20090266 Ver 9_ePCN Application_20220801

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
0 No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/2/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version# *
20090266 9
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Washington Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
What amout is owed?*
O $240.00
0 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Robert Tankard:eads\rbtankard
la. Name of project:
Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Maintenance Dredging
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Keven Arrance
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/1/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Tar River
Basin
Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
WS-IV; NSW; CA
Site Coordinates
..........................................................................
Latitude:
35.635654
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-77.401361
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Pitt
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
21 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
OYes 0No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
03 - Maintenance
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Greenville
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Randall D. Emory, P.E.
2d. Address
Street Address
3355 NC 43
Address Line 2
City
Greenville
Postal / Zip Code
27834
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Keven Arrance
4b. Business Name:
Hazen and Sawyer
4c. Address
Street Address
4011 WestChase Blvd
Address Line 2
Suite 500
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
Of appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Greenville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
4679517312
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1721 Water Way Road
Address Line 2
City
Greenville
Postal / Zip Code
27858
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Tar River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV; NSW; CA
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201030404
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
147
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site consists of an active water treatment plant. The project footprint consists of the Tar River at the location of the existing raw water intake structure and along the existing intake flow
vanes in the river as well as a construction laydown/staging area located in a maintained upland area within the water treatment plant property. The vicinity of the project site is currently
developed for residential and commercial uses as well as undeveloped areas and agricultural lands. Additionally, the Pitt -Greenville Airport is located east of the project site.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
- Yes No Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2018-01462; DWR# 09-0266 v6. Previous authorization was under the 2017 NWP 3 for maintenance dredging for the purpose of maintaining water depth and flow to supply the raw
water intake with adequate water. The previous authorization did not specifically include the proposed screen replacement component of the current PCN application.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.87 acre
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,850 feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The project has two purposes related to maintenance of the existing raw water intake. First, the existing intake screens have failed due to not being designed for the correct backflushing
pressure. The existing screen failure is constraining the capacity of water fed to the plant. The screens need to be replaced to ensure future water supply for the GUC's water customers.
The new screens are designed for higher backflush and collapse pressure than the existing screens while maintaining the same capacity and slot size as the existing screens. Sediments
have collected around the screens and will be removed to accommodate the screen replacement work and ensure full operational integrity of the intake. Secondly, the project involves
maintenance dredging to ensure that the flow of water in the river provides adequate volume at the intake screens. Maintenance dredging for this purpose is an ongoing need and a routine
operation.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The screen replacement component of the project includes removal of the four existing intake screens, installation of the new intake screens, diver -assisted hydraulic dredging around the
intake structure, mechanical dredging along the intake flow vanes immediately upriver of the intake structure, and cleaning out of the existing raw water lines. The laydown area will be
established in an upland area on the plant property that is presently maintained as lawn. The screen removal, screen installation, dredging, and water line clean -out will be performed by
divers. The existing and proposed screens are the same size and capacity. Support for the screen replacement work will be provided by a barge -mounted crane. Dredging and water line
clean -out activities will be supported by a barge -mounted vac truck, or similar. The dredging around the intake structure will be performed manually by the divers, to the extent feasible,
with a hydraulic dredge. The extent of the dredging for screen replacement will be the minimum necessary and is not expected to exceed 30 feet in any direction from the intake.
Sediments will be removed down to the existing riprap that was previously placed under the intake.
The maintenance dredging component of the project involves removal of accumulated sediments and debris within the area surrounding and immediately upstream of the intake structure.
The areas identified for maintenance dredging are anticipated, based on past dredging needs, to extend 30 feet downriver from the downstream end of the intake screen, 170 feet upriver
from the same point, and cover a 60-foot-wide path in the river. The 170-foot length allows GUC to dredge in front of and along the intake flow vanes previously installed in the river to
direct flows in the channel toward the intake screens. The maintenance dredging extents will be set based on the minimum area needed at a given time to maintain adequate flows to the
intake screens. The depth of the dredging will not be deeper than the approximate channel depth that existed when the intake was originally constructed, as documented on record
drawings for the intake, sealed on June 2, 2009 and attached. Dredging around the intake structure will be performed using a hydraulic dredge operated by a diver in the river to ensure
that the existing infrastructure and aquatic life are not damaged or harmed by the work. Dredging beyond the area immediately surrounding the intake structure will be performed via
mechanical dredge.
Dredged materials will be temporarily stockpiled onsite in an upland area. Dewatering will occur via passive methods, including evaporation and infiltration. Silt fence will be installed
around the perimeter of the temporary stockpile area to protect against erosion and unintended transport of dredged materials beyond the limits of the stockpile area. The dredge spoils will
be hauled offsite for disposal at an approved landfill.
Land -based site access will be accomplished across existing onsite access roads and maintained lawn areas. No disturbance of existing wetlands, streams, floodplain, floodway, or
riparian buffer vegetation is anticipated to occur to accommodate site access. Sediment control within the river will be achieved using a turbidity curtain along the limits of the dredging
operation. The curtain will contain suspended sediments within the work area, preventing downstream water quality degradation.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
No Unknown
Comments:
Waters of the US were delineated and verified in 2016. Re -delineation was performed but not verified
in 2020.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2016-01379
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
K. Arrance, L. Diebolt
Hazen and Sawyer
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No other NWPs, regional general permit, or standard permits are intended to be used to authorize the project.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary

