NC0025445_Permit (Issuance)_19960703

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0025445
Randleman WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance`'`
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Correspondence
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
July 3, 1996
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the re -sr -ex -me slide

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 3, 1996
Mr. Richard D. Hardin
City of Randleman
110 Hilliary Street
Randleman, North Carolina 27317
A7A
�EHNR
Subject: Permit Issuance
NPDES Permit NC0025445
Randleman WWTP
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Hardin:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on October 2, 1995., we are
forwarding herewith the subject State - NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
Two issues were raised in a letter from Marziano & Minier dated April 24,1996 - flow limit and
plant classification. The authorization to operate the plant at 1.745 MGD will be allowed following
written notification to the Winston-Salem Regional Office water quality staff. A copy of this letter
should be sent to the Permits and Engineering Unit in Raleigh as well. The permit cover supplement
sheet has been modified accordingly. Regarding the plant classification issue, it has been determined
that the modifications to the sludge handling system will add as many rating points as they could take
away, and therefore the plant classification would remain a Class IV. As a result, no changes have
been made to the corresponding monitoring frequencies.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicative hearing upon written request within thirty
(30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless
such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take notice this permit is not transferable. Part II, E.4. addresses the requirements to be
followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge. _
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by
the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources,
Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Greg Nizich at telephone
number 919/733-5083, ext. 541.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Central Files
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Facility Assessment Unit
Aquatic Survey & Toxicology Unit
Technical Assistance & Certification Group
Permits and Engineering Unit

Permit No. NC0025445
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Randleman
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Randleman Wastewater Treatment Plant
on NCSR 2133
Randolph County
to receiving waters designated as the Deep River in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, III, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective August 1, 1996
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on April 30, 2001.
Signed this day July 3, 1996
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich -
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. NC0025445
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
City of Randleman
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a 1.50 MGD wastewater treatment plant consisting of influent pumping
stations with grit and solids removal, mechanical bar screen, extended aeration basins, clarifiers,
aerated sludge holding tank, traveling bridge filter, chlorine contact chamber, cascade aerator and
sludge drying beds located at Randleman Wastewater Treatment Plant, ,on NCSR 2133,
Randolph County (See Part III of this Permit), and
2 . After written notification to the Division of Environmental Management that the necessary
treatment units are operational, increase treatment capacity to 1.745 MGD, and
3 . Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Deep River
which is classified Class C waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.

A. (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SUMMER (April 1 - October 31) Permit No. NC0025445
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD or expiration, the
Perinittce is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as
specified below:
Effluent Characteristics Discharge Limitations
Monthly. Ayg,
Flow 1.50 M30
I3OD, 5-Day, 20°C 5.0 mg/I
Total Suspended Residue" 30.0 m g / I
NH3 as N 2.0 mg/I
Dissolved Oxygen "'
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Conductivity
Total Phosphorus
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
200.0 /100 ml
Weekly Avg.
7.5 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
400.0 /100 ml
Monitoring Requirements
Mc. s_uremest
Daily Max. Frequency
Continuous
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
28.0 µg/I Daily
Daily
Daily
Monthly
Monthly
_S.tlmpk . _S.ample
Type location
Recording I or E
I,E
I,E
E
E,U,D
E,U,D
E
E,U,D
E,U,D
E
E
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstreain @ Fox Street, D - Downstream @ Worthville Bridge. Upstream and downstream
samples shall be grab samples. Strcam sar- iples shall be collected three times per week during June, July, August and September, and once per
wcck during the remaining months of the year. Instream monitoring for Cadmium, Chromium, Lead and Nickel shall be performed quarterly.
Instrcam sampling for mercury shall be performed monthly.
** The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85 %
removal).
*** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l.

••
• f
•
• • • •
- iJ—i4l
• 1L^•^•
•
•
•
-
•' t.
-j-
71E
•
„,./ r • •
•
_ _// "i'' ' .. , . � ., . 'n/ ; 1
I�
•
DiscH4ROE PoI T•
'.- •t
r\� t .. \ -
2/
•
• •" •c
•
�O
•
•
•
•
•
•=a
•
•
�r f
fir. /�
•
• •
•
_
• — _ �� >_ - •
In
^.1

A. (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SUMMER (April 1 - October 31) Permit No. NC0025445 •
During the period beginning on the effective; date of the permit and lasting until EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD or expiration, the
Pertnittce is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. (Continued)
Effluent Characteristics Discharge Limitations Monitoring
Meamurement
Monthly. Avg. Weekly Avg. Daily Marc„ Frequency
Cadmium 4.2 µ g / I Weekly
Lead 25.0 µ g / 1 Weekly
Mercury 0.038 µg/l Weekly
Chromium 2/Month
Nickel 2/Month
2/Month
Cyanide 2/Month
Fluoride
2/Month
Copper 2/Month
Zinc
Silver 2/Month
Chronic Toxicity**** Quarterly
Requirements
Sample
IyRe
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite E
'Sample
Location
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E
E
E
E
E
**** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 32%; January, April, July and October; See Part III, Condition G.
The P i-I shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units at the effluent. Effluent monitoring shall be conducted Daily
by grab samples:
•
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A. (2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WINTER (November 1- March 31)
During the period beginning on the effecti 'c date of the permit and lasting until EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD or expiration, the
Pcrmittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as
specified below:
Effluent Characterist1 J
Discharge Limitations
Monthly. Avg,
Flow 1.50 Nk3D
BOD, 5-Day, 20"C** 10.0 mg/I
Total Suspended Residue" 30.0 mg/I
NH3asN 4.0 mg/I
Dissolved Oxygen "'
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 200.0 /100 ml
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Conductivity
Total Phosphorus
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Measurement
Weekly Avg, Daily Max, Frequency
Continuous
15.0 mg/I Daily
45.0 mg/I Daily
Daily
Daily
400.0 /100 mi Daily
28.0 N g/I Daily
Daily
Daily
Monthly
Monthly
Permit No. NC0025445
Monitoring Requirements
$ample
Type
'Sample
Location
Recording I or E
Composite I,E
Composite I,E
Composite E
Grab E,U,D
Grab E,U,D
Grab E
Grab E,U,D
Grab E,U,D
Composite E
Composite E
* Sample locations: E - Effluent,.I - Influent, U - Upstream @ Fox Street, D - Downstream @ Worthville Bridge. Upstream and downstream
samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three tunes per week during June, July, August and September, and once per
week during the remaining months of the year. In stream monitoring for Cadmium, Chromium, Lead and Nickel shall be performed quarterly.
lnstrcam sampling for mercury shall be conducted monthly.
** The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85 %
removal).
*** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/1.

A. (2)• . EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WINTER (November 1 - March 31) Permit No. NC0025445 •
During the period beginning on the cffectiNc; date of the permit and lasting until EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD or expiration, the
i'crmittec is authorized io discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. (Continued)
Effluent
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Chromium
Nickel
Cyanide
Fluoride
Copper
Zinc
Silver
Chronic
Characteristics Discharge [.imitations
Monthly. Avg= Weekly Avg, Daily Max.
4.2 µg/I
25.0 µg/I
0.038 µg/I
Toxicity****
Monitoring
Measurement
Frequency
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Quarterly
Requirements
Sample •Sample
Type Location
Composite E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E
E
E
E
E
E
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
**** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) PIF at 32%; January, April, July and October; See Part III, Condition G.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units at the effluent. Effluent monitoring shall be conducted Daily
by grab samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A. (3). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONFORING REQUIREMENTS SUMMER (April 1 - October 31)
Permit No. NC0025445
During the period beginning upon EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the pennittce as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitationg
Monthly. Avg.
Flow 1.745 MGD
BOD, 5-Day, 20°C" 5.0 m g/I
Total Suspended Residue" 30.0 m g/I
NH3 as N 2.0 m g/I
Dissolved Oxygen ""
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 200.0 /1 30 ml
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Conductivity
Total Phosphorus
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monitoring Requirements
Measurement Sample 'Sample
Weekly Avg. Daily Mix. Frequency Type Location
Continuous Recording I or E
7.5 mg/I Daily Composite I,E
45.0 mg/I Daily Composite I,E
Daily Composite E
Daily Grab E,U,D
400.0 /100 ml Daily Grab E,U,D
28.0 µ g/ I Daily Grab E
Daily Grab E,U,D
Daily Grab E,U,D
Monthly Composite E
Monthly Composite E
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream @ Fox Street, D - Downstream @ Worthville Bridge. Upstream and downstream
samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per week during June, July, August and September, and once per
week during the remaining months of the year. In stream monitoring for Cadmium, Chromium, Lead and Nickel shall be performed quarterly.
Instrcam monitoring for mercury shall be conducted monthly.
** The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85 %
removal).
*** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/1.

A. (3). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SUMMER (April 1 - October 31) Permit No. NC0025445
During the period beginning upon EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Pcrmittce is authorized to discharge
from outfall(s) serial number 001. (Continued)
Effluent Characteristics Discharge Limitations
Monthly. Avq. Weekly
Cadmium ti'
Lead
Mercury J
Chromium v
Nickel V
Cyanide
Fluoride
Copper
Zinc e,
Silver
Chronic Toxicity****
Monitoring
M...urement•
Daily Max, Frequency
3.9 p g / I ✓ Weekly
25.0 p g/l ✓ Weekly
0.034 µg/I"- Weekly
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Quarterly
**** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 35%; January, April, July and October; See Part III, Condition H.
Requirements
Sample
Type
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
`Sample
Location
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E
E
E
E
E
E
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units at the effluent. Effluent monitoring shall be conducted Daily
by grab samples. '
There shall be no discharge of floating sol ds or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A. (4). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WINTER (November 1 - March 31) Permit No. NC0025445
During the period beginning upon EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and tnonitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations
Monthly. Avg.
Flow 1.745 MGD
BOD, 5-Day, 20°C** 10.0 mg/I
Total Suspended Residue" 30.0 mg/I
NH3 as N 4.0 mg/I
Dissolved Oxygen ***
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 200.0 /100 ml
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Conductivity
Total Phosphorus
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monitoring Requirements
Measurement Sample *Sample
Weekly Avg, Daily Max. Frequency Type Location
Continuous Recording I or E
15.0 mg/I Daily Composite I,E
45.0 mg/I Daily Composite I,E
Daily Composite E
Daily Grab E,U,D
400.0 /100 mi Daily Grab E,U,D
28.0 µg/I Daily Grab E
Daily Grab E,U,D
Daily Grab E,U,D
Monthly Composite E
Monthly Composite E
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream @ Fox Street, D - Downstream 0 Worthville Bridge. Upstream and downstream
samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per week during June, July, August and September, and once per
week during the remaining months of the year. Instreatn monitoring for Cadmium, Chromium, Lead and Nickel shall be performed quarterly.
Instream monitoring for mercury shall be conducted monthly.
** The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85 %
removal).
*** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mgfl.

