NC0025445_Wasteload Allocation_19910724

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNINI; COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0025445
Randleman WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File
- Historical
Approval
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment
(67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
July 24, 1991
Miss document ices printed on reu,ae paper - i aore any
conteat oa the X•elitielVISe slide

1/7A1R I
17 d .w+ sob.K'.+ Bret..-ed E
-co
,n,04-- be p1 e41eci. a-t -F :s
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D. W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Mr. Richard D. Hardin
City of Randleman
101 Hilliary Street
Randleman, NC 27317
Dear Mr. Hardin:
July 3, 1991
03-06-01>
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC0025445
Randleman WWTP
Randolph County
"Dee? J
Reference is made to your NPDES permit application received on September 19, 1990. The
Division of Environmental Management (DEM) has previously requested additional information
by letter dated April 15, 1991 (copy attached). This additional information was needed in order
for the Water Quality Section to complete its permit review.
Because a response to our request has not been received, the Division of Environmental
Management is returning your application. A copy of your application has been submitted to our
Central Files for future reference.
Should you desire to reactivate your permit request, please advise the Division of
Environmental Management in writing and resubmit a new complete application with the
appropriate application fees. Construction of wastewater discharge facilities without a permit
may be considered a violation of DEM Regulation 15 NCAC 2H .0101 and the North Carolina
General Statutes (GS 143-215.1).
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Rosanne Barona at 919/733-5083.
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Mr. Alan Clark
Mr. Dan Blaisdell
,Zrevor C1emel is
Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
rely,
George T. Everett
JUL 221991
�• ! SiiPi' RT BRANCH
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

riT R EQu ES
r-
.4=: NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0025445
PERMITTEE NAME: City of Randleman / Randleman WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Modification
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: * 1.25 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 42.8 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 57.1 %
Comments:
* application for expansion to 1.75 MGD pretreatment information
attached dt
RECEIVING STREAM: Deep River
Class: C
rxp. - baz7.�
Sub -Basin: 433-06=69- 03-04,-03/3t (9
Reference USGS Quad: • D 15 SE -j/ \5 S e (please attach)
County: Randolph
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 7/31/93 Treatment Plant Class: Class 2
Classification changes within three miles:
none
PLOITED
Requested by: Rosanne Barona
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
W��Lr✓
Date:
Date:
Date:
l
oZ q
Modeler
DateRec.
#
/
Drainage Area(mil ) Avg. Streamflow (cfs): / 7/
7Q10 (cfs) ,- Winter 7Q10 (cfs) /a 30Q2 (cfs) A?3
Toxicity Limits: IWC 35- % Acut o
Instream Monitoring:
t
•
Parameters -1)O4_ TemI, Concti Rea-( Co1i �or,►1
Upstream ✓ Location 106 -Pt-
Downstream ✓ Location bey liver! above Wo► ,416l)4...�
�i 2ver, alert" L.. car � c ey - 4-L H is Creek
C
omments: (KON,TOR : a? pe ri ' inc, A lu,►,tnu,N►, ?eirackta,ro eilene.
pkit,c,lc,4e. 3 Cklor; des

\ \- •
• ---.. I •
'
ij" .••• •
r". f---:, ' ,•-• •
& (
..r.......---.. **,. /'...
(.,.--. , \
_......., ...__...^......: .--, • s
s. • "..., s '
--....--•
...... 1'.
••:::-- •., -7--....- ii ,...., ., !It i .....\ ''' \...._,,..„ _..,, \
"....6 - ,-",* i • .. ,
------1 / /"-/—*: '• 1 2......-.................,...,_:); :',7 / :,., ,,
• 1
• • I
I
•,.
• • ••••••. .•••
•—• - • •
'l.hz:JTh
,
,...---t:.,, -..
.--:).....,::....„ ,...,........_:..,,,,s>'0..., ( ,/...,,,, ..,,,......:,, ,......::)...*:;• a 2.„, .......>:'›
• .'. ,43-;----..\ .., :. • 1/..-O- ----
',''' •,,,',•—\\.,...., ,, . _:, • —
.1n/.----,-__---7-.---
.-s,‘. , .;:.• , -.
•
....--
it)iir„)./. 750
„.„„ ,-_--
..
,.._..,....--,:.,..,__ • 0......, ,..,,r., • , •
•//
t:
• '• 1,<;))
'
(TV
3967
-50'
Ad-
e
3965
5964
zr,
( C-•
. 3963
_ . .
4 7130"
"1
Itt 411

Effluent Characteristics
A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Final Winter: November 1 - March S1
During the. period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration.
the permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 001
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Monitoring Requirements
Discharge Limitations
Kg/day (lbs/day)
Monthlz Avg. Weekly. Avg.
Flow
BOD,5Day,20°C **
Total Suspended Residue**
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen (minimum)
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Chronic Toxicity ***
Total Nickel 81.0 ug/1****
Cyanide 18.0 ug/1****
Priority Pollutants *****
Conductivity
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Zinc
Other Units (Specify) Measurement
Monthl/ Avg. Weekly. Avg. Frequencx
1.25 MGD Continuous
30.0 mg/1 45.0 mg/1 2/Month
30.0 mg/1 45.0 mg/1 2/Month
2/Month
5.0 mg/3 5.0 mg/1 Weekly
1000.0/100 ml 2000.0/100 ml 2/Month
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
2/Month
2/Month
Annually
Weekly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
*Sample locations: E - Effluent, I
D - Downstream at
��� ,monthly average
effluent
valsOD5
ue
oc� respective influent
ri !r,Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 28%, January, April, July, and October.
EQ A III, CONDITION NO. I.
* * *
Sample
Type
*Sample
Location -
Recording I or E
Composite E,I,U,D
Composite E,I
Composite E
Grab E,U,D
Grab E,U,D-
Grab E
Grab E,U,D
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Grab E
E
Grab U,D
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
- Influent, U - Upstream at Fox Street,
Worthville Bridge
d'
ximum Limitation
T III, CONDITION NO. J.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standards units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent, upstream and downstream by grab samples.
There
shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
and Total Suspended Residue shall not exceed
(85% removal).
15%
Nn
Nrnn75445

