NC0024244_Permit (Issuance)_20110426

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0024244
Albemarle / Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance --'.
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Renewal Application
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
April 26, 2011
Thies dcmcumeat era priated oa reuese paper - igrtc re amity
caateat oa the relizerese Bide

I PAr -
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 26, 2011
Mr. Raymond Allen, City Manager
City of Albemarle
P.O. Box 190
Albemarle, North Carolina 28002-0190
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0024244
Albemarle -Long Creek WWTP
Facility Class IV
Stanly County
Dear Mr. Allen:
In accordance with the application for discharge permit received, the Division is forwarding
herewith the subject NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently
amended).
The final permit authorizes the City of Albemarle to discharge wastewater from the Long
Creek WWTP to Long Creek, a class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. The final
permit includes discharge limitations/or monitoring for flow, BOD5, ammonia nitrogen, total
suspended solids (TSS), dissolved oxygen, total residual chlorine, fecal coliform, mercury,
cadmium, chromium, copper, silver, color and several other parameters.
Please note that the receiving stream, Long Creek, is listed as an impaired waterbody
on the 2010 North Carolina 303(d) Impaired Waters List. Addressing impaired waters is a
high priority with the Division, and instream data will continue to be evaluated. If there is
noncompliance with permitted effluent limits and stream impairment can be attributed to
your facility, then mitigative measures may be required.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
•
No`rthCarolina
7Vatllrail//

Letter to Mr. Allen
Page 2
ram•
The following procedure has been implemented by DWQ: Total residual chlorine (TRC)
compliance level changed to 50 ug/L. Effective March 1, 2008, the Division received EPA
approval to allow a 50 ug/L TRC compliance level. This change is due to analytical difficulties
with TRC measurements. Facilities will still be required to report actual results on their
monthly discharge monitoring report (DMR) submittals, but for compliance purposes, all TRC
values below 50 ug/L will be treated as zero. A footnote regarding this change has been added
to the effluent limitations page in the draft permit.
There are permit corrections included in the final permit:
• Additional language has been added to the supplement to cover page to address the
procedure for facility expansion to 16 MGD.
• At both 12 MGD and 16 MGD, the daily maximum limit for total mercury has been
corrected to 36 ng/1. The monthly average mercury limit remains 12 ng/1 at both
wasteflows..
• The daily maximum limits for chromium have been corrected to 1093 ug/1 at 12 MGD
and 1076 ug/1 at 16 MGD. The previous daily maximum limits did not reflect the
correct allowable concentrations based on the acute criteria for chromium.
• Quarterly monitoring for total cyanide should not have been included in the permit
based on the results of the reasonable potential analysis. The analysis had no
reported cyanide data above detection level and therefore no additional monitoring
should have been added to the NPDES permit. Cyanide will continue to be monitored
quarterly in the pretreatment long term monitoring program.
The following are modifications to the final permit that were not included in the draft
permit.
• Effluent limits have been added to the permit for total nickel based on further review
of the reasonable potential analysis that was performed on submitted data. At 12
MGD, total nickel will have a monthly average limit of 27.2 ug/1 and a daily
maximum limit of 279 ug/1. At 16 MGD, total nickel will have a monthly average
limit of 26.6 ug/1 and a daily maximum limit of 275 ug/1.
• Effluent limits have been added to the permit for total selenium based on further
review of the reasonable potential analysis that was performed on submitted data. At
12 MGD, total selenium will have a monthly average limit of 5.4 ug/1 and a daily
maximum limit of 59.9 ug/1. At 16 MGD, total selenium will have a monthly average
limit of 5.3 ug/1 and a daily maximum limit of 58.9 ug/1.
• In special condition A.4. Color reopener and monitoring requirements, the second
paragraph has been removed. It has been noted that visible observations of stream
color should be submitted with the monthly DMRs. All other language in the color
special condition remains the same.
The following modifications from the draft permit of March 2nd are in the final permit:
• The inclusion of an effluent page for 12 MGD based on the rerating of the treatment
facility as related to the size and capacity of the existing equipment. Upon receipt of an
Authorization to Construct (ATC) from the Division's Construction Grants and Loans
(CG&L) Section, the facility will be rerated to 12 MGD and the 12 MGD flow page will be
effective immediately. Existing effluent limits for BOD5, ammonia, total residual chlorine,
and dissolved oxygen will remain the same at the rerated flow of 12 MGD. The 16 MGD

Letter to Mr. Allen
Page 3
r_. effluent page will also remain in the permit but shall only be effective upon plant
expansion.
The following components have been removed from the facility description and will not be
brought back into service (per CG&L) :
o dual gravity grit chambers
o preaeration basins
o primary clarifiers,
o trickling filters
o dissolved air flotation units.
At both flows of 12 MGD and 16 MGD, the following changes are included:
• Monthly average and daily maximum limits for cadmium and chromium have been
added based on a reasonable potential analysis (RPA) that indicated that the NC water
quality standard could be exceeded instream.
• Quarterly monitoring for lead has been added based on RPA results and Division
procedure.
• Twice per month monitoring for silver and zinc has been reduced to quarterly based
on'DWQ procedure.
• Twice per month monitoring for copper has been reduced to monthly based on DWQ
procedure.
• Upstream and downstream monitoring for copper has been added to permit based on
Long Creek's 303d listing for copper impairment. This instream monitoring will help
determine the Long Creek WWTP's contribution to the impairment.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within
thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714.
Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. The Division may require modification
revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to
obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by
the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal or Local
governmental permits may be required.

Letter to Mr. Allen
Page 4
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jacquelyn Nowell at
telephone number [phone].
Sin erely,
oleen H. Sullins
Attachments
cc: NPDES File/NC0024244
Mooresville Regional Office/ Surface Water Protection Section
EPA Region IV/attn: Pamala Myers
ESS/Aquatic Toxicology Unit (ecopy)
PERCS/Monti Hassan (ecopy)
Central Files

Permit NC0024244
•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of Albemarle
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Long Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
1040 Coble Avenue
Albemarle
Stanly County
to receiving waters designated as Long Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin in accordance with effluent
limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective June 1, 2011.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February 28, 2014
Signed this day April 26, 2011.
,eka
eelen H. Sullins, Director
Dievision of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0024244
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked, and as of this issuance,
any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and
discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
The City of Albemarle is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate and maintain the rerated 12.0 MGD wastewater treatment system consisting of the following
components:
➢ Mechanical bar screens with manual bypass screens
➢ Dual influent lift station (Screw pumps)
> Parshall flume with instrumental flow measurement
> Mechanical aeration basins
➢ Secondary clarifiers
➢ Gravity tertiary filters (not in service)
> Chlorination and dechlorination
> Instrumented effluent flow measurement
➢ Dual RAS lift stations (Screw pumps)
➢ Aerobic digesters (not in service)
➢ Centrifuge (not in service)
➢ Sludge dryer system (not in service)
> Sludge holding tanks
> Sludge thickeners
This facility (historically permitted as 16 MGD, now rerated to 12 MGD) is located at the Long Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant, 1040 Coble Avenue, Albemarle, Stanly County.
2. With the approval of the rerating of the treatment plant to 12 MGD, shall receive an Authorization to Construct
(ATC) from the Division's Construction Grants and Loans Section. The following treatment components will be
added with the ATC :
• Two mechanical bar screens
• Two manual by-pass bar screens
• Dual grit vortex removal systems
• Tertiary disk filters
3. Upon receipt of an Authorization to Construct (ATC) from the Division's Construction Grants and Loans
Section and the submission of a signed Engineer's Certification to the Division, expand the treatment plant to 16
MGD.
4. Discharge from said treatment works4t the location specified on the attached map into Long Creek, classified C
waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.

City of Albemarle
Long Creek WWTP
Latitude: 35° 19' 27" State Grid: Albemarle
Longitude: 80° 12' 56" , Permitted Flow: 12.0 & 16.0 MGD
Receiving Stream: Long Creek Stream Class: C
Drainage Basin: Yadkin- Pee Dee River Basin Sub -Basin: 03-07-13
NPDES Permit No. NC0024244
Stanly County

Permit NC0024244
•
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expansion to 16 MGD, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from ouffall serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample Location1
Flow
12.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C (April 1 to
October 31) 2
10.0 mg/I
15.0 mg/1
Daily
Composite
Influent & Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C
(November 1 to March 31)2
20.0 mg/1
30.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Influent & Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mgll
45.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Influent & Effluent
NH3 as N (Apr 1 to Oct 31)
2.0 mg/l
6.0 mg/1
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N (Nov 1 to Mar 31)
4.0 mg/l
12.&mg/I
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygenl
See Note 1
Grab
U, D1 & D2
Fecal Coliform (geometric
mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
18 ug/I
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature1
See Note 1
Grab
U, D1 & D2
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 +
TKN)
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Conductivity1
See Note 1
Grab
U, D1 & D2
Total Cadmium
2.2 pg/I
16.0 pg/I
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium
53.5 pg/I
1093 pg/I
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Lead
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent ,
Total Mercury
12 ngll
36 ngll
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nickel
27.2 pg/I
279 pg/I
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Selenium
5.4 pg/I
59.9 pg/I
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper
Monthly
Composite
Effluent, U, D1 & D2
Total Silver
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Color (ADMI)1
_
See Note 1
Grab
U & D3
Color (ADMI)6
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH7
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent

Permit NC0024244'
Footnotes:
1. U = Upstream above the discharge point. D1 = Downstream at the end of NCSR 1960. D2 = Downstream 3.9
miles at NCSR 1967. D3 (for color samples) = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point.
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected once per month
in the winter (October through May) and once per week during the summer (June through September).
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 concentrations shall not exceed 15 percent of the respective influent value
(85 percent removal is required). The monthly average effluent TSS concentrations shall not exceed 32 percent
of the respective influent value (68 percent removal) in the winter months (November 1 to March 31) and shall
not exceed 18 percent of the respective influent value (82 percent removal) in the summer months (April 1 to
October 31).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mgll.
4. The Division shall consider all effluent total residual chlorine values reported below 50 ug/L to be in compliance
with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North
Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values all below 50 ug/L.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 90%: March, June, September, & December (see Part I. A. (3.)).
6. See Part I. A. (4.) Color reopener and monitoring requirements.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

•
Permit NC0024244
•
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
During the period beginning upon expansion to 16 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from outfall serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample Location1
Flow
16.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C (April 1 to
October 31)2
10.0 mgll
15.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Influent & Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20 °C
(November 1 to March 31)2
20.0 mg/I
30.0 mgll
Daily
Composite
Influent & Effluent
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Influent & Effluent
NH3 as N (April 1 to October
31)
2.0 mg/I
6.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N (November 1 to
March 31) •
4.0 mg/I
12.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved 0xygen3
•
Daily
_
Grab
• Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen1
See Note 1
Grab
U, D1 & D2
Fecal Coliform (geometric
mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
18 ug/l
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Daily
Grab
Effluent
_Temperature
Temperature1
See Note 1
Grab
• U, D1 & D2
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 +
TKN)
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Conductivity1
See Note 1
Grab
U, D1 & D2
Total Cadmium
2.1 pg/I
15.8 pgll
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium
52.6 pgll
1076 pgfl
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Lead
_
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury
12 ng/l
36 ng/l
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nickel
26.6 pg/I
275 pg/I
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Selenium
5.3 pg/I
58.9 pg/l
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper
Monthly
Composite
Effluent, U, D1 & D2
Total Silver
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Color (ADMI)1
See Note 1
Grab
U & D3
Color (ADMI)6
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
pH7
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent

Permit NCQ024244
Footnotes:
1. U = Upstream above the discharge point. D1 = Downstream at the end of NCSR 1960. D2 = Downstream 3.9
miles at NCSR 1967. D3 (for color samples) = approximately 200 yards downstream from the discharge point.
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected once per month
in the winter (October through May) and once per week during the summer (June through September).
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 concentrations shall not exceed .15 percent of the respective influent value
(85 percent removal is required). The monthly average effluent TSS concentrations shall not exceed 32 percent
of the respective influent value (68 percent removal) in the winter months (November 1 to March 31) and shall
not exceed 18 percent of the respective influent value (82 percent removal) in the summer months (April 1 to
October 31).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/I.
4. The Division shall consider all effluent total residual chlorine values reported below 50ug1L to be in compliance
with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North
Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values all below 50 ug/L.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 90%: March, June, September, & December (see Part I. A. (3,)).
6. See Part I. A. (4.) Color reopener and monitoring requirements.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0024244
v
A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) at 12.0 and 16.0 MGD
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90% at 12 MGD; 90% at 16 MGD .
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) orsubsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent
sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit,
then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as
described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed. If reporting pass/fail results using the
parameter code TGP3B, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is sent to the below address. If reporting Chronic Value results
using the parameter code THP3B, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility
name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the
comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited
above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be
required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of such monitoring
shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT Forms submitted.
•
•

Permit NC0024244
•
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified -in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid
test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following
the month of the initial monitoring.
A. (4.) COLOR REOPENER AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS •
This permit will be modified or revoked and reissued to incorporate color limitations and /or revised monitoring
requirements in the event color testing or other studies conducted by the permittee or the Division indicate that color
has rendered or could render the receiving waters injurious to public health, secondary recreation, to aquatic life and
wildlife or adversely affect the palatability of fish, aesthetic quality or impair the water for any designated use.
Color samples should be analyzed as follows:
➢ At natural pH;
➢ Free from turbidity (true color); and
➢ Samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the provisions of Method 2120.E.4 as described in the 18th
edition of Standard Methods for the examination of Water and Wastewater. Using a narrow -band
scanning spectrophotometer to produce a COMPLETE spectral curve of the visible spectrum (350-750
nm), calculate and report results in ADMI values for true color values at the samples ambient pH value.
All color data including visible stream color observations should be submitted with the monthly DMRs.
4

•
•
Permit NC0024244
A. (5) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The Permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the attached table (using a
sufficiently sensitive detection level in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136). Samples shall represent seasonal
variations. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N) Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual, TRC) 1,1-dichloroethylene ' Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen 1,2-dichloropropane Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Kjeldahl nitrogen Bthylbcnzene Butyl bcnzyl phthalate
Oil and grease Methyl bromide - 2-chloronaphthalene
Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene
I-Iardncss 1,1,2,2-tetrachlorocthane Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony Tetrachloroethylene Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium Trichloroethylene 1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper Vinyl chloride 3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead Acid -extractable compounds: Diethyl phthalate
Mercury P-chloro-m-cresol . Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dinitrotolucne
Silver 2,4-dimethylphenol 1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Fluoranthene
Zinc 2,4-dinitrophenol Fluorene
Cyanide 2-nitrophenol I Iexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds 4-nitrophenol 1-Iexachlorobutadiene
Volatile organic compounds; Pentachlorophenol Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein Phenol I-Iexachloroethane
Acrylonitrile 2,4,6-trichlorophenol I ndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene Bute -neutral compounds: Isophorone
Bromoform Acenaphthene Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride Acenaphthylene Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene Anthracene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane Benzidine N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane Benzo(a)anthracene N-nitrosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethyh7nyl ether Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrene
Chloroform 3,4 benzofluoranthene Pyrene
Dichlorobromomethane Benzo(ghi)perylene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane Bis (2-chlorocthoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- A MR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the
Director within 90 days of sampling. The report shall be submitted to the following address: Division of
Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section, Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-1617.