A. (4). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WINTER (November 1 - March 31)
Permit No. NC0025445
During the period beginning upon EXPANSION ABOVE 1.5 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
from outfall(s) serial number 001. (Continued)
Effluent Characteristics Discharge Limitations Monitoring
Measurement
Monthly. Avg, Weekly Avg, Daily Max, Frequency
Cadmium 3.9 µ g / I Weekly
Lead 25.0 µ g / I Weekly
Mercury 0.034 µg/I Weekly
Chromium 2/Month
Nickel • 2/Month
Cyanide 2/Month
Fluoride 2/Month
Copper 2/Month
Zinc 2/Month
Silver 2/Month
Chronic Toxicity"" Quarterly
R .quirements
Sample •Sample
UPS_ Location
Composite E,U,D
Composite E,U,D
Composite E,U,D
Composite E,U,D
Composite E,U,D
Grab E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
**** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 35%; January, April, July and October; See Part III, Condition H.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units at the effluent. Effluent monitoring shall be conducted Daily
by grab samples. •
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Pan III Permit No. NC0025445
G. CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is 32% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document).
The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure tp establish compliance
with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date
of this permit during the months of January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this
testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include. alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
H. CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is 35% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document).
The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance
with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date
of this permit during the months of January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this
testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.

All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). F lure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0025445
PERMr1TEE NAME: City of Randleman
FACILITY NAME: Randleman Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor
Design Capacity: 1.745 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 42.8 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 57.1 %
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM:Deep River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-06-08
Reference USGS Quad: D 19 SE
(please attach)
County: Randolph
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 3/31/96 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
none
Requested by: Greg Nizich&'5
Prepared by:,
Reviewed by
vO ,u 33 AIL
Date: 10/6/95
Date: tyyfy5"
Date: C ✓
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
J (i.6
/04 /%'
.--,rl
Drainage Area (mi2 ) / ' % 6 0 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 17 /
7Q10 (cfs) 5, 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) /cZ. 30Q2 (cfs) 073
Toxicity Limits: IWC 35 % Acute/1Acute/01Z 'c
Instream Monitoring:
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Deep River at Fox Street
Deep River at Worthville Bridge
Temp, Fecal, Conductivity, D. O., Metals *
* Quarterly monitoring for Cr, Ni, Cd, and Hg at Fox Street and
Worthville Bridge.
Monthly monitoring for lead at Fox Street and Worthville
Bridge
Wasteflow (MGD):
BODS (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (m8/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 mi):
Residual Chlorine (p.g/1):
Conductivity
Temperature:
TP ( ):
TN (mg/1):
Fluoride (mg/):
Cadmium (ug/1):
Chromium (ug/1):
Nickel (ug/1):
Lead (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/1):
Copper (ug/l)
Zinc (ug/1):
Silver (ug/1):
Mercury (ug/1):
Summer
1.745
5.0
2.0
6.0
30.0
200
28
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
3.9
monitor
monitor
25.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
0.034
Winter
1.745
10.0
4.0
6.0
30.0
200
28
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Comments:

FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
Submit a description of each major industrial facility discharging to the municipal system, using a separate Section IV for each
facility description. Indicate the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)for the industry, the major product or raw
material, the flow (in thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of the wastewater discharged from the industrial facility
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measures of products or raw materials. (see instructions)
1.
Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
Number & Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
2 Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indcate if
pretreatment is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
401a
401b
401c
401d
401e
401f
402
403a
403b
404a
404b
405
Deep River Dye
225 Poplar Street
Randleman
Randolph
North Carolina
27317
2262
I:1
Quantity
460 thousand gallons per day
❑ Intemlittent(int) 1E Continuous (con)
❑ Yes a No
403e
403f
Units(See
Table III)
Parameter
Name
BOD
TSS
Zinc
Nickel
Lead
Copper
Parameter
Number
00310
00530
61092
01067
01051
01042
Value
365
150
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.05

FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION III. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS AND SCHEDULES OF IMPLEMENTATION
This section requires information on any uncompleted implementation schedule which has been imposed for construction of waste
treatment facilities. Requirement schedules may have been established by local, State, or Federal agencies or by court action. IF
YOU ARE SUBJECT TO SEVERAL DIFFERENT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES, EITHER BECAUSE OF DIFFERENT
LEVELS OF AUTHORITY IMPOSING DIFFERENT SCHEDULES (ITEM 1b) AND/OR STAGED CONSTRUCTION OF
SEPARATE OPERATIONAL UNITS (ITEM 1c), SUBMIT A SEPARATE SECTION III FOR EACH ONE..
FOR AGENCY USE
1.
Improvements Required
a Discharge Serial Numbers
Affected List the Dscharge .
serial numbers, assigned in
Section I1, that are covered by
this implementation schedule
b. . Authority Imposing Require-
ment Check the appropriate
item indicating the authority
for the implementation schedule
If the identical implementation
schedule has been ordered by
more than one authority, check
the appropriate items. (see
instructions)
Locally developed plan
Areawide Plan
Basin Plan
State approved implementation
schedule
Federal approved water quality
standards implementation plan
Federal enforcement procedure
or action
State court order
Federal court order
300
301a
301b
001
LOC
ARE
•ate
DSOS
WQS
DENF
CRT
(] FED
c. Improvement Description Specify the 3-character code for the General Action
Description in Table 11 that best describes the improvements required by the
implementation schedule. If more than one schedule applies to the facility because
of a staged construction schedule, state the stage of construction being described
here with the appropriate general action code. Submit a separate Section III for each
stage of construction planned. Also, list all the 3-character (Specific Action) codes which
describe in more detacl the pollution abatement practices that the Implementation schedule requires.
3-character general action 301c NA
description
3-character specific action 301d
2 Implementation Schedule and 3. Actual Complete Dates
Provide dates imposed by schedule and any actual dates of completion for implementation steps listed below.
Indicate dates as accurately as possible. (see instructions) NA
Implementation Steps 2.
a
b.
c.
d.
e.
9.
h.
Preliminary plan complete
Final plan complete
Financing complete & contract
awarded
Site acquired
Begin construction
End construction
Begin discharge
Operational level attained
Schedule (yr/Mo/Day) 3. Actual Completion (YdMo/Day)
302a
33213
302c
302d
302e
302f
302h
303a
30313
303c
303d
303e
3031
303g
303h

FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
SuPrnitecioNriptignufeaghMai9rindustrialfeitydlechamingto-themunicipeloystem,usingaseparateSectionlVforeach
Malaydageriptlein, Imitate ilia d digit Standard Indualrial Ciaositication (SIC) for the industry, the major product or raw
material, the flow (in thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of the wastewater discharged from the Industrial faCility
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measure Of products or raw material. (see instructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
Number & Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
2. Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this cfischarge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indicate if
pretreatment is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
401a
401b
401c
401d
401e
4011
402
403a
402b
404a
404b
405
Jockey International
1 Parrish
Randleman
Randolph
North Carolina
27317
.2 252
Units(See
Quantity Table III)
101
thousand gallons per day
EJ Intermittent(int) Continuous (con)
El Yes El
4C14:f
Parameter
Name
BOD
TS S
Zinc
Nickel
Lead
Copper
Parameter
Number
00310
06530
01092
01067
01051
01042
Value
265
150
0.20
.05
0.10
. 08

FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
Submit a description of each major industlial facility discha irtg Ule munici a!system usinga separate Section IV for each
facility, description. Indicate the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for Me Industry, the major product or raw
material, the flow (in thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of the wastewater discharged from the industrial facility
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measures of products or raw materials. (see instructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
Number 8 Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
2 Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indcate if
pretreatment is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
401a
401b
401c
401d
401e
401f
402
403a
403b
404a
404b
405
Commonwealth Hosiery Mill
P. O. Box 545, W. Academy Street
Randleman
Randolph
North Carolina
27317
2251
Quantity
Units(See
Table IIII
403c 403e
403d 4031
35usand gallons per day
Intermittent(int) I] Continuous (con)
Ei Yes ig3 No
Parameter
Name
BOD
TSS
Zinc
Nickel
Lead
Copper
Parameter
Number
00310
00530
•01E 92
01067
010'51
01042
Value
265
150
0.30
0.05
0.10
.08

FOR AGEIN CY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
Submit a description of each major industrial facility discharging to the municipal system, using a separate Section IV for each
facility description. Indicate the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for the industry, the major product or raw
material, the now (in thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of the wastewaterdischarged from the tndustrial fadlity
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measures of products or raw materials. (see instructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
Number & Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
a Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided tndcate if
pretreatment is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
401a
401b
401c
401d
401e
4011
402
403a
403b
404a
404b
405
Laughlin Hosiery Mill
P. 0. Box 517, Hwy. 220 Business
Randleman
Randolph" :
North Carolina
27317
2251
:1
Units(See
Quantity Table III)
67.1
thousand gallons per day
O Intermittent(int) El Continuous (con)
Ej Yes g] No
4°3e4°3f
Parameter
Name
BOD
TSS
Zinc
-
Nickel
Lead
Copper
Parameter
Number
00310
0053C
0102
01067
01051
01042
Value
265
150
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.05

