20200021 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2022_20220808

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20200021
Version* 1
Select Reviewer: *
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 08/08/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/8/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Matthew Reid
Project Information
ID#:*
20200021
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
• DMS Mitigation Bank
Bull Chute
Randolph
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
BullChute_100137_MY0_2022. pdf
Existing Version
19.82MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Matthew Reid

MVO FINAL MONITORING REPORT
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, NC
Yadkin River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03040103
DMS Project ID No. 100137
Full Delivery Contract No. 7878-01
RFP#16-007878 (Issued: 5/6/2019)
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2020-00049
DWR Project No. 20200021
Data Collection: March - May 2022
Submission: July 2022
4
y �q
.' w .
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
7,a
Mitigation Services
ENVIRQNMENTALQ UAL ETY

CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
July 31, 2022
Mr. Matthew Reid
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Re: Bull Chute — MY-0 As -Built Report (DMS Project No. 100137)
Response to Comments
Dear Mr. Reid,
Please find below the response to comments on the Bull Chute As -Built Report provided by
DMS, dated July 25, 2022:
1) Please add Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 to Table of Contents.
Re: Tables 1-3 were added to the table of contents.
2) Monitoring Table Summary and 4.2 Hydrology Assessment indicates that 9 groundwater
gauges were installed. The CCPV and soil boring logs show 10 ground water gauges.
Please review and revise as necessary.
Re: The table was revised to reflect the 10 groundwater gauges installed throughout Site
wetlands.
3) Table 8: Vegetation Plot Data Table: There are several species included on the
vegetation table under the "species included in approved mitigation plan" section that
were not part of the approved list (Catalpa sp., Quercus lyrate, Quercus pagoda and
Viburnum dentatum). Any species not included in the approved mitigation plan should
be in the "post mitigation plan species" section (see DMSMonReportTablesOct2020.xls).
These species should be counted in the "total" column and not in the "planted" column.
Please revise table and update report to reflect any changes.
Re: The Quercus lyrata and Quercus pagoda were likely misidentified. These have been
revised to Quercus sp. and will be identified to species during MY1 monitoring. The
Catalpa sp. was a data entry error and has been corrected to Carpinus caroliniana. The
Viburnum dentatum in Random Plot 10 was misidentified and has been revised to
Cornus amomum. All identifications will be confirmed during MY1.
4) Several species from the approved mitigation plan do not appear in the table. Carya
tomentosa, Salix nigra and Carpinus caroliniana. Revise as necessary.
Re: Carya tomentosa and Carpinus caroliniana were identified on Site. Salix nigra was
planted in the streamside assemblage and was not captured in the vegetation plot data.
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901
clearwatermitigation©gmail.com

CLEARWATER MITIGATION SOLUTIONS
Bull Chute As -Built Report
Response to Comments
Page 2
5) Several Quercus sp. were counted in the vegetation plot data. Please identify in the MY1
report. If these are planted species, they should be either Quercus nigra or Quercus
phellos.
Re: These will be identified to species during MY1 when leaves are present.
6) There was one Carya sp. identified in VP21. Should this be Carya tomentosa? Review
and revise as necessary.
Re: Yes, this specimen has been revised to Carya tomentosa.
7) Record Drawing: Please add call outs to changes in red with short description (ex. log
cross vane added, cross vane not constructed).
Re: All redline changes now have call outs.
8) Record Drawing: Hard copy was not printed in color. Red line markups were
indiscernible as a result. Please revise for final submittal.
Re: The hard copy was printed in color for this submittal.
9) Record Drawing: Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) was the only species not planted.
Please include a red line strike through since it is a deviation from the original design.
Re: Ironwood in design planting list has a line strike through.
Digital Deliverable Review:
10) Digital deliverables have been reviewed and are complete. Please provide an updated
digital deliverable submittal based on comments above when submitting the revised
final MVO report.
Re: The digital deliverables have been updated based on the DMS comments.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions at 919-624-6901.
Sincerely,
"4:41
Kevin Yates
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901
clearwatermitigation@,gmail.com

MVO FINAL MONITORING REPORT
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, NC
Yadkin River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03040103
DMS Project ID No. 100137
Full Delivery Contract No. 7878-01
RFP #16-007878 (Issued: 5/6/2019)
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2020-00049
DWR Project No. 20200021
Data Collection: March - May 2022
Submission: July 2022
Prepared For:
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL (RIALUTY
Prepared By:
And
CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, North Carolina
Contact: Kevin Yates
Phone: [phone]
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Grant Lewis
Phone: [phone]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 1
1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND, COMPONENTS, AND STRUCTURE 1
TABLE 1. PROJECT COMPONENTS AND MITIGATION CREDITS 2
TABLE 2. SUMMARY: GOALS, PERFORMANCE, AND RESULTS 3
TABLE 3. PROJECT ATTRIBUTE TABLE 4
1.2 SUCCESS CRITERIA 5
2.0 AS -BUILT CONDITION (BASELINE) 5
3.0 PROJECT MONITORING — METHODS 6
3.1 MONITORING 6
4.0 MONITORING YEAR 0 — DATA ASSESSMENT 8
4.1 STREAM ASSESSMENT 8
4.2 HYDROLOGY ASSESSMENT 8
4.3 VEGETATIVE ASSESSMENT 8
4.4 MONITORING YEAR O SUMMARY 8
5.0 REFERENCES 9
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
Table of Contents page i
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

APPENDICES
Appendix A. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 4A-H. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Permanent Photo Points (Bridge Crossings)
Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6A. Planted Bare -Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6B. Permanent Seed Mix
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Data Table from Vegetation Data Entry Tool
Appendix C. Stream Geomorphology Data
Cross -Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profile
Table 9A-F. Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables
Table 10A-E. Cross -Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Appendix D. Hydrologic Data
Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles
Appendix E. Project Timeline and Contact Info
Table 11. Project Timeline
Table 12. Project Contacts
Appendix F. Record Drawings (As -Built Survey)
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
Table of Contents page ii
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Clearwater Mitigation Services has established the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) Bull Chute Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site"). The
Site includes Unnamed Tributaries (UTs) to Caraway Creek in the Southern Outer Piedmont
ecoregion of North Carolina. The Site is located in the Yadkin River Basin, cataloguing unit
03040103 and Targeted Local Watershed and Local Watershed Plan Area (Caraway Creek)
03040103050040 and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) subbasin number
03-08-38. Site watersheds range from approximately 0.008 of a square mile (5.4 acres) on UT2 to
0.19 of a square mile (120.9 acres) at the Site's outfall.
1.1 Project Background, Components, and Structure
Located in Randolph County, less than one -mile northwest of New Market and 4.5 miles
northwest of Randleman, the Site encompasses 31.7 acres. Restoration activities within the Site
included the construction of meandering, E/C-type stream channel resulting in 6974 linear feet
of Priority I stream restoration, 617 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level I), 833 linear feet
of stream enhancement (Level 11), 450 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level 11 with an
adjusted ratio), 3.13 acres of riparian wetland re-establishment, 0.114 acres of riparian wetland
rehabilitation, and 1.462 acre of riparian wetland enhancement. The site is expected to provide
7742.933 warm water stream credits and 3.937 riparian wetland credits by closeout (Table 1,
page 2). A conservation easement was granted to the State of North Carolina and recorded at
the Randolph County Register of Deeds on April 9, 2021.
Prior to construction, the Site was characterized by disturbed forest and livestock pasture. Site
design was completed in May 2021. Construction started on September 6, 2021 and ended
within a final walkthrough on March 8, 2022. The Site was planted on March 18, 2022.
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, and project contacts are
summarized in Tables 11-12 (Appendix E).
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
page 1
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

Table 1. Bull Chute Mitigation Site (ID-100137) P oject Mitigation Quantities and Credits
Project Segment
Original
Mitigation
Plan
Ft/Ac
As -Built
Ft/Ac
Original
Mitigation
Category
Original
Restoration
Level
Original
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Stream
UT 1 Reach A
UT 1 Reach B
UT 1 Reach C
UT 1 Reach D
UT 1 Reach E
UT 2
UT 3 Reach A
UT 3 Reach B
UT 3 Reach C
UT 4A
UT 4B
UT 4C
173
468
68
149
2164
592
418
306
1137
410
295
180
187
456
68
149
2168
592
423
303
1119
402
290
175
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
El
El
El
El
El
EII*
No Credit
2.50000
1.50000
2.50000
1.50000
1.00000
2.50000
1.00000
7.50000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
0.00000
69.200
312.000
27.200
99.333
2,164.000
236.800
418.000
40.800
1,137.000
410.000
295.000
0.000
UT 4
2482
2492
Warm
R
1.00000
2,482.000
UT 5A
UT 5B
UT 6
UT 7
37
38
121
68
36
38
130
77
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
No Credit
R
No Credit
EII*
0.00000
1.00000
0.00000
5.00000
Total:
0.000
38.000
0.000
13.600
7,742.933
Wetland
Wetland Reestablish
Wetland Rehabilitation
Wetland Enhancement
3.13
0.114
1.462
3.13
0.114
1.462
R
R
R
REE
RH
1.00000
1.50000
2.00000
3.130
0.076
0.731
Total:
3.937
Comments
Approx. 30 If (approx. sta. 10+11 to 10+41) was realigned during
construction to avoid damaging mature trees. This resulted in an increase
of stream restoration footage along this reach at MYO. However, no
change to crediting is proposed for MYO.
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian
Non -Rip
Coastal
Warm
Cool
Cold
Wetland
Wetland
Marsh
Restoration
6,944.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Re-establishment
3.130
0.000
0.000
Rehabilitation
0.076
0.000
0.000
Enhancement
0.731
0.000
0.000
Enhancement I
411.333
0.000
0.000
Enhancement II
333.200
0.000
0.000
Enhancement II*
54.400
0.000
0.000
Creation
0.000
0.000
0.000
Preservation
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Totals
Total Stream Credit
7,742.933
7,742.933
Total Wetland Credit 3.937
3.937
Wetland Mitigation Category Restoration Level
*Enhancement Level II with an adjusted ratio (based on IRT comment and review).
CM Coastal Marsh HOP High Quality Preservation
R Riparian P Preservation
NR Non -Riparian E Wetland Enhancement-Veg and Hydro
Ell Stream Enhancement II
El Stream Enhancement I
C Wetland Creation
RH Wetland Rehabilitation -Veg and Hydro
REE Wetland Re-establishment Veg and Hydro
R Restoration

Table 2. Summary: Goals, Performance, and Results
Goals
Objectives
Success Criteria
(1) HYDROLOGY
• Minimize downstream flooding to
the maximum extent possible.
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore
overbank flows
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• Deep rip floodplain soils to reduce compaction and increase soil
surface roughness
• Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
• Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and
longitudinal profile
• BHR not to exceed 1.2
• Document four overbank events in separate monitoring years
• Continuous intermittent surface flow for at least 30 days
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Conservation Easement recorded
• Increase stream stability within the
Site so that channels are neither
aggrading nor degrading.
• Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and
longitudinal profile
• Remove livestock from the property
• Construct stable channels with appropriate substrate
• Upgrade existing piped channel crossings and install piped
crossings at existing forded crossings
• Stabilize stream banks
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• Cross-section measurements indicate a stable channel with
appropriate substrate
• Visual documentation of stable channels and structures
• BHR not to exceed 1.2
• < 10% change in BHR in any given year
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
(1) WATER QUALITY
• Remove direct nutrient and
pollutant inputs from the Site and
reduce contributions to
downstream waters.
• Remove agricultural livestock and reduce agricultural land/inputs
• Install marsh treatment areas
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
• Provide surface roughness and reduce compaction through deep
ripping/plowing
• Restore overbank flooding by constructing channels at historic
floodplain elevation
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
(1) HABITAT
• Improve instream and stream -
side habitat.
• Construct stable channels with appropriate substrate
• Plant woody riparian buffer to provide organic matter and shade
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore
overbank flows
• Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
• Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
• Stabilize stream banks
• Install in -stream structures
•
•
•
•
•
Cross-section measurement indicate a stable channel with
appropriate substrate
Visual documentation of stable channels and in -stream
structures.
Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
Conservation Easement recorded
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
page 3
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

Table 3. Project Attribute Table
Project Name
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
County
Randolph County, North Carolina
Project Area (acres)
31.7
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude decimal degrees)
35.8325, -79.8879
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
3040103050040
DWR Sub -basin
03-07-09
Project Drainage Area (acres)
218.5
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<2%
Land Use Classification
Managed Herbaceous Cover & Hardwood Swamps
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
UT 1
UT 2
UT 3
UT 4
UT 4A/B
UT 4C
UT 5
UT 6
UT 7
Pre -project length (feet)
3022
592
1861
2482
705
180
75
121
68
Post -project (feet)
3149
592
1907
2558
693
175
75
130
77
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined,
A, C
A, C
A, C
A, C
A, C
A, C
A, C
A, C
A, C
Drainage area (acres)
97.6
48.1
48.1
120.9
10.2/8.9
8.3
12.5
5.4
16
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Int/Per
Int
Int/Per
Per
Int
Int
Int
Int
Int
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C
Dominant Stream Classification (existing)
G5
---
GS
Fg/GS
Eg/Cf5
Dominant Stream Classification (proposed)
Ce 3/4
---
Ce 3/4
Ce 3/4
Ce 3/4
Ce 3/4
Ce 3/4
---
Ce 3/4
Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) if applicable
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
III
III
III
III
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetlands
Pre -project (acres)
3.130 acre drained & 1.576 acre degraded
Post -project (acres)
3.206 restored & 0.731 enhanced
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian)
Riparian riverine
Mapped Soil Series
Mecklenburg, Wynott-Enon Complex, and field identified Wehadkee Variant
Soil Hydric Status
Non-hydric, Non-hydric, and Hydric
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
Section 404 Permit
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
Section 401
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
CE Document
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
CE Document
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

1.2 Success Criteria
Monitoring and success criteria for stream restoration should relate to project goals and
objectives identified from on -site NC SAM and NC WAM data collection. From a mitigation
perspective, several of the goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally elevated by
restoration activities without direct measurement. Other goals and objectives will be considered
successful upon achieving success criteria. The following summarizes Site annual success criteria.
Success Criteria
Streams
•
All streams must maintain an Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
•
Continuous surface flow in intermittent streams must be documented each year for a minimum of 30
consecutive days.
•
Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 at any measured cross-section.
•
BHR at any measure riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10% from baseline condition during
any given monitoring period.
•
The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards shall be met through four
separate bankfull events, occurring in separate years, during the monitoring years 1-7.
Wetland Hydrology
•
Saturation or inundation, measured annually, within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum,
12 percent of the growing season*, during average climatic conditions.
Vegetation
•
Within planted portions of the site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum
of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at
year 7.
•
Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7 in each plot.
•
Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the
site; natural recruits not on the planting list may be considered by the IRT on a case -by -case basis.
•
Any volunteer species on the approved planting list must be established for at least 2 years to count towards
success and will be subject to the average height standard.
*Growing season for this site is to start no earlier than March 1 and range through November 13 as verified by soil temperature
and bud burst
2.0 AS -BUILT CONDITION (BASELINE)
Construction started on September 6, 2021 and ended within a final walkthrough on March 8,
2022. The Site was planted on March 18, 2022. As -built and MYO data collection occurred
between March and May 2022.
In general, no significant issues arose during the construction of the Site. A sealed half-size set of
record drawings are provided in Appendix F, which includes the post -construction survey,
alignments, structures, and monitoring features. These include redlines for any significant field
adjustments made during construction that differ from the design plans. Where needed,
adjustments were made during construction based on field evaluations and are listed below.
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
page 5
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

Location
Deviation
Explanation
UT-1 sta. 0+19
Log cross vane added
Slope in field conditions required a structure
UT-1 sta. 26+75
Log cross vane added
Slope in field conditions required a structure
UT-1 sta. 30+43
Cross vane not constructed
Slope in field conditions did not require a structure
UT-3 sta. 8+88
Log cross vane added
Slope in field conditions required a structure
UT-4 sta. 10+11 to 10+41
Alignment altered
To avoid damage to existing mature trees
UT-7 sta. 0+80
Cross vane not constructed
Property line in conflict with vane arm
All Easement Crossings
Culverted crossings replaced
with bridge crossings
Improvement of crossings for landowner use,
hydraulics, and aquatic life passage
Additional activities that occurred at the Site included the following.
• Planting 28.5 acres of the Site with 31,620 stems (planted species are included in Table
6A [Appendix B]).
• Treating Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) mechanically and with herbicide prior to
planting.
• Treating fescue (Festuca sp.) with herbicide prior to planting.
• Applying a temporary seed mix consisting of grain rye (Secale cereale) and Brown Top
Millet (Urochloa ramosa) primarily on disturbed or stockpiled areas, and Orchard Grass
(Dactylis glomerata) and German Millet (Setaria italica) along stream channels and banks.
• Applying sitewide and streamside/wetland permanent seed mixes across the Site.
Species lists are included in Table 6B (Appendix B).
3.0 PROJECT MONITORING — METHODS
Monitoring will be conducted in accordance with 2016 NCIRT Guidelines. Monitoring will be
conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc based on the schedule below. A summary of monitoring
is outlined in Section 3.1. Annual monitoring reports will be submitted to the NCDMS by
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions no later than December 1 of each monitoring year data is
collected.
Monitoring Schedule
Resource
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Streams
Wetlands
Vegetation
Visual Assessment
Report Submittal
3.1 Monitoring
The monitoring parameters are summarized in the following table.
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
page 6
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

Monitoring Summary
Stream Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
Stream Profile
Full longitudinal survey
As built (unless otherwise
required)
All restored stream channels
Graphic and tabular data.
Stream Dimension
Cross -sections
Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
Total of 26 cross sections on
restored channels
Graphic and tabular data.
Channel Stability
Visual Assessments
Yearly
All restored stream channels
Areas of concern will be depicted on a
plan view figure with a written
assessment and photograph of the area
included in the report.
Additional Cross -sections
Yearly
Only if instability is documented
during monitoring
Graphic and tabular data.
Stream Hydrology
Continuous monitoring surface water
gauges and/or trail camera
Continuous recording through
monitoring period
6 surface water gauges on UT 1, UT
2, UT 3, UT 4A, UT 4B, and UT 7
Surface water data for each monitoring
period
Bankfull Events
Continuous monitoring surface water
gauges and/or trail camera
Continuous recording through
monitoring period
3 crest gauges on UT 1, UT 3, and
UT 4
Surface water data for each monitoring
period
Visual/Physical Evidence
Continuous through
monitoring period
Periodic Site visits throughout the
year.
Visual evidence, photo documentation,
and/or rain data.
Wetland Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
Wetland
Restoration
Groundwater gauges
Years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
throughout the year with the
growing season defined as
March 1-November 13*
10 gauges spread throughout
restored wetlands
Soil temperature at the beginning of
each monitoring period to verify the start
of the growing season**, groundwater
and rain data for each monitoring period
Vegetation Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
Vegetation
establishment and
vigor
Permanent vegetation plots 0.0247
acre (100 square meters) in size; CVS-As-built,
EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008)
Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
21 plots spread across the Site
Species, height, planted vs. volunteer,
stems/acre
Annual random vegetation plots,
0.0247 acre (100 square meters) in size
As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
10 plots randomly selected each
year
Species and height
*The growing season will be verified by soil temperature and bud burst of more than one species (excluding Sambucus and red maple.)
**Growing season for the Site is to start no earlier than March 1 and will be verified by soil temperature and bud burst. The growing season will end November 13.
Note: Photo points will be taken at all cross sections and at vegetation plot origin points. In addition, photo points will be located at
all culverts and crossings.
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
page 7
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