Factsheet Amendment:
The following amendments to effluent limits or monitoring will be included in the final
permit to be issued to the City of Albemarle:
• The daily maximum limit for total mercury was corrected to 36 ng/l. The
monthly average mercury limit remains at 12 ng/1. This is consistent with the
current DWQ procedure for the assignment of mercury limits for facilities that
show reasonable potential to exceed the instream standard and based on the
statewide mercury impairment.
• Quarterly monitoring for cyanide will be removed from the permit based on
further evaluation of the RPA and cyanide data. All cyanide data was reported
as below detection, therefore no effluent monitoring should have been required
in the permit. Cyanide will continue to be monitored quarterly in the
pretreatment Long Term Monitoring Program.
• Effluent limits will be added to the permit for selenium and nickel based on
further evaluation and review of the RPA and selenium and nickel data. There
was reasonable potential shown to exceed the allowable concentrations. Limits
will be added to the final permit and these parameters will be monitored
monthly.
• The daily maximum limits for chromium have been corrected to 1093 ug/1 at
12 MGD and 1076 ug/1 at 16 MGD. Limits equal to the monthly average were
given in the draft permit when the calculated acute allowable concentrations
should have been given.
• The second paragraph in the color monitoring special condition has been
removed. A review of the paragraph language seemed inconsistent with other
color monitoring language in other NC NPDES permits. The remaining
language in the condition was sufficient to collect the needed effluent and
instream color data.
4/15 8s 25/2011
Albemarle- Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 6

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
Ow (MGD) = 12.00
1Q10S (cfs) = 1.30
7Q10S (cfs) = 1.60
7Q10W (cfs) = 9.50
30Q2 (cfs) = 4.70
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cis) = 64.00
Receiving Stream: Long Creek
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
WWTP/WTP Class: IV
1WC @ 1Q10S = 93.47%
IWC @ 7Q10S = 92.08%
!WC @ 7Q10W = 66.19%
IWC @ 30Q2 = 79.83%
IWC @ QA = 22.52%
Stream Class: C
Outfali 001
Qw=12MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
(1)
& CRITERIA (2)
,A
ar
a
(0
z
m
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WQS/ Chmnk Applied Standard
%FAV/Acute
n
# Det Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Arsenic
Arsenic
C
C
50
10
FW(7010s)
HH(Qavg)
ug/L
ug/L
19
19
0
0
3.3
3.3
Acute: NO WQS
__ _ _______ _____
Chronic: 54
No value > Allowable Cw__
Chronic: 44
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Cw - No Monitoring
required _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of C-w - No Monitoring
required
Beryllium
NC
6.5
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ _
--Chronic------- - — -
----------- ----------------�
Cadmium
NC
2
FW(7Q10s)
15
uglL
15
2
5.1
Acute: 16.0
_ _ _
- — Chronic: — - — - —2.2 - — -
9 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230,000
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ -
--Chronic: _ _ ----249,783
-- --------------------------
Chromium
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
1,022
ug/L,
40
25
232.1
Acute: 1,093
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic 54.3
1 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Copper (AL)
NC
7
FW(7Q10s)
7.3
ug/L
114
114
204.8
Acute: 7.8
_
Chronic 7.6
114 value(s) > Allowable CW
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Cyanide
NC
5
FW(7010s)
22
10
ug/L
31
0
5.0
Acute: 24
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic 5.4
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP but no values >Detect - no limit or monitoring
recommended
Fluoride
NC
1,800
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _
--Chronic: -- --1,955 --
----------------------------
Lead
NC
25
FW(7Q10s)
33.8
ug/L
23
1
54.4
Acute: 36.2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 27.2
No value > Allowable Cw
RP shown- recommend limit with monthly monitoring
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RPA shown - recommend limit with monthly
monitoring
Page 1 of 2
24244newrpa2011gw12.xlsm, rpa
4/25/2011

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Ouffall 001
Qw=12MGD
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1
A(3002)
10
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
-- _ 1.3--------
Chronic:
---------------------------•
Mercury
NC
12
FW(7Q10s)
0.5
ng!L
183
178
38
Acute: NO WQS
- _-_----- _---
Chronic: 13
8 value(s) > Allowable Cw
---------------------------
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Molybdenum
NC
2,000
HH(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
NIA
Acute: NO WQS
Chronic----- 2,172 --►----------------------------
•
Nickel
NC
25
WS(30402)
261
ug/L
22
3
56.0
Acute: 279.2
__ _ ______ ____
Chronic 27.2
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Selenium
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
56
ug/L
24
2
13.2
Acute: 59.9
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic 5.4
3 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Silver (AL)
NC
0.06
FW(7010s)
1.23
ug/L
53
1
10.82
Acute: 1.32
_
Chronic 0.07
53 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Zinc (AL:
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
67
ug/L
114
104
101.6
Acute: 72
Chronic:54
6 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring In conjunction with TOX Test
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
-_
—Chronic _-----------
----------------------------
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
--Chronic-----------
--- ---
----------------------
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
_ _ _ _ ----------
Chronic:
----------------------------
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
_ _
--Chronic------------------------------••--------
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
----------
—Chronic_ _--
---------------------------•
K
Page 2 of 2
24244newrpa2011gw12.xlsm, rpa
4/25/2011

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
Qw (MGD) = 16.00
1Q1OS (cfs) = 1.30
7Q10S (cfs) = 1.60
7Q10W (cfs) = 9.50
30Q2 (cfs) = •4.70
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 64.00
Receiving Stream: Long Creek
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
WWTP/WTP Class: IV
/WC @ 1Q1OS = 95.02%
!WC @ 7Q10S =. 93.94%
!WC @ 7Q10W = 72.30%
! WC @ 30Q2 = 84.07%
!WC@QA= 27.93%
Stream Class: C
Outfatf 001
Qw=16MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
(1)
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
a
a
u)
z
0
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WQS/ Chronic Applied Standard
%%FAV/Acute
n
II Del. Max Pred Cw . Allowable Cw
Arsenic
Arsenic
C
C
50
10
FW(7Q10s)
HH(Qavg)
ug1L
ug/L
19
19
0
0
3.3
3.3
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic 53
No value > Allowable Cw__
Chronic: 36
No value > Allowable Cw
•
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Cw - No Monitoring
required
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Cw - No Monitoring
required
Beryllium
NC
6.5
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_
--Chronic: _ -----6.9 ---
----------------------- ----
Cadmium
NC
2
FW(7010s)
15
ug/L
15
2
5.1
Acute: 15.8
_ _ ---------
--Chronic:
Chronic21
9 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ -
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230,000
FW(7Q10s)
.
ug/L
0
0
WA
Acute: NO WQS
-- _ _ — - — _ _ _ -----------------------------
Chronic:-244,837
_
Chromium
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
1,022
ug/L
40
.
25
232.1
Acute: 1,076
_ _ _ _
- — Chronic: — - — - 53.2 - — -
1 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit-
Copper (AL)
NC
7
FW(7Q10s)
7.3
.
ug/L
114
114
204.8
Acute: 7.7
- — Chronic: 7.5
.114 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly - — - —
Monitoring In conjunction with TOX Test
Cyanide
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
22
10
ug/L
31
0
5.0
Acute: 23
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 5.3
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP but no values >Detect - no limit or monitoring
recommended
Fluoride
NC
1,800
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
-- _ _ ----_ _ --
Chronic: 1,916
'
----------------------------
Lead
NC
25
FW(7Q10s)
33.8
ug/L
23
1
54.4
Acute: 35.6
- — _ - — - — - _ _ - — -
Chronic 26.6
No value > Allowable Cw
RP shown- recommend limit with monthly monitoring
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - — - — -
RPA shown - recommend limit with monthly
monitoring
Page 1 of 2
24244newrpa2010gw16v2.xls, rpa
4/25/2011

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Ouffall 001
Qw=16MGD
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1
A(30Q2)
10
ug/L
0
0
WA
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ _ _ ------� 2 ---
Chronic:
'
---------------------------•
Mercury
NC
12
FW(7Q10s)
0.5
nglL
183
178
38
Acute: NO WQS
-_ _ _-----_ _----------------_--------------
Chronic: 13
10 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Molybdenum
NC
2,000
HH(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
WA
Acute: NO WQS
- _ _----- _ --
Chronic: 2,129
----------------------------
Nickel
NC
25
WS(30Q2)
'
261
ug/L
22
3
56.0
Acute: 274.7
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 26.6
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Selenium
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
56
ug/L
24
2
13.2
Acute: 58.9
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic 5.3
3 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Silver (AL)
NC
0.06
FW(7Q10s)
1.23
ug/L
53
1
10.82
Acute: 1.29
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic_ 0.06
53 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Zinc (AL)
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
67
uglL
114
104
101.6
Acute: 71
-_ _ _-----_ _---
Chronic: 53
7 value(s) > Allowable Cw
----------------_-----------
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
uglL
0
0
WA
Acute:
--Chronic-----------
---------—— -------------
----
uglL
0
0
N/A
Acute:
Chronic-------------------------------,--------
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
— __
-------------------------------
-
Chronic:
—---- ---
ug/L
0
0
WA
Acute:
-_
—Chronic: _ ----------
-----------—-- --------------
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
— _ _ ——
---------
Chronic:
------------------------
----
Page 2 of 2
24244newrpa2010qw16v2.xis, kip
4/25/2011

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
Qw (MGD) = 12.00
1 Q 10S (cfs) = 1.30
7Q10S (cfs) = 1.60
7Q10W (cfs) = 9.50
30Q2 (cfs) = 4.70
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 64.00
Receiving Stream: Long Creek
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
WWTP/WTP Class: IV
/WC @ 1Q10S = 93.47%
/WC @ 7Q10S = 92.08%
IWC @ 7010W = 66.19%
IWC @ 3042 = 79.83%
IWC @ QA = 22.52%
Stream Class: C
Outfall 601
Qw=12MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
(1)
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
a
co
z
M
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WQS! Chronic Applied Standard
5i FAV / Acute
n
# Del Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Arsenic
Arsenic
C
C
50'
10 .
FW(7Q10s)
HH(Qavg)
ug/L
ug/L
17
17
0
0
3.4
3.4
Acute: NO WQS
__ _ _ _____ ____
Chronic: 54
No value > Allowable Cw
Chronic: 44
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RPA, Predicted Max < 50%f Cw - No
Monitoring required
No RPA, Predicted Max < 50% of Cw - No
Monitoring required
Beryllium
NC
6.5
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
-_ _ ---- _
—Chronic:—7.1 ---
----------------------------
1 Cadmium
NC
' 2 `
FW(7Q10s)
15
ug/L
13
2
5.6
Acute: 16.0
--Chronic _ _------_---
2.2
7 value(s) > Allowable Cw
-- --------—--- --
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230,000
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
-_ _ ---_ _ _
—Chronic:-249-
,783
----------------------------
• Chromium
NC
'50!
FW(7010s)
1,022
ug/L
38
23
240.9
Acute: 1,093
Chronic: 54
1 value(sl > Allowable w
53' S
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Copper(AL)
NC
7
FW(7Q10s)
7.3
ug/L
107
107
208.0
Acute: 7.8
__ _ _ _____ ___
Chronic: 7.6
107 value(s) > Allowable CW
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
RPA for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Cyanide
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
22
10
ug/L
29
0
5.0
Acute: 24
__ _ _____ ____
Chronic: 5.4
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RPA but no values >Detect - apply Quarterly
Monitoring
Fluoride
NC
1,890
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ _ — — _ _ _
Chronic: 1,955
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lead
NC
25
FW(7Q10s)
33.8
ug/L
21
1
58.7
Acute: 36.2
Chronic: 27.2
No value > Allowable Cw
RPA but no values >Cw - apply Quarterly Monitoring
RPA but no values >Cw - apply Quarterly Monitoring
Page 1 of 2
24244newrpa2010qw12.xls, rpa
1/25/2011

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Outfall 'tool
Qw = 12 MGD
Chlorinated Phei:'lic Compounds
NC
1 A(30Q2)
10
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
----------------------------
Y Mercury
NC
12 FW(7Q10s)
0.5
ng/L
160 156
40
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 13 i
8 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Molybdenum
NC
2,000 HH(7Q10s)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
Chronic----- 2,172 �----------------------------
Nickel
NC
7-9 I Os
25) WS4 - 261
ug/L
20 3
60.0
Acute: 279
-_ _ _-_-_-_ __—
Chronic: 27
No value > Allowable Cw
----------------------------
RPA but no values >Cw - apply Quarterly Monitoring
Selenium
NC
5. FW(7Q10s) 56
ug/L
22 1
14.0
Acute: 60
-_
—Chronic: _ ------5 ---
3 value(s) > Allowable Cw
----------------------------
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Silver (AL)
NC
0.061 FW(7Q10s) 1.23
ug/L
43 1
11.69
Acute: 1.32
Chronic: 0.07
43 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RPA for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Zinc (AL)
NC
,' 50 FW(7010s) 67
ug/L
104 94
103.2
Acute: 72
Chronic: 54 '
6 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RPA for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute:
-----
-- _ ----------^---------------------
Chronic:
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute:
----------------------------
-_
—Chronic: _----------
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute:
-_
—Chronic: _--------------------------------------
uglL
0 0
N/A
Acute:
-- _--------------------------------------
Chronic:
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute:
_ _
--Chronic--------------------------------------
Page 2 of 2
24244newrpa2010gw12.xls, rpa
1/25/2011