A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Final Summer: April 1 - October 31
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiratio
permittee is authorized to discharge the from outfall serial number - 001
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee. as specified below: 1
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Kg/day (lbs/day)
Monthly Avg.. Weekly Avg..
Flow
BOD,5Day,20 C **
Total Suspended Residue**
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen (minimum)
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Chronic Toxicity
Total Nickel
Cyanide
Priority Pollutants
Conductivity
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Zinc
Other Units (Specify)
Monthly_ Avg. Weekly Avg.
1.25 MGD
28.0 mg/l 42.0 mg/1
30:0 mg/1 45.0 mg/1
2.0 mg/1 3.0 mg/1
5.0 mg/l 5.0 mg/1
1000.0/100 mi 2000.0/100 ml
***
81.0 ug/1****
18.0 ug/1****
*****
*Sample locations: E - Effluent, I
- Influent,
D - Downstream at
* * *
Measurement
Frequency
Continuous
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Weekly
2/Month
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
2/Month
2/Month
Annually
Weekly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Sample
Tue
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
U - Upstream at Fox Street,
Worthville Bridge
**The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue shall not exceed
of the respective influent values (85% removal).
icity (Ceriodaphnia)
EE PART`'T , CONDITION NO. I.
im`im Limitation
II' CONDITION NO. J.
P/F at
28%, January, April, July, and October.
*Sample
Location
I or E
E,I,U,D
E,I
E
E,U,D
E,U,D
E
E,U,D
E
E
E
E
E
E
U,D
E
E
E
15%
.,ot be less than 6.0 standards units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
an monitored 2/month at the effluent, upstream and downstream by grab samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Dr -ma r ur Nr'nn7 S645

A
Chronic Toxicity Testing Requirement
The effluent dischargeshall
tino time exhibit chronic toxicity
using test procedures outlined
ronic
luent
ssaY
1. TherNorth
reC(Northna Carolinaaphnia ChronichBioassayfProcedurea- Revised
procedure (N
*February 1987) or subsequent versions.
le
The effluent concentration at which there may be no obs2rvablefined
inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality The
as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
docug ment).
permit holder shall perform m
quarterly monitoring do
his
procedure to establish compliance
afterwith
thirtythe
daysmfromoissuance ofhthis
first test will be performed
permit duringthe months of January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed atthe NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form
(MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to
the following address:
Technical Services Branch
North Carolina Division oof 27687onmental Management
i
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting
chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the
toxicity tests, as well as all osampleonse mustdbeameasured and. Total idual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity s
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste
stream.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests
performed =y the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may
be reopened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limitations.
d
Note: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified;; n the c4.4�,
minimum control organism survival a,n;d a ,.rsopria-t�
document, such as r .t�l:,..1
environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test .a
require immediate retesting (within 30 tays of resultsnwil�'lco
event). Failure to submit suitabletes
non-compliance with monitoring requirements. ��
\CO•

permittee shall conduct a test for priority pollutants annually
The acidp
after combination of all`"�asa�edtformallnvolatilenfractionse pipe.
p•in
The discharge shall be evaluated
fractions, base/neutral fractions, and pesticide fractions listed
cyanide,
Table II of Appendix D. of 40 CFR Part e122 2ixand all
40metals,
122.
and phenols listed in Table III of ApP oof CFR
Partated 2.
in
The permittee shall teendixt the
Def ofu40tCF12for
Part p22, if a specific
Tables IV and V of APP resent in the discharge. In addition
pollutant is believedingto be
other significant levels of
of
to the above testing requirements,
synthetic organic chemicals must be identified. Forthe pthrposeo
implementing this requirement, the largest 10 percent
othere GC/MS
than the priority pollutants shall be identified. All
Peaks performed in accordance with the EPA Reference
tests shall be P Methods listed in 40 CFR part 136.
K. This permit shall be modified, or revoked and reissued, if the
results of instream studies indicate thatetherereay be a detrimental
effect on the water quality in the receiving
In order to address the documented water quality problems occurring
L. e location and the Worthvihle Dam,ag
between the permittee's discharge
the permittee shall perform additional instream monitoring
the months of July through September, 1988. This instream
erative
monitoring requirement shall be determined through a coop
effort between the permittee and the Division of Environmental
Management prior to July 15, 1988.
e, ,1.01:r: ...., '
n :, _ s \ ...
,4.-...,
a
•lw�I!.sYF.X1.1- .ice•..-
�'�i7C#!I�

:FACILITY NAME:
REQUESTER :
NPDES PRETRFATMF.NT INFORMATION REQUEST FORM
NPDES NO. NCOO a 5 7 L" 5
DATE: my / to REGION: IiMk -
PERMIT CONDITIONS COVERING PRETRE.ATMFNT
This facility has no flIUs and should not have pretreatment language.
This facility should and/or is developing a pretreatment program.
Please include the following conditions:
Program Development
Phase I due / /
Phase II due / /
Additional Conditions
This facility is currently irrrplementing a pretreatment
(attached)
Please include the following conditions:
Program Implementation
Additional Conditions
(attached)
IGNIFICANP INDUSTRIAL USERS' (S IUs) CONTRIBUTIONS
SIU FLOW - TOTAL:
- COMPOSITION:
TEXTILE:
METAL FINISHING:
OTHER: y 111(4.6
1.00 MGD
MGD
HEAIxJRKS REVIEW
PARAhEZER
Cd
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Zn
CN
Phenol
Other
Ln
.._— DAILY LOAD IN LIDS/DAY
DCMESI'IC PERMITTED
(0.4 (0,lO * ID.2'/
CG• a4
0, (n,
. 36
o� —Erish-gp
9 a -
0.
C.J. 141 dir-2 - c
a63
3V
RECEIVED:
/,26 /90 REVI DITED BY:
4,64
RE'I[JRNED : PI / 90i

MARZIANO & MINIER, P.A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
HIRAMJ. MARZIANO. P.E.
EVAN R. MINIER. P.E.
513 White Oak Street, P. O. Drawer 2048, Ashrhor$ North Carolina 27204-2048
September 24, 1990
NC Department of Environment, Health
& Natural Resources
Permits & Engineering Section
P. 0.. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Attention: Ms. Roseanne Barona
Re:
Dear Ms. Barona:
NPDES Permit Application
for the City of Randleman
Randolph County
At your request, this letter is to explain the difference
between the flow request in the permit application and the
engineering report for the City of Randleman, North Carolina.
The engineering report was performed in late 1989 and early 1990
and indicated that a wastewater treatment plant capacity of about
1.7 MGD was projected over the planning period. The study went
on to indicate that an additional flow increase up to 2.0 MGD
could be effected for approximately the same amount of capital
investment.
However, the engineering report did not include provisions
for more stringent limits being imposed at the discharge point on
the Deep River. It is our understanding now that more stringent
limits will probably be imposed for this wastewater discharge.
Assuming more stringent discharge limits, the facilities proposed
to be constructed in the engineering report would probably not be
adequate to handle the wastewater treatment at a flow of 2.0 MGD.
The above justification is basically the reason that the
permit application has been somewhat reduced from the flow
contained in the engineering report. I trust the above
information will be sufficient for your purposes. If you require
additional information, please let us know. Thank you for your
review of this project.
HJM:jy
cc: Mr. Rick Hardin
Very truly yours,
MARZIANO & MINIER, P.A.
Hiram J. arziano, P.E.

44,
it4§1 405
1711V111 SAV1191
cs=
c

Request No. 5895
Facility Name
NPDES No.
Type of Waste
Facility Status
Permit Status
Receiving Stream
Stream Classification
Subbasin
County
Regional Office
Requestor
Date of Request
Topo Quad
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS
:City of Randleman WWTP
:NC0025445
:42.8% Domestic/57.1% Industrial
:Existing
:Modification
:Deep River
:C
:03-06-08
:Randolph Stream Characteristics:
:Winston-Salem USGS #02 1001.1525 Date 1988
:Rosanne Barona Drainage Area: 180 sq.mi.
:10/9/90 Summer 7Q10: 5 cfs
:D19SE Winter 7Q10: 12 cfs
Average Flow: 171 cfs
30Q2: 23 cfs
Wasteload Allocation Summary
C= =b
RECEIVED
N.. Dept. NRCD
8 i 391JAN 2 8 IQ91
,I•
Region, (Mice
Randleman has requested an increase in permitted flow from 1.25 MGD to 1.75
MGD (they have indicated a future need for up to 2.5 MGD). Tertiary
treatment is recommended for any expansion in wasteflow at the Randleman
WWTP. New and expanding dischargers in the Deep River basin are receiving
stringent limits due to water quality problems in the Deep River.
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
WASTELOAD SENT TO EPA? (Major) _Y_ (Y or N) . NMO fi01I b.th u»1'1• bt &* Ec 694
(if yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreads eet, copy of model, or
if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description
of how fits into basinwide plan)
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
S<o1JJ
c, _4! J1_ - i .
Date: //!2/?/
Date: Il11at
Date: 2-7- 4/
Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
1991
Zllrlfr

''-2- Request No. 5895
Existing Limits
Wasteflow (MGD) :
BOD5 (mg/1) :
NH3N (mg/1) :
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1) :
Fecal Coliform (/100 ma):
pH (SU) :
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1) :
Recommended Limits
Wasteflow (MGD) :
BOD5 (mg/1) :
NH3N (mg/1) :
DO (mg/1) :
TSS (mg/1) :
Fecal Coliform (/100 ml) :
pH (SU) :
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Limits Chanaes Due To:
Instream Data
Ammonia Toxicity
Chlorine
Nutrient Sensitive Waters
HOW
New 7Q10 flow data
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average Daily Maximum
Summer/Winter
1.25
28/30
2/monitor
5
30
1000
6-9
no limit
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average
Summer/Winter
1.75
5/10
2/4
6
30
200
6-9
no limit
monitor
monitor
Daily Maximum
Parameter (s) Affected
x BOD5, NH3-N, DO
x Chlorine
Modeling Studies x BOD5, NH3-N, DO
New facility information
Other (explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis
including new flows, rates, field data, interacting discharges, etc.)
(See page 4 for Miscellaneous and special conditions if apply)

-3-
Request No. 5895
Toxicty Limit: Chronic, Quarterly
Existing Limit: 28%
Recommended Limit: 35%
Existing Limits
Cadmium (ug/ 1) :
Chromium (ug/1) :
Copper (ug/1) :
Zinc (ug/1) :
Chlorine (ug/1) :
Recommended Limits
TOXICS
Monitoring Schedule:
JAN, APR, JUL, OCT
Toxics or metals limits
Daily Maximum
Cadmium (ug/1) :
Chromium (ug/1) :
Copper (ug/1):
Nickel (ug/l):
Lead (ug/1) :
Zinc (ug/l) :
Cyanide (ug/ 1) :
Chlorine (ug/1) :
Fluoride (ug/1) :
Aluminum (ug/1) :
Tetrachloroethylene (ug/1) :
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (ug/l) :
Chlorides (ug/1):
Limits Changes Due to:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Failing toxicity test
Priority Pollutant Analysis
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Daily Maximum
5.7
142
monitor
250
71
monitor
14
28
5118
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Parameter (s) Affected
Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, CN
Fluoride, Aluminum,
Tetrachloroethylene,
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate,
Chlorides
(onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Miscellaneous information pertinent to the renewal or new permit for this
discharge. Include relationship to the Basinwide management plan.