4.0 MONITORING YEAR 0 — DATA ASSESSMENT
Site visits were conducted between March and May 2022 to collect as -built and annual
monitoring data for the project. Stream, wetland, and vegetation monitoring for the Site follow
the approved success criteria presented in the Mitigation Plan and summarized in Section 1.3;
monitoring methods are detailed in Section 3.0.
4.1 Stream Assessment
Geomorphology surveys for MY0 were conducted between May 18 - 26, 2022. All streams within
the Site are stable and functioning as designed. Refer to Appendix A for the Visual Stream
Morphology Stability Assessment Table. Refer to Appendix C for Stream Geomorphology Data.
No stream areas of concern were identified during MYO.
4.2 Hydrology Assessment
ITen groundwater monitoring gauges were installed throughout the Site's wetlands. Hydrologic
data will be collected and reported during MY1 (2023).
4.3 Vegetative Assessment
The MY0 vegetative survey was completed on April 4, 2022. Vegetation monitoring resulted in a
sitewide stem density average of 778 planted stems per acre, above the interim requirement of
320 stems per acre required at MY3. All 21 fixed vegetation plots and 10 random transects met
the interim success criteria. Please refer to Appendix A for Vegetation Plot Photographs and the
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table, and Appendix B for Vegetation Plot Data. No vegetation
areas of concern were identified during MYO.
4.4 Monitoring Year 0 Summary
In summary, the site streams are stable and performing as intended and vegetation
establishment across the site appears to be on target to meet success criteria for permanent and
random plots. Periodical monitoring will continue to be conducted to identify any areas of
concern in the future.
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
page 8
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

5.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2005. Local Watershed Plan for the
Upper Yadkin River Basin: Upper Uwharrie River Watershed (online). Available:
https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Yadkin_River_Basin/Upper_Uwharri
e/Upper_Uwharrie_PFR_aug%2705.pdf (July 30, 2019).
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River
Basin Restoration Priorities (online). Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Yadkin_River_B
asin/Lower%20Yadkin_Pee_Dee_RBRP_2009_FinaI092010.pdf (July 30, 2019).
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment
Method (NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
page 9
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

APPENDIX A
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 4A-H. Stream Visual Stability Assessment
Table 5. Visual Vegetation Assessment
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Permanent Photo Points (Bridge Crossings)
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

0
250
500
1,000
Feet
Note: Basemap is drone imagery from April 2022 on
top of 2018 aerial orthoimagery from NC OneMap
N
Legend
Bull Chute Site Easement = 31.7 ac
Asbuilt Structures
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement (Level I)
Stream Enhancement (Level 11)
Stream Enhancement (Level 11, 5:1)
Stream Enhancement (Level 11, 7.5:1)
Stream Generating No Credit
Wetland Reestablishment
Wetland Rehabilitation
Wetland Enhancement
* Photo Points (Bridge Crossings)
'r Vegetation Plot Origins
• Groundwater Gauge
• Rain Gauge/Soil Probe
O Stream Crest Gauge
A Stream Flow Gauge
Cross Sections
Permanent Vegetation Plots
2x50 m Random Vegetation Transect
4x25 m Random Vegetation Transect
Axiom Environmenlai, inc.
CLEARWATER MITIGATION
Project:
BULL CHUTE
MITIGATION SITE
Randolph County, NC
Title:
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Drawn by:
KRJ
Date:
JUL 2022
Scale:
1:3500
Project No.:
20-006
FIGURE
1

Table 4A. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach
Assessed Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
UT 1
3149
6298
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
46
46
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
46
46
100%

Table 4B. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach UT 2
Assessed Stream Length 592
Assessed Bank Length 1184
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
0
0
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
0
0
100%

Table 4C. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach
Assessed Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
UT 3
1907
3814
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
30
30
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
30
30
100%

Table 4D. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach
Assessed Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
UT 4
2558
5116
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
27
27
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
27
27
100%

Table 4E. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach
Assessed Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
UT 4A
401
802
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
17
17
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
17
17
100%

Table 4F. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach UT 4B
Assessed Stream Length 290
Assessed Bank Length 580
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
10
10
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
10
10
100%

Table 4G. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach UT 4C
Assessed Stream Length 175
Assessed Bank Length 350
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
4
4
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
4
4
100%

Table 4H. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach UT 5
Assessed Stream Length 75
Assessed Bank Length 150
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
0
0
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
0
0
100%

Table 4H. Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach UT 7
Assessed Stream Length 77
Assessed Bank Length 154
Survey Date: May 13, 2022
Major Channel Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
0
100%
Totals
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
1
1
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance
document)
1
1
100%

Table 5. Visual Vegetation Assessment
Planted acreage
28.5
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.10 acres
0.00
0.0%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MY stem count criteria.
0.10acres
0.00
0.0%
To
.
0.00
0.0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates
Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY Performance Standard.
0.10 acres
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreage
31.7
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
Combined
Acreage
% of Easement
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will therefore be calculated
against the total easement acreage: Include species with the potential to directly outcompete native,
young, woody stems in the short-term or community structure for existing communities. Species
included in summation above should be identified in report summary.
0.10 acres
0.00
0.0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
II
0 Encroachments
noted
Encroachment may be point, line, or polygon. Encroachment to be mapped consists of any violation of
restrictions specified in the conservation easement. Common encroachments are mowing, cattle access,
vehicular access. Encroachment has no threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact
area.
none

Bull Chute Mitigation
MYO(2022)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken April 4, 2022)
Ngfill
Il
goln, , P
Plot 1 ' � A �I�g ��/ Plot 2
A,.,
`.
—..; 1. rM'%..a ` 4it, � .;,,� y '..,,.....P. „.
..,y l 5'+a _ tr't''� ---n=: � - 4 It 4 l _
- ; :ate - 'z r , 1 . s
�. y �,a �-'4 3 wa , �� r{d - .-2 - 1,.; Sv z'4'�`1 ' ''AF "�� F - _
r. fix' -. -,� s 3
a
�,. u} �E��i;��� �I� s�r1.::6a�.a i�� �a�µ- `�: a z�.ax';�m�ri'��� ` . .�� :� .,�:y. i' Mzk,,,s<�'��.!I:��
c
Plot 3 `.', r y Plot 4
ga_ d ���I I 1 ��, 5 1� r .a N AF
, i �1 I I�I , _ V�� a 1 !„
_I J I: 1- ts'
1 -, -: 1. . -
` q. ter
e x r
. w'„2t ,, t:. -- '+ ' _ie'4- . tam%.: Irtety -.# •t i'y yr ":
l l),'tis. z., .�, ✓;� � ':i fir- 1 ;:.:
Plot 5 Plot 6 .,
r ai
j a
v -
'.x `
a
''''.':_.,.:,:;'''';.:1,,',,,,,,,,.,,,e...t4 1°4': •-,;-'3.=:,"'--' ' ' '%' -.'-
Plot 7 Plot 8
g,i r
r
.,.
,-- ,.-...,•.::„.1..4,.„ti-_,E,-;,.7.'*-:; _,-,.,, -....; 4,_
--
.,..______
_� r mr h ' $ �"," Sy '
� �. .. it ram, 'fit_ ,
.„may re..p
'.-':;, -f?.. - ,i ,,,,,:„,,,-„,,i,,,,,,,, „,,,-,,,--
MYO Monitoring Report(Project No.100137.) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County,North Carolina July 2022

Bull Chute Mitigation Site
MVO(2022)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken April 4, 2022)
Plot 9 Plot 10
rah ass=Nopuirpr'
-
`'� .sae-. "&t ta, ;- usa, I
'-. x � �0�2 � 04'-j r r; 022/04/04
hula .' H< #" L �,- a ''' I
Plot 11 • " V'�., k �' r �, ,AAAAkkkk Plot 1•
ft r i 1 3 Y� 4 lll��.�r TPA '
x (7AI K t #
A ter —'
Ski y -
rr ,fir,
e a � �,a
i
Plot 13 Plot 14
f z111114
v
n �'7 o ,Ar on
'� 41 7T:L �y t
4Vw,1 YN :1f.'
4b, n�7�h
�I. F
f },- ,erg ,r^r ' r
Plot 15 Plot 16
1
(' ' 1
r.nit '"yam * 1 `�' '-ii t.,
a@ �' �' ,as \t`a ,, N
MVO Monitoring Report(Project No.100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County,North Carolina July 2022

Bull Chute Mitigation Site
MYO (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (takewn April 4, 2022)
Plot 17 ?11' Plot 18
�>
y
Kec
w
f ^�`'� ��- '"=tit i,�,,a'>
to taken 51141„0,...:,,,,:c.
/13/22
t�'� �� tt 4x � as
Plot 19 " 4 , q 4 lt,,, Plot 20
t fit..
" -✓ t«u _s -_ m
`-f ``� • y0",.� '" fa '� � er rt '' ri„/ t`*` Z ` ` . a "� ` •
'' � .� ¢g'us . �' ^ ,- r '�
gp ;`
•
Plot 21
•
sl t., e..-, :ce, i
� z
n
V
ti:, a° :.
MYO Monitoring Report(Project No.100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation
Randolph County,North Carolina JulySolutions 2022

Bull Chute Mitigation Site
MYO (2022) Permanent Photo Points (taken July 8, 2022)
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137)
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
Appendices
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
July 2022

Appendix B
Vegetation Data
Table 6A. Planted Bare -Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6B. Permanent Seed Mix
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Data Table from Vegetation Data Entry Tool
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

Table 6A. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Species
Total
Acres
28.5
Alnus serrulata
2,500
Betula nigra
4,000
Cercis canadensis
600
Carya tomentosa
200
Cornus amomum
5,000
Diospyros virginiana
420
Liriodendron tulipifera
1,700
Nyssa sylvatica
600
Platanus occidentalis
5,500
Quercus nigra
5,500
Quercus phellos
4,000
Salix nigra
1,600
TOTALS
31,620
Average Stems/Acre
1,110
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

Table 6B. Permanent Seed Mix
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Species
Percent of Total Mix
Redtop (Agrostis gigantea)
10%
VA Wild Rye (Elymus virginicus)
15%
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum)
15%
Eastern Gammagrass (Tripsacum dactyloides)
5%
PA Smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum)
5%
Little Bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium)
5%
Soft Rush (Juncus effusus)
5%
Bur Marigold (Bidens cernua)
10%
Lance -leaved Tickseed (Coreopsis lanceolata)
10%
Deertongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum)
10%
Big Bluestem (Andropogon gerardii)
5%
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans)
5%
TOTAL
100%
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

Table 7. Planted Vegetation Totals
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Plot #
Planted Stems/Acre
Success Criteria Met?
1
1538
Yes
2
972
Yes
3
648
Yes
4
688
Yes
5
1012
Yes
6
891
Yes
7
1255
Yes
8
1295
Yes
9
729
Yes
10
607
Yes
11
607
Yes
12
1579
Yes
13
850
Yes
14
688
Yes
15
891
Yes
16
810
Yes
17
648
Yes
18
607
Yes
19
607
Yes
20
972
Yes
21
1376
Yes
Transect 1 (4x25 m)
324
Yes
Transect 2 (2x50 m)
445
Yes
Transect 3 (4x25 m)
648
Yes
Transect 4 (4x25 m)
405
Yes
Transect 5 (2x50 m)
364
Yes
Transect 6 (2x50 m)
567
Yes
Transect 7 (4x25 m)
324
Yes
Transect 8 (2x50 m)
405
Yes
Transect 9 (2x50 m)
445
Yes
Transect 10 (2x50 m)
931
Yes
Average Planted Stems/Acre
778
Yes
MY0 Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

Table 8. Vegetation Plot Data Table from Vegetation Data Entry Tool
Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
28.5
2022-04-01
NA
NA
2022-04-04
0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/S
hrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 1 F
Veg Plot 2 F
Veg Plot 3 F
Veg Plot 4 F
Veg Plot 5 F
Veg Plot 6 F
Veg Plot 7 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
OBL
11
11
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
2
2
2
2
27
27
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
FAC
Carya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
FACU
1
1
3
3
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
19
19
2
2
1
1
7
7
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
FACU
4
4
10
10
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
FAC
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
8
8
3
3
4
4
8
8
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
6
6
10
10
5
5
1
1
3
3
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FAC
5
5
7
7
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
Quercus sp.
10
10
8
8
1
1
Sum
Performance Standard
38
38
24
24
18
18
17
17
25
25
22
22
39
39
■
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
38
24
18
17
25
22
39
Stems/Acre
1538
972
648
688
1012
891
1255
Species Count
4
5
4
6
4
6
7
Dominant Species Composition (%)
50
42
61
41
40
36
69
Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
% Invasives
0
0
0 .]
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
Stems/Acre
Species Count
Dominant Species Composition (%)
Average Plot Height (ft.)
Invasives
38
24
972
5
42
18 11111
648
r
1
17
688
25
1012
4
40
1
L
22
891
6
36
1
0 AIL
39
1255
7
69
2
-0
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that
have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 8. Vegetation Plot Data Table from Vegetation Data Entry Tool (continued)
Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
28.5
2022-04-01
NA
NA
2022-04-04
0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/S
hrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 8 F
Veg Plot 9 F
Veg Plot 10 F
Veg Plot 11 F
Veg Plot 12 F
Veg Plot 13 F
Veg Plot 14 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
OBL
1
1
4
4
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
7
7
3
3
3
3
2
2
6
6
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
FAC
Carya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
FACU
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
5
5
12
12
14
14
6
6
5
5
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
5
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
FACU
3
3
3
3
2
2
4
4
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
FAC
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
8
8
6
6
1
1
5
5
5
5
2
2
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
1
1
3
3
3
3
5
5
6
6
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FAC
3
3
1
1
6
6
1
1
4
4
1
1
Quercus sp.
6
6
4
4
2
2
1
1
Sum
Performance Standard
32
32
18
18
15
15
18
18
39
39
21
21
17
17
■
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
32
18
15
18
39
21
17
Stems/Acre
1295
729
607
607
1579
850
688
Species Count
6
6
4
5
8
6
4
Dominant Species Composition (%)
25
33
40
67
36
29
35
Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
% Invasives
0
0
0 .]
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
32
18
15
18
39
21
17
Stems/Acre
Species Count
Dominant Species Composition (%)
Average Plot Height (ft.)
Invasives
729
6
33
607
1
607
1579
8
36
2
0
850
6
29
2
0 AIL
688
4
35
11111.02
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that
have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 8. Vegetation Plot Data Table from Vegetation Data Entry Tool (continued)
Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
28.5
2022-04-01
NA
NA
2022-04-04
0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/S
hrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 15 F
Veg Plot 16 F
Veg Plot 17 F
Veg Plot 18 F
Veg Plot 19 F
Veg Plot 20 F
Veg Plot 21 F
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
OBL
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
1
1
2
2
5
5
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
FAC
1
1
Carya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
Tree
1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
FACU
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
11
11
4
4
3
3
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
FACU
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
FAC
9
9
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
9
9
7
7
4
4
5
5
11
11
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FAC
4
4
4
4
2
2
5
5
4
4
8
8
Quercus sp.
4
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
6
6
2
2
9
9
Sum
Performance Standard
22
22
20
20
16
16
15
15
15
15
24
24
34
34
■
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
22
20
16
15
15
24
34
Stems/Acre
891
810
648
607
607
972
1376
Species Count
5
5
6
5
5
7
7
Dominant Species Composition (%)
50
45
44
33
40
33
32
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
31
90
2
2
1
% Invasives
0
0
0 .]
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
22
20
16
15
15
24
34
Stems/Acre
891
810
648
Species Count
5
Dominant Species Composition (%)
45
Average Plot Height (ft.)
Invasives
2
31
607
MET
607
5
40
2
0
972
7
33
2
0 AIL
1376
7
32
1
-0
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that
have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.

Table 8. Vegetation Plot Data Table from Vegetation Data Entry Tool (continued)
Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
28.5
2022-04-01
NA
NA
2022-04-04
0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Tree/S
hrub
Indicator
Status
Veg Plot 1 R
Veg Plot 2 R
Veg Plot 3 R
Veg Plot 4 R
Veg Plot 5 R
Veg Plot 6 R
Veg Plot 7 R
Veg Plot 8 R
Veg Plot 9 R
Veg Plot 10 R
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Species
Included in
Approved
Mitigation Plan
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Tree
OBL
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
7
2
3
2
1
1
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
FAC
Carya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
FACU
1
1
Cornusamomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
FACW
1
7
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
FACU
6
7
4
7
7
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
FAC
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
3
8
3
3
8
1
2
6
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
3
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FAC
3
3
5
1
2
1
4
1
2
Quercus sp.
1
1
4
2
1
1
Sum
Performance Standard
10
13
16
10
9
14
11
10
12
23
I
Mitigation Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
10
13
16
10
9
14
11
10
12
23
Stems/Acre
324
445
648
405
364
567
324
405
445
931
Species Count
2
3
5
4
6
4
3
4
5
5
Dominant Species Composition (%)
70
62
38
50
33
50
73
40
58
30
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Post Mitigation
Plan
Performance
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
10
13
16
10
9
14 11
10
12
23
Stems/Acre
324
445
648
405
364
567 324
405
445
931
Species Count
2
3
5
4
6
3
4
5
5
Dominant Species Composition (%)
70
62
38
50
33
50 73
40
58
30
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
1
2
1
1 1
2
1
1
Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan
addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and
proposed stems.

