Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20221050 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220803Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits (along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications) April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* OO Yes 0 No Is this project a public transportation project?* OYes 0No Change only if needed. Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on: 5/6/2022 BIMS # Assigned * 20221050 Is a payment required for this project?* 0 No payment required O Fee received Fee needed - send electronic notification Reviewing Office* Wilmington Regional Office - (910) 796-7215 Information for Initial Review Version#* What amout is owed?* 0 $240.00 O $570.00 Select Project Reviewer* Holley Snider:eads\hasnider la. Name of project: Carolina Beach State Park Wetland Restoration la. Who is the Primary Contact?* North Carolina Coastal Federation - Bree Charron lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:* breet@nccoast.org (252)393-8185 Date Submitted 8/3/2022 Nearest Body of Water Cape Fear River Basin Cape Fear Water Classification SC Site Coordinates Latitude: 34.048862 A. Processing Information Longitude: -77.914603 County (or Counties) where the project is located: New Hanover Is this a NCDMS Project 0Yes ONo Is this project a public transportation project?* 0Yes ONo la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) ❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Has this PCN previously been submitted?* 0 Yes O No 1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? O Nationwide Permit (NWP) 0 Regional General Permit (RGP) 0 Standard (IP) lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? OYes 0No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: O 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular O Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit O Individual 401 Water Quality Certification 27 - Restoration le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* O Yes O No 0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express 0 Riparian Buffer Authorization lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? O Yes O No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? O Yes O No lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? O Yes O No 1i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? O Yes O No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? Yes • No B. Applicant Information 0 Unknown 0Yes ONo OYes 0No ld. Who is applying for the permit? 0 Owner ✓ Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* OYes 0No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: NC Division of Parks and Recreation 2b. Deed book and page no.: 2c. Contact Person: Chris Helms 2d. Address Street Address 1010 State Park Road Address Line 2 City Carolina Beach Postal / Zip Code 28428 2e. Telephone Number: (910)458-8206 2g. Email Address:* j.chris.helms@ncparks.gov 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name: Bree Charron 3b. Business Name: North Carolina Coastal Federation 3c. Address Street Address 3609 NC Highway 24 Address Line 2 City Newport Postal / Zip Code 28570 3d. Telephone Number: (252)393-8185 3f. Email Address:* breet@nccoast.org 4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name: Paul Masten 4b. Business Name: Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC 4c. Address Street Address 2014 Wrightsville Avenue Address Line 2 City Wilmington Postal / Zip Code 28403 4d. Telephone Number: (910)512-1253 4f. Email Address:* p masten @terra inenv. com C. Project Information and Prior Project History State / Province / Region NC Country 2f. Fax Number: State / Province / Region NC Country 3e. Fax Number: State / Province / Region NC Country 4e. Fax Number: 1. Project Information lb. Subdivision name: (if appropriate) lc. Nearest municipality / town: Carolina Beach 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: R09100-002-001-000, R08700-002-001-000 2b. Property size: 130 2c. Project Address Street Address 1010 State Park Road Address Line 2 City Carolina Beach Postal / Zip Code 28428 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: * Cape Fear River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: * SC 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Cape Fear 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030300050704 4. Project Description and History State / Province / Region NC Country 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: * The goal of this project is to develop a restoration plan focused on reducing and controlling a large stand of Phragmites australis that has invaded a freshwater marsh area. Park personnel have been using a combination of burning, cutting and herbicide application to manage the stand with some success but funding for long-term, intensive management is not available. As such, NC Coastal Federation has applied for and received grant funding from the Kerr McGee Superfund settlement to aid in this effort. Historically, the stand has totaled approximately 8-10 acres. During our site visits in October and early February, Park management practices had reduced the aboveground biomass to approximately 5 acres. Native marsh species (Carex spp., Scirpus cyperinus and possibly Typha angustifolia) were observed beginning to recolonize the recently managed areas. Although these management efforts do result in an immediate reduction of the stand, it has always rebounded due to the lack of funding available for consistent treatment activities. Tidal flow into this marsh from the Cape Fear River is limited to the highest monthly tides and/or during high winds blowing from the south, west and southwest. These sporadic flow events enter the marsh from the south beneath an existing footbridge and from the west through a narrow slough that connects to other areas of coastal wetland and eventually the Cape Fear River. Increasing tidal flow is anticipated to help reduce the P. australis stand when coupled with the ongoing management practices being used by Park personnel. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* 0 Yes 0 No ® Unknown 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 69.31 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 5005 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: * The purpose of this project is to reduce and help control invasive Phragmites australis growth occurring within a large wetland area. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* To accomplish the restoration, NC Coastal Federation is proposing to excavate a shallow slough leading from the existing narrow slough mentioned previously. Once the slough is excavated, they will incorporate a planting plan within the slough to mimic the native marsh species observed in the coastal wetland areas. The excavations will range from 6 to 18 inches deep and 40 feet wide at slough bottom, and will be excavated using backhoes and/or excavators with dump trucks hauling the material to an upland storage location. Marsh mats will be used to provide a stable work surface and entry/exit path into the marsh for the excavation equipment and dump trucks. Material stockpiled during the excavations and side slopes of the excavations will be stabilized within the prescribed regulatory timelines. Sidecasting of excavated material into the adjacent marsh is not proposed. Neither temporary nor permanent discharges into marsh areas are proposed. 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? * ® Yes Comments: PJD issued 1/26/22 0 No 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? * 0* Preliminary O Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A Corps AID Number: SAW-2022-00220 Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? 0 Unknown Name (if known): Paul Masten Agency/Consultant Company: Other: Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC 5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR PJD issued 1/26/22 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* O Yes O No Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? No other permits anticipated D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): RI Wetlands O Streams -tributaries EJ Open Waters Cl Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts O Buffers 2a. Site #* (?) 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type* (?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of Jurisdicition* (?) 2g. Impact area* Slough Slough excavation P Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh WA No Both 1.170 (acres) 2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 0.000 2g. Total Wetland Impact 1.170 2i. Comments: 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact 1.170 The proposed permanent impacts are associated with excavation of the proposed slough. No fill is proposed and no loss of wetland is proposed. E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: Approximately 68.14 acres of wetland are being avoided during design. lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: Silt fence will be installed to reduce offsite sedimentation, marsh mats will be used to provide access to the work areas and stable surfaces for excavators and dump trucks, and side casting of excavated spoils will not be occurring. Excavated soils will be stabilized in upland locations and native seeding and a planting plan will be implemented to stabilize and naturalize the slough and adjacent areas. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? O Yes O No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: No temporary or permanent fill to wetlands or Waters of the US is proposed. No loss of wetland is proposed. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 0 Yes O No If no, explain why: The project is not located in a watershed with buffer protection rules 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?* 0 Yes (3 No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? OYes 0No Comments: This is not an NCDOT project and no built -upon area/impervious surfaces are proposed. G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* • Yes O No lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?* O Yes O No Comments: * Project meets the exclusion set for in 15A NCAC 01 C.0409(6) for production of native vegetation to enhance fish and wildlife habitat. 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)2* O Yes No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* O Yes O No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project will not result in additional development in order for it to function properly in the future. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* 0Yes 0No*N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* O Yes O No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* 0 Yes : No 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* 0 Yes 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? 0Yes ONo O No Unknown 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? OYes 0No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? 0Yes ONo 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?` OYes 0No 5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? 0Yes ®No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS species list for New Hanover County was included and discussed with USFWS personnel during a pre -application meeting on 5/6/22. No impacts to federally -listed species are anticipated. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* O Yes O No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?* NCDMF interactive GIS mapping 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? * O Yes U No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* NCSHPO HPOWEB 2.0 interactive GIS mapping 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* O Yes O No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No permanent structures are proposed 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* NC FRIS website mapping Miscellaneous Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred. Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document PJD Request - Carolina Beach State Park Habitat Restoration.pdf 6.09MB final signed tear sheet Carolina Beach State Park PJD.pdf 175.76KB final counter signed PJD form with maps.pdf 5.92MB CBSP_SitePlan_0727.pdf 3.84MB File must be PDF or KMZ Comments The PJD Request Package and issued PJD have been attached. The PJD Package, prepared by Terrain Environmental, includes figures showing wetland/upland boundaries and CAMA areas. A site plan, prepared by NC Coastal Federation, showing the slough location with a typical cross-section has been included. Signature RI By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: • The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and • The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time. • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Paul Masten Signature Oradave Date 8/3/2022 1- 4o 1. :133HS JMQ f OHd ZZ/LZ/LO :31vo „L 0 ONIMVaa 1VNI00,1O NO HONI 3N0 SI NV8 31 V OS AdItiln