la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
O Wetlands
OO Open Waters
4. Open Water Impacts
O Streams -tributaries
O Pond Construction
O Buffers
4a. Site #
4a1. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type
4c. Name of waterbody
4d. Activity type
4e. Waterbody type
4f. Impact area
OW-1
maintenance dredging
P
Tar River
Dredging
Tributary
0.28
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.28
4h. Comments:
The impact area is approximately 60 feet wide and 200 feet long within the Tar River.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.28
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Avoidance of impacts to waters of the US is only possible with a no -action alternative, which does not address GUC's responsibility to continue providing
adequate drinking water to their customers. The nature and extent of the proposed impacts are the minimum necessary to ensure that GUC is able to
fulfill their responsibility to their customers. The proposed impacts are in the area of past impacts for establishing and maintaining the raw water intake,
avoiding impacts to areas that have not been previously disturbed. Laydown and site access footprints utilize existing maintained/disturbed areas,
avoiding impacts to wetlands, riparian buffers, and undisturbed natural areas.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
All equipment used for in -water work will be mounted on a barge in the river, eliminating potential damage to the riverbank and temporary impacts to
adjacent wetlands. The laydown area will be established in an upland area away from the riparian buffer. Vehicle and equipment maintenance will be
performed away from sensitive resources in order to protect these areas from spills or leaks of fluids. A turbidity curtain will be used in the river to
contain sediments that are disturbed during construction. A vac truck will be used to remove the suspended sediments and dredged materials from the
river. The work will be performed using divers in order to protect the river and its inhabitants from avoidable effects. The time -of -year restriction that is
applicable to in -water work in the Tar River at Greenville will be complied with in order to provide protection to aquatic species.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Mitigation is not required by USAGE or DWR for the proposed activity.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes 0 No
What type of SCM are you providing?
0 Level Spreader
O Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
O Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
O Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
O✓ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
a Yes 0 No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
OYes 0No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation

la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes O No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
O Yes O No
Comments: *
The project does not exceed the minimum criteria to trigger an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes J No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project consists of maintenance of existing raw water intake components. No development or growth in the service area will occur as a result of the
project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0Yes ®No0N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
* Yes C` No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
0 Yes J No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0 Yes No
O No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
0 Yes ® No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes ® No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
OYes 0No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0 Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Hazen reviewed the IPaC tool for the project site on May 13, 2022. Due to the history of sediment loading and deposition in and around the proposed in -
water work area, suitable habitat for the Atlantic pigtoe, Tar River spinymussel, and Neuse River waterdog is not present. All land -based activity will
occur within existing paved areas or maintained lawns, which do not provide the opportunity for milkweeds to grow and provide food source for the
Monarch butterfly. NMFS protects the Atlantic sturgeon and its designated critical habitat, which includes the Tar River within the project area and
extends from Rocky Mount to the Pamlico Sound.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes C No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed online on May 13, 2022. No EFH was shown in the Tar River in Pitt County at the time of the
review.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes O No

