HomeMy WebLinkAbout20221050 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220803Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
0 No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/6/2022
BIMS # Assigned *
20221050
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Wilmington Regional Office - (910) 796-7215
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
0 $240.00
O $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Holley Snider:eads\hasnider
la. Name of project:
Carolina Beach State Park Wetland Restoration
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
North Carolina Coastal Federation - Bree Charron
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
breet@nccoast.org (252)393-8185
Date Submitted
8/3/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Cape Fear River
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
SC
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.048862
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-77.914603
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
New Hanover
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
OYes 0No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
O Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
O Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
27 - Restoration
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes • No
B. Applicant Information
0 Unknown
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner ✓ Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
NC Division of Parks and Recreation
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Chris Helms
2d. Address
Street Address
1010 State Park Road
Address Line 2
City
Carolina Beach
Postal / Zip Code
28428
2e. Telephone Number:
(910)458-8206
2g. Email Address:*
j.chris.helms@ncparks.gov
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Bree Charron
3b. Business Name:
North Carolina Coastal Federation
3c. Address
Street Address
3609 NC Highway 24
Address Line 2
City
Newport
Postal / Zip Code
28570
3d. Telephone Number:
(252)393-8185
3f. Email Address:*
breet@nccoast.org
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Paul Masten
4b. Business Name:
Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC
4c. Address
Street Address
2014 Wrightsville Avenue
Address Line 2
City
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28403
4d. Telephone Number:
(910)512-1253
4f. Email Address:*
p masten @terra inenv. com
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Carolina Beach
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
R09100-002-001-000, R08700-002-001-000
2b. Property size:
130
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1010 State Park Road
Address Line 2
City
Carolina Beach
Postal / Zip Code
28428
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Cape Fear River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
SC
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300050704
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The goal of this project is to develop a restoration plan focused on reducing and controlling a large stand of Phragmites australis that has invaded a freshwater marsh area. Park personnel
have been using a combination of burning, cutting and herbicide application to manage the stand with some success but funding for long-term, intensive management is not available. As
such, NC Coastal Federation has applied for and received grant funding from the Kerr McGee Superfund settlement to aid in this effort.
Historically, the stand has totaled approximately 8-10 acres. During our site visits in October and early February, Park management practices had reduced the aboveground biomass to
approximately 5 acres. Native marsh species (Carex spp., Scirpus cyperinus and possibly Typha angustifolia) were observed beginning to recolonize the recently managed areas.
Although these management efforts do result in an immediate reduction of the stand, it has always rebounded due to the lack of funding available for consistent treatment activities.
Tidal flow into this marsh from the Cape Fear River is limited to the highest monthly tides and/or during high winds blowing from the south, west and southwest. These sporadic flow events
enter the marsh from the south beneath an existing footbridge and from the west through a narrow slough that connects to other areas of coastal wetland and eventually the Cape Fear
River. Increasing tidal flow is anticipated to help reduce the P. australis stand when coupled with the ongoing management practices being used by Park personnel.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes 0 No ® Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
69.31
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
5005
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to reduce and help control invasive Phragmites australis growth occurring within a large wetland area.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
To accomplish the restoration, NC Coastal Federation is proposing to excavate a shallow slough leading from the existing narrow slough mentioned previously. Once the slough is
excavated, they will incorporate a planting plan within the slough to mimic the native marsh species observed in the coastal wetland areas. The excavations will range from 6 to 18 inches
deep and 40 feet wide at slough bottom, and will be excavated using backhoes and/or excavators with dump trucks hauling the material to an upland storage location. Marsh mats will be
used to provide a stable work surface and entry/exit path into the marsh for the excavation equipment and dump trucks. Material stockpiled during the excavations and side slopes of the
excavations will be stabilized within the prescribed regulatory timelines. Sidecasting of excavated material into the adjacent marsh is not proposed. Neither temporary nor permanent