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requester:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Randleman WWTP
NC0025445
42.8% domestic, 57.2% industrial
Existing
Renewal
Deep River
C
03-06-08
Randolph
Winston-Salem
GnuI 7.ic1c1
11/27/91
D 15 SE
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
NOV 2 1 1`325
E3telWins C,l•-Sa em
8362 Regional Office
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
02.1001.1525
1988
180
5.0
12
171
23
35
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Randleman WWTP has experienced several permit violations since the last permit review in
1992. These include four Cd violations, five BOD5 violations, three pH violations, and one
chlorine violation. No violations for fecal, ammonia, flow, Cr, cyanide, D. O., fluoride, Pb, or
Ni were noted in the DMRs through 1992. The facility has consistently passed its WET test since
1991.
No instream D. O. violations were reported in 1992 through 1994. However, two
upstream D. O. violations and one downstream violation occurred in June of this year. A check of
the USGS gage data near Randleman revealed that the flow in the Deep River was approximately
35 cfs at the time when the D. O. concentrations dropped below the state standard. The lowest
D.O. observation was 4.3 mg/L measured at the downstream monitoring site on June 14, 1995.
Quarterly instream monitoring for metals was added to the permit in 1992. Since then
instream lead violations have been reported in the DMRs. In June 1994 an upstream Pb
concentration of 13 ug/L and a downstream concentration of 46 ug/L was recorded. The Pb
concentration in the effluent on that same day was <2.5 ug/L. The instream Pb violations were
discussed with Frankie Brewer (ORC for Randleman WWTP), Bo McMinn (Pretreatment), Corey
Basinger (WSRO), and Jim Johnston (WSRO). No one could suggest a specific source where the
Pb could be coming from. Since little is known of the fate and transport of Pb tracking down the
source is difficult.
Bo, Corey, and Jim have all voiced their concerns over the fact that the tertiary filters at
Randleman frequently fail. Due to the frequent wash overs of the sand filters the region has
expressed concerns that the effluent monitoring data may not at times be representative of the actual
discharge.
Special Schedule Requirementsn and additional comments from Reviewers:
ES (6- 0
-t Fie 6f I. 7 16D j:s `JiJ/ 'r 'Mil/-r cU [ CAlki Cc -A/

2
Recommended by: /1'.�t'/'O.UJ 1/(744',/,(
Date: //7/51
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: SDate: / /13—
v Date: / 1 --2 5 - SS'
Date: /
Regional Supervisor: /LA
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:

3
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 1.745 1.745
BOD5 (mg/1): 5.0 10.0
NH3N (mg/1): 2.0 4.0
DO (mg/1): 6.0 6.0
TSS (mg/1): 30.0 30.0
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200
Residual Chlorine (14/1): 28 28
Conductivity monitor monitor
Temperature: monitor monitor
TP (mg/1): monitor monitor
TN (mg/1): monitor monitor
Recommended Limits:
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 1.745 1.745
BOD5 (mg/1): 5.0 10.0
NH3N (mg/1): 2.0 4.0
DO (mg/1): 6.0 6.0
TSS (mg/1): 30.0 30.0
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200
Residual Chlorine (µg/1): 28 28
Conductivity monitor monitor
Temperature: monitor monitor
TP (mg/1): monitor monitor
TN (mg/1): monitor monitor
LIMIT CHANGES DUE TO:
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
No limit changes recommended.
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

4
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit
Recommended Limit
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
Fluoride (mg/):
Cadmium (ug/1):
Chromium (ug/l):
Nickel (ug/1):
Lead (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/l):
Copper (ug/1)
Zinc (ug/l):
Tetrachloroethylene (ug/l):
Mercury (ug/1):
Chloroform (ug/l):
Recommended Limits
Fluoride (mg/):
Cadmium (ug/1):
Chromium (ug/1):
Nickel (ug/1):
Lead (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/1):
Copper (ug/1)
Zinc (ug/1):
Silver (ug/1):
Mercury (ug/1):
TOXICS/ME~TALS
Chronic toxicity P/F permit limit (QRTRLY)
35%
35%
Jan., April, July, Oct.
Daily Max.
5.1
5.7
142.0
250.0
71.0
14.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Daily Max. WQ or EL
monitor
3.9 WQ
monitor
monitor
25.0 WQ
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
0.034 WQ
LIMIT CHANGES DUE TO:
The predicted maximum fluoride concentration was only approx. one half the allowable.
Therefore, monitoring instead of a limit for fluoride is recommended.( Cadmium at a concentration
of 1 ug/L was detected upstream of the outfall. This value was input into a mass balance equation
to calculate a new limit for cadmium. The predicted maximum chromium and nickel concentrations
were still less than the allowable even considering upstream Cr and Ni concentrations. Therefore,
monitoring instead of a limit for Cr and Ni is recommended. Up and downstream levels of lead
have exceeded the instream standard. As a result, a Pb limit at the standard is recommended.
Downstream levels of Pb as high as 46 ug/L and 41 ug/L have been reported in the DMRs in the
past 1 1/2 years. Upstream cyanide levels were all below detect therefore an allowable based only
on dilution was calculated. This allowable concentration was greater that the predicted maximum
therefore monitoring for cyanide instead of a limit is recommended. Three observations of
mercury concentrations in the effluent above the detection level were reported in the DMRs. As a
result, a Hg limit at the allowable based on dilution is recommended. Instream Hg data was not
available to use in a mass balance equation. The predicted maximum silver concentration was 80
times the allowable, therefore monitoring for Ag is recommended: Chloroform and
tetrachloroethylene monitoring is no longer recommended. The predicted maximum concentrations
for each of these compounds was far below the allowable.

5
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

6
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Deep River at Fox Street
Downstream Location: Deep River at Worthville Bridge
Parameters: Temp, Fecal, Conductivity, D. O., Metals *
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
* Quarterly monitoring for Cr, Ni, Cd, and Hg at Fox Street and Worthville Bridge. Monthly
monitoring for lead at Fox Street and Worthville Bridge. Instream monitoring for cyanide can
be dropped from the permit. All instream observations for cyanide have been below detect.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name A P. /1-.%i a /1 W Uv I / - Permit # / U CThYc S'fy5Pipe #
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is a5 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirtydays f om the effective date of this permit during the months of
von, t; /', Wily/ 0�7 . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 S. G cfs
Permitted Flow /. 7•/5 MGD
IWC %
Basin & Sub -basin 03 O' --0?
Receiving Stream 12ee,/,9 f2/ ve r
County a19elk /(k,
Recommended by: �J
Date /0-5/9s
QCL P/F Version 9/91

kink mail M%TIC
// -002:Y �f 5
/ 744/6D
03-06
1-khY o, Gvz-g
.Set Go,,Ir't Ades 7;)' pre - /9? Z /)7 )
GooJr, c h ,e,i eweQ` /4 Z //9z sin T6,G1ns�n s
Wi ? t/1//
l990 G� ( 58yS"� f6 SP� / � � Tor o.��� GAS q
d
• 1",r/ca/kvIc /1211)-41t,e-it 61/ 014,2 /7 Pi Ge-44 /77
, 17V u /''(ir4nl64 4/aZ) /- 'e �U
�
/Z€ p� " U -' wt . Vo`in�a�1 Gi4 mo ireimmnic42 h0
fWa c✓,i i s f . boon, /f rim /o &ar6otz2- 6 - -
` Goo Levd �3 friar, p�d Lf� fro 5P �. �r� c/k Ice(oPmzP/del
' 5)r1 //14Pnl %r! p Cc!) L✓/ a / `00e,4t
Gt Or41/•'i 4-
1jv+J /aGAii(971/a , & 1'iG/ 'aid /' mnnlb, tr.01 du- c�/ueFi1.
/% /% // / 9 /ur / S 11 1714 Ote- in#17.5k64,14 Movie
/Gtr id tit C1) /57ai ,447.460,4 & 7 7/e4
totAis Ylt4 -fghoilky //0/41:
_ 5); ce- re I/ IOW 6/ /At ,a/ eiegabni
6/7/ 93-" o,o
6/z//95 9 o iy/z
/Z1/9.s /a' O Aj/L.
(oEn)

INA,a j) f witA edd irin4 /" lf/%GGtii i! (wiftS9avr 04,t4,cita. 14vi /% /L
�
l�lC�lrl ( ,f .,9
14,a 4NoY5 0/me slp! ay" - y
. HaoeveL) P.14 a /6, atZIOpt /f $ f o i t4
R 0 ) /MIGi n 4. comiok(R' c �iuf/l' L2h , 146 /h1�(° Cc/
adou fih f�
' 60051110 lattim
%r,7 �95
VT-
44/r
'9f
Au�e '%`l
NO V5 W ('r( wi G fen/ fl {. 1/ 10,ci . 4/0 ea,eaV vaQf y(.„
W (AL repivtd /9 9; rr /773 h4rAwl-C- Z;.1/ s bi/Le 4 &4 .
# vfolArna. ; Pec, lam 11 J 19f,
I; (g) / 14s-An kvefu Pv f/ f/ PAIgs
viklAt fht fi ft y / eft/put O 'z 6, /
ov th4 eut * ycv s
Olf-7, �t : NOV ye/` /g V 60,14 ' 9s y,Wifte,71r
C� 011 / /cri n 4t� #u /f9s ;
fivit �IL) l/it7 recei vei .t /Gzc a/ leJ tiovz r / 7/ 199%
C"ilaA,Miz w&y /Yoh pry GC ,71
/tl s,