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
Qw (MGD) = 16.00
1Q10S (cis) = 1.30
7Q10S (cfs) = 1.60
7Q10W (cfs) = 9.50
30Q2 (cfs) = 4.70
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cis) = 64.00
Receiving Stream: Long Creek
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
WWTP/WTP Class: IV
IWC @ 1Q10S = 95.02%
IWC @ 7Q10S = 93.94%
IWC @ 7Q10W = 72.30%
IWC @ 30Q2 = 84.07%
IWC @ QA = 27.93%
Stream Class: C
Outfali11101
Qw=16MGD .
PARAMETER
TYPE
(1)
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
a
a
co
z
m
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WQS/ Chronic Applied Standard
55 FAV/Acute
n
# Det Max Prod Cw Allowable Cw
Arsenic
Arsenic
C
C
50
10
FW(7010s)
HH(Qavg)
uglL
ug/L
17
17
0
0
3.4
3.4
Acute: NO WQS
- _- -_____ _-__
Chronic: 53
No value > Allowable Cw
Chronic: 36 —
No value > Allowable Cw
___________-_-_____________-
No RPA, Predicted Max < 50% of Cw - No
Monitoring required --_-_-_--_-_
Pre No RPA, dicted Max < 50% of Cw --NO—
Monitoring required
Beryllium
NC
6.5
FW(7Q10s)
uglL
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ __-__ _-_-
Chronic: 6.9
__------- __---- _____________
Cadmium
NC
2
FW(7Q10s)
15
ug/L
13
2
5.6
Acute: 15.8
--- _ -_-___ _---
Chronic: 2.1
7 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_-_-______-------- ___-__---
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230,000
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NOWQS
_ _ _______ _ __
Chronic: 244,837
_________-___________-_____
Chromlum
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
1,022
ug/L
38
23
240.9
Acute: 1,076
Chronic:
1 value(s) > Allowable Cw
5 2.. (o .
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Copper(AL)
NC
7
FW(7Q10s)
7.3
ug/L
107
107
208.0
Acute: 7.7
Chronic: 7.5
107 value(s) > Allowable CW
RPA for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Cyanide
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
22
10
ug/L
29
0
5.0
Acute: 23
__ _-_______ ____
Chronic: 5.3
No value > Allowable Cw
___________-_______________.
RPA but no values >Detect - apply Quarterly
Monitoring
Fluoride
NC
1,800
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
__-_-_ __
--Tro-r-i
Chronic: 1,916
--- ______________-_-_-_____
Lead
NC
25
FW(7010s)
33.8
ug/L
21
1
58.7
Acute: 35.6
---_ _-_-_-_ ____
Chronic: 26.6
No value > Allowable Cw
RPA but no values >Cw - apply Quarterly Monitoring
____----- __---- ------ ______-
RPA but no values >Cw - apply Quarterly Monitoring
Page 1 of 2
24244newrpa2010.xlsm, rpa
11/9/2010

Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
NC0024244
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
t.
r A
Outfalh .001
Qw=16MGD .
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1
A(30Q2)
10
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
-_ _-_-----__-------------------------------
Chronic: 1.2
w
Mercury
NC
12
FW(7Q10s)
0.5
ng/L
160
156
40
Acute: NO WQS
- _-_----- _---
Chronic: 13
10 value(s) > Allowable Cw
---------------------------_
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Molybdenum
NC
2,000
HH(7010s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
-_ _ _-----_ _ --
Chronic: 2,129
---------------------------
Nickel
NC
25
7Q {V.S
WS(99E1')-
261
ug/L
20
3
60.0
Acute: 275
Chronic 27 V
No value > Allowable Cw
RPA but no values >Cw - apply Quarterly Monitoring
Selenium
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
56
ug/L
22
1
14.0
Acute: 59
- _ _------__---
Chronic: 5
3 value(s) > Allowable Cw
---------------------------.
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Silver(AL)
NC
0.06
FW(7Q10s)
1.23
ug/L
43
1
11.69
Acute: 1.29
- _-_----- __--
Chronic: 0.06
43 value(s) > Allowable Cw
----------------------------
RPA for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Zinc (AL)
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
67
ug/L
104
94
103.2
Acute: 71
_-----_ _---
Chronic: 53
7 value(s) > Allowable Cw
------------_------_-------
RPA for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI)- apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
- ----------------------------------------
Chronic:
V
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
--------------------------------------� —Chronic__-
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
-- ------------------------------------
Chronic
---
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
--Chronic-----------
--
----------------------- ---
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute:
_
--Chronic: ----------
----------------------------
Page 2 of 2
24244newrpa2010.xlsm, rpa
11/9/2010

•Nowell, Jackie
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 11:18 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: Re: NC0024244 Long Creek in Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin
Good Morning Jackie,
I have completed my review of this draft permit and have no comments.
Please proceed to permit issuance at your earliest convenience.
Thank you,
Pamala Myers
404.562.9421
myers.pamala0epa.gov
Environmental Engineer and Technical Advisor I Pollution Control and Implementation Branch
Water Protection Division I Municipal and Industrial NPDES Section U.S. EPA, Region 4 161
Forsyth St. SW I Atlanta, GA 30303
1

North Carolina ) ss
Mecklenburg County)
The Charlotte Observer Publishing Co.
Charlotte, NC
Affidavit of Publication
THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
DINA SPRINKLE
NCDENR/DWO/POINT SOURCE BRANCH
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699
REFERENCE: 30063432
6550995 Npdes Permit
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly authorized to administer
oaths affirmations, etc., personally appeared,
being duly sworn or affirmed according to law,
doth depose and say that he/she is a
representative of The Charlotte Observer
Publishing Company, a corporation organized and
doing business under the laws of the State of
Delaware, and publishing a newspaper known as The
Charlotte Observer in the city of Charlotte,
County of Mecklenburg, and State of
and that as such he/she is familiar
books, records, files, and business
North Carolina
with the
of said
Corporation and by reference to the files of said
publication, the attached advertisement was
inserted. The following is correctly copied from
the books and files of the aforesaid Corporation
and Publication.
PUBLISHED ON: 03/08
AD SPACE:
FILED 0
NAM
64 LINE
03/10/11
TITLE:
DATE:
Public Notice
North Carolina Environmental Management
CommissionlNPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
•
Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit
propoNorth
ses to issuena NPDES wastewater Environmental dischargenagement Commission
permit to the
person(s) listed below.
Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be
accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. The
Director of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWO) may
hold a public hearing should there be a significant degree
of public interest. Please mail comments and/or Information
requests to DWO at the above address. Interested persons may
visit the DWO at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to
review information on file. Additional information on NPDES
permits and this notice may be found on our website:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swP1Ps/npdes/calendar, or by
calling [phone].
City of Albemarle requested renewal of permit NC0024244 for the
Long Creek WWTP in Stanley County. This permitted discharge is
treated municipal wastewater to Long Creek, Yadkin River Basin.
The City of Statesville requested modllication end renewal of
permit NC0020591 for the Third Creek WWTP in Irede(I County,
this permitted discharge is treated municipal and Industrial
wastewater to•Third Creek, Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin.
LP6550995
MAR 1 h41(A---
In Testimo ' hereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal, the
day :: year aforesaid.
Notary
My Commission Expires May 17, 2011
My Commission Expires: _/_/_

' .Nowell, Jackie
From: Krebs, Rob
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:05 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: Albemarle WVVTP
Jackie,
No comments on the draft permit.
Rob
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
Rob Krebs - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
Mooresville Surface Water Protection Section Supervisor
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
1

.Nowell, Jackie
From: Pohlig, Ken ----
Sent: Frida , February 25, 2011:51 PM
To: Nowel ,
Cc: Robertson, Seth; Colson, Kim
Subject: RE: Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP draft permit
Jackie:
Looks good. We here in CG&L would only have a few thoughts on two of the documents:
(1) On the FACT SHEET: You might consider looking at the firs sentence on page 1. You might say that the facility
has an "historical design capacity" of 16 MGD... etc., etc. "t3 `
(2) On the Draft NPDES Cover Letter:
C(a) It has come to my attention that Mr. Phillip Hazelwood, W&S Plants Supervisor, whom the Letter is
addressed, it not there anymore(Ieaving recently). You might ask the City who this should be addressed to.
(b) On the Cover Letter, Page 2, Bullet #1 at the top of the page: The last sentence might be re -worded to say
something like ..."Upon receipt of the ATC..., the facility will be rerated to 12 MGD, but will still maintain its
16 MGD flowsheet." Just a suggestion.
(3) On the NPDES Permit, Page 2, Item #1: Maybe it should say: "Historically or previously permitted at 16.0 MGD,
but now rerated to 12.0 MGD" ?? See (5) below.
(4) On the NPDES Permit, Page 2: We recommend that the WWTP description be "cleaned up" a bit, as this
description still includes processes from the old 1970's Plant which basically have been "moth -balled" along
time ago (like 30 years), and will never be brought back into service. Therefore, we would recommend
completely removing the following items:
(a) Dual gravity grit chambers (not in service)
(b) Preaeration basins (not in service)
(c) Primary clarifiers (not in service)
(d) Trickling filters (not in service), and
(e) Dissolved air flotation units (not in service)
(f) We recommend keeping the item "gravity tertiary filters (not in service)" because there has been some
discussion from the City about putting them back into service, but it will not likely happen.
(g) We recommend keeping the sludge units: Aerobic Digesters, Centrifuges and Sludge Dryer (correctly stated as
not in service).
(h) We recommend adding the following, to be added with this new ATC: Two (2) new mechanical bar screens and
two (2) manual by-pass bar screens, and new dual grit vortex removal systems , and new Tertiary Disk Filters.
(5) At first I thought that this sentence was backwards. Usually we issue the ATC, and THEN the WWTP gets
rerated. But then, I realized that maybe you switch it to imply that the issuance of this Permit changes the
flowsheet to 12 MGD even before we issue the ATC.... Which makes perfect sense! But, if this is the case,
maybe you need to highlight the idea that the issuance of your Permit automatically switches the flowsheet to
the 12 MGD number.... But that we still need to issue the ATC in order to do needed upgrades at the facility.
1

Anyway, just some thoughts!
Ken Pohlig
Construction Grants & Loans Section
715-6221
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:19 PM
To: Krebs, Rob; Bell, Wes; Pohlig, Ken
Subject: Albemarle - Long Creek WWTP draft permit
For your review and comments. I will send this permit to public notice on Wednesday, March 2nd. Please have any
comments, corrections, edits to me by Tuesday morning. Sorry for the short turnaround time.
Jackie
2

Date Evaluated:
Prepared by:
Metal
Copper
Zinc
Facili
ty
February 14, 2011
Kevin Bowden
Acute AL
Chronic AL 1/2 FAV Chronic CF Acute CF Kpo alpha WQCdis(chrnc) WQCdis(ac)
7 7.3 0.96 0.96 1.04E+06-0.7436 6.72 7.008
50 67 0.986 0.978 1.25E+06-0.7038 49.3 65.526
Toxicity
Permit No. Test Type Flow (MGD) 7Q10s
Albemarle WWTP
NC0024244
Chronic
16
1.6
Facility
Albemarle WWTP
NOTES:
Permit No.
NC0024244u
Cu Limit Zn Limit
gr
Cu instrn
IWC Subbasin TSS(15th ptcntl) Cu fD=cD/cT Zn fD=cD/cT (chronic
93.94 YAD13 2 4.46E-01 3.94E-01 15
(If blank, no RP to exceed the recalculated Action Level)
RP exists for Copper; RP does NOT exist for zinc
Data range: 12/06 through 11/10
Data NOT compared to hard copy in Central Files
(/ is 2'bl07 & rl` /l
Albemarle Cu Zn template.xls

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0024244, City of Albemarle WWTP
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
City of Albemarle/ Long Creek WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 190, Albemarle, NC 28002
Facility Address:
1040 Coble Avenue, Albemarle, NC 28002
Permitted Flow
16 MGD; 12 MGD
Type of Waste:
Domestic and Industrial
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Stanly
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Long Creek
Regional Office:
MRO
Stream Classification:
C
Quad
F 18SW
Albemarle
303(d) Listed?:
Yes; Copper
Permit Writer:
Jackie Nowell
Subbasin:
030713
Date:
February 10, 2011
Drainage Area (mi2):
C4
h
Summer 7Q 10 (cfs)
1.6
; y:. � ,�
.F"'
Winter 7Q10 cfsa
Average Flow (cfs):
64
r
IWC (%):
94
Primary SIC Code:
4952
Facility Overview
The facility has an "historical" design capacity for 16 MGD, however the plant is
seeking to rerate the capacity of the plant to 12.0 MGD based the specifications of the
influent lift stations. Construction Grants and Loans (CG&L) has been working with
Albemarle to determine the proper rating of the facility and will be issuing an
authorization to construct for the lower capacity. As part of the pending rerate, the
facility has requested the addition of an effluent limit page for 12 MGD in this permit
renewal. NPDES has determined that effluent limits for oxygen consuming parameters
of BOD5 = 10 mg/1 (summer);20 mg/1 (winter), NH3 = 2 mg/1 (summer); 4 mg/1
(winter) and DO = 5 mg/1 will remain the same at the rerated flow of 12 MGD.
Effluent limitations for metals and other toxicants will be reevaluated based on the
rerated design flow of 12 MGD. The effluent page for the historical design flow of 16
MGD will remain in the permit.
Staff notes that the Albemarle facility has been inadequately maintained and operated
for several years and therefore cannot adequately treat wastewater coming into the
plant. Aeration basins need to be cleaned, aeration blowers should be upgraded and
inflow and infiltration problems must be addressed through the collection system.
The existing wastewater treatment system consists of the following components:
> Mechanical bar screens with manual bypass screens
> Dual influent lift station (Screw pumps)
> Parshall flume with instrumental flow measurement
> Mechanical aeration basins
> Secondary clarifiers
> Gravity tertiary filters (not in service)
➢ Chlorination and dechlorination
> Instrumented effluent flow measurement
> Dual RAS lift stations (Screw pumps)
> Aerobic digesters (not in service)
Albemarle- Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 1

> Centrifuge (not in service)
> Sludge dryer system (not in service)
> Sludge holding tanks
> Sludge thickeners
The following components have been removed from the facility description and (per
CG&L) will not be brought back into service: dual gravity grit chambers, preaeration
basins, primary clarifiers, trickling filters and dissolved air flotation units.
With the Authorization to Construct that will be issued by CG&L, the following
equipment will be added:1) Two new mechanical bar screens , 2) two manual by-pass
bar screens, 3) dual grit vortex removal systems, and tertiary disk filters.
The facility serves the City of Albemarle and Stanly County (-15414 persons).
City of Albemarle has a full pre-treatment program with a Long Term Monitoring Plan
and has 4 SIUs (Significant Industrial Users) and 1 CIU (Categorical Industrial User)
per its application.
Receiving Stream
The City of Albemarle -Long Creek WWTP discharges treated municipal and industrial
wastewater to Long Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin. The stream
classification of this segment of the Long Creek is C. This segment of Long Creek,
from Little Long Creek to the Rocky River, is listed on the 2010 NC Impaired Streams
List (303d) for a standards violation for copper. The most recent ratings for the
stream are Good for the benthic data (2006) and Good for the fish community (2006).
Instream monitoring is required for temperature; dissolved oxygen, conductivity and
color.
Current instream monitoring sites are as follows :
Upstream = above the discharge point
Downstream 1 = Downstream at the end of NCSR 1960
Downstream2 = Downstream 3.9 miles at NCSR 1967
Downstream3 (for color samples only) = approximately 200 yards downstream from
the discharge point
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be
collected once per month in the winter (October through May) and once per week
during the summer (June through September) unless otherwise noted.
Review of instream data from 2007-2010: the dissolved oxygen standard of 5 mg/1 was
met most of the time at stations upstream and downstream of the WWTP. The
recorded violations of the DO standard occurred first at the upstream station (1000 ft
above the outfall). The average DO upstream of the facility was approx. 4.25 mg/1 in
June and July 2008. However, both downstream DO averages were above 5 mg/1 in
July 2008. In 2007, upstream DO averages in May, August and September were
around 4.1 mg/1. Only in May 2007 were the downstream stations also less than 5
mg/1. Overall, the DO standard downstream of the Albemarle facility is being met.
There is some factor upstream that causes the substandard DO values. The 2008
Yadkin River Basin Management Plan indicates that Long Creek is impacted by low
DO from natural conditions. Based on this data, we recommend that the instream
monitoring frequency remain at once per week in the summer and once per month in
the winter.
Instream color data
Review of upstream and downstream color data for 2008 through 2010 shows that
color is increasing upstream of the Albemarle WWTP, as well as in the effluent. Based
on these two instances, color downstream of the plant is also increasing. There is still
Albemarle- Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 2