Appendix C
Stream Geomorphology Data
Cross -Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profile
Table 9A-F. Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables
Table 10A-E. Cross -Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

Site Bull Chute Site r . e►'.
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 . , ±.
XS ID UT1,XS-1 $''
Feature Riffle -
st - .1 ' 1 .
Date: 5/11/2022 T • y '1 4
'Field Crew: Lewis .
' k
-
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ,l
0.0 714.0 Bankfull Elevation: 713.54 �---�. ' -.
S
4.3 713.7 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 - - s
7.5 713.7 Thalweg Elevation: 712.66
8.4 713.6 LTOB Elevation: 713.54 _ ._,.:_' . �'•
9.6 713.2 LTOB Max Depth: :. �� ' = -.,i j
10.1 712.8 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 5.7 y % 4
10.6 712.7 = `
12.3 712.8 .. d : : : . . _ i
13.4 712.8 ", #
14.9 712.8W.A _ ' .
16.2 712.8 'J ten= '4 ''
16.7 713.0 Stream Type E/C 4
17.5 713.3
18.2 713.5
19.9 713.5 Bull Chute,UT 1,XS - 1,Riffle
22.2 713.5
24.2 713.5
25.5 713.5
o)
0 713 -
a
o)
ti
W \a . / Bankfull
MY-00 5/1122
712 ,
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site - P''u
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin, 03040103 ;- -4', h
XS ID UT1,XS -2 `. `'' ; ', ' '■ .r.
Feature Pool '' '' .• ��'i 4- '
..
„ ...
Date: 5/11/2022 ,4 �'?
r
Field Crew: Lewis 1 F - = r•',
•
•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA s .:.r . } ,F .�
0.0 714.9 Bankfull Elevation: 714.80 1 F
3.4 714.7 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 i . 'tir.
5.5 714.9 Thalweg Elevation: 712.56 ....
7.1 714.8 LTOB Elevation: 714.80 • f -,. ';
8.3 714.3 LTOB Max Depth: 2.24 •
' ��. .,;;
9.1 713.7 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 11.7 4 ram; s '.L k,
9.7 713.5 • : i.'.110.2 713.0
•
11.1 713.0 ,} _ '.~ ''t4
11.5 712.8
11.7 712.6
12.3 712.6 •
.�3 .. �r ' 4-. r .r , ,;,. G . . ,. ' ..
12.7 712.7 Stream Type E/C 4
13.1 713.1
13.6 713.2
14.2 713.3 Bull Chute, UT 1,XS - 2, Pool
14.8 713.5
15.3 714.1
15.7 714.4
16.4 714.7
16.9 714.88
17.6 714.9 ---- ----
18.9 714.9 715
20.5 714.9
22.0 714.9 0
22.8 714.8
W 713
Bankfull
MY-005/11/22
712 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site
Bull Chute Site
Watershed:
Yadkin River Basin, 03040103
XS ID
UT1, XS -3
Feature
Riffle
Date:
5/11/2022
Field Crew:
6
Lewis
Station
Elevation
0.0
727.7
3.6
727.7
5.6
727.7
6.5
727.8
7.6
727.4
8.3
727.2
8.6
726.7
9.7
726.9
10.4
726.8
11.3
726.8
12.3
726.8
13.5
726.6
14.3
726.8
15.1
727.1
15.9
727.6
16.5
727.6
18.8
727.6
21.1
727.6
22.4
727.7
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
727.56
Bank Hieght Ratio:
1.00
Thalweg Elevation:
726.64
LTOB Elevation:
727.56
LTOB Max Depth:
0.91
LTOB Cross Sectional Area:
5.5
Stream Type
E/C 4

Site Bull Chute Site f. - �- -- .
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 4'
: • _ { - A. 7
XS ID UT1,XS-4 :-.- -
�y JY .
Feature Pool • - - - _
Date: 5/11/2022 a i = ,- .
Field Crew: Lewis •
•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - • w
0.0 727.8 Bankfull Elevation: 727.84 �� .:
_ '
3.0 727.9 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 • E. • . •
•
5.5 727.8 Thalweg Elevation: 726.21 •
7.1 728.0 LTOB Elevation: 727.84
8.0 727.5 LTOB Max Depth: 1.64
8.8 726.9 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 9.4 •
•
•
9.6 726.6 • .
10.5 726.4 •
11.4 726.3 `
11.4 726.2 Y :_•.. .
12.4 726.3 t - .t '•. .
13.3 726.4 ?r".. •
14.0 726.6 Stream Type E/C 4
14.0 726.6
14.6 727.1
15.5 727.5 Bull Chute,UT 1,XS - 4,Pool
17.2 727.8
19.8 727.9
22.0 728.0 1
c 727
a
Wti
Bankfiill
MY-00 5/11/22
726 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site
Bull Chute Site
Watershed:
Yadkin River Basin, 03040103
XS ID
UT1, XS -5
Feature
Riffle
Date:
5/11/2022
Field Crew:
6
Lewis
Station
Elevation
0.0
739.8
4.3
739.8
6.0
739.9
7.5
739.5
8.3
739.1
9.1
738.9
11.0
738.8
12.2
738.7
13.8
738.8
14.8
738.9
15.3
738.9
16.0
739.4
16.5
739.8
19.1
739.8
22.4
739.6
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
739.80
Bank Hieght Ratio:
1.00
Thalweg Elevation:
738.69
LTOB Elevation:
739.80
LTOB Max Depth:
1.11
LTOB Cross Sectional Area:
8.1
Stream Type
E/C 4

Site Bull Chute Site
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 w.£� ;,,"' r,, x
XS ID UT1,XS-6 '�c :
Feature Pool , .
Date: 5/11/2022 S '`- , < i
Field Crew: Lewis ; T____ ` � ' •�,r;-"'"'"
L
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA F r' !�^
0.0 740.1 Bankfull Elevation: 739.99
2.3 740.0 Bank Hieght Ratio: r r • \
738.45 3.2 739.8 Thalweg Elevation:
739.99 5.3 739.9 LTOB Elevation:
7.0 739.5 LTOB Max Depth: 1.54
8.0 738.9 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 11.9 x
10.0 738.5 . O ,
11.5 738.5 _: ` ti, '
13.1 738.5 ,s:.
14.1 738.7 +'. , ' >'
14.9 739.2
16.2 740.0 Stream Type MlimI E/C 4
17.4 740.3
20.1 740.3
23.2 740.1 Bull Chute,UT 1,XS - 6,Pool
741 -
r
0 739
a
ti
W
BanMall
f MY-005/11/22
738 , I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site a y� °-` , ,
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin, 03040103 ,f
" p ,i 1
XS ID UT1,XS -7 o
4 I ( ',' '' k +; ''
Feature Riffle
Date: 5/11/2022 -,,,e*
a
Field Crew: Lewis ' •.r i
k l4 1.
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA , -..i 4 4,
0.0 747.6 Bankfull Elevation: 747.73
2.3 747.6 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00
4.2 747.7 Thalweg Elevation: 746.66
r
6.4 747.8 LTOB Elevation: 747.73 'r , (!.1' '
7.8 747.5 LTOB Max Depth: 1.07
8.8 746.9 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 6.9 , ""
9.6 746.7 .,a .
OPP . �
10.3 746.7 s � .
10.9 746.8 ,r4 {der' .,;. ,t. ,„, '� 1 , ,,oi t
11.5 746.7 it 14 :1, - 2022/05/12
12.0 746.7 r '
1 1 r
12.4 746.7
12.9 746.9 Stream Type E/C 4
13.5 746.7
14.0 746.7
14.6 747.0 Bull Chute, UT 1,XS - 7, Riffle
15.3 747.4
16.3 747.7 748 -
18.2 747.7
20.8 747.7
24.0 747.54
4
0 747
W
Bankfiill
f MY-005/11/22
746 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site ,`1`" , N. ,t ' , . 7'
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 ;w�� * , , 0,;
XS ID UT1,XS-8 : `'., ,
Feature Pool '
Date: 5/11/2022 leers N'
Field Crew: Lewis
` Votr,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA . _ ,-....�.,
0.0 747.9 Bankfull Elevation: 747.94 _ , ,t'.,,,7 -
1.8 747.9 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00
4.1 748.0 Thalweg Elevation: 746.29
6.3 747.9 LTOB Elevation: 747.94
7.4 747.7 LTOB Max Depth: 1.64 „ ,,.,..
8.8 747.1 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 10.3 �.
9.7 747.0
10.2 747.1
10.8 746.8
11.6 746.4
12.4 746.3
13.0 746.3
13.9 746.4 Stream Type E/C 4
14.5 746.5
15.7 747.1
17.2 748.1 Bull Chute,UT 1,XS - 8,Pool
20.5 748.0
23.1 748.0 748
•
r----ram z_ -
o)
0 747
a
o)
Wti
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
746 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site ----- -
«��� Z
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 a 4° "" ".t. •., � , A •+. i
XS ID UT1,XS-9 0,4 ,
Feature Riffle
Date: 5/11/2022
Field Crew: i Lewis 'o`
Z.... .
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA w.:ipc.
0.0 764.5 Bankfull Elevation: 763.66 , ���
1.3 764.5 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00
3.1 764.4 Thalweg Elevation: 763.30 v
4.0 764.0 LTOB Elevation: 763.66
4.7 763.6 LTOB Max Depth: 0.36
5.6 763.6 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 1.3 , � ?
5.7 763.4 ' ",/,- - S
6.2 763.4 I � •
6.9 763.3 ��
y -•t s,
i
7.8 763.3 „ 4,.', "2Q22/05/12
8.5 763.4
9.4 763.4
10.0 763.7 Stream Type E/C 4
11.0 763.7
11.9 763.8
12.8 763.6 Bull Chute,UT 1,XS -9,Riffle
13.9 763.7
15.6 763.5 765
16.9 763.6
18.1 763.9
o)
0 764
a
Wti
Bankfiill
MY-00 5/11/22
763 7 I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site '„ '. . 'x -`._ . .
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 rt
XS ID UT1,XS-10 - = - •-"
Feature Pool - - ' ,~
Date: 5/11/2022 - rill '_
igitField Crew: Lewisi.
h
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA -.. .-.
0.0 765.6 BankfullElevation: 764.42 , :`F:='
1.3 765.4 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 :` .
2.1 764.9 Thalweg Elevation: 763.33 '�€
3.1 764.6 LTOB Elevation: 764.42
k. ,. , 4,'.:. .
4.0 764.2 LTOB Max Depth: 1.09
4.7 763.7 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 6.3 ;5
5.7 763.4 •
5.9 763.3 I. :,.
6.5 763.4 y�
7.1 763.4 ,
•8.3 763.4 : es{p5wY4� ^�' ,
'n
9.5 763.6
10.5 763.8 Stream Type E/C 4
11.6 764.2
12.4 764.4
14.3 764.5 Bull Chute,UT 1,XS - 10,Pool
15.8 764.4
16.5 764.5 767 -
I765
764
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
763 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site '` •• • :"'-; Wit q': _T
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 {`' ¢ #"'
XS ID UT3,XS-13
Feature Riffle y\
.
Date: 5/11/2022 '. .
Field Crew: i Lewis A.
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA •..• ��d
0.0 722.6 Bankfull Elevation: 722.63
2.2 722.6 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00
4.4 722.6 Thalweg Elevation: 721.62
6.0 722.6 LTOB Elevation: 722.63
6.6 722.5 LTOB Max Depth: 1.02 ' . =_
6.9 722.2 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 6.3 ,u ; +1* 1. '
r =
7.4 721.9 ,�tIt �- ,. .-
7.9 721.9 `? ��� tk ., 4 � Cj
r
9.1 721.7
l � �
9.8 721.9 i "-L A 1.
10.4 721.7
10.9 721.6 Stream Type E/C 4
11.5 721.7
12.3 721.7
13.1 721.9 Bull Chute, UT 3,XS - 13,Riffle
14.0 722.1
14.7 722.3 724 -
15.3 722.6
16.5 722.7
18.4 722.66
20.3 722.7
21.7 722.6
I
722
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
721 ,
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site ,� �,'
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 ���a ��'= ° r s s �xx�, r d" ai I �,
XS ID UT3,XS-14 ��
Feature Pool ���„�I�.. P.i 4
Date: 5/11/2022 R
Field Crew: 1 Lewis
Station >Mition SUMMARY DATA
0.0 723.2 Banlull Elevation: 722.98 , `,,
2.7 723.2 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 r �: .
4.9 723.1 Thalweg Elevation: 720.98 ' '
5.8 722.4 LTOB Elevation: 722.98
6.3 722.0 LTOB Max Depth: 2.00 `
6.8 721.8 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 10.4
7.4 721.5 ,
8.1 721.3 �' :6'471121,-1_
8.7 721.1 �_ ��_
9.1 721.0
9.5 721.0 t � I I`'' r��, 1 a'
10.1 721.1
10.5 721.3 Stream Type E/C 4
11.2 721.8
11.8 722.1
12.3 722.3 Bull Chute,UT 3,XS - 14,Pool
13.0 722.5
13.7 722.6 724 -
14.5 722.9
15.3 723.0 ■-
16.7 722.96 -
18.5 722.9
722
z
0
a
o)
ti
721
W
B.kfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
720 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site ,': w ,y v ,- , C 1 *,
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 '�
XS ID UT3,XS-15 P / / /t A.
Feature Pool ' >9 `
Date: 5/11/2022 �
Field Crew: Lewis
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 734.2 Bankfull Elevation: 734.17
1.4 734.2 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00
3.4 733.9 Thalweg Elevation: 732.78 71� / ;' , .,
4.3 733.9 LTOB Elevation: 734.17
5.0 733.5 LTOB Max Depth: 1.39 7, 7�� ,
5.6 733.2 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 7.0 4'' ','.
6.2 733.0 /�� ,')4,r
6.7 732.9 ����, ���� l��'
7.2 732.8 -
7.7 733.0 14 ���., .�,. �
8.3 733.2 i ei?k\044:
8.9 733.2 0;6 1.`, -,,,;N
9.4 733.3 Stream Type E/C 4
10.0 733.4
11.0 733.6
11.8 733.9 Bull Chute,UT 3,XS - 15,Pool
12.5 734.3
13.3 734.2
14.4 734.1
16.0 734.1
17.5 734.18
0 I
a
Wti
Bankfiill
MY-00 5/11/22
, I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site Y , ' I' /` /
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103
I L /r'?• it!l,'r 't lI silo l , .�
XSID UT3,XS-16 f' l/
Feature Riffle �, d , / , r"
Date: 5/11/2022 f4 � �� : pj, ,.
Field Crew: i Lewis = :1 .y'
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 734.9 Bankfull Elevation: 734.92
2.4 734.8 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 I
4.9 734.8 Thalweg Elevation: 733.97 ., �� x- ; .�
5.5 734.9 LTOB Elevation: 734.92 - - t
6.2 734.7 LTOB Max Depth: 0.95 � �
6.8 734.4 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 4.7 ig* - .. "� A:� i_j ',tr,
7.3 734.10.
'%i°"r .7 , ,1
8.5 734.0 ,7.8 734.0
9.4 734.2 . , ,. ss ;�®�5
. < �. l-�i
10.3 734.1 ° �.` el:'
,/) \ ,'4 4-1
11.2 734.3
11.8 734.4 Stream Type E/C 4
12.6 734.6
13.2 734.8
14.2 735.1 Bull Chute, UT 3,XS - 16,Riffle
15.2 735.1
16.9 734.9
18.6 735.0
20.0 735.0
o)
0 735 •
a
o)
ti
W
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
734
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site - '" -. -
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 ih�` `.
XS ID UT3,XS-17
Feature Riffle owe.
Date: 5/11/2022 '
Field Crew: i Lewis
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA i
1
0.0 763.6 Bankfull Elevation: 763.55 AV1.7 763.7 Bank Hieght Ratio: 0.98 1'p'�
2.6 763.5 Thalweg Elevation: 762.51
3.2 763.3 LTOB Elevation: 763.52 d. i
3.8 762.9 LTOB Max Depth: 1.01 -10Ca
4.5 762.7 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 4.9 - .4w _
5.1 762.5 -- , , ,'' --- ---°\ s,
5.8 762.5
6.3 762.6 ,f. ��A
6.7 762.8 .�, ,,--or.--- A �c v-,
l
8.1 762.8
8.9 762.8 Stream Type E/C 4
9.6 763.0
9.8 763.2
10.4 763.5 Bull Chute, UT 3,XS - 17,Riffle
11.3 763.7
12.2 763.7 764 -
13.5 763.6
14.6 763.6
a
0 763
a
Wti
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
762 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site « t 7'' ' `t' -
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 ,� �
XS ID UT3,XS-18 r - a '
Feature Pool
Date: 5/11/2022
Field Crew: Lewis
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 764.0 Bankfull Elevation: 763.85
1.5 764.0 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00
2.6 763.8 Thalweg Elevation: 762.31
3.5 763.5 LTOB Elevation: 763.85
4.2 763.4 LTOB Max Depth: 1.55
4.7 763.1 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 6.6
5.1 762.7
5.8 762.6 I
6.3 762.5 /, ' X
6.5 762.5
6.9 762.4 J'
7.4 762.3 ®-�%`� , .vim, ` 4
7.6 762.5 Stream Type E/C 4
8.0 762.8
8.4 763.1
9.2 763.2 Bull Chute,UT 3,XS - 18,Pool
9.6 763.3
10.4 763.6 764
11.1 763.9
12.2 763.8 r
13.2 763.81 - - --
14.7 763.7
I
763
Bankfiill
MY-00 5/11/22
762 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site -w -- � _: - . i " " P-'' " -
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 /f
XS ID UT 4 Downstream,XS-11 `�' '.„. k i `,.* `' _�
Feature PoolEti' .Y E R -a , ,.s,
Date: 5/11/2022 •`' � '`- +
Field Crew: Lewis k _ _ =.- ,�: , 014 4! -0 i 10 0. :. a ,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 715.4 Bankfull Elevation: 714.76 - -- i
3.0 715.1 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00
_
5.0 714.9 Thalweg Elevation: 713.25 ,;\-- r 'c =
6.1 714.8 LTOB Elevation: 714.76
6.8 714.2 LTOB Max Depth: 1.51j
7.6 713.8 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 7.9 k!' .a
8.5 713.3
9.4 713.7 - �
10.3 713.3 12.7 713.8
- "f r,---.
11.6 713.5 i ., __ a ,�+ `"4 .1► .y{ `' 06/1 1
13.3 714.1
14.0 714.6 Stream Type ] E/C 4
15.0 714.9
16.3 714.9
18.3 715.1 Bull Chute, UT 4 Downstream,XS - 11,Pool
20.1 715.0
20.8 714.9 716 -
715
z
0
ti
W 713 \/NY . Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
712 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site . - ` • •r y ' Jh.S4.4 r. I r+
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin, 03040103 , .
XS ID UT4,XS -12 t , {'= ` {
Feature Riffle • ' ' '' " .�• �• ' •
Date: 5/11/2022 • # ,„ ` ,'•.' ,� ; ., *:�' 17
Field Crew: Lewis '1: ;i'',''i. \:' '1 •':' .. i A ,
• ;_,tit• ,y. n
,,,.).
v‘i. .. ...-.......
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA • • - - . . -. G. M!;.r,.,a � , .1. • •. , •° •:' ',1;
0.0 715.5 Bankfull Elevation: 715.38 ' '• ,. 'tt .)- ,.r. ,'j•
2.3 715.6 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 ,- . ._w,`�.-•- .
.• '�:
4.6 715.5 Thalweg Elevation: 714.22 } .7. . * ¢* -}*.. • z
6.2 715.4 LTOB Elevation: 715.38
r
y
' �y
7.4 714.9 LTOB Max Depth: 1.15 * •• _
8.1 714.7 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 8.5 iF . * + '
9.1 714.6 ,� i. • - '�,
10.9 714.6 i 5 .S -j'' ; ;I F ' y .
12.0 714.4 le ti A.• r. 4 R ;; • `
13.2 714.2 , ' .� a4 h R „* 'ir ...
14.4 714.3 - -
15.5 714.4 Stream Type E/C 4
15.9 714.6
16.6 715.1
17.5 715.6 Bull Chute, UT 4 Downstream,XS - 12, Riffle
20.3 715.3
23.7 715.4 717
27.0 715.4
716
o
0
W 715 ■
Bankfull
f MY-00 5/11/22
713 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site F` F' �' �'' i - .1._ '
a.Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 "}�
XS ID UT4 Upstream,XS-19
Feature Pool ba -,
Date: 5/11/2022
Field Crew: Lewis rt* `•~ f ' '
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 732.9 Bankfull Elevation: 732.43 .
2.3 732.9 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 . . . .
3.2 732.6 Thalweg Elevation: 731.14 - �- - _ -
4.8 732.4 LTOB Elevation: 732.43 - - ,
5.7 732.2 LTOB Max Depth: 1.29 _. -•,.
6.3 731.7 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 6.7r :; � y
7.1 731.3 t.
8.0 731.1 4 r,
8.9 731.2
9.7 731.2 .. -
10.6 731.5 `'+
11.9 731.7
12.4 732.1 Stream Type E/C 4
13.3 732.4
15.1 732.5
17.3 732.5 Bull Chute,UT 4 Upstream,XS - 19, Pool
18.6 732.6
734 -
■
733 A
t
-a, .........1("ua
731
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
730 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site r 4"-
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 - '- ' :F!
XS ID UT4 Upstream,XS-20 = • -;
Feature Riffle ;"�Y l.c
Date: 5/11/2022 `'' _ x ' . .
Field Crew: i Lewis _. : .. • r
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - -
i
0.0 733.7 Bankfull Elevation: 733.76 _ _ _ . . -.".
2.7 733.7 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 T �.
4.5 733.7 Thalweg Elevation: 732.93 -+ .,
6.0 733.8 LTOB Elevation: 733.76 t v, ;.. . r
6.8 733.5 LTOB Max Depth: 0.84
7.3 733.3 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 5.2 , -
7.8 733.0 w ker _ x
9.0 733.0 x ' }
9.9 733.0 M1 i fad} �
11.4 733.0 � ' ,;:,s.r6
12.9 732.9 .��. : k:, , .�-T .
13.5 733.5
13.9 733.5 Stream Type E/C 4
14.4 733.7
14.8 733.8
16.8 733.7 Bull Chute, UT 4 Upstream,XS - 20,Riffle
18.3 733.9
19.6 733.8
o)
I
734 -------
Bankfiill
AML..... ........,/7 "'
MY-00 5/11/22
733 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 _ .
XS ID UT4 Upstream,XS-21 - ". . r . - ' ,
Feature Riffle t --' -
Date: 5/11/2022 1 ,;
Field Crew: i Lewis . . _
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA .
0.0 750.3 Bankfull Elevation: 750.00 -
_ _ _
2.3 750.2 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 k . . . . -
3.9 750.2 Thalweg Elevation: 748.99 .. ?.. .
4.8 749.9 LTOB Elevation: 750.00 -_ .
5.4 749.7 LTOB Max Depth: 1.00 x- -- , -
6.0 749.4 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 5.7 .
6.8 749.3 -
7.5 749.1 ..
•8.7 749.1 #__ ,:4 --sue
9.7 749.0 ,� .; .; . srh y ,
9.7 749.0 f--1. M1 ..- i'- ,
10.7 749.3
11.1 749.2 Stream Type I E/C 4
11.5 749.2
12.2 749.5
12.7 749.8 Bull Chute, UT 4 Upstream,XS - 21,Riffle
13.4 750.0
14.5 750.1 751 -
16.0 750.0
18.1 750.1
0 750
1
0)
ti
W
Bazikfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
748 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