discharges into marsh areas are proposed.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
® Yes
Comments:
PJD issued 1/26/22
0 No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0* Preliminary O Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-00220
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
0 Unknown
Name (if known): Paul Masten
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
PJD issued 1/26/22
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No other permits anticipated
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
RI Wetlands O Streams -tributaries
EJ Open Waters Cl Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
O Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Slough
Slough excavation
P
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
WA
No
Both
1.170
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
1.170
2i. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
1.170
The proposed permanent impacts are associated with excavation of the proposed slough. No fill is proposed and no loss of wetland is proposed.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Approximately 68.14 acres of wetland are being avoided during design.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fence will be installed to reduce offsite sedimentation, marsh mats will be used to provide access to the work areas and stable surfaces for
excavators and dump trucks, and side casting of excavated spoils will not be occurring. Excavated soils will be stabilized in upland locations and native
seeding and a planting plan will be implemented to stabilize and naturalize the slough and adjacent areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
No temporary or permanent fill to wetlands or Waters of the US is proposed. No loss of wetland is proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
0 Yes O No
If no, explain why:
The project is not located in a watershed with buffer protection rules
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
0 Yes (3 No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
OYes 0No
Comments:
This is not an NCDOT project and no built -upon area/impervious surfaces are proposed.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
• Yes O No
lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
O Yes O No
Comments: *
Project meets the exclusion set for in 15A NCAC 01 C.0409(6) for production of native vegetation to enhance fish and wildlife habitat.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)2*
O Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional development in order for it to function properly in the future.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0Yes 0No*N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes O No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
0 Yes : No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0Yes ONo
O No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ONo
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?`
OYes 0No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0Yes ®No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS species list for New Hanover County was included and discussed with USFWS personnel during a pre -application meeting on 5/6/22. No
impacts to federally -listed species are anticipated.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes O No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NCDMF interactive GIS mapping
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
O Yes U No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO HPOWEB 2.0 interactive GIS mapping
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No permanent structures are proposed
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC FRIS website mapping
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PJD Request - Carolina Beach State Park Habitat Restoration.pdf 6.09MB
final signed tear sheet Carolina Beach State Park PJD.pdf 175.76KB
final counter signed PJD form with maps.pdf 5.92MB
CBSP_SitePlan_0727.pdf 3.84MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
The PJD Request Package and issued PJD have been attached. The PJD Package, prepared by Terrain Environmental, includes figures showing wetland/upland boundaries and CAMA
areas. A site plan, prepared by NC Coastal Federation, showing the slough location with a typical cross-section has been included.
Signature
RI By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Paul Masten
Signature
Oradave
Date
8/3/2022
1-
4o 1. :133HS
JMQ
f OHd
ZZ/LZ/LO :31vo
„L 0
ONIMVaa 1VNI00,1O
NO HONI 3N0 SI NV8
31 V OS AdItiln
NMOHS SV 31VOS
N O
Ln
m
rvD
w z
00
w z
0o
1-,•
00 N
00
Ln
v
0
co
H
0
VZ ,IMH 609E
ZLtI-3# 3SN3JI1 Wild
NOIJ V O±S821 CINV-118M
N` 7d ONIIN` 7d ?Rd NOIIV1303A 3AIIVN
(•du) 3aV 0 0NI1SIX3
01 30VNI`d2IG 3AI1IS0d
ONV N0I1ISNV 1 H1001AIS
32IfSNl ,1010VellN00
SNOIlVOIHIO]dS GNd SNd1d 2:I3d 30NV9 flISI0 AO SlIWI1
SSVWOI9 10V j f1S ONINIVIAI ,&NV 1A01Al]ez1
` ]eiV S1IWOVeiHd
)12IVd 81b1S H0b88 VNI-1O21NO
z
0
H
m
J��IVGNfli
T-4)
1IV130 eI3d 30N3d 11IS -11V±SNI
iO N`d 8 em11S I0 J0 S11 W 11 31V W IXO ezI d dV
TERRAIN
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING
January 20, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attention: Mr. Brad Shaver
Subject: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Carolina Beach State Park Habitat Restoration
Carolina Beach State Park
Carolina Beach, NC
Dear Mr. Shaver:
Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC (TEC) is requesting a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination at the above -referenced site on behalf of the North Carolina Division of Parks
and Recreation. It is our understanding that the North Carolina Coastal Federation intends to
undertake habitat restoration projects at the park as part of the Kerr-McGee Site Superfund
settlement.