apparent color in the stream based on staff observations, therefore we recommend
continuation of the instream color monitoring program. Albemarle should continue to
monitor color at the upstream station and at the downstream station 200 yards below
the discharge.
Toxicity Testing
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail (Quarterly)
Existing Limit: 001: Chronic P/F @ 90%
Recommended Limit: 001: Chronic P/F @ 90%
Monitoring Schedule: March, June, September, and December
The facility had passed all quarterly toxicity tests from March 2006 until June 2008,
when there was one failure. The follow-up tests were Passes. Since June 2008, the
facility has passed all toxicity tests. It is recommended that the Chronic Pass/Fail
toxicity test be continued at both flows of 12 and 16 MGD.
Compliance History
The City of Albemarle has been in significant noncompliance with permit limits,
monitoring, and facility performance for the past three years. Because of the
continuous poor operation and maintenance of the WWTP, The Division has issued
several civil penalities and the most recent assessment (April 2009) totaled nearly
$75,000 because of intentional bypasses, failures to report the bypasses and failure to
operate and maintain the WWTP. From September 2008 to present, other civil
penalties (11) issued against the City of Albemarle for limits and monitoring
violations, totaled nearly $14,500. In addition, DWQ staff has conducted numerous
technical assistance visits to help guide treatment plant employees toward
compliance. However, due to the poor condition of the treatment plant, numerous
problems continue to exist.
The City has recently applied for a loan from DWQ's Construction Grants and Loans
(CGB&L) to upgrade and repair portions of the treatment plant. CG&L is also working
with engineering consultants to rerate the plant for a lower wasteflow due to pump
station size. A Special Order by Consent (SOC) has also been applied for BOD, TSS,
BOD and TSS percent removal and Ammonia. The SOC application is inhouse and
being evaluated and reviewed by DWQ staff for completeness prior to issuance.
Reasonable Potential Analysis
The following metal parameters were limited or monitored in the existing NPDES
permit: Mercury, Copper, Silver and Zinc.
Data for these additional parameters was reported in the discharge monitoring
reports: Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Cyanide, Lead, Nickel, and Selenium as
a requirement of the long term monitoring program for pretreatment.
Reasonable potential analysis was conducted at . oth 12 and 16 VIGD based on data
from 2007 through 2010. Results and data analy';'s are at ache . a.
Based on the Reasonable Potential Analysis, llowin:are e
Y�recommended
IS
Monthly limits for cadmium, chromic , and merc . The results for these three
constituents had max. predicted value that exceed d the allowable concentrations.
All showed reasonable potential to ex eed the allable concentrations. Per DWQ
NPDES procedure, monthl s' :e d dail mum'limits will be ' si d�for
these parameters. ©�i '� \ �M�V"
Quarterly monitoring
reasonable potential,
• cyanid
o - ver a re
Albemarle- Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 3
1 analysis showed
es above detection

or no values greater than the allowable concentration. Per current DWQ NPDES
procedure, the parameters should be monitored quarterly.
Quarterly monitoring for silver and zinc. These parameters have NC action level
standards. All analysis showed reasonable potential to exceed the allowable
concentration. Per current DWQ NPDES procedure, the parameters should be
monitored quarterly and in conjunction with the whole effluent toxicity test.
Monthly monitoring for copper should be in the permit. As a parameter with a NC
action level standard and showing reasonable potential, quarterly monitoring would
normally be recommended. However, because the receiving stream, Long Creek, is
impaired for copper, DWQ is recommending that 1) copper be monitored monthly, 2)
upstream and downstream monitoring for copper to determine the contribution of the
Albemarle WWTP to the impairment, and 3) the facility should also review and
evaluate for contributors of copper to the treatment system.
Results of the RPA for arsenic showed no reasonable potential for exceedance of the
allowable concentrations. Arsenic can continue to be monitored as a part of the
pretreatment LTMP.
PROPOSED CHANGES
• Addition of monthly average and daily maximum limits for cadmium and
chromium.
• Mercury limit changed from weekly average limit only to monthly average and
daily maximum limit. Frequency changed from weekly to monthly based on
new DWQ procedure for monitoring frequencies. Mercury limit corrected from
13 ng/1 to 12 ng/1/
• Quarterly monitoring for cyanide, lead, nickel and selenium added based on
RPA results.
• Twice per month monitoring for silver and zinc reduced to quarterly based on
new DWQ procedure for monitoring frequencies.
• Twice per month monitoring for copper reduced to monthly based on DWQ
procedure for monitoring frequencies.
• Upstream and downstream monitoring for copper added to permit based on
Long Creek's 303d listing for copper.
Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: March 2, 2011
Permit Scheduled to Issue: April 25, 2011 (est.)
State Contact:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit,
please contact Jackie Nowell at [phone]
NAM
/A1
DATE: �j Z/4t/
.r
Albemarle- Long Creek WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 4

Nowell, Jackie
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:46 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie:
Just got off the phone with Ben Clawson (Engineer), and he said we'll go ahead and get the
City to mail into your office the request to de -rate the Albemarle flow to an even 12.0 MGD.
So, I wanted to let you know, just in case you haven't heard that.
Ken Pohlig
CG&L
Original Message
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 10:23 AM
To: Pohlig, Ken
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Thanks Ken. So there will be a rerating of the plant for 12.2 MGD or less (per your last
email)? No chance that it will be the 12.25 MGD that the City had once said? Just asking so
that I can do a preliminary reasonable potential analysis at the rerated flows.
Original Message
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 9:08 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie:
We are still in the preliminary review, and have just received the specifications.
They will need to alter the plans to take care of some bar screen details, etc.
I'll let you know for sure next week, I hope.
Hope that is ok.
Ken Pohlig
CG&L
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:14 PM
To: Pohlig, Ken
1

, Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Hello Ken,
Has ATC info been submitted? Has the rerating situation for the subject facility been
finalized?
Thanks
Jackie
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:16 PM
To: Colson, Kim; Nowell, Jackie; Krebs, Rob
Cc: Robertson, Seth
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie:
After further discussions with Kim Colson (who reminded me of a few things!)..., we should
modify my last e-mail to say that.. whereas at this point in time it appears that the new -re -
rating flow will be 12.2 MGD, it would be good for the NPDES Permit Unit to wait until CG&L
AND the Mooresville R.O. has time to review the actual submitted Plans and Specs and the full
design package BEFORE we make the final determination as to what the new re -rating flow
should be. It is possible that the proposed ATC package may have some design features and/or
calculations which could limit the re -rating number to something even lower than 12.2 MGD.
Therefore, to be on the safe side, can we officially wait until we (and the Mooresville R.O.)
have had time to do an initial review of the ATC Package BEFORE we give you a final re -rating
flow?
Ken Pohlig
CG&L
715-6221
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:01 PM
To: Colson, Kim; Nowell, Jackie; Krebs, Rob
Cc: Robertson, Seth
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Actually, Kim, I already have.
This is what Ben Clawson and I have been going `round and `round on over the last few weeks.
I think we now have enough information to say that the new re -rating number should be 12.2
MGD... Based on the limiting pumping capacity of Lift Station B.
(Unless you want to wait until we have the official ATC submittal.)
Ken
From: Colson, Kim
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:53 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie; Krebs, Rob
Cc: Pohlig, Ken; Robertson, Seth
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
2

Jackie - Keep in mind that we do not yet have a formal submittal for an AtC. Until we get
that,and complete a formal review of the entire WWTP we will not have final capacity
determination.
Ken - Once we have that submittal and are comfortable with a capacity number please convey
that to Jackie.
Thanks - KC
Original Message
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:28 AM
To: Robertson, Seth; Colson, Kim
Subject: FW: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Ben Clawson just yesterday sent me some updated pump information:
Influent Lift Station A has a slightly higher pump rating than Influent Lift Station B...
so B is the limiting factor here in determining that WWTP would be rated at (at about 12.25
MGD).
This sets the stage for this e-mail below.
Ken
Original Message
From: Ben Clawson [mailto:bclawson®mesco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 5:20 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie; Robertson, Seth; Pohlig, Ken
Subject: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie:
I wanted to update you on some of the progress that has been made in
regards to the safe re -rating of the Long Creek WWTP. After an ongoing
conversation with CG&L in regards to the maximum capacity of the
existing pump stations at the Long Creek WWTP it has been decided that a
3

rating of 12.25 MGD would be the maximum allowed under current North
Carolina rules. Would you be able to give any approximate time lines for
the NPDES unit to issue a re -rating after receiving the official
request by Albemarle?
I will be speaking with the City of Albemarle tomorrow to discuss this
information and whether they would like to ask for a re -rating of 12.25
MGD or 12 MGD. I will also be putting together a template letter that
will be signed by the Mayor or Manager of Albemarle to officially ask
the NPDES unit for this re -rating and amended flow sheet.
Thank you again for your time and assistance,
Ben
Benjamin D. Clawson, P.E.
Project Engineer
Municipal Engineering Services Company P.A.
P.O. Box 97
Garner, NC 27529
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax

01"1"Date
1/6/2010
1/19/2010
2/11/2010
2/23/2010
12/8/2009
11/4/2009
11/17/2009
10/6/2009
10/20/2009
9/2/2009
9/16/2009
8/5/2009
8/18/2009
7/2/2009
7/18/2009
4/8/2009
4/22/2009
Infl Adj Infl
89 92
Ups Adj Ups
48 55
95 97
Eff Adj Eff Dwn Adj Dwn
85 37 48 52
60 63 98 80 •
71 70 26 27 52 51
74 84 44 44 61 62
54 59 <20 38 45 50 •
48 49 91 64 52 48
77 81 42 47 60 62
153 84 66 112 131 85
32 74 77 46 ' 52
150 65 80 89
46 80 77
104.5
3/25/2009 <25
10/15/2008
10/29/2008
12/3/2008 66
12/18/2008 124
69 87
68 91 101
<20 •<20 <20
107 88 87 92
29 <25
27
15
17
33
44
<25
41
36
28.5
33
26
29
26
37
Upstream- 1000 ft above effluent
Downstreaml - 200 yards below effluent
Downstream2 - State Road 1960
Downstream3 - NCSR 1967
Adj pH - 7.6 SU
Influent Color in Platinum Cobalt
Influent color in ADMI

Date Infl Adj Infl Ups Adj Ups Eff Adj Eff Dwn Adj Dwn
11/6/2008 51 39
11/28/2008 39 46 •
9/3/2008 40 21 29
9/18/2008 32 34 37
8/6/2008 22 29 30
8/21/2008 34 34 33
7/9/2008 32 31 32
7/23/2008 24 38 41
6/5/2008 25 45 42
6/24/2008 28 34 35
5/7/2008 32 28 32
5/21/2008 26 37 32
4/9/2008 25 72 40
4/21/2008 21 40 24
3/13/2008 22 37 31
3/26/2008 25 22
2/13/2008 16 35 26
2/27/2008 18 39 29
1/9/2008 13 83 58
1/30/2008 15 57 41

v,OS _v Lrry
,sf. 30
tliuc 0 3q
7 CM

City of Albemarle
North Carolina
PO Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002-0190
www.ci.albemarle.nc.us
October 20, 2010
Gil Vinzani, P.E.
NCDENR-DWQ
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27966-1617
Raymond I. Allen
City Manager
Phone — 704-984-9408
Fax — 704-984-9406
ral [e-mail]
Re: City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP — NPDES Permit Number: NC0024244
Modifications to the Existing NPDES Permit
Dear Mr. Vinzani:
The City of Albemarle requests a modification to the existing NPDES permit for the grit
removal system and for a revised flow sheet for 12 MGD at the Long Creek WWTP. The
grit removal structures will be installed directly after the influent screw pumps, and will
help remove grit and heavy particles before the aeration basins. The revised flow sheet
for 12 MGD will cover the grit removal system, fine bar screens, and the tertiary filters at
the WWTP. The revised average daily flow for the Long Creek WWTP will be 12 MGD
and this rerating will allow the City of Albemarle to make the needed upgrades at a
decreased capital cost.
The City of Albemarle is in the process of requesting an Authorization to Construct from
the Construction Grants and Loans Section of the Division of Water Quality.
A copy of the existing NDPES permit is enclosed for convenience.
If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free to call me at ( )
or Ben Clawson at [phone]. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
0 1incereIy,
aymond I. Allen
City Manager
7;7
N O V 2010
POINT 3O u ZUE BRANCH

Notes on the Albemarle WWTP rerating 9/15/2010
Telecon with Ken Pohlig, CG&L
Asked Ken, if the Albemarle plant is rerated, would they still want to keep the 16 MGD page of the
permit? Email from Town's engineer made it seem that they would only want 12 or 12.25 MGD. Ken
states that he thinks that Albemarle wants to keep the 16 MGD effluent page. They are about to submit
for SRF funds of about $6M to fix valves, slide gates, and nonfunctional filters.
When it became clear that engineers were using a peaking factor of 2.0 — CG&L can't justify the low
peaking factor. After getting more data, the peaking factor is about 2.5 not 3.0. The 1970 design of the
plant, the 2.0 peaking factor was okay. But now CG&L can't rate the plant at 16 MGD anymore, they
would have to derate the plant, that's why the request for the rerating to a lower flow page. With 16
MGD (design capacity) for an avg. daily flow, pumps have to be able to pump peak hour flow (which
would be higher than 16 MGD). Their pumps can't do a 2.5 flow rate which would be up to 40 MGD.
There is an old plant (built in the 40s or 50s) and a new plant built in 1970's. There is gravity flow
through the plant. There are A & B pump stations. The City needs to spend about $2M to replace the
pumps. There will be some pump replacement with the CG&L project but those pumps will not increase
the capacity. They cannot get any credit for any increased capacity at these pumps.
The actual rerated flow per Ken Pohlig is 12.2 MGD. The B pump station is the limiting factor. With
the rerating CG&L would give an ATO & and ATC. The plant cannot be rated at 16 MGD based on the
existing flow pumps. The pump capacity is not truly rated for 16 MGD. The treatment trains are sized
correctly. In 1970, the plant was rated at 16 MGD. Pumps used a different peaking factor. There is so
much I&I, now seeing higher peaks.
Based on a site visit, there is a huge need for maintenance at the plant. Even if pump in brand new
shape, can't pump peak hour flow at 16 MGD. He would prefer that plant not lose the 16 MGD page
because the rest of the plant can handle 16 MGD.
*email followed from Ken and Kim Colson that indicated that MRO would need to review the CG&L
project also before the final decision on the rerating flow is made.