7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC's online mapper, HPOWEB, was reviewed on May 13, 2022. The nearest site that is identified as eligible for listing is approximately one mile east of
the project area and on the other side of the Pitt -Greenville Airport. The proposed screen replacement and maintenance dredging activities will not affect
the eligible property due to the distance, lack of visibility of the project area from the eligible site, and existing adjacent land use (i.e., the airport).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
n Yes O No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project will not permanently alter the volume of infrastructure present within the regulatory floodway or 100-year floodplain. No permanent change to
the capacity of the floodway or floodplain will result from the proposed project. Temporary modifications within the 100-year floodplain are proposed to
provide a staging and storage area. The temporary modifications will be coordinated with the local floodplain manager to ensure compliance with FEMA
and local floodplain regulations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map was viewed online via the FEMA Map Service Center. The site is depicted on flood map panel 3720467900J,
effective as of January 2, 2004.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
SupportingDocs.pdf 10.95MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
The Pre -Filing Meeting Request email was sent on May 2, 2022 and is attached as part of the SupportingDocs.pdf. No confirmation email was received for this project's request; however,
receipt of the request email has been confirmed by DWR. The attached PDF also includes the signed agent authorization form, HPOWEB map of the project vicinity, the IPaC report for the
WTP property and surrounding areas, as -built drawing, and figures.
Signature U'
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Keven Arrance
Signature
Date
8/1/2022

AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID 4679517312
STREET ADDRESS: 1721 Water Way Road, Greenville, NC 27834
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
Greenville Utilities Commission
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Ms. Keven Arrance , of Hazen and Sawyer
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of Consulting Firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
3355 NC-43, Greenville, NC 27834
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Ca"2/
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Date://3/2 Z

Arrance, Keven
From: Arrance, Keven
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 9:29 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: 401 Pre -filing Meeting Request
Please fill out the following information:
Project Name: Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement
County: Pitt
Applicant Name: Greenville Utilities Commission, attn: J. Scott Farmer, P.E.
Applicant Email: [e-mail]

NCHPO HPOWEB
5/13/2022, 1:54:08 PM
Surveyed in NRHD
Local individual resources & centerpoints
Surveyed Only, Gone
Local Landmark
Surveyed in NRHD, Gone
Surveyed Only individual resources & centerpoints
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
Surveyed Only
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmln, GeoTechnologies, Inc., NGA, IJSGS i

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section. \kik\:40'1/4
Location0
Pitt County, North Carolina
#01coik *53 ft
4. 0
Tar RI...
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
fi [phone]
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 1/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1\44
4 \O
°c\ *°
\3\"-Ii
GO
,c $C)'C
\C)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 2/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local ❑ffice and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an ❑fficial species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to d❑ so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1 . Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 3/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
Wherever found Marine mammal
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/4469
400c\0111 .14
Reptiles
NAME STATUS IX
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SAT
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/776
Amphibians CO
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location
overlaps the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 4/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Critical habitats 4 \04
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
This location overlaps the critical habitat for the following species:
NAME TYPE
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi" Final
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772#crithab
0\14%*
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.'and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1 . The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 5/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.rr- sk
NAME (:)%44,i
BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS
04C) INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST,THE BIRD MAY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
IS A VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE
OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH
THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
AREA.)
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 6/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
t, CP)
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 7/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1 . The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. T❑ properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence ❑n week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 8/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American 1—II —++i 1+++ ,III liii liii liii liii +-1-. , . I 1 1 .
BCC-BCR(This
is a Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
only in
particular Bird
Conservation
Regions(BCRs)
in the
continental
USA)
No'n_-Bgle Illl II11 IIII IIII liii 1111 IIII ---� +� � ..El! :I:!: *kik
Vulnerable
(This is not a
Bird of \O
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
in this area, but114\1.00°c °‘‘
warrants
attention
because of the
Eagle Act or for11016 \4113
potential
susceptibilities
in offshore
areas from
certain types of 04C
development
or activities.)
Lesser --+1 1+-+ ----
Yellowlegs
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 9/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Prairie Warbler ++++ + —�l —
BCC Rangewide +N rt rt
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Prothonotary I ++++ 1111
I!!! II! ii fl--- +.•1
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout itsOfic\011‘41114
range in the
continental
USA and °c1>
Alaska.)
Red-headed ++++ ++• ----
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its tO
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Rusty Blackbird i--_—' ++— ++++
BCC-BCR(This
is a Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
only in
particular Bird
Conservation
Regions(BCRs)
in the
continental
USA)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 10/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Wood Thrush ++++ 1111 1111 1111 1111
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary.Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN),The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle Ogle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again,the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area.To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN).This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 11/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All
About Birds Bird Guide, or(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of
Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season
associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in
your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC- BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities(e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal,The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 12/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator(a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species.This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed.To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
401
\ \:C i)111446.
odC
\C)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 13/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Marine mammals
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also
protected under the Endangered Species Act'and the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals
are shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears,
manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales,
dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are
not shown on this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine ,4
Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website. ) r
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or
attempt to harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine mammals and further coordination may
be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field
Office shown.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. VA
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not
threaten their survival in the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
are potentially affected by activities in this location:
NAME
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 14/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation
process.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN COASTAL BARRIERS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary(i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone"that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation
Data exclusions \O\
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20-or 30-foot bathymetric contour(depending on the location
of the unit).The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data,therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units(e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
[e-mail]�v, \4444w\Lollok.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 15/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or
for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to
view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
0 ‘
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources.The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands.These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory.These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 16/17