Request No. 5895
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIRMENTS:
Upstream: Y
Donwstream: Y
Location: 100 feet upstream
Location: 1.) Deep River, above worthville Dam
2.) Deep River, above the confluence with
Hasketts Creek
PARAMETERS: DO, TEMP, COND, FECAL COLIFORM
Special Instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
The two downstream monitoring sites are required to determine the extent of
the DO sag. Two sags are predicted by the Level-B model. One above the
dam and the second 2 miles below the discharge.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR CONDITIONS
SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS:
(for P&E or region to recommend time frame for implementing new limits)
ADDITIONAL "REVIEWER" COMMENTS:
Additional Information attached? (yes or no) I es, explain attachments.
Aric i s1SJJ 7u,e.e,th

10/89
Facility Name Ci4y i
Ik*,m)
Permit # /l/600/5— 5—
CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity in any two consecutive toxicity tests,
using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is ,35 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
document). The permit holder shall perform quarter(v monitoring using this procedure to establish
compliance with the permit condition. The. first test will be performed after thirty days from
issuance of this permit during the months ofa / 1 l�u- OCR . Effluent
sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below
all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed inrassociation with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 .- cfs
Permited Flow MGD
IWC% J3
Basin & Sub -basin 03 -0b —Of(
Receiving Stream cp Rife, -
County of fi. Date
See Part ,3 , Condition V.
Recommended by:
**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 455770,

z
01.
s
106,=,2.
QA=11
Asuoey.
W 1.0Tp
wgd
olla-
1414416N1AR bat.
ton?
7Q UD1 zg5
30Qs+,a
Oft:.1
13
WuA 1i QM
C° a foot d► ?)
%d
.440
MS
•44s
7 Q Eo -
I ev,Akl,•
d •
7wwS2„.
710 2i
Q( d
Tat5 -)rbs
72l'b Q A
ed
\ 1 -. I.:,, _ , 4 2 2. -',- .5.
1. ' II, 2 -z , 2 7,1
-- . 3S( . 3 SS
5-3
g, 5
3
3E
e3
(,39 (a,3i
3
.3.3
.SQ-c- R 4ND 4 v
(6 el/a e�
Ef/ -._ 1 Y
‘&65-- o10G5
. 31r S-
. 3 t'c . 36.3 el
f. 19
'3
• 5-3
`, 3
t3
ra
Co.x COIN ..ii.x• katop) .

SUMMER
KD = 0.2
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : CITY OF RANDLEMAN
Receiving Stream : DEEP RIVER
The End D.O. is 6.56 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 5.29 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 1.52 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 4.98 0.40 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 5
Reach 6
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.00 1.75000
0..00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA **4,
Discharger : CITY OF RANDLEMAN Subbasin 030609
..Receiving Stream : DEEP RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7Q10 : 5.0 Winter 7Q10 : 12.0
Design Temperature: 23.0
(LENGTH( SLOPE( VELOCITY 1 DEPTH( Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN
1 mile I ft/mil fps 1 ft (design ► @204 (design) @20' Idesignl
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.401 0.001 0.032 1 6.10 10.23 1 0.20 1 0.21 1 0.201 0.38
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.131 0.001 0.032 1 8.30 10.23 1 0.20 1 0.26 I 0.241 0.38
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.671 0.001 0.232 1 1.35 1 0.23 1 0.20 1 4.25 1 3.981 0.38
Reach 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.671 0.001 0.195 1 2.30 1 0.23 1 0.20 1 1.75 I 1.641 0.38
Reach 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.671 0.001 0.159 13.24 1 0.23 1 0.20 1 0.95 1 0.89( 0.38
Reach 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I I 1
Segment 1 1 0.671 0.001 0.122 4.19 0.23 0.20 0.57 0.53 0.38
Reach 6 1 1
1 Flow 1 CBOD 1 NBOD 1 D.O. 1
1 cfs I mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1 2.712 1 10.000 1 9.000 ( 6.000
Headwaters) 5.000 1 10.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff I 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 2.000 1 2.500 1 0.500 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.000 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff I 0.380 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720

Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.380 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 5
Waste I 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.380 1 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 6
Waste I 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.380 1 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