The site consists of an approximately 130-acre portion of two parcels identified as New
Hanover County Parcel IDs R08700-002-001-000 and R09100-002-001-000. Our site visits
were conducted from October 11 to November 4, 2021. The following documentation has
been provided in support of this request:
• Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
• Appendix 2 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
• Agent Authorization
• Figure 1 — Site Vicinity
• Figure 2 — Project Site
• Figure 3 — USGS Topography
• Figure 4 — Soils
• Figure 5 — Waters of the US
• Wetland and Upland data forms
CLOSING
If you have any questions, require additional information, or wish to schedule a site meeting,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Paul Masten, LSS, PWS
President/Owner
Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: (828) 271-7980
Fax Number: (828) 281-8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554-4884
Fax Number: (919) 562-0421
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251-4610
Fax Number: (252) 975-1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: (910) 251-4025
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1
Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: State Park Road
City, State: Carolina Beach, NC
County: New Hanover
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
R08700-002-001 -000, R09100-002-001-000
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental
Mailing Address: 2014 Wrightsville Avenue
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
❑
EI
o
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-512-1253
pmasten@terrainenv.com
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: NC Division of Parks and Recreation
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1010 State Park Road
Carolina Beach, NC 28428
910-458-8206
j.chris.helms@ncparks.gov
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Paul Masten
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3
Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 130 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4
Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34.048862
Longitude: -77.914603
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5
Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: New Hanover City: Carolina Beach
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.048862
Long.: -77.914603
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Cape Fear River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
• Field Determination. Date(s): October 11 - November 4, 2021
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
WA
34.048862
-77.914603
68.73 ac
wetland
Section 404
WB
34.049371
-77.917524
0,31
ac
wetland
Section 404
WC
34.046451
-77.920143
0,27 ac
wetland
Section 404
SA
34.047413
-77.920596
2, 976
If
non -wetland water
Section 10/404
SB
34.051199
-77.916053
2, 029
If
non -wetland water
Section 10/404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-5
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Carolina Beach 1:24000
O Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map
or n Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-5
• Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Carolina Beach 1:24000
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map
or n Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Digitally signed by Paul Masten
Date: 2022.01.20 09:17:52 -05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Letter of Authorization
I, James C. Helms, with North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation authorize Terrain
Environmental Consulting, PLLC to act as our limited agent to coordinate with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality for the purposes of
jurisdictional delineations and regulatory agency coordination with the Carolina Beach State
Park Habitat Restoration project site located in Carolina Beach, NC.
Authorization will terminate on either final agency action or upon written notification from either
party involved.
Client name: North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation
Contact name: James C. Helms, Park Superintendent
Client Address: 1010 State Park Road, Carolina Beach, North Carolina 28428
Client Phone: (910) 458-8206
Client Email: j.chris.helms@ncparks.gov
2„ 2Z
Date
FIGURES
lrla 0
ee1e,4wbq
8E
Long beach oa►Island
LeVnd
r�o.wn nas4
pl
04.
Se
e
P
ipri q
I-atp .w Or
I
L
Soulhpon 4�
t
rr
Stymy Pole
r.11ilary
• L»e 1.unlV,..l
wind rigor
--p., R•„y r
x .•
0
1
Per. 0. WOO. h Stap ate
gl.er d.�111
o
�eT�11>•e°`F4
1
6
*rile Greve
Carol Ina
Beach
]Lure Beach
wrlgHtooIlle
Beach
Arlinllr
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,
NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esn (Thailand), NGCC, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Carolina Beach State Park
Carolina Beach, NC
Miles
0 3
New Hanover
January 2022
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only.
...._
-- •
• -
8D1 j (0.9\V‘,- Ctart - - . - ...•
Carolina Beach State Park Marina
_ r_.----
_ ...,.
1
. ..
..., • '
. .
le ' •' /' '
, t
t :'e - • ' . .
