20090136 Ver 9_ePCN Application_20220808

DW R
mrlsloa of ware.Besourcrs
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13,2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre-Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/6/2022
BIMS#Assigned" Version#*
20090136 9
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required What amout is owed?*
Fee received $240.00
Fee needed-send electronic notification $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Central Office-[phone] Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Information for Initial Review
1a.Name of project:
Dunn Creek Greenway Phase 4
1 a.Who is the Primary Contact?*
Emma Radford,WPIT
1 b.Primary Contact Email:* 1c.Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
8/8/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Dunn Creek(Hatters Branch)
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
...._.........
Latitude: Longitude:
35.988966 -78.488219
A. Processing Information u
County(or Counties)where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
Yes No

1a.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit(wetlands,streams and waters,Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit(navigable waters,tidal waters,Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?"`
Yes
No
1 b.What type(s)of permit(s)do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit(NWP)
Regional General Permit(RGP)
Standard(IP)
1c.Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit(NWP)Number: 14-Linear transportation
NWP Numbers(for multiple NWPS):
1d.Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification-Regular 401 Water Quality Certification-Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le.Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? "
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f.Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h.Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j.Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d.Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant(other than owner)
le.Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2.Owner Information
2a.Nari on recorded deed:
Town of Wake Forest
2b.Deed book and page no.:
2c.Contact Person:
Dylan Bruchhaus,Planner II
2d.Address
Street Address
301 South Brooks Street
Address Line 2
City State/Province Region
Wake Forest NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27587-2932 USA

2e.Telephone Number: 2f.Fax Number:
[phone]
2g.Email Address:
[e-mail]
4.Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a.Name:
Emma Radford,WPIT
4b.Business Name:
Kimley-Horn
4c.Address
Street Address
421 Fayetteville Street
Address Line 2
Suite 600
City State/Province/Region
Raleigh NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27601 USA
4d.Telephone Number: 4e.Fax Number:
[phone]
4f.Email Address:"
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.Project Information
1b.Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c.Nearest municipality/town:
Town of Wake Forest
2.Project Identification
2a.Property Identification Number: 2b.Property size:
4.38
2c.Project Address
Street Address
N/A(Linear Transportation Project)
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Postal/Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a.Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:'
Dunn Creek(Hatters Branch)
3b.Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s)is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d.Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
0302020111
4. Project Description and History
4a.Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project study area is primarily composed of undeveloped forestland and riparian corridors.The project study area is bounded to the north by primarily undeveloped forestland,to the
east and west by single-family residential housing and recreational facilities,and to the south by single-family residential housing and undeveloped forestland.
4b.Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project(including all prior phases)in the past?*
Yes No Unknown

If yes,please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID(exp.SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2017-02221;NBRRO#17-098-Phase 3
4f.List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.02
4g.List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
173
4h.Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The Town of Wake Forest proposes to construct Phase 4 of the Dunn Creek Greenway,a 0.56 mile extension to the existing multi-use path system as part of the Town of Wake Forest's
Open Space&Greenway Plan
4i.Describe the overall project in detail,including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of the installation of a 0.56-mile extension of the Dunn Creek Greenway in Wake Forest.The project would tie into existing greenway segments constructed
by private development and would connect into Del Webb at Traditions,The Orchards at Traditions,and Flaherty Farms.The project will require two greenway easements,one through Del
Webb at Tradition's common open space and the other at Flaherty Farms.The balance of the project will be located on property owned by the Town of Wake Forest.The project will be
constructed using excavators,skid-steers,pavers,and other construction equipment typically used for greenway projects.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
Kimley-Horn staff delineated the project study area in January 2022 and identified two wetlands(W1
and W3)and four streams(Dunn Creek,S1,S2,and S3).
5b.If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-00621
5c.If 5a is yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name(if known): William Sullivan,PWS and Mackenzie Richards,PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
5d.List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
April R.Norton of the USACE responded to the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request confirming the delineated stream and wetland boundaries and concurrence was received
on April 26,2022(SAW-2022-00621).Chris Smith of the NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the project on April 20,2022(NBRRO#22-089).
6. Future Project Plans
6a.Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
6b.If yes,explain.
This project is being constructed and permitted as Phase 4 of the Dunn Creek Greenway.Prior phases 1,2,and 3 have been permitted and constructed.
Are any other NWP(s),regional general permit(s),or individual permits(s)used,or intended to be used,to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a.Where are the impacts associated with your project?(check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2.Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?) 2b.Impact type*(?) 2c.Type of W. 2d.W.name 2e.Forested* 2f.Type of Jurisdicition* 2g.Impact
(?) area*
Wetland and Construction Access T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland W1 Yes Both 0.005
Stream Impact (acres)
Site 2
Wetland and Greenway Construction P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland W1 Yes Both 0.005
Stream Impact and Culvert Installation (acres) ::I-
Site 2

