20140804 Ver 1_Application_20140724

Attachment L: Lour Impact Bridge Replacement Process
Low Impact Bridge Project No.: BD- 5102AA County Greene
Bridge No. 93 over Beaman Run WBS Element Number 45348.1.27
This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October 6,
2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval procedures
under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge Replacements. This project
meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria Rules.
Date: July 22, 2014
Applicant Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation ,1,,
Applicant Address: P.O. Box 1587 � .8 -V 4
2 '
Greenville NC 27835
20140804
Primary Contact for Project: Jay B. Johnson
Phone No.:
252 - 439 -2800
Is this an after- the -fact application: Yes X No
River Basin: Neuse
Stream Classification:_ Beaman Run C; Sw, NSW
Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity
Federal. USACE Nationwide General Permit 3 -- Maintenance
State: General Water Quality Certification #3687 and/or Buffer Authorization
Local: None
Project Description — This project involves the replacement of Greene County Bridge No. 93 on SR
1 240 (Walston Rd.) over Beaman Run The existing 52' long by 25' wide concrete floor on timber foists
will be replaced with a 65' long by 30' wide cored slab bridge at the same location. In accordance with
Neuse Buffer Regulations, the proposed bridge does not contain deck drains All stormwater will be
collected by a storm drainage system and discharged outside the buffer limits in the southeast quadrant.
Signature.
Print Name: Jays' Jnson JUL 2 4 2014
Title: Division Environmental Officer o � _ - ant WE

Peojrd Tracking No. (Internal Use)
12 -I1 -4023
DUN. HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
,. NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
BD- 5102AA
County:
Greene
WBS No.:
45348.1.27
Docutnent
e:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
® State Federal
Federal Permits
Yes No
Permits)
NWP 3
T e:
Pro,Lect Description:
Replace Bridge No. 93 (existing is 52 feet long by 25.3 feet wide timber bridge) over Beaman Run on SR
1240 (Walston Rd) with a proposed concrete cored slab bridge. The area of potential effects will be 500
feet from each end of the existing bridge and 75 feet in each direction from the centerline of the roadway.
There will be an off -site detour.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPOweb GIS mapping, historic designations roster, and indexes was
conducted on 11/20 /12. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in
the Area of Potential Effects (APE). The CRS also reviewed Greene County GIS and tax records which
revealed no properties at all within the APE. Built in 1959, Bridge No. 93 has not yet been evaluated for
eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge
Inventory but appears to be a standard bridge design indistinctive of style or engineering significance.
Thus, a survey is not required for this project.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the proiect
area:
HPO quad maps, HPOweb GIS mapping, Google maps and Greene County property records are
considered valid tools for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present.
A survey is not required for this project.
N%gorw Arrhilecure and Lamliccymrr NO SURYP r RA'QUIRM farm jar Ihnor T irmnspnnetnm Projecros do Qualifwd m the 21W Propyanmalic :1grermod.
Page 1 of 2

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
NMap(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
Historian
1I/2l0
Date
f Jititoric Anhefcrrrrrc runt Lmuhcapes ,Y(J 1L'R! ?.'!' RLOf RRF.1) jwm furkhme r ?r —,vjxP rxi m Projects w Qwkfted in the XW Programm oc• Agrecmeru.
Page 2 of 2

1
Greene 93
GREENE 93
SR 1240 (WALSTON ROAD)
OVER BEAMAN RUN
WALSTONBURG USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 2 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF GREENE COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 3675
MAP NUMBER 3720367500)
CONTENTNEA 03020203
BEAMAN RUN C; Sw, NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.27
NOVEMBER 13, 2012
4.1pi LAM
SR 12.32
L
1 Greene 93
t N 658906.4836
E2377367.9750 ��8;• ' \ ''
`j N 35 -33 -14 �r� I .. y ' i. °a.• �Lc, { i : ' S
W 77 -43 -52 y •:r . ' f 'e. f. y I �� }. , �R . t
l N 35.553830
oar; '?94 1
W 77.731227
SRI 315
MW
.. I I .NSF I � � .' ��� �`,� { '� - - ;;, ; ►. 1 !
N {
�'1i7QTA17► ? ' I — 1. —� • *• ' 1 I _ ' I ♦�Z 1
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Fee k. k`