5/13/22,3:17 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
111/44
1 \CI
\ \:C Ii)1446'
0&
,c odC
\C)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/LPJFJ2Q77ZHVHOPDT67GXEORCY/resources 17/17

A
J
K
L
N
0 P
ExrsnNG
CONCRETE
RETAINING
WALL ay-P)
PUMP STATION
BUILDING
(2 STORY)
FF • 27.0' (MIL)
litit
.�f
1 -nrr wrsnr=n ur � _
*AZT CONCRETE PAD -� g
N: 890349.93 ``� 9 ��
E: 2475047.36 = i �S -4.
F' e EL.Y2B.94' IN15L} i_ Y 4 Y__ 3 II
Y�3 -y� GEOTECHNICAL BORE _!--5 �� �+ y�_
.M+'` LIMITS OF RI0.RAP LOCATION mrp) �� y
J1'4"jr:11.141$.4 t4_,%.6.1.1,1.1k911-tri#16II Ali
RIP -RAP TO BE
REMOVED AND
REPLACED IH /101 I
KIND iTYP)�..�
LIMITS OF
� +---I
SEE DRAWING.
010-C-02 FOR
HEADER SYSTEM
DETPJ ,5
30_RW
FLOW TRAINING VANE (TYP
{SEE DETAILS CJ000-C-02
AND DI000-C-02 FOR
CONFIGURATION)
Irk
15
10
-5
-10
-15
-20
30' PIPES '
--------
INTAKE PIPE WI sr:
ITS OF __I
WETLANDS . (1Yp)
•
30- PIPES
5A'
FIELD LOMK GASKET
TES �PL1G- 0
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION {rYP]
sit`..o
TeaftuLtit
UTION SIGN PER ti 1911 ei
GAFFER DAM r� --- Mt. 10'
-
SOCK DRAIN -
CLNAN
DETAL C1000-C-01
►� PROPOSED BANK GRADING APPROXIMATES�-�
/.. [SEE DRAWING 018-C-05 EDGE OF WATER �� Y -`
• r ,FOR REVEGETATION PLAN) I _ AT TIME OF TOPO
SURVEY(iYP) `
TOP OF EXISTING % AND TURBIDffY
SANK ITYP) r `• CURTAIN AS
-_ 9- ` REOIJIREO
C�l l� TAR RIVER _ _ - -- - =-- -
1�Y __ _ _ FLOW DIRECTION
�i
- ~~ _ �~ _ REGULATORY WARNING
BUOY (TYP OF 4)
°` RS SITE PLAN D 30 6a
REGULATORY WARNING \
SCALE: 1" = 30'
-EXIS"RNG I
APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF BUOY (TYP OF 5) _.
RIP -RAP (SEE DETAIL (SEE DETAIL 81000.0-02)
EI000-C-03) -
SEE DETAIL
f WOOD-C-93 FOR
PROPOSED
INTAKE SECTION
re
APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF
RIP -RAP {SEE DETAIL
0l000-C-03)
__may
KEY NOTES:
Na- DESCRIPTION
0 30" X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
0 30' X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
O 30' X 30' 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
30" X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
30" X 30' 45-DEGREE SEND, RJ X RJ
30' X 30' 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
O 30" X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
O 30" X 30' 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
O 30" X 30' 22.5-DEGREE BEND, PE X RJ
19 30" X 30" 22.5-DEGREE BEND, PE X RJ
71 30" X 30" 22.5-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
72 30" X 30' 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
73 INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
CONNECTION
14 INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
CONNECTION
75 INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
CONNECTION
0 INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
CONNECTION
17
3.'4" BUBBLE LINES LOCATED a 30' BFVB OPERATOR.
BOTH OPERATORS 70 SOUTH SIDE OF VALVE -
18 90" MJ BUTTERFLY VALVE
19 30" MJ BUTTERFLY VALVE
15
EXISTING GRADE
IYYP)
TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED GRADE
42:1}
1
1
1
STA.4446.76
1 INTAKE SCREEN
- 42' HEADER SYSTEM
ISEE DRAWING O70-C-02)
WATER
SURFACE
INTAKE SCREENS
(SEE SHEET
000-C-03 FOR
INTAKE SECTION}
1
I
STA. 4+-55.14
INTAKE SCREEN
g STA 4+57.27
INTAKE SCREEN
- {VAFSABLE)
Ba
0
°
rip
g' STA.4+5
/ INTAKE 5
t� -' Y I AKE E.
I:
MEL
30' INTAKE
PIPE (TYP. OF 2)
i
'
IMTAICE -
I PIPE B2
-7-0'
STA. 2+01.72
.,1TA 3.
71.96
II
i
A.0+0724
STA, 1+24.10
45'BEND
STD. 3+02.75
45°BEND
STA1+74.00
•
71
-11_5' MSL
It
.
45- BEND {DOWN)
STA. 9
H40.07
'
I 41)
APPROXIMATE
�' BEND
STA. 1+12.50
45° BEND
` ` STA. 0+04,59
45' BEND
W4 - BOTTOM = -13.
45°
STy 3,y,
BEND
R,
I
45' BEND
45' BEND