•
. Nowell, Jackie
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:16 PM
To: Colson, Kim; Nowell, Jackie; Krebs, Rob
Cc: Robertson, Seth
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie:
After further discussions with Kim Colson (who reminded me of a few things!)..., we should
modify my last e-mail to say that.. whereas at this point in time it appears that the new -re -rating flow will
be 12.2 MGD, it would be good for the NPDES Permit Unit to wait until CG&L AND the Mooresville R.O. has time to
review the actual submitted Plans and Specs and the full design package BEFORE we make the final determination
as to what the new re -rating flow should be. It is possible that the proposed ATC package may have some design
features and/or calculations which could limit the re -rating number to something even lower than 12.2 MGD.
Therefore, to be on the safe side, can we officially wait until we (and the Mooresville R.O.) have had time to do an initial
review of the ATC Package BEFORE we give you a final re -rating flow?
Ken Pohlig
CG&L
715-6221
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:01 PM
To: Colson, Kim; Nowell, Jackie; Krebs, Rob
Cc: Robertson, Seth
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Actually, Kim, I already have.
This is what Ben Clawson and I have been going 'round and 'round on over the last few weeks.
I think we now hay? enough information to say that the new re -rating number should be 12.2 MGD...
Based on the limiting pumping capacity of Lift Station B.
(Unless you want to wait until we have the official ATC submittal.)
Ken
From: Colson, Kim
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:53 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie; Krebs, Rob
Cc: Pohlig, Ken; Robertson, Seth
Subject: RE: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie — Keep in mind that we do not yet have a formal submittal for an AtC. Until we get that and complete a formal
review of the entire WWTP we will not have final capacity determination.
Ken — Once we have that submittal and are comfortable with a capacity number please convey that to Jackie.
Thanks — KC
1

, 'Original Message
From: Pohlig, Ken
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:28 AM
To: Robertson, Seth; Colson, Kim
Subject: FW: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Ben Clawson just yesterday sent me some updated pump information:
Influent Lift Station A has a slightly higher pump rating than Influent Lift Station B...
so B is the limiting factor here in determining that WWTP would be rated at (at about 12.25
MGD).
This sets the stage for this e-mail below.
Ken
Original Message
From: Ben Clawson rmailto:bclawsonOmesco.coml
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 5:20 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie; Robertson, Seth; Pohlig, Ken
Subject: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie:
I wanted to update you on some of the progress that has been made in
regards to the safe re -rating of the Long Creek WWTP. After an ongoing
conversation with CG&L in regards to the maximum capacity of the
existing pump stations at the Long Creek WWTP it has been decided that a
rating of 12.25 MGD would be the maximum allowed under current North
Carolina rules. Would you be able to give any approximate time lines for
the NPDES unit to issue a re -rating after receiving the official
request by Albemarle?
I will be speaking with the City of Albemarle tomorrow to discuss this
information and whether they would like to ask for a re -rating of 12.25
MGD or 12 MGD. I will also be putting together a template letter that
will be signed by the Mayor or Manager of Albemarle to officially ask
the NPDES unit for this re -rating and amended flow sheet.
Thank you again for your time and assistance,
Ben
Benjamin D. Clawson, P.E.
Project Engineer
Municipal Engineering Services Company P.A.
P.O. Box 97
Garner, NC 27529
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax
2

' .Nowell, Jackie
From: Ben Clawson [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 5:20 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie; Robertson, Seth; Pohlig, Ken
Subject: City of Albemarle WWTP re -rating
Jackie:
I wanted to update you on some of the progress that has been made in regards to the safe re -
rating of the Long Creek WWTP. After an ongoing conversation with CG&L in regards to the
maximum capacity of the existing pump stations at the Long Creek WWTP it has been decided
that a rating of 12.25 MGD would be the maximum allowed under current North Carolina rules.
Would you be able to give any approximate time lines for the NPDES unit to issue a re -rating
after receiving the official request by Albemarle?
I will be speaking with the City of Albemarle tomorrow to discuss this information and
whether they would like to ask for a re -rating of 12.25 MGD or 12 MGD. I will also be putting
together a template letter that will be signed by the Mayor or Manager of Albemarle to
officially ask the NPDES unit for this re -rating and amended flow sheet.
Thank you again for your time and assistance, Ben
Benjamin D. Clawson, P.E.
Project Engineer
Municipal Engineering Services Company P.A.
P.O. Box 97
Garner, NC 27529
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax

Note to Albemarle File
4/21/2010 - Received call from Jarvis (Koonce) who works for the City of Albemarle WWTP. He asked
when draft permit would be send and if I could put something in the permit that would make the higher
ups take notice. Reports that his superiors don't want to put any money into the WWTP. That things
are "no good" He wants tighter limits or something that would cause some action from his bosses.
Recommends getting SC or someone involved to get their attention. Stated no one's scared of the
Riverkeeper. Said if any additional info is needed he would supply but he's only been there since
October 2009. The previous superintendent did the application. He knew things were bad but he didn't
realize it was this bad. Does not think much of the new ORC. Will await his permit but something needs
to be done.

thtbo
/Y(2//
z/
zisiu
occ1L-c La/21c,C 79: y29, 6
int-C1- j -� `4M • c/r r
(__4,4 Ut s3'
/4n.
J«3
c« �ncelebi)
mif dI#
Vic "
,x, ff a3
AVM ii-C4AAGLIZZ GO
*frato 4 A .
luti
/� a/is
0/44
//
/ 7035: 3J
T /0 g s; 30
Zco. 3"°
1.4 /y 3 s 3Z
o
7/o, 37
3ogod y
Z580, 7s�
20 8S, 77
/$-ec.79/
// dyirfc-1'
744c f lyeA41-4 'peed
ceple.e.,4„—/k/d 64r4/.e-c/A0 -7#4,0/ cdcest/4, fi)c.
Crcci

✓ Of 7
NCav 2 q ' it
/7 (—e/ i7L6h?,/o)
7//1 Zdag- udi
/A'
OiC
,4i - dN
r-
u
viUt14
Y//lei AYJ

a:n.43
ar14/ 8/yzo/b
1. Continue to operate and maintain the existing 16.0 MGD wastewater treatment system consisting of the
following components:
➢ Mechanical bar screens with manual bypass screen
➢ Dual gravity grit chambers (not in-service)
> Dual Influent lift stations (Screw Pumps)
> Parshall flume with instrumental flow measurement
➢ Preaeration basins (not in-service)
➢ Primary clarifiers (not in-service)
> Trickling filters (not in-service)
➢ Mechanical aeration basins
> Secondary clarifiers
> Gravity tertiary filters (not in-service)
> Chlorination and dechlorination
➢ Instrumented effluent flow measurement
> Dual RAS lift stations (Screw Pumps)
➢ Aerobic digesters (not in-service)
➢ Centrifuge (not in-service)
> Sludge Dryer System (not in-service)
> Dissolved -air flotation units (not in-service)
> Sludge holding tanks
> Sludge thickeners
> Standby Power
This facility is located in Albemarle on the Coble Avenue Extension at the Long Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant in Stanly County.
* the treatment units listed as "not in-service" are still on -site but have been taken out of the operational
process and/or no water is passing through these units.
** don't know if you would want to include a statement regarding the ATC and the involved upgrades.

2/25/2011 IWC Calculations
Albemarle WWTP
NC0024244
Prepared By: RDB
Enter Design Flow (MGD):
Enter s7Q10(cfs):
Enter w7Q 10 (cfs):
Total Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (l
IWC (%)
Allowable Conc. (ug/l)
Fecal Limit
(If DF >331; Monitor)
(If DF <331; Limit)
Dilution Factor (DF)
12.000
1.600
9.500
Assume upstream TRC level = 0
Assume upstream Fecal level = 0
Check Box if WTP Facility ❑
Enter Upstream NH3-N Level (mg/L):
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
1.6 7Q10 (CFS)
12 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
18.6 DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (I
92.08 IWC (%)
18 Allowable Conc. (mg/I)*
WEEKLY AVG LIMIT (mg/I)
2001100m1
1.09
Check other limit docs such as basin plan or model
NPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (I
IWC (%)
Allowable Conc. (mg/I)*
WEEKLY AVG LIMIT (mg/I) •
* MONTHLY AVG LIMIT
1.6
12
18.6
1.0
0.220
92.08
1.1
3.2
9.5
12
18.6
1.8
0.220
66.19
2.6
7.8
0.220
Limit MAX
35.0 mg!L
NON-POTW
1.1
5.3
(MONTHLY/DAILY)
NON-POTW
2.6
13.0
(MONTHLY/DAILY)
J(OU1G
D van b
2/25/2011

2/25/2011 IWC Calculations
Albemarle WWTP
NC0024244
Prepared By: RDB
Assume upstream TRC level = 0
Assume upstream Fecal level = 0
Check Box if WTP Facility ❑
Enter Design Flow (MGD):
Enter s7Q10(cfs):
Enter w7Q10 (cfs):
Total Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
IWC (%)
Allowable Conc. (ug/I)
Fecal Limit
(If DF >331; Monitor)
(If DF <331; Limit)
Dilution Factor (DF)
16.000
1.600
9.500
Enter Upstream NH3-N Level (mg/L):
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
1.6 7Q10 (CFS)
16 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
24.8 DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (
93.94 IWC (%)
18 Allowable Conc. (mgfl)*
WEEKLY AVG LIMIT (mgli)
200/100m1
1.06
Check other limit docs such as basin plan or model
NPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (
IWC (%)
Allowable Conc. (mg/I)*
WEEKLY AVG OMIT (mgll)
* MONTHLY AVG LIMIT
1.6
16
24.8
1.0
0.220
93.94
1.1
3.2
9.5
16
24.8
1.8
0.220
72.30
2.4
7.2
0.220
Limit MAX
35.0 mg/L
NON-POTW
1.1
5.3
(MONTHLY/DAILY)
NON-POTW
2.4
12.0
(MONTHLY/DAILY)
2/25/2011

Albemarle WWTP - existing Qw
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (I
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ug
Fecal Limit
Ratio of 0.1 :1
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
1.6 7Q10 (CFS)
16 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
24.8 DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
93.94 IWC (%)
18.10 Allowable Concentration (m
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
200/100mI DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (m
1.6
16
24.8
1.0
0.22
93.94
1.05
16
24.8
1.8
0.22
85:872.34
7, 4-H
Z.�
NC0024244
1/19/2011

Albemarle WWTP - existing Qw
Residual Chlorine
7010 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (l
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ug,
Fecal Limit
Ratio of 0.1 :1
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
1.6 7Q10 (CFS)
12 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
18.6 DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
92.08 IWC (%)
18.46 Allowable Concentration (m
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7010 (CFS)
200/100m1 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (m
1.6
12
18.6
1.0
0.22
92.08
1.07
!./
4J
12
18.6
1.8
0.22
81-9-4C"C"_)99
--271-5 i Z,
141
Zt�
N C 0024244
1/19/2011

All Waters in NC lare in Category 5-303(d) List for Mercury due to statewide fish consumption advice for several fish species
AU Number AU Name AU Description LengthArea AU Units Classification
Parameter Reason for Rating Use Category Collection Year 303(d)year
Q 13-17b Rocky River
5 Copper
From mouth of Reedy Creek to mouth of 26.5 FW Miles C
Dutch Buffalo Creek
Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
5 Turbidity
Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin Long Creek Watershed 0304010504
Q 13-17-31-1 Little Long Creek From source to Long Creek 8.5 FW Miles C
5 Ecological/biological Integrity Benthos Fair Bioclassification Aquatic Life 2006 1998
Q 13-17-31b Long Creek From Little Long Creek to Rocky River 2.2 FW Miles C
5 Copper
Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin • Richardson Creek Watershed 0304010505
Q 13-17-36-4-(0.5) Little Richardson
Creek (Lake Monroe)
From source to a point 0.6 mile upstream 77.1 FW Acres WS-IV
of Buck Branch
5 Chlorophyll a Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008
(D 13-17-36-4-(2) Little Richardson From a point 0.6 mile upstream of Buck 38.7 FW Acres WS-IV;CA
Creek to Richardson Creek
Creek (Lake Monroe)
5 Chlorophyll a Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008
Q 13-17-36-(5)a1a Richardson Creek
From Monroe Water Supply Dam (Lake Lee) 8.2 FW Miles C
to MiII Creek 13-17-36-10
5 Ecological/biological Integrity Benthos Fair Bioclassification Aquatic Life 2006 1998
Q 13-17-36-(5)a1b Richardson Creek
5 Copper
From Mill Creek 13-17-36-10 to Watson 3.9 FW Miles C
Creek
Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Q 13-17-36-(5)a2
5 Copper
Richardson Creek From Watson Creek to Negro Head Creek 4.7 FW Miles C
(Salem Creek)
Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Q 13-17-36-(3.5)b
5 Chlorophyll a
Richardson Creek
(Lake Lee)
Entire Reservoir 106.4 FW Acres WS-IV;CA
Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008
5 High pH
Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Q 13-17-36-9-(1) Stewarts Creek
5 Ecological/biological Integrity Benthos
From source to a point 0.4 mile 8.3 FW Miles WS-III
downstream of mouth of Stumplick Branch
Fair Bioclassification Aquatic Life
2006 2008
rated Report Category 5-303(d) List EPA Submittal 20100329 Monday, March 29, 2010 Page 113 of 115

