Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020800_Wasteload Allocation_19921208NPDES DOCIMENT 5CANNINC COVER SHEET NC0020800 Andrews WWTP NPDES Permit: Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Correspondence Speculative Limits Instream Assessment (67b) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: December 8, 1992 This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any content on the reverse side Refer : Basinwide / Streamline WLA File Completed By Permits & Engineering At Front Of Subbasin PERMIT NO.: NC0020800 PERMITTEE NAME: FACILITY NAME: Town of Andrews NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Andrews Wastewater Treatment Facility Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor -q Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 1.5 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): Industrial (% of Flow): Comments: 88 % 12% S 'EL .-i- ►vt ckt) s arc, (,JQ RECEIVING STREAM: the Valley River Class: C-Trout Sub -Basin: 04-05-02 Reference USGS Quad: G4NW County: Cherokee Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 12/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: Class III Classification changes within three miles: no change within three miles. (please attach) Requested by: Randy Kepler 07-Lic Date: 8-7- Prepared by: // Date: / 3 97i Reviewed by: ak_A_ d/WatA Date: Modeler Date Rec. # 'bAG 4)(ikkz 1010 Drainage Area (mil ) 52.Z Avg. Streamflow (cfs): /50 7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) Toxicity Limits: IWC /3 % Instream Monitoring: Parameters / 30Q2 (cfs) Acutehronic� Upstream Location Downstream Location Effluent Characteristics S„ Winter BOD5 (mg/1) .90 NH 3 N (mg/1) rn4 /7/./iY O• (maw) k.,) ,nor/lr> TSS (mg/l) 30 F. Col. (/100 ml) Z D 0 pH (SU) (- 7 fP(w- /1) 410,77frr —j-,..I end/ 0 rrlo n/m' Tb1/ctirewhon%J O 372 c4,4(m4,vrr, J /l) 3 Lr.a� 9/ l / Co' A/1* &/ (f/I% 6s7z, Cnp"tr" y //) fitimitry inc I /} mvy,i'tzr,' etc ///) 37 +Cyan, j 77fis.64/I 4c/60/i) 30 befp (ty//) M(3i5 ( /J ) 373 Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Request # 7070 Town of Andrews/Andrews Wastewater Treatment Faciftt3E C E i V E G NC0020800 Water Quality Section Domestic - 88%/Industrial - 12% Existing Renewal Valley River C-Trout 040502 Cherokee Asheville Lowe 1 4 —1.9NW Stream Characteristic: USGS # Date: Drainage Area (mi2): Summer 7Q10 (cfs): Winter 7Q10 (cfs): Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): % IWC: NOV 9-1992 Astteville Regional 0ffi LiArtlUtorth Carnfhca 1990 52.4 15 19 130 30 13 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Scoville did the last WLA in 1990. Permit should be reissued with new limits for lead, arsenic, and mercury. Limits for nickel and cyanide were transposed in last permit, so that will be corrected in this renewal. Monitoring for chloride and fluoride will be required as a result of values documented in the annual pollutant analysis monitoring report. Special Schedule Requirements and additional ^^comments from Reviewers: / Cl, (the., )P.- p,r JY �R4rv� svi ✓+q �..t ✓n I, d k � net- i ., ll// nP�PSS a��. Man.-F,r..;tiIve-.....r.Mt-.f-t G�se) r�-jo. � ��, to say,.{v(.'.,`8��✓�,t-- ,. r[ no"i-5Pe1+, S d,�n(J✓:� EP -rkr nPsdo.!d✓kS -v- F}n,)vP.siS k.,aS do0 Jt.'n d4(Y.ivlr r r 1) P Gil?.eye a f . /,7 r f n, cctr?.- . CerWP C 1. ,i -, Lk PVC-5.1.r)i° ,-s&',,� s�.4.J� ne f revs c 1 ?vv6 Irrn - t a se./ )� i Recommended by: 01,71, Reviewed by Instream Assessm nt: Regional or: Permits & Engineering: Date: 10/a2/6a Date:// 9 Date: VZ.-7 RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: nor 1 1992. 