survival (%)
Average wt lrng)
97.5
0.555
97_5
0.605
95.0
0.564
10-07-13
1600 ET
Day 0
Initial 1 Final
Day
initial 1 Final
Day 2
Initial I Final
Day3
Initial [ Final
Dal 4
Initial I Final
Dav5
Initial ( Final
Da(v6
Initial I Final
7.68
7,33
7.70
7.35
7.52
7.26
7.53
7.25
7.63
7.24
7.46
7.04
7.58
7.61
8.0
7.6
80
7.8
8.0
7.9
79
7.7
8.0
7.8
8.0
7.0
7.9
8.2
24.7
24.6
24.8
24.6
24.7
24.5
24.7
24.6
24.8
24.4
24.7
24.5
24.8
24.5
6.54
6.60
6.81
6.60
6.60
6.55
6.70
6.47
6.52
6.71
6.91
6.54
6.87
6.67
7.9
7.6
8.0
7.7
7.9
7.8
8.1
75
8.3
7.8
7.9
7.2
8.0
7.8
24.9
24 7
24.9
24.4
25,0
24.4
25.0
24 4
25.0
24.6
24.8
24.5
25.0
24.4
Sample Information
Collection sign date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L. C aCOrl:
Hardness (mg/1., CaCOt):
Conduanity (pmhoslan):
Total residual chlorine (mgiL):
Sample Temp. at Receipt CC)
Overall Analysis:
Sample 1
10-06-13
24 25-h
8
Sample 2
10.08-13
24.25-h
7
Smnplc 3
10-10-13
56
54
24-h
8
56
389
<0.10
0.4
394
< 0.10
0.5
385
< 0.10
1.4
Control
32. 34.32
42, 40. 40
150-154
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV:
Analyses
Normal:
Hone. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Mahod:
Sun•ival
Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
100%
100%
>100%
>1005
>100%
>100%
Visual lnsp.
Duanen's
Survival
Growth
% Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Cntieai
Calculated
45%
2.410
1.797
67.5%
2.410
1.568
90%
.
I.410
1.(l90
45°e
2.410
-0.149
100%
2 410
0.886
DH'Q form AT-S(8103)

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002
Receive Date: 07/29/2016
Reported: 08/02/2016
For: LC 07/29/16
Comments:
Sample Number Parameter Sample ID Result Unit Method Analyzed Analyst
160729-06-01 Hardness LC Eff 51.25 mg/L 101 08/02/2016 MD
160729-06-02 Hardness LC Upstream 70.65 mg/L 101 08/02/2016 MD
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA #NC00909
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
Page 1 of 2

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002
Receive Date: 08/01/2016
Reported: 08/02/2016
For: LC
Comments:
Sample Number Parameter Sample ID Result Unit Method Analyzed Analyst
160801-17-01 Hardness Eff 46.28 mg/L 101 08/02/2016 MD
160801-17-02 Hardness Upstream 62.63 mg/L 101 08/02/2016 MD
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
4C Cert #440,
'-4ICDW Cert #37755,
EPA #NC00909
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
page.' of 1

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002
Receive Date: 08/02/2016
Reported: 08/16/2016
For: ' LC 08/02/16
Comments:
Sample Number Parameter Sample ID Result Unit Method Analyzed Analyst
160802-28-01 Hardness LC Eff 52.1 mg/L 101 08/16/2016 MD
160802-28-02 Hardness Upstream 62.2 mg/L 101 08/16/2016 MD
Respectfully submitted,
0
-'—'Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA #NC00909
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
Page 1 of 2

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002
Receive Date: 08/03/2016
Reported: 08/16/2016
For: LC 08/03/16
Comments:
Sample Number Parameter Sample ID Result Unit Method Analyzed Analyst
160803-18-01 Hardness LC Eff 46.9 mg/L 101 08/16/2016 MD
160803-18-02 Hardness Upstream 25.6 mg/L 101 08/16/2016 MD
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA #NC00909
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
Page 1 of 2

Analytical Results
City of Albemarle
PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002
Receive Date: 08/04/2016
Reported: 08/16/2016
For: Long Creek
Comments:
Sample Number Parameter Sample ID Result Unit Method Analyzed Analyst
160804-19-01 Hardness LC Eff 47.8
160804-19-02 Hardness , Upstream 35.5
Respectfully submitted,
roles..; 0
Dena Myers
NC Cert #140,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA #NC00909
mg/L 101
mg/L 101
08/16/2016 MD
08/16/2016 MD
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
Page 1 of 2

HL(7iINE CONTACT
Municipal
Services
!Y:E7FL :t._
Engineering
Company, P.A.
s ais.ene-sue i�sses `�

RAW SEWAGE
RAW SEWAGE
SCREW PUMP STATION
AERATION BASIN
DISTRIBUTION BOX 7
i
METERING STATION
TO DISTRIBUTION
BOX
7
AERATION BASIN
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
/
sue —
RETURN SLUDGE
SCREW PUMP STATION
RETURN SLUDGE
METERING STATION
TO CLARIFIER
TO CLARIFIER
CHLORINE CONTACT
BASIN
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
DISK FILTERS
BACKUP GENERATOR
LONG CREEK WWTP
PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC
Average Daily Flow: Plant Influent and effluent averaged 6.29 MGD for calendar year 2013.
The average recycle rate at the plant is 63% making the flow entering the aeration basin and
clarifier portion of the treatment process 10.3 MGD.
Influent Pump Station - This station utilizes four (4) screw pumps and one stand-by "dry prime"
type pump. This station is rated for 32 MGD based on one of the 4 screw pumps being out of
service. Influent flow metering is done by a Parshall flume that is upstream of this pump station.
Aeration Basins - The biological treatment portion at the Long Creek WWTP (LCWWTP) takes place
in four (4) partially lined aeration ponds. Each pond is concrete lined at the top portion of the
sloped walls as well as a concrete bottom portion under each of the six (6) aerators that are in
each of the four aeration ponds, which total 24 60-HP aerators that comprises the entire system.
The basins have a depth of approximately 12 feet which equates to a volume of roughly 4.2 million
gallons per basin.
Clarifiers - The LCWWTP uses 4 80 foot diameter secondary clarifiers: These units are arranged to
each pair with one of the four aeration ponds. Each clarifier has a depth of 12 feet and an approximate
surface area of 5,027 sq ft. The working volume of each clarifier is approximately 60,319 cu ft.
RAS Pumps - The Return Activated Sludge (RAS) is pumped via two separate screw pump stations that
feed two aeration basins per station. These screw pump stations return the settled sludge from the
clarifiers to a distribution box where the RAS flow meets and mixes with the raw influent wastewater
prior to entering the two aeration basins for each of the two treatment trains. Sluice gates are present
within the distribution box to allow operators to make slight process changes within the activated sludge
process.
WAS Pumps - The Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) is pumped out of the system through a pumping station
that utilizes a wet -pit / dry -pit configuration.
Disinfection - The plant utilizes chlorine gas and a dechlorination agent to properly disinfect its effluent
prior to entering Long Creek. There are two mirrored chlorine contact chambers, each with an estimated
volume of 11,610 cu ft.
Engineerin
Company, P.A.