Yadkin-Peedee River Basin
Rocky River 8-Digit Subbasin 03040105
Assessment Unit Number Name
Description
Classification Old DWQ Subbasin Miles/Acres
Use
Support
Category
Use
Support
Rating
Reason for
Rating
Parameter of
Interest
Collection Listing IR
Year Year Category
13-17-40-(1) Lanes Creek
From source to Marshville Water Supply Dam (located 0.1 mile downstream of Beaverdam
Creek)
WS-V 03-07-14 27.4 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Fair Bioclassification
Ecological/biological Integrity 1989 2004 5
Benthos
13-17-40-(12) Lanes Creek
From Marshville Water Supply Dam (located 0.1 mile downstream of Beaverdam Creek) to
Rocky River
03-07-14 27.1 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Fair Bioclassification
Ecological/biological Integrity 1996 1998 5
Benthos
13-17-31-1 Little Long Creek
From source to Long Creek
C 03-07-13
8.5 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Fair Bioclassification
Ecological/biological Integrity 2006 1998 5
Benthos
13-17-36-4-(0.5) Little Richardson Creek (Lake Monroe)
From source to a point 0.6 mile upstream of Buck Branch
WS-IV
03-07-14 3.8 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Standard Violation
Chlorophyll a
2006 2008 5
13-17-36-4-(2) Little Richardson Creek (Lake Monroe)
From a point 0.6 mile upstream of Buck Creek to Richardson Creek
WS-IV;CA 03-07-14 0.6 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Standard Violation
Chlorophyll a
2006 2008 5
13-17-5b Mallard Creek
From Stoney Creek to Rocky River
C 03-07-11
4.8 FW Miles
Aquatic Life
Aquatic Life
Aquatic Life
Impaired
Impaired
Impaired
Standard Violation
Standard Violation
Fair Bioclassification
Copper
Turbidity
Ecological/biological Integrity
Benthos
2008
2006
2003
2008 5
2008 5
2008 4s
13-17-8-4 McKee Creek
From source to Reedy Creek
03-07-11 6.9 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Data Inconclusive
Aquatic Life Impaired Fair Bioclassification
Recreation Impaired Standard Violation
Sediment Historic Listing 1998 1998 5
Ecological/biological Integrity 2003 2008 5
Benthos
Fecal Colifonn (recreation) 1998 1998 4a
13-17-20-1 North Fork Crooked Creek
From source to Crooked Creek
C 03-07-12 12.0 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Standard Violation
Aquatic Life Impaired Fair Bioclassification
Turbidity
2006 2004 5
Ecological/biological Integrity 2000 1998 4s
Benthos
13-17-8 Reedy Creek
From source to Rocky River
03-07-11
15.2 FW Miles
Aquatic Life Impaired Fair Bioclassification
Ecological/biological Integrity 2003 2008 5
Benthos
Waters are in Category 5 due to statewide Fish Consumption Advice for Mercury Category 5 Assessments require TMDL development per Clean Water Act Section 303(d)
orth Carolina Integrated Report Category 4 and 5 Impaired Waters List- 2010311 Page 137 of 139

l
S� z / Yu 0
(7,4‘4,-
¢/zer,v—
;WO/ /l�e)v 6
zo-vg

NPDES/Aquifer Protection Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
PART:
PERMIT WRITERS - AFTER you get this form
PERMIT WRITER COMPLETES THIS
back from PERCS:
Check all that apply
Notify PERCS if LTMP/STMP data we said should
Date of Request
8/4/2009
municipal renewal
x
be on DMRs is not really there, so we can get it for
Requestor
Jackie Nowell
new industries
you (or NOV POTW).
Facility Name
Albemarle
WWTP expansion
- Notify PERCS if you want us to keep a specific
Permit Number
NC0024244
Speculative limits
POC in LTMP/STMP so you will have data for next
Region
MRO
stream reclass.
permit renewal.
Email PERCS draft permit, fact sheet, RPA.
Basin
Yadkin/Pee Dee
stream relocation
- Send PERCS paper copy of permit (w/o NPDES
7010 change
boilerplate), cover letter, final fact sheet. Email RPA
other
if changes.
other
check applicable
PERCS staff:
Other Comments
to
PERCS:
510S^`-f cI(A=I
CTB, CHO, LUM, NEW, ROA - Dana Folley (523)
�'j� a )
X
HIW, LTN, NEU, YAD - Monti Hassan (371)
1 'i C{ U f f — cr(C '. S '%ri
BRD, CPF, FRB, TAR - Sarah Morrison (208)
PERCS PRETREATMENT STAFF COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status of Pretreatment Program (check all that apply)
1) facility has no SIU's, does have Division approved Pretreatment Program that is INACTIVE
2) facility has no SIU's, does not have Division approved Pretreatment Program
3) facility has SlUs and DWQ approved Pretreatment Program (list "DEV' if program still under development)
V
3a) Full Program with LTMP
3
3b) Modified Program with STMP
4
4) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below
STMP time frame:
Most recent:
Flow, MGD
Permitted
Actual
Time period for Actual
Next Cycle:
Industrial
a� O
Uncontrollable
nn//a
< 476
,1
POC In
LTMP/
STMP
Parameter of
Concern (POC)
Check List
POC due to
NPDES/ Non-
Disch Permit
Limit
Required
by EPA'
Required
by 503
Sludge'
POC due
to SIU"'
POTW POC
(Explain
below)""
STMP
Effluent
Freq
LTMP
Effluent
Freq
D'1-fv 110(
V
BOD
✓
heN3c.
4
Q M
y'
TSS
4
Q M
\=Quarter)
V
NH3
V
M
4
Q M
M= Monthly
V
Arsenic
\/
4
Q M
Ni
Cadmium
\I
4✓
V
4
Q M
J
Chromium
-4
V,
4
Q M
C
Copper
-1
//
✓
4
Q M
V
Cyanide
✓
4
Q M
all data on DMRs?
4
Lead
-4
✓
✓
4
Q M
YES
/
Mercury
V
V/
4
Q M
NO (attach data)
V
Molybdenum
t/
4
Q M
'I
Nickel
4
V
V
4
Q M
V
Silver
IV.
4
Q M
✓
Selenium
✓
/
4
Q M
-,1
Zinc
4✓
V
4
Q M
data in spreadsheet?
Total Nitrogen
4
Q M
YES (email to writer)
P
Phosphorus
4
Q M
NO
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
*Always in the LTMP/STMP ** Only in LTMP/STMP if sludge land app or composte (dif POCs for incinerators)
"' Only in LTMP/STMP while SIU still discharges to POTW "" Only in LTMP/STMP when pollutant is still of concern to POTW
Comments to Permit Writer (ex., explanation of any POCs; info you have on IU related investigations into NPDES problems):
albemarlepirt
Revised: July 24, 2007

5-33,g 1- J;3Y` /z
iy, f (5), ZO Jf3A) (t )
//3 : z /E (S>
-5V S� J(o)( /o Xi, ?
/I
Z c x 8, 3 y = 26 6 e, " *-/ce
l33Y, 5Y=rZ/460 _ i 3, 3 nyte (s)
Z , v° zYy / a/f e z(0, 6 7/? /3op5(w/
{Ntf3 /Q, (S) x Z X 3y _ Z6c�, , 4/c{
�r
(4„) = 7c x. x = c,z241-4,(
(a6 5 ), 34 /z _ .Z 7 ' fl ,,C' 4/y'
3, .3 I /e 4r1//7,4
J
/ Z // 2
10,(- 5 , /3,. ,p ja orv5—(w%= 2c, c
/ (s% _ , 7 A, �3dx'SCw2 3;3 °4/(c.
;f
/ 6 /11 / 2 4160
,v,;(,ft£/ i3dt'(
f i v /V/7/3
/ 3, 3 rip
Z iy a 2,7 -,/e
w14/f' door 20 71(
L✓r,�f4i Al(i)
477e 5; 7-ye

P O Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002-0190
www.ci.albemarle.nc.us
eitp of ttbt marfe
ortlj Carolina
4*
May 6, 2009
Gil Vinzani, Supervisor, Eastern NPDES Program
NC Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27966-1617
Department of Public Utilities
Phone - 704-984-9609
Fax - 704-984-606
RECEIVED
DENR - WATER QUALITY
Subject: City of Albemarle Long Creek Wastewater Treatment P1arIPOINT SOURCE BRANCH
Minor Modifications to the Existing NPDES Permit
NPDES Permit Number: NC0024244
Dear Mr. Vinzani:
The City of Albemarle requests a Minor Modification to the existing NPDES permit for a grit
removal system at the existing 16 MGD Long Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. The grit
removal structures will be installed immediately after the screw pumps and before the
aeration basins. This process will remove grit and other heavy particles as well as provide
some aeration to the sewage. The addition of this treatment process will not increase or
decrease the treatment capacity.
The City of Albemarle is in the process of requesting an Authorization to Construct from the
Construction Grants & Loans Section of the Division of Water Quality.
A copy of the existing NPDES permit is enclosed for ease of reference.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call me at
[phone] or Amy Ratliff, P.E. at [phone]. Thank you for your consideration in
this matter.
Sincerely
Ernest D. Borders, MS, EI, CET
Director of Public Utilities
Cc: Amy Ratliff, P.E. Municipal Engineering Services
file

W-2:7/0j
ZI-of (40 (e-Aek)
Lrp131- 1- 1114- 1.1144
179
ci•vilirteriar_g_hd tivaA cie(eir Jt.felf,
d-reohnmi L4,brANy6.,., 4 a mieo
et 1- qyy,e 1..14

reonewile
Albemarle WWTP ,Gta l _ F� 7 Z(TD'3'✓m
trevbe,a- 40
bAWLJI'M,#O y i ✓f
Subject: Albemarle WWTP comp/IA/me,1.)) tie")
From: Rob Krebs <[e-mail]> l "�
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:56:54 -0400
To: Tom Belnick <[e-mail]>
(,S95(brna4ww7P
r12'1l
Tom,
Before this gets approved, please call me. Next week would be fine. We met with them on Thursday.
Rob
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Rob Krebs - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Cell [phone]
Ph: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
3/17/07—
— RJR. bad Arto u+�/
Si C hi h 1 ,+Ah-ogyl;o.«+.1/Na✓
MFo Aa, rsa� O i1 crncIMV, 4#11
1 04." p.,f y-"vi
— 1401'h S Iktel re 144 ..14)44, e*.
up,4 mf Aneelp) //M75-
jaihvLopAA.0
MAO Sri? evs4- erdi
ThA') nzAti 04,1,1,,,,
° s (4/..c d
dim
keih)
1 of 1
3/20/2009 3:05 PM

Re: [Fwd: Re: Albemarle]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Albemarle]
From: Tom Belnick <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:29:08 -0400
To: Barbara Sifford <[e-mail]>
Looks like Long Creek flows into Rocky River. Long Creek is not listed as impaired on the 2006 303(d)
list, so I don't see anything pointing to nutrient limits at this time. But permit file contained comments
from last permit round, so there is public interest in this permit renewal, and we'll re-evaluate existing
permit limits. Permit renewal has not started yet, I think it is assigned to Jackie Nowell.
Barbara Sifford wrote:
I had sent this request to Agyemang. I was wondering about future limits on Albemarle Long Creek
WWTP, both in this permit renewal and in the next 5 years if nutrient removal was something they
needed to consider in plant rehab since there is much to be done in the next several years. Thanks
for any ideas on where this might go.
Subject:
Re: Albemarle
From: Agyemang Adu-Poku <agyeman.adupoku a ncmail.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:40:38 -0400
To: Barbara Sifford <barbara.sifford a,ncmail.net>
To: Barbara Sifford <barbara.sifford ancmail.net>
Barbara:
I no longer work in the NPDES Unit so please contact Tom Belnick, NPDES West Supervisor for
assistance.
Thanks
Barbara Sifford wrote:
I am working on operational improvements that need to be made at this facility as a request for
Technical Assistance. I did not find a draft of the new permit to be issued this year in our files,
but I was wanting to check to see if the limits might remain the same for the next 5 years. (for
planning purposes) Specifically that the filters could be taken off the treatment components. I
am trying to determine where and how much money needs to be spent. I think Rob told you to
hold this renewal at this time from some problems that they were having.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
1 of 2 3/20/2009 3:15 PM

Re: [Fwd: Re: Albemarle] .
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Tom Belnick
Supervisor, Western NPDES Program
N.C. Division of Water Quality
919-807-6390
919-807-6495 (fax)
[e-mail]
2 of2
3/20/2009 3:15 PM

[Fwd: Re: Albemarle] 6/ lifyi g1tPt16? 1//t4 j91 'r1%i ! 4-41 s iksv w 0444.
(yl�i1) t &(bk, J'e 10,1(we
/( d e1st h G�✓ ,4�/rr)
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Albemarle] iN 1s e 3/13 < 0
From: Barbara Sifford <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:20:24 -0400
To: Tom Belnick <[e-mail]> SIC (TO 2 Y 2 VI
I had sent this request to emang. I was wondering about future limits on
Albemarle Long Creek WWT , both in this permit renewal and in the next 5 years if
nutrient removal was something they needed to consider in plant rehab since there is
much to be done in the next several years. Thanks for any ideas on where this might
go.
Barbara Sifford - Barbara.Sifford®ncmail.net
Technical Consultant
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality V /
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301 d /o L 3 z 3(dj, 4/tjvl4. 2'b
Mooresville, NC 28115 w T q�
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: [phone] N%1II4.4"
�CfdAIti Qr ✓-t&�h 03a713
M
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
************************************************************************
Subject: Re: Albemarle
From: Agyemang Adu-Poku <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:40:38 -0400
To: Barbara Sifford <[e-mail]>
Barbara:
I no longer work in the NPDES Unit so please contact Tom Belnick, NPDES West
Supervisor for assistance.
Thanks////''
Barbara Sifford wrote:
I am working on operational improvements that need to be made at this facility as
a request for Technical Assistance. I did not find a draft of the new permit to
be issued this year in our files, but I was wanting to check to see if the limits
might remain the same for the next 5 years. (for planning purposes) Specifically
that the filters could be taken off the treatment components. I am trying to
determine where and how much money needs to be spent. I think Rob told you to
hold this renewal at this time from some problems that they were having.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Agyemang Adu-Poku
Environmental Engineer II
NCDENR-Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
P: 919-508-8520
1 of 2 3/13/2009 5:39 PM

[Fwd: Re: Albemarle]
F: 919-733-4810
Email:[e-mail]
http://wastenotnc.org/
Re: Albemarle.eml
Content -Type: message/rfc822
Content -Encoding: 7bit
2 of2
3/13/2009 5:39 PM

/17444 .IL fir /47, l7r. 06 - o/zo oe/7/0„,,, .5--
/ z/3/zdlo
r
10fAr?- ‘tin- ag-mi /./v ctri f..4- la, /74101 4 e 1/74-my
„vd //v
/ /z�/zo/v
((ay- fesei ztid,
20y `/'
fU�YI i ddcS . %t/
//Mo 10
gO,C date
7/fiff /4/4o69 �f; ` �� �/ / .; '/ti,./
Ifft #-(AliCk in 7-4 /74 211. Pepn--41 1"'
e 74,L.
�1� � �'►�(��,,;� 10/,3 /wo 7 , , AAA.
i€4/44, /6n5
:,,et,d/y/.1�-:N ,�iiN� �o.� lid * t� „FJj.St 2014 - 2 ZvoS zoo C
Lr, /irnr, sos' zoo 9- 7 Zo 7 -
ZJ G ,S

/o/z-0°7—
/Zo1?
/// zoo €
Wzoog
40, G cd-1,q.
/v/Z o7 RA5-74-40,4604/—
/l/wok 4`ey1 ,

,'fie, y�r CGiL
wcvyd-/ 1,17,4 1/4"
d/4
47/z4-7-,
67,70,64.43) J.-15/T / 2-
/ J4 10
1/200e Y3
A /74 7
"7/140 y eic
61 zoo u USG.!
"14.,4 /70
10101 (o, 3 4,N. z
1/0
612efg.f/te71
44,
Y 1Co 3 F, 7
Zoe 7
cyf
,9/f4 7
zoo Y4 /yG U
1z7
74067
`(rf km) 3,
S;6 otriv
ZviG Itf'. 5J
7/WD 7 s 6 47<�. �. 6,2 4r0.. 5:8 - ,C; 41%r
4110,7
5%wo 1 ' It,1l,z y
it 1
y,Sh,,N 5,8

City of Albemarle
North Carolina
Philip Hazelwood
Water & Sewer Plants Superintendent
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
February 21, 2009
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR/DWQ/ Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: City of Albemarle Wastewater Treatment Plant Renewal
Dear Mrs. Dina Sprinkle:
Public Utilities Department
P. O. Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002-0190
www.ci.albemarle.nc.us
I am writing this in regards of our renewal of the City of Albemarle's Long Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit NC0024244 which expires on February 28, 2009. I sent the
original renewal request in August, it was suggested that we might be able to drop this additional
unit just recently so I am writing this request also. I would like to drop what is listed on our
current permit as Gravity tertiary filters. This unit does not work and after talking to many of our
employees who have been here many years they say it never worked since it was installed. For
many years we have been meeting our permit limits without them working they are more like a
pipe or hole that the water flows through. There has been no treatment from them for years and
there is no treatment now. Thank You for your time in this matter.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me at [phone]. Any comments you
may have are welcome.
Philip Hazelwood
Water & Sewer Plants Superintendent
Enclosure
CEIVED
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH

To: Western NPDES Unit
Surface Water Protection Section
Attention: Jackie Nowell
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
Date: September 4, 2008
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS _ , _
County: Stanly +'
NPDES Permit No.: NC0024244 I
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and address: Long Creek WWTP
% City of Albemarle
Post Office 190
Albemarle, N.C. 28002
Physical Location
1040 Coble Avenue
Albemarle, NC 28002
SEP 8 2008 IL:.
.
2. Date of investigation: January 6, 2005
3. Report prepared by: Michael L. Parker, Environmental Engineer II
4. Person contacted and telephone number: Phil Hazelwood, WWTP Superintendent, (704)
984-9630.
5. Directions to site: From the jct of Hwy. 24-27 and SR 1900 (Coble Ave.) southwest of
the City of Albemarle, travel south on SR 1900 ,,0.3 mile. The WWTP site is located on
the left side of this road.
6. Discharge point(s), list for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35 ° 19' 27"
Longitude: 80° 12' 56"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: F 18 SW
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application: Yes. Expansion area is
available, if necessary.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Gently rolling with slopes ranging
from 2-6%. The WWTP appears to be at or very near flood plain elevation.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Approx. 500± feet from the WWTP site.