NI c ot& 11 ti
is U'ie'lufrto fr-- Tea, g rr,ram , gyaMiL , ,00J
MY/ g 1 f°6 )_ 07 Alt - /,r/&Le GrG 1`P 1?r /AC. C/'l /23
fhru. 1992.
f� a �/lti4/14-- o it 7`h ifs .r 4'7 _ fr/ ,V-f�
d'� c -104 /99z 10 .1,^G .01 , �� sre.t.,;A.f oak,
lei/ kttil o & fS/r&tea /n
J u n,6, --! S. 1760 no th Gvis1 ,4141 /eI itytart,714
.. JvwvcSIrtaiiM 1 p, '9Y dui 4/4 610R.
11 Tel 1.57.
11 7Koh _tomAgin' L2A/le o1 t7 t . 71,E
ict4ovc e AZin, dhs& kiln, ,,/fd i✓d2
99 4[ / .% rec/ M1 n eikgett
TGu 1- /e 446%6 her e,-,11 d% a%i'ni &ii 71efrite e/
GdliCbiaref4111/2, Pica /2c4i AffeoWate.e.- //tA'tie77-(-
.. n to Comm e441L
Remit? _ ',yoga A '11/tij 6.9 ratnetilte/P1 1-11- Ith
Cr aL , AA41 /!u,y,1 4 L '1-k 7th r y d . Rd .
y ed / �� :
w�. < fit . ��rti G- i� ke��or (a n itici kt,,n f /
Nil /Li, prdic ma/x. otnei/SrAtt". < 4,4 Aliatal-
6
5/i-444 /19; v/6.-(A/7,“ a.f/ti
Nct Ad 0- Pk d 541 1"6, recornficie.,/
e SJ /i'En q f 5��.4 P6 Urn. /C4Z

Wt1,1 1g9�
r /?f - Gr/G4 w t ; /mf's fo oIv-rat
(an51Pi4/)7k141/) -- /7lAl5 f el ii4411&aa/- p/�& 16 ad
'27 at 1101ff 1,14tx.e.e, ri/tc,-4 I wil)-64,f4,7
twa/1444, &tIvo4//175z_ AriL 5,//mAkei
_ZN T vyAi,,j / Mem i 4 11 f / S T Gdr) 1 GAS/ t
fk /WA- / 1( a4, i/t-s-trea/P0, fri/di fi 713
4,fi,a44_ q"e / 'al/Gv /y w, //u/t;/.

iand/egign 6vWTP
No04 5ti 'S
7ys ,tt6p
Our 'r, tiJc
03-v6 -v
i'/GiSS 61,14,GIlR- Fur A fags
13u rrgnd
1861s 6tik ma n, wai 4 mid cAlcu'd
Hut a l/owa lam. erlivvitt tirwetttifilZit t 416tAl
1,,,:fit„cr 176)/id m eiA,/ crKee44%,A,--h.
wvGr fA era0 .
nr 55 6/1A,44-‘, ef ; ��wp Q" cupG',3t C f- Q
W h ' C 44415 Meta, ckIMISlie4fili, 5d o st4tA /4451
claw n 0' c // h/ quig a- Q46—
CiAp = rne1l�elltc up5fr catfrko Slit -to h191, rtwIti Vahtt
QL/tr: Isire , 7/Iw = 7QIO
llvwa �� mobs rQ.44zemi
6- 4wdestn.�04-flay
,9
&Aro/14F fo so/v G fel ctit
co - (cu.. oviAin - C lAr (Lio ,R.,

Cd ` C = 1ii/t recop/ea 1,14 ocir
Q4 =
Ca,h = Z /L = 5f
=s�r-s v
ad,),:: .17 05-4. 4 7. 7 2$ d
cikr- )( z 705(14 - /as-44.)]/z.7o,cia,
CtAr" 13 /4,14 reewa 14 /vos). 15
56t& u% 1 ea
5-°/1/0 5 (/3/LJL)7/.7. 7"5-
64,-= ia,vo/(47/Li
Ali: cor i;t4 A/it 'YY
S8�/1_ =Stat rws7Ye.4u7
Ctli,=[(r8,111-J(7. gas #i.) - (/?fri/LIC"-P-NZ 7°-(1/2-

•
C.
� - � (�v�L�'7, 7os�,� - ( Z, 5ll��s�-��/d.7o5�
C� 96211/1_
)14.ce_ flu ysfret,m oramio6
b 4/ hied C w, // A{ flu a //oU/d6-
ea,&,14h41 tox)
Z-S/U1/--) UGC t 5/raoi c wer,J_ < 5, /z
,', J/f&c&,n, /ed ad-eze.
57°//y/L -= 5/A4i 4tsftavril 7V
CoV7 Pot !' o9i 710 , Co aA-r %Lit
Iva 41/14/L(-- Yrn ke
yi V611
IWatt A fAirifr
P - G = Z6 /L .puovh/ 1/47;u4
/•n� it yf ram -drt,417 -&laeeis/%
(5 /k) tit, / A/r
t� s��

#✓56 `i/'/,�forr,d 7744 r
• 60727)-(A,
fr'fitGe G Ott Le- Guy,' kalmwenht4t'11/74, •
j. Akui tUeW h a l 1/14,11,ikt/5/r,Y 12°• 7L /ax/V
fil/f,a/L6tCd a/ a Ad, Wid i‘COION4(.4 4 4 4 ?t,7f/2.
��c 5 /rw-i /rn 7/4 Gr U° re'G/114141l CONS/ ,.yl
/4 pI' 74 a s74f
ar[ GP,(,( /41IaG /A,v1: deo, 1 #
t%'-nef/i/vill'AZ/11/ :A4 -74k.(;t.
artzolo:rm" 7 a r d, 14I0/4/ /i ri'n Ut.20(
;a- k,o6 1e624
I PO 6 412/0411Vni-
' /ors Zt/- d r5 /1/1

19q1—;
/%11 lit, Pia 1/1 WWfP
NLOo2S "y4/S
03-06-0g/
1-fisipz,1 Minihoh
4,9/
///93
roitt 't7/1/t1/4)
Umtr.tod &Pm 5/1944, ,ae&Li5hrAtim
/o 5 kr i ll PU �i v WMga_Eol
MvL
19,3 ; . H., e/AIL
c d `/
Cr 13 No'13
Ni 17
Gy K5
illg
/VA .t '9
Alo ,4yfr-A PO pro.
1993
..Ph < 1 i3 <io <io
:IUL 11 c5 <5- c
.4 <s <5 <5 c5
C�1 r `' < I
er 3 <Z Z
s/o
4
/3
<j
no
p/I 5:3 /1f/; / 9 Z
by,o dtd=<2,5 vb•r
< / <lo 15
Zg `S
c5
c S--
</ <1 <1 ‹I
2- `� ` Z
NG VttSfrat) DO "Tat n:S
1/11 S4T 4 fl /# not /a- 4,
/qad/ /l74/

Vp(76101.
1q9 DO s S /c 9�
rig. 114
3t (44
33 (.,(r.
fb 230 Zi
/i/t
ems' L
del 4 Z <I
Cr `� 3
044/1->a/,,
(Wc'ii v tt?t)
Oovz I
- ►41/l TflA
OP L-57
1)0-4,3
<L
P4 v/6, oiqtavt4: "9‘/ amArAmi 021 s/c/
could Coy 1 4; 1/1 v y (w.) J //Am it,U, 67/1/1/M/
(oRckri / nawz WwTh) GPI 661/ i s tity
kn,, 144/c1A- Pb w , wCJ 1u
1/14f ?Atp /i/ V ty. Nit tItki Jkat cold

f ypui/lit w I'm jfg (w5o) 41t _,ai41614auA .lie
CuWGwtt4144Vfnl.PAl15 40wt' idvwt 144.M7d0Y! n9 pvocg1,C1/4A.-_
Ike _hu�ufl5. �iaw4wi,aM jaktfrii i�a� yayhy
v�5��� 1 Cu��Osc� �avhyz�a- �1 occ/SSGt. l4[14elda46
yan..J. 1.1.fritio oca flow sevm d //i'Ui a ��,y it/t
dKc�, o_ 51'acafid weAA_ a o,,,� ��� �, /lu�'s '-
PPR m4/7
QYfifiGl IUW.
gd $l G r hG1 (rtrt,qY GJ51
mai/ameet 71, r.2-z,<. 1144
(oi.'v! /and. l4t1s
LUL�ZS. G��'J[ 5iZj?iL/f?-‘7 /cC /1.ki
130 n0// aALD 14W. f/u p -7 f /ice! (1Qaect%
44.1 ! Avtc.
ate.
5 � 14�.� P4i. Cie ' e� t —
/Gu %3d Ih�it/� /
/7
5.!1Y,t /578 - /> oP Ails!
/24 s <ec,onip7 Ga?/2.e, fez
I/ /et e ierz&e/47 714“ Cpez- 74) C
/ Ph /m.t. .1d i;t4 /hi_ 170.14 61/i e
/�/A i, o% 4 14'iG c. e/ever " f kt L ��N2 $ " L flr�
3- 0e a_/c,t& /4bve m,, a. Ay nat. eA - '%&/
OY �� / fie 7ro%14/14 5f�ra.�.G C / % w�- cowl/ 6. a
Gf_v2G4-- .' PA io i,t,e/i'Y�y1 n2liL
yy t /pis(Nco5i2/ a) W-11 7C/ Nei& 7eei 54,

Ni A /90�d 5)' tor/ o/ /�
9
/-4,rw4 gec ,, 4 ',a- 7 7/ /2 r vPlLe
d . Hal AI GUI, 111 / fo nh/' / / f a; //i
% S�' hi i re .ca /4( pi
f •c. . �I/ i at/YVR/74 c s (L.4s ‘ eftte(/r�,
�
h�>y ,0 'Woe 81?liaan r 4/1X_ 7-AA- so u.
&d

CC:
Permits and Engineering
Technical Support Branch
Randolph County Health Dept.
Central Files
WSRO
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Greg Nizich
Date: 27 October 1995
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Randolph
Permit No. NC0025445
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: City of Randleman WWTP
101 Hillary Street
Randleman, NC 27317
2. Date of Investigation: 24 October 1995
3. Report Prepared by: W. Corey Basinger
Environmental Engineer
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
* Mr. Frankie Brewer, ORC 910-498-2254
5. Directions to Site: From WSRO, follow Hwy 311 south to the
junction with Hwy 220 business. Take Hwy 220 business north
into Randleman and turn right onto E. Naomi Street. Proceed
on E. Naomi Street to Fox Street and cross Deep River.
Follow River Road to the right past the Water Treatment
Plant and turn right onto NCSR 2134. Take the first right
onto Applewood Drive (NCSR 2133). The WWTP is located at
the end of Applewood Drive.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 48' 24" Longitude: 79° 47' 00"
U.S.G.S. Quad No. D-19 SE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Randleman
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
Area is available for proposed expansion.