4s. BEND
(DOWN)
INTAKE PIPE 91
7 STA. 4+28
39
STA. 4+15.416
45` BEND
IJP} 45' BEND
UP)
0+00
1+00
2+00
2+50
PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE' 1' = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1' • 5'
3+00
3+60
4+00
4*50
10
5.59
GREEN
-5
GREEN =-7.0" MSL
-10
AVER
MSL
-15
- 18.75'MS4
-20
5400
NORTHING
690330.26
599326.06
690222 70
6130215.77
690074.35
690072.81
4590005.00
6599111.32
869994.17
659976.06
669965.7
66E1970.56
5891361.00
689955-79
5691335.97
6691333.68
EASING
2474960.73
2474994.01
2474969.52
247498323
2475096.50
2475091.413
2476084.41
2475086.90
2475071.00
2475080.55
2475064.35
2475073.76
2475030.38
2475023..8
2475034.89
2475028.39
ELEVATION IMSL)
CL
CL =
CL =
CL = -7-00'
CL = -7.00'
CL = -7.00'
CL • -7.00'
CL = -7.00'
CL =-7.00
CL=-7.00
CL=-15.75
CL = -15.75
CL=-7.00'
CL=.7.00'
CL=
CL -=
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO EXISTING PUMP STATION STRUCTURE
AND EXISTING PUMP STATION INTERIOR IS BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS
BY OLSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.. DATED JULY, 1950.
2. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE THESE GENERAL NOTES, SEE
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. SPECIFIC NOTES AND
DETAILS ON DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND
TYPICAL DETAILS.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ADEQUATE PRECAUTIONS TO ENSURE THE
SAFETY OF WORKERS AND VISITORS TO THE SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO ACCESS RESTRICTIONS, PROPER PERSONAL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT. SAFETY MEETINGS AND TRAINING, WARNING SIGNS AND
BARRIERS, SHORING, AND BRACING. COMPLY WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE.
AND LOCAL SAFETY CODES AND STANDARDS.
4. ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SWILL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF
GREENVILLE MANUAL OF STANDARD DESIGNS AND DETAILS {M50D1.
5. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE DEPICTED
ACCURATELY AND THAT UTILITIES IN ADDITION TO THOSE SHOWN WILL, NOT
BE ENCOUNTERED. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING
LOCATION OF BURIED UTILITIES BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY EXCAVATION
WORK_ CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY NC -ONE -CALL 11-800-632-4949 OR 611}
AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING
70 HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITES LOCATED.
S. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF EXISTING PIPE
MATERIALS, PIPE LOCATION, PIPE SIZE AND DEPTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL
PREPARE FOR AND PERFORM DISCOVERY DIGS AHEAD OF CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTIONS OF SUCH VERIFICATIONS- TIME AND SCHEDULE FOR
CONSTRUCTION SHALL ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR SUCH DISCOVERY
WORK A MINIMUM OF TEN 110) WORKING DAYS BEFORE CONNECTION IS
SCHEDULED TO BE CONSTRUCTED. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED
IMMEDIATELY OF ANY REQUIRED CHANGES
7. DESIGN AND LAYOUTS OF UTILITIES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS ARE SCHEMATIC
ONLY- POINTS OF CONNECTION SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.
BUT INTERMEDIATE ROUTING SHALL BE DETERMINED ON THE MOST
SUITABLE LOCATION TO ALLOW NEW UTILITIES TO AVOID, PASS OVER, OR
PASS UNDER EXISTING UTILITIES AS VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE
CONTRACTOR
8- REQUIRED UTILITY RELOCATIONS ARE NOT NECESSARILY IDENTIFIED- ANY
RELOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY
THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