Page Two
10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: Long Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin 030713
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Flow was
observed in the receiving stream (8-10 feet wide x 6-10 inches deep) at the time of
the site inspection. Downstream uses are primarily for secondary recreation and
agriculture. IWC = 1.6 cfs
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater: 16.0 MGD (Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity: 16.0 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of current facility (current design capacity): 16.0 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous ATCs issued in the
previous two years: There have been no ATCs issued in the past two years.
e. Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: The existing
WWT facilities consist of four mechanical bar screens followed by two gravity
grit chambers, an influent lift station, a parshall flume with instrumented flow
measurement, two preaeration basins, four primary clarifiers, four trickling filters,
four mechanical aeration basins, four secondary clarifiers, a gravity tertiary sand
filter*, a chlorine contact basin, sodium bisulfite disinfection, instrumented
effluent flow measurement, two aerobic digesters, and two sludge holding tanks.
* The tertiary filter is not in service at this time and the filter media has been
removed. In addition, grit collection, primary clarifiers, and trickling filters in an
abandoned portion of the WWTP are no longer being used. Consideration should
be given to removing these process from the facility description.
f. Description of proposed WWT facilities: There are no proposed WWT facilities at
this time.
g•
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Generally, this facility has a very good
compliance record for toxicity.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): Approved.
2. Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Residuals are land applied under the
authority of DWQ Permit No. WQ0002616
3. Treatment Plant Classification: Class IV

Page Three
4. SIC Code(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): 55, 01, 59 MTU Code(s): 01103
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? The WWT facilities were constructed with public monies.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None at this time.
3. Important SOC/JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: This facility is neither under an
SOC/JOC nor is one being considered at this time.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of Albemarle requests renewal of the subject permit. There have been no
changes or modifications to the existing WWT facilities or the permit since the permit was last
renewed.
This facility has experienced some difficulty in achieving the 85% removal rate for TSS
due to low influent TSS values. The MRO has suggested to the City that consideration be given
to evaluating I/I to insure that excess water during storm events is not diluting influent waste
strength.
Pending receipt and approval of the draft permit, it is recommended that the NPDES
Permit be renewed as requested.
Signature of Report Preparer
//4 4 fi
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
h:\dsr\dsr08\albemrle.doc
Date
?/5X)pf-'
Date

Philip Hazelwood
Water & Sewer Plants Superintendent
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
City of Albemarle
North Carolina
fr
August 1, 2008
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR/DWQ/ Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: City of Albemarle Wastewater Treatment Plant Renewal
Dear Mrs. Dina Sprinkle:
Public Utilities Department
P. O. Box 190
Albemarle, NC 28002-0190
www.ci.albemarle.nc.us
I am requesting the renewal of the City of Albemarle's Long Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant Permit NC0024244 which expires on February 28, 2009. I would like to drop
the flowing components from our permit the primary clarifiers, the trickling filters and the
influent flow measurement and add Effluent flow measurement.
I would like to drop the primary clarifiers, the trickling filters for the following reasons
we are not using them and with our current BOD loading if they were in use we most likely
would not have enough BOD to feed the Aeration Basins and meet our permit requirements. In
addition the primary clarifiers and, the trickling filters are in total disrepair and would have to be
completely overhauled and rebuilt at great expense to the City with out improving the effluent
quality. When talking to all the employees here I found out the primary clarifiers, the trickling
filters have not been in use since 2005 and we have still met our permit limits.
We recently failed a Toxicity Test one we were running and one we collected for the state
the state gave us a NOV for the one we collected for them. We found out that it was the operator
who cleaned the sampler before the tests cleaned it with acid and did not rinse it thoroughly. We
did not meet % removal on TSS twice once in March & once in April. This is due to not enough
TSS in the influent to remove.
We had a Plant inspection on Oct. 30, 2007 where the State Inspector wrote some NOV's for
plant maintaince not for effluent quality. I was hired December 4, 2008 and since then we have
been making progress.
We were using the influent flow measurement and he suggested that we install a Effluent
flow meter. The Influent Flow meter had side streams that were feeding into the measurement
and was not a true reading of the influent flow. We have installed a new Effluent flow meter and
have been getting our flow reading from it. We fixed the influent bar screen which had two bars
that needed to be replaced.
The City has employed a outside Engineering Company to study the other problems Grit
Removal, Aeration Basins, Secondary Clarifier, Tertiary Filtration and Aerobic Digesters.

The Company is Municipal Engineering Services Company, P.A., and P.O. Box 97 Gamer, NC
27529, Phone [phone] that has been employed to study the situation and get back to us.
We have been cleaning and painting the plant as weather has allowed and the plant looks
better than it did and will look a lot better by time we are finished.
The City of Albemarle runs a Land Application program Permit # WQ0002616 and
applies residuals on dedicated sites at the Cities treatment plant and at the Cities landfill. All
sites have groundwater monitoring. The City has a sludge drier, which is used during the winter
months and landfills the dried material due to high copper numbers.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me at [phone]. Any comments you
may have are welcome.
Sincerely,
Philip Hazelwood
Water & Sewer Plants Superintendent
Enclosure

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
FORM
2A
NPDES -
NPDES� I�PPLICATION OVERVIEW
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Yadkin -Pee Dee
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow z 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
RECEIVED
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surfac44aters cif ttQ6ited States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or DENR - WATER QUALITY
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the inforrpNT SOURCE BRANCH
E Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SlUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). Sills are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVVVTP,
NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name Long Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mailing Address P.O. Box 190
Albemarle, North Carolina 28002
Contact Person Philip Hazelwood
Title Water & Sewer Plant Superintendent
Telephone Number ( 704) 984-9630
Facility Address 1040 Coble Ave.
(not P.O. Box) Albemarle, North Carolina 28002
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
❑ owner x operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility x applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC0024244 PSD
UIC Other WQ0002616
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
City of Albemarle 15414 separate municipal
Stanly County separate municipal
Total population served
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
❑ Yes x No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes x No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 121h month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 16 mgd
b. Annual average daily flow rate
Two Years Aqo
7.42 MGD
c. Maximum daily flow rate 32.20 MGD
Last Year
7.38 MGD
This Year
6.54 MGD
29.62 MGD 17.3 MGD
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
x Separate sanitary sewer 100 ok
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.?
❑ Yes x No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
v. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
1
x No
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) mgd
Is discharge
❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? ❑ Yes x No
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site: mgd
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
❑ Yes x No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVVVfP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
e.
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the
following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
that receives this discharge
the receiving facility. mgd
in a manner not included
injection): ❑ Yes x No
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location City of Albemarle. North Carolina 28002
(City or town, if applicable)
Stanly
(County)
35°19'27"N
(Zip Code)
NC
(State)
80°12'56"
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 7.38 mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes x No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes x No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Long Creek
b. Name of watershed (if known)
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mgll of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVVVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
❑ Primary x Secondary
❑ Advanced 0 Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 97
Design SS removal 97 %
Design P removal %
Design N removal %
Other %
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? X Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? X Yes 0 No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the Indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number. 001
PARAMETER
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.6
s.u.
pH (Maximum)
7.8
s.u.
Flow Rate
32.20
MGD
7.40
MGD
Continuous 3yrs
Temperature (Winter)
21
°C
18.8
°C
761
Temperature (Summer)
31
°C
27.4
°C
730
• For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
6.1
m /l
g
4.16
mg/I
g
504
sm 5010,
5210
DEMAND (Report one)
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
43000
CFU
2.09
CFU
504
sm 9222 D
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
15
mg/I
8.62
mg/I
504
sm 2540
A,B,D,E
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVVVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
only go to 32 mqd when it rains we can go to were the meters
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Even thought the avg. flow rate is 7.4 mgd, the flow meters
peaks out. The City is in the process of replacing some of it's collection system lines. We have not exceed our
monthly average flow at our WWTP and have meet our permit limits for other perameters.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within % mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, induding all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes x No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number. ( 1
Responsibilities of Contractor.
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question 8.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VWVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed
applicable. For improvements
applicable. Indicate
Implementation Stage
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational
e. Have appropriate
Describe briefly:
by any compliance schedule
planned independently
dates as accurately as possible.
Level
permits/clearances concerning other
or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed
of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion
Schedule Actual Completion
MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
below, as
dates, as
Yes ❑ No
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ /
been obtained?
/ /
/ 1
/ /
Federal/State requirements
❑
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Applicants that discharge
effluent testing required
on combine sewer overflows
using 40 CFR Part 136
QA/QC requirements for
based on at least three
Outfall Number:
(GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
to waters of the US must
by the permitting authority
in this section. All information
methods. In addition, this data
standard methods for analytes
pollutant scans and must be
i
ONLY).
provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide
for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include
the indicated
information
conducted
other appropriate
data must be
reported must be based on data collected through analysis
must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing
no more than four and on -half years old.
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
1.06
mg/I
....
rii J„1
730
sm 4500 N-
NH3,A,F
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
<10
ugll
0
ugll
730
sm 4500 CL
G
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
9.40
mg/I
7.3
mg/I
805
sm 4500 o g
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
3.90
mg/I
1.6
mg/I
6
EPA 351.2
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
5.39
mg/I
4.32
mg/I
4
sm 4500
OIL and GREASE
<5
mg/I
0
mg/I
5
sm 4500
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
1-80
mg/I
0.86
mg/I
805
sm 4500
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
239.5
mg/I
199.5
mg/I
3
sm 2540 c
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 8 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
x Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
x Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
x Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
x Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Philip Hazelwood ater & Sewer Plants Superintenden
Signature �t /. /e
/
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed 71/30 C18'
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number. 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE,
PHENOLS,
AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
0.04
rng/I
0.024
mg/I
3
EPA 200.8
ARSENIC
<.003
mg/I
0
mg/I
3
EPA 200.8
BERYLLIUM
<.002
mg/I
0
mg/I
3
EPA 200.8
CADMIUM
11.4
mg/I
3.8
mg/I
3
sm 3111 b
CHROMIUM
17.0
ug/I
0.38
ug/I
207
sm 3111 b
COPPER
113
ug/I
15.1
ug/I
195
EPA 200.8
LEAD
<20
ug/I
0
ug/I
195
EPA 200.8
MERCURY
.015
ug/l
.007
ug/I
43
EPA 245.1
NICKEL
<20
ug/I
0
ug/I
203
EPA 200.8
SELENIUM
6.2
ug/I
0.2
ug/I
32
EPA 200.8
SILVER
27
ug/l
0.1
ug/I
38
EPA 200.8
THALLIUM
<.001
mg/I
0
mg/I
3
EPA 200.8
ZINC
0.047
mg/I
0.04
mg/I
3
EPA 200.8
CYANIDE
2
ug/I
0
ug/I
59
LOCI 0 204 00
1X
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
35.6
ug/I
21.4
ug/I
3
EPA 420.1
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
563
mg/I
210.1
mg/I
3
sm2340 b
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVVVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
<50
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
ACRYLONITRILE
<50
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
BENZENE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
BROMOFORM
<5
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
<5
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
CHLOROBENZENE
<5
ug/I
0
ugll
3
EPA 624
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
CHLOROETHANE
<5
ugll
0
ugll
3
EPA 624
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
<10
ug/I
0
ugll
3
EPA 624
CHLOROFORM
7.01
ug/I
2.4
ugll
3
EPA 624
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
<2
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/I
0
ugll
3
EPA 624
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<5
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
<5
ugll
0
ugll
3
EPA 624
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
<5
ugll
0
ugll
3
EPA 624
ETHYLBENZENE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
METHYL BROMIDE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
METHYL CHLORIDE
<5
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
<5
ugll
0
ug/l
3
EPA 624
EPA 624
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
TOLUENE
<5
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<5
ugfl
0
ugfl
3
EPA 624
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<5
ug/l
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
VINYL CHLORIDE
<5
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
2-CHLOROPHENOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/l
3
EPA 625
4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL
<50
ug/I
0
ug/1
3
EPA 625
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
<50
ug/I
0
ugfl
3
EPA 625
2-NITROPHENOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
4-NITROPHENOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
<30
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
PHENOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
<10
ug/I
0
ugfl
3
EPA 625
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
ANTHRACENE
<10
ugfl
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BENZIDINE
<50
ug/l
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<10
ugfl
0
ug/1
3
EPA 625
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Outfall number. (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/l
3
EPA 625
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL)ETHER
<10
ug/l
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
<10
ug/l
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
CHRYSENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
<10
ug/l
0
ug/l
3
EPA 625
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 624
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
<10
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Outfail number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
<10
ugll
0
ug/I
.
EPA 625
FLUORENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<10
ug/I
0
ugll
3
EPA 625
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/1
3
EPA 625
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/1
3
EPA 625
INDEN0(1,2,3 CD)
PYRENE
<10
ug/l
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
ISOPHORONE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
NAPHTHALENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
NITROBENZENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
<20
ug/I
0
ug/l
3
EPA 625
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
<20
ug/I
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
PHENANTHRENE
<10
ug/I
0
ug/1
3
EPA 625
PYRENE
<10
ugll
0
ug/I
3
EPA 625
1,2,4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
<10
ugll
0
ugh
3
EPA 625
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on
other base -neutral compounds
requested
by the permit
writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
P2ge 14 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVVVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using altemate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent
❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the
column per test (where each species
toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
constitutes a test). Copy this page
Test number.
if
more than three tests are being reported.
Test number:
Test number.
a. Test information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
X
X
x
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test senes.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
LC50
95% C.I.
%
%
Control percent survival
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VWVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
°/a
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
/ /
/ /
/ /
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
D Yes x No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information,
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the
of the results.
Date submitted: 10/30/07 01/29/08 03/18/08, 3/4/08, 04/15/08 05/20/08,6/4/08(MM/DD/YYYY)
or information regarding the
permitting authority and a summary
from improper cleaning by
for July yet and August has not got
FAIL, <45
Summary of results: (see instructions) Outfall 001 : Fail on 6/4/08 & <45 was due to contaminated sampler tubing
operator, Toxicity test are being run in each of the two month after in July & August. I do not have the results
here yet.
10/30/07 PASS, 1/29/08 PASS, 3/18/08 >100, 3/4/08 PASS, 4/15/08 >32, 5/20/08 >100, 6/4/08
Test of 6/4/08 FAILED due to sample not being thoroughly rinsed out by operator during cleaning.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
X Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 3
b. Number of CIUs. 1
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: IAC of North America, LLC
Mailing Address: 313 Bethany Road
Albemarle, North Carolina 28001
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Discharge of wastewater that is generated by the textile dyeing and finishing manufacturing process, non -contact cooling water, boiler blowdown,
and domestic wastewater from all sources at the facility.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Dyed Automotive Carpet
Raw material(s): Nylon Yam, Polyester/Nylon substrate, pre-metalized dues, uv stabilizers, and auxiliary chemicals.
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1.520.000 gpd (x continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
30,000 gpd (x continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes X No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VWVfP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes X No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
0 Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
X Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 3
b. Number of CIUs. 1
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Americacn Fiber & Finishing
Mailing Address: 225 N. Depot Street
Albemarle, North Carolina 28001
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Discharge of waste water that is generated by all cotton yam spinning and fabric production process, boiler blowdown, cooling water.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Book Binder
Raw material(s): Cotton, Caustic, Hydrogen Peroxide, chelate agent, de-sization agent, organic stabilizer, surfactant, corn starch , acrylic
latex
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1227165 gpd (x continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes X No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
El Yes X No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATIONICORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) X No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must complete part
F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
X Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 3
b. Number of CIUs. 1
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and provide the
information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as
necessary.
Name: Gentry Mills
Mailing Address: 2035 Kingsley Drive
Albemarle, North Carolina 28001
F.4. Industrial Proccscc . Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Discharge of wastewater that is generated by textile dying and knitting production processes, boiler blowdown, and domestic wastewater.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Principal product(s): Dyed Screen printed Fabric
Raw material(s): Cloth
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
140000 gpd (x continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10000 gpd (x continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X Yes D No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes X No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VWVTP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or cont ibuted to any problems (e.g., upsets,
interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
0 Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if known.
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VVV TP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
X Yes 0 No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 3
b. Number of CIUs. 1
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Metal Forge SPX
Mailing Address: 1301 Mabry Drive
Albemarle. North Carolina 28001
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Discharge of boiler blowdown, domestic wastewater from all sources at the facility and discharge of pipe 001
Discharge of wastewater generated by all regulated powder painting coating and electocoated manufacturing process at the facility.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Metal Forming Industry Auto Parts
Raw material(s): Hot Roll Carbon Steel, Cold Roll Carbon Steel, Cast Iron, Cast Aluminum ,Cast Magnesium
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10000 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2000 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards X Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
Metal Molding & Casting 40 CFR 464, Metal Fining 40 CFR 433
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek VWVfP, NC0024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