a
m
FL
0
Z
a
N
V
Gz
=�
o=
�o
0
co

►V i
cil
Z3.
CL
fb
Z
O
CO
W
r 1
LJ

Low /Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet
Completed by:
Engineer
Division EnvttonMentaVIDfficer
TIP NO
BD- 5102AA
WBS Element No.
45348.1.27
County
Greene
Bridge Number
390093
Description
SR 1240 Walston Rd
Stream
Basin
Classification
SIN
Type
Size
Neuse
C, Sw, NSW
27 -86 -13
perennial /inland
25'x3'
Existing Structure
Type
Size
Suff. Rating
1 @ 17' -8 ",1 @ 16-10 ",1 @ 17' -8"
52'x25'
59.1
Proposed Structure
Type
Size
Bridge
65'x30'
Stream
USACE (LF)
NCDWQ Impacts (LF)
0
0
Wetlands
USACE Impacts (AC)
Non 404 Impacts (AC)
CAMA Impacts SF
0.0009
0
0
NC DWQ Buffers Impacts (SF)
0
Buffer Applicaton Required (Y /N)
State Stormwater Permit Required
YIN
T &E
Habitat
Species Present
Bio Conclusion
No Habitat
NIA
No Effect
Moratorium
Type
Dates
No
N/A
Trout Waters
Native /Hatchery
Trout Species Present
Trout Conditions (Y /N)
WRC Reviewer
No
No
No
N/A
CAMA AECs
No
Essential Fish Habitat
No
Nay. Opening
No
USCG Permit
No
Historic Properties
No
Archaeological Resources
No
Tribal Lands
No
4 Resources
No
6 (f) [LWCF ] Resources
No
Wild and Scenic River
No
Federal Lands
No
TVA Area
No
FEMA Buyout
No
FEMA Flood Study
No
USTs Haz Mats
No
Relocatees
No
Location
LAT
LONG
35.55383
77731227
Project Comments
Completed by:
Engineer
Division EnvttonMentaVIDfficer

Project lracking.'Vo
12 -11 -0023
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES _
ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL ,SITES
PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RF.SOt1RCES for this project. It is not c —
�ro Q!�' valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the _
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: BD- 5102AA Courlrv: Greece
WBS No: 45348.1.27 Document: MCS
F. A. No: Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit ReguireW ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: Nationwide 3
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 93 over Beaman Run on SR1240 (Walston Road) in Greece
County, North Carolina. It is anticipated that the proposed construction effort will utilize an off -site
detour (SR1240 to SR1242 to SR1222 to SR1225 to SR1240) during construction activities thereby
minimizing the effects to the surrounding land surfaces. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects
(APE) for the project is centered upon Bridge 93 and measures 500ft in length (250ft from each
bridge end - point) by 100ft is width (50ft laterally from each side of the SR1240 center- line).
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCD07) Archaeology Group reviewed
the subject project and determined:
® There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES vrxthin the project's
area of potential effects.
® No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
❑ All identified archaeoloeieal sites located Within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121 -12(a) has been completed for this project.
® There is no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present or
affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed)
V
N JUL 2 4 2014
NR t
Wd Y �AT< P, QUALITY
h.tlWhll.Rk 6L.7 4ltEA WBLEORLISTEDAR( N: t1: 111 .(X;!!.i!.,i1T1iSPkLSiNTOR.ti
form f*r Mrrror Tramponurrur FmIccu as Qw!rfird m rh, 20- PrograwnwicAgrraa m
1 of 2