•
Site Bull Chute Site {:
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin, 03040103 TM ,
XS ID UT4 Upstream,XS-22
Feature Pool - ' -;;; '_•:. ;= ,►, :-477.ti .. ? . .•'• ' .Y'•',
Date: 5/11/2022 k_ .ti { • r
Field Crew: Lewis ..4. ., ;4.• r ... .. ",.�F Y . . '' ,
=..#'f:-..f = '':,bk ,_r.: 'a • `' --
•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA _ .Y„ < • _ ` " �'
0.0 750.2 Bankfull Elevation: 750.27 bt•. .'r'i' Y, _
piste's '' y`i. : • f5:• d x'
•
2.2 750.4 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 f't. :;:
3.0 750.3 Thalweg Elevation: 748.69 = :
3.7 750.0 LTOB Elevation: 750.27 , ' ' k •• { `ffi
4.3 749.8 LTOB MaxD tiY.. - .• '� • •..r}4..: #s.
O a Depth: 1.58 ;#.` :,, .„4 �,; ,
4.8 749.7 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 8.3L..�{" f �
5.3 749.5 .. • . . - .
74
5.7 749.3 • r¢ •
6.6 748.9
7.3 748.8 Sy:
rye.:
1�� G- • • i4. '.
8.1 748.9
8.7 ,' '� ' 1 • ` • _
:tea. I•I .I, : . ;lt. - • • •• , t *`. *i' ;;�s.
8.7 748.7
9.2 748.9 Stream Type E/C 4
9.7 749.1
10.1 749.4
10.6 749.5 Bull Chute, UT 4 Upstream,XS -22, Pool
11.2 749.8
11.5 749.8 751
12.1 750.1
12.9 750.3
13.7 750.28 _ ___ __
15.8 750.2
0 750
W
Bankfiill
f MY-005/11/22
748 ,
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site "'` : -:r-r... '.44,114
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin, 03040103 "a
XS ID UT4B,XS-23
Feature Pool
Date: 5/11/2022
Field Crew: Lewis ._ , a r_ _ _. ..,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA '�' ti' ;8 . v ;::
��..
0.0 758.1 Bankfull Elevation: 757.88 '{ y .`
1.5 757.9 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 _ Y '
•
3.4 757.9 Thalweg El '., �.
a weg Elevation:
756.83 ' : : "
4.6 757.9 LTOB Elevation: 757.88 � * '�
� ' "ry��?.. ``- �ti. ,' �
4.9 757.8 LTOB Max Depth: 1.05 '-..: n;.}":A ' ' .
5.2 757.6 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 3.4 x. A` i
5.5 757.3 s `4 'f 5''.k ,
5.9 757.0 r s',..'•-., _. y'. . -
6.6 756.8 1.-....z:::!.....:-..&•,0.• t{M1 4 x_ {', .n. r
•
7.3 756.8 *=. 'rw +� • '?. .,. , . . ' •. r ��
7.7 757.1 ', J' . °p " a,.. . r t w' f.
8.0 757.3
8.5 757.5 Stream Type E/C 4
9.1 757.6
10.0 757.7
10.6 757.4 Bull Chute, UT 4B,XS -23, Pool
11.4 757.9
12.4 757.9 759
13.8 757.8
14.8 757.9
av
0)
•0 758
W
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
756 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103
XS ID UT4B,XS-24 '
Feature Riffle
Date: 5/25/2022
Field Crew: Lewis ,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA �y•�_
0.0 758.0 Bankfull Elevation: 758.07
2.7 758.1 Bank Hieght Ratio: 0.52
3.5 758.1 Thalweg Elevation: 757.50
4.1 758.0 LTOB Elevation: 758.07
4.9 757.8 LTOB Max Depth: 0.57
5.5 757.5 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 1.6 ,, 1' :':',1
6.4 757.5
6.9 757.7
7.5 757.9 �
7.9 757.8 / - '.A
8.8 758.1 a s :fi`►
9.3 758.0
10.5 758.0 Stream Type E/C 4
12.6 758.1
Bull Chute, UT 4B, XS -24, Riffle
0 758
a
a
Wti
Bankfidl
MY-00 5/11/22
756 , I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site - -• -
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103
XS ID UT4A,XS-25 , t.
Feature Pool
Date: 5/11/2022 I
Field Crew: Lewis • .,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA . -- 4;#. ... . .
0.0 758.3 Bankfull Elevation: 758.11 :_�-^': -, ' . . x.. -
•
1.7 758.2 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 • . . ,
3.5 758.5 Thalweg Elevation: 757.29
4.5 758.3 LTOB Elevation: 758.11 .. - - '
5.0 758.4 LTOB Max Depth: 0.82 `'
5.4 758.2 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 1.5 - . - . .
6.0 758.1 , ,.. . . .
6.3 757.8
6.7 757.5 - - .', - : '
6.9 757.4 . .
7.2 757.3 • .;;% 1,..,I'. ,,# a {`,, z• .4; �tr
7.6 757.5 '.; , .��[ fir: . �� _ � •�' .'=: .: , .'
7.8 757.5 Stream Type E/C 4
8.3 757.7
8.7 757.9
9.3 758.1 Bull Chute, UT 4A,XS- 25,Pool
10.0 758.1
11.3 758.3
11.3 758.3
V....wiee....-I
0 758
a
Wti
Bankfiill
f MY-00 5/11/22
756 , I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site Bull Chute Site . , " - "1°`v". . - .
Watershed: Yadkin River Basin,03040103 1 !„ .
XS ID UT4A,XS-26 f .
Feature Riffle ,: --
Date• 5/11/2022 -
Field Crew: i Lewis - _ - --
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 758.6 Bankfull Elevation: 758.57
0.9 758.9 Bank Hieght Ratio: 1.00 ,.
3.2 758.8 Thalweg Elevation: 757.79
4.8 758.6 LTOB Elevation: 758.57 ..
6.0 758.6 LTOB Max Depth: 0.78 `` = �;- = _..
6.4 758.5 LTOB Cross Sectional Area: 1.6 - - _ __'-': %..= _ `' ' .; fig,•.... .
7.0 758.4 `" .. ` - u _ ;: :'- =?c
7.3 758.4 =. : . . <>; ; tr
7.8 758.2 ; ` _
8.4 758.0 * .. .' - ;-, . '._
9.7 758.2
10.0 758.3 Stream Type E/C 4
11.0 758.5
11.7 758.6
12.4 758.6 Bull Chute, UT 4A,XS -26,Riffle
14.0 758.5
15.8 758.2
0 759 _ __
a
Wti
Bankfiill
f MY-005/11/22
758 , I I
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 1 (Sta 00+00 to 10+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
Station
As needed
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
0.0
38.3
70.0
100.0
110.6
137.6
139.2
144.3
147.5
168.8
169.7
172.4
173.8
194.9
703.92
705.62
707.17
708.50
708.32
708.68
708.40
708.21
709.13
709.08
708.87
708.46
709.89
709.88
703.94
705.72
707.30
708.55 709.07
708.59
708.99 709.92
708.96
708.97
709.17
709.46 710.52
709.43
709.38
709.96
710.09
725
720
4-1
W 715
710
705
700
0
100
200
300
Bull Chute, UT 1 (Sta 00+00 to 10+00)
Baseline Profile 2022
400
500
Distance (feet)
600
-Bed Baseline 5/11/2022 Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022 TOB 5/11/2022
700
800
900
1000
(-FV1.J
475.5
4//.6
4?$U.0
481.5
497.3
498.4
502.2
502.8
5L4.5
5L5.0
532.7
537.9
540.0
/ 19F. LO
714.64
/13.93
/14.1U
714.98
715.07
714.46
714.20
715.64
/ 15.61
/15.Ui
715.62
715.52
715.65
/ 1'-F.'-F1
714.75
/14. /6
/14. /5
715.04
715.33
715.32
715.31
715.71
/15.yj
/15.9L
715.92
715.92
715.92
/"1/.UU

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 1 (Sta 10+00 to 20+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
Station
As needed
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
976.1
977.2
1004.5
1028.2
1031.1
1040.3
1048.9
1053.0
1071.4
1074.0
1080.1
1090.5
1091.5
1109.9
723.09
724.63
724.66
725.01
724.92
725.10
725.00
725.31
725.56
725.17
725.38
725.33
726.18
726.13
723.97
724.67
725.01
725.49
725.50
725.50
725.48
725.60
725.95
725.95
725.91
725.97
726.09
726.36
726.57
727.21
727.31
745 -
740
4-1
735
W
730
725 -
720
Bull Chute, UT 1 (Sta 10+00 to 20+00)
Baseline Profile 2022
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
Distance (feet)
1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
-Bed Baseline 5/11/2022 Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022 TOB 5/11/2022
14dU.b
"I4bb.0
"I4r1..5
1480.0
1483.9
1504.7
1525.0
1527.0
10,5 .,5
0,5L.
1544.5
1547.3
1553.9
/ G‘J. / V
idU.1 1
r.SU.0"I
730.50
730.69
730.98
731.81
731.26
r.�I.Iy
732.13
731.75
731.52
/ L7.71
730.37
/31.UL
/31.uu
730.95
731.00
731.45
732.03
732.05
/3L.U4
/jL.LS
732.56
732.53
732.57
. /4
732.95
733.61

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 1 (Sta 20+00 to 30+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
Station
As needed
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
1983.7
2001.5
2003.4
2013.4
2014.3
2026.7
2030.7
2035.9
2041.3
2043.9
2066.7
2070.0
2077.2
2087.0
741.13
741.50
741.25
741.44
741.86
742.13
741.86
741.41
741.71
742.24
742.93
742.15
742.03
742.35
741.19
741.77
741.77
741.91
742.36
742.34
742.34
742.33
742.34
743.15
743.16
743.15
743.13
742.62
742.96
743.52
770 -
765
Bull Chute, UT 1 (Sta 20+00 to 30+00)
Baseline Profile 2022
760
CIJ
755
,0
ct
W
750
J
�
745
740
735
2000
1
2100
1
2200
1
2300
2400
2500
Distance (feet)
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
Baseline 5/11/2022
Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022
TOB 5/11/2022
-Bed
G`rVG.I
14:ib.b
L4by.:i
L4b.S.0
2469.8
2470.9
2480.1
2482.7
2490.5
L4y.S.�S
LOU I .
2503.0
2506.9
2507.8
JV.JJ
(5U.bb
b] .4b
b i .4L
751.05
751.95
751.54
751.06
751.35
rb1.04
tbL.b.S
752.27
751.33
753.23
/ JV.9-J
750.97
/51.61
/51./1
751.71
751.92
751.87
751.93
751.90
752.56
752.57
753.21

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 3 Downstream from EI I Reach (Sta 00+00 to 12+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
Station
As needed
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
0.0
25.5
29.8
35.3
39.3
56.0
61.1
63.3
66.9
70.9
90.6
91.6
94.1
96.7
719.06
719.39
718.95
718.55
720.00
719.84
719.47
719.59
719.57
720.25
720.79
720.05
720.13
720.74
719.28
719.66
719.66
719.68
720.07
720.28
720.28
720.30
720.28
720.36
720.80
720.81
720.84
720.83
720.11
720.99
721.61
745 -
740
735
4-1
w 730
725
720
715
Bull Chute, UT 3 Downstream from EII Reach (Sta 00+00 to 12+00)
Baseline Profile 2022
0
200
400
600 800
Distance (feet)
-Bed Baseline 5/11/2022 Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022 TOB 5/11/2022
1000 1200
JOV.7
384.6
385.1
3y25. "1
399.8
404.8
408.8
413.4
430.5
434. /
44U.b
448.7
453.3
480.7
/ LJ.JV
724.98
/26.4/
/Lb.54
726.01
725.60
725.98
726.60
727.02
/Lb.b"1
/Lb.4b
726.57
727.55
728.08
/ LV.1O
726.19
/26.59
/Lb.?$5
726.84
726.86
726.85
726.86
727.34
/L /.33
/L /.jj
727.35
727.61
728.39
/L/.4i
728.08

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 3 Upstream from EIII Reach (Sta 00+00 to 04+10)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
0.0
13.9
15.1
17.6
19.3
32.0
34.2
38.0
39.4
57.0
59.2
67.7
69.1
84.6
754.05
753.95
753.61
753.64
754.19
754.65
754.00
754.25
754.98
755.61
754.97
755.28
756.21
756.25
754.10
754.15
754.16
754.15
754.27
754.67
754.67
754.69
755.07
755.73
755.75
755.85
756.24
756.47
755.21
755.45
768
766
764
a4
4 762
0
Ct
W 760
758
756
754
752
-
Bull Chute, UT 3 Upstream from EII Reach (Sta 00+00 to 04+10)
Baseline Profile 2022
1
0 50
1
100
1
150
1
200
Distance (feet)
I
250
I
300
I
350
I
400
Baseline 5/11/2022
Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022
TOB 5/11/2022
-Bed
J�FV.J
356.4
35 /.6
3b5.Z
365.9
380.4
385.0
387.9
389.1
409.8
/ VJ.VV
763.95
/63.35
/b3. 35
764.50
764.37
763.96
763.94
765.21
765.59
/ VJ.71
764.13
/64.1/
/b4.15
764.52
764.69
764.71
764.71
765.28
765.83
765.08
765.93
766.79

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 4 (Sta 00+00 to 10+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
Station
As needed
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
0.0
5.2
15.8
19.3
21.0
46.2
51.5
59.1
63.7
84.2
86.8
93.3
99.0
123.9
708.20
708.29
707.98
707.58
708.49
708.53
708.08
708.16
708.54
709.12
708.40
708.47
709.13
709.56
708.57
708.58
708.59
708.57
708.59
708.86
708.88
708.90
708.93
709.35
709.37
709.39
709.40
709.99
709.84
710.35
730 -
725
4-1
720
W
715
710
705
Bull Chute, UT 4 (Sta 00+00 to 10+00)
Baseline Profile 2022
�V v
V
0 100 200 300 400 500
Distance (feet)
600 700 800 900 1000
-Bed Baseline 5/11/2022 Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022 TOB 5/11/2022
�FV7.L
420.9
426.5
4L?$.1
432.4
450.9
456.5
458.0
460.0
4?$4.b
46 / . 5
489.7
493.7
518.8
/ 19-.JL
715.00
/14.2U
/14..L
714.78
715.27
714.51
714.87
715.34
/15.?$L
/15.Ly
715.31
715.94
716.16
/1'-F./1
715.21
/15.21
/15.1
715.21
715.53
715.52
715.55
715.55
/1b.Uy
/1b.U25
716.10
716.12
716.46
715.94
716.56
717.47