SITOTR
KD = 0.2
Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I
1 1 0.00 7.12 10.00 3.81 7.71
1 1 0.05 6.80 9.78 3.68 7.71
1 1 0.10 6.49 9.57 3.55 7.71
1 1 0.15 6.21 9.36 3.42 7.71
1 1 0.20 5.93 9.16 3.30 7.71
1 1 0.25 5.67 8.96 3.18 7.71
1 1 0.30 5.43 8.77 3.07 7.71
1 1 0.35 5.20 8.58 2.96 7.71
1 1 0.40 4.98 8.39 2.86 7.71
1 2 0.37 5.54 7.18 2.37 9.71
1 2 0.42 5.38 7.02 2.29 9.71
1 2 0.47 5.22 6.87 2.21 9.71
1 3 0.40 5.22 6.87 2.21 9.71
1 3 0.50 5.53 6.81 2.18 9.75
1 3 0.60 5.80 6.75 2.15 9.79
1 3 0.70 6.04 6.69 2.13 9.83
1 3 0.80 6.26 6.63 2.10 9.86
1 3 0.90 6.45 6.58 2.08 9.90
1 3 1.00 6.63 6.52 2.05 9.94
1 4 0.94 6.63 6.52 2.05 9.94
1 4 1.04 6.66 6.45 2.03 9.98
1 4 1.14 6.70 6.39 2.00 10.02
1 4 1.24 6.74 6.33 1.97 10.05
1 4 1.34 6.77 6.27 1.94 10.09
1 4 1.44 6.81 6.21 1.92 10.13
1 4 1.54 6.84 6.15 1.89 10.17
1 5 1.48 6.84 6.15 1.89 10.17
1 5 1.58 6.83 6.08 1.86 10.21
1 5 1.68 6.81 6.01 1.83 10.24
1 5 1.78 6.80 5.94 •1.80 10.28
1 5 1.88 6.79 5.88 1.77 10.32
1 5 1.98 6.79 5.81 1.74 10.36
1 5 2.08 6.78 5.74 1.72 10.40
1 6 2.01 6.78 5.74 1.72 10.40
1 6 2.11 6.74 5.67 1.68 10.43
1 6 2.21 6.70 5.59 1.65 10.47
1 6 2.31 6.66 5.51 1.61 10.51
1 6 2.41 6.62 5.44 1.58 10.55
1 6 2.51 6.59 5.36 1.55 10.59
1 6 2.61 6.56 5.29 1.52 10.62
Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I

•
10/29/90 ver 3.1
TOXICS
REVI EWE
•'L':..cti:�:r �tl4J►r2K"V"A0.LG[Zni!?iM'+�'w`F'
Facility: City of Randleman WWTP
NPDES Permit No.: NC0025445
Status (E, P, or M) : M
Permitted Flow: ,.1r8- mgd V-15-
Actual Average Flow: 1.0 mgd
Subbasin: '030608
Receiving Stream: Deep River I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA---- 1
Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTED' I
7Q10: 5.0 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY 1
IWC: 35.17 4 I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic)
Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria I
Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violations)
(ug/1) (ug/1) 1 % (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam)I
Cadmium S 2.0 1 924 0.0 0.1 0.08 1.2 1.250 1 20.0 I
Chromium S 50.0 1 764 0.1 0.2 0.25 10.3 10.370 1 20.0 I I
Copper AL 7.0 1 82% 0.1 0.1 0.28 8.6 8.760 1 170.0 I N
Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.0 0.3 0.37 3.7 3.740 1 88.0 I P
Lead S 25.0 1 814 0.1 0.6 0.74 6.6 6.740 1 I U
Zinc AL 50.0 1 77% 0.4 0.5 0.90 21.0 2i.310 1 1,110.0 1 T
Cyanide S 5.0 1 594 0.1 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.090 1 30.0 I
Mercury S 0.012 1 0% 1 I S
Silver AL 0.06 1 0% 1 I E
Selenium S 5.00 1 0% 1 I C
Arsenic S 50.00 1 0% 1 I T
Phenols S NA 1 0% 1 I I
NH3-N C 1 0* 1 10
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 1 0% I I N
I I I
I I I
I--------------- ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM
Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Pollutant 1 Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ?
(#/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data I OBSERVED (YES/NO)
Cadmium S 1 0.89 5.687 0.705 11.748 7.03 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 A
Chromium S 1 7.39 142.166 7.077 292.391 7.03 Monitor Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 N
;Copper AL•., 1 1.38 19.903 5.879 185.247 59.79 Monitor Monitor Monitor ) Weekly YES 1 A
Nickel S 1 4.59 250.212 29.399 298.782 30.95 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 L
Lead S 1 4.67 71.083 16.607 150.448 0.00 Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 Y
Zinc AL , 1 7.71 142.166 24.238 575.817 390.39 Monitor Monitor Monitor .I Weekly YES 1 S
Cyanide S 1 0.43 14.217 4.339 4.335 10.55 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 I
Mercury S 1 0.00 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
Silver AL ► 0.00 0.171 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 I
Selenium S 1 0.18 14.217 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R
Arsenic S 1 1.77 142.166 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 E
Phenols S 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 I I S
NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 1 1 U
T.R.Chlor.AL 1 48.336 0.00 Limit 1 1 L
1 I I T
i IS

