Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820271_Routine Inspection_20210706/1 Facility Number 54 Division of Water Resources 0 Division. of Soil and Water Conservation 0Other Agency Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: `P6, Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Farm Name: Arrival Time: Owner Name: Hog 5) g fi INC 8: nomn Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: a O\ N t LmoN Onsite Representative: C Departure Time: I/O go 40) Owner Email: Phone: County: 91 mppo N Region:0 ENTERED TO LASERFICHE Title: DEQ7DWR WU[ROS FAYET T EVtLLE NP_i\IAi OFFICE Integrator: Tm PoImS Certified Operator: Certification Number: ! 1 7 Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Longitude: Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder QwO9 Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer D Poult Design Curren Ca s aci. Po . . Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle. Design Curren Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes -[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes aNQo ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes "o ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: - J1 I Date of Inspection: -7_ (p - Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: ❑ Yes . _aNlo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Designed Freeboard (in):. Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 11 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): ?xfflL'cfr(e 1j ,0 13. Soil Type(s): G UttvI I) wog tzLh') 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ri Waste Analysis n Soil Analysis ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield I'A 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Yes ,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes r❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 12I No 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes allo n Yes No n Yes wNo ❑ Yes ,JNo ❑ Yes No n Yes ❑ Yes n Other: 1174 • No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Yes n No ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakcrs on irrigation equipment? Page 2 of 3 ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code n Sludge Survey ❑ NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: - o� Date of Inspection: 7- (0 - 4 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ❑ Yes n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE No ❑ NA ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes gl No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Jj-No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Aallo ❑ NA 0 NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ,-f"No ❑ NA 0 NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes`No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes --No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes .,❑'o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �21-1\10 ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any othe Use drawings of facility to betterexplain situations (use additional pages as necessary). Note: goii survey de b 491, forms neemPr0verr7ern need' proper 3 QnQ time 3 Frued Cornp/.p,j-j-. ovt_ Reviewer/Inspector Name: KC? FO ni-er 0 Phone: yIR S7609715 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Date: • g� 2/4/2015 - EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED ./ purr) P11- I - DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS 9 110020 - FLOW RATES 7 RAIN FALL (#21) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT 1 -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED -LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2 FORM -DUE E AL) GE#1&25) /E10 .(u EVERY YEAR: DATE O: 3'9) P: 5, % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS NO rouNbrec-c -- i d'J 0IC pr VISUAL CHECK MORTALITY FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE FACILITY #: FARM NAME: I DM FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT (#19) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS rry1 tD �p�- EXPERIATIONDATE `1ofa'`� NUMBEROFANIMALS��ivUil UIeu-1� ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL (Q Oq OIC CARD YES OR NO ( � I ✓� ��i i WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) SOIL TYPESQU li€1 c wAram CROP TYPES c,&Or 8e rniAtai grL5s THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST ES R NO - Irrigation Plan Maps WASTE REPORT (#21) - GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE �( yJr NITROGEN LEVEL 1 . SOIL REPORT (#21) EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE la/ la 16 P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)1 PH (Note if 4 or less) a/ Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU / ZN ieveiG 900q (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) - MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS IRR2 (#21) ZONE tl ACRES I(0 PAN 2/8 CROP TYPE beinmkt FLOW RATES 70 NITROGEN (N) 120 Min inspection initialed ' Weather Codes Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter ,tire- 3 en�1 rlf�� nod e q(.tu(U 11) "31FP i�m�d�� t� Ise EiQ a (te'2 Kr,t Pe CALBRIATION (#24)