180011_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
McAllister Dairy Farm Inc
McAllister Dairy Inc
3438 East Maiden Rd
Mainden NC 28650
Dear Mr. Dairy Farm Inc:
vA
• .1 1 F
DIEHNJF
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: McAllister Dairy Inc
Facility ID #: 18-11
Catawba County
N.C. DEPT. OF.
ENVIRONMENT, I
F& NATURAL RF::;.,r:, .
DEC.1sf996
111VIS1011 OF ENVI001111E(ITAL F-;ANA iEf fEIIT
E100RESVILLE REGIME OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of -
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
retumed by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System
Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Sincerely,
/Z T
F9gve W. Tedder
Reduce Reuse Recycle
Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, -
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
CER'1'1>i'LED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
McAllister Dairy Farm
3438 East Maiden Rd.
Maiden, NC 28650
Dear Mr. McAllister:
AT"CA
D1EHFJF
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 5, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
McAllister Dairy Farm Inc., Facility #: 18-11
Catawba County, NC
During an inspection of your facility by Mr. Alan Johnson on May 12, 1997 you were issued a
Notice of Deficiency for a trench that carried surface runoff from your facility to a stream. You were
informed at that time that the trench must be filled in. Mr. Johnson visited the facility again on August
13, 1997 and found that the trench had not been filled. The trench and its subsequent discharge into a
stream below your facility is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a). .
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by September 25, 1997
indicating theactionstaken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
Be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide'for penalties of up to $10,000per day
per violation for noncompliance with state environmental laws and regulations. You will be informed , in
writing, of any action this Office intends to take.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D. Rex
Gleason, Water Quality Regional supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at [phone].
cc: Catawba County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement File
Sincerely,
Barbara Christian
Acting Regional Supervisor
919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115-
Voice 704-663-1699
�y• FAX [phone]
ri An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
James McAllister
3438 E. Maiden Rd.
Maiden, NC 28650
Dear Mr. McAllister:
WI Fr
�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 12, 1997
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
McAllister Dairy, Facility #: 18-11
Catawba County, NC
Enclosed is a.copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on May 7, 1997 by Mr. Alan
Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are indicated in
the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
The trench which diverts the wastewater away from the milking parlor needs to be filled. Because of the
way it has been constructed, the trench also carries surface runoff from the pasture and facility. Currently,
it discharges into the creek below the facility. This is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 (a).
When this problem has been addressed, the facility can be removed from the register. As long as you
are on the register, you are required to have a Designated Certified Operator and a certified farm plan
by January 1, 1998.
For technical assistance, contact you local Soil and Water Conservation District representative.
Please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per
violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. Any
further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. If you have any
questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Enclosure
cc: Catawba SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
03)
919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Voice 704-663-1699
Sincerely,
D. Rex G Eason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Farm Status: '
Rec1 r a v'e
Farm Name: 4, (r (
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
I37/ 7I
Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
l.,751
County:
Owner Name:._ _. J.aY_r? c5_ _...2L! .f.» !.4 kr- `Phone Nor ....:_Ya ?f -.25 S ...r _.� .
Mailing Address: ` j 2€ /en ,,, ? eig,, t j _ _ __.. cDs65 G._
Onsite Representative: 3 iu .. ,,,7/..S .... Integrator:.. _..._....._.. __.�._... .�_�
Certified Operator: «_._..___._ — _,,,..,__,..... ,__.,_,,,,__,_,,,_,,,,__„_„-„_ Operator Certification Number: _ ....................._......_.....
Location of Farm:
42a,12
..%1 e
2
s
... zA- 5 R l
'
5.6...04
RA)._...
R
i $.T
Q
.41s&L.
....5
Latitude
ICI Not Operational
Longitude
Date Last Operated.
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
•
Swine
umber
0 Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
,❑ Farrow to Wean
j] Farrow t'o Feeder
,D Farrow to Finish
Poultry
0 Laver
❑ Non -Layer
•'' Number'
Other Type of Livestock
:;;Number, of Lagoons /. Holding Ponds"
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b: If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ
. c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
❑ Yes allo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify, DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? aYes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse in)p cts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 1 o
"one_ a 5��. s �'r
5. Does any part of the waste management system -Other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes 0 No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons and/or Ho!dine Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
/t;/4-
❑Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes El No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
/%/p - f Go y r7 .._µ
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No -
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?, . ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application A//"-
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes tificlo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ._._ A.5
.... ...._ .... _ .... _.._ ..._ ._._._ ..
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have -a jack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ,(f/4
For Certified Facilities Only Ai
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of theAnimalWaste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the -facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?.
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? -
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with.owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes `❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
4-Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
CI Yes El No
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): ,Explain any YES answers and/or any.recommendations or any other comments..:
Use drawings of facility to better_explain situations. {use additional pages as neces s..
4t-Onfr ,:, 4e4a4i 4._ -Yk-esk 010-e-5 r76 10.360(..
bM11aytu-Y - j s ?u.sL-eS; t r{id Car, olser- c roc (b j 5'tacV.-), V lk r
oas(.e-- wa r. .5 d; s c�c�r �c� ivy `fie. I eks v-e. r4 -}revrck i S tk:5-ek Cd
cG-�c ref 4„ 5 csoc�� e AS w eAL ck5 .c y s v. -c-ct c .e= v-•-.vx- ch - c+, ow\
a s -ec.vv.— , � s ; 5 �� Zs � y dS •
Callowi ` r(� 1 \t . 1'hr Ni'� r�-i�i t aev' t�:as 1vtho,: � ��2s(1.c�G c�os� ►v►
. � 4—re l t"e-�CL po ►tnA- s ou..rt . - b e, iw c k {�
ev►S c v e, weA -etc 4- c)3ee-StA` she , Lt-VsLt2,
8
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 7 j 7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
11/14/96