2 PARAMETERS Existing Limits: Monthly Average Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Temperature (°C): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Total Chromium (4/1): Cadmium (4/1): Lead (118/1): Nickel (mil): Copper (4/1): Zinc 01.g/1): Cyanide (pg/1): Silver (p.g/1): Residual Chlorine (µg/I): Chronic Toxicity: 1.5 30.0 monitor 30.0 200.0 6.0-9.0 monitor monitor monitor 372 3.0 monitor 37 monitor monitor 655 monitor 30.0 P/F @ 13% (Mar, Jun, Sep, Dec) Recommended Limits: Monthly Average Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Temperature (°C): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Total Chromium 0.1g/1): Cadmium (4/1): Lead 0tg/1): Nickel 04/1): Copper (41): Zinc (µg/1): Cyanide 0.tg/1): 'Silver (µg/l): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Arsenic (41): Chronic Toxicity: i3A5 �ug•U ; 2 imits Changes Due To: Other (limits transposed in permit) New regulations/standards/procedures New facility information (Headworks, APAM) 1.5 30.0 monitor 30.0 200.0 6.0-9.0 monitor monitor monitor 372 l.J Q 3.0 LO R 186 Q 656 t,L) monitor monitor 37 monitor 30.0 373 P/F t 13% (Mar, Jun, Sep, Dec) WO Mini Oe ec.x"'o`t- Parameter(s) Affected x Cyanide, Nickel x Mercury, Lead, Chloride, Fluoride x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. .o 4/ o` ivaea0' Facility Name Permit # Zo goo Pipe # CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is 1.3 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of 1 f i •r 44-1 ,5cA roc e- . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES r�mitt&d final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. pe g All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q10 /5 cfs Permitted Flow / .S+ MGD 1WC /3 % Basin & Sub -basin 11Ivt/ ae/O 0J Receiving Stream VAtu Y lrvE,‹ County ('.,GFr-wor Date /a 2 9 zi Recommended by: QCL PIF Version 9I91 10/14/92 ver 3.1 TOXICS REVIEW Facility: ANDREWS NPDES Permit No.: NC00208OO Status (E, P, or M) : E Permitted Flow: 1.5 mgd Actual Average Flow: 0.5 mgd Subbasin: '040502 Receiving Stream: VALLEY RIVER I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA---- 1 Stream Classification: "C-TROUT" I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI I 7010: 15.0 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY 1 IWC: 13.40 % I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic) Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria I Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violationsl (ug/1) (ug/l) I % (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam)1 Cadmium S-2.48- (1,4 1 68% 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.039 Chromium S 50.0 1 55% 0.2 0.1 0.23 0.7 0.880 Copper AL 7.0 1 61% 0.2 0.1 0.28 0.9 1.070 Nickel S 88.0 1 29% 0.1 0.1 0.19 1.0 1.130 Lead S 25.0 1 55% 0.2 0.0 0.18 0.2 0.350 Zinc AL 50.0 1 67% 0.6 0.1 0.74 0.6 1.230 Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 0.1 0.0 0.15 0.0 0.140 Mercury S 0.012 1 50.0% 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.001 Silver AL 0.06 1 66% 0.0 0.0 0.05 0.1 0.117 Selenium S 5.00 1 0% Arsenic S 50.00 1 45% 0.0 0.0 0.01 1.1 1.136 Phenols S NA 1 0% NH3-N C I 0% T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 I 0% Pollutant ✓Cadmium S /Chromium S Copper Nickel v/Zinc vyan i AL S S AL de S Mercury S Silver AL Selenium S Arsenic S Phenols S NH3-N C T.R.Chlor.AL Zrt> /y-0 /CC Feo 100 0 IvY I N P U T 5 E C T I 0 N ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT 1--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S-- Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on I FREQUENCY INSTREAM 1 Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor. Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent I based on Recomm'd ? 