NMOHS SV 31VOS N O Ln m rvD w z 00 w z 0o 1-,• 00 N 00 Ln v 0 co H 0 VZ ,IMH 609E ZLtI-3# 3SN3JI1 Wild NOIJ V O±S821 CINV-118M N` 7d ONIIN` 7d ?Rd NOIIV1303A 3AIIVN (•du) 3aV 0 0NI1SIX3 01 30VNI`d2IG 3AI1IS0d ONV N0I1ISNV 1 H1001AIS 32IfSNl ,1010VellN00 SNOIlVOIHIO]dS GNd SNd1d 2:I3d 30NV9 flISI0 AO SlIWI1 SSVWOI9 10V j f1S ONINIVIAI ,&NV 1A01Al]ez1 ` ]eiV S1IWOVeiHd )12IVd 81b1S H0b88 VNI-1O21NO z 0 H m J��IVGNfli T-4) 1IV130 eI3d 30N3d 11IS -11V±SNI iO N`d 8 em11S I0 J0 S11 W 11 31V W IXO ezI d dV TERRAIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING January 20, 2022 US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Attention: Mr. Brad Shaver Subject: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Carolina Beach State Park Habitat Restoration Carolina Beach State Park Carolina Beach, NC Dear Mr. Shaver: Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC (TEC) is requesting a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination at the above -referenced site on behalf of the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation. It is our understanding that the North Carolina Coastal Federation intends to undertake habitat restoration projects at the park as part of the Kerr-McGee Site Superfund settlement. The site consists of an approximately 130-acre portion of two parcels identified as New Hanover County Parcel IDs R08700-002-001-000 and R09100-002-001-000. Our site visits were conducted from October 11 to November 4, 2021. The following documentation has been provided in support of this request: • Jurisdictional Determination Request Form • Appendix 2 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form • Agent Authorization • Figure 1 — Site Vicinity • Figure 2 — Project Site • Figure 3 — USGS Topography • Figure 4 — Soils • Figure 5 — Waters of the US • Wetland and Upland data forms CLOSING If you have any questions, require additional information, or wish to schedule a site meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Paul Masten, LSS, PWS President/Owner Jurisdictional Determination Request US Army Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by assigned counties can be found on-line at: http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx, by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager. ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number: (828) 271-7980 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 General Number: (919) 554-4884 Fax Number: (919) 562-0421 WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 General Number: (910) 251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 General Number: 910-251-4633 Fax Number: (910) 251-4025 INSTRUCTIONS: All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G. NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H. NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s) authorized agent to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Version: May 2017 Page 1 Jurisdictional Determination Request A. PARCEL INFORMATION Street Address: State Park Road City, State: Carolina Beach, NC County: New Hanover Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): R08700-002-001 -000, R09100-002-001-000 B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Mailing Address: 2014 Wrightsville Avenue Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Select one: o ❑ EI o Wilmington, NC 28403 910-512-1253 pmasten@terrainenv.com I am the current property owner. I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant' Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase Other, please explain. C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2 Name: NC Division of Parks and Recreation Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: 1010 State Park Road Carolina Beach, NC 28428 910-458-8206 j.chris.helms@ncparks.gov 1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter. 2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record). Version: May 2017 Page 2 Jurisdictional Determination Request D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4 By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on - site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Paul Masten Print Name Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agents Date Signature E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable) I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources. n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process. ❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. ❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization. I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. ❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. n Other: 3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. 4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a continuation sheet. 5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s). Version: May 2017 Page 3 Jurisdictional Determination Request F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One) I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property. PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is "preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do not expire. I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years (subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05- 02). I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision. G. ALL REQUESTS n Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the review area. Size of Property or Review Area 130 acres. ❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site. Version: May 2017 Page 4 Jurisdictional Determination Request H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS z Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34.048862 Longitude: -77.914603 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area. Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been reviewed and approved).6 • North Arrow • Graphical Scale • Boundary of Review Area • Date • Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary assessment reach. For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations: • Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features. • Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries, impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary, open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear length of each of these features as appropriate. • Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non - jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e. "Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage or linear length of these features as appropriate. For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations: • Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404, Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and linear length of these features as appropriate. n Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region (at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type) 6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit- Pro gram/Jurisdiction/ Version: May 2017 Page 5 Jurisdictional Determination Request 0 Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form • PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the Aquatic Resource Table • AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) Landscape Photos (if taken) NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms Other Assessment Forms ' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/ Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website. Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued. Version: May 2017 Page 6 Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: New Hanover City: Carolina Beach Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 34.048862 Long.: -77.914603 Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Cape Fear River E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: • Field Determination. Date(s): October 11 - November 4, 2021 TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION. Site number Latitude (decimal degrees) Longitude (decimal degrees) Estimated amount of aquatic resource in review area (acreage and linear feet, if applicable) Type of aquatic resource (i.e., wetland vs. non -wetland waters) Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource "may be" subject (i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404) WA 34.048862 -77.914603 68.73 ac wetland Section 404 WB 34.049371 -77.917524 0,31 ac wetland Section 404 WC 34.046451 -77.920143 0,27 ac wetland Section 404 SA 34.047413 -77.920596 2, 976 If non -wetland water Section 10/404 SB 34.051199 -77.916053 2, 029 If non -wetland water Section 10/404 1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: ■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: Figures 1-5 O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Carolina Beach 1:24000 O Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) ■❑ Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map or n Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determi nations. Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: • Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: Figures 1-5 • Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. • U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Carolina Beach 1:24000 ❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑■ Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map or n Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determi nations. Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD Digitally signed by Paul Masten Date: 2022.01.20 09:17:52 -05'00' Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)' 1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. Letter of Authorization I, James C. Helms, with North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation authorize Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC to act as our limited agent to coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality for the purposes of jurisdictional delineations and regulatory agency coordination with the Carolina Beach State Park Habitat Restoration project site located in Carolina Beach, NC. Authorization will terminate on either final agency action or upon written notification from either party involved. Client name: North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation Contact name: James C. Helms, Park Superintendent Client Address: 1010 State Park Road, Carolina Beach, North Carolina 28428 Client Phone: (910) 458-8206 Client Email: j.chris.helms@ncparks.gov 2„ 2Z Date FIGURES lrla 0 ee1e,4wbq 8E Long beach oa►Island LeVnd r�o.wn nas4 pl 04. Se e P ipri q I-atp .w Or I L Soulhpon 4� t rr Stymy Pole r.11ilary • L»e 1.unlV,..l wind rigor --p., R•„y r x .• 0 1 Per. 0. WOO. h Stap ate gl.er d.�111 o �eT�11>•e°`F4 1 6 *rile Greve Carol Ina Beach ]Lure Beach wrlgHtooIlle Beach Arlinllr Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esn (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Carolina Beach State Park Carolina Beach, NC Miles 0 3 New Hanover January 2022 NAD83 NC StatePlane This map is for reference only. ...._ -- • • - 8D1 j (0.9\V‘,- Ctart - - . - ...• Carolina Beach State Park Marina _ r_.---- _ ...,. 1 . .. ..., • ' . . le ' •' /' ' , t t :'e - • ' . . St •,, , 11' , • — i,.: _ f•I. 1•\ ' ., 4 ri ie '1.• • 0° ‘. , •:' '?), 4 ' - .-.'h%* Or 0, • ,,, t / . . • i le , i .CD js, \ _ .. .•. ,_ A.. . . ,, • ' _ • . ....,„, - , r " 1 NatUre . till 3 , ..,.• , ,::.. .. . .._ , , Ar „. . . twill • -ie. it * ' .i' ' . , ,:. i h• , , - • s;, .F. ' . (.) ...,..N• . V ; • • -• bi- . ,.. _ 4.. 1 04 3 %I.-1 , .• .• . . t ' ‘... If 4• , ( . . . ' f r n ;• '. ,. ••••• - f . - . . ,I. 4 ''-'- • 4-... i •4 " - 1 • it+.,.' I -Legend ? • ' . 4,10 , ir"..4,;,. ' ,• ' i 1 Vitri '. \4 A Project Site .14,0, \ • --. • ._ t• _ S _ .AL. 4' '43 er 0 EN • A,. e- 4(i k 1, Figure 2 - Project Site ii400440-imiultra•igrA .,eikteezalevaavampti.-wou r Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Carolina Beach State Park W 1 isiaislovi, 4.,111111V 1 = New HanoverPIIN Al Carolina Beach, NC ,-.,--. Feet January 2022 ....-+ 0 1 ,0 0 0 NAD83 NC StatePlane ---...--,—..- This map is for reference only CONSUL-MI6 0000•91° NORTH CAROLINA Intracoastal Waterway Intracoastal Waterway Service Layer Credits: USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Figure 3 - USGS Topography Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Carolina Beach State Park Carolina Beach, NC 0 Feet 600 New Hanover January 2022 NAD83 NC StatePlane This map is for reference only. At-441W \N" , • Nt , TM .. , _..... . _ W _ -- , • _...-— I .,, , .k ... .• •• . TMJ- • 4-"-•'. , . .. .. r — e TM • 7,- ----4-V.:.% , ..., , ,. •... .. - , f 'La Will* 'A N ''• . ..',4: a .- .-- L. —. li V +•., i/ 1,,,,, '44 . ok ,,,c• \,. ..,.,., / , . f• "f I, ..." • 44, . •ne. , ' 4 . DO . lb Ly . , •„ ,,,„ ., , P - , , ' II . ' • e Be . 1 fifi_ 41g,e .riersClegrelfteeH .. . . 4. . ,.. '.. le , A . . .e 41'' • l_e '''',. , ••• , ' ,Ict ' •• , r . .. ,Lt ,I. . ' . . * . **.'''