Project Trackmg ,Vo
12 -11 -0023
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Monday, November
26, 2012 served to gauge the cultural resource potential of the project area based on factors associated with
local archaeological and historical site profiles. This enterprise determined that no previously documented
archaeological sites were situated within the project's APE or adjacent Examination of National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and
Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website concluded that none of
the above or any other historic properties were located within the bounds of or directly proximal to the APE.
Historic maps illustrate land usage (agricultural) within and adjacent to the APE and house locations in the
direct vicinity of the project area over a long period of time (1863- 1910 +). In general, this work
demonstrated a sustained historical presence in this portion of Greene County, but an absence of significant
historic properties or prevailing unassessed archaeological sites within the project APE.
Further, topographic, historic, and NRCS soil survey maps (BB), and historical/archaeological reference
materials were inspected to appraise environmental, cultural, and other determinants that may have resulted
in past occupation within the project limits. Aerial photographs were examined for assessment of
hydrological, agricultural, modern, and other erosive disturbances and construction design data was
reviewed for the determination of potential impacts to the APE ground surfaces. Due to a heightened
prehistoric site potential and federal permitting interaction, the cultural resource specialist recommends an
archaeological survey of the APE prior to construction activities.
An on- ground investigation of the project study area and APE was conducted on Tuesday, December 18,
2012. First, a walk -over of all APE ground surfaces was completed. This served to identify any above - ground
archaeological or historical remains, and to determine the location and extent of subsurface investigation
necessary for project compliance. The entire APE, including the federal permit area, was distinguished by
wetland vegetation and typified by Bibb loam, a frequently flooded and poorly drained soil type. Well- drained
Pactolus fine sands were relegated to the ground surfaces beyond the APE north of Beaman Run. No artifacts
or other evidence of past cultural occupation was documented during the reconnaissance investigation of the
APE. No subsurface shovel testing was conducted in association with the archaeological investigation as no
ground surfaces inward of the APE were deemed satisfactory for recovery of intact cultural sites.
Since the APE and federal permit area encompass a wetland area containing no historic or prehistoric site
potential, and because the construction impacts are unlikely to affect the areas outward of the existing ditch -
lines, no further archaeological survey or input is recommended. A finding of "no historic properties affected"
is considered appropriate for the BD- 5102AA project as currently proposed.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: 51 Map(s) ['Previous Survey Wo ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
Signed:
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date
4©RA 770VA I. RFGP;TFR FLN;LRI.F OR II.'7 D ARC'HAF.OLCX:IC ,41..V7:FC PML%'T 0R AFFEC.TEU
form for Minor I Pariafjo Prvfe fs as Q" fred m the 2W07 Programesa7rc Agreemew.
2of2

Greene 93
1 SR1250
SR1232
Greene 93
N 658906.4836 I
E 2377367.9750 N
N 35 -33 -14
W 77 -43 -52
H
N 35.553830
W 77.731227 r\
3,000 1,500 0
3,000 F
m
Rl
GREEN E93
93
SR 1240 (WALSTON ROAD)
OVER BEAMAN RUN
WALSTONBURG USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 2 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF GREENE COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 3675
MAP NUMBER 3720367500)
CONTENTNEA 03020203
BEAMAN RUN C; Sw, NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.27
NOVEMBER 13, 2012
J
1
6�13�3
S,Q7
?49
/ SRS ?sr
�h
Q�
5
S,Q
8
1
N
A
i SR1243
f
SR
ti
SR1315
241
e�
N
T
SR1244
h/%

GREENE 93
Greene 93 SR 1240 (WALSTON ROAD)
OVER BEAMAN RUN
WALSTONBURG USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 2 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF GREENE COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 3675
MAP NUMBER 3720367500)
CONTENTNEA 03020203
BEAMAN RUN C; Sw, NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.27
NOVEMBER 13, 2012
$R1260
41232
'!la. _ •• rte., . i i• .. (' _ . �, - .., e.
Greene 93
`•. r N 658906.4836
E 2377367.9750
N 35 -33 -14
W 77-43-52
N 35.553630 ;,s „y. ( ,. fi. t y?fq , I
W 77.731227 �/' _ . F , r• J __ —
to
•i i
- -. Y 1 �,�'.;� t � Iw 'J _- .Pty 1 ' � '• ' .. <
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 F ' — _ .� j �•.

Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
• Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
• Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
• Landform: Flood plains
• Landform position (two- dimensional): Toeslope
• Down -slope shape: Concave
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Properties and qualities

i
�Ch.
YL
. .sue. ��� i _, .io I _ ��- '�,- -�-"-•, ,.- J _ � •
r �, _ \ agar'° `�'� t f_' �i � —,ia -� � • j ,I 4
TabOMacla_ Ch,
C.,
SPeights Budge I
• � aq ems` -'- — .�. -I � i �'\
32'30" 1 I � . � . . — + .. ..- -- � , j.• �.. .'l��a'— - .
Cerra .
Is3 - — — - -- -- _ _

12 -11 -0023 - SR1 240 - Bridge 93 - Greene
County
�� %�nDw f'y't w"_+� »ow rf� ,,c3nOta ■sw•+»�wy »as• ` ?o»Oru sgOwtiwrN nar• a
Clyr/f•J( z
r! 4 YO.O+ «r•r,G ON.x +ate.. �'
1
CR Z 35 MW C—P"
GRODa2A Mw.. O.Orm •.s.....��w.,..'
.. ...""■ ■�• a■•.y ■� ttttN Mfu�. � wrrfar -
OR�sO Prr•h worry r.s�•
�>12 bryp K Lw r a•• ;erg•?
tatmx lY•..wrr. «ow'6•.y
r
6f Y � !0'.'O'r- aaa.n karse
,�6R0'205•egis Beop•POStxulCi: -.'1
OR7[ tf g•►a^*MOV►Cro•. »ou i
/Iti`M•i�C•� ■M�1�
t
■f]t1011■M�■11 faru�aerl■ fat■
•
ORf2a64vdlis .lsa.
ORE-ENE
GM]iNa SO»? "- yMa- Ca[1L�[s ':R 7'1'.�CaiNa.w•� •
� ■■o+a� ■r,a..nr..
cs or�o.� +uetrensa.
00037f hr
enr29 -s L% c•. 6r.Tef• 1o. –
GR)1 *35i. —V—Grr Kq .
CRC..2:3 vue
011ft<7 C•[v. V•ac wrfwn.[ =h+U a>.'
t ►r.
ve
c'
go New?
Copyngn12011 Esn. ANng -ts reserved. Wed Nov 212012 102856 AM

S PEjT'SNT
A. 19 C L WY
vl?
spvwff� -
BRIVIGIF eor& jr-
-10
1910 Rural Delivery Routes, Greene County, North Carolina; United States Post Office Dept.
i
,r�
A-"ORIA.
70
1863 Field Map of Lieut. Koerner's Military Survey between the Neuse and Tar Rivers North Carolina;
Gilmer, Jeremy Francis
vl?
spvwff� -
BRIVIGIF eor& jr-
-10
1910 Rural Delivery Routes, Greene County, North Carolina; United States Post Office Dept.
i
,r�
A-"ORIA.

t
i ! I
11
6
1924 Soil Map, North Carolina, Greene County sheet
Pi
1938 Greene County, North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission Map
o•
9 e
♦ o o
,o
o•
♦4
o• a 4
♦ '
n s
r
v
SPEIGHTS
•
e
s e
A
BRIDGE-
e
♦
•
o
J
�
O
♦
0
e.
O
A
a o • _
D O
e O
•
•
O
•
�• f•�
r. o e o e e■ °
e
e 4 •
•
�� • e
R
•
e
o
�
•0
a♦
o
f
�p� i
a°
• •
• fs•
to tj
O
�-�
• s
•
♦ oee
e
o
e o°
C
�
or
Oaf •
• e■
♦p
� �•
_
•
.10
1938 Greene County, North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission Map

-<-- Z

Project Trading No. ankmal Use)
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyncr, Human Environment Unit
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598
ATTENTION: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor ENTERED NOV
Mary Pope Furr; Historic Architecture Supervisor
FROM: First Last Bill Brame Jr j �r
Title Division Environmental Specialist � kf ,
SUBJECT: Request for Cultural Resources Review i NOV 1
2012
DATE: November 13, 2012
.................��a
t1!
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: BD- 5102AA County: Greene
WBS No: 45348.1.27 Document:
FA. No: Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
USGS Quad- Walstonburg
Project Description:
Greene 93, Replace existing 52' long by 25.3' wide timber bridge with a proposed concrete cored slab
bridge; SR 1240 Walton Road over Beaman Run.
Purpose do Need:
The purpose of this project is to replace the existing bridge built in 1959 with a proposed concrete cored
slab bridge
SCHEDULING AND CONTACT INFORMATION
Date Needed: December 2012
Engineer: Maria Rogerson Tel 252A39 -2800 Email marog_erson(a),ncdot.goy
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length: 500 feet from each end of the eidsting bridge
Exist. R W.- 60'
Proposed RIW.• 60'
E.risl. Speed Limit: 55 Proposed Speed Limit: 55
Exist. X- Section: N/A
Detour Route: SR 1240 to SR 1242 to SR 1222 to SR 1225 to SR 1240
Structure T Reinforced Concrete Floor on year Built: 1959
yam' Timber Joists