1 (#/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO) 1 __ I 0.53 7 19 0.913 2.968 0.00 Monitor Limit LIMIT- I NCAC NO I A 9.45 372.581 24.720 94.173 0.00 Monitor Limit 1,1 M 1r I NCAC NO 1 N 1.53 52.161 25.598 99.238 0.00 Monitor Monitor WAIII V .I Monthly NO 1 A 10.54 655.742 32.756 190.795 0.00 Monitor Limit 1.--,A41 {I NCAC NO 1 L 4.73 186.290 19.263 37.455 0.00 Limit Limit L I14}('. 1 NCAC NO 1 Y 12.89 372.581 57.759 96.527 0.00 Monitor Monitor M O1.%ITO _l Monthly NO 1 S 1.04 37.258 14.820 13.650 0.00 Limit Limit LIM ('r 1 NCAC NO 1 I 0.00 0.089 0.119 0.119 0.00 Limit Limit 1 1 S 0.02 0.447 4.366 9.460 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 I 0.43 37.258 0.000 0.000 0.00 I 1 R 7.73 372.581 1.308 148.583 0.00 Limit 1 1 E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S 0.000 0.00 1 1 U 126.677 0.00 1 1 L I i T I I S TOWN OF ANDREWS - Allowable Waste Concentrations for Toxicants 7010= 15 - Qa= 130 Qw (in cfs)= 2.325 PARAMETER FEDERAL/STATE STANDARD ALLOWABLE EFF. CONC. ACTUAL EFF. CONC. ACTION (µ9/I) (µ9/I) Mil) Chloride* 230 h.' if 1713.87 7,(o, OO1 2O ' ter, A Di-n-butyl phthalate 2715 154521.45 51 ,none t"'ta Fluoride 1800 13412.90 /l b *"Standards" are actually action levels. 1 0/1 9/9 2 <;:klik) ,41/0ZALf Dy /6-/frierD Oer K/✓.&/ �/STo�Y aF 1/4b/i ((a ,-,)'�iyQ/ tiI/G,9 /h /97S�G/�%r rest %Lel .5-Q,C416(iy /;;Iif ."1/1- /2/A/P-d- extel 711,071i . /km r.itz, m'av //I /q - ItAr 41-da /7 M(w96 /»,,, /5 . 4ief' geweei 47 /913 Gtmo� aGblee( iGGue l C�`oYi%� Moi/ a �i�91/. �/avd ttiCrs 940 in0AWfd. -74) tc /1/6.0 nit.71 4/1-- /411/1-dy* !'e1%/6tdt'7 GGst�i(� -v/� �t�iE� �/��.tl��'rYl�G?1'�' (,/remen6 by a.:4( „C. .6p44.c. 114,Cle f; v.ev- — th?t�t .�t64/ 0/45 /Z5L/h./ Lk c«r L'-Ii�!61 < ^eatir hmkerks amaty.r/ 04i 1691Liy- /679e2 Asea`Mts, 5-de7////e, ��� /ii J-� Z1( lN)' 44,d Cam. 'fed c /1,47 .°,46,9// . 01 If r ir-4/Wel WA( et 41517 tom, t6( R11 ,34,reZrdir--PAio ca / �'0/r farm 4vz4 ,r�/ei'�. > ZflG�jjOdr7!/� ym/. �G(� k,4 �� ��d�/ice Li VIA 7kt f,er o�scu. OA Acc/x15. 06iG� aerr rhishkCs rryr �� enig/o/ee "ii/frinq ),th#i i„l /qq7i 4w/ rematia eot aco# /11 Asti( ezi; -exatek9 . p•Elizmne.,7 74 47% Amd 04, A,sid .he,-;1/W kvigi;la dl/n4( y�Jort'i%ky rt/%ll /74, ve frtiyrdl ,� a.A6l. ViAt-745 PM, ft7e-nfixrn;q 0,r,.ek f,fred /on& A;i d 60:p:re/I. /177G1eYSrry7 ��ts,Z1 a C'G�t6i/' 67'i GCGt/Ge / ?7l ,uff/emoi, rtfe, r-c d/:_c/11 6?› V4C/1//16,-r- /!�liS s4ti-e~7/4is 7/aft. `2'o iI!`S /,S.-e> s" r NPDES PRETRE INE T INFORMATION REQUEST FORM FACILITY NAME: ANmEms \J \Ng' tp bDF NPDES NO. NCOO 2 e8 oc) REQUESTER raiKIZMNMI4C-A.Pt.ea.Alif DATE: 1 -7 / 7/ 94 REGION: AA�VILL&RO PEr 4IT CONDITIONS COVERING PRETREATMENT This facility has no SIUs and should not have pretreatment language. This facility should and/or is developing a pretreatment m •._.:..._.. Please 6ti.rilude the following conditions: Pi'IPAIED pFeFvFn RECEIVED: . , Program Development Phase I due / / 11'I 2 1`:%; 2 Phase II due / / Additional Conditio 4 i ` i ns � {:; • (attached) =i TECHNICAL NICAL SUPPORT �' ` '� ` aciinclude currently implementing a pretreatment program- el; z:i�= = i the following conditions: 1 �' {f, -- ` r'�Program Implementation au Additional Conditions `n �� '<~ ,c ., c r-J (r.) Ic IFICANT+ INDUSTRIAL USERS(SIUs) CONTRIBUTIONS SIU FIAW TOTAL: ` RtCEIVE-DomPosTrioN: JUL 0 2 1992 TECN31CAL SUPPORT BRANCH (attached) ▪ ISMGD - Lce. TEXTILE: pel /CD OM -, ME<!AL FINISHING: • 0 S— MGD OTR: ,$a ktr ��rn : • 0 I 1J MD MGD HEADwoxus REVIEW PASS P (THROUGH DAILY LOAD IN LEIS/DAY ACTUAL *. L'41-" '"re DOIESTIC PERM.Lamv �/a 1`res Cd ;ALLOWABLE eoY •o+ INDUSTRIAL % REMOVAL Cr 3.47 •027 .bOZ =- 'SZ ► .86 .0GI sS Ni . ZZ. . Iy. _ 99 — Ll Zn IZ . b7 . 