8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Located
above the flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: No dwellings are within 1000
feet of the WWTP.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Deep River
a. Classification: Class C Ooi3
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-06-.D9
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Class C uses
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 1.50 MGD
(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? 1.745 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? 1.25 MGD (0.25 MGD basin is
currently being used as sludge storage until new
facilities are constructed)
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years.
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities; The facility currently consists of (2)
.250 MGD aeration basins and (2) 0.50 MGD aeration
basins each with final clarifiers, an aerated sludge
holding tank, chlorination and contact tank, cascade
aeration, multimedia tertiary filter, and influent
pumping stations with grit and solids removal.
*** NOTE: (1) of the 0.25 MGD basins is currently being
used as sludge storage until new facilities
are constructed.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities. Proposed facilities include (1)
0.45 MG sludge storage tank, (1) sludge pumping
station, a lime silo and mix tank, (4) telescoping
valves at existing pumping station, 209,7 anoxic zones in
each of the basins, and a sludge loading station.
g Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Unknown

NPDES Permit Staff Report
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved XXX
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit No. W00004825.
Residuals Contractor AMSCO, Inc.
Telephone No. 910-766-0328
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP XX PFRP
Other
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet) . Class IV
4. SIC Code(s) : 4952
Primary 01 Secondary 55,58
Main Treatment Unit Code: 0 4 1 x 3
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)?
Yes
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests: City plans to request that monitoring for
Tetrachloroethylene and chloroform be removed.
3. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated. N/A
Spray Irrigation:
Connection to Regional Sewer System:
Subsurface:
Other disposal options:

NPDES Permit Staff Report
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of Randleman has applied for renewal of NPDES
Permit No. NC0025445. The City will be constructing the facility
additions mentioned above in the coming months/year. Also, the
City will be requesting that monitoring requirements for
Tetrachloroethylene and Chloroform be removed from the new
permit.
WSRO recommends reissuance of the subject permit in
accordance with Division guidelines after the following concerns
are addressed:
(1) The City of Randleman, or its Engineer(s), must submit
to the Division information relating to the actual
treatment capacity of the facility. The current permit
states a flow of 1.745 MGD. The capacity of the units
at the facility only add to be 1.5 MGD.
(2) The tertiary filter does not seem to be operating as
designed. The effluent overflows the weir most of the
time and this should not occur. Also, the filter
itself is not level which could be causing problems.
Environmenta, Engineer
7)/
Water Quality R tonal Supervisor Date
epat7a(c-/cs—
j
/o /27 /9S'

C= allowar c�•�
W iv tlu sere, iv
C" 6t4- c d
'b7 talivizi
cqh . Srt, nO44-
C #: 3, gs
Cyr.=C�
/L.
C .=Z5,74,
N/q
Cu,
4111
TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Facility Name
Randleman
NPDES #
NC0025445
Qw (MGD)
1.745
35.10
/WC (%)
Reeving Stream
Deep River
Stream Class
C
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
LIMIT
Max. Pred Cw
16
Allowable Cw
5.7
Chromium
OK I
Max. Pred Cw
85.32724301
Allowable Cw
142.4
Nickel
OK !
Max Pred Cw
40.3
Allowable Cw
250.7
Cyanide
OK !
Max. Pred Cw
11.5742068
Allowable Cw
14.2
Copper
MONITOR
Max. Pred Cw
81.33186035
Allowable Cw
19.9
Zinc
MONITOR
Max. Pred Cw
244.2012398
Allowable Cw
142.4
Lead
OK !
Max. Pred Cw
38.46473659
Allowable Cw
71.2
Arsenic
OK 1
Max. Pred Cw
8.114806214
Allowable Cw
142.4
Silver
MONITOR
Max. Pred Cw
i; ':, , * 17 408
Allowable Cw
0.2
Mercury
LIMIT
Max. Pred Cw
0.303328995
Allowable Cw
0.03418
Chloroform
OK 1
Max. Pred Cw
37.87183582
Allowable Cw
30183.0
Tetrachloroethyle
OK !
Max. Pred Cw
26.67938616
Allowable Cw
568.3
Floride
OK !
Max. Pred Cw
2331
Allowable Cw
5127.5
Moni To 1
Cell-
E--Li ;7i CVr < Cw
C _ 4/6 Men/ f p r
<— L/mil/ C < CA,
/l/o morns of
C�ity,t4,
11/7/95
PAGE

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Parameter -
CadmiHm
I I I
Standard a
__ _
2
NA
Don't forget to check with Pratt!
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
2.5
<5
Std Dev.
1.450294168
2
2.5
<5
Mean
1.14484127
3
2.5
<5
C.V.
1.266808078
4
2.5
<5
5
2.5
<5
6
2.5
<5
Mutt Factor a
1.6
7
2.5
<5
Max. Value
10
NA
8
2.5
<5
Max. Prod Cw
16
jegf
NA
9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
5.7
10
2.5
<5
11
2.5
<5
12
2.5
<5
Linear Interpolation
of Mult. Facto
13
2.5
<5
14
2.5
<5
C.V.
1.266808078
15
2.5
<5
C.V. to
12
16
2.5
<5
C. V. hi
1.3
17
0.5
<1
MFhi '•
1.6i
18
0.5
<1
MFlo •
1.6J1
19
0.5
<1
MF=
1.6
20
0.5
<1
21
0.5
<1
22
0.5
<1
23
0.5
<1
24
0.5
<1
25
0.5
<1
26
0.5
<1
27
1
<2
28
3
3
29
0.5
<1
30
0.5
<1
31
0.5
<1
32
0.5
<1
33
0.5
<1
34
0.5
<1
35
2.5
<5
36
2.5
<5
37
1
<2
38
1
<2
39
1
<2
40
0.5
<1
41
0.5
<1
42
0.5
<1
43
0.5
<1
44
0.5
<1
45
0.5
<1
46
0.5
<1
47
0.5
<1
48
0.5
<1
49
0.5
<1
50
0.5
<1
51
0.5
<1
52
0.5
<1
53
1
<2
54
0.5
<1
55
0.5
<1
56
0.5
<1
57
0.5
<1
58
0.5
<1
59
0.5
<1
60
0.5
<1
61
0.5
<1
62
0.5
<1
63
0.5
<1
64
0.5
<1
65
0.5
<1
66
0.5
<1
67
0.5
<1
11/7/95 PAGE '

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
.•
68
0.5
<1
69
0.5
<1
70
0.5
<1
71
0.5
<1
72
0.5
<1
73
0.5
<1
74
0.5
<1
75
0.5
<1
76
0.5
<1
77
0.5
<1
78
0.5
<1
79
0.5
<1
80
0.5
<1
81
0.5
<1
82
0.5
<1
83
0.5
<1
84
0.5
<1
85
0.5
<1
86
0.5
<1
87
0.5
<1
88
0.5
<1
89
0.5
<1
90
0.5
<1
91
0.5
<1
92
1
<2
93
125
<2.5
94
1
<2
95
1
<2
96
1
<2
97
2
4
98
5
5
99
1
<2
100
1
<2
101
6
6
102
1
<2
103
9
9
104
10
10
105
0.5
<1
106
1
<2
107
1
<2
108
1
<2
109
1
<2
110
1
<2
111
1
<2
112
1
<2
113
1
<2
114
0.5
<1
115
0.5
<1
116
0.5
<1
117
0.5
<1
118
0.5
<1
119
0.5
<1
120
0.5
<1
121
0.5
<1
122
0.5
<1
123
0.5
<1
124
0.5
<1
125
0.5
<1
126
0.5
<1
11/7/95
PAGE

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
2arameter a
Chromium
Standard = 1
»••_••« 50
���p
MI
n
BDLa1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
28
28
Std Dev.
9.118
2
24
24
Mean
9.303
3
27
27
C.V.
0.98
4
34
34
5
19
19
6
5
<10
Mint Factor=
1.6
7
10
<20
Max. Value
54
NA
8
25
25
Max. Pred Cw
85.33
µg/l
9
10
<20
Allowable Cw
142.4
µg/1
10
34
34
11
5
<10
12
10
10
Linear Interpol. of MF
13
5<10
14
5
<10
C.V.
0.98
15
10
<20
C.V. Io
0.9
16
5
<10
C. V. hi
1
171
2.5<5
MFhi
1.6
18
10
10
MFio
1.5
19
5
5
MFF
1.6
20
2.5
<5
21
7
7
22
5
5
23
11
11
24
6
6
25
4
4
26
4
4
27
4
4
28
5
5
29
2
<4
30
53
53
31
6
6
32
8
8
33
5
5
34
5
5
35
4
4
36
2
<4
37
10
<20
38
5<10
39
22
22
40
8.2
8.2
41
42
42
42
9
9
43
9
9
44
21
21
45
6
6
4s
6
6
47
7
7
48
7
7
49
18
18
50
7
7
51
4
4
52
6
6
53
31
31
54
21
21
55
6
6
56
10
10
57
5
5
58
12
12
59
6
6
60
5
5
61
5
5
62
5
5
63
1<2
644
4
65
5
5
66
6
6
67
6
6
11/7/95 PAGE •