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Maria Rogerson, P.E.
Division Bridge Program Manager, NCDOT
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: August 17, 2012
SUBJECT: Division 2 Bridge Replacements
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661- 667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699 -1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Bridge Memo Page 2 August 17, 2012
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr.
Logan Williams should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species
may be required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
11. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long -term erosion control.
12. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
13. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
14. Only clean, sediment -free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
15. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be

%D
Bridge Memo Page 3 August 17, 2012
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40 -50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100 -year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
• Beaufort County Bridge No. 297 over Broad Creek on SR 1520: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County Bridge No. 316 over Unnamed Canal on SR 1627: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Greene County Bridge No. 8 over Sandy Run on SR 1301: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Greene County Bridge No. 9 over Sandy Run on SR 1324: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.

f
Bridge Memo Page 4 August 17, 2012
• Greene County Bridge No. 93 over Beaman Run on SR 1240: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 142 over Cross Swamp on SR 1777: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 69 over Cross Swamp on SR 1139: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 43 lover Cross Swamp on SR 1591: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 415 over Cross Swamp on SR 1108: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 20 over Cross Swamp on SR 1941: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Lenoir County Bridge No. 142 over Bearwell Branch on SR 1922: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at (919) 528 -9886. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.

GREENE 93
Greene 93 SR 1240 (WALSTON ROAD)
OVER BEAMAN RUN
WALSTONBURG USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 2 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
! OF GREENE COUNTY
` FIRM PANEL 3675
i MAP NUMBER 3720367500J
CONTENTNEA 03020203
BEAMAN RUN C, Sw, NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
' WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.27
NOVEMBER 13, 2012
'i L jb.� _AWNN WnrYrN I
- SR1250
_ SR1232
Greene 93
_ N 658906.4836
'z E 2377367.9750
N 35 -33 -14 ,� { ; . f y r yC� I
- - W 77 -43 -52
N 35.553830
I BMSMa 7)(.N. I I lei.:
W 77.731227 !
.✓y l,/ ' -. �_/ _ ' V�,� 1 _ .4- ,ice. _ .- wt ._ I— ! -__
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Fee JU
R

GREENE 93
Greene 93 SR 1240 (WALSTON ROAD)
OVER BEAMAN RUN
WALSTONBURG USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 2 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
! OF GREENE COUNTY
{ FIRM PANEL 3675
i MAP NUMBER 3720367500J
r CONTENTNEA 03020203
BEAMAN RUN C; Sw, NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
' WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.27
NOVEMBER 13, 2012
- -� 3
5�1�0 ^ry
SR1250 SRr�s'
SR1232
^ry
5�
SR�3� 3
Greene 93
E 377367 9750
N
N 35-33-14
04
y�
W 77-43-62 Ix
SR1314
N 35.5 3830
W 77.731227
SR1315
S
N
Iwo
co
�
SR1241
SR1243
m
M
N
r
N
Sp
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 F

I'
mop r
GRFF.�� .?r Bridge No. 93
W 1243
SR 12"
,I
5K t_• t
County GREEN Exchange SNOW HILL
Road No SR 1240
CENTURYLINK Auth No. 620889 Engineer Dennis Strickland (252) 571 -1748
Direction from nearest town: DOT BRIDGE REPLOACEMENT PROJECT, GREEN 93
Beginning at app. .3 mile South of SR -1225. App start Lat /Long, N35.55337 W77.73100, ending,
app N35.55431 W77.73144. Placing app. 425'copper cable with a 260' directional bore
w /conduit crossing Beamon Run Creek. NO road bores are required and placement will be
within 5' inside of R/W edge unless otherwise agreed to by DOT inspector(s).
Legend Proposed CT &T Aerial Buried X Other Bridges
X Box Culverts None involved
Method of Construction Plowed X Trenched Other Directional bored
Distance from CA of proposed facility APP. 28'
Depth of proposed facility 36" under ditch 30" along shoulder 10' minimum under creek
bed
Total length of Encroachment .1 miles