St •,, ,
11'
, • — i,.:
_
f•I. 1•\ ' ., 4
ri ie '1.• •
0° ‘. ,
•:' '?), 4
' - .-.'h%* Or 0, • ,,, t /
. .
•
i
le ,
i .CD js,
\ _
.. .•.
,_ A.. . .
,, • '
_ •
. ....,„,
- ,
r " 1 NatUre . till
3
, ..,.• ,
,::.. .. . .._ ,
, Ar
„. .
. twill • -ie. it * '
.i'
' .
, ,:. i h• , ,
- • s;, .F. ' .
(.) ...,..N• . V ; • • -• bi- .
,.. _
4.. 1 04 3 %I.-1 , .•
.• . . t
' ‘...
If 4• , ( . . .
' f
r n ;•
'. ,. •••••
-
f .
- . .
,I.
4
''-'- • 4-... i •4 "
- 1 • it+.,.' I -Legend
? • ' .
4,10
, ir"..4,;,. ' ,• ' i 1 Vitri '.
\4 A Project Site
.14,0,
\
•
--.
•
._ t• _ S _ .AL.
4'
'43
er
0 EN • A,.
e-
4(i
k 1,
Figure 2 - Project Site ii400440-imiultra•igrA
.,eikteezalevaavampti.-wou
r Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Carolina Beach State Park W 1 isiaislovi,
4.,111111V 1 = New HanoverPIIN
Al Carolina Beach, NC
,-.,--. Feet
January 2022
....-+ 0 1 ,0 0 0 NAD83 NC StatePlane
---...--,—..- This map is for reference only
CONSUL-MI6
0000•91°
NORTH
CAROLINA
Intracoastal Waterway
Intracoastal Waterway
Service Layer Credits: USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP
Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset,
National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation
Figure 3 - USGS Topography
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Carolina Beach State Park
Carolina Beach, NC
0
Feet
600
New Hanover
January 2022
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only.
At-441W \N" , •
Nt ,
TM
.. ,
_..... . _
W _ --
, •
_...-— I
.,,
, .k ... .•
•• . TMJ- • 4-"-•'. , . .. ..
r —
e TM • 7,- ----4-V.:.% , ..., ,
,. •...
.. -
,
f 'La
Will* 'A
N ''• . ..',4: a .- .-- L. —. li
V +•., i/ 1,,,,, '44 . ok
,,,c• \,. ..,.,., /
, .
f• "f I, ..." •
44, .
•ne. ,
' 4 .
DO
. lb Ly
. ,
•„ ,,,„
.,
, P - ,
,
' II . '
• e Be . 1
fifi_ 41g,e .riersClegrelfteeH
..
. . 4. .
,.. '..
le , A .
. .e 41''
•
l_e '''',. , ••• ,
' ,Ict ' •• ,
r . ..
,Lt
,I. .
' .
. * .
**.'''. .. .""0......./.... .-... 'i
7 e •
,
• -..,.
Le
1 ,,.,
t' •-k 7
• r
x•:, , t. , , .-,,,, . (
, ., c.
,''' iRm T„6.-.....s
TM m .
-:-- - •.,,- - ,
Ar'
0.,
, . .
••
. 114 , -•• , . '
''. , '-f.!:: ' `+'i'•
. - r
,
V 41, 'X Ipi ._ . N• f
t•%. •....
.:
Le .
. '
• ''/' • -.41'
W'.. r
...• 0K,, ,‘. --4.' r ,ft. .).r. . , .
e ; ,
R Rm, . 4+ - ' ,k- ' 11111
- Rm
4.F.o
e-
Figure 4 -Web Soil Survey ohlom•amiAlit 14 itiA
-ittit'lentorgek-Ati
0,e40:21Kievaa.10..41-o- r•gi.
Wgif Wi( -P
r• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Carolina Beach State Park
IO moos,
isk
= New Hanover la
Wit( rip
N Carolina Beach, NC
,-.,--
<•.--:*, January 2022
....--,.. Feet NAD83 NC StatePlane
---...--,.._...-— This map is for reference only
CONSUL-MI6 0 600
•
L�ti.. Snows CUI�+ +��y- .... •_r-- ..-. .r.. A�� _ • :nY .. -i� ill
.L
,,,.