10/29/90 ver 3.1 T OXICS REVIEW
Facility: City of Randleman WWTP
NPDES Permit No.: NC0025445
Status (E, P, or M) : "'NC.
Permitted Flow: .-Z►A mgd 1.7-S
Actual Average Flow: 1.0 mgd
Subbasin: '030608
Receiving Stream: Deep River I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ----
Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI
7Q10: 5.0 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY
IWC: 27.93 % 1 Domestic PERMITTED Domestic I OBSERVED of Chronic
Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria
Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violations
(ug/1) (ug/1) 1 % (t/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam)
Cadmium S 2.0 1 92% 0.0 0.1 0.08 1.2 1.250 1 20.0
Chromium S 50.0 1 76% 0.1 0.2 0.25 10.3 10.370 1 20.0 1 I
Copper AL 7.0 1 82% 0.1 0.1 0.28 8.6 8.760 1 170.0 1 N
Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.0 0.3 0.37 3.7 3.740 1 88.0 1 P
Lead S 25.0 1 61% 0.1 0.6 0.74 6.6 6.740 1 1 U
Zinc AL 50.0 1 77% 0.4 0.5 0.90 21.0 21.310 1 1,110.0 1 T
Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 0.1 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.090 1 30.0
Mercury S 0.012 1 0% 1 1 S
Silver AL 0.06 1 0% 1 1 E
Selenium S 5.00 1 0% 1 1 C
Arsenic S 50.00 1 0% 1 1 T
Phenols S NA 1 0% 1 1 I
NH3-N C 1 0% 1 1 0
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 1 0% 1 1 N
Pollutant
Cadmium S
Chromium S
Copper
Nickel
Lead S
Zinc AL
Cyanide S
Mercury S
Silver AL
Selenium S
Arsenic S
Phenols S
NH3-N C
T.R.Chlor.AL
AL
S
ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM
Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ?
(#/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO)
0.89 7.161 0.705 11.748 5.59 Monitor Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 A
7.39 179.032 7.077 292.391 5.59 Monitor Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 N
1.38 25.065 5.879 185.247 47.48 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Weekly YES 1 A
4.59 315.097 29.399 298.782 24.58 Monitor Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 L
4.67 89.516 16.607 150.448 0.00 Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 Y
7.71 179.032 24.238 575.817 310.00 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Weekly YES 1 S
0.43 17.903 4.339 4.335 8.38 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 I
0.00 0.043 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
0.00 0.215 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 I
0.18 17.903 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R
1.77 179.032 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 E
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 s
0.000 0.00 1 1 U
60.871 0.00 Limit 1 1 L
I T
1 S

10/29/90 ver 3.1 TOXICS REV I E W
Facility: City of Randleman WWTP
NPDES Permit No.: NC0025445
Status (E, P, or M): M
Permitted Flow: . -Lr8.- mgd i,1 5-
Actual Average Flow: 1.0 mgd
Subbasin: '030608
Receiving Stream: Deep River I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ----
Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI
7Q10: 5.0 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY
IWC: 35.17 % I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic
Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria
Pollutant AL Conc. I Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violations
(ug/1) (ug/1) 1 % (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam)
Cadmium S 2.0 1 92% 0.0 0.1 0.08 1.2 1.250 1 20.0
Chromium S 50.0 1 76% 0.1 0.2 0.25 10.3 10.370 I 20.0 1 I
Copper AL 7.0 1 82% 0.1 0.1 0.28 8.6 8.760 1 170.0 I N
Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.0 0.3 0.37 3.7 3.740 1 88.0 1 P
Lead S 25.0 1 81% 0.1 0.6 0.74 6.6 6.740 1 1 U
Zinc AL 50.0 1 77% 0.4 0.5 0.90 21.0 21.310 1 1,110.0 1 T
Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 0.1 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.090 1 30.0
Mercury S 0.012 1 0% 1 1 S
Silver AL 0.06 1 0% 1 1 E
Selenium S 5.00 1 0% 1 1 C
Arsenic S 50.00 1 0% 1 1 T
Phenols S NA 1 0% 1 1 I
NH3-N C I 0% I 1 0
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 1 0% 1 1 N
Pollutant
ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM
Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ?
(#/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO)
Cadmium S 1 0.89 5.687 0.705 11.748 7.03 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 A
Chromium S 1 7.39 142.166 7.077 292.391 7.03 Monitor Limit Limit I NCAC NO 1 N
Copper AL 1 1.38 19.903 5.879 185.247 59.79 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Weekly YES I A
Nickel S 1 4.59 250.212 29.399 298.782 30.95 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 L
Lead S 1 4.67 71.083 16.607 150.448 0.00 Limit Limit I NCAC NO 1 Y
Zinc AL 1 7.71 142.166 24.238 575.817 390.39 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Weekly YES 1 S
Cyanide S 1 0.43 14.217 4.339 4.335 10.55 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 I
Mercury S 1 0.00 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
Silver AL 1 0.00 0.171 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 I
Selenium S 1 0.18 14.217 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R
Arsenic S 1 1.77 142.166 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 E
Phenols S 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 1 I U
T.R.Chlor.AL 1 48.336 0.00 Limit 1 1 L
I I I T
i I I S

i!
UTH --Ran lIeinArj
,yleeto veer (G)
i!
Pr-0/.0,0s6/ l �5 il��� �re�u�d �—
ilefraitz4ed SoG)
IL
1611.7, 1/;-- 046 61. 4-6 16mv)
,
1.FX/.5777g6- L/rr1 / 0,?8/07/6
ij2d 72o = _6, o `ms a .7D s' - y. I/3 y f( , ya
3i,
! /v� Dof r /rfL, L[
f�?
II,Pflel
f ! �
1 c 1 Gn d 'J 0 -, Z /btu a
I" e6ov = 11^., 5 !C
i° 71/401 1.5`a M� c
'it 1tiSK
it
�..
b s = .3ZU 3 .�,CL Yo .2es
�,t/Isr' NU Li ,n/ 73
Stt0,7 Mir- 1-e•
/ Z
N1 ,i a
'PO 5-
7SS 3v 30
,-&f /ovv /ovv
/4-6/,a g1 Tr,
Cry. -4,