(7N‹1
,t
C a(t r 3
OFOf—a()wc leap wW`;P
City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Wastewater Treatment
Application Sites
Fields 1 & 6
REFERENCE 113E ONLY Location: Stanly County
Owner: City of Albemarre
Permit Number. WO0002616
Map Type:Application Map Fields 1 & 6
Scale: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
1 inch eluats 625 feet
W WfP_Property_Buffer_5O0
-L-LJ Land_Applcation_Fields
- streams
Alb Buildng_Footprint Polygon
Buffer of Alb_Building_Footprim_Potygone
-- Fences
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division 47O4) 984-9437
SGi ,\pi �v m
Ayn
9 e s"0 rS
ey.w
oo

LONG CREEK WWTP
ALBEMARLE , N.C.
f�
10
al
10
l-i
1. "rAril U z,;,t •
2.. ,11Rk :;Se -RE -"NI
,trICT‘V.,f4fIG CI
5 . MAIN 'PUMP ''STATIONS
6. DISTRIBUTION BOX
7. AERATION BASIN
r
11
I7
a
IO LGNS \\
r� )gyp )' �I UlV
TO LANDFILL
12
13
8. CLARIFIER
9. RETURN SLUDGE METER
3E_'.RETURN D E VUMPiSTATiON
33::i+I1iA 1 UMP• TATION.
32 :TERTIARY- T 11;r>:.tt
13.CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN
14..- Of 1-, 6 t< fl i y ►3q P4ss
TO LONG
CREEK
tJ
5
19
15. SL�:��z Itij_"o-i'i1,4,3
16. 7+3 J. G (5 •
..1.$_ iaMLOPTTTF" LUTT.RT'Si::.�:
• '19 :''OPERATIONS "BUILDfl G
�o. eF F1 -- )0\,,) r
2 • Ge. 1 Q-ra{'tr,r

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Legend
CountyRoads
s':=111Qwirmswr,1116,
■umu$tt
!'t!i
REFERENCE USE ONLY
"`�t
1.011 ti1�r�1r11l� lI
IM44:PSVM=1411
3= , ; EMI,
iugiatelavatilvir,,*t
�1, Fit fl‘
irrl wsC2
Site Location
�tER HuN,
-`r Site Location
Location: Stardy County
Owner: City of Albemarle
Penult Number: W00002516
Nap type: Vicinity Map
Scale:1:3750
November28, 2007
M CEDE
co
a
E1N CHURCH
1 inch equals 3,750 feet
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
SN m 5§ o a o �b o
g T.V b v G f
ry^a. a°' v
a' o 43.
Y
%L O 1 v 's, �6
g 4iDh� <J`��Q� pb e a i
Y3. K' p a N N_ g
ti
$ycp s
480 o N m
q
e ^a• 0
m a
m • m N 432
P00% 452
Y N _
P� 481,
a
478 9`e0
Cp b�P to '42 9s848809$
a a 436 PLO
ao UO Py0 - 0.
�,1 432 �O
O 428 434 S a p a
410 ,� P 448 0 1T a' eo o X,
20 vv 434 , a 1' o- c
426 /B a a26 s v S v i' 1
416 Pry v a /•
o ti 90 0 �..- ._
$'a ep m b
O
4p2 'o N 434 m
00 412 0+ 420 v m v
ap4 p,Pp b Na.
a12 0 8 vQ PM1 a0
P Alb_2R_Contours_PreRdease
4 pio fo N i ••a 0 e • �' ,- -0
m o ,• $y ,,p 4T
rob m qi , > y 440 s�N / 8 a 7' ro 482 .,ry �`gS
4084� 47s2p�0 434 �1 m gN % ••, .... q98 �,,pp 1a Oa�O 3
8 422 p�B mom 416y26 7 �' g� a g .. a46 p'1F' Av. a q94 480
41 �• a a t v o 1,0�A, p61' a10 N a iyo, ��0
a 432 A26 co ( '9vr, �' `'$ o v v m t2/;% 0- mN
�+ r/ aa0 m 480 hro . m .480 480 a16
N'� P 4 p10 6
\ v q N 4j 46
0 1\ '72 �2
v'` O 44- fi if - 470
\• � D` 'elf `� N. J i i �9 ,,p, 80 482
• a 1_ o 492
% a. ov 452 n w 452 �y `f+r. OQO ,5p0
a pit.. 442 446 4q� 484 a N' ii .98
p p m d$s
rr, mO v e al P
N 4s2 r, , or
%aifS�-���q70 9a NP�6
ni ASP 26. - 4. 'St e.0 (<".. g;
N - N v0B 474a
�/` _a o 462
irae
9J2 444 v v o p0a
• f 0 Y q38 > v v°,
./ 42 04,4 N o a
.`' A- q4, N 'O o
fI 11t7• 'O -O 402 v 922 y
sr tt
O
N 426 2
472
O ip
o
m v sa agls
03
•teg tir A2241
Tg. v S 426 428
m
v a 440
ry v..pp p 's t ola
a9a �v o t�
466 e?° s
o m2 y48g142450% amg24 ati
e 4 N
48pa10 462 A�' 452 446 c as'
468 458 v,
t 482
b 46b
490
v
488
p92
424
N �
424 )
0
440
Municipal Landfill
Application Sites
Fields 2, 3, 4, 5
a
Field 3
rp
T � i
gO Kph
Pr--14
Field
2 13.28
18.74
60.58
.39.19
3
5
�a
436
Acreage
Field 2
444
Tp
t v
t
4
a
3a4
398
480
d
412P
Legend
- W WTP_Property
Stream_Buffer 5011
- CountyRoads
WWTP_Property_Buffer_50ft
Stream Buffer 50ft
- Landfill Property
Land_Application_Fields
Landfill_Propeny_Buffer 50R
•
- streams
A Ib_Buildmg_,Footpri nt_Polygone
Fences
ry a
a o i
v 99
s
sma n � 4o
2
�' N p4p0 v 372 ao
g fro \ f „
\b. n P
a 'Oe,
Field 4
(.a28
a r
,SgO i6. _.- 2Z4, 372
_ 38r` 388 392 `gv n
▪ 390 4130398396 4104� '02 a �
31
O
y�9
b�
_ n 0
ry O
,yOb ,ry y ti
O
5 s4,0_
I O',
A58 4,p ^y .92
o-
av o 454 rv'P
Oq�jQ
O I
40240
416Bg24 �m4q`9972
a 2
39N m s m
% ,r
909 17, .0 ry
`fPd 'i•'98 ae'D 4.2,31%4-
a a14 #,S'
392 400 or
• '198390,50
377
F
Field
OF'
404
430 428
44 432
�9 Tn
REFERENCE USE ONLY Location: Stanly County
tamer. City of Albemarle
Permit Number. WQ0002616
Map Type: Topo Map Fields 2, 3, 4, 5
Scale: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
1 inch e;tuals 500 feet
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Wastewater Treatment
Application Sites
Fields 1 & 6
Field Acreage
la 21.7ac
16a 23.9ac
6b 2.87ac
6c 7.9ac
REFERENCE USE ONLY
Oa
Location: Stanly County
Owner. City or Albemarle
Permit Number. W00002616
Map Type: Soils Map Fields 13 6
Scale: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
The
BaB
1 inch eluals 500 feet
Field 6a
Field 6b
Legend
- WVVTP_Property
Stream Buffer 50ft
- CountyRoads
W WTP_Property_Buffer_50ft
,.._3 Land Appiication_Fields
- streams
Alb_Building_Footprint_Polygon
Fences
BaB
BaD
BaB
BaB
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Field 3
Municipal Landfill
Application Sites
Fields 2.3.4. 5
Field Acreage
2 13.28
3 18.74
4 60.58
5 39.19
REFERENCE USE ONLY
Field 2
Location: Stanly County
Owner. City of Albemarle
Permit Number. W00002616
Map Type: USGS Topo Map Fields 2, 3, 4, 5
Scale: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
1 inch eals 500 feet
,ter a
Legend
- CountyRoads
✓ , Stream Buffer 50ft
- Landfill Property
11=Land_Application Fields
Landfil I_Propeny_Buffer_50ft
- streams
�• Alb Building_Foolprint_Polygone
Fences
- City of Albemarle
V7.4. Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
v N '
f.?p
Wastewater Treatment
Application S tes
Fields 1 & 6
Field Acreage
1la 21.7ac
168 23.9ac
6b 2.87ac
7.9ac
REFERENCE USE ONLY
fr m
JS
Location: Stanly County
Owner: City of Albemarle
Permit Number. W00002816
Map Type: Topo Map Fields 1 & 6
Scale: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
486
1 inch eivals 500 feet
504
522624520
Ste
525
Field 6a
Sz
5 °
72 o
5os
h
532
518
52.7'
556 5,6
534535
524
✓� 498
i(:
Field 6b
NyQO 448
N O�
508
16025
Legend
- WMP_Propeny
Stream Buffer_50ft
- CountyRoads
--- WN5P_Picgmty_Buffer_50ft
® Land_Application_Fields
- streams
Alb Building_Footprint Polygons
Fences
Alb_2ft_Contours_PreRelease
,512
• A_
m
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
W WrP_Properly
Stream_Buffer_50ft
- CounityRoads
1 WARP_Property_Buffer_50ft
Stream Buffer 50ft
- Landfill Property
Q Lend Application_Fields
Landfill Property_Buffer_50ft
- streams
Alb_B ilding_Footprint_Poygone
Fences
REFERENCE USE ONLY
Location: Stang County
Owner: City of Albemarle
Permit Number. W00002616
Map Type: Application Map Fields 2, 3, 4, 5
Scale: 1:3750
November28, 2007 1 inch e uals 500 feet
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Park
Wastewater Treatment
Application Sites
Fields 1 & 6
Field Acreage
j la 21.7ac
6a 23.9ac
16b 2.87ac
16c _ 7.9ac
1 r i . _ J7 .- - d
REFERENCE USE ONLY
Location: Stanly County
Owner: City of Albemarle
Permit Number. W00002616
Map Type: Topo Map Fields 1 & 6
Scale: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
Field 6c
Field 6b
-74
sq)
1 inch equals 500 feet
H
Legend
- WWTP Property
Stream_9ufer_50ft
- CountyRoads
WJYTP_Property_Bulfer_50ft
Land_Appliration_Fields
- streams
Alb_Buildng_Footprint_Polygone
Fences
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Field 3
Municipal Landfill
Appficalion Sites
Fields 2, 3, 4, 5
Field
2 1328
3 118.74
4 80.58
5 130.19
REFERENCE USE ONLY
Field 2
Location: Stagily County
Owner. City of Albemarle
Permit Number. W00002,316
Map Type: Soils Map Fields 2, 3, 4, 5
Scale: 1:3750
November 25, 2007
1 inch eivals 500 feet
Legend
- CountyRoads
Stream Buffer 50ft
- Landfill Property
Land_Application_Fields
Landfill_Propeny_Buffer 50ff
- streams
A Ib_Building_Footpri nt_Polygone
Fences
City of Albemarle
Department of Engineering Services
G1S Division [phone]

City of Albemarle
Wastewater Treatment Application Sites
Wastewater Treatment
Application Sites
Fields 1 & 6
Legend
- WWtP Property
--- Stream Butter 50It
CountyRoads
WWfP_PropertyBufer_50R
Lend_Application_Fields
- streams
Alb_Building_ Footprint_Polygone
J Butter of Alb_Building_Footprint_Polygone
Fences
REFERENCE USE ONLY
Location: Stanty County
Owner: City of Albemarle
Permit Number. W00002616
Map Type: Application Map Fields 1 d 6
Scale: 1:3750
November 28, 2007
1 inch e/uals 625 feet
City of Albemarle
ih 7. Department of Engineering Services
GIS Division [phone]