. .. .""0......./.... .-... 'i 7 e • , • -..,. Le 1 ,,., t' •-k 7 • r x•:, , t. , , .-,,,, . ( , ., c. ,''' iRm T„6.-.....s TM m . -:-- - •.,,- - , Ar' 0., , . . •• . 114 , -•• , . ' ''. , '-f.!:: ' `+'i'• . - r , V 41, 'X Ipi ._ . N• f t•%. •.... .: Le . . ' • ''/' • -.41' W'.. r ...• 0K,, ,‘. --4.' r ,ft. .).r. . , . e ; , R Rm, . 4+ - ' ,k- ' 11111 - Rm 4.F.o e- Figure 4 -Web Soil Survey ohlom•amiAlit 14 itiA -ittit'lentorgek-Ati 0,e40:21Kievaa.10..41-o- r•gi. Wgif Wi( -P r• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Carolina Beach State Park IO moos, isk = New Hanover la Wit( rip N Carolina Beach, NC ,-.,-- <•.--:*, January 2022 ....--,.. Feet NAD83 NC StatePlane ---...--,.._...-— This map is for reference only CONSUL-MI6 0 600 • L�ti.. Snows CUI�+ +��y- .... •_r-- ..-. .r.. A�� _ • :nY .. -i� ill .L ,,,. , . _ ••. . _ .., _. _ . _ d_. _ , • .,.. • , . _ _ ,0•1‘•iii - .. , .... — -- -- .- _ - -• ,.,;-: , .,--•_ ;., , , --.- -%ey."n „ . "" 111* - _ �/ - A l - - 1 N. 11 ' 1 t WA I ...). : 4 IiiilliNW B 40 ,..-a.4„. iit +. WA Wet (2c. : ' r r I I. rli WA ' - i iir it j • ° Nat '' tier : t` Cape Fear River ��- . A WC / /191)11'4— Ar - WA.. WA Wet (3) n; 3 i • *Ali „„1-.. , ,,-- 1 ;'* - - .7, 1{ a ram: s i d ' .i ;; : fi . 1 T �f . It'' - t *.y.......... Legend JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION N TERRAIN Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request �\ Figure 5 , L Project Site Normal High Water Line Culvert '�4f• ENVIRONIVIENTAL Carolina Beach State Park CONSULTING Wetland High Marsh Carolina Beach, NC Feet 0 200 400 January 2022 Coastal Wetland + Data Points Source:NC One Map WETLAND/UPLAND DATA FORMS WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park city/county: New Hanover Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation Sampling Date: 11/3/21 State: NC Sampling Point: WA Wet (1) Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage way Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.045561 Long: -77.917194 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland - Typic Quartzipsamments NWI classification: upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) ✓ Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 3 inches Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 2 inches (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA Wet (1) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Baccharis halimifolia Morella cerifera Pinus taeda Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. Spartina alterniflora 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 40 Yes FAC 20 Yes FAC 5 No FAC 65 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13 40 Yes OBL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 40 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA Wet (1) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-9 10YR 2/2 100 9-18 2.5Y 5/2 100 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 MS M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture sand sand Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Remarks mucky modified 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/3/21 Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation State: NC Sampling Point: WA Up (1) Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.04539 Long: -77.917212 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland - Typic Quartzipsamments NWI classification: upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA Up (1) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1 Quercus virginiana 2. Liquidambar styraciflua 3. Quercus laurifolia 4. Carya glabra Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 40 10 10 10 Yes No No No FACU FAC FACW FACU 5. 6. 70 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Ilex vomitoria Pinus taeda Baccharis halimifolia 50% of total cover: 37.5 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 40 = Total Cover Graminaea 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 40 Yes FAC 20 Yes FAC 15 Yes FAC 75 = Total Cover 15 20% of total cover: 40 Yes FAC 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA Up (1) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-2 10YR 4/3 50 2-18 2.5Y 6/3 100 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 10YR 7/1 50 D M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks sand sand Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 10/11/21 State: NC Sampling Point: WA Wet (2) Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.048862 Long: -77.914603 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Dorovan - Typic Haplosaprists NWI classification: PFO1 Cd Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test ✓ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 2 inches Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0 inches (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA Wet (2) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. Nyssa biflora 5 No OBL 3. 4. 5. 6. 55 = Total Cover Acer rubrum Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 50 Yes FAC 50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover: 11 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. Pinus taeda 10 3. 4. 5. 6. Ilex vomitoria 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 20 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. Polygonum plebeium Yes Yes FAC FAC 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 2. Saururus cernuus 3. Liquidambar styraciflua 4. Symphyotrichum sp. 55 Yes FACW 15 No OBL 10 No FAC 5 No FACW 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 85 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA Wet (2) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-3 7.5YR 2/2 100 3-18 2.5Y 4/1 80 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 MS M 7.5YR 3/4 20 C PL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture muck clay loam Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Remarks 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park city/county: New Hanover Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation Sampling Date: 10/11/21 State: NC Sampling Point: WA Up (2) Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2-3 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.04888 Long: -77.914754 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Dorovan - Typic Haplosaprists NWI classification: upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA Up (2) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. Pinus taeda 30 ft ) 2. Acer rubrum 3. Quercus nigra 4. 5. 6. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 40 Yes FAC 20 Yes FAC 10 No FAC 70 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. Ilex vomitoria 80 Yes FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA Up (2) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-11 7.5YR 3/2 100 11-16 2.5Y 2.5/1 80 16-18 2.5Y 4/1 70 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 2.5Y 4/2 20 D M 7.5YR 3/4 30 c M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks sand <70% coated sand grains sand clay loam Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swamp Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Soil Map Unit Name: Leon - Aeric Alaquods Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? City/county: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/2/21 State: NC Sampling Point: WA Wet (3) Section, Township, Range: Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Lat: 34.045561 Long: -77.917194 Slope (%): 0 Datum: NAD 83 NWI classification: upland No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ✓ No No No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 2 inches Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0 inches (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA Wet (3) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. Acer rubrum 2. Nyssa biflora 3. Liquidambar styraciflua 4. Pinus taeda Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 30 Yes FAC 30 Yes OBL 15 No FAC 15 No FAC 5. 6. 90 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Nyssa biflora 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 25 Yes OBL 25 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. Arundinaria tecta 20 Yes FACW 2. Pinus taeda 3. Morella cerifera 4. Persea borbonia 5. 6. 15 Yes FAC 5 No FAC 5 No FACW 45 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. Carex sp. 90 Yes FACW 2. Lyonia lucida 5 No FACW 3. Persea borbonia 5 No FACW 4. Morella cerifera 5 No FAC 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 105 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 52.5 20% of total cover: 21 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA Wet (3) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-5 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 5-10 2.5Y 3/1 100 10-18 2.5Y 3/2 100 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 MS M MS M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks muck sand sand Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Soil Map Unit Name: Leon - Aeric Alaquods Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? City/county: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11 /2/21 State: NC Sampling Point: WA Up (3) Section, Township, Range: Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Lat: 34.04539 Long: -77.917212 Slope (%): 1-2 Datum: NAD 83 NWI classification: upland No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Yes Yes No No No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 12 inches (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA Up (3) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1 Pinus taeda 30 ft ) 2. Pinus palustris 3. Quercus laurifolia 4. Persea palustris 5. 6. Sapling Stratum (Plot size: Quercus nigra Absolute % Cover 40 20 15 10 Dominant Indicator Species? Status Yes FAC Yes FACU No FACW No FACW 85 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 47.5 20% of total cover: 17 30 ft ) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 5 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. Morella cerifera 5 3. 4. 5. 6. Persea borbonia 10 Yes FAC 10 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 2 15 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 97 = Total Cover Arundinaria tecta Yes Yes FACW FAC 20 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Ilex glabra Lyonia lucida Ilex vomitoria Andropogon virginica 60 Yes FACW 20 Yes FACW 10 No FACW 5 No FAC 2 No FAC 50% of total cover: 48.5 20% of total cover: 19.4 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA Up (3) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-3 10YR 2/1 100 3-10 2.5Y 3/1 100 10-18 2.5Y 4/2 95 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 7.5YR 4/6 5 c M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks sand <70% coated sand grains sand <70% coated sand grains sand <70% coated sand grains Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park city/county: New Hanover Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation Sampling Date: 11/3/21 State: NC Sampling Point: WB Wet Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.049371 Long: -77.917524 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Dorovan - Typic Haplosaprists NWI classification: upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 10 inches Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 6 inches (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WB Wet Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC 2. Magnolia grandiflora 5 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. 15 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. Ilex vomitoria 20 Yes FAC 2. Pinus taeda 5 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. Polygonum plebeium 25 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5 30 Yes FACW 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WB Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-4 10YR 2/1 100 4-13 10YR 3/1 100 13-18 10YR 4/2 60 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 10YR 3/1 40 Ms M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks sand >70% coated sand grains sand sand Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/3/21 Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation State: NC Sampling Point: WB Up Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1-2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.049462 Long: -77.917622 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland - Typic Quartzipsamments NWI classification: upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WB Up Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status 1. Quercus laurifolia 5 Yes FACW 2. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. Juniperus virginiana 5 Yes FACU 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 2 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. Ilex vomitoria 45 Yes FAC 5 = Total Cover 5 1 20% of total cover: 2. Pinus taeda 5 No FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. 