2g.Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g.Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.005 0.005
2g.Total Wetland Impact
0.010
2i.Comments:
At Stream and Wetland Impact Site 2,permanent wetland impacts resulting from construction of the proposed greenway will involve the placement of
riprap along the wingwalls and toe of slope for the new culvert installation,as well as grading and placement of fill material to construct the greenway.
Temporary impacts to wetlands will result from necessary construction access corridors,and will be returned to preconstruction contours after
completion of the project.
3. Stream Impacts
3a.Reason for impact(?) 3b.lmpact type* 3c.Type of impact* �ff.name* ��3e.Stream Type* 3f.Type of 3g.S.width 31h.Impact
?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Wetland and Stream Impact Temporary Other Stream S1 Intermittent Both
Site 1—construction access Average(feet) (linear feet)
S2 Wetland and Stream Impact Permanent Culvert Stream S1 Perennial Both 14
Site 1—Culvert Extension Average(feet) (linear feet)
S3 Wetland and Stream Impact Permanent Rip Rap Fill Stream S1 Perennial Both 4 17
Site 1—Rip-Rap Placement Average(feet) (linear feet)
(P-NNL)
S4 Wetland and Stream Impact Temporary Other Stream S2 Perennial Both
Site 2—construction access Average(feet) (linear feet)
S5 Wetland and Stream Impact Permanent Culvert Stream S2 Perennial Both 69
Site 2—Culvert Installation Average(feet) linear feet)
S6 Wetland and Stream Impact Permanent Rip Rap Fill Stream S2 Perennial Both 5 13
Site 2—Rip-Rap Placement Average(feet) (linear feet)
(P-NNL)
3i.Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31.Total permanent stream impacts: 3i.Total temporary stream impacts:
113 14
31.Total stream and ditch impacts:
127
3j.Comments:
Unavoidable permanent impacts to streams will result from the proposed greenway alignment.Permanent and permanent no-net loss(P-NNL)stream
impacts at Stream and Wetland Impact Sites 1 as a result of the proposed culvert extension and associated keyed-in rip rap outlet,and at Stream and
Wetland Impact Site 2 as a result of the proposed culvert installation and associated keyed-in riprap outlet.Temporary impacts to streams S1 and S2 will
result from the construction access necessary to install the proposed culverts and rip rap.All temporarily impacted areas will be returned to pre-existing
conditions upon completion of construction.Dunn Creek(Hatters Branch)will be crossed with a prefabricated pedestrian bridge as shown in the
attached plan sheets;therefore,no impacts to Dunn Creek are anticipated.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a.Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse Tar-Pamlico
Catawba Randleman
Goose Creek Jordan Lake
Other
6b.Impact Type 6c.Per or Temp 6d.Stream name 6e.Buffer mitigation required? SE Zone 1 impact 6g.Zone 2 impact
Buffer Impacts Site 1-Greenway Construction P Stream S1 No 3,903 2,172
Buffer Impacts Site 2-Greenway Construction P Stream S2 No 0 671
Buffer Impacts Site 3-Greenway Construction P Stream S1 No 25 716
Buffer Impacts Site 4-Greenway Construction P Stream S2 No 4,894 1,528
Buffer Impacts Site 5-Greenway Construction P Dunn Creek No 1,327 1,279
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00

Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 10,149.00 6,366.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 10,149.00 6,366.00
6i.Comments:
Portions of the protected riparian buffers of Dunn Creek and streams S1,S2,and S3 will be permanently impacted at Buffer impact Sites 1-5 resulting
from the construction of the greenway path and shoulder,as well as for the installation of a prefabricated pedestrian bridge that will be used to span
Dunn Creek.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.Avoidance and Minimization
la.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to streams,wetlands,and riparian buffers in the project corridor were avoided and minimized to the extent practical.To minimize impacts to
riparian areas,the proposed greenway has been located outside of buffer zone 1 to the extent practical and stream crossing were intentionally located
where perpendicular crossings were feasible and/or where prefabricated pedestrian bridges could be used to span the entire stream.Impacts to
wetlands within the corridor were avoided the the extent practical,and have only been proposed where necessary fillslope structures are required to
protect the greenway integrity.Where practical,the proposed greenway has been located within existing maintained easements throughout the project
corridor.
1 b.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Impacts to streams,wetlands,and protected riparian buffers within the corridor and its vicinity will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the
construction process by avoiding these features with equipment,materials,and access corridors where practicable.Where feasible,staging and
construction access routes will be located in upland areas throughout the corridor.Silt fencing will be installed around the limits of disturbance to help
ensure that all construction equipment will remain within the project area throughout the construction process.Temporary sediment control measures will
be used to reduce stormwater impacts to receiving waters and minimize runoff from the construction sites.During the construction process,streams will
be diverted by means of stream diversion operation or pump-around operation sized by ordinary daily flow to allow for in-stream and channel repair.
2.Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a.Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b.If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation,explain why:
Due to the minimal stream and wetland impacts(<0.02 ac of stream and<0.1 ac of wetland),compensatory mitigation has not been proposed.
Per the Neuse River Basin riparian buffer rules,impacts to protected riparian buffers resulting from greenway construction where built upon area is added to the riparian buffer,equal to or
less than 10 feet wide with two foot wide shoulders are"Allowable Upon Authorization".As such,no mitigation is required for the proposed riparian buffer impacts.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) u
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la.Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance(lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale(higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30%nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a.Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b.Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2)?
Yes No
2c.Does this project have a stormwater management plan(SMP)reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state-approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A-project disturbs<1 acre
2d.Which of the following stormwater management program(s)apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase 11 NSW USMP Water Supply

Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Wake Forest
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la.Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/statellocal)funds or the use of public(federallstate)land?*
Yes No
1 b.If you answered"yes"to the above,does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State(North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments:*
The project does not exceed the minimum criteria thresholds of the state project agency.
2.Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a.Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0500),Isolated Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H.1300),or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a.Will this project result in additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b.If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete greenway corridor connecting previously disconnected sections of greenway trail.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a.Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a.Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b.Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d.Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e.Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f.Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g.Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h.Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
51.Does this project involve(1)blasting,and/or(2)other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines,such as jackhammers,mechanized pile drivers,etc.?
Yes No

5j.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
As of August 1,2022,the US Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)Information for Planning and Consulting(IPaC)tool lists six protected species with
potential to occur within the project vicinity:red-cockaded woodpecker,Neuse River waterdog,Carolina madtom,Atlantic pigtoe,dwarf wedgemussel,
and Michaux's sumac.The bald eagle(Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus)also has potential to occur in the project vicinity and is protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act(BGPA).Kimley-Horn reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program(NCNHP)element occurrence database(updated April
2022)to determine if there are any known occurrences of federally protected species in the project study area or its vicinity.No known occurrences of
protected species were recorded in or within 1.0-mile of the project study area.
Suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker(RCW)is not present within the project study area.Forested areas within the project study area,
mostly comprised of hardwoods and immature pines,are disturbed along the perimeters,with a dense understory and closed canopy.A review of the
NCNHP database records(updated April 2022)indicates there are no known occurrences of RCW in or within 1.0 mile of the project study area.
Additionally,the project study area is located outside of the red-cockaded woodpecker Section 7 Consultation Areas identified within the RCW SLOPES
Manual,and therefore the proposed project is anticipated to have"No Effect'on the RCW.
Suitable habitat for the Neuse River waterdog is not present within the tributaries to Dunn Creek(Streams S1,S2,and S3)within the project study area.
The majority of these tributaries were found to have low flow and low dissolved oxygen content.Potentially suitable habitat may be present within Dunn
Creek,however the project does not anticipate any impacts to this stream.Additionally,the NCNHP database(updated April 2022)records indicate that
there are no known occurrences of the Neuse River waterdog in or within 1.0-mile of the project study area.Due to the lack of impacts to potentially
suitable habitat and the lack of recorded individuals,it has been determined that the proposed project would have"No Effect"on the Neuse River
waterdog.
Suitable habitat for the Carolina madtom is not present within the tributaries to Dunn Creek(Streams S1,S2,and S3)within the project study area.The
majority of these tributaries were found to have low flow and low dissolved oxygen content.Potentially suitable habitat is present within Dunn Creek,
however the project does not anticipate any impacts to this stream.Additionally,the NCNHP database(updated April 2022)records indicate that there
are no known occurrences of the Carolina madtom in or within 1.0-mile of the project study area.Due to the lack of impacts to potentially suitable habitat
and the lack of recorded individuals,it has been determined that the proposed project would have"No Effect'on the Carolina madtom.
Suitable habitat for the Atlantic pigtoe is not present within the tributaries to Dunn Creek(Streams S1,S2,and S3)within the project study area.The
majority of these tributaries were found to have low flow and low dissolved oxygen content.Potentially suitable habitat is present within Dunn Creek,
however the project does not anticipate any impacts to this stream.Additionally,the NCNHP database(updated April 2022)records indicate that there
are no known occurrences of the Atlantic pigtoe in or within 1.0-mile of the project study area.Due to the lack of impacts to potentially suitable habitat
and the lack of recorded individuals,it has been determined that the proposed project would have"No Effect"on the Atlantic pigtoe.
Suitable habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel is not present within the tributaries to Dunn Creek(Streams S1,S2,and S3)within the project study area.
The majority of these tributaries were found to have low flow and low dissolved oxygen content.Potentially suitable habitat is present within Dunn Creek,
however the project does not anticipate any impacts to this stream.Additionally,the NCNHP database(updated April 2022)records indicate that there
are no known occurrences of the dwarf wedgemussel in or within 1.0-mile of the project study area.Due to the lack of impacts to potentially suitable
habitat and the lack of recorded individuals,it has been determined that the proposed project would have"No Effect"on the dwarf wedgemussel.
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is present within the project study area.Kimley-Horn scientists conducted pedestrian surveys for Michaux's sumac
on August 3,2022 and no individuals were identified.Additionally,a review of the NCNHP database(updated April 2022)records indicates there are no
known occurrences of Michaux's sumac in or within 1.0 mile of the project study area.Due to the lack of recorded occurrences and lack of observed
individuals,it has been determined that the proposed project will have"No Effect"on Michaux's sumac.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?"
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed on August 1,2022.No essential fish habitat was found within the project study area or within
the project vicinity.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No