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 4 (Sta 10+00 to 20+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
Station
As needed
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
991.2
1008.4
1012.5
1014.1
1015.9
1033.0
1035.6
1046.7
1049.7
1067.8
1069.9
1074.8
1080.8
1096.1
722.50
722.87
722.36
722.38
723.23
723.63
723.37
723.35
723.54
723.95
723.41
723.47
723.85
724.46
722.74
723.15
723.15
723.15
723.27
723.86
723.86
723.88
723.86
724.16
724.18
724.15
724.21
724.60
723.70
724.25
724.72
725.30
4>
\-;
.o
Ct
W
745 -
Bull Chute, UT 4 (Sta
Baseline Profile
10+00 to 20+00)
2022
740
735
730
•
•
Vim_
725
720
1000
1
1100
1
1200
1
1300
1
1400
1
1500
Distance (feet)
I
1600
I
1700
I
1800
I
1900
2000
Baseline 5/11/2022
Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022
TOB 5/11/2022
-Bed
I J / V.G
1d/U.2
dUb.b
14Ub.b
1409.8
1414.6
1431.0
1435.8
1439.1
144U.b
14b / .0
1461.7
1465.5
1468.6
GV.V I
i LtS.1 b
728.44
728.89
729.43
729.07
729.14
(iU.Ub
t iU. 14
729.56
729.70
730.21
/ LO.JV
728.85
/29.21
/L:LLL
729.21
729.23
729.70
729.73
729.69
/iU.U6
/iU.ib
730.36
730.36
730.37

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 4 (Sta 20+00 to 27+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
1998.9
2014.0
2019.3
2026.2
2031.5
2045.4
2049.8
2052.6
2055.4
2068.9
2072.9
2074.8
2077.1
2093.6
740.31
740.71
739.64
740.25
740.87
741.47
740.81
740.75
741.43
741.83
741.07
741.18
741.95
742.44
740.37
740.92
740.90
740.93
741.04
741.58
741.60
741.60
741.60
741.99
742.02
742.01
742.00
742.69
741.92
742.06
742.56
743.08
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
Station
As needed
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
754 -
752
Bull Chute, UT 4 (Sta
Baseline Profile
20+00 to 27+00)
2022
750
,-,
4>
748
z
0
.,
VI
746
W
744
742
740
738
2000
1
2100
1
2200
1
2300
I
2400
Distance (feet)
I
2500
I
2600
2700
Baseline 5/11/2022
Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022
TOB 5/11/2022
-Bed
JJJ`t.J
Lddb.b
L.S40.
2353.2
2355.8
2357.9
2368.1
2371.0
L.Srb.b
2388.1
2391.6
2395.6
I `t I . I �J
/4 ( . /4
� 40.0U
748.24
748.25
748.61
748.90
748.03
r40:I "1
r4.Ub
749.23
748.67
748.68
I `t I . c, .
(4ZS.4b
748.84
748.83
748.87
749.07
749.07
r4y.U�S
r4.1 Z
749.53
749.51
749.53
4.b4
749.73
750.21

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 4A (Sta 00+00 to 05+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
0.0
5.5
8.3
10.5
12.2
27.1
30.9
34.6
36.3
46.0
58.1
63.5
66.8
72.7
752.25
752.28
752.00
751.91
753.14
753.39
753.20
753.00
753.70
753.70
754.43
753.28
753.28
754.83
752.48
752.75
752.74
752.74
753.20
753.58
753.52
753.57
753.76
753.90
754.49
754.49
754.46
754.02
a)
ct
a)
W
768
766
764
762
760
758
756
754
752
750
-
Bull Chute, UT 4A (Sta
Baseline Profile
00+00 to 05+00)
2022
I
1
0 50
1
100
1
150
1
200
1
250
Distance (feet)
I1
300
350
1I
400
450
500
Baseline 5/11/2022
Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022
TOB 5/11/2022
-Bed
L�F7.J
253.3
256. /
159.3
261.0
269.6
275.7
278.5
279.9
Z65.3
291.8
293.9
298.2
/ VV.LV
760.26
/59.63
/5 3. 35
760.90
761.11
761.37
760.41
761.86
/b1.bU
/b1.19
761.27
762.43
762.44
/VV.LJ
760.42
/60.41
/bU.41
760.87
761.25
761.47
761.43
761.87
/b1.64
/b1.tSb
761.84
760.59
761.76
762.82 762.82

Project Name Bull Chute - Baseline (2022) Profile
Reach UT 4B (Sta 00+00 to 05+00)
Feature Profile
Date 5/ 11 /22
Crew Lewis
Station
2022
Baseline Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
As needed
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation TOB
0.0
4.0
9.4
13.2
15.1
25.1
39.8
43.5
45.6
52.0
56.1
58.2
70.3
74.1
752.25
752.74
752.51
752.24
753.12
753.06
753.54
752.66
754.25
754.38
754.37
754.63
755.19
754.64
752.48
752.92
752.90
752.89
753.15
753.38
753.78
753.79
754.45
754.57
754.57
754.58
755.96
a)
,0
Ct
a)
W
764
762
760
758
756
754
752
750
-
Bull Chute, UT 4B (Sta
Baseline Profile
00+00 to 05+00)
2022
1
0 50
1
100
1
150
1
200
I
250
Distance (feet)
I1
300
350
1I
400
450
500
Baseline 5/11/2022
Water Surface Baseline 5/11/2022
TOB 5/11/2022
-Bed
Li-FO.O
262.9
1/6.1
L/y.L
281.9
282.4
297.0
303.0
/ VV.VV
760.63
/61.06
/b"1.U5
761.01
761.85
762.10
762.96
/61.9 /

Table 9A. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Bull Chute - UT 1
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline
(MY0)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.6
8.5
16
8.5
9.8
5.5
10.2
5
Floodprone Width (ft)
10
14
100
50
150
25
100
5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.7
1.1
0.6
0.7
0.2
0.8
5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
1.1
1.4
0.8
1.1
0.4
1.1
5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
6
6
6
6
6
1.3
8.1
5
Width/Depth Ratio
5.1
12.1
40
12
16
12.8
22.9
5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.4
15.9
5.9
15.3
4.6
11.4
5
Bank Height Ratio
1.3
2.8
5
1
1.3
1
1
5
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
G 5
Ce 3/4
Ce 4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
22.9
22.9
22.9
Sinuosity (ft)
1.03
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0211
0.0189
0.0197
Other
Table 9B. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Bull Chute - UT 3
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline
(MVO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.3
5.1
7.1
6.7
7.7
8.0
10.0
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
7
9
50
50
100
75
75
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.7
1.1
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1
1.7
0.6
0.8
0.9
1.0
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
4.8
6.4
2
Width/Depth Ratio
3
7.3
13.5
12
16
12.4
15.6
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.5
13.5
7.5
13
7.5
9.4
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.5
2.5
4
1
1.3
1
1
2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
G 5
Ce 3/4
Ce 4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
13.7
13.7
13.7
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0254
0.0225
0.0199
Other

Table 9C. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Bull Chute - UT 4 Upstream
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline
(MY0)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
5
8.3
10.4
7.2
8.3
8.5
8.9
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
6
11
24
50
100
75.0
75.0
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
1.1
1.2
0.7
0.9
0.8
1.0
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
5.1
5.8
2
Width/Depth Ratio
5.6
15.4
26
12
16
13.7
14.1
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.3
2.6
7
12.1
8.4
8.8
2
Bank Height Ratio
2.5
3.1
5.4
1
1.3
1.0
1.0
2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Fg 5
Ce 3/4
Ce 4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
16.1
16.1
16.1
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.212
0.0196
0.0182
Other
Table 9D. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Bull Chute - UT 4 Downstream
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline
(MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.8
9.2
10
9.1
10.5
11.0
11.0
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
9
11
14
50
150
100.0
100.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.9
1
1.1
0.8
1.1
1.2
1.2
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
8.5
8.5
1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.8
9.7
12.6
12
16
14.0
14.0
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.2
1.4
5.5
14.3
9.1
9.1
1
Bank Height Ratio
4.7
5.3
5.9
1
1.3
1.0
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
G 5
Ce 3/4
Ce 4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
26.7
26.7
26.7
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0165
0.0146
0.01484
Other

Table 9E. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Bull Chute - UT 4A
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline
(MY0)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.3
3.3
4.5
3.9
4.6
4.7
4.7
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
6
8
12
20
50
35
35
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.7
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1
Width/Depth Ratio
4.6
8.3
15
12
16
15.5
15.5
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
3.5
3.6
5.1
11
7.5
7.5
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.7
3
3.9
1
1.3
1
1
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Eg 5
Ce 3/4
Ce 4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
4.3
4.3
4.3
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0444
0.0336
0.0356
Other
Table 9F. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Bull Chute - UT 4B
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple)
Design
Monitoring Baseline
(MVO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.1
5
6.9
3.9
4.6
5.3
5.3
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
9
14
18
20
50
35
35
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.6
1.6
1
Width/Depth Ratio
7.8
21.1
34.5
12
16
17.5
17.5
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
3.6
5.8
5.1
11
6.6
6.6
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.3
4.3
7.3
1
1.3
1
1
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Cf 5
Ce 3/4
Ce 4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
4.3
4.3
4.3
Sinuosity (ft)
1.03
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0359
0.0336
0.034
Other

Table 1OA. Monitoring Data - Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
(Bull Chute/ DMS:1OO137) UT 1
UT 1- Cross Section 1(Riffle)
UT 1 Cross Sectio 2 (Pool)
UT 1- Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
UT 1- Cross Section 4 (Pool)
UT 1- Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull r Area
713.54
714.80
727.56
727.84
739.80
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
712.66
712.56
726.64
726.21
738.69
LT0132 Elevation
713.54
714.80
727.56
727.84
739.80
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
0.88
2.24
0.91
1.64
1.11
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
5.7
11.7
5.5
9.4
8.1
UT 1- Cros Section 6 (Pool)
UT 1 Cross Section 7 (Riffl )
UT 1- Cross Section 8 (Pool)
UT 1- Cros Sectio 9 (Riffle)
UT 1- Cros Sectio 10 (P ol)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull r Area
739.99
747.73
747.94
763.66
764.42
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
738.45
746.66
74629
763.30
763.33
LT0132 Elevation
739.99
747.73
747.94
763.66
764.42
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.54
1.07
1.65
0.36
1.09
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
12.0
6.9
10.3
1.3
6.3
The abov
resulted in
morp ology arameters reflect the 2018 guidance hat arose from the mitigation tech ical workgroup onsisting of DMS, th IRT and ind us ry mitigation provider /practitioners The o tcome
the fo us on hree p imary morphological paramet rs of i terest for the purpo es oft acking channel change moving forwa d. The are th bank height r do usi g a constant As -built bankfull area
sectional area an max depth based on each ye rs low op of bank. These are calculated as follows:
Height Ratio (BHR) to es the As -built bankful area as the ba is for adjusting each subseq ent years bankfull elevation. For example if the As -built bankfull area was 10 ft2, then the MY1 bankfull
would be adjusted un it the calculated bankfull area within he MY1 cross section surve = 10 ft2. The BHR would then be calculated with the difference between the low top of bank (LTOB)
for MY1 and the thalweg elevation for MY1 in the numerator with the difference between the MY1 bankfull elevation and the MY1 thalweg elevation in the denominator. This same process is then
in each successivey ar.
Area and Max depth - These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (Th same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and
each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elev tion (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.
and the cross
1 - Bank
elevation
elevation
carried out
2 - LTOB
tracked for
Bankfull Elevation (ft) -Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull r Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB2 Elevation
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
Note:The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of r liable d tection, herefore inter -a nual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases. Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.

Table 10B. Monitoring Data - Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
(Bull Chute/ DMS:100137) UT 3
UT 3 - Cross Sectio 13 (Riffle)
UT 3 - Cross Section 14 (Pool)
UT 3 - Cross Section 15 (Pool)
UT 3 - Cross Section 16 (Riffle)
UT 3 - Cross Section 17 (Riffle)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
722.63
722.98
734.17
734.92
763.55
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.98
Thalweg Elevation
721.62
720.98
732.78
733.97
762.51
LTOB2 Elevation
722.63
722.98
734.17
734.92
763.52
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.02
2.00
1.39
0.95
1.01
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
6.3
10.4
7.0
4.74
4.94
UT 3 - Cros Sectio 18 (Pool)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull1 Area
763.85
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
762.31
LTOB2 Elevation
763.85
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.55
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
6.58
The abov
morp ology arameters ref ect the 2018 guidance hat ar se from the mitigation tech ical workgroup onsisting of DMS, th IRT and indus ry mitigation provider /practitioners The o tcome
the fo us on hree p imary morphological paramet rs of i terest for the purpo es oft acking channel change moving forwa d. The are th bank height r do usi g a constant As -built bankfull area
sectional area an max d pth based on each ye rs low op of bank. These are calculated as follows:
Height Ratio (BHR) to es the As -built bankful area as the ba is for adjusting each subseq ent years bankfull elevation. For example if the As -built bankfull area was 10 ft2, then the MY1 bankfull
would be adjusted un it the calculated bankfull area within he MY1 cross section surve = 10 ft2. The BHR would then be calculated with the difference between the low top of bank (LTOB)
for MY1 and the thalweg elevation for MY1 in the numerator with the difference between the MY1 bankfull elevation and the MY1 thalweg elevation in the denominator. This same process is then
in each successivey ar.
Area and Max depth - These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (Th same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and
each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elev tion (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.
resulted in
and the cross
1 - Bank
elevation
elevation
carried out
2 - LTOB
tracked for
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull1 Area
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB Elevation
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
Note:The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of r liable d tection, herefore inter -a nual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases. Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.

Table 10C. Monitoring Data - Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
(Bull Chute/ DMS:100137) UT4
UT 4 - Cross Section 11(Pool)
UT 4 - Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
UT 4 - Cross Section 19 (Pool)
UT 4 - Cross Section 20 (Riffle)
UT 4 - Cross Section 21(Rife)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
714.76
715.38
732.43
733.76
750.00
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
713.25
71422
731.14
732.93
748.99
LTOBz Elevation
714.76
715.38
732.43
733.76
750.00
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.51
1.16
1.29
0.84
1.00
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
7.9
8.5
6.7
5.2
5.7
UT 4 - Cros Sectio 22 (Pool)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
750.27
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
748.69
LTOB2 Elevation
750.27
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
1.58
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
8.3
The abov morp ology arameters reflect the 2018 guidance hat arose from the mitigation tech ical workgroup onsisting of DMS, th IRT and indus ry mitigation provider /practitioners The o tcome
resulted in the fo us on hree p imary morphological paramet rs of i terest for the purpo es oft acking channel change moving forwa d. The are th bank height r do usi g a constant As -built bankfull area
and the cross sectional area an max depth based on each ye rs low op of bank. These are calculated as follows:
1 - Bank Height Ratio (BHR) to es the As -built bankful area as the ba is for adjusting each subseq ent years bankfull elevation. For example if the As -built bankfull area was 10 ft2, then the MY1 bankfull
elevation would be adjusted un it the calculated bankfull area within he MY1 cross section surve = 10 ft2. The BHR would then be calculated with the difference between the low top of bank (LTOB)
elevation for MY1 and the thalweg elevation for MY1 in the numerator with the difference between the MY1 bankfull elevation and the MY1 thalweg elevation in the denominator. This same process is then
carried out in each successivey ar.
2 - LTOB Area and Max depth - These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (Th same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and
tracked for each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elev tion (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOBz Elevation
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
Note: The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of r liable d tection, herefor inter -a nual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases. Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.

Table 10D. Monitoring Data - Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
(Bull Chute/ DMS:100137) UT 4A
UT 4A - Cross Secti n 25 (Pool)
UT 4A Cross ection 26 (Riffle)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
758.11
758.57
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
1.00
Thalweg Elevation
757.29
757.79
LTOB2 Elevation
758.11
758.57
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
0.82
0.78
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
1.5
1.6
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB2 Elevation
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
The abov
morp ology arameters ref ect the 2018 guidance hat ar se from the mitigation tech ical workgroup onsisting of DMS, th IRT and indus ry mitigation provider /practitioners The o tcome
the fo us on hree p imary morphological paramet rs of i terest for the purpo es oft acking channel change moving forwa d. The are th bank height r do usi g a constant As -built bankfull area
sectional area an max d pth based on each ye rs low op of bank. These are calculated as follows:
Height Ratio (BHR) to es the As -built bankful area as the ba is for adjusting each subseq ent years bankfull elevation. For example if the As -built bankfull area was 10 ft2, then the MY1 bankfull
would be adjusted un it the calculated bankfull area within he MY1 cross section surve = 10 ft2. The BHR would then be calculated with the difference between the low top of bank (LTOB)
for MY1 and the thalweg elevation for MY1 in the numerator with the difference between the MY1 bankfull elevation and the MY1 thalweg elevation in the denominator. This same process is then
in each successivey ar.
Area and Max depth - These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (Th same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and
each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elev tion (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.
resulted in
and the cross
1 - Bank
elevation
elevation
carried out
2 - LTOB
tracked for
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull1 Area
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB Elevation
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
Note:The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of r liable d tection, herefore inter -a nual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases. Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.

Table 10E. Monitoring Data - Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
(Bull Chute/ DMS:100137) UT 4B
UT 4B - Cross Section 23 (Pool)
UT 4B Cross Section 24 (Riffle)
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull r Area
757.88
758.07
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
1.00
0.52
Thalweg Elevation
756.83
757.50
LTOB1 Elevation
757.88
758.07
LTOB1 Max Depth (ft)
1.05
0.57
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
3.4
1.6
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfullc Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB2 Elevation
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB1 Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
The abov more ology arameters reflect the 2018 guidance hat arose from the mitigation tech ical workgroup onsisting of DMS, th IRT and indus ry mitigation provider /practitioners The o tcome
resulted in the fo us on hree p imary morphological paramet rs of i terest for the purpo es oft acking channel change moving forwa d. The are th bank height r do usi g a constant As -built bankfull area
and the cross sectional area an max depth based on each ye rs low op of bank. These are calculated as follows:
1 - Bank Height Ratio (BHR) to es the As -built bankful area as the ba is for adjusting each subseq ent years bankfull elevation. For example if the As -built bankfull area was 10 ft2, then the MY1 bankfull
elevation would be adjusted un it the calculated bankfull area within he MY1 cross section surve = 10 ft2. The BHR would then be calculated with the difference between the low top of bank (LTOB)
elevation for MY1 and the thalweg elevation for MY1 in the numerator with the difference between the MY1 bankfull elevation and the MY1 thalweg elevation in the denominator. This same process is then
carried out in each successivey ar.
2 - LTOB Area and Max depth - These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (Th same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and
tracked for each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elev tion (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull' Area
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull' Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOBz Elevation
LTOB1 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Note:The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of r liable d tection, herefor inter -a nual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases. Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.