50 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. Ilex vomitoria 5 Yes FAC 2. Pinus taeda 5 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WB Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-4 10YR 3/2 100 4-10 10YR 4/2 100 10-18 10YR 6/3 100 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks sand <70% coated sand grains sand <70% coated sand grains sand Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/4/21 Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression & floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.046451 Long: -77.920143 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Kureb - Spodic Quartzipsamments State: NC Sampling Point: WC Wet NWI classification: upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test ✓ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 4 inches Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 3 inches (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WC Wet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Baccharis hamilifolia Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 60 = Total Cover Scirpus cyperinus 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 60 Yes FAC 60 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12 Carex sp Polygonum plebeium Leersia oryzoides 40 Yes OBL 10 No FACW 5 No FACW 5 No OBL 50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WC Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-2 7.5YR 2.5/1 100 2-12 2.5Y 3/1 100 12-18 2.5Y 5/2 100 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 MS M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks fibric organic sand >70% coated sand grains sand Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/4/21 Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation State: NC Sampling Point: WC Up Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope in floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.046363 Long: -77.920078 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Kureb - Spodic Quartzipsamments NWI classification: upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D5) (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated ✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns ✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 10 inches Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 9 inches (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WC Up Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. Morella cerifera 2. Ilex vomitoria 3. Baccharis hamilifolia 4. Pinus taeda 5. Quercus minima 6. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 15 Yes 15 Yes FAC FAC 10 Yes FAC 5 No 5 No FAC FAC 50 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 1. Arundinaria tecta 40 Yes FACW 2. Graminaea spp 20 Yes FAC 3. Pteridium aquilinum 10 No FACU 4. Juniperus viginiana 10 No FACU 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 0 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WC Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-5 10YR 2/1 100 5-13 2.5Y 4/1 100 13-18 10YR 5/2 100 Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 MS M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al ) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Texture Remarks sand <70% coated sand grains sand <70% coated sand grains sand Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 Electronically Transmitted U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. SAW-2022-00220 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Carolina Beach NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Requestor: NC Division of Parks and Recreation Chris Helms Address: 1010 State Park Road Carolina Beach, NC 28428 E-mail: j.chris.helms4,ncparks.gov Size (acres) 130 Nearest Town Sea Breeze Nearest Waterway Cape Fear River River Basin Cape Fear USGS HUC 03030005 Coordinates Latitude: 34.048862 Longitude: -77.914603 Location description: The project area is located off State Park Road to the south of the Park Marina within Carolina Beach State Park in Carolina beach. Indicate Which of the Following Apply: A. Preliminary Determination ® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated January 2022. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction deteunination may be used in the peunit evaluation process, including detei,�ining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a peunit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the peunitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary deteunination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. ❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the peunit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary deteunination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps. B. Approved Determination ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the peunit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the peunit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps. SAW-2022-00220 ❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years. ❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808 to deteunine their requirements. Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army peunit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Aitny permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-251-4611 or brad.e.shaver(a(usace.army.mil. C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated 01/26/2022. D. Remarks: This determination was made via desktop. E. Attention USDA Program Participants This delineation/deteunination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/detei,uination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland deteunination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B. above) If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this deteunination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: US Auuy Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin Administrative Appeal Review Officer 60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803 AND PHILIP.A. SHANNIN(a(USACE.ARMY.MIL SAW-2022-00220 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must deteunine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA foul', it must be received at the above address by Not applicable. **It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the deteunination in this correspondence.