6I - l 8 CN (0 71 • 6z . l� is C7 Phenol • l 9 Other S.%t /- Al 01 r . o ° 597. Li g ` TS5 t:3 /1 7S. 3Sy. Z9y /0Y 7 �1. rc% • . 001. 8 g 89 .001. ---- So / / REVIEWED BY: ave? i'o.C.- : B / 7 / 9 ti Annual Poilntent Analysis Monitoring (Requirement Reporting Form A • (Revised June i990) t. Facility Inlornintion: Page 1 of 9 NPDES Permit No: Nk,oQ 20$oO Discharge -(Pipe) No: e0 t Year: )992 Facility Name: 'own of Andrews Class: County: Person(s) Collecting Samples: . Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical: Yes No If no, oxpiniti briefly: Analytical l,nliotnlo►y PACE; Incorporated Ii. Sampling: 24 fir composite for main sample / grab sample for purgeable fraction Dale Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing: Sampling begun (dale, time): :• Yes Sampling finished (date, time): Date and time sampled (grab sample). No Instructions The purpose of this document end the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling. analysis and reporting procedures to be used for the Annual Pollulant Analysts Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described In the permit. Sampling 1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile organic fraction wiron collection of the 24-hour composlte sample Is completed. Follow any other sampling Instructions provided by the laboratory performing the analysis. 2 - Indicate In the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken. 3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided on the form. Analysis 4 • Analyze the effluent for pollulerils listed on the APAM form, including those to be identified and approximately quantified under the 10 significant peaks ruin, using nppropriele EPA -approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted only with prior, written approval of (lie Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM). Read and distrlbute.to the laboratory performing the anniysle the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements. 5 • identify chornlonis lo be nnaly,ed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described In item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement Iri lire penult) using a GC/MS library search: Tentative Identification is all that Is required; confirmation by standard injection Is not nnonsaery. Estimell the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention time. Reporting 6 • Ouanlitaliorr (.lrrrlt 1 a►gets llrnl should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantlta• tlon Ilmll and an explerinllon as to wily lire listed quantltatlon limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting a quanlltatlon limit large( could be high background concentrations In a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical to within a quantifiable concentration. t-iet any quantltation limit dilfenent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided for this purpose. 7 • If a chemical Ie found to be below the quanlltatlon limit, report the concentration detected as Tess than (or ' < ') the quantltatlon limit In the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected In concentrations greater than the detection limit and less than the quantltallon limit. Enter the detection limit In parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the quan• Illation limits must be quantified. Ouantltatlon limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October.1990). Enter the total number of peaks detected In each analytic fraction In the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations In units of micrograms per liter (ug/1) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be Identified under the 10 significant peaks rule are observed, enter "none" In the space provided for "other" compounds in each appropriate analytic fraction Section. Provide the concentra- tion estimate and istalillon time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made. • 8 • If "significant peeks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, identificailon basis, and MS scan number for each. In addition, Ilat internal standards and their retention times. 