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
68
1<2
69
1
<2
70
7
7
71
2
2
72
5
5
73
5
5
74
4
4
75
1<2
76
7
7
77
6
6
78
2
2
79
8
8
80
10
10
81
12
12
82
7
7
83
5
5
84
9
9
85
7
7
86
5
5
87
6
6
88
6
6
89
2
<4
90
9
9
91
9
9
92
2
<4
93
11
11
94
12
12
95
7
7
96
2.5<5
97
10
10
98
7
7
99
8
8
100
8
8
101
10
10
102
10
10
103
12
12
104
54
54
105
15
15
106
3
3
107
6
6
108
11
11
109
7
7
110
2
2
111
6
6
112
5
5
113
2.5
<5
114
5
5
115
4
4
116
5
5
117
3
3
118
6
6
119
10
10
120
12
12
121
8
8
122
6
6
123
9
9
124
10
10
125
6
6
126
19_
19
11/7/95 PAGE:

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
r1
mam.bo'-
MAN
Standard-
�
n
8DLr1 Data
RESULTS
1
12.6
<25
S1d Div.
6.008
2
12.5
<25
Wan
6.801
3
12.5
<25
C.V.
0.883
4
12.5
<25
5
12.5
<25
6
12.5
<25
MAFedor -
1.3
7
12.5
<25
Max. Value
31 IRA
40.3
RA
AA
8
12.5
<25
Mex. Pr.dCw
9
12.5
<25
Nowabl.Cw
250.7
10
12.6
<25
11
12.6
<25
12
12.5
<25
LM.er intend. of M1F
13
12.5
<25
14
12.5
<25
C.V.
0.883
15
12.5
<25
C.V. lo
0.8
16
12.5
<25
C.V.H
0.9
17
12.6
<25
MIFhi
1.3
18
12.5
<25
MRo
1.3
19
12.5
<25
MF-
1.3
20
12.5
<26
21
12.6
<25
22
12.5
<25
23
12.5
<26
24
12.5
<26
25
12.5
<26
26
12.5
<25
27
25<50
26
25
<50
29
' 25
<50
30
25
<50
31
12.5
<26
'
32
12.5
<25
33
12.5
<25
34
24
24
35
12.5
<25
38
12.5
<25
37
12.5
<25
38
12.5
<25
39
12.5
<25
40
26
<50
41
12.5
<25
42
12.5
<25
43
12.5
<25
44
12.5
<25
45
12.5
<25
46
12.5
<25
47
12.5
<25
48
12.5
<25
49
12.6
<25
50
12.5
<26
51
26
<50
52
25
<50
53
12.5
<25
54
12.5
<25
55
12.5
<25
56
12.6
<25
57
2.5
<5
58
2.5
<5
59
2.5
<5
6D
2.5
<5
61
25
<5
62
2.5
<5
83
2.5
<5
64
25
<5
f 5
2.5
<5
88
2.5
<5
67
2.5
<5
66
2.5
<5
69
2.5
<5
70
2.5
<5
71
2.5
<5
72
2.5
<5
73
2.6
<5
74
2.5
<5
75
2.5
<5
76
2.5
<5
77
2.5
<5
78
2.5
<5
79
25
<5
80
5
<10
81
2.5
<5 MI
82
5
<10
83
2.d
4
84
25
<5
85
2.5
<5
88
7
7
87
2.5
<5
88
15
<5
89
25
<5
90
1.5
<3
91
2.5
<5
92
2.5
<5
93
2.5
<5
94
2.5
<5
95
2.5
<5
96
2.5
<5
97
15
43
96
5
<10
11nl95 PAGE 1

TOXICANT ANALYSES
•
•
99
25
<5
100
31
31
101
5
<10
102
5
<10
103
12.5
<25
104
12.5
<25
105
125
<25
106
125
<25
107
115
<25
106
12.5
425
109
5
<10
110
5<10
111
5
<10
112
12.5
113
25
4
114
25
4
115
2-5
<5
116
2.5
<5
117
2.5
<5
118
25
4
119
25
<5
120
23
<5
121
9
9
122
5<10
._
123
23
45
124
25
4
<125
15
4
<126
2.5
4
<127
2.5
<5
<126
2.5
<5
<129
12
12
<130
2.5
<5
<131
2.5
<5
<132
25
<5
<133
25
4
<134
2.5
<5
<135
2.5
<5
<136
25
<5
<137
2.5
<5
<138
25
<5
<139
25
<5
<140
25
<5
<141
2.5
4
<142
2.5
4
<143
25
<5
<144
25
<5
<145
15
<5
<146
2.5
<5
<147
25
<5
<148
2.5
<5
<149
2.5
<5
<150
254
<151
2.5
4
41152
2.5
4
<153
25
4
<154
25
4
<155
2.5
4
<156
25
<5
<157
25
4
<158
25
<5
<159
2.5
4
<160
15
<5
<161
2345
<162
2.54
<163
12..5
•:25
<164
15
<5
<165
25
4
<166
2-5
4
<187
5
<10
<168
15
<5
<169
5
<10
<170
15
<5
<171
15
<5
<172
2.5
<5
<173
5
<10
<174
5
<10
<175
5
<10
<176
5
<10
<177
5<10
<176
5<10
<179
5
<10
<180
5<10
<la'
5<10
<182
5
<10
<183
5
<10
<184
10
<20
<185
5
<10
<186
15
<5
<187
2.54
<188
25
c5
<189
2.5
c5
<190
25
<5
<191
2.5
<5
<192
25
4
<193
2.5
<5
<194
2
<4
<195
25
4
<196
2_5
4
<197
15
45
<198
15
<5
11 /7/95 PAGE;

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
0wp��d.�N.
Salina .
C
u/� ¢_--
{"�p���
n
60tn1R2 DI.
Awual Data
RESULTS
1
2.5
<5
Sad Dev.
0.9756
2
2.5
<5
Mean
2.7296
3
2.5
<5
C.V.
0.3574
4
2.5
<5
5
2.5
<5
6
2.5
<5
Um Fedor.
1.2
7
2.5
<5
Max. Value
10
saga
40
8
2.5
<5
Max. Prod Cy/
11574
0
2.5
<5
ANowade Ow
142
{MA
10
2.5
<5
11
5
5
12
2.5
<5
lbear land. of MF
13
2.5
<5
14
2.5
<5
C.V.
0.357
15
2.5
<5
C.V. b
0.3
16
3
<6C.V.N
O.
17
2.5
<5
MRA
12i
18
2.5
<5
MFb
1.t
19
2.5
<5
MF.
1.2
20
2.5
<5
21
2.5
<5
22
2.5
<5
23
2.5
<5
24
2.5
<5
25
2.5
<5
26
2.5
<5
27
2.5
<5
28
2.5
<5
29
2.5
<5
30
2.5
<5
31
2.5
<5
32
2.5
<5
33
2.5
<5
34
7
7
36
2.5
<5
36
2.5
<5
37
2.5
<5
38
2.5
<5
39
2.5
<5
40
2.5
<5
41
2.5
<5
42
2.5
<5
43
2.5
<6
44
2.5
<5
45
2.5
<5
46
2.5
<5
47
2.5
<5
49
2.5
<5
40
2.5
<5
50
2.5
<5
51
2.5
<5
52
2.5
<5
53
2.5
<5
54
2.5
<5
55
2.5
<5
56
2.5
<5
57
2.5
<5
58
2.5
<5
59
2.5
<5
60
2.5
<5
61
2.5
<5
62
2.5
<5
63
2.5
<5
64
3
<6
66
2.5
<5
66
25
<5
07
2.5
.5
68
3
<6
69
2.5
<5
70
25
4
71
25
4
72
25
<5
73
2.5
4
74
7
7
75
2.5
<3
78
2.5
<5
n
2.5
<5
7i
25
4
79
25
<
80
25
4
61
2.5
<5
82
2.5
<3
13
25
<5
St
2.5
<5
65
25
<5
86
25
<5
87
5
<10
68
8A
8A
89
5
<so
90
2.5
.5
91
25
.3
9a
so
so
93
25
4
94
3
<6
95
25
<5
96
25
4
97
25
.5
98
3
<6
09
25
<5
100
25
<5
•
101
2.5
<5
102
25
4
11 /75

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
103
2.5
4
104
2.5
4
105
2.5
4
106
2.5
<8
107
2.5
4
108
2.5
4
109
2.5
4
110
2.5
<
111
2.5
4
112
2.5
8
113
2.5
<5
114
2A
d
115
2.5
<5
116
2.5
4
117
2.5
4
118
2.5
4
119
2A
<8
120
2.5
4
121
24
4
'
122
25
45
123
2.5
48
124
2.5
d
125
2.5
<8
<126
2.5
<5
<127
6
6
<128
2.5
4
<129
2.8
4
430
2.5
<5
<131
2.5
d
<132
6
6
<133
2A
4
<134
2A
<5
<135
2.5
d
<136
23
4
<137
25
4
<138
2.
4
<139
6
6
<140
2.5
4
<141
2.5
<8
<142
2.5
4
<143
2.3
<5
<144
25
4
<145
25
4
c148
2.5
4
<147
2.5
<5
<148
25
<5
<149
2A
<5
<150
2.5
<5
<151
2.5
45
<152
2,5
41
<153
2.5
<5
454
25
4
<155
2A
d
<156
2.5
4
<157
2.5
<5
<158
2.5
4
<159
2.5
4
<160
2A
4
<161
2A
4
<162
2.5
<5
<163
2.5
45
<164
2.5
4
<165
2.5
4
<166
25
4
<167
25
4
<168
2.5
4
<169
2.5
<5
<170
25
<5
<171
25
4
<172
2.3
4
<173
2.5
45
<174
2.5
4
<175
25
4
<176
2.5
Q
<177
2.5
<8
<178
2.5
es
<179
2.5
45
<180
25
45
<181
2.5
4
<182
25
4
<163
25
45
<184
2.5
<5
<185
2.3
<5
<186
2.5
45
<187
2.3
4
<188
2.5
4
<189
2.5
45
<190
2.5
4
<191
2.5
45
<192
6
6
<193
2.5
4
<194
2.5
<5
<196
2A
4
<196
2.5
4
<197
2.5
45
<199
2.5
45
<199
25
4
<200
2.5
4
<201
25
<
402
2.5
4
<203
2.5
41
11/7193 PAGE:
t¢