9fF=18v
7Qtb,;50
QR . 1'7 I
AZ 6.105Y0
W4f1P
hnck
.13 ►Ki
w•r waits. t7a,-
LIafoo} atbp)
19 f1"%t2
7Q<A -�
. 44S nn.
1.4
4(.s
71b , 12r
Qn Ro
IRt gyros
.5166 /iow
TateQ
vE1((0G,`-1
k>n
. l3
5-3
. 0 3;
g 3
a3
.3
• 2'-(
6S
3b
6.3cl
a3a
.3
3.`1W
�e cc. dam wu.s s
a I�5
3
3
.3
.3k
.3s4
15
3.?
.3
(6 a'a a �
rsAu'l;',
-3�
.3�
a i as
3
.3
S3
is
Co x V aryt, 6?. Z -Get" arep)

jl %n Cl69 ••r,
✓ 03-OG -Oa
Gv/ 00
c 7 � -•RUC / "r• 5,0ecce dc6 � ovz e (cw Q— �7L
a: < S P11& iD < 7 e e,r7.90 ,5-i,s, ha 40 L<J don ct 2 l S G - /7CCo/
/L TD ',Z.G ee,c( Ct4e,e [2Q:^e lee dels-c SS C-(,
Liam i -t j)a,c al I s Mode( w416K e 'S cd- //aske tit;
?Gee- 721e ,42.06( % Uoi Cowie e4.oerle:15- 0,1 Ae_ GhpC.CQ aY' ![C/
I 7ed
are A/lDhliQ 6/e , �l o eve/ i,C f( / - 0, pZ , o i 5%7/6.
I;!
lil are rle,,,e(e tiv i- i-e o s7zuhc(C( 1 l L ahoy .
/0K i/k a,� ✓i%CC !�D e2.4 040E2 /s' evt � s c`'v/'%' `y
1+Ltnj
)vim (1..2C° 75 c-t vaAe. 6acfrOter7d //rYt[ / c S�a/� a--e.
reC'4h,rrtPnGtPlf. /1'/56, ,4skabew Gvlc%TP (Y' F41e J c%1!' rS /it `)-e-et
tvPr 74e kkode / A
(ccrd �14 ') /�LCG�) %?dY S , / -`
/1 tee`
stows einA- ote �e/vim Ras ke # &s 77/- Q/, Q�1-0s
C4X �a 0, t5- ryu& k / Hp-sMAC" (1`& )
�r e ; j' fr O i Ol e i C 2/� c� vL,
ve e6-6( io i'/G /va ,45-4beY? G(p /,
u 5/2 / f5,
/71(e G7'c- i tt- he -v
•Wve /e15,. et. 60*<.5<
„ 7 #04J Q�Gls /'!i (i6se
kw 3

7DX/CS A«UC/177OJV
.0 rze_e4 Sir-571-L002e% - /n /9y0, jA,=
- — S I (
/. 2 S 4
F
kRA
p,F
L6/020a
a3-06_o -
AOC, 35- V.
f a of ,,ed //4/1, zs Cwl/. 75-
tf�0,8 �ymOGkvG�r�corv�e f-�aae ie7 .5 yq,c)a3 3 4/5 /
i4a
/7v, C°hl.. J.r,.L (c) 1. / va, as 3 3v, /5
90 M s� M
.5"a Fl M 377 M
Men.
/wG = aF %
r
r e/i-a4L/ccy-oe 7 (Qua.. (c)
S9a -e y/IfPXy /)phiAle kc /3
Ftd •
73 0 3/ 1 M a y7 M
`f
So A c_
a30 (-C�/o c&
/D F/u
t&ti _ /0/
i 7q vl /sl L r')
Fo. 3,5-Y? ! I (S 3/9.,-... 3 pi
6 5/ 5'S 1_ S/I 8- L

SUMMER
KD = 0.2
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : CITY OF RANDLEMAN
Receiving Stream : DEEP RIVER
The End D.O. is 6.56 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 5.29 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 1.52 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 4.98 0.40 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 5
Reach 6
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.00 1.75000
0..00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : CITY OF RANDLEMAN Subbasin : 030609
Receiving Stream : DEEP RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7Q10 : 5.0 Winter 7Q10 : 12.0
Design Temperature: 23.0
ILENGTHI SLOPE' VELOCITY 1 DEPTH' Kd I Kd I Ka 1 Ka I KN I
mile I ft/mil fps I ft Idesign i @201, Idesign l @201/2 Idesign'
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.401 0.001 0.032 16.10 10.23 10.20 10.21 I 0.201 0.38
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.131 0.001 0.032 1 8.30 10.23 1 0.20 1 0.26 I 0.241 0.38
Reach 2 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I
1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.232 11.35 10.23 1 0.20 14.25 I 3.981 0.38
Reach 3 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I
1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.195 12.30 1 0.23 1 0.20 11.75 I 1.641 0.38
Reach 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I
I 1 1 I I I 1 I I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.159 13.24 1 0.23 10.20 10.95 I 0.891 0.38
Reach 5 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.122 1 4.19 10.23 10.20 10.57 I 0.531 0.38
Reach 6 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I
I Flow I CBOD I NBOD I D.O. I
I cfs I mg/1 1 mg/1 I mg/1 I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste I 2.712 110.000 I 9.000 I 6.000
Headwaters) 5.000 110.000 I 1.000 1 7.720
Tributary I 0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff I 0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 2.000 1 2.500 I 0.500 I 7.720
* Runoff I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff I 0.380 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.720

u tv
c
Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff I 0.380 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 5
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff I 0.380 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 6
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff I 0.380 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