Appendix D
Hydrologic Data
Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 1 (35.831389, -79.887733)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Wynott-Enon Complex
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-20
10 YR 4/2
70
10 YR 4/3
30
C
M
sandy clay loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 2 (35.832431, -79.885531)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Wynott-Enon Complex
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-2
10 YR 4/1
100
sandy clay loam
2-12
10 YR 5/1
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
M
sandy clay loam
12-20
10 YR 4/3
90
10 YR 6/2
5
D
M
clay loam
10YR 3/3
5
C
M
20+
10YR 5/1
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
M
sandy clay loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 3 (35.835164, -79.882049)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Wynott-Enon Complex
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-10
10 YR 5/1
95
10 YR 4/1
5
C
M
sandy clay loam
10-18
10 YR 6/2
90
10 YR 5/4
10
C
M
sandy clay loam
18-20
10 YR 5/1
90
10 YR 4/5
10
D
M
sandy clay loam
20+
Gley 6/1
95
10 YR 4/5
5
D
M
sandy clay loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 4 (35.836123, -79.881328)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Mecklenburg Clay Loam
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-9
10 YR 4/2
95
10 YR 5/4
5
C
M
loam
9-14
10 YR 4/2
90
10 YR 5/4
5
C
M
loam
10 YR 3/2
5
C
M
14-20
10 YR 5/1
60
10 YR 3/2
20
C
M
clay loam
Gley 6/1
20
20+
10 YR 6/1
85
10 YR 4/6
10
D
M
clay
Gley 6/1
5
C
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 5 (35.833120, -79.888360)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Wynott-Enon Complex
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-10
10 YR 4/1
98
10 YR 4/6
2
C
M
loam
10+
Gley 1 3/104
100
clay loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 6 (35.836651, -79.886569)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Wynott-Enon Complex
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-3
10 YR 5/1
100
sandy clay loam
3-15
10 YR 5/1
70
10 YR 6/1
20
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 5/6
10
C
M
15-22
10 YR 7/1
60
10 YR 5/6
30
D
M
clay
10 YR 5/1
10
C
M
22+
10 YR 4/6
90
10 YR 5/1
10
D
M
clay
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: &-Cr A Jt-Jr.
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 7 (35.833712, -79.889062)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Mecklenburg clay loam
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-3
10 YR 5/4
100
loam
3-12
10 YR 4/2
80
10 YR 5/6
20
C
M
loam
12-18
10 YR 4/1
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
M
clay loam
18+
Gley 1 5/104
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
M
clay loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 8 (35.834751, -79.889586)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Mecklenburg clay loam
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-12
10 YR 4/2
95
10 YR 4/4
5
C
M
sandy clay loam
12-20
10 YR 5/1
80
10 YR 4/3
15
C
M
clay loam
10 YR 3/2
5
C
M
20+
10 YR 6/1
90
10 YR 5/4
5
C
M
clay
10 YR 4/6
5
D
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 9 (35.836685, -79.890433)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Mecklenburg loam
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-10
10 YR 5/1
95
10 YR 5/6
5
C
M
clay loam
10+
10 YR 6/5
90
10 YR 5/1
5
C
M
clay
10 YR 5/4
5
C
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/4/2022
Project/Site: Bull Chute
County, State: Randolph County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GW 10 (35.837255, -79.889980)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Mecklenburg loam
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Location is shown on
Figure 4.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-13
10 YR 5/1
95
10 YR 5/6
5
C
M
loam
13-22
Gley 6/5GY
70
10 YR 4/6
30
D
M
loam
22+
10 YR 6/1
90
10 YR 4/6
10
D
M
clay
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
1/(
Signature: ' �' -04/t
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

Appendix E
Project Timeline and Contact Info
Table 11. Project Timeline
Table 12. Project Contacts
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

Table 11. Project Timeline
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Task Completion or
Deliverable Submission
Project Instituted
NA
Nov-19
Mitigation Plan Approved
NA
13-May-21
Construction (Grading) Completed
NA
8-Mar-22
Planting Completed
NA
18-Mar-22
As -built Survey Completed
Jun-22
Jun-22
MY-0 Baseline Report
May-22
Jul-22
MY1+ Monitoring Reports
Remediation Items (e.g. beaver removal, supplements, repairs etc.)
Encroachment
Table 12. Project Contacts
Project Name/Number
Provider
Mitigation Provider POC
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon PI.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Kevin Yates
919-624-6901
Designer
Primary project design POC
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis
919-215-1693
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks, Inc.
5616 Coble Church Rd
Julian, NC 27283
Kory Strader
336-362-0289

Appendix F
Record Drawings (As -Built Survey)
MYO Monitoring Report (Project No. 100137) Appendices
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Randolph County, North Carolina July 2022

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229 44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
QD
H
N
a
czA
fi
3.5
525
•
1527
Ne
629
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
AS -BUILT PLANS
BULL CHUTE SITE
LOCATION: RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1525
VICINITY MAP
Not to Scale
BULL CHUTE SITE
SITE #: 100137
YADKIN 03040105
RANDOLPH COUNTY
CONTRACT#: 7878-01
LATITUDE: 35.8325
LONGITUDE: -79.8879 (WGS84)
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0
50
100
PLANS
50 25 0 50
100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10
1� PROFILE (VERTICAL)
ST
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT (CLEARING,
GRUBBING, GRADING, EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING)
I RECORD DRAWING
START -UT4B-
STA 0+00
W -a
O N
UT 4B
END -UT
STA 2
RT -UT4-
STA
STA 2+88
T -UT4C-
C o_i
START -194A-
il STA 0+00
alla`'�`UT
+88 STA END -4+32
UT4A-
UT 4
"0 2
Q �
\*IP
ill
N S'
� 0
7� .a C m START -UT5-
0 S \ . STA 0+00
UT 5
? END -UT3-
OIL
4 STA /9+32
Q�J
UTD
= ll 1 AA1S� r
1i
END -UT6-
EN
S � 28+ NOro
QS STA /+2/
4 re : UT 1
0/
U
STA 0+00
4C _
END-UT4C�--B
START -UT3-
STA 0+00
QS��J
P
STA 1+80
UT 4
START -UT7-
0
UT 7
END -UT7-
STA 1+44
STA 0+0gzz„,
UT 2
END -UT2-
STA 5+92
0
1:6STA T/ UT6-
END -UTI-
STA 31+69
IO en
A =
UT 3
STA 0+00
UT 6
NORFOLKISOUTHLI-RN
CORPORATION
START -UT2-
STA 0+00
QS op4
Q` END -UTS-
STA 0+8/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE: 42.74 AC
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 1- =
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 2- =
3169
592
1932
2555
432
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 4B- =
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT4C- =
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 5-=81
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 6- =
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 7- =
288
180
_
121
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 3- =
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT4- =
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT4A- =
144
TOTAL STREAM LENGTHS (LF) =
9494
RESTORATION LEVEL
STREAM (linear footage)
RIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
NON RIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
RESTORATION
6937
3.130(Reestablishment)
0.000
ENHANCEMENT!
411
0.114(Rehabilitation)
0.000
ENHANCEMENT!!
333
1.4662 (Enhancement)
0.000
ENHANCEMENT!!!
50
0.000
0.000
TOTALS
7731
4.710
0.000
START -UTI-
.Z` iX STA 0+00
UT 1
STATB
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
BULL CHUTE SITE
1
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NUMBER
AB-01
AB-02
AB-03
AB-04A THRU AB-04V
AB-04W
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION(S
SHEET
Title Sheet
Symbology
Easement
As -Built Structures
As -Built Planting List
Surveyors disclaimer: No attempt was made to locate any cemeteries, wetlands, hazardous material
sites, underground utilities or any other features above, or below ground other than those shown.
However; no visible evidence of cemeteries or utilities, aboveground or otherwise, was observed by
the undersigned (other than those shown).
I certify that the survey is of an existing parcel or parcels of land or one or more existing easements
and does not create a new street or change an existing street.
I JOHN A. RUDOLPH , certify that this plat was prepared under my supervision from an actual field
survey made under my supervision, of as -built conditions.
That the boundaries not surveyed are clearly indicated as such and were plotted from information as
referenced hereon; That the ratio of precision as calculated was 1:7,500+ and that the
global navigational satellite system (GNSS) was used to perform this survey and the following
information was used:
Class of Survey: CLASS B (HORIZONTAL( CLASS B (VERTICAL)
Positional Accuracy: 0.12 feet (HORIZONTAL)
Type of GPS field procedure: RTK
Dates of survey: Mav and June 2022
Datum/Epoch: NAD 1983(20111
Published/Fixed Control Use: OPUS
Geoid Model: 2012B CONUS
Combined Grid Factor: 0.99995565 GROUND TO GRID
Units: US SURVEY FEET
That this plat meets the requirements of the standards of practice for land surveying in North
Carolina. Witness my hand and seal this 12th day of July 2022.
0\11111l////
B30
SEAL .9� ••,
L-4194
Qom•, 7/26/2022 L-4194
ti SUR p
Professional Land Surveyor License Number
/''/�SNLEY \RJ \\
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Roleigh, NC 27603
GRANT LEWIS
PROJECT DESIGNER
Prepared in the Office of:
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
•0
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL [phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS 4
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
KEVIN YATES
SITE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
JOSHUA G. DALTON, P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
\/,IllH ll/,//
55/ U CAR
'D�py�,igne �� �i
�o/, -.
'� 0_7'�9i II
26971
99,
O/C I N -- O�
/PN ON
7/26/2022
DATE:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:
State Line
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Computed Property Corner
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line
Proposed Fence Gate
0
EIP
ECM
X X X
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
Existing Historic Property Boundary
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
Sign
Well
Small Mine
Foundation
Area Outline
Cemetery
Building
School
Church
Dam
HYDROLOGY.-
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir 7
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
EAB
EPB
HPB
0
0
0
t
Js
BZ 1
BZ 2
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Primary Horiz Control Point
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap
Vertical Benchmark
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
New Right of Way Line
New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap
New Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R/W Marker
New Control of Access Line with
Concrete C/A Marker
Existing Control of Access
New Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
New Conservation Easement
New Temporary Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
New Permanent Utility Easement
New Temporary Utility Easement
New Aerial Utility Easement
m
O 0
® O
0
(A,
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb —
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
Proposed Curb Ramp
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION:
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
♦ Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
0 Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall —
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
E
CE
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
C
F
cR
TTTT
n n n
ED
CA CA CA 4
Vineyard
CONC
CONC WW
/ CONC Hw \
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
>—
CB
OO
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H—Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
RECORD DRAWING
SS Forced Main Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U,G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
b AG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U,G Test Hole LOS A (S.U.E.*)
© Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
Water Hydrant
U/G Water Line
U/G Water Line
U/G Water Line
LOS B (S.U.E*)
LOS C (S.U.E*)
LOS D (S.U.E*)
Above Ground Water Line
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
f
0
0
A/C water
U/G Gas Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
A/G Gas
OO
O
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
A/G Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
FSS
Riffle Rip Rap
Log Vane
Log Cross Vane
Step Pool Structure
Stream Plug
FSS
•
O
( us7 )
AATUR
E.O.I.
�C�oo�C�og�oo�C�oo�
Yon�Yon°�on°Yo���
Begin
Floodplain Interceptor
Proposed Fence
Limits of Disturbance
AS BUILT
Stream Centerline
Stream Top of Bank
Stream Gauge
Groundwater Gauge
Benthic & Water Quality Station
Origin Point on CVS Plots
CVS Plots
Cross Section
Adjusted Stream Structure
Not Constructed
11./-
End
�A�AAEEE jLIO%l j
�ll �i�/Ti_�llll �l �%Ti
— LOD —
O
XS-10R
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
cD
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
c_r
CO
o
,1;'
BULL CHUTE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
SYMBOLOGY
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-02

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
m
22
09U
UT 4B
UT4C
UT 4
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CE
T14
UT 4A
_UT 4
c
yv c
A
W
UT
W
U
UT 3
14.7
SURVEY INFORMATION
EASEMENT PROVIDED BY:
K2 DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
5688 U.S. HIGHWAY 70 EAST
GOLDSBORO, NC 27534
UT 2
UT 3 /
150' 75' 0 150' 300'
TIT
TII
SCALE: 1"= 300'
/ a2
j / c
n
m
UT
so
UT 6
co
a
Z
RECORD DRAWING
UT
co
Mary
Viola
Rd.
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
cD
CD
co
w
0
w
Q
C7
o=
;'
BULL CHUTE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
EASEMENT
PROJECT +�
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-03

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
25' 12.5' 0
25'
50'
JONES, SUSAN
DIANE REDDING
BK 001856, PG 02359
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
RECORD D
p-DocuSigneifAtiy: n
4 lln
ASS/ „
�'1089 DAC149 4C3... 0�
-17
g-S-AL
2697 I
stiO4,
6 o D
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
0
0
0
cD
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
cr
CO
1,1;'
BULL CHUTE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04A

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
775
77Q
765
___ Z 6 0
755
STR TYPE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
-UT
1- AS -BUILT S
NORTHING
760,252.03
760,091.55
760,049.78
760,034.58
759,983.76
759,986.14
759,948.26
759,939.15
0
S
A
RT
E
A U+UU
Ell
V=7
a
H
A
0
JONES, SUSAN
DIANE REDDING
BK 001856, PG 02359
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
ND ENHANCEMENT II
START ENHANCEMENT I
STA 1+73 -UT 1-
EU
EN
T
u
TRUCTURE LOCATIONS
EASTING
1,738,725.33
1,738,655.86
1,738,627.34
1,738,604.62
1,738,527.23
1,738,516.22
1,738,496.68
1,738,498.81
L
AB Survey
Prop Elevation Elevation
771.25
764.07
762.75
762.11
759.65
759.47
758.42
757.96
764.10
762.54
762.15
759.53
759.31
758.32
757.67
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
S
E
L
AT
A
E
OCS
�7
V= ib,1
r
GILO
T
A
8,1
T
N
ALWE
B
LT
LIMITS OF
GRADING
E
NTE
E
25' 12.5' 0
25'
50'
IEELLEI
SCALE: 1"=50' O,d�
=ORD DRAWING
•
•
•
•
•
c.$
[DocuSipgp!d\ /,
J,7,91y.\17!..,„, A, /IR/ 0 ///
3/.0
_ = 26971 = _
,, ,y0q 61 P�
699
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
— — — HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
P
R
P
rH
A
LW
E
Er
+50 01 +50 02 +50 03 +50 04 +50 05
0
r
775
770
765
760
755
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04B

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
--- 764-
-763-
-
•
' ,'-
5•
6 • •
---
61-----
♦
J•
ti
♦
`` ,♦ 1 I
PkQPOSED BAN �JLIa
'ENP _NHA CEIIIEN)TI
START 1k HANCEM NTIII
SITA6-iM0-j.1T1-'
1 ► 1 1 1
►1
♦ ► 1
► /
II
1 /
/ • I
NL �N
SEE S S 7-4
760
CN
753
J
750'-t1
UT
2
750
J
•
1 ,
HEET q*00
4
o
0
EXS
AT PROP
05
09,
,
,
4LTMIT3'QP 1
,GF(A�IG,'I,
//-
/,/
6
99
,7/
/
i
-
/ -- --- -- --,
,
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
END ETIFIANEEI7EV1vT II ---'--
s aFflEr 1- Nc-E n>'m r
--758----
cPeCISS-VANE-(W-P --
OVE-'CCAY PIg —
56 -
1
-'• ------_-16
+ts� - 7
tfri' 's -9-�/-148 747_
111FECORD DRAWING
_ EASE Pt F_ENCE LINE
TS _____
-----
_____-
__— 7rr"-- -
ENDENHA uENTU-
-\
STA 5+92 -UT 2-•
--STA-7t04----^
/�.-LIMITSGRA1� 1�OFFL
ROVE _
•
_--•—• .-� _---- -`-
-749 �- -
C PIPE
GROUND
TI IALWEG
+5
0
3T
ART
7
i
AS-BUIL
CtN I tRLINE
END
STA
EN
EN
HAN
+2-L
-
6+40
-LEV
06
CM EN
1 2-
600,
- LSL
1!
C/
PROPOSED.__-^
_ __ -
'--B, N ELL _- _
•-` �END NHAT'C€MEN•T TAR EQ@[TION�
-_S-TA8_+-UT 1-
------------------
B7kSEMEN/9ftlq E LINE
C9L•---------
.--179L---------------- ----------
--___ JONES,SU7An---__
-------
-L11AIEREDDING
..... ------------ _BK 001856, PG 023S4��
9
7
3
3
5
0
FNf)
F
S
E
F
U- 1
in FP IA
NC,F
-AR1I EN1-1
A 7-09
EV 246
\HAN .M
S�A 5� 92-U 1 2
S A 74 04 -UT 1
A LIItT CE
AN
A+I
UT 1
35
T
NT
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
Prop Elevation
756.73
756.20
755.90
755.03
753.07
752.00
749.94
748.69
747.85
746.19
AB Survey
Elevation
-r
ER
F
L
N
T
NEI
oocuSigneed\d):1 ll���
Je3\ �/a�tof,CA,R<
1089Ab8 1 .9 C�� 0 � /
26971 =
GI ���
RRq R\\R
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-UT 1-AS-BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
MET\T
IN
E
1
NORTHING
759,906.20
759,903.01
759,888.22
759,866.94
759,808.06
759,773.99
759,700.65
759,670.79
759,645.15
759,593.50
END
S
EL
4
E
N
T
EV-
EASTING
1,738,462.97
1,738,451.12
1,738,443.24
1,738,421.87
1,738,367.26
1,738,350.14
1,738,295.33
1,738,248.75
1,738,230.62
1,738,188.44
HANCE
RES
5
8-I1
418 39
EN
co
N
756.73
756.13
755.96
755.17
753.34
751.27
750.02
748.73
747.95
746.18
7610
755
750
745
740

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
__--95L--------
E SEMENT
FENCE LINE
-17S`._��L_``
LIMITS OF
GRADING
SHIPTON, DAVID LEE
BK 001713, PG 00504
CROS
VANE (TYP)
STREAM PLUG
• LGL-------' JONES,SUSATI ▪ --- ---- --
--------
__�� n01.a-PE,42.3 9�� `--_---- ---- E S NT FENCE LINE
a
---- ----
25' 12.5' 0
RECORD DRAWINC.
OMITS OF
GRADING
cDocuS�gpcd i, 14" , / / /,
Je . oA 1 i
� SEAL ':
26971
%y'Uq 610P�
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
-UT 1- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
759,548.37
1,738,123.70
744.37
744.53
CROSS VANE
759,532.46
1,738,090.18
743.28
743.47
CROSS VANE
759,476.12
1,738,055.80
741.84
741.84
CROSS VANE
759,451.74
1,738,040.70
741.25
741.16
CROSS VANE
759,433.59
1,738,023.53
740.63
740.38
LOG VANE
759,426.58
1,737,893.32
738.45
738.37
CROSS VANE
759,398.10
1,737,866.61
737.94
738.47
CROSS VANE
759,358.85
1,737,815.88
736.72
736.61
U
750
LI
750
74
C C
r
AT
PRO
T
R
H
U
ALWEG
-r
745
74Q
740
73
z
Ror
rii
WGG
—
735
73Q
A
4
UI
LT
C
E
TERL
NE
730
N GROUP, PA.
Q
0
o✓
cD
CD
CO
w
0 '
W .
QCD -I
*1
REVISIONS:
10 +50 11
+50 12 +50 13 +50 14
+50
15
SHEET NO.
AB-04D