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Parameter.
Co2per
:; Parameter
Zinc
v7[t[ a
Standard.
_
7'
�'� '
Standard
_
50:-
?ri`':
n
BDL=1/2D
Actual Data
RESULTS
Illi.
n
BDL 1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
5
<10
Std Dev.
8.52834
MIK
1
130
130
Std Dev.
32.7297
2
17
17
Mean
IIM]fri
2
120
120
Mean
73.5536
3
5
<10
C.V.
0.74845n:
s
3
110
110
C.V.
0.44498
4
10
10
EW
4
93
93
5
'
14
14
MI
5
105
105
6
5
<10
Mutt Facia' a
1.8
WV
6
120
120
MultFactor =
1.4
7
10
<20
Max. Value
44I"':
;h;
7
60
60
Max. Value
169
_!
8
10
<20
Max. Pred Cw
81.3319
Me; ;
8
100
100
Max. Pred Cw
244.201
_!
9
10
<20
Allowable Cw
19.9
Ira <<
9
78
78
Allowable Cw
142.4
.2
10
25
25
10
88
88
11
5
<10::
11
120
120
12
18
18
Linear int: . • . of MF
Mt:
12
97
97
Linear Into . .
. of MF
13
21
21{V:
13
85
85
14
5
<10
C.V.
0.74845
14
78
78
C.V.
0.44498
15
17
17
C.V. to
0.7
15
151
151
C.V. b
0.4
16
5
<10
C.V. hi
011
ti;:
16
59
59
C.V. hi
0.5
17
30
30
MFhi
1 A.
' k
17
85
85
MFhi
1.5.
_„_,�
18
10
10
MFlo
_._.•_
�1.81
18
37
37
MFlo
1.4
19
8
8
MF=
1.8
19
66
66
MFa
1.4
20
•
7
7
20
50
50
21
8
8`
rw:
21
50
50
22
6
6
r*.
22
52
52
23
4
4
Mt
23
34
34
24
15
15
111`::r.
24
55
55
25
15
15
Iv:
25
73
73
26
2
2
tiv
—}}
26
68
68
27
10
10
.
27
53
53
28
31
31
-:
28
73
73
29
10
10
29
75
75
30
5
5
r'
30
58
58
31
5
5
Mt
31
57
57
32
11
11
32
65
65
33
5
<10
Mit
33
59
59
34
19
19
Mt:.
34
169
169
35
8.6
8.6
`:v
35
131
131
36
8.5
8.5
36
80
80
37
10
10
Mr:
37
71
71
38
10
10
Illiii'i
38
44
44
39
44
44'f
39
40
40
40
6
6
Nlz
40
26
26
41
11
11
f� r
'{r
41
40
40
42
40
40'l
42
48
48
43
6
6
E v;:
43
40
40
44
4
4'{
44
31
31
45
6
6
45
34
34
46
7
7
; rr:
46
37
37
47
6
6
47
45
45
48
9
9
r+i2
48
36
36
49
11
11
:?
49
126
126
50
16
16
1r {
50
95
95
51
12
12
NW,'.
?r:
51
52
106
106
52
6
6
70
70
53
10
10
NW:
53
61
61
54
5
5
:::f }
54
43
43
55
9
9
::r:
55
58
58
56
10
10r
r �:
56
84
84
5
Mr.
57
11/7/95
PAGE •

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
arameter a 1Lead
Standard a I 25
µa/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
25
<50
Std Dev.
5.07703
2
25
<50
Mean
6.05425
3
25
<50
C.V.
0.83859
4
25
<50
5
25
<50
6
5
<10
Mult Factor =
1.5
7
5
<10
Max. Value
25
µg/I
8
5
<10
Max. Pred Cw
38.4647
µg/I
9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
71.2
µg/I
10
5
<10
11
5
<10
12
5
<10
Linear Interpol. of MF
13
5
<10
14
2.5
<5
C.V.
0.83859
15
5
<10
C.V.lo
0.8
16
5
<10
C.V.hi
0.9
17
5
<10
MFhi
I 1.64
18
5
<10
MFIo
i 1.5
19
5
<10
MF=
1.5
20
5
<10
21
5
<10
22
5
<10
23
5
<10
24
5
<10
25
11
11
26
5
<10
27
5
<10
28
5
<10
29
5
<10
30
5
<10
31
5
<10
32
5
<10
33
5
<10
34
5
<10
35
5
<10
36
5
<10
37
17
17
38
5
<10
39
1.25
<2.5
40
5
<10
41
5
<10
42
5
<10
43
5
<10
44
5
<10
45
5
<10
46
5
<10
47
5
<10
48
5
<10
49
5
<10
50
5
<10
51
5
<10
11 /7/95 PAGE '

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
52
5
<10
53
5
<10
54
5
<10
55
5
<10
56
5
<10
57
5
<10
58
5
<10
59
5
<10
60
5
<10
61
5
<10
62
5
<10
63
5
<10
64
5
<10
65
5
<10
66
5
<10
67
5
<10
68
5
<10
69
5
<10
70
5
<10
71
25
<50
72
6
6
73
2.5
<5
74
2.5
<5
75
12
12
76
2.5
<5
77
6
6
78
2.5
<5
79
2.5
<5
80
5
5
81
2.5
<5
82
2.5
<5
83
2.5
<5
84
13
13
85
2.5
<5
86
2.5
<5
87
2.5
<5
88
2.5
<5
89
8
8
90
2.5
<5
91
2.5
<5
92
2.5
<5
93
2.5
<5
94
5
<10
95
5
<10
96
5<10
97
5
<10
98
5
<10
99
5
<10
100
5
<10
101
5
<10
102
5
<10
103
5
<10
104
5
<10
105
5
<10
106
5
<10
11/7/95 PAGE

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
arameter
Arsenic
::;::;Parameter=
Silver
Standard —
50
µg/I
#?:€ Standard =
0.06.µg/I
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
5
<10
Std Dev.
1.478
1
2.5
<5
Std Dev.
1.87962
2
5
<10
Mean
4.333
2
5
<10
Mean
2.42857
3
5
<10
C.V.
0.341
3
5
<10
C.V.
0.77396
4
5
<10
4
5
<10
5
5
<10
5
5
<10
6
0.5
<1
Mult Factor =
1.6
6
0.5
<1
Mult Factor ='
,
7
0.5
<1
Max. Value
5
µg/I`'< 7
0.5
<1
Max. Value
5
µg/I
8
2.5
<5
Max. Pred Cw
8.115
µg/1': s 8
0.5
<1
Max. Pred Cw
16.4792
µg/1
9
5
<10
Allowable Cw
142.4
µg/I s'' 9
0.5
<1
Allowable Cw
0.2
µg/I
10
5
<10
10
0.5
<1
11
5
<10
11
,'_-1:5
3
12
5
<10
Linear Interpol. of MF
12
2.5
<5
Linear Interpol. of MF
13
5
<10
13
2.5
<5
14
5
<10
C.V.
0.341
14
2.5
<5
C.V.
0.77396
15
5
<10
C.V.lo
0.3
15
C.V.lo
0.7
16
5
<10
C. V. hi
0.4
16
C. V. hi
0.8
17
5
<10
MFhi
1.8i
17
MFhi
3.4
18
5
<10
MFIo
1.5
18
MFIo
3
19
2.5
<5
MF=
1.6
19
MF=
�3-3
20
5
<10
20
21
5
<10
21
22
22
11 /7/95
PAGE 1

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
'arameter s
Mercury
rv: Parameters
Chloroform
Standards ,
0.0124.tg/1
Standards
__r 4701µg/1
n
BDLs1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
r., n
BDLs1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
0.1
<.2
Std Dev.
0.03043
J 1.
1
6
6
Std Dev.
3.626
2
0.1
<.2
Mean
0.10914
l 2
6
6
Mean
5.7238
3
0.1
<.2
C.V.
0.27877
3
2
2
C.V.
0.6335
4
0.22
0.22
f
4
3
3
5
0.2
0.2
5
8
8
6
0.1
<.2
Mint Factor =
1.4
"6
{v�:
4
4
Mult Factors
2.4
7
0.2
0.2
Max. Value
0.22
NAr ., 7
6
6
, Max. Value
16
µg/l
µg/l
µg/1
8
0.1
<.2
Max. Pred Cw
0.30333
fiJ
Wg/I '..- 8
ie
3
3
Max. Pred Cw
37.872
9
0.1
<.2
Allowable Cw
0.03418
µg/I • 9
2
2
Allowable Cw
30183.0
10
0.1
<.2
.Yti•
.r.• 10
5.1
5.1
11
0.1
<.2
11
8
8
12
0.1
<.2
Linear Interpol. of MF
12
4.4
4.4
Linear Interpol. of MF
13
0.1
<.2
13
4.7
4.7
14
0.1
<.2
C.V.
0.27877
r�r 14
8
8
C.V.
0.6335
15
0.1
<.2
C.V.Io
0.2
N 15
10
10
C.V.lo
0.6
16
0.1
<.2
C. V. hi
0.3
16
16
16
C. V. hi
0.7
17
0.1
<.2
MFhi
1.4
, 17
2.5
<5
MFhi
i 2.51
18
0.1
<.2
MFlo
1.3
18
5
5
MFlo
2.31
19
0.1
<.2
MF.
1.4
,
: 19
2.5
<5
MF.~
2.4
20
0.1
<.2
f 20
2
2
21
0.1
<.2
$ •' 21
12
12
22
0.1
<.2
: 22
23
0.1
<.2
5 23
24
0.1
<.2
4 24
25
0.1
. <.2
t 25
26
0.1
<.2
• 26
27
0.1
<.2
• 27
28
0.1
<.2
044
.z. 28
29
0.1
<.2
29
30
30
0.1
<.2
31
0.1
<.2
31
32
0.1
<.2
32
33
33
0.1
<.2
34
0.1
<.2
34
.35
0.1
<.2
35
36
36
11/7/95
PAGE 1