L�,
NIA
I
oI
Jg I-
o
blL
O o1N
O �
1
xtI, " s
it
O l �
Ln 9 if
w I 1
o,.00�o� =i mi as I.
In
O a :r W _r { I, • ' J,.yJ, L.�o
O 11 JU_N W W
dW >t�U Q> �Jd Y- tta / fON
O �q-
+
p WW
11, J w
W j p v Ld
N p �_j T1 G
Q+ C .., i„y _ i �MIPM PUN
N F t> a� V 6
m
0 INK -
N O m i?
O 1 TiTi L 45 W At
I I �
W
W wyo
w Y' ZZ
e. o
K W
O Omz
c.7
O at ,�p Ka
t W w 0 O V !-
_NU
U.1
IW 4
<Z m
J
° °
r_
N it Ln
a
�m
O
1
16 r

iIHA S31tlyS MS II SSK VYNI 1SilU3tl NO '{IHMaYAV 9 S1m. OaIY SW. ]erAV39 S 9M ®3� Y%fl[M V
Sa313W NI am VINPJIM'Np153tl'A3/1tlOS lV.M901D3O 'S fl A8 31V5 tl0! V + „sy,un +I uulnw,ulu! +.41 +W ° +NwuyA !v„x uu alq!+!n ,1!a,au+h
1961 SNO11VA3l3 ONV s8no1N07 SONVm1VlG A)v1tluT' dYW 1VIJlILLYN Iu3M %a>m+u� aVl+ rEU a,+yM a+u!1 Plwl Pue >a'•al P +.,a!+.
St, '[/A MEN
mS J1 SIJNVen!nW u w.xoaAav amv y +cx aiwYu]Il 1uNtl, O 3A ) yA)� tlLLv3w L0rL0iY rr.r )r WnI'YrSNu�<x s N Eea Vr 9µ N 3 x w MLL�3IHHro w �w a L>3ht V,e"n a , >,.u,. — wP-,av ay ,.yew uP W - •q ^ pM 11 . . 1—. hl UW1O
'J'N '9Hf9 1tlM suw ,:nu.+y y. p ur „ u.A !v , .w,vl>o. N
YlL3W 1 roMfll -W uwLrrlJ \xruurl ueK ,vcl uev„+wV 4noN LLhI
OI Pue W0' uuu,Mn
b
peu, pavrMwu!, _ — —• � MaPvva>a �N .
f31N1 Itlfil P+up +J°W HLhI p +M +>V >PI >li LLfii u +1°,
- S I y� 1 >yAv,EupryA le„ae woo +p„y1MU ,!„w,wv,6n„nIA hq AyAe,Hodal
Pw9 t,lt vw SVal1 0 S . _ :y.+,ny ,!,>I'w!1 eu 1-3 y,>-N pue' VYON:SON'S•-riO /N Iwwo�
nP>,V 'peo'npq.,yg,3 •Ary/ry :S,�ly 1"�� i svl,lnaa!I e . , ..
AanLng Iea,sopa0 ayi A9 Pa4Ht19 ^d P"e'Pal!pa •paddehl
NOLLVJLIISSYD UVON 0001Z :1 37YJS
OE.LE L[ 3•w.IY: 4S: HV ys, :.::..: .. / „rvs SS: Of..LV Kr 1331 I,N nP!: 1. IS: + •. ISM 0l: SE
Q I
\
_
1 f
I
I I
I
>
/
I \ 1
\ la:
I
- re
1 i
I /
/ \
Wll ”
e+C
ixl :
/ 1
I _ _ I - >..e,:>� y • ,..ems., '
_IzE
t
1»aev 1
I
\ 1' /. I .
01 IF I� ft 7,11 X3A2lCIS 7tlJtJOl03�J _
(31HdVH9OdO1) S31l13s 31nNIW S'L c HOIH31N1 3H1 70 1N3W.LHVd3a
VNnOHVJ H1HON (� S31VJ.S 431.INn
319NVHOVnO JanENOISIVM
`o t4
m
C )
�' i

o
-0
i 06
irc
o o
0
�o I , A
i I Z. -t
o Z
z
............... . ............. . ... . ...... . . .. . ......... . . . .. ...............................................................
8m
m
ar
on 3 ng
.7 a7
z
>
3 03 is
it! iz
;b
IE� "WMA NPrWWd NO- . - � A" A V ... PDF
Sh—. - - k - .- . I.D. .. . o
Uja
dl
S/
I
CL
F
3 3
6,2
2w p
w0 r
A
of
jw.
9
:1
Aiil 9.
-�Zz
7
CE
:i 1
o
z Z
0
z
-3p
Uja
dl
S/
I
CL
6,2
2w p
w0 r
of
2w p
w0 r