9 • in the section labeled "Orgniilo Analytical Information" (p. 9), include for each organic fraction the method, extract• ion technique. GC operaling conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size o1 the GC/MS _library being utilized In the appropriate space.: 10 • Use copies of flits Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Forth A lo report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory representative and the facility operetor in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page). 11 • Mall two completed copies of lire form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Central Files, Division of Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box Zee; Raleigh, NC 17r644. Mall the APAM form separately from Discharge .Mo. nitoring Reports. .Z9 5.3'�. � ��'(01(• ....., ....... . . A. PurgecthIa (Volatile Organic) Fraction, EPA Method Number of chemicals detected In Fraction Fraction S 1'Ofl1 ' Number 04005 Page 2 01 9 STOFlET Number Comlto1,nd Qtiantitatlon Quanlltation L1mlt Target Limit' Concentration GC/MS Detected Confirmation? . Pollutants to he analyzed for: 34210 34215 34030 32101 (ug11) (ug/1) Acrololn 1lcrytortltrllo 100 32104 34413 32102 34301 ' 34311 34576 32106 34410 32105 34400 Benzene 50 100 50 (ug/1) A Yes ND ND No 0 rornodlchloromelhane 5 5.0 ND 13tomofortn ihoinotnothane Grttl)ult lotrnctitroride (;hlotobonzone Gltlotoa(hana 2•(:1tioronthy vinyl ether Gltlo►olorrrt Chlotornethano Dlbromochlorornethane 5 5.0 5 5.0 ND ND 10 10 5 5.0 6 5.0 10 10 ND ND ND ND 10 5.0 5 5.0 10 10 34531 1,1•I_)Ichioroolhane —1,2•t31uli oro (bane 34501 34546 34541 34704 34699 34371 34423 34510 34475 34010 5 5.0 5 5.0 ND Nn ND ND ND 1, f-Dlchtoroolltylene 5 5.0 NI) traits- l,2-Dlchloroethytene 1 2•1)ic;hloropitIpane clog-filchlotopropene bane 1,3•t.)Ichlr)ropropene t:titylhonzono Methylene chlullde 1,1,1 2-Totrac tluroolhane To t t acitloroott►ylene Toluene 34506 1,1,17rlcltlo►onlltatto 34511 1,1,2•Trichloroolhane 39180 Trlcliloroethylolto 34488 Tr lchlotoflurortlothane 39175 Vinyl chlotido 5 5 5.0 5.0 6 5.0 NI) ND ND 5 5.0 5 5.0 8 5 7 5 �-0 5,n 5.0 5.0 6 5.0 5 5.0 5 ' • 5.0 5 5.0 10 5.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Nn • if different front cluantl•tation limit target 10 10 D ND 2. Olt�or purgeablon (up to 10 Illplioet peaks) Page 3 of 9 •'u E tO Identification Basis. - - (Check all that apply) • • Manual...:: Interpretation fir. V. 13 Retention Time (RT) (Min) 0 (<1 01 • Library Match Probability (%) cv 0 r Estimated. Concentration (ugl1) 0 • • Probable Molecular Weight • • • v . c M • 0 a E 8 a) g 1. a) . co 0 w v 0 0 0 0 •Q m 0 O a1 O O. E 0 U t• r• D. Acid 1 xltnclnblo Fraulion, EPA Method Number of nhailiIcals tlnlected In Fraction Fraction S•1OI1ET Number 45582 Page 4.or 9 STOItET Numbor Compound Quantltation Limit Target Quantllatlon Limit` Concentration Detected GC/MS Confirmation? 1. Pollutants to Ian analyzed for: (ug11) (ug/1) (ug/1) Yes No 34452 34506 34601 34606 4-Chioro-3-methylphenol 2-Chforophonol 2,4-1)ichloropl lonoi 2,4•blmothytpllonol 34616 2Dtnitrophonol 34657 2-Mothy1-4,6-ditlltrophenol 34591 _2-N!Itophonol 34646 4-Nltrophonol f'enlnrhiorophonol Minna! 