1-1ri.' II 4 tit, 1 t' u e--:, e r'►`
Fits -Class Mail
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Ut-ZY co_ta a &Fees Paid
USES
z PM M �' _ Pe It N='1 o. G-0 _
• Print your name, gas:11e6, and ZIP Code -in this -box •
DEHNR (WATER QUALITY) 9-S-5 7 ®g „A
919 NORTH MAIN STREET �ti� v; -.c
MOORESVILLE NORTH CAROLIN 1 �5z"��
b1Jc____.-
C�� 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

: ik riA 1 713 063
US Postal Seffirice
Receipt for Certified Mail
\No Insurance Coverage Provided.
rn
rn
O
O
E
o`
co
a
Do not use for International Mail (See reverse)
Sent to
StreetlAUXSTER DAIRY FARM
3438 EAST MAIDEN ROAD
Post gpaijm f, Zii5 @ode 28650
Postage
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery -Fee --
Return Receipt Showing to -
Whom & Date Delivered
Return Receipt Showing to Whom,
Date, & Addressee's Address
TOTAL Postage & Fees
Postmark or Date

;; SENDER:
O •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
H •Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
w ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this
card to you.
> •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
tv permit.
y ■ Write'Return Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
« •The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
-0 3. Article Addressed to:
a)
a
E
0
0
to
fn
cc
w
L ,f jeceived By: (Print Name)
W
cc
: PS:Form 3811„ December 1994 ;
I also wish to receiv4 the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.
MCALLISTER DAIRY FARM
3438 EAST MAIDEN ROAD
MAIDEN, NC 28650
4a. A cle Number
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered
❑ Express Mail
❑ Certified
❑ Insured
0 Retum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
7. Date of Delivery
8. Addressee's Addres' (Only if requested
and fee is paid)
6. Sign re:f4e'dressee or Agent)
:
Xl� I (ell slf� rt1E f i i I I if
�'�'( '; ; ; 102595-97-B-0179 Domestic Return Receipt

State of North Carolina •
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office"
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
CERl'IHED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
McAllister Dairy Farm
3438 East Maiden Rd. --
Maiden, NC 28650
Dear Mr. McAllister:
e��
�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 5, 1997
N.C. DEFT. OF
ENVIRONMENT, I3EALTII ,
& NATURAL RESOD
EP 2 2 1997
—QIVISton_CF Ef:flrt=� :� A MARP, MEET
P iHFS 1
MOORESVILLE REMIT. a
Subject: Notice of Violation
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
McAllister Dairy Farm Inc., Facility #: 18-11
Catawba County, NC
During an inspection of your facility by Mr. Alan Johnson on May 12, 1997 you were issued a
Notice of Deficiency for a trench that carried surface runoff from your -facility to a stream. You were
informed at that time that the trench must be filled in. Mr. Johnson visited the facility again on August
13, 1997 and found that the trench had not beenfilled. The trench' and its subsequent discharge into a
stream below your facility is a violation' of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by September-25, 1997
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
Be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day
per violation for noncompliance with, state environmental laws and regulations. You will be informed , in
writing, of any action this Office intends to take.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D.' Rex
Gleason, Water Quality Regional supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at [phone].
cc: Catawba County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ
919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Voice 704-663-1699
Sincerely,
ih,drio,_ ciAA,,4,
Barbara Christian'
Acting Regional Supervisor
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper •
Reduce Reuse Recycle