■
•
a
N
I-I►
N C='
v
O
0
0
m
0
I
I
I
I
r
N CO
O �
Z� l
o /
N�Wd�9
N n�
0
Zs
N
O
tia,
O
O
°
FT-1
N
i y
r
n y
Q I
REVISIONS
NNE
00
000
rn
~zt
�pZZO
�y►
Corn
g
comm0
cep
R
o m
"Min
Z) >
U)
rrn
rri
00Do
Z
rn
U) (A
tn t
�
° c+
II
_
s
<
`s
�o
:]D n
�
cn r
U)
rnTTyz
i
r
o m
rn�
°
rn
rn
Z
i
y
■
•
a
N
I-I►
N C='
v
O
0
0
m
0
I
I
I
I
r
N CO
O �
Z� l
o /
N�Wd�9
N n�
0
Zs
N
O
tia,
O
O
°
FT-1
N
i y
r
n y
Q I
REVISIONS
MWI
C • l
mills ■ �I�i :�
cnm
�-iz
V1ODZZn(n�-iUl(nG�
c>[�ornoz
�tnmm-0
rn
~zt
�pZZO
�y►
Corn
g
comm0
cep
R
o m
"Min
Z) >
U)
D p
O D
Z
o
O
tn t
�
° c+
II
_
s
<
`s
a
�
�
n
�rnzrn
rnTTyz
i
r
o m
rn�
°
�o
Z
y
CD
o
0
�
z
CID
�
T
'I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
�1
�
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
27
4
MWI
C • l
mills ■ �I�i :�
I �
I �
W
I�
CD
1
i-
o
o kA �oL�
n N a N
oioi
m m
II '
0 Ul
sr-=7 I
sr
Bl
BZ .
BZ 2-
cnm
�-iz
V1ODZZn(n�-iUl(nG�
c>[�ornoz
�tnmm-0
rn
~zt
�pZZO
�y►
Corn
g
comm0
cep
R
o m
"Min
I �
I �
W
I�
CD
1
i-
o
o kA �oL�
n N a N
oioi
m m
II '
0 Ul
sr-=7 I
sr
Bl
BZ .
BZ 2-
m N
cnm
�-iz
V1ODZZn(n�-iUl(nG�
c>[�ornoz
�tnmm-0
rn
~zt
�pZZO
v�O
Corn
g
comm0
cep
Nrr�
Ins (n::u
o m
co cn
Z) >
U)
D p
O D
Z
N �
O
tn t
�Nl��
m N
mC
V1ODZZn(n�-iUl(nG�
c>[�ornoz
Na
rn
~zt
m�rn
Corn
g
-0���
yCDonC)D
o�n
ED
Ins (n::u
cc>u,yU
tz
n N a Iv
°
rn
�rn
orn
ornorn
gS
WZZQD
��cz rn rn
tn t
�Nl��
° c+
II
s
0
(0
a
�
a
�rnzrn
rnTTyz
N4p M1C
et C,
NS%
RS
2pp7
0
0
V1ODZZn(n�-iUl(nG�
c>[�ornoz
orv��
rn
~zt
,rT,n
y
Corn
om °- rnizc
-0���
yCDonC)D
o�n
Ornr
N
cc>u,yU
CZ >. -u
� Z
°
rn
�rn
orn
:
��Zwyn�op;
WZZQD
��cz rn rn
��gy
po �rnryj
rn o���
�uo :rn
moo
(7) rn
0
(0
c,00
zN�rn
C)
�rnzrn
rnTTyz
i
rn
o m
rn�
°
�o
Z
y
CD
o
rn
N4p M1C
et C,
NS%
RS
2pp7
0
0