39032 34694 34621 214,04rIchloroplionol 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 50 * 50 * 50 * sn * 250 * 250 * 50 * ND ND ND NU NIS ND ND 50 50 10 10 250 * 250 * 51) 50 * If different from gunnlilntlon !knit target * Matrix interference itt sample exceeded required quantitation limit. ND ND ND ND • h , • • . • • : :_• - ... . .. _ .. -•--• • Compound . • Probable Molecular Weight Estimated Concentration (ugll) Library Match Probability (%) Retention Time (RT) (Min) Identification Basis - .. (Check all that apply) - - - - Scan Number LIbrary Match Manual • Interpretation RT D - limonene EO 94 9.62 5989275 Unknown ECO 18.37 •1 let y1-1,2-e siiylbis (cxv-2,1 3 t vl) - - - t;:2--orooeboic acid • ' • 3000 89 21.49 - 109160 - . Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present: Internal Standard Retention Time (Min) m 0 r I C. Base/Neutral Fraction, EPA Method Number of chemicals dotected In Fraction Fracl lon S i'Of lE r Number 45583 Page 6 of 9 STOF1ET Colrlpound Nlnnhor Quantitallon Limit Tnrjot Quanlitallon Limit' Concentration Detected GC/MS Confirmation? 1. Pollutants Io be analyzed for: (ug11) (ug.11) (ug!1) Yes No 3405 AnorinphtI1orlo • 10 50 * ND 34200 Anniimilllylel(tl 10 50 * ND 34220 AIllllrncono 10 50 * ND 39120 Unrizldl►to 50 250 * ND 34520 Boltz.o (n)_nnllli•nce►ie 10 50 * ND 34247 13m17.0 (n) pylon 10 50 * ND 34230 13or12.o (b) lluorrintllone 10. 50 * • ND 34521 Bonze (jJI►Il petylene 10 50 * ND 34242 Mertz() (k) fluoranlhene ' 10 50 * ND _ 34278 Uis(2•cllloroolhoxy) methane 10 50 * ND 34273 13is(2-cllloroelhyl) ether 10 50 * ND 342.03 131s(2•chlorolsop.ropyl) other 10 50 * ND 39100 1315(2•ollyllioxyl) phthalate 10 50 * ND 34636 4-Uromophenyl phol yI other 10 50 * ND 34292 Butyl bonzyl pltlllalnle 10 50 * ND 3,1581 2-Chlororlaphlll«lorlo 10 50 * ND 34641 4•Ghiorophenyl phenyl other i 10 50 * ND 34320 Chrysene 10 50 * ND 34556 Dlbonzo a, 1 atllhracene 10 50 * ND _ 34536 1,2•Dlchlorobonz.one 10 50 * ND 34566 1,3•Dlchlorobonzone 10 50 * ND 34571 1,4•I-)Ichlo►obonzorte 10 50 * ND 34631 3,3•I)Icltloroborl7ldlno 20 100 * ND 34336 Diethyl phthalate 10 50 * ND 34341 Dllnulhyl phthnlnlo 10 50 * ND 39110 DI.n.bulyl phlhnlnle • 10 50 * 51b 21! S e• ff rr '' 34611 2,4•1.)Irlllrololuollo 10: 50 * ND 0 a,it 3,1620 34690_ 34340 2,11•Dlnllrololuotto 10 50 * ND DI•n-octyl phlhnlale 10 50 * ND 12_I)Ipihonylhyllf nzhlo 10 50 * ND 3437(3 Fluolnnlhone 10 50 * • ND [4301 FItlrlrollo 10 50 * ND 39700 1IoxachloroborlZolhe 10 50 * ND 3.1391 IlexnchlotubulncIlene 10 50 * ND 34386 I-IoxuChloro yolopenladlene 10 50 * ND 34396 Hexachloroothano 10 50 * ND 34403 Ind(3no(1,2,3•cc]) pyrone 10 50 * N11 34400 Isophorono 10 50 * ND 34696 Naphthalene 10 50 * ND 34447 Nitrobenzene 10 50 * ND 34438 N•Illl1oaodlrnolliylamine 10 50 * ND 3442E N-nIttoso•dl-n-plopylarnlne 10 50 * ND 34433 N-nllro3odihhellylamine 10 50 * ND 34461 Phenanlhrene 10 50 * Nn• 34469 Pyrono 10 50 * ND 34551 1,2,4.1 rlcirlorobonzene ' 10 50 * ND ' 11 different from qunnlitatlon target * Mnt:r.ix inl prr:eronr.n hi sample exceeded required quanitation limit. • Compound Probable Molecular Weight Estimated Concentration (uc11) Ubrary Match Probability (%) Retention Time (RT) (Min) Identification Basis (Check all that apply) Library I Manual Maxca !nte atation n i1 Scan Nurccor Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present: Internal Standard Retention Time (Min) 7 . �- 1. D. Organoeltlorltto&Otganophosphorus Pesticides and PCB's • Numbor of eltemlc:nln.detrictod In Fractlori , . , • - Pima 8 of 9 '' •�'' • '' ' ' . Fraction STOr1C'i' Nurit6of 0010E �.