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
w
Nai
O �
NU
735
725
CATTLE GATE
_'--_FZLt�7.'--
-XIJ
-GH
---- - %
_ —44:,->-
i
PERMANENT CROSSING
\ ` 1@71"x4'7" CSPA
1@lE /CSP FLOODPLA
‘- RIPK EACH SIDE ,/
TOP WIDTH (TyP)
BRIDGE ITA
PLACE O PIP
CATTLE
GATE
SHIPTON, DAVID LEE
BK 001713, PG 00504
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
litANKFULL /♦
/ // o
/ i
cn
/ 1� // 18+00/
i< j."00 M / -UT /I
•
STA 0+00 -UT 5-
END RESTORATION
STA 0+76 -UT 5-
STA 16+78 -UT 1-
E
.9 ` .9u9 cam`'
LIMITS OF
GRADING
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
25' 12.5' 0
25' 50'
TI
SCALE: 1"=50'
Oa?
RECORD DRAWING
0
�DocuSi9���14A�1III 0,„
AR
.�osL l�� 0�
2
= 26971 =
, 7'Uq 619PA
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
-UT 1- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
759,318.86
1,737,775.95
735.28
735.16
CROSS VANE
759,277.20
1,737,689.03
732.84
733.14
CROSS VANE
759,264.29
1,737,670.60
732.23
732.43
-r
LJ
V)
CT{
vIC
ATION
5
z
z
0
PC
0
0
O
0
0
0
F_
0
O
O
H
O
a
0
0
z
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04E
15
+50
16
+50
17
+50
18 +50
19
+50
20
0
+ 50 0

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
0
' W
0�
00
+
om
N .,r
F—
Q LU
F— LU
Lu V)
Lu
J
S
0
F—
Q
SHIPTON, DAVID LEE
BK 001713, PG 00504
STA 0+00 -UT 6-
I nc; VANE (TYP) —
EASEMENT
FENCE LINE
-UT 1- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
LOG VANE
759,012.18
1,737,371.17
726.11
BUILT / NS
LOG VANE
758,976.28
1,737,358.40
725.69
725.57
CROSS VANE
758,947.39
1,737,296.29
727.81
724.66
CROSS VANE
758,945.75
1,737,267.69
724.16
723.87
CROSS VANE
758,900.75
1,737,215.30
722.65
722.63
CROSS VANE
758,876.87
1,737,166.46
721.32
721.43
CROSS VANE
758,856.99
1,737,123.87
720.38
720.43
CROSS VANE
758,812.65
1,737,053.63
718.58
718.37
73,
72
72.
71
710
-r
1
20
+50
XST G
O N
21
+50
22
25' 12.5' 0
'RD DRAWING
---`739*
-------' 738 -
737 - '
_—__-735_���_----•
-------- ------
EASEMENT FENCE E--------
CROSS VANE (TYP)
LIMITS OF
GRADING
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001856, PG 02361
i
u-
STA
oTA 22+
2- T6
+50
PERMANENT CROSSING
1@73"x55" CSPA
1@18" CSP FLOODPLAIN
PIPE EACH SIDE
16' TOP WIDTH (TYP)
23
+50
24
727_
CATTLE
GATE
+50
TC
SI
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"=50'
D
n
rnz
m
cp
F
m D
—4
N
D �
CD +
00
0
0
—4
25 0
222
DoFuSigned-by�. R //
Q8 8 14994C3...
S -SS
2697 1 2
/�S ''G
11 i��\\\`� O`er
�7(1 61 9 P'
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
+50
735
730
725
720
715
01 +50
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
N GROUP
z

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
D
n
v,=
mr
mz
m
= c/1
mD
DLn
OD +
00
0
, EASEMENT FENCE LINE
--
CROSS VANE (TYP)
LIMITS OF
GRADING
CROSS VANE_ADD..Q
/110 ♦
STREAM PLUG
ZR6.17 S.tD � LIMITS OF
BAMt FULL` `RADIRG
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001856, PG 02361
♦
♦
•
•
N
N
N
♦ •
♦
♦
- •
•
�z
% ♦♦ ♦ •//
♦ --- --EASEMENT FN C NE♦�-
♦ _ kXISTII•tp 01
A3(
OSED BANKFULL
-UT 1-AS-BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
758,796.15
1,737,017.04
717.73
717.67
CROSS VANE
758,776.30
1,736,961.54
716.66
716.83
CROSS VANE
758,736.64
1,736,902.46
715.63
715.67
] CROSS VANE
758,716.91
1,736,893.28
714.93
CROSS VANE
758,678.61
1,736,865.13
714.27
714.21
CROSS VANE
758,649.05
1,736,854.80
713.63
713.38
CROSS VANE
758,629.55
1,736,823.19
712.92
712.57
CROSS VANE
758,606.00
1,736,771.07
711.77
711.52
715
71Q
705
W
-7
c
<1
5
1
AT
5
0
P
-PH
J
ALWEG
2
5
A
0
UILT
f
EN
2
TE
7
R
LI
E
♦
♦
♦
♦
GHANNEL +
N 1�
Cy/
Sc
MORD DRAWING
♦• \
rJ
r oo
k
O
0
♦
FILL
EXISTING
C T-
-- -C+IANNEL
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
758,639.57
1,736,646.04
710.12
710.15
E
5
1
0
28
L
50
R
0
P
THALWEG
29
+50
-7
c
rr'
Z
25' 12.5' 0
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"=50'
1
—DocuS1gil ti I I I/
Je4 direftl 1,
�1Q89AD881 94C3...0 `�
= 26971
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
UT 4
A
S-B
UILT
E
N-R
L
INE
EXST GROI1ND
AT PR P THALgEG
= c
c Ln
CN
A
J
-7
J
l
i
715
710
7
a
N GROUP, P.,
DRAW ING NAME:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REV IEWED BY,
JGD
REV IS IONS:
SHEET NO.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
t/1
m —H
m D
U1IN)
COD
m + —�
mon
—� O
z
coCm
I -H
C
-UT 1- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
758,523.24
1,736,664.87
709.12
709.15
CR CC VANE
768,606.00
1,736,632.20
708.37
DROP STRUCTURE
758,499.00
1,736,623.75
708.27
708.48
DROP STRUCTURE
758,419.84
1,736,586.29
704.36
704.53
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
758,527.25
1,736,634.01
708.56
708.47
CROSS VANE (TYP)
EASEMENLIMITS OFLINE
GRADING
CRC75 : s ' NE -Id
% CON RUCTED
31 + 00
ENI I RESTORATION
STA128.±39 -UT 4-
STA 30+46 -UT 1-
PROPOSED BANKFULL
LIMITS OF
GRADING
F\LL EXISTING CHANNEL
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001856, PG 02361
END RESTORATION
STA 31+43 -UT 1-
DROP STRUCTURE
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
11. RECORD DRAWING
25' 12.5' 0
TI
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"=50'
Qd?
Do7Sjghifi ti C-446W1:440,4 /
BAR,
1 94D6 1 94C3...0
2697 1 9 _
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
UT 1
UT 4
715
F NI) R
FST
ORATIO
S 1 A 28
38
715
SrA30
46
UT 1-
PROP
THALWE
G
71Q
a
PROP
T
ALWEG
AS
B
U1LT
E
NT
ERU
N
AS
C
UI
LT
CE
E
RLI'
710
70
70Q
AT
EXS
PR
1
P
G
T
ROUND
HAL EG
1
EMD
STA
EL
E
31
Elf=
7
ST
43
04
DRAT
UT
35
XS
AT
P
GR UND
R
OP THALW
EG
ENT) I'Z
ES
STA 28
ELEV-
1
1
+�g
CJK
U
3y
A
T
4
1
N
705
700
695
695
7
a
0
0
0
0
00
0
00
z
N GROUP, P.,
z
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04H

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
0
II
AMIN
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
NEN
NON
REMOVE PQKJC - 777'
/ _ -.
//,///,7- -776_.-/' / /. ,'
1/11
__
....
,„....
....
,.... „
, „
, ,
, ,
•
0.
0• .
/ / / � // /)/ 1 � POND I �� iii,,,,,,.„----
._ �//// //�0.
� // - // •
��' �L�E — --
/ /
iiiii
1
• — CL
•
•
•
„.
__..„
.,
,...„„__
_____z9z
0,,
--- ____
____,______
___
___
_._,
_ ___
.41
4.
N
/, //---' CO I�Ti I '//�/ _ `• _• LL _` --_ '�\\ `�\\S9L--_ ♦\ ‘ _ _ _7_ _ _._ _ _77 „...„>:
r...::-
\--.:...�_L
//// //-- —• � i' I —�- %� _—_ \�-- — ▪ -'---. -�\``\ \\ `• - `•
� � ``- `� `` \\ ♦♦♦—__ ___♦\-19
♦ - \ \ • ' • \ `
•
( / 1 ♦� • START ENHANCE ENT II \ \ .� _
/ 1 \`-- STA0+00-U12- `.-``.�-``.:--- \\ :---—— ----.� `♦
\ --•♦—
\ _
EASEMENT FENCE LINE \ \ ♦- • ♦^♦
\ ♦♦ ♦ \
JONES, SUSAN
DIANE REDDING \ \ \
1 1 1
BK 001856, PG 02359 I 1
1 1
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
50'
RECORD DRAWING
1
1
/--6LL -
08L -
REMOVE
CLAY PIPE
♦
♦
---
- �♦
♦ ♦
N
6-)
0
'
— + m
Q
Q• LU
- 0
LU V
J LU
=0
U
DocuSign
26971 9
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
UT
2
770
765
760
755
75Q
AT
P
EXST
RO
GRO
ND
THALWEG
V
7
+50 01 +50 02 +50 03 +50 04
r
f
770
765
760
755
750
2
7
7
z
H
0
u
0
00
0
00
7
z
PROJECT .
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
760,907.01
1,736,070.30
761.77
761.92
CROSS VANE
760,848.88
1,736,043.28
760.27
BUILT / NS
CROSS VANE
760,838.72
1,736,042.06
759.78
759.84
CROSS VANE
760,824.39
1,736,047.63
759.21
759.27
CROSS VANE
760,809.92
1,736,046.94
758.67
758.70
CROSS VANE
760,752.71
1,736,063.38
757.19
757.26
SILL STEP
760,739.66
1,736,066.18
756.60
756.53
CROSS VANE
760,725.04
1,736,063.02
755.78
755.68
SILL STEP
760,709.27
1,736,070.63
755.16
754.99
SILL STEP
760,697.97
1,736,073.60
754.41
754.51
SILL STEP
760,674.66
1,736,090.56
753.41
753.13
I
L_B -
CROSS
SPENCER, BARRY BRUCE
BK 002260, PG 00218
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION
OF SPRING
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
SILL STEP
760,663.18
1,736,107.94
752.57
752.48
CROSS VANE
760,612.01
1,736,106.18
751.28
751.32
CROSS VANE
760,590.48
1,736,094.17
750.80
750.88
CROSS VANE
760,545.86
1,736,099.74
749.96
749.91
CROSS VANE
760,501.69
1,736,079.94
749.09
749.11
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
A P'
\3-\ RE- EN I SLORATION
k50 AP A 4+28 -UT
3 P� 0 STAz+93 -UT 4-
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
/
/
/
/
k00
z
•
TO RAT!O NV
ZJT B ♦♦•
♦
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
50'
B8 avN
RECORD DRAWING'
/
PROPOSED BANKFULL /
LIMITS OF
/kiRADING /
4
START RESTORATION
STA 2+95 -UT_4
SILL STEP (TYP)
Docuigii& byI Ili/ v
C.W \,,,,--\41., A R 0 ///
•*ADG:cc4.9 4 .0 ' ;
=Z SAL 7
_ = 26971 = _
9696609
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
-UT 4A-AS-BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
SILL STEP
760,734.86
1,736,111.78
754.86
754.92
CROSS VANE
760,703.01
1,736,100.80
753.79
753.71
CROSS VANE
760,679.25
1,736,100.09
753.29
753.16
T4
765
START REST FA
N
UT 4A
I
STA +C T 4
z
765
760
EXS
P
P
G
T
R
U
J
AT 4W G
R
H
755
75
0
745
PROP THALWE
AS Byl gNl
E
D RE
S7 RA-
Ink
STA
4+23 -U
AA
/
END REST pATI
0
STA 2- 5 4UT 4 -
N
/ S I AR I RES JRA I !ON
f STA 2 I. ,UT 4-
ti
f
Q -
Q
r
R
AT
r
PR
T
RO
UND
I-
HA
760
AS
-B
EV=
LT
2
C€
J
ATION
- 4A-
0,4
755
750
-ERLINE
745
STA 2+93 -,,T 4
0
+50
01
+50
02
+50
03
+50
04
+50
05 3 + 50
04 + 50
SENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CO
Q
a
0
IY
O
CD
C/)
w
0
w
cr
up
iro
BULL CHUTE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO
AB-04J
0

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
-UT 4C- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
760,412.52
1,736,054.25
747.30
747.29
SILL STEP
760,404.05
1,736,061.52
747.16
BUILT/NS
SILL STEP
760,391.91
1,736,070.92
746.30
746.48
CROSS VANE
760,382.39
1,736,073.63
745.61
745.70
' - - -I�fr.'.'' - - - 747 00154EASEMENT FENCE
/ RQSS�VAN (TYBr'�3'�' LI�41'fS OF::::::4
-- ------RG MMMMMMM
'-"GRADII -�"
-''PROPOyrED- - - - 7
43•
J
''
42_ ..' i�� 00
E0 Q
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLEI
25'
50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
C,
,, e., ' \__----_---,....AN\ \ %.000
,V1.11-11#
�'�--z / -- Pt, ___ �-, -- Q
\ - --
STA 1+71 -UT 4C- \ / BANKFUL
STA 6+35 -UT 4- \ -crThn ` -
STA 1+20 -UT 4C- Tcnn-
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
SILL STEP
760,465.76
1,736,065.81
748.30
748.51
SILL STEP
760,423.72
1,736,102.15
746.83
746.95
SILL STEP
760,395.95
1,736,090.11
745.96
746.01
SILL STEP
760,368.77
1,736,087.71
745.06
745.09
CROSS VANE
760,330.29
1,736,108.30
743.70
743.75
CROSS VANE
760,313.02
1,736,122.72
743.16
743.16
CROSS VANE
760,304.88
1,736,140.57
742.74
742.88
CROSS VANE
760,273.67
1,736,151.67
742.07
741.97
CROSS VANE
760,206.95
1,736,169.90
740.46
740.41
CROSS VANE
760,174.41
1,736,170.89
739.64
739.65
CROSS VANE
760,129.49
760,129.49
738.65
738.61
75
75Q
745
74Q
J
73
05
+50
06
r
A
S
41
6
+50
EXST (;ROIIINI'
PROP IHALNEG
71 U 4C
35 -U-
�
07
LIMITS O nn-)
GRADING
4
+50
A
B
08
L
T
P
C
E
NT
9tP4 Q.PIIS D
REMOVE DAM
AND PIPES
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
TH
E
R
A
LI
LWBG
E
+50
09
tiI
+50
10
-DocuSignd b A
1os9A�
S
S/
14994C3...
2697 1
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
L RECORD DRAWING
i==
_... i.._. .__ - .__
=.. ■ aA..� ---
=o ■ ov iuo olE7 ,W■Rlii==
=.. ■ ...N.1 i■iY i...Wll.==
.M. ■ WI =MN Mg,.'.iOE
Sia__.. ice___.. _. _.._..__
ei__...=M.==ono==
....41. =r onc�,a�+■ ono==
wRY- ...
i•T-EN M== ...... magi.
iigi.
=W1 NMI U■II .__
r=6 ,3.L1 .1 _9 i79.1�.1 .}9.nI' NPR
r■.7 0I117-II.1112 .--
_....ii=... i_..I_■--
so� • PIRIWVIMHE=MINE= --
....t_ --
��:�:� --
. ^P.\.1 . �i C.�7. A� ■
ter.... _
.r._ ■ -
. H�' �t7Lfi71I1.M..� ■
�� .. • __..._
01
+50

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
CROSS VANE
NORTHING
759,983.37
EASTING
1,736,263.17
AB Survey
Prop Elevation Elevation
735.15
735.09
CROSS VANE
759,953.84
1,736,272.42
734.44
734.52
CROSS VANE
759,932.41
1,736,283.88
733.82
734.05
LOG VANE
759,776.05
1,736,318.22
730.79
730.64
CROSS VANE
759,745.49
1,736,366.18
729.99
730.25
CROSS VANE
759,711.42
1,736,408.70
728.84
728.56
CROSS VANE
759,698.35
1,736,425.81
728.37
728.45
'e CE
PERMANENTCROSSINGU,
1@64"x43" CSPA
1 18" CSP FLOODPLAIN
PIPE EACH SIDE
16' TOP WIDTH (TYP)
74
74
73
73
72
STTLE
GATE
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001416, PG 00154
BRIDGE INSTALLED IN
PLACE OF PIPES
LE
LIMITS OF
GRADING
STR M LUG
—_/*--
K
'' -44L144.7
,�1 —
.1444,,
.._._.__--,... .4,1 ..........., ,, ....,
„TO. A 77•E‘. - — — — --
M4T�]RE�:EES ,UND€PtIROUND LOCATION
--L174
CATTLE
GATE
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
FILL EXISTING
CHANNEL
1 .
__L-
2 s .t
13+00
-UT 4-
cLu
EASENT FENCE LINE
MM
PS=I.1u111 ■UR!UI•I UU•I�1UI\INUr u�
25'
50'
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
DocuSjg dtiII11����/
.�as ra111/A
S/
---- 1089A 11 994C3...0�
_ = 26971 = _
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
&RECORD DRAWING
MMM
--RRRP SED— --
BANI<FULL_ _ _
25' 12.5' 0
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001447, PG 00980
LIMITS OF
GRADING
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001187, PG 02018
10
+50
11
+50
12
+50
13
+50
14
+50
15

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
25' 12.5' 0
25'
50'
1 I
r /
REDDING, C RTIS A /
BK 001447, /G 009£�)
EASEMENT FENCE
J
D
CD +O �
O }.
o
\w� I � L �_ • // _
—I\av' '—
11111111111040.40- .:0-'
rot -
/
------------------
__
BANKFULL -
3
GRADING
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
LIMITS OF
GRADINJG—
/ VROPO�/
ED / KFULL
/ / /
/ / ; /
♦ r _./ //13 ,
\cis
LIMITS OF
19+00 NI
-UT -UT 4/N
•
•
-. -- — ���
I.
//ST AM-PL G ' � �_ --
Aft
L£L- q --
CROSS NNE TYP)
NT FENCE LINE
DDING, CURTIS A
BK 001187, PG 02018
UT
4
LLELLEI
SCALE: 1"= 50'
D gtiSignedbyy i/[4\ iiii‘c_11//z/
Q60 C14994C30j;
26971
FA,
�, Go DPI-\��
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
■ RECORD DRAWING
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
759,619.83
1,736,415.50
727.16
727.09
CROSS VANE
759,519.80
1,736,460.50
725.28
725.29
CROSS VANE
759,445.98
1,736,545.63
723.40
723.32
735
735
73Q
AT
P
S7
ROP
Nn
z
G
00
-r
730
725
72Q
Pd
1
LT
EN
1
LERL
P
ROP
T
A
LW
6
725
720
715
715
15 +50 16
+50 17 +50 18
+50
19
+50
20
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
O
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
cr
CID
�o _w
BULL CHUTE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04M
r
f ALW