`1 y
•
SUMMER
KD = 0.2
I Seg
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I Seg
# I Reach #
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
# I Reach #
I Seg Mi
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.37
0.42
0.47
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.94
1.04
1.14
1.24
1.34
1.44
1.54
1.48
1.58
1.68
1.78
1.88
1.98
2.08
2.01
2.11
2.21
2.31
2.41
2.51
2.61
I Seg Mi I
D.O.
7.12
6.80
6.49
6.21
5.93
5.67
5.43
5.20
4.98
5.54
5.38
5.22
5.22
5.53
5.80
6.04
6.26
6.45
6.63
6.63
6.66
6.70
6.74
6.77
6.81
6.84
6.84
6.83
6.81
6.80
6.79
6.79
6.78
6.78
6.74
6.70
6.66
6.62
6.59
6.56
D.O.
I CBOD
10.00
9.78
9.57
9.36
9.16
8.96
8.77
8.58
8.39
7.18
7.02
6.87
6.87
6.81
6.75
6.69
6.63
6.58
6.52
6.52
6.45
6.39
6.33
6.27
6.21
6.15
6.15
6.08
6.01
5.94
5.88
5.81
5.74
5.74
5.67
5.59
5.51
5.44
5.36
5.29
I CBOD
I NBOD
3.81
3.68
3.55
3.42
3.30
3.18
3.07
2.96
2.86
2.37
2.29
2.21
2.21
2.18
2.15
2.13
2.10
2.08
2.05
2.05
2.03
2.00
1.97
1.94
1.92
1.89
1.89
1.86
1.83
1.80
1.77
1.74
1.72
1.72
1.68
1.65
1.61
1.58
1.55
1.52
I NBOD
I Flow I
7.71
7.71
7.71
7.71
7.71
7.71
7.71
7.71
7.71
9.71
9.71
9.71
9.71
9.75
9.79
9.83
9.86
9.90
9.94
9.94
9.98
10.02
10.05
10.09
10.13
10.17
10.17
10.21
10.24
10.28
10.32
10.36
10.40
10.40
10.43
10.47
10.51
10.55
10.59
10.62
Flow I

SUMMER
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : CITY OF RANDLEMAN
Receiving Stream : DEEP RIVER
The End D.O. is 6.54 mg/1.
The End CBOD is 11.43 mg/1.
The End NBOD is 1.52 mg/1.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 5.03 0.40 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 5
Reach 6
34.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.00 1.75000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
,Discharger : CITY OF RANDLEMAN Subbasin : 030609
Receiving Stream : DEEP RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7Q10 : 5.0 Winter 7Q10 : 12.0
Design Temperature: 23.0
ILENGTHI SLOPE' VELOCITY 1 DEPTH' Kd 1 Kd I Ka 1 Ka 1 KN I
I mile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft Idesign l @20% Idesign l @20,4 'design'
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.401 0.001 0.032 16.10 10.11 1 0.10 10.21 I 0.201 0.38
Reach 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.131 0.001 0.032 18.30 10.11 1 0.10 1 0.26 1 0.241 0.38
Reach 2 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I
1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.232 11.35 1 0.11 10.10 14.25 I 3.981 0.38
Reach 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.195 12.30 10.11 10.10 11.75 I 1.641 0.38
Reach 4 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I
1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.159 1 3.24 10.11 10.10 10.95 I 0.891 0.38
Reach 5
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 I 0.671 0.001 0.122 1 4.19 10.11 10.10 1 0.57 I 0.531 0.38
Reach 6 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I
I Flow 1 CBOD 1 NBOD I D.O. 1
I cfs I mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste I 2.712 1 34.000 I 9.000 1 6.000
Headwaters' 5.000 110.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 2.000 1 2.500 I 0.500 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste 1 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary 1 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.380 1 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720

Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.380 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 5
Waste I 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.380 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 6
Waste 1 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.380 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

I
I
Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I
1 1 0.00 7.12 18.44 3.81 7.71
1 1 0.05 6.81 18.24 3.68 7.71
1 1 0.10 6.52 18.04 3.55 7.71
1 1 0.15 6.24 17.84 3.42 7.71
1 1 0.20 5.98 17.65 3.30 7.71
1 1 0.25 5.72 17.46 3.18 7.71
1 1 0.30 5.48 17.27 3.07 7.71
1 1 0.35 5.25 17.08 2.96 7.71
1 1 0.40 5.03 16.89 2.86 7.71
1 2 0.37 5.58 13.93 2.37 9.71
1 2 0.42 5.42 13.78 2.29 9.71
1 2 0.47 5.27 13.63 2.21 9.71
1 3 0.40 5.27 13:63 2.21 9.71
1 3 0.50 5.57 13.54 2.18 9.75
1 3 0.60 5.84 13.46 2.15 9.79
1 3 0.70 6.08 13.37 2.13 9.83
1 3 0.80 6.29 13.29 2.10 9.86
1 3 0.90 6.48 13.20 2.08 9.90
1 3 1.00 6.65 13.12 2.05 9.94
1 4 0.94 6.65 13.12 2.05 9.94
1 4 1.04 6.69 13.03 2.03 9.98
1 4 1.14 6.72 12.94 2.00 10.02
1 4 1.24 6.76 12.86 1.97 10.05
1 4 1.34 6.79 12.77 1.94 10.09
1 4 1.44 6.82 12.68 1.92 10.13
1 4 1.54 6.85 12.60 1.89 10.17
1 5 1.48 6.85 12.60 1.89 10.17
1 5 1.58 6.84 12.50 1.86 10.21
1 5 1.68 6.82 12.41 1.83 10.24
1 5 1.78 6.81 12.32 1.80 10.28
1 5 1.88 6.80 12.22 1.77 10.32
1 5 1.98 6.79 12.13 1.74 10.36
1 5 2.08 6.78 12.04 1.72 10.40
1 6 2.01 6.78 12.04 1.72 10.40
1 6 2.11 6.73 11.94 1.68 10.43
1 6 2.21 6.69 11.83 1.65 10.47
1 6 2.31 6.65 11.73 1.61 10.51
1 6 2.41 6.61 11.63 1.58 10.55
1 6 2.51 6.57 11.53 1.55 10.59
1 6 2.61 6.54 11.43 1.52 10.62
Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I