� • •• . . • STOnET • Compound ... Nuntbt r • • Quanlflation Limit Target Quantltatlon Limit' -Concentration Detected Confirmation? Dual Column GC/MS 1. Pollutants to bo analyzed fot: Organochlorine I'osticidos!PCE3's: EPA Method (Ug11) (ugll) (ug/l) Yes No Yes No 39330 Aldrin - _ - 0.05 1.0 * ND 39337 alpha -DI -IC 0.05 1.0 * ND 39338 t3ota•Di-1C 0.05 1.0 * ND • 34259 Nita-dl-IC 0.1 1.0 * ND 39340 Gaptintl•E3I IC (Undone) 0.05 1.0 * ND 39350 Chlutdntto 0.2 1.0 * ND . 39310 414'•l.)UU • 0.1. 1.0 * ND 39320 414'•1)DC 0.1 1.0 * ND 39300 - 4,-1'-DD i' 0.1 1.0 * ND _ 39380 Dluldrin 0.02 1.0 * NO ' 34361 Ertdonuilon jjnlpha) 0.1 • 1.0 * ND 34356 Endosullan II (j eta) 0.1 1.0 * ND 34351 Endosuifan sulfate 0.7 1.0 * ND 39390 1 nd i i n 0.06 1.0 * ND 34360 • Mullin nldollytlq 0.2 1.0 * ND 39410 i oiilnchior 0.05 1„0 * ND 39420 I-lopincltlor opoXld© 0.8 1.0 * ND 39480 Mothoxychior 0.5 1.0 * ND 39755 Mllax 0.2 1.0 * ND 39400 Toxnpitotto 2.4 1.0 * ND 34671 PCII 1010 0.5- .: 1.0 * _ ND 394813 PCI1 1221 0.5 •. 1.0 * ND 39492 POD 1232 0.5 1.0 * ND 39496 PC13 1242 - 0.5 • 1.0 * ND 39500 PCI3 1248 . . 0.5 1.0 * ND . ' 39504 POD 1254 • • • 1.0 1.0 ND . • 39508 PCB 1260 1.0 . 1.0 -' • ND • Organophosphorus Pesticides: EPA Method I. * . . ".I` • 39560 Demeton 2.5 1.0 ND . 39540 Parathion (ethyl) - 0.6 1.0 * • ND • . E. l-Ierblcldon, Number Fraction CPA Mnl�tnd * . , .••• • • • . • • • ,: ::'^ ..:.'` ' ; . • of chomlcais decocted in Fraction STOIIET Number 00148 - STOflET Compound Number QUantltatlon Limit Target Quantitation • Limit* : Concentration Detected Confirmation? . Ddal Column 1. Pollutants to Ian analyzed tor: _ lug/1) • (ug/1) .. . (ugll) Yes Ho ' 39730 2,i•I? 12 10 ND `' 39045 811vox . , 2 1.0 ' . ND l 39740 2,4,5-1 • - . i 2 1.0 • • ND ;°.. • If different from qua:tlllation ilmIt target • 1,1 • * Mntri.x interfrr:encn in hrimpie exceeded required quantitation limit. Organic Analyllunl IrtrorrniIlion: Pape 9 of 9 Orgnnic unction Method Extraction GC Opernlfug Conditions Description Surrogates (Spikes) Column , c• Batch Continuous Length X ID, Film Thickness, Column Type, Cantor Gas & Flow Rate, Temperature Program Compound ilecovary % Purganbla 62/I X 6ft x 0.11n glass, (6t cic lh ip2ro 98 X 1% SP-1000 40 (lmin) 220 C(lmin) toluene-d8r 98 X 8 C/rein 240 C(12.5n1n) 10 C/min 4-) 1e 0I'0 99 Acld Extractable 625 X 2-fluoro P 58 X _9mx 0. 251rra, 0.25 tort n1-d( 40 X Di35 J&W, He 30 cm/sec it4r c bra u 90 • Base/Neutral Extractable 32 C(4.5 min ) 300 C nf ri 5 ne 91 _X X (9 min) at 10 C/min 2 kitioY1— 106 .., tarplienyl-d14 84 Example: Acid Exlrnclnhlo 0255 X 30rn x 0.25mm, 0.25um, DB-5, Ile, 30 cm/sac, 40°C (4 min) - 270°C, 10°lririn d5 • phenol 50 GC/MS Library slza (nuulhor of Inference spectre): F. Metals and Other Chemicals Number of Metals and Other Chemicals,(as listed below) detected In Sarnple Fracllon STOf1ET Number 7$240 STOriri. Compound Number • Quantliatlon Limit Target QUantllatlon Limit* Concerilratlon Detected 1. Pollutants to bn nntlyzud (or: (ugll) • (ug/1) (ug/1). 01 104 Aluminum 50 100 * 203 01097 Antimony 50 50 ND 01002 Arsenic 10 1,0 2,0 01012 Beryllium 25 5.0 ND MB 01027 CadirtlUrrt 2 1.0 01034 Chromium 5 5.0 60 01042 Copper 2 2.0 45 01051 Lead 10 1.0 ND 71900 Mercury 0.2 0.2 M) 01067 Nick©l 10 10 , ND 01147 Selenium 5 1.0 IV 01077 Sllvor 5 to 01092 Zino 10 __.5,,,0 10 200 2. Other Inor anion: 01007 Barluin 500 100 ND 00940 •;, Chtoildo 1000 1000 • 26000 f 'Q2.30 to 00720 . Cy_ntildo 20 2 5 00951 Fluoride 100 100 190 /, q.v. ' If different from rltranlltnttorl limit target <- Analytical L/abboot it Re.prr s j v• PACE, Incorporated Signed:_-�2���� a6/ Date:6 78^%2 Faclilty Operator In.flosponslhio Charge (ORC): 1 certify that this tnpnl'1 Is acutirato and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signed: • .1 Date:__.... _.... _.' ____.. _. .TO. PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT WATER QUALITY SECTION DATE: August 3, 1992 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDAT ON COUNTY Cherokee PERMIT NUMBER NC0020800 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Town of Andrews j Post Office Box 2137 Andrews, N. C. 28901 2. Date of Investigation: May 5, 1992 3. Report Prepared By: W. E. Anderson 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: RECEIVED AUG 1 0 1992 TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH Michael Kovach 704-321-3113 5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of Main Street and NCSR 1618(Whitaker Lane) in Andrews, travel southeast on NCSR 1618 approximately 0.25 miles to Reagan Avenue (just before the railroad tracks). Turn right on Regan avenue and travel 0.3 miles to the Andrews wastewater treatment facility on the right. 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points: Latitude: 35° 11' 51" Longitude: 83° 50' 46" Attach a USGS map extract and indi.c:atA treatment facility site and discharge point on map. U.S.G.S. Quad No. 150-NE(G3NE) U.S.G.S. Quad Name Andrews 7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): N/A 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat, in the flood plain. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: Greater than 500 feet. Page 1 • 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Valley River a. Classification: "C-Trout" b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Hi.wassee 040502 c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: This discharge is about: 5. 5 miles upstream from the Coats American raw water intake. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Type of wastewater: 92 % Domestic 08 % Industrial a. Volume of Wastewater: 1.50 MGD (Design Capacity) b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:50,000 GPD of metal finishing wastewater, 75,000 GPD laundry wastewater. c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: Chronic toxicity has not been a problem to date. d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): Yes in development approved XX should be required not needed 2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day: Discharge limits not production based. a. Highest month in the past 12 months: lbs/day b. Highest year in the past 5 years: lbs/day 3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and applicable CFR Part and Subpart: Metal finishing:40 CFR 433 Laundry wastewater is not categorical. 4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): Existing microscreens/packed tower(trickling filter)/clarification with disinfection. 5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme: The sludge disposal plan for this facility should be restated prier to permit renewal. 6. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): III 7. SIC Codes(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): Primary 01 Main Treatment Unit Code: 420- Secondary 30,40,57 Page 2 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant funds (municipals only)? N/A 2. Special monitoring requests: None 3. Additional effluent limits requests: Include Daily Maximum effluent fecal coliform bacteria limit. 4. Other: PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The facility is in adequate condition to comply with effluent limits. After the sludge disposal plan had been restated, permit renewal is recommended with the following condition added to the supplement page: After receiving authorization fgpm the Division, construct permanent disinfection facilities Adequate to meet permit requirements. Signature of Report Preparer Water Quality Regional Supervisor Date Page 3