, . _
••.
. _
.., _. _ .
_ d_.
_ ,
• .,.. • ,
. _ _
,0•1‘•iii - .. ,
....
— -- -- .- _ - -• ,.,;-: , .,--•_ ;., , , --.- -%ey."n „ . ""
111*
- _ �/ - A l - - 1
N.
11
' 1 t WA
I ...). : 4
IiiilliNW B
40 ,..-a.4„. iit
+. WA Wet (2c. : ' r
r I I.
rli
WA ' -
i
iir
it
j • ° Nat '' tier : t`
Cape Fear River ��- .
A
WC / /191)11'4— Ar - WA..
WA Wet (3) n; 3
i
• *Ali „„1-.. , ,,-- 1 ;'* -
- .7, 1{ a ram: s i d ' .i ;; :
fi . 1 T �f
. It'' - t *.y..........
Legend JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION N
TERRAIN Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request �\ Figure 5
, L Project Site Normal High Water Line Culvert
'�4f• ENVIRONIVIENTAL Carolina Beach State Park
CONSULTING Wetland High Marsh Carolina Beach, NC Feet
0 200 400 January 2022
Coastal Wetland + Data Points
Source:NC One Map
WETLAND/UPLAND
DATA FORMS
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park city/county: New Hanover
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
Sampling Date: 11/3/21
State: NC Sampling Point: WA Wet (1)
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage way Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.045561 Long: -77.917194 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland - Typic Quartzipsamments
NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) ✓ Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 3 inches
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 2 inches
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Wet (1)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Baccharis halimifolia
Morella cerifera
Pinus taeda
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Spartina alterniflora
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
40 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
5 No FAC
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13
40 Yes
OBL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WA Wet (1)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-9 10YR 2/2 100
9-18 2.5Y 5/2 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
MS M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture
sand
sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Remarks
mucky modified
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/3/21
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
State: NC Sampling Point: WA Up (1)
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.04539 Long: -77.917212 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland - Typic Quartzipsamments
NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Up (1)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1 Quercus virginiana
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Quercus laurifolia
4. Carya glabra
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40
10
10
10
Yes
No
No
No
FACU
FAC
FACW
FACU
5.
6.
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ilex vomitoria
Pinus taeda
Baccharis halimifolia
50% of total cover: 37.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
40 = Total Cover
Graminaea
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
40 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
75 = Total Cover
15
20% of total cover:
40
Yes
FAC
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 0
0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WA Up (1)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-2 10YR 4/3 50
2-18 2.5Y 6/3 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
10YR 7/1 50 D M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
sand
sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
City/County: New Hanover
Sampling Date: 10/11/21
State: NC Sampling Point: WA Wet (2)
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.048862 Long: -77.914603 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dorovan - Typic Haplosaprists
NWI classification: PFO1 Cd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 2 inches
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0 inches
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Wet (2)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2. Nyssa biflora 5 No OBL
3.
4.
5.
6.
55 = Total Cover
Acer rubrum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
50 Yes FAC
50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2. Pinus taeda 10
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ilex vomitoria
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Polygonum plebeium
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
2. Saururus cernuus
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Symphyotrichum sp.
55 Yes FACW
15 No OBL
10 No FAC
5 No FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 0
0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WA Wet (2)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-3 7.5YR 2/2 100
3-18 2.5Y 4/1 80
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
MS M
7.5YR 3/4 20 C PL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture
muck
clay loam
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park city/county: New Hanover
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
Sampling Date: 10/11/21
State: NC Sampling Point: WA Up (2)
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2-3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.04888 Long: -77.914754 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dorovan - Typic Haplosaprists
NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Up (2)
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1. Pinus taeda
30 ft )
2. Acer rubrum
3. Quercus nigra
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Ilex vomitoria 80 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WA Up (2)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-11 7.5YR 3/2 100
11-16 2.5Y 2.5/1 80
16-18 2.5Y 4/1 70
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
2.5Y 4/2 20 D M
7.5YR 3/4 30 c M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
sand <70% coated sand grains
sand
clay loam
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swamp
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon - Aeric Alaquods
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
City/county: New Hanover
Sampling Date: 11/2/21
State: NC Sampling Point: WA Wet (3)
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Lat: 34.045561 Long: -77.917194
Slope (%): 0
Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: upland
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes ✓
Yes ✓
Yes ✓
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 2 inches
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0 inches
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Wet (3)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Acer rubrum
2. Nyssa biflora
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Pinus taeda
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
30 Yes OBL
15 No FAC
15 No FAC
5.