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
730
725
720
.\
2C
1_
715
1
71Q
-UT 3- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
759,209.75
1,736,611.53
720.01
720.07
E S� \a P
M P� cNSEE I�����
•
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001187, PG 02018
EDDING, CURTIS A
001447, PG 00980
721\-
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
--------------
D RESTORATION
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
sTA 19+2 ZIT 3C= — — — — 722EASEMENT-FENCE LINE -
STA 21+30 -UT 4-
- -REMOVE. CLAY_EIEE ______
QIL� PARTIALLY
-U 4_ — - - - \ -�� -
2a- O0 - -
♦
•
'\_— ♦
I
I I i `� �� o C
— ���\ __ACROSS VANE (TYP) 1 i 1 _ A
STRE4M PLUG
LIMITS OF I I
GRADING I
REDDING, CURTIS Ann
BK 001856, PG 02361
r�l->
_r
LIMITS QE
—GRADING
//
/ /
/ ,
//
/ ,
/ .
25' 12.5' 0
SELLS
SCALE: 1"= 50'
°- sa
25'
50'
DocuSiined b. A
1089AI3614994C3...�i�
SSSS�=
_ = 26971 = _
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RECORD DRAWING
InI1III I
' II
AS -BUILD II " III 1 I I .I��
IIII1 CENTERLI : 1111i .. ■ r
. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII..IrrII1111r/Illllldi�..n■■■,■r.= - n■111111111111111■■1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
nn ., 1 -- 11 1 1 -111 ii 1 riiiiiie�1='-!■,�U��1111111111111111�IIII/iii1minnimminnummumminiminnimminnummumminimmllllllllllllllllllllllmin
IiIIiiiIIIIIIII�ii111111111iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRII.RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�III�■.Ill�li��lllr■■■■■■■■nrr1111II..rn- ��11����11r.1�111 11�!I,111;;:I!11!!!!l1111 I IIi111::111i 111111�1E �iui:; •GIs-•■■■ P IIII■11!IIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
•
— -- ^r.11 �I.-
111111IIiIII11111111111111111111111114111111111111111;IIIII!I
11.'}.-II■IIII■■■I■-I \■■7I a■I 4II-■----
11111111111111111111111111111111111E111111111111111111111
111111111■C91J■\Is,;,.Jus:wDLILM91111111111111111111jj1111
I, .IILGa7iL1r1IIIIi.F
-I I-J�earc r u P -Son
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIiii1111Fi1iiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!1111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
LOCATIONS
AB Survey
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
Elevation
CROSS VANE
759,155.54
1,736,588.87
718.80
718.82
759,110.05
1,736,595.33
718.14
718.18
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
759,058.88
1,736,599.88
717.44
717.45
CROSS VANE
758,993.93
1,736,588.73
716.58
716.70
758,855.94
1,736,596.88
714.50
714.50
CROSS VANE
CROSS VANE
758,828.36
1,736,603.14
713.96
713.87
I
10111111
I I1111 ! ' I1;1
S
725
0
r
_n
Q
✓4
L
720
715
710
705
2
7
7
a
0
u
0
F
0
00
0
0
N GROUP, P.,
z
PROJECT n
DRAINING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
ems
+50
19
+50
20
+50
21
+50
22
+50
23
+50
24
+ 50
25
AB-04N

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
/'0'v ,EASEMENT //
/ - FENCE LINE ,
i
.' /
-,�5`b/
.i ..
.. i
i
• �\�
i
I
i
POSED ,'
ANKFULL/
•` 26
.v, A
I
♦ ♦� w
♦ ♦ ♦ zw
♦ ♦ I —w
LOG CRc SS I =
♦cam
�- VANE ( ')♦ /
OMITS OF a
GRADING
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001856, PG 02361
•
i
EASEMENT
FENCE LINE
UT 4
25' 12.5' 0
25'
50'
1111111111
SCALE: 1"=50'
es OVN
440/1
O CY4 9 C3..O�
S-55
26971 =
F2\-�
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RECORD DRAWING
-UT 4- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
758,773.81
1,736,601.36
712.84
712.82
CROSS VANE
758,692.57
1,736,621.45
711.26
711.20
725
725
72Q
z
a
c
c
-r
-r
720
715
A
EXST
�'kCY
GRO
WI HALALw
•
715
71Q
705
AS-8
ILT
PRo
CENTERLI
THA
NE
WE
t
710
705
7
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
N GROUP
z
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BYr
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
25 +50 26 +50
AB-040

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
770
765
760
75
75Q
START
STA 0+00 -UT 4A-
START RESTORATION
STA 0+18 -UT 4A-
EASEMENT FENCE LINE .<(
\ \
LIMITS OF \ \
GRADING
ST R
LE
v-
A—
ON
LIMITS OF
GRADING
_ — n r n-, ram-,
— - — 1 \
V `BARR\ BR*E SILY) STEA (TIP)
PE
\ B\ oog265., PG 00 ROSS�/ANFE ( P)
\ \ \ \ \ \ N .
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \\ \ \
\
1.
\ I \
‘PROPOSED
AI{MF U LL\\
\
I:XS
P1i
GR U
THA
ND
M_EG
AS-B
LT
CE
1"
TE
L
E
U
4
A
18
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
PR
OP
PROPOSED BANKFULL
THAI.WE
STR TYPE
CROSS VANE
SILL STEP
SILL STEP
SILL STEP
SILL STEP
SILL STEP
CROSS VANE
SILL STEP
CROSS VANE
SILL STEP
CROSS VANE
SILL STEP
CROSS VANE
SILL STEP
1111111111
25' 12.5' 0
SELLS
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
50'
FDo4Sig nd br, A R /i,,
ii,;,,,t4-i:;;;1/411, , , ,,, </
1089A*14994C3... 1, R
-� S-SS -
_ = 26971
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RECORD DRAWING
-UT 4A-AS-BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
1111111111
NORTHING
760,983.07
760,954.77
760,944.24
760,918.13
760,907.49
760,898.44
760,880.97
760,869.80
760,847.53
760,819.33
760,790.24
760,770.84
760,756.77
760,741.02
IIII~IIII
L
✓r
1111111111
EASTING
1,736,216.46
1,736,208.36
1,736,204.22
1,736,199.74
1,736,197.75
1,736,187.99
1,736,183.47
1,736,177.10
1,736,170.65
1,736,176.11
1,736,170.29
1,736,156.55
1,736,152.03
1,736,122.67
1111111111
1111111111
Prop Elevation
765.54
764.87
764.11
763.04
762.30
761.59
760.84
760.43
759.30
758.74
757.62
756.85
756.17
755.58
1111111111
1111111111
AB Survey
Elevation
765.71
765.08
764.27
763.07
762.43
761.93
760.95
760.27
BUILT / NS
758.75
BUILT / NS
756.88
756.14
755.66
1111111111
770
765
755
750
a
0
z
0
0
z
7
z
0
7
a
5
E-
H
0
0
0
a
0
0
z
0
F
0
0
0
0 0
u
00
a
u
0
0
0
0
z
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04P

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
SPENCER, BARRY BRUCE
BK 002260, PG 002'9
W
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
50'
STA 0+00 -UT 4C-
\ARC
1049& @8V 4g54e3.
= JJ269771 =
yUq 6 �Pv-
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RECORD DRAWING
UT
4
760
755
750
745
74Q
E
S
R
UN
AT RDOU THAIWEG
1
r
t
7A0
755
750
745
740
c�
7
H
O
H
O
0
0
0
O
0
O
z
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
-UT 7- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CR 33 VANE
7C0,50C.34
1,737,233.22
7✓J.25
—
CROSS VANE
760,577.35
1,737,202.79
759.10
758.95
2-99
CROSS VAN
START RESTORATION
STA 0+00 -UT 3A-
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
S-
N
♦
♦
0
PROPOSED BANKFULL
LIMITS OF
GRADING
SPENCER, BARRY BRUCE
BK 002260, PG 00218
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
MILLBROOK TRUST
BK 002571, PG 00308
START ENHANCEMENT III
aTItOSS) E NOT
CONSTRUCTED DUE
TO PROPERTY
LINE CONFLICT
SILL STEP (TYP)
REMOVE DAMS
END RESTORATION
STA 4+18 -UT 3A-
START ENHANCEMENT II
STA 4+18 -UT 3B-
-UT 3- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
CROSS VANE
NORTHING
760,739.57
EASTI NG
1,737,111.71
Prop Elevation
765.07
AB Survey
Elevation
765.20
CROSS VANE
760,718.31
1,737,118.46
764.34
764.51
SILL STEP
SILL STEP
760,673.48
760,630.25
1,737,162.00
1,737,172.83
762.73
762.78
END ENHANCEMENT III
STA 1+36 -UT 7-
STA 2+31 -UT 3A-
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
DROP STRUCTURE
X
REDDING, CURTIS A
K 001447, PG 00980
cF
n
t/1 =
F, F-
M z
m
cn
= LT)
rn -1
mLP
+
CD Q
a
LP
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001416, PG 00154
761.18
761.25
730
SILL STEP
CROSS VANE
760,592.08
760,544.29
1,737,185.73
1,737,176.68
759.67
758.10
759.78
757.81
AR -EMI
A
N
Ct
vrt.NT
r1
SILL STEP
760,488.83
1,737,119.05
756.15
756.20
A Pi+
U
J
•
q
PA
77
71
WAIM
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
50'
S8 CNN
10/
DocuSig d ti 1,1 1
L,A�
.firs ,a111/A ' i I i ,
T 1 9A 1 994Cnq3... LI
= 26971
(
s��c Q-
o�\\\
/y'Uq 1
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RECORD DRAWING
-UT 3- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
AB Survey
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
Elevation
SILL STEP
760,461.65
1,737,118.47
755.09
755.23
760,443.28
1,737,114.89
754.10
754.04
SILL STEP
SILL STEP
760,421.43
1,737,120.43
753.06
753.99
DROP STRUCTURE
760,410.60
1,737,119.64
752.46
DROP STRUCTURE
760,399.36
1,737,113.44
750.98
752.48
N,
770
MJN
r
S
710
- CT-('
i 1 J
nJ
E
T
LE`./
7
UT 'A
58J
760
755
AS-B
W
LT
E
E
RL
E
T
A
1
U
T
7
1
CI I I
J
II
i
CGICII
T
— &OP THALWEG
s
S
T
TA
1
2
33
+3
UT
U
fi
3A-
NU YESIOPAIICN
STA 4+ 3 -UT 3A-
STA- T ENHANCEMENT II
STA 4+ 3 -UT 3B-
750
+50
01
+50
0
+50 01 +50 02
+50 03 +50 04
+50 05
T OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED.
22 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CO
PROJECT .
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04R

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
-UT 3-AS-BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
760,118.82
1,736,981.57
741.82
742.14
CROSS VANE
760,089.87
1,736,967.76
741.23
BUILT /NS
CROSS VANE
760,065.16
1,736,947.51
740.56
740.62
1 CROSS VANE
760,022.32
1,736,923.46
739.34 r
CROSS VANE
759,993.32
1,736,917.71
738.99
739.08
C'y
S
�2\
y�2
_-
O b9L—__ s. s__ L,..
O —_ -
-.
CATTLE GATE
END ENHANCEMENT II
STA 7+24 -UT 3B-
START RESTORATION
EASEMENT FENCE LINESTA 7+24 -UT 3C-
BRIDGE INS LED-i ---
PLACE CF11RZ,S
sss
CATTLE GATE
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001447, PG 00980
FROSS VANE (GYP)
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
�JI1NITS'5F-'-��
-
-IA
-- �- ' -
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001416, PG 00154
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
-Gf pIW�/
' --
-
off - -�/
� '' --
-- i-
off-.
25'
50'
-off
DocuS Reed b�: 1,1 i i/ i T
C.SOLP.A.IVI 141 ///
iosiApdcc<4494-6O
= 26971 = _
,7(1 61
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RECORD DRAWING
UT
3
75
750
•
745
0
745
740
r
u
735
— 1
73Q
E
ND EN
STA
HA
NCEMENT
S,TA"n 24
T
ST
A
UT3b
.STORATI.iN
141-'11 Ulf C
EIJEV=742.99
AT
r
AS
—B
EXST
PROP
G
R
PROP
UILT
CE
UN D
T
H
EG
ALWEG
TE
RUNE
v7-----.\
-
/\
C_
r
f
740
735
730
c
7
a
0
0
P
0
0
0
0
o
z
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
AB-04S

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
-UT 3- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
759,936.81
1,736,864.49
737.15
737.33
CROSS VANE
759,822.33
1,736,856.80
734.75
734.88
CROSS VANE
759,754.48
1,736,844.82
733.19
733.13
CROSS VANE
759,704.27
1,736,827.61
731.98
732.10
CROSS VANE
759,628.21
1,736,824.97
730.23
730.27
CROSS VANE
759,599.83
1,736,786.35
729.13
729.14
CROSS VANE
759,532.58
1,736,793.78
727.61
727.63
eN
__ . _ __738___ 1'_/,
-/
O Px LO-\\_I✓
_ i — - _ x __ _UT
-L
``` `` -
w
U
LIMITS OF
GRADING
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
REDDING, CURTIS A
BK 001447, PG 00980
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
50'
RECORD
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
PROPOSED BANKFULL CROSS VANE (TYP)
3 Do w
/
'♦ .. ��ST'QM PLU-_� �NLL EXISTI
CHANNEL
ROPOSED BANKFULL
EASEMENT FENCE LINE I
UM!AT&T-MI /A RYFA Cf,
ROCK OUTCROP
3
IMITS OF
GRADING
H
DocuSiTdliDY:I III
J3�1d ARoz
1 RD8 .149&166./
= 26971 = _
9696609
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
730
10
+50
11
+50
12
+50
13
+50
14
+50
15
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
NS
C
♦ d�dLL EXISTING �•
.♦A. x CHANNEL
♦ ` i
♦♦ A ' LIMITS OF/
♦• ♦♦ �♦ ♦A GRADII
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
LOG
VANE (TYP)
•
♦
♦ ♦
♦ ,
♦ ��•
♦ ` ♦ �X
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ X \ X
)
♦ ♦ REDDINGCURTIS R
♦ ♦ \ BK 001447XPG 00980 X
♦•♦♦ ♦♦♦ 0 A. EASEMENT FENCE♦`LINE �♦ `
SEE
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
CROSS VANE (TYP)
�►- PROPOSED B, ,NI(FULL
qM
xcJ
25' 12.5' 0
LEILLED
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
50'
DocuSiTv&I iyI I
Al I RO /'�,
ios aQBb1 94 3s - ,
,0 S -QL ' i
26971 =
,s
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
MIPRECORD DRAWING _
-UT 3- AS -BUILT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
AB Survey
Elevation
CROSS VANE
759,481.31
1,736,759.89
726.50
726.50
CROSS VANE
759,439.19
1,736,748.95
725.37
725.35
LOG VANE
759,391.08
1,736,730.12
724.25
BUILT / NS
CROSS VANE
759,343.33
1,736,702.44
723.46
723.51
CROSS VANE
759,278.39
1,736,656.57
721.70
721.78
UT
3
735
735
730
725
z
r
AT
EXST
PR
P
GR
TI
OUN
ALWC
D
G
x
r
72Q
r
FO
r
THALWEG
J
730
725
720
715
AS
B
UILT
E
NTE
R
L
INS
715
7
a
0
0
00
0
0
N GROUP, P.,
z
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
15 +50 16 +50 17 +50 18
AB-04U

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
-`\XX�XXX /_ - -
XXs
MILLBROOK TRUST
BK 002571, PG 00308
SPENCER, BARRY BRUCE
BK 002260, PG 00218
EASEMENT FENCE LINE
STA 0+00 -UT 7-
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
LO
X
AT
P
R
V
25' 12.5' 0
ILLELLE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
25'
DoFVSI ned,D I11 /i�
SS
108 A68i4994C3Q
SsAL
_ = 26971 = _
X // osXc ��Q 0
7/26/2022
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
■ RECORD DRAWING
0
+50

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DF7F384-5229-44F3-936D-33FF129541 C2
DESIGN PLANTING TABLE
Vegetation Association
Piedmont/Low Mountain
Alluvial Forest*
Dry-Mesic Oak-
Mckory Forest*
Stream -side
Assemblage**
TOTAL
Area (acres)
163
6.2
6.0
28.5
Species
# planted*
% of total
# planted*
% of total
# planted**
% of total
# planted
Tag alder (Alnus serrulata)
--
--
--
--
2448
15
2418
River birch (Betula nigra)
1663
15
--
--
2448
15
4111
S43
20
S113
Red bud (Cercis canadensis)
--
--
632
15
--
--
632
Silky dogwood (Corpus amomum)
1663
15
--
--
3264
20
r
4927
Persinmiun (Diospyros virginiana)
--
--
422
10
--
--
422
Mockemut hickory (Carya tomentosa)
--
--
211
5
--
--
211
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
1663
15
--
--
--
--
1663
Sycamore (Platanus occidental's)
2217
20
--
--
3264
20
5481
Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica)
--
--
632
15
--
--
632
Wateroak(Quercusnigra)
2217
20
843
20
1632
10
4692
Willow oak(Quercusphellos)
1663
15
632
15
1632
10
3927
Blackwillow(Salixnigra)
--
--
--
--
1632
10
1632
TOTAL
11084
100
4216
100
16320
100
31620
* Planted at a density of 680 stems/acre.
** Planted at a density of 2720 stems/acre.
RECORD DRAWING
AS -BUILT PLANTING TABLE
Table 6A. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Species
Total
Acres
28.5
Alnus serrulata
2,500
Betula nigra
4,000
Cercis canadensis
600
Carya tomentosa
200
Corpus amomum
5,000
Diospyros virginiana
420
Liriodendron tulipifera
1,700
Nyssa sylvatica
600
Platanus occidentalis
5,500
Quercus nigra
5,500
Quercus phellos
4,000
Salix nigra
1,600
TOTALS
31,620
Average Stems/Acre
1,110
Table 6B. Permanent Seed Mix
Bull Chute Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
Species
Percent of Total Mix
Redtop (Agrostis gigantea)
10%
VA Wild Rye (Elymus virginicus)
15%
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum)
15%
Eastern Gammagrass (Tripsacum dactyloides)
5%
PA Smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum)
5%
Little Bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium)
5%
Soft Rush (Juncus effusus)
5%
Bur Marigold (Bidens cernua)
10%
Lance -leaved Tickseed (Coreopsis lanceolata)
10%
Deertongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum)
10%
Big Bluestem (Andropogon gerardii)
5%
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans)
5%
TOTAL
100%
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
(D
CO
w
0
w
Q
(r
BULL CHUTE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
AS -BUILT PLANTING LIST
PROJECT n
DRAWING NAME:
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET N0.
AB-04W