r
?4, 'rad .716 .14 (i:-ZY

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 9, 1997
James McAllister
3438 E. Maiden Rd.
Maiden, NC 28650
Subject: -Wastewater Discharge
McAllister Dairy, Facility #: 18-11
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. McAllister:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on May 7, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. A
Notice of Deficiency was issued for a trench which discharges wastewater into Link Creek, a Class C
water. This is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a).
This letter is to remind you that the trench must be filled. Waste from the facility cannot enter waters
of the State directly or indirectly. Also, the facility cannot come off the state register until this
deficiency has been corrected. If the operation is on the state register, it is required to have a certified
operator as of January 1, 1997 and a certified farm plan' by December 31, 1997.
For technical assistance, contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District representative.
Please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per
violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. Any
further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. If you have any
questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Catawba SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Voice 704-663-1699
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Re-duuse Recycle
An Equal FAX [phone]
Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

bb
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
James McAllister
3438 E. Maiden Rd.
Maiden, NC 28650
a •
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 12, 1997
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
McAllister Dairy, Facility #: 18-11
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. McAllister:
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on May 7, 1997 by Mr. Alan
Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are indicated in
the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
The trench which diverts the wastewater away from the milking parlor needs to be filled. Because of the
way it has been constructed, the trench also carries surface runoff from the pasture and facility. Currently,
it discharges into the creek below the facility. This is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 (a).
When this problem has been addressed, the facility cin be removed from the register. As long as you
are on the register, you are required to have a Designated Certified Operator and a certified farm plan
by January 1, 1998.
For technical assistance, contact you local Soil and Water Conservation District representative.
Please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per
violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. Any
further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. If you have any
questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
z), L%'1
D. Rex ason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Catawba SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Voice 704-663-1699
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
Reduce Reuse Recycle

Ifl outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Farm Status:
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
%/c71
Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
7.1
Farm Name: Z 1�../1. ,S /`er..�. r r .__....... County: .a„`j-c.,._"s. . _._._.._.._._ .�..._..,».._..
Owner Name. ' Jete-t L5 2 7 .4::" 3 /& Phone No:. Y - 9" S—S 2
Mailing Address. ? ` 7 j /774/c-/eri __2. ,47 .S(5 G
Onsite Representative:.__,5ZZ• 41-f •f.,, ,_.....ye. ../!-? ._ Integrator: ...._.
Certified Operator: _._.___ ._... __....__.... _ _ ._....__._.__. .._..._ Operator Certification Number: ....................
Location of Farm:
e.rMa2 ..2
[a/t 's' Crux: n.
z
R
/.
('84
2hP.r,15 B,d.�._
1 I.a-
4
.3
..:51
Latitude
•
ID Not Operational ,
u
Longitude
Date Last Operated.
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
•
K
Swine :.:
.Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
''Poultry
❑ Layer -
❑ Non -Layer
Number ==
Other Type of Livestock
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? -
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ; b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
. c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon'system? (If yes, .notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse in p cts to the waters of the State other than from .a discharge?-
A/ohe_ al-- 5".11.i •l?-e
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes jallo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
D Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Wiles ❑ No
❑ Yes Etigo
t9 ies ❑No
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? 0 Yes 0 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? 0 Yes 0 No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? 0 Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds) /f1/
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? / ❑ Yes 0 No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon Lagoon
1 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
/
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 0 Yes 0 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes 0 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? 0 Yes 0 No
'Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? 0 Yes tficlo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop a
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Ai/4
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers -and/or any recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as.neces r ::.
e_ le%4J -1f._ - sh L We- cc)-e_S .1(:)f 44ve c tojo .
`Q- iticukudre I s �(�51� t-A-a an ° eek os��� CD� S�ac�)� ��kk Pc.r\ir
V1c�s� Wa r ; 5 A:5 c�c�E-q l�c� ivy � I e,s`t-�V'e_. 1Q�r'k-r-e�►tcL iS u_s-ek C6
(��G-� ram( 1S C�c� AS we.kL 0.S e w/ Sl,.r�Ct[� � '-W' 6Yr ^ ovr1 0.ratuvl
4G4-CZ Ly 4 pQsLi-v _ O- SAY 2C1(v, Lae- � S2 y 4s .
�aflow1 jA3 -e_ A-r-eC"` 11'l r Y11 ` ►�i(i a�er c xs 1,,co, v - eA ��2
4vevd,. poiiA1-- se,o-ze d►Sc�nc.,r �, C�lvrr slio� lc� b� wkcAk 4�
ev►SL.uv-e, wcjses�o �- c�es`- e_.&e,r- 04.._ '44,e, c.:<<4- 7/
-7
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ts-
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
es Date: S —7 j 7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
11/14/96