6.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
Nyssa biflora
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
25 Yes OBL
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Arundinaria tecta 20 Yes FACW
2. Pinus taeda
3. Morella cerifera
4. Persea borbonia
5.
6.
15 Yes FAC
5 No FAC
5 No FACW
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Carex sp. 90 Yes FACW
2. Lyonia lucida 5 No FACW
3. Persea borbonia 5 No FACW
4. Morella cerifera 5 No FAC
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
105 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 52.5 20% of total cover: 21
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WA Wet (3)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-5 2.5Y 2.5/1 100
5-10 2.5Y 3/1 100
10-18 2.5Y 3/2 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
MS M
MS M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
muck
sand
sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon - Aeric Alaquods
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
City/county: New Hanover
Sampling Date: 11 /2/21
State: NC Sampling Point: WA Up (3)
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Lat: 34.04539 Long: -77.917212
Slope (%): 1-2
Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: upland
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 12 inches
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Up (3)
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Pinus taeda
30 ft )
2. Pinus palustris
3. Quercus laurifolia
4. Persea palustris
5.
6.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
Quercus nigra
Absolute
% Cover
40
20
15
10
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes FAC
Yes FACU
No FACW
No FACW
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 47.5 20% of total cover: 17
30 ft )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2. Morella cerifera 5
3.
4.
5.
6.
Persea borbonia
10 Yes
FAC
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
97 = Total Cover
Arundinaria tecta
Yes
Yes
FACW
FAC
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Ilex glabra
Lyonia lucida
Ilex vomitoria
Andropogon virginica
60 Yes FACW
20 Yes FACW
10 No FACW
5 No FAC
2 No FAC
50% of total cover: 48.5 20% of total cover: 19.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 0
0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WA Up (3)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-3 10YR 2/1 100
3-10 2.5Y 3/1 100
10-18 2.5Y 4/2 95
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
7.5YR 4/6 5 c M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
sand <70% coated sand grains
sand <70% coated sand grains
sand <70% coated sand grains
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park city/county: New Hanover
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
Sampling Date: 11/3/21
State: NC Sampling Point: WB Wet
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.049371 Long: -77.917524 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dorovan - Typic Haplosaprists
NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 10 inches
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 6 inches
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC
2. Magnolia grandiflora 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Ilex vomitoria 20 Yes FAC
2. Pinus taeda 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Polygonum plebeium
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
30 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WB Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 2/1 100
4-13 10YR 3/1 100
13-18 10YR 4/2 60
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
10YR 3/1 40 Ms M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
sand >70% coated sand grains
sand
sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/3/21
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
State: NC Sampling Point: WB Up
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.049462 Long: -77.917622 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland - Typic Quartzipsamments
NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB Up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Quercus laurifolia 5 Yes FACW
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Juniperus virginiana 5 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 2
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Ilex vomitoria 45 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
5 1
20% of total cover:
2. Pinus taeda 5 No FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Ilex vomitoria 5 Yes FAC
2. Pinus taeda 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WB Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 3/2 100
4-10 10YR 4/2 100
10-18 10YR 6/3 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
sand <70% coated sand grains
sand <70% coated sand grains
sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/4/21
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression & floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.046451 Long: -77.920143 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Kureb - Spodic Quartzipsamments
State: NC Sampling Point: WC Wet
NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes I✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 4 inches
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 3 inches
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Baccharis hamilifolia
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
60 = Total Cover
Scirpus cyperinus
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
60 Yes
FAC
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Carex sp
Polygonum plebeium
Leersia oryzoides
40 Yes OBL
10 No FACW
5 No FACW
5 No OBL
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 0
0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
El3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WC Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-2 7.5YR 2.5/1 100
2-12 2.5Y 3/1 100
12-18 2.5Y 5/2 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
MS M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
fibric organic
sand >70% coated sand grains
sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Carolina Beach State Park City/County: New Hanover Sampling Date: 11/4/21