** Digitally signed by Brad Brad Shaver Shaver Date: 2022.01.26 11:11:07 Corps Regulatory Official: 05'00' Date of JD: 01/26/2022 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/. Copy Furnished(electronic): Terrain Environmental Consulting attn: Paul Masten NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND REQUEST FOR APPEAL Applicant: Helms NC Division of Parks and Recreation, Chris File Number: SAW-2022-00220 Date: 01/26/2022 Attached is: See Section below INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B PERMIT DENIAL C APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION I - The following identifies your rights and options information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx regarding an administrative appeal E of the above decision. x SECTION Additional or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information Corps to reevaluate the JD. to the Corps regarding the JD (which may be appealed), for further consideration by the PERMIT 1 SECTION II - RE • , . T FOR APP CTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POINT OF CONTACT FOR=UESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal process you may contact: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn: Brad Shaver Wilmington Regulatory Office U.S Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also contact: MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER CESAD-PDS-O 60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803 PHONE: (404) 562-5136; FAX (404) 562-5138 EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(a�USACE.ARMY.MIL RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi ations. Date: Telephone number: Signature of appellant or agent. For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Brad Shaver, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to: Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 1/26/2022 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Carolina Beach State Park C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, CB State Park, SAW-2022-00220 D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: New Hanover City: Carolina Beach Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 34.048862 Long.: -77.914603 Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Cape Fear River E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): X Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 1/26/2022 ■❑ Field Determination. Date(s): October 11 - November 4, 2021 Site visit by consultant only. TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION. Site number Latitude (decimal degrees) Longitude (decimal degrees) Estimated amount of aquatic resource in review area (acreage and linear feet, if applicable) Type of aquatic resource (i.e., wetland vs. non -wetland waters) Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource "may be" subject (i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404) WA 34.048862 -77.914603 68.73 ac wetland Section 404 WB 34.049371 -77.917524 0,31 ac wetland Section 404 WC 34.046451 -77.920143 0.27 ac wetland Section 404 SA 34.047413 -77.920596 2, 976 If non -wetland water Section 10/404 SB 34.051199 -77.916053 2, 029 If non -wetland water Section 10/404 1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "maybe"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "maybe" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: ❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: Figures 1-5 O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Carolina Beach 1:24000 O Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑■ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map or ❑ Other (Name & Date): n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: n Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Brad Shave Digitally signed by Brad Shaver r Date: 2022.01.26 11:15:37 -05'00' Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD Digitally signed by Paul Masten Date: 2022.01.20 09:18:55 -05'00' Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)' 1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. /^1 _�tl+er King Jr r*Pt ivia Dantorearise SE 5\a untl Dr Long Beach ,c y 1innabow .1. I -I Ind Fun Mon Rd SE 4 Baling Spring Lakes Leland eC.. O° ee4 RdS Southport [133 Sunny Point • Military Ocean Terminal O Pant ens* yYPlace 0r _ to wlnting I - fe i cietride$t Mg/itseilfa P'• Seagate pne oleander Dr Pe o Greeriy�/le \.°oQ St L, "m Nohoa„ to \ y Myrtle Grove .1c III Caul fear River Bain rP l Carolina Beach Kure Beach Masonboro Project Site Wrightsville Beach Atlantic Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Carolina Beach State Park Carolina Beach, NC Miles 0 3 New Hanover January 2022 NAD83 NC StatePlane This map is for reference only. Ai,sTion _ , Carolina Beach State Park Marin; � , ,` Is A e 4 q F _ �, " lk ILI o y nna f a 0 h' k+ (, a a .,,,,A1:40,,, , ili.i,„ 47 k ' Legend t . �, . .. t Project Site ,,= �r � V/4,O <P '' i1�°ha..� 1 fir 1' is 4,, Figure 2 - Project Site ���►��VINr►r:ov.44f \��� �� �� Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request "=���'�"��'eis:islovi';�1 1��( )��i( Carolina Beach State Park N _ New Hanover�•� 1`ll00 ��j� Carolina Beach, NC M^ Feet January 2022 �^^ NAD83 NC StatePlane -�---�i 0 ,000 This map is for reference only. CONSULTING NORTH CAROLINA Waterway Wute`'' Intracoastal Water Service Layer Credits: USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Figure 3 - USGS Topography Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Carolina Beach State Park Carolina Beach, NC 0 Feet 600 New Hanover January 2022 NAD83 NC StatePlane This map is for reference only. r 4` TM `'� 1 ..--••_- 'TM «- - i' �i. ` La fi , , 4,44: saran " / AN # Sit* 7,:, TNI DO lkil( r; , �. � Ly r I t ' Le F ;v # xQ / '- t. t Le �. t1' <.' r _ . TM Ir., 31,,0,,E t i. L Rm r k R Rrm!. ` .. / 9 IttY Rm ENS \� ''Po ��P �� Figure 4 -Web Soil Survey +��"�'�R"`�"��:�'��"`% ��\�\ �� %„ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request "=,k♦'�kieva's,��#` i1 1��� 1���i� Carolina Beach State Park N New Hanover�•� 11��j� Carolina Beach, NC M^ % January �^^ Feet NAD83 NC StatePlane2022 �-- �i This map is for reference only. C°NSULTING 0 600 S ——_,- t Snows Cut_-_.=P- - // f d gr.' � `/' WA > E t re` a:, • \ a * o ,k't .f '' 'ABo +WA Wet(2 -- -WA WA % ,t N. ik f - otiiiiiii''' 4';'1.4,,,_. ., ,-7-.A.e."-le Cape Fear River % '' . %'. � s. 1.. .qP y k y. r= a 14 TERRAIN Legend JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION N ProjectSite —Normal High Water Line Culvert Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Figure 5 rl, ENVIRONMENTALCarolina Beach state Park °%Co N S U LTI N G Wetland 'High Marsh Carolina Beach,NC Feet 0 200 400 January 2022 Coastal Wetland + Data Points Source:NC One Map