650978.89 3475083.75 RELOCATING EXISTING UTILITIES THAT INTERFERE WITH THE INSTALLATION
OF NEW UTILITIES, AND r0 OTHERWISE DEFINE A ROUTING FOR ALL NEW
1JTILr1TES OVER UNDER, OR AROUND THE REMAINING EXISTING UTILITIES.
THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED
689996.78 2476.014 28 WITI4 THE RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
APPROVED
North Carolina Environmental
Managemer0 Commissian
Dlvhion cif Water Resources
Dots 06113 2] 19
permit 1 09-0266 VG
9- BURIED POWER LINES EXIST WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR LESS
THAN TFN FEET OUTSIDE THE WMITS.
10. CONTROL DATUM:
TBM 117
N • 690464.65, E • 2474992.51 - BOLT ON TOP FLANGE OF FIRE HYDRANT
ELEVATION = 29.25' (MSL)
TEM 92
N7690349.93, E.2475047-38 - NW CORNER OF CONCRETE PAD
ELEVATION = 2934' {MSL}
11. ALL COORDINATES FOR PROPOSED SITE ARE AT GRADE LEVEL AND
OUTSIDE FACE OF STRUCTURE, PIPE CENTERLINE, OR TOP OF CONCRETE
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
12. FOR SITE REMOVAL ITEMS SEE DRAWING 070-C-01.
13- CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS FROM THE
STATE AND CORPS FOR ANY WETLAND/RIVER DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO ANY
CONSTRUCTION AcnvmeS.
14. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 01014 FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
15. EXISTING PUMPING STATION SHALL REMAIN IN SERVICE AT ALL TIMES
DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPECT AND MATCH PROVISIONS FOR RAPIDLY
FLUCTUATING GROUND WATER AND SURFACE WATER. DEWATERING OF
THE CONSTRUCTION SITE IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND
SHALL CONFIRM TO/COMPLY WITH ALL REGULATORY PROVISIONS.
17. RESTORE SITE TO EXISTING GRADES AT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION.
18. TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY FOR RECORD DRAWINGS COMPLETED BY CH
ENGINEERING, INC. 0r4 07102I2010 AND 1140E9201 D, SUPPLIMENTED WITH
SURVEY DATA PROVIDED EV BROWN AND CALDWELL ON 997152010.
RECORD DRAWINGS
THIS RECORD DFAVANO WAS PREPARED WING BTFORMATION REPORTED TO BROWN AND CALDWELL
ANC, CONTAINS ONLY THE STANDARD AND CUSTOMARY LEVEL OF DETAIL THE &FORMATION WAS NOT
INDEPENDENTLY FIELD VERIFIED. THERE IS NO ONGOING PROGRAM TO UPDATE THE CRAWRM-S TO
REFLECT CHµG65 SUBSEQUENT 10 THE DATE INDICATED 1HEREFORE, THIS ORAWIN016NOTA
CERTIFIED DOCIAAFNT44 TO THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT BUT ONLY AS TO THE RECORD DRAWING
CHARGES.
THIS DOCUMENT ORIGINALLY ISSUED ANL1 8EA1PP 9Y 50650T A TEEM. N.CPE. 0322E9, DATED JUNE0
2428.
THE BEAL OF ROBERT A. TEEM NA.P.E. MM. COVERS ONLY RECORD DRAWING CHANGES MADE TO
THEN DRAWINGS DURING CONSTRUCTION. DOCUMENTED THROUGH PART TIME OBSERVATION EY THE
ENGINEER AND FORMALLY RECORDED BYTHE CONTRACTOR.
Know what's beI0101.
Call before you dig.
Brown ,'Jr.
Caldwell
5410 Trinity Road
Palisades It Suite 320
Raleigh, North Carolina 27807
[phone]
NC License No, F-0785
LINE IS 21NCHES
A7 RA-1.-
(IF NOTT-SCALE ACCORDIVGLV}
DESIGNED: C SANOT
DRAWN: M MENDEZ
CHECKED:
R TEEM
CHECKED R CARRIER
APPROVED
EXTERNAL REFERENCE FILES
1341141-GUC-09.C-0544
ISIStlEurstuAwk.
REVISIONS
ZONE
REV-
DESCRIPRON
8Y DATE
APP.
Greenville
Utilities
GREENVILLE UTILITIES C4.NM13510N
POST OFFICE BOX 1847
GREENVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 27835
GREENVILLE UTILITIES COMMISSION
RAW WATER PUMPING STATION IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROPOSED INTAKE PIPING
FILENAME
134591-010-G53
SC PROJECT NUMBER
1344191
CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWING NUMBER
Q 1 O-C-03
SHEET NUMBER
OF
A B
I J
L
N 0