Applicant/Owner: NC Coastal Federation
State: NC Sampling Point: WC Up
Investigator(s): Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope in floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.046363 Long: -77.920078 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Kureb - Spodic Quartzipsamments
NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated
✓ High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) V Geomorphic Position
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 10 inches
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 9 inches
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC Up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Morella cerifera
2. Ilex vomitoria
3. Baccharis hamilifolia
4. Pinus taeda
5. Quercus minima
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
15 Yes
15 Yes
FAC
FAC
10 Yes FAC
5 No
5 No
FAC
FAC
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
1. Arundinaria tecta 40 Yes FACW
2. Graminaea spp 20 Yes FAC
3. Pteridium aquilinum 10 No FACU
4. Juniperus viginiana 10 No FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 0
0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
O 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
EJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: WC Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-5 10YR 2/1 100
5-13 2.5Y 4/1 100
13-18 10YR 5/2 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
MS M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al )
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Texture Remarks
sand <70% coated sand grains
sand <70% coated sand grains
sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Electronically Transmitted
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2022-00220 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Carolina Beach
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: NC Division of Parks and Recreation
Chris Helms
Address: 1010 State Park Road
Carolina Beach, NC 28428
E-mail: j.chris.helms4,ncparks.gov
Size (acres) 130 Nearest Town Sea Breeze
Nearest Waterway Cape Fear River River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030005 Coordinates Latitude: 34.048862
Longitude: -77.914603
Location description: The project area is located off State Park Road to the south of the Park Marina within Carolina Beach
State Park in Carolina beach.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated January 2022.
Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction deteunination may be used in the peunit evaluation process, including detei,�ining
compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource
protection measures, a peunit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be
affected in any way by the peunitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
deteunination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the peunit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary deteunination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the peunit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this deteunination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the peunit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
SAW-2022-00220
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808 to deteunine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army peunit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Aitny permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-251-4611 or
brad.e.shaver(a(usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 01/26/2022.
D. Remarks: This determination was made via desktop.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/deteunination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/detei,uination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland deteunination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
deteunination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Auuy Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A. SHANNIN(a(USACE.ARMY.MIL
SAW-2022-00220
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must deteunine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA foul', it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the deteunination in this correspondence.**
Digitally signed by Brad
Brad Shaver Shaver
Date: 2022.01.26 11:11:07
Corps Regulatory Official: 05'00'
Date of JD: 01/26/2022 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/.
Copy Furnished(electronic):
Terrain Environmental Consulting attn: Paul Masten
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant:
Helms
NC Division of Parks and Recreation, Chris
File Number: SAW-2022-00220
Date: 01/26/2022
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
I - The following identifies your rights and options
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
regarding an administrative appeal
E
of the above decision.
x
SECTION
Additional
or the
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
to the Corps regarding the
JD (which may be appealed),
for further consideration by the
PERMIT
1
SECTION II - RE • , . T FOR APP CTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR=UESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Brad Shaver
Wilmington Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
CESAD-PDS-O
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
PHONE: (404) 562-5136; FAX (404) 562-5138
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(a�USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Brad Shaver, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: (404) 562-5137
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 1/26/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Carolina Beach State Park
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, CB State Park, SAW-2022-00220
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: New Hanover City: Carolina Beach
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.048862
Long.: -77.914603
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Cape Fear River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
X
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 1/26/2022
■❑ Field Determination. Date(s): October 11 - November 4, 2021 Site visit by consultant only.
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
WA
34.048862
-77.914603
68.73 ac
wetland
Section 404
WB
34.049371
-77.917524
0,31
ac
wetland
Section 404
WC
34.046451
-77.920143
0.27 ac
wetland
Section 404
SA
34.047413
-77.920596
2, 976
If
non -wetland water
Section 10/404
SB
34.051199
-77.916053
2, 029
If
non -wetland water
Section 10/404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "maybe"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "maybe" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-5
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Carolina Beach 1:24000
O Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Brad Shave
Digitally signed by Brad
Shaver
r Date: 2022.01.26 11:15:37
-05'00'
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Digitally signed by Paul Masten
Date: 2022.01.20 09:18:55 -05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
/^1
_�tl+er King Jr r*Pt
ivia Dantorearise
SE
5\a
untl Dr
Long Beach
,c y
1innabow
.1. I -I Ind
Fun Mon Rd SE
4
Baling
Spring
Lakes
Leland
eC..
O° ee4 RdS
Southport
[133
Sunny Point •
Military
Ocean Terminal
O
Pant ens*
yYPlace 0r _ to
wlnting I - fe
i
cietride$t
Mg/itseilfa P'• Seagate
pne oleander Dr
Pe
o Greeriy�/le \.°oQ
St
L,
"m Nohoa„ to
\ y Myrtle Grove .1c
III
Caul fear River
Bain
rP l
Carolina
Beach
Kure Beach
Masonboro
Project Site
Wrightsville
Beach
Atlantic
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,
NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Carolina Beach State Park
Carolina Beach, NC
Miles
0 3
New Hanover
January 2022
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only.
Ai,sTion _
,
Carolina Beach State Park Marin; � , ,`
Is
A e
4
q F
_ �, " lk
ILI
o y
nna
f
a
0
h' k+ (, a a .,,,,A1:40,,, , ili.i,„
47
k '
Legend t . �, . ..
t
Project Site ,,=
�r
� V/4,O
<P '' i1�°ha..� 1 fir 1' is
4,, Figure 2 - Project Site ���►��VINr►r:ov.44f
\��� �� �� Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request "=���'�"��'eis:islovi';�1
1��( )��i( Carolina Beach State Park N _ New Hanover�•�
1`ll00
��j� Carolina Beach, NC
M^ Feet
January 2022
�^^ NAD83 NC StatePlane
-�---�i 0 ,000 This map is for reference only.
CONSULTING
NORTH
CAROLINA
Waterway
Wute`'' Intracoastal Water
Service Layer Credits: USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP
Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset,
National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation
Figure 3 - USGS Topography
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Carolina Beach State Park
Carolina Beach, NC
0
Feet
600
New Hanover
January 2022
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only.
r 4`
TM `'�
1
..--••_-
'TM «- -
i' �i. ` La
fi , , 4,44: saran
"
/ AN # Sit*
7,:, TNI
DO
lkil( r; ,
�. � Ly
r I
t
'
Le F
;v
# xQ
/
'-
t.
t Le �. t1'
<.'
r _ .
TM
Ir., 31,,0,,E
t
i.
L Rm
r
k R Rrm!. ` .. / 9 IttY Rm
ENS
\� ''Po
��P �� Figure 4 -Web Soil Survey +��"�'�R"`�"��:�'��"`%
��\�\ �� %„ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request "=,k♦'�kieva's,��#` i1
1��� 1���i� Carolina Beach State Park N New Hanover�•�
11��j� Carolina Beach, NC
M^ % January
�^^ Feet NAD83 NC StatePlane2022
�-- �i This map is for reference only.
C°NSULTING 0 600
S ——_,-
t
Snows Cut_-_.=P- -
//
f
d
gr.' � `/' WA >
E t
re` a:, •
\ a
* o ,k't
.f '' 'ABo +WA Wet(2
-- -WA WA
% ,t
N.
ik
f
- otiiiiiii''' 4';'1.4,,,_. ., ,-7-.A.e."-le
Cape Fear River % '' .
%'. � s. 1..
.qP
y k
y.
r=
a 14
TERRAIN Legend JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION N
ProjectSite —Normal High Water Line Culvert Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Figure 5
rl, ENVIRONMENTALCarolina Beach state Park
°%Co N S U LTI N G Wetland 'High Marsh Carolina Beach,NC Feet
0 200 400 January 2022
Coastal Wetland + Data Points
Source:NC One Map