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
'arameter. . lTetrachloroethylene
Standard. 1 8.85
pg/I
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
0.5
<1
Std Dev.
1.814
2
0.5
<1
Mean
1.5952
3
0.5
<1
C.V.
1.1371
4
0.5
<1
5
0.5
<1
6
0.5
<1
Mult Factor.
3.8
7
0.5
<1
Max. Value
7
µg/l
8
0.5
<1
Max. Pred Cw
26.679
µg/l
9
0.5
<1
Allowable Cw
568.3
jµg/)
10
0.5
<1
11
0.5
<1
12
0.5
<1
, Linear Interpol. of MF
13
0.5
<1
14
2.5
<5
C.V.
1.1371
15
2.5
<5
C.V.lo
1.1
16
7
7
C. V. hi
1.2
17
2.5
<5
MFhi
4
18
5
5
MFIo
3.7
19
2.5
<5
MF=
3.8
20
4
4
21
1
1
22
11/7/95 PAGE '

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
A
ParrmsMl.
Florida
n
BDL.1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
50
<100
Std Day.
232.6891108
2
116
116
Mean
158.572093
3
50
<100
C.V.
1.487402658
4
50
<100
5
98.2
98.2
6
50
<100
Ai*RFaxxa.
2.1
7
50
<100
Max. Vats
1110
ytgA
8
50
<100
Max. Prod Cw
2331
jzoll
9
50
<100
AIIowabia Cw
5127.47943
j glI
10
' 114
114
11
50
<100
12
50
<100
Unbar IntorpcL 01
MF
13
183
183
14
126
126
C.V.
1.467402658
15
122
122
C.V. b
1.4
16
169
189
C. V. hi
1.5
17
116
116
MFhi
2.17
18
50
<100
MFio I
2.1 1
19
195
195
W.
Zit
20
146
146
21
128
128
22
102
102
23
132
132
24
122
122
25
140
140
26
151
151
27
50
<100
28
50
<100
29
50
<100
30
50
<100
•
31
50
<100
32
50
<100
33
50
<100
34
50
<100
35
719
719
36
151
151
37
50
<100
38
50
<100
39
124
124
•
40
727
727
41
760
760
42
749
749
43
889
889
44
1110
1110
_
45
760
780
46
645
645
47
672
672
48
148
148
49
138
138
50
50
<100
51
127
127
52
200
200
53
50
<100
54
50
<100
55
50
<100
56
70
70
57
50
<100
58
50
<100
59
720
720
60
50
<100
61
50
<100
62
50
<100
83
50
<100
64
50
<100
65
50
<100
66
50
<100
67
50
<100
68
110
110
69
50
<100
70
50
<100
71
50
<100
72"'
50
4000
Entered he value a 50 Instead of 4000 to see he effect on the prod max. Cw.
73
50
<100
74
50
<100
75
50
<100
78
50
<100
77
50
<100
78
50
<100
79
50
<100
80
50
<100
81
50
<100
82
50
<100
83
106
108
84
50
<100
85
50
<100
86
50
<100
87
11/7/95
PAGE•

l I / l I Ln
/4l /d pva L !� ��1.�i7 / aj i e z o T(I 04,
CO�C�2t �� rn A
/2e p /q) v iz al /f M4/1 wLr, /7fr (iW Cho z5 Y5
iqto-
,47,4 0,, Pow 4m 5/rskyvi
C = [chl,i 1/f v'mJ a/wn shumi
to o 10-1A I' Qw = waAtt flaw
f°; s0 Cw = a //8W4 ( [C6 ro f0 (mil('
C� i lots 5fr% i (cb)
u _///
Gu'[ 10r0 tmi 544j1„i
(i%u f, o A
Qh + Qw (tit: Q _ Row = 171 (.64. from, 1q9/ wi-n)
/7/ -1-(1,715ti1&-,0 f,c7r)
/7� , 7
C i 73, 7 )(+7o/L)
015 MUi T/.cs"
•
AllaWa;i4 feireatiolod , /rru
�i5f� 5fd, Gp = S. 8s /y/G
(0,CD)/a,
-= (175.7 5- 40474-5,460 ,f-As"c)
5-6?. 3 Ati/L

cS� w
CYO v1
L.� N
(ZS 6 A) a 12o U,'(7/##77 2- 1,t 012
• <5
to
A
<.IS
Gz� �
li N 1/ i
1 / 717 d'ah
4416/nzoi WW1P
n0
I99Z : 'n'
f J f i i f 1
Al;r Cd Cr CAjt
?ri 4 A tli- fis
J
(5AL5 ..Z5 <S `S Zg' c10 i3a (S <sopi
c.2 `�o
C.
0 " 24 17 J z c �' ,� <, Z h
0 N a1 <►° I10 <10 " 'ZZ N
,Zo
o v► h 3'1- 10 q3 <10 0
VI " ►9 (4 dos
0 r <la <l o IZo
ki hQ`' " <ZO czo bo
N 0 , k'34 . LS C zo 1 oG
N 5 ,jv czo cZa 7g
N <5 �� 34 Z,( 5(8'
<5 c10 c]o 1 zo
in 0 if pi c-
c5 l0 1� 17" S
C� (/0 2► gl`
N c SN CC </0 <16 78
0 <.5' C5 <Z° 17 1:57
1, h <r ctb <10 51
li n (5 <5 -;o
<s z 5 9
c25-x-4 <s�
sa <53
< z; ¶*5
‘ZS 5 <-54-4

1
N\.\N
19
93
f
A" C� Li Cr 14 P ROf
<555 (5*5 cJ
CID
<5
<10
<7
5-
<�
<c
C c
< �S
e5
(5)6
a <10
31
Clo
Gi0
<z5�1
<Z5
< 2S-
<10/3
<ZS
<5
<5
<6,
cs
C5
<C
<5.
55s4
c5 2
c C.9-
<S�S'
<5
' /0
� 1a
<j'
<5"
10
< S"'
<G
c.553
<6,
(5 y
<s" 44
c
f0
c5
7
1-
4
S
cq
53
5,
<1-
¶ 2b
<►o
ZZ
i2
10
7
6
4
15
15
10
3I
)o
5-
5,
<(0
3'7
C/6
SO
550
5l
167
/51
5fv
7/
<1u
cIv
<10
<10
ci0
�/o
<10
<5—
<10
< to
(10
'►v
cjO
<IQ
7,07
/,/Z
/103
,f57
/26,0
<1
3
LS
<5
C./
</
<5
CIO
<1U
<�o
<10
CIO
<0
�Uv Guff CJU Gtaiati/#74 r�z /99,3

010
7b0
Lei S
bar
94Z
1;6
Z.,
1Z'7
824
Cd
cr a
<loo (55 z <1 <I*S 9 10 <Io 4-
116 <5,r� 3 < I <I 9 I4 rl
2.1
ioo <5.„ 41 (t4 1a,�
.z/oo c 4 < / 4 2 (0 VI <lo el-
IG051- 4 <C 3 .cI cI 7 1o3
11‘( <, S1 <,1 cl Iq 4- <10
400 `I �I 7
crdo cc I 5J-*5 4 Z.S
g3 <5 0 c I� 6 7 <r "
(10
»2_ � 4_,-1
� � Zt {►ors
lag <54 <l 4
rIL c5 9 4 /0 Flo 4
<�ao. 41 * 4
? MI «� <IIr4 <105
ty� <4 / Z �.1b�}
PIG (9'4 <iv ¢
/Z8' 3� 5 <la 3
'AZ c5-9(9- r «�
13Z <2
/ZZ 4
t4
G
15G
<400 x'J <Z h 17
e1Cny `Z
5
719 z 9
tsl 5-' 5
5
c.r ao S iO
c o 4bo47
I zN 4Z e4
7..7
760
711
6s61
r+
J
Ni
<5
<*3
<re
<5
c3
<S-*3
i"7
<5
<54
<5.5
<5
<s
CS
S
<54-4-
<5*t
<2c
zto
24
fo
40
3/
34
37
4s
<rb
<to
<10
<10
c 2-
<5
<5
<5"

e, (iv CAA Pt, 141
200 <s g
<s 6
{S 10 C-5 Li, 2 h 6 cry
C►� � 1� 1(o 45 c,2
�s �� �23 cS c,2
)0a (5.. <5 <5 4
60 <S C }b
110 ‹r < :1-
ia <5A41 5 <Z 75 c,2
<Ido <54 <5 �Z g 1 <� 2 <,
16� CSC ? to I0 <� <,2
?a 5 ,2
<,�, t5� _1 '� <5
<1001E4 `5 �� lZ
1 S4 <5
110 <5 C2
5 4.1 3 13
<,00 sr <Z <5.x4
< too < 1- < Z II
< 100 <5 Ait c21.9 i <y *4-
5I x5 <►0S
(100Y-5- <1*4 5-`►o x4
<IN4 45
<110*4 5 efo*4
10V 4
<100
<10o
400
3
I0
it
c5 126
<5 9s
CS 10(
<to 70
L5 (o(
cIb 13
<io4
<►05
<(a
(10
<1v
<5-3
c4
<•
9
go
5,, 5 4y/G S131 KKs
4.3 hip, )10,15,3 ? 7/i_ cm/ 5eM.:.k
c wt,1 f L 7119 (45
571LZ.0v=5,S / 9/i7/7