0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet
\VI
Greenville
Utilities
Hazen
Project Location Map
Greenville Utilities Commission
Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Dredging
Pitt County, North Carolina

N
100-Year Floodplain
(Landward Limit)
Proposed Construction Laydown Area
0 350 700 1,400
Feet
1 inch = 700 feet
LIV
Greenville
Utilities
Hazen
Pitt -Greenville
Airport Property
Project Vicinity Map
Greenville Utilities Commission
Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Dredging
Pitt County, North Carolina

N
W
Proposed Maintenance Dredge Extents
0 100 200 400
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet
LIV
Greenville
Utilities
Hazen
Proposed Construction Laydown Area
Proposed Activities Map
Greenville Utilities Commission
Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Dredging
Pitt County, North Carolina

•
Tar River
Permanent Impact OW-1
Maintenance Dredging
60 feet wide, 200 feet long
0.28 acre of Tar River
I
1
•
Existing Intake Flow Vanes
Delineated Wetland
Buffer
Zone 2
Temporary Impact within OW-1
Existing Intake -
Screen Replacement
3 feet x 1 foot x 4 screens (12 SF)
N
W
F.
0 10 20 30
1 inch = 30 feet
60
Feet
IL
Greenville
Utilities
Hazen
Proposed Impacts Map
Greenville Utilities Commission
Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Dredging
Pitt County, North Carolina