7b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A review of the State Historic Preservation Office(NCSHPO)HPOWEB GIS Service database performed on August 1,2022 did not identify any historic
resources within the project study area;however,9 National Register,Determined Eligible,or Study List historic resources are located within 1.0-mile of
the project study area:
-W.E.B.DuBois School(National Register)—located approximately 0.62 miles southwest of the project study area
-Glen Royall Mill Village Historic District(National Register)—located approximately 0.44 miles west of the project study area
-Dr.Calvin Jones House(National Register)—located approximately 0.97 miles southwest of the project study area
Raleigh&Gaston Rail Corridor(Determined Eligible)—located approximately 0.32 miles west of the project study area
Wake Forest Historic District(National Register)—located approximately 0.82 miles west of the project study area
-Olive Branch Baptist Church(Study List)—located approximately 0.86 miles southwest of the project study area
Wake Forest Historic District Additional Documentation(Study List)—located approximately 0.99 miles west of the project study area
-Battle-Purnell House(Study List and Determined Eligible)—located approximately 0.79 miles northwest of the project study area
-Royall Cotton Mill Commissary(National Register)—located approximately 0.57 miles west of the project study area
88 historical and cultural resources currently listed as"Blockface","Survey Only","Survey Only,Gone',and"Surveyed area'were found in or within 1.0-
mile of the project study area.Due to the minimal visual and ground disturbing impact resulting from the proposed greenway,as well as the existing
maintenance easements throughout the corridor,it is anticipated that the proposed project will have no effect on any historical or archaeological
resources within the project study area or project vicinity.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b.If yes,explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
It is anticipated that the project will qualify for a No-Rise Certification through FEMA.If a No-Rise cannot be achieved,the appropriate FEMA
certifications will be received prior to construction.
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Map(DFIRM)Panel 3720185100L(effective July 19,2022)was accessed on August 1,2022.FEMA-regulated
floodways and Zone AE are present within the project study area.
Miscellaneous u
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review.Documents should be combined into one file when
possible,with a Cover Letter,Table of Contents,and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
02_SIGNED_DunnCreek_Agent Authorization Form_signed.pdf 61.95KB
03_DunnCreekFigures.pdf 5.83MB
04_BufferLetter_Dunn Creek Greenway-Phase 4.pdf 2.28MB
05_SAW-2022-00621(Dunn Creek Greenway)PJD Concurrence.pdf 3.11 MB
06_DunnCreeklV_Permit Drawings_Buffers_(2022-08-02).pdf 1.86MB
07_DunnCreeklV_Permit Drawings_Wetland and Stream_(2022-08-02).pdf 2.06MB
08_2022.08.03_DunnCrkGrwy_Phase 4_Plans.pdf 14.3MB
00_DunnCreek_PCN Cover Letter.pdf 538.17KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
To assist with the processing of this application,the following information is included:
•ePCN Application Form
Signed Agent Authorization Form
Figures
•USACE Email Delineation Concurrence(SAW-2022-00621)
•NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter(NBRRO#22-089)
•Buffer Permit Drawings
•Wetland and Stream Permit Drawings
•Plan Sheets
If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing of this NWP application,please do not hesitate to contact me at(919)677-2215 or Emma.Radford@Kimley-
Horri
Signature V
*
By checking the box and signing below,I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief';and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true,accurate,and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");

• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Emma Radford,WPIT
Signature
6 azia vlb&e,-,-?J,
Date
8/8/2022