HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0055191_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220801ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Attn: Shannon V. Becker
202 Mackenan Dr
Cary, NC 27511-6447
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 1, 2022
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Penman Heights Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit Number: NC0055191
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Becker:
Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR),
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) of the Melbille Heights wastewater treatment
plant (WWTP) on June 27th, 2022. The assistance and cooperation of Shelby Cheek, Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC), was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are detailed in the attached
water compliance inspection report.
Please be aware that the Division may take enforcement action against any permittee who fails to
comply with any requirement of their permit. Pursuant to NC General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.6A, a
civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against any
person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any
permit issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Boone by phone at 336-
776-9690, or by email at ron.boone@ncdenr.gov. Thank you in advance for your time and attention to
this matter.
Attachments:
1. Water Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Laserfiche
GDE
NORTH C OLI JA '
omm mr� ep..of o�.i
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
�145B49E225C94EA...
Lon T. Snider, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800
United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction
1 IN
Code
I 2
IL
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac
I 3 I NC0055191 111 121 22/06/27 117 1810I 19I S I 2011
Type
21IIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIII
I
IIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
P6
Inspection
671
Work Days
Facility Self -Monitoring
I 70I
Evaluation Rating
I 711
B1
1
72
QA
I N I
73I
1
I I
Reserved
74 71
J
I
I I
I
I
I
180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES Dermit Number)
Penman Heights WWTP
NCSR 1917
High Point NC 27260
Entry Time/Date
02:OOPM 22/06/27
Permit Effective Date
22/01/01
Exit Time/Date
03:OOPM 22/06/27
Permit Expiration Date
26/08/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Shelby Darlene Cheek/ORC/336-362-2007/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Thomas J Roberts,202 Mackenan Dr Cary NC 275116447//919-467-8712/9194661583
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenar Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Progran Sludge Handling DispoFacility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Wate
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)
Ron
and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Boone DWR/WSRO WQ/336-776-9690/
-DocuSigsened by:p8/1/2022
coover ,G�.e�YJoo,i,e
—1..b2QrSereei
Signature
AS90U...
of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
r;iDocuSigned by:
-e. T. SA,ac>_ 8/1/2022
145B49E225C94EA...
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1
3I
NPDES yr/mo/day
N C 0055191 111 121 22/06/27
I17
Inspection Type
18 [j
(Cont.)
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the NC Division of Water Resources, conducted
a compliance evaluation inspection of the Penman Heights WWTP on 6/27/22. The assistance and
cooperation of Shelby Cheek, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), was greatly appreciated.
Inspection
findings are detailed below and in the accompanying checklist.
Records Review:
Operational records were reviewed and found to be complete, current, and compliant. This includes
operator visitation logs, operations logs, maintenance logs, and other pertinent records that the
operators provided during the inspection. Records are kept for at least 3 years.
Analytical records are complete, current, and compliant. The permittee uses Water Tech labs and
conducts field parameter analyses in house. Chains of custody, lab reports, etc, were all available for
review. All analytical records are kept for at least 5 years. No discrepancies in reporting lab results
were noted.
The current permit is maintained onsite.
Plant Inspection:
The influent pump station and equalization basin are fully operational and no issues were noted. The
bar screen is operational and in good condition. The aeration basins (AB) appear to be in good
condition and the mixed liquor appears healthy. The ABs use diffused aeration and they all appear
operational and there are no deadspots in the basins. The clarifiers also appear in good condition
and operating properly. The weirs are level and no short circuiting was noticed in the clarifiers. The
plant uses chlorine tablets for disinfection and dechlorination tablets for dechlorination. No issues
were noted with the chlorinator or dechlorinator. The effluent flow meter is used for reporting and it
was just recently calibrated. It reports both a constant flow rate as well as the total flow.
The effluent appeared excellent. It was very clear and there is no odor. Fish were seen in the
immediate area of the outfall.
No permit deficiencies or violations were noted during the inspection.
Page# 2
Permit: NC0055191
Inspection Date: 06/27/2022
Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new El El ❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • El El El
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? El • El El
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • El El El
Comment: None
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified
operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility
classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment: None
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
•
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ • ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Page# 3
Permit: NC0055191
Inspection Date: 06/27/2022
Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Comment: None
II El El El
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, MODE
and sampling location)?
Comment: None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? ❑ ❑ • ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 ❑ ❑ ❑ •
degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type • ❑ ❑ ❑
representative)?
Comment: None
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: None
Pump Station - Influent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 4
Permit: NC0055191
Inspection Date: 06/27/2022
Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Are all pumps present? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is basin size/volume adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Bar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment: None
Yes No NA NE
•
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Page# 5
Permit: NC0055191
Inspection Date: 06/27/2022
Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Are the diffusers operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Comment: None
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth)
Comment: None
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment: None
Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
# Is the odor acceptable?
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ El El El
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 6
Permit: NC0055191
Inspection Date: 06/27/2022
Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Comment: None
Disinfection -Tablet Yes No NA NE
Are tablet chlorinators operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes in use? 4
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Comment: None
De -chlorination Yes No NA NE
Type of system ? Tablet
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ❑ • ❑ ❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ❑ ❑ • ❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes in use? 4
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment: None
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 7
Permit: NC0055191
Inspection Date: 06/27/2